Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | MALDEIKIS Eugenijus ( UEN) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | MAURO Mario ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | JELEVA Rumiana ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | CONT |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 156, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 175-p1
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 156, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 175-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) and the European Energy Efficiency Fund (EEEF).
This report sets out, for each part of the EEPR, the progress made in implementing the projects and the European Energy Efficiency Fund (EEEF).
It follows the report adopted in 2016. It covers the implementation of the projects between 31 August 2016 and 30 June 2017 and the payments made during that period.
Implementation of projects : the EEPR has delivered good results. The majority of projects (37 out of 59) were completed at the end of June 2017, particularly regarding gas and electricity infrastructures. A total amount of EUR 2 279 701 215 was paid to the beneficiaries. The strict control exercised by the European Commission in project implementation and monitoring has helped to increase the efficiency of the instrument.
Gas and electricity infrastructures : the EEPR infrastructure sub-programme supports 44 projects in three major areas of activities: (i) gas infrastructure and storage projects; (ii) gas reverse flow projects; (iii) electricity infrastructure projects.
To date, 35 out of the 44 infrastructure projects have been completed , four projects are ongoing and one is in under discussion.
- In the electricity sector , 10 out of 12 projects have been completed. The 2 remaining projects are progressing well and are expected to be completed by the end 2017.
- In the gas sector , 25 out of 32 projects have been completed; two are progressing according to schedule, one is currently under discussion and four have been terminated.
All of the reverse flow and interconnections projects in Central and Eastern Europe have been completed.
Important progress has been made for electricity and gas infrastructure projects since the last 2016 EEPR implementation report. For instance, the reinforcement of French gas network on the Africa-Spain-France axis is on track.
The EEPR funds have secured the development of the project notably on the Eastern axis by encouraging the beneficiaries to take their investment decision. The Bulgarian – Romanian interconnection has been implemented successfully end 2016.
The Nordbalt 1 project consisted of the construction of the Swedish - Lithuanian electricity transmission systems' interconnection by a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) submarine cable with a capacity of 700 MW. The project aims at further removing the Baltic States isolation from the internal energy market. All works have been completed.
To date, it is foreseen that out of the 5 on-going projects, 3 should be completed in 2017, with 1 in 2018 and one under discussion .
Offshore wind energy (OWE) : this EEPR sub-programme consisted of nine projects and gave EUR 565 million of support. Four of nine projects have been completed and 2 terminated prematurely. EUR 255 744 668 has been paid to the projects. The three remaining projects are on-going.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) : this EEPR sub-programme consisted of 6 projects and EUR 1 billion of support to aim at demonstrating the full carbon capture, transport and storage process. One project was finished providing operational pilot plants for capture, transport and storage. Three projects have been terminated prematurely due to the decision of the project promoter not to invest, one project ended without completion and ROAD was the last remaining project.
In November 2016, the Commission and the ROAD project promoters agreed an extension of the grant agreement until 31 December 2019 following progress in discussions on additional sources of funding, restructuring of the project and change to a less costly storage site. However, in June 2017 the project promoters informed the Commission that the joint venture partners Engie and Uniper decided to stop their financial support for the project and later on confirmed that they withdraw the request for the grant agreement. Consequently the grant agreement is in the process of being terminated.
The Commission concluded that although the financial support of EEPR was not sufficient to prompt companies to realise commercial-scale CCS demonstration projects, the Commission still considers CCS important for decarbonisation. Future CCS demonstration efforts in Europe are expected to focus on energy- and carbon intensive industries.
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) and the European Energy Efficiency Fund (EEEF).
All EEPR projects were adopted in 2010. The report covers the implementation of the projects between 31 August 2015 and 30 June 2016 and the payments made during that period.
Implementation of projects : the EEPR delivered good results . The majority of projects (37 out of 59) were completed by the end of June 2016, and a total amount of EUR 2 122 297.449 was paid to the beneficiaries. The strict control exercised by the European Commission in project implementation and monitoring has helped to increase the efficiency of the instrument.
Gas and electricity infrastructures : the EEPR infrastructure sub-programme supports 44 projects in three major areas of activities: (i) gas infrastructure and storage projects; (ii) gas reverse flow projects; (iii) electricity infrastructure projects.
To date, 33 out of the 44 infrastructure projects have been completed with six projects ongoing and one suspended.
Important progress has been made since the last 2015 EEPR implementation report. For instance the project Halle/Saale – Schweinfurt link the North-Eastern part to the South-Eastern part of Germany, is almost completed; the France-Spain interconnection (Baixas – Santa Llogaia) was inaugurated in February 2015; the interconnection between Sicily and mainland Italy (Sorgente – Rizziconi) is completed; the Nordbalt 01 project (subsea interconnection between Lithuania to Sweden) has progressed well and was inaugurated in December 2015.
Offshore wind energy (OWE) : this EEPR sub-programme consisted of nine projects and gave EUR 565 million of support. Three of nine projects were completed and 2 terminated prematurely. EUR 221 985 224 was paid to the projects.
Despite the fact that Off-Shore Wind projects appeared to be more complex than expected, the promoters and the constructors have managed to find solutions and the technological knowledge has been gained over the five years.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) : this EEPR sub-programme consisted of 6 projects and EUR 1 billion of support to aim at demonstrating the full carbon capture, transport and storage process.
The Commission remains committed to demonstrating CCS despite the challenges in finding the necessary complementary funding which has led to the termination of some EEPR projects.
The Commission is in the final phase of negotiating with the ROAD project which would be the first project in Europe demonstrating the application of post-combustion CCS technology to a commercial scale coal power plant.
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR).
This report sets out, for each part of the EEPR, the progress made in implementing the projects and the EEE F. It follows on from the report which was adopted in 2013, covers the implementation of the projects between October 2013 and 31 August 2014 and the payments made between 1 July 2013 and 31 August 2014.
Energy infrastructure and innovation, the driving forces behind the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR), remain as important now as they were in 2009 when the EEPR was set up.
In its recent Communication on the European Energy Security Strategy , adopted on 28 May 2014, the Commission has reaffirmed the importance of developing critical infrastructure in view of reinforcing our energy security.
Main findings : according to the Commission, the EEPR has delivered good results . At the end of 2013, 30 projects out of 61 were already fully technically completed, and a total amount of EUR 1 499 826 548 has been actually paid to the beneficiaries).
Substantial progress has been made for electricity and gas infrastructure projects . A large majority of the projects (40 out of 44) are either completed or progressing.
The EEPR is concretely improving the way the internal market works, by providing interconnections between Western and Eastern parts of the EU , and increasing the security of supply of the country and regions concerned.
To date, it is foreseen that the majority of the 13 still on-going projects should be completed during the years 2014 and 2015 whilst only a few projects will run until 2017.
Offshore wind energy (OWE) projects : the EEPR sub-programme consisted of 9 projects giving EUR 565 million of support split between two main types of activities. 3 of these projects have been completed and 1 terminated prematurely. EUR 226 981 500 has been paid to the projects.
Difficulties with obtaining planning consents (Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm), difficulties are regards the cost of technology components (Kriegers Flak), the introductions of new regulatory elements at national level (for instance, Cobra Cable) and significant difficulties in obtaining the necessary funding for both construction and operation have all contributed to the delays concerning these projects.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) : the most problematic area is CCS . As already identified in previous reports, this reflects many different factors, the most important of which is the changed business case for the technology since the start of the EEPR programme. The difficulties for the public authorities both at government and regulatory level to offer a proper regulatory framework, the lack of public acceptance, as well as difficulties linked to environmental issues and public procurement have all constituted additional challenges for the projects promoters.
The EEPR sub-programme consisted of 6 projects giving EUR 1 billion of support to projects that would aim at demonstrating the full carbon capture, transport and storage process.
As of 30 April 2014: 1 project has finished providing operational pilot plants for capture, transport and storage. 3 projects have been terminated prematurely. 2 projects are ongoing. EUR 374 871 355 have been paid to these projects.
The Commission continues to make every political effort to further the development of the remaining two projects; nevertheless, their success will depend on the efforts of private investors and national governments.
European Energy Efficiency Fund (EEE F) : the Fund has been successful: a commercial fund was established that will continue to grow providing financing solutions and generating profits covering administrative expenses, shareholders’ dividend and repayment of establishment costs.
In total, the Fund has allocated EUR 219 million to 13 projects , mostly in the energy efficiency sector. The full EU contribution to the Fund (EUR 125 million) has thus been successfully allocated to project investments by 31 March 2014 as required by the Regulation.
The important role of the EEPR projects : the report noted that while implementation of the programme has been slower than expected in some areas, this has generally been due to reasons beyond the Commission's direct control.
Nevertheless, notwithstanding these delays, the value of large-scale infrastructure, innovative technologies and innovative EU funding in achieving the EU's security of supply, internal market and climate change objectives remains high.
This has been underlined by the Council and the European Parliament when they increased the EU funds for energy infrastructure and innovation in CEF, Horizon 2020 and the Structural Funds under the new financial framework. The completion of the remaining EEPR projects will complement these programmes, as well as provided valuable experience on which to build as they are being rolled out.
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of The European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR). The Programme provides financial support to selected, highly strategic, projects in three areas of the energy sector: gas and electricity connections, offshore wind energy and carbon capture and storage.
The report notes that most of the budget available was allocated to 59 promoters and 61 projects in the following sub-programmes: gas infrastructure (EUR 1363 million); electricity infrastructure (EUR 904 million); offshore wind energy (EUR 565 million); and carbon capture and storage (EUR 1000 million).
The report provides information on the state of play since the last report (August 2012) as well as data related to the payments and the de-commitments as from the start of the programme up to June 2013. It also provides an overview of the current state of play and of the mid-term evaluation of the EEE-Fund.
Progress achieved : since the 2012 report, the implementation of the EEPR has continued progressing. A substantial number of projects are now completed and others are well on track and will be operational soon.
At the end of 2012, 20 projects out of 61 were already fully technically completed , and a total amount of EUR 1,416,970,178.64 has been actually paid to the beneficiaries (June 2013).
The rate of payments remains low but this confirms the difficulties in the planning of such big and complex projects (complexity of the technologies involved, the difficulties for the public authorities both at government and regulatory level regards offering a proper regulatory framework, the lack of public acceptance, as well as difficulties linked to environmental issues and public procurement). Furthermore, the permit granting procedure forms the basis for many of the delays.
Gas and Electricity Infrastructure : substantial progress has been made. To date 19 projects out of the 44 are completed, as compared to 13 at the beginning of 2012. In the electricity sector , 4 projects are completed. The remaining 8 projects are progressing well, with some projects expected to be completed by 2014. In the gas sector , 15 projects are completed; 13 are progressing according to schedule. Most (10 out of 15 projects) of the reverse flow and interconnections projects in Central and Eastern Europe have been completed.
The Commission states that the EEPR is concretely improving the way the internal market works, by providing interconnections between Western and Eastern parts of the EU, and increasing the security of supply of the country and regions concerned. Some remarkable steps forward are being taken: the reverse flow gas projects are up and running and avoided a gas supply crisis during the recent February 2012 cold spell.
The completion of an EU-wide energy infrastructure system is progressing thanks to the clearing of bottlenecks and the progressive integration of "energy islands" such as the three Baltic States, the Iberian Peninsula, Ireland, Sicily and Malta.
To date, it is envisaged that the majority of the 25 on-going projects will be completed during the years 2013/2014 whilst only a few projects will run until 2017. The remaining projects, those undergoing serious difficulties, may be terminated by the end of 2013.
Off shore wind energy (owe) projects : out of the 9 projects, 1 has been successfully completed (Thornton Bank in Belgium). Some others could last until 2016/2017 (gravity foundations), and 2017/2018 (Aberdeen, Krieger Flak in the Baltic sea region), 2019 (Cobra Cable - link between Denmark and the Netherlands) and will require the Commission's close monitoring.
The report notes that through the EEPR grants, the installation of the first large size (400 MW) offshore wind farms far from shore (more than 100 km) and located in deep waters (more than 40 m) has been secured. The EEPR support to "turbines and structures" projects results directly in an additional 1500 MW of carbon-free electricity production capacity.
For the wind-grid integration projects, the maturity and cost of the HVDC technology, the licensing of the wind farms to be connected as well as the co-financing to be obtained through the regulatory authorities, are the crucial hurdles to be addressed before the FID can be taken.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) : despite the good progress achieved so far as regards preparatory work for implementing CO 2 capture, transport and storage solutions, the actual implementation of most CCS projects remains uncertain . Public acceptance for CO 2 onshore storage remains a significant hindrance. The EEPR funding alone provides a kick start for projects but is not sufficient to cover all additional costs for applying CCS in power plants.
The Communication of 27 March 2013 on the Future of Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe aims to re-start the CCS agenda and to initiate a debate on how best to encourage demonstration and deployment and to stimulate investment. Based on the contributions received, the full analysis of the transposition and implementation of the CCS Directive in the Member States, and in the context of its work on the 2030 Climate and Energy framework, the Commission will consider the need to prepare proposals, if appropriate, for the short, medium and long-term.
For the immediate future, the second call for proposals, launched on 3 April, in the framework of the NER 300 programme , is a second chance to improve the current prospects for CCS demonstration in Europe.
European Energy Efficiency Funds (EEE F) : the mid-term evaluation shows some fair first results and a reasonably promising outlook for the Fund. So far, 6 projects have been approved and signed leading to a total of around EUR 79.2 million allocated.
At present, the Commission considers that an increase of the EU financial contribution does not seem justified. However, once this amount is spent and the Fund will have reached its maturity level and proved its attractiveness to the market, additional contributions could be considered provided there is a large increase in leverage.
The Commission presents a report on the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) established by Regulation (EC) No 663/2009. The EEPR provides financial support to selected highly strategic projects in the energy sector. To recall, the year 2010 was devoted mainly to setting the EEPR in motion. Most of the budget available was allocated to 59 projects in the following sub-programmes:
· gas infrastructure (EUR 1363 million);
· electricity infrastructure (EUR 904 million);
· offshore wind energy (EUR 565 million); and
· carbon capture and storage (EUR 1000 million).
The report states that overall, by the end of 2010, grant decisions and grant agreements had been made for a total amount of EUR 3833 million i.e. 96.3% of the total EEPR budget. An amount of EUR 146 million that could not be committed to projects in these sectors by the deadline of 31 December 2010 was reallocated to a new financial facility, the European Energy Efficiency Fund (Regulation (EC) No 1233/2010), focusing on energy efficiency and renewable energy investments.
This annual report focuses on the state of play of the programme implementation. An independent mid-term evaluation carried out in 2011 states that the programme, by setting in motion construction works and procurements of equipment and intermediate manufactured goods, is already generating a meaningful impact on the real economy.
The actual implementation of the projects had started in 2010 but it is only in 2011 that it gained momentum. In some cases project implementation is challenging and is advancing slower than initially planned. The economic and regulatory context is particularly challenging for the Carbon Capture and Storage sub-programme, which is at a crossroad.
The report outlines problems common to all three programmes.
Complex and lengthy permit granting procedures : the ensuing regulatory uncertainty has led to delays in the final investment decisions. The Commission proposal on the energy infrastructure guidelines is expected to bring about major improvements.
Financing: as a consequence of the credit crisis and the regulatory measures, which followed (Basel III, Solvency II), it has become increasingly difficult for infrastructure projects to access long term financing. This coincides with the unprecedented investment volumes expected as many Transmission System Operators (TSOs) will need to step up their investment plans even threefold. The Commission proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) , a cross-sector infrastructure fund, is designed to help projects put together the necessary financing package.
The report discusses the sub-programmes in detail.
1. Gas and electricity infrastructure : during the second year of implementation, good progress has been demonstrated for electricity and gas infrastructure projects , notably for the reverse flow gas projects , with 13 projects completed and in operation. A large majority of the projects, 31 out of 44, are either completed or progressing according to plan.
Overall, the EEPR is concretely improving the way the internal market works, by providing interconnections between western and eastern parts of the EU, and increasing the security of supply of the country and regions concerned. Some remarkable steps forward are being taken : the reverse flow gas projects are up and running and avoided a gas supply crisis in the recent February 2012 cold spell. The strong EEPR support to the Southern Gas Corridor projects has been instrumental in the negotiations with supply countries, which are intensifying. The electricity projects supported are lending strong impetus to completion of the internal market and bringing major improvements to the security of supply of the countries and regions concerned. The completion of an EU- wide energy infrastructure system is progressing thanks to the clearing of bottlenecks and the progressive integration of "energy islands" such as the three Baltic States, the Iberian Peninsula, Ireland, Sicily and Malta.
To date, it is estimated that the majority of the 31 on-going projects should be completed during the years 2012-13 whilst only a few projects will run until 2017 given the technical, regulatory and commercial challenges they face.
2. Offshore wind energy : the EEPR support to " turbines and structures " projects will result directly in an additional 1500 MW of carbon-free electricity production capacity and some projects are already delivering part of this result. The EEPR projects are also generating important learning effects, for instance shortening of production time of offshore foundations and decreases in the installation time of foundations.
In some cases project implementation is challenging and is advancing slowly . Timely implementation of the EEPR actions depends heavily on swift progress in permitting procedures. Other framework conditions are also crucial such as the guarantees for offshore wind farms to obtain a grid connection.
For the wind-grid integration projects , the licensing of the wind farms to be connected as well as the co-financing to be obtained through the regulatory authorities are the crucial hurdles to be addressed before the final investment decisions can be taken.
3. Carbon capture and storage : good progress was achieved in finalising detailed technical studies for capture units and, to a lesser extent, validation of storage sites.
However, after its second year of implementation the CCS sub-programme is at a crossroads: one project has been cancelled and none of the remaining five has yet adopted the final investment decision. There are several reasons for the delays: (i) all permits have not yet been secured; (ii) characterisation of the storage sites has not been finalised; (iii) financial structure has yet to be completed.
As a result, most plants are likely to postpone operation to 2016 or 2017. CCS is a novel activity that, in addition to validating technical and economic aspects, needs to comply with new regulatory frameworks (e.g. for CO2 storage). Industry and Member States will need to intensify their efforts if the delays relating to regulatory and financial aspects are to be mitigated for these projects.
4. European Energy Efficiency Fund: lastly, the report gives a brief account of the European Energy Efficiency Fund , established by Regulation (EU) No 1233/2010, which is in an early stage of implementation as it has been operational only since July 2011. Very intense activities have been carried out during the first months of operations to launch it and to start to identify projects with a potential for being supported by the Fund.
The report notes that municipalities, ESCOs and other entities acting on behalf of public authorities have already submitted to the fund manager a large number of proposals for projects in the fields of cogeneration, public lighting, district heating and building upgrade. The Commission will report on the progress of the Fund by June 2013.
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) established by Regulation (EC) No 663/2009, which co-finances a selected portfolio of energy projects with a view to sustaining capital expenditure in the European economy while helping to achieve key EU energy and climate policy objectives.
The report notes that since the first report on implementation of the EEPR was published in April 2010, considerable progress has been made . In all three sectors — energy infrastructure, offshore wind energy and carbon capture and storage — construction work has started and investment costs are being incurred. Three infrastructure projects have already been completed and are now operational; others are at the construction or development stage. The EEPR has proved a valuable tool at EU level that has accelerated implementation of major energy projects and played its role as a stimulus to economic recovery. Moreover, the scope of the EEPR has been expanded by allocating unspent funds to the energy efficiency and renewable energy sources sectors by means of an amendment to the EEPR Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 1233/2010), which was adopted swiftly thanks to the good cooperation between the European institutions.
Budget : by 31 December 2010, the individual legal commitments had been made for all 59 projects to which the EEPR had awarded a grant. This adds up to a combined total of EUR 3 833 million in terms of commitments, equivalent to 96.3% of the total EEPR budget. This is a very good result, considering the large size of the programme and the tight deadline. Progress on implementation is also reflected in the level of payments, which is gaining momentum. By the end of 2010, EUR 700 million had been paid to beneficiaries, in the form of EUR 361 million to gas and electricity infrastructure projects, EUR 146 million to OWE projects and EUR 193 million to CCS projects.
Gas and electricity infrastructure : implementation of the electricity and gas infrastructure part of the programme in 2010 was very satisfactory. In the course of the year, three of the infrastructure projects were completed already. These are:
pipeline linking Hungary to Romania, the first high-pressure gas interconnection between the two countries; the first of the four reverse flow projects in Austria at the Baumgarten import facility; the Hungary-Croatia link, the first direct interconnection between Croatia and the European gas network.
The EEPR has speeded up implementation of projects by financing specific action, such as technical, engineering and environmental studies, procurement of long-lead items (pipes, cables, converter stations, transformers, etc.) and construction work. Thanks to the programme, project promoters were able to secure additional funding from financial institutions more easily: loan negotiations are ongoing, or have already been finalised, for 15 projects. Moreover, EEPR support has helped a great number of projects that were facing serious environmental permit problems to receive priority from the national administrations.
Offshore wind energy (OWE): thanks to the EU support, installation of the first large (400 MW) offshore wind farms far (more than 100 km) from shore and in deep waters (more than 40 m) is secured. The EEPR grants for the offshore wind sector will directly increase carbon-free electricity production capacity by about 1500 MW. They will play a crucial role in EU Member States achieving the binding targets for renewable electricity in 2020. The grants are also fundamental for taking the first steps towards building a European offshore grid, thus increasing capacity for trading electricity in the internal market.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): all six CCS projects are progressing on schedule, including the front-end engineering and design (FEED) studies for the capture installations and exploration of CO2 storage sites. All the projects are completing the application procedures for the necessary permits and authorisations for a CCS demonstration plant in their Member State. They have already received some of the permits necessary for construction and operation of the power plant and some for the capture installations. There has also been progress in the
exploration of potential storage sites for the projects. However, some delays occurred, in part because of legal uncertainties concerning the details of CO2 storage regulation resulting from the transposition of the CCS Directive into national legislation.
A new financial facility for energy efficiency and renewable energy sources: Regulation (EU) No 1233/2010 provides for the creation of a financial facility to support energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives. This initiative fits into the Europe 2020 strategy for sustainable growth and jobs as well as the recently adopted Energy Efficiency Plan 2011 and complements other EU programmes. The EU will contribute EUR 146 million to the facility and the EIB up to EUR 75million. Other financial institutions could join the fund later.
The Commission is currently negotiating an agreement to delegate to the EIB the tasks of setting up and managing this new facility. The Delegation Agreement has to be signed by 31 March 2011 at the latest. The facility is expected to come into operation in the second quarter of 2011.
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EERP).
It recalls that the EEPR is endowed with a financial envelope of EUR 3 980 million in support of three sub-programmes. Regulation (EC) No 663/2009 allocates EUR 2 365 million to gas and electricity infrastructure projects, EUR 565 million to offshore wind electricity projects (OWE), and EUR 1 050 million to carbon capture and storage projects (CCS).
EEPR implementation - state of play : the Commission received 87 applications: 46 for gas and electricity projects, 29 for OWE and 12 for CCS. It adopted the award decisions, on 9 December 2009 for the OWE and CCS sub-programmes and on 4 March 2010 for the gas and electricity infrastructure projects.
It is currently estimated that almost the entire EEPR financial envelope will be committed in the spring of 2010. There remains an amount of around EUR115 million (less than 3% of the total) which can not be committed. This amount is not expected to change, unless one or more project promoters fail to take up the grants because of regulatory constraints and technological or market-related risks. The Commission departments are currently assessing options for the possible reallocation of unspent funds.
Gas and electricity infrastructure projects : of the 46 proposals submitted, the evaluation committee recommended 43 projects for funding and the Commission decided to award financial support of EUR 2.3 billion (31 gas and 12 electricity projects). Offshore wind energy projects : based on the recommendations of the evaluation committee, the Commission awarded EUR 565 million to the 9 highest-ranking proposals within the limits of the available budget. Carbon capture and storage projects : of the 12 proposals submitted, the Commission awarded EUR 1 billion to the six best-ranked proposals.
First assessment of results and achievements : given the short time which has elapsed since the EEPR call for proposals was launched, it is too early to assess the results of the programme. However, a first qualitative appreciation of the impact of the EEPR is possible. First of all, the success of the call for proposals must be stressed. The high number and quality of the proposals received confirms the relevance of the EEPR approach and the readiness of the industry.
From the start the EEPR appears to have been an accelerator of infrastructure investments. Indeed, the technical maturity of the selected projects meant that pre-feasibility studies, cost and market analysis and investment strategies, in some cases funded by the TEN-E programme, had already been completed before the EEPR came into the picture. However, the perspective of the EU financial support for capital expenditure has proven to be decisive in the actual launching of the projects. In particular, EEPR funding has acted as a stimulus, attracting co-financers and encouraging them to make investment commitments. Thus it has been possible to set up projects that otherwise would have been delayed or abandoned given the particularly severe funding constraints prevailing in the current economic circumstances. The EU contribution will have an important leverage effect.
In the case of gas and electricity projects, it is expected that the EUR 2.3 billion of EEPR grants will help to mobilise up to EUR 22 billion of private sector investment over the next 3 to 5 years. However, the growth enhancing effect of the EEPR grants is not limited to direct investments in the selected projects. It also spills over into the supply chain. This can already be seen in the OWE sector, where the projects contribute to creating or securing numerous jobs in new factories or production lines for the manufacturing of foundation structures and wind turbine components as well as their assembly and offshore installation. Some of this new manufacturing activity is taking place in regions where unemployment is particularly high, for example near the coastline of Cuxhaven in northern Germany. The OWE projects are the most advanced in terms of budgetary execution. As of the end of March 2010, the Commission had made pre-financing payments totalling over EUR 65 million. Further payments, totalling approximately EUR 155 million, are planned in the period April – June 2010.
CCS projects are also making good progress. The presence of the EEPR as co-financer has been decisive in giving these projects a kick-start. The demonstration effect is already being felt in the Rotterdam and Hatfield projects, which are aspiring to become CCS hubs with a potential to attract other investments for CO2 transport and storage infrastructure from other big CO2 emitters in the region. First orders for installations will be placed during 2010 and will lead to substantial capital expenditures and job creation.
Potential risks and mitigation measures : the projects supported by the EEPR may present a high degree of technical, organisational and financial complexity and therefore involve some level of risk. The Commission's individual grant decisions for gas and electricity projects will state that, before payments can be made, the beneficiaries must have:
obtained the necessary environmental and construction permits, and signed an investment decision, namely a formal commitment by the project promoters to go ahead with the project, by the end of 2010.
Should these conditions not be met, the Commission will assess the situation with a view, possibly, to cancelling the decision and de-committing the funds.
In some OWE projects, the main risk is technological. For example, one project will demonstrate offshore deployment of 6 MW turbines for the first time, while others will use innovative high voltage direct current (HVDC) technology for the grid integration of wind electricity at yet to be proven capacities. In other projects, the risks are more financial (financial close foreseen in the next few months) or administrative (possible delays with permits). The technical annexes to the grant agreements explain how the beneficiaries manage the risks involved and include plans for obtaining the necessary co-funding and permits.
As for CCS projects, implementation is progressing smoothly. There are, however, sensitive issues which need to be monitored:
continued national funding and industrial commitment will be necessary if the CCS demonstration projects are to be successfully completed by 2015; Member States need to provide the necessary legal framework for CO2 storage by transposing the CCS Directive into national law. This is to avoid delays in the delivery of CO2 storage authorisation and ultimately in the timely approval of the final investment decision; public awareness of CO2 storage safety should be properly addressed as this is critical in the implementation of the CCS projects.
The Commission, in close cooperation with Member States and/or project promoters, will ensure project management, supported by external independent experts in the monitoring of the EEPR projects and the overall assessment of the impacts of the EEPR programme.
PURPOSE: to contribute to economic recovery through the establishment of a financing instrument entitled the European Energy Programme for Recovery (the EEPR).
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 663/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy
CONTENT: t he Council adopted this Regulation, approving all the European Parliament's first reading amendments. The Regulation establishes a financing instrument entitled the European Energy Programme for Recovery (the EEPR) for the development of projects in the field of energy in the Community which, by providing a financial stimulus, contribute to economic recovery, the security of energy supply and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The Regulation is part of the European economic recovery plan endorsed by the European Council in December 2008 in response to the global financial crisis and economic slowdown.
It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of: (a) gas and electricity infrastructures; (b) offshore wind energy; and (c) carbon capture and storage .
The Regulation identifies projects to be financed under each sub-programme and lays down criteria for identifying and implementing actions to realise these projects.
The plan provides a framework for measures taken by each Member State in response to its specific circumstances, and identifies a number of actions to be taken at EU level. It lists 47 projects and the Community contribution for each of them, with a total financial envelope for implementation in 2009 and 2010 of EUR 3 980 million , divided as follows:
18 gas infrastructure projects: EUR 1 440 million; 9 electricity infrastructure projects: EUR 910 million; 2 small island projects: EUR 15 million; 5 offshore wind-energy projects: EUR 565 million; 13 carbon capture and storage projects: EUR 1050 million.
For each project, specific proposals - in particular for implementing the project on the ground - will be submitted to management committees which will check whether the proposals meet the selection criteria set in the Regulation. The award criteria include maturity, defined as reaching the investment stage, and incurring substantial capital expenditure by the end of 2010, and the extent to which lack of access to finance is delaying the implementation of the action, as well as socio-economic and environmental impacts.
Owing to the urgent need for stimulus, all individual legal commitments implementing the budgetary commitments made in 2009 and 2010 will be made by 31 December 2010 at the latest .
The EEPR will serve urgently to adapt and develop energy networks of particular importance to the Community in support of the operation of the internal energy market and, in particular, to increase interconnection capacity, security and diversification of supply and to overcome environmental, technical and financial obstacles. Special Community support is necessary to develop energy networks more intensively and to accelerate their construction, notably where the diversity of routes and sources of supply is low.
Evaluation : the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of the EEPR by 31 December 2011 in order to assess its contribution to the effective use made of the appropriations. It will also, each year, on presentation of the preliminary draft budget, present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the EEPR.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 01/08/2009.
The European Parliament adopted by 526 votes to 64 with 14 abstentions a legislative resolution amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy.
The amendments were the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council.
The main amendments are as follows:
Budget: the financial envelope for the implementation of the EEPR for 2009 and 2010 shall be EUR 3 980 million, allocated as follows: (a) gas and electricity infrastructure projects: EUR 2 365 million; (b) offshore wind energy projects: EUR 565 million; (c) projects for carbon capture and storage: EUR 1 050 million.
The compromise text specifies that individual legal commitments implementing the budgetary commitments made in 2009 and 2010 shall be made before 31 December 2010.
Gas and electricity infrastructure projects : award criteria that the Commission must follow include: maturity, defined as reaching the investment stage, and incurring substantial capital expenditure by the end of 2010; and the contribution to the creation of a well integrated energy market.
Offshore wind projects : award criteria include: maturity, defined as reaching the investment stage, and incurring substantial capital expenditure by the end of 2010; and the extent up to which lack of access to finance is holding back the implementation of the action. EEPR assistance shall contribute to project-related expenditure for the implementation of the project, and must not exceed 50% of the eligible costs.
Carbon capture and storage : eligible proposals must fulfil certain conditions, including: projects shall demonstrate that they have the ability to capture at least 80 % of CO2 in industrial installations and the ability to transport and geologically store this CO2 safely underground; in power installations, CO 2 capture has to be demonstrated on an installation of at least 250 MW electrical output or equivalent. Selection criteria must include maturity, defined as reaching the investment stage, which includes exploration and development of storage options, and incurring substantial investment-related expenditure for the project by the end of 2010. Award criteria must include the extent up to which lack of access to finance is holding back the implementation of the action.
Evaluation: this must be done by 31 December 2011.
Report: if the Commission’s report identifies serious risks in implementing the priority projects, the Commission should recommend measures to offset those risks, and make additional proposals for projects consistent with the Recovery Plan, if appropriate.
Annex: the compromise text makes some amendments to the eligible projects.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report drawn up by Eugenijus MALDEIKIS (UEN, LT) amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy.
The main amendments are as follows:
Budget : the report deleted the sum of EUR 3500 as the financial envelope for the implementation of the EEPR. Instead, it left the amount for the financial envelope blank and added the following:
- individual legal commitments implementing the budgetary commitments made in 2009 and 2010 shall be made before 1 September 2010 for the gas and electricity interconnection projects, the offshore wind energy projects, and projects for carbon capture and storage;
- where a project does not reach the investment phase and the individual legal commitment cannot be made, the funds which have been reserved for the individual project shall without delay be redirected to projects in the field of energy efficiency and renewable energy;
- no later than 1 September 2009 the Commission shall submit a proposal on the eligibility and selection criteria that apply for the projects in the field of energy efficiency (for example, smart cities) and renewable energy.
Member States' financial responsibilities : the report adds that the Commission shall inform the European Parliament of the control, management and monitoring system established by the Member States.
Selection and award criteria : the Commission’s text on the selection criteria is deleted. Members stipulate that the Commission shall apply the following award criteria: (a) maturity, that is, by the end of 2010, the proposal has reached the investment stage and substantial capital expenditure has been incurred; (b) the extent to which a lack of access to finance is delaying implementation of the project. The report deletes the Commission’s text on award criteria, which relates, inter alia, to funding per tonne of CO2 to be abated in the first 5 years of operation.
EEPR assistance through innovative financial instruments : Members want a part of the Community assistance to be implemented through a contribution to an appropriate instrument, such as a loan, guarantee, equity or other financial product issued by the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF) or other public financial institutions, which provide long-term lending, to support projects in the fields of gas and electricity interconnection, carbon capture and storage, energy efficiency, renewable energy and smart cities. That contribution shall be equal to EUR 500 million. The relevant financial institutions shall contribute an equal amount. The commission had referred only to EIB resources.
Specific attention shall be given to the development, by the EIB, of a finance facility , along the lines of the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility for research and development projects, designed for the financial support of the energy projects contained in the Regulation. The Commission, the EIB, the EIF and other public financial institutions, which provide long-term lending, shall establish a memorandum of understanding.
Protection of Communities financial interest: the report adds that the Commission shall strictly assess the financial parameters of each of the proposed projects, in order to prevent the misuse of Community funds.
Evaluation: the first review by the Commission on the projects for which financing has been committed or spent shall be transmitted to the European Parliament and the Council no later than 31 December 2009. The Commission shall carry out a further evaluation of the EEPR by 31 March 2010 in order to assess the effectiveness of the appropriations. It shall, immediately after noticing that a project cannot be financed, reallocate funds to projects in the field of energy efficiency (for example, smart cities) or renewable energy. The Commission shall, after having informed and taken into account the opinion of the European Parliament, introduce proposals in accordance with the provisions in the Regulation.
The Commission presented to the Council its communication on "mobilising information and communication technologies to facilitate the transition to an energy-efficient, low-carbon economy" (see COM(2009)0111).
The Council examined proposals aimed at providing additional support to energy projects and other infrastructure investments under the European economic recovery plan .
Concluding the debate, the presidency indicated its intention of obtaining an agreement, on the basis of a compromise proposal, in the run-up to the European Council's meeting on 19 and 20 March.
PURPOSE: to propose a financial stimulus to key parts of the energy sector.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: this proposal responds to the sharp downturn faced by the European economy in the wake of the financial crisis and to shortcomings in the Community's security of energy supply illustrated by the gas crisis, which involved lack of delivery to the Community of gas produced in Russia in December 2008. The proposal implements the European Economic Recovery Plan ( COM(2008)800 ) endorsed by the European Council of 11-12 December 2008. Together with proposals in the area of broadband and rural development, it specifically responds to the request of the European Council to provide a detailed list of actions. The gas crisis demonstrates that energy interconnections in Europe are not sufficient, and both crises pose structural problems for the European economy and the welfare of Europe's citizens.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the urgency of the economic crisis calls for the fastest possible action. This means there has not been time for an impact assessment.
CONTENT: it is proposed to establish a financing instrument, the European Energy Programme for Recovery, ("the EEPR"), for the development of projects in the field of energy in the Community that contribute to economic recovery, the security of energy supply and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of:
gas and electricity interconnections (financial envelope: EUR 1750 million); offshore wind energy (EUR 500 million); and carbon capture and storage (EUR 1250 million).
It identifies projects to be financed under each sub-programme and lays down criteria for identifying and implementing actions to realise these projects. There are 20 projects for gas and electricity interconnectors and 5 off shore wind projects that are listed in the Annex to the proposal.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: a financial envelope of EUR 3,500 million is envisaged in total for the three sub-programmes, consisting of EUR 1,500 million for 2009 and EUR 2,000 million for 2010. The main volume of payments will be made between 2009 and 2012 with the last payments, notably for carbon capture and storage projects, programmed for 2014/2015.
PURPOSE: to propose a financial stimulus to key parts of the energy sector.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: this proposal responds to the sharp downturn faced by the European economy in the wake of the financial crisis and to shortcomings in the Community's security of energy supply illustrated by the gas crisis, which involved lack of delivery to the Community of gas produced in Russia in December 2008. The proposal implements the European Economic Recovery Plan ( COM(2008)800 ) endorsed by the European Council of 11-12 December 2008. Together with proposals in the area of broadband and rural development, it specifically responds to the request of the European Council to provide a detailed list of actions. The gas crisis demonstrates that energy interconnections in Europe are not sufficient, and both crises pose structural problems for the European economy and the welfare of Europe's citizens.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the urgency of the economic crisis calls for the fastest possible action. This means there has not been time for an impact assessment.
CONTENT: it is proposed to establish a financing instrument, the European Energy Programme for Recovery, ("the EEPR"), for the development of projects in the field of energy in the Community that contribute to economic recovery, the security of energy supply and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of:
gas and electricity interconnections (financial envelope: EUR 1750 million); offshore wind energy (EUR 500 million); and carbon capture and storage (EUR 1250 million).
It identifies projects to be financed under each sub-programme and lays down criteria for identifying and implementing actions to realise these projects. There are 20 projects for gas and electricity interconnectors and 5 off shore wind projects that are listed in the Annex to the proposal.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: a financial envelope of EUR 3,500 million is envisaged in total for the three sub-programmes, consisting of EUR 1,500 million for 2009 and EUR 2,000 million for 2010. The main volume of payments will be made between 2009 and 2012 with the last payments, notably for carbon capture and storage projects, programmed for 2014/2015.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0670
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2021)0306
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2020)0169
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0476
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0086
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0048
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0743
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0374
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0484
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2015)0191
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0669
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0791
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2013)0457
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2013)0458
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0445
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2012)0243
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0217
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2010)0191
- Follow-up document: COM(2010)0191
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2009/663
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 200 31.07.2009, p. 0031
- Draft final act: 03659/2009/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3616
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0873/2009
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0366/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0261/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0261/2009
- Committee opinion: PE421.343
- Committee opinion: PE421.246
- Debate in Council: 2935
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.268
- Debate in Council: 2932
- Debate in Council: 2925
- Debate in Council: 2922
- Legislative proposal: COM(2009)0035
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0035
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2009)0035 EUR-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.268
- Committee opinion: PE421.246
- Committee opinion: PE421.343
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0261/2009
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0873/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3616
- Draft final act: 03659/2009/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2010)0191 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0217 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0445 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2012)0243
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2013)0791
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0457
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0458
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0669 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0484 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2015)0191
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0743 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0374
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0086 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0048
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0476 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0169
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0670 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0306
- Contribution: COM(2010)0191
Activities
- Reimer BÖGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport MALDEIKIS A6-0261/2009 - AM 13 #
Rapport MALDEIKIS A6-0261/2009 - AM 14 #
Rapport MALDEIKIS A6-0261/2009 - proposition modifiée #
Rapport MALDEIKIS A6-0261/2009 - résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
172 |
2009/0010(COD)
2009/03/16
REGI
167 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) An important part of the Recovery Plan was the proposal to increase Community spending in defined strategic sectors, addressing lack of confidence among investors and helping develop the path to a stronger economy for the future. The European Council asked the Commission to present a list of concrete projects, taking into account an adequate geographical balance, to reinforce investments for the development of, in particular, infrastructure projects, including renewable energy and investments in the field of energy efficiency, in particular in cities and buildings.
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The lack of security in the energy sector, especially in terms of gas supply, is having an increasingly negative impact on the financial and economic development of Member States.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) It is especially important to finance measures that rapidly address both the economic crisis and the Community's urgent energy needs, adopting a balanced approach so as to ensure regional parity.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the project timetable shall include a substantial capital
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the project
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the project timetable shall include substantial
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The different projects shall be prioritised according to the feasibility of implementation and the speed at which they can be realised.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the soundness of the financial package for the full investment phase of the project based on a comprehensive financial plan and the identification of areas or items or investment phases to which the funding shall be devoted;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the soundness of the financial package for the full investment phase of the project based on a comprehensive financial plan and the identification of areas or items or investment phases to which the funding shall be devoted;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) requested funding per tonne of CO2 to be abated in the first 5 years of operation, taking into account amongst other things major factors such as the size of the project, the technology applied, the fuel used, and the mode of transport (weighting of
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter II – Title and articles 4 to 22 Chapter II - title and Articles 4 to 22 are deleted
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to make an immediate impact on the economic crisis, it is also necessary to increase the efficiency and value of Community financial aid by means of closer coordination and effective cooperation with the operations of the European Investment Bank, the European Investment Fund and relevant national public financial institutions that are capable of managing EU-wide programmes.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) probability of the project achieving expected outcomes (weighting 20%);
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (bb) added benefits of the project, such as its contribution towards a future European CCS infrastructure, that would benefit future commercial projects (weighting 20%);
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed 80% of total eligible investment costs.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the planning phase and the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the planning phase and the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 a (new) Article 22a Eligibility 1. Proposals shall be eligible for EEPR assistance only if they implement projects in the fields covered by Article 1. 2. Depending on the project, proposals may be submitted: (a) by one or several Member States or EU cities acting jointly; (b) with the agreement of the Member State(s) directly and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) concerned by the project in question, by one or several public or private undertakings or bodies acting jointly; or (c) with the agreement of all Member States and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) directly concerned by the project in question, by one or several international organisations acting jointly; or (d) with the agreement of all Member States and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) directly concerned by the project in question, by a joint undertaking; or (e) by one or several undertakings, acting jointly. 3. Proposals submitted by natural persons shall not be eligible.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Since the current economic, energy and financial crisis has demonstrated the fragility of our energy choices, more incentives to invest in energy efficiency could help stimulate the economy and create new job opportunities.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 EEPR assistance shall contribute to the cost of those elements of the investment phase of the project that are only attributable to carbon capture and storage, taking account of possible operating benefits. It shall not exceed
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) EEPR assistance is without prejudice to further co-financing by Member States and other Community instruments, provided that the total amount financed by Community and national instruments does not exceed 80% of total eligible investment costs.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) EEPR assistance is without prejudice to further co-financing by Member States and other Community instruments.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. Following the call for proposals referred to in Article 18(2), the Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 28(2), shall select the proposals to receive EEPR assistance and determine the amount
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall, every three months, publish a report with the updated list of proposals and their expected construction starting date.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Should any of the proposals included in the main list suffer delays such that the physical construction cannot start by June 30 2010, those proposals on the reserve list which require a similar amount of support funds shall be included in the main list for immediate launching.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter II – section 3 a (new) SECTION 3a SMART ENERGY CITIES Article 22a EEPR assistance for smart energy cities shall be awarded following a call for proposal limited to the actions that realise the projects listed in the Annex, Part Ca (new).
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter II – section 3 a (new) SECTION 3a Article 22a 1. In financing projects concerning energy saving and energy efficiency there shall be close cooperation between different financial institutions, in particular the EIB and EIF. 2. In addition there shall be close cooperation between local authorities in realising the relevant projects and the different programmes such as Smart Cities, which shall be considered as projects to be financed. The projects include those focusing on local sustainable energy and climate funds, direct loans for EU cities and local banks for sustainable actions, local energy and climate agencies and awareness raising campaigns for smart energy buildings market.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – title CHAPTER III CHAPTER III COMMON PROVISIONS COMMON PROVISIONS DIRECT GRANTS AND INNOVATIVE FINANCE INSTRUMENTS
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 a (new) – after title of Chapter III Article 22a Eligibility 1. Proposals shall be eligible for EEPR assistance only if they implement projects in the fields covered in Article 1. 2. Depending on the project, proposals may be submitted: (a) by one or several Member States or EU cities acting jointly; (b) with the agreement of the Member State(s) directly and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) concerned by the project in question, by one or several public or private undertakings or bodies acting jointly; or (c) with the agreement of all Member States and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) directly concerned by the project in question, by one or several international organisations acting jointly; or (d) with the agreement of all Member States and/or competent authorities (cities, provinces or regions) directly concerned by the project in question, by a joint undertaking; or (e) by one or several undertakings, acting jointly. 2. Proposals submitted by natural persons shall not be eligible.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 b (new) Article 22b Selection and award criteria 1. In assessing the proposals received under the call for proposals, the Commission shall apply the own merit principle, which shall be based on the following criteria: - maturity, notably by reference to the ability to start work early and the commitment to carrying out a significant proportion of the associated spending by the end of 2010, as well as demonstrable ability to carry out feasibility assessments, preparatory and technical studies and obtain licences and authorisations by June 2010; - the potential for long-term social returns with respect to energy security and climate change objectives, notably by promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency; - the application of an integrated approach and the extent to which public and private partners are involved in all phases of project preparation, implementation and assessment; - the soundness and technical adequacy of the approach and the soundness of the financial package for the full investment phase of the project, in particular by reference to the likely extent of job creation and size of the domestic fiscal multiplier and the use of under-utilised human and natural resources.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5b) In order to ensure that the funds granted under the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) will have a maximum leverage effect, they should not be restricted to direct grants but should mainly be channelled through innovative finance instruments, such as loan guarantee schemes, risk sharing facilities, direct equity facilities, revolving funds and reduced interest rate funds. The European Commission should mandate the European Investment Bank (the EIB), the European Investment Fund (the EIF) and other public financial institutions with relevant experience, such as the German KfW or the French Caisse des Crédits, to develop such instruments. In order to ensure that the European Parliament, as the budgetary authority, has an effective control over spending under these instruments, the European Commission should every month present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the Programme, and should, upon the request of the Parliament or of the Council, be further obliged to provide detailed information on the use of EEPR assistance, including that of innovative finance instruments, as well as on the implementation of each project, including its development stage and concrete figures, in particular in respect of financial programming.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 b (new) – after title of Chapter III Article 22b Selection and award criteria 1. In assessing the proposals received under the call for proposals, the Commission shall apply the own merit principle, which shall be based on the following criteria: - maturity, notably by reference to the ability to start work early and the commitment to carrying out a significant proportion of the associated spending by the end of 2010, and a demonstrable ability to carry out feasibility assessments, preparatory and technical studies and obtain licences and authorisations by June 2010; - the potential for long-term social returns with respect to energy security and climate change objectives, notably by promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency; - the soundness and technical adequacy of the approach and the soundness of the financial package for the full investment phase of the project, in particular by reference to the likely extent of job creation and size of the domestic fiscal multiplier and the use of under-utilised human and natural resources.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 c (new) – after title of Chapter III Article 22c Funding conditions 1. EEPR assistance shall contribute to the costs associated with the technical assistance and construction of projects, taking account of possible operating benefits, where appropriate. 2 In the case of projects included in the indicative list of projects under the Annex, EEPR assistance, calculated as the sum of direct grants and innovative finance instruments awarded for each project shall not exceed the maximum amounts of EEPR assistance laid down therein. 3. EEPR direct grant assistance shall not exceed 50% of the eligible investment costs per project.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 d (new) – after title of Chapter III Article 22d Instruments 1. Following the call for proposals the Commission, as applicable, shall select the proposals, taking the indicative list in the Annex as a basis, to receive EEPR assistance after assessing the compliance of these proposals with the eligibility criteria laid down in Article 22a and the selection and award criteria laid down in Article 22b and shall determine the amount of EEPR funding to be granted. The conditions and methods for their implementation shall be specified in a cooperation agreement between the Commission and the applicants. The Commission shall inform the beneficiaries of any EEPR funding to be granted. 2. EEPR assistance shall be granted on the basis of direct grant agreements or innovative finance instruments as prescribed in Article 23.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. A part of the Community assistance for the projects such as those listed in the Annex may be implemented through a contribution to an appropriate instrument under the resources of the European Investment Bank. That contribution shall not exceed EUR 500 million.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Eligibility and selection criteria for other renewable energy and smart cities projects Proposals that are financed under the conditions of paragraph 2 of Article 3 shall be eligible for EEPR assistance if they fulfil the following conditions: - they are submitted by one or more EU city(ies); - they are planned to start before the end of 2011; - they aim to improve energy efficiency and promote other renewable energy, notably in buildings and transport sectors, which leads to both short-term stimulation and longer term restructuring of the EU's economy.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 a (new) Article 26a Member States' financial responsibilities 1. Member States shall undertake the technical monitoring and financial control of projects in close cooperation with the Commission and shall certify the amount of the expenditure incurred in respect of projects or parts of projects and the conformity of the expenditure with requirements of this Regulation. Member States may request the participation of the Commission during on-the-spot checks. 2. Member States shall inform the Commission of the measures taken under paragraph 1 and, in particular, shall supply a description of the control, management and monitoring systems established to ensure that projects are successfully completed and that related expenditure is legal and regular.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall carry out a mid term evaluation of the EEPR by 30 September 2010 in order to assess the effective use made of the appropriations. Those funds which are not yet committed or reserved for running tenders shall be redirected to other renewable energy projects and energy efficiency projects, including smart cities.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) for energy efficiency projects, the committee established by Article 16 of Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and by Article 14 of the Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) for smart cities by the Covenant of Mayors.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 c (new) Article 22c Funding conditions 1. EEPR assistance shall contribute to the costs associated with the technical assistance and construction of projects, taking account of possible operating benefits, where appropriate. 2. In the case of projects included in the indicative list of projects set out in the Annex, EEPR assistance, calculated as the sum of direct grants and innovative finance instruments awarded for each project, shall not exceed the maximum amounts of EEPR assistance laid down there. 3. EEPR direct grant assistance shall not exceed 50% of the eligible investment costs per project.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) To have a tangible and substantial impact, this investment should be focussed on a few specific sectors. These should be sectors in which: (a) the action will make a clear contribution to the objectives of security of energy supply, energy efficiency and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; (b) there exist large, mature projects capable of making efficient and effective use of significant amounts of financial
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) for smart energy cities by the Covenant of Mayors.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. Where reference is made to this Article, Article
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph - 1 a (new) -1. The Commission shall prepare a financial evaluation of the impact of the recent gas crises upon the Member States and take the results into account in its future work in the field of Community energy policy;
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall carry out a mid term evaluation of the EEPR by 30 September 2010 in order to assess the effective use made of the appropriations. Those funds which are not yet committed or reserved for running tenders shall be redirected to renewable energy projects that can be used to support offshore wind energy.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall carry out a mid term evaluation of the EEPR by 30 September 2010 in order to assess the effective use made of the appropriations. Those funds that are not reserved for running tenders should be redirected to renewable energy projects that can be used to support offshore wind energy.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 The Commission shall monitor the implementation of this Regulation. E
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 a (new) Article 30a Future perspectives 1. The Commission shall prepare a new programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy for the period after 2010. 2. The Commission shall, in preparing a new programme, take into account the current economic and political conditions, and organise consultations with all interested parties and experts, but prior to this shall carry out an impact assessment, to determine the most urgent areas for investments. 3. In parallel, the Commission shall develop a strong and significant financing mechanism for the new programme.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point A – point 1 – part 6 Mediterranean
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 d (new) Article 22d Instruments 1. Following the call for proposals the Commission, as applicable, shall select the proposals, taking the indicative list in the Annex as a basis, to receive EEPR assistance after assessing the compliance of those proposals with the eligibility criteria laid down in Article 22a and the selection and award criteria down in Article 22b and determine the amount of EEPR funding to be granted. The conditions and methods for their implementation shall be specified in a co- operation agreement between the Commission and the beneficiaries. The Commission shall inform the beneficiaries of any EEPR funding to be granted. 2. EEPR assistance shall be granted on the basis of direct grant agreements or innovative finance instruments as prescribed in Article 23.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) To have a tangible and substantial impact, this investment should be focus
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point C Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point c a (new) Annex Ca Solar Thermal Electricity Projects or Solar Power Projects The Commission shall introduce a new Annex E with projects in the field of Solar Power. The Commission shall launch a call for proposals in the field of solar power and, more precisely, solar thermal electricity.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – Title CHAPTER III COMMON PROVISIONS DIRECT GRANTS AND INNOVATIVE FINANCE INSTRUMENTS
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 – point b (b) there exist large, mature projects capable of making efficient and effective use of significant amounts of financial assistance and of catalysing significant amounts of investment from other sources, including the European Investment Bank
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) for energy efficiency projects, the committee established by Article 16 of Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and by Article 14 of the Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 – point c a (new) (ca) the action will contribute to increased energy efficiency and reduced primary energy consumption;
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 – point c b (new) (cb) the action will result in short, medium and long-term job creation.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 – subparagraph 2 The sectors of gas and electricity interconnections
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 – subparagraph 2 The sectors of gas and electricity interconnections
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1b) The current state of development of the intra-Community gas pipeline network does not allow proper and adequate supply to all Member States.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) In the case of gas and electricity interconnections, the challenges have developed in the course of the last years. The recent gas crises (winters 2006 and 2009) and the increase of oil prices until mid-2008 showed how much Europe was vulnerable. The lack of interconnections from eastern European countries into the EU energy market has not yet been addressed. Indigenous energy resources – gas and oil – are decreasing so that Europe is increasingly dependent on imports for its energy supply. In this context, energy infrastructure will play a crucial role.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (8a) Among the energy infrastructure projects, it is necessary to select projects that are important to the operation of the internal energy market, to the security of energy supply and which also contribute to the recovery of the economy. In this regard, special attention should be paid to the implementation of projects providing alternative gas supplies to the Member States dependent on a single supplier and which are most vulnerable to interruption of gas supplies.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (8a) Among the energy infrastructure projects, it is necessary to select projects that are important to the operation of the internal energy market, to the security of energy supply, to increased energy efficiency and reduced primary energy consumption and which also contribute to the recovery of the economy.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (8a) Among the energy infrastructure projects, it is necessary to select projects that are important to the operation of the internal energy market, to the security of energy supply and which will also contribute to easing the effects of the recession and thereafter to the recovery of the economy.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the cases of
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the cases of
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the cases of carbon capture and storage and
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In the field of energy efficiency, there is a huge potential, will and capacity among cities to deliver sustainable development that will lead to both short- term stimulation and longer term restructuring of the EU’s economy, as demonstrated by the success of the Covenant of Mayors initiative. Cities are able to call on existing close cross- sectoral partnerships, expertise in ‘on the ground’ project management, responsibility as planning authorities, and their roles as large-scale employers and in infrastructure management. Innovative and sustainable projects at city level will be able to take advantage of local capacity to train workers, adapt infrastructure and support businesses. Cities should be further supported in order to achieve and surpass the EU energy and climate targets. The EEPR should therefore place cities, and especially the energy efficiency and renewable energy of their buildings at its centre, through the reallocation of funding towards ‘smart projects’ coordinated and extensively implemented at city level.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 b (new) (9b) 40% of the energy consumed in the EU is in the building sector. The necessary means for renovating and constructing buildings in the most energy- efficient way while using all the renewable energy sources available on site are of key importance for reducing climate change impacts, increasing the security of energy supply, and ensuring immediate employment growth in the EU. The EEPR should provide assistance for upfront investment in energy smart buildings, and more generally in order to serve the aims of the Directive xxxx/xxxx on the energy performance of buildings.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 c (new) (9c) Costs for resource use are today at significant levels in certain EU key industries and are sometimes even higher than labour costs. As pointed out in the relevant Commission communication the EU also has a growing and worrying dependency on a limited number of countries outside its Member States for certain rare but strategic raw materials such as lithium. Using today’s crises to invest substantially in the modernisation of industrial processes in the EU´s large- scale industries and its SME sector will be one of the biggest drivers for the competitiveness of the EU economy. Eco- industries are also important future industries with potential high growth rates. The EU is often leading research in the eco-technology area but other economies, notably the United States, are surpassing the EU when it comes to mainstreaming these technologies, in particular through better access to venture capital.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In the field of energy efficiency, there is a huge potential, will and capacity among cities to deliver sustainable development that will lead to both short- term stimulation and longer-term restructuring of the EU’s economy, as demonstrated by the success of the Covenant of Mayors initiative. Cities are able to call on existing close cross- sectoral partnerships, expertise in ‘on the ground’ project management and responsibility as planning authorities, and their roles as large-scale employers and infrastructure managers. Innovative and sustainable projects at city level should take advantage of local capacity to train workers, adapt infrastructure and support businesses. Cities should be further supported in order to achieve and exceed EU energy and climate targets. The EERP should therefore place cities, and especially energy efficiency and renewable energy of buildings at its centre, through the reallocation of funding to‘smart projects’ which are coordinated and widely implemented at the city level.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 c (new) (1c) The need for a functioning and well connected internal energy market together with a stable and transparent legal and regulatory framework is a prerequisite for efficient energy supply and use.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to have an immediate impact on the economic crisis, it is necessary for this Regulation to
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Cities have a huge potential, will and capacity to deliver sustainable development that will lead to both short- term stimulation and longer term restructuring of the EU's economy, as demonstrated by the Covenant of Mayors initiative. Cities should be encouraged to achieve and surpass the EU energy and climate targets; the EEPR should therefore place cities and energy efficiency at its centre, through the 'smart cities' project.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 – paragraph 1 (11) In the case of gas and electricity interconnection projects, this open list is established according to the project's contribution to the objectives of security and diversification of supply as identified in the recent 2nd Strategic Energy Review and endorsed by the European Parliament and the Council. Projects are selected on the basis that they implement the priorities identified in that Review, have achieved a reasonable degree of maturity, and contribute to:
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In this regard, the current list of projects proposed by the Commission for community financing through the EEPR continues to lack coherence and does not provide adequate anti-crisis response to the Member States most affected by the gas crisis.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In the case of
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In the case of carbon capture and storage,
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Where financial assistance cannot be directed to listed projects due to their lacking progress and investment maturity in 2009 and 2010, the Commission should submit - if deemed appropriate - a proposal identifying additional eligible energy projects.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It will be necessary to select among the eligible projects. This selection should ensure, inter alia, that no more than one carbon capture and storage project is supported in each Member State
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) In the light of the specific goal of this Regulation and in view of the need urgently to ensure maximum financial assistance to the three strands of projects contained therein, the Commission should strengthen the financial instruments in this Regulation in collaboration and with the help of the financial instruments of the European Investment Bank. Specific attention should be given to the development, by the European Investment Bank, of a finance facility designed for the financial support of the energy projects contained in this Regulation, and along the lines of the Research Risk Sharing Finance Facility.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 b (new) (9b) 40% of the energy consumed in the EU is in the building sector. The necessary means for renovating and constructing buildings in the most energy- efficient way while using all the renewable energy sources available on site are of key importance for reducing climate change impacts, increase energy security of supply, as well as immediately boosting employment in the EU. The recovery plan should provide assistance for upfront investment in energy-smart buildings.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 d (new) (1d) Energy infrastructure investments are in principle driven by market forces and undertakings are generally and primarily responsible for infrastructure development.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) Before 30 June 2009, the Commission should put before the European Parliament a proposal improving the operation of the three European Structural Funds, especially for SMEs, through, inter alia, a shortening of the time period before payment from the funds and the possibility to receive contributions from the funds in advance.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Due to the urgent need to address the economic crisis and the Community's pressing energy needs, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes a financing instrument, the European Energy Programme for Recovery, hereinafter referred to as 'the EEPR', for the development of projects in the field of energy in the Community that contribute to economic recovery, the security of energy supply, energy efficiency and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of: (a) gas and electricity interconnections; (b) offshore wind energy;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of: (a) gas and electricity interconnections
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of: (a) gas and electricity interconnections; (b) offshore wind energy;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) energy saving and energy efficiency
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) smart energy cities
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 It i
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) In case the established sub-programmes and identified projects do not allow for timely investments due to a lack of project maturity, this Regulation may be complemented by proposals establishing additional sub-programmes and projects.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 It establishes sub-programmes to advance those objectives in the fields of: (a) gas and electricity interconnections
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 e (new) (1e) There is a unique, exceptional and temporary need to stabilise the economy.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) The different projects shall be prioritised according to the feasibility of their implementation and speed at which they can be achieved. Between the projects in these four fields there shall be a high degree of flexibility.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) 'investment phase' shall mean the phase of a project during which advanced technical studies and construction take
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f a (new) (fa) 'smart cities' means cities which commit to energy efficiency and renewable energy, notably in the building and transport sectors, and which coordinate at EU level notably through networks such as the Covenant of Mayors;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f a (new) (fa) 'renewable energy' shall mean energy from renewable non-fossil energy sources as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2009/ xxxx of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f b (new) (fb) 'smart cities' shall mean cities which are committed to promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy in the building and housing sector and climate- friendly public transport projects, and which coordinate at EU level notably through networks such as the Covenant of Mayors;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f c (new) (fc) 'eco-industries' shall mean activities which produce goods and services to measure, prevent, limit, minimise or correct environmental damage to water, air and soil, and problems related to waste, noise and ecosystems. This includes cleaner technologies, products and services that reduce environmental risk and minimise pollution and resource use;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point g a (new) (ga) 'innovative finance instruments' shall mean instruments with a significant leverage effect on public and private investments; they shall include direct equity for large-scale projects, notably though the 'Marguerite' fund, direct equity for small and medium-scale projects through participation in the 'venture capital funds' of the EIF, guaranteed loan facilities and risk sharing facilities at the EIB or public banks, creation of reduced interest rates on lending from the EIB or public banks, or financing technical assistance to 'catalysers for change' such as 'smart cities';
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point g b (new) (gb) 'own merit principle' shall mean the principle according to which viable and sustainable projects shall be selected among the eligible projects and awarded a grant or assistance under an innovative finance instrument.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the EEPR for 2009 and 2010 shall be EUR 3,75
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The financial envelope for the
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point g a (new) (ga) "smart cities" shall mean cities which commit themselves to energy efficiency and renewable energy in the building and housing sectors and to climate-friendly public transport projects, and which coordinate at EU level, notably through networks like the Covenant of Majors, URBACT, ICLEI, Eurocities;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) At the same time it is clear that the long-term strength and sustainability of the European economy depends on reshaping it to face the demands of energy security
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) projects for carbon capture and storage: EUR
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) energy efficiency, including energy efficiency in buildings: 500 million.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) smart energy cities: EUR 500 million
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. An amount equal to 50% of the total financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 shall be awarded to projects falling under paragraph 1(c) in the form of direct grants, that is EUR 1,875 million, while the remaining 50% of the total financial envelope shall be awarded in the form of innovative finance instruments. Funds which are unallocated in 2009 and 2010 in the form of grants shall be reallocated to the innovative financing instruments.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The energy infrastructure financed or co-financed by means of available European funds shall be economically viable and shall have an overall European added value.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. The contribution from the budget of the European Union to the EIB, EIF and other public banks towards the innovative finance instruments referred to in paragraph 1a shall be equal to EUR 1,875 million. The relevant financial institutions shall contribute an equal amount, that is an additional EUR 1,875 million, raising the innovative finance instruments to a total of EUR 3,750 million, with a further significant leverage effect on public and private investments of between EUR 5 and 15 million, depending on the nature of the innovative financing instrument.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The financial envelope earmarked for projects in the Annex that do not meet the eligibility criteria in Articles 8, 14 and 19 shall immediately be redistributed to energy efficiency projects, including smart cities, and other renewable energy projects, referred to points (ca) and (cb) of Article 1, which meet the eligibility criteria set out in Article 23a.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The budgetary authority shall decide on the Commission's proposals within
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the EEPR for 2009 and 2010 shall be EUR 3,75
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Stresses that energy infrastructure investments are primarily driven by market forces and thus the primary responsibility for infrastructure projects lies with undertakings. Member States and the European Union should therefore take action to deliver a better framework for undertakings to invest in energy infrastructure. This should include stable and transparent legal and regulatory frameworks as a prerequisite for efficient energy supply and use.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point b Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point c (c) development of the energy network to strengthen economic and social cohesion
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point d (d) connection and integration of renewable energy
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point e a (new) (ea) providing an adequate response to the recent gas crises.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 The EEPR shall serve to urgently adapt and develop energy networks of particular importance to the Community in support of the operation of the internal energy market and, in particular, to solve the problems of bottlenecks, security and diversification of supply and to overcome environmental, technical and financial obstacles. Special Community support is necessary to develop energy networks more intensively and to accelerate their construction, in particular in the Member States which were affected by the gas crisis in January 2009 and which are most vulnerable to interruptions of gas supplies.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 An indicative list of projects corresponding to the priorities laid down in Article 5 is set out in the Annex, Part A and B.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Financial assistance under the EEPR (hereinafter referred to as 'EEPR assistance') for gas and electricity interconnection projects shall be awarded to actions that contribute to growth in energy efficiency, including in buildings, or that realise the projects in the Annex, Part A, or parts thereof.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Proposals shall be eligible for EEPR assistance only if they implement the projects relating to energy efficiency, including energy efficiency in buildings, or are projects listed in the Annex, Part A and do not exceed the maximum amount of EERP assistance laid down there.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new) (-a) for long-term projects planned to start before the end of 2010;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The different projects shall be prioritised according the feasibility of implementation and the speed at which they can be realised.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. An amount equal to 50% of the total financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 shall be awarded to projects falling within the scope of paragraph 1c in the form of direct grants, that is EUR 1,875 million, while the remaining 50% of the total financial envelope shall be awarded in the form of innovative finance instruments. Funds not spend on grants in 2009 and 2010 shall be used to help strengthen the innovative financing instruments.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) An important part of the Recovery Plan was the proposal to increase Community spending in defined strategic sectors, addressing lack of confidence among investors and helping develop the path to a stronger economy for the future. The European Council asked the Commission to present a list of concrete projects, taking into account an adequate geographical balance, to reinforce investments for the development of, in particular, infrastructure projects, including renewable energy and investments in the field of energy efficiency, in particular in cities and buildings.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maturity, in relation in particular to the ability to start work early and commit funds by the end of 201
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) the period in which the increase of interconnection capacity must be available to market agents, which shall not be more than three years since the granting of the assistance;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new) (ab) the increase of electricity or gas transport capacity at least between the borders of the Member States involved in the project, regardless of whether the assistance is granted to one or more of those Member States;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a c (new) (ac) the extent to which the project is in line with the priorities established in each of the Regional Initiatives led by the European Regulators´ Group for Electricity and Gas (ERGEG) with the aim of achieving a single European energy market;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new) (ha) the potential for improving energy efficiency and reducing primary energy consumption in the buildings sector and elsewhere.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The different projects shall be prioritised according to the likelihood of success in implementation and the speed at which they can be realised.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. EEPR assistance for offshore wind projects shall be awarded following a call for proposals
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Proposals shall be eligible for EEPR assistance only if they implement
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the project
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. The contribution from the budget of the European Union to the EIB, EIF and other public banks towards the innovative finance instruments referred in paragraph 1a shall be equal to EUR 1,875 million. The relevant financial institutions shall contribute an equal amount, that is an additional EUR 1,875 million, raising the innovative finance instruments to a total of EUR 3,750 million, with a further significant leverage effect on public and private investments of between 5 and 15 depending on the nature of the innovative financing instrument.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) An important part of the Recovery Plan was the proposal to increase Community spending in defined strategic sectors, addressing lack of confidence among investors and helping develop the path to a stronger economy for the future, acknowledging the unique, exceptional and temporary need to stabilise the economy. The European Council asked the Commission to present a list of concrete projects, taking into account an adequate geographical
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The different projects shall be prioritised according to the feasibility of their implementation and the speed at which they can be realised.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 –point e a (new) (ea) the extent to which the Community undertakings referred to in Article 14(2) duly integrate the relevant European industry.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The different projects should be prioritised according to the feasibility of implementation and the speed at which they can be realised.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. EEPR assistance for carbon capture and storage projects shall be awarded to actions that realise
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 4. EEPR assistance shall be granted to no more than 5 projects. Funding shall not exceed EUR
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The carbon capture and storage projects referred to in paragraph 1 shall receive funding in accordance with the Strategic Energy Technology Plan for Europe (SET-Plan). This funding shall be taken into account in setting future funding priorities in relation to the six European Industrial Initiatives of the SET-Plan.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Proposals shall be eligible for EEPR assistance only if they implement
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) projects shall demonstrate that they have the ability to capture at least 85% of CO2 in power generating installations that will have at least 300 MW electrical output or equivalent (or in capture equipment treating a flue gas flow corresponding to at least 300 MWe output in a larger power plant), and the ability to transport and geologically store this CO2 safely underground;
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) projects shall demonstrate that they have the ability to capture at least 85% of CO2 in power generating installations that will have at least 300 MW electrical output or equivalent (or in capture equipment treating a flue gas flow corresponding to 300 MWe output in a larger power plant), and the ability to transport and geologically store this CO2 safely underground;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) projects shall demonstrate that they have the ability to capture at least 85% of CO2 in power generating installations that will have at least
source: PE-421.388
2009/03/24
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. In order to ensure the maximum effectiveness of committed Community budgetary resources in terms of economic recovery and added value, the Commission shall evaluate the expected contribution of allocated funds to the fulfilment of the objectives of the approved projects, taking into account also general Community needs in the field of energy, the financial capabilities of the beneficiary Member States and their ability to attract investment from external sources; calls on the Commission to submit the results of this evaluation to the budgetary authority.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission will strictly assess the financial parameters of each of the proposed projects, in order to prevent the misuse of Community funds, as well as to ensure the application of the "getting results" concept.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The present regulation creating the programme setting a budget reference amount for Community financial assistance in the field of energy is strictly linked to the review of the Multiannual Financial Framework and should not change the financial architecture of the EU in such a way as will hinder the achievement of its development goals.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission will ensure that the Community assistance for energy projects should be based on the principles of financial solidarity and will pursue the objective of a balanced development of the Member States, taking into account the level of influence of the crisis upon them.
source: PE-423.644
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=17154&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0191/COM_COM(2010)0191_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0191/COM_COM(2010)0191_EN.pdf |
docs/10/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=0445New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=445 |
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0669/COM_COM(2014)0669_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0669/COM_COM(2014)0669_EN.pdf |
docs/24 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/26 |
|
docs/26 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2009&number=0010&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2009&number=0010&appLng=EN |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.268New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE421.268 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.246&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-421246_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.343&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-421343_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0261_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0261_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0873)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0873)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0669/COM_COM(2014)0669_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0669/COM_COM(2014)0669_EN.pdf |
docs/22 |
|
docs/23 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/25 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|