Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | PETERLE Alojz ( PPE) | PARGNEAUX Gilles ( S&D), NICHOLSON James ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | THOMSEN Britta ( S&D) | Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | GROSSETÊTE Françoise ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the Communication from the Commission on ‘Action Against Cancer: European Partnership’ and on the Council Recommendation 2003/878/EC of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening.
To recall, the Commission adopted on 24 June 2009 the above-mentioned Communication to support the Member States in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information, capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control, and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort.
The communication followed a resolution adopted by the European Parliament on 10 April 2008, on combating cancer in the enlarged EU. The Council also adopted its conclusions on reducing the European burden of cancer on 10 June 2008.
The Communication required the Commission to present a report on the work undertaken which would constitute a basis for determining future EU action on cancer. The report summarises the main achievements in the fight against cancer in the EU in the framework of both initiatives towards the target to reduce cancer incidence by 15% by 2020.
Main results :
· Political will : the vast majority of Member States – 24 out of 28 - met the target of producing a National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) before 2013.
· Support for Member States : through a Joint Action under the Health programme, guidance for Member States on establishing national cancer plans and on cancer care has been developed. A new Joint Action launched in 2014 will lead to a European Guide on Quality Improvement in Comprehensive Cancer Control. The Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare provides further opportunities for increased cooperation through European Reference Networks between healthcare providers and centres of expertise.
· Prevention: the fourth version of the European Code Against Cancer supported by the Commission through administrative agreements with the International Agency for Research on Cancer will be launched soon.
· Screening: based on current projections, well over 500 million screening examinations for breast, cervical and/or colorectal cancer will have been performed in publicly mandated programmes in the EU between 2010 and 2020. European Guidelines for quality assurance in screening and diagnosis have been produced for breast cancer (2006, supplements 2013), cervical cancer (2008, second edition 2014) and colorectal cancer (2010).
· Quality assurance : the Commission is developing a Quality Assurance scheme for Breast Cancer Services based on the European legislative framework.
· Research: during the last seven years, the EU has invested more than EUR 1.4 billion in research efforts in relation to cancer. More than half of this budget – EUR 770 million – has been invested in collaborative research projects to find new ways of fighting cancer and supporting patients.
· Cancer information : in 2012, the Joint Research Centre was made responsible for coordinating the European Cancer Information System and acting as repository of European Union data and tools.
· Coordination: to improve the coordination of the range of cancer initiatives at EU level, the Commission established a European Union Group of Experts on Cancer Control in 2014.
Next steps : EU action on cancer based on the Commission Communication has strengthened cooperation between the European Union, Member States and relevant stakeholders and has created European added value in relevant areas (NCCP, screening, cancer information system, rare cancers, etc.) as well as a practical basis on which to continue and expand mechanisms for cooperation.
This cooperation in strategic areas provided a framework which made a sustainable contribution to reduce the burden of cancer in the EU and towards maintaining the target of a 15% reduction by 2020. According to the last available data, in the period 2000-2010, the incidence of the most frequently occurring forms of cancers (i.e. breast, lung, prostate and colorectal) decreased by about 10%.
In order to take forward this cooperation, the Commission sets out some of the next steps:
- the 3rd EU Health Programme offers opportunities to promote public health action on cancer and Horizon 2020 , in particular its Health, demographic change and wellbeing objective, offers opportunities to pursue research on cancer and other major chronic diseases.
- continued support for the development of high quality National Cancer Plans in the European Union;
- the new Tobacco Products Directive which should be fully operational by ensuring full use of its delegated and implementing powers as well as supporting its implementation by Member States in order to reduce smoking throughout the EU and contributing to reduce the incidence of cancer;
- enhance cooperation between the fields of Public Health, Environment and Occupational Health in order to tackle the avoidable causes of cancer from a broader perspective;
supporting a voluntary European Quality Assurance scheme for breast cancer services;
- creation of European Reference Networks, including on rare tumours. The Commission intends to organise calls for Networks in 2014 and 2015;
improving screening programmes and networking between centres and experts, at the EU, national and regional level;
- consideration of a specific Action on Rare Cancers;
- wider uptake of eHealth for efficient disease management and to strengthen effective prevention practices.
The recommendations of Members States and stakeholders, in the framework of the Commission Group of Experts on Cancer Control, will also be taken into account.
The report states that the Commission maintains the objective of reducing the burden of cancer in the EU, and the target of a 15% reduction of cancer incidence by 2020 ( 510,000 new cases ).
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Commission communication on Action Against Cancer: European Partnership.
It welcomes the Commission proposal to set up a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer for the period 2009-2013 to support the Member States in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information, capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort.
Parliament agues that strong action on cancer at a European level has the potential to set in place a framework for coordinated action at Member State, regional and local level. The European Partnership for Action Against Cancer should complement and build on work currently undertaken by the European Institutions in the field of health, and should seek to form partnerships with other services and sectors to ensure a comprehensive approach to the prevention and treatment of cancer.
Recognising that health matters are primarily the responsibility of the Member States, Parliament stresses the importance of establishing a Community roadmap. For this reason, it encourages the Commission and the Member States to take joint action and a comprehensive approach by incorporating the medical field into policy areas such as education, environment, research and social issues.
Cooperation with stakeholders and the European Parliament: to ensure the Partnership’s success, Parliament stresses the need for closer cooperation with stakeholders with a genuine interest in improving health outcomes, and the participation of civil society and employers’ and employees’ organisations at international, European, national, regional and local level so as to ensure the dissemination of best practices in the field. The Partnership should also establish channels of communication with other fora (e.g. the EU Health Policy Forum), to ensure the work against cancer gives due consideration to other concerns, such as health inequalities, etc. Members, in particular, call on the European Commission and the European Council to cooperate with the European Parliament in a well-coordinated inter-institutional partnership in order to reduce the burden of cancer, using the legal basis established in the Treaty of Lisbon to protect public health and prevent diseases. The European Commission and the European Council should also consider the various formal and informal structures that exist to consult with MEPs.
Strengthening the effectiveness of existing measures: Parliament calls on the Commission to specify the nature of and the sources of funding for the Partnership. It considers that its success – given the absence of additional funding before the end of the current financial framework (2013) - depends on making optimum use of the available resources. It calls on Member States to set up integrated cancer plans as soon as possible as these are key to achieving the Partnership’s ambitious long-term aim of reducing the burden of cancer by 15% by 2020. It also stresses that a comprehensive cancer approach and multidisciplinary teams can ensure more effective care for patients with cancer and that integrated cancer care, giving due consideration to psychosocial and mental wellbeing and support, is a vital part of care that should also be encouraged. It also points out that, according to the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may also adopt incentive measures designed to protect and improve human health. Parliament therefore calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a Council Recommendation on Cancer Control Plans and to monitor independently, on a yearly basis, the implementation and progress of the recommendation adopted.
Reinforced prevention: Parliament emphasises the importance of prevention because it is the most cost-effective response (one third of cancers are preventable). It urges that more resources are systematically and strategically invested in prevention, both secondary and primary. Additional actions should be considered to guarantee a healthy environment, in particular measures regarding tobacco, food and alcohol. Tackling risk factors for cancer is key to prevention and this should be given priority by Member States and research should be focused on certain environmental factors, such as radiation and excessive UV exposure, exposure to chemicals and endocrine disruptors. Members consider that the current funding available to fight cancer in the EU is inadequate to produce the necessary research and coordination, as well as to provide decent preventive information for EU citizens. They therefore encourage the Commission to include funding to promote cancer prevention in the financial perspective.
Parliament also calls for:
the reorganisation of national cancer registries in order to provide the data necessary for better informed and more focused policies; the promotion of actions against excessive weight, alcohol consumption, and the prevention of viral hepatitis.
Improving patients’ everyday lives: Members highlight the need to focus on the quality of life for a rising number of chronic cancer patients whose illness cannot be cured but which may be stabilised for a number of years. Inequities in the cancer burden need to be reduced. Members invite the Commission to draw up a charter for the protection of the rights of cancer patients and chronically sick people in the workplace, with a view to requiring firms to make it possible for patients to continue in employment during their treatment and to return to the employment market after it has finished.
Encourage early screening: given that screening is one of the most important instruments in combating cancer, Parliament invites the Member States to invest in cancer screening programmes to be made available to the widest possible range of people. It also urges Member States to establish a legal obligation to declare cancer cases, using standardised European terminology, the object being to provide means of evaluating prevention, screening, and treatment programmes, survival rates, and the comparability of data from one Member State to another. According to Members, it is possible to reduce the incidence of cancer by applying evidence-based strategies for early detection and management of patients with cancer, and promoting awareness of the advantages of screening among the population. They also ask the Member States to examine whether breast cancer screening for women under 50 and over 69 serves a useful purpose (see Parliament’s declaration on this issue). Parliament also calls for the drawing up of European accreditation/certification programmes in the area of cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment to be drawn up on the basis of the European quality assurance guidelines. It also the exchange of best practice on the use of preventive or early-detection measures, such as cost-effective integration of appropriate human papilloma virus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination to protect young women from cervical cancer. They also want the Partnership to examine the need to update the Council recommendation on cancer screening to take account of evidence for effective prostate cancer screening in men.
More research: Parliament also stresses the use of nutrition for cancer prevention and the treatment of malnutrition related to cancer. It encourages the Commission to provide specific funding in this area and to develop guidelines on nutritional support for cancer patients. Efforts should be made to further develop blood- and urine-based tests (biomarker tests) within the seventh Research Framework Programme, bearing in mind that these early diagnosis procedures are promising tools for detecting different types of cancer (prostate, colon, ovarian, kidney, and bladder cancer). Members believe that existing FP7 funding allocated to the fight against cancer should be used more efficiently. Members call for support to be stepped up for research into cancer prevention, including research into the effects of harmful chemicals and environmental pollutants, nutrition, lifestyle, genetic factors, and the interaction of all these, and call for the links between cancer and potential risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol and pharmaceutical and synthetic hormones present in the environment to be investigated. They also propose i) bio-monitoring research to pay particular attention to the most important sources of exposure to carcinogenic substances, in particular traffic, emissions from industry, air quality in large cities, etc. ii) more research on the connection between cancer and gender; iii) more research on the impact of the working environment on cancers; iv) research programmes to develop alternatives for harmful substances that are not carcinogens. Overall, Parliament wants research results to be translated into concrete actions as soon as possible. To this effect, it wants greater encouragement to be given to public-private partnerships to stimulate research and screening.
Combat environment-related cancers: Parliament calls on the Commission to ensure full implementation of relevant worker health legislation and to contribute swiftly and in a determined manner to the establishment of a comprehensive candidate list of substances of very high concern as a stepping stone for rapid decisions on CMR substances in the context of authorisations under REACH. In its view, proper implementation of existing legislation with regard to substances that cause or promote cancer is of paramount importance in action against cancer.
Other aspects mentioned by Parliament include:
p romoting information campaigns on cancer screening directed at the general public and all healthcare providers more funding to be allocated to regional policy programmes and European Social Fund programmes to educate and inform women about breast cancer protection and prevention; research on the new generation of anti-cancer medication and treatments; encouraging the Member States to adopt policies to support the principles embodied in the World Health Organization's Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health launched in 2004; the importance of the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use; the development of nutritional and other natural product-based approaches to cancer prevention, validated through nutrigenomic and epigenetic research; the development of networks of health professionals to encourage the exchange of best practices; improving the quality treatment standards for childhood cancers; specific and coordinated actions in order to reduce inequalities in terms of access to cancer treatment and care; the development of psychological care and support throughout the EU for cancer survivors; the production of guidelines for a common definition of disability covering persons suffering from chronic diseases or from cancer; improving the quality of palliative care for the terminally ill.
Parliament finds the proposed structure lacking since there is no clear definition of specific action objectives, such as how to achieve the integration of all Member States’ plans in the fight against cancer by 2013. It calls on the Commission to rectify this lack of focus. Lastly, it urges the European institutions to support the 10-year sustainability and viability of the Cancer Partnership in a future Community health budget.
The Commission on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report by Alojz PETERLE (EPP, SI) welcoming the Commission’s proposal to establish a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer for the period 2009-2013. This partnership would support Member States in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information, capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort.
Members consider it is necessary to set in place a framework for coordinated action at Member State, regional and local level in this field and to build on work currently undertaken by the European Institutions in the field of health, as well as to form partnerships with other services and sectors to ensure a comprehensive approach to the prevention and treatment of cancer.
Recognising that health matters are primarily the responsibility of the Member States, Members stress the importance of establishing a Community roadmap. For this reason, they encourage the Commission and the Member States to take joint action and a comprehensive approach by incorporating the medical field into policy areas such as education, environment, research and social issues.
Cooperation with stakeholders and the European Parliament: to ensure the Partnership’s success, Members stress the need for closer cooperation with stakeholders with a genuine interest in improving health outcomes, and the participation of civil society and employers’ and employees’ organisations at international, European, national, regional and local level so as to ensure the dissemination of best practices in the field. The Partnership should also establish channels of communication with other fora (e.g. the EU Health Policy Forum), to ensure the work against cancer gives due consideration to other concerns, such as health inequalities, etc. Members, in particular, call on the European Commission and the European Council to cooperate with the European Parliament in a well-coordinated inter-institutional partnership in order to reduce the burden of cancer, using the legal basis established in the Treaty of Lisbon to protect public health and prevent diseases. The European Commission and the European Council should also consider the various formal and informal structures that exist to consult with MEPs.
Strengthening the effectiveness of existing measures: Members call on the Commission to specify the nature of and the sources of funding for the Partnership. They consider that its success – given the absence of additional funding before the end of the current financial framework (2013) - depends on making optimum use of the available resources. They call on Member States to set up integrated cancer plans as soon as possible as these are key to achieving the Partnership’s ambitious long-term aim of reducing the burden of cancer by 15% by 2020. They also stress that a comprehensive cancer approach and multidisciplinary teams can ensure more effective care for patients with cancer and that integrated cancer care, giving due consideration to psychosocial and mental wellbeing and support, is a vital part of care that should also be encouraged. They also point out that, according to the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may also adopt incentive measures designed to protect and improve human health. They therefore call on the Commission to present a proposal for a Council Recommendation on Cancer Control Plans and to monitor independently, on a yearly basis, the implementation and progress of the recommendation adopted.
Reinforced prevention: Members emphasise the importance of prevention because it is the most cost-effective response (one third of cancers are preventable). They urge that more resources are systematically and strategically invested in prevention, both secondary and primary. Additional actions should be considered to guarantee a healthy environment, in particular measures regarding tobacco, food and alcohol. Tackling risk factors for cancer is key to prevention and this should be given priority by Member States and research should be focused on certain environmental factors, such as radiation and excessive UV exposure, exposure to chemicals and endocrine disruptors. Members consider that the current funding available to fight cancer in the EU is inadequate to produce the necessary research and coordination, as well as to provide decent preventive information for EU citizens. They therefore encourage the Commission to include funding to promote cancer prevention in the financial perspective.
They also call for:
the reorganisation of national cancer registries in order to provide the data necessary for better informed and more focused policies; the promotion of actions against excessive weight, alcohol consumption, and the prevention of viral hepatitis.
Improving patients’ everyday lives: Members highlight the need to focus on the quality of life for a rising number of chronic cancer patients whose illness cannot be cured but which may be stabilised for a number of years. Inequities in the cancer burden need to be reduced. Members invite the Commission to draw up a charter for the protection of the rights of cancer patients and chronically sick people in the workplace, with a view to requiring firms to make it possible for patients to continue in employment during their treatment and to return to the employment market after it has finished.
Encourage early screening: given that screening is one of the most important instruments in combating cancer, Members invite the Member States to invest in cancer screening programmes to be made available to the widest possible range of people. They also urge Member States to establish a legal obligation to declare cancer cases, using standardised European terminology, the object being to provide means of evaluating prevention, screening, and treatment programmes, survival rates, and the comparability of data from one Member State to another. According to Members, it is possible to reduce the incidence of cancer by applying evidence-based strategies for early detection and management of patients with cancer, and promoting awareness of the advantages of screening among the population. They also ask the Member States to examine whether breast cancer screening for women under 50 and over 69 serves a useful purpose. They also call for the drawing up of European accreditation/certification programmes in the area of cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment to be drawn up on the basis of the European quality assurance guidelines.
More research: Members also stress the use of nutrition for cancer prevention and the treatment of malnutrition related to cancer. They encourage the Commission to provide specific funding in this area and to develop guidelines on nutritional support for cancer patients. Efforts should be made to further develop blood- and urine-based tests (biomarker tests) within the seventh Research Framework Programme, bearing in mind that these early diagnosis procedures are promising tools for detecting different types of cancer (prostate, colon, ovarian, kidney, and bladder cancer). Members believe that existing FP7 funding allocated to the fight against cancer should be used more efficiently. They call for support to be stepped up for research into cancer prevention, including research into the effects of harmful chemicals and environmental pollutants, nutrition, lifestyle, genetic factors, and the interaction of all these, and call for the links between cancer and potential risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol and pharmaceutical and synthetic hormones present in the environment to be investigated. They also propose i) bio-monitoring research to pay particular attention to the most important sources of exposure to carcinogenic substances, in particular traffic, emissions from industry, air quality in large cities, etc. ii) more research on the connection between cancer and gender; iii) more research on the impact of the working environment on cancers; iv) research programmes to develop alternatives for harmful substances that are not carcinogens. Overall, the Committee wants research results to be translated into concrete actions as soon as possible. To this effect, they want greater encouragement to be given to public-private partnerships to stimulate research and screening.
Awareness: Members call on the Commission and Member States to promote information campaigns on cancer screening directed at the general public and all healthcare providers, as well as the exchange of best practice on the use of preventive or early-detection measures, such as cost-effective integration of appropriate human papilloma virus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination to protect young women from cervical cancer. They also want the Partnership to examine the need to update the Council recommendation on cancer screening to take account of evidence for effective prostate cancer screening in men.
Combat environment-related cancers: Members call on the Commission to ensure full implementation of relevant worker health legislation and to contribute swiftly and in a determined manner to the establishment of a comprehensive candidate list of substances of very high concern as a stepping stone for rapid decisions on CMR substances in the context of authorisations under REACH. In their view, proper implementation of existing legislation with regard to substances that cause or promote cancer is of paramount importance in action against cancer.
Other aspects mentioned by Members include:
more funding to be allocated to regional policy programmes and European Social Fund programmes to educate and inform women about breast cancer protection and prevention; research on the new generation of anti-cancer medication and treatments; the importance of the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use; the development of nutritional and other natural product-based approaches to cancer prevention, validated through nutrigenomic and epigenetic research; the development of networks of health professionals to encourage the exchange of best practices; specific and coordinated actions in order to reduce inequalities in terms of access to cancer treatment and care; the development of psychological care and support throughout the EU for cancer survivors; the production of guidelines for a common definition of disability covering persons suffering from chronic diseases or from cancer; improved quality of palliative care for the terminally ill.
Members find the proposed structure lacking since there is no clear definition of specific action objectives, such as how to achieve the integration of all Member States’ plans in the fight against cancer by 2013. They callson the Commission to rectify this lack of focus. Lastly, they urge the European institutions to support the 10-year sustainability and viability of the Cancer Partnership in a future Community health budget.
PURPOSE: to propose a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer.
BACKGROUND: figures show that, in 2006, after circulatory diseases, cancer was the second most common cause of deat h (two out of ten deaths in women and three out of ten deaths in men). This equates to approximately 3.2 million EU citizens diagnosed with cancer each year.
The legal basis for action in the field of health largely falls on the Member States (Article 152 of the EC Treaty). However, there are areas where joint EU action can bring considerable added value in tackling major health challenges more effectively, through information sharing and exchange of expertise and best practice.
The European Parliament and Council have also shown their political commitment and given strategic direction to future European cancer activities. On 10 April 2008, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on combating cancer in the enlarged EU, and, on 10 June 2008, reducing the European burden of cancer were adopted.
On this basis, the European Commission proposes a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer for the period 2009-2013 to support the Member State in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information, capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control, and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort.
CONTENT: this Communication broadly sets out the objectives for the European Partnership for Action Against Cancer, as well as the identified areas and actions to be further determined.
Objectives of partnership: to more effectively combat cancer at European level, it will be necessary to draw up a strategy to assist the Member States to enhance their knowledge and cooperation in the field, within the context of the limited competences of the Community in this field. This Partnership aims to support the Member States in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information , capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control, and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort. The aim is for all Member States to have integrated cancer plans by the end of the partnership, which should result in a 15% reduction by 2020 (510 000 new cases).
Areas and actions to be covered: the Communication stresses the fact that one-third of cancers are preventable and that, for this reason, emphasis needs to be placed on health promotion . Cancer is caused by many factors and therefore its prevention needs to address on an equal footing lifestyle, occupational and environmental causes, such as smoking, being overweight, low fruit and vegetable intake, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption.
To prevent and combat cancer, further actions need to be taken in the areas of detection, the dissemination of good practices, cooperation in research activities and improving the comparability of results between the Member States.
1) early detection: cancer can be reduced and controlled by implementing evidence-based strategies for early detection and management of patients with cancer. This includes appropriate information to ensure awareness about the benefits of screening for those who should benefit from it. In fact, the annual number of screening examinations in the EU is well below what it could be (approximately 125 million examinations per year).
The Communication proposes to reduce the burden of cancer by achieving 100% population coverage of screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer by 2013 by providing 125 million examinations to citizens per year. In order to achieve this target, Member States should promote large scale information campaigns on cancer screening, directed at the general public and health-care providers.
Other actions could include:
assessing the effectiveness of Community policy in the area of tobacco control; using existing mechanisms, such as the stakeholder forums focusing on alcohol and nutrition, to take forward cancer actions; reviewing the European Code Against Cancer, including its implementation; assessing the burden of infection-induced cancer in the EU; providing an overview of the range of recommendations in the EU on the implementation of human papillomavirus vaccination as a public health policy to prevent cervical cancer; reviewing the Council Recommendation on cancer screening in view of recent scientific developments; development of a voluntary European pilot accreditation scheme for breast cancer screening and follow-up, building on the European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
2) identification and dissemination of good practice: the Communication also proposes tackling inequalities linked to cancer mortalities, in particular by reducing disparities between the member states. Whilst it may not be possible to eliminate all the existing inequalities, the Commission considers that a 70% reduction by 2020 is a feasible target, taking account of scientific developments and the different circumstances of different countries and cancers. This aim will be supported by the development of guidelines for models of best practice in cancer-related care.
Other actions could include:
sharing knowledge and expertise on different models for comprehensive and integrated cancer care, and in particular the organisation of care, with the aim of developing consensus around definitions and models of care, including chronic and palliative care; exploring the application of ongoing European efforts under the Health Technology Assessment initiative as a means to tackle cancer more efficiently, building on the framework to be established under the proposed Directive on the Application of Patients' Rights in Cross-border Healthcare ; exploring alternative technical and financial solutions for the European supply of medical isotopes, taking account of shortages in supply across Europe.
3) cooperation and coordination in cancer research: health research is of central importance to the EU's research commitments. Recognising that cancer research is mainly undertaken at national level and that it is considerably fragmented and diverse across the EU, the Community aims to step up its efforts to improve EU-wide coordination within this field. The Communication proposes the development of a coordinated approach to cancer research across the EU, aiming to achieve coordination of one-third of research from all funding sources by 2013.
Other actions could include:
bringing together partners in a collective effort to address obstacles in European cancer research; identification of gaps in research and methodology, enhancement of research cooperation to avoid duplication of efforts and strengthening research on prevention and translational research; increasing public access to information on cancer research and clinical trials in particular; improving the regulatory environment on clinical research in the EU.
4) providing the comparable information necessary for policy and action: the Commission considers that it is important to ensure comprehensive and standardised cancer information and data from all Member States. In other words, comparative research at European level into best practices in the field is required. The sharing of relevant information for statistical purposes is essential for developing effective public health interventions and the European benchmarking process.
In this regard, the Communication proposes to ensure the availability of accurate and comparable data on cancer incidence, prevalence, morbidity, cure, survival and mortality in the EU by 2013.
Other actions could include:
identification of obstacles in collection of data and indicators, including legislative obstacles and accessibility of data, and ways to overcome those problems; agreement on a set of core indicators to measure and enable European comparisons of the burden of cancer, quality of care and impact of cancer strategies, with special emphasis on health inequalities; encouragement of high quality standards and networking on cancer registries; collection of data on the cost of cancer to society; conducting a survey to gauge European opinion on cancer data registration as a means for public health research and planning of effective health systems.
Financing and next steps: the actions undertaken within the framework of the Partnership would be funded by existing financial instruments until the end of the current financial framework (2013) without additional budgetary consequences. In order to take forward these identified areas and actions, this Communication proposes a specific joint action to be supported by the Health Programme as from 2010 . In addition, several other Community programmes also provide funding relevant to cancer, e.g. the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development as well as Regional Policy Programmes.
At the end of the current financial framework, a review process will be undertaken to assess the Partnership's successes and shortcomings. A final report on the work undertaken on the basis of this Communication will be submitted by the Commission to the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, which will constitute the basis for determining future Community action on cancer.
PURPOSE: to propose a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer.
BACKGROUND: figures show that, in 2006, after circulatory diseases, cancer was the second most common cause of deat h (two out of ten deaths in women and three out of ten deaths in men). This equates to approximately 3.2 million EU citizens diagnosed with cancer each year.
The legal basis for action in the field of health largely falls on the Member States (Article 152 of the EC Treaty). However, there are areas where joint EU action can bring considerable added value in tackling major health challenges more effectively, through information sharing and exchange of expertise and best practice.
The European Parliament and Council have also shown their political commitment and given strategic direction to future European cancer activities. On 10 April 2008, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on combating cancer in the enlarged EU, and, on 10 June 2008, reducing the European burden of cancer were adopted.
On this basis, the European Commission proposes a European Partnership for Action Against Cancer for the period 2009-2013 to support the Member State in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information, capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control, and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort.
CONTENT: this Communication broadly sets out the objectives for the European Partnership for Action Against Cancer, as well as the identified areas and actions to be further determined.
Objectives of partnership: to more effectively combat cancer at European level, it will be necessary to draw up a strategy to assist the Member States to enhance their knowledge and cooperation in the field, within the context of the limited competences of the Community in this field. This Partnership aims to support the Member States in their efforts to tackle cancer by providing a framework for identifying and sharing information , capacity and expertise in cancer prevention and control, and by engaging relevant stakeholders across the European Union in a collective effort. The aim is for all Member States to have integrated cancer plans by the end of the partnership, which should result in a 15% reduction by 2020 (510 000 new cases).
Areas and actions to be covered: the Communication stresses the fact that one-third of cancers are preventable and that, for this reason, emphasis needs to be placed on health promotion . Cancer is caused by many factors and therefore its prevention needs to address on an equal footing lifestyle, occupational and environmental causes, such as smoking, being overweight, low fruit and vegetable intake, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption.
To prevent and combat cancer, further actions need to be taken in the areas of detection, the dissemination of good practices, cooperation in research activities and improving the comparability of results between the Member States.
1) early detection: cancer can be reduced and controlled by implementing evidence-based strategies for early detection and management of patients with cancer. This includes appropriate information to ensure awareness about the benefits of screening for those who should benefit from it. In fact, the annual number of screening examinations in the EU is well below what it could be (approximately 125 million examinations per year).
The Communication proposes to reduce the burden of cancer by achieving 100% population coverage of screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer by 2013 by providing 125 million examinations to citizens per year. In order to achieve this target, Member States should promote large scale information campaigns on cancer screening, directed at the general public and health-care providers.
Other actions could include:
assessing the effectiveness of Community policy in the area of tobacco control; using existing mechanisms, such as the stakeholder forums focusing on alcohol and nutrition, to take forward cancer actions; reviewing the European Code Against Cancer, including its implementation; assessing the burden of infection-induced cancer in the EU; providing an overview of the range of recommendations in the EU on the implementation of human papillomavirus vaccination as a public health policy to prevent cervical cancer; reviewing the Council Recommendation on cancer screening in view of recent scientific developments; development of a voluntary European pilot accreditation scheme for breast cancer screening and follow-up, building on the European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
2) identification and dissemination of good practice: the Communication also proposes tackling inequalities linked to cancer mortalities, in particular by reducing disparities between the member states. Whilst it may not be possible to eliminate all the existing inequalities, the Commission considers that a 70% reduction by 2020 is a feasible target, taking account of scientific developments and the different circumstances of different countries and cancers. This aim will be supported by the development of guidelines for models of best practice in cancer-related care.
Other actions could include:
sharing knowledge and expertise on different models for comprehensive and integrated cancer care, and in particular the organisation of care, with the aim of developing consensus around definitions and models of care, including chronic and palliative care; exploring the application of ongoing European efforts under the Health Technology Assessment initiative as a means to tackle cancer more efficiently, building on the framework to be established under the proposed Directive on the Application of Patients' Rights in Cross-border Healthcare ; exploring alternative technical and financial solutions for the European supply of medical isotopes, taking account of shortages in supply across Europe.
3) cooperation and coordination in cancer research: health research is of central importance to the EU's research commitments. Recognising that cancer research is mainly undertaken at national level and that it is considerably fragmented and diverse across the EU, the Community aims to step up its efforts to improve EU-wide coordination within this field. The Communication proposes the development of a coordinated approach to cancer research across the EU, aiming to achieve coordination of one-third of research from all funding sources by 2013.
Other actions could include:
bringing together partners in a collective effort to address obstacles in European cancer research; identification of gaps in research and methodology, enhancement of research cooperation to avoid duplication of efforts and strengthening research on prevention and translational research; increasing public access to information on cancer research and clinical trials in particular; improving the regulatory environment on clinical research in the EU.
4) providing the comparable information necessary for policy and action: the Commission considers that it is important to ensure comprehensive and standardised cancer information and data from all Member States. In other words, comparative research at European level into best practices in the field is required. The sharing of relevant information for statistical purposes is essential for developing effective public health interventions and the European benchmarking process.
In this regard, the Communication proposes to ensure the availability of accurate and comparable data on cancer incidence, prevalence, morbidity, cure, survival and mortality in the EU by 2013.
Other actions could include:
identification of obstacles in collection of data and indicators, including legislative obstacles and accessibility of data, and ways to overcome those problems; agreement on a set of core indicators to measure and enable European comparisons of the burden of cancer, quality of care and impact of cancer strategies, with special emphasis on health inequalities; encouragement of high quality standards and networking on cancer registries; collection of data on the cost of cancer to society; conducting a survey to gauge European opinion on cancer data registration as a means for public health research and planning of effective health systems.
Financing and next steps: the actions undertaken within the framework of the Partnership would be funded by existing financial instruments until the end of the current financial framework (2013) without additional budgetary consequences. In order to take forward these identified areas and actions, this Communication proposes a specific joint action to be supported by the Health Programme as from 2010 . In addition, several other Community programmes also provide funding relevant to cancer, e.g. the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development as well as Regional Policy Programmes.
At the end of the current financial framework, a review process will be undertaken to assess the Partnership's successes and shortcomings. A final report on the work undertaken on the basis of this Communication will be submitted by the Commission to the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, which will constitute the basis for determining future Community action on cancer.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0584
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)4415
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0152/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0121/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0121/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.847
- Committee opinion: PE430.881
- Committee opinion: PE431.010
- Committee draft report: PE438.367
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0291
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0291
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0291 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE438.367
- Committee opinion: PE430.881
- Committee opinion: PE431.010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.847
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0121/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)4415
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0584 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nessa CHILDERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antonyia PARVANOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
130 |
2009/2103(INI)
2010/02/03
ITRE
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas one third of all cancer cases can be prevented through proper screening and early detection,
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation -1 (new) - having regard to Article 152 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, concerning health policies,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas health inequality is still widespread in the European Union, and whereas disadvantaged communities – as a result of limited access to resources, information and services – face higher risks of adverse health outcomes than those who are in a higher socio-economic position,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Urges the Commission to encourage those Member States with high cancer mortality to reform their national cancer registries in order to provide the data necessary for better informed and more focused policies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital D d (new) Dc. whereas the medical instruments used in cancer screening and treatment are too expensive for regional hospitals in the new Member States, and whereas the medical industry is not prepared to make an effort on pricing, because it is too intent on making a profit,
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Finds the proposed structure lacking in so far as there is no clear definition of specific action objectives, such as how to achieve the integration of all Member States’ plans in the fight against cancer by 2013, and calls on the Commission to rectify this lack of focus;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital D e (new) De. whereas husbands, fathers and children are also affected by specifically feminine diseases,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that the fight against cancer requires a real and accountable action plan that sets clear and ambitious goals that go beyond the mere collection of existent data such as the Commission currently proposes; considers also that fighting cancer is a long-term battle and believes, therefore, that the Commission should propose long-term plans instead of a Partnership that is currently foreseen to work only from 2009 to 2013 under the current proposed structure;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital D f (new) De. whereas men also experience cancer- related health problems; whereas although in men cancer is easier to detect, it is detected at a later stage, by which time the tumours have become too large; whereas men accordingly require specific screening and information,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to consider also prevention (primary and secondary) and the control of diseases which might develop into cancer;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital D g (new) Dg. whereas special measures should be available under national labour law to make it easier for current and former cancer sufferers to return to work, and should involve rehabilitation and the adjustment of working hours to fit in with courses of treatment,
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out, in view of the importance of prevention, the need to bring about the necessary improvements and to take action at all levels in respect of health determinants (environmental, nutritional, etc.), in order to limit the risk of cancer occurrence as early as possible;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital D h (new) Dh. whereas, the incidence of certain cancers such as cervical cancer being significantly higher in certain female migrant populations, it is necessary to guarantee that prevention and early detection programmes are focused on and available for these high-risk groups,
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses likewise the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital D i (new) Di. whereas the prevalence of cancer correlates with increasing age and is closely linked with old age, and it is also the case that with the ageing of the population the overall incidence of cancer will increase as well; whereas this trend will manifest itself mainly amongst older women, since women still have a higher life expectancy than men, and it is therefore necessary to guarantee that prevention and early detection programmes are made available not only for middle-aged women but also for older women as well as for the very oldest,
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital D j (new) Dj. whereas research has shown that women from certain Member States as well as women from certain migrant populations are hindered from participating in prevention and early detection programmes, under pressure of their population’s cultural and/or religious convictions and prejudices, so that it is necessary to develop efficient programmes to reach these women as well,
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital D k (new) Dk. whereas, although the new generation of anti-cancer medication and sometimes even the more common anti-cancer therapies requiring regular treatment are currently extremely expensive, populations at risk of poverty (in particular women and illegal immigrants) should get full and affordable access to these facilities,
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that more research on the connection between cancer and gender is needed as well as specific, not fragmented, research on the impact of the working environment on cancers contracted by women and men, including research on the effects of harmful chemicals and environmental pollution, nutrition, hormone treatments, lifestyle, genetic factors and the interaction of all these;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the prevention and early detection of cancer would enable the funds earmarked for this sector to be used more efficiently, and having regard to the importance of improving information to citizens and providing greater access to tests and treatment,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Citation -1 a (new) - having regard to the 2007-2013 public health programme, which focuses on the means and methods of tackling health problems,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that more awareness and prevention campaigns, specifically dedicated to the most frequent types of cancers affecting women, are needed in order to encourage and facilitate access to screening and early diagnoses;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the full implementation by Member States of the Commission's European Guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, in cooperation with other Member States, professional bodies and experts, is a prerequisite for reducing mortality rates in the EU and underlines that inequalities in cancer incidence, mortality and survival rates between Member States still persist; therefore considers it necessary to exchange best practices and to strengthen cooperation as regards national strategies for tackling those inequalities;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that gender equality with regard to access to cancer treatment should be actively promoted by the EU and Member States and underlines that cancer prevention action should take account of the trends in cancer over time, which differ significantly by gender, risk group and time period in Eastern and Western Europe;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Considers that research has to be developed in order to understand how inequitable access for lower socio- economic groups to healthcare services influences cancer incidences and outcomes;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Considers it essential to revise Council Recommendation 2003/878/ΕC on cancer screening to include new forms of cancer and add new techniques for early diagnosis;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Considers that the Member States (with the active participation of women's organisations) should organise information campaigns, which focus particularly on preventable cancers;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission proposal on a European Partnership for Action against Cancer for the period 2009-2013 and the proposal to reduce a cancer burden by
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for more funding to be allocated to regional-policy and European Social Fund programmes to educate and inform women about breast cancer protection and prevention;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that early detection procedures and techniques should be researched more thoroughly before being widely applied in order to guarantee that their use and application is safe and evidence-based, and that it is therefore necessary that this research should lead to unambiguous and evidence-based recommendations and guidelines;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on the Member States to ensure that women and men have unrestricted access to high-quality early diagnosis and treatment, irrespective of their origin, social status and level of education;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises that, under Article 168 TEC, actions relating to health matters are primarily the responsibility of the Member States, but stresses the importance of establishing a Community roadmap and encourages the Commission and the Member States to take joint action and a comprehensive approach by incorporating the medical field into policy areas such as education, environment, research and social issues;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Citation 3 - having regard to
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Calls on the Member States, the Council and the Commission carefully to consider the possibility of funding cancer prevention and treatment under the European Structural Funds;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Welcomes the debate on cancer held within national parliaments and the European Parliament; encourages its competent parliamentary committees and the relevant intergroups to continue to cooperate closely with representatives of representative associations engaged in combating cancer in men and women;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 f (new) 3f. Considers combating cancer in men and women to be one of the rare issues on which the European Parliament is united, with its committees and political groups presenting a common front in the face of what is a rare disease, in that it is related not to poverty but to growing prosperity;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 g (new) 3g. Calls on national statistics offices and Eurostat to publish statistics showing the link between women's use of hormonal contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy and abortion, and cancer;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the current funding available to fight cancer in the EU is inadequate to result in the necessary research and coordination as well as to provide decent preventive information for EU citizens;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, according to the Eurostat yearbook for 2006-2007, cancer is one of the main causes of death in the EU-25, claiming more than 1 million lives per year,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Encourages the Commission to include funding to promote cancer prevention in the financial perspective;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas prevention and access to early screening and diagnoses are the most important prerequisites for effectively addressing the burden of cancer,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Considers that existing FP7 funding allocated to the fight against cancer should be used more efficiently through, for example, better coordination between the different cancer research centres in the EU;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the most frequent types of
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that success is also dependent on the Member States’ commitment to making the necessary efforts towards combating cancer and calls on the Commission and the Member States to take more decisive and coordinated action with a view to preventing cancer effectively;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to share all information gathered so far as well as best practices in order to reduce any future and existing overlapping of efforts funded through Community programmes;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Da. whereas, while on average the health of EU citizens has steadily improved over the past decade, health disparities are still to be found in the Member States, in particular within different population groups and between men and women,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to use the existing European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) by adding non-communicable diseases to its mandate and by using it as the headquarters for EU cancer research where all the data already collected in each Member State could be harnessed and analysed in order to provide scientists and doctors with best practices and greater knowledge of the disease;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) Db. whereas men also contract cancer, and the prevention and treatment of cancer in men must also be continued,
source: PE-438.394
2010/03/15
ENVI
81 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) Aa. whereas certain Member States have made progress in reducing cancer rates thanks to anti-smoking policies, improved secondary prevention and treatment of certain forms of cancer6; 6 Jemal A, Ward E, Thun M (2010) Declining Death Rates Reflect Progress against Cancer. PLoS ONE 5(3): e9584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009584
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H c (new) Hc. whereas the disease arises principally as a consequence of individual exposure to carcinogenic agents in what individuals inhale, eat and drink, or are exposed to in their personal or work environment. Personal habits, such as tobacco use, dietary and physical activity patterns - as well as occupational and environmental conditions – play major roles in the development of cancer,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H d (new) Hd. whereas cancer arises principally as a consequence of individual exposure to carcinogenic agents in what individuals inhale, eat and drink, or are exposed to in their personal or work environment. Personal habits, such as tobacco use, dietary and physical activity patterns - as well as occupational and environmental conditions – play major roles in the development of cancer.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H e (new) He. whereas, according to the World Health Organisation, at least 10% of annual cancer-related deaths are caused directly by exposure to carcinogens at the workplace; whereas such exposure could be averted if the carcinogens were replaced by less harmful substances,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H f (new) Hf. whereas the rapid rate of increase of some cancers such as e.g. testicular and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, and the increase in childhood cancers of 1% per year in Europe since the last 20 years according to the WHO show that environmental factors must be involved,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H g (new) Hg. whereas effective secondary prevention aimed at early disease detection can also significantly contribute to improving health prevention can greatly contribute to improving health and whereas it has been predicted that, by implementing 100% population coverage of cervical cancer screening, an estimated reduction of over 94% of life years lost could be attained and, for every 152 pap smear tests performed, one life year could be gained,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. Whereas the incidence of certain cancers such as cervix cancer is significantly higher in certain female migrant populations, and therefore it is necessary to guarantee that prevention and early detection programmes are focused on and available for these high risk groups;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the Union’s ageing population is one of the reasons for the increase in the cancer burden across the Union and whereas the increase in the incidence of cancer will impose additional pressures on public finances and the productivity of the private sector economy and therefore an improvement in the health indicators relating to cancer will also contribute to improving the long-term economic indicators,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. Whereas the prevalence of cancer correlates with increasing age and is closely linked with old age, it is also the case that with the ageing of the population the overall incidence of cancer will increase as well; this trend will manifest itself mainly amongst older women, since women still have a higher life expectancy than men, and therefore it is necessary to guarantee that prevention and early detection programmes are not only made available for middle aged women but also for older women as well as for the oldest old;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K b (new) Kb. Whereas research has shown that women from certain Member States as well as women from certain migrant populations are hindered from participating in prevention and early detection programmes, under pressure of their population's cultural and/or religious convictions and prejudices, and therefore it is necessary to develop efficient programmes to reach these women as well;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K c (new) Kc. Whereas the new generation of anti- cancer medication and sometimes even the more common and regular anti- cancer therapies are currently extremely expensive, populations at risk of poverty, in particular women and (illegal) immigrants, should get full and affordable access to these facilities;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cancer was the second most common cause of death in 2006, accounting for two out of ten deaths in women and three out of ten deaths in men, equating to approximately 3.2 million EU citizens diagnosed with cancer each year; whereas the deaths are due for the most part to lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the WHO estimates that at least one third of all cancer cases are preventable and that prevention offers the most cost-effective long-term strategy for the control of cancer and it has been estimated that cancer could be prevented by modifying or avoiding key risk factors such as smoking, being overweight, low fruit and vegetable intake, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption, infectious agents and exposure to certain chemical substances and ionising radiation;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. whereas crystalline silica is classed by the WHO as a Group 1 carcinogen and whereas 3.2 million workers in the EU are exposed to this substance for at least 75 % of their working time; whereas 2.7% of lung/bronchial cancer deaths have to be considered attributable to occupational exposure to crystalline silica,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N b (new) Nb. whereas poor nutrition, physical inactivity, obesity, tobacco and alcohol, are risk factors common to other chronic diseases, such as CVD, type 2 diabetes, and respiratory diseases, and therefore cancer prevention programmes should be conducted within the context of an integrated chronic disease prevention programme,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N c (new) Nc. whereas poor nutrition, physical inactivity, obesity, tobacco and alcohol, are risk factors common to other chronic diseases, such as CVD, type 2 diabetes, and respiratory diseases, and therefore cancer prevention programmes should be conducted within the context of an integrated chronic disease prevention programme
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U a (new) Ua. whereas cancer is also strongly associated with social and economic status. Cancer risk factors are highest in groups with the least education. In addition, patients in the lower socioeconomic classes have consistently poorer survival rates than those in higher strata,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U b (new) Ub. whereas cancer is also strongly associated with social and economic status. Cancer risk factors are highest in groups with the least education. In addition, patients in the lower socioeconomic classes have consistently poorer survival rates than those in higher strata.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital V a (new) Va. whereas broad disparities exist among Member States concerning the development, implementation and quality of cancer control plans,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital W a (new) Wa. whereas there are at present considerable qualitative differences within the EU as regards cancer screening, early detection, and follow-up; whereas the differences relate in particular to the application of procedures for the purposes of early detection, a method making for a cost measurable, cost-effective reduction in the impact of the disease,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Z a (new) Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital AA a (new) AAa. whereas physical health and mental health are closely linked and interconnected, and this two-way connection is too often neglected in the care of cancer sufferers and other service users
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas prevention involves both primary prevention of incidence and secondary prevention via screening and early detection;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital AB AB. whereas the complexity of cancer requires improved communication between the many and varied healthcare professionals involved in cancer patient treatment and whereas psychosocial and mental health care of cancer patients can improve their life expectancy and quality of life,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Argues that strong action on cancer at a European level has the potential to set in place a framework for coordinated action at Member State, regional and local level. The European Partnership for Action Against Cancer should complement and build on work currently undertaken by the European Institutions in the field of health, and should seek to form partnerships with other services and sectors to ensure a comprehensive approach to the prevention and treatment of cancer;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Argues that strong action on cancer at a European level has the potential to set in place a framework for coordinated action at Member State, regional and local level. The European Partnership for Action Against Cancer should complement and build on work currently undertaken by the European Institutions in the field of health, and should seek to form partnerships with other services and sectors to ensure a comprehensive approach to the prevention and treatment of cancer.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that closer cooperation with stakeholders, with the participation of civil society and employers’ and employees’ organisations at international, European, national, regional and local level, should be established for a
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that closer cooperation with stakeholders, with the participation of civil society and employers’ and employees’ organisations at international, European, national, regional and local level, should be established for a
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the European Commission and the European Council to cooperate with the European Parliament in a well-coordinated inter-institutional partnership in order to reduce the burden of cancer
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the European Commission and the European Council to cooperate with the European Parliament in a well-coordinated interinstitutional partnership in order to reduce the burden of cancer, grounded in the legal basis established by Article 168(4) and (5) of the Treaty of Lisbon regarding the protection of public health and the prevention of illnesses;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to specify the nature of, and the sources of funding for, the European Partnership for Action Against Cancer;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines that prevention is the most cost-effective response, as one third of cancers are preventable, and urges that more resources are systematically and strategically invested in both primary and secondary prevention; underlines the importance of maintaining investments in health, in particular through preventive actions. In this regard, the European Commission and the Council should consider further action to ensure a health-improving environment, including work on tobacco, nutrition and alcohol and provisions to improve opportunities for physical activity;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that a comprehensive cancer approach and multidisciplinary teams can ensure more effective care for patients with cancer and that integrated cancer care, giving due consideration to psychosocial and mental wellbeing and support, is a vital part of care that should also be encouraged;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas effective primary prevention can greatly contribute to improving health
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph a (new) 4a. Stresses that special action are to be taken for rare and less common cancers, with the aim of accelerating diagnosis and making expertise more widely available in centers of excellence
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to build on findings of the Cancer Partnership with regard to cancer control plans and present a proposal for a Council Recommendation on Cancer Control Plans; and calls on the Commission to monitor independently on a yearly basis the implementation and progresses of the adopted recommendation
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that prevention is the most
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that prevention is the most cost-effective response, as one third of cancers are preventable, and urges that more resources are systematically and strategically invested in prevention; underlines that in these times of financial instability it is all the more important to maintain investments in health, in particular through preventive actions; in this sense, considers that the Commission and the Council should examine means of action to ensure an environment favourable to improved health, through, inter alia, measures on smoking, nutrition and alcohol and providing greater opportunities for physical activity;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls upon the Partnership to ensure that all actions in the group ‘Health Promotion and Prevention’; and in ‘Research’ include a component on environmental factors, with environmental factors defined as not only environmental tobacco smoke, radiation, and excessive UV exposure, but also hazardous chemicals in the indoor and outdoor environment to which people are exposed, including endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Considers that primary prevention is essential and shall involve actions on a broader scope of environmental factors defined as not only Environmental Tobacco Smoke (involuntary exposure to smoking), radiation, and excessive UV exposure, but also hazardous chemicals in the indoor and outdoor environment to which people are involuntarily exposed;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Considers that tackling 'risk factors' for cancer is key to prevention and urges member states to treat this as a priority,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the role of screening as one of the most important instruments in the fight against cancer; urges member states to invest in cancer screening programmes and considers that these initiatives are most efficient when they are available to the widest possible range of people and on a regular basis
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that integrated research (basic and clinical) on the use of nutrition in preventing cancer/treating malnutrition associated with cancer should be developed
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the Member States to establish a legal obligation to declare cancer cases, using standardised European terminology, the object being to provide means of evaluating prevention, screening, and treatment programmes, survival rates, and the comparability of data from one Member State to another and, on the basis of the findings, to produce information aimed at the general public;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas effective primary prevention can greatly contribute to improving health notably through population-based interventions and measures to encourage healthy lifestyles, and whereas
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that cancer can be reduced and controlled by implementing evidence- based strategies for early detection and management of patients with cancer; this includes appropriate information to ensure awareness of the benefits of screening for those who should benefit from it; urges the Member States in this connection to examine whether breast cancer screening for women under 50 and over 69 years of age serves a useful purpose and asks the Commission to collect and analyse this information;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on member states to do more to raise awareness of cancers that specifically affect men, in order to increase levels of prevention and encourage screening for these diseases
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to provide funding for the further development of blood- and urine-based tests (biomarker tests) within the seventh research framework programme, bearing in mind that these early diagnosis procedures are promising tools for detecting different types of cancer (prostate, colon, ovarian, kidney, and bladder cancer);
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for support to be stepped up for research into cancer prevention, including research into the effects of harmful chemicals and environmental pollutants, nutrition, lifestyle, genetic factors, and the interaction of all these, and calls for the links between
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for support to be stepped up for research into cancer prevention, including
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for support to be stepped up for research into cancer prevention, including research into the effects of harmful chemicals and environmental pollutants, nutrition, lifestyle, genetic factors, and the interaction of all these, and calls for the links between breast cancer and potential risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol and synthetic environmental and pharmaceutical hormones to be investigated;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Notes that the Czech Government has not yet ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which entered into force in February 2005, and therefore urges it to do so;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls for priority attention of bio- monitoring research to the most important sources of exposure to carcinogenic substances, in particular: the traffic, the emissions from industry, the quality of the air in the large cities, and the emanations and surface waters in the vicinity of waste disposal.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Calls upon the Commission to ensure that swifter action is taken under the Community Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 d (new) 16d. Stresses that research findings should be translated into concrete action as soon as possible, and that ongoing research should not be used to delay action against known or suspected factors that cause or promote cancer incidence;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution recital G a (new) Ga. Whereas prevention involves both primary prevention of incidence, which can be accomplished by reducing population exposure to cancer-related contaminants in the environment, in addition to secondary prevention via screening and early detection;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 e (new) 16e. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to adopt policies to support the principles embodied in the World Health Organization's Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health launched in 2004
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to promote by every possible means the principle of prevention both in medical practices and in more healthy lifestyles and to encourage Member States to invest more of their resources in prevention;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to invest more of their resources in prevention, both primary (exposure to environmental pollutants) and secondary via screening and early detection;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to invest more of their resources
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Points out the need for large-scale research programmes to develop alternatives for harmful substances that are not carcinogens. Innovation should be encouraged and should lead to a phasing- out of all the harmful substances that accumulate in the human body or in the environment, which cause cancer or mutagenic effects. In the long term, those substances should be replaced on the market.
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Considers that early detection procedures and techniques should be researched more thoroughly before being widely applied in order to guarantee that their use and application is safe and evidence-based; therefore, it is necessary that this research leads to unambiguous and evidence-based recommendations and guidelines;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission and Member States to set up a European Network for Prevention under the European Cancer Partnership that addresses all health determinants for relevant for cancer, including environmental ones;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to encourage and support initiatives bringing together a wide range of stakeholders with the aim of preventing cancer by reducing occupational and environmental exposure to carcinogens and other cancer-producing substances and by promoting healthy lifestyles, not least by highlighting the main risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol, obesity, poor diet, lack of exercise, and exposure to the sun, placing the emphasis first and foremost on children and teenagers;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls for the need to tackling the environmental-health related problems which have impacts on the development of specific types of cancer in accordance to what has been defined under the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010, namely through the assessment of the subsequent national Environmental and Health Action Plans and through the cooperation between Member States on the results achieved throughout the process, in order to guarantee that the results obtained in each country may help to fed European intervention in this domain.
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H.
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Commission, the Member States, and the European Chemicals Agency to implement Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals, enforce the applicable restrictions (REACH), and update the list of substances of very high concern, which covers carcinogens;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Calls on the Commission, working within the Partnership, to encourage and support initiatives seeking to prevent imports of goods containing cancer- producing chemicals, and to take Europe- wide measures with a view to intensifying checks to detect such chemicals, pesticides included, as might be present in foodstuffs;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that more efforts should be made in psychosocial and occupational rehabilitation programmes for cancer patients which include a broad range of activities aimed at information, counselling, advice on possible changes in lifestyle and behaviour, psychological support and social welfare questions; and underlines the importance of monitoring and assessing the mental health status of people with cancer
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU-wide human bio-monitoring surveys receive the funding required to enable carcinogens and other cancer-producing substances to be monitored for the purpose of gauging policy effectiveness;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to revise Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (the Clinical Trials Directive) with a view to encouraging a greater cancer research effort, focusing in particular on screening, including early detection, without, however, disregarding the impact of the expenditure entailed on the non- commercial research sector, and to improve the information available to patients and the public at large about clinical trials in progress or which have been successfully completed;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that EU legislation contains incentives for researchers and industry to develop nutritional and other natural product- based approaches to cancer prevention, validated through nutrigenomic and epigenetic research.
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to employ every means required to produce guidelines for a common definition of disability covering persons suffering from chronic diseases or from cancer and, in the meantime, ensure that those Member States which have not yet done so take the necessary steps without delay to include persons in the above categories in their national definitions of disability;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that cancer medicines, including treatments for rare and less common cancers, are uniformly available to all patients who need them in all Member States; and calls on the Commission and Member States to take specific and coordinated actions in order to reduce inequalities in terms of access to cancer treatment and care
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that cancer medicines are uniformly available to all patients who need them in all Member States and that, whenever possible, the provision made for the above purpose includes the new ‘targeted’ cancer drugs recently put on the market;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Points out that the objectives set by the Cancer Partnership are long-term, and therefore urges the European institutions to support the 10-year sustainability and viability of the Cancer Partnership in a future Community health budget; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph H a (new) Ha. whereas environmental factors include not only environmental tobacco smoke, radiation and excessive UV exposure but also exposure to chemical contaminants in food, air, soil and water due to inter alia industrial processes, agricultural practices or the content of such substances in e.g. construction and consumer products;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Considers that proper implementation of existing legislation with regard to substances that cause or promote cancer is of paramount importance in action against cancer; therefore calls on the Commission to ensure full implementation of relevant worker health legislation and to contribute swiftly and in a determined manner to the establishment of a comprehensive candidate list of substances of very high concern as a stepping stone for rapid decisions on CMR substances in the context of authorisations under REACH;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Similarly calls on the Commission to take rapid action in the context of the Community Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution recital H b (new) Hb. whereas environmental factors include not only environmental tobacco smoke, radiation and excessive UV exposure but also other chemical contaminants in air, soil and water, and many of which are in present in both occupational and residential settings through industrial and consumer products;
source: PE-439.847
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0584/COM_COM(2014)0584_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0584/COM_COM(2014)0584_EN.pdf |
events/0/date |
Old
2009-06-24T00:00:00New
2009-06-23T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.367New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.367 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.881&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-430881_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE431.010&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-431010_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.847New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.847 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0121_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0121_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100505&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100505&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-121&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0121_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0584/COM_COM(2014)0584_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0584/COM_COM(2014)0584_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-121&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0121_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-152New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0152_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/00826New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Report on the Commission communication on Action against cancer: European partnershipNew
Action against cancer: European partnership |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|