Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | GROSCH Mathieu ( PPE) | GRIESBECK Nathalie ( ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE), VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | LEINEN Jo ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | KELLY Seán ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | CANCIAN Antonio ( PPE) | Zigmantas BALČYTIS ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 554 votes to 34, with 82 abstentions, a resolution on the sustainable future for transport, in response to the Commission communication entitled: “A sustainable future for transport: towards an integrated, technology-led and user-friendly system”.
The resolution underlines that the transport sector is an important element in the development of the European Union and its regions and cities, and one which has a direct influence on the competitiveness and social cohesion of the regions and cities and thereby makes a significant contribution to achieving the European single market.
The financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support and promote the transport industry in a forward-looking way, especially through promoting the sustainability of transport modes and investments in, among other things, rail and waterway transport. This will ensure a more level playing field in the market. Members consider it vital for measurable targets to be set for the transport sector, as a way of both monitoring the efficiency of transport policy more effectively and establishing social and economic planning guidelines.
Transport has a triple role: an economic role, a social role and a territorial cohesion role, all of which are essential for European integration. The sector plays a key role in the economy and employment, given that it represents 10% of the EU's prosperity (viewed in terms of gross domestic product) and provides over 10 million jobs and will therefore have a crucial role in the implementation of the EU 2020 strategy .
Social, economic and environmental challenges : Parliament is convinced that EU policy, in general, needs a clear and coherent vision of the future of transport as a sector at the core of the single market, guaranteeing free movement of persons and goods and ensuring territorial cohesion throughout Europe. It takes the view that the transport sector must guarantee economic efficiency and develop within consistently high social and environmental standards .
Members are convinced that demographic change, in particular in urban areas, will give rise to safety and capacity challenges for transport and mobility, and that the basic right to mobility, as well as the applicability of this right, is crucial in this regard. They stress that, in this context, well-integrated multimodal transport chains including walking and cycling and public transport are the way ahead for urban areas. They ask the Commission to introduce Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) for cities of more than 100 000 inhabitants.
The resolution stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix promoting the research and development of more environmentally friendly technologies and modes, price formation measures and the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the revenue generated at EU level is used to improve the sustainability of mobility.
Safety : emphasising that safety must continue to be one of the priority objectives of the future transport policy, Members consider it to be of the utmost importance to reduce the health effects of transport and to ensure the rights of passengers in all transport modes, particularly those with reduced mobility, by means of clear and transparent regulations.
They call on the Commission to present a study detailing the best practices of the Member States concerning the impact of speed limiters for all types of vehicles and roads, with a view to presenting legislative measures aimed at reducing emissions and improving road safety.
The resolution also underlines the necessity of guaranteeing both personal safety and legal certainty for workers in the transport sector by, among other things, creating a sufficient number of safe and secure parking places and harmonising the enforcement of road transport rules and the sanctions for which they provide.
Efficient comodality : Members consider that European transport policy should have as its main goal efficient comodality, which is closely linked to the decarbonisation, safety and economic aspects of transport. They stress that efficient comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost-effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection, social and employment conditions, and safety and territorial cohesion
Completion of the single market : Parliament considers that transport plays an essential role in completing the European single market and freedom of movement for persons and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in the rail transport sector, in all EU Member States. It calls on the Commission and on Member State authorities to facilitate the completion of the liberalisation of cabotage transport, to reduce the prevalence of empty mileage and to provide for a more sustainable road and rail network in the form of more freight transport hubs.
Members believe it essential, in order to achieve an efficient maritime transport system that complements other modes, to focus once again on a clear liberalisation process enabling it to be truly competitive.
The resolution underlines the importance of genuinely European management of transport infrastructure with a view to eliminating the ‘border effect’ in all transport modes and enhancing the EU’s competitiveness and appeal. It calls for the establishment of a common European reservation system.
Parliament underlines that 75% of transport is road-based, and asks for consideration to be given to the need for an agency for road transport, in particular to improve road safety and also to guarantee people's fundamental right to safe mobility by supporting new applications (such as Galileo or equally suitable technologies for intelligent transport systems) and conducting research programmes. Members call for regular reviews of European legislation and its transposition and implementation, with a view to guaranteeing the effectiveness thereof.
European agencies : Parliament is aware of the view that technical interoperability and its financing, European certification, standardisation and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that their enforcement should figure more prominently among the tasks of the various agencies. It underlines that all the agencies should strive for, and swiftly attain, a similarly high level of responsibility and competence and should be evaluated regularly.
Research and technology : Parliament calls for a research and technology agenda for the transport sector. It considers that priority should be given to projects to decarbonise transport, increase the transparency of the supply chain and transport safety and security, improve traffic management and reduce administrative burdens.
The resolution underlines that, within the framework of climate protection and EU energy independence, each transport mode should reduce its CO2 emissions and be supported by research and development in innovative, energy-efficient and clean technologies and renewable energies.
Transport fund and a European transport network : the resolution calls for the current resources for transport and mobility to be increased and considers the following to be necessary:
the creation of a facility to coordinate the use of different sources of transport funding, funds available under cohesion policy, PPPs or other financial instruments such as guarantees; a budget commitment for transport policy under the multiannual financial framework; the possibility that, in the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact, the long-term nature of investments in transport infrastructure, which improves the competitiveness of the economy, is taken into account when calculating the public deficit; the use of the fund to require, among other things, cofinancing from revenue generated by the internalisation of external costs.
Measurable targets for 2020 : Parliament calls for compliance with clearer, more measurable targets to be achieved in 2020 with reference to 2010, and therefore proposes the following:
a 40% reduction in the number of deaths of and serious injuries to active and passive road transport users, a 40% increase in the provision of parking areas for heavy goods vehicles in the trans-European road network (TERN) in each Member State; a doubling of the number of bus, tram and rail passengers (and, if relevant, ship passengers) and a 20% increase in funding for pedestrian- and cycle-friendly transport concepts; a 20% reduction in CO2 exhaust emissions from road passenger and freight traffic; a 20% reduction in the energy used by rail vehicles compared with the 2010 level and capacity and a 40% reduction in diesel use in the rail sector; fitting an ERTMS-compatible and interoperable automatic train speed control system to all new railway rolling stock commissioned from 2011 onwards, and to all new and rehabilitated link lines starting in 2011; a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions from air transport throughout EU airspace by 2020; financial support for the optimisation, development and, where necessary, creation of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway transport, inland ports and rail transport and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms by 2020; at least 10% of TEN-T funding to be dedicated to inland waterway projects.
Lastly, the Commission is called upon to monitor progress towards reaching these targets and to report annually to Parliament thereon.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted an own-initiative report drafted by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP, BE) in response to the Commission communication entitled “A sustainable future for transport: towards an integrated, technology-led and user-friendly system”.
Social, economic and environmental challenges: the committee is convinced that EU policy, in general, needs a clear and coherent vision of the future of transport as a sector at the core of the single market, guaranteeing free movement of persons and goods and ensuring territorial cohesion throughout Europe. It takes the view that the transport sector must guarantee economic efficiency and develop within consistently high social and environmental standards.
Members are convinced that demographic change, in particular in urban areas, will give rise to safety and capacity challenges for transport and mobility, and that the basic right to mobility, as well as the applicability of this right, is crucial in this regard. They stress that, in this context, well-integrated multimodal transport chains including walking and cycling and public transport are the way ahead for urban areas. They ask the Commission to introduce Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) for cities of more than 100 000 inhabitants.
and, with due respect for the principle of subsidiarity, encourage cities to draw up mobility plans which propose an integrated transport concept with the objective of reducing environmental damage and making mobility healthier and more efficient;
The report stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix promoting the research and development of more environmentally friendly technologies and modes, price formation measures and the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the revenue generated at EU level is used to improve the sustainability of mobility.
Safety: emphasising that safety must continue to be one of the priority objectives of the future transport policy, Members consider it to be of the utmost importance to reduce the health effects of transport and to ensure the rights of passengers in all transport modes, particularly those with reduced mobility, by means of clear and transparent regulations.
They call on the Commission to present a study detailing the best practices of the Member States concerning the impact of speed limiters for all types of vehicles and roads, with a view to presenting legislative measures aimed at reducing emissions and improving road safety.
The report also underlines the necessity of guaranteeing both personal safety and legal certainty for workers in the transport sector by, among other things, creating a sufficient number of safe and secure parking places and harmonising the enforcement of road transport rules and the sanctions for which they provide.
Efficient comodality: Members consider that European transport policy should have as its main goal efficient comodality, which is closely linked to the decarbonisation, safety and economic aspects of transport. They stress that efficient comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost-effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection, social and employment conditions, and safety and territorial cohesion
Completion of the single market : the committee considers that transport plays an essential role in completing the European single market and freedom of movement for persons and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in the rail transport sector, in all EU Member States. It calls on the Commission and on Member State authorities to facilitate the completion of the liberalisation of cabotage transport, to reduce the prevalence of empty mileage and to provide for a more sustainable road and rail network in the form of more freight transport hubs.
Members believe it essential, in order to achieve an efficient maritime transport system that complements other modes, to focus once again on a clear liberalisation process enabling it to be truly competitive.
The report underlines the importance of genuinely European management of transport infrastructure with a view to eliminating the ‘border effect’ in all transport modes and enhancing the EU’s competitiveness and appeal. It calls for the establishment of a common European reservation system.
Members call for regular reviews of European legislation and its transposition and implementation, with a view to guaranteeing the effectiveness thereof. They propose that at least one joint meeting be held every year with representatives of the national parliaments responsible for transport, with a view to sharing and cooperating to ensure better, more effective implementation of EU transport legislation.
European agencies: Members are of the view that technical interoperability and its financing, European certification, standardisation and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that their enforcement should figure more prominently among the tasks of the various agencies. They underline that all the agencies should strive for, and swiftly attain, a similarly high level of responsibility and competence and should be evaluated regularly.
Research and technology: Members call for a research and technology agenda for the transport sector. They consider that priority should be given to projects to decarbonise transport, increase the transparency of the supply chain and transport safety and security, improve traffic management and reduce administrative burdens.
The report underlines that, within the framework of climate protection and EU energy independence, each transport mode should reduce its CO2 emissions and be supported by research and development in innovative, energy-efficient and clean technologies and renewable energies.
Transport fund and a European transport network: the report calls for the current resources for transport and mobility to be increased and considers the following to be necessary:
the creation of a transport fund endowed with resources over and above those already included in the EU budget; a budget commitment for transport policy under the multiannual financial framework; the possibility that, in the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact, the long-term nature of investments in transport infrastructure, which improves the competitiveness of the economy, is taken into account when calculating the public deficit; the use of the fund to require, among other things, cofinancing from revenue generated by the internalisation of external costs.
Measurable targets for 2020: Members call for compliance with clearer, more measurable targets to be achieved in 2020 with reference to 2010, and therefore proposes the following:
a 40% reduction in the number of deaths of and serious injuries to active and passive road transport users, a 40% increase in the provision of parking areas for heavy goods vehicles in the trans-European road network (TERN) in each Member State; a doubling of the number of bus, tram and rail passengers (and, if relevant, ship passengers) and a 20% increase in funding for pedestrian- and cycle-friendly transport concepts; a 20% reduction in CO2 exhaust emissions from road passenger and freight traffic; a 20% reduction in the energy used by rail vehicles compared with the 2010 level and capacity and a 40% reduction in diesel use in the rail sector; fitting an ERTMS-compatible and interoperable automatic train speed control system to all new railway rolling stock commissioned from 2011 onwards, and to all new and rehabilitated link lines starting in 2011; a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions from air transport throughout EU airspace by 2020; financial support for the optimisation, development and, where necessary, creation of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway transport, inland ports and rail transport and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms by 2020; at least 10% of TEN-T funding to be dedicated to inland waterway projects.
The Council held a debate and adopted conclusions on clean and energy efficient vehicles for a competitive automotive industry and decarbonised road transport.
The main elements of the conclusions may be summarised as follows:
- the Council recalls that the objective of the European Union to raise the share of renewable energies in its gross final energy consumption to 20% and to 10% in transport by 2020. It also recalls that the Competitiveness Council in its Conclusions on the “Need for a new industrial policy” of 2 March 2010 invited the Commission to come forward with an action plan for clean and energy-efficient vehicles (including the growing role of fully electric cars and plug-in hybrids. In particular, it welcomes the Commission's Communication entitled "A European strategy on clean and energy efficient vehicles” of 28 April 2010, which builds on the on-going measures and sets out an ambitious medium- to long-term policy through an Action Plan, which will strengthen Europe's leadership in clean automotive technologies;
- the Council emphasises, in the light of scientific and market evidence, that electric vehicles (including full electric and plug-in hybrids) will soon be ready for market introduction by some manufacturers and are meeting increasing consumer acceptance, as the safety, standardisation, electricity consumption, environmental aspects and affordability are optimized. It also notes the need to make further progress on improving the environmental performance and the fuel efficiency of these vehicles, including increased use of second generation bio-fuels and gaseous fuels;
- the Council considers that in order to speed up the market uptake of clean and energy efficient vehicles, a supportive policy framework could contribute to creating business confidence. It emphasises that the European Union should take leadership in supporting the roll-out and consumer acceptance of alternative power-trains and energy efficient vehicles while bearing in mind actions taken by the Member States, regions and municipalities – in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
With regard to the action plan presented in the Communication, the Council highlights the need to:
focus on research excellence in order to ensure that alternative power-trains receive targeted research financing, including innovative energy storage and conversion technologies, such as batteries, fuel cells and the necessary respective infrastructure; support breakthrough improvements in internal combustion engines, further step-change improvements to the performance of conventional vehicles and exploring the opportunities offered by mild hybridisation of conventional vehicles, aerodynamics improvement and weight reduction; simplify and streamline the administrative rules for obtaining EU research grants; promote the successful implementation of the Green Car Initiative via EIB financing and European research grants that helped the industry to maintain their R&D activities during the crisis in order to be well positioned for the economic recovery.
The Commission is called upon to consult Member States and stakeholders and to rapidly come up with guidelines on potential financial incentives for consumers to buy green vehicles in order to stimulate the market uptake of clean and energy-efficient vehicles, without giving preference to any particular technology. The Council calls on local, regional and national authorities and all relevant stakeholders to take all necessary measures so that a skilled and qualified workforce is available for alternative power-train and energy-efficient technologies.
In parallel, the Council urges European standardisation bodies, via the standardisation process, to develop, as a matter of priority by mid-2011, a harmonised solution for the interoperability between electric vehicles and the charging infrastructure and to address safety risks and electromagnetic compatibility. The European standardisation bodies should take into account existing technical solutions and ongoing work at international standardisation bodies, international promotion of EU standards should continue. The Council welcomes the intention of the Commission to launch an EU-wide electromobility demonstration project in 2011, which could integrate national pilot projects across borders.
The Council calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals for the implementation of actions set out in the Communication and therefore:
stresses the need for the Commission to engage in a thorough consultation process in order to propose legislative acts (accompanied by impact assessments) and guidelines; calls for the prompt re-launch of the CARS 21 process, with a revised mandate and extended stakeholder involvement; calls on it to draw lessons from national strategies and regional pilot projects launched by European cities and regions and to incorporate, where appropriate, these in its work on guidelines for financial incentives and infrastructures; calls on the Commission to report annually on the implementation of the strategy to the Council, notwithstanding the mandatory review to be performed in 2014; confirms that the Council is ready to assume responsibility for the timely and efficient implementation of the legislative measures required.
The Presidency submitted to ministers draft conclusions on a Commission communication on the sustainable future for transport. The discussion showed that while there was very broad agreement on the text, not all Member States were able to support all of its elements. The Presidency therefore drew the conclusions under its own responsibility. The main points are as follows;
The Council states the following:
it welcomes the Commission Communication and the latter’s decision to start the preparatory process to update and renew the European transport policy for the next decade 2010-2020; it acknowledges that the current economic situation offers lessons to be learnt and recognises the need to prepare the transport sector to face future challenges, as well as the need to better exploit all modes of transport. It also recognises the need to take positive measures to encourage a shift to the use of those that are more energy efficient and environment friendly, as well as a more efficient use of all modes of transport and seamless inter-modality, i.e. co-modality and its promotion, considering that these are key elements of a sustainable, eco-efficient, accessible and integrated transport system; the Commission should promote one fully integrated multimodal transport system, particularly through the revision of the TEN-T policy, the Marco Polo programme and the Naiades Action Programme, and other Community policies, which have a positive impact on the transport system, while taking into account the need to mitigate the present regional differences within the EU, the needs of the Member States at the periphery of the EU, as well as the major transnational traffic flows; the TEN-T policy should pay due attention to the timely completion of priority projects and their effective integration in the comprehensive network, nodes (ports, airports) and inter-modal connections (such as connections between rail, road, inland waterways, ports and airports), multimodal green corridors, missing infrastructure links, cross-border sections, the elimination of bottlenecks, interconnections with neighbouring countries and regions and building on the extension of existing corridors; proper funding mechanisms, coming from Community and other sources, should be considered important in order to ensure an effective implementation of transport infrastructure projects. The Council supports the general principle of internalisation and implementation of external costs in all modes of transport, taking into account, inter alia, the need to ensure a level playing field between different modes; the Council acknowledges the need to break the transport sector's fossil fuel dependence and reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases inter alia through the introduction of innovative and energy efficient technologies for traffic management tools. It supports a comprehensive approach which includes a variety of measures such as alternative drive concepts, alternative fuels, electric mobility and its relevant infrastructure, and a transition to renewable energy sources; it encourages the continued development of a fair and balanced regulatory environment aimed at the completion of an internal transport market, properly regulated and without restrictions, that will allow the EU's businesses to prosper and the EU's citizens to move seamlessly throughout Europe, exploiting the potential of competitive transport services across all modes; there is a need to promote changes in individual behaviour, inter alia, through awareness campaigns, in order to meet environmental challenges and improve safety in all modes of transport. The Council invites the Commission to present the Fourth Action Programme on road safety (2011-2020) and, in this context, acknowledges the need to enhance coordination between European Agencies and national competent authorities; the safety and security of transport users and workers should remain a priority and the rights and needs of transport users should be assessed and taken into account; the promotion of quality employment and training in the transport sector needs to be enhanced:
The Council calls on the Commission to ensure proper implementation of the Community acquis and existing projects and to adopt where necessary additional measures. It stresses the importance of developing more flexible legislative and non-legislative instruments, respecting the principles of subsidiarity, transparency and better regulation, whilst aiming at reducing administrative burdens.
Lastly, the Council looks forward to the Commission's reports on the outcome of the consultation process and invites the Commission to take note of Member States' further reflection and to inform the Council about the developments in the preparation process for the forthcoming White Paper which is expected by the end of 2010 / beginning of 2011.
PURPOSE: to launch a debate on the sustainable future of transport (towards an integrated, technology-led and user friendly system).
BACKGROUND: transport is an essential component of the European economy. The transport industry at large accounts for about 7% of GDP and for over 5% of total employment in the EU. The European Transport Policy has contributed significantly to the Lisbon Agenda for Growth and Jobs. More limited, however, have been the results with respect to the goals of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy: as indicated in the progress report of 2007 ( COM(2007)0642 ), the European transport system is still not on a sustainable path on several aspects .
In 2001, the Commission issued a White Paper setting an agenda for the European transport policy throughout 2010. This programme was updated in the mid-term review of 2006 . Approaching the end of the ten-year period, it is time to look further ahead and prepare the ground for later policy developments.
To this end, the Commission launched a reflection exercise, comprising an evaluation study on the European Transport Policy; a debate within three ‘Focus Groups’; a study – ‘Transvisions’ – identifying possible low-carbon scenarios for transport; and a consultation of stakeholders, notably through a High Level Stakeholders’ Conference on 9-10 March 2009.
The present Communication summarises the results of this wide reflection. It refers to recent developments of the ETP and outstanding issues. It also looks at the future, identifying trends in transport drivers and the likely challenges they could pose to society. It proposes some intermediate policy objectives, which could be pursued to address the emerging challenges in the transport sector. It describes some available instruments and possible lines of intervention for achieving the stated objectives.
The ideas put forward in this Communication are meant to stimulate further debate aimed at identifying policy options, without prejudging the formulation of concrete proposals in the next White Paper of 2010 .
CONTENT: this Paper states that it is difficult to anticipate which factors will have the greatest influence in shaping the future of transport, but it identifies 6 main trends that will certainly pose challenges to our mobility system: (i) ageing; (ii) migration; (iii) environmental sustainability; (iv) fossil fuel scarcity; (v) urbanisation and (vi) globalisation.
The goal of the European Transport Policy is to establish a sustainable transport system that meets society’s economic, social and environmental needs and is conducive to an inclusive society and a fully integrated and competitive Europe. The ongoing trends and future challenges highlighted above point to the need for satisfying a rising demand for ‘accessibility’ in a context of growing sustainability concerns. The most immediate priorities appear to be the better integration of the different modes of transport as a way to improve the overall efficiency of the system and the acceleration of the development and deployment of innovative technologies .
The communication transforms the above priorities into more operational goals, proposing seven broad policy objectives for consideration:
quality transport that is safe and secure : an improvement of the overall quality of transport, including personal security, the reduction of accidents and of health hazards, the protection of passengers’ rights and the accessibility of remote regions, must remain a high priority of transport policy. Road safety will remain an issue of concern. It is also necessary to: (i) improve safety and security conditions, attention should be given to the issue of privacy and data protection that can arise in relation to the means employed for surveillance, registration and control purposes; (ii) supply people with reduced mobility with comfortable transport solutions; (iii) ensure a safer and more secure urban environment. a well maintained and fully integrated network : a better exploitation of the network’s capacity and of the relative strengths of each mode could contribute significantly to reducing congestion, emissions, pollution and accidents. With regard to passenger transport, the integration of aviation with high-speed rail will be a crucial development. Concerning freight transport, an intelligent and integrated logistic system must become a reality, where development of ports and intermodal terminals is key element. The above-described urbanisation trend will make ‘modal shift’ towards more environmentally friendly modes particularly important in the context of urban transport. Infrastructure should be well maintained and improvement works coordinated. New infrastructure should be planned and prioritised with a view to maximising socio-economic benefits taking into account externalities and effects on the total network. more environmentally sustainable transport : l owering consumption of non-renewable resources is essential for all aspects of transport systems and their use. For some aspects, in view of the long time required to effect change, long term strategies are required to provide assurance for different actors in the market. In devising the future of the transport system, all elements of sustainability should be taken into account. This concerns the operation of transport means (emissions, noise) as well as the provision of infrastructure (land occupancy, bio-diversity); keeping the EU at the forefront of transport services and technologies : “soft infrastructures”, like intelligent transport systems for road (ITS) and traffic management systems for rail ( ERTMS ) and aviation (Single European Sky’s SESAR ), backed by Galileo, can optimise the use of the network and improve safety. Innovative vehicle technology can lower emissions, reduce oil dependency and increase comfort. Lastly, the development of technological solutions for sustainable transport is also important to promote growth and safeguard jobs; protecting and developing the human capital : transport workers in some sectors may be displaced from their jobs as a result of the adjustment to a radically different economic and energy context. It is important to ensure that such change is well anticipated and managed, so that changing conditions will also be a source of new jobs and that transport workers can participate in, and respond to, the process. This can be done through a range of instruments, including information and consultation of workers, social dialogue, early identification of skills shortages, training, and ensuring that any restructuring is carried out in a socially responsible way. It must also be ensured that working conditions are maintained or improved. Differences in rights and social conditions between Member States should not result in a race to the bottom and become a factor of competitiveness. smart prices as traffic signals : in transport, like in any other sector, there cannot be economic efficiency unless the prices reflect all costs – internal and external – actually caused by the users. The transport system would particularly benefit from better price signals. The next decade is likely to be one of transition for the transport system. New practices and new technologies will emerge; long-term investments, for example in infrastructure, will be made. Europe will have to live with these choices for a long time: it is therefore essential that they are guided by correct price signals. planning with an eye to transport: improving accessibility : many public services have been progressively centralised with a view to increasing efficiency. The distances between the citizens and the service providers (schools, hospitals, shopping malls) have been on the increase. Firms have followed the same trend by keeping a smaller number of production, storage and distribution centres. The trend towards the concentration of activities has produced a large amount of ‘forced’ mobility, owing to a worsening of accessibility conditions. When taking land-use planning or location decisions, public authorities and companies should take into account the consequences of their choices in terms of travel needs of clients and employees in addition to the transport of goods. Sound planning should also facilitate the seamless integration of the different transport modes. Transportation needs can also be reduced by increasing ‘virtual’ accessibility through information technology (teleworking, e-Government, e-Health, etc.).
The Commission puts forward some suggestions on how the available policy instruments could be activated to reach those goals and respond to the sustainability challenge:
the optimal functioning of the transport system requires full integration and interoperability of the individual parts of the network, as well as interconnection between different (modal) networks. Well focused infrastructure expansion will help avoiding congestion and time losses. In this respect, infrastructure needs to be carefully planned and prioritised with a view to optimising transport chains and the overall transport network; find the resources for sustainable transport : the transition towards a low carbon economy will impose a substantial overhaul of the transport system which will require considerable and well coordinated funding, but the necessary resources will be difficult to find; accelerate the transition to a low-carbon society and lead global innovation : (i) adopt technologies to build lower and zero-emission vehicles and for the development of alternative solutions for sustainable transport; (ii) set open standards, ensuring interoperability, increasing R&D expenditures for technologies that are not yet mature for market application; (iii) define a clear legal and regulatory framework – e.g. for liability and privacy issues – and promoting best practice examples; (iv) foster R&D expenditures towards sustainable mobility, for example through the European Green Cars Initiative and Joint Technology Initiatives; improve the legislative framework : (i) further promote market opening and fostering competition; (ii) include administrative simplification aiming at reducing unnecessary burdens on transport companies; (iii) evolve the regulatory framework towards harmonised environmental obligations, effective supervision, uniform protection of workers conditions and users’ rights; educate, inform and involve citizens : greater public involvement in transport planning can be ensured by recourse to participatory instruments, namely open consultations, surveys and stakeholders’ representation in decision processes; improve governance through effective and coordinated action, notably in two areas: (i) interoperability standards; (ii) the urban challenge. promote the external dimension : the European transport policy needs therefore to think and act internationally to ensure further integration with its neighbouring countries and advance Europe’s economic and environmental interests in the global context.
The Commission encourages all interested party to contribute to the consultation exercise launched by the present Communication by 30 September 2009 .
PURPOSE: to launch a debate on the sustainable future of transport (towards an integrated, technology-led and user friendly system).
BACKGROUND: transport is an essential component of the European economy. The transport industry at large accounts for about 7% of GDP and for over 5% of total employment in the EU. The European Transport Policy has contributed significantly to the Lisbon Agenda for Growth and Jobs. More limited, however, have been the results with respect to the goals of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy: as indicated in the progress report of 2007 ( COM(2007)0642 ), the European transport system is still not on a sustainable path on several aspects .
In 2001, the Commission issued a White Paper setting an agenda for the European transport policy throughout 2010. This programme was updated in the mid-term review of 2006 . Approaching the end of the ten-year period, it is time to look further ahead and prepare the ground for later policy developments.
To this end, the Commission launched a reflection exercise, comprising an evaluation study on the European Transport Policy; a debate within three ‘Focus Groups’; a study – ‘Transvisions’ – identifying possible low-carbon scenarios for transport; and a consultation of stakeholders, notably through a High Level Stakeholders’ Conference on 9-10 March 2009.
The present Communication summarises the results of this wide reflection. It refers to recent developments of the ETP and outstanding issues. It also looks at the future, identifying trends in transport drivers and the likely challenges they could pose to society. It proposes some intermediate policy objectives, which could be pursued to address the emerging challenges in the transport sector. It describes some available instruments and possible lines of intervention for achieving the stated objectives.
The ideas put forward in this Communication are meant to stimulate further debate aimed at identifying policy options, without prejudging the formulation of concrete proposals in the next White Paper of 2010 .
CONTENT: this Paper states that it is difficult to anticipate which factors will have the greatest influence in shaping the future of transport, but it identifies 6 main trends that will certainly pose challenges to our mobility system: (i) ageing; (ii) migration; (iii) environmental sustainability; (iv) fossil fuel scarcity; (v) urbanisation and (vi) globalisation.
The goal of the European Transport Policy is to establish a sustainable transport system that meets society’s economic, social and environmental needs and is conducive to an inclusive society and a fully integrated and competitive Europe. The ongoing trends and future challenges highlighted above point to the need for satisfying a rising demand for ‘accessibility’ in a context of growing sustainability concerns. The most immediate priorities appear to be the better integration of the different modes of transport as a way to improve the overall efficiency of the system and the acceleration of the development and deployment of innovative technologies .
The communication transforms the above priorities into more operational goals, proposing seven broad policy objectives for consideration:
quality transport that is safe and secure : an improvement of the overall quality of transport, including personal security, the reduction of accidents and of health hazards, the protection of passengers’ rights and the accessibility of remote regions, must remain a high priority of transport policy. Road safety will remain an issue of concern. It is also necessary to: (i) improve safety and security conditions, attention should be given to the issue of privacy and data protection that can arise in relation to the means employed for surveillance, registration and control purposes; (ii) supply people with reduced mobility with comfortable transport solutions; (iii) ensure a safer and more secure urban environment. a well maintained and fully integrated network : a better exploitation of the network’s capacity and of the relative strengths of each mode could contribute significantly to reducing congestion, emissions, pollution and accidents. With regard to passenger transport, the integration of aviation with high-speed rail will be a crucial development. Concerning freight transport, an intelligent and integrated logistic system must become a reality, where development of ports and intermodal terminals is key element. The above-described urbanisation trend will make ‘modal shift’ towards more environmentally friendly modes particularly important in the context of urban transport. Infrastructure should be well maintained and improvement works coordinated. New infrastructure should be planned and prioritised with a view to maximising socio-economic benefits taking into account externalities and effects on the total network. more environmentally sustainable transport : l owering consumption of non-renewable resources is essential for all aspects of transport systems and their use. For some aspects, in view of the long time required to effect change, long term strategies are required to provide assurance for different actors in the market. In devising the future of the transport system, all elements of sustainability should be taken into account. This concerns the operation of transport means (emissions, noise) as well as the provision of infrastructure (land occupancy, bio-diversity); keeping the EU at the forefront of transport services and technologies : “soft infrastructures”, like intelligent transport systems for road (ITS) and traffic management systems for rail ( ERTMS ) and aviation (Single European Sky’s SESAR ), backed by Galileo, can optimise the use of the network and improve safety. Innovative vehicle technology can lower emissions, reduce oil dependency and increase comfort. Lastly, the development of technological solutions for sustainable transport is also important to promote growth and safeguard jobs; protecting and developing the human capital : transport workers in some sectors may be displaced from their jobs as a result of the adjustment to a radically different economic and energy context. It is important to ensure that such change is well anticipated and managed, so that changing conditions will also be a source of new jobs and that transport workers can participate in, and respond to, the process. This can be done through a range of instruments, including information and consultation of workers, social dialogue, early identification of skills shortages, training, and ensuring that any restructuring is carried out in a socially responsible way. It must also be ensured that working conditions are maintained or improved. Differences in rights and social conditions between Member States should not result in a race to the bottom and become a factor of competitiveness. smart prices as traffic signals : in transport, like in any other sector, there cannot be economic efficiency unless the prices reflect all costs – internal and external – actually caused by the users. The transport system would particularly benefit from better price signals. The next decade is likely to be one of transition for the transport system. New practices and new technologies will emerge; long-term investments, for example in infrastructure, will be made. Europe will have to live with these choices for a long time: it is therefore essential that they are guided by correct price signals. planning with an eye to transport: improving accessibility : many public services have been progressively centralised with a view to increasing efficiency. The distances between the citizens and the service providers (schools, hospitals, shopping malls) have been on the increase. Firms have followed the same trend by keeping a smaller number of production, storage and distribution centres. The trend towards the concentration of activities has produced a large amount of ‘forced’ mobility, owing to a worsening of accessibility conditions. When taking land-use planning or location decisions, public authorities and companies should take into account the consequences of their choices in terms of travel needs of clients and employees in addition to the transport of goods. Sound planning should also facilitate the seamless integration of the different transport modes. Transportation needs can also be reduced by increasing ‘virtual’ accessibility through information technology (teleworking, e-Government, e-Health, etc.).
The Commission puts forward some suggestions on how the available policy instruments could be activated to reach those goals and respond to the sustainability challenge:
the optimal functioning of the transport system requires full integration and interoperability of the individual parts of the network, as well as interconnection between different (modal) networks. Well focused infrastructure expansion will help avoiding congestion and time losses. In this respect, infrastructure needs to be carefully planned and prioritised with a view to optimising transport chains and the overall transport network; find the resources for sustainable transport : the transition towards a low carbon economy will impose a substantial overhaul of the transport system which will require considerable and well coordinated funding, but the necessary resources will be difficult to find; accelerate the transition to a low-carbon society and lead global innovation : (i) adopt technologies to build lower and zero-emission vehicles and for the development of alternative solutions for sustainable transport; (ii) set open standards, ensuring interoperability, increasing R&D expenditures for technologies that are not yet mature for market application; (iii) define a clear legal and regulatory framework – e.g. for liability and privacy issues – and promoting best practice examples; (iv) foster R&D expenditures towards sustainable mobility, for example through the European Green Cars Initiative and Joint Technology Initiatives; improve the legislative framework : (i) further promote market opening and fostering competition; (ii) include administrative simplification aiming at reducing unnecessary burdens on transport companies; (iii) evolve the regulatory framework towards harmonised environmental obligations, effective supervision, uniform protection of workers conditions and users’ rights; educate, inform and involve citizens : greater public involvement in transport planning can be ensured by recourse to participatory instruments, namely open consultations, surveys and stakeholders’ representation in decision processes; improve governance through effective and coordinated action, notably in two areas: (i) interoperability standards; (ii) the urban challenge. promote the external dimension : the European transport policy needs therefore to think and act internationally to ensure further integration with its neighbouring countries and advance Europe’s economic and environmental interests in the global context.
The Commission encourages all interested party to contribute to the consultation exercise launched by the present Communication by 30 September 2009 .
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6850/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0260/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0189/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0189/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.922
- Committee opinion: PE430.420
- Committee opinion: PE430.700
- Committee opinion: PE430.980
- Committee draft report: PE438.273
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0279
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0279
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0279 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE438.273
- Committee opinion: PE430.700
- Committee opinion: PE430.980
- Committee opinion: PE430.420
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.922
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0189/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6850/2
Activities
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Magdalena ALVAREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Michael CRAMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Spyros DANELLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Knut FLECKENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Jan KOZŁOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Hella RANNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Debora SERRACCHIANI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Laurence J.A.J. STASSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Corien WORTMANN-KOOL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
- Joachim ZELLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 A sustainable future for transport (debate)
Votes
Rapport GROSCH A7-0189/2010 - AM 4 #
Rapport GROSCH A7-0189/2010 - AM 5 #
Rapport GROSCH A7-0189/2010 - RÉSOLUTION #
Amendments | Dossier |
499 |
2009/2096(INI)
2009/12/11
ENVI
39 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the internalisation into transport prices of the external costs of transport (local emissions, CO2 emissions, biodiversity loss, habitat fragmentation,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls, in the interest of creating coherent urban and suburban transport and retaining the rural population, for the formation of Functional Urban Regions;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers compliance with air quality norms as laid down in EU legislation as crucial given the increase in respiratory, cardiovascular and other diseases related to air pollution, mainly resulting from transport.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers compliance with air quality norms as laid down in EU legislation as crucial, given the increase in respiratory and other diseases related to air pollution
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the adoption of European legislation concerning pedestrians’ rights in line with the European Charter for Pedestrians’ rights adopted by the European Parliament, and for a universal low speed limit in all residential areas; recommends that the Brussels Charter cycling targets be adopted as formal EU policy objectives and financing for investments in trans-European cycling infrastructure to receive TEN-T funding; calls for barrier-free access to transport services for persons with reduced mobility to be among the basic principles guiding transport policy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 2008, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail for medium- to long-haul transport;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 2008, fig. 5.1) . Is
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 20081, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 20081, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail. Calls for road building to be halted and the rail system expanded instead;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the internalisation into transport prices of the external costs of transport (local emissions, CO2 emissions, habitat fragmentation, and health costs) in a fair, non-discriminatory way across the transport modes, graduated by level of pollution, would lead to an environmentally friendly choice of transport mode.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 2008, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail and other energy efficient transport means.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 20081, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Considers that the impact of black carbon (soot) particles on global warming should also be taken into account and that particle filtration should be recommended to eliminate that impact in order to at least partly compensate for the increase or insufficient reduction of CO2 emissions. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of the main north-south strand of the Trans- European Transport Network, particularly given that, in the absence of motorways, trans-European traffic passes through the towns of the region, causing a major environmental burden;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to remove local obstacles that are slowing down the establishment of railway communication corridors;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned about the expected emissions of SOx and NOx from maritime transport which will be approximately equivalent to land-based transport by 2020, and the failed attempt by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to put in place a CO2 emission reduction system
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned about the expected
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Deplores the Commission’s failure to respect its commitment to address the climate impact of NOx emissions from aviation in a separate instrument and therefore calls for the introduction of a multiplier on the use of Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation (CDM&JI) or emissions credits issued for other sectors by the aviation operators effective from 2012; calls on the EU to ensure that the full climate impact of aviation is accounted for in all European and international climate policy instruments;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Moreover calls for sectoral CO2 emissions reduction targets for transport, compatible with a mandatory overall CO2 emissions reduction of at least 30 % until 2020, at both national and European levels;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers Research and Development (R&D) to be key factor in our search for a sustainable future for transport because
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers Research and Development (R&D) to be key factor in our search for a sustainable future for transport because only a radical
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers Research and Development (R&D) to be key factor in our search for a
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Highlights the fact that, despite the increase of energy efficiency in transport, the efficiency gains have not resulted in an overall reduction in fuel consumption due to the increase in demand for transport;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls urgently, in the interest of protecting the existing infrastructure – particularly urban public transport – for the subsidy system to be restructured in such a way that at least as much priority is accorded to the maintenance and modernisation of existing lines as has been given to the building of new lines in the past decades;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Encourages the Commission to continue its exchange of best practices, for instance in the framework of the Mayors' Convention, the CIVITAS initiative and others, which offer
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Considers that the maintenance, upgrading and intelligent use of existing transport infrastructure must have priority over new construction; calls for investment in new infrastructure to be mainly for environmentally-friendly projects such as public transport, cycling lanes, intermodality and road safety;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Calls for EU funding for transport projects, including EIB loans, to be made conditional on reliable overall Sustainable Transport Plans presented by each country and region and for a priority network approach to replace a priority project approach; insists on the strengthening public consultation and transparency rules and on an improved implementation and enforcement of environmental impact assessment and nature protection legislation as regards transport infrastructure investments;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. In addition, considers that a cultural shift towards more sustainable transport modes is needed, and should be facilitated by a public information policy; considers that revenues from internalisation of transport costs should be primarily reinvested in sustainable transport modes and climate mitigation;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the predicted trend towards an increasing degree of urbanisation of our society, hence the increasing importance of spatial planning and attractive
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the predicted trend towards an increasing degree of urbanisation of our society, hence the increasing importance of spatial planning and attractive and more environmentally friendly mass transport systems, especially with regard to urban transport, but without neglecting rural transport;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the predicted trend towards an increasing degree of urbanisation of our society, hence the increasing importance of spatial planning
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new) 2a. Highlights the importance of checking that the maximum speed limit of 50 km/h is strictly complied with in urban areas; as various studies and research have shown, this has a dual impact: firstly, it reduces pollutant emissions and secondly, the number of accidents and road deaths which are known to affect a substantial percentage of the population in densely inhabited areas; 2b. Highlights the need to institutionalise the concept of environmentally friendly driving, or eco-driving, and to make it compulsory when training young drivers, since, by taking simple measures when driving, fuel consumption can demonstrably be reduced by up to 30%, thereby reducing air pollution from CO2, unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) and fine dust;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that good transport links to public services in rural areas will cut down on private car use;
source: PE-430.949
2010/02/03
ITRE
84 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph - 1 (new) -1. Stresses that the mobility sector is of crucial importance for Europe: firstly, efficient and sustainable transport boosts the performance of the economy and enables people to participate in social life, and secondly the mobility sector is a core sector of European industry, providing many jobs;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by using an interoperable transport system will it be possible in future to combine most successfully the use of various transport modes and improve energy savings; stresses the urgency of rapidly increasing interoperability and, in this regard, the importance of internalising external costs in order to restore balance in the use of the various transport modes and to promote, where possible and necessary, the use of less polluting modes of transport;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights the role that cohesion policy can play in developing transport infrastructure by ensuring that priority is given to networks and not merely stand
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by using an interoperable transport system will it be possible in future to combine most successfully the use of various transport modes and improve energy savings; stresses, in this regard, the importance of internalising external costs in order to restore balance in the use of the various transport modes and to promote
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by using an interoperable transport system will it be possible in future to combine most successfully the use of various transport modes and improve energy savings; stresses, in this regard, the importance of internalising external costs in order to restore balance in the use of the various transport modes and to promote, where possible and necessary, the use of less polluting modes of transport and alternative energy sources ranging from all types of gaseous and liquid fuels, such as LPG, LNG and CNG, to electricity;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights the role that cohesion policy can play in developing transport infrastructure by ensuring that priority is given to the main networks and not merely stand-
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by using an interoperable transport system will it be possible in future to combine most successfully the use of various transport modes and improve energy savings; stresses, in this regard, the importance of internalising external costs in order to restore balance in the use of the various transport modes and to promote, where possible and necessary, the use of less polluting modes of transport; supports in particular electric-powered mobility with a view to boosting the use of low-CO2 technologies and achieving overall efficiency in the transport system;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the highest possible proportion of the EU funding earmarked for the transport sector to be channelled into existing infrastructure, intermodal platforms, ports and railways;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recognises the importance of the public sector in improving public access to less polluting public transport services, in developing basic economic sectors, particularly the energy sector, in industry and tourism, in promoting economic, social and regional cohesion, and in strengthening the state's role in market regulation, participation and intervention in cooperation with users' organisations, taking the lead in supplying services of general interest; stresses that, in most cases, public-private partnerships in this sector serve only to make business easier for economic groups and provide cover for privatisations that harm the interests of the public and of public transport service users;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Advocates the development and enhancement of local public transport systems through not only the more effective utilisation of existing infrastructures but also demand management initiatives (for example, preferential lanes, ecopass tariff systems and restricted traffic zones). Considers it essential in this connection to invest in technological innovation and innovative solutions for the promotion of low- emission transport systems;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recognises the importance of internalising external costs in all modes of transport order to restore balance between the use and the potential of the various transport modes and to promote, where possible and necessary, the use of less polluting modes of transport;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation in addressing challenges faced by the transport sector;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the information and communication technologies (ICT), in conjunction with the satellite navigation systems Galileo and EGNOS, will allow traffic flows to be optimised
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation in addressing challenges faced by the transport sector; therefore calls for the trans-border considerations to be taken into account in future transport policy; further calls on the Commission to fully and consistently make use of the European Coordinators particularly for the planning and construction of cross-border sections of priority projects in the TEN-T network, on the grounds that there will be a multiple return on the investment involved in their activity in the form of savings arising from more efficient and speedier completion of projects;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the information and communication technologies (ICT), in conjunction with the satellite navigation
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation in addressing challenges faced by the transport sector; therefore calls for the trans-border considerations to be taken into account in future transport policy; recommends the development of the TEN-T priority axes, for example axis 18 (Rhine/Meuse – Main – Danube), so as to facilitate the development of regional transport infrastructures in southeast Europe in line with the objectives and measures of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the information and communication technologies (ICT), in conjunction with the satellite navigation system Galileo, will allow traffic flows to be optimised and urban and interurban congestion to be reduced;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation in addressing challenges faced by the transport sector; therefore calls for the trans-border considerations to be taken into account in future transport policy; stresses the need to find a simpler, more transparent and more effective way of bringing INTERREG funding to bear in support of inter-regional cooperation;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the necessary framework conditions and open standards must be introduced for promising technologies, without giving an undue advantage to any specific technology;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of interregional, cross-border and transnational cooperation in addressing challenges faced by the transport sector; therefore calls for the trans-border considerations to be taken into account in future transport policy; stresses at the same time the major importance of transport for the development of the macroregions;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the Commission’s initiative to outline a strategy for a future sustainable transport policy in the EU; agrees that the European transport system is still far from sustainable in many respects, for example as regards contribution to climate change, consumption of non- renewable energy resources, fine particle emissions, road deaths and damage to biodiversity and landscapes; stresses the importance of the relationship between cohesion and transport policy in achieving the broader goal of sustainable regional development;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes the view that, in order to improve safety for all road users, urban development should take account of more sustainable urban and inter-urban mobility;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the increasing trend of urbanisation in Europe; stresses the need to ensure high quality and accessible transport services to citizens in urban areas, with a view to avoiding urban spread and the energy wastage it entails; highlights the EU’s role in fostering cooperation between urban areas to allow for sharing and exchanging of best practice to make transport systems more sustainable; stresses that, in towns with more than 100 000 inhabitants, the development of a sustainable urban mobility plan should be linked to issues such as cofinanced transport projects, EU greenhouse gas and hydrocarbons consumption targets and EU environmental legislation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the logistical importance of intelligent information systems and transport development; welcomes the various initiatives taken at Community level (such as SESAR, ERTMS, RIS and SafeSeaNet); calls on the Member States to step up their investment in infrastructure
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the logi
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the increasing trend of urbanisation in Europe; stresses the need to ensure high quality and accessible transport services to citizens in urban areas; highlights the EU’s role in fostering cooperation between urban areas to allow for sharing and exchanging of best practice to make transport systems more sustainable; stresses, in this connection, the significance of the Action Plan on Urban Mobility adopted on 30 September 2009, and expects the measures proposed therein to be introduced swiftly;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the logistical importance of intermodal intelligent information systems and transport development; welcomes the various initiatives taken at Community level (such as SESAR, ERTMS, RIS and SafeSeaNet); calls on the Member States to step up their investment in infrastructure and in particular intermodal intelligent transport systems, to promote the use of public transport and to introduce interoperable pricing with the issuing of multimodal tickets in order to optimise the use and interoperability of the various transport modes, to reduce energy consumption and improve safety;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the increasing trend of urbanisation in Europe; stresses the need to ensure high quality and accessible transport services to citizens in urban areas; highlights the EU’s role in fostering cooperation between urban areas to allow for sharing and exchanging of best practice to make transport systems more sustainable; urges the local authorities to promote the most ecological form of public transport possible;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the logistical importance of intermodal intelligent information systems and transport development; welcomes the various initiatives taken at Community level (such as SESAR, ERTMS, RIS and SafeSeaNet); calls on the Member States to step up their investment in infrastructure and intermodal intelligent transport systems, to promote the use of public transport and to introduce interoperable pricing with the issuing of multimodal tickets in order to optimise the use and interoperability of the various transport modes, to reduce energy consumption and improve safety;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Highlights the need for adequate research in the field of transport innovation, with the aim of, among other things, reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions and increasing the use of renewable energies;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points to the importance of electric mobility not only as a means of improving the energy efficiency of transport as a whole, but also as a way to incorporate renewable energy sources into the electricity system, thus enhancing its efficiency; calls on the Commission and the Member States expressly to commit themselves, with the support of local authorities, to projects serving to demonstrate the viability – in technical and energy terms – of electric mobility in urban environments and to provide a basis for regulatory measures to encourage the requisite technology, including for example tax measures applying to the purchase or use of vehicles, type approval, and supply tariffs;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Recognises the central role which efficient road freight plays in a sustainable transport mix; calls, therefore, on the Commission and Member State authorities to facilitate the completion of the liberalisation of cabotage transport, to reduce the prevalence of empty mileage;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Takes the view that the development of sustainable transport should take account of the needs of people with disabilities in order to boost their mobility;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Stresses the pre-eminent importance of road transport and road improvements for the connectivity and competitiveness of regional enterprises; stresses in particular the importance of road connections for the economic development of peripheral and outermost regions; calls for improved and sustainable interlinking of road and rail networks in the form of more freight transhipment points;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission, with a view to strengthening the sustainable, low- carbon mobility sector, to develop an integrated policy which joins up thinking on innovations such as Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS), on research promotion, on competition law, on internal market rules (e.g. cabotage) and on logistics policy, and brings these policy areas together;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of alternative fuels (for example, natural gas, biomethane) for the purpose of establishing sustainable mobility on a wide scale; advocates development of the necessary infrastructures for the supply of such fuels and the harmonised distribution of refuelling points in geographical terms with a view also to developing industrial supply;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Urges the industry and research institutes to widen the range of, and further develop, internationally competitive European technologies to improve the safety and eco-compatibility of all types of vehicles, whether for private use or for public and commercial use;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that rail liberalisation is
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that energy efficiency in the various modes of transport
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the Commission’s initiative to outline a strategy for a future sustainable transport policy in the EU; stresses the importance of the relationship between cohesion and transport policy in achieving the broader goal of sustainable regional development throughout the EU;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Urges car and heavy goods vehicle manufacturers to apply the available technologies with a view to obtaining basic information about vehicle-road interaction and weather conditions, and to make wide use of the in-vehicle system enabling key data (speed, navigation, driving time, etc.) to be projected onto the windscreen, the object being to encourage environmentally sustainable driving behaviour; calls on the Member States to promote new information and education campaigns aimed at road users;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that rail liberalisation is linked with the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector as a whole and promoting regional development; notes
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to strengthen research in the sector of transport by increasing R&D expenditures on new technologies, safety and sustainable mobility, to adopt positive measures to foster the use of less polluting modes of transport, to improve logistics and existing infrastructure, to complete within a short time frame the TEN-T projects that have already been financed, to plan future transport networks in an integrated, consistent manner in keeping with the implementation of the Lisbon Agenda
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that rail liberalisation is linked with the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector as a whole and promoting regional development; notes however, that liberalisation should not have the unintended consequence of making rail transport less competitive vis-a-vis road transport and that due regard must be given to ensuring that peripheral regions
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Shares the Commission’s view that completion of the internal market needs to be complemented by liberalisation of the transport sector, especially rail transport; believes that in the transport sector, as in other sectors, the rules making for genuinely free competition should be enforced fairly and common provisions applied in order to afford access to the market or at the very least guarantee reciprocity; hopes that where transport and energy policy is concerned, and in its relations with non-member countries, Europe will speak with one voice;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that although rail liberalisation is linked with the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector as a whole and promoting regional development
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Encourages the Commission to promote policies which would foster the production and use of zero-emission vehicles, such as electrical vehicles, in Europe;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that rail liberalisation is linked with the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector as a whole and promoting regional development; notes however, that liberalisation should not have the unintended consequence of making rail transport less competitive vis-a-vis road transport and that due regard must be given to ensuring that peripheral regions do not
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the establishment of a common European reservation system in order to enhance the effectiveness of the various modes of transport and to simplify and increase their interoperability.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of developing short-sea shipping
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen sustainable cross-border transport projects with European Neighbourhood Policy countries, especially Ukraine, as the lack of properly functioning interconnections between train, road and inland waterways networks is a major factor in the almost total reliance on the use of heavy goods vehicles on regional roads;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses in general terms the central role of multimodal transport, and especially of shipping as an environmentally friendly and sustainable form of transport; stresses specifically the importance of short-sea shipping as a sustainable mode of transport which can also improve the connectivity and development of peripheral and
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make significant efforts to rapidly implement the standardisation of innovation in the mobility sector, so as to speed up the arrival on the market of new technology, e.g. in the field of e- mobility;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of short-sea shipping as well as freshwater traffic in rivers and lakes as a sustainable mode of transport which can also improve the connectivity and development of peripheral and outermost regions;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the need to look at short-sea- shipping and sea-highway projects in a broader context embracing the countries in Europe’s immediate geographical environment; points out that this will require a better synergy to be achieved between regional policy, development policy and transport policy;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Takes the view that the development of sustainable transport should form part of the EU 2020 strategy;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Supports the development and introduction of a sustainable mobility management method based on the promotion and development of a decentralised consumption and production system that will avoid unnecessary and inefficient transport of goods;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes that substantial progress has been made in implementing TEN-T projects; is of the opinion that TEN-T projects should remain at the core of EU transport policy, in particular projects which are planned or being implemented in the most isolated EU regions, which lack the necessary transport infrastructure and interconnections with the rest of Europe for the carriage of both people and goods;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that energy efficiency in the various modes of transport has increased
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the Commission’s initiative to outline a strategy for a future sustainable transport policy in the EU; stresses the importance of the relationship between cohesion and transport policy in achieving the broader goal of sustainable regional development and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the need for a fully liberalised rail sector with a view to increasing its competitiveness with other modes of transport by improving diversity of service providers, quality and service.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recognises that regional airports play a crucial role in the development of peripheral and outermost regions by increasing their connectivity with hubs; considers it particularly useful to apply intermodal solutions where possible and the identification of innovative financial solutions to facilitate the modernisation of these airports; takes the view that (high- speed) rail links between airports offer an ideal opportunity to sustainably link different modes of transport.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to give more active assistance for coping with structural change in the mobility sector, so that this core sector of European industry can remain viable and its jobs made secure. This may include converting motor manufacturers into mobility service providers, broadening the skills and qualifications of employees, anticipating developments in a product, sector or system, establishing a pan-European observatory for industrial change in the mobility sector, creating regional mentoring schemes and granting support from the Structural Funds, with a view to promoting the sustainable mobility of people and goods and minimising the disruption caused by structural change in the mobility sector;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to continue consistently to proceed on the basis of the ‘co-modality’ principle defined in the Mid-term review of the European Commission’s 2001 Transport White Paper, with a view to improving the overall transport connectivity of the regions, which is an essential condition for their development; takes this view because it considers that there is only a single transport sector, or one demand for transport services, and that the challenge for public policies is to create fair conditions for the various modes of transport to ensure that each can contribute its strengths to the system as a whole, whereas giving one-sided preferential treatment to one transport mode over another results in inequalities and inefficiencies;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Deplores the fact that the goal of halving road transport casualties by 2010 that was set in 2001 White Paper has not been achieved; calls on the Commission to present a follow-up strategy with clearly defined actions to combat road accidents more effectively;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the need for consultations and discussions to be held on the specific transport issues facing archipelago regions.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the transport system must provide customers with the best possible mobility choices, combining sustainable solutions with an efficient service; notes that better integration of the various transport modes will improve the overall efficiency of the transport system;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that an integrated approach to infrastructure planning, project financing and development can play a central role in developing a competitive and sustainable transport sector; stresses that the regions and local authorities should already take on responsibility in a preventive role by ensuring at the planning stage (residential areas/work/leisure facilities) that sensible structures are created that will minimise, or at least reduce, the volume of traffic (especially cars) from the outset; stresses that local and regional authorities often cannot meet transport challenges without co-operation, calling therefore for their and the stakeholders’ active involvement in the policy development and implementation process;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers the development of maritime corridors and sea and rail transport as cheaper and more ecological modes of transport to be a priority;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that an integrated approach to infrastructure planning, project financing and development can play a central role in developing a
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that an integrated and coordinated approach to
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that only by using an interoperable transport system will it be possible in future to combine most successfully the use of various transport modes and improve energy savings; stresses, in this regard, the importance of internalising the external costs of promoting stronger, high-quality public transport networks at prices that are affordable for the general population, in order to restore balance in the use of the various transport modes and to promote, where possible and necessary, the use of less polluting modes of transport;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights the role that cohesion policy can play in developing transport infrastructure by ensuring that priority is given to networks and not merely stand- alone projects; considers that use of Intelligent Transport Systems contributes to the development of transport infrastructures in terms of safety, sustainability and efficiency; recommends that transport projects co-financed from the Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund are oriented towards pursuing the goal of balanced development and achieving greater territorial cohesion and calls for a better coordination between Community Funds and national funds;
source: PE-438.447
2010/03/26
TRAN
376 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s communication entitled ‘Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan’ (COM(2007)0607),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the transport sector has a major impact on aspects of economic policy and employment policy, given that it represents 10% of the EU’s prosperity (as a proportion of gross domestic product) and provides over 10 million jobs, and whereas improvements in the efficiency of transport chains are therefore required in order to ensure that the transport sector can play a key role in the European economy in future too,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Observes that transport is the second largest source of PM10 emissions; the accumulation of toxins and pollutants in particulate form causes serious cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses resulting in considerable social and economic costs; the use of filter technology in transport fleets should also be recommended in order to make a substantial contribution to the reduction of pollutant emissions;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need for better information of the general public about the consequences of leisure-time travel and calls on the Commission to consider leisure-time travel in its policy approach;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that Member States must assume their responsibility by creating sufficient safe parking places along roads; is of the opinion that the European Commission must ensure that, where EU rules provide for sufficient rest for drivers, they also have sufficient parking places to take that rest. That also applies with regard to special safety conditions for parking lorries carrying dangerous goods;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Underlines that there is still a significant lack of safety for workers in the road transport sector, and therefore finds it essential to continue the work of establishing secure parking sites with high minimum standards along the trans European network;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that promoting safety in all modes of transport must be a priority and represents a major challenge; is convinced in particular that, in order to improve the safety of road transport in Europe, the EU must propose an ambitious road safety action programme for 2020, notably through vigorous actions to combat speeding and drink and drug driving; states that the EU must make a firm commitment to improve road safety among young drivers and motorcycle users; states that it must also propose solutions to ensure better protection for vulnerable users and, to this end, be consistent with the urban mobility action plan; stresses, lastly, that the EU must ensure that all those guilty of road traffic offences are charged, irrespective of the Member State in which the offence is committed (Commission proposal on the cross-border application of sanctions);
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that safety must continue to be one of the priority objectives of the future transport policy; considers that greater emphasis should be placed on the safety aspects specific to transport; considers it necessary, therefore, to improve safety through new investment in new infrastructure and better maintenance;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that the European Union’s overall road safety goal should be to have the safest roads in the world, thereby adopting a ‘Vision Zero’ approach which is not willing to accept serious injuries and fatalities as a given and thus requires the potential for improvements to be harnessed in all transport sectors, with the focus on utilisation of existing and future technologies;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is convinced that the first building block of the future Road Safety Strategy should be to reduce the number of road deaths, with a realistic but ambitious long-term goal of at least a 40% reduction within 10 years, and, secondly, a separate target to reduce the number of serious injuries, including the development of standards for the compilation of the required data; states that special attention should be paid to unprotected road users in this context;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is convinced that the European Commission should involve experts in traffic medicine and traffic psychology in the formulation of its future Road Safety Strategy;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the transport sector has a major impact on
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is convinced that an integrated transport policy not only between the transport modes but also on the entire value chain of transport and logistics services with all relevant actors of the industry is necessary to suitably address the challenges of transport; calls on the European Commission to create a high- level stakeholders group for logistics with broad based industry representation;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not of the transfer of traffic but rather of the effective use of the various modes of transport, and that the goal of European transport policy should therefore be effective comodality; emphasises the important role of seaports and inland harbours in the efficient combination of different modes and the development of an efficient and sustainable transport and logistics chain;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas transport has a triple role: an economic role, a social role and a territorial cohesion role, all essential for European integration,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not of the transfer of traffic but rather of the effective use of the various modes of transport, and that the goal of European transport policy should therefore be effective comodality which contributes to improved safety and emissions reductions across all modes and the transport sector as a whole;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not of the transfer of traffic but rather of the effective use of the various modes of transport, mainly those disposing over free and available capacity, and their integration in order to enhance seamless traffic flows across modes and nodes, and that the goal of European transport policy should therefore be effective comodality;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not only of the transfer of traffic but
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not only of the transfer of traffic but
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Finds that the development of passenger and freight transport as a whole raises the issue not of the transfer of traffic but rather of the effective use of the various modes of transport, promoting more sustainable forms of transport in urban areas, and that the goal of European transport policy should therefore be effective comodality;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that effective comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost- effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that effective comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost- effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection, social and employment conditions
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that effective comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost-
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas transport has an important and fundamental role to play in the promotion and development of the Europe 2020 Strategy, notably as regards the industrial application of ‘green mobility technologies’ and the need ‘for a sustainable long-term financial plan for the trans-European networks’,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that effective comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost- effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that effective comodality should be measured not only in terms of cost- effectiveness but also according to criteria of environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Raises the importance of developing cross border green corridors for all modes of transport to be able to achieve effective comodality;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for an efficient cross border green corridor approach between hubs and terminals in which rail, road and sea systems co-operate to be the fundament for utilizing the infrastructure in a more efficient way and achieve effective comodality;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that the efficiency of comodality is largely connected to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and reduction of bottlenecks on roads, therefore the Commission and the Member States should promote the modal shift from road to rail, especially in the freight transport;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that in order to achieve the objective of more sustainable, safe transport, the EU must promote a modal balance; to this end, considers that it is essential to promote rail and maritime freight transport because of the major contribution both these modes make to achieving more sustainable, safe transport;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that it is therefore essential to promote the interoperability of the transport system, with emphasis on the intermodal modes. Calls for a policy that promotes interconnections between the different modes, particularly by improving access to ports and logistics centres;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Once effective instruments, such as digital tacographs, are available to control working time, it will be important to avoid any rigidity, taking approaches that promote flexibility and do not prevent drivers from reconciling their working and family life;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the Commission to integrate a social dimension in all transport policy and to include a social chapter in the white book outlining a strategy that includes concrete measures for strengthening social rights of transportation workers in order to avoid a race to the bottom; requests that such strategy includes measures such as improved enforcement of cabotage rules, creation of community rules on customers social and environmental responsibility in procurement, improved enforcement of working time and rest time rules, and the creation of a driver attestation showing the place of employment for the driver and belongingness to a social rights catalogue of a Member State;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Proposes that in the new framework of the Lisbon Treaty, and in accordance with the Commission, at least one joint meeting be organised every year with the representatives of the national parliaments responsible for transport with a view to sharing and cooperating to ensure better, more effective implementation of EU transport legislation;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the transport sector, due to its crucial contribution to economic growth, can play a key role in the realisation of the EU 2020 Strategy,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls upon the Commission to issue clear, unambiguous guidelines on State aid, particularly in the maritime sphere, and thus ensure a level playing field in the European transport market;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be accompanied by other measures aimed at avoiding distortions of competition, inter alia in the social, fiscal and environmental fields, and preserving and harmonising safety standards, working conditions and consumer rights;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete regulation and market opening should be
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas investment in transport infrastructure stimulates the economy in the short term and increases productivity in the medium and long term,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening, based on the principle of reciprocity, should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be accompanied by other measures aimed at avoiding distortions of competition, inter alia in the social, fiscal and environmental fields;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening, based on the principle of reciprocity, should be achieved, primarily in rail transport by the end of 2011; this complete market opening should be accompanied by other measures aimed at avoiding distortions of competition, inter alia in the social, fiscal and environmental fields;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that uniformly regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport, in all EU Member States;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be accompanied by other measures aimed at avoiding distortions of competition and at creating a level playing field between transport modes, inter alia in the social, fiscal and environmental fields;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Finds that transport plays an essential role in completing the European Single Market and the freedom of movement of people and goods, and that regulated market opening should be achieved, primarily in rail transport; this complete market opening should be accompanied by measures safeguarding the quality of public services and other measures aimed at avoiding distortions of competition, inter alia in the social, fiscal and environmental fields;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for competition and fiscal policies in the transport sector to put an end to unfair competition in favour of more polluting modes, such as road and air transport; demands therefore the Commission inter alia to propose to end tax exemptions on kerosene and VAT exemptions for transborder EU flight tickets;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that in future all infrastructure costs, as well as external costs, should be charged to all modes;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that one of the main difficulties in completing the internal market is cross-border interconnections, as a result of a lack of infrastructure, bottlenecks or shortcomings in system interoperability, which is why the future European transport policy must focus on overcoming these difficulties;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines, with regard to the economic requirements, the importance of genuine European management of transport infrastructures (freight and high-speed rail corridors, Single European Sky, maritime area without borders) with a view to eliminating the border effect and enhancing the EU’s competitiveness and appeal;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas it is vital that the EU has a financial framework that can respond to the transport policy challenges in the years ahead,
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines, with regard to the economic requirements, the importance of genuine European management of transport infrastructures (freight and high-speed rail corridors, Single European Sky, maritime area without borders, etc.) with a view to eliminating the ‘border effect’ and enhancing the EU’s competitiveness and appeal;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that in order to improve the competitiveness of rail transport, it is necessary to reduce the fragmentation of the European rail market and develop a network of rail corridors that allow goods to be transported efficiently, giving priority to investment in ports and their connections with the transport network;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the consumers should be the major beneficiaries of the market opening, and therefore urges the Commission and the Member States to evaluate their long term planned investments for infrastructure especially by strengthening the interoperability aspect and recalls that the achievement of interoperability in the rail sector, should be a financial priority of the EU and the Member States;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of cooperation between the Commission and the Member States for the swift completion of ERTMS, RailNetEurope and the future Freight Corridors projects in the field of rail transport for freight and urges the Commission to find a solution in order to harmonise those projects for the completion of the internal market and finally for the benefit of the European consumers;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. In order to achieve efficient maritime transport that complements other modes, it is essential once again to focus on a clear liberalisation process so that it can be truly competitive;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that a genuinely successful common ports policy is impossible without unambiguous arrangements for State aid to ports; urges the European Commission to produce guidelines without delay;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that, for the proper functioning of the internal market, the same EU rules should apply on all inland waterways within the EU, so that all boatmen throughout the EU receive the same treatment;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines that a European harmonisation of Environmental zones for vehicles at an ambitious level would be a way to both complete the single market for transport and improve air quality in Europe;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that transport is especially important for the outermost regions, and that the future transport policy must therefore take into account their needs and the fact that their economic and social development is highly dependent on transport;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the imperative goal of completing the internal market can not be reached without better involvement of stakeholders and strengthened social dialogue at European level;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the transport sector has a considerable impact on people’s health and quality of life, and, whilst facilitating people’s private and professional mobility, was responsible for 24.6% of total CO2 emissions in 2006, and whereas this figure has since risen even further
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport has an impact
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport impacts on social, health and security policy and that, in the context of creating a single transport area, employment conditions and education and training must be harmonised and improved;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport impacts on social, health and security policy and that, in the context of creating a single transport area, employment conditions and education and training must be harmonised and improved; stresses that the creation of, inter alia, a European system for accreditation and the European accreditation of national training centres and the creation of EU centres of excellence in the relevant Member States can contribute to promoting the quality of training and the status of transport sector employees, as well as to the mutual recognition of training courses;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport impacts on social, health and security policy and that, in the context of creating a single transport area, employment conditions and education and training must be harmonised and improved; urges the Commission to establish as soon as possible the conditions for effective social dialogue aimed at facilitating this harmonisation; stresses that the creation of, inter alia, European training centres and EU centres of excellence in the relevant Member States can contribute to promoting the quality of training and the status of transport sector employees, as well as to the mutual recognition of training courses;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport impacts on social, health and security policy and that, in the context of creating a single transport area, employment conditions and education and training must be harmonised a
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transport impacts on social, health and security policy and that, in the context of creating a single transport area, employment conditions and education and training must be harmonised and improved; stresses that the creation of, inter alia, European training centres and EU centres of excellence in the relevant Member States can contribute to promoting the verifiable quality of training and the status of transport sector employees, as well as to the mutual recognition of training courses;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for enforceable and verifiable rules on the conditions of employment of mobile personnel, in order to improve their working conditions and remove distortions of competition;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the importance of the completion of the internal market, of the reduction of administrative burdens and of more harmonisation in the execution and maintenance in the area of transport, like driving and resting hours;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Takes the view that the enforcement and sanctioning of the road transport rules must be harmonised, particularly in regard to driving and rest times; like any citizen, road transport operators must have legal certainty as to the relevant rules and their enforcement and sanctioning;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Draws attention to the fact that the provision of parking areas in the trans- European road network (TERN) has not kept pace with the increase in road freight transport, so compliance with the permissible driving times and rest periods established for professional drivers, especially during night-time hours, and road safety more generally will be seriously compromised unless the quality and quantity of rest facilities are improved in the EU Member States;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the transport sector has a considerable impact on the environment and on people’s health and quality of life, and, whilst facilitating people’s private and professional mobility, was responsible for
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers that, in addition to the proper implementation of EU legislation and effective enforcement, it is a challenge for the EU in the next ten years to ensure that EU legislation is interpreted uniformly by the national enforcement bodies for the realisation of the internal EU transport market; draws attention to the good example of the common enforcement interpretation in Directive 2006/22/EC; calls upon the Commission to give further consideration to the desirability of EU training in the enforcement of EU transport legislation;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers a sustainable transport policy to be an opportunity to develop a leading industrial sector in green technologies that also creates jobs and high-quality employment in the EU. Calls on the European Commission, in the impact study of its legislative proposals, to quantify and evaluate the creation of ‘green jobs’ and propose measures to encourage this;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that in order to achieve greater effectiveness in transport policy
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that effectiveness in transport policy consists in evaluating programmes (such as Galileo and ITS) and then reorienting or further continuing them, as appropriate; sees a consequent need, for example, for a new road traffic safety programme, a mid-term review of NAIADES as well as a permanent follow up of NAIADES in order to strengthen the existing policy framework for inland waterway transport, implementation of the Open Sky Programme and the continuation of Marco Polo in a simplified form;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that effectiveness in transport policy consists in evaluating programmes (such as Galileo and ITS) and then reorienting or further continuing them, as appropriate; sees a consequent need, for example, for a new road traffic safety programme, a mid-term review of NAIADES, implementation of the Open Sky Programme and the
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that effectiveness in transport policy consists in evaluating programmes (such as Galileo and ITS) and then reorienting or further continuing them, as appropriate; sees a consequent need, for example, for a new road traffic safety programme, a mid-term review of NAIADES, implementation of the Open Sky Programme
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that effectiveness in transport policy consists in evaluating programmes (such as Galileo and I
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that effectiveness in transport policy consists in evaluating programmes (such as Galileo and ITS) and then reorienting or further continuing them, as appropriate; sees a consequent need, for example, for a new road traffic safety programme, further revitalisation of the TEN-Ts, a mid-term review of NAIADES, implementation of the Open Sky Programme and the continuation of Marco Polo in a simplified form;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers the creation of the Single European Sky essential to decrease the environmental impact of flights and to achieve a three-fold increase of capacity while improving the safety of the European airspace; insists that the successful implementation of the Single European Sky is only possible with the completion of its technical pillar, SESAR; therefore calls on the Commission to submit proposals to create an appropriate governance framework for SESAR deployment and to provide for adequate public funding;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that the enforcement of these should figure more prominently in the tasks of the various agencies; underlines that all the Agencies should strive for, and shortly attain, a similarly high level of responsibility and competence; encourages in particular the development of the full potential of the European Railway Agency, including progressively assuming responsibility for certifying all new rolling stock and railway infrastructure, and for regular audits of national safety authorities or equivalent bodies in the Member States, as laid down in Directive 2004/49/EC of 29 April 2004;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that the enforcement of these should figure more prominently in the tasks of the various agencies; notes that the funding for technical and operational interoperability should be included in the budget priorities of the European Union and its Member States;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market,
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that the enforcement of these should figure more prominently in the tasks of the various agencies; points out, too, that the agencies should in particular review the need for, and implementability of, new specifications prior to their adoption;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that coordination of the preparation and construction of priority TEN-T projects and their operation, technical interoperability, European certification and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that the consistent enforcement of these should figure more prominently in the tasks of the various agencies, since the costs thus incurred will be recouped in the form of savings owing to the better functioning of the system as a whole;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is of the view that technical interoperability, European certification, standardisation and mutual recognition are essential elements of an effectively functioning single market, and that the enforcement of these should figure more prominently in the tasks of the various agencies;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the importance for the European Commission to constantly monitor and work to maintain the highest level of rail safety through improved technical interoperability across the EU and to operate in order to strengthen the competences and the means of the European Railway Agency;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s report entitled ‘Second report on monitoring development of the rail market' (COM(2009)0676),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas within the transport sector road transport accounted for 71.0%, aviation for 12.2%, sea and inland waterways for 15.3% and railways for only 0.6% of total transport CO2 emissions in 2006, according to ‘EU energy and transport in figures’, in 2009,
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the importance for the European Commission to constantly monitor and work to maintain the highest level of safety for transport. This can be achieved through the strengthening of the competences and the means of the European Agencies dealing with all types of transport;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that a high level of rail safety is maintained, while accelerating technical interoperability in the European Union, and, to this end, to reinforce the management, competences and resources of the European Railway Agency;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that a high level of rail safety is maintained, while accelerating technical interoperability in the European Union, and, to this end, to reinforce the management, competences and resources of the European Railway Agency;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Underlines that 75% of transport is road-based, and that based on a cost- benefit analysis, the need for an agency for road transport
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Underlines that 75% of transport is road-based, and that
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Underlines that 75% of transport is road-based, and that an agency for road transport is therefore needed; calls for such an agency to guarantee people’s fundamental right to secure mobility, support new applications (such as Galileo
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the transport sector share of CO2 emissions in the EU increased by 35% during the two last decades and cars in cities cause 70% of all the GHG emissions from transport, while the share of industry and buildings in CO2 emissions decreased by 17% each,
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls for concrete political and financial support to increase the contribution made both by private-sector and publicly-funded research towards the attainment of the EU’s goals in respect of sustainable road transport; emphasises the need to support research into all modes of transport, both in respect of new technologies and in the improvement of conventional technologies; calls, further, for consideration to be given to the transport system, including sustainable road transport, as a priority topic in the Eighth Framework Programme for Research;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to present a very brief study detailing the best practices of the Member States concerning the impact of speed limiters for all types of vehicles and roads, both urban and inter-urban, with a view to presenting legislative measures aimed at reducing emissions and improving road safety;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Points out that inland waterway transport is still confronted with a diverging institutional framework and requests the establishment of a permanent and structured cooperation between the competent institutions in order to fully exploit the potential of this mode of transport;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental improvements due to modal shift to more sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling and public transport), a reduction in exhaust gases and traffic noise, improve safety by creating solutions to infrastructure bottlenecks and, not least, result in increased energy independence; underlines that challenges in the transport sector are concentrated in urban areas regarding pollution, congestion and mobility for citizens and need to be recognised by special funds supporting urban ITS solutions;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent and interoperable systems in transport organisation, such as ERTMS, Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent decisions, behaviour and systems in transport organisation, such as intermodal and interoperable use of ERTMS, RIS, Galileo and ITS
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental improvements due to a reduction in exhaust gases and traffic noise, improve safety by creating solutions to infrastructure bottlenecks and, not least, result in increased energy independence; calls on the Member States to ensure swift implementation of ITS applications, so as to extend their benefits to all citizens across the Union;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas, in the transport sector, road transport accounted for 71.2% of total CO2 emissions in 2005, air transport accounted for 11.9% , maritime and inland waterway transport accounted for 14.5% and rail transport accounted for 1.6%,
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental improvements due to a reduction in exhaust gases and traffic noise, improve safety by creating solutions to infrastructure bottlenecks and, not least, result in increased energy independence across the modes in the entire transport network;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo, SESAR and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent and interoperable systems in transport organisation, such as ERTMS, SESAR, Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental improvements due to a reduction in exhaust gases and traffic noise, improve safety by creating solutions to infrastructure bottlenecks and, not least, result in increased energy independence;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that intelligent systems in transport organisation, such as Galileo and ITS, need support in terms of research as well as in their application, since they lead to considerable environmental improvements due to a reduction in
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Underlines that to achieve comodality, connecting information is as important as connecting modes of transport and stresses therefore that connecting modal intelligent systems in transport organisation is required to attain better capacity use, more safety and more sustainability in the entire transport network;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Underlines that to achieve comodality and network integration, connecting information is as important as connecting modes of transport and stresses therefore that connecting modal intelligent systems in transport organisation is required to attain better capacity use, more safety and more sustainability in the entire transport network;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers that Member States should be encouraged to carry out national and cross-border trials with European Modular Systems, including intermodal transport trials;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls upon the Commission to set up more national and cross-border experimental projects with European Modular Concepts, including intermodal transport projects;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Emphasises that climate protection, sustainability, reduction of import dependency and greater cost stability for energy and fuels are reasons why a timely conversion to alternative energy sources and drive systems is required in the transport sector, and calls on the European Commission to take more vigorous action to promote and drive forward this conversion, taking account of cost-benefit considerations: environmental levies should only be introduced if they can reasonably be borne by transport users and consumers and result in the greatest possible benefit to the environment;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12a (new) 12a. Is convinced that the key answers, in terms of achieving further CO2 reductions in road transport, lie, in the short to medium term, in improvements in the efficiency of combustion engines and auxiliary units and, in the medium to long term, in diversification of drive systems, with a particular but not exclusive focus on electrification;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas rail transport and maritime transport are, in general, very safe and environmentally friendly and there is a significant imbalance with road transport and air transport ,
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Emphasises that in order to achieve further energy savings and to promote the use of energy carriers with low CO2 intensity, innovative technologies are required and that Europe’s industry can become a leader in the development of these future-oriented technologies, as there is considerable development potential to reduce CO2 emissions in the transport sector in particular, both with regard to vehicles (fuel consumption), energy carriers (natural gas, biofuels, hydrogen) and information and communications (telematics, congestion avoidance);
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Is convinced that European efficiency and safety technologies, not least highly efficient diesel technology, open up considerable export opportunities for European companies worldwide, and therefore merit political support in the interests of sustainability and competitiveness;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Emphasises that the energy sources used for transport pose a double challenge for the future: substituting polluting energies with energies with a low environmental impact and replacing fossil-based energy sources, which are limited or soon to be depleted, with renewable energy sources; in these conditions, biofuels, liquefied gas and, above all, electrical energy (source of production and operational system under way) must be the subject of concerted efforts at EU level in terms of research, development and production means;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that in an era where oil resources are declining and GHG emissions must significantly be reduced, alternative low-carbon fuels will enable synergies between the transport sector and the electricity sector. Proactive measures are required to speed up the necessary development of electric vehicles, hydrogen and alternative fuels in order to decrease oil dependency, as stated in the conclusions of the Energy Council of February 2009;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Is convinced that one way of reducing the climate impact from transport vehicles goes through increased energy efficiency and sustainable renewable fuels; calls for further European research and development funding for new energy efficient technologies; calls for the EU to support the development of production and refinement of renewable fuels and facilitate tools for building the needed infrastructure to distribute the fuels;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges that particular attention should be addressed to EU projects related to the so-called ‘Green Corridors’ for mid-long distance road transport. The aim of the projects should be to analyze the possible implementation of advanced technologies and the development of the infrastructure for capillary and available alternative fuels distribution and to dedicate available EU R&D resources with the scope to step forward to a greener freight logistic;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the necessity of research and the importance of rapid developments in vehicle technology which should be taken into account in any further legislation; calls upon the European Commission to take into consideration new technologies that are available to improve vehicles safety and to effectively reduce CO2 emissions in an integrated manner; and supports the fitment of such advanced technologies in all vehicle types;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers research and development (R&D) to be key factor in our search for a sustainable future for transport because a radical technological switch can bring about the much-needed emission reductions and the transition to low carbon transport; urges the Commission and the Member States to identify the drivers for and barriers to, possible innovation resulting from R&D and to priorities investment in environmentally friendly infrastructure, such as for example smart grids for electric transport, natural gas and biomethane from renewable energies and hydrogen distribution networks. Urges the Commission not to neglect the influence of in-vehicle technologies on driver behaviour and its potential contribution to the reduction of fuel consumption/CO2 emissions;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Underlines the importance of innovation for reducing vehicle emissions, particularly rechargeable hybrid vehicles and clean, energy-efficient airplanes, and encourages, in the field of innovation, the European projects;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls upon the Commission to carry out more research into the use of alternative fuels in the transport sector and to develop an alternative fuels strategy;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas in Europe all modes of transport are very safe, although in 2008 approximately 39 000 people unfortunately died in traffic accidents and 300 000 people were seriously injured in accidents involving vehicles for private and professional use, which means that further efforts are required as regards all aspects concerning safety, notably road safety,
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. The Commission should stress the importance of RTD and innovation for further improving the technological performance and attractiveness of clean and energy-efficient vehicles to the consumer, such as battery improvement;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Asks the Commission to investigate how new technologies can be introduced for inland shipping as soon as possible to enable NOx emissions to be cut to 90%;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that, given the positive impact of clean and intelligent technologies on the greening of the transport system, EU research funds should support relevant ‘demonstration’ projects with a view ensuring their introduction on the market and should improve access for SMEs;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls for appropriate EU-action to support increased use and development of sustainable urban and regional public transportation through research and development and arenas for knowledge exchange including financial support through appropriate funds;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that in the transport sector, too, open source software should be supported because it promises to offer higher software quality and therefore better product safety, more competition in software maintenance, more rapid standardisation, and hence lower costs, and is thus beneficial for Europe’s ICT industry culture, which is based predominantly on SMEs;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers transport as of utmost importance as it is related to all fields of policies, despite that, calls on the Commission to strengthen research on avoiding unnecessary transport and shortening existing transport routes in Europe;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Emphasises, that it is necessary to focus on research and the next steps in road safety, which should contribute to a significant improvement of the situation;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Emphasises the need for a uniform definition of relevant terms relating to road safety and accident research, in order to ensure comparability of findings and any measures that may be implemented;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls for a research and technology agenda for the transport sector, this should be done in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders in order to understand the needs of the sector and better attribute EU funding accordingly; the priority should be given to projects to decarbonise transport, increase the transparency of the supply chain and transport safety and security, improve traffic management and reduce administrative burdens;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas border crossings represent a serious obstacle to the effective development of rail transport, not just for passengers but especially for freight, in particular where these crossings are more difficult because of mountain ranges that require low-toll tunnels adapted to the sector’s needs,
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding,
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure, support research and promote the implementation of intelligent transport systems
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure, support research and promote the implementation of intelligent transport systems and should be guided by award criteria which take
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding,
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure, support research and promote the implementation of intelligent transport systems in all modes of transport and should be guided by award criteria which take account of environmental, social and security efficiency;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure, support research and promote the implementation of intelligent transport systems in all modes of transport and should be guided by award criteria which take account of environmental, social, economic and security efficiency;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the EU undertook, in the climate change package, to achieve a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990, which remains a binding target,
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used to improve infrastructure, support research and promote the implementation of intelligent transport systems and should be guided by award criteria which take account of environmental, social and security efficiency as well as social, economic and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that an efficient transport policy requires adequate funding, and that a transport fund might be created using, inter alia, existing funds in the EU budget, part of the structural and cohesion policy funds and PPPs or other financial instruments; such a fund should be used, at all levels of government, to
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. The fund should also address increasing urban mobility challenges faced by cities (pollution, congestion, ageing society, etc.). In this context, a consequent share of the resources of the fund should be allocated to the financing of urban mobility specifically;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. It is absolutely essential to increase the economic and financial resources available for the creation of a European infrastructure network, with emphasis on resources for cross-border sections, with a view to guaranteeing the accessibility of the territories. The mid-term revision of the financial perspective must take account of the evident inadequacy of the resources it has envisaged for this purpose;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for transport policy to be able to promote, inter alia, transport by rail and ship, port policy
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for a coherent and integrated transport policy to be able to promote, inter alia, transport by rail and ship, port policy and public transport by means of financial support which is not measured by competitiveness criteria;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for transport policy to be able to promote, inter alia, transport by rail, air and ship, port policy and public transport by means of financial support which is not measured by competitiveness criteria;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part, so that
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Points out that, given the importance of the railway transport development for social and economic development and taking into account the high population density in the EU, it is highly important for Europe to develop rail and naval transport; underlines the importance of the development of railway infrastructure, its modernisation and equipment with ERTMS systems, the development of railway corridors for merchandise and high speed railways to connect all capitals and big cities of the Member States;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the financial and economic crisis can serve as an opportunity to give targeted support to the field of transport and enable investment in safe, environmentally-friendly
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the financial and economic crisis can serve as an opportunity to give targeted support to the field of transport and enable investment in safe, environmentally friendly
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the financial and economic crisis can serve as an opportunity to give targeted support to the field of transport and enable investment in safe, environmentally-friendly and therefore sustainable transport by means of financial assistance; considers that efficient, sustainable transport offers economic advantages in terms of reducing fuel bills, cutting energy dependency and creating sustainable jobs;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the financial and economic crisis can serve as an opportunity to give targeted support to the field of transport and enable investment, primarily and as a priority, in safe, environmentally- friendly and
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the financial and economic crisis
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Underlines that sustainable transport and mobility systems, such as rail, tramways, buses and bicycles, including their industries and services, offer a unique opportunity for creating stable jobs and contribute in the medium and long term to the avoidance of external costs for our society; calls therefore on the Commission and the Member States to cofinance and promote this sector, at least in a way similar as to what has been done during the last year in favour of banks and the automobile industry;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional level, and that multimodal platforms remain an essential element of infrastructural supply, since they enable effective interconnections between different modes of transport
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part, so that
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional level, and that multimodal platforms remain an essential element of infrastructural supply, since they enable
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional level, and that multimodal platforms remain an essential element of infrastructural supply, since they enable effective interconnections between different modes of transport; therefore investments in logistics, and Public Private Partnership constructions, are essential;
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN-T network should be evaluated according to criteria of territorial cohesion, accessibility of regions and sustainable development at European and also regional level, and that multimodal platforms remain an essential element of infrastructural supply, since they enable effective interconnections between different modes of transport;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is convinced that the definition of a European core network within the overall TEN network should be evaluated according to criteria of sustainable development at European and also regional level, and that multimodal platforms and dry ports remain an essential element of infrastructural supply, since they enable effective interconnections between different modes of transport;
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Is of the opinion that TEN-T projects should remain a priority of EU transport policy, in particular projects which are planned or being implemented in the EU regions which lack the necessary transport infrastructure and interconnections with the rest of Europe for the carriage of both people and goods;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Stresses the urgent need to focus TEN-T efforts, inter alia, on eliminating the historical and geographical obstacles that remain at borders (different track widths or impassable borders at large mountain ranges such as the Alps or the Pyrenees) because of its added European value and as a necessary means of overcoming the obstacles to free movement in the rail sector; to this end, highlights the importance of establishing the infrastructure needed to open the borders once and for all;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to establish as ‘EU TEN-T Days’ an annual meeting at ministerial level involving all the institutions and stakeholders involved in European transport policy (e.g. Naples 2009 and Zaragoza 2010), with the aim, inter alia, of raising the profile and visibility of the commitment to sustainable European transport so that it is included in the key EU agendas (EU 2020, Neighbourhood Policy, cohesion policy, financial perspective, social and environmental policy);
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers that, with a view to targeted extension of (road) infrastructure capacity, there is a need to designate a coherent EU network of major roads for freight transport, based on actual goods flows and the wishes of carriers and shippers; these should replace the current TEN projects, which are largely based on political expediency;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part, so that
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that the development of trans- European networks, including the financial aspects, is a highly ambitious undertaking for individual Member States; points out that European seaports and inner harbours are a key element of trans-European networks, in that they combine various modes (water, rail and road); urges that seaports and inner harbours be given a prominent role in future TEN-T policy;
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Stresses the importance of the main north-south strand of the trans-European Transport network, particularly given that, in the absence of motorways, trans- European traffic passes trough the towns of the related regions, causing a major environmental burden;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers that the TEN-T should be integrated into a pan-European network with links extending both inside and outside the EU in order to ensure links with other continents, primarily Africa and Asia;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to present as soon as possible a proposal to integrate the concepts of green corridors, corridors dedicated to rail transport of freight and specific TEN-T corridors that integrate coherently ports, airports and important European logistics platforms, as well as affected urban areas, as significant nodes with a view to ensuring that the political and legislative measures in the field of EU transport are more coherent and consistent;
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission, in the interest of greater consistency and effectiveness, to present a proposal for future management of the TEN-T in which the role of the Executive Agency of Coordinators, EEIGs (European Economic Interest Groupings), bilateral working groups and intergovernmental dialogue assume a new dynamic in terms of promoting the European general interest, which is to be guaranteed by the Commission and which has been reinforced with the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for inland waterway transport, inland ports and the multimodal linking of seaports with the hinterland to play a greater role in European transport policy. Calls, too, for due attention to be given to the specific characteristics of the countries of the Mediterranean, which are affected by serious traffic disruption due to high flows of commercial transport by road and underdeveloped road and rail links. It would thus be advisable to develop infrastructure and logistics of Mediterranean ports in order to expand roll on/roll off commercial maritime networks over short routes; this would be consistent with the climate and energy package that commits the EU to a 20% reduction in the level of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020;
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for inland waterway transport, inland ports and the multimodal linking of seaports with the hinterland and rail connections to play a greater role in European sustainable transport policy; underlines that better transborder cooperation and coordination between ports, waterborne and rail transport can substantially contribute to reduce the crossing of sensitive landscapes, such as the Alpine regions and thereby avoid and/or reduce landscape damage and inland infrastructure costs;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for rail transport and inland waterway transport, rail terminals, inland ports and the multimodal (especially rail), linking of seaports with the hinterland to play a greater role in European transport policy; underlines in particular the need for better connections between ports and rail to be taken into consideration in the next TEN–T revision;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for inland waterway transport infrastructure, inland ports and the multimodal linking of seaports with the hinterland to play a greater role in European transport policy and to be given greater support to help reduce the environmental impact and increase the safety in EU transport;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for inland waterway transport, inland ports and the multimodal linking of seaports with the hinterland to play a greater role in European transport policy; considers that the environmental performance of inland waterway vessels can be radically improved if new engines equipped with the latest available emission control technology are installed in inland waterway vessels;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s communication entitled ‘Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018’ (COM(2009)0008),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the necessity to develop the naval transport and to ensure the comodality of inland and maritime ports and therefore asks the Commission to come up with an EU strategy for the development of waterway transport, taking into account that the Danube together with the Rhine shortens with its over 4 000-km long course the distance between the North Sea and the Black Sea and taking into account that the EU has the world’s largest maritime territory, 1 200 ports and 43 011 km of navigable inland waterways;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the need to support the Single European Sky project as it generates considerable environmental and safety improvements as a result of the reorganisation of air space and the elimination of infrastructure problems;
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls for the swift implementation of the Single European Sky II package and therefore asks the Commission to swiftly elaborate delegated acts and implementing measures in order to speed up the implementation of Functional Airspace Blocks and the performance scheme of the SES, thus increasing effectiveness, environmental friendliness and safety in the European air transport;
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls for the EIB policy change to give greater priority to businesses wishing to make their production tools ‘greener’ (fleet renewal);
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that the creation of a European transport area is an important priority which depends to a large extent on international acceptance under agreements which are yet to be negotiated, particularly in connection with air and ship transport, and that the EU should play an increasingly formative role in the relevant international bodies, taking account of the need to ensure the efficient flow of goods in cooperation with partners all over the world, in particular by modernising transport networks that are essential for increasing the capacity of rail and road routes providing links with Asia and the Far East;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that the creation of a European transport area is an important priority which depends to a large extent on international acceptance under agreements which are yet to be negotiated, for all transport modes, particularly in connection with air and ship transport, and that the EU should play an increasingly formative role in the relevant international bodies;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Underlines the need to strengthen and give greater priority to the rights of passengers and transport users, which means paying more attention to the user’s perspective when drawing up transport policies. Calls for effective implementation of the legislation on passengers’ rights in all modes of transport;
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 introductory part 20. Calls for compliance with clearer, more
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 introductory part 20. Calls for compliance with clearer, more measurable targets to be achieved in 2020 with reference to 2010, and therefore proposes the following:
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 introductory part 20. Calls for compliance with clearer, more measurable targets by 2020 , and therefore proposes the following:
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 - a 40% reduction in deaths and serious injuries on the roads from 2010 to 2020; this target should be laid down in both the forthcoming White Paper on Transport and the new Road Safety Action Programme;
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 - a
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 - a
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 - a
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 a (new) - a 40% increase in the provision of parking areas for heavy goods vehicles in the Trans-European road network (TERN) in each Member State between 2010 and 2020, in order to safeguard road safety and compliance with rest periods established for professional drivers,
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 a new Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 1 a new - completion by Member States of the TEN-T projects set out in Decision No 884/2004/EC in accordance with the approved schedule,
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of bus and rail
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the goals set in the 2001 White Paper have been attained only in part, so that the question of whether they should be maintained or reformulated needs to be examined on the basis of the current state of rail and road infrastructure,
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of bicycle, bus and rail users in urban areas by 2020,
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 - a doubling of the number of
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 a (new) - a doubling of the number of passengers carried by inland waterway and maritime transport by 2020,
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 2 a (new) - implementation of the tools and projects aimed at reducing CO2 emissions in the transport sector, in accordance with the envisaged timetables,
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 - a
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 - a 20% reduction in CO2 exhaust emissions from road passenger and freight traffic compared with
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the road safety target of halving the number of deaths on European roads during the period 2000- 2010 will not be met, although it has been very successful in motivating all stakeholders to make special efforts,
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 - a
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 - a 20% reduction in CO2 exhaust emissions from
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 - a 20% reduction in CO2 exhaust emissions from road traffic compared with 20
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 a (new) - binding standards for the EU fleet average of CO2 emissions for passenger cars of 80 g/km by 2020 and 60 g/km by 2025,
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 3 b (new) - binding standards for the EU fleet average of CO2 emissions for light commercial vehicles of 160 g/km by 2015 and 125 g/km by 2020,
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a 20%
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a 20% reduction in the electricity used by rail vehicles compared with 2010 and a 100% use of renewable energy by electrified systems in the rail sector by 2020,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Parliament’s work must be consistent, particularly in areas which
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a 20% reduction in both the electricity and the diesel used by rail vehicles compared with 2010
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a 20% reduction in the e
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 - a 20%
Amendment 343 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 a (new) Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 a (new) - a 50% increase in the number of private sidings at companies and production sites from 2010 to 2020, in order to ensure that the sustainable transfer and environmental goals in freight transport are achieved,
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 4 a (new) - a 20% increase in e-bikes and electric vehicles in rail and tramway transport,
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible system to all new railway rolling stock and link lines, whereby the introduction and interoperability of the system will be cofinanced by the Union,
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible system to all new railway rolling stock and link lines, and increased EU financial efforts for the implementation and extension of the Deployment Plan for ERTMS,
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible automatic train speed control system to all new railway rolling stock and link lines, where appropriate,
Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible automatic train speed control system to all new railway rolling stock and link lines, where appropriate,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Parliament’s work must be consistent, particularly in areas which affect transport policy directly such as, for example, environment, social, land use planning, employment and economic policy,
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible and interoperable system to all
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 2011, fitting an ERTMS- compatible system to new link lines and all new railway rolling stock ordered after 1.1.2012 and
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 -
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 5 - starting from 20
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 - a
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 -a
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 a (new) - an aspirational goal of 50% reduction in CO2 emissions caused by aircraft throughout EU airspace by 2050,
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 b (new) - a carbon-neutral growth for air transport from 2020 and onwards,
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 c (new) - a fuel efficiency of 1.5% per year for air transport,
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 a (new) - a 20% increase of modal shift from road to rail in freight transport by 2020,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Parliament’s work must be consistent, particularly in areas which affect transport policy directly such as, for example, environment, social, urban- planning, employment and economic policy,
Amendment 360 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 -
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - a 30% growth in financial support for the optimisation and, where needed, creation of multimodal connections (platforms)
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation of multimodal
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway transport, inland ports and rail transport, and a 20%
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation and development of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway transport, and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms, by 2020,
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation and development of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway and rail transport, and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms, by 2020,
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway transport to be connected with rail, and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms
Amendment 367 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 - financial support for the creation of multimodal connections (platforms) for inland waterway and rail transport, and a 20% increase in the number of such platforms, by 2020,
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 -
Amendment 369 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - completion by Member States of the TEN-T projects laid down in Decision No 884/2004/EC in accordance with the approved schedule,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support and promote the transport industry in a forward-looking way, especially through promoting sustainable transport modes such as inland shipping, short sea shipping and rail,
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - a 60% increase in European funding for sustainable transport for the 2014-2020 financial programming period,
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - European funding for investment in rail interoperability, divided among infrastructure managers and rail companies pro rata according to the cost of this interoperability for each of them,
Amendment 372 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - at least 10% out of the TEN-T funds to be dedicated to inland waterway projects,
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - at least 10% out of the TEN-T funds dedicated to inland waterway projects,
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 7 a (new) - measures to ensure that the White Paper and the new Road Safety Action Programme are mutually reinforcing and establishment of EU-wide targets for a reduction in serious injuries and fatalities on Europe’s roads by 2020,
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) - Calls on the European Commission to monitor progress towards reaching these targets and to report annually to the European Parliament;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) - Calls on the European Commission to monitor progress towards the attainment of the targets set, and to report to the European Parliament every two years;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support and promote the transport industry in a
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 b (new) - having regard to the European Commission’s communication and Action Plan for The Creation of a European Maritime Transport Space Without Barriers (COM(2009) 0010),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support and promote the transport industry in a forward-looking way,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the financial and economic crisis has hit the transport sector hard, a situation which should, however, be taken as an opportunity to support and promote the transport industry in a forward-looking way and with regard for sustainable development,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas transport is crucial for growth and employment and it is very important to encourage investment in transport infrastructure, which is why such spending should receive special treatment when calculating the public deficit,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I.
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas transport agencies play an important role in the gradual creation of a European transport area, and whereas the road system, as the most used medium, needs a corresponding structure which will enable it to be more efficient and sustainable, while other transport sectors, which fulfil a no less important role, must also receive support,
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas transport agencies
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas transport agencies play an important role in the gradual creation of a European transport area, and whereas the road system, as the most used medium, needs a
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas it is vital for measurable targets to be set for the transport sector, as a way both of monitoring the efficiency of transport policy more effectively and of establishing social and economic planning
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the preponderance of the debates on climate change and road safety are obscuring the potential of transport and logistics not only for the development and daily welfare of European citizens but also in terms of offering innovative and job-creating solutions in the field of the environment and safety; whereas raising the public profile of transport is necessary to help raise awareness of the urgency of the measures that have to be implemented and the factors on which they are dependent,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the EU 2020 Strategy¹, ¹ Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0053.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas there is a significant imbalance between transport infrastructure needs, the stated goals and the financial and regulatory means available to the European Union,
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas significant developments in research, infrastructure and technology, in particular vehicle technology (such as advanced safety features), require adjustment to be made to the financial resources and instruments,
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the development of society
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the development of society and a wide range of economic sectors results in increased demand in the transport sector, so that all means of transport are vital; whereas, however, these should be measured according to their efficiency in economic, environmental, cohesion, social and employment policy terms,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, in the future, the sustainable interworking of all modes of transport in the area of passenger and freight transport will be necessary for the creation of secure and logistically consistent transport chains, including multi-modal solutions and linking long-distance and local transport together based on priorities of sustainable development,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, in the future, the sustainable interworking of all modes of transport
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, in the future, the sustainable interworking of all modes of transport in the area of passenger and freight transport will be necessary for the creation of secure, environmentally friendly and logistically consistent transport chains,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, in the future, the sustainable interworking of all modes of transport in the area of passenger and freight transport will be necessary for the creation of secure, environmentally sustainable and logistically consistent transport chains,
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 1a (new) -1a. Is convinced of the imperative need for a clear and coherent vision of the future of transport as a sector at the core of the single market, guaranteeing free movement of persons and goods and ensuring territorial cohesion throughout Europe. While continuing to generate a significant part of Europe’s sustainable growth and competitiveness, the transport sector must develop within consistently high social and environmental standards;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 33 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; would stress, in particular, that urbanisation gives rise not only to growth in passenger transport in cities but also, especially, to growth in freight transport; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and a shift towards the most sustainable transport modes with collective transport
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility realised also by improved accessibility and the construction of missing infrastructure links and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas; recognises the contribution of all levels of governance to achieve sustainable transport in Europe, in the respect of subsidiarity;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity,
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the transport sector is an important element in the development of the European Union and its regions, one which has a direct influence on the competitiveness and social and territorial cohesion of the regions and thereby makes a significant contribution to achieving the European single market and to creating the conditions for equal benefit from its advantages,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas, and points out in that connection that in urban areas the existing structure in particular will determine which mode is most appropriate;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that population growth, in particular in cities, will give rise to challenges for transport in terms of safety and capacity, and that the basic right to mobility and the applicability of this right are crucial in this regard; stresses that, in this context, multimodal transport chains and less polluting, collective transport, inter alia, are the way ahead for urban areas;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission, in this context, to issue recommendations for harmonisation so that coaches, as an environmentally compatible, collective mode of transport, can enter city centres throughout Europe without being obstructed by diverse environmental zoning regulations which have a negative impact on tourism in cities;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. In the light of current and upcoming challenges faced by European cities, such as increasing congestion and pollution linked to the urbanization trend in Europe, a strategy for the future of transport should be promoting a modal shift from modes responsible for pollution and congestion, towards more sustainable modes of transport, including soft modes (cycling and walking) in urban areas; this approach can be combined with comodality when it comes to the rest of the transport network;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that in the light of increasing urbanisation, and in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the EU must move forward with an urban transport and mobility policy that offers cities and regions solutions for common problems such as safety, congestion, pollution, noise, etc.; calls in particular on the Commission to encourage those actions that promote public transport and those that are most environmentally friendly;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In the light of current and upcoming challenges faced by European cities, such as increasing congestion and pollution linked to the urbanisation trend in Europe, a strategy for the future of transport should be promoting a modal shift from modes responsible for pollution and congestion, towards more sustainable modes of transport, including soft modes (cycling and walking) in urban areas; this approach can be combined with comodality when it comes to the rest of the transport network;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Notes that an increasing number of cities are introducing environmental zones but that clear and unambiguous EU rules for their establishment are lacking; stresses the need for unambiguous access requirements and mutual international recognition of emission reduction adjustments for vehicles, for which the European Commission must set standards;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Demands the Commission to introduce Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) for cities of more than 100 000 inhabitants and to link these plans with EU cofinancing of transport projects for cities as well as with EU targets (CO2 emissions and accidents reduction) and legislation limits for (ozone and particulate matter);
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that increasing demand
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that increasing demand also results, inter alia, in a strain on capacity and reduced efficiency due to infrastructure problems in the field of freight transport, and that, primarily, comodal use and the safety of transport users and transported goods should therefore be increased; modal shift in urban areas to low carbon transportation like public transport, walking and cycling should be supported;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the transport sector is an important element in the development of the European Union and its regions and cities, one which has a direct influence on the competitiveness and social cohesion of the
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that increasing demand also results, inter alia, in a strain on capacity and reduced efficiency due to infrastructure problems in the field of freight transport, and that, primarily, the TEN-T network should therefore be completed, the bottlenecks removed and the missing links filled in, in particular in cross-border sections, and comodal use and the safety of transport users and transported goods should therefore be increased;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy, together with improved safety, and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, promoting the research and development of more environmentally friendly and safer technologies and modes, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as a more thorough application of the BATNEEC (Best Available Technique Not Entailing Excessive Cost) principle to new transport vehicles, an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, research, completion of the internal market for transport, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility; underlines that, to this end, the priority development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition in the process, should be preferred to the imposition of sanctions;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility and measures are taken to adapt the behaviour of transport users and professionals (awareness-raising, environmentally friendly behaviour, etc.); underlines that, to this end, the priority development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition in the
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, support for environmentally friendly technology and transport using energy sources that are technologically compatible with existing power units, such as CNG, LNG and LPG, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility; underlines that, to this end, the priority development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition in the process, should be preferred to the imposition of sanctions;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this such as
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the transport sector is an important element in the development of the European Union and its regions and cities, one which has a direct influence on the competitiveness and social cohesion of the regions and cities and thereby makes a significant contribution to achieving the European single market,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility; underlines that, to this end, the priority development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition between modes of transport and Member States in the process, should be preferred to the imposition of sanctions;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility; underlines that, to this end, the priority development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition in the process, should be
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability and safety of mobility;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available, sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this, such as an energy mix, price formation measures and internalising external costs of all modes of transport, provided that the ensuing revenue is used to improve the sustainability of mobility; underlines that, to this end, the priority is the development of financial incentives, ruling out any distortions of competition in the process
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is of the view that the full internalisation of external costs to the environment and health must start with road freight, due to its overwhelming importance for the environment, the economy and society, and that the decision-making process on the Eurovignette Directive should be concluded swiftly;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Affirms the goal of a long term strategy for the decarbonisation of transport by 2050; requests that progress towards this goal is benchmarked against measurable interim targets, with respect to total energy usage and carbon intensity, in 2015, 2020, 2030 and 2040;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises the role that should be played by emissions trading in decarbonising the transport sector; underlines that, in line with the ‘polluter pays’ principle, all modes of transport must make their contribution to climate protection and is of the view that, until this is achieved, unilateral cost burdens on individual modes of transport through emissions trading should be avoided in order to create a level playing field;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that the funds generated by the auctioning of CO2 allowances and by the ETS in the air transport sector could be used to finance, first and foremost, the projects designed to specifically reduce emissions in the sector (Clean Sky, biofuels, Single Sky);
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 3a. Member States should be free to decide how revenues generated by the auctioning of aviation sector allowances under the Emissions Trading Scheme are to be used and to consider in this context whether a share of such revenues might be used to finance the implementation of the Single European Sky;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Requests that the challenges of climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the achievement of the 2 degree target is put at centre stage in the formation and implementation of transportation policy at all levels; emphasises to that end the importance of coherence between environmental and transport policy;
source: PE-439.922
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18484&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.273New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.273 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.700&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-430700_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.980&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-430980_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.420&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-430420_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.922New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.922 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0189_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0189_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0279/COM_COM(2009)0279_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0279/COM_COM(2009)0279_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100705&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100705&type=CRE |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-189&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0189_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-189&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0189_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-260New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0260_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/00993New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
A sustainable future for transportNew
Sustainable future for transport |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0279/COM_COM(2009)0279_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0279/COM_COM(2009)0279_EN.pdf |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities/4/committees/3/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
committees/3/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|