BETA


2010/2110(INI) EU agriculture and international trade

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AGRI PAPASTAMKOS Georgios (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion DEVE TOIA Patrizia (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion INTA QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve (icon: PPE PPE) José BOVÉ (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Marielle DE SARNEZ (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2011/09/12
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/03/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/03/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU agriculture and international trade.

The resolution notes that the EU is the world’s largest importer of agricultural goods from developing countries , importing more than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined (around 71% of the EU’s total agricultural imports originate from developing countries).

The EU must strike a balance in international trade agreements between market liberalisation and protection for economic sectors and the rights of workers and consumers. EU trade agreements with third countries must safeguard EU sectors that are experiencing difficulties – in particular the fruit and vegetables, livestock and cereals sectors. Local small farmers, who make a significant contribution to food security in their regions, must not be adversely affected by the EU's conclusion of international trade agreements.

In this context, the resolution makes the following recommendations:

(1) Consistency between EU agricultural and common commercial policies : Parliament considers that the EU agricultural sector has a clear added value for the European economy and underlines the need to ensure policy coherence between the EU’s agricultural, trade and development policies. E xternal trade policy must not jeopardise the EU’s ability to maintain a strong agricultural sector and to ensure food security against a background of increased market volatility. The Commission is called upon to defend, in all fora, and in the WTO in particular, the multifunctional role of EU agriculture, including the vital role it plays in providing employment and in sustaining the vitality of rural areas, and the European agrifood model.

Parliament condemns the Commission’s approach, which far too often makes concessions on agriculture in order to obtain enhanced market access in third countries for industrial products and services. It calls on the Commission to propose an approach that strikes a balance between domestic production and imports .

The resolution stresses that, in relation to the agricultural sector, the Commission must conduct impact assessments which must be made public before the commencement of negotiations and proposed updates to take account of new positions arising in the negotiations.

The Parliament takes the view that decisions to further open up the EU market to imports of agricultural goods should not be taken without ensuring that EU farmers can be compensated for their losses. It is adamant that third-country production methods for export to the EU must provide European consumers with the same guarantees in terms of health, food safety, animal welfare, sustainable development and minimum social standards as those required of EU producers.

In relation to imports, Parliament stresses the need for strict compliance with origin rules and mechanisms for the prevention of triangular trade. The Commission is urged proactively to promote the EU’s offensive agricultural interests and to make it easier for EU products to gain access to third-country markets .

(2) Agriculture in the multilateral trading system .

Doha Development Agenda (DDA) : Members consider, in a bid to secure a successful outcome to the DDA, the EU made an extremely generous offer on agriculture, which cannot be increased, but this has not, to date, been reciprocated by an equivalent level of ambition from other developed and advanced developing countries. The Commission is called to comply strictly with its negotiating mandate from the Council, which sets the most recent reform of the CAP as the limit of its action, provided that equivalent concessions are obtained from its trading partners.

The resolution deplores the absence of progress on the establishment of a multilateral register for wines and spirits as well as on the extension of the protection of geographical indications to all agricultural products. It recalls that these elements are sine qua non for a balanced outcome to the agricultural negotiations. It also emphasises the need for the principles underpinning the EU’s agricultural product quality policy to be promoted more widely at multilateral and bilateral level.

Members recall the commitment made by the WTO members during the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference to achieving the elimination of all forms of export subsidies . They consider that the general reduction in customs tariffs should be assessed in the light of the EU offer concerning the domestic support and export competition pillars, and should depend on the possibility of keeping the Special Safeguard clause, on a specific exemption from tariff simplification disciplines and on adequate flexibility in the formula for tariff cuts and in the designation of sensitive products.

WTO dispute settlement : Parliament notes the fact that the agreement on trade in bananas constitutes an important step towards the consolidation of a rule-based multilateral trading system. It calls on the Commission to ensure that the settlement of the ‘ beef hormones ’ dispute will allow for the suspension of the sanctions on EU products, while guaranteeing that beef imports to the EU will be in line with EU requirements. The Commission is asked to vigorously to defend the EU regime for authorising and marketing GMOs against challenges in the WTO.

(3) Agriculture in plurilateral, inter-regional and bilateral trade relations : Parliament considers that the conclusion of multilateral negotiations is a priority to be pursued by the EU. It believes that bilateral trade agreements must complement multilateral processes in the form of respect for equal working conditions, common environmental rules and food safety standards already in force in the European Union.

The resolution stresses that in order to avoid ‘paying twice’– first at bilateral and then at multilateral level – the concept of a ‘ single pocket agreement ’ must be supported, under which concessions in bilateral agreements will be linked to the final outcome of the Doha negotiations.

The resolution also recalls that the Free Trade Agreement with South Korea allowed significant numbers of GIs to be recognised and calls for further efforts to be made to provide for this in future trade agreements.

Parliament expresses its strong concern about the EU-Morocco agreement. It points out that, while European markets have opened up almost completely to imports from Morocco, some agricultural products are still subject to quotas on exports from the EU. It considers it unacceptable that the Commission resumed negotiations with Mercosur without making publicly available a detailed impact assessment and without engaging in a proper political debate with the Council and Parliament. Members are deeply concerned about the impacts on the EU agricultural sector as a whole of a possible association agreement with Mercosur and consider it is necessary to review the concessions so as to protect our farmers' interests.

The resolution points out that any additional bilateral EU sugar market access concessions granted to third countries (for example Latin American countries and Ukraine) will be destabilising for the EU sugar market. Members are concerned at the prospect of concessions on cereals in the negotiations with Ukraine. Members regret that the Commission has not yet informed Parliament about the negotiations for a free trade agreement between the EU and Canada, even though these negotiations commenced in October 2009.

The Commission is called upon to:

ensure that trade agreements do not undermine the EU system of entry prices for fruit and vegetables ; abide by its commitments regarding the EU sugar sector and to end systematic concessions on sugar in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations; in negotiations on EU trade agreements, including those with Canada and Ukraine, take account of the interests of EU citizens, to maintain openness and to inform Parliament regularly about the progress of the negotiations.

Lastly, Parliament emphasises the importance of strict implementation of the preferential rules of origin. They call for a review of all trade preferences given to emerging countries which are members of the G-20 by the European Union.

Documents
2011/03/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/03/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/02/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/02/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2011/01/26
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Georgios PAPASTAMKOS (EPP, EL) on EU agriculture and international trade.

The report notes that the EU is the world’s largest importer of agricultural goods from developing countries , importing more than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined (around 71% of the EU’s total agricultural imports originate from developing countries).

The EU must strike a balance in international trade agreements between market liberalisation and protection for economic sectors and the rights of workers and consumers. EU trade agreements with third countries must safeguard EU sectors that are experiencing difficulties – in particular the fruit and vegetables, livestock and cereals sectors. Local small farmers, who make a significant contribution to food security in their regions, must not be adversely affected by the EU's conclusion of international trade agreements.

In this context, the report makes the following recommendations:

(1) Consistency between EU agricultural and common commercial policies : Members consider that the EU agricultural sector has a clear added value for the European economy and underline the need to ensure policy coherence between the EU’s agricultural, trade and development policies. E xternal trade policy must not jeopardise the EU’s ability to maintain a strong agricultural sector and to ensure food security against a background of increased market volatility. The Commission is called upon to defend, in all fora, and in the WTO in particular, the multifunctional role of EU agriculture, including the vital role it plays in providing employment and in sustaining the vitality of rural areas, and the European agrifood model.

Members condemn the Commission’s approach, which far too often makes concessions on agriculture in order to obtain enhanced market access in third countries for industrial products and services. They call on the Commission to propose an approach that strikes a balance between domestic production and imports .

The report stresses that, in relation to the agricultural sector, the Commission must conduct impact assessments which must be made public before the commencement of negotiations and proposed updates to take account of new positions arising in the negotiations.

The committee takes the view that decisions to further open up the EU market to imports of agricultural goods should not be taken without ensuring that EU farmers can be compensated for their losses. It is adamant that third-country production methods for export to the EU must provide European consumers with the same guarantees in terms of health, food safety, animal welfare, sustainable development and minimum social standards as those required of EU producers.

In relation to imports, Members stress the need for strict compliance with origin rules and mechanisms for the prevention of triangular trade. The Commission is urged proactively to promote the EU’s offensive agricultural interests and to make it easier for EU products to gain access to third-country markets .

(2) Agriculture in the multilateral trading system .

Doha Development Agenda (DDA) : Members consider, in a bid to secure a successful outcome to the DDA, the EU made an extremely generous offer on agriculture, which cannot be increased, but this has not, to date, been reciprocated by an equivalent level of ambition from other developed and advanced developing countries. The Commission is called to comply strictly with its negotiating mandate from the Council, which sets the most recent reform of the CAP as the limit of its action, provided that equivalent concessions are obtained from its trading partners.

The report deplores the absence of progress on the establishment of a multilateral register for wines and spirits as well as on the extension of the protection of geographical indications to all agricultural products. It recalls that these elements are sine qua non for a balanced outcome to the agricultural negotiations. It also emphasises the need for the principles underpinning the EU’s agricultural product quality policy to be promoted more widely at multilateral and bilateral level.

Members recall the commitment made by the WTO members during the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference to achieving the elimination of all forms of export subsidies .

They consider that the general reduction in customs tariffs should be assessed in the light of the EU offer concerning the domestic support and export competition pillars, and should depend on the possibility of keeping the Special Safeguard clause, on a specific exemption from tariff simplification disciplines and on adequate flexibility in the formula for tariff cuts and in the designation of sensitive products.

WTO dispute settlement : Members note the fact that the agreement on trade in bananas constitutes an important step towards the consolidation of a rule-based multilateral trading system. They call on the Commission to ensure that the settlement of the ‘ beef hormones ’ dispute will allow for the suspension of the sanctions on EU products, while guaranteeing that beef imports to the EU will be in line with EU requirements.

The Commission is asked to vigorously to defend the EU regime for authorising and marketing GMOs against challenges in the WTO.

(3) Agriculture in plurilateral, inter-regional and bilateral trade relations : Members consider that the conclusion of multilateral negotiations is a priority to be pursued by the EU. They believe that bilateral trade agreements must complement multilateral processes in the form of respect for equal working conditions, common environmental rules and food safety standards already in force in the European Union.

The report stresses that in order to avoid ‘paying twice’– first at bilateral and then at multilateral level – the concept of a ‘ single pocket agreement ’ must be supported, under which concessions in bilateral agreements will be linked to the final outcome of the Doha negotiations.

The report recalls that the Free Trade Agreement with South Korea allowed significant numbers of GIs to be recognised; calls for further efforts to be made to provide for this in future trade agreements.

Members express its strong concern about the EU-Morocco agreement. It points out that, while European markets have opened up almost completely to imports from Morocco, some agricultural products are still subject to quotas on exports from the EU. They consider it unacceptable that the Commission resumed negotiations with Mercosur without making publicly available a detailed impact assessment and without engaging in a proper political debate with the Council and Parliament.

They are deeply concerned about the impacts on the EU agricultural sector as a whole of a possible association agreement with Mercosur and consider it is necessary to review the concessions so as to protect our farmers' interests.

The Commission is called upon to:

ensure that trade agreements do not undermine the EU system of entry prices for fruit and vegetables ; abide by its commitments regarding the EU sugar sector and to end systematic concessions on sugar in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations; in negotiations on EU trade agreements, including those with Canada and Ukraine, take account of the interests of EU citizens, to maintain openness and to inform Parliament regularly about the progress of the negotiations.

Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of strict implementation of the preferential rules of origin. They call for a review of all trade preferences given to emerging countries which are members of the G-20 by the European Union.

2010/12/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/12/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/11/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/10/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/09/09
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2010/07/08
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/06/01
   EP - QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2010/05/19
   EP - PAPASTAMKOS Georgios (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2010/05/05
   EP - TOIA Patrizia (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

Votes

A7-0030/2011 - Georgios Papastamkos - § 43 #

2011/03/08 Outcome: -: 449, +: 187, 0: 17
FR HU AT ES CY LU MT LT LV EE SK BE FI SI DK PT SE CZ IE NL EL BG RO IT DE GB PL
Total
63
17
14
43
6
6
5
8
8
6
11
19
12
6
13
20
15
20
10
21
20
16
31
65
92
58
47
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2
3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
22

France EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

2
icon: ECR ECR
50

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
166

Hungary S&D

Against (2)

3
2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
240

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2
AmendmentsDossier
182 2010/2110(INI)
2010/11/12 INTA 166 amendments...
source: PE-452.784
2010/11/15 DEVE 16 amendments...
source: PE-452.695

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-03-07-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.614
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-PR-450614_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.917
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AM-450917_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.854&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-450854_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.764&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-450764_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2011-02-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html title: A7-0030/2011
events/3
date
2011-02-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html title: A7-0030/2011
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110307&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2011-03-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0083_EN.html title: T7-0083/2011
summary
events/6
date
2011-03-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0083_EN.html title: T7-0083/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2010-05-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: TOIA Patrizia date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TOIA Patrizia group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2010-06-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0030_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-83
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0083_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-07-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-02-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0030/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110307&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19544&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-83 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0083/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: -- --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2010-05-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AGRI
date
2010-05-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TOIA Patrizia group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2010-06-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2010-06-01T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve
docs
  • date: 2010-10-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.614 title: PE450.614 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2010-11-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.917 title: PE450.917 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.854&secondRef=02 title: PE450.854 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.764&secondRef=02 title: PE450.764 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-02-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN title: A7-0030/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=19544&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)5426 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2010-07-08T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2011-01-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Georgios PAPASTAMKOS (EPP, EL) on EU agriculture and international trade. The report notes that the EU is the world’s largest importer of agricultural goods from developing countries , importing more than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined (around 71% of the EU’s total agricultural imports originate from developing countries). The EU must strike a balance in international trade agreements between market liberalisation and protection for economic sectors and the rights of workers and consumers. EU trade agreements with third countries must safeguard EU sectors that are experiencing difficulties – in particular the fruit and vegetables, livestock and cereals sectors. Local small farmers, who make a significant contribution to food security in their regions, must not be adversely affected by the EU's conclusion of international trade agreements. In this context, the report makes the following recommendations: (1) Consistency between EU agricultural and common commercial policies : Members consider that the EU agricultural sector has a clear added value for the European economy and underline the need to ensure policy coherence between the EU’s agricultural, trade and development policies. E xternal trade policy must not jeopardise the EU’s ability to maintain a strong agricultural sector and to ensure food security against a background of increased market volatility. The Commission is called upon to defend, in all fora, and in the WTO in particular, the multifunctional role of EU agriculture, including the vital role it plays in providing employment and in sustaining the vitality of rural areas, and the European agrifood model. Members condemn the Commission’s approach, which far too often makes concessions on agriculture in order to obtain enhanced market access in third countries for industrial products and services. They call on the Commission to propose an approach that strikes a balance between domestic production and imports . The report stresses that, in relation to the agricultural sector, the Commission must conduct impact assessments which must be made public before the commencement of negotiations and proposed updates to take account of new positions arising in the negotiations. The committee takes the view that decisions to further open up the EU market to imports of agricultural goods should not be taken without ensuring that EU farmers can be compensated for their losses. It is adamant that third-country production methods for export to the EU must provide European consumers with the same guarantees in terms of health, food safety, animal welfare, sustainable development and minimum social standards as those required of EU producers. In relation to imports, Members stress the need for strict compliance with origin rules and mechanisms for the prevention of triangular trade. The Commission is urged proactively to promote the EU’s offensive agricultural interests and to make it easier for EU products to gain access to third-country markets . (2) Agriculture in the multilateral trading system . Doha Development Agenda (DDA) : Members consider, in a bid to secure a successful outcome to the DDA, the EU made an extremely generous offer on agriculture, which cannot be increased, but this has not, to date, been reciprocated by an equivalent level of ambition from other developed and advanced developing countries. The Commission is called to comply strictly with its negotiating mandate from the Council, which sets the most recent reform of the CAP as the limit of its action, provided that equivalent concessions are obtained from its trading partners. The report deplores the absence of progress on the establishment of a multilateral register for wines and spirits as well as on the extension of the protection of geographical indications to all agricultural products. It recalls that these elements are sine qua non for a balanced outcome to the agricultural negotiations. It also emphasises the need for the principles underpinning the EU’s agricultural product quality policy to be promoted more widely at multilateral and bilateral level. Members recall the commitment made by the WTO members during the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference to achieving the elimination of all forms of export subsidies . They consider that the general reduction in customs tariffs should be assessed in the light of the EU offer concerning the domestic support and export competition pillars, and should depend on the possibility of keeping the Special Safeguard clause, on a specific exemption from tariff simplification disciplines and on adequate flexibility in the formula for tariff cuts and in the designation of sensitive products. WTO dispute settlement : Members note the fact that the agreement on trade in bananas constitutes an important step towards the consolidation of a rule-based multilateral trading system. They call on the Commission to ensure that the settlement of the ‘ beef hormones ’ dispute will allow for the suspension of the sanctions on EU products, while guaranteeing that beef imports to the EU will be in line with EU requirements. The Commission is asked to vigorously to defend the EU regime for authorising and marketing GMOs against challenges in the WTO. (3) Agriculture in plurilateral, inter-regional and bilateral trade relations : Members consider that the conclusion of multilateral negotiations is a priority to be pursued by the EU. They believe that bilateral trade agreements must complement multilateral processes in the form of respect for equal working conditions, common environmental rules and food safety standards already in force in the European Union. The report stresses that in order to avoid ‘paying twice’– first at bilateral and then at multilateral level – the concept of a ‘ single pocket agreement ’ must be supported, under which concessions in bilateral agreements will be linked to the final outcome of the Doha negotiations. The report recalls that the Free Trade Agreement with South Korea allowed significant numbers of GIs to be recognised; calls for further efforts to be made to provide for this in future trade agreements. Members express its strong concern about the EU-Morocco agreement. It points out that, while European markets have opened up almost completely to imports from Morocco, some agricultural products are still subject to quotas on exports from the EU. They consider it unacceptable that the Commission resumed negotiations with Mercosur without making publicly available a detailed impact assessment and without engaging in a proper political debate with the Council and Parliament. They are deeply concerned about the impacts on the EU agricultural sector as a whole of a possible association agreement with Mercosur and consider it is necessary to review the concessions so as to protect our farmers' interests. The Commission is called upon to: ensure that trade agreements do not undermine the EU system of entry prices for fruit and vegetables ; abide by its commitments regarding the EU sugar sector and to end systematic concessions on sugar in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations; in negotiations on EU trade agreements, including those with Canada and Ukraine, take account of the interests of EU citizens, to maintain openness and to inform Parliament regularly about the progress of the negotiations. Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of strict implementation of the preferential rules of origin. They call for a review of all trade preferences given to emerging countries which are members of the G-20 by the European Union.
  • date: 2011-02-08T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN title: A7-0030/2011
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110307&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19544&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-83 title: T7-0083/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU agriculture and international trade. The resolution notes that the EU is the world’s largest importer of agricultural goods from developing countries , importing more than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined (around 71% of the EU’s total agricultural imports originate from developing countries). The EU must strike a balance in international trade agreements between market liberalisation and protection for economic sectors and the rights of workers and consumers. EU trade agreements with third countries must safeguard EU sectors that are experiencing difficulties – in particular the fruit and vegetables, livestock and cereals sectors. Local small farmers, who make a significant contribution to food security in their regions, must not be adversely affected by the EU's conclusion of international trade agreements. In this context, the resolution makes the following recommendations: (1) Consistency between EU agricultural and common commercial policies : Parliament considers that the EU agricultural sector has a clear added value for the European economy and underlines the need to ensure policy coherence between the EU’s agricultural, trade and development policies. E xternal trade policy must not jeopardise the EU’s ability to maintain a strong agricultural sector and to ensure food security against a background of increased market volatility. The Commission is called upon to defend, in all fora, and in the WTO in particular, the multifunctional role of EU agriculture, including the vital role it plays in providing employment and in sustaining the vitality of rural areas, and the European agrifood model. Parliament condemns the Commission’s approach, which far too often makes concessions on agriculture in order to obtain enhanced market access in third countries for industrial products and services. It calls on the Commission to propose an approach that strikes a balance between domestic production and imports . The resolution stresses that, in relation to the agricultural sector, the Commission must conduct impact assessments which must be made public before the commencement of negotiations and proposed updates to take account of new positions arising in the negotiations. The Parliament takes the view that decisions to further open up the EU market to imports of agricultural goods should not be taken without ensuring that EU farmers can be compensated for their losses. It is adamant that third-country production methods for export to the EU must provide European consumers with the same guarantees in terms of health, food safety, animal welfare, sustainable development and minimum social standards as those required of EU producers. In relation to imports, Parliament stresses the need for strict compliance with origin rules and mechanisms for the prevention of triangular trade. The Commission is urged proactively to promote the EU’s offensive agricultural interests and to make it easier for EU products to gain access to third-country markets . (2) Agriculture in the multilateral trading system . Doha Development Agenda (DDA) : Members consider, in a bid to secure a successful outcome to the DDA, the EU made an extremely generous offer on agriculture, which cannot be increased, but this has not, to date, been reciprocated by an equivalent level of ambition from other developed and advanced developing countries. The Commission is called to comply strictly with its negotiating mandate from the Council, which sets the most recent reform of the CAP as the limit of its action, provided that equivalent concessions are obtained from its trading partners. The resolution deplores the absence of progress on the establishment of a multilateral register for wines and spirits as well as on the extension of the protection of geographical indications to all agricultural products. It recalls that these elements are sine qua non for a balanced outcome to the agricultural negotiations. It also emphasises the need for the principles underpinning the EU’s agricultural product quality policy to be promoted more widely at multilateral and bilateral level. Members recall the commitment made by the WTO members during the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference to achieving the elimination of all forms of export subsidies . They consider that the general reduction in customs tariffs should be assessed in the light of the EU offer concerning the domestic support and export competition pillars, and should depend on the possibility of keeping the Special Safeguard clause, on a specific exemption from tariff simplification disciplines and on adequate flexibility in the formula for tariff cuts and in the designation of sensitive products. WTO dispute settlement : Parliament notes the fact that the agreement on trade in bananas constitutes an important step towards the consolidation of a rule-based multilateral trading system. It calls on the Commission to ensure that the settlement of the ‘ beef hormones ’ dispute will allow for the suspension of the sanctions on EU products, while guaranteeing that beef imports to the EU will be in line with EU requirements. The Commission is asked to vigorously to defend the EU regime for authorising and marketing GMOs against challenges in the WTO. (3) Agriculture in plurilateral, inter-regional and bilateral trade relations : Parliament considers that the conclusion of multilateral negotiations is a priority to be pursued by the EU. It believes that bilateral trade agreements must complement multilateral processes in the form of respect for equal working conditions, common environmental rules and food safety standards already in force in the European Union. The resolution stresses that in order to avoid ‘paying twice’– first at bilateral and then at multilateral level – the concept of a ‘ single pocket agreement ’ must be supported, under which concessions in bilateral agreements will be linked to the final outcome of the Doha negotiations. The resolution also recalls that the Free Trade Agreement with South Korea allowed significant numbers of GIs to be recognised and calls for further efforts to be made to provide for this in future trade agreements. Parliament expresses its strong concern about the EU-Morocco agreement. It points out that, while European markets have opened up almost completely to imports from Morocco, some agricultural products are still subject to quotas on exports from the EU. It considers it unacceptable that the Commission resumed negotiations with Mercosur without making publicly available a detailed impact assessment and without engaging in a proper political debate with the Council and Parliament. Members are deeply concerned about the impacts on the EU agricultural sector as a whole of a possible association agreement with Mercosur and consider it is necessary to review the concessions so as to protect our farmers' interests. The resolution points out that any additional bilateral EU sugar market access concessions granted to third countries (for example Latin American countries and Ukraine) will be destabilising for the EU sugar market. Members are concerned at the prospect of concessions on cereals in the negotiations with Ukraine. Members regret that the Commission has not yet informed Parliament about the negotiations for a free trade agreement between the EU and Canada, even though these negotiations commenced in October 2009. The Commission is called upon to: ensure that trade agreements do not undermine the EU system of entry prices for fruit and vegetables ; abide by its commitments regarding the EU sugar sector and to end systematic concessions on sugar in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations; in negotiations on EU trade agreements, including those with Canada and Ukraine, take account of the interests of EU citizens, to maintain openness and to inform Parliament regularly about the progress of the negotiations. Lastly, Parliament emphasises the importance of strict implementation of the preferential rules of origin. They call for a review of all trade preferences given to emerging countries which are members of the G-20 by the European Union.
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AGRI/7/02733
New
  • AGRI/7/02733
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.10 Agricultural policy and economies
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
3.10
Agricultural policy and economies
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
6.30
Development cooperation
activities
  • date: 2010-07-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-02-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-30&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0030/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110307&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19544&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-83 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0083/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPASTAMKOS Georgios
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-06-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AGRI/7/02733
reference
2010/2110(INI)
title
EU agriculture and international trade
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject