BETA


2008/2140(INI) Supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE EHLER Christian (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ENVI HEGYI Gyula (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/03/10
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/11/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/11/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes to 66 with 20 abstentions, a resolution on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue.

The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.

CCS technologies : Parliament recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU’s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection.

Insufficient Commission measures : Parliament defends the idea that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. MEPs take the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015. They points out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level, and by uncertainties about future movements in emission trading allowance prices.

Short-term financing by the 7th Framework Research Programme : MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission. Parliament calls on the Commission to produce a detailed assessment of the cost of, and the share of private and public funding in, each of the 12 demonstration facilities.

Support via the EU emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) : MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure.

Infrastructure and transport : MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure, and notes in this regard that the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures can last for years; in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020.

Selection criteria for projects : Parliament stresses that binding and strict criteria should be set for the long-term safety and permanence of storage sites. MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW be included in the selection.

Documents
2008/11/18
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/11/17
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/10/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/10/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/10/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue.

MEPs recall that the 2005 Special Report on carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies (CCS) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which identified CCS as a promising technology for the rapid reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the potential to achieve a reduction of up to 55% by 2100.

The report recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU`s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection.

The Industry Committee endorses the view that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. It takes the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015 . MEPs point out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level.

MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission.

As regards the EU emission trading scheme (EU ETS) , MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they t consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure.

MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure . They note, in this regard, the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures which can last for years, and in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020.

Lastly, MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW,be included in the selection.

2008/10/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/09/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/06/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/06/03
   EP - HEGYI Gyula (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2008/05/27
   EP - EHLER Christian (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2008/05/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/05/22
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2008/01/23
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to support early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels.

CONTENT: the EU has set itself ambitious targets to reduce green house gas emissions. Emissions from the energy sector – primarily coal and gas, lead to approximately 40% of all CO2 emissions in the EU. Thus, any strategy to address climate change needs to consider ways in which to reduce the effect of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power generation. One way forward is the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS). This technology, which is expected to be commercially feasible in 10-15 years, will enable CCS to stand on its own feet in an Emission Trading Scheme.

This Communication complements a Commission proposal for a Directive on Geological Storage of CO2. Its purpose is to set out a strategy for the realisation of CCS and to set out a vision on how to effectively coordinate and support large-scale CCS demonstrations as well as creating the conditions for bold industrial investments in a series of plants.

The investment needed to bring CCS to market is substantial. Around EUR 1 billion will have to be spent between now and 2020 on R&D activities to bring CCS technologies to a state in which they can be commercially deployed. In addition, early demonstrations of CCS in industrial-scale power plants will require further spending to the tune of billions of Euros. For example, several hundred million Euros per plant will have to be invested in large-scale projects that include capture, transportation and storage. This is significantly more than for standards plants.

The first step to enabling CCS power generation can be taken without substantial additional costs. The Commission’s proposal for a CCS Directive will crate a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure the safety of CCS deployment. In response to these developments the EU is putting a structure in place that seeks to stimulate the demonstration of CCS in power plants. This is the SET-Plan, which creates a framework in which CCS can develop. The plan identifies CCS as one of the strategic energy technologies and sets the time horizon of 2020 for making its use in power generation a realistic option. A coherent and coordinated EU-level action could add value and enhance overall impact, whilst respecting the autonomy of national initiatives.

The SET-Plan proposes to examine avenues for raising additional funds. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is currently analysing new products for financing CCS in addition to the existing Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)

Within this context the Commission is proposing to launch a European Industrial Initiative on CO2 capture, transport and storage starting in 2008. While stimulating large-scale demonstration, this Initiative will also seek to address, in an integrated manner, the need for continuous research and for increased public awareness and acceptance.

In order to push this initiative forward, in 2008 the Commission will set up a Support Action under the 7 th Framework Programme the purpose of which will be to create and animate a network of CCS demonstration projects. In this way the Commission will provide first movers with a list of best practices. Information thus gathered will help focus policies establishing a long-term value chain for CO2 and will give coherent and effective interaction of participating projects with related R&D undertaken across the EU.

2008/01/23
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/01/23
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/01/22
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to support early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels.

CONTENT: the EU has set itself ambitious targets to reduce green house gas emissions. Emissions from the energy sector – primarily coal and gas, lead to approximately 40% of all CO2 emissions in the EU. Thus, any strategy to address climate change needs to consider ways in which to reduce the effect of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power generation. One way forward is the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS). This technology, which is expected to be commercially feasible in 10-15 years, will enable CCS to stand on its own feet in an Emission Trading Scheme.

This Communication complements a Commission proposal for a Directive on Geological Storage of CO2. Its purpose is to set out a strategy for the realisation of CCS and to set out a vision on how to effectively coordinate and support large-scale CCS demonstrations as well as creating the conditions for bold industrial investments in a series of plants.

The investment needed to bring CCS to market is substantial. Around EUR 1 billion will have to be spent between now and 2020 on R&D activities to bring CCS technologies to a state in which they can be commercially deployed. In addition, early demonstrations of CCS in industrial-scale power plants will require further spending to the tune of billions of Euros. For example, several hundred million Euros per plant will have to be invested in large-scale projects that include capture, transportation and storage. This is significantly more than for standards plants.

The first step to enabling CCS power generation can be taken without substantial additional costs. The Commission’s proposal for a CCS Directive will crate a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure the safety of CCS deployment. In response to these developments the EU is putting a structure in place that seeks to stimulate the demonstration of CCS in power plants. This is the SET-Plan, which creates a framework in which CCS can develop. The plan identifies CCS as one of the strategic energy technologies and sets the time horizon of 2020 for making its use in power generation a realistic option. A coherent and coordinated EU-level action could add value and enhance overall impact, whilst respecting the autonomy of national initiatives.

The SET-Plan proposes to examine avenues for raising additional funds. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is currently analysing new products for financing CCS in addition to the existing Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)

Within this context the Commission is proposing to launch a European Industrial Initiative on CO2 capture, transport and storage starting in 2008. While stimulating large-scale demonstration, this Initiative will also seek to address, in an integrated manner, the need for continuous research and for increased public awareness and acceptance.

In order to push this initiative forward, in 2008 the Commission will set up a Support Action under the 7 th Framework Programme the purpose of which will be to create and animate a network of CCS demonstration projects. In this way the Commission will provide first movers with a list of best practices. Information thus gathered will help focus policies establishing a long-term value chain for CO2 and will give coherent and effective interaction of participating projects with related R&D undertaken across the EU.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Ehler A6-0418/2008 - résolution #

2008/11/18 Outcome: +: 474, -: 66, 0: 20
DE IT FR PL GB ES HU CZ RO BG EL NL PT IE SK LT BE AT DK SI EE SE FI MT LU CY LV
Total
76
53
55
34
49
28
20
20
19
17
20
23
16
12
11
10
16
14
14
5
6
17
10
3
5
5
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
200
2

Belgium PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
153

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Spain ALDE

1
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
28

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

France NI

3

United Kingdom NI

4

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

France IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
44 2008/2140(INI)
2008/09/16 ITRE 44 amendments...
source: PE-412.213

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
docs/0/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Non-legislative basic document
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-409643_EN.html
docs/6
date
2008-10-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.289
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/0
date
2008-01-22T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.473
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.473
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.213
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.213
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2008-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html title: A6-0418/2008
events/4
date
2008-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html title: A6-0418/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE
events/7
date
2008-11-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0545_EN.html title: T6-0545/2008
summary
events/7
date
2008-11-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0545_EN.html title: T6-0545/2008
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-05-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: HEGYI Gyula date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HEGYI Gyula group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html
docs/8/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0418_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-545
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0545_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0013 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52008DC0013:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
  • date: 2008-10-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0418/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16236&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-545 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0545/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-05-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EHLER Christian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HEGYI Gyula group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2008-05-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
docs
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0013 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=13 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to support early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels. CONTENT: the EU has set itself ambitious targets to reduce green house gas emissions. Emissions from the energy sector – primarily coal and gas, lead to approximately 40% of all CO2 emissions in the EU. Thus, any strategy to address climate change needs to consider ways in which to reduce the effect of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power generation. One way forward is the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS). This technology, which is expected to be commercially feasible in 10-15 years, will enable CCS to stand on its own feet in an Emission Trading Scheme. This Communication complements a Commission proposal for a Directive on Geological Storage of CO2. Its purpose is to set out a strategy for the realisation of CCS and to set out a vision on how to effectively coordinate and support large-scale CCS demonstrations as well as creating the conditions for bold industrial investments in a series of plants. The investment needed to bring CCS to market is substantial. Around EUR 1 billion will have to be spent between now and 2020 on R&D activities to bring CCS technologies to a state in which they can be commercially deployed. In addition, early demonstrations of CCS in industrial-scale power plants will require further spending to the tune of billions of Euros. For example, several hundred million Euros per plant will have to be invested in large-scale projects that include capture, transportation and storage. This is significantly more than for standards plants. The first step to enabling CCS power generation can be taken without substantial additional costs. The Commission’s proposal for a CCS Directive will crate a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure the safety of CCS deployment. In response to these developments the EU is putting a structure in place that seeks to stimulate the demonstration of CCS in power plants. This is the SET-Plan, which creates a framework in which CCS can develop. The plan identifies CCS as one of the strategic energy technologies and sets the time horizon of 2020 for making its use in power generation a realistic option. A coherent and coordinated EU-level action could add value and enhance overall impact, whilst respecting the autonomy of national initiatives. The SET-Plan proposes to examine avenues for raising additional funds. The European Investment Bank (EIB) is currently analysing new products for financing CCS in addition to the existing Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Within this context the Commission is proposing to launch a European Industrial Initiative on CO2 capture, transport and storage starting in 2008. While stimulating large-scale demonstration, this Initiative will also seek to address, in an integrated manner, the need for continuous research and for increased public awareness and acceptance. In order to push this initiative forward, in 2008 the Commission will set up a Support Action under the 7 th Framework Programme the purpose of which will be to create and animate a network of CCS demonstration projects. In this way the Commission will provide first movers with a list of best practices. Information thus gathered will help focus policies establishing a long-term value chain for CO2 and will give coherent and effective interaction of participating projects with related R&D undertaken across the EU. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0047/COM_SEC(2008)0047_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)0047 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=47 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0048/COM_SEC(2008)0048_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)0048 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=48 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.473 title: PE409.473 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-09-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.213 title: PE412.213 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.643&secondRef=02 title: PE409.643 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-14T00:00:00 docs: title: PE414.289 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN title: A6-0418/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16236&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)400 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0013 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=13 title: EUR-Lex
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report drafted by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue. MEPs recall that the 2005 Special Report on carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies (CCS) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which identified CCS as a promising technology for the rapid reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the potential to achieve a reduction of up to 55% by 2100. The report recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU`s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection. The Industry Committee endorses the view that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. It takes the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015 . MEPs point out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level. MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission. As regards the EU emission trading scheme (EU ETS) , MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they t consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure. MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure . They note, in this regard, the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures which can last for years, and in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020. Lastly, MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW,be included in the selection.
  • date: 2008-10-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN title: A6-0418/2008
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16236&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-545 title: T6-0545/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes to 66 with 20 abstentions, a resolution on supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same issue. The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration by Christian EHLER (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. CCS technologies : Parliament recognises that the use of CCS technologies can contribute to attaining the EU’s stated climate targets after 2020. Given the role played by fossil fuels in the energy mix of many countries worldwide, MEPs believe that these technologies in the EU could, in addition to the efforts being made to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies, contribute to achieving security of supply and climate protection. Insufficient Commission measures : Parliament defends the idea that the construction of at least 12 demonstration facilities within the EU is necessary in order to achieve the desired use of CCS technologies in power stations and to secure CO2 storage from 2020. MEPs take the view that the measures unveiled by the Commission are not sufficient to provide the desired incentives for constructing at least 12 demonstration facilities by 2015. They points out that investment decisions and capital acquisition on financial markets for demonstration facilities are made more difficult by the absence of a legislative framework, in particular at national and regional level, and by uncertainties about future movements in emission trading allowance prices. Short-term financing by the 7th Framework Research Programme : MEPs take the view that the time delay between the potential support from emissions trading from 2013, and the necessary planning and construction phase of demonstration facilities, can be overcome by making financial resources available. They propose in this connection that the risk sharing finance facility resources held back after the adoption of the Seventh Framework Research Programme until the mid-term review, should be committed for CCS demonstration facilities so as to make resources available promptly to support these projects and, if possible, to supplement them with other funds in cooperation with the European Investment Bank, as envisaged by the Commission. Parliament calls on the Commission to produce a detailed assessment of the cost of, and the share of private and public funding in, each of the 12 demonstration facilities. Support via the EU emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) : MEPs consider that incentives for CCS technology production should be increased, by allocating, within the EU ETS, allowances for anticipated CCS technology production with an increase of at least 25 % from 2013. However, they consider that such allowances should be allocated at least two years prior to construction so that they can be traded and consider alternatively, that an allocation of 500 million emission trading allowances for the support of the projects within the EU should be envisaged. They encourage the Member States to use proceeds from auctioning emission allowances in the framework of the EU ETS to support CCS technologies and the necessary infrastructure. Infrastructure and transport : MEPs regard as necessary an additional EU commitment on facilitating development of the necessary transport infrastructure, and notes in this regard that the authorisation procedures in individual Member States for other transport infrastructures can last for years; in this connection points to the importance of shortening such procedures to ensure construction by 2020. Selection criteria for projects : Parliament stresses that binding and strict criteria should be set for the long-term safety and permanence of storage sites. MEPs considers it imperative that at least the 12 demonstration facilities earmarked for assistance should cover all possible combinations of the three CCS technologies with the various energy sources and storage options and for these facilities to be sited with a view to maximum geographical spread across the European Union. The report recommends that power station projects with a proposed minimum output of 180 MW be included in the selection.
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/6/62938
New
  • ITRE/6/62938
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60 Energy policy
  • 3.60.01 Solid fuels, coal mining, mining industry
  • 3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels
  • 3.60.03 Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
  • 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
  • 3.70.20 Sustainable development
New
3.60
Energy policy
3.60.01
Solid fuels, coal mining, mining industry
3.60.02
Oil industry, motor fuels
3.60.03
Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
3.70.02
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
3.70.20
Sustainable development
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0013/COM_COM(2008)0013_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008DC0013:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2008)0013 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
  • date: 2008-10-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-418&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0418/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16236&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-545 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0545/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HEGYI Gyula
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EHLER Christian
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/6/62938
reference
2008/2140(INI)
title
Supporting early demonstration of sustainable power generation from fossil fuels
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject