Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | EHLER Christian ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | HEGYI Gyula ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes to 66 with 20 abstentions, a resolution on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.
CCS technologies : Parliament recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU’s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection.
Insufficient Commission measures : Parliament defends the idea that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. MEPs take the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015. They points out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level, and by uncertainties about future movements in emission trading allowance prices.
Short-term financing by the 7th Framework Research Programme : MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission. Parliament calls on the Commission to produce a detailed assessment of the cost of, and the share of private and public funding in, each of the 12 demonstration facilities.
Support via the EU emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) : MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure.
Infrastructure and transport : MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure, and notes in this regard that the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures can last for years; in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020.
Selection criteria for projects : Parliament stresses that binding and strict criteria should be set for the long-term safety and permanence of storage sites. MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW be included in the selection.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue.
MEPs recall that the 2005 Special Report on carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies (CCS) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which identified CCS as a promising technology for the rapid reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the potential to achieve a reduction of up to 55% by 2100.
The report recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU`s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection.
The Industry Committee endorses the view that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. It takes the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015 . MEPs point out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level.
MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission.
As regards the EU emission trading scheme (EU ETS) , MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they t consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure.
MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure . They note, in this regard, the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures which can last for years, and in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020.
Lastly, MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW,be included in the selection.
PURPOSE: to support early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels.
CONTENT: the EU has set itself ambitious targets to reduce green house gas emissions. Emissions from the energy sector – primarily coal and gas, lead to approximately 40% of all CO2 emissions in the EU. Thus, any strategy to address climate change needs to consider ways in which to reduce the effect of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power generation. One way forward is the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS). This technology, which is expected to be commercially feasible in 10-15 years, will enable CCS to stand on its own feet in an Emission Trading Scheme.
This Communication complements a Commission proposal for a Directive on Geological Storage of CO2. Its purpose is to set out a strategy for the realisation of CCS and to set out a vision on how to effectively coordinate and support large-scale CCS demonstrations as well as creating the conditions for bold industrial investments in a series of plants.
The investment needed to bring CCS to market is substantial. Around EUR 1 billion will have to be spent between now and 2020 on R&D activities to bring CCS technologies to a state in which they can be commercially deployed. In addition, early demonstrations of CCS in industrial-scale power plants will require further spending to the tune of billions of Euros. For example, several hundred million Euros per plant will have to be invested in large-scale projects that include capture, transportation and storage. This is significantly more than for standards plants.
The first step to enabling CCS power generation can be taken without substantial additional costs. The Commission’s proposal for a CCS Directive will crate a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure the safety of CCS deployment. In response to these developments the EU is putting a structure in place that seeks to stimulate the demonstration of CCS in power plants. This is the SET-Plan, which creates a framework in which CCS can develop. The plan identifies CCS as one of the strategic energy technologies and sets the time horizon of 2020 for making its use in power generation a realistic option. A coherent and coordinated EU-level action could add value and enhance overall impact, whilst respecting the autonomy of national initiatives.
The SET-Plan proposes to examine avenues for raising additional funds. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is currently analysing new products for financing CCS in addition to the existing Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Within this context the Commission is proposing to launch a European Industrial Initiative on CO2 capture, transport and storage starting in 2008. While stimulating large-scale demonstration, this Initiative will also seek to address, in an integrated manner, the need for continuous research and for increased public awareness and acceptance.
In order to push this initiative forward, in 2008 the Commission will set up a Support Action under the 7 th Framework Programme the purpose of which will be to create and animate a network of CCS demonstration projects. In this way the Commission will provide first movers with a list of best practices. Information thus gathered will help focus policies establishing a long-term value chain for CO2 and will give coherent and effective interaction of participating projects with related R&D undertaken across the EU.
PURPOSE: to support early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels.
CONTENT: the EU has set itself ambitious targets to reduce green house gas emissions. Emissions from the energy sector – primarily coal and gas, lead to approximately 40% of all CO2 emissions in the EU. Thus, any strategy to address climate change needs to consider ways in which to reduce the effect of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power generation. One way forward is the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS). This technology, which is expected to be commercially feasible in 10-15 years, will enable CCS to stand on its own feet in an Emission Trading Scheme.
This Communication complements a Commission proposal for a Directive on Geological Storage of CO2. Its purpose is to set out a strategy for the realisation of CCS and to set out a vision on how to effectively coordinate and support large-scale CCS demonstrations as well as creating the conditions for bold industrial investments in a series of plants.
The investment needed to bring CCS to market is substantial. Around EUR 1 billion will have to be spent between now and 2020 on R&D activities to bring CCS technologies to a state in which they can be commercially deployed. In addition, early demonstrations of CCS in industrial-scale power plants will require further spending to the tune of billions of Euros. For example, several hundred million Euros per plant will have to be invested in large-scale projects that include capture, transportation and storage. This is significantly more than for standards plants.
The first step to enabling CCS power generation can be taken without substantial additional costs. The Commission’s proposal for a CCS Directive will crate a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure the safety of CCS deployment. In response to these developments the EU is putting a structure in place that seeks to stimulate the demonstration of CCS in power plants. This is the SET-Plan, which creates a framework in which CCS can develop. The plan identifies CCS as one of the strategic energy technologies and sets the time horizon of 2020 for making its use in power generation a realistic option. A coherent and coordinated EU-level action could add value and enhance overall impact, whilst respecting the autonomy of national initiatives.
The SET-Plan proposes to examine avenues for raising additional funds. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is currently analysing new products for financing CCS in addition to the existing Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Within this context the Commission is proposing to launch a European Industrial Initiative on CO2 capture, transport and storage starting in 2008. While stimulating large-scale demonstration, this Initiative will also seek to address, in an integrated manner, the need for continuous research and for increased public awareness and acceptance.
In order to push this initiative forward, in 2008 the Commission will set up a Support Action under the 7 th Framework Programme the purpose of which will be to create and animate a network of CCS demonstration projects. In this way the Commission will provide first movers with a list of best practices. Information thus gathered will help focus policies establishing a long-term value chain for CO2 and will give coherent and effective interaction of participating projects with related R&D undertaken across the EU.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)400
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0545/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0418/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0418/2008
- Committee opinion: PE409.643
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE412.213
- Committee draft report: PE409.473
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0013
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0047
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0048
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2008)0013
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0013 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0047 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0048 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE409.473
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE412.213
- Committee opinion: PE409.643
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0418/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)400
Votes
Rapport Ehler A6-0418/2008 - résolution #
DE | IT | FR | PL | GB | ES | HU | CZ | RO | BG | EL | NL | PT | IE | SK | LT | BE | AT | DK | SI | EE | SE | FI | MT | LU | CY | LV | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
76
|
53
|
55
|
34
|
49
|
28
|
20
|
20
|
19
|
17
|
20
|
23
|
16
|
12
|
11
|
10
|
16
|
14
|
14
|
5
|
6
|
17
|
10
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
|
PPE-DE |
200
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (38)Albert DESS, Alexander RADWAN, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christian EHLER, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Gabriele STAUNER, Georg JARZEMBOWSKI, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Michael GAHLER, Peter LIESE, Reimer BÖGE, Roland GEWALT, Rolf BEREND, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
|
France PPE-DEFor (15) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (15) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (10) |
Romania PPE-DEFor (8) |
Bulgaria PPE-DE |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (7) |
Portugal PPE-DE |
5
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (7) |
2
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Sweden PPE-DE |
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|||||
PSE |
153
|
France PSEFor (19)André LAIGNEL, Anne FERREIRA, Brigitte DOUAY, Catherine BOURSIER, Catherine GUY-QUINT, Catherine NERIS, Catherine TRAUTMANN, Françoise CASTEX, Guy BONO, Harlem DÉSIR, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Martine ROURE, Michel ROCARD, Pervenche BERÈS, Pierre PRIBETICH, Roselyne LEFRANÇOIS, Stéphane LE FOLL, Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Poland PSEFor (6) |
United Kingdom PSEFor (13) |
Spain PSEFor (16)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ, Enrique BARÓN CRESPO, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Josep BORRELL FONTELLES, Juan FRAILE CANTÓN, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA, María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Hungary PSEFor (6) |
2
|
Romania PSEFor (6) |
4
|
Greece PSEFor (7) |
Netherlands PSEFor (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
Belgium PSE |
5
|
Denmark PSE |
1
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||
ALDE |
75
|
Germany ALDEFor (6) |
Italy ALDEFor (8) |
9
|
2
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (8) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
Bulgaria ALDEFor (5) |
3
|
1
|
Lithuania ALDEFor (5) |
4
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Finland ALDE |
1
|
|||||||
UEN |
28
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
22
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
15
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
30
|
4
|
Italy GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
Czechia GUE/NGLFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
37
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
2
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (4) |
2
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Amendments | Dossier |
44 |
2008/2140(INI)
2008/09/16
ITRE
44 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, in
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas delays in constructing demonstration facilities cast into doubt the
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas CCS is a transitional technology and as such must not be viewed as the mainstay of the fight against climate change,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises th
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to ensure that national debates are held, and all specialists in the area involved, in conveying the importance of the early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, and in the process of selecting, presenting and promoting the best demonstration projects;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the view that construction of
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas according to current scientific and technological findings, and without massive R&D investment, the use of fossil fuels within the EU will continue to be necessary for many
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the view that construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the view that construction
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the view that construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that CCS technologies
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that, in the light of the role played by fossil fuels, and particularly coal, in the energy mix of some Member States, CCS technologies have a
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that CCS technologies could potentially have a substantive contribution to make in achieving security of supply and climate protection, not only in Europe but also worldwide;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Takes the view that the measures proposed by the Commission should be sufficient to support R&D in CCS technologies development; considers that as far as the 12 demonstration projects are concerned, complementary public funding should only be made available if companies make serious investments, especially given their windfall from the current emissions trading scheme in the Community; also considers that in the case of public financing, this should further be accompanied by an agreement to share intellectual property rights in the technology;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to produce a detailed assessment of the cost of, and the share of private and public funding in, each of the 12 demonstration projects;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas according to current scientific
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that a direct financial commitment
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that investment decisions and capital acquisition for demonstration projects on financial markets
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that investment decisions and capital acquisition for demonstration projects on financial markets are made
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Proposes in this connection that
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Proposes
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers furthermore that, in connection with the emission trading scheme, incentives should be increased by allocating allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increased volume of at least 25% from 2013, but at least two years before construction so that they can be traded; believes too that serious consideration should also be given to using, as a leading instrument for the financing of demonstration plants, proceeds from auctions for the allocation of emissions allowances, in return for payment, under that trading scheme;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration projects earmarked for assistance should cover possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges that energy production projects planned to have a minimum energy output of 200 MW resulting from the use of both conventional methods and the high- efficiency IGCC (Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle) technology should be included in the selection;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges that projects planned to have a minimum output of
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regards a
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regards a European commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure, too, as necessary and points to the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures which last years;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to present an EU-wide study on the projected distances and transport means between capture and storage points, as well as relevant projected costs;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Regards using structural fund resources for CCS demonstration facilities as an option only if individual regions have not yet committed the appropriations or submitted proposals for other long-term projects, and emphasises that the acceptance of climate protection efforts will decrease if appropriations for improving economic and social cohesion have to compete with climate protection measures;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas in many Member States coal plays a
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the part played by coal in the Member States' energy mix should not expand to the detriment of sustainable energy solutions,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the widespread use
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the widespread use of CCS 'technologies is necessary in order to attain the ambitious EU climate targets going beyond 2020, and the use of these technologies must
source: PE-412.213
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
docs/0/type |
Old
Document attached to the procedureNew
Non-legislative basic document |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-409643_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.473New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.473 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.213New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.213 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html |
docs/8/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-545New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0545_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/6/62938New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|