BETA


2008/0199(COD) Deposit guarantee schemes: coverage level and the payout delay

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON EHLER Christian (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion IMCO
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2

Events

2009/03/13
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

CONTENT: following a first reading agreement with the European Parliament, the Council adopted a Directive raising guarantee levels and reducing payout delays in the event that deposits of a bank would become unavailable. The new Directive includes provisions:

raising the coverage level to a minimum of EUR 50 000 as from 30 June 2009, rather than the present EUR 20 000; setting the coverage level at EUR 100 000 as from 31 December 2010 ; reducing the payout delay to 25 working days (a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment). The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to the possibility of two three-month extensions.

By 16 March 2011, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether reduction to 10 working days of the delay could be implemented.

Member States shall ensure that:

credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community; the depositors be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the deposit-guarantee scheme; deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and that, if appropriate, they are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to give rise to the intervention of deposit-guarantee schemes.

The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009 at the latest. It shall be accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals to amend this Directive.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 16/03/2009.

TRANSPOSITION: 30/06/2009.

2009/03/11
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2009/03/11
   CSL - Final act signed
2009/03/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/02/26
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2009/02/26
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/01/29
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/12/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 556 votes to 21 with 3 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. The amendments were the result of a compromise between the Council and the Parliament. The main amendments - adopted under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows:

Determination of failure to repay deposits : in the cases where payout is triggered by a determination of the competent authorities, the decision period of 21 days provided for in current legislation is reduced to 5 working days in order not to impede rapid payout. However, the competent authorities must first be satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable. That assessment should be subject to the judicial or administrative procedures of the Member States.

Scope: the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor must be at least EUR 50 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable.

Increase in coverage : by 31 December 2010, Member States must ensure that the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor shall be set at EUR 100 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable. However, this will not preclude the retention of provisions which offered, before 1 January 2008, notably for social considerations, full coverage for certain kinds of deposits.

If the Commission report to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2009, concludes that such an increase and such harmonisation are not appropriate and not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection, financial stability in the Community and to avoid cross-border distortions between Member States, it shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a proposal to amend the provision on increase in coverage.

Conversion: Member States that convert the amounts expressed in euro into their national currency shall ensure that the amounts in national currencies effectively paid to depositors are equivalent to those set out in the Directive.

Inflation: the Commission may adjust the amounts referred to above in accordance with the inflation in the EU on the basis of changes in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices published by the Commission.

Information: credit institutions must make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner.

Information shall be given on request on the conditions for compensation and the formalities which must be completed to obtain compensation.

Time limits for payout : deposit–guarantee schemes must be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 20 working days of the date on which the competent authorities determine that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, or the judicial authority makes the appropriate ruling. This time limit includes the collection and transmission of the accurate data on depositors and deposits, which are necessary for the verification of claims. The Commission had recommended 3 days and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs had stipulated 14 days.

In wholly exceptional circumstances and in special cases, a guarantee scheme may apply to the competent authorities for an extension of the time limit , which will not exceed 10 working days.

2 years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall submit a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether further reduction to 10working days of the delay could be implemented.

Member States shall ensure that deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and, if appropriate, are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to trigger deposit-guarantee schemes.

Report: by 31 December 2009 at the latest, the Commission must submit a report on

- the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of an absence of harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis, in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the benefits and costs of such harmonisation;

- the appropriateness and modalities of providing for a full coverage for certain temporarily increased account balances;

- possible models for introducing risk-based contributions;

- the benefits and costs of a possible introduction of a Community deposit-guarantee scheme; the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up;

- the harmonisation of the scope of products and depositors covered, including the specific needs of small and medium enterprises and local authorities; the link between deposit-guarantee schemes and alternative means for reimbursing depositors, such as emergency pay-out mechanisms. If necessary, the Commission shall submit appropriate proposals to amend the Directive.

Transposition: 30 June 2009. However, Member States shall apply the provisions of Article 1(3)(i) (determination of failure) and Article 10(1) (time-limits for payout) of Directive 94/19/EC, as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010, at the latest .

By way of derogation, Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 7(1a) and Article 7(3) of Directive 94/19/EC (amount of coverage), as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010 .

Emergency payout : the compromise text states in the recitals that Member States should aim at ensuring the continuity of banking services and access to liquidity of banks, in particular in periods of financial turmoil. For this purpose, Member States should be encouraged to make arrangements as soon as possible for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon the application of the affected depositor, within 3 days or less after the application . Since the reduction of the current payout delay of three months will have a positive impact on the confidence of depositors and the proper functioning of the financial markets, Member States and their deposit-guarantee schemes should ensure that the payout delay is as short as possible.

Documents
2008/12/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/12/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/12/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2008/12/08
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), and amended the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

The main amendments – made in 1st reading of the codecision procedure – were as follows:

Scope: the Commission proposal had limited the scope of the Directive to private investors. However, Members felt that small and medium sized enterprises should continue to be protection and come within the scope, given the importance for the economic situation in Member States and the state of the labour market in Europe.

Impact assessment for increased coverage : Members felt that, given the urgency of the situation, there had been no time for an impact assessment. However, they stipulated that, by 31 December 2009, coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor will be increased to EUR 100 000, or equivalent, unless a Commission impact assessment, submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 30 April 2009, concludes that such an increase is not appropriate and is not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection and financial market stability. The maintenance of institutional guarantee, the possibility of full coverage of certain deposits including temporarily increased account balances and exchange rates arrangements for non Euro-zone currencies shall be ensured.

Comitology : Members deleted the Commission's powers to make changes through comitology and stated that further changes should be carried out in normal procedure. The annual review by the Commission will ensure that action can be taken in time.

Information : Member States shall ensure that credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner.

Time limits on default : Members felt that the Commission proposal was unrealistic and stated that, in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, deposit-guarantee schemes shall be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 14 days (rather than 3 as the Commission had proposed.) Two years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall assess whether a further reduction to 10 days, without limitation of the scope of coverage, can be proposed.

Emergency payment : a new clause states that in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, Member States in cooperation with deposit-guarantee schemes shall make arrangements for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon application of the affected depositor of up to at least EUR 1 000 within three days or less after the application.

Report : Members considerably expanded the issues which should be the subject of the Commission's report, and provided that the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31st December 2009, a report on: the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of such harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis , in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the costs of such harmonisation; standards for better early-risk warning ; possible models for introducing risk-based contributions; the benefits of a possible introduction of a community deposit guarantee scheme . This shall cover the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up; the specific needs of SMEs and local authorities as regards deposit guarantee coverage levels.

2008/12/02
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council arrived at a general approach on a draft Directive aimed at tightening up the rules on bank deposit guarantee schemes in order to improve confidence in the banking sector. On the basis of this approach, the Presidency will continue its contacts with the European Parliament in order to reach an agreement enabling the Directive to be adopted at first reading, before the end of the parliamentary term.

The Council's general approach provides for:

raising the deposit guarantee level to EUR 50 000, rather than the present EUR 20 000, from 30 June 2009 and harmonising the level at EUR 100 000 from 31 December 2011. That harmonisation should make it possible to avoid the distortion of competition among banks which appeared during the financial crisis (in the form of massive deposit transfers from banks affiliated to a scheme offering a low coverage level to banks affiliated to a scheme offering a high coverage level); a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment. The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to two three-month extensions. Overall, the payout period could not exceed 35 working days, compared with 10 months at present.

The European Parliament's vote is expected during the week of 15 December.

Documents
2008/12/02
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/11/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/11/18
   ECB - European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
Details

OPIONION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK at the request of the Council of the European Union on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay .

On 24 October 2008, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

The ECB's competence to deliver an opinion on the proposed directive is based on Article 105(4) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.

General observations : the ECB notes that the current financial market crisis has confirmed that deposit-guarantee schemes are vital for maintaining depositors' confidence and therefore safeguarding financial stability. The ECB supports the underlying aim of enhancing depositors' confidence and understands that for urgency reasons the proposed directive focuses on increasing the coverage level of national deposit-guarantee schemes in line with the Ecofin Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008, reducing payout delay and discontinuing the current option for co-insurance.

At the same time, the ECB supports the Commission's intention to continue work on convergence of the national schemes, with particular regard to harmonising their funding mechanisms, and to submit a report on the matter to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009. In view of the importance of the funding arrangements of the national schemes for the effectiveness of the financial safety net and for safeguarding financial stability, the ECB looks forward to contributing to the Commission's future work in this field and encourages timely completion of the Commission's report.

In this context, the ECB underlines that national schemes' funding arrangements must, inter alia, comply with the monetary financing prohibition laid down in the Treaty, and in particular with the prohibition on national central banks providing overdraft facilities or any other type of facility within the meaning of Article 101 of the Treaty, as more specifically considered in past ECB opinions concerning draft national legislation and in the ECB's Convergence Reports.

Specific observations : the ECB makes the following specific observations:

Coverage level of the guarantee : the ECB welcomes the increase in the minimum amount of guaranteed deposits to EUR 50 000 by the end of 2008 and the further increase to EUR 100 000, as mentioned in the Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008. At the same time, the ECB emphasises that any increase in the coverage exceeding the latter of the above mentioned amounts should be preceded by close coordination at the EU level, as substantial differences between national measures may have a counter-productive effect and create distortions in the single market; Reduction of payout delay : the ECB welcomes the intention to reduce delays in payouts of guaranteed deposits significantly and thereby strengthen depositors' confidence. In this context, the ECB would emphasise that recent analysis at international level has highlighted that a prompt payout of depositors' claims is of key importance for effective deposit protection. At the same time, a pragmatic approach should be taken to introducing the necessary reduction in payout delays, thereby preserving credibility of the deposit-guarantee schemes. This implies establishing efficient operational processes for verifying claims and paying depositors, as well as ensuring that sufficient funding is available. In particular, procedures need to be put in place so that if a bank that operates on a cross-border basis fails, depositors receive payouts as efficiently as they would if the failed bank were operating in a single Member State . Moreover, the ECB suggests that the Commission's plan to assess whether it would be possible to harmonise further the funding arrangements used by the national schemes should be accompanied by a review of the effectiveness of payout procedures. Finally, in addition to shortening the payout period, the ECB suggests that public confidence in deposit-guarantee schemes could be enhanced by improving depositors' awareness of the terms and conditions of deposit protection, inter alia through appropriate disclosure of the terms and conditions by credit institutions.

2008/10/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/10/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2008/10/15
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

CONTENT: the Council of the European Union agreed on 7 October 2008, that it is a priority is to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector. In times of volatile markets, one of the biggest concerns for depositors is the safety of bank deposits should their bank fail.

All Member States are committed to provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50 000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to at least EUR 100 000.

Ministers are committed to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes.

Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit guarantee schemes provides already for a basic coverage of depositors. However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of the coverage.

The Directive should be revised in four key areas:

1) Coverage level : t he current minimum coverage level is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this does not reflect the current average deposits of approximately EUR 30 000 per EU citizen. In order to maintain depositors' confidence, the coverage level should be raised to at least EUR 50 000 and, after one year, to at least EUR 100 000 . According to estimates, about 65% of eligible deposits are covered under the current regime. The new amounts would cover an estimated 80% (with coverage of EUR 50 000) and 90% (with coverage of EUR 100 000) of deposits.

Changes of the coverage level should be subject to the standard comitology procedure. However, in emergency situations, prompt action, coordinated across the Community, would be needed to increase the level of coverage to address any sudden loss of depositor confidence. Therefore, an emergency comitology measure is critical. Such emergency measures should be restricted to 18 months.

2) Reduction of payout delay : t he current payout delay of three months, which can even be extended to nine months, is detrimental to the confidence of depositors and does not meet their needs. Many depositors can be expected to face significant financial difficulties already within less than one week. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to three days , without a possibility extension.

However, the deadline should commence only when either the competent authorities have determined that the credit institution appears to be unable to repay the deposit or a judicial authority has ruled that the claims of depositors are suspended. The decision of the competent authorities may take up to 21 days after first becoming satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits. In the interest of a rapid payout, this period of 21 days should be reduced to 3 days. For the purposes of rapid payout, a scheme should cover only retail deposits. However, Member States should have the option to include other depositors provided that this inclusion does not impede rapid payouts.

3) Co-insurance : t he current Directive allows an optional co-insurance of up to 10%, i.e. a certain percentage of losses that is borne by the depositor. This option should be discontinued.

4) Cross-border cooperation : a deposit guarantee scheme does not only cover depositors in the Member State where the bank is authorized (home country) but also covers depositors at the bank's branch in another Member State (host country). It is essential that 'home and host' schemes cooperate with each other to ensure rapid payout. The proposal, therefore, explicitly introduces a general obligation for schemes to cooperate with each other.

2008/10/14
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.

CONTENT: the Council of the European Union agreed on 7 October 2008, that it is a priority is to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector. In times of volatile markets, one of the biggest concerns for depositors is the safety of bank deposits should their bank fail.

All Member States are committed to provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50 000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to at least EUR 100 000.

Ministers are committed to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes.

Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit guarantee schemes provides already for a basic coverage of depositors. However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of the coverage.

The Directive should be revised in four key areas:

1) Coverage level : t he current minimum coverage level is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this does not reflect the current average deposits of approximately EUR 30 000 per EU citizen. In order to maintain depositors' confidence, the coverage level should be raised to at least EUR 50 000 and, after one year, to at least EUR 100 000 . According to estimates, about 65% of eligible deposits are covered under the current regime. The new amounts would cover an estimated 80% (with coverage of EUR 50 000) and 90% (with coverage of EUR 100 000) of deposits.

Changes of the coverage level should be subject to the standard comitology procedure. However, in emergency situations, prompt action, coordinated across the Community, would be needed to increase the level of coverage to address any sudden loss of depositor confidence. Therefore, an emergency comitology measure is critical. Such emergency measures should be restricted to 18 months.

2) Reduction of payout delay : t he current payout delay of three months, which can even be extended to nine months, is detrimental to the confidence of depositors and does not meet their needs. Many depositors can be expected to face significant financial difficulties already within less than one week. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to three days , without a possibility extension.

However, the deadline should commence only when either the competent authorities have determined that the credit institution appears to be unable to repay the deposit or a judicial authority has ruled that the claims of depositors are suspended. The decision of the competent authorities may take up to 21 days after first becoming satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits. In the interest of a rapid payout, this period of 21 days should be reduced to 3 days. For the purposes of rapid payout, a scheme should cover only retail deposits. However, Member States should have the option to include other depositors provided that this inclusion does not impede rapid payouts.

3) Co-insurance : t he current Directive allows an optional co-insurance of up to 10%, i.e. a certain percentage of losses that is borne by the depositor. This option should be discontinued.

4) Cross-border cooperation : a deposit guarantee scheme does not only cover depositors in the Member State where the bank is authorized (home country) but also covers depositors at the bank's branch in another Member State (host country). It is essential that 'home and host' schemes cooperate with each other to ensure rapid payout. The proposal, therefore, explicitly introduces a general obligation for schemes to cooperate with each other.

2008/10/13
   EP - EHLER Christian (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Ehler A6-0494/2008 - résolution #

2008/12/18 Outcome: +: 556, -: 21, 0: 3
DE FR PL GB IT ES RO PT BE NL HU EL AT BG DK SK SE IE FI LT LV SI LU EE MT CY CZ
Total
70
60
47
58
46
39
21
19
17
21
17
18
15
13
13
11
17
10
9
8
7
7
5
4
4
5
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
212

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
164

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
16

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

5

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
48 2008/0199(COD)
2008/11/28 ECON 48 amendments...
source: PE-415.263

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2008-10-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-11-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/2
date
2008-11-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/2/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTML
events/0/date
Old
2008-10-15T00:00:00
New
2008-10-14T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0199&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0199&appLng=EN
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.139
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.139
docs/1/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.263
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.263
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16492&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4
date
2008-12-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html title: A6-0494/2008
events/4
date
2008-12-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html title: A6-0494/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE
events/7
date
2008-12-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0630_EN.html title: T6-0630/2008
summary
events/7
date
2008-12-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0630_EN.html title: T6-0630/2008
summary
procedure/instrument
Old
  • Directive
  • Amending Directive 94/19/EC
New
Directive
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/1/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-630
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0630_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0661 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52008PC0661:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2008-10-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2911 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2911 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0494/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16492&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-630 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0630/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2927
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014 title: Directive 2009/14 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:068:TOC title: OJ L 068 13.03.2009, p. 0003
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2008-10-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2927 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2927*&MEET_DATE=26/02/2009 date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2911 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-10-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.139 title: PE415.139 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52008AB0070:EN:NOT title: CON/2008/0070 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOC title: OJ C 314 09.12.2008, p. 0001 summary: OPIONION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK at the request of the Council of the European Union on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay . On 24 October 2008, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. The ECB's competence to deliver an opinion on the proposed directive is based on Article 105(4) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion. General observations : the ECB notes that the current financial market crisis has confirmed that deposit-guarantee schemes are vital for maintaining depositors' confidence and therefore safeguarding financial stability. The ECB supports the underlying aim of enhancing depositors' confidence and understands that for urgency reasons the proposed directive focuses on increasing the coverage level of national deposit-guarantee schemes in line with the Ecofin Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008, reducing payout delay and discontinuing the current option for co-insurance. At the same time, the ECB supports the Commission's intention to continue work on convergence of the national schemes, with particular regard to harmonising their funding mechanisms, and to submit a report on the matter to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009. In view of the importance of the funding arrangements of the national schemes for the effectiveness of the financial safety net and for safeguarding financial stability, the ECB looks forward to contributing to the Commission's future work in this field and encourages timely completion of the Commission's report. In this context, the ECB underlines that national schemes' funding arrangements must, inter alia, comply with the monetary financing prohibition laid down in the Treaty, and in particular with the prohibition on national central banks providing overdraft facilities or any other type of facility within the meaning of Article 101 of the Treaty, as more specifically considered in past ECB opinions concerning draft national legislation and in the ECB's Convergence Reports. Specific observations : the ECB makes the following specific observations: Coverage level of the guarantee : the ECB welcomes the increase in the minimum amount of guaranteed deposits to EUR 50 000 by the end of 2008 and the further increase to EUR 100 000, as mentioned in the Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008. At the same time, the ECB emphasises that any increase in the coverage exceeding the latter of the above mentioned amounts should be preceded by close coordination at the EU level, as substantial differences between national measures may have a counter-productive effect and create distortions in the single market; Reduction of payout delay : the ECB welcomes the intention to reduce delays in payouts of guaranteed deposits significantly and thereby strengthen depositors' confidence. In this context, the ECB would emphasise that recent analysis at international level has highlighted that a prompt payout of depositors' claims is of key importance for effective deposit protection. At the same time, a pragmatic approach should be taken to introducing the necessary reduction in payout delays, thereby preserving credibility of the deposit-guarantee schemes. This implies establishing efficient operational processes for verifying claims and paying depositors, as well as ensuring that sufficient funding is available. In particular, procedures need to be put in place so that if a bank that operates on a cross-border basis fails, depositors receive payouts as efficiently as they would if the failed bank were operating in a single Member State . Moreover, the ECB suggests that the Commission's plan to assess whether it would be possible to harmonise further the funding arrangements used by the national schemes should be accompanied by a review of the effectiveness of payout procedures. Finally, in addition to shortening the payout period, the ECB suggests that public confidence in deposit-guarantee schemes could be enhanced by improving depositors' awareness of the terms and conditions of deposit protection, inter alia through appropriate disclosure of the terms and conditions by credit institutions. type: European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report body: ECB
  • date: 2008-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.263 title: PE415.263 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN title: A6-0494/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16492&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)402 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03743/2008/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
events
  • date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0661 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=661 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. CONTENT: the Council of the European Union agreed on 7 October 2008, that it is a priority is to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector. In times of volatile markets, one of the biggest concerns for depositors is the safety of bank deposits should their bank fail. All Member States are committed to provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50 000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to at least EUR 100 000. Ministers are committed to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes. Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit guarantee schemes provides already for a basic coverage of depositors. However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of the coverage. The Directive should be revised in four key areas: 1) Coverage level : t he current minimum coverage level is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this does not reflect the current average deposits of approximately EUR 30 000 per EU citizen. In order to maintain depositors' confidence, the coverage level should be raised to at least EUR 50 000 and, after one year, to at least EUR 100 000 . According to estimates, about 65% of eligible deposits are covered under the current regime. The new amounts would cover an estimated 80% (with coverage of EUR 50 000) and 90% (with coverage of EUR 100 000) of deposits. Changes of the coverage level should be subject to the standard comitology procedure. However, in emergency situations, prompt action, coordinated across the Community, would be needed to increase the level of coverage to address any sudden loss of depositor confidence. Therefore, an emergency comitology measure is critical. Such emergency measures should be restricted to 18 months. 2) Reduction of payout delay : t he current payout delay of three months, which can even be extended to nine months, is detrimental to the confidence of depositors and does not meet their needs. Many depositors can be expected to face significant financial difficulties already within less than one week. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to three days , without a possibility extension. However, the deadline should commence only when either the competent authorities have determined that the credit institution appears to be unable to repay the deposit or a judicial authority has ruled that the claims of depositors are suspended. The decision of the competent authorities may take up to 21 days after first becoming satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits. In the interest of a rapid payout, this period of 21 days should be reduced to 3 days. For the purposes of rapid payout, a scheme should cover only retail deposits. However, Member States should have the option to include other depositors provided that this inclusion does not impede rapid payouts. 3) Co-insurance : t he current Directive allows an optional co-insurance of up to 10%, i.e. a certain percentage of losses that is borne by the depositor. This option should be discontinued. 4) Cross-border cooperation : a deposit guarantee scheme does not only cover depositors in the Member State where the bank is authorized (home country) but also covers depositors at the bank's branch in another Member State (host country). It is essential that 'home and host' schemes cooperate with each other to ensure rapid payout. The proposal, therefore, explicitly introduces a general obligation for schemes to cooperate with each other.
  • date: 2008-10-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 title: 2911 summary: The Council arrived at a general approach on a draft Directive aimed at tightening up the rules on bank deposit guarantee schemes in order to improve confidence in the banking sector. On the basis of this approach, the Presidency will continue its contacts with the European Parliament in order to reach an agreement enabling the Directive to be adopted at first reading, before the end of the parliamentary term. The Council's general approach provides for: raising the deposit guarantee level to EUR 50 000, rather than the present EUR 20 000, from 30 June 2009 and harmonising the level at EUR 100 000 from 31 December 2011. That harmonisation should make it possible to avoid the distortion of competition among banks which appeared during the financial crisis (in the form of massive deposit transfers from banks affiliated to a scheme offering a low coverage level to banks affiliated to a scheme offering a high coverage level); a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment. The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to two three-month extensions. Overall, the payout period could not exceed 35 working days, compared with 10 months at present. The European Parliament's vote is expected during the week of 15 December.
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), and amended the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. The main amendments – made in 1st reading of the codecision procedure – were as follows: Scope: the Commission proposal had limited the scope of the Directive to private investors. However, Members felt that small and medium sized enterprises should continue to be protection and come within the scope, given the importance for the economic situation in Member States and the state of the labour market in Europe. Impact assessment for increased coverage : Members felt that, given the urgency of the situation, there had been no time for an impact assessment. However, they stipulated that, by 31 December 2009, coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor will be increased to EUR 100 000, or equivalent, unless a Commission impact assessment, submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 30 April 2009, concludes that such an increase is not appropriate and is not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection and financial market stability. The maintenance of institutional guarantee, the possibility of full coverage of certain deposits including temporarily increased account balances and exchange rates arrangements for non Euro-zone currencies shall be ensured. Comitology : Members deleted the Commission's powers to make changes through comitology and stated that further changes should be carried out in normal procedure. The annual review by the Commission will ensure that action can be taken in time. Information : Member States shall ensure that credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner. Time limits on default : Members felt that the Commission proposal was unrealistic and stated that, in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, deposit-guarantee schemes shall be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 14 days (rather than 3 as the Commission had proposed.) Two years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall assess whether a further reduction to 10 days, without limitation of the scope of coverage, can be proposed. Emergency payment : a new clause states that in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, Member States in cooperation with deposit-guarantee schemes shall make arrangements for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon application of the affected depositor of up to at least EUR 1 000 within three days or less after the application. Report : Members considerably expanded the issues which should be the subject of the Commission's report, and provided that the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31st December 2009, a report on: the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of such harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis , in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the costs of such harmonisation; standards for better early-risk warning ; possible models for introducing risk-based contributions; the benefits of a possible introduction of a community deposit guarantee scheme . This shall cover the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up; the specific needs of SMEs and local authorities as regards deposit guarantee coverage levels.
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN title: A6-0494/2008
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16492&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-630 title: T6-0630/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 556 votes to 21 with 3 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. The amendments were the result of a compromise between the Council and the Parliament. The main amendments - adopted under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows: Determination of failure to repay deposits : in the cases where payout is triggered by a determination of the competent authorities, the decision period of 21 days provided for in current legislation is reduced to 5 working days in order not to impede rapid payout. However, the competent authorities must first be satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable. That assessment should be subject to the judicial or administrative procedures of the Member States. Scope: the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor must be at least EUR 50 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable. Increase in coverage : by 31 December 2010, Member States must ensure that the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor shall be set at EUR 100 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable. However, this will not preclude the retention of provisions which offered, before 1 January 2008, notably for social considerations, full coverage for certain kinds of deposits. If the Commission report to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2009, concludes that such an increase and such harmonisation are not appropriate and not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection, financial stability in the Community and to avoid cross-border distortions between Member States, it shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a proposal to amend the provision on increase in coverage. Conversion: Member States that convert the amounts expressed in euro into their national currency shall ensure that the amounts in national currencies effectively paid to depositors are equivalent to those set out in the Directive. Inflation: the Commission may adjust the amounts referred to above in accordance with the inflation in the EU on the basis of changes in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices published by the Commission. Information: credit institutions must make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner. Information shall be given on request on the conditions for compensation and the formalities which must be completed to obtain compensation. Time limits for payout : deposit–guarantee schemes must be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 20 working days of the date on which the competent authorities determine that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, or the judicial authority makes the appropriate ruling. This time limit includes the collection and transmission of the accurate data on depositors and deposits, which are necessary for the verification of claims. The Commission had recommended 3 days and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs had stipulated 14 days. In wholly exceptional circumstances and in special cases, a guarantee scheme may apply to the competent authorities for an extension of the time limit , which will not exceed 10 working days. 2 years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall submit a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether further reduction to 10working days of the delay could be implemented. Member States shall ensure that deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and, if appropriate, are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to trigger deposit-guarantee schemes. Report: by 31 December 2009 at the latest, the Commission must submit a report on - the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of an absence of harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis, in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the benefits and costs of such harmonisation; - the appropriateness and modalities of providing for a full coverage for certain temporarily increased account balances; - possible models for introducing risk-based contributions; - the benefits and costs of a possible introduction of a Community deposit-guarantee scheme; the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up; - the harmonisation of the scope of products and depositors covered, including the specific needs of small and medium enterprises and local authorities; the link between deposit-guarantee schemes and alternative means for reimbursing depositors, such as emergency pay-out mechanisms. If necessary, the Commission shall submit appropriate proposals to amend the Directive. Transposition: 30 June 2009. However, Member States shall apply the provisions of Article 1(3)(i) (determination of failure) and Article 10(1) (time-limits for payout) of Directive 94/19/EC, as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010, at the latest . By way of derogation, Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 7(1a) and Article 7(3) of Directive 94/19/EC (amount of coverage), as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010 . Emergency payout : the compromise text states in the recitals that Member States should aim at ensuring the continuity of banking services and access to liquidity of banks, in particular in periods of financial turmoil. For this purpose, Member States should be encouraged to make arrangements as soon as possible for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon the application of the affected depositor, within 3 days or less after the application . Since the reduction of the current payout delay of three months will have a positive impact on the confidence of depositors and the proper functioning of the financial markets, Member States and their deposit-guarantee schemes should ensure that the payout delay is as short as possible.
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. CONTENT: following a first reading agreement with the European Parliament, the Council adopted a Directive raising guarantee levels and reducing payout delays in the event that deposits of a bank would become unavailable. The new Directive includes provisions: raising the coverage level to a minimum of EUR 50 000 as from 30 June 2009, rather than the present EUR 20 000; setting the coverage level at EUR 100 000 as from 31 December 2010 ; reducing the payout delay to 25 working days (a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment). The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to the possibility of two three-month extensions. By 16 March 2011, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether reduction to 10 working days of the delay could be implemented. Member States shall ensure that: credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community; the depositors be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the deposit-guarantee scheme; deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and that, if appropriate, they are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to give rise to the intervention of deposit-guarantee schemes. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009 at the latest. It shall be accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals to amend this Directive. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 16/03/2009. TRANSPOSITION: 30/06/2009. docs: title: Directive 2009/14 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014 title: OJ L 068 13.03.2009, p. 0003 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:068:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/6/68655
New
  • ECON/6/68655
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014
procedure/instrument
Old
Directive
New
  • Directive
  • Amending Directive 94/19/EC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.50.02 Savings
  • 2.50.04 Banks and credit
New
2.50.02
Savings
2.50.04
Banks and credit
procedure/summary
  • Amending Directive 94/19/EC
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008PC0661:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2008)0661 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
  • date: 2008-10-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2911 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2911 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0494/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16492&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-630 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0630/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2927
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014 title: Directive 2009/14 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:068:TOC title: OJ L 068 13.03.2009, p. 0003
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/6/68655
reference
2008/0199(COD)
instrument
Directive
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amending Directive 94/19/EC
subtype
Legislation
title
Deposit guarantee schemes: coverage level and the payout delay
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject