Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | MEISSNER Gesine ( ALDE) | KOUMOUTSAKOS Georgios ( PPE), FLECKENSTEIN Knut ( S&D), TAYLOR Keith ( Verts/ALE), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ANTINORO Antonello ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | STAVRAKAKIS Georgios ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Commission presents its second report describing the progress of the EU’s Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) and maritime sectoral policies between 2010 and 2012. It highlights the contribution of these policies to the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy by taking stock of concrete achievements that help create growth, enhance resource efficiency and save public money.
The report notes that the IMP was created to reaffirm the maritime dimension of the EU. The IMP has grown from this vision into a tool delivering concrete benefits for maritime growth and sustainability in Europe. The report presents a picture of achievements in all policy areas related to the seas. It examines actions taken under the following policy areas: transport, research, environment, tourism, shipbuilding, climate change adaption, and regional policies. Among the initiatives launched are the following:
· the White Paper for Transport , which further specifies the orientations of the Maritime Transport Strategy until 2018: the ability to provide cost-efficient maritime transport services; the long-term competitiveness of the EU shipping sector; and the creation of seamless transport chains for passengers and cargo across transport modes;
· the Common Information Sharing Environment for the EU’s maritime domain to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of maritime surveillance;
· a Task force on Maritime Employment and Competitiveness;
· three joint calls of FP7 Research Programme under the Ocean of Tomorrow to support multidisciplinary marine and maritime projects, a first version of the European Marine Observation and Data Network to improve access to data and reduce costs to users;
· a Maritime Strategy for the Atlantic adopted in November 2011;
· a Decision to implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, laying down criteria and methodological standards for the assessment of Good Environmental Status.
The contribution of the maritime economy to growth and employment
Blue Growth: the Commission adopted a Communication on Blue Growth , opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. The objective is to launch a joint initiative with Member States, regions, and all relevant stakeholders to unlock the potential of the blue economy. A study launched by the Commission in 2010 has identified as common bottlenecks the lack of appropriate skills, access to risk capital, fragmented marine data, environmental challenges and difficult planning processes. Actions are underway in Member States to remedy the skills shortage — for example through encouraging clusters of industry and education. Integrated maritime policy initiatives are addressing the data and planning issues. However, certain sectors require a more targeted approach. Accordingly, five areas with growth potential —maritime and coastal tourism, ocean renewable energy, marine mineral resources, aquaculture, and blue biotechnology — have been analysed in more depth to suggest additional measures needed to increase growth and jobs.
Energy: offshore wind energy contributes to reach a 20% share of energy from renewable sources by 2020. In 2011, the Commission proposed guidelines to lay down rules for the development and interoperability of trans-European energy networks. Priority corridors were identified, including the North Sea Offshore Grid and the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan.
Shipbuilding: a new Framework on State Aid to Shipbuilding was adopted in December 2011 containing specific provisions in relation to innovation aid and regional aid for shipbuilding, as well as provisions on exports credits. Its extended scope now applies to inland waterway vessels and floating and moving offshore structures.
Fisheries and aquaculture : in July 2011, the Commission adopted a package of initiatives, including new legislative proposals, to reform the Common Fisheries Policy. The transition will be accompanied by a European Maritime and Fisheries Fund to improve sustainability, the performance of small-scale coastal fisheries, promote aquaculture, support job creation in maritime communities and deliver cost-efficiency in maritime affairs.
The report shows that the strong contribution of maritime sectors to Europe’s economy and the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy are reinforced by coordinated action to lower costs, improve resource efficiency, reduce risks, support innovation and make better use of public money. By facilitating the cooperation of all maritime players across sectors and borders, and by avoiding duplication of spending and efforts, the IMP has enhanced the sustainable development of the European maritime economy, while contributing to a better protection of the marine environment.
The Commission considers it is setting the best possible conditions for sustainable economic development to come from the sea. Building on those achievements, Blue Growth is the objective for the coming years. During Cyprus’s Council Presidency, an informal Ministerial Conference on IMP will be a major stepping-stone towards this goal. Blue Growth will drive a second phase of the Integrated Maritime Policy to achieve a healthy maritime economy that delivers innovation, growth and sustainability for European citizens.
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), in response to several Commission communications on the subject.
Members welcomed the European Commission’s October 2009 package on the integrated maritime policy (IMP) and confirm overall the validity of the integrated approach to maritime affairs .
The resolution stresses that IMP should contribute to achieving a competitive, social and sustainable Union. It takes the view in this regard that the development of IMP must harmoniously incorporate efforts to attain economic development, a high level of employment – particularly by making the sector more attractive for young people through training actions and the launch of a ‘Maritime Erasmus’ – and environmental protection. It states, therefore, that the IMP should be interconnected with the objectives and initiatives of the EU 2020 Strategy .
The Commission is called upon to:
come up with an overarching, cross-sectoral strategy for sustainable growth in coastal regions and maritime sectors by 2013 , based on a broad investigation of potentials and policy options and on broad stakeholder consultation; take action after the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico , and create legal certainty in the field of offshore oil extraction in Europe by submitting a coordinated European action strategy for emergency preparedness and for tackling disasters caused by drilling rigs and tankers, at an international level especially in cases of cross-border contamination; extend the mandate of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) on safety inspections of offshore installations and the cleaning up of oil spills in the review of the EMSA Regulation; ensure that its stated intention to finance the IMP with EUR 50 million over the next two years in order to build upon previous projects in the areas of policy, governance, sustainability and surveillance is supported.
Maritime governance : Parliament calls on those Member States whose IMP administrative structures are still highly fragmented, to establish forthwith unified and integrated maritime governance structures.
The Commission, the Member States and coastal regions are called upon to intensify their efforts in defining integrated maritime policies and in building adequate maritime governance structures, which make it possible to take decisions on the basis of the best information available, involving all interested parties and therefore better respecting the different policy objectives.
Members propose the establishment and development of strategies for the EU’s maritime macro-regions in the context of strategic approaches for regional maritime areas.
In addition, the resolution invites the Member States, the Council and the Commission to:
intensify their dialogue at international level on IMP and other maritime issues in the competent fora, including on the ratification and implementation of UNCLOS; support the inclusion of IMP in the financial leverage instruments and objectives of the EU’s external policy through the development of suitable initiatives aimed at addressing problems such as pollution, illegal fishing and piracy.
Sea basin initiatives and strategies : the resolution welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission and the macro regional strategies of relevance to the sea. It calls for further dialogue and cooperation in order to improve governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the framework of a multi-level approach in the different maritime sea basins, including the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean area, and asks the Commission to take rapid steps in cooperation with Member States to draw up and present actions in these regions.
Maritime spatial planning : Members are of the view that the management of intensifying and increasingly competing sea uses on an eco-system basis requires coordinated, streamlined and cross-border maritime spatial planning as a neutral tool.
The resolution notes the essential importance of European maritime spatial planning and its uses for coastal regions and the outermost regions in particular.
Maritime Surveillance : Parliament considers that a well coordinated and integrated cross-pillar, cross-sectoral, and cross-border approach towards maritime surveillance will improve protection of the interests of Member States and the European Union and protection against marine pollution and illegal actions.
The resolution calls therefore on the Commission, the Member States, EU agencies and in particular the EMSA, and relevant organisations to speed up their efforts in terms of cooperation and coordination and with regard to the necessary legislative adaptations.
Parliament reiterates its call for improved cooperation between Member States’ national inspectorates, coastguards and navies and reminds the Commission to carry out – as requested earlier by the European Parliament for 2005 in Directive 2005/35/EC – a feasibility study with the prospect of creating a European Coastguard Service .
Among the other recommendations, the report calls on the Commission to:
take into account the critical role of maritime freight transport in trade today, to promote the development of secondary and less congested ports and to adequately address the question of maritime transport security measures in the EU and abroad by investing in enhancing multilayered risk management systems for targeting and inspecting dangerous cargo integrate the European Maritime Policy and the inland waterways policies, in order to maximise the potential of the waterway transport and to create efficient and diversified ways of transport; improve the working conditions of seafarers by appropriate means, to implement the ILO Maritime Labour Convention in Community law and to propose a programme for the qualification and training of seafarers and especially the recruitment of young people, including those from third countries; consider a coordinated European industrial policy initiative aimed at increasing competitiveness, supporting the excellence of European shipbuilding, and the safety and environmental performance and competitiveness of shipping in the common maritime space without barriers; coherently integrate the CO2 reduction targets and introduce economic market based instruments, into the maritime sector such as (emissions trading schemes) and to develop a strategy to mitigate the specific impacts of climate change on coastal and island regions; come up with a strategy for sustainable coastal, islands and marine tourism. accelerate their efforts to make the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODNET) operational as soon as possible.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Gesine MEISSNER (ADLE, DE) on Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), in response to several Commission communications on the subject.
Members welcome the European Commission’s October 2009 package on the integrated maritime policy (IMP) and confirm overall the validity of the integrated approach to maritime affairs .
The committee considers that IMP should contribute to achieving a competitive, social and sustainable Union; takes the view in this regard that the development of IMP must harmoniously incorporate efforts to attain economic development, a high level of employment – particularly by making the sector more attractive for young people through training actions and the launch of a ‘Maritime Erasmus’ – and environmental protection. It states, therefore, that the IMP should be interconnected with the objectives and initiatives of the EU 2020 Strategy .
The Commission is called upon to:
come up with an overarching, cross-sectoral strategy for sustainable growth in coastal regions and maritime sectors by 2013 , based on a broad investigation of potentials and policy options and on broad stakeholder consultation; take action after the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, and create legal certainty in the field of offshore oil extraction in Europe by submitting a coordinated European action strategy for emergency preparedness and for tackling disasters caused by drilling rigs and tankers, at an international level especially in cases of cross-border contamination; extend the mandate of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) on safety inspections of offshore installations and the cleaning up of oil spills in the review of the EMSA Regulation; ensure that its stated intention to finance the IMP with EUR 50 million over the next two years in order to build upon previous projects in the areas of policy, governance, sustainability and surveillance is supported.
Maritime governance : Members call on those Member States whose IMP administrative structures are still highly fragmented, to establish forthwith unified and integrated maritime governance structures;
The Commission, the Member States and coastal regions are called upon to intensify their efforts in defining integrated maritime policies and in building adequate maritime governance structures , which make it possible to take decisions on the basis of the best information available, involving all interested parties and therefore better respecting the different policy objectives.
Members propose the establishment and development of strategies for the EU’s maritime macro-regions in the context of strategic approaches for regional maritime areas.
In addition, the report invites the Member States, the Council and the Commission to:
intensify their dialogue at international level on IMP and other maritime issues in the competent fora, including on the ratification and implementation of UNCLOS; support the inclusion of IMP in the financial leverage instruments and objectives of the EU’s external policy through the development of suitable initiatives aimed at addressing problems such as pollution, illegal fishing and piracy.
Sea basin initiatives and strategies : the report welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission and the macro regional strategies of relevance to the sea. It calls for further dialogue and cooperation in order to improve governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the framework of a multi-level approach in the different maritime sea basins, including the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean area, and asks the Commission to take rapid steps in cooperation with Member States to draw up and present actions in these regions.
Maritime spatial planning : Members are of the view that the management of intensifying and increasingly competing sea uses on an eco-system basis requires coordinated, streamlined and cross-border maritime spatial planning as a neutral tool, which has the potential to contribute significantly to the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and to facilitate the harmonious coexistence of different sea uses.
The report notes the essential importance of European maritime spatial planning and its uses for coastal regions and the outermost regions in particular.
Maritime Surveillance : the committee expects that a well coordinated and integrated cross-pillar, cross-sectoral, and cross-border approach towards maritime surveillance will improve protection of the interests of Member States and the European Union and protection against marine pollution and illegal actions.
The report calls therefore on the Commission, the Member States, EU agencies and in particular the EMSA, and relevant organisations to speed up their efforts in terms of cooperation and coordination and with regard to the necessary legislative adaptations.
Members reiterate their call for improved cooperation between Member States’ national inspectorates, coastguards and navies with the prospect of creating a European Coastguard Service .
Among the other recommendations , the report calls on the Commission to:
integrate the European Maritime Policy and the inland waterways policies, in order to maximise the potential of the waterway transport and to create efficient and diversified ways of transport; improve the working conditions of seafarers by appropriate means, to implement the ILO Maritime Labour Convention in Community law and to propose a programme for the qualification and training of seafarers and especially the recruitment of young people, including those from third countries; consider a coordinated European industrial policy initiative aimed at increasing competitiveness, supporting the excellence of European shipbuilding, and the safety and environmental performance and competitiveness of shipping in the common maritime space without barriers; coherently integrate the CO2 reduction targets and introduce economic market based instruments, into the maritime sector and to develop a strategy to mitigate the specific impacts of climate change on coastal and island regions; come up with a strategy for sustainable coastal, islands and marine tourism .
The Commission presents a Communication on developing the international dimension of the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) of the European Union . It recalls that the aim of the IMP is to promote the sustainable growth of both the maritime economy in particular, and the coastal regions more generally, by improving coordination between the different sectoral policies and by developing crosscutting tools. If the IMP is to succeed, however, it cannot be just a European policy. Marine ecosystems and maritime economies transcend national boundaries . Many of the most urgent challenges which demand an integrated approach cannot be effectively addressed without robust international cooperation. Where the challenges facing the regional seas adjacent to the EU are concerned, the Commission will shortly set out its vision of the steps required in specific Communications. This Communication complements this regional approach by exploring how the IMP should be extended into the wider international arena. It envisages the creation of an EU framework for a global integrated approach to maritime affairs . It outlines ways in which the EU's authority, as an international maritime power, should be strengthened at the multilateral level. This would also facilitate regional cooperation with maritime neighbours with whom the EU shares sea-basins, as well as helping develop closer bilateral relations with key partners. Efforts promoted in the framework of the international dimension of the EU IMP will be coherent with the EU's overarching external relations policy and the development policy.
The Communication sets out the key themes for an EU platform in international maritime affairs . It notes that the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) remains the key reference in this domain, as supplemented by the UN
Fish Stocks Agreement in the field of fisheries. Yet despite repeated calls from the international community, a number of countries have still to become a party to these instruments and implement them. Furthermore, while UNCLOS contains general obligations for the protection of the marine environment and for cooperation, there are no mechanisms for taking effective action in the high seas from a cross-cutting approach. The EU is also advocating an integrated approach to the protecting and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. It has proposed an Implementation Agreement under UNCLOS for this purpose, which could play a key role in filling gaps in the current legal framework, in particular for the establishment of marine protected areas in the high seas.
The Commission goes on to discuss the need for sustainable fishing activities and efforts to put in place a post-2012 climate change agreement , as well as the need to ensure maritime safety, and enhance participation in large-scale international research programmes going beyond national jurisdictions and deep-sea research .
The paper describes also the need to strengthen the EU as a player in the existing multilateral system, particularly in UN fora and Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs).
It goes on to discuss the establishment of regional cooperation within shared sea basin such as the EU Atlantic basin, and the Black Sea.
The Communication states that an integrated approach to maritime affairs is beginning to establish itself as the gold-standard for maritime governance around the world. The EU's Integrated Maritime Policy positions it as a forerunner in this field. However, to capitalise on this momentum, and to ensure it reaps the full benefits of integrated policy making at home, it needs to ensure that its influence in the international debate is maintained and enhanced . The EU should therefore support the widespread adoption of IMP-type principles, tools and processes based on the ecosystem approach , as both a necessary precondition for effective integrated management in the EU's own waters, and as a good in itself, in line with its belief in cooperative multilateral decision-making.
In particular, the EU should:
strengthen its role as a global player through greater and more unified participation in multilateral fora, in coherence with the principle of the unity of the EU external representation; promote global membership of UNCLOS ; establish by mutual consent high-level dialogues on maritime affairs with key partners, ensuring synergies with existing sectoral dialogues in other policy areas; pursue dialogue on IMP bilaterally through both the ENP instruments and multilateral dialogue at sea-basin-level within existing frameworks (e.g. Union for the Mediterranean, Northern Dimension, Black Sea Synergy), sharing best practice in implementing the IMP tools with its neighbours and encouraging them to implement such tools; continue to work on moving oceans and coasts higher up the climate change agenda and provide assistance to developing coastal and island states in this field, in line with the EU development cooperation strategies and initiatives; continue to support an integrated approach to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity , particularly in areas beyond national jurisdiction, including for the establishment of marine protected areas; pursue its cooperation with the ILO to encourage decent working conditions in the maritime sector; pursue its actions to ensure freedom, safety and security of navigation, including actions against piracy ; strengthen cooperation research activities with third countries in order to enhance participation in large-scale international research programmes and with countries neighbouring the EU in order to define common regional marine research strategies; ensure coherence between the activities of various organisations, notably in the fisheries, environment and transport fields; encourage the OECD to develop a structure for exchange of best practices on integrated approaches to maritime affairs; develop strategies for all relevant shared sea basins .
The Commission invites the EU institutions to endorse the Commission's proposed actions as set out in this Communication and to support the approach outlined.
The Commission presents a Communication the integration of maritime surveillance: a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain. The aim of integrated maritime surveillance is to generate a situational awareness of activities at sea impacting on maritime safety and security , border control, the marine environment, fisheries control, trade and economic interests of the EU as well as general law enforcement and defence so as to facilitate sound decision making.
There is a clear need to share maritime surveillance information . Different sectoral authorities dealing with surveillance of actions at sea gather data and operational information so as to establish the best possible maritime awareness picture for their own use. For many user communities, at present, this picture does not include complementary information gathered by other sectoral users due to the lack of mutual exchange. Developing the necessary means to allow for such data and information exchange should enhance the different users' awareness picture. Such enhanced pictures will increase the efficiency of Member States' authorities and improve cost effectiveness.
The objective of this Communication is to set out guiding principles for the development of a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain and to launch a process towards its establishment. To achieve this, enhanced coordination and coherence between the European Commission, the Member States and those interlocutors whom the European defence community may indicate for this purpose, should be established.
The Commission sets out the challenges currently being faced with regard to the development of a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain: These include: i) diverse user and operator communities responsible for defence, border control, customs, marine pollution, fisheries control, maritime safety and security, vessel traffic management, accident and disaster response, search and rescue as well as law enforcement. All communities are collecting information for their own purposes; (ii) diverse legal frameworks; (iii) cross border threats and (iv) specific legal provisions particularly on processing data.
The Communication sets out Guiding Principles for the Development of a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain , setting out in detail the issues to be considered, and makes certain recommendations in order to give effect to each of these principles:
Principle 1: an approach interlinking all user communities : the common information sharing environment should enable Member States' authorities to make a more efficient use of maritime surveillance information. Common rules and standards should be developed at Community level to optimise the exchange of information between the different user communities. Each of these communities should be given the possibility to provide and/or receive information at national level from international, regional, Community, military and internal security systems and mechanisms on a need-to-know basis, in line with conditions of use and defined user access rights, in order to build up its individual user-defined situational picture.
Principle 2: building a technical framework for interoperability and future integration : a Common Information Sharing Environment for the EU maritime domain may be best achieved through a non-hierarchical technical framework of maritime monitoring and surveillance systems. Such architecture should be designed as a cost effective interaction of different information layers to enable the improvement of user defined pictures. The system architecture must allow data to be inter alia collected, merged, analysed, disseminated and managed at the appropriate level of decentralisation, depending on security concerns (e.g. intelligence) and in compliance with data protection regulations, international rules and functional requirements. Best use should be made of existing systems.
Principle 3: information exchange between civilian and military authorities : surveillance information should be shared between civilian and military authorities to avoid duplications and to be cost effective. Whilst recognising their distinct purposes and underlying mandates, this requires common standards and procedures for access to and use of the relevant information to allow for a two-directional information exchange.
Principle 4: specific legal provisions : obstacles to the exchange of monitoring and surveillance data for the purpose of setting up a common information sharing environment should be identified in EU and national legislation. In removing these obstacles, due consideration must be given, inter alia, to respect for data confidentiality, intellectual property rights issues and protection of personal data as well as ownership of data in accordance with national and international law.
The Commission concludes that an integrated approach to maritime surveillance should improve the effectiveness of the authorities responsible for maritime activities by making available more tools and more information necessary for the performance of their duties. This should result in more efficient operations and reduced operating costs. The potential savings at EU level are significant given the growing need to detect, identify, track and intercept amongst others illegal migration, illegal fishing as well as to prevent accidents at sea, to safeguard the environment and to facilitate trade. The benefits to flow from this process will positively affect national security, maritime security and safety, the protection of the marine environment, border control and, in general, law enforcement.
PURPOSE : progress report and strategic directions for the EU’s Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP).
CONTENT : the Commission presents this report following the European Council’s endorsement of the IMP in December 2007. The report sums up the achievements of the IMP and charts the course for the next phase. It also highlights how coherent policy-making towards our seas, maritime sectors and coastal areas can contribute to addressing challenges posed by the current global economic crisis and by the need to take decisive action against climate change and environmental degradation.
The October 2007 Blue Paper ( COM(2007)0575 ) set out an ambitious Action Plan. The implementation of the Action plan has progressed well : Of the 65 actions in the plan, 56 have been launched or completed (mostly in the form of Commission or Council acts). On 9 actions various initiatives have been undertaken, although no formal documents are adopted yet. Following the first phase, the Commission and Member States are now focusing efforts on effective implementation on the ground, with additional activities in all relevant policy areas pursued where needed.
The Blue Paper and Action Plan were drawn up in a radically different economic climate. The crisis has not spared the maritime economy from declining revenues and downturn. Beyond achievements so far, the paper also sets out where further action will be required in order to unlock the undeniable potential of our oceans, seas and coastal regions, but also to address the economic problems faced by maritime sectors.
The Commission’s assessment is that the last two years have confirmed the IMP as a highly promising policy providing a significant contribution to growth, jobs and environmental sustainability for Europe’s coastal areas and beyond. Despite its young age, this new EU policy has already changed the way in which Europe deals with its maritime and coastal assets . After three years of intense deliberations, it is fundamental to keep this momentum in order to address the challenges of environmental protection and economic growth. The double impact of climate change and the economic crisis is particularly felt in the maritime world: oceans are the drivers of our climate and maritime industries have been the drivers of globalisation and prosperity. It is therefore important to unlock the economic potential of maritime Europe, optimise government action on the seas, and further explore the synergies that allow economic growth and environmental stability to reinforce each other.
The Commission considers that these objectives will be best achieved through a combination of progress in six strategic directions .
Integrated maritime governance must be further enhanced . The progress registered over recent years needs to be turned into effective integrated structures at all levels of government. EU institutions, Member States and coastal regions have a particular responsibility in ensuring upstream policy integration and in adopting coherent agendas for maritime affairs, further counteracting the prevalence of isolated sectoral policy thinking. Stakeholder involvement in maritime policy-making should also be enshrined more permanently in governance structures. This should also lead to a more intense dialogue between the EU, Member State's governments and coastal regions, which often hold key expertise necessary for an integrated approach to Maritime Affairs. For the same reason the formation of a cross-sectoral platform for stakeholder dialogue on maritime affairs should be supported.
Cross-cutting policy tools are of utmost importance to enhance economic development, environmental monitoring, safety, security and law enforcement on Europe’s oceans and seas. In particular, maritime spatial planning, in combination with increased marine knowledge, can unblock considerable economic investment and drastically improve the way we manage our maritime spaces, preserving their ecosystems. It must become a practical instrument on all levels of governance, and to ensure coherent decision-making over cross-border investments. The integration of maritime surveillance has the potential to make a difference to the way key policy objectives such as the fight against illegal immigration, the safeguard of commercial shipping and the protection of natural resources are carried out by national authorities. Member States and the Commission will have to continue to work together on these items so that the processes which were initiated in the last two years will bear fruit.
The definition of the boundaries of sustainability of human activities that have an impact on the marine environment, in the framework of Directive 2008/56/EC (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) will design a platform for the successful development of all maritime activities, paying due attention to their cumulative impacts. Hence, the implementation of this Directive will remain a key objective of the IMP, which should also develop the necessary cooperation between all relevant sectors, including between marine science and the marine environment policy.
Sea-basin strategies are key to a successful implementation of the IMP. This is where the priorities and the tools of the policy can be adapted to the specific geographic, economic and political contexts of each large maritime region. Co-operation among Member States and regions sharing a sea basin is a crucial element of success and this should be accompanied with proper dialogue with third countries sharing a sea basin with the EU. Action at the level of sub-basins can also be useful in establishing best practices.
The international dimension of the IMP will also require more attention, as discussed by the Communication published together with this report ( COM(2009)0536 ). Europe must take a leading role in improving global maritime governance, as it has done in the matter of piracy or with regard to destructive fishing practices. The Commission intends to strengthen dialogue with a limited number of major maritime partners and its participation in international fora and informal processes.
The implementation of the IMP, in the present context of economic downturn, should put a renewed focus on sustainable economic growth, employment and innovation . Hence the EU should explore synergies between the European Energy Policy and the IMP, promoting energy generation from the sea, including renewable forms of energy, and use the sea more for energy transportation through pipelines, underwater grids and vessels. It will also be necessary further to link the EU's Climate Change Policy with IMP, by developing a strategy for adaptation to climate change in coastal and maritime areas. As part of the developing debate on territorial cohesion, it will be important to ensure that maritime and coastal areas are fully taken into account.
The EU will also have to promote better maritime transport in order to foster co- modality, to implement the concept of the Motorways of the Sea, and to improve the EU programme for short sea shipping. Still aiming at the economic development of maritime activities, it will be necessary to find ways of further stimulating maritime employment and investment in EU–flagged shipping, while remaining determined to advance the idea of clean ships. Indeed, support for innovation and research towards very low or even zero emission ships will continue to be a major part of the Community's response to the strategically important shipbuilding sector. In this manner the EU can give to European shipyards and the marine equipment industry a competitive technological edge over other regions of the world, and will make maritime transport, in particular along the coasts of Europe, safer and more sustainable.
Lastly, the Commission is examining the future funding needs of the IMP. It intends to produce in 2010 a policy document detailing projects and initiatives aimed at further developing the above six strategic directions, following consultations with stakeholders.
The Commission presents a Communication entitled “Towards an Integrated Maritime Policy for better governance in the Mediterranean”. The Communication highlights the mechanisms and tools that should be mobilised to achieve an integrated approach to governing maritime activities in the Mediterranean sea-basin . It is meant to complement the various sectoral actions that the EU promotes in the Mediterranean area. While the Integrated Maritime Policy is primarily addressed to Member States, the Communication calls for stronger co-operation with non-EU Mediterranean partners at the appropriate levels.
It sets out the key challenges , noting that the Mediterranean bears 30% of global sea-borne trade in volume from or into its more than 450 ports and terminals, and a quarter of worldwide sea-borne oil traffic. Its coasts are home to more than 150 million inhabitants, a figure which doubles during the tourist season. Half of the EU’s fishing fleet is active there together with an increasing marine aquaculture production. Pressure on fish stocks is also exerted by vessels from the Southern Mediterranean and non-EU countries.
Improved Maritime Governance : two major problems need to be tacked: (i) in most Mediterranean States, each sectoral policy is pursued by its own administration, just as each international agreement is performed within its own set of rules, rendering an overview of the cumulative impact of maritime activities, including at basin level, a difficult objective to attain; (ii) the large proportion of marine space made up of high seas makes it difficult for coastal States to regulate activities that directly affect their territorial seas and coasts. The combination of these two elements gives rise to a situation where policies tend to develop in isolation from each other and without proper coordination.
The role of Mediterranean coastal States : the Commission will:
propose that High Level Focal Points of Member States regularly address the Mediterranean Sea in order to discuss progress made in integrated maritime policy making; encourage Member States to exchange best practices in integrated maritime governance, in particular through the European Territorial Co-operation Objective programmes for the Mediterranean; set up a working group dedicated to Integrated Maritime Policy, with a view to exchanging best practices with non-EU Mediterranean coastal States; provide technical assistance, under the European Neighbourhood Policy and Partnership Instrument, for Mediterranean partners that express an interest in an integrated approach to maritime affairs, thereby raising awareness and assisting in setting implementation mechanisms.
Governance of the marine space : the Commission states that it will:
support dialogue amongst Mediterranean coastal States through high-level meetings, academic and other international organisations, with a view to improving governance of the marine space; provide an overview of existing agreements and organisations relating to maritime affairs in the Mediterranean; make recommendations for the improvement of cross-sectoral cooperation between existing agreements and organisations; encourage the ratification and concerted implementation of UNCLOS in its bilateral relations; launch a study on the costs and benefits of establishing maritime zones.
Improved stakeholder involvement : the Commission will encourage stakeholder platforms to address Mediterranean Sea issues, with the aim of suggesting priorities on integrated maritime policymaking at basin level. It will explore options for better associating stakeholders from all coastal States.
Crosscutting tools : improved maritime governance needs to be matched by cross-cutting tools, geared at generating additional potential for sea-borne economic growth and securing environmental protection.
Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) and Marine Strategies : the Commission will:
launch a study on MSP in the Mediterranean basin, with the aim of identifying potential areas for its application; thereafter, launch a project to test the application of MSP at sub-regional level and encourage concrete cross-border practices; assist Member States, through a Common Implementation Strategy, to deliver on their obligations under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, including a comprehensive assessment by 2010 of marine waters and related uses.
Integrated management in coastal areas and islands : Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) national strategies are being developed by Member States in the Mediterranean and the EC has recently signed a first basin-wide legal instrument on ICZM, adopted within the framework of the Barcelona Convention. The Commission will:
provide a web-based inventory of ICZM)tools, best practices and case studies, with a view to enhance its implementation; support under FP7 the development of the knowledge-base on ICZM in the Mediterranean, with particular focus on international co-operation; test possibilities for strengthening the land-sea interface, in particular linking up terrestrial and maritime planning, through the MSP actions proposed above.
Facilitating knowledge-based action : the Commission will:
pay particular attention to the Mediterranean in setting-up an integrated marine ERA-NET (European Research Area Network) aimed at strengthening coordination in marine research between Member States; define a long-term strategic framework for basin-wide scientific co-operation in the Mediterranean, enabling marine research co-operation to develop within a structured agenda, responding to agreed common challenges; develop a major cross-thematic research effort under FP7, targeted at integrating knowledge on the Mediterranean Sea across all relevant disciplines.
Integrated surveillance for a safer and secure maritime space : lastly, the Commission is:
launching a pilot project to improve co-operation amongst national authorities of Mediterranean Member States responsible for maritime monitoring, and exchange of information between port authorities; presenting a set of principles guiding integrated maritime surveillance in the EU (see summary of COM(2009)0538), so as to move progressively from a sectoral to an integrated approach to maritime surveillance at EU and national level.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0491
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2012)0255
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)609/3
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0386/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0266/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0266/2010
- Committee opinion: PE442.787
- Committee opinion: PE442.865
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE445.744
- Committee draft report: PE442.886
- Contribution: COM(2009)0466
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0536
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0538
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0540
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0466
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0466 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0536 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2009)0538 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE442.886
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE445.744
- Committee opinion: PE442.865
- Committee opinion: PE442.787
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0266/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)609/3
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0491 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2012)0255
- Contribution: COM(2009)0466
Activities
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Kriton ARSENIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Gerard BATTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Spyros DANELLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Knut FLECKENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Nick GRIFFIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Marek Józef GRÓBARCZYK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Elie HOARAU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Ville ITÄLÄ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Georgios KOUMOUTSAKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Corinne LEPAGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Guido MILANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Mario PIRILLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Britta REIMERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Debora SERRACCHIANI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Georgios STAVRAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Struan STEVENSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Keith TAYLOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Michael THEURER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Traian UNGUREANU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
186 |
2010/2040(INI)
2010/06/24
PECH
48 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reiterates the need to intensify support for scientific research, both as regards the conservation of marine ecosystems and as regards new technology research (more selective gear, environment-friendlier engines, development of species in captivity, etc.), since this will directly benefit the fisheries and aquaculture sectors;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2а. Emphasises the importance of aquaculture being regulated within the IMP legal framework, which will contribute to priority acceleration and sustainable development at European and national levels;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it essential to strengthen regional cooperation in order to achieve sustainable and more efficient management of marine and coastal resources, particularly where there is a complete interdependence of activities in the maritime area
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it essential to strengthen regional cooperation in order to achieve sustainable and more efficient management of marine and coastal resources, particularly where there is a complete interdependence of activities in the maritime area, as is the case in
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it essential to strengthen regional cooperation in order to achieve sustainable and more efficient management of marine and coastal resources, particularly where there is a complete interdependence of activities in the maritime area, as is the case in many sea areas, in particular in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it essential to strengthen regional cooperation in order to achieve sustainable and more efficient management of marine and coastal resources, particularly where there is a complete interdependence of activities in the maritime area, as is the case in particular in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points to the importance of the Marine Strategy Directive, the environmental pillar of the IMP, and the need for the reformed CFP to be properly consistent with the directive’s aims;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Is aware that the delimitation of frontiers between European countries bordering the Mediterranean and other Mediterranean countries raises politically complex and sensitive issues that could obstruct the emergence of a genuinely integrated maritime policy for the Mediterranean region, not least where the management of fish stocks is concerned;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention in this context to the efficient cooperation of coastal states in the Baltic Strategy, which aims to promote dynamic growth in that region’s economy, environment and infrastructure;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls, also, for
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls, also, for consultation mechanisms to be established for drawing up decisions relating to the integrated maritime policy (IMP) and the common fisheries policy (CFP), based in particular on the joint consultation bodies set up in each Member State and bringing together actors from the fisheries and maritime affairs sectors, thus making possible a genuine upstream exchange between IMP and CFP actors;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that, to date, neither the sustainability of marine resources nor the economic viability of the EU’s fishing fleets and coastal communities has been well served by the common fisheries policy (CFP) and that the EU integrated maritime policy must therefore be pursued in such a way as to prevent the CFP being flawed because of, for example, overcentralisation or any failure to allow for the regional diversity of EU waters;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission, given the need to lay down funding commensurate with the EU’s integrated maritime policy, to specify what is meant by a ‘sound financial basis’ and, proceeding from the principle that any new priorities will have to have funding to match, maintains that these should not be financed from the CFP;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a 5a. Calls for the development of an exchange between institutional actors of the IMP and the CFP in connection with the desirable regionalisation of the latter, so as to release potential synergies between the IMP and the CFP, particularly in the context of an approach based on fishing zones;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Reiterates the urgent need to relieve pressures upon the marine environment which originate from land, such as pollution from industrial and agricultural effluents and poor coastal zone management, in the context of an integrated ecosystem-based approach; stresses, furthermore, the need for the urgent implementation of a network of marine protected areas;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that both fisheries and aquaculture have a place in the maritime and coastal – often remote – region economy, whose
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Maintains that creating more and better maritime jobs, especially in the fisheries sector, also depends on a guarantee of the necessary fair income and proper working conditions (including health and safety) and on access to training for fisheries sector professionals;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that both the fisheries sector and environmental organisations share the concern that fisheries and aquaculture should be taken into account in policies dealing with maritime affairs as a whole;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges that the fisheries sector be involved more closely, and participate more actively, in European maritime clusters;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes the essential importance of European maritime spatial planning and its uses for coastal regions and the ORs in particular and points to the need to protect the ecologically most sensitive marine biogeographical regions while enabling the fisheries sector to exploit resources on a sustainable basis;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Urges the Commission to implement Parliament’s proposals set out in the own- initiative report on a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture, adopted in Strasbourg on 17 June 2010, since this would boost the EU’s aquaculture sector and help it to move forward;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the wish to see the IMP contribute to the safeguarding of a viable European fisheries sector which respects the environment but is also a source of wealth for its actors
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the wish to see the IMP contribute to the safeguarding of an economically and socially viable European fisheries sector which respects the environment but is also a source of wealth for its actors has implications for the Union’s commercial policy;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the important role of targeted and integrated marine research and the promotion of innovation which will help meet the needs of stakeholders more effectively and maintain marine biodiversity; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of greater support for applied research within the 8th FP through, for example, horizontal coordination of the relevant research programmes, more adequate funding or the creation of a European Marine Research Institute under the auspices of the Joint Research Centre;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls, in particular, for the Commission to make the maintenance and sustainability of European fisheries a non- negotiable element in the negotiations it is conducting at international level, and for increased liberalisation of fisheries and aquaculture products from third countries to apply only to products complying with the same social, environmental and health
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls, in particular, for the Commission to make the maintenance of European fisheries a non-negotiable element in the negotiations it is conducting at international level, and for increased liberalisation of fisheries and aquaculture products from third countries to apply only to products complying with the same environmental, social and health requirements as those for products originating in the European Union;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Points out that fisheries is in a bad position legally, compared to other uses, as it is sacrificing fishing zones for offshore wind parks, sand and gravel extraction and other space-hungry uses;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Supports the Commission's stated intention to finance the IMP with 50 million Euro over the next two years in order to build upon previous projects in the areas of policy, governance, sustainability and surveillance;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the essential aim of the EU integrated maritime policy where fisheries are concerned should be to promote modernisation and balanced, fair sustainable development of the fisheries sector in the EU as a whole, in order to make the sector socially and economically viable and achieve stock sustainability, guarantee sovereignty and food security, supply fish to the public, preserve jobs, and improve the living conditions of fishermen;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses the need to assess and if necessary contribute to the additional financial needs of coastal member states in the context of maritime surveillance of EU waters;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Asks the Commission and Member States, as a matter of urgency, to reassess risks arising from the operation of offshore drilling platforms, and to address possible shortcomings as soon as possible, taking into account the grave threat posed to fisheries, fishermen and coastal communities;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Asks, furthermore, for a moratorium on the granting of new licenses for offshore drilling platforms;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Asks for the principles of resource efficiency and sustainable production and consumption to be mainstreamed in the IMP;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Maintains that good ecological status of the oceans is a priority for the IMP and the CFP; in this context reiterates the need for funding/subsidies to cushion non-industrial fishing against the socio- economic impact caused by the implementation of measures to protect marine ecosystems, such as the recovery plans for certain species, taking into account in particular the fishing regions and communities most dependent on fishing, including the outermost regions;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Reiterates the need to establish cross- cutting policy approaches encompassing fisheries, aquaculture, and other sectors in such a way as to optimise European maritime spatial planning, foster the development of marine-related knowledge, and provide for integrated maritime surveillance;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Welcomes the establishment of the Regional Advisory Councils and the Community Fisheries Control Agency, which have a key role to play in ensuring good ecological status of fish stocks, but considers that their powers need to be strengthened under the reformed CFP and the IMP;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that funding to implement the IMP must be guaranteed in the Community budget by means of a proportional contribution from all the sectors affected by this policy, taking account of the differences that the EU budget applies to each policy, the balance between the benefits and risks – both environmental and socio-economic – of such activities to society, and the degree of interdependence between coastal areas and the different activities, bearing in mind that the fisheries sector’s dependence on the marine area is unavoidable.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Believes that such funding should be separate from the present EFF (or any other future fund to support the CFP) but should cover the fisheries sector in the same way as other maritime activities;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that, despite the efforts invested, the present CFP has failed to bring sustainability to marine resources and economic viability to fishing fleets and coastal communities, and that the reason lies in the overcentralisation of executive power and in burdensome red tape, both of which should be remedied in the new reformed CFP;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists, in particular, that the constraints and specificities of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors be taken into account in the IMP as regards use of the maritime domain,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists, in particular, that the constraints and specificities of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors be taken into account in the IMP as regards use of the maritime domain, the preservation of stock recovery and development conditions, variations in geographical and climatological conditions, and the planning and
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Particularly stresses the vital need to carry out multidisciplinary research programmes designed to properly integrate all the activities occurring in the marine environment, based on an ecosystem approach and taking account of the potential impact of such activities on fisheries and aquaculture, as these sectors are extremely dependent on natural resources;
source: PE-443.121
2010/06/29
REGI
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference to territorial cohesion in the TFEU, and with the aim of improving accessibility, considers it essential to continue to make the mobility of passengers and goods an integral part of internal market policy through the promotion of short sea shipping and maritime cabotage between territories and, at the same time, ensure better links between peripheral maritime regions, outermost regions and islands and mainland and economic centres; in the same context, points out that it is of crucial importance to deal with the difficulties facing island areas in the EU with regard to the transport of persons by guaranteeing the same cost per kilometre for the transport of goods and people, regardless of their location; calls for concrete measures for the outermost regions taking account of their distinctive features;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reminds to the particular vulnerability of coastal regions and islands to impacts of climate change; stresses that planning of all developments along the Community's lengthy coast including its hinterland must take into account the consequences of climate change; suggests vulnerability to climate change to be considered when shaping future regional policy in order not to jeopardise the implementation of the IMP;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. The development of coastal transport using modern, safe ships with low passenger fares and freight charges to serve the needs on a daily and annual basis of workers and those living on islands and in remote regions, in conjunction with an increase in ships’ complements, reduction in working hours and satisfaction of seafarers’ demands, is a basic priority for the working class;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the need to enhance regional maritime cooperation within an integrated framework in order to strengthen maritime sectors, create sustainable economic growth and jobs in maritime regions, deal with the negative effects of insularity and encourage the exchange and transfer of best practices. Simultaneously, stresses the importance of further and ongoing research into the affects of climate change in order to protect the marine ecosystems in these regions. Calls for a comprehensive and understandable system of environmental protection of the coastal areas and seas to assist regional planning;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the need to enhance regional maritime cooperation within an integrated framework in order to strengthen maritime sectors, deal with the negative effects of insularity and encourage the exchange and transfer of best practices
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the need to enhance regional maritime cooperation within an integrated framework in order to strengthen maritime sectors, deal with the negative effects of insularity and encourage the exchange and transfer of best practices; stresses in this context the contribution made by regional policy through its territorial cooperation objective;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the need to enhance regional maritime cooperation within an integrated framework in order to strengthen maritime sectors, protect maritime ecosystems, deal with the negative effects of insularity and encourage the exchange and transfer of best practices;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Favours the establishment and development of strategies for the EU's maritime macro-regions aimed at promoting an integrated approach to all activities related to the maritime sector; stresses, in this connection, the need to take account of the specific characteristics of the maritime basins and the priorities of the coastal economies of the Union's most remote regions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the need for coherence between maritime and terrestrial spatial planning keeping in mind the ecosystem based approach; notes that territorial cooperation is particularly important for the protection of cross-border sensitive marine areas;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Taking into account the fact that
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Taking into account the fact that every island has its own specific characteristics which require specific solutions, stresses the need to encourage tailored local development strategies and discourage the ‘one size fits all’ approach; considers, therefore, that integrated maritime governance is essential in order to avoid any overlapping of competences between different levels of government and to enhance cooperation and dialogue with local and regional authorities; with this in mind, supports the creation of a specific strategy for the Atlantic in the context of strategic approaches for regional maritime areas;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference to territorial cohesion in the TFEU, and with the aim of improving accessibility, considers it essential to continue to make the mobility of passengers and goods an
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Taking into account the fact that every island has its own specific characteristics which require specific solutions, stresses the need to encourage tailored local development strategies and discourage the ‘one size fits all’ approach; considers, therefore, that integrated maritime governance is essential in order to avoid any overlapping of competences between different levels of government
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Nevertheless, for tackling common problems, priorities and challenges in a larger geographical sphere, including different Member States, recommends the Commission, in the light of the 'EU2020' strategy, to analyse the opportunity of promoting a "macro-regional" approach, based on objective 3 of the regulation on structural funds which states that any "macro-regional" strategy should be incorporated in the EU's regional policy, as a coordinated policy for the whole territory of the EU; and where the need is highlighted to analyse the added value of this strategy for the implementation of the objective of territorial cohesion within the territory of the Union; this should also be done for maritime policy, with a view to foster development and a better implementation of EU maritime policy in coastal and outermost regions within a coherent, comprehensive strategy;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Draws attention to the importance of the maritime economy in particular, for those Member States with large Exclusive Economic Zones, and to the need to promote the development of maritime economic clusters and to boost their contribution to growth and employment under the 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Proposes th
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Proposes the creation, within the Commission, of a
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to place the outermost regions at the heart of the international dimension of maritime policy as outposts of the Union in their respective maritime areas, as set out in its 2004 Communication (COM(2004)343); considers, therefore, that these territories should be priority centres for the establishment of Community structures representing the international dimension of the IMP whenever expedient;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Reminds the Commission of the undertaking it made in its 2004 communication (COM(2004)343) to come forward with maritime regional strategies for the outermost regions;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the Commission to incorporate a maritime dimension into its international agreements with regional sub-groups, such as the Cariforum EPA, particularly when the regions in question include a maritime area in which there are European territories;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Calls on the Commission to launch an impact assessment on the desirability of and conditions for establishing a Caribbean ‘motorway of the sea’ following the Caribbean island arc;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference to territorial cohesion in the TFEU, and with the aim of improving accessibility, considers it essential to continue to make the mobility of passengers and goods an integral part of internal market policy through the promotion of short sea shipping and maritime cabotage between territories and, at the same time, ensure better links between peripheral maritime regions and islands and mainland and economic centres; in the same context, points out that it is of crucial importance to deal with the difficulties facing island areas, in
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Given the safety, security and defence risks to which coastal regions in particular are exposed, points out the importance of maritime safety measures, which require joint efforts encompassing maritime policy and measures and cooperation in other policy areas at EU level
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Suggests the development of regional initiatives in the framework of the Motorways of the Sea in European maritime areas of high importance in order to encourage the introduction of new intermodal maritime-based logistics chains in Europe and enhance the development of the maritime commerce.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that an increase in the development of maritime energy production will cause pressure on the leisure, tourist, fishing and freight industries and calls for cooperation between regions to protect these interests.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Maintains that the Integrated Maritime Policy should have its own funding, taking into account the actual specific characteristics of the various regions involved.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference to territorial cohesion in the TFEU, and with the aim of improving accessibility, considers it essential to continue to make
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Empowered by the reference to territorial cohesion in the TFEU, and with the aim of improving accessibility, considers it essential to continue to make the mobility of passengers and goods an integral part of internal market policy through the promotion of short sea shipping and maritime cabotage between territories and, at the same time, ensure better links between peripheral maritime regions, low tide zones connected to such regions and islands and mainland and economic centres; in the same context, points out that it is of crucial importance to deal with the difficulties facing island areas in the EU with regard to the transport of persons by guaranteeing the same cost per kilometre for the transport of goods and people, regardless of their location;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Member States to better use structural and cohesion funds for further developing the ports' intermodal transport services in order to strengthen the switch from land to water transport and increase the energy efficiency and reducing the CO2 emissions of the European transport system;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Emphasises that Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage), which abolished cabotage in the interests of complete liberalisation of markets, has caused freight charges and fares to soar, has left islands cut off, particularly during the winter months, which fail to generate the massive profits sought by ship owners, while state subsidies to ship owners have increased tenfold within seven years (2003-2010), has led to thousands of dismissals of dock workers, has placed a serious burden on the environment by exempting shipping companies from the obligation to comply with environmental protection rules, is creating explosive social problems both for dock workers, who are experiencing serious unemployment, and for those living in island regions, e.g. in Greece, for whom the cost of living is inflated even more than it is for those living in mainland regions, and has caused an overall deterioration of coastal transport; The failure of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 proves the necessity of repealing it and of dismissing any further moves to lift cabotage arrangements for cruise shipping lines;
source: PE-443.147
2010/07/15
TRAN
104 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 23 a (new) - having regard to the Council conclusions of 14 June 2010 on integrated maritime policy,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the European Union contains a large number of island and extremely remote regions, which account for a substantial proportion of the EU's maritime borders, and whereas such areas should play a key role in the planning and implementation of the IMP and benefit from measures specially geared to their geographical characteristics and special features,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Welcomes the European Marine and Maritime Research Strategy as well as the joint calls under the Research Framework Programme on ‘Oceans of Tomorrow’ as concrete signs of an integrated approach to implementing of the IMP. The maritime related sciences should become a key issue in the 8th research framework programme";
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Agrees that building an interdisciplinary scientific and technological knowledge base on Europe’s seas and coasts is essential; asks the Commission and the Member States in cooperation with regional and local actors to assess the existing databases and observation programmes and to accelerate their efforts to make the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODNET) operational as soon as possible;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Urges the Commission to help Member States to launch a plan to survey and map wrecked ships and submerged archaeological sites – since these form part of the Community's historic and cultural heritage – and hence to facilitate understanding and the study of such sites and help prevent the despoliation to which they are being subjected, thus enabling them to be properly preserved;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Encourages the Commission, the Member States and Industry to intensify efforts in research and development in the use and application of renewable energy sources for both ship propulsion and onboard electric power;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the Atlas of the Seas
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas the European Union is the world's leading maritime power and should use the IMP and its achievements as a basis for acting as a driving force internationally to improve the planning of maritime activities, environmental protection and the promotion of good practices within international fora,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Europe's coasts and outermost islands play a special role as regards security and protection against environmental impacts and criminal acts,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that IMP should be mutually interconnected and in line with the objectives and initiatives of the Europe 2020 Strategy; believes also that IMP should contribute to achieving a competitive, social and sustainable Union which puts human beings and environmental protection at the centre of its policies; takes the view in this connection that the development of IMP must harmoniously incorporate efforts to attain economic development, a high level of employment and environmental protection;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that our "strong maritime tradition" is one of the strengths of Europe; calls therefore on the European Commission and the Member States to further develop the potential offered by the different maritime sectors
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that our ‘strong maritime tradition’ is one of the strengths of Europe; calls therefore on the European Commission and the Member States to further develop the potential offered by the different maritime sectors particularly by making the sector more attractive for young people through training actions and to put a renewed focus on sustainable and inclusive economic growth, employment and innovation;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the importance of the added value of the Seas/Maritime Policy in strengthening cooperation between neighbours and especially between Member States and candidate countries;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission, therefore, to come up with an overarching, cross- sectoral strategy for sustainable growth in coastal regions and maritime sectors by 2013, based on a broad investigation of potentials and policy options and on broad stakeholder consultation; considers that one element of this strategy should be a new, integrated approach to strengthening Europe’s world leadership in maritime engineering across sectors such as shipbuilding, off-shore energy development and technologies; another aspect must be to find solutions at an international level to eradicate practices of unfair competence within the shipbuilding industry;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission, therefore, to come up with an overarching, cross- sectoral strategy for sustainable growth in coastal regions and maritime sectors by 2013, based on a broad investigation of potentials and policy options and on broad stakeholder consultation; considers that one element of this strategy should be a new, integrated approach to strengthening Europe’s world leadership in marine and maritime research, technology development and maritime engineering across sectors such as shipbuilding, sustainable development of marine resources, off-shore energy development and technologies;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission, therefore, to come up with an overarching, cross- sectoral strategy for sustainable growth in coastal regions and maritime sectors by
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 27 a (new) - having regard to the Convention for the protection of the Mediterranean Sea against pollution and the protocols thereto,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to learn the lessons of the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, to identify all possible legislative loopholes at EU and Member State level and to adjust as quickly as possible all relevant EU legislation accordingly; reiterates its call for a civil protection force to be established as soon as possible, capable of being deployed in coastal, island, outermost and marine areas to deal with environmental and industrial risks and disasters, such as oil spills, unauthorised emptying of tanks, extreme weather events and water surges;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to learn the lessons of the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to learn the lessons of the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, to submit a coordinated European action strategy for emergency preparedness and for tackling disasters caused by drilling rigs and tankers, to identify all possible legislative loopholes at EU and Member State level and to adjust as quickly as possible all relevant EU legislation accordingly, taking into account the various circumstances of the Gulf of Mexico and European coastal regions and seas;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission to introduce the option for a moratorium on deep sea drilling, to include offshore oil and gas exploitation into the review of the Environmental Liability Directive and to extend the mandate of EMSA on safety inspections of offshore installations and cleaning up oil spills into the review of the EMSA Regulation;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that, in this context, there is an urgent need for action to review the Directive on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (2004/35/EC), which does not include liability in accordance with the 'polluter pays' principle in the case of offshore oil extraction;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission in this connection to investigate whether the remit of the European Maritime Safety Agency should be extended and whether it should be assigned responsibility for monitoring compliance with safety standards in offshore oil extraction and reviewing contingency plans in that connection;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Insists that the Member States and the Council include the 'Bergen Statement 2010' in the OSPAR Convention in order to significantly reduce the safety risks associated with offshore oil and gas exploitation;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of a maritime space without barriers and calls on the Commission and Member States to: - evaluate and preserve small ports; - expand the short sea shipping network in order to minimize the land transport distances; - promote modal shift taking into consideration that this is the key for the success of short sea shipping; - support research and innovation on cargo modes, cargo handling and logistic solutions with the aim of finding solutions that reduce time in transport and in handling costs; - support the port infrastructure development;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the seas and oceans are of historic and strategic importance to the European Union, form an integral part of the European heritage and represent a considerable potential in such important areas as the fight against climate change, employment, transport, industry, research, energy, regional planning, tourism, security, fisheries and external relations, and whereas improved consideration of the maritime dimension in Community policies will provide real added value and make it possible to cope with the many challenges of the IMP,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the new IMP will receive appropriate funding; calls on the Commission, in the next financial perspective,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the new IMP will receive appropriate funding in the next financial perspective
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the new IMP will receive appropriate funding, commensurate with its economic weight, implications and ambitions, in the next financial perspective, and to study, as one option, the Committee of the Regions’ proposal of a coastal fund, while also taking account of ways of using the structural and cohesion funds more effectively for the benefit of maritime policy;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the new IMP will receive appropriate funding in the next financial perspective
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to ensure that the
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Commission, to improve the working conditions of seafarers by appropriate means, to implement the ILO maritime labour convention in Community law and to propose a programme for the qualification and training of seafarers specially the recruitment of young people including those of thirds countries;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Congratulates those Member States and regions which have already established integrated maritime governance policies and structures;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that fishery workers should be involved in this governance, in view of the problems which they face and the importance of their work for food supplies in an international context marked by the food crisis;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to evaluate in more detail, and based on performance, the quality of maritime governance structures at Member State and regional level and to
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the world’s oceans and seas are interlinked and interdependent and whereas, moreover, the ever more intense use of the oceans and seas by sectors such as shipping, fisheries, energy, tourism
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Agrees with the Commission that stakeholder involvement in maritime policy-making should also be enshrined more permanently in governance structures; invites to this end all coastal Member States which have not as yet done so to answer positively the Commission’s request to designate national contact points for IMP, and stresses the necessity to activate this operational network as soon as possible; supports the formation of a cross- sectoral platform for stakeholder dialogue on maritime affairs, asks for arrangements to be introduced for a concrete partnership between the Commission and the Regions and reiterates its support for European Maritime Day;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Agrees with the Commission that stakeholder involvement in maritime policy-making should also be enshrined more permanently in governance structures; invites to this end all coastal Member States which have not as yet done so to
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the European network of Maritime Clusters and asks the Commission, Member States and Regions to support these emerging organisations on all levels, in particular by supporting their innovative capacity and their integration into national and Community policies and programmes, strengthening transnational cooperation, working towards more openness to SMEs and improving their visibility;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the European network of Maritime Clusters and
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to intensify their dialogue a
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the international dimension of the IMP and draws the attention of the Commission and Member States to the fact that improvements in working conditions at sea, safety and the environmental performance of vessels in should be placed on the agenda of international fora and ratified by port, flag and coastal States as part of international agreements in order to make it possible to achieve a worldwide improvement in the field of shipping;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to support the inclusion of IMP in the financial leverage instruments and objectives of the EU's external policy through the development of suitable initiatives aimed at addressing problems such as pollution, illegal fishing and piracy;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission; recognises that the implementation of the IMP principles requires that they be translated into targeted strategies and specific measures tailored to the specificities of each sea basin, and in the case of the Mediterranean, the various sub-regions present therein; calls for further dialogue and co-operation in order to improve the governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the different maritime sea basins, including the North Sea, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean area, and asks the Commission to implement
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission; recognises that the
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission and the macroregional strategies of relevance to the sea; recognises that the implementation of the IMP principles requires that they be translated into targeted strategies and specific measures tailored to the specificities of each sea basin, and in the case of the Mediterranean, the various sub- regions present therein; calls for further dialogue and co-operation in order to improve the governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the different maritime sea basins, including the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean area, and asks the Commission to implement the proposed actions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. Whereas shipping and ship building industry contributes significantly to the economic welfare of the EU countries and provides a valuable service to European and global industry and consumers;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the regional sea-basin initiatives and strategies proposed so far by the Commission; recognises that the implementation of the IMP principles requires that they be translated into targeted strategies and specific measures tailored to the specificities of each sea basin, and in the case of the Mediterranean, the various sub-regions present therein; calls for further dialogue and co-operation in order to improve the governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the framework of a multi-level approach in the different maritime sea basins, including the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean area, and asks the Commission to implement the proposed actions;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to give special consideration to the specific features of the EU's outermost regions, whose territorial waters ensure that the EU has the world's largest Exclusive Economic Zone, the physical, social and economic characteristics of their sea basins and the challenges resulting from their remote location, as well as difficulties of access and the need for greater coastal maritime surveillance of such regions;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Deplores the fact that a large part of the waters of the Mediterranean Sea is outside the areas under the jurisdiction or sovereign rights of coastal States, and that consequently these States do not have prescriptive and enforcement powers to regulate human activities beyond such areas in an integrated manner; stresses that the Union for the Mediterranean provides a possible forum for resolving the problems and disputes relating to the demarcation of the territorial waters of each of the Mediterranean states, as do the IMO and UNCLOS; stresses that the absence of any demarcation of territorial waters in this sea means that there are vast sea areas over which no control or sovereignty is exercised and which could give rise to conflicts about the exercise of or claim to sovereignty or about human activities in these areas; regrets that this is complicating the implementation of the IMP and the management of shared seas strategy in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Deplores the fact that a large part of the waters of the Mediterranean Sea
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Stresses the value of considering the IMP as one of the priorities of the European Neighbourhood Policy and of the various regional partnerships, given that each sea in the Community is a shared sea and that this has repercussions on relations with Mediterranean third countries; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take into consideration the impact of activities and projects carried out in the maritime area on relations with Mediterranean third countries; notes that closer cross-border and transnational cooperation with these countries would make it possible to conduct large-scale structural projects and provide more substantial funding, and would contribute to the success of the IMP;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Asks the Commission to integrate the European Maritime Policy and the inland waterways policies, in order to maximise the potential of the waterway transport and to create efficient and diversified ways of transport;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Asks therefore the
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Understands that stability, predictability and transparency of the management of marine spaces is key to securing optimal and sustainable development of economic activities and new growth and jobs
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Understands that stability, predictability and transparency of the management of marine spaces is key to securing optimal and sustainable development of economic activities and new growth and jobs on the sea, including the further development of renewables such as wind and wave energy, without prejudice to more traditional activities; draws attention to the fact that, according to a recent Commission study, this sector could give rise to a net increase of 410 000 jobs by 2020;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. Whereas the IMP approach represents a clear response to the question of how to achieve greater coherence between the
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is of the view that the management of intensifying and increasingly competing sea uses on an eco-system basis requires coordinated, streamlined and cross-border Maritime Spatial Planning as a neutral tool, which has the potential to contribute significantly to the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and to facilitate the harmonious coexistence of different sea uses;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the road map on Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP), based on an ecosystem approach and the development
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the road map on Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP), based on an ecosystem approach and the development of the ten planning principles, considers this cross-sectoral policy tool essential for the implementation of IMP; asks the Commission to submit in 2011 a draft directive on MSP or to propose the type of instrument most suitable for ensuring coherence between MSP and the other existing initiatives (ICZM, Natura 2000, Marine Strategy Framework Directive”);
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Fully supports maritime spatial planning (MSP) as a cross-sectoral tool of the IMP, covering all human activities on coastal and maritime regions, the mainland, island regions and outermost regions, ensuring environmental sustainability and viability and using massive financing instruments such as the cohesion policy, the TEN-T and the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument; stresses the need to devise MSP that will improve decision- making and governance and help limit and control threats to the marine environment, such as over-exploitation of resources, pollution, climate change, rising sea levels, changing currents, acidification and extreme weather events; considers that MSP should also be based on an integrated approach and offers an ideal opportunity for exchanges of good practices;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recognises in this regard the strong need for identifying, surveying and protecting marine sensitive areas, including the trans-border, and prohibiting ships with dangerous and polluting goods to pass through them;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Suggests to evaluate opportunities of co-utilization of maritime space by different sectors (e.g. shipping, renewable/wind energy and aquaculture);
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Expects that a well coordinated and integrated cross-pillar, cross-sectoral, and cross-border approach towards maritime surveillance will improve protection of the interests of Member States and the European Union by making available, to authorities operating at sea, monitoring and surveillance information across
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Expects that a well coordinated and integrated cross-pillar, cross-sectoral, and cross-border approach towards maritime surveillance will improve protection of the interests of Member States and the European Union and protection against marine pollution and illegal actions by making available, to authorities operating at sea, monitoring and surveillance information across various sectors of activity, thereby generating more efficiency;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Expects that a well coordinated and integrated cross-pillar, cross-sectoral, and cross-border approach towards maritime surveillance will improve protection of the interests of Member States and the European Union by making available, to authorities operating at sea, monitoring and surveillance information across various relevant sectors of activity, thereby generating more efficiency;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls therefore on the Commission, Member States, EU agencies, in particular the EMSA, and relevant organisations to speed up their efforts in terms of cooperation and coordination and with regard to the necessary legislative adaptations;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. Whereas the framework Directive on the maritime strategy is the environmental pillar of the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), whereas this approach should be better linked with the other sectorial policies;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls the Commission in cooperation with Member States to identify obstacles to the exchange of data in EU and national legislation and in the mandates of the agencies, to learn from the experience gained in regional and national initiatives, research projects and in pilot projects and from CSDP operations relating to maritime surveillance, to present in 2010 a roadmap on integrated maritime surveillance and to explore areas for cooperation with third countries, especially from the Mediterranean which have ratified UNCLOS as well as with relevant organisations;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Asks the Commission to identify the additional financial needs for creating a common Information Sharing Environment within the framework of integrated maritime surveillance in good time before the next Financial Perspective for the benefit of both the EU and Member States;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Reiterates its call for improved cooperation between Member States’ national inspectorates, coastguards and navies and reminds the Commission to carry out – as requested earlier by the European Parliament – a feasibility study on further collaboration or integration between the different coastguard services, as already called for in 2005 in Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements; considers that, in this context, there is great potential to involve the European Maritime Safety Agency more fully in monitoring coastal areas and to provide more support for Member States in tracing marine pollution;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Reiterates its call for improved cooperation between Member States’ national inspectorates, coastguards and navies and reminds the Commission to carry out – as requested earlier by the European Parliament – a feasibility study on further collaboration or integration between the different coastguard services; points out that this would help strengthen both surveillance capacities if combined with greater interoperability of the different surveillance systems and the safety of the marine space by improving the various services' resources and reactivity;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Reiterates its call for improved cooperation between Member States’
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Member States to comply with their obligations under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and, by 15 July 2012, perform an assessment of the environmental status of their marine waters and establish environmental targets and monitoring programmes; calls on Member States, furthermore, to adopt ambitious programmes of measures to attain a good environmental status for those waters;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Calls on Member States to comply with their obligation under Article 13 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive to designate marine protected areas; calls, furthermore, on Member States to monitor compliance with the protection measures effectively;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Observes that since 1 July 2010 new limit values for SO2 levels in shipping fuels have been in force in the English Channel, North Sea and Baltic Sea, which have been declared sulphur emission control areas under an IMO decision; considers that all European coastal areas should be protected against emissions and that distortion of competition by disparities in the strictness of emission limit values in the waters of the Community should be avoided and consequently, if overall environmental performance is improved by emission control areas, uniform rules covering the whole EU would be preferable;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Calls on the Commission and Member States at international level, particularly under the auspices of the International Maritime Organisation, to seek the introduction of compulsory pilotage in particularly dangerous international waters, for example the Kadet Trench in the Baltic, in order to reduce the danger of oil disasters caused by vessels;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Stresses that, in the development and implementation of the IMP, maritime transport should be considered as a priority especially in view of its low environmental impact in comparison with other transport modes, the growth niches for this mode and related sectors, the need to promote the widest possible connections in order to strengthen the internal market, and its vital role in achieving the objectives of territorial cohesion and continuity;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. Whereas a successful IMP should be based on excellence in marine research, technology and innovation and should lead to a one-stop-shop approach in decision- making
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Asks the Commission in view of the upcoming White Paper on the Future of Transport to take into account the critical role of maritime freight transport in trade today, to promote the development of secondary and less congested ports and to adequately address the question of maritime transport security measures in EU and abroad by investing in enhancing multilayered risk management systems for targeting and inspecting dangerous cargo.
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Recognises that the seas have become a disposal site for immense and fast-growing volumes of waste material, much of it of plastic origin, as well as of lost shipping containers; calls on the Commission to promote a European and international debate to explore means by which it can be reduced;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Takes the view that Community coastal and maritime spatial planning should be considered in close connection with the maritime transport network and that this is a prerequisite for achieving a European marine space without barriers;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new) 26c. Considers that the need to ensure sustainable use of the marine space and to protect the resources thereof should prompt the Commission, the Member States and businesses in the sector to facilitate maritime transport, strengthen short sea shipping networks, and take measures to develop and support the establishment of logistical platforms and interconnection infrastructure with other modes of transport, in order significantly to improve the co-modality and interoperability of networks; calls for a new impetus to be given rapidly for the establishment of sea highways, in particular within the Union for the Mediterranean, with a view to coping with the increase in sea traffic;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Asks the Commission to come up with a strategy to mitigate the specific impacts of climate change on coastal are
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Asks the Commission to support the launch of a pilot project "Maritime Erasmus" to develop the mobility of young people in training in the maritime sector;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Considers that all policies relating to climate change adaptation, spatial planning and use, the exploitation of marine resources and measures to combat deterioration, especially from land-based sources, should be coupled with a marine space restoration policy; calls on the Commission to consider ways of implementing and financing such a policy, which could also be based on exchanges of good practices and research excellence; points to the ambitious project, in this context, of de-polluting the Mediterranean Sea, under the aegis of the Union for the Mediterranean;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to develop a fleet renewal programme for the very old coastal shipping fleet, thus increasing the safety, environmental performance and competitiveness of shipping in the common maritime space without borders, while making full use of the competitive shipbuilding capacity of Europe for this purpose; stresses that this programme should be supplemented by measures to step up vessel dismantling capacities and skills; reiterates its desire to multiply sources of funding for shipbuilding, the development of high-quality shipyards, competitiveness and innovation with a view to supporting the excellence of European shipbuilding, its related sectors, its workforce and know-how in order to cope with international competition;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas these integrated maritime governance structures should enhance the coordinated planning of competing maritime activities, the strategic management of maritime areas, the quality of surveillance activities and the enforcement of laws, and whereas this objective calls for measures to clearly identify the whole range of such structures, guarantee their visibility and improve their cooperation, within a transparent and coherent framework enabling coordination between the various policies and the integration of the various issues relating to the maritime environment,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to develop a fleet renewal programme for the very old coastal shipping fleet, by providing the necessary financial resources for this purpose, thus increasing the safety, environmental performance and competitiveness of shipping in the common maritime space without b
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to develop a fleet renewal programme for the very old coastal shipping fleet, thus increasing the safety, environmental performance and competitiveness of shipping in the common maritime space without borders, while making full use of the competitive shipbuilding capacity of Europe for this purpose and using environmentally sound technologies and alternative shipping fuels to promote 'green shipping';
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Underlines that any fleet renewal programme being considered must meet stringent criteria in order to avoid overcapacity and overinvestment in inter alia the fishing ships sector;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Asks the Commission to come up with a strategy for sustainable coastal and marine tourism
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29.
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Asks the Commission to come up with a strategy for sustainable coastal and marine tourism, making full use of the new provisions on tourism in the Lisbon Treaty, which, in protected regions such as the Wadden Sea world heritage site, accord with the objectives of protection;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Points out that coastal regions represent the principal tourist destination in Europe and that it is therefore important to give due consideration to spatial planning methods in coastal areas, the risks of extensive urbanisation, the need to maintain the quality and sustainability of coastal areas, their heritage and tourist service infrastructure, the use of natural resources such as water and waste disposal; asks the Commission to include these issues in its strategy for sustainable coastal and marine tourism;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Stresses the vast potential for development and substantial source of growth represented by marine and coastal tourism and related sectors; calls, in this connection, on the Commission and the Member States to consider ways of developing new forms of tourism, such as cruise tourism, green tourism, health and wellness tourism, and tourism promoting natural sites and the underwater marine environment; stresses that the Community tourism policy, in particular as regards maritime regions, should look into ways of extending seasons and guarantee the sustainability and quality of tourist practices and infrastructure in order to ensure that the EU remains a destination of excellence;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Welcomes the European Marine and Maritime Research Strategy as well as the joint calls under the Research Framework Programme on ‘Oceans of Tomorrow’ as concrete signs of an integrated approach to implementing of the IMP; proposes making sea-related sciences a priority in the 8th Framework Programme for Research;
source: PE-445.744
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0466/COM_COM(2009)0466_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0466/COM_COM(2009)0466_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0536/COM_COM(2009)0536_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0536/COM_COM(2009)0536_EN.pdf |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18873&j=0&l=en
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0491/COM_COM(2012)0491_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0491/COM_COM(2012)0491_EN.pdf |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdf |
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0538/COM_COM(2009)0538_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0538/COM_COM(2009)0538_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.886New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-442886_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.865&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-442865_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.787&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-442787_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0266_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0266_EN.html |
docs/9/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Follow-up document |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101021&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-10-21-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-266&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0266_EN.html |
docs/8/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-386New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0386_EN.html |
activities |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/02394New
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
InitiativeNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) - Evaluation of progress made and new challengesNew
Integrated maritime policy (IMP) - Evaluation of progress made and new challenges |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freightNew
3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|