Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | GROSSETÊTE Françoise ( PPE) | WILLMOTT Dame Glenis ( S&D), PARVANOVA Antonyia ( ALDE), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), CABRNOCH Milan ( ECR), ROSSI Oreste ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | WERTHMANN Angelika ( NA) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 168-p5
Legal Basis:
TFEU 168-p5Subjects
Events
The Commission presents the report on the implementation of the 2017 annual work programme (2017 AWP), under the third Health Programme 2014-2020 established by Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
It provides detailed information on the 2017 budget and how it was used.
2017 highlights
The 2017 AWP launched six Joint Actions totalling EUR 20.229.410,14 of EU co-funding:
- Joint Action Health Equity Europe (JAHEE),
- European Joint Action on vaccination (JAV),
- Joint Action supporting the eHealth Network (e-Health),
- Joint Action Information for Action (InfAct),
- Joint Action Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer (iPAAC), and
- Joint Action Preparedness and action at points of entry (Healthy Gateways).
These Joint Actions, along with other actions funded in 2017, addressed several of the health programmes objectives.
Budget implementation
The overall budget for the third health programme 2014-2020 is EUR 449.4 million. This includes EUR 30 million for the operating costs of the Consumer, Health, Food and Agriculture Executive Agency (Chafea), mandated by the Commission to manage the health programme 2014-2020. Chafea has been providing the Commission with technical, scientific and administrative assistance in implementing the health programme since 2005.
The budget set out in the work plan for 2017 was EUR 61 904 085.00 broken down as follows:
- operational expenditure: EUR 60 404 085.00 corresponding to third programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020) budget line 17 03 01 (‘Encouraging innovation in health, increasing the sustainability of health systems and protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats’);
- administrative expenditure: EUR 1 500 000.00 corresponding to the expenditure to support the third programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020) budget line 17 01 04 02.
The operational budget totalled EUR 60 404 085.00 including EUR 1 574 508.00 of EFTA/EEA credits.
From that, under the 2017 annual work programme, EUR 60 386 800.00 were committed. Chafea committed EUR 46 764 719.17 of this budget while DG SANTE committed EUR 13 622 080.83 covering part of procurement and other actions. From the overall commitment, the budget implemented was EUR 60 063 178.12 with EUR 323 621.88 of not used credits (0.54%).
Objectives, priorities and financing mechanisms in 2017
In 2017, the total operational budget implemented (EUR 60.063.178,12) was divided among the four specific Programme objectives as follows:
1. Health promotion - EUR 22 282 477.74 (37% of the operational budget) for promoting health, preventing diseases and fostering supportive environments for healthy lifestyles taking into account the ‘health in all policies’ principle;
2. Health threats - EUR 7 198 549.97 (12% of the operational budget) for protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats;
3. Health systems - EUR 18 059 351.37 (30% of the operational budget) for contributing to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems;
4. Better and safer healthcare - EUR 8 560 567.66 (14% of the operational budget) for facilitating access to better and safer healthcare for Union citizens.
In addition, horizontal activities (IT, communication) and transversal actions amounted to EUR 3 962 231.38 (7% of the operational budget).
Beneficiaries
In 2017, Chafea and DG SANTE signed more than 238 different grants and contracts with diverse beneficiaries and service providers: governmental, academic institutions, non-governmental organisations, private companies, and individual experts. Other beneficiaries include international organisations and EU services (via direct agreements). The total number of beneficiaries is 450, with the two main categories being private consultant companies (procurement) and governmental organisations (Joint Actions).
The Commission presents the report on the implementation of the 2016 annual work programme (2016 AWP), under the third Health Programme 2014-2020 established by Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
It provides detailed information on the 2016 budget and how it was used.
Themes
The priority health initiative under the 2016 AWP was to set up the European Reference Networks (ERNs) in accordance with: (a) Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare; and (b) the EU policy on rare diseases.
ERNs are virtual networks involving more than 900 healthcare providers across the EU. They aim to tackle complex or rare diseases and conditions that require highly specialised treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources.
Several financing measures were used to support ERNs in 2016, amounting to more than EUR 8 million (EUR 8 012 343.47). These included:
- a call of interest for ERNs;
- requests for service for the independent assessment bodies to assess candidate ERNs;
- a call to fund the coordination costs of the approved networks (EUR 4 386 344.15);
- a call in support of rare disease patient registries for the ERNs (EUR 1 979 361.05).
Budget implementation
The overall budget for the third health programme 2014-2020 is EUR 449.4 million. This includes EUR 30 million for the operating costs of the Consumer, Health, Food and Agriculture Executive Agency (Chafea), mandated by the Commission to manage the programme. Chafea has been providing the Commission with technical, scientific and administrative assistance in implementing the health programme since 2005. It organises annual calls for proposals, coordinates the evaluation of submissions, and negotiates, signs and manages related grant agreements, and disseminates results of the actions. It is also responsible for many procurement procedures.
The budget set out in the work plan for 2016 AWP was EUR 62 160 000, broken down as follows:
- operational expenditure: EUR 56 451 000, corresponding to the third EU health programme (2014-2020);
- administrative expenditure: EUR 1 500 000, corresponding to the expenditure to support the third EU health programme (2014-2020);
- contribution of the health programme to Chafea's budget: EUR 4 209 000.
The total operational budget came to EUR 57 992 112 as it included an additional EUR 1 541 112 of EFTA/EEA credits and recovery credits from previous budget years.
A total of EUR 56 695 888.83 was committed under the 2016 AWP: Chafea covered EUR 48 248 609.99 of this amount, while DG SANTE committed an additional EUR 8 447 278.84 covering part of procurement and other actions.
Objectives, priorities and financing mechanisms in 2016
In 2016, the total operational budget committed (EUR 56 695 888.83) was divided among the programme's four specific objectives as follows:
1. Health promotion: EUR 25 622 317.07 (45% of the operational budget in 2016) for promoting health, preventing diseases and fostering supportive environments for healthy lifestyles taking into account the ‘health in all policies’ principle 2. Health threats: EUR 3 947 709.3 (7%) for protecting EU citizens from serious cross-border health threats.
3. Health systems: EUR 8 655 656.8 (15%) for contributing to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems.
4. Better and safer healthcare: EUR 14 892 153.25 (26%) for facilitating access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens
Future developments
Following the work done in 2015, Chafea continued to invest significantly in information and dissemination activities in close collaboration with DG SANTE and the health programme's network of National Focal Points. Chafea organised several workshops, collaborated in major national and international conferences, and organised stand-alone events with national authorities in EU countries. It also produced a series of brochures and info-sheets on the health programme's key priority areas.
As most actions are still in their early stages, concrete results are not yet available. Deeper insights into the programme's overall impact will only be available once the first generation of co-funded actions has been completed. Nevertheless, the multiannual plan developed at the outset of the third health programme ensures continuity and coherence between the different types of financing instruments available.
This Commission staff working document accompanies the report on the implementation of the third health programme in 2016.
The report provides a detailed overview of all the actions funded under the annual work programme for 2016 (AWP 2016) and highlights some of the key co-funded initiatives that aim to implement EU health policy and legislation, which ended in late 2015 and in 2016, and which were in some cases followed up by actions even larger in scope and ambition.
Key actions co-funded under the second and third health programmes for which final results became available in 2016
These include, inter alia :
- joint action on rare diseases;
- joint action on a cross-border patient registries initiative;
- joint action on quality assurance exercises and networking on the detection of highly infectious pathogens;
- joint action on efficient response to highly dangerous and emerging pathogens at EU level;
- joint action on improving quality in HIV prevention.
The document also includes actions on the main themes (such as rare diseases and European Reference Networks, care coordination, registries, health security — especially in light of the Ebola epidemic and tobacco) which have been included in successive financing decisions.
Lastly, it provides useful figures and statistics and the full list of co-funded initiatives and contracts financed under the third health programme's operating budget in 2016.
The Commission presents the report on the implementation of the 2015 annual work programme (2015 AWP), under the third Health Programme 2014-2020 established by Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
It provides detailed information on the 2015 budget and how it was committed. It also takes account of the amendment to the 2015 AWP to channel funding towards those Member States under particular migratory pressure that require support in their response to the related health challenges.
Themes
The 2015 AWP focused on innovation in health and healthcare, with two related action streams (health technology and migrants’ health) highlighted in this report. The Commission decided to amend the 2015 AWP in response to the high influx of migrants in clear need of international protection and the need to provide financial support to organisations able to support Member States in addressing this emergency situation.
The priority health topic for the 2015 AWP was ‘health technology assessment (HTA) and innovation’. This was addressed through several actions funded by different financing mechanisms and signed in the first quarter of 2016, most of them for 3 years, meaning that they will run until the end of 2018 and in some cases until 2020.
They are:
- the new joint action on HTA, representing the highest ever EU contribution (EUR 11 999 798.74) to a single aspect of health policy under the third Health Programme;
- two projects and a joint action on integrated care (total EU contribution EUR 6 837 798.31);
- the preparatory work for the establishment of the European Reference Networks (EUR 381 372.23).
Budget implementation
The overall budget for the third Health Programme 2014-2020 is EUR 449.4 million. This includes EUR 30 million for the functioning of the Consumer, Health, Food and Agriculture Executive Agency (Chafea) which the Commission has mandated to manage the Health Programme 2014-2020. Chafea has been providing the Commission with technical, scientific and administrative assistance in implementing the Health Programme since 2005. It organises annual calls for proposals, coordinates the evaluation of submissions, negotiates, signs and manages related grant agreements, and disseminates the results of actions. It is also responsible for many procurement procedures.
The budget set out in the work plan for the 2015 AWP was EUR 59 750 000, broken down as follows:
- operational expenditure : EUR 54 041 000, corresponding to the third programme for EU action in the field of health (2014-2020) budget line 17 03 01 (‘Encouraging innovation in health, increasing the sustainability of health systems and protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats’);
- administrative expenditure : EUR 1 500 000, corresponding to the support expenditure for the third Programme for EU action in the field of health (2014-2020) budget line 17 01 04 02.
The total operational budget was EUR 55 629 805 and the total administrative budget was EUR 1 551 822.66. This included EFTA/EEA credits and recovery credits from previous budget years.
Objectives, priorities and financing mechanisms in 2015
In 2015, the total operational budget was divided among the four specific programme objectives as follows.
1. Health promotion : EUR 15 669 170.92 (29 % of the operational budget in 2015) for promoting health, preventing diseases and fostering supportive environments for healthy lifestyles taking into account the ‘health in all policies’ principle.
2. Health threats : EUR 5 016 028.59 (9 % of the operational budget in 2015) for protecting EU citizens from serious cross-border health threats.
3. Health systems : EUR 25 106 924.35 (46 % of the operational budget in 2015) for contributing to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems.
4. Better and safer healthcare : EUR 6 127 923.17 (11 % of the operational budget in 2015) for helping EU citizens access better and safer healthcare.
Other salient features
- 2015 was the second year of the third Health Programme that was seriously affected by the pressure caused by the unprecedented influx of refugees entering Europe;
- the number of participants involved in joint actions continued to be relatively high, as was the case for the second Health Programme and first year of the third Health Programme. There were between 10 and 45 partners (beneficiaries) per joint action. This high number was a challenge for the Programme’s overall management and coordination, as all partners had to sign the grant agreement;
- electronic monitoring and reporting has been introduced to save time on both sides however further improvements are to be introduced in the coming years, including an improved electronic monitoring and reporting system and better and more targeted dissemination.
The Commission report presents the main conclusions of the mid-term evaluation of the 3rd Health programme 2014-2020 under Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 on the establishment of a third programme of Union action in the field of health (2014-2020). It also presents ideas for improving the implementation of the programme for the remaining programming period (2018 – 2020).
The mid-term evaluation conducted in 2016-2017 - based on an external study and open public consultation - focused on the relevance of the thematic priorities, the achievement of the objectives and the effectiveness of the Programme’s management. However, it also touched upon other issues such as the efficient use of resources, the programme’s EU-added value and its internal and external coherence.
Results and achievements : the mid-term evaluation was positive and found that implementation of the programme is on track.
1) Health promotion and disease prevention : the Programme has supported cooperation among Member States through the generation, use, sharing and exchange of knowledge and best practices thus contributing to the achievement of SDG 3 to "ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages".
The Commission, jointly with the OECD and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, is bringing together expertise in the State of Health in the EU cycle to strengthen country-specific and EU-wide knowledge in health, supporting Member States in their evidence-based policy making. The perspective is to create a sustainable and integrated EU health information system.
Exchange of best practice has also been at the heart of several co-funded actions, in areas as diverse as HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis or the reduction of alcohol-related harm.
2) Crisis preparedness and management : activities to support capacity building against health threats have helped to avoid duplication and improve capabilities, delivering added value for the EU. During the Ebola and Zika virus outbreaks, the programme was used to support EU-funded activities to limit the spread of these threats.
Examples of further action include implementing the joint procurement of vaccines and medical counter-measures and improving the capacity of laboratories to rapidly detect new or emerging risks and ensure uniform standards of testing.
3) Innovation in health systems : the programme works in synergy with other EU programmes and policy areas to increase the efficiency of EU expenditure and maximise its impact. The joint action to support the eHealth network promotes digital services infrastructure in the public health sector. Collaboration among EU health technology assessment bodies has resulted in common tools and standards, providing opportunities for substantial economies of scale.
4) Access to better and safer healthcare : 24 European Reference Networks for rare diseases have been established to unite the expertise of more than 300 healthcare providers and 900 centres of expertise across Europe and make it available to rare disease patients. The programme also plays a crucial role in addressing Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR).
The main lessons learned are:
all thematic priorities remain valid and most actions deliver useful outcomes with high EU-added value , in particular for crisis management and for the safety and security in Europe; the Programme is in line with the needs of the Member States : the defined objectives are clear, explicit and specific, and the actions financed in the first three years are relevant; programme management has been made more efficient by better defining the types of objectives expected and providing indicators to measure progress; the Programme demonstrated its responsiveness and flexibility in the face of emerging needs such as the refugees’ crisis in summer 2015, which made a significant contribution to the Commission’s migration policy. Overall, action on migrants and refugees represents a public health investment of EUR 14.4 million; efficiency is being improved : broader thematic areas like health promotion and health systems were identified as priorities by Member States’ representatives in e-surveys and by a large number of health stakeholders in the public consultation and received the highest amount of funding. The programme introduced simplification measures concerning rules and procedures; the open public consultation attracted the attention of a broad selection of interested parties and provided strong support for continued cooperation through the Programme, particularly in areas such as health promotion, disease prevention and eHealth .
Improvements to be made : following the ex-post evaluation of the second Health Programme, the Commission undertook to work on three main aspects of the third Health Programme, as stated in its report to the European Parliament and the Council in May 2016: These commitments were to:
improve monitoring, reporting and dissemination efforts ; encourage participation of all Member States and other participating countries, and to work with all Member States, particularly those with greater public health needs; and develop synergies with the Commission’s main priorities and other programmes.
Moreover, and as suggested in the mid-term evaluation, the programme should remain focused on issues where EU added value can be achieved . These areas fall mainly under the objectives of protecting against cross-border health threats and the access to better and safer healthcare.
This European Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council concerns the implementation of the 3rd EU action programme in the field of health in 2014.
Objective of the report: the report provides an assessment of the implementation of the Union's action programme in the field of health in order to meet the requirements of Article 13 of the Regulation which lays down the requirement for the report. Its main purpose is to provide information on how the programme’s budget was used in 2014.
It is accompanied by a Commission staff working document which provides several examples of the main actions financed under the 2014 work programme in ancillary areas such as evaluation and dissemination.
As a reminder, the 3rd programme had a total budget of EUR 449.4 million and had 4 specific objectives to:
1. promote health, prevent disease and work towards the creation of conditions conducive to healthy lifestyles, taking into account the principle of integrating health issues into all policies;
2. protect EU citizens from serious cross-border threats to health;
3. contribute to innovative, effective and sustainable health systems;
4. improving access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens.
Key findings: 2014 was the first year of the third programme, and its implementation was delayed. Thus, most grant agreements and several service contracts were signed only in the first quarter of 2015.
There has been progress in the execution of the programme, such as on-line submissions through the Participants Portal , on-line evaluation and the electronic signing of grant agreements. The Regulation also introduces simplified administrative procedures and direct grant agreements for joint actions, as well as partnership framework agreements, so that operating grant holders can carry out longer-term planning.
The new procedure for joint actions is also more transparent, since the consortium must first be constituted by designations by the Member States and the countries participating in the third programme. This means, however, that EU umbrella non-governmental organisations in particular, face the challenge of being nominated, whereas during the second programme they were nominated by the Commission.
The number of participants in joint actions remains relatively high, as was the case during the 2nd programme: 12 to 39 participants per joint action in 2014 , with an average of 25 participants.
This is a challenge for the overall management and coordination of joint actions . The outcome of the calls for proposals for projects shows that 2 calls ended with no project awarded. In one case, no applications were received, perhaps because the theme had been narrowly defined and the proposed co-financing was relatively low. In the second case, several proposals were received, but all were excluded during the evaluation process due to insufficient quality.
Outlook: In line with the recommendations of the ex-post evaluation, improvements should be made in the coming years , including:
· improved electronic tracking and reporting system,
· improved and better targeted dissemination and
· sustained work to involve organisations and institutions from countries that have so far been under-represented among beneficiaries.
PURPOSE: to establish a third Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a third Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
CONTENT: in the framework of the new programme period 2014-2020, the European Parliament and the Council have established a third Programme for the Union's action in the field of health.
General objectives : the Programme shall have the general objectives to complement and support the policies of the Member States to improve the health of Union citizens and reduce health inequalities, by:
· promoting health,
· encouraging innovation in health,
· increasing the sustainability of health systems
· protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats, as well as adding value to these policies.
Programme actions : the actions would be intended to:
1. promote health, prevent diseases, and foster supportive environments for healthy lifestyles (census of good practices): the realisation of this objective shall be measured through the increase in the number of Member States involved in health promotion and disease prevention, using evidence-based and good practices through measures and actions taken at the appropriate level in Member States ;
2. protect Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats (the development of coherent approaches for better preparedness and coordination in health emergencies in particular): the realisation of this objective shall be measured through the increase in the number of Member States integrating coherent approaches in the design of their preparedness plans;
3. support public health capacity-building and contribute to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems (developing tools, at Union level, to address shortages of resources, and to facilitate the voluntary uptake of innovations in public health intervention): the realisation of this objective shall be measured through the increase in the advice produced and the number of Member States using the tools and mechanisms identified;
4. facilitate access to better and safer healthcare for Union citizens by increasing access, beyond national borders, to medical expertise and information for specific conditions: the realisation of this objective shall be measured through the increase in the number of European reference networks and centres of expertise joining European reference networks.
These actions should conform to the thematic priorities listed in the Regulation Annex and established within the framework of the annula work programmes.
Financial envelope : the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 shall be EUR 449 394 000 in current prices.
Types of interventions : the Regulation lists the types of intervention possible under the programme. It is particularly foreseen that for the actions having a clear Union added value and co-financed by the competent authorities that are responsible for health in the Member States or in the third countries, detailed rules for intervention are planned, if the actions have a character of exceptional utility . Exceptional utility is achieved where at least 30 % of the budget of the proposed action is allocated to Member States whose GNI per inhabitant is less than 90 % of the Union average, with at least 14 countries participating in the said action. It should be noted that g rants paid by the Union should not exceed 60 % of eligible costs for an action relating to an objective of the Programme or for the functioning of a non-governmental body. In cases of exceptional utility, the contribution by the Union may be up to 80 % of eligible costs.
Annual work programmes : the Commission shall be responsible for implementing the Programme and establishing annual work programmes by means of implementing acts. The annual work programmes shall set out the actions to be undertaken, including the indicative allocation of financial resources.
Administrative and technical assistance : the financial envelope for the Programme may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities required directly for the management of the Programme and the achievement of its objectives..
Participation of third countries : the programme is open to the participation of third countries subject to the terms outlined in the Regulation.
Methods of implementation : the Commission shall be responsible for the implementation of the Programme. It will deliver the Programme by means of annual work programmes which set out the actions to be undertaken, including the indicative allocation of financial resources.
Consistency and complementarity with other policies : the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union.
Monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of results : the conventional methods of control, monitoring, evaluation, dissemination of results and anti-fraud measures are set out in the Regulation.
The Commission should, in close cooperation with the Member States, monitor the implementation of the actions under the Programme in the light of its objectives and indicators, and shall keep the European Parliament and the Council informed.
Mid-term evaluation report : half way through the duration of the Programme, but not later than 30 June 2017 , the Commission shall draw up and present to the European Parliament and to the Council a mid-term evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of the Programme. The mid-term evaluation report shall, additionally, address the scope for simplification, the internal and external coherence of the Programme, as well as the continued relevance of all objectives.
Where the mid-term evaluation report identifies that one or more thematic priorities cannot be implemented and achieved in line with the objectives of the Programme and within the duration of the Programme, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt, by 31 August 2017, delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 in order to remove the thematic priority concerned or to add new ones.
Annexes : Annex I provides thematic priorities for the implementation of the programme; and Annex II details the criteria for the preparation of the annual work programmes.
Repeal : Decision No 1350/2007/EC shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014 .
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 22.03.2014. The Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2014 .
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delegated acts with regard to the adaptation of the Programme following the conclusions of the mid-term evaluation report . The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections in regard to a delegated act within two months of notification of that act (this period may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or the Council make objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 576 votes to 33 with 39 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Health for Growth Programme, the third multi-annual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise agreement between Parliament and Council. They amend the proposal as follows:
Title: the title of the programme has been amended so as to delete the words ‘health for growth’ and insert in its place a third Programme for the Union's action in the field of health (2014-2020). The new regulation will repeal Decision No 1350/2007/EC.
General objectives : it is specified that the general objectives of the Programme shall be to complement, support to the policies of the Member States to improve the health of Union citizens and reduce health inequalities by:
· encouraging innovation in health,
· increasing the sustainability of health systems and
· protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats,
as well as add value to the policies of the Member States.
Programme actions : actions have been redefined. These must now be aimed at:
· health promotion and disease prevention and fostering supportive environments for healthy lifestyles (exchange of good practice ): this objective shall be measured, in particular, through the increase in the number of Member States involved in health promotion and disease prevention, using evidence-based and good practices through measures and actions taken at the appropriate level in Member States;
· protecting Union citizens from serious cross-border health threats by developing coherent approaches for better preparedness and coordination in health emergencies. This objective shall be measured through the increase in the number of Member States integrating coherent approaches in the design of their preparedness plans;
· supporting public health capacity-building and contribute to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems by developing tools at Union level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and facilitate the voluntary uptake of innovations in public health intervention. This objective shall be measured, through the increase in the advice produced and the number of Member States using the tools and mechanisms identified;
· facilitating access to better and safer healthcare for Union citizens by increasing access to medical expertise, facilitate the application of the results of research and develop tools for the improvement of healthcare quality and patient safety through, actions contributing to the improvement of health literacy. This objective shall be measured, in particular, through the increase in the number of healthcare providers and centres of expertise joining European reference networks,
The specific objectives shall be achieved through actions in line with the thematic priorities listed in Annex I and implemented via the annual work programmes.
Funding: the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 shall be EUR 449 394 000 in current prices.
Types of intervention : this shall take the form of grants, public procurement or any other form of intervention necessary for achieving the objectives of the Programme. Grants may be awarded to fund actions having a clear Union added value co-financed by the competent authorities that are responsible for health in the Member States or in the third countries participating in the Programme if exceptional utility is achieved. This will be the case where at least 30 % of the budget of the proposed action is allocated to Member States whose GNI per inhabitant is less than 90 % of the Union average; and bodies from at least 14 participating countries participate in the action, out of which at least four are countries whose GNI per inhabitant is less than 90 % of the Union average.
Annual work programmes : the Commission shall implement the Programme by establishing annual work programmes adopted by means of implementing acts. These annual work programmes which shall set out, in particular, actions to be undertaken, including the indicative allocation of financial resources.
Mid-term evaluation : half way through the duration of the Programme, but not later than 30 June 2017, the Commission shall draw up and a mid-term evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of the Programme. The report shall, additionally, address the scope for simplification, the internal and external coherence of the Programme, and the continued relevance of all objectives.
Where the mid-term evaluation report identifies that one or more thematic priorities cannot be implemented and achieved in line with the objectives of the Programme and within the duration of the Programme, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt, by 31 August 2017, delegated acts in order to remove the thematic priority or priorities concerned from Annex I or add new thematic priorities.
Annexes: Annex I has been amended to put in new thematic priorities mentioned in the text. A new Annex II sets out the criteria for establishing annual work programmes.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Françoise GROSSETÊTE (EPP, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Health for Growth Programme, the third multi-annual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted in first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Title : Members propose changing the title of the programme to “Health and Growth for Citizens Programme” instead of “Health for Growth Programme.
General objectives : the Programme should respect the competences of Member States in the field of health and their freedom to decide what kind of health services they consider it appropriate to provide, in strict compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. The general objectives of the Programme shall be to complement, support and add value to the policies of the Member States in order to improve physical and mental health and access to healthcare for all EU citizens and reduce health inequalities by addressing the health-related, social and economic challenges posed by an ageing population and the increasing number of chronic illnesses , by:
promoting health and the principle of prevention, encouraging innovation in healthcare, increasing the sustainability and the comparability of health systems, operating within a gender-sensitive framework, protecting EU citizens from serious crossborder health threats.
The objectives shall be achieved through the actions listed in the Annex.
Specific objectives : Members state that the general objectives shall be pursued through the following specific objectives:
develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages or surplus of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate voluntary up-take of innovation in public health interventions, prevention strategies and healthcare management, in order to contribute to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems; increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders, develop shared solutions and guidelines, promote research and comparisons between national health systems to improve health literacy; identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, harmful use of alcohol, an unhealthy diet, a sedentary lifestyle and obesity, drug use and environmental factors, as well as communicable diseases , with a focus on the cross border dimension, and operating in a gender-sensitive framework; contribute to evidence-based decision making by fostering health information, collecting and analysing harmonised health data and disseminating key health indicators .
Financial envelope : in the report, Members point out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal constitutes only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. They stress that the amounts of funding referred to in this legislative procedure may have to be adapted to suit the financial envelope of the Health for Growth Programme in the ongoing negotiations on the multi-annual financial framework. They reiterate that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon. Members point out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5% compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments .
Members note that budgetary resources should be shared out between objectives in a manner proportionate to their probable advantages for EU citizens’ health. There should not, therefore, be a set order of priority for objectives.
Delegated acts : in order to implement the Programme, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of drawing up annual work programmes . As the annual work programme contains elements that are significant policy choices intended to supplement or amend the primary policy shaping elements as established in this Regulation, it is suitable to delegate powers to the Commission in this respect.
Consistency and complementarity : the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union and the activities of agencies whose remit is covered by the Programme.
Key indicators : the Commission should annually monitor the implementation of the programme using key indicators for assessing results and impacts . The indicators, should provide the basis for assessing the extent to which the objectives of the programme have been achieved.
Report : Members suggest that Member States shall report every two years on the measures undertaken and the resources spent on actions under the Programme, including, in particular, networking activities, exchange of best practices and expertise across borders. The Commission shall make the results publicly available and shall ensure they are widely disseminated.
Annex : the annex details the eligible actions, such as:
innovation : f ostering innovation in the field of public health interventions, prevention strategies, health system management and organisation and provision of care, has the potential to improve public health outcomes. Member call for innovative measures to be supported such as health innovation and e-Health : use of intelligent transport systems ( ITS ) by emergency medical services; mental health : a ccording to the WHO, one in four Europeans will have a mental health issue at some time in their lives. Mental health problems are also wide-ranging, long-lasting and a source of discrimination, contributing significantly to inequality in health in the Union. Members call for innovative solutions in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases ; prevention : Members consider that p revention needs to be looked at in its entirety, including primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, in order to stop a disease getting to its final stage. Prevention means primary prevention, including health promotion policies, as well as secondary prevention, including vaccination programmes , early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in order to prevent the development of a disease, as well as tertiary prevention, including methods to mitigate and reduce the complications of a disease. The aim is to identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, harmful use of alcohol, an unhealthy diet, a sedentary lifestyle and obesity, drug use and environmental factors, as well as communicable diseases; synergies : Members consider that this p rogramme should also contribute to creating synergies with the European research field by introducing and applying innovative breakthroughs in the health sector and making sure that limited national European resources are used efficiently; gender dimension, notably in terms of data collection : the report notes that m ajor gaps still exist in expertise and general knowledge about the differences between disease processes in women and men, and further gendersensitive studies, analyses, investigations and sex-disaggregated data would contribute to identifying, disseminating and promoting validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures addressing gender-specific health conditions and diseases; health education : studies show that the Union is lagging far behind many countries in the world as regards health education and patient awareness of safety and quality issues. Members consider it essential to focus more closely on improving EU citizens’ health education and raising awareness among patients and healthcare professionals of safety and quality issues; rare diseases : Members call for support for European cooperation, networking and information in the field of rare diseases as well as emerging rare diseases; resistance to medicine : Members state that the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in medicinal products in both human medicine and veterinary medicine should be improved and that there should be a reduction in the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance, including in the veterinary sector, particularly in hospitals; combat inequality : the programme should develop comparable Union-wide health indicators in order to help reduce inequalities as regards healthcare in the Union; environmental impact on health : according to the WHO, in the WHO European region more than 1.7 million deaths (18% of the total) each year can be ascribed to environmental factors. In this respect, Members call for the exchange knowledge and best practice on the environmental impacts on health; public health threats : t o minimise the public health consequences of cross-border health threats which could range from mass contamination caused by chemical incidents to pandemics, like those unleashed recently by E coli, influenza strain H1N1 or SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) or diseases from developing countries which through global population movements are an increasing reality in some European countries, the Programme should contribute to the creation and maintenance of rob ust mechanisms and tools to detect, assess and manage major cross-border health threats. The EU should be more proactive in implementing its Europe-wide vaccination strategies by ensuring optimal vaccination cover .
The Council agreed a partial general approach on the third multi-annual EU programme in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
The programme aims to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
These general objectives will be pursued through actions grouped under four specific objectives:
(1) innovative and sustainable health systems,
(2) increased access to better and safer healthcare,
(3) prevention of diseases and promotion of good health and
(4) protection from cross-border health threats.
The general approach is partial since the budget to be made available for the next EU public health programme will depend on the outcome of the negotiations on the next multiannual framework. The Commission proposed to support the new programme with an amount of EUR 446 million.
The Commission reserves its position on the entire compromise proposal. It particularly highlighted its fundamental disagreement on:
the change of the Title; the reordering of the objectives; the procedure on how to adopt the work programme; the introduction of a no-opinion clause and the footnote regarding drug prevention.
PURPOSE: to establish a Health for Growth, the third multi-annual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the healthcare sector is one of the largest in the EU: it accounts for approximately 10% of the EU’s gross domestic product and employs one in ten workers, with a higher than average proportion of workers with tertiary-level education. Health therefore plays an important role in the Europe 2020 agenda .
As underlined in its Communication of 29 June 2011 entitled “ A budget for Europe 2020 ”, this third programme of EU action in the field of health (2014-2020), ‘Health for Growth’, strengthens and emphasises the links between economic growth and a healthy population to a greater extent than the previous programmes. The Programme is geared towards actions with clear EU added value .
The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with Member States to:
encourage innovation in healthcare, increase the sustainability of health systems, and improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment looked at different options for the programme and their expected impact:
Option 1 : minimal action: this option corresponds to the absolute minimum of actions resulting from the legal obligations imposed by the Treaty and the existing EU acquis in the field of medicinal products, medical devices, substances of human origin, patients rights in cross border healthcare, Health security (cross border health threats) and tobacco. Option 2 : baseline scenario: this option implies continuing the programme in its present form with no changes consequently to the findings of the evaluations, in addition to the direct legal obligations.
· Option 3, sub-option A : this option corresponds to a well structured programme, with SMART objectives, prioritised actions, creating EU added value and with better monitoring of outcomes and impacts. It will be focused on: i) supporting actions required by the current EU health and internal market legislation, ii) supporting the up-take of innovative solutions for improving specific points concerning the quality, efficiency and sustainability of health systems, iii) prevention of diseases at EU level by helping and complementing Member States’ efforts to increase their citizens’ number of healthy life years (HLY), including the aspect of reduction of health inequalities but mainly by other means than the resources of the Programme and limited to development of working methods and policy evaluation; iv) supporting and complementing Member States efforts in protecting citizens from cross-border health threats.
· Sub-option 3, sub-option B: this option corresponds to a well structured programme but dealing only with one of the general objectives as a trade off. This programme would be focused on: i) supporting actions required by the current EU health and internal market legislation, ii) supporting the up-take of innovative solutions for improving specific points concerning the quality, efficiency and sustainability of health, iii) supporting and complementing Member States efforts in protecting citizens from cross-border health threats.
· Sub-option 3, sub-option C: this option corresponds to a programme limited to supporting actions required by the current EU health related legislation and to supporting solutions for cross border health threats. In addition, there would be some dissemination of the results of the current Health Programme (2008–2013) in order to take into account the conclusions of previous evaluations.
Option 4: this corresponds to a well-structured programme focusing on the same issues as option 3 A but adding a specific objective for addressing wider, social and economic, causes of health inequalities by appropriate financial means. This option would imply a significant increase of the envelope for the Programme.
Following analysis of the results, Option 3A is the preferred option .
LEGAL BASIS: Article 168 (5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
It focuses on four specific objectives with a strong potential for economic growth through better health:
1) to develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems ;
2) to increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders and to develop shared solutions and guidelines to improve healthcare quality and patient safety in order to increase access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens;
3) to identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol and obesity, as well as HIV/AIDS, with a focus on the cross border dimension, in order to prevent diseases and promote good health; and
4) to develop common approaches and demonstrate their value for better preparedness and coordination in health emergencies in order to protect citizens from crossborder health threats.
Eligible actions: the proposal lays down the actions eligible under the programme. Actions that will be eligible will be those that:
Contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems : e.g. developing EU cooperation on Health Technology Assessment; promoting the uptake of health innovation and e-Health by increasing the interoperability of e-Health applications; supporting the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, a pilot project under Europe 2020 flagship initiative Innovation Union; fostering a health knowledge system,…
Increase access to better and safer healthcare for citizens : e.g. supporting action on rare diseases including creation of European Reference Networks; strengthening collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by increasing the availability of information to patients, exchanging of best practices and development of guidelines; developing guidelines to improve the prudent use of antimicrobials in human medicine and reducing the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance,…
Promote good health and preventing diseases : e.g. exchanging best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol and obesity; supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities,…
Protect citizens from cross border health threats : e.g. strengthening preparedness and response for serious cross border health threats; supporting capacity building against health threats in Member States,…
A more detailed description of the content those actions may have is included in Annex I of the proposed Regulation.
Participation of third countries: the Programme shall be open on a cost basis, to the participation of third countries, in particular of:
· acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidates benefiting from a pre-accession strategy,
· EFTA/EEA countries,
· neighbouring countries and the countries to which the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) applies,
· other countries in accordance with the conditions laid down by a relevant bilateral or multilateral agreement.
Types of intervention and participation: financial contributions by the Union may take the form of either grants or public procurement or any other interventions necessary for achieving the objectives of the Programme. The proposal describes the forms of intervention by type of action eligible. Overall; the design of the revised programme favours simplification of interventions:
· simplified rules,
· reducing the costs of participation,
· accelerating award procedures, and
· providing a "one-stop shop" to make it easier for beneficiaries to access EU funding.
Budget and rate of co-financing : the programme will have a budget of EUR 446 million from 2014-2020. The level of Union co-financing for grants for actions, actions co-financed by the competent authorities of the Member States or third countries, or by non-governmental bodies mandated by these authorities and operating grants will be harmonised at 60% of eligible costs and up to 80% in cases of exceptional utility .
Provisions are foreseen to define the rules regarding eligibility for grants for actions covered by the Programme. Grants may be awarded to legally established organisations, public authorities, public sector bodies, in particular research and health institutions, universities and higher education establishments and undertakings, in accordance with strictly defined criteria.
Administrative and technical assistance : the financial allocation for the Programme may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities required directly for the management of the Programme and the achievement of its objectives, in particular studies, meetings, information and communication actions, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the EU, as well as all other technical and administrative assistance expense incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme.
Methods of implementation: the Commission shall be responsible for the implementation of the Programme by drawing up annual work programmes establishing the priorities and actions to be undertaken, as well as other detailed eligibility criteria for the beneficiaries. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
Consistency and complementarity with other policies: the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union.
Monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of results: the usual methods of monitoring, evaluation, dissemination of results and combating fraud are foreseen in the proposal. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, monitor the implementation of the actions under the programme in the light of its objectives and indicators and keep the European Parliament informed thereof.
Reporting : no later then mid-2018, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, in view of a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The longer-term impacts and the sustainability of effects of the Health for Growth Programme should be evaluated with a view to feeding into a decision on a possible renewal, modification or suspension of a subsequent programme.
It should be noted that the Member States shall designate National Focal Points which shall assist the Commission in the promotion of the Programme, the dissemination of its results and the information on its impacts in their respective countries.
Repeal: Decision No 1350/2007/EC shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the financial appropriations for implementing the programme over the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 will amount to EUR 446 million (in current prices).
PURPOSE: to establish a Health for Growth, the third multi-annual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the healthcare sector is one of the largest in the EU: it accounts for approximately 10% of the EU’s gross domestic product and employs one in ten workers, with a higher than average proportion of workers with tertiary-level education. Health therefore plays an important role in the Europe 2020 agenda .
As underlined in its Communication of 29 June 2011 entitled “ A budget for Europe 2020 ”, this third programme of EU action in the field of health (2014-2020), ‘Health for Growth’, strengthens and emphasises the links between economic growth and a healthy population to a greater extent than the previous programmes. The Programme is geared towards actions with clear EU added value .
The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with Member States to:
encourage innovation in healthcare, increase the sustainability of health systems, and improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment looked at different options for the programme and their expected impact:
Option 1 : minimal action: this option corresponds to the absolute minimum of actions resulting from the legal obligations imposed by the Treaty and the existing EU acquis in the field of medicinal products, medical devices, substances of human origin, patients rights in cross border healthcare, Health security (cross border health threats) and tobacco. Option 2 : baseline scenario: this option implies continuing the programme in its present form with no changes consequently to the findings of the evaluations, in addition to the direct legal obligations.
· Option 3, sub-option A : this option corresponds to a well structured programme, with SMART objectives, prioritised actions, creating EU added value and with better monitoring of outcomes and impacts. It will be focused on: i) supporting actions required by the current EU health and internal market legislation, ii) supporting the up-take of innovative solutions for improving specific points concerning the quality, efficiency and sustainability of health systems, iii) prevention of diseases at EU level by helping and complementing Member States’ efforts to increase their citizens’ number of healthy life years (HLY), including the aspect of reduction of health inequalities but mainly by other means than the resources of the Programme and limited to development of working methods and policy evaluation; iv) supporting and complementing Member States efforts in protecting citizens from cross-border health threats.
· Sub-option 3, sub-option B: this option corresponds to a well structured programme but dealing only with one of the general objectives as a trade off. This programme would be focused on: i) supporting actions required by the current EU health and internal market legislation, ii) supporting the up-take of innovative solutions for improving specific points concerning the quality, efficiency and sustainability of health, iii) supporting and complementing Member States efforts in protecting citizens from cross-border health threats.
· Sub-option 3, sub-option C: this option corresponds to a programme limited to supporting actions required by the current EU health related legislation and to supporting solutions for cross border health threats. In addition, there would be some dissemination of the results of the current Health Programme (2008–2013) in order to take into account the conclusions of previous evaluations.
Option 4: this corresponds to a well-structured programme focusing on the same issues as option 3 A but adding a specific objective for addressing wider, social and economic, causes of health inequalities by appropriate financial means. This option would imply a significant increase of the envelope for the Programme.
Following analysis of the results, Option 3A is the preferred option .
LEGAL BASIS: Article 168 (5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
It focuses on four specific objectives with a strong potential for economic growth through better health:
1) to develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems ;
2) to increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders and to develop shared solutions and guidelines to improve healthcare quality and patient safety in order to increase access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens;
3) to identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol and obesity, as well as HIV/AIDS, with a focus on the cross border dimension, in order to prevent diseases and promote good health; and
4) to develop common approaches and demonstrate their value for better preparedness and coordination in health emergencies in order to protect citizens from crossborder health threats.
Eligible actions: the proposal lays down the actions eligible under the programme. Actions that will be eligible will be those that:
Contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems : e.g. developing EU cooperation on Health Technology Assessment; promoting the uptake of health innovation and e-Health by increasing the interoperability of e-Health applications; supporting the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, a pilot project under Europe 2020 flagship initiative Innovation Union; fostering a health knowledge system,…
Increase access to better and safer healthcare for citizens : e.g. supporting action on rare diseases including creation of European Reference Networks; strengthening collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by increasing the availability of information to patients, exchanging of best practices and development of guidelines; developing guidelines to improve the prudent use of antimicrobials in human medicine and reducing the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance,…
Promote good health and preventing diseases : e.g. exchanging best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol and obesity; supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities,…
Protect citizens from cross border health threats : e.g. strengthening preparedness and response for serious cross border health threats; supporting capacity building against health threats in Member States,…
A more detailed description of the content those actions may have is included in Annex I of the proposed Regulation.
Participation of third countries: the Programme shall be open on a cost basis, to the participation of third countries, in particular of:
· acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidates benefiting from a pre-accession strategy,
· EFTA/EEA countries,
· neighbouring countries and the countries to which the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) applies,
· other countries in accordance with the conditions laid down by a relevant bilateral or multilateral agreement.
Types of intervention and participation: financial contributions by the Union may take the form of either grants or public procurement or any other interventions necessary for achieving the objectives of the Programme. The proposal describes the forms of intervention by type of action eligible. Overall; the design of the revised programme favours simplification of interventions:
· simplified rules,
· reducing the costs of participation,
· accelerating award procedures, and
· providing a "one-stop shop" to make it easier for beneficiaries to access EU funding.
Budget and rate of co-financing : the programme will have a budget of EUR 446 million from 2014-2020. The level of Union co-financing for grants for actions, actions co-financed by the competent authorities of the Member States or third countries, or by non-governmental bodies mandated by these authorities and operating grants will be harmonised at 60% of eligible costs and up to 80% in cases of exceptional utility .
Provisions are foreseen to define the rules regarding eligibility for grants for actions covered by the Programme. Grants may be awarded to legally established organisations, public authorities, public sector bodies, in particular research and health institutions, universities and higher education establishments and undertakings, in accordance with strictly defined criteria.
Administrative and technical assistance : the financial allocation for the Programme may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities required directly for the management of the Programme and the achievement of its objectives, in particular studies, meetings, information and communication actions, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the EU, as well as all other technical and administrative assistance expense incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme.
Methods of implementation: the Commission shall be responsible for the implementation of the Programme by drawing up annual work programmes establishing the priorities and actions to be undertaken, as well as other detailed eligibility criteria for the beneficiaries. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
Consistency and complementarity with other policies: the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union.
Monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of results: the usual methods of monitoring, evaluation, dissemination of results and combating fraud are foreseen in the proposal. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, monitor the implementation of the actions under the programme in the light of its objectives and indicators and keep the European Parliament informed thereof.
Reporting : no later then mid-2018, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, in view of a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The longer-term impacts and the sustainability of effects of the Health for Growth Programme should be evaluated with a view to feeding into a decision on a possible renewal, modification or suspension of a subsequent programme.
It should be noted that the Member States shall designate National Focal Points which shall assist the Commission in the promotion of the Programme, the dissemination of its results and the information on its impacts in their respective countries.
Repeal: Decision No 1350/2007/EC shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the financial appropriations for implementing the programme over the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 will amount to EUR 446 million (in current prices).
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0328
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0186
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0680
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2021)0311
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0691
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2020)0256
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0088
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2020)0052
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0365
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2019)0316
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0818
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0489
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0586
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0331
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0333
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0149
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0119
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)446
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2014/282
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 086 21.03.2014, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00105/2013/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0156/2014
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0224/2012
- Debate in Council: 3177
- Committee opinion: PE487.685
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE489.545
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0067/2012
- Committee opinion: PE480.750
- Committee draft report: PE486.116
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0480/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Debate in Council: 3131
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0709
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1322
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1323
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0709
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0709 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1322 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1323 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0480/2012
- Committee draft report: PE486.116
- Committee opinion: PE480.750
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0067/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE489.545
- Committee opinion: PE487.685
- Draft final act: 00105/2013/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)446
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0149 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0119
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0586 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0331
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0333
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0818 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0489
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0365 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2019)0316
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0088 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0052
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0691 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0256
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0680 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0311
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0328 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0186
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
- Contribution: COM(2011)0709
Activities
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria BADIA i CUTCHET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zdravka BUŠIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Satu HASSI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jolanta Emilia HIBNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zofija MAZEJ KUKOVIČ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Horst SCHNELLHARDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alda SOUSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dame Glenis WILLMOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0224/2012 - Françoise Grossetête - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
244 |
2011/0339(COD)
2012/03/09
ITRE
28 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The actions foreseen in the programme should help to strengthen European public health systems as they are a crucial mechanism to keep social welfare and to reduce inequalities that are worryingly increasing due to the current economic uncertainty.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) To minimise the public health consequences of cross-border health threats which could range from mass contamination caused by chemical incidents to pandemics, like those unleashed recently by E coli, influenza
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) This programme should also contribute to create synergies with the European research field by introducing and applying innovative breakthroughs into health sector and making sure that the limited national European resources are utilized efficiently. In order to translate research into actual innovation within health systems, particular attention should be given to actors with specific vulnerabilities, such as women and children, that make, nevertheless, a crucial contribution to social and economic growth and welfare.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The Programme should be implemented in full respect of the principle of transparency
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems and to reduce inequalities within healthcare European services.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – subparagraph 1 (2) To increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders, and to develop shared solutions and guidelines to improve healthcare quality and patient safety in order to increase access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens throughout the EU.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – subparagraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) 1a. To develop joint approaches and actions and to demonstrate their value for better preparedness and coordination of research into, prevention and treatment of rare diseases which, owing to their low rate of occurrence, can only effectively be addressed at a pan-European level.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) 1a. There should be a substantial balance guaranteed among the four objectives of the Programme.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 1.2 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 1.2 a (new) – 1.2a. Develop e-Health ICT standards and protocols, in order to turn ICT technologies to good use in the field of health in order to guarantee the protection of personal data and protect patients and their privacy;
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 1.2 b (new) – 1.2b. Develop e-Health ICT standards and protocols for emergency services, including the use of intelligent transport systems (ITS) in such services;
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 2.2 – 2.2 Support action on rare diseases including
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 3 .1 Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, the use of drugs, including ethnobotanical substances, abuse of alcohol and obesity;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point 3.2 – 3.2 Supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cardiovascular diseases, hepatitis B and C and cancer, by sharing knowledge and best practice and
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) actions having a clear EU added value co-financed by other public or private bodies, as referred to in article 8 (1), including international organisations active in the area of health and for the latter, where appropriate without previous call for proposal, duly justified in the annual work programmes, in accordance with the EU financial regulations and its implementing rules;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) They are non-governmental, non-profit- making, independent of industry, commercial
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) the actions co-financed by international organisations active in the area of health without previous call for proposal duly justified, in accordance with the EU financial regulations and its implementing rules.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, monitor the implementation of the actions under the programme in the light of its objectives and indicators
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on the way in which the programme is being implemented and on its impact.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later then mid-2018, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission and presented to the European Parliament on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, in view of a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives, as well as the contribution of the measures to the Union priorities of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It shall take into account evaluation results on the long-term impact of the predecessor programme.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.2 a (new) 1.2a. Health innovation and e-Health: use of intelligent transport systems (ITS) by emergency medical services.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.4 a (new) 1.4a. Creating synergies with the European research field so that the main research breakthroughs can be introduced and actually applied into health systems.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 2. To increase access to medical expertise
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 4.1 4.1. Preparedness to and response for serious cross border health threats taking into account and coordinating with global initiatives: put in place common components of generic and specific preparedness planning, including for pandemic influenza, and report regularly on implementation of preparedness plans; bring innovation to patients for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases coming from developing countries which are increasingly becoming a reality in some European countries.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) A high level of health protection
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 5) The programme shall put forward actions in areas where there is evidence of EU added-value on the basis of the following criteria: best practice exchange between Member States; supporting networks for knowledge sharing or mutual learning; addressing cross-border threats to reduce risks and mitigate their consequences; addressing certain issues relating to the Internal Market where the EU has substantial legitimacy to ensure high-quality solutions across Member
source: PE-483.849
2012/05/09
BUDG
10 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe1; reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5% compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; challenges the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its policy priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The World Health Organisation (WHO)
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol, a
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The Programme should focus mainly on cooperation with competent national health
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The programme should promote
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol, a
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union, promoting a multi-fund approach wherever possible.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 source: PE-489.376
2012/05/21
ENVI
206 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 2 – paragraph 2 This objective will be measured
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 2 – paragraph 2 This objective will be measured in particular through the increase of number
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol and obesity, as well as HIV/AIDS, with a focus on the cross border dimension, and operating in a gender-sensitive framework, in order to prevent diseases and promote good health.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, a
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol, a
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol and obesity, as well as HIV/AIDS, with a focus on the cross border dimension, in order to prevent diseases and promote good health, and to empower EU citizens and patients to play an active role in managing their health and healthcare, inter alia by enhancing their health literacy skills.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 1 (3) To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 3 – paragraph 2 This objective will be measured in particular through the increase of number of Member States involved in promoting good health and preventing diseases, using the validated best practices, as well as through the monitoring of health literacy levels across the Union, using appropriate indicators.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 4 – paragraph 1 (4) To develop common approaches and demonstrate their value for better
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 4 a (new) (4a) To address health inequalities within and between Member States. This objective will be measured in particular by the increase in Member States using common approaches and validated practices aiming to improve health across social population gradients.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 4 a (new) (4a) To contribute to evidence-based decision making by fostering health information, collecting and analysing harmonized health data and disseminating key health indicators.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 4 a (new) 4a. Review medical protocols to include streamlining and sustainability criteria with a view to reducing costs and improving quality of life.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part (1) Contributing to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems:
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.3 – 1.3. Support the sustainability of EU health workforce by promoting effective forecasting
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.3 – 1.3. Support the sustainability of EU health workforce by promoting effective forecasting
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.3a. (new) - 1.3a. Support the mobility of health workforce and eHealth development within the Union in order to address shortages or surplus of human resources;
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.3 a (new) - 1.3a. Promote and support the exchange of best practices and pilot projects aiming at fostering innovation in the field of public health interventions, prevention strategies and health system management;
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.3 b (new) - 1.3b. Support the incorporation of information and communications technology in the health systems in order to facilitate information management and communication processes and the Member States may voluntarily encourage the participation of the possible excess health work force in related projects;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.4 – 1.4. Provide expertise to assist Member
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.4 – 1.4. Provide expertise to assist Member States undertaking health systems reforms, including through the development of primary healthcare;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.4 – 1.4. Provide expertise to assist Member States undertaking health systems reforms, including through the development of primary healthcare;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.5 – 1.5. Support to the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, a pilot project under Europe 2020 flagship initiative Innovation Union, including through the promotion of and support for scientifically validated natural treatments designed to prevent disease and restore and maintain public health;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.7 – 1.7. Foster a health knowledge system, including standardised methods for data collection, coordination, collection and monitoring of data on chronic diseases and Scientific Committees, to contribute to evidence-based decision making.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.7 a (new) - 1.7a. Encourage the compilation of statistics comparing individual national health systems in Europe.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – indent 1.7 a (new) - 1.7a. Take action to combat medical malpractice, especially in homes for the elderly.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.2 – 2.2. Support action
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.2 – 2.2. Support action on rare diseases and childhood diseases (including prematurity) including creation of European Reference Networks (in accordance with 2.1), information and registries based on the common criteria for accreditation;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.2 – 2.2. Support action on rare diseases including creation of European Reference Networks (in accordance with 2.1) and centres of expertise, information and registries based on the common criteria for accreditation;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.3 – 2.3. Strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by increasing the availability of information to patients, improve access to appropriate and high quality health care, exchange of best practices and development of clinical and treatment guidelines; support action on
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.3 – 2.3. Strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.3 – 2.3. Strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by increasing the availability of information to patients, exchange of best practices and development of guidelines; support action on chronic disease
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.3 – 2.3. Strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, by i
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.4 – 2.4. Develop guidelines to improve the prudent use of antimicrobials in human medicine and reduce the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance, and improve networking among all healthcare actors in relation to dealing with antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.4 – 2.4. Develop guidelines to improve the prudent use of antimicrobials in
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.5 – 2.5. Actions required by or contributing to the objectives of EU legislation in the fields of tissues and cells, blood, organs, patients' rights in cross-border healthcare
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.5 – 2.5. Actions required by or contributing to the objectives of EU legislation in the fields of tissues and cells, blood, organs, patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare and medicinal products, fully respecting the competences and ethical choices of Member States in these fields;
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – indent 2.6 a (new) - 2.6a. Strengthen the patient-centredness and comprehensibility of health systems and enhance citizens' health literacy to make health systems better accessible and understandable for patients.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) Promoting health literacy, good health and preventing diseases:
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention,
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, drug use, abuse of alcohol, internal and external air pollution and obesity;
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as the elimination of environmental health risks, smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol and obesity;
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol, a sedentary lifestyle, an unhealthy diet and obesity;
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol and obesity and health promotion programmes aimed at the general public;
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 – 3.1. Exchange best practices on key health issues such as smoking prevention, mental health, abuse of alcohol and obesity;
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 a (new) - 3.1a. Support effective response to communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and hepatitis by identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of good practices for cost effective prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care;
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.1 b (new) - 3.1b. Support the exchange of good practices to reduce drug-related health damage, including information and prevention;
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.2 – 3.2. Supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer, taking into account the differences between disease processes in women and men, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities;
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.2 – 3.2. Supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge and best practice, developing guidelines regarding the underlying environmental factors of chronic diseases and developing joint activities;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.2 – 3.2. Supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.2 – 3.2. Supporting the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities, including activities to promote optimum maternal and neonatal health;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.2 a (new) – 3.2a. Supporting the early diagnosis of neurogenerative and other brain diseases, by sharing knowledge and best practice and developing joint activities;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.3 – 3.3. Actions required by or contributing to the objectives of EU legislation in the fields of
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.3 a (new) - 3.3a. Advance health literacy in the European population through specific programmes in all areas such as health promotion, prevention and patient-centred care;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.3 b (new) - 3.3b. ensure that health systems are designed to make citizens able to access, understand, appraise and apply information to make decisions in terms of disease prevention, health promotion and healthcare, and hence make better and more sustainable use of health services;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.4 a (new) - 3.4a. To develop common tools and mechanisms at Union level to promote mental health and develop appropriate services to treat patients suffering from poor mental health in order to reduce absenteeism, improve productivity and alleviate human suffering.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – indent 3.4 a (new) – 3.4a. Recognising, promoting, and supporting the beneficial role of thermal cures in prevention and in the recovery and maintenance of health.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Promoting activities aimed at protecting people from second-hand tobacco smoke at workplaces, as referred to in Council Recommendation of 30 November 2009 on smoke-free environments (2009/C 296/02)1; _______________ 1 . OJ C 296, 5.12.2009, p. 4.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – indent 4.1 a (new) - 4.1a. Conduct studies and make proposals on how to facilitate the cross- border treatment of patients, with a view to drawing up a common inventory of healthcare services for all Member States and protocols for the chronically ill.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – indent 4.3 a (new) - 4.3a. Launch pilot programmes to encourage the involvement of non- medical healthcare professionals in the follow-up treatment of long-term patients, thereby increasing the care options open to them.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – indent 4.5 a (new) - 4.5a. Promote activities on climate adaptation to protect public health, including assessing health risks from climate change and enhanced preparedness; and support for climate mitigation activities;
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) actions having a clear EU added value co-financed by the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for Public Health or the third countries participating pursuant to Article 6, or by non- governmental bodies and specialised networks mandated by these competent authorities;
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) actions having a clear EU added value co-financed by the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for Public Health or the third countries participating pursuant to Article 6, or by ano
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the functioning of
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) projects proposed by non- governmental bodies that are in pursuit of the implementation of the annual work programme.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 60 % of eligible costs for the functioning of a non-governmental body or its projects. In cases of exceptional utility such bodies may benefit from a financial contribution
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 60 % of eligible costs for the functioning of a
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The grants for actions referred to under Article 7 (2) (a) and (b) may be awarded to
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The grants for the functioning of bodies and projects referred to under Article 7 (2) (c) and (c a) may be awarded to the bodies which comply with all the following criteria:
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) They are non-
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) They are active at the Union level and in at least
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) They are active at the Union level and
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 1. The Commission shall
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall implement the Programme by establishing annual work programmes, with the input from health stakeholders and their representative organizations, including patients, setting out the elements provided in the Financial Regulation and in particular:
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) detailed eligibility criteria for the beneficiaries in compliance with Article 8, in particular concerning legal independence, financial independence, transparency of the applicants' activities and funding and effective assessment of independence;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union, in particular in the area of the environment and climate policy.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency and complementarity between the Programme and other policies, instruments and actions of the Union and the activities of agencies whose remit is covered by the Programme.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States and health stakeholders and their representative organizations, including patients, monitor the implementation of the actions under the programme in the light of its objectives and indicators, including information on the amount of climate related expenditure. It shall report thereon to the committee referred to in Article 13, and shall keep the European Parliament and the Council informed.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later than mid-201
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later than mid-2018, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, in view of a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives, as well as the contribution of the measures to
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The longer-term impacts and the sustainability of effects of the Health for
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall make the results
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 Member States shall designate National Focal Points which shall assist the Commission in the promotion of the Programme, the dissemination of the results of the Programme and the information on impacts generated by the Programme in their respective countries. The National Focal Points shall, in addition, compile comparative statistics on the individual national health systems with a view to identifying best practice.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Article 16a Exercise of delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 11 shall be conferred on the Commission for the period of seven years from...* and for the duration of the Programme. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 11 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 11 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council. ____________ * OJ please insert the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – introductory part 1. Developing common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and facilitating voluntary up-take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative, efficient, and sustainable health systems
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.2 1.2. Health innovation and e-Health: increasing the interoperability of patient registers and other e-Health solutions, including voluntary use of a health card containing relevant patient information; supporting European cooperation on e- Health, notably on registries and uptake by health professionals. This will serve the European voluntary network on e-Health set up by
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 1.3. Health workforce: develop effective health workforce forecasting and planning in terms of numbers, gender equality, scope of practice and skills, monitor mobility (within the Union) and migration of health professionals, establish efficient recruitment and retention strategies and capacity development.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 a (new) 1.5a. Support for the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020, especially in the area for action relating to health.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 a (new) 1.5a. Develop digital networks, programmes and content for the elderly providing information and details of specific programmes on sport, nutrition and how to use the Internet.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.7 a (new) 1.7a. Actions required to facilitate the continuous monitoring of health literacy in the Union and to develop effective approaches for advancing health literacy in the work force and for the design of health literate service provision
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.7 a (new) 1.7a. Alternatives to patent monopolies: Assessment of Innovation Inducement Prizes for a variety of diseases, including cancer, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis to address medical needs and Open Source Research to allow researchers to collaborate and share knowledge on medicine research;
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.7 a (new) 1.7a. Common assessment criteria, to be laid down by the Commission in agreement with the authorities of the Member States for the purpose of evaluating results and the improvements achieved.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – introductory part 2. Increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders and developing shared solutions and guidelines to improve healthcare quality and patient safety in order to increase access to better and safer healthcare for EU citizens in line with the Union's fundamental values of universality, high quality, equity of access and solidarity.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.2 2.2 Rare diseases: support
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.2 2.2. Rare diseases and childhood diseases, including prematurity: support Member States, patient organisations and stakeholders by coordinated action at Union level in order to effectively help patients affected by rare diseases and children affected by serious diseases (including prematurity). This includes creation of reference networks (in compliance with point 2.1), information and registries for rare diseases based on the common criteria of accreditation.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.2 2.2. Rare diseases: support Member States, patient organisations and stakeholders by coordinated action at Union level in order to effectively help patients affected by rare diseases as well as emerging rare diseases. This includes creation of centres of expertise, reference networks (in compliance with point 2.1), information and registries for rare diseases based on the common criteria of accreditation.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.2 a (new) 2.2 a. Age-related diseases: support actions that promote cooperation, exchange of information and the development of research programmes on age-related diseases, including neurodegenerative, cardiovascular and rheumatologic diseases, and on side effects associated with polypharmacy.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.3 2.3. Quality and safety: strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, including complementary and alternative medicine, through, inter alia, implementing the Council Recommendation on patient safety and the prevention and control of healthcare- associated infections; exchange best practice on complementary and alternative medicine; exchange best practice on quality assurance systems; develop guidelines and tools to promote patient safety and quality; increase the availability of information to patients on safety and quality, improve feedback and interaction between health providers and patients; support action to exchange knowledge and best practice on chronic diseases care, the response of health systems and research including development of European guidelines.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.3 2.3. Quality and safety: strengthen collaboration on patient safety and quality of healthcare, through, inter alia, implementing the Council Recommendation on patient safety and the prevention and control of healthcare- associated infections; exchange best practice on quality assurance systems; develop guidelines and tools to promote patient safety and quality; develop health education for EU citizens; increase the availability of information to patients on safety and quality, improve feedback and interaction between health providers and patients; support action to exchange knowledge and best practice on chronic diseases care, the response of health systems and research including development of European guidelines.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.4 2.4. Safety: improve the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in medicinal products and reduce the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance; reduce the burden of resistant infections and healthcare- associated infections and secure the availability of effective antimicrobials; promote the establishment of a European system of interoperable national registers of patients who, as a result of medical errors or vaccine therapies, have contracted serious diseases, chronic illnesses, or disabilities, one of its aims being to encourage Member States to grant fair compensation to such patients and allow them to receive appropriate treatments free of charge.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.4 2.4. Safety: improve the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in medicinal products and reduce the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance; reduce the burden of resistant infections and healthcare- associated infections and secure the availability of effective antimicrobials; sustained investment in improving methods of analysis to detect and prevent resistance.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.4 2.4. Safety: improve the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in medicinal products and reduce the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance, including in the veterinary sector; reduce the burden of resistant infections and healthcare- associated infections and secure the
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.5 2.5. Actions required by or contributing to the implementation of Union legislation in the fields of tissues and cells, blood
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.6 a (new) Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – introductory part 3. Identifying, disseminating and promoting up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – introductory part 3. Identifying, disseminating and promoting up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol, unhealthy diet, a sedentary lifestyle and
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – introductory part 3. Identifying, disseminating and promoting up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, a
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – introductory part 3. To identify, disseminate and promote the up-take of validated best practices for cost- effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – introductory part 3. Identifying, disseminating and promoting up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measure by addressing the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol, a
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures: this will include actions towards the setting up of pan- European networks and partnerships engaging wide range of actors in communication and awareness raising actions on key health issues such as smoking
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures of communicable and non-communicable diseases: this will include actions towards the setting up of pan-
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures: this will include actions towards the setting up of pan- European networks and partnerships engaging wide range of actors in improving health literacy through communication and awareness raising actions on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol, addressing obesity and low physical activity with a focus on the cross-border dimension and on Member States with no or little action on these issues.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures:
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures: this will include actions towards the setting up of pan- European networks and partnerships engaging wide range of actors in communication and awareness raising actions on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol, addressing obesity with a focus on the cross-border dimension and on Member States with no or little action on these issues, and operating in a gender-sensitive framework.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 3.1. Cost-effective promotion and prevention measures: this will include actions towards the setting up of pan- European networks and partnerships engaging wide range of actors in communication and awareness raising actions on key health issues such as smoking prevention, abuse of alcohol, addressing obesity and health promotion with a focus on the cross-border dimension and on Member States with no or little action on these issues.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 a (new) 3.1a. Support effective responses to communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and hepatitis by identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of good practices for cost effective prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 b (new) 3.1b. Support the exchange of good practices to reduce drug-related health damage, including information and prevention.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge, good practice, promoting education and developing joint activities on prevention
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking through joint actions on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, the differences between disease processes in women and men, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention. Cancer: follow-up work already undertaken; set up a European cancer information system with comparable data; support cancer screening, including voluntary accreditation mechanisms; support the development of European guidelines for prevention where
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention and enhancing health literacy. Cancer: follow- up work already undertaken; set up a European cancer information system with comparable data; support cancer screening, including voluntary accreditation mechanisms; support the development of European guidelines for prevention where major inequalities exist.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention. Cancer: follow-up work already undertaken; set up a European cancer information system with comparable data; support cancer screening, including voluntary accreditation mechanisms; support the development of European guidelines for prevention where major inequalities exist. Neurodegenerative diseases: improve prevention, diagnostic visualisation methods, early diagnosis methods, standardisation criteria and diagnostic measures, draw up treatment strategies and carry out clinical trials of new chemical and biological agents, vaccines and technologies.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2 3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer (including activities to promote optimum maternal and neonatal health), by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention. Cancer: follow-up work already undertaken; set up a European cancer information system with comparable data; support cancer screening, including voluntary accreditation
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 4 – point 4.3 4.3. Support capacity building against health threats in Member States: develop preparedness and response planning, public health response coordination, common approaches on vaccination; develop guidelines on protective measures in an emergency situation, guidelines on information and guides to good practice; set up a new mechanism for joint procurement of medical countermeasures; develop common communication strategies; strengthen cooperation among the Member States in order to address the impact on public health systems from the increasing flows of illegal migration.
Amendment 23 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the amounts of funding referred to in this legislative procedure may have to be adapted to suit the financial envelope of the Health for
Amendment 24 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the amounts of funding referred to in this legislative procedure may have to be adapted to suit the financial envelope of the Improved Health for Sustainable Growth Programme in the ongoing negotiations on the multi-annual financial framework;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing a Health
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing a Health for
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing a Health for Citizens and Growth Programme, the third multi-
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Better Health for Sustainable Growth Programme, the third multi-annual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020 (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing an Improved Health for Sustainable Growth Programme, the third multi-
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 a (new) – Having regard to its resolution of 9 October 2008 on "Together for Health: A Strategic approach for the EU 2008- 2013"1, _______________ 1. OJ C 9E, 15.1.2010, p.56.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 b (new) – Having regard to the White paper - Together for Health: A strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013 (COM (2007)630 final),
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) – Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 35 thereof,
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 5 a (new) – Having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on reducing health inequalities in the EU1, _______________ 1 P7_TA(2011)0081.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) A high level of health protection should be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities, in accordance with Article 168 of the Treaty and Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The Union shall complement
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Continued effort is required in order to meet the requirements set out in Article 168 of the Treaty.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Continued effort is required in order to meet the requirements set out in Article 168 of the Treaty. Promoting good health at EU level is an integral part of the ‘Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. Keeping people healthy and active for longer
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Continued effort is required in order to meet the requirements set out in Article 168 of the Treaty. Promoting good health at EU level is an integral part of the ‘Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. Keeping people healthy and active for longer will have positive overall health effects, and a positive impact on productivity and competitiveness, while reducing pressures on national budgets. Innovation in health helps take up the challenge of sustainability in the sector in the context of demographic change, and action to reduce inequalities in health is important to achieve ‘inclusive growth’ and contribute to the Union's objective of 'well-being of its peoples' set out in Article 3 of the Treaty. It is appropriate in this context to establish a
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Continued effort is required in order to meet the requirements set out in Article 168 of the Treaty. Promoting good mental and physical health at EU level is an integral part of the ‘Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’. Keeping people healthy and active for longer will have positive overall health effects, and a positive impact on productivity and competitiveness, while reducing pressures on national budgets. Innovation in health helps take up the challenge of sustainability in the sector in the context of demographic change, and action to reduce inequalities in mental and physical health is important to achieve ‘inclusive growth’. It is appropriate in this context to establish a ‘Health for Growth’ Programme, the third programme of EU action on health (2014-
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The economic crisis has had a detrimental effect on the health of many EU citizens, particularly on mental health, and on the capacity of Member States' healthcare systems. The Programme should aim to help mitigate the negative effect of the economic crisis on mental and physical health.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The new Programme should also build on the activities and achievements carried out under the European Pact for Mental Health and Well-being of 13 June 2008 and explicitly recognise the irrefutable link between physical and mental health.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In line with the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Programme should focus on a set of well defined objectives and actions with clear, proven
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The programme shall put forward actions in areas where there is evidence of EU added-value on the basis of the following criteria: best practice exchange between Member States; supporting networks for knowledge sharing or mutual learning; achieving key social objectives such as promotion of equity and solidarity and reduction of health inequalities; addressing cross-border threats to reduce risks and mitigate their consequences; addressing certain issues relating to the Internal Market where the EU has substantial legitimacy to ensure high- quality solutions across Member States; unlocking the potential of innovation in health; actions that could lead to a system for benchmarking to allow informed decision-making at European level; improving economies of scale by avoiding waste due to duplication and
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The programme should respect the competences of Member States in the field of health and their freedom to decide what kind of health services they consider it appropriate to provide, in strict compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, including respect for the different management systems and for the specific approaches chosen by the Member States in integrating public and private provision of healthcare services.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5b) Where ethical issues arise, it remains within the competence of the Member States to determine whether or not a given service constitutes a health service.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The World Health Organisation (WHO) European Health Report 2009 identifies scope for increasing investment in public health and health systems. In this regard, Member States are encouraged to identify mental and physical health improvement as a priority in their national programmes and to benefit from better awareness of the possibilities of EU funding for health. Therefore, the Programme should facilitate the uptake of its results into the national health policies.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Whereas the austerity measures in all Member States affect health care by decreasing public expenditure and consequently increasing unequal accessibility to health care for people with low income. The Programme should therefore facilitate the funding of national public health care.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Innovation in health
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Innovation in health in terms of products, and services, health promotion, disease prevention, timely diagnosis, appropriate treatment and rehabilitation and the organisation and provision of care, has the potential to enhance the quality of care to patients and respond to unmet needs, while also improving the cost- efficiency and sustainability of care. Therefore, the Programme should facilitate the uptake of innovation in healthcare in the broadest sense.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Taking into consideration (a) the increasingly ageing population and (b) the mounting pressure to the public finances and private productivity, due to the increase of expenses for this ageing population which is a structural problem for the Member States, the Programme should also support the firm promotion of the principle of prevention (in terms of medical practices as well as in terms of encouraging healthier lifestyles) and the introduction of e-health services. Health indicators will contribute to significant improvement of the economic indicators.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The position of the patient should be strengthened by enhancing health literacy to achieve better and safer health outcomes.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, a
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote physical and mental health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU, and are often accompanied by mental health problems. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol and obesity, as well as on HIV/AIDS, the Programme will contribute to prevent diseases and promote good health, also bearing in mind underlying factors of a social and environmental nature.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of alcohol
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In the context of an ageing society, well-directed investments to promote health and prevent diseases can increase the number of ‘healthy life years’ and thus enable the elderly to continue working as they grow older. Chronic diseases are responsible for over 80% of premature mortality in the EU. By identifying, disseminating and promoting the up-take of validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures focused on the key risk factors, namely smoking, abuse of
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) In addition to differences related to reproductive functions, biological differences between women and men also include, for example, the better infant survival rates of females, sex-specific diseases, distinctions in symptoms of diseases, or women's longer life expectancy, which in combination with existing social factors embodied by gender inequalities such as lesser access to resources, heavier workload, gender- based violence against women and gender-based discrimination, significantly affect the health status of women and therefore call for an adequate integration of gender as a determinant of health into public health policies.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Prevention means primary prevention, including health promotion policies, as well as secondary prevention, including vaccination programmes, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in order to prevent the development of a disease, as well as tertiary prevention, including methods to mitigate and reduce the complications of a disease.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Whereas, with an ageing population and changing family structures, the demand for formal, professionalised care is increasing as the availability of informal care in the family environment is declining. Healthcare has also become more specialised and requires more intense work and longer training. By 2020 there will be a shortage of one million health workers in the Union and, should no action be taken, 15% of necessary care will not be covered, the Programme should be addressed in order to create significant employment opportunities.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The links between the environment and health are now well documented. According to the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) 2009 report on health in Europe, in the WHO European region more than 1.7 million deaths (18 % of the total) each year can be ascribed to environmental factors. The risk factors have a clear cross-border dimension. By way of an example, atmospheric pollution increases the prevalence of respiratory problems and cardiovascular disease. By the same token, the presence of toxic products in the water, the air, the soil, housing and foodstuffs can have a serious impact on health, in particular for the most vulnerable groups, such as children or the elderly. The EU should therefore provide the Member States with support in preventing and reducing environmental health risks.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 b (new) (10b) Major gaps still exist in expertise and general knowledge about the differences between disease processes in women and men, and further gender- sensitive studies, analyses, investigations and sex-disaggregated data would contribute to identifying, disseminating and promoting validated best practices for cost-effective prevention measures addressing gender specific health conditions and diseases.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) To minimise the public health consequences of cross-border health threats which could range from mass contamination caused by chemical incidents to pandemics, like those unleashed recently by E coli, influenza strain H1N1 or SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), the Programme should contribute to the creation and maintenance of robust mechanisms and tools to detect, assess and manage major cross-border health threats. Due to the nature of these threats, the Programme should support coordinated public health measures at EU level to address different aspects, building on preparedness and response planning, robust and reliable risk assessment and a strong risk and crisis management framework. In this context, it is important that the programme should benefit from complementarity with the work programme of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in the fight against communicable diseases and the activities supported under the Unions programmes for research and innovation. Special efforts should be undertaken to
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) To minimise the public health consequences of cross-border health threats which could range from mass contamination caused by chemical
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In accordance with art 114 of the Treaty, a high level of health protection should be ensured in the legislation adopted by the Union for the establishment and the functioning of the Internal Market. In line with this objective, the Programme should undertake special efforts to support actions required by and contributing to the aims of EU legislation in the fields of medicinal products, medical devices, human tissues and cells, blood, human organs, communicable diseases and other health threats, patients' rights in cross- border healthcare (e.g. access to centres of expertise) and tobacco products and advertisement.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Studies show that the European Union lags well behind many countries in the world as regards patient awareness of safety and quality issues; it is essential, therefore, to focus more closely on raising awareness among patients and healthcare professionals of safety and quality issues.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 b (new) (13b) Studies show that the European Union lags well behind many countries in the world as regards health education and patient awareness of safety and quality issues; it is essential, therefore, to focus more closely on improving EU citizens’ health education and raising awareness among patients and healthcare professionals of safety and quality issues.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The Programme should recognise the importance of a holistic approach to public health and take into account, where appropriate and where there is scientific or clinical evidence about its efficacy, complementary and alternative medicine in its actions.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The programme should promote synergies while avoiding duplication with related Union programmes and actions. Appropriate use should be made of other Union funds and programmes, in particular the current and future Union framework programmes for research and innovation and their outcomes, the Structural Funds, the Programme for social change and innovation, the European Solidarity Fund, the European strategy for health at work, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme, the Framework Programme for Environment and Climate action (LIFE), the programme of Union action in the field of consumer policy (2014-2020), the Justice programme (2014-2020), the Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme,
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) According to forecasts, the number of persons suffering from neurodegenerative diseases (such as Parkinson’s disease) is likely to increase in the future. Hitherto, these diseases have not been given the attention they deserve. Research should therefore focus more closely on these diseases and ways of combating them.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 b (new) (16b) Greater attention should be paid to disease prevention, as this would serve to reduce subsequent spending on treatment.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In accordance with Article 49 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, this Regulation provides the legal basis for the action and for the implementation of the Health for
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The value and impact of the Programme should be regularly monitored and evaluated and patients and their representative organizations should be included in this activity. Its evaluation should take into account the fact that the achievement of the Programme's objectives may require a longer time period than its duration.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28a) According to the WHO, mental health problems account for almost 40% of years lived with disability. One in four Europeans will have a mental health issue at some time in their lives. Mental health problems are also wide-ranging, long- lasting and a source of discrimination, contributing significantly to inequality in health in the Union and therefore challenging the European values at their core. Moreover the economic crisis affects the factors determining mental health as protective factors are weakened and risk factors increased. The economic consequences of mental health problems, mainly due to a loss of productivity, are estimated to be 3-4% of the gross national product in the Union. Because mental problems often already start in adolescence or young adulthood, the loss of productivity can therefore be long- lasting, it is of importance to tackle these problems at an early age. However prevention and service provision are often inadequate and persons do not receive the treatment or support that they need. Social support, a healthy community and environment, having adequate employment and access to mental health services can prevent a person from developing mental health problems and increase productivity as a whole for society.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 b (new) (28b) Article 8 makes the promotion of equality an objective of the Union. which states "in all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women." The reduction of inequalities, and in particular health inequalities and the promotion of social cohesion are objectives of the European Union, and the Health for Growth programme helps to meet these aims. Reducing health inequalities will be key to achieving 'Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' 8 objectives of lifting 20 million people out of poverty. Thus the Programme can complement the integrated guideline 10 on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, the Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010- 2015), the Youth Pact, the Disability Strategy, and the European Pact for Mental Health and Wellbeing. The Programme should help to identify the causes of health inequalities and encourage, among other things, the exchange of best practices to tackle them.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 c (new) (28c) The Programme should place emphasis on improving the health condition of children and young people and promoting a healthy lifestyle and a culture of prevention among them.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 d (new) (28d) The Programme should address gender-related and ageing-related health issues.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes a third multi- annual programme of Union action in the field of health, called the Health for
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens, to firmly promote the principle of prevention and protect the
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States and representative health stakeholder organizations to encourage innovation in healthcare in the widest sense and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to address the health- related, social and economic challenges posed by the early ageing of population and the increasing number of chronic illnesses, to improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to equalize the access to healthcare for all European citizens), to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 The general objectives of the Health for Growth Programme shall be to work with the Member States to encourage innovation in healthcare and increase the sustainability of health systems, to improve the physical and mental health of the EU citizens and protect them from cross-border health threats.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare and primary healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems, in primary healthcare, in particular through third-sector involvement.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up-take of innovation in healthcare and primary healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems, including through third-sector involvement.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up-take of innovation in
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate voluntary up- take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1 (1) To develop common tools and mechanisms at EU level to address shortages or surplus of resources, both human and financial, and to facilitate up- take of innovation in healthcare in order to contribute to innovative and sustainable health systems.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 2 – paragraph 1 (2) To increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point 2 – paragraph 1 (2) To increase access to medical expertise and information for specific conditions also beyond national borders,
source: PE-489.545
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1323/COM_SEC(2011)1323_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1323/COM_SEC(2011)1323_EN.pdf |
docs/9 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/25 |
|
docs/26 |
|
docs/27 |
|
docs/27 |
|
docs/28 |
|
docs/28 |
|
docs/29 |
|
docs/29 |
|
docs/30 |
|
docs/30 |
|
docs/31 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0339&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0339&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0480)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0480)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.116New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-486116_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.750&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-480750_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0067)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0067)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.545New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-489545_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.685&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-487685_EN.html |
docs/21 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/23 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/25 |
|
docs/26 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140225&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-02-25-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Decision 1350/2007/EC 2005/0042A(COD) Repealed by 2020/0102(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Decision 1350/2007/EC 2005/0042A(COD)
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/10/body |
EC
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=709New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0709 |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-224&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0224_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0156New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0156_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/07740New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0282New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0282 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0709:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0709:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|