BETA


2011/2244(INI) Equality between women and men in the European Union - 2011

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM IN 'T VELD Sophia (icon: ALDE ALDE) JÁRÓKA Lívia (icon: PPE PPE), ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína (icon: S&D S&D), WERTHMANN Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE), CORNELISSEN Marije (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina (icon: ECR ECR), BLOOM Godfrey (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2013/12/05
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2013/05/29
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In 2002, the Barcelona European Council set objectives in regard to the development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth : Member States were to remove disincentives to female labour force participation, taking into account the demand for childcare facilities and in line with national patterns of provision, to provide childcare by 2010 to at least 90% of children between 3 years old and the mandatory school age and at least 33% of children under 3 years of age.

In 2008, a first review revealed that the demand for formal systems of childcare was far from being met, in particular for children under 3. It highlighted the high costs incurred by parents and the opening hours of facilities, which were incompatible with full-time work. Five years on, it can be seen in this second review undertaken by the European Commission that, despite a slight improvement, these challenges remain.

The report’s main conclusions may be summarised as follows:

A mixed picture: more than 10 years after they were adopted, the Barcelona objectives have not been achieved by most Member States. Furthermore, the situation is deteriorating in several Member States. Significant improvements still need to be made to achieve a satisfactory level of availability , especially for children under 3. Also, the cost of services is still a significant obstacle for parents, as are opening hours , which are not always compatible with their occupational commitments. Investment in quality education and care services that are universal and accessible to all must be continued . This effort must be made largely at Member State level. The Commission is providing support on several fronts.

The development of childcare services under supervision as part of the European Semester: opening up access to the labour market and to employment for a second wage-earner from the household thanks to suitable tax incentives and the introduction of affordable, quality childcare services was identified as a priority in the Annual Growth Survey . Nine Member States (AT, CZ, DE, HU, IT, MT, PL, SK, UK) have received a recommendation on the employment of women and on the availability of childcare services in 2012.

The Structural Funds are an important lever: in the 2007-2013 period, it is estimated that EUR 2.6 billion from the Structural Funds was allocated to actions aiming to promote the employment and sustainable participation of care services for dependants. In addition, around EUR 616 million from the European Development Fund was made available to Member States between 2007 and 2013 to finance childcare infrastructures. Almost all the Member States allocated resources to childcare services. However, the total expenditure varies enormously from one Member State to another depending on the budget available under the Structural Funds and the current state of provision of services.

In the report, the Commission undertakes to:

continue to work with social partners who play a key role in the area of work-life balance in cooperation with the public authorities; strengthen cooperation between its departments working on policies relevant to early childhood education and care (ECEC) , such as justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, education and culture, employment, social policy, health, etc.. continue to monitor the Barcelona objectives by helping the Member States to develop their statistical capacity by improving data collection and refining the way the use of childcare services is measured for the EU SILC survey, in particular by collecting comparable information on the barriers to these services (cost, unmet demand, etc.). continue to support the Member States:

- whenever necessary, throughout the European Semesters, the Commission will continue to adopt specific recommendations calling on the Member States to achieve the Barcelona objectives and to maintain public investment despite the economic crisis;

- when programming the European Funds, the Commission will work together with the Member States to make full use of the cofinancing options offered by the Structural Funds and other Community programmes such as 'Erasmus for all', including during the next programming period, for developing ECEC services and services for other dependent people, staff training and improving service quality .

The report points out that developing childcare services for pre-school children is not enough in itself to give women and men free choice of how to best achieve a work-life balance and it does not take into account the difficulties faced at different stages in life . The Commission must therefore act:

by promoting a combination of measures to achieve a work-life balance consisting of flexible working methods, a family leave system and the availability of affordable, quality care services for pre-school children as well as for pre-adolescent children outside school hours and for other dependants; by also encouraging the Member States to remove barriers (including tax constraints) to occupational activity for women and to encourage fathers to take on more family responsibilities, for example by taking family leave in the same way as women.

This report reflects the Commission's own commitment, within the limits of its competences, to supporting the achievement of the Barcelona objectives and the development of affordable, accessible and quality childcare services in order to eliminate the obstacles to parents' participation in employment, to foster social inclusion and to promote equality of opportunity between women and men.

2013/05/29
   EC - Follow-up document
2012/07/18
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2012/03/13
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 361 votes to 268, with 70 abstentions, on equality between women and men in the European Union – 2011.

Parliament recalls that on average 3 in 10 households in the European Union are single-person households, the majority of them comprising women living alone, and that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty. It stresses that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty, in particular at times of economic adversity. Moreover, cuts in public spending are expected to have a disproportionate impact on female employment and wage difference, as many more women than men are employed in the public sector.

In this context, measures should be taken to reinforce the economic independence of women and their potential to take decisions.

Equal economic independence : Member States are called upon to:

ensure that their marriage and divorce and matrimonial property laws do not directly or indirectly constitute a financial ‘trap’ for the spouses, in particular women, and to ensure that couples who seek marriage are fully informed in a suitable time-frame of the legal and financial implications of marriage and divorce; invest in affordable, high-quality facilities for the care of children, the sick, the disabled, the elderly and other dependent persons, making sure that they have flexible times and are accessible so that as many people as possible can combine professional and private life; move towards individualised systems of social security; develop the legal concept of shared ownership - in order to ensure full recognition of women's rights in the agricultural sector; elaborate proposals for the mutual recognition of civil unions and of same-sex families across Europe between those countries which already have the relevant legislation in place, so as to ensure equal treatment with regard to work, free movement, taxation and social security, etc. (in this regard, Parliament regrets the implementation by some Member States of restrictive definitions of ‘family’ in order to deny legal protection to same-sex couples and their children); promote women’s entrepreneurship, by setting up training and careers and legal advice services and facilitating access to public and private funding; invest current Structural Funds spending for the period 2007-2013 in the development of care services to enable both women and men to combine professional and private life.

Parliament stresses that fiscal consolidation without consideration for gender equality risks leading to increased gender segregation in the labour market, increased precarious work among women, a wider gender pay gap, increased feminisation of poverty and more difficulties in combining caring and working. Income and high-quality gainful employment for women are the key to their economic independence and to greater equality between men and women in society as a whole.

Equal pay for equal work and work of equal value : Parliament notes that, despite countless campaigns, targets and measures in recent years, the gender pay gap remains stubbornly wide, women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men. It recalls that the gender gap is smaller before family formation and increases when individuals form a couple. It points out that a drop in the employment rate occurs for women at first childbirth and the labour market disadvantages accumulate in the earlier stages of their life cycle, connected to child-care, which at a later stage changes into care of elderly people, which often flows into in-work poverty.

Efforts should be redoubled to put European measures in place with the aim of closing this gap:

a multifaceted strategy from European institutions, Member States and the Social Partners to tackle the full range of causes of the persistent gender pay, including a European equal pay target to reduce the pay gap by 10% in each Member State ; a legislative proposal is called for from the Commission on this issue.

Parliament is concerned about the legislation in some Member States which does not expressly prohibit the handing of pre-signed resignation letters to employers when women are recruited, which has the effect of enabling maternity laws to be circumvented.

Equality in decision-making : Parliament regrets that economic recovery projects still focus mainly on male-dominated employment. It calls on the Member States and the Commission to give high priority to addressing barriers to women's participation in the labour market with particular emphasis on women with disabilities, migrant and ethnic minority women, etc.

Once again, it calls for concrete measures to be taken to:

enhance the presence of women in the renewable sector, science and technology-intensive jobs; break down stereotypes; strengthen the presence of women in the 2014 European elections.

Plenary reiterates Parliament’s call in 2011 for legislation, including quotas, to be proposed by 2012 to increase female representation in corporate management bodies to 30% by 2015 and to 40% by 2020 , while taking account of the Member States' responsibilities and of their economic, structural (i.e. company-size related), legal and regional specificities. It is disappointed that the Commission is refraining from taking immediate legislative measures with a view to improving the balance between men and women in economic decision-making.

Noting that the use of electoral quotas has positive effects on women’s representation, Parliament calls on the Member States with particularly low representation of women in political assemblies to consider introducing equivalent measures.

The Member States are called upon to promote female entrepreneurship and to provide financial support, vocational guidance and training to encourage women setting up their own companies.

Dignity, integrity and an end to gender-based violence : welcoming efforts, both at Community and national levels, to combat violence against women (such as the European Protection Order , the Directive on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and the legislative package to strengthen the rights of victims in the EU), Parliament stresses that this phenomenon remains a major unresolved problem. They call on the Commission and the Member States to adopt and implement policies to combat all forms of violence against women including all sexual, physical and psychological abuse, domestic violence, harassment and the need to include the fight against gender-based violence in EU external and development cooperation policies.

Parliament reiterates the need for the Commission to present an EU-wide strategy to end violence against women including a legislative criminal-law instrument to combat gender-based violence as it has already requested in several resolutions.

Parliament also calls for:

the establishment of information programmes concerning harassment and mobbing at work, so that women who are subjected to such treatment can take effective counter-measures; specific actions and resources to combat all forms of violence against women, including so called honour killings, Female Genital Mutilation, forced marriages etc; the introduction of rehabilitation and psychological programmes for perpetrators of physical abuse, which would reduce the incidence of such abuse; the enhancement of social and economic autonomy which are important preconditions for fighting against violence.

Parliament defines domestic violence as including all sexual, physical and psychological abuse. It points out that gender violence claims many lives across the EU each year. It thus calls for adequate measures to be taken so that gender-based violence is treated as a public security issue rather than as a private, domestic issue and as a violation of fundamental rights, by ensuring, amongst other things, access to forms of prevention, legal protection and assistance, including with regard to stalking.

Parliament reiterates its position on sexual and reproductive health rights and the need for these to be safeguarded. It calls for national budgets for family planning and sexual education to be maintained and calls for more HIV/AIDS prevention measures given that 45% of young women and girls who are newly infected with HIV are between the ages of 15 and 24 years old.

The Member States and the Commission are called upon to pay special attention to vulnerable groups of women : disabled women, women of advanced age, women with little or no training, women with dependent persons in their charge, female immigrants and women belonging to minorities, all of whom constitute specific groups on whose behalf measures adapted to their circumstances must be taken.

Gender equality beyond the Union : Parliament calls for human rights for women and the ability to use them effectively to be given the highest priority in the EU’s external policies. Whilst welcoming the Arab Spring, it calls on Commission to develop specific support measures for gender equality in those countries.

Parliament deplores the fact that rape is still used in certain regions of the world as a weapon . It calls on the European External Action Service to include this phenomenon as a priority on its political agenda. Parliament notes that this year the world population has reached 7 billion and expresses its conviction that family planning should be at the top of the political agenda.

As regards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Parliament calls for the improvement of maternal health and reproductive health by 2015 (about 1000 women still die each day from entirely avoidable pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications). It calls on Member States to uphold their political and financial support for the MDGs, despite times of economic downturn.

Parliament welcomes the recent decision of the United Nations to create an International Day of the Girl Child on 11 October , which is a powerful way to highlight the particular needs and rights of girls.

Governance : in an amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament invites the Council to unblock the Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation with a view to adoption during the Danish Presidency. It also calls on the Council, within the on-going negotiations on the EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020, to introduce gender-responsive budgeting in the EU budgetary process.

The Commission is called upon to:

put forward proposals for leave arrangements for care for elderly or sick relatives; put forward a comprehensive communication on the situation of single-person households in the EU, with policy proposals to achieve fair treatment in areas like taxation, social security, housing, healthcare, insurance and pensions; publish reliable gender-disaggregated data and qualitative gender indicators so as to be able to properly evaluate and update the Commission’s Strategy for equality between Women and Men (2010-2015); investigate the treatment of victims of human trafficking and prostitution in the Member States given that, in some cases, these people are treated as criminals instead of getting support.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call on the Commission for a Road Map on Equality for LGBTI people, analogous to the Gender Equality Road Map.

Documents
2012/03/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
2012/03/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/03/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2012/03/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2012/02/27
   EP - Vote in committee
2012/01/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/11/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2011/10/27
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/03/15
   EP - IN 'T VELD Sophia (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2011/02/11
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the Commission Staff Working paper on Annual Report 2010 on equality between men and women.

CONTENT: the report points out that, despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets.

This report takes stock of the situation for gender equality in the European Union in five significant areas in the first year of the Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It points out that despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets.

Most Member States do have ongoing gender equality plans or strategies, which both support gender mainstreaming and initiate specific actions. In previous years, gender equality policies everywhere in the EU have not only improved the situation and rights of women, but have significantly contributed to economic growth and social welfare.

By launching its new Strategy, the European Commission reiterates its commitment to promoting gender equality in all its policies .

This report is the first annual report presented after the adoption of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Commission’s new Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It describes recent developments in gender equality in the EU and presents statistics on all areas covered as well as recent new developments in the Member States.

It establishes a state of play for the five priority areas of the Women’s Charter and the Strategy, namely:

(1) Equal economic independence : sustained employment participation will strengthen women’s lifelong economic independence and enable them to have adequate pensions. Between 2009 and 2010 the difference between female and male employment rates narrowed by 0.4% from 13.3% to 12.9%. At national level, significant differences exist throughout the EU. Still, any positive assessment of the trend in women’s employment is offset by the fact that so many work part-time. A major reason for women’s low employment rates is the challenge of reconciling work, family and private life. The labour market participation of mothers is 11.5% lower than that of women without children, while the rate for fathers is 8.5% higher than that for men without children. In addition, poorly designed tax and benefit systems, in particular joint taxation, can - in combination with a lack of affordable and high quality childcare facilities - create strong disincentives for second earners to take up work.

Providing a sufficient number of high-quality, affordable and accessible childcare is a vital step in offering parents, and especially women, a genuine choice to work. Moreover, care for the elderly and disabled is becoming a significant challenge with the ageing of the population, for society as a whole and for women in particular. Mothers often take care of both children and older relatives, sometimes at the same time. In the EU, around 30 % of women with care responsibilities say they are inactive or work part-time because of the lack of care services for children and other dependent persons.

The year 2010 saw the adoption of Directive 2010/41/EC on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity . This was the first provision at EU level for a maternity allowance for self-employed workers and their spouses or life partners.

(2) Equal pay : women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men and there has been no reduction of the gender pay gap in the last few years. Member States have fully transposed the EU legislation on equal pay but the pay gap is unlikely to be solved by legal means alone. The underlying causes remain numerous and complex, not only reflecting discrimination on the grounds of sex but also inequalities linked to education, the horizontal and vertical segregation of the labour market, the difficulty of reconciling work, family and private life , the unequal distribution of family and domestic responsibilities, the lack of pay transparency and the impact of gender roles influencing the choice of education and vocational training courses. The Council conclusions adopted under the Belgian Council Presidency on the gender pay gap are thus an important step. In its conclusions, the Council invites Member States to adopt or pursue a comprehensive set of measures to tackle the full range of causes of the gender pay gap linked to the labour market inequalities between women and men.

(3) Equality in decision-making : the higher up the hierarchy, the fewer women there are. The percentage of women in key political and economic positions is roughly unchanged from last year. In 2010, the governments of three EU Member States (Germany, Finland and Slovakia) were led by women, while the average number of female members of national parliaments (single/lower houses) was 24%, one p.p. higher than in 2005. In parallel, still only 3 % of the largest publicly quoted companies have a woman chairing the highest decision-making body.

Yet the majority of the population are women and their participation in decision-making can make for more targeted policies and stronger and more prosperous democracies. The business case for having women in senior positions has been boosted by independent research suggesting a c orrelation between companies with women in decision-making positions and good performance . It also seems that gender diversity brings a number of vital benefits to boardrooms, such as higher returns, better overall performance, better risk management and greater employment of female talents.

Some countries also have corporate governance codes stressing the importance of diversity and gender equality. Corporate codes sometimes contain special transparency rules on the composition of the board. Generally speaking, countries that have introduced these types of codes also have a higher proportion of women at board level — for instance Sweden and Finland.

Other measures to improve gender balance include voluntary commitments. Denmark and the Netherlands have charters to promote women in management. The United Kingdom is undertaking a review on how obstacles can be removed to allow women to make it to the boards. The Commission will establish a direct dialogue with industry and urges private companies to make special efforts to address persistent imbalances in decision-making positions.

(4) Fight against sexual violence : fighting against all forms of violence against women is one of the top priorities of the current Trio of presidencies (Spain, Belgium, Hungary) and of the European Commission but there is still a lack of timely, reliable, accurate and comparable data at both national and EU level. There are several reasons why data are scarce.

A recent Eurobarometer survey appears to reveal the widespread nature of domestic violence across the EU: one out of every four respondents claims to know a woman among friends or in the family circle who has been a victim of domestic violence. During the ‘Women Ministers Summit on violence against women’ organised by the Belgian Presidency, a declaration was signed in order to encourage and support further appropriate action at EU level. The Commission will in 2011 propose an ambitious but realistic package of legislative and practical measures aimed at changing attitudes towards victims and bringing them into the heart of the criminal justice system. This ‘victims’ package’ will also include measures to combat gender-based violence more effectively.

(5) Gender equality beyond the Union : as part of the enlargement process, the Commission will continue to monitor the transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU legislation in the gender equality area in the candidate countries and potential candidates in 2011. Gender equality is also addressed in the accession negotiations on social policy and employment with Turkey and Iceland.

Cooperation with, and the support of, civil society organisations and women’s networks working in this area remains a key objective of EU policy. Several Member States also have action plans to implement Resolution 1325. In 2010, more than 130 EU delegations in non-EU countries were actively involved in the implementation of the 2008 EU Guidelines on violence against women and girls and the combating of all forms of discrimination against them. Gender equality issues were also discussed in several human rights dialogues and consultations.

UN WOMEN, the new UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, became operational in January 2011 when several bodies merged to form a new, stronger gender entity, marking a milestone in UN reform. UN WOMEN amalgamates the UN’s policies and practical work in this area and will improve the promotion of effective system-wide gender mainstreaming in the UN. Cooperation between the EU and UN WOMEN boosts the promotion of gender equality outside the Union.

As part of the Commission strategy to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), it adopted a Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development for the period up to 2015. The Action Plan’s overarching objective is to meet the MDG more quickly and in particular MDG 3 (‘Promoting gender equality and empowering women’) and MDG 5 (‘Improving maternal health’).

Lastly, as regards governance : the new Strategy for Equality between Men and Women sets out the Commission’s work programme for incorporating gender equality into all its work and taking specific action to promote equality between women and men. It lays the foundations for cooperation with the EU institutions and the Member States. Partnership with all stakeholders at EU level has proved to be the key to progress in achieving gender equality. In line with the European Parliament’s proposal, the Strategy seeks to strengthen the partnership by holding an annual top-level Gender Equality Dialogue. Council conclusions on the new Strategy were adopted under the Belgian Presidency.

2011/02/10
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the Commission Staff Working paper on Annual Report 2010 on equality between men and women.

CONTENT: the report points out that, despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets.

This report takes stock of the situation for gender equality in the European Union in five significant areas in the first year of the Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It points out that despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets.

Most Member States do have ongoing gender equality plans or strategies, which both support gender mainstreaming and initiate specific actions. In previous years, gender equality policies everywhere in the EU have not only improved the situation and rights of women, but have significantly contributed to economic growth and social welfare.

By launching its new Strategy, the European Commission reiterates its commitment to promoting gender equality in all its policies .

This report is the first annual report presented after the adoption of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Commission’s new Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It describes recent developments in gender equality in the EU and presents statistics on all areas covered as well as recent new developments in the Member States.

It establishes a state of play for the five priority areas of the Women’s Charter and the Strategy, namely:

(1) Equal economic independence : sustained employment participation will strengthen women’s lifelong economic independence and enable them to have adequate pensions. Between 2009 and 2010 the difference between female and male employment rates narrowed by 0.4% from 13.3% to 12.9%. At national level, significant differences exist throughout the EU. Still, any positive assessment of the trend in women’s employment is offset by the fact that so many work part-time. A major reason for women’s low employment rates is the challenge of reconciling work, family and private life. The labour market participation of mothers is 11.5% lower than that of women without children, while the rate for fathers is 8.5% higher than that for men without children. In addition, poorly designed tax and benefit systems, in particular joint taxation, can - in combination with a lack of affordable and high quality childcare facilities - create strong disincentives for second earners to take up work.

Providing a sufficient number of high-quality, affordable and accessible childcare is a vital step in offering parents, and especially women, a genuine choice to work. Moreover, care for the elderly and disabled is becoming a significant challenge with the ageing of the population, for society as a whole and for women in particular. Mothers often take care of both children and older relatives, sometimes at the same time. In the EU, around 30 % of women with care responsibilities say they are inactive or work part-time because of the lack of care services for children and other dependent persons.

The year 2010 saw the adoption of Directive 2010/41/EC on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity . This was the first provision at EU level for a maternity allowance for self-employed workers and their spouses or life partners.

(2) Equal pay : women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men and there has been no reduction of the gender pay gap in the last few years. Member States have fully transposed the EU legislation on equal pay but the pay gap is unlikely to be solved by legal means alone. The underlying causes remain numerous and complex, not only reflecting discrimination on the grounds of sex but also inequalities linked to education, the horizontal and vertical segregation of the labour market, the difficulty of reconciling work, family and private life , the unequal distribution of family and domestic responsibilities, the lack of pay transparency and the impact of gender roles influencing the choice of education and vocational training courses. The Council conclusions adopted under the Belgian Council Presidency on the gender pay gap are thus an important step. In its conclusions, the Council invites Member States to adopt or pursue a comprehensive set of measures to tackle the full range of causes of the gender pay gap linked to the labour market inequalities between women and men.

(3) Equality in decision-making : the higher up the hierarchy, the fewer women there are. The percentage of women in key political and economic positions is roughly unchanged from last year. In 2010, the governments of three EU Member States (Germany, Finland and Slovakia) were led by women, while the average number of female members of national parliaments (single/lower houses) was 24%, one p.p. higher than in 2005. In parallel, still only 3 % of the largest publicly quoted companies have a woman chairing the highest decision-making body.

Yet the majority of the population are women and their participation in decision-making can make for more targeted policies and stronger and more prosperous democracies. The business case for having women in senior positions has been boosted by independent research suggesting a c orrelation between companies with women in decision-making positions and good performance . It also seems that gender diversity brings a number of vital benefits to boardrooms, such as higher returns, better overall performance, better risk management and greater employment of female talents.

Some countries also have corporate governance codes stressing the importance of diversity and gender equality. Corporate codes sometimes contain special transparency rules on the composition of the board. Generally speaking, countries that have introduced these types of codes also have a higher proportion of women at board level — for instance Sweden and Finland.

Other measures to improve gender balance include voluntary commitments. Denmark and the Netherlands have charters to promote women in management. The United Kingdom is undertaking a review on how obstacles can be removed to allow women to make it to the boards. The Commission will establish a direct dialogue with industry and urges private companies to make special efforts to address persistent imbalances in decision-making positions.

(4) Fight against sexual violence : fighting against all forms of violence against women is one of the top priorities of the current Trio of presidencies (Spain, Belgium, Hungary) and of the European Commission but there is still a lack of timely, reliable, accurate and comparable data at both national and EU level. There are several reasons why data are scarce.

A recent Eurobarometer survey appears to reveal the widespread nature of domestic violence across the EU: one out of every four respondents claims to know a woman among friends or in the family circle who has been a victim of domestic violence. During the ‘Women Ministers Summit on violence against women’ organised by the Belgian Presidency, a declaration was signed in order to encourage and support further appropriate action at EU level. The Commission will in 2011 propose an ambitious but realistic package of legislative and practical measures aimed at changing attitudes towards victims and bringing them into the heart of the criminal justice system. This ‘victims’ package’ will also include measures to combat gender-based violence more effectively.

(5) Gender equality beyond the Union : as part of the enlargement process, the Commission will continue to monitor the transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU legislation in the gender equality area in the candidate countries and potential candidates in 2011. Gender equality is also addressed in the accession negotiations on social policy and employment with Turkey and Iceland.

Cooperation with, and the support of, civil society organisations and women’s networks working in this area remains a key objective of EU policy. Several Member States also have action plans to implement Resolution 1325. In 2010, more than 130 EU delegations in non-EU countries were actively involved in the implementation of the 2008 EU Guidelines on violence against women and girls and the combating of all forms of discrimination against them. Gender equality issues were also discussed in several human rights dialogues and consultations.

UN WOMEN, the new UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, became operational in January 2011 when several bodies merged to form a new, stronger gender entity, marking a milestone in UN reform. UN WOMEN amalgamates the UN’s policies and practical work in this area and will improve the promotion of effective system-wide gender mainstreaming in the UN. Cooperation between the EU and UN WOMEN boosts the promotion of gender equality outside the Union.

As part of the Commission strategy to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), it adopted a Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development for the period up to 2015. The Action Plan’s overarching objective is to meet the MDG more quickly and in particular MDG 3 (‘Promoting gender equality and empowering women’) and MDG 5 (‘Improving maternal health’).

Lastly, as regards governance : the new Strategy for Equality between Men and Women sets out the Commission’s work programme for incorporating gender equality into all its work and taking specific action to promote equality between women and men. It lays the foundations for cooperation with the EU institutions and the Member States. Partnership with all stakeholders at EU level has proved to be the key to progress in achieving gender equality. In line with the European Parliament’s proposal, the Strategy seeks to strengthen the partnership by holding an annual top-level Gender Equality Dialogue. Council conclusions on the new Strategy were adopted under the Belgian Presidency.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 27 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 418, +: 236, 0: 28
PL IT HU RO LT SI FI SK LU CY EL AT IE LV EE BG MT DK PT ES BE NL CZ SE DE GB FR
Total
45
66
16
29
12
8
9
13
5
6
19
18
10
8
6
17
5
10
18
45
22
25
22
19
96
65
67
icon: PPE PPE
243

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
2

Ireland PPE

Abstain (2)

4

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Czechia PPE

2
icon: EFD EFD
29
2

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Hungary NI

1

Romania NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
49

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1
3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
174

Slovenia S&D

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 7/1 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 382, -: 275, 0: 33
GB CZ SE NL DE ES BE FR DK PT EL AT FI EE IE BG CY LV SI MT LU SK LT RO HU IT PL
Total
64
22
19
26
96
44
22
68
12
19
19
19
10
6
10
16
6
8
8
5
4
13
11
32
17
67
46
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
77
3

Greece ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
49

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

United Kingdom NI

5

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFD

2
icon: PPE PPE
249

Czechia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

5

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 8 S=Am 16 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 561, +: 91, 0: 47
GB DK CZ LU MT EE CY SK FI SE LV IE LT SI NL BE BG AT PT HU EL RO PL ES IT FR DE
Total
65
12
21
5
5
6
6
13
11
19
8
10
12
8
26
22
17
19
19
18
20
32
46
46
67
67
98
icon: ECR ECR
49

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
80
3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: S&D S&D
177

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
252

Czechia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

3

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 17 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 596, +: 82, 0: 22
GB LU CZ CY MT EE LV DK LT FI SI SK IE NL BE AT BG HU SE EL PT PL RO ES IT FR DE
Total
65
5
22
6
5
6
8
12
12
11
8
13
10
26
22
19
17
18
19
20
19
46
32
46
67
68
97
icon: ECR ECR
49

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
252

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Czechia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 18 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 579, +: 105, 0: 13
GB DK CZ EE LU MT SK CY FI LT LV SI NL IE BG AT BE SE HU EL PT PL RO ES IT FR DE
Total
64
12
22
6
5
5
13
6
11
12
8
8
26
10
17
19
22
19
18
20
19
46
32
46
67
66
97
icon: ECR ECR
48

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
80
3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
252

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 19 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 576, +: 104, 0: 15
GB DK CZ LU SK MT NL EE CY LV LT FI SI IE BG BE AT HU PT SE EL PL RO IT ES FR DE
Total
64
12
22
5
13
5
25
6
6
8
12
11
8
10
17
20
19
18
18
19
20
46
32
67
46
67
98
icon: ECR ECR
48

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2
2
icon: NI NI
25

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
79
3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
250

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 16 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 571, -: 106, 0: 19
DE FR ES IT RO PL EL PT AT HU BG SE BE SK LT FI IE NL LV SI EE CY LU MT CZ DK GB
Total
98
67
46
67
32
46
20
19
19
18
17
19
22
13
12
11
10
26
8
8
6
6
5
5
22
12
61
icon: PPE PPE
252

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Czechia PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
178

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

5
icon: EFD EFD
29
2

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
49

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 20 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 585, +: 89, 0: 18
GB CZ SK LU MT DK EE CY LT LV SI FI NL IE BG BE AT HU EL SE PT PL RO ES IT FR DE
Total
62
22
13
5
5
12
6
6
12
8
8
11
25
10
17
22
19
18
19
19
19
46
31
46
67
66
97
icon: ECR ECR
49

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (2)

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
250

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 21 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 585, +: 90, 0: 18
GB DK CZ LV LU MT EE CY SK LT SI NL FI IE SE AT HU BE BG EL PT PL RO ES IT FR DE
Total
65
11
22
8
5
5
6
6
13
11
8
25
11
10
19
19
16
21
17
20
19
46
32
46
67
67
97
icon: ECR ECR
49

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
79
3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
249

Czechia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 12 S=Am 22 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 521, +: 152, 0: 24
GB DK CZ SK EE MT IE LV LU NL CY LT FI SI AT SE PT BE ES BG PL EL HU RO IT FR DE
Total
65
12
22
13
5
5
10
8
5
26
6
12
10
8
19
19
19
22
46
17
46
20
18
32
67
66
98
icon: ECR ECR
49

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1
2

Greece EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
78
3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
252

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
179

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 13 S=Am 23 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 415, +: 247, 0: 28
PL HU ES IE GB DK SE LU SK MT NL FI LV CY EE LT BG AT SI PT BE RO CZ EL DE IT FR
Total
45
18
45
10
64
11
19
5
13
5
26
11
8
6
6
12
17
18
8
19
21
31
22
20
97
66
66
icon: ECR ECR
48

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29
2

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

Against (1)

1
5

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2
icon: PPE PPE
248

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Finland PPE

3

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

4

Czechia PPE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Greece Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France GUE/NGL

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Spain ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 32/1 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 548, -: 121, 0: 25
DE FR IT RO PL EL HU BE ES PT BG AT SE LT FI NL SI LV IE LU SK MT EE DK CZ CY GB
Total
96
68
67
31
46
20
18
22
45
19
17
19
18
12
11
26
8
8
10
5
13
5
6
12
22
6
63
icon: PPE PPE
250

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
179

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFD EFD
29
2

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1
icon: NI NI
24

France NI

2

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
49

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 32/2 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 469, -: 160, 0: 42
FR DE IT RO HU EL PL BE AT NL LT SE BG FI SI ES IE PT LV MT CZ EE DK CY SK LU GB
Total
66
94
66
30
18
19
45
20
17
24
10
18
16
11
7
45
10
17
8
5
21
6
12
5
13
4
63
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
244

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Malta PPE

2

Czechia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Spain NI

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Greece EFD

2

Poland EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
47

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 24 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 637, +: 37, 0: 17
LU MT LV EE CY LT DK FI SI NL IE SK AT BE EL BG HU SE PT CZ RO GB ES PL IT FR DE
Total
5
5
8
6
6
11
12
10
8
24
10
13
18
22
20
17
18
19
19
21
32
65
46
46
66
67
96
icon: NI NI
24
5

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
28

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
47

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

3

Finland ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: S&D S&D
178

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
252

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Czechia PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 15 S=Am 25 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 571, +: 96, 0: 16
GB CZ DK FI EE LU MT CY LT LV SI SK NL BE IE BG AT HU EL PT SE PL RO ES IT FR DE
Total
62
22
10
9
6
5
5
6
11
8
8
13
25
20
10
17
19
16
20
19
19
45
32
46
66
68
95
icon: ECR ECR
45

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
2
icon: NI NI
25

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
249

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 47/1 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 490, -: 143, 0: 60
DE FR GB RO SE BE BG EL NL PT AT IT CZ DK FI ES SI LV LU LT EE CY SK HU IE MT PL
Total
97
68
64
31
19
22
17
20
26
19
19
66
22
12
9
45
8
8
5
12
6
6
13
17
10
5
46
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Greece ALDE

1
3

Finland ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
249

Czechia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Romania NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2
5

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
48

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 47/2 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 424, -: 209, 0: 52
FR GB NL SE EL DE RO BE CZ DK BG ES SI FI LV EE CY LU IT LT PT AT SK IE MT HU PL
Total
66
65
26
19
20
94
29
22
20
12
17
45
8
10
8
5
6
5
66
12
19
19
13
10
5
18
45
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Greece ALDE

1
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
49

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Romania NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
248

Czechia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 57/2 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 503, -: 113, 0: 76
DE FR GB ES RO NL SE EL BG PT BE AT DK CZ IT IE HU LV FI CY SI LU EE SK LT MT PL
Total
97
67
65
45
32
26
19
20
17
17
22
19
12
22
67
10
18
8
9
6
8
5
6
13
10
5
46
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

4

Greece ALDE

1
3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
246

Czechia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3
2

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: ECR ECR
49

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

5

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 58/2 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 361, -: 125, 0: 57
FR GB DE RO NL EL AT BE SE PT DK CZ BG IT ES CY FI EE LU LV SI LT SK HU IE MT PL
Total
50
58
67
29
22
20
15
17
14
14
9
17
15
55
38
5
7
4
4
6
3
7
12
8
8
2
36
icon: S&D S&D
143

Netherlands S&D

2

Belgium S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

France ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2
3

Spain ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
22

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1
3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

5

Romania NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

5
icon: EFD EFD
27

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFD

2
icon: PPE PPE
197

Portugal PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

2

Hungary PPE

Abstain (1)

4

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Am 26 S #

2012/03/13 Outcome: -: 517, +: 122, 0: 25
EE NL MT BG LU IE FI DK SI CY LV LT SK BE SE EL AT GB HU CZ RO PT IT ES PL FR DE
Total
5
25
5
17
5
10
10
11
8
5
8
10
13
21
16
18
19
63
17
20
32
19
63
45
43
64
91
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Estonia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

3
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Greece ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
24

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
28

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2
2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
47

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: S&D S&D
174

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2
2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
239

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Cyprus PPE

2
3

Czechia PPE

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 61/2 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 457, -: 191, 0: 48
FR GB DE ES NL BE SE EL RO CZ DK FI BG CY LV EE SK PT LU SI LT AT IT IE MT HU PL
Total
67
65
97
45
25
22
19
20
32
22
12
11
17
6
8
6
13
19
5
8
12
19
66
10
5
18
46
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Greece ALDE

1
3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
55

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
49

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Romania NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: PPE PPE
249

Czechia PPE

2
2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

4

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - § 66 #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 379, -: 273, 0: 34
FR BE DE RO ES SE EL NL PL PT FI BG AT EE DK CY SI CZ MT IE LV SK LT LU HU IT GB
Total
65
21
95
32
45
19
20
25
46
19
10
17
19
6
12
5
8
22
5
10
8
13
11
5
18
65
64
icon: S&D S&D
173

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Greece ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Romania NI

2

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
49

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
248

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PPE

4

Czechia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Considérant R #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 487, -: 149, 0: 58
FR DE GB NL RO BE SE EL BG IT PT AT DK CZ ES LV FI SI CY LU EE SK LT IE HU MT PL
Total
67
98
63
25
32
22
19
20
17
66
19
19
12
22
45
8
11
8
6
5
6
13
12
10
17
5
46
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Greece ALDE

1
3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Romania NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
48

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
248

Czechia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Considérant T #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 437, -: 194, 0: 48
GB ES DE NL BE SE FR CZ DK AT PT BG RO SI EL FI CY IE LV LU MT EE LT SK HU IT PL
Total
63
43
95
25
22
19
66
21
12
18
19
17
31
8
19
10
6
10
8
5
5
6
12
12
16
64
46
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Greece ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
48

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

5

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Greece EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFD

2
icon: PPE PPE
243

Czechia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2
2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A7-0041/2012 - Sophia in 't Veld - Résolution #

2012/03/13 Outcome: +: 361, -: 268, 0: 70
FR BE DE SE NL EL RO ES PT BG FI EE DK SI AT LT LV CZ CY MT IE SK LU HU GB IT PL
Total
67
22
98
19
26
20
32
46
19
17
11
6
12
8
19
12
8
22
6
5
10
13
5
18
65
66
46
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Greece ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
56

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

2

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
29

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFD

2
icon: ECR ECR
49

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
251

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

4

Czechia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3
AmendmentsDossier
236 2011/2244(INI)
2012/01/09 FEMM 236 amendments...
source: PE-478.674

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/1/name
Old
NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína
New
ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína
docs/0
date
2011-02-11T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/3
date
2012-03-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html title: A7-0041/2012
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/6
date
2013-12-06T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0322 title: COM(2013)0322
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/8
date
2013-12-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0322 title: COM(2013)0322
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
events/0/date
Old
2011-02-11T00:00:00
New
2011-02-10T00:00:00
events/3
date
2012-03-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html title: A7-0041/2012
events/3
date
2012-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html title: A7-0041/2012
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-03-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/5
name
GUSTAFSSON Mikael
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.338
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-PR-478338_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.674
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-478674_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0069_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0069_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2012-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html title: A7-0041/2012
summary
events/3
date
2012-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html title: A7-0041/2012
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: IN 'T VELD Sophia date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: IN 'T VELD Sophia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-69
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0069_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-41&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0041_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=193 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2011)0193 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: REDING Viviane type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2011-10-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: JÁRÓKA Lívia group: S&D name: NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína group: ALDE name: WERTHMANN Angelika group: Verts/ALE name: CORNELISSEN Marije group: ECR name: YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael group: NI name: BLOOM Godfrey responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • date: 2012-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: JÁRÓKA Lívia group: S&D name: NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína group: ALDE name: WERTHMANN Angelika group: Verts/ALE name: CORNELISSEN Marije group: ECR name: YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael group: NI name: BLOOM Godfrey responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • date: 2012-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-41&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0041/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21255&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: REDING Viviane
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: IN 'T VELD Sophia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
docs
  • date: 2011-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.338 title: PE478.338 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.674 title: PE478.674 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-69 title: T7-0069/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 361 votes to 268, with 70 abstentions, on equality between women and men in the European Union – 2011. Parliament recalls that on average 3 in 10 households in the European Union are single-person households, the majority of them comprising women living alone, and that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty. It stresses that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty, in particular at times of economic adversity. Moreover, cuts in public spending are expected to have a disproportionate impact on female employment and wage difference, as many more women than men are employed in the public sector. In this context, measures should be taken to reinforce the economic independence of women and their potential to take decisions. Equal economic independence : Member States are called upon to: ensure that their marriage and divorce and matrimonial property laws do not directly or indirectly constitute a financial ‘trap’ for the spouses, in particular women, and to ensure that couples who seek marriage are fully informed in a suitable time-frame of the legal and financial implications of marriage and divorce; invest in affordable, high-quality facilities for the care of children, the sick, the disabled, the elderly and other dependent persons, making sure that they have flexible times and are accessible so that as many people as possible can combine professional and private life; move towards individualised systems of social security; develop the legal concept of shared ownership - in order to ensure full recognition of women's rights in the agricultural sector; elaborate proposals for the mutual recognition of civil unions and of same-sex families across Europe between those countries which already have the relevant legislation in place, so as to ensure equal treatment with regard to work, free movement, taxation and social security, etc. (in this regard, Parliament regrets the implementation by some Member States of restrictive definitions of ‘family’ in order to deny legal protection to same-sex couples and their children); promote women’s entrepreneurship, by setting up training and careers and legal advice services and facilitating access to public and private funding; invest current Structural Funds spending for the period 2007-2013 in the development of care services to enable both women and men to combine professional and private life. Parliament stresses that fiscal consolidation without consideration for gender equality risks leading to increased gender segregation in the labour market, increased precarious work among women, a wider gender pay gap, increased feminisation of poverty and more difficulties in combining caring and working. Income and high-quality gainful employment for women are the key to their economic independence and to greater equality between men and women in society as a whole. Equal pay for equal work and work of equal value : Parliament notes that, despite countless campaigns, targets and measures in recent years, the gender pay gap remains stubbornly wide, women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men. It recalls that the gender gap is smaller before family formation and increases when individuals form a couple. It points out that a drop in the employment rate occurs for women at first childbirth and the labour market disadvantages accumulate in the earlier stages of their life cycle, connected to child-care, which at a later stage changes into care of elderly people, which often flows into in-work poverty. Efforts should be redoubled to put European measures in place with the aim of closing this gap: a multifaceted strategy from European institutions, Member States and the Social Partners to tackle the full range of causes of the persistent gender pay, including a European equal pay target to reduce the pay gap by 10% in each Member State ; a legislative proposal is called for from the Commission on this issue. Parliament is concerned about the legislation in some Member States which does not expressly prohibit the handing of pre-signed resignation letters to employers when women are recruited, which has the effect of enabling maternity laws to be circumvented. Equality in decision-making : Parliament regrets that economic recovery projects still focus mainly on male-dominated employment. It calls on the Member States and the Commission to give high priority to addressing barriers to women's participation in the labour market with particular emphasis on women with disabilities, migrant and ethnic minority women, etc. Once again, it calls for concrete measures to be taken to: enhance the presence of women in the renewable sector, science and technology-intensive jobs; break down stereotypes; strengthen the presence of women in the 2014 European elections. Plenary reiterates Parliament’s call in 2011 for legislation, including quotas, to be proposed by 2012 to increase female representation in corporate management bodies to 30% by 2015 and to 40% by 2020 , while taking account of the Member States' responsibilities and of their economic, structural (i.e. company-size related), legal and regional specificities. It is disappointed that the Commission is refraining from taking immediate legislative measures with a view to improving the balance between men and women in economic decision-making. Noting that the use of electoral quotas has positive effects on women’s representation, Parliament calls on the Member States with particularly low representation of women in political assemblies to consider introducing equivalent measures. The Member States are called upon to promote female entrepreneurship and to provide financial support, vocational guidance and training to encourage women setting up their own companies. Dignity, integrity and an end to gender-based violence : welcoming efforts, both at Community and national levels, to combat violence against women (such as the European Protection Order , the Directive on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and the legislative package to strengthen the rights of victims in the EU), Parliament stresses that this phenomenon remains a major unresolved problem. They call on the Commission and the Member States to adopt and implement policies to combat all forms of violence against women including all sexual, physical and psychological abuse, domestic violence, harassment and the need to include the fight against gender-based violence in EU external and development cooperation policies. Parliament reiterates the need for the Commission to present an EU-wide strategy to end violence against women including a legislative criminal-law instrument to combat gender-based violence as it has already requested in several resolutions. Parliament also calls for: the establishment of information programmes concerning harassment and mobbing at work, so that women who are subjected to such treatment can take effective counter-measures; specific actions and resources to combat all forms of violence against women, including so called honour killings, Female Genital Mutilation, forced marriages etc; the introduction of rehabilitation and psychological programmes for perpetrators of physical abuse, which would reduce the incidence of such abuse; the enhancement of social and economic autonomy which are important preconditions for fighting against violence. Parliament defines domestic violence as including all sexual, physical and psychological abuse. It points out that gender violence claims many lives across the EU each year. It thus calls for adequate measures to be taken so that gender-based violence is treated as a public security issue rather than as a private, domestic issue and as a violation of fundamental rights, by ensuring, amongst other things, access to forms of prevention, legal protection and assistance, including with regard to stalking. Parliament reiterates its position on sexual and reproductive health rights and the need for these to be safeguarded. It calls for national budgets for family planning and sexual education to be maintained and calls for more HIV/AIDS prevention measures given that 45% of young women and girls who are newly infected with HIV are between the ages of 15 and 24 years old. The Member States and the Commission are called upon to pay special attention to vulnerable groups of women : disabled women, women of advanced age, women with little or no training, women with dependent persons in their charge, female immigrants and women belonging to minorities, all of whom constitute specific groups on whose behalf measures adapted to their circumstances must be taken. Gender equality beyond the Union : Parliament calls for human rights for women and the ability to use them effectively to be given the highest priority in the EU’s external policies. Whilst welcoming the Arab Spring, it calls on Commission to develop specific support measures for gender equality in those countries. Parliament deplores the fact that rape is still used in certain regions of the world as a weapon . It calls on the European External Action Service to include this phenomenon as a priority on its political agenda. Parliament notes that this year the world population has reached 7 billion and expresses its conviction that family planning should be at the top of the political agenda. As regards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Parliament calls for the improvement of maternal health and reproductive health by 2015 (about 1000 women still die each day from entirely avoidable pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications). It calls on Member States to uphold their political and financial support for the MDGs, despite times of economic downturn. Parliament welcomes the recent decision of the United Nations to create an International Day of the Girl Child on 11 October , which is a powerful way to highlight the particular needs and rights of girls. Governance : in an amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament invites the Council to unblock the Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation with a view to adoption during the Danish Presidency. It also calls on the Council, within the on-going negotiations on the EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020, to introduce gender-responsive budgeting in the EU budgetary process. The Commission is called upon to: put forward proposals for leave arrangements for care for elderly or sick relatives; put forward a comprehensive communication on the situation of single-person households in the EU, with policy proposals to achieve fair treatment in areas like taxation, social security, housing, healthcare, insurance and pensions; publish reliable gender-disaggregated data and qualitative gender indicators so as to be able to properly evaluate and update the Commission’s Strategy for equality between Women and Men (2010-2015); investigate the treatment of victims of human trafficking and prostitution in the Member States given that, in some cases, these people are treated as criminals instead of getting support. Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call on the Commission for a Road Map on Equality for LGBTI people, analogous to the Gender Equality Road Map. type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=21255&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)387 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0322/COM_COM(2013)0322_EN.doc title: COM(2013)0322 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=322 title: EUR-Lex summary: In 2002, the Barcelona European Council set objectives in regard to the development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth : Member States were to remove disincentives to female labour force participation, taking into account the demand for childcare facilities and in line with national patterns of provision, to provide childcare by 2010 to at least 90% of children between 3 years old and the mandatory school age and at least 33% of children under 3 years of age. In 2008, a first review revealed that the demand for formal systems of childcare was far from being met, in particular for children under 3. It highlighted the high costs incurred by parents and the opening hours of facilities, which were incompatible with full-time work. Five years on, it can be seen in this second review undertaken by the European Commission that, despite a slight improvement, these challenges remain. The report’s main conclusions may be summarised as follows: A mixed picture: more than 10 years after they were adopted, the Barcelona objectives have not been achieved by most Member States. Furthermore, the situation is deteriorating in several Member States. Significant improvements still need to be made to achieve a satisfactory level of availability , especially for children under 3. Also, the cost of services is still a significant obstacle for parents, as are opening hours , which are not always compatible with their occupational commitments. Investment in quality education and care services that are universal and accessible to all must be continued . This effort must be made largely at Member State level. The Commission is providing support on several fronts. The development of childcare services under supervision as part of the European Semester: opening up access to the labour market and to employment for a second wage-earner from the household thanks to suitable tax incentives and the introduction of affordable, quality childcare services was identified as a priority in the Annual Growth Survey . Nine Member States (AT, CZ, DE, HU, IT, MT, PL, SK, UK) have received a recommendation on the employment of women and on the availability of childcare services in 2012. The Structural Funds are an important lever: in the 2007-2013 period, it is estimated that EUR 2.6 billion from the Structural Funds was allocated to actions aiming to promote the employment and sustainable participation of care services for dependants. In addition, around EUR 616 million from the European Development Fund was made available to Member States between 2007 and 2013 to finance childcare infrastructures. Almost all the Member States allocated resources to childcare services. However, the total expenditure varies enormously from one Member State to another depending on the budget available under the Structural Funds and the current state of provision of services. In the report, the Commission undertakes to: continue to work with social partners who play a key role in the area of work-life balance in cooperation with the public authorities; strengthen cooperation between its departments working on policies relevant to early childhood education and care (ECEC) , such as justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, education and culture, employment, social policy, health, etc.. continue to monitor the Barcelona objectives by helping the Member States to develop their statistical capacity by improving data collection and refining the way the use of childcare services is measured for the EU SILC survey, in particular by collecting comparable information on the barriers to these services (cost, unmet demand, etc.). continue to support the Member States: - whenever necessary, throughout the European Semesters, the Commission will continue to adopt specific recommendations calling on the Member States to achieve the Barcelona objectives and to maintain public investment despite the economic crisis; - when programming the European Funds, the Commission will work together with the Member States to make full use of the cofinancing options offered by the Structural Funds and other Community programmes such as 'Erasmus for all', including during the next programming period, for developing ECEC services and services for other dependent people, staff training and improving service quality . The report points out that developing childcare services for pre-school children is not enough in itself to give women and men free choice of how to best achieve a work-life balance and it does not take into account the difficulties faced at different stages in life . The Commission must therefore act: by promoting a combination of measures to achieve a work-life balance consisting of flexible working methods, a family leave system and the availability of affordable, quality care services for pre-school children as well as for pre-adolescent children outside school hours and for other dependants; by also encouraging the Member States to remove barriers (including tax constraints) to occupational activity for women and to encourage fathers to take on more family responsibilities, for example by taking family leave in the same way as women. This report reflects the Commission's own commitment, within the limits of its competences, to supporting the achievement of the Barcelona objectives and the development of affordable, accessible and quality childcare services in order to eliminate the obstacles to parents' participation in employment, to foster social inclusion and to promote equality of opportunity between women and men. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0192:FIN:FR:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2013)0192 type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2013-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0322 title: COM(2013)0322 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2011-02-11T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=193 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2011)0193 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of the Commission Staff Working paper on Annual Report 2010 on equality between men and women. CONTENT: the report points out that, despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets. This report takes stock of the situation for gender equality in the European Union in five significant areas in the first year of the Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It points out that despite a general trend towards more equality in society and on the labour market, progress in eliminating gender inequalities remains slow . Meeting the employment targets in the Europe 2020 Strategy will be a challenge, and this report highlights the importance of gender equality for reaching those targets. Most Member States do have ongoing gender equality plans or strategies, which both support gender mainstreaming and initiate specific actions. In previous years, gender equality policies everywhere in the EU have not only improved the situation and rights of women, but have significantly contributed to economic growth and social welfare. By launching its new Strategy, the European Commission reiterates its commitment to promoting gender equality in all its policies . This report is the first annual report presented after the adoption of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Commission’s new Strategy for Equality between Women and Men (2010-2015). It describes recent developments in gender equality in the EU and presents statistics on all areas covered as well as recent new developments in the Member States. It establishes a state of play for the five priority areas of the Women’s Charter and the Strategy, namely: (1) Equal economic independence : sustained employment participation will strengthen women’s lifelong economic independence and enable them to have adequate pensions. Between 2009 and 2010 the difference between female and male employment rates narrowed by 0.4% from 13.3% to 12.9%. At national level, significant differences exist throughout the EU. Still, any positive assessment of the trend in women’s employment is offset by the fact that so many work part-time. A major reason for women’s low employment rates is the challenge of reconciling work, family and private life. The labour market participation of mothers is 11.5% lower than that of women without children, while the rate for fathers is 8.5% higher than that for men without children. In addition, poorly designed tax and benefit systems, in particular joint taxation, can - in combination with a lack of affordable and high quality childcare facilities - create strong disincentives for second earners to take up work. Providing a sufficient number of high-quality, affordable and accessible childcare is a vital step in offering parents, and especially women, a genuine choice to work. Moreover, care for the elderly and disabled is becoming a significant challenge with the ageing of the population, for society as a whole and for women in particular. Mothers often take care of both children and older relatives, sometimes at the same time. In the EU, around 30 % of women with care responsibilities say they are inactive or work part-time because of the lack of care services for children and other dependent persons. The year 2010 saw the adoption of Directive 2010/41/EC on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity . This was the first provision at EU level for a maternity allowance for self-employed workers and their spouses or life partners. (2) Equal pay : women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men and there has been no reduction of the gender pay gap in the last few years. Member States have fully transposed the EU legislation on equal pay but the pay gap is unlikely to be solved by legal means alone. The underlying causes remain numerous and complex, not only reflecting discrimination on the grounds of sex but also inequalities linked to education, the horizontal and vertical segregation of the labour market, the difficulty of reconciling work, family and private life , the unequal distribution of family and domestic responsibilities, the lack of pay transparency and the impact of gender roles influencing the choice of education and vocational training courses. The Council conclusions adopted under the Belgian Council Presidency on the gender pay gap are thus an important step. In its conclusions, the Council invites Member States to adopt or pursue a comprehensive set of measures to tackle the full range of causes of the gender pay gap linked to the labour market inequalities between women and men. (3) Equality in decision-making : the higher up the hierarchy, the fewer women there are. The percentage of women in key political and economic positions is roughly unchanged from last year. In 2010, the governments of three EU Member States (Germany, Finland and Slovakia) were led by women, while the average number of female members of national parliaments (single/lower houses) was 24%, one p.p. higher than in 2005. In parallel, still only 3 % of the largest publicly quoted companies have a woman chairing the highest decision-making body. Yet the majority of the population are women and their participation in decision-making can make for more targeted policies and stronger and more prosperous democracies. The business case for having women in senior positions has been boosted by independent research suggesting a c orrelation between companies with women in decision-making positions and good performance . It also seems that gender diversity brings a number of vital benefits to boardrooms, such as higher returns, better overall performance, better risk management and greater employment of female talents. Some countries also have corporate governance codes stressing the importance of diversity and gender equality. Corporate codes sometimes contain special transparency rules on the composition of the board. Generally speaking, countries that have introduced these types of codes also have a higher proportion of women at board level — for instance Sweden and Finland. Other measures to improve gender balance include voluntary commitments. Denmark and the Netherlands have charters to promote women in management. The United Kingdom is undertaking a review on how obstacles can be removed to allow women to make it to the boards. The Commission will establish a direct dialogue with industry and urges private companies to make special efforts to address persistent imbalances in decision-making positions. (4) Fight against sexual violence : fighting against all forms of violence against women is one of the top priorities of the current Trio of presidencies (Spain, Belgium, Hungary) and of the European Commission but there is still a lack of timely, reliable, accurate and comparable data at both national and EU level. There are several reasons why data are scarce. A recent Eurobarometer survey appears to reveal the widespread nature of domestic violence across the EU: one out of every four respondents claims to know a woman among friends or in the family circle who has been a victim of domestic violence. During the ‘Women Ministers Summit on violence against women’ organised by the Belgian Presidency, a declaration was signed in order to encourage and support further appropriate action at EU level. The Commission will in 2011 propose an ambitious but realistic package of legislative and practical measures aimed at changing attitudes towards victims and bringing them into the heart of the criminal justice system. This ‘victims’ package’ will also include measures to combat gender-based violence more effectively. (5) Gender equality beyond the Union : as part of the enlargement process, the Commission will continue to monitor the transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU legislation in the gender equality area in the candidate countries and potential candidates in 2011. Gender equality is also addressed in the accession negotiations on social policy and employment with Turkey and Iceland. Cooperation with, and the support of, civil society organisations and women’s networks working in this area remains a key objective of EU policy. Several Member States also have action plans to implement Resolution 1325. In 2010, more than 130 EU delegations in non-EU countries were actively involved in the implementation of the 2008 EU Guidelines on violence against women and girls and the combating of all forms of discrimination against them. Gender equality issues were also discussed in several human rights dialogues and consultations. UN WOMEN, the new UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, became operational in January 2011 when several bodies merged to form a new, stronger gender entity, marking a milestone in UN reform. UN WOMEN amalgamates the UN’s policies and practical work in this area and will improve the promotion of effective system-wide gender mainstreaming in the UN. Cooperation between the EU and UN WOMEN boosts the promotion of gender equality outside the Union. As part of the Commission strategy to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), it adopted a Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development for the period up to 2015. The Action Plan’s overarching objective is to meet the MDG more quickly and in particular MDG 3 (‘Promoting gender equality and empowering women’) and MDG 5 (‘Improving maternal health’). Lastly, as regards governance : the new Strategy for Equality between Men and Women sets out the Commission’s work programme for incorporating gender equality into all its work and taking specific action to promote equality between women and men. It lays the foundations for cooperation with the EU institutions and the Member States. Partnership with all stakeholders at EU level has proved to be the key to progress in achieving gender equality. In line with the European Parliament’s proposal, the Strategy seeks to strengthen the partnership by holding an annual top-level Gender Equality Dialogue. Council conclusions on the new Strategy were adopted under the Belgian Presidency.
  • date: 2011-10-27T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-02-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-03-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-41&language=EN title: A7-0041/2012 summary: The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality adopted the report by Sophia IN 'T VELD (ADLE, NL) on equality between women and men in the European Union – 2011. The report recalls that on average 3 in 10 households in the European Union are single-person households, the majority of them comprising women living alone, and that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty. It stresses that these households are more vulnerable and more at risk of poverty, in particular at times of economic adversity. Moreover, cuts in public spending are expected to have a disproportionate impact on female employment and wage difference, as many more women than men are employed in the public sector. In this context, measures should be taken to reinforce the economic independence of women and their potential to take decisions. Equal economic independence : Member States are called upon to: ensure that their marriage and divorce and matrimonial property laws do not directly or indirectly constitute a financial ‘trap’ for the spouses, in particular women, and to ensure that couples who seek marriage are fully informed in a suitable time-frame of the legal and financial implications of marriage and divorce; invest in affordable, high-quality facilities for the care of children, the sick, the disabled, the elderly and other dependent persons, making sure that they have flexible times and are accessible so that as many people as possible can combine professional and private life; ensure that men and women caring for children or the elderly receive recognition by giving them individual social security and pension rights; move towards individualised systems of social security; elaborate proposals for the mutual recognition of civil unions and of same-sex families across Europe between those countries which already have the relevant legislation in place, so as to ensure equal treatment with regard to work, free movement, taxation and social security, etc; promote women’s entrepreneurship, by setting up training and careers and legal advice services and facilitating access to public and private funding; invest current Structural Funds spending for the period 2007-2013 in the development of care services to enable both women and men to combine professional and private life. The report stresses that fiscal consolidation without consideration for gender equality risks leading to increased gender segregation in the labour market, increased precarious work among women, a wider gender pay gap, increased feminisation of poverty and more difficulties in combining caring and working. Income and high-quality gainful employment for women are the key to their economic independence and to greater equality between men and women in society as a whole. Equal pay for equal work and work of equal value : Members note that, despite countless campaigns, targets and measures in recent years, the gender pay gap remains stubbornly wide, women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men and there has only been a marginal reduction of the gender pay gap in the last few years. Efforts should be redoubled to put European measures in place with the aim of closing this gap. The report calls for a multifaceted strategy from European institutions, Member States and the Social Partners to tackle the full range of causes of the persistent gender pay, including a European equal pay target to reduce the pay gap by 10% in each Member State. Members are still awaiting a legislative proposal to be put forward by the Commission on this issue. Members are concerned about the legislation in some Member States which does not expressly prohibit the handing of pre-signed resignation letters to employers when women are recruited, which has the effect of enabling maternity laws to be circumvented . Equality in decision-making : Members regret that economic recovery projects still focus mainly on male-dominated employment. They call on the Member States and the Commission to give high priority to addressing barriers to women's participation in the labour market with particular emphasis on women with disabilities, migrant and ethnic minority women, etc. Once again, Members call for concrete measures to be taken to: enhance the presence of women in the renewable sector, science and technology-intensive jobs; break down stereotypes; support women in their career development and efforts to reach managerial positions (within the EU, on average only 12% of the executives of the major listed companies are women, with only 3% female chairs); propose legislation, including quotas, by 2012 to increase female representation in corporate management bodies to 30% by 2015 and to 40% by 2020; strengthen the presence of women in the 2014 European elections. The report points out that the use of electoral quotas has positive effects on women’s representation and welcomes the legislated parity systems and gender quotas introduced in France, Spain, Belgium, Slovenia, Portugal and Poland. It calls on the Member States with particularly low representation of women in political assemblies to consider introducing equivalent measures. The Member States are called upon to promote female entrepreneurship and to provide financial support, vocational guidance and training to encourage women setting up their own companies. Dignity, integrity and an end to gender-based violence : Members urge the Commission to include homophobic and transphobic violence and harassment in its action programmes against gender-based violence. Welcoming efforts, both at Community and national levels, to combat violence against women (such as the European Protection Order , the Directive on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and the legislative package to strengthen the rights of victims in the EU), Members stress that this phenomenon remains a major unresolved problem . They call on the Commission and the Member States to adopt and implement policies to combat all forms of violence against women including all sexual, physical and psychological abuse, domestic violence, harassment and the need to include the fight against gender-based violence in EU external and development cooperation policies. The report reiterates the need for the Commission to present an EU-wide strategy to end violence against women including a legislative criminal-law instrument to combat gender-based violence as requested by Parliament in several resolutions. Members also call for: the establishment of information programmes concerning harassment and mobbing at work, so that women who are subjected to such treatment can take effective counter-measures; adequate measures to be taken so that gender-based violence is treated as a public security issue and as a violation of fundamental rights rather than as a private, domestic issue by ensuring, amongst other things, access to forms of prevention, legal protection and assistance, including with regard to stalking; specific actions and resources to combat all forms of violence against women, including domestic violence, sexual violence, harassment, so called honour killings, Female Genital Mutilation, forced marriages and other forms of violence and violation of individual rights; the introduction of rehabilitation and psychological programmes for perpetrators of physical abuse, which would reduce the incidence of such abuse; the enhancement of social and economic autonomy which are important preconditions for fighting against violence. Members reiterate their position on sexual and reproductive health rights and express concern in this respect about recent funding cuts to family planning and sexual education and also restrictions on access to sexual and reproductive health services in some Member States, in particular pregnancy and maternity protection and safe and legal abortion. They also express concern over the rising incidence of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmissible diseases, in particular amongst women and point out that 45% of young women and girls who are newly infected with HIV are between the ages of 15 and 24 years old. The Member States and the Commission are called upon to pay special attention to vulnerable groups of women: disabled women, women of advanced age, women with little or no training, women with dependent persons in their charge, female immigrants and women belonging to minorities, all of whom constitute specific groups on whose behalf measures adapted to their circumstances must be taken. Gender equality beyond the Union : Members call for human rights for women and the ability to use them effectively to be given the highest priority in the EU’s external policies. Whilst welcoming the Arab Spring, Members call on Commission to develop specific support measures for gender equality in those countries. The report deplores the fact that rape is still used in certain regions of the world as a weapon. They call on the European External Action Service, to include this phenomenon as a priority on its political agenda. As regards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Members call for the improvement of maternal health and reproductive health by 2015 (about 1000 women still die each day from entirely avoidable pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications). They call on Member States to uphold their political and financial support for the MDGs, despite times of economic downturn. The report welcomes the recent decision of the United Nations to create an International Day of the Girl Child on 11 October , which is a powerful way to highlight the particular needs and rights of girls. Governance : Member calls on the incoming Council to reassess the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation with a view to adoption during the Danish Presidency. They call on the Council, within the on-going negotiations on the EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020, to introduce gender-responsive budgeting in the EU budgetary process. The Commission is called upon to: put forward proposals for leave arrangements for care for elderly or sick relatives; put forward a comprehensive communication on the situation of single-person households in the EU, with policy proposals to achieve fair treatment in areas like taxation, social security, housing, healthcare, insurance and pensions; publish reliable gender-disaggregated data and qualitative gender indicators so as to be able to properly evaluate and update the Commission’s Strategy for equality between Women and Men (2010-2015) as well as to monitor the cross-cutting nature of gender equality in all policies; present a Road Map on Equality for LGBTI people, analogous to the Gender Equality Road Map; investigate the treatment of victims of human trafficking and prostitution in the Member States.
  • date: 2012-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21255&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
FEMM/7/07283
New
  • FEMM/7/07283
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.04 Gender equality
  • 4.15.08 Work, employment, wages and salaries: equal opportunities women and men, and for all
New
4.10.04
Gender equality
4.15.08
Work, employment, wages and salaries: equal opportunities women and men, and for all
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000
New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000
New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
545fc318d1d1c57f99000000
New
4f1ac934b819f25efd00011a
activities
  • date: 2011-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=193 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2011)0193 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: REDING Viviane
  • date: 2011-10-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: JÁRÓKA Lívia group: S&D name: NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína group: ALDE name: WERTHMANN Angelika group: Verts/ALE name: CORNELISSEN Marije group: ECR name: YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael group: NI name: BLOOM Godfrey responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • date: 2012-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: JÁRÓKA Lívia group: S&D name: NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína group: ALDE name: WERTHMANN Angelika group: Verts/ALE name: CORNELISSEN Marije group: ECR name: YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael group: NI name: BLOOM Godfrey responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • date: 2012-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-41&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0041/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21255&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: JÁRÓKA Lívia group: S&D name: NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína group: ALDE name: WERTHMANN Angelika group: Verts/ALE name: CORNELISSEN Marije group: ECR name: YANNAKOUDAKIS Marina group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael group: NI name: BLOOM Godfrey responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
FEMM/7/07283
reference
2011/2244(INI)
title
Equality between women and men in the European Union - 2011
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject