Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | LEHNE Klaus-Heiner ( PPE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | JURI | LEHNE Klaus-Heiner ( PPE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | JURI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ECON | STERCKX Dirk ( ALDE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 050-p1, TFEU 294-p7-ac
Legal Basis:
TFEU 050-p1, TFEU 294-p7-acSubjects
Events
PURPOSE: to amend the 4th Company Law Directive (Directive 78/660/EEC) to simplify the business environment and particularly the financial reporting requirements for micro-entities in order to enhance their competitiveness and release their growth potential.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2012/6/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities.
CONTENT: the Council adopted a directive aimed at exempting very small companies from accounting and financial reporting obligations , following an agreement with the European Parliament at second reading.
The new provisions have the potential to significantly reduce the administrative burden for those companies not exceeding the limits of two of the following criteria:
a balance sheet total of EUR 350 000 , a net turnover of EUR 700 000 and an average of ten employees during the financial year.
The directive will allow Member States to exempt micro-enterprises from the publication of annual accounts . This optional exemption will be compatible with national obligations to keep records showing the company's business transactions and financial situation.
Report : not later than 10 April 2017 the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the situation of micro-entities taking account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of companies covered by the size criteria and the reduction of administrative burdens resulting from the exemption from the publication requirement.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10/04/2012.
TRANSPOSITION: Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive if and when they decide to make use of any option provided for in Article 1a of Directive 78/660/EEC, taking into account in particular the situation at national level regarding the number of companies covered by the size criteria laid down in paragraph 1 of that Article.
The Commission accepts the amendments voted by the European Parliament at second reading on the basis of a compromise obtained at a trilogue held on 9 November 2011.
The opinion of the European Parliament at second reading is a balanced compromise, making a limited number of amendments to the Council's position:
in order to enable more microentities to potentially benefit from a simplified regime, an increase in the size criteria defining micro-entities is needed : this shall be defined as an entity comprising of no more than 10 employees, a maximum net turnover of €700 000 and/or a maximum total balance sheet of €350 000 (two of three criteria have to be matched); clarification of the reach of the exemption from publication requirements foreseen in the Council position. As a result, the balance sheet information of micro-entities filed with the public registers should be obtainable to stakeholders upon application, and micro-entities should no longer have to disclose that information by ways of publication in the national gazette nor other equally effective means; a comprehensive review clause invites the Commission, not later than 5 years after entry into force, to submit a report on the situation of micro-entities taking account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered under the size criteria and the reduction of administrative burdens resulting from the exemption of the publication requirement; it removes, with the Commission's consent, the encouragement for the Member States to draw up correlation tables .
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities.
Parliament adopted its position at second reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of an agreement negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Council position as follows:
Exemptions : in line with the Members’ requests, Member States should provide for exemptions from certain obligations under this Directive in respect of companies which on their balance sheet dates do not exceed the limits of two of the three following criteria (micro-entities):
balance sheet total: EUR 350 000 ; net turnover: EUR 700 000 .
Report : not later than 5 years after entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the situation of micro-entities taking account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered under the size criteria and the reduction of administrative burdens resulting from the exemption of the publication requirement.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted a recommendation for second reading contained in the report drafted by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP, DE) on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities.
The committee recommends that the European Parliament’s position at first reading, under the ordinary legislative procedure, should be to amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Exemptions : Members call on the Member States to provide for exemptions from certain obligations under this Directive in respect of companies which on their balance sheet dates do not exceed the limits of two of the three following criteria (micro-entities):
balance sheet total: EUR 350 000 (EUR 250 000 according to the Council); net turnover: EUR 700 000 (EUR 500 000 according to the Council).
Report : not later than 5 years after entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the situation of micro-entities taking account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered under the size criteria and the reduction of administrative burdens resulting from the exemption of the publication requirement.
Even though it amends the Commission proposal to a considerable extent, especially on the definition of microentities, it maintains the thrust of the Commission proposal to offer the ability to the Member
States to exempt micro-entities from a considerable number of burdensome accounting obligations at EU level.
Whilst the Commission proposal was to allow for a full exemption, the Council position would restrict this to a pre-defined number of areas that would still allow for significant progress towards simplification.
The Commission therefore considers that it can endorse the Council position.
It should be recalled that the Council’s position adopted by qualified majority maintains notably a requirement for micro-entities to draw up accounts under EU legislation.
The follow-up of amendments introduced by the European Parliament amendments:
amendment to introduce requiring micro-entities to still be subject to the obligation to keep accounting records that show the company's business transactions and financial situation: amendments to highlight that Member States should have the free choice of exempting micro-entities or not, taking particular account of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered by the thresholds laid down in the Directive.
The Council position supported the approach of having a separate category of micro-entity company, but it proposed a new definition that would re duce the size thresholds for the balance sheet total and net turnover respectively to EUR 250 000 and EUR 500 000 .
The Commission estimates that with these lower thresholds, the simplification measures in the Council position would reach around 15% fewer companies than the Commission proposal would.
The Council proposed that the Member States should not have the ability to provide for an outright exemption from EU accounting requirements for micro-entities, but instead proposed a number of simplifications that the Member States could adopt .
Compared to the Commission proposal, the Council position would nevertheless continue to impose a certain number of accounting obligations at EU level, including for instance general valuation rules, mandatory layouts for the balance sheet and profit and loss account, as well as minimum transparency requirements.
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament at first reading, the Commission undertakes to facilitate the inter-institutional negotiation to reach an acceptable compromise for both colegislators.
The Council broadly agrees with the spirit of the European Parliament’s amendments and took extensive account of them when drawing up its position at first reading. Furthermore, in order to specify the principles set out in the European Parliament's position, the Council included a number of detailed provisions in view of facilitating the transposition and applicability of the Directive in the Member States.
Parliament expressed broad support for the Commission proposal and adopted five amendments to it. Parliament’s main amendments included in the Council's position at first reading are the following:
a) Maintenance of the obligation to keep records showing the company's business transactions and financial situation : the Council fully supports the European Parliament's view that Member States should remain obliged to maintain a certain level of accounting obligations in order to help micro-entities to structure their finances and provide information for national authorities and, if necessary, for financial institutions.
The Council maintains a certain level of accounting obligations by modifying the concept of the Commission proposal. It introduces a variety of optional exemptions from parts of the 4th Company Law Directive instead of a complete exemption of micro-entities from the scope of the Directive. As a result Member States:
will be free to allow their micro-entities to draw up a very simplified balance sheet and profit and loss account with almost no disclosures; will also have the option of replacing the current publication regime by a simple obligation for micro-entities to file the balance sheet information with one competent authority designated by the Member State concerned. If the designated competent authority is not the business register, the information will have to be transmitted to that register by the competent authority.
The conceptual change introduced by the Council aims at making clear which are the specific obligations under the 4th Company Law Directive maintained for micro-entities.
b) Member States' discretion in the implementation of the Directive: Parliament had emphasised that: (i) as the size criteria for the definition of micro-entities will lead to significant differences among Member States as regards the number of enterprises considered as micro-entities and (ii) as micro-entities usually have no cross-border activity and thus no impact on the functioning of the internal market, harmonisation by means of this Directive would not be justified.
The Council fully agrees with the European Parliament that any harmonisation is excluded from the scope of this Directive and Member States should transpose it in the way that they consider most appropriate for their national situations.
The Council also introduced additional changes: included in the Council's position at first reading
consequences of the Lisbon Treaty : the Council's position at first reading refers to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 50(1) thereof and to the ordinary legislative procedure; the definition of micro-entities : the European Parliament's position at first reading follows the Commission's proposal as regards the following definition of micro-entities. The Council's position at first reading lowered two of the size criteria (balance sheet total: EUR 250 000 ; net turnover: EUR 500 000 ) in order to avoid the situation where the vast majority of companies would be covered by the category of micro-entities;
transposition : a reference to correlation tables has been included in the recitals and the one in the operative provisions has been deleted.
The Council looks forward to constructive discussions with the European Parliament at second reading with a view to the early adoption of the Directive.
The Council broadly agrees with the spirit of the European Parliament’s amendments and took extensive account of them when drawing up its position at first reading. Furthermore, in order to specify the principles set out in the European Parliament's position, the Council included a number of detailed provisions in view of facilitating the transposition and applicability of the Directive in the Member States.
Parliament expressed broad support for the Commission proposal and adopted five amendments to it. Parliament’s main amendments included in the Council's position at first reading are the following:
a) Maintenance of the obligation to keep records showing the company's business transactions and financial situation : the Council fully supports the European Parliament's view that Member States should remain obliged to maintain a certain level of accounting obligations in order to help micro-entities to structure their finances and provide information for national authorities and, if necessary, for financial institutions.
The Council maintains a certain level of accounting obligations by modifying the concept of the Commission proposal. It introduces a variety of optional exemptions from parts of the 4th Company Law Directive instead of a complete exemption of micro-entities from the scope of the Directive. As a result Member States:
will be free to allow their micro-entities to draw up a very simplified balance sheet and profit and loss account with almost no disclosures; will also have the option of replacing the current publication regime by a simple obligation for micro-entities to file the balance sheet information with one competent authority designated by the Member State concerned. If the designated competent authority is not the business register, the information will have to be transmitted to that register by the competent authority.
The conceptual change introduced by the Council aims at making clear which are the specific obligations under the 4th Company Law Directive maintained for micro-entities.
b) Member States' discretion in the implementation of the Directive: Parliament had emphasised that: (i) as the size criteria for the definition of micro-entities will lead to significant differences among Member States as regards the number of enterprises considered as micro-entities and (ii) as micro-entities usually have no cross-border activity and thus no impact on the functioning of the internal market, harmonisation by means of this Directive would not be justified.
The Council fully agrees with the European Parliament that any harmonisation is excluded from the scope of this Directive and Member States should transpose it in the way that they consider most appropriate for their national situations.
The Council also introduced additional changes: included in the Council's position at first reading
consequences of the Lisbon Treaty : the Council's position at first reading refers to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 50(1) thereof and to the ordinary legislative procedure; the definition of micro-entities : the European Parliament's position at first reading follows the Commission's proposal as regards the following definition of micro-entities. The Council's position at first reading lowered two of the size criteria (balance sheet total: EUR 250 000 ; net turnover: EUR 500 000 ) in order to avoid the situation where the vast majority of companies would be covered by the category of micro-entities;
transposition : a reference to correlation tables has been included in the recitals and the one in the operative provisions has been deleted.
The Council looks forward to constructive discussions with the European Parliament at second reading with a view to the early adoption of the Directive.
The European Parliament adopted by 618 votes to 17, with 5 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro- entities.
The European Parliament set out its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as the codecision procedure). The amendments amend the Commission’s proposal as follows:
Members consider that micro-entities must still be subject to the obligation to keep records that show the company's business transactions and financial situation as a minimum standard to which Member States remain free to add further obligations; given that the threshold values set in this Directive will apply to numbers of businesses which will vary greatly from one Member State to another, and given that the activities of micro-entities have no bearing on cross-border trade or the functioning of the internal market, the Member States should have the freedom to decide whether or not to exempt micro-entities , taking into account, in particular, the situation at national level with respect to the number of businesses covered under the threshold values laid down in the directive; a new recital stresses that whilst it is imperative to ensure transparency also for micro-entities, in order to ensure that they are open and have access to the financial markets, Member States should take into account the specific conditions and needs of their own market when implementing Directive 78/660/EEC.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report drawn up by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities. It recommended that the European Parliament's position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as the codecision procedure) should be to amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Article 1a paragraph 1 of Directive 78/660/EEC and the corresponding recital 6 should stipulate that micro-entities must still be subject to the obligation to keep records that show the company's business transactions and financial situation as a minimum standard to which Member States remain free to add further obligations.
Furthermore, it should be stressed that Member States should have the free choice of exempting micro-entities or not , taking into account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered under the threshold values laid down in the Directive.
In public deliberation, the Council held a policy debate on a draft directive aimed at simplifying the business environment, and particularly the financial reporting requirements, for micro-enterprises in order to enhance their competitiveness and release their growth potential.
The outcome of the debate provides political guidance for further work to be continued within the Council. The debate focused on two key issues:
I. the significance of the proposed directive in a broader context of the simplification process of the 4th and 7th company law directives ("Accounting directives"), which was announced in the Commission's legislative work programme; and
II. the optional nature of the proposal: Member States that wish to reduce administrative burdens on micro-entities caused by the requirement to draw up and publish annual accounts, would be allowed to exclude them from the scope of the 4th company law directive. However, some concerns have been raised that the optional nature of the proposal would result in de-harmonisation of rules at EU level in the field of accounting.
The European Parliament has not yet adopted its opinion on the proposal, which falls under the legislative codecision procedure.
PURPOSE: to amend the 4th Company Law Directive (Directive 78/660/EEC) to simplify the business environment and particularly the financial reporting requirements for micro-entities in order to enhance their competitiveness and release their growth potential.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the European Council of 8‑9 March 2007 underlined that reducing administrative burden is important for boosting the European economy, especially considering the potential benefits this can bring for SMEs. In this context, it called on the Commission to identify new "fast track" legislative proposals in order to reduce administrative burdens. Accounting and auditing have been identified as key areas for reducing administrative burden for European companies.
Furthermore, the European Parliament encourages the Commission to continue its activities with regard to the simplification of company law, accounting and auditing, in particular the 4th and 7th Company Law Directives, and explicitly calls on the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal that allows Member States to exempt local and regional undertakings from the scope of the Accounting Directives.
The 4th Company Law Directive was adopted in 1978 in order to create a harmonised set of requirements for the external reporting of all limited liability companies in the EU.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment covers six options:
Option 0 : No change to the Directives; Option 1 : Encourage a full use of existing options in the Accounting Directives; Option 2 : Obligatory exemption of micro entities from the scope of the Directives; Option 3 : Member State option to exempt micro entities from the scope of the Directives; Option 4 : Introduction of a simplified accounting regime for micro entities; Option 5 : Amendments to the Accounting Directive without introducing the micro category.
The Commission considers that the option that provides the biggest burden reduction is Option 3 (option to exempt micro entities). This option can also be implemented within the shortest timeframe.
CONTENT: the Commission suggests establishing an option for Member States of removing the micro-entities from the scope of the 4th Company Law Directive and, by doing so, relieving them from the requirement to draw up annual accounts. Accordingly, the Commission proposes to add a new Article 1a to the 4th Company Law Directive extending the discretion of Member States to relieve the micro-entities from the scope of the 4th Company Law Directive.
According to that Article, Member States may provide for an exemption from the obligations under the Directive for companies which on their balance sheet dates do not exceed the limits of two of the three following criteria:
balance sheet total: EUR 500 000; net turnover: EUR 1 000 000; average number of employees during the financial year: 10.
However, it needs to be recalled, that companies, including micro entities, keep records of sales and transactions for their own management purposes and for tax reporting. The Directive will enable Member States to align the financial reporting to such other reporting needs to avoid unnecessary administrative burden. Micro entities can on a voluntary basis still draw up annual accounts, have them audited and send them to the national register.
These changes should lead to reduced administrative burden while safeguarding adequate protection and information to stakeholders and enable alignment of the micro-entities' reporting requirements with the real needs of users and preparers.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the Community budget.
PURPOSE: to amend the 4th Company Law Directive (Directive 78/660/EEC) to simplify the business environment and particularly the financial reporting requirements for micro-entities in order to enhance their competitiveness and release their growth potential.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the European Council of 8‑9 March 2007 underlined that reducing administrative burden is important for boosting the European economy, especially considering the potential benefits this can bring for SMEs. In this context, it called on the Commission to identify new "fast track" legislative proposals in order to reduce administrative burdens. Accounting and auditing have been identified as key areas for reducing administrative burden for European companies.
Furthermore, the European Parliament encourages the Commission to continue its activities with regard to the simplification of company law, accounting and auditing, in particular the 4th and 7th Company Law Directives, and explicitly calls on the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal that allows Member States to exempt local and regional undertakings from the scope of the Accounting Directives.
The 4th Company Law Directive was adopted in 1978 in order to create a harmonised set of requirements for the external reporting of all limited liability companies in the EU.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment covers six options:
Option 0 : No change to the Directives; Option 1 : Encourage a full use of existing options in the Accounting Directives; Option 2 : Obligatory exemption of micro entities from the scope of the Directives; Option 3 : Member State option to exempt micro entities from the scope of the Directives; Option 4 : Introduction of a simplified accounting regime for micro entities; Option 5 : Amendments to the Accounting Directive without introducing the micro category.
The Commission considers that the option that provides the biggest burden reduction is Option 3 (option to exempt micro entities). This option can also be implemented within the shortest timeframe.
CONTENT: the Commission suggests establishing an option for Member States of removing the micro-entities from the scope of the 4th Company Law Directive and, by doing so, relieving them from the requirement to draw up annual accounts. Accordingly, the Commission proposes to add a new Article 1a to the 4th Company Law Directive extending the discretion of Member States to relieve the micro-entities from the scope of the 4th Company Law Directive.
According to that Article, Member States may provide for an exemption from the obligations under the Directive for companies which on their balance sheet dates do not exceed the limits of two of the three following criteria:
balance sheet total: EUR 500 000; net turnover: EUR 1 000 000; average number of employees during the financial year: 10.
However, it needs to be recalled, that companies, including micro entities, keep records of sales and transactions for their own management purposes and for tax reporting. The Directive will enable Member States to align the financial reporting to such other reporting needs to avoid unnecessary administrative burden. Micro entities can on a voluntary basis still draw up annual accounts, have them audited and send them to the national register.
These changes should lead to reduced administrative burden while safeguarding adequate protection and information to stakeholders and enable alignment of the micro-entities' reporting requirements with the real needs of users and preparers.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the Community budget.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2012/6
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 081 21.03.2012, p. 0003
- Draft final act: 00079/2011/LEX
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2012)0001
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: EUR-Lex
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T7-0563/2011
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A7-0393/2011
- Committee draft report: PE473.823
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2011)0589
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Council position: 10765/1/2011
- Council position published: 10765/1/2011
- Council statement on its position: 13133/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)2013
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0052/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0011/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0011/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE430.367
- Committee opinion: PE428.154
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE429.641
- Debate in Council: 2963
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1192/2009
- Committee draft report: PE421.432
- Legislative proposal: COM(2009)0083
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)0206
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)0207
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0083
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2009)0083 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)0206 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)0207 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE421.432
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1192/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE429.641
- Committee opinion: PE428.154
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE430.367
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0011/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)2013
- Council statement on its position: 13133/2011
- Council position: 10765/1/2011
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2011)0589 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE473.823
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2012)0001 EUR-Lex
- Draft final act: 00079/2011/LEX
Activities
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities (debate)
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities (debate)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Wojciech Michał OLEJNICZAK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Nikolaos CHOUNTIS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Harlem DÉSIR
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities (debate)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marianne THYSSEN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities (debate)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alfredo ANTONIOZZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vito BONSIGNORE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Joe HIGGINS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Filip KACZMAREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabeth KÖSTINGER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Stavros LAMBRINIDIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Klaus-Heiner LEHNE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Willy MEYER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Georgios PAPASTAMKOS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dirk STERCKX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eva-Britt SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kay SWINBURNE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kader ARIF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mario BORGHEZIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan BŘEZINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nessa CHILDERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Proinsias DE ROSSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert DUŠEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dennis de JONG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alexander Graf LAMBSDORFF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sabine LÖSING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Arlene McCARTHY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tiziano MOTTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- María MUÑIZ DE URQUIZA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kristiina OJULAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hella RANNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicole SINCLAIRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine SOULLIE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexandra THEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Traian UNGUREANU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique VLASTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cecilia WIKSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Artur ZASADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
34 |
2009/0035(COD)
2009/10/02
ECON
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may provide for an exemption from the obligations under this Directive for companies which on their balance sheet dates do not exceed the limits of two of the three following criteria and whose turnover from cross-border activities within the European Union does not exceed 10 % of their total turnover:
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may provide for a
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In addition to these requirements, and in order for micro-entities to be exempted from the scope of the Directive by the Member State, they must carry out their activities essentially in the Member State or at local or regional level, with an annual net turnover from cross-border transactions of 10% or less.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States may provide for lower limits for the criteria set out in paragraph 1. In the event that a Member State provides such lower limits, the companies concerned shall comply with a simplified annual accounting regime. The Commission shall elaborate a simplified annual accounting regime by 31 December 2010.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where on its balance sheet date, a
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where on its balance sheet date, a company exceeds the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1 in
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where on its balance sheet date, a company exceeds the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1 in
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where on its balance sheet date, a company exceeds the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1 a in two consecutive financial years that company may no longer benefit from the
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where on its balance sheet date, a company has ceased to exceed the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1, and where 10% or less of its annual net turnover stemmed from cross- border trade, since its activities were essentially carried out at the level of the Member State or at local or regional level, it may benefit from the exemption referred to in that paragraph,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where on its balance sheet date, a company has ceased to exceed the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1, it may benefit from the exemption referred to in that paragraph, provided that it has not exceeded those limits in
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where on its balance sheet date, a company has ceased to exceed the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1, it may benefit from the exemption referred to in that paragraph, provided that it has not exceeded those limits in
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where on its balance sheet date, a company has ceased to exceed the limits of two of the three criteria set out in paragraph 1a, it may benefit from the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal and to
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal and to ask for a general revision of the 4th and 7th Company Law Directives in 2010, accompanied by an all-inclusive impact assessment. That impact assessment may include consideration of whether only micro-entities whose turnover from cross- border activities within the European Union does not exceed 10 % of their total turnover should be included within the simplification of financial reporting requirements.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) In its revision, the Commission is urged to pay due attention to the reduction of the administrative burden on SMEs and, in particular, on micro-entities. Simplified accounting principles for micro-entities and simplified presentation formats for the annual accounts of micro-entities should be the main aim of the revision. Furthermore, the Commission should encourage Member States to simplify publication procedures for the annual accounts of micro-entities in a cost- efficient way. In order not to cause fragmentation of the internal market and to ensure a level playing field, a European framework should be maintained.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) In this revision, the Commission should pay special attention to analysing the negative effects, in particular as regards the administration of micro-entities, and adopt measures that will encourage the Member States to offer simplified reporting and accounting for micro- entities. In addition, the Commission's goal must be a simple, cost-effective and transparent European accounting framework in order to counteract possible disputes between Member States.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 6 (6) Micro-entities are however often subject to the same reporting rules as larger companies. Those rules put a burden on them which is not in proportion to their size and is therefore disproportionate for the smallest enterprises as compared to the larger enterprises. Therefore it should be possible immediately to exempt micro- entities
source: PE-429.559
2009/10/13
JURI
6 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 4 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 5 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to conduct a more comprehensive impact study on accounting simplification measures for micro-entities with a view to submitting a new proposal in a harmonised framework;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Given that the threshold values set in this Directive will apply to numbers of businesses which will vary greatly from one Member State to another and the activity of micro-entities has no bearing on cross-border trade or the functioning of the internal market, the Member States should take into account the differing impact of these values when implementing the Directive at national level.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 8 b (new) 8b. Whereas it is imperative to ensure transparency also for micro-entities, in order to ensure that they are open and have access to the financial markets, Member States should take into account the specific conditions and needs of their own market when implementing Directive 78/660/EEC.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive if and when they decide to make use of the option provided for in Article 1a of Directive 78/660/EEC, taking account in particular of the situation at national level regarding the number of businesses covered under the threshold values laid down in the Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
source: PE-429.641
2009/10/21
JURI
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 5 (5) Micro-entities are in most cases engaged in business at local or regional level with no or limited cross-border activity, usually not exceeding 10 per cent of all incoming payments, and have limited resources to comply with demanding regulatory requirements. In addition, micro-entities are important for creating new jobs, fostering research and development and creating new economic activities.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 6 (6) Micro-entities are however often subject to the same reporting rules as larger companies. Those rules put a burden on them which is not in proportion to their size and is therefore disproportionate for the smallest enterprises as compared to the larger enterprises. Therefore it should be possible to exempt micro-entities from the obligation to draw up annual accounts,
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1 a – paragraph 1 1. Whilst maintaining the obligation of cash-based accounting, Member States may provide for an exemption from the obligations under this Directive for companies which on their balance
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Where on its balance
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 Directive 78/660/EEC Article 1 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where on its balance
source: PE-430.367
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0206/COM_SEC(2009)0206_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0206/COM_SEC(2009)0206_EN.pdf |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0207/COM_SEC(2009)0207_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0207/COM_SEC(2009)0207_EN.pdf |
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=17927&j=0&l=en
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2009-02-26T00:00:00New
2009-02-25T00:00:00 |
events/9/date |
Old
2011-09-12T00:00:00New
2011-09-11T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2009&number=0035&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2009&number=0035&appLng=EN |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0207/COM_SEC(2009)0207_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0207/COM_SEC(2009)0207_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.432New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE421.432 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1192)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1192)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE429.641New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE429.641 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE428.154&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-428154_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.367New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.367 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0011_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0011_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=17927&j=0&l=en
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0589/COM_COM(2011)0589_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0589/COM_COM(2011)0589_EN.pdf |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.823New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE473.823 |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100308&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100308&type=CRE |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0393_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0393_EN.html |
events/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0563_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0563_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
New
Directive |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2/date |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4/date |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-11&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0011_EN.html |
docs/8/body |
EC
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0001/COM_COM(2012)0001_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0001/COM_COM(2012)0001_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0083/COM_COM(2009)0083_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0083/COM_COM(2009)0083_EN.pdf |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-11&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0011_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-52New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0052_EN.html |
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-393&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0393_EN.html |
events/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-563New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0563_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/06165New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0006New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0006 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industriesNew
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|