Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | EHLER Christian ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
CONTENT: following a first reading agreement with the European Parliament, the Council adopted a Directive raising guarantee levels and reducing payout delays in the event that deposits of a bank would become unavailable. The new Directive includes provisions:
raising the coverage level to a minimum of EUR 50 000 as from 30 June 2009, rather than the present EUR 20 000; setting the coverage level at EUR 100 000 as from 31 December 2010 ; reducing the payout delay to 25 working days (a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment). The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to the possibility of two three-month extensions.
By 16 March 2011, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether reduction to 10 working days of the delay could be implemented.
Member States shall ensure that:
credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community; the depositors be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the deposit-guarantee scheme; deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and that, if appropriate, they are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to give rise to the intervention of deposit-guarantee schemes.
The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009 at the latest. It shall be accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals to amend this Directive.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 16/03/2009.
TRANSPOSITION: 30/06/2009.
The European Parliament adopted by 556 votes to 21 with 3 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. The amendments were the result of a compromise between the Council and the Parliament. The main amendments - adopted under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows:
Determination of failure to repay deposits : in the cases where payout is triggered by a determination of the competent authorities, the decision period of 21 days provided for in current legislation is reduced to 5 working days in order not to impede rapid payout. However, the competent authorities must first be satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable. That assessment should be subject to the judicial or administrative procedures of the Member States.
Scope: the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor must be at least EUR 50 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable.
Increase in coverage : by 31 December 2010, Member States must ensure that the coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor shall be set at EUR 100 000 in the event of deposits being unavailable. However, this will not preclude the retention of provisions which offered, before 1 January 2008, notably for social considerations, full coverage for certain kinds of deposits.
If the Commission report to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2009, concludes that such an increase and such harmonisation are not appropriate and not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection, financial stability in the Community and to avoid cross-border distortions between Member States, it shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a proposal to amend the provision on increase in coverage.
Conversion: Member States that convert the amounts expressed in euro into their national currency shall ensure that the amounts in national currencies effectively paid to depositors are equivalent to those set out in the Directive.
Inflation: the Commission may adjust the amounts referred to above in accordance with the inflation in the EU on the basis of changes in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices published by the Commission.
Information: credit institutions must make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner.
Information shall be given on request on the conditions for compensation and the formalities which must be completed to obtain compensation.
Time limits for payout : deposit–guarantee schemes must be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 20 working days of the date on which the competent authorities determine that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, or the judicial authority makes the appropriate ruling. This time limit includes the collection and transmission of the accurate data on depositors and deposits, which are necessary for the verification of claims. The Commission had recommended 3 days and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs had stipulated 14 days.
In wholly exceptional circumstances and in special cases, a guarantee scheme may apply to the competent authorities for an extension of the time limit , which will not exceed 10 working days.
2 years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall submit a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether further reduction to 10working days of the delay could be implemented.
Member States shall ensure that deposit-guarantee schemes perform regular tests of their systems and, if appropriate, are informed in the event that the competent authorities detect problems in a credit institution that are likely to trigger deposit-guarantee schemes.
Report: by 31 December 2009 at the latest, the Commission must submit a report on
- the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of an absence of harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis, in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the benefits and costs of such harmonisation;
- the appropriateness and modalities of providing for a full coverage for certain temporarily increased account balances;
- possible models for introducing risk-based contributions;
- the benefits and costs of a possible introduction of a Community deposit-guarantee scheme; the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up;
- the harmonisation of the scope of products and depositors covered, including the specific needs of small and medium enterprises and local authorities; the link between deposit-guarantee schemes and alternative means for reimbursing depositors, such as emergency pay-out mechanisms. If necessary, the Commission shall submit appropriate proposals to amend the Directive.
Transposition: 30 June 2009. However, Member States shall apply the provisions of Article 1(3)(i) (determination of failure) and Article 10(1) (time-limits for payout) of Directive 94/19/EC, as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010, at the latest .
By way of derogation, Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 7(1a) and Article 7(3) of Directive 94/19/EC (amount of coverage), as amended by this Directive, by 31 December 2010 .
Emergency payout : the compromise text states in the recitals that Member States should aim at ensuring the continuity of banking services and access to liquidity of banks, in particular in periods of financial turmoil. For this purpose, Member States should be encouraged to make arrangements as soon as possible for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon the application of the affected depositor, within 3 days or less after the application . Since the reduction of the current payout delay of three months will have a positive impact on the confidence of depositors and the proper functioning of the financial markets, Member States and their deposit-guarantee schemes should ensure that the payout delay is as short as possible.
The Committee on Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE), and amended the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
The main amendments – made in 1st reading of the codecision procedure – were as follows:
Scope: the Commission proposal had limited the scope of the Directive to private investors. However, Members felt that small and medium sized enterprises should continue to be protection and come within the scope, given the importance for the economic situation in Member States and the state of the labour market in Europe.
Impact assessment for increased coverage : Members felt that, given the urgency of the situation, there had been no time for an impact assessment. However, they stipulated that, by 31 December 2009, coverage of the aggregate deposits of each depositor will be increased to EUR 100 000, or equivalent, unless a Commission impact assessment, submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 30 April 2009, concludes that such an increase is not appropriate and is not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection and financial market stability. The maintenance of institutional guarantee, the possibility of full coverage of certain deposits including temporarily increased account balances and exchange rates arrangements for non Euro-zone currencies shall be ensured.
Comitology : Members deleted the Commission's powers to make changes through comitology and stated that further changes should be carried out in normal procedure. The annual review by the Commission will ensure that action can be taken in time.
Information : Member States shall ensure that credit institutions make available to actual and intending depositors the information necessary for the identification of the deposit-guarantee scheme of which the institution and its branches are members within the Community or any alternative arrangement provided for in the text. The depositors shall be informed of the provisions of the deposit-guarantee scheme or any alternative arrangement applicable, including the amount and scope of the cover offered by the guarantee scheme. When a deposit is not guaranteed by a deposit-guarantee scheme, the credit institution shall inform its depositors accordingly. All information shall be made available in a readily comprehensible manner.
Time limits on default : Members felt that the Commission proposal was unrealistic and stated that, in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, deposit-guarantee schemes shall be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within 14 days (rather than 3 as the Commission had proposed.) Two years after the coming into force of the Directive, the Commission shall assess whether a further reduction to 10 days, without limitation of the scope of coverage, can be proposed.
Emergency payment : a new clause states that in the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, Member States in cooperation with deposit-guarantee schemes shall make arrangements for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon application of the affected depositor of up to at least EUR 1 000 within three days or less after the application.
Report : Members considerably expanded the issues which should be the subject of the Commission's report, and provided that the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31st December 2009, a report on: the harmonisation of the funding mechanisms of deposit-guarantee schemes addressing, in particular, the effects of such harmonisation in the event of a cross-border crisis , in regard to the availability of the compensation payouts of the deposit and in regard to fair competition, and the costs of such harmonisation; standards for better early-risk warning ; possible models for introducing risk-based contributions; the benefits of a possible introduction of a community deposit guarantee scheme . This shall cover the impact of diverging legislations as regards set-off, where a depositor's credit is balanced against its debts, on the efficiency of the system and possible distortions, taking into account cross-border winding-up; the specific needs of SMEs and local authorities as regards deposit guarantee coverage levels.
The Council arrived at a general approach on a draft Directive aimed at tightening up the rules on bank deposit guarantee schemes in order to improve confidence in the banking sector. On the basis of this approach, the Presidency will continue its contacts with the European Parliament in order to reach an agreement enabling the Directive to be adopted at first reading, before the end of the parliamentary term.
The Council's general approach provides for:
raising the deposit guarantee level to EUR 50 000, rather than the present EUR 20 000, from 30 June 2009 and harmonising the level at EUR 100 000 from 31 December 2011. That harmonisation should make it possible to avoid the distortion of competition among banks which appeared during the financial crisis (in the form of massive deposit transfers from banks affiliated to a scheme offering a low coverage level to banks affiliated to a scheme offering a high coverage level); a period of five working days to establish that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable, and of 20 working days, subject to extension by 10 working days, to make the repayment. The corresponding periods are at present 21 working days and three months, subject to two three-month extensions. Overall, the payout period could not exceed 35 working days, compared with 10 months at present.
The European Parliament's vote is expected during the week of 15 December.
OPIONION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK at the request of the Council of the European Union on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay .
On 24 October 2008, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
The ECB's competence to deliver an opinion on the proposed directive is based on Article 105(4) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.
General observations : the ECB notes that the current financial market crisis has confirmed that deposit-guarantee schemes are vital for maintaining depositors' confidence and therefore safeguarding financial stability. The ECB supports the underlying aim of enhancing depositors' confidence and understands that for urgency reasons the proposed directive focuses on increasing the coverage level of national deposit-guarantee schemes in line with the Ecofin Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008, reducing payout delay and discontinuing the current option for co-insurance.
At the same time, the ECB supports the Commission's intention to continue work on convergence of the national schemes, with particular regard to harmonising their funding mechanisms, and to submit a report on the matter to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 December 2009. In view of the importance of the funding arrangements of the national schemes for the effectiveness of the financial safety net and for safeguarding financial stability, the ECB looks forward to contributing to the Commission's future work in this field and encourages timely completion of the Commission's report.
In this context, the ECB underlines that national schemes' funding arrangements must, inter alia, comply with the monetary financing prohibition laid down in the Treaty, and in particular with the prohibition on national central banks providing overdraft facilities or any other type of facility within the meaning of Article 101 of the Treaty, as more specifically considered in past ECB opinions concerning draft national legislation and in the ECB's Convergence Reports.
Specific observations : the ECB makes the following specific observations:
Coverage level of the guarantee : the ECB welcomes the increase in the minimum amount of guaranteed deposits to EUR 50 000 by the end of 2008 and the further increase to EUR 100 000, as mentioned in the Council's conclusions of 7 October 2008. At the same time, the ECB emphasises that any increase in the coverage exceeding the latter of the above mentioned amounts should be preceded by close coordination at the EU level, as substantial differences between national measures may have a counter-productive effect and create distortions in the single market; Reduction of payout delay : the ECB welcomes the intention to reduce delays in payouts of guaranteed deposits significantly and thereby strengthen depositors' confidence. In this context, the ECB would emphasise that recent analysis at international level has highlighted that a prompt payout of depositors' claims is of key importance for effective deposit protection. At the same time, a pragmatic approach should be taken to introducing the necessary reduction in payout delays, thereby preserving credibility of the deposit-guarantee schemes. This implies establishing efficient operational processes for verifying claims and paying depositors, as well as ensuring that sufficient funding is available. In particular, procedures need to be put in place so that if a bank that operates on a cross-border basis fails, depositors receive payouts as efficiently as they would if the failed bank were operating in a single Member State . Moreover, the ECB suggests that the Commission's plan to assess whether it would be possible to harmonise further the funding arrangements used by the national schemes should be accompanied by a review of the effectiveness of payout procedures. Finally, in addition to shortening the payout period, the ECB suggests that public confidence in deposit-guarantee schemes could be enhanced by improving depositors' awareness of the terms and conditions of deposit protection, inter alia through appropriate disclosure of the terms and conditions by credit institutions.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
CONTENT: the Council of the European Union agreed on 7 October 2008, that it is a priority is to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector. In times of volatile markets, one of the biggest concerns for depositors is the safety of bank deposits should their bank fail.
All Member States are committed to provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50 000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to at least EUR 100 000.
Ministers are committed to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes.
Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit guarantee schemes provides already for a basic coverage of depositors. However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of the coverage.
The Directive should be revised in four key areas:
1) Coverage level : t he current minimum coverage level is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this does not reflect the current average deposits of approximately EUR 30 000 per EU citizen. In order to maintain depositors' confidence, the coverage level should be raised to at least EUR 50 000 and, after one year, to at least EUR 100 000 . According to estimates, about 65% of eligible deposits are covered under the current regime. The new amounts would cover an estimated 80% (with coverage of EUR 50 000) and 90% (with coverage of EUR 100 000) of deposits.
Changes of the coverage level should be subject to the standard comitology procedure. However, in emergency situations, prompt action, coordinated across the Community, would be needed to increase the level of coverage to address any sudden loss of depositor confidence. Therefore, an emergency comitology measure is critical. Such emergency measures should be restricted to 18 months.
2) Reduction of payout delay : t he current payout delay of three months, which can even be extended to nine months, is detrimental to the confidence of depositors and does not meet their needs. Many depositors can be expected to face significant financial difficulties already within less than one week. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to three days , without a possibility extension.
However, the deadline should commence only when either the competent authorities have determined that the credit institution appears to be unable to repay the deposit or a judicial authority has ruled that the claims of depositors are suspended. The decision of the competent authorities may take up to 21 days after first becoming satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits. In the interest of a rapid payout, this period of 21 days should be reduced to 3 days. For the purposes of rapid payout, a scheme should cover only retail deposits. However, Member States should have the option to include other depositors provided that this inclusion does not impede rapid payouts.
3) Co-insurance : t he current Directive allows an optional co-insurance of up to 10%, i.e. a certain percentage of losses that is borne by the depositor. This option should be discontinued.
4) Cross-border cooperation : a deposit guarantee scheme does not only cover depositors in the Member State where the bank is authorized (home country) but also covers depositors at the bank's branch in another Member State (host country). It is essential that 'home and host' schemes cooperate with each other to ensure rapid payout. The proposal, therefore, explicitly introduces a general obligation for schemes to cooperate with each other.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay.
CONTENT: the Council of the European Union agreed on 7 October 2008, that it is a priority is to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector. In times of volatile markets, one of the biggest concerns for depositors is the safety of bank deposits should their bank fail.
All Member States are committed to provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50 000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to at least EUR 100 000.
Ministers are committed to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes.
Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit guarantee schemes provides already for a basic coverage of depositors. However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of the coverage.
The Directive should be revised in four key areas:
1) Coverage level : t he current minimum coverage level is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this does not reflect the current average deposits of approximately EUR 30 000 per EU citizen. In order to maintain depositors' confidence, the coverage level should be raised to at least EUR 50 000 and, after one year, to at least EUR 100 000 . According to estimates, about 65% of eligible deposits are covered under the current regime. The new amounts would cover an estimated 80% (with coverage of EUR 50 000) and 90% (with coverage of EUR 100 000) of deposits.
Changes of the coverage level should be subject to the standard comitology procedure. However, in emergency situations, prompt action, coordinated across the Community, would be needed to increase the level of coverage to address any sudden loss of depositor confidence. Therefore, an emergency comitology measure is critical. Such emergency measures should be restricted to 18 months.
2) Reduction of payout delay : t he current payout delay of three months, which can even be extended to nine months, is detrimental to the confidence of depositors and does not meet their needs. Many depositors can be expected to face significant financial difficulties already within less than one week. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to three days , without a possibility extension.
However, the deadline should commence only when either the competent authorities have determined that the credit institution appears to be unable to repay the deposit or a judicial authority has ruled that the claims of depositors are suspended. The decision of the competent authorities may take up to 21 days after first becoming satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits. In the interest of a rapid payout, this period of 21 days should be reduced to 3 days. For the purposes of rapid payout, a scheme should cover only retail deposits. However, Member States should have the option to include other depositors provided that this inclusion does not impede rapid payouts.
3) Co-insurance : t he current Directive allows an optional co-insurance of up to 10%, i.e. a certain percentage of losses that is borne by the depositor. This option should be discontinued.
4) Cross-border cooperation : a deposit guarantee scheme does not only cover depositors in the Member State where the bank is authorized (home country) but also covers depositors at the bank's branch in another Member State (host country). It is essential that 'home and host' schemes cooperate with each other to ensure rapid payout. The proposal, therefore, explicitly introduces a general obligation for schemes to cooperate with each other.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2009/14
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 068 13.03.2009, p. 0003
- Draft final act: 03743/2008/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)402
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0630/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0494/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0494/2008
- Debate in Council: 2911
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.263
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2008/0070
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: OJ C 314 09.12.2008, p. 0001
- Committee draft report: PE415.139
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0661
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0661
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0661 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE415.139
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2008/0070 OJ C 314 09.12.2008, p. 0001
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.263
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0494/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)402
- Draft final act: 03743/2008/LEX
Activities
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Mariela Velichkova BAEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paolo BARTOLOZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sharon BOWLES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Colm BURKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ján HUDACKÝ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margarita STARKEVIČIŪTĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cornelis VISSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Ehler A6-0494/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
48 |
2008/0199(COD)
2008/11/28
ECON
48 amendments...
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 2 a (new) (2a) While the Directive 94/19/EC currently allows considerable scope for Member States to develop systems which are best suited to their market conditions, differences between the guarantee levels afforded to depositors across the Member States create difficulties under crisis conditions, inter alia because they cause competitive distortions and destabilising effects as regards the need to ensure a high level of financial stability within the European Union.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 2 b (new) (2b) In the event of a cross-border EU banking crisis, full harmonisation at EU level as regards coverage level is required in order to avoid depositors facing different levels of protection. Such harmonisation would also avoid competitive distortions between banks, while maintaining depositor confidence.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 3 (3) The current minimum coverage level provided for in Directive 94/19/EC is set at EUR 20 000 with the option for Member States to determine a higher coverage. However, this has proved to be not adequate for a large number of deposits in the Community. In order to maintain depositors' confidence
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 4 (4) Under Directive 94/19/EC, Member States may limit the coverage by a certain percentage. That option has proven counter-productive for the confidence of depositors
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 (5) The payout period of three months currently provided for, which can be extended to 9 months, runs counter to the need to maintain depositors' confidence and does not meet their needs. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to a period of t
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 (5) The payout period of three months currently provided for, which can be extended to 9 months, runs counter to the need to maintain depositors' confidence and does not meet their needs. Therefore, the payout delay should be reduced to a period of t
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 (5) The payout period of three months currently provided for, which can be extended to 9 months, runs counter to the
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Member States should be encouraged to pursue options for maintaining the continuity of banking service and access to monies for depositors, and, where appropriate, to allow access to deposit- guarantee funds for that purpose.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 b (new) (5b) In the event that a deposit-guarantee scheme is triggered, depositors should have a local point of contact in their own country.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 6 (6) The possibility of discretionary exclusions of certain categories of depositors set out in Annex I to Directive 94/19/EC has led to a variety of categories of beneficiaries that have to be identified during the payout procedure. This has proven to be difficult for the enforcement of arrangements between home and host country schemes (topping up) and to delay payout and should therefore be discontinued. In addition most of the exclusions currently provided for concern public entities and financial institutions. An increased protection should, however, benefit depositors who as a matter of principle do not dispose of a lot of financial expertise. The
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 6 (6) The possibility of discretionary exclusions of certain categories of depositors set out in Annex I to Directive 94/19/EC has led to a variety of categories of beneficiaries that have to be identified during the payout procedure. This has proven to be difficult for the enforcement of arrangements between home and host country schemes (topping up) and to delay payout and should therefore be discontinued. In addition most of the exclusions currently provided for concern public entities and financial institutions. An increased protection should, however, benefit depositors who as a matter of principle do not dispose of a lot of financial expertise. Therefore protection should be limited to retail depositors, whilst maintaining the option for Member States to extend that protection to other categories of depositors. Protection should not, however, benefit depositors in the event that their deposits were made in a bank branch located in a tax haven.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Deposit-guarantee schemes should not be used deliberately for marketing purposes to attract new deposits or gain a competitive advantage in the market, including the market of the European Economic Area. The use of topping up as marketing strategy should be minimised to the greatest extent possible until there is a fully harmonised coverage level.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 7 (7) Member States should ensure that deposit-guarantee schemes have adequate funds available to meet their needs. The deposit-guarantee scheme should be empowered to raise finance for the purposes of underpinning the continuity of banking services and access to monies and should stand as a creditor in the normal sequence of insolvency.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 9 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 10 Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 a Directive 94/19/EC Article 1 – point 3 − point ii (1a) Point (3)(ii) of Article 1 is replaced by the following: "(ii) a judicial authority has made a ruling for reasons which are directly related to the credit institution's financial circumstances which has the effect of suspending depositors' ability to make claims for restoring due and payable deposits against it, should that occur before the [...] determination has been made in accordance with point (i);".
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. In the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4,
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. In the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4, Member States shall ensure that Deposit-guarantee
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint b Directive 94/19/EC Article 4 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall review the functioning of this Article every three years or whenever urgency demands and, if appropriate, propose amendments thereto.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint b Directive 94/19/EC Article 4 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall review the functioning of this Article
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Deposit-guarantee schemes shall
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 By 31 December 2009
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States that are not members of the euro area may apply the exchange rate prevailing at ...*. Updating that exchange rate may be effected at the discretion of the Member State concerned and shall be effected in the event that the converted amount falls to more than 5 % below the minimum amount in euro. * OJ: please insert the date of adoption of the amending act.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may provide that certain deposits, listed in Annex I, be excluded from the guarantee or be granted a lower level of guarantee provided that the payment to all depositors is carried out within the deadline set out to in Article 10(1). In any event, protection should not benefit depositors if their deposits are situated in a bank branch located in a tax haven.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may provide that certain deposits, listed in Annex I, be excluded from the guarantee or be granted a lower level of guarantee provided that the payment to all depositors is carried out within the deadline set out to in Article
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive shall not cover deposits for
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive shall cover all depositors
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive shall cover depositors who are natural persons
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 3 – subpoint d Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States shall ensure that deposit-guarantee schemes are pre- funded.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 94/19/EC Article 7 a – paragraph 1 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that accurate data on depositors and deposits, which are necessary for the verification of claims, are made available without undue delay to the deposit-guarantee scheme
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that accurate data on depositors and deposits, which are necessary for the verification of claims, are made available without undue delay to the deposit-guarantee scheme
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Deposit-guarantee schemes shall be in a position to pay duly verified claims by depositors in respect of unavailable deposits within t
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Deposit-guarantee schemes shall be in a position to pay duly verified claims by
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 5 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) In the event that the continuity of banking services and access to monies is not deliverable, Member States shall make appropriate and timely arrangements to facilitate emergency payouts.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Directive 94/19/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 2009
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Directive 94/19/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 2009
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 7 – subpoint a Directive 94/19/EC Annex I – points 1 to 9 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 7 – subpoint b Directive 94/19/EC Annex I – point 11 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 7 – subpoint b Directive 94/19/EC Annex I – point 11 (b) point 11 is
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 7 – subpoint c Directive 94/19/EC Annex I – point 14 Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 7 – subpoint c a Directive 94/19/EC Annex I – point 13 – indent 2 (ca) In point 13, the second indent is replaced by the following: "- euro."
source: PE-415.263
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTML |
events/0/date |
Old
2008-10-15T00:00:00New
2008-10-14T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0199&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0199&appLng=EN |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.139New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.139 |
docs/1/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOC |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.263New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.263 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16492&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081216&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081216&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
New
Directive |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:314:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-494&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0494_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-630New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0630_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/6/68655New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0014 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0661/COM_COM(2008)0661_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|