BETA


2011/2309(INI) Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE TZAVELA Niki (icon: EFD EFD) BŘEZINA Jan (icon: PPE PPE), KALFIN Ivailo (icon: S&D S&D), HALL Fiona (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad (icon: ECR ECR), MATIAS Marisa (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052

Events

2012/11/21
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/11/21
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 492 to 129 with 43 abstentions a resolution on industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil and recalls that shale gas development can have a significant impact on the natural gas market in terms of dynamics and prices, as well as on power generation.

Potential resources: Parliament notes that various estimates of shale gas resources in Europe have been made and that several Member States have reserves. It considers that policymakers should have at their disposal more accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive scientific data to enable them to make informed choices. It agrees with the European Council that Europe’s potential for the sustainable extraction and use of shale gas and shale oil resources, without putting the availability and quality of water resources at risk, should be assessed and mapped in order to potentially enhance security of supply.

Energy markets : Members point out unconventional gas in the form of tight gas, shale gas and coal bed methane already contributes to more than half of gas production in the US, with shale gas showing the largest increase. The shale gas boom in the US has had a significant positive impact on the natural gas market and on gas and electricity prices. Parliament observes that US spot prices have fallen to a historic low, thus widening the price gap between the US and a Europe bound by long-term contracts , and having an impact on the competitiveness of Europe’s economies and industry. As the gas market becomes ever more global and interconnected, the development of shale gas will increase global gas-to-gas competition and will therefore continue to have a major effect on prices.

Parliament notes, on the other hand, that significant investments are needed for the establishment of all the necessary infrastructures related to the drilling and to the storage, transport and reprocessing of gas and fracking fluid, which have to be entirely covered by the industry.

In this context, the Commission is urged to:

· address, at the next meeting of the EU-US Energy Council, the potential impact of worldwide shale gas development on the LNG market and the lifting of possible restrictions to global LNG trade;

· come forward, by the end of 2013, with an analysis of the future of the global and EU gas market, including the impact of the gas infrastructure projects already planned (such as those developed in the context of the Southern Corridor), new LNG terminals, the impact of shale gas on the US gas market (notably on LNG import needs), and the impact of possible shale gas developments in the EU on the future of security of gas supply and prices. Parliament believes that the analysis should reflect, and take as a starting point, the current state of infrastructure development and the EU's 2020 CO2 targets. All relevant stakeholders should be consulted.

Transition to a decarbonised economy : Parliament agrees with the Commission that gas will be significant for the transformation of the energy system, as stated in the Energy Roadmap 2050, since it represents a quick, temporary and cost-efficient way of reducing reliance on other, dirtier fossil fuels before moving to fully sustainable low-carbon power generation, thereby lowering greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in those Member States that currently use large amounts of coal in power generation, should the impact studies conclude that these operations do not adversely affect either the environment, particularly groundwater, or the adjoining local communities.

Given the lack of comprehensive European data on the carbon footprint of shale gas, Parliament calls on the Commission to finalise its full life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas extraction and production, with a view to ensuring that they are correctly accounted for in future.

Parliament also calls on the Commission to:

· analyse the economics of CCS for gas in order to speed up the development and deployment of this technology and examine the likely impact of CCS technology on the flexibility of gas power generation, and therefore on its role as back-up for renewable energy sources;

· in line with the EU Energy Roadmap 2050 strategy, to evaluate the economic and environmental impact of and prospects for unconventional gas in the EU, taking into account what can be learnt from the USA's experience and regulation in this field, whilst recognising that the extent of unconventional gas use in the EU will ultimately be decided by the market and the decisions of the Member States acting within the framework of the EU's long-term climate and energy policy objectives;

· ask the European Environment Agency (EEA) to prepare a full-scale scientific environmental analysis of shale gas and shale oil exploitation and the potential impact of available techniques.

Public authorities are called on to produce an underground regional impact assessment in order to optimise resource allocation between geothermal energy, shale gas and other underground resources, and therefore maximise the benefits for society.

Industrial environment : Parliament recalls that the massive increase in US shale gas production has been supported by an established industrial environment, including sufficient numbers of rigs, the necessary manpower and an experienced and well-equipped service industry. It is aware that in the EU it will take time for the necessary service sector to build up adequate capacity and for companies to acquire the necessary equipment and experience, and that this is also likely to contribute to higher costs in the short term. Members encourage cooperation between relevant EU and US companies with a view to applying green completions, Best Available Technologies and environment-friendly industrial processes while reducing costs. They believe that expectations about the pace of shale gas development in the EU should be realistic and that any potential commercial extraction should be gradually phased and paced, in order to avoid boom-and-bust economic cycles with their significant adverse local impacts. Furthermore, a stable regulatory framework is essential both to create the right environment for gas companies to invest in much-needed infrastructure and research and development, and to prevent market distortions. Member States are urged to introduce the necessary skills required into their mainstream education and training systems, in order to prepare the necessary skilled labour force.

Parliament also calls for further research and development activity relating to tools and technologies, including CCS, so as to explore the possibility of a more sustainable and safe development of unconventional gas. It recommends that other Member States and the Commission examine the possibility of extracting shale gas without the use of chemicals , and calls for further research and development activity relating to such techniques and/or practices that would mitigate potential impacts on the environment. The Commission is urged to put forward recommendations for all shale gas wells in the EU for reducing fugitive methane emissions.

Licensing framework : Parliament calls on the Member States to put in place a robust regulatory regime and ensure the necessary administrative and monitoring resources for the sustainable development of all shale gas-related activities, including those required by EU environmental and climate protection legislation. It recalls that in accordance with the subsidiarity principle each Member State has the right to decide for itself on the exploitation of oil and shale gas.

Members express the view that Member States undertaking shale gas projects should adopt a one-stop-shop approach to authorisation and licensing and the examination of compliance with environmental regulations. They call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the modifications to the legal framework necessary for the licensing of shale gas exploration require the mandatory approval of the local authorities affected.

Public opinion and best practice : Members are well aware that public attitudes to shale gas development vary between Member States, and that negative attitudes might be caused by lack of information or misinformation. Therefore, Parliament:

· calls for improving and better provision of public information on shale gas operations to be provided in a transparent and objective manner, and supports the creation of portals providing access to a wide range of public information on such operations;

· urges companies considering extraction of shale gas in the EU to provide full information on their activities, to consult with local communities and local authorities prior to drilling, and to publicly disclose all chemicals used by them in hydraulic fracturing, including the concentrations used, following the assessment of the shale formation;

· stresses the importance of applying the highest safety standards , the best available technologies and the best operational practices in shale gas exploration and production, and of continuously improving technologies and practices and minimising adverse effects; stresses, in this respect, the importance of ensuring significant levels of R&D investment on behalf of the industry;

· calls on the EU to follow the US lead in shale gas environmental standards for fracking that require companies to capture methane and other pollutant gas emissions, as introduced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Members believe that concerns over the potential of shale gas development to damage water supplies through leakage from wells can be addressed through the adoption of best practices in well development and construction . They call on shale gas operators to test domestic water wells close to their wells both before and during production, and to disclose the resulting information to the public in an accessible, understandable and transparent manner.

Lastly, they recall that the “ polluter pays ” principle must be consistently applied to shale gas and shale oil operations, particularly regarding waste water treatment, and that companies must be fully liable for any direct or indirect damage they might cause.

Documents
2012/11/21
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/11/20
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/09/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Energy, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Niki TZAVELA (EFD, EL) on industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil.

Potential resources: the report notes that various estimates of shale gas resources in Europe have been made and that several Member States have reserves. They consider that policymakers should have at their disposal more accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive scientific data to enable them to make informed choices. They agree, therefore, with the European Council that Europe’s potential for the sustainable extraction and use of shale gas and shale oil resources, without putting the availability and quality of water resources at risk, should be assessed and mapped in order to potentially enhance security of supply.

Energy markets : Members point out that the shale gas boom in the US has already had a significant positive impact on the natural gas market and on gas and electricity prices. They observe that US spot prices have fallen to a historic low, thus widening the price gap between the US and a Europe bound by long-term contracts , and having an impact on the competitiveness of Europe’s economies and industry. As the gas market becomes ever more global and interconnected, the development of shale gas will increase global gas-to-gas competition and will therefore continue to have a major effect on prices.

The report notes, on the other hand, that significant investments are needed for the establishment of all the necessary infrastructures related to the drilling and to the storage, transport and reprocessing of gas and fracking fluid, which have to be entirely covered by the industry.

In this context, the Commission is urged to:

· address, at the next meeting of the EU-US Energy Council , the potential impact of worldwide shale gas development on the LNG market and the lifting of possible restrictions to global LNG trade;

· come forward by the end of 2012 with an analysis of the future of the global and EU gas market , including the impact of the gas infrastructure projects already planned, new LNG terminals, the impact of shale gas on the US gas market and the impact of possible shale gas developments in the EU on the future of security of gas supply and prices. All relevant stakeholders should be consulted.

Transition to a decarbonised economy : Members take the view that shale gas has in the short to medium term a role to play in the EU , contributing to achieving the EU’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. They believe that shale gas could play a critical role in this, particularly in those Member States that currently use large amounts of coal in power generation, should the impact studies conclude that these operations do not adversely affect either the environment, particularly groundwater, or the adjoining local communities.

The Commission is urged to evaluate the economic and environmental impact of and prospects for unconventional gas in the EU , taking into account what can be learnt from the USA’s experience and regulation in this field, whilst recognising that the extent of unconventional gas use in the EU will ultimately be decided by the market and the decisions of the Member States acting within the framework of the EU’s long-term climate and energy policy objectives.

Public authorities are called on to produce an underground regional impact assessment in order to optimise resource allocation between geothermal energy, shale gas and other underground resources, and therefore maximise the benefits for society.

Industrial environment : the Members are aware that in the EU it will take time for the necessary service sector to build up adequate capacity and for companies to acquire the necessary equipment and experience to support a high level of sustainable shale gas production, and that this is also likely to contribute to higher costs in the short term. They encourage cooperation between relevant EU and US companies with a view to applying green completions, Best Available Technologies and environment-friendly industrial processes while reducing costs. The report also points out that a stable regulatory framework is essential both to create the right environment for gas companies to invest in much-needed infrastructure and research and development, and to prevent market distortions. They also underline the importance of supporting the development of the shale gas industry by establishing the necessary infrastructure, particularly in terms of pipelines, provided that shale gas exploitation projects are financially and socially sustainable.

LicLicensing framework : the report calls on the Member States to put in place a robust regulatory regime and ensure the necessary administrative and monitoring resources for the sustainable development of all shale gas-related activities, including those required by EU environmental and climate protection legislation. It recalls that in accordance with the subsidiarity principle each Member State has the right to decide for itself on the exploitation of oil and shale gas.

The Members express the view that Member States undertaking shale gas projects should adopt a one-stop-shop approach to authorisation and licensing and the examination of compliance with environmental regulations. They call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the modifications to the legal framework necessary for the licensing of shale gas exploration require the mandatory approval of the local authorities affected.

Public opinion and best practice : the Members are well aware that public attitudes to shale gas development vary between Member States, and that negative attitudes might be caused by lack of information or misinformation. Therefore, the report:

· calls for improving and better provision of public information on shale gas operations to be provided in a transparent and objective manner, and supports the creation of portals providing access to a wide range of public information on such operations;

· urges companies considering extraction of shale gas in the EU to provide full information on their activities, to consult with local communities and local authorities prior to drilling, and to publicly disclose all chemicals used by them in hydraulic fracturing, including the concentrations used, following the assessment of the shale formation;

· stresses the importance of applying the highest safety standards , the best available technologies and the best operational practices in shale gas exploration and production, and of continuously improving technologies and practices and minimising adverse effects; stresses, in this respect, the importance of ensuring significant levels of R&D investment on behalf of the industry.

The Members believe that concerns over the potential of shale gas development to damage water supplies through leakage from wells can be addressed through the adoption of best practices in well development and construction .

Lastly, they recall that the “ polluter pays ” principle must be consistently applied to shale gas and shale oil operations, particularly regarding waste water treatment, and that companies must be fully liable for any direct or indirect damage they might cause.

Documents
2012/09/18
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2012/05/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/03/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2011/12/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2011/12/14
   EP - TZAVELA Niki (EFD) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
223 2011/2309(INI)
2012/05/15 ITRE 223 amendments...
source: PE-489.454

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: TZAVELA Niki date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Democracy abbr: EFD
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TZAVELA Niki group: Europe of Freedom and Democracy abbr: EFD
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-284&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0284_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-444
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0444_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BŘEZINA Jan group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: HALL Fiona group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
  • date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BŘEZINA Jan group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: HALL Fiona group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
  • date: 2012-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-284&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0284/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121120&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22011&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-444 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0444/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TZAVELA Niki group: Europe of Freedom and Democracy abbr: EFD
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
docs
  • date: 2012-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.123 title: PE486.123 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.454 title: PE489.454 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-09-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-284&language=EN title: A7-0284/2012 summary: The Committee on Energy, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Niki TZAVELA (EFD, EL) on industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil. Potential resources: the report notes that various estimates of shale gas resources in Europe have been made and that several Member States have reserves. They consider that policymakers should have at their disposal more accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive scientific data to enable them to make informed choices. They agree, therefore, with the European Council that Europe’s potential for the sustainable extraction and use of shale gas and shale oil resources, without putting the availability and quality of water resources at risk, should be assessed and mapped in order to potentially enhance security of supply. Energy markets : Members point out that the shale gas boom in the US has already had a significant positive impact on the natural gas market and on gas and electricity prices. They observe that US spot prices have fallen to a historic low, thus widening the price gap between the US and a Europe bound by long-term contracts , and having an impact on the competitiveness of Europe’s economies and industry. As the gas market becomes ever more global and interconnected, the development of shale gas will increase global gas-to-gas competition and will therefore continue to have a major effect on prices. The report notes, on the other hand, that significant investments are needed for the establishment of all the necessary infrastructures related to the drilling and to the storage, transport and reprocessing of gas and fracking fluid, which have to be entirely covered by the industry. In this context, the Commission is urged to: · address, at the next meeting of the EU-US Energy Council , the potential impact of worldwide shale gas development on the LNG market and the lifting of possible restrictions to global LNG trade; · come forward by the end of 2012 with an analysis of the future of the global and EU gas market , including the impact of the gas infrastructure projects already planned, new LNG terminals, the impact of shale gas on the US gas market and the impact of possible shale gas developments in the EU on the future of security of gas supply and prices. All relevant stakeholders should be consulted. Transition to a decarbonised economy : Members take the view that shale gas has in the short to medium term a role to play in the EU , contributing to achieving the EU’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. They believe that shale gas could play a critical role in this, particularly in those Member States that currently use large amounts of coal in power generation, should the impact studies conclude that these operations do not adversely affect either the environment, particularly groundwater, or the adjoining local communities. The Commission is urged to evaluate the economic and environmental impact of and prospects for unconventional gas in the EU , taking into account what can be learnt from the USA’s experience and regulation in this field, whilst recognising that the extent of unconventional gas use in the EU will ultimately be decided by the market and the decisions of the Member States acting within the framework of the EU’s long-term climate and energy policy objectives. Public authorities are called on to produce an underground regional impact assessment in order to optimise resource allocation between geothermal energy, shale gas and other underground resources, and therefore maximise the benefits for society. Industrial environment : the Members are aware that in the EU it will take time for the necessary service sector to build up adequate capacity and for companies to acquire the necessary equipment and experience to support a high level of sustainable shale gas production, and that this is also likely to contribute to higher costs in the short term. They encourage cooperation between relevant EU and US companies with a view to applying green completions, Best Available Technologies and environment-friendly industrial processes while reducing costs. The report also points out that a stable regulatory framework is essential both to create the right environment for gas companies to invest in much-needed infrastructure and research and development, and to prevent market distortions. They also underline the importance of supporting the development of the shale gas industry by establishing the necessary infrastructure, particularly in terms of pipelines, provided that shale gas exploitation projects are financially and socially sustainable. LicLicensing framework : the report calls on the Member States to put in place a robust regulatory regime and ensure the necessary administrative and monitoring resources for the sustainable development of all shale gas-related activities, including those required by EU environmental and climate protection legislation. It recalls that in accordance with the subsidiarity principle each Member State has the right to decide for itself on the exploitation of oil and shale gas. The Members express the view that Member States undertaking shale gas projects should adopt a one-stop-shop approach to authorisation and licensing and the examination of compliance with environmental regulations. They call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the modifications to the legal framework necessary for the licensing of shale gas exploration require the mandatory approval of the local authorities affected. Public opinion and best practice : the Members are well aware that public attitudes to shale gas development vary between Member States, and that negative attitudes might be caused by lack of information or misinformation. Therefore, the report: · calls for improving and better provision of public information on shale gas operations to be provided in a transparent and objective manner, and supports the creation of portals providing access to a wide range of public information on such operations; · urges companies considering extraction of shale gas in the EU to provide full information on their activities, to consult with local communities and local authorities prior to drilling, and to publicly disclose all chemicals used by them in hydraulic fracturing, including the concentrations used, following the assessment of the shale formation; · stresses the importance of applying the highest safety standards , the best available technologies and the best operational practices in shale gas exploration and production, and of continuously improving technologies and practices and minimising adverse effects; stresses, in this respect, the importance of ensuring significant levels of R&D investment on behalf of the industry. The Members believe that concerns over the potential of shale gas development to damage water supplies through leakage from wells can be addressed through the adoption of best practices in well development and construction . Lastly, they recall that the “ polluter pays ” principle must be consistently applied to shale gas and shale oil operations, particularly regarding waste water treatment, and that companies must be fully liable for any direct or indirect damage they might cause.
  • date: 2012-11-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121120&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-11-21T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22011&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-11-21T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-444 title: T7-0444/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 492 to 129 with 43 abstentions a resolution on industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil and recalls that shale gas development can have a significant impact on the natural gas market in terms of dynamics and prices, as well as on power generation. Potential resources: Parliament notes that various estimates of shale gas resources in Europe have been made and that several Member States have reserves. It considers that policymakers should have at their disposal more accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive scientific data to enable them to make informed choices. It agrees with the European Council that Europe’s potential for the sustainable extraction and use of shale gas and shale oil resources, without putting the availability and quality of water resources at risk, should be assessed and mapped in order to potentially enhance security of supply. Energy markets : Members point out unconventional gas in the form of tight gas, shale gas and coal bed methane already contributes to more than half of gas production in the US, with shale gas showing the largest increase. The shale gas boom in the US has had a significant positive impact on the natural gas market and on gas and electricity prices. Parliament observes that US spot prices have fallen to a historic low, thus widening the price gap between the US and a Europe bound by long-term contracts , and having an impact on the competitiveness of Europe’s economies and industry. As the gas market becomes ever more global and interconnected, the development of shale gas will increase global gas-to-gas competition and will therefore continue to have a major effect on prices. Parliament notes, on the other hand, that significant investments are needed for the establishment of all the necessary infrastructures related to the drilling and to the storage, transport and reprocessing of gas and fracking fluid, which have to be entirely covered by the industry. In this context, the Commission is urged to: · address, at the next meeting of the EU-US Energy Council, the potential impact of worldwide shale gas development on the LNG market and the lifting of possible restrictions to global LNG trade; · come forward, by the end of 2013, with an analysis of the future of the global and EU gas market, including the impact of the gas infrastructure projects already planned (such as those developed in the context of the Southern Corridor), new LNG terminals, the impact of shale gas on the US gas market (notably on LNG import needs), and the impact of possible shale gas developments in the EU on the future of security of gas supply and prices. Parliament believes that the analysis should reflect, and take as a starting point, the current state of infrastructure development and the EU's 2020 CO2 targets. All relevant stakeholders should be consulted. Transition to a decarbonised economy : Parliament agrees with the Commission that gas will be significant for the transformation of the energy system, as stated in the Energy Roadmap 2050, since it represents a quick, temporary and cost-efficient way of reducing reliance on other, dirtier fossil fuels before moving to fully sustainable low-carbon power generation, thereby lowering greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in those Member States that currently use large amounts of coal in power generation, should the impact studies conclude that these operations do not adversely affect either the environment, particularly groundwater, or the adjoining local communities. Given the lack of comprehensive European data on the carbon footprint of shale gas, Parliament calls on the Commission to finalise its full life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas extraction and production, with a view to ensuring that they are correctly accounted for in future. Parliament also calls on the Commission to: · analyse the economics of CCS for gas in order to speed up the development and deployment of this technology and examine the likely impact of CCS technology on the flexibility of gas power generation, and therefore on its role as back-up for renewable energy sources; · in line with the EU Energy Roadmap 2050 strategy, to evaluate the economic and environmental impact of and prospects for unconventional gas in the EU, taking into account what can be learnt from the USA's experience and regulation in this field, whilst recognising that the extent of unconventional gas use in the EU will ultimately be decided by the market and the decisions of the Member States acting within the framework of the EU's long-term climate and energy policy objectives; · ask the European Environment Agency (EEA) to prepare a full-scale scientific environmental analysis of shale gas and shale oil exploitation and the potential impact of available techniques. Public authorities are called on to produce an underground regional impact assessment in order to optimise resource allocation between geothermal energy, shale gas and other underground resources, and therefore maximise the benefits for society. Industrial environment : Parliament recalls that the massive increase in US shale gas production has been supported by an established industrial environment, including sufficient numbers of rigs, the necessary manpower and an experienced and well-equipped service industry. It is aware that in the EU it will take time for the necessary service sector to build up adequate capacity and for companies to acquire the necessary equipment and experience, and that this is also likely to contribute to higher costs in the short term. Members encourage cooperation between relevant EU and US companies with a view to applying green completions, Best Available Technologies and environment-friendly industrial processes while reducing costs. They believe that expectations about the pace of shale gas development in the EU should be realistic and that any potential commercial extraction should be gradually phased and paced, in order to avoid boom-and-bust economic cycles with their significant adverse local impacts. Furthermore, a stable regulatory framework is essential both to create the right environment for gas companies to invest in much-needed infrastructure and research and development, and to prevent market distortions. Member States are urged to introduce the necessary skills required into their mainstream education and training systems, in order to prepare the necessary skilled labour force. Parliament also calls for further research and development activity relating to tools and technologies, including CCS, so as to explore the possibility of a more sustainable and safe development of unconventional gas. It recommends that other Member States and the Commission examine the possibility of extracting shale gas without the use of chemicals , and calls for further research and development activity relating to such techniques and/or practices that would mitigate potential impacts on the environment. The Commission is urged to put forward recommendations for all shale gas wells in the EU for reducing fugitive methane emissions. Licensing framework : Parliament calls on the Member States to put in place a robust regulatory regime and ensure the necessary administrative and monitoring resources for the sustainable development of all shale gas-related activities, including those required by EU environmental and climate protection legislation. It recalls that in accordance with the subsidiarity principle each Member State has the right to decide for itself on the exploitation of oil and shale gas. Members express the view that Member States undertaking shale gas projects should adopt a one-stop-shop approach to authorisation and licensing and the examination of compliance with environmental regulations. They call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the modifications to the legal framework necessary for the licensing of shale gas exploration require the mandatory approval of the local authorities affected. Public opinion and best practice : Members are well aware that public attitudes to shale gas development vary between Member States, and that negative attitudes might be caused by lack of information or misinformation. Therefore, Parliament: · calls for improving and better provision of public information on shale gas operations to be provided in a transparent and objective manner, and supports the creation of portals providing access to a wide range of public information on such operations; · urges companies considering extraction of shale gas in the EU to provide full information on their activities, to consult with local communities and local authorities prior to drilling, and to publicly disclose all chemicals used by them in hydraulic fracturing, including the concentrations used, following the assessment of the shale formation; · stresses the importance of applying the highest safety standards , the best available technologies and the best operational practices in shale gas exploration and production, and of continuously improving technologies and practices and minimising adverse effects; stresses, in this respect, the importance of ensuring significant levels of R&D investment on behalf of the industry; · calls on the EU to follow the US lead in shale gas environmental standards for fracking that require companies to capture methane and other pollutant gas emissions, as introduced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Members believe that concerns over the potential of shale gas development to damage water supplies through leakage from wells can be addressed through the adoption of best practices in well development and construction . They call on shale gas operators to test domestic water wells close to their wells both before and during production, and to disclose the resulting information to the public in an accessible, understandable and transparent manner. Lastly, they recall that the “ polluter pays ” principle must be consistently applied to shale gas and shale oil operations, particularly regarding waste water treatment, and that companies must be fully liable for any direct or indirect damage they might cause.
  • date: 2012-11-21T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/7/07776
New
  • ITRE/7/07776
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40 Industrial policy
  • 3.40.16 Raw materials
  • 3.60 Energy policy
  • 3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels
  • 3.60.03 Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
New
3.40
Industrial policy
3.40.16
Raw materials
3.60
Energy policy
3.60.02
Oil industry, motor fuels
3.60.03
Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
activities
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BŘEZINA Jan group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: HALL Fiona group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
  • date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BŘEZINA Jan group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: HALL Fiona group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
  • date: 2012-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-284&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0284/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121120&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22011&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-444 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0444/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: BŘEZINA Jan group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: HALL Fiona group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/7/07776
reference
2011/2309(INI)
title
Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject