BETA


2009/0806(CNS) Police and judicial cooperation: accreditation of forensic laboratory activities (DNA and fingerprints). Framework Decision. Initiative Sweden and Spain

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE KIRKHOPE Timothy (icon: ECR ECR) VAN DE CAMP Wim (icon: PPE PPE), SIPPEL Birgit (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 198, Treaty on the European Union (after Amsterdam) M 039-p1

Events

2009/12/09
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to ensure that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body in order to combat crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities.

CONTENT: the intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another, highlights the need to establish common standards for forensic service providers.

In the Council and Commission Action Plan implementing The Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union Member States stressed the need for a definition of the quality standards of forensic laboratories by 2008.

The purpose of this Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities carried out by accredited forensic service providers in one Member State are recognised by the authorities responsible for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences as being equally reliable as the results of laboratory activities carried out by forensic service providers accredited to EN ISO/IEC 17025 within any other Member State. This purpose is achieved by ensuring that forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities are accredited by a national accreditation body as complying with EN ISO/IEC 17025.

An accreditation standard allows any Member State to require, if it wishes, complementary standards in laboratory activities within its national jurisdiction. Accreditation will help establish mutual trust in the validity of the basic analytic methods used. However, accreditation does not state which method to use, only that the method used has to be suitable for its purpose

This Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities resulting in: (a) DNA-profile; and (b) dactyloscopic data.

Member States shall forward to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national laws the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision by 30 May 2016 at the latest.

On the basis of the information provided by the Member States on request, the Commission shall, before 1 July 2018, submit a report to the Council on the implementation and application of this Framework Decision.

The Council shall, by the end of 2018, assess the extent to which Member States have complied with this Framework Decision.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 29/12/2009.

IMPLEMENTATION: 30/11/2013 (DNA profile) and 30/11/2015 (dactyloscopic data).

2009/11/30
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2009/11/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/11/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/11/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/11/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament rejected (651 votes against, 9 in favour, 7 abstentions), under the consultation procedure, the initiative with a view to adopting a Council framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities.

2009/11/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/11/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2009/11/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2009/11/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report drawn up by Timothy KIRKHOPE (ECR, UK) on the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain for the adoption of a Council framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities, calling on the European Parliament to reject the proposed initiative.

The Members consider that this draft framework decision raises issues in terms of the correct legal base.

They therefore call on the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain to withdraw their initiative.

2009/11/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2009/10/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2009/10/23
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

Ministers reached a general agreement on a draft framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities. They welcomed the progress made and asked Council preparatory bodies to continue their work with a view to adopting the legislation as soon as possible.

The purpose of this framework decision is to ensure that the results of forensic laboratory activities carried out in one EU Member State are recognised by the authorities responsible for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences within any other Member States. To this end, a national accreditation body in each Member State must accredit forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities as complying with the relevant international ISO-standard.

The overall aim of this framework decision is confidence-building between EU Member States. As the amount of data transferred across the EU increases, it will become increasingly important to ensure that the quality of the data is sufficiently high.

Documents
2009/10/23
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/09/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2009/09/02
   EP - KIRKHOPE Timothy (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2009/07/20
   CSL - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: initiative of Sweden and Spain on ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body in order to combat crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: the intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another highlights the need to ensure that the quality of the data is sufficiently high.

Information originating from forensic processes in one Member State may currently be associated with a level of uncertainty in another Member State regarding how an item has been handled, what methods have been used and how the results have been interpreted. It is particularly important to safeguard the quality of the information exchanged when it relates to such sensitive personal data as DNA profiles and fingerprints. The accreditation of forensic processes is an important step towards a safer and more effective exchange of scientific evidence within the Union. Accreditation offers the necessary guarantees that laboratory activities are performed in accordance with relevant international standards, such as EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, as well as relevant applicable guidelines.

Accreditation is granted by a national accreditation body which has exclusive competence to assess if a laboratory meets the requirements set by harmonised standards. An accreditation body derives its authority from the State. Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products contains detailed provisions on the competence of the national accreditation bodies. The absence of an agreement to apply a common accreditation standard for analysis of scientific evidence is a deficiency that should be remedied.

CONTENT: the purpose of this draft Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities of one Member State are recognised as being equivalent to the results of laboratory activities of any other Member State. This purpose is achieved by ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Scope: the Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities relating to: (a) DNA; and (b) fingerprints.

Accreditation: Member States shall ensure that their laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Mutual recognition of results: each Member State shall ensure that the results of accredited laboratory activities carried out in other Member States are recognised as being equivalent to the results of domestic accredited laboratory activities.

Costs: each Member State shall bear any costs resulting from the Framework Decision. Implementation: it is proposed that Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions before 1 January 2012.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission is encouraged to consider financial support for related national and transnational projects, inter alia, for the exchange of experience, dissemination of know-how and proficiency.

Documents
2009/07/19
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: initiative of Sweden and Spain on ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body in order to combat crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: the intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another highlights the need to ensure that the quality of the data is sufficiently high.

Information originating from forensic processes in one Member State may currently be associated with a level of uncertainty in another Member State regarding how an item has been handled, what methods have been used and how the results have been interpreted. It is particularly important to safeguard the quality of the information exchanged when it relates to such sensitive personal data as DNA profiles and fingerprints. The accreditation of forensic processes is an important step towards a safer and more effective exchange of scientific evidence within the Union. Accreditation offers the necessary guarantees that laboratory activities are performed in accordance with relevant international standards, such as EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, as well as relevant applicable guidelines.

Accreditation is granted by a national accreditation body which has exclusive competence to assess if a laboratory meets the requirements set by harmonised standards. An accreditation body derives its authority from the State. Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products contains detailed provisions on the competence of the national accreditation bodies. The absence of an agreement to apply a common accreditation standard for analysis of scientific evidence is a deficiency that should be remedied.

CONTENT: the purpose of this draft Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities of one Member State are recognised as being equivalent to the results of laboratory activities of any other Member State. This purpose is achieved by ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Scope: the Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities relating to: (a) DNA; and (b) fingerprints.

Accreditation: Member States shall ensure that their laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Mutual recognition of results: each Member State shall ensure that the results of accredited laboratory activities carried out in other Member States are recognised as being equivalent to the results of domestic accredited laboratory activities.

Costs: each Member State shall bear any costs resulting from the Framework Decision. Implementation: it is proposed that Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions before 1 January 2012.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission is encouraged to consider financial support for related national and transnational projects, inter alia, for the exchange of experience, dissemination of know-how and proficiency.

Documents

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
5 2009/0806(CNS)
2009/10/26 LIBE 5 amendments...
source: PE-430.425

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2009-07-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11419%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11419/2009
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
events/0/date
Old
2009-07-20T00:00:00
New
2009-07-19T00:00:00
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • See also 2019/0012(NLE) See also 2019/0013(NLE)
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.425
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.425
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.264
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.264
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20091123&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20091123&type=CRE
events/7/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/instrument
Old
  • Decision
  • See also 2019/0012(NLE) See also 2019/0013(NLE)
New
Decision
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 198
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 188
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: KIRKHOPE Timothy date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2009-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KIRKHOPE Timothy group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2009-0071_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2009-07-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11419%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 11419/2009 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: BARROT Jacques type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2009-09-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2969 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2969*&MEET_DATE=23/10/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2969 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2009-10-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-11-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0071/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20091123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17647&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2979
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2009-12-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0905 title: Decision 2009/905 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:322:TOC title: OJ L 322 09.12.2009, p. 0014
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: BARROT Jacques
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2009-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KIRKHOPE Timothy group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2009-09-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2979 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2979*&MEET_DATE=30/11/2009 date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2969 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2969*&MEET_DATE=23/10/2009 date: 2009-10-23T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2009-10-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.425 title: PE430.425 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.264 title: PE430.264 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN title: A7-0071/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 2009-07-20T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11419%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11419/2009 summary: PURPOSE: initiative of Sweden and Spain on ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body in order to combat crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: the intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another highlights the need to ensure that the quality of the data is sufficiently high. Information originating from forensic processes in one Member State may currently be associated with a level of uncertainty in another Member State regarding how an item has been handled, what methods have been used and how the results have been interpreted. It is particularly important to safeguard the quality of the information exchanged when it relates to such sensitive personal data as DNA profiles and fingerprints. The accreditation of forensic processes is an important step towards a safer and more effective exchange of scientific evidence within the Union. Accreditation offers the necessary guarantees that laboratory activities are performed in accordance with relevant international standards, such as EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, as well as relevant applicable guidelines. Accreditation is granted by a national accreditation body which has exclusive competence to assess if a laboratory meets the requirements set by harmonised standards. An accreditation body derives its authority from the State. Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products contains detailed provisions on the competence of the national accreditation bodies. The absence of an agreement to apply a common accreditation standard for analysis of scientific evidence is a deficiency that should be remedied. CONTENT: the purpose of this draft Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities of one Member State are recognised as being equivalent to the results of laboratory activities of any other Member State. This purpose is achieved by ensuring that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Scope: the Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities relating to: (a) DNA; and (b) fingerprints. Accreditation: Member States shall ensure that their laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body to comply with International Standard EN ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Mutual recognition of results: each Member State shall ensure that the results of accredited laboratory activities carried out in other Member States are recognised as being equivalent to the results of domestic accredited laboratory activities. Costs: each Member State shall bear any costs resulting from the Framework Decision. Implementation: it is proposed that Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions before 1 January 2012. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission is encouraged to consider financial support for related national and transnational projects, inter alia, for the exchange of experience, dissemination of know-how and proficiency.
  • date: 2009-09-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2969*&MEET_DATE=23/10/2009 title: 2969 summary: Ministers reached a general agreement on a draft framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities. They welcomed the progress made and asked Council preparatory bodies to continue their work with a view to adopting the legislation as soon as possible. The purpose of this framework decision is to ensure that the results of forensic laboratory activities carried out in one EU Member State are recognised by the authorities responsible for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences within any other Member States. To this end, a national accreditation body in each Member State must accredit forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities as complying with the relevant international ISO-standard. The overall aim of this framework decision is confidence-building between EU Member States. As the amount of data transferred across the EU increases, it will become increasingly important to ensure that the quality of the data is sufficiently high.
  • date: 2009-11-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report drawn up by Timothy KIRKHOPE (ECR, UK) on the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain for the adoption of a Council framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities, calling on the European Parliament to reject the proposed initiative. The Members consider that this draft framework decision raises issues in terms of the correct legal base. They therefore call on the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain to withdraw their initiative.
  • date: 2009-11-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN title: A7-0071/2009
  • date: 2009-11-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20091123&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17647&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The European Parliament rejected (651 votes against, 9 in favour, 7 abstentions), under the consultation procedure, the initiative with a view to adopting a Council framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities.
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-12-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to ensure that laboratory activities are accredited by an accreditation body in order to combat crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities. CONTENT: the intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another, highlights the need to establish common standards for forensic service providers. In the Council and Commission Action Plan implementing The Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union Member States stressed the need for a definition of the quality standards of forensic laboratories by 2008. The purpose of this Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities carried out by accredited forensic service providers in one Member State are recognised by the authorities responsible for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences as being equally reliable as the results of laboratory activities carried out by forensic service providers accredited to EN ISO/IEC 17025 within any other Member State. This purpose is achieved by ensuring that forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities are accredited by a national accreditation body as complying with EN ISO/IEC 17025. An accreditation standard allows any Member State to require, if it wishes, complementary standards in laboratory activities within its national jurisdiction. Accreditation will help establish mutual trust in the validity of the basic analytic methods used. However, accreditation does not state which method to use, only that the method used has to be suitable for its purpose This Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities resulting in: (a) DNA-profile; and (b) dactyloscopic data. Member States shall forward to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national laws the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision by 30 May 2016 at the latest. On the basis of the information provided by the Member States on request, the Commission shall, before 1 July 2018, submit a report to the Council on the implementation and application of this Framework Decision. The Council shall, by the end of 2018, assess the extent to which Member States have complied with this Framework Decision. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 29/12/2009. IMPLEMENTATION: 30/11/2013 (DNA profile) and 30/11/2015 (dactyloscopic data). docs: title: Decision 2009/905 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0905 title: OJ L 322 09.12.2009, p. 0014 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:322:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: BARROT Jacques
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/7/00471
New
  • LIBE/7/00471
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0905
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0905
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • See also 2019/0012(NLE) See also 2019/0013(NLE)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 188
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 188
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.30 Police, judicial and customs cooperation in general
  • 7.30.05 Police cooperation
  • 7.30.20 Action to combat terrorism
  • 7.40 Judicial cooperation
New
7.30
Police, judicial and customs cooperation in general
7.30.05
Police cooperation
7.30.20
Action to combat terrorism
7.40
Judicial cooperation
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2009-07-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11419%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 11419/2009 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: BARROT Jacques
  • date: 2009-09-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2969 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2969*&MEET_DATE=23/10/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2969 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2009-10-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-11-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2009-71&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0071/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20091123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17647&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2979
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2009-12-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0905 title: Decision 2009/905 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:322:TOC title: OJ L 322 09.12.2009, p. 0014
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VAN DE CAMP Wim group: S&D name: SIPPEL Birgit responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: BARROT Jacques
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/7/00471
reference
2009/0806(CNS)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Legislation
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
title
Police and judicial cooperation: accreditation of forensic laboratory activities (DNA and fingerprints). Framework Decision. Initiative Sweden and Spain
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject