Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | FÄRM Göran ( S&D) | JENSEN Anne E. ( ALDE), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | CANCIAN Antonio ( PPE) | Inés AYALA SENDER ( S&D), Michael CRAMER ( Verts/ALE), Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | LANGEN Werner ( PPE) | Claude TURMES ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172, TFEU 173-p3
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172, TFEU 173-p3Subjects
- 3.20.11 Trans-European transport networks
- 3.30.20 Trans-European communications networks
- 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
- 3.40.14 Industrial competitiveness
- 3.50.02 Framework programme and research programmes
- 3.50.04 Innovation
- 3.60.06 Trans-European energy networks
- 8.40.07 European Investment Bank (EIB)
- 8.70 Budget of the Union
Events
This report from the Commission concerns financial instruments supported by the general budget according to Article 140(8) of the Financial Regulation as at 31 December 2013.
The report focuses on all centrally-managed Financial Instruments for internal and external Union policies supported by the general budget according to Article 140(8) of the Financial Regulation as of 31 December 2013.
To recall, financial instruments, including loans or guarantees with greater risk capacity, represent a smart way to finance the real economy, and boost growth and employment. They can achieve financial leverage (multiplying scarce budgetary resources by attracting private and public funds to support EU policy objectives), policy leverage (incentivising entrusted entities and financial intermediaries to pursue EU policy objectives through alignment of interest), and institutional leverage (benefiting from the expertise of the actors involved in the implementation chain).
This report is the first to be prepared under the new requirements of the Financial Regulation . It is intended to provide an informative overview of how the taxpayer's money has been used and of the progress made in the implementation of the Financial Instruments as of 31 December 2013.
The report is complemented by a Commission Staff Working Document which provides specific information on individual financial instruments, their progress made in implementation and their environment in which they operate.
The report highlights that important outcomes have been achieved through the use of Financial Instruments in the years 2007-2013 , and they will play an even more significant role in the 2014-2020 Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF). The budgetary authorities have expressed their political commitment and increased the necessary resources . Furthermore, the Financial Regulation has been extended with a dedicated chapter, setting up the appropriate regulatory framework for Financial Instruments' design, management and reporting.
The main conclusions of the report are :
(1) The implementation of the 2007-2013 centrally-managed financial instruments has been instrumental in helping to alleviate financial market failures and leverage the positive effects of EU-wide actions . For example, in the 2007-2013 period, the main EU-level financial instruments dedicated to SME support (CIP-GIF, CIP-SMEG 07 and RSI) and micro-SME support (EPMF) with an overall contribution (EU commitments) of more than EUR 1.6 billion, mobilised lending of nearly EUR 17.9 billion and also supported equity investments of about EUR 2.8 billion, thus enhancing access to finance for more than 336 000 SMEs.
(2) The achieved leverage is equal to 5 for Equity Instruments, and ranges from 4.8 to 31 for Guarantee instruments, from 10 to 259 for Risk-sharing instruments, from 1.54 to 158 for Dedicated Investment Vehicles, from 5 to 7 for Financial Instruments in the Enlargement Countries, from 5 to 27.6 for Financial Instruments in Neighbourhood Countries and Countries covered by the Development Cooperation Instrument.
With the experience gained in the course of implementation during the 2007-2013 period, and in the context of programme evaluations and audits, several lessons have been learned on how to further improve the design and management of financial instruments:
best practices have been capitalised on the design and the management of the new generation of financial instruments; further, Financial Instruments will now cover all main types of final recipients over the full funding cycle and will include offer of both pro- and counter-cyclical instruments to respond flexibly to market needs, based on demand-driven implementation; effectiveness and efficiency have been enhanced through fewer instruments with larger volumes, ensuring critical mass in full consistency with State aid rules; alignment of interest with entrusted entities and financial intermediaries will be further achieved through fees and incentives, and risk sharing.
Since 2013 is the last year of commitment for the 2007-2013 programming period for a number of instruments, a final evaluation assessing the extent to which objectives have been achieved has not been finalised. More qualitative and in-depth feedback on the attainment of objectives will be available within one year and will be duly reported upon.
This Staff Working Document (SWD) constitutes an Annex to the report of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on financial instruments supported by the general budget according to Article 140(8) of the Financial Regulation as at 31 December 2013. It provides specific information on individual financial instruments, their progress made in implementation and their environment in which they operate.
Financial instruments are a proven way to achieve EU policy objectives. They use EU funds to support economically viable projects and attract very significant volumes of public and private financing. By injecting money into the real economy, financial instruments contribute to the achievement of the EU policy objectives enshrined in the Europe 2020 Strategy, notably in terms of employment, innovation, climate change and energy sustainability, education and social inclusion.
The report gives detailed information on each financial instrument.
Project Bonds Initiative
The Pilot Phase of the Project Bond Initiative (PBI, MFF 2007-2013) & the Risk sharing debt instrument under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) including the PBI.
The Project Bond Initiative aims to stimulate capital market financing for infrastructure projects in the areas of Trans-European networks in transport and energy as well as broadband networks. Several transactions have reached financial close under the Pilot Phase of the PBI so far.
The pilot phase has a total financial envelope of EUR 230 million: EUR 200 million from the TEN-T budget line, EUR 10 million from the TEN-E budget line and EUR 20 million from the CIP ICT line.
The Initiative shall start up progressively within a ceiling of EUR 230 million during the years 2014 and 2015.
The Project Bond Initiative will be continued under the Connecting Europe Facility , with some adjustments necessary for the implementation of the instrument.
The Loan Guarantee Instrument for Trans-European Transport Network Projects (LGTT)
This is a debt instrument for project finance. To date, six TEN-T projects worth a cumulated capital cost of EUR 11,716 million have been supported, using almost EUR 500 million of guarantees and attracting EUR 6 billion of private financing.
The Risk sharing debt instrument including the PBI
This will target projects of common interest in the sectors of transport, broadband, and energy networks. The expected Union contribution of EUR 121 million in 2014 is estimated to support financing for EUR 720 million -1.8 billion.
The Equity Instrument under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)
This will aim to provide risk capital for actions contributing to projects of common interest in the field of transport, energy and broadband. The goal of the instrument shall be to attract capital market financing by providing equity and quasi-equity investments to European infrastructure projects. The instrument will be designed at a later stage.
The Private Finance for Energy Efficiency Instruments (PF4EE)
This is financed under the LIFE programme , shall provide inter alia a Risk Sharing Facility, designed to reduce the credit risk faced by financial intermediaries when lending to the energy efficiency sector. The Union budget commitment of EUR 80 million is expected to support a total investment up to about EUR 650 million for 2014-2020.
The 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change and Infrastructure – (Marguerite)
This is a Pan-European equity fund which supports infrastructure investment within the transport (TEN-T), energy (TEN-E) and renewables sectors in Member States. The Union contribution of EUR 80 million is expected to support funding volumes around EUR 10.2 billion.
The European Energy Efficiency Fund (EEE-F)
This Fund is a spin-off of the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) which invests in energy efficiency, renewable energy projects, and clean urban transport. By the end of March 2014, the Fund fully allocated the EU contribution (EUR 125 million) for a total of EUR 219 million investment in projects. From the Technical Assistance envelope, EUR 17.7 million has been allocated to support project preparation by the same date.
The Natural Capital Financing Facility (NCFF)
This Facility will finance upfront investment and operating costs for revenue-generating or cost-saving pilot projects, which promote the conservation, restoration, management, and enhancement of natural capital in the areas of Nature and Biodiversity and Climate Change Adaptation. The initial Union contribution is foreseen at EUR 60 million.
In accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) N° 670/2012, the Commission presents its interim report evaluating the progress of the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative (PBI). To recall, the PBI pilot was set up with EU budget of EUR 230 million to allow stakeholders to familiarise themselves with the new instrument on the basis of concrete transactions during an initial pilot phase.
In the pilot phase, which started on 7 November 2012, projects may be approved by the EIB until 31 December 2014 and must reach financial close by 31 December 2016.
The full roll-out is envisaged within the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) forming part of the 2014-2020 Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF).
This report prepared in cooperation with the EIB, covers the first 12-month period from November 2012 to November 2013 and shows the progress made on project approval and financing. The report analyses lessons learnt during the pilot phase and highlights possible synergies and economies of scale that could be achieved within the framework of the CEF. The CEF role could be maximized by creating synergies through the combination of grants and financial instruments, such as the PBI, Loan Guarantee for TEN-Transport (LGTT) and programme support actions.
In a context where private sector financing of infrastructure in the EU has not yet recovered to pre-crisis levels of EUR 25-30 billion, which was still insufficient for EU infrastructure needs, the report considers the initiative a success.
Summary of achievements : in the first year of operation, eight projects have been approved by the EIB Board as potential beneficiaries of Project Bond Credit Enhancement (PBCE) and further projects are being advanced. Two projects have been credit enhanced by EIB and an additional project is expected to be signed by early 2014. One of these three projects was closed without support from the EU budget.
The active promotion by the EC and the EIB of Project Bonds for infrastructure financing has been recognised and appreciated by the market and has supported the development of other market solutions through the catalytic effect envisaged. In particular, the PBI has provided a wider range of investors with access to infrastructure assets as evidenced by the transactions completed already. Even where PBI has not ultimately been selected as the preferred funding option, it has provided competitive pressure reducing overall financing costs for a number of projects.
However, the market has so far focused on smaller sized local infrastructure projects in the UK with limited activity in support of larger projects at national level. In particular, the conditions for TEN greenfield projects remain difficult. Member States should speed up the identification and preparation of infrastructure projects in order to bring them to the market.
Assessment: Market interest in and feedback on the initiative have been positive and this has been instrumental in terms of focusing investors on bond solutions. In terms of developing project bonds:
more work is needed to develop an active bond market , including the issuance of further bonds so that a sufficient stock is outstanding and benchmarks for future issuance can more easily be defined. This will make it easier for investors and procuring authorities to assess likely funding levels and make the pricing of bond solutions more predictable, perhaps enabling procuring authorities to move away from requiring fully committed funding; a liquid project bond market requires better prepared and more mature projects. Governments should commit to long term planning so as to ensure a more stable and transparent pipeline of infrastructure projects. In this respect, CEF provides for technical assistance at institutional and project level to help prepare future pipelines of project of common interest in order to support Member States and the private sector. There is also scope to expand the PBI to other policy areas where the financing of smaller local infrastructure projects could be pooled at national or regional level; the CEF role could potentially be maximized if a merger of the three sector portfolios (i.e. transport, energy and broadband), as referred to in the upcoming Regulation establishing the CEF, were carried out. With a view to increasing the efficiency and leverage effect of EU budget spending, this opportunity could be used to create a shared first loss provisioning system to benefit from the inherent diversification of the three sectors wherein the pre-existing instruments could be used as a seed portfolio.
PURPOSE: to launch the pilot phase for the Europe 2020 initiative with respect to bonds for the financing of projects in the fields of transport, energy and information and communication technologies (ICTs).
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 670/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (2007-2013) and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
CONTENT: following an agreement with the European Parliament at first reading, the Council adopted a Regulation launching the 2012-2013 pilot phase of the EU project bonds initiative aimed at mobilising up to EUR 4.5 billion in private sector long-term capital market financing of economically viable projects in the field of transport, energy and ICT infrastructure.
In its resolution of 8 June 2011 , entitled “Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competititve, sustainable and inclusive Europe”, the European Parliament welcomed the Europe 2020 initiative with respect to project bonds for the financing of projects in the field, a risk-sharing mechanism with the EIB providing capped support from the Union budget, that is designed to leverage the Union funds and attract additional interest from private investors for participating in priority projects that are in line with Europe 2020 objectives.
Project bonds are private debt issued by the sponsor(s) of a project , either a private company or a special purpose vehicle (SPV) created by one or more companies to finance a specific project. The EU project bonds instrument will provide credit enhancement for projects in order to make it easier for their sponsors to attract private financing.
When raising financing through a project bond, the company or SPV shall issue senior and subordinated tranches of debt. By creating a subordinated tranche, which takes first losses, the credit standing of the senior debt is enhanced because it carries less risk and thus can attract more investors.
The European Investment Bank will take up the subordinated debt, whereby funds from the EU budget will be used to cover part of the EIB's risk.
The risk-sharing instrument for project bonds referred to in the Regulation is a joint instrument by the Commission and the EIB which provides added value as a Union intervention, addresses sub-optimal investment situations when projects do not receive adequate financing from the market, and provides additionality. It avoids distortion of competition, aims to secure a multiplier effect and aligns interests in the form of a credit enhancement. The risk-sharing instrument for project bonds shall:
take the form of a debt instrument or a guarantee granted by the EIB with the support of a Union budget contribution in favour of financing provided to projects in the field of ICT and broadband, complementing or attracting financing by Member States or the private sector; mitigate the debt service risk of a project and the credit risk of bond holders; be used only for projects whose financial viability is based on project revenues.
The main terms, conditions and procedures of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds are laid down in Annex IIIa of the Regulation.
The initiative will be entirely financed by the EU budget via redeployment within the envelopes of existing programmes in 2012 and 2013. Under the Regulation
up to EUR 200 million in 2012-2013 will be allocated for transport projects, up to EUR 10 million for energy and up to EUR 20 million for ICT and broadband projects.
If successful, the pilot phase will be followed by an operational phase during 2014-2020 under the EU's " Connecting Europe " facility for transport, energy and ICTs.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 01/08/2012.
The European Parliament adopted by 579 votes to 32, with 9 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
Parliament reached its position in first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission’s proposal as follows:
Pilot phase for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative: this pilot phase shall be launched with the aim of helping to finance priority projects with a clear EU added value , as well as to facilitate greater private sector involvement in the long-term capital market financing of economically viable projects in the field of transport, energy and ICT infrastructure.
The instrument will benefit projects with similar financing needs and, thanks to synergies between the sectors, should produce greater benefits in terms of market impact, administrative efficiency and resource utilisation. It should provide infrastructure stakeholders such as financiers, public authorities, infrastructure managers, construction companies and operators with a coherent instrument and will be driven by market demand .
During the pilot phase for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, the Union budget is to be used along with financing from the EIB in the form of a joint risk-sharing instrument for project bonds issued by project companies. That instrument seeks to mitigate the debt-service risk of a project and the credit risk of bondholders to such an extent that capital market participants, such as pension funds, insurance companies and other interested parties, are willing to invest in a larger volume of infrastructure project bonds than would be possible without Union support .
Involvement of the EIB: the Commission shall involve the EIB in the implementation of the pilot phase. The main terms, conditions and procedures of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds are laid down in a new annex to the Regulation.
The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds, including risk sharing, remuneration, monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a cooperation agreement between the Commission and the EIB . That cooperation agreement shall be approved by the Commission and the EIB according to their respective procedures.
Implementation: the pilot phase of the Initiative should be implemented without undue delay in order to ascertain whether, and to what extent, such risk-sharing financial instruments offer added value in the area of infrastructure financing and for the development of debt capital market financing of infrastructure projects. Application for support, and selection and implementation of all projects should be subject to Union law, in particular with regard to state aid, and should seek to avoid creating or adding to market distortions.
Independent evaluation: in addition to the reporting requirements under point 49 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, the Commission should, with the support of the EIB, report every six months during the pilot phase to the European Parliament and the Council after the signature of the cooperation agreement and submit an interim report to the European Parliament and the Council in the second half of 2013. An independent full-scale evaluation should be carried out in 2015 .
Drawing upon that independent full-scale evaluation, the Commission should assess the relevance of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative as well as its effectiveness in increasing the volume of investments in priority projects and enhancing the efficiency of Union spending.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report drafted by Göran FÄRM (S&D, SE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
It recommends that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading, under the ordinary legislative procedure, should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Risk-sharing instrument for project bonds : this shall mean a joint instrument by the Commission and the EIB which provides a credit enhancement to projects of common interest with European added value , complementing financing by Member States or private investors and addressing sub-optimal investment situations when projects do not receive adequate financing from the market.
Implementation of the instrument : Members state that the Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the Council without delay of the basic elements of that agreement. Risk assessment by the EIB shall be guaranteed in accordance with the EIB Credit Risk Policy Guidelines, and the EIB's selection criteria in the social, environmental and climate field shall be duly taken into account.
Independent assessments : the Commission should perform an independent, in-depth assessment of the pilot phase of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds. That assessment must, if appropriate, be accompanied by legislative proposals on innovative financial instruments in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020.
Reporting requirements : Members call on the Commission to report to the European Parliament and the Council every six months during the pilot phase. Such reporting shall include the provision of information regarding the performance of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and recommendations regarding ways of enhancing its effectiveness.
Before 30 June 2013, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report containing a list of the projects selected for the financial aid specifying the contribution, the financing institutions and the investors involved. The Commission shall include in that report a good practice guide and a list of investors potentially interested in innovative financial instruments.
PURPOSE: to launch the pilot phase for the Europe 2020 initiative with respect to bonds for the financing of projects in the fields of transport, energy and information and communication technologies (ICTs).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: due to fiscal austerity in the Member States, there is a danger that infrastructure projects of EU interest are not carried out at the pace required to achieve Europe 2020 objectives thereby compromising the EU's economic recovery and growth. Innovative solutions are urgently required to mobilise a greater share of private savings and to improve the range of financial instruments available for infrastructure projects, especially in the energy, transport and ICT sectors.
The norm for infrastructure projects with commercial potential should be to combine EU funds in partnerships with the capital market and banking sectors, particularly via the European Investment Bank (EIB). In its resolution of 8 June 2011 , the European Parliament underlined that the Union should take action notably to enhance the use of the Union funds as a catalyst for attracting additional financing from the European Investment Bank (EIB), European Bank for Reconstruction and development (EBRD), other international financial institutions and the private sector.
On 29 June 2011, the European Commission adopted its proposal for the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for the period 2014-2020 . One of the key decisions was to bring the granting of financial aid for transport, energy and ICT infrastructure into a common legislative framework, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). The mechanism will provide a longer term framework enabling the creation and implementation, in a timely and efficient manner, of projects in the fields of energy, transport and telecommunications.
The Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative will become an integral part of the risk-sharing instruments of the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020. The main objective of the pilot phase in 2012-2013 is to prepare the operational phase of the initiative under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020 and to provide immediate support for infrastructure projects.
In order to allow a more efficient implementation of the financial instruments under the Connecting Europe Facility, the launch of a pilot phase is required, both to allow the optimisation of the design and stimulate investor appetite for the post-2013 period.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
the impact assessment reviews the current market situation with a link to the impact assessment accompanying the proposal for the CEF which includes more background on the potential CEF instruments, financing gaps and market imperfections affecting current levels of investment in infrastructure.
Three options were analysed: i) the status quo, i.e. continuing with current grant programmes for energy and transport and the current grant programmes and financial instruments for transport; ii) regulatory incentives and iii) the proposal to implement the Project Bond Initiative. In this context, the potential risks hindering the implementation of the Initiative have been reviewed and a quantifiable expected impact revealed in terms of a multiplier effect.
LEGAL BASIS: Articles 172 and 173 (3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the Commission is proposing To launch a pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative in the area of transport, energy and ICT . This initiative seeks to mobilise investment in areas that will stimulate growth and create jobs. The Initiative aims to provide the credit enhancement required to attract capital market investors and would facilitate the creation of a new asset class in terms of infrastructure project bonds. The initiative will complement, rather than replace bank lending and thus provide an alternative and competitive source of long-term debt finance to infrastructure projects . To have the maximum impact, the initiative could also be applied to projects at an advanced stage of the bidding process for the purposes of refinancing during or shortly after the end of the construction period.
In the pilot phase, the Commission would work in particular with the EIB to optimise the design of the initiative for optimal implementation from 2014 onwards. Budgetary funds should be requested by the EIB on the basis of a range of projects, which the EIB would deem suitable and likely to be realised. Any such requests should be made prior to 31 December 2013. Due to the complexity of large infrastructure projects, the actual approval might take place at a later date, but no later than 31 December 2014.
In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down the general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks should be amended.
Given the short time available, the Commission invites the Parliament and the Council to adopt the proposal for a pilot phase as speedily as possible.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the total budget available from the EU for the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative is EUR 230 million .
The initiative will be entirely financed by redeployment within the envelopes of existing programmes in 2012 and 2013 . The following redeployments could be made in favour of the initiative:
up to EUR 200 million from the TEN-T (transport) budget, up to EUR 20 million from the budget of the framework programme for innovation and competitiveness in order to allow the financing of projects in the field of ICT and in particular broadband, and an amount of up to EUR 10 million from the TEN-E (energy) budget.
Documents
- For information: SWD(2016)0058
- For information: SWD(2016)0060
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0686
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2014)0335
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0929
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)627
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2012/670
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 204 31.07.2012, p. 0001
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0648/2012
- Draft final act: 00027/2012/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0296/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0150/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE486.222
- Committee opinion: PE483.491
- Committee opinion: PE483.478
- Committee draft report: PE485.863
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0493/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1237
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1239
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0659
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1237 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1239 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0493/2012
- Committee draft report: PE485.863
- Committee opinion: PE483.478
- Committee opinion: PE483.491
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE486.222
- Draft final act: 00027/2012/LEX
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0648/2012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)627
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2013)0929
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0686 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2014)0335
- For information: SWD(2016)0058
- For information: SWD(2016)0060
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
- Contribution: COM(2011)0659
Activities
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Paolo Francesco SILVESTRIS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks (debate)
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander MIRSKY
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks (debate)
- Philippe BOULLAND
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iva ZANICCHI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marta ANDREASEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ioan ENCIU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne E. JENSEN
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hans-Peter MARTIN
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Paul MURPHY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacek WŁOSOWICZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pino ARLACCHI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Richard ASHWORTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tadeusz CYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hynek FAJMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Salvador GARRIGA POLLEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacky HÉNIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicole KIIL-NIELSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan KOZŁOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean ROATTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Amalia SARTORI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios STAVRAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alf SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Claude TURMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique VLASTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Amendments | Dossier |
86 |
2011/0301(COD)
2012/03/05
ITRE
26 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Council of 12 July 2011 recalled that financial instruments need to be assessed in terms of leverage effects in comparison to existing instruments, risks that would be added to government balance sheets and possible crowding out of private institutions. The Commission Communication on a pilot for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative and its impact assessment, which draw on a public consultation, contributes to addressing the aforementioned issues. It is also necessary to ensure that the measure proposed is compatible with political decisions and social agreements designed to achieve sustainable economic, environmental and social objectives.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) It will be the first financial instrument benefiting infrastructure projects with similar financing needs across several sectors and will as such produce higher benefits in terms of market impact, administrative efficiency and resource
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The Union support should mitigate the risk inherent in project bonds to the extent that capital market participants are willing to invest in a larger volume infrastructure project bonds than would be possible without Union support. Project bonds should be extended to innovation and demonstration projects as well.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Europe's economic recovery should not be compromised by growing transport congestion, missing energy links and a slowing down of broadband penetration due to infrastructure projects' difficulties in gaining access to long-term private finance or public funding. The Project Bonds Initiative in the framework of the EU 2020 partnership agreement shall provide a clear eligibility framework subject to enhanced democratic scrutiny as a proper means for achieving sustainable and countercyclical investments programmes consistent with EU social, climate and environmental objectives, while playing a catalytic role aiming at attracting private capital for long-term project.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Europe's economic recovery should not be compromised by growing transport congestion, missing energy links
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The reassessment of infrastructure investment programmes by Member States in the context of their fiscal austerity and structural reforms will not facilitate the required acceleration of the pace of infrastructure investment needed to meet the policy objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular a shift towards a resource-efficient, low-carbon economy to achieve sustainable growth, as laid down in the Europe 2020 resource efficiency flagship initiative. In addition, long-term bank lending for infrastructure projects continues to be insufficient and expensive, calling for alternative and competitive sources of debt financing.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Therefore, a pilot phase for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative should be launched during the current financial framework in order to develop debt capital market financing in the area of infrastructure more generally and to extend the range of financial instruments currently available for transport projects. The pilot phase should be followed by an evaluation carried out by the Commission in cooperation with the EIB. The Commission, after consultation of stakeholders involved in pilot phase projects, should report to the European Parliament and the Council by the end of 2013.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Nonetheless, it should be borne in mind that project securities can only supplement existing financing models and cannot entirely replace them.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects with commercial potential and socioeconomic benefits in line with the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular the resource efficiency flagship initiative, in the transport, energy and ICT sectors, while after 2013 the initiative
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects of common European interest with commercial potential in the transport, energy and ICT sectors, while after 2013, subject to positive evaluation, the initiative may be extended to other sectors.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In light of the EIB's long-standing expertise and as the major financier of
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In light of the EIB's long-standing expertise and as the major financier of infrastructure projects and given its nature as the EU financial body established by the Treaty, the Commission should involve the EIB in the implementation of this pilot phase. The specific terms and conditions of the co-operation including risk-sharing and remuneration of the EIB, should be laid down in an agreement between the Commission and the EIB and disclosed to the Council and the European Parliament.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In light of the EIB's long-standing expertise and as the major financier of infrastructure projects and given its nature as the EU financial body established by the Treaty, the Commission should involve the EIB in the implementation of this pilot phase. The specific terms and conditions of the co-operation including risk-sharing and remuneration of the EIB, should be laid down in an agreement between the Commission and the EIB, which shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative should be launched in preparation of the proposed Connecting Europe Facility. This pilot phase will help to pave the way for the risk-sharing financial instrument under the Connecting Europe Facility. The decision about the continuation of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative after the end of the pilot phase should be taken after an in-depth evaluation of the pilot phase has taken place.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The application for support, selection and implementation of all projects shall be in line with the Union's long term policy objectives and subject to Union law, in particular with regard to state aid, transparency and nature protection, and shall seek to avoid creating or adding to market distortions.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The application for support, selection and implementation of all projects sh
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) Debt criteria for public-private partnership projects should be the same as for traditional projects launched under public procurement procedures, so as to ensure the necessary budget transparency, avoid additional budgetary risks and ensure that the relevant authorities are able to choose freely between public- private partnership projects and traditionally funded projects.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) The pilot phase should be funded using budget redeployment in 2012 and 2013 from existing transport, energy and telecommunication programmes. For this purpose, up to EUR 200 million might be redeployed for this initiative from the TEN-T budget, up to EUR 20 million from the budget of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and up to EUR 10 million from the TEN-E budget. The budget available limits both the scope of the initiative and the number of projects that can be supported
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Budgetary funds should be requested by the EIB on the basis of a range of projects, which the EIB would deem suitable, in line with the Union's long term policy objectives and likely to be realised. Any such requests should be made prior to 31 December 2013. Due to the complexity of large infrastructure projects, the actual approval might take place at a later date, but no later than 31 December 2014.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point (a) Decision no 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. The projects shall aim to promote innovation, technology transfer and the dissemination of new technologies that are ready for market uptake, with priority to integration of renewable energy and environmentally sustainable transport.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point (b) Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2a 2a. takes the form of a loan or a guarantee granted by the EIB in favour of financing provided to projects of common European interest in the field of ICT and broadband;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point (b) Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2c 2c. The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds, including its monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a delegation agreement between the Commission and the EIB, which shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point (b) Decision 1639/2006/CE Article 31 – paragraph 2d a (new) Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point (b) Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6 – paragraph 1 point (g) (g) a financial contribution to the EIB to the provisioning and capital allocation for loans or guarantees to be issued by the EIB on its own resources under the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in the field of TEN-T and TEN-E. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and there shall be no further liability on the general budget of the Union. The residual risk inherent in all operations shall be borne by the EIB. The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds, including its monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a delegation agreement between the Commission and the EIB, which shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council. In 2012 and 2013, an amount of up to EUR 210 million, of which up to EUR 200 million for transport projects and up to EUR 10 million for energy projects, may be redeployed for the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2) from the TEN-T (LGTT) and TEN-E budget lines, respectively. The risk-sharing instrument for project bonds may reuse any revenues received within the investment period for new loans and guarantees.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission in coordination with the EIB shall evaluate the pilot phase and, after consultation of stakeholders involved in pilot phase projects, shall report to the European Parliament and the Council no later than 31 December 2013.
source: PE-483.729
2012/03/07
TRAN
21 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Therefore, a pilot phase for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative should be launched during the current financial framework in order to develop debt capital market financing in the area of infrastructure more generally and to extend the range of financial instruments currently available for transport projects, bearing in mind that the costs of transport should be reflected in its price in an undistorted way, as indicated in the White Paper on Transport Policy of 2011.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The details of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative are not completely clear at the moment. The pilot phase should be implemented as soon as possible, in order to clarify outstanding issues raised by possible investors and external organisations involved.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects with a clear European added value and with commercial potential in the transport, energy and ICT sectors, while after 2013 the initiative may be extended to other sectors.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Budgetary funds should be requested by the EIB on the basis of a range of projects, which the EIB would deem suitable and likely to be realised. Any such requests should be made prior to 31 December 2013. Due to the complexity of large infrastructure projects, the actual approval might take place at a later date, but no later than 31 December 2014. The selection of projects eligible for the EU funding should reflect the need for infrastructure that minimises the impact on the environment, that is resilient to the possible impact of climate change, health and that improve the safety and security of users.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Since in the conclusions of the European Council of 1-2 March 2012 the deadline for reaching an agreement on the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative is set on June 2012, the Commission needs to start implementing this pilot phase without further delay.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Other sources of funding to be considered include schemes for the internalisation of external costs and infrastructure use charges, which could create additional revenue streams making infrastructure investments more attractive to private capital.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 b (new) (20b) Price signals play a crucial role in many decisions that have long-lasting effects on the transport system. Transport charges and taxes must be restructured in the direction of wider application of the 'polluter-pays' and 'user-pays' principle. They should underpin transport's role in promoting European competitiveness and cohesion objectives, while the overall burden for the sector should reflect the total costs of transport including infrastructure and external costs. Wider socioeconomic benefits and positive externalities justify some level of public funding, but in the future, transport users are likely to pay for a higher proportion of the costs than today. It is important that correct and consistent monetary incentives are given to users, operators and investors.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part (b) The following paragraphs 2a to 2da are inserted:
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 a – point c a (new) (ca) is directed only to core TEN-T, TEN- E and CIP projects, as these are the priority settled by the EU. In case that the pilot phase begins before an agreement is reached on the new core-networks, the Commission proposals shall be fully taken into account.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2da. The Commission shall submit annually to the European Parliament a report containing a breakdown by project of the utilisation of the amounts referred to in paragraph 2d. The report shall also contain information regarding the performance of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and recommendations regarding ways of enhancing its effectiveness.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b – introductory part Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6– paragraph 1 – point b (b) the following point (g) – (ga) is added:
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6– paragraph 1 – point g (g) a financial contribution to the EIB to the provisioning and capital allocation for loans or guarantees to be issued by the EIB on its own resources under the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in the field of TEN-T and TEN-E. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument for project bonds, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and there shall be no further liability on the general budget of the Union. The residual risk inherent in all operations shall be borne by the EIB. The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk- sharing instrument for project bonds, including its monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a delegation agreement between the Commission and the EIB, which shall be submitted to the European Parliament and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. In 2012 and 2013, an amount of up to EUR 210 million,
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6– paragraph 1 – point g a (ga) The Commission shall submit annually to the European Parliament a report containing a breakdown by project of the utilisation of the amounts referred to in paragraph 2d. The report shall also contain information regarding the performance of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and recommendations regarding ways of enhancing its effectiveness.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) (3a) In Article 17(1), the following subparagraph is added: Before 30 June 2013, the Commission shall submit to Parliament and the Council a report containing a list of the projects selected for the financial aid referred to in Article 6(1)(g), specifying the contribution, the financing institutions and the investors involved. The Commission shall include in that report a good practice guide and a list of investors potentially interested in innovative financial instruments.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 b (new) Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) (3b) In Article 19 the following paragraph 1a is inserted: Before the end of 2013, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an assessment of the various financial instruments under this Regulation and of whether they need to be retained or amalgamated.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Over the next decade, unprecedented investment volumes in Europe's transport, energy, information and communication networks will be needed in order to underpin the Europe 2020 flagship actions and develop smart, upgraded and fully interconnected infrastructures to foster the completion of the internal market. Estimated investment needs of the TEN-T network amount to EUR 500 billion. Among energy infrastructure projects of European relevance, approximately EUR 100 billion of investments is at risk of not being delivered due to obstacles related to permit granting, regulation and financing, while another EUR 100 billion will be financed by the sector itself. Investment needs for achieving the Digital Agenda objective of providing fast internet access for all European citizens and businesses range from EUR 181 to EUR 273 billion, of which private sector investment is expected to amount to between EUR 30 billion and EUR 100 billion. One should ensure, however, that EU-funded transport infrastructure takes into account energy efficiency needs, noise reduction at the source, biodiversity and climate change challenges.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) It is necessary to emphasize the importance of adopting the proposed MFF, as it introduces the Connecting Europe Facility (including the project bonds initiative) and allocates the appropriate budget.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative has a double objective
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) With the Europe 2020 Project Bond
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) A further step forward which should be carefully assessed and reported to the European Parliament and the Council is the public issuing of project bonds by the Union, targeted to financing sustainable infrastructure projects with European Added Value (i.e. TEN-T, TEN-E, etc.).
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) A further step forward, which should be carefully assessed, is the public issuing of project bonds by the Union, targeted at financing infrastructure projects with European added value such as TEN-T, TEN-E, etc. In this case, the issuing of the project bond would have to follow a preliminary phase during which details of the project emerge, so as to enable close consideration of the risks and benefits of that project.
source: PE-483.806
2012/04/03
BUDG
39 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Over the next decade, unprecedented investment volumes in Europe's transport, energy, information and communication networks will be needed in order to underpin the Europe 2020 flagship actions and develop smart, upgraded and fully interconnected infrastructures to foster the completion of the internal market. Estimated investment needs of the TEN-T network amount to EUR 500 billion. Among energy infrastructure projects of European relevance, approximately EUR 100 billion of investments is at risk of not being delivered due to obstacles related to permit granting, regulation and financing, while another EUR 100 billion will be financed by the sector itself. Investment needs for achieving the Digital Agenda objective of providing fast internet access for all European citizens and businesses range from EUR 181 to EUR 273 billion, of which private sector investment is expected to amount to between EUR 30 billion and EUR 100 billion. It should be ensured, however, that EU-funded transport infrastructure takes into account energy-efficiency needs, noise reduction at source, biodiversity and climate-change challenges.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Given the magnitude of investment needs and objectives laid down in the Europe 2020 strategy over the next decade, the Commission should, if the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative be deemed to have been a success following appropriate monitoring and assessment, consider a more complete roll-out in the Union's effort toward leveraging and attracting additional funding.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative has a double objective: first to help finance projects of European policy priorities, and second, to facilitate greater private sector involvement in the long-term capital market financing of infrastructure projects.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) It will be the first financial instrument benefiting infrastructure projects with similar financing needs across several sectors and will as such produce higher benefits in terms of market impact, administrative efficiency and resource utilisation, thanks to the possible synergies between the transport, energy and ICT sectors. It will provide a coherent instrument to infrastructure stakeholders such as financiers, public authorities, construction companies and operators.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) It will be the first financial instrument benefiting infrastructure projects with similar financing needs across several sectors and will as such produce higher benefits in terms of impact on the Union budget, market impact, administrative efficiency and resource utilisation. It will provide a coherent instrument to infrastructure stakeholders such as financiers, public authorities, construction companies and operators.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) With the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, bonds would be issued by project companies, the Union budget together with financing from a financial partner would be used to improve the credit quality of the bonds in order to attract debt capital market investors such as pension funds
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) A further step forward which should be carefully assessed and reported to the European Parliament and the Council is the public issuing of project bonds by the Union, targeted at financing sustainable infrastructure projects with European added value (i.e. TEN-T, TEN-E, etc.).
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The Union support should mitigate the risk inherent in project bonds to the extent that capital market participants are willing to invest in a larger volume infrastructure project bonds than would be possible without Union support. As a counterpart for the socialisation of risk through the EU budget and EIB guarantees, appropriate public ownership and democratic accountability of financed projects has to be guaranteed.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The Union support provided by means of this regulation should mitigate the risk inherent in project bonds to the extent that capital market participants are willing to invest in a larger volume infrastructure project bonds than would be possible without Union support.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The socialisation of risks through risk-taking by the Union and the EIB should in principle be compensated through the premium charged for compensation; if this is not the case, it should be explicitly mentioned and appropriately justified.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Given that the risk of the project bond is capped for the Union but the residual risk is fully borne by the EIB, robust monitoring systems for increased liabilities should also be established by the EIB as well as for the EU budget contribution.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Europe's economic recovery should not be compromised by
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The reassessment of infrastructure investment programmes by Member States in the context of their fiscal austerity and structural reforms will not facilitate the required acceleration of the pace of infrastructure investment needed to meet the policy objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular a shift towards a resource-efficient, low-carbon economy to achieve sustainable growth, as laid down in the Europe 2020 resource efficiency flagship initiative. In addition, long-term bank lending for infrastructure projects continues to be insufficient and expensive, calling for alternative and competitive sources of debt financing.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Therefore, a pilot phase for the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative should be launched during the current financial framework in order to develop debt capital market financing in the area of infrastructure more generally and to extend the range of financial instruments currently available for transport projects, bearing in mind that the costs of transport should be reflected in its price in an undistorted way, as indicated in the White Paper entitled Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system of 28 March 2011.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects with commercial potential and socio-economic benefits in line with the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular the resource efficiency flagship initiative, in the transport, energy and ICT sectors, while after 2013 the initiative
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects with commercial potential in the transport, energy and ICT sectors across all Member States, while after 2013 the initiative may potentially be extended to other sectors.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to implement the pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, Decision No 1639/2006/EC and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 should be amended. This pilot phase aims to support infrastructure projects
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In light of the EIB's long-standing expertise and as the major financier of infrastructure projects and given its nature as the EU financial body established by the Treaty, the Commission should involve the EIB in the implementation of this pilot phase.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The pilot phase of the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative should be launched no later than 31 July 2012 in preparation of the proposed Connecting Europe Facility. This pilot phase, should it prove successful, and following appropriate analysis and evaluation, will help to pave the way for the risk-sharing financial instrument under the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) The selection of projects to be supported should respect relevant environmental, social and climate criteria as outlined in the "European Principles for the Environment" and "The EIB Statement of Environmental and Social Principles and Standards". The EIB should fully apply the procedures contained in its Environmental and Social Practices Handbook.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Budgetary funds should be requested by the EIB on the basis of a range of projects, which the EIB would deem suitable and likely to be realised. Any such requests should be made prior to 31 December 2013. Due to the complexity of large infrastructure projects, the actual approval might take place at a later date, but no later than 31 December 2014. The selection of projects eligible for EU funding should reflect the need for infrastructure that minimises the impact on the environment, that is resilient to the possible impact of climate change, and that improves the health, safety and security of users.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Budgetary funds should be requested by the EIB on the basis of a range of projects, which the EIB and the Commission would deem suitable and likely to be realised. Any such requests should be made prior to 31 December 2013. Due to the complexity of large infrastructure projects, the actual approval might take place at a later date, but no later than 31 December 2014.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) It is desirable that the Commission should perform an independent, in-depth assessment of the pilot phase of the risk- sharing instrument for project bonds. This assessment must, if appropriate, be accompanied by legislative proposals on innovative financial instruments in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Other sources of funding to be considered include schemes for the internalisation of external costs and infrastructure use charges, which could create additional revenue streams making infrastructure investments more attractive to private capital.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point -1 (new) -1. In Article 8, the following paragraph is added: "5a. The Commission shall obtain a full- scale external, independent evaluation of the pilot phase of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds referred to in paragraphs 2a to 2da of Article 31, which shall cover, inter alia, its added value, including the impact on the financial viability of the project, additionality compared to other Union or Member State instruments and any other long-term debt financing, and the multiplier effect achieved, and shall include general observations on market developments including the creation or correction of distortive effects, if any. Furthermore, the Commission shall in that evaluation make an assessment of future steps to be taken in order to enhance the efficiency of Union spending as well as to increase investment volumes towards priority projects. That assessment shall examine, inter alia, how to make the project bond instrument even more attractive to a wider range of long-term investors, including public ones and how to widen the scope of projects eligible, including through the possible creation of project portfolios, to be supported by standardised and more liquid project bonds, the option of issuing European public bonds guaranteed by the Union budget and the possible development of equity instruments to finance Union infrastructure. The Commission shall also obtain a full scale external, independent evaluation of the pilot phase of the risk-sharing instruments for project bonds referred to in paragraphs 2a to 2da of Article 31, which shall cover, inter alia, an assessment of the risks involved including project risk, the consequences of investor withdrawal and partner risk, give an accurate assessment of the weighted cost of capital, consider whether a maximum rate of return would be appropriate for private sector investor funding of public projects, provide a cost comparison with alternative means of project finance to include bank loans and equity and shall also evaluate the effectiveness of the EIB's monitoring systems and structures for increased liabilities incurred as a result of these instruments.''
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point -1 (new) Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point a Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. The projects shall aim to promote innovation, technology transfer and the dissemination of new technologies that are ready for market uptake, with priority to the integration of renewable energy and environmentally sustainable transport.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 a – point c (c) is used only for projects whose financial viability is based on project revenues and whose commercial potential is not sufficient to ensure financing by market mechanisms alone.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 b 2b. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and there shall be no further liability on the general budget of the Union. The residual risk inherent in all operations shall be borne by the EIB, after it has performed a risk analysis.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b 2c. The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds, including its monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a delegation agreement between the Commission and the EIB. This agreement shall aim at ensuring appropriate public ownership for the projects benefiting from the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and refer to relevant Commission and EIB selection criteria in the social, environmental and climate field. It shall also include modalities for ensuring that in principle the premium charged for compensation of risk-taking by the Union and the EIB corresponds to full risk- taking compensation. Where full compensation is not applied, this transfer of risk shall be made explicit and the cost- benefit analysis shall identify positive externalities generated by the project justifying such an approach.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b 2ca. Before undertaking any risk-sharing instruments for project bonds, the Commission and EIB must undertake, and make public, a full risk assessment of the project, which shall be updated subsequently in the event of any material change to the fundamental principles of the project.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 – point b Decision No 1639/2006/EC Article 31 – paragraph 2 d b (new) 2db. In addition and in parallel with the pilot phase, the Commission shall launch a broad market study on how to promote a proper Union single project – debt market, examining the need and feasibility of project bonds not only for TEN and ICT projects, but also for other areas supporting the Europe 2020 strategy. This market study shall also include an assessment on how to better include smaller and medium-sized projects into the facility.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 2 – point 14 14. 'risk-sharing instrument for project bonds' means a credit enhancement provided to projects of common interest. The risk-sharing instrument for project bonds covers the debt service risk of a project and mitigates the credit-risk of bond holders. It is used only for projects whose financial viability is based on project revenues and whose commercial potential is not sufficient to ensure financing by market mechanisms alone.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) a financial contribution to the EIB to the provisioning and capital allocation for loans or guarantees to be issued by the EIB on its own resources under the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in the field of TEN-T and TEN-E. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and, during the term of those bonds, there shall be no further liability on the general budget of the Union. The residual risk inherent in all operations shall be borne by the EIB. The detailed terms and conditions for
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) a financial contribution to the EIB to the provisioning and capital allocation for loans or guarantees to be issued by the EIB on its own resources under the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in the field of TEN-T and TEN-E. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) a financial contribution to the EIB to the provisioning and capital allocation for loans or guarantees to be issued by the EIB on its own resources under the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in the field of TEN-T and TEN-E. The Union exposure to the risk sharing instrument, including management fees and other eligible costs, shall be strictly limited to the amount of the Union contribution to the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds and there shall be no further liability on the general budget of the Union. The residual risk inherent in all operations shall be borne by the EIB, after it has performed a risk analysis. The detailed terms and conditions for implementing the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds, including its monitoring and control, shall be laid down in a delegation agreement between the Commission and the EIB. In 2012 and 2013, an amount of up to EUR 210 million, of which up to EUR 200 million for transport projects and up to EUR 10 million for energy projects, may be redeployed for the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2) from the TEN-T (LGTT) and TEN-E budget lines, respectively. The risk-sharing instrument for project bonds may reuse any revenues received within the investment period for new loans and guarantees.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 a (new) (3a) In Article 16, the following paragraph is added: "2a. The Commission shall obtain a full- scale external, independent evaluation of the pilot phase of the risk-sharing instrument for project bonds referred to in point (g) of Article 6(1), which shall cover, inter alia, its added value, including the impact on the financial viability of the project, additionality compared to other Union or Member State instruments and any other long-term debt financing, and the multiplier effect achieved, and shall include general observations on market developments including the creation or correction of distortive effects, if any. Furthermore, the Commission shall in that evaluation make an assessment of future steps to be taken in order to enhance the efficiency of Union spending as well as to increase investment volumes towards priority projects. That assessment shall examine, inter alia, how to make the project bond instrument even more attractive to a wider range of long-term investors, including public ones and how to widen the scope of projects eligible, including through the possible creation of project portfolios, to be supported by standardised and more liquid project bonds, the option of issuing European public bonds guaranteed by the Union budget and the possible development of equity instruments to finance Union infrastructure. The Commission shall also obtain a full scale external, independent evaluation of the pilot phase of the risk sharing instruments for project bonds referred to in point (g) of Article 6(1), which shall cover, inter alia, an assessment of the risks involved including project risk, the consequences of investor withdrawal and partner risk, give an accurate assessment of the weighted cost of capital, consider whether a maximum rate of return would be appropriate for private sector investor funding of public projects, provide a cost comparison with alternative means of project finance to include bank loans and equity and shall also evaluate the effectiveness of the EIB's monitoring systems and structures for increased liabilities incurred as a result of these instruments.''
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new) source: PE-486.222
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0301&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0301&appLng=EN |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1237/COM_SEC(2011)1237_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1237/COM_SEC(2011)1237_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0493)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0493)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.863New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-485863_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE483.478&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-483478_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE483.491&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-483491_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.222New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-486222_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0648)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0648)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120704&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-07-04-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1237/COM_SEC(2011)1237_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1237/COM_SEC(2011)1237_EN.pdf |
docs/9/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0659New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=659 |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-150&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0150_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-296New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0296_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/7/07790New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0670New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0670 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0659:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0659:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0659New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=659 |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-150&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-0150&language=EN |
activities/5/docs/1/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-296New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-0296 |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|