BETA


2012/2069(ACI) Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFCO HÄFNER Gerald (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) TRZASKOWSKI Rafał (icon: PPE PPE), GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (icon: S&D S&D), DUFF Andrew (icon: ALDE ALDE), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (icon: EFD EFD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 148

Events

2014/04/01
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude an Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on the forwarding to the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council

ACT: Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy.

BACKGROUND: the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament informed is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), under the terms of which Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council .

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose.

CONTENT: this agreement establishes the procedures concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy, which is relevant in order for the European Parliament to exercise its powers and functions.

Scope : are affected:

· proposals subject to a special legislative procedure or to another decision-making procedure under which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent ;

· international agreements on which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent ;

· negotiating directives for international agreements referred to in the previous poin t;

· activities, evaluation reports or other documents on which the European Parliament is to be informed; and

· documents on the activities of those Union agencies in the evaluation or scrutiny of which the European Parliament is to be involved .

Typology of information : the IIA distinguishes four levels of classified information :

1. ‘RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED’,

2. ‘CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL’,

3. ‘SECRET UE/EU SECRET’,

4. ‘TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET’.

Management and protection of ‘classified information’ : a series of provisions are intended to define the classified information that may be sent to the European Parliament. In general, there is a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification.

The European Parliament shall take the appropriate measures to ensure that classified information provided to it by the Council shall not:

· be used for purposes other than those for which access was provided;

· be disclosed to others or made public;

· be released to other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or to Member States, third States or international organisations without the prior written consent of the Council.

In addition, t he Council may not grant the European Parliament access to classified information which originates in other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or in Member States or third States.

Data security : where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, access may be granted only to Members of the European Parliament authorised by the President of the European Parliament and on certain conditions (notably, security-cleared).

However, where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL or its equivalent, access may also be granted to those Members of the European Parliament who have signed a solemn declaration of non-disclosure. It would also be possible to grant access to those officials working for political groups on certain conditions specified in the IIA.

Procedure for accessing classified information : the Council should provide classified information to the European Parliament where it is under a legal obligation to do so pursuant to the Treaties or to legal acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties. In other cases, the Council may provide classified information to the European Parliament either at its own initiative or on written request from the President, the Conference of Presidents, the Bureau, the chair(s) of the committee(s) concerned or even the Rapporteurs concerned.

Registration, storage, consultation and discussion of classified information : where it is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, classified information provided by the Council to the European Parliament should:

· be registered for security purposes to record its life-cycle and ensure its traceability at all times;

· be stored in a secure area which meets the minimum standards of physical security laid down in the Council’s security rules and the European Parliament’s security rules; and

· only be consulted by the relevant Members of the European Parliament, officials of the European Parliament and other Parliament employees working for political groups in a secure reading room within the European Parliament’s premises and under certain confidentiality conditions.

Types of treatment of classified information are provided for by the IIA with a differentiation in the handling depending on the level of confidentiality of the documents concerned.

Breach of security, loss or compromise of classified information : some provisions are provided to sanction any loss or compromise of classified information provided by the Council. Any Member or official who is responsible for a breach of the provisions laid down in the European Parliament’s security rules or in this Agreement shall be liable to penalties .

Review : the IIA may be reviewed at the request of either institution in the light of experience in implementing it.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 01.04.2014.

2014/03/03
   CSL - Council Meeting
2012/09/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/09/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/09/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU .

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council .

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy (" the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement ") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification; a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned; provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

Documents
2012/09/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/07/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council .

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy (" the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement ") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification; a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned; provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification; the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.

Documents
2012/07/12
   EP - Vote in committee
2012/06/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/05/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/04/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/03/22
   EP - HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0245/2012 - Gerald Häfner - Vote unique #

2012/09/13 Outcome: +: 587, -: 7, 0: 6
DE FR IT PL ES GB RO CZ SE HU EL PT AT BE BG IE SK FI LT DK NL SI LV LU EE CY MT ??
Total
89
63
54
45
41
49
30
21
19
19
18
16
17
14
12
11
11
10
8
8
8
7
7
6
6
6
3
2
icon: PPE PPE
219

Czechia PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
2
icon: S&D S&D
155

Bulgaria S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Spain ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

1
3

Netherlands ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
40

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
3

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Netherlands NI

1
icon: EFD EFD
23

Poland EFD

2

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
3 2012/2069(ACI)
2012/06/14 AFCO 3 amendments...
source: PE-491.308

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-PR-489377_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-491308_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2012-07-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0245_EN.html title: A7-0245/2012
summary
events/2
date
2012-07-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0245_EN.html title: A7-0245/2012
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-09-13-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0339_EN.html title: T7-0339/2012
summary
events/5
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0339_EN.html title: T7-0339/2012
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 148
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 140
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
rapporteur
name: HÄFNER Gerald date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÄFNER Gerald group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0245_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0339_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
  • date: 2012-07-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
  • date: 2012-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0245/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21905&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0339/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-03-03T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3298
  • date: 2014-04-01T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÄFNER Gerald group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFCO
date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3298 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3298*&MEET_DATE=03/03/2014 date: 2014-03-03T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2012-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377 title: PE489.377 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-06-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308 title: PE491.308 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2012-04-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-07-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-07-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN title: A7-0245/2012 summary: The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy. It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU. In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council . Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy (" the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement ") until other arrangements are agreed. In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature. Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement: a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification; a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned; provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents. Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement. They regret the following, however: that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification; the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21905&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339 title: T7-0339/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy. BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU . In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council . Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy (" the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement ") until other arrangements are agreed. In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision. Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement: a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification; a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission; the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned; provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents. Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-04-01T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to conclude an Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on the forwarding to the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council ACT: Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. BACKGROUND: the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament informed is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), under the terms of which Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council . In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. CONTENT: this agreement establishes the procedures concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy, which is relevant in order for the European Parliament to exercise its powers and functions. Scope : are affected: · proposals subject to a special legislative procedure or to another decision-making procedure under which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent ; · international agreements on which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent ; · negotiating directives for international agreements referred to in the previous poin t; · activities, evaluation reports or other documents on which the European Parliament is to be informed; and · documents on the activities of those Union agencies in the evaluation or scrutiny of which the European Parliament is to be involved . Typology of information : the IIA distinguishes four levels of classified information : 1. ‘RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED’, 2. ‘CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL’, 3. ‘SECRET UE/EU SECRET’, 4. ‘TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET’. Management and protection of ‘classified information’ : a series of provisions are intended to define the classified information that may be sent to the European Parliament. In general, there is a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification. The European Parliament shall take the appropriate measures to ensure that classified information provided to it by the Council shall not: · be used for purposes other than those for which access was provided; · be disclosed to others or made public; · be released to other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or to Member States, third States or international organisations without the prior written consent of the Council. In addition, t he Council may not grant the European Parliament access to classified information which originates in other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or in Member States or third States. Data security : where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, access may be granted only to Members of the European Parliament authorised by the President of the European Parliament and on certain conditions (notably, security-cleared). However, where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL or its equivalent, access may also be granted to those Members of the European Parliament who have signed a solemn declaration of non-disclosure. It would also be possible to grant access to those officials working for political groups on certain conditions specified in the IIA. Procedure for accessing classified information : the Council should provide classified information to the European Parliament where it is under a legal obligation to do so pursuant to the Treaties or to legal acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties. In other cases, the Council may provide classified information to the European Parliament either at its own initiative or on written request from the President, the Conference of Presidents, the Bureau, the chair(s) of the committee(s) concerned or even the Rapporteurs concerned. Registration, storage, consultation and discussion of classified information : where it is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, classified information provided by the Council to the European Parliament should: · be registered for security purposes to record its life-cycle and ensure its traceability at all times; · be stored in a secure area which meets the minimum standards of physical security laid down in the Council’s security rules and the European Parliament’s security rules; and · only be consulted by the relevant Members of the European Parliament, officials of the European Parliament and other Parliament employees working for political groups in a secure reading room within the European Parliament’s premises and under certain confidentiality conditions. Types of treatment of classified information are provided for by the IIA with a differentiation in the handling depending on the level of confidentiality of the documents concerned. Breach of security, loss or compromise of classified information : some provisions are provided to sanction any loss or compromise of classified information provided by the Council. Any Member or official who is responsible for a breach of the provisions laid down in the European Parliament’s security rules or in this Agreement shall be liable to penalties . Review : the IIA may be reviewed at the request of either institution in the light of experience in implementing it. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 01.04.2014. docs: title: Third pillar act 2014/401 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32014Y0401(01) title: OJ C 095 01.04.2014, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2014:095:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFCO/7/09318
New
  • AFCO/7/09318
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ C 095 01.04.2014, p. 0001
New
Third pillar act 2014/401
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2014:095:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32014Y0401(01)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 140
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 140
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.40.01 European Parliament
  • 8.40.02 Council of the Union
  • 8.40.10 Interinstitutional relations, democratic deficit, subsidiarity, comitology
New
8.40.01
European Parliament
8.40.02
Council of the Union
8.40.10
Interinstitutional relations, subsidiarity, proportionality, comitology
procedure/title
Old
Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
New
Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy
other/0/dg/title
Old
Secretariat General
New
Secretariat-General
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefa
New
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de188f10fb8127435bdc3f7
New
4f1adc16b819f207b30000fe
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1852d0fb8127435bdbe9e
New
4f1ac8c7b819f25efd0000f1
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de1843a0fb8127435bdbd46
New
4f1ac7b2b819f25efd0000a1
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
New
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12a
New
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c
activities/1/body
EP
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
activities/1/date
Old
2014-04-01T00:00:00
New
2012-07-12T00:00:00
activities/1/type
Old
Final act published in Official Journal
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/body
EP
activities/5/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
activities/5/date
Old
2012-07-12T00:00:00
New
2014-04-01T00:00:00
activities/5/text
  • PURPOSE: to conclude an Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on the forwarding to the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council

    ACT: Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy.

    BACKGROUND: the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament informed is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), under the terms of which Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure

    In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

    In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose.

    CONTENT: this agreement establishes the procedures concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy, which is relevant in order for the European Parliament to exercise its powers and functions.

    Scope: are affected:

    ·         proposals subject to a special legislative procedure or to another decision-making procedure under which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent;

    ·         international agreements on which the European Parliament is to be consulted or is required to give its consent;

    ·         negotiating directives for international agreements referred to in the previous point;

    ·         activities, evaluation reports or other documents on which the European Parliament is to be informed; and

    ·         documents on the activities of those Union agencies in the evaluation or scrutiny of which the European Parliament is to be involved.

    Typology of information: the IIA distinguishes four levels of classified information:

    1.      ‘RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED’,

    2.      ‘CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL’,

    3.      ‘SECRET UE/EU SECRET’,

    4.      ‘TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET’.

    Management and protection of ‘classified information’: a series of provisions are intended to define the classified information that may be sent to the European Parliament. In general, there is a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification.

    The European Parliament shall take the appropriate measures to ensure that classified information provided to it by the Council shall not:

    ·         be used for purposes other than those for which access was provided;

    ·         be disclosed to others or made public;

    ·         be released to other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or to Member States, third States or international organisations without the prior written consent of the Council.

    In addition, the Council may not grant the European Parliament access to classified information which originates in other Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or in Member States or third States.

    Data security: where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, access may be granted only to Members of the European Parliament authorised by the President of the European Parliament and on certain conditions (notably, security-cleared).

    However, where the information concerned is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL or its equivalent, access may also be granted to those Members of the European Parliament who have signed a solemn declaration of non-disclosure. It would also be possible to grant access to those officials working for political groups on certain conditions specified in the IIA.

    Procedure for accessing classified information: the Council should provide classified information to the European Parliament where it is under a legal obligation to do so pursuant to the Treaties or to legal acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties. In other cases, the Council may provide classified information to the European Parliament either at its own initiative or on written request from the President, the Conference of Presidents, the Bureau, the chair(s) of the committee(s) concerned or even the Rapporteurs concerned.

    Registration, storage, consultation and discussion of classified information: where it is classified at the level CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET UE/EU SECRET or TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET or its equivalent, classified information provided by the Council to the European Parliament should:

    ·         be registered for security purposes to record its life-cycle and ensure its traceability at all times;

    ·         be stored in a secure area which meets the minimum standards of physical security laid down in the Council’s security rules and the European Parliament’s security rules; and

    ·         only be consulted by the relevant Members of the European Parliament, officials of the European Parliament and other Parliament employees working for political groups in a secure reading room within the European Parliament’s premises and under certain confidentiality conditions.

    Types of treatment of classified information are provided for by the IIA with a differentiation in the handling depending on the level of confidentiality of the documents concerned.

    Breach of security, loss or compromise of classified information: some provisions are provided to sanction any loss or compromise of classified information provided by the Council. Any Member or official who is responsible for a breach of the provisions laid down in the European Parliament’s security rules or in this Agreement shall be liable to penalties.

    Review: the IIA may be reviewed at the request of either institution in the light of experience in implementing it.

    ENTRY INTO FORCE: 01.04.2014.

activities/5/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Final act published in Official Journal
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefa
New
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de188f10fb8127435bdc3f7
New
4f1adc16b819f207b30000fe
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1852d0fb8127435bdbe9e
New
4f1ac8c7b819f25efd0000f1
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de1843a0fb8127435bdbd46
New
4f1ac7b2b819f25efd0000a1
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
New
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12a
New
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2014:095:TOC
title
OJ C 095 01.04.2014, p. 0001
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 140
activities/5
date
2014-04-01T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in Parliament
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4
date
2014-03-03T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
meeting_id
3298
activities/3/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
type
Debate in Parliament
title
Debate in Parliament
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/2
date
2012-06-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE491.308
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/date
Old
2012-05-07T00:00:00
New
2012-09-13T00:00:00
activities/3/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339
text

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
title
T7-0339/2012
activities/3/docs/1/title
Old
PE489.377
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/3/docs/1/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/3/docs/1/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21905&l=en
activities/3/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
activities/5/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
type
Debate in Parliament
title
Debate in Parliament
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/5/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
type
Debate in Parliament
title
Debate in Parliament
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/5/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
type
Debate in Parliament
title
Debate in Parliament
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/5/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRE
type
Debate in Parliament
title
Debate in Parliament
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/4/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
New

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
activities/5/docs/0/text/0
Old

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

New

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

activities/4/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
New

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
activities/5/docs/0/text/0
Old

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

New

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

activities/1/date
Old
2012-06-14T00:00:00
New
2012-05-07T00:00:00
activities/1/docs/0/title
Old
PE491.308
New
PE489.377
activities/1/docs/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377
activities/1/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/2
date
2012-05-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377 type: Committee draft report title: PE489.377
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/2/date
Old
2012-06-13T00:00:00
New
2012-06-14T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE491.308
activities/2/type
Old
Deadline Amendments
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/4/date
Old
2012-03-15T00:00:00
New
2012-07-18T00:00:00
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0245/2012
activities/4/type
Old
EP officialisation
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/5/date
Old
2012-07-18T00:00:00
New
2012-09-13T00:00:00
activities/5/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
New

The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

activities/5/docs/0/title
Old
A7-0245/2012
New
T7-0339/2012
activities/5/docs/0/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339
activities/5/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21905&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
activities/7
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
activities/7/docs/1
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21905&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/7/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

    BACKGROUND: it should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

    In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

    Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

    In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter.

    After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations which resulted in a final agreement which is the subject of this decision.

    Main points of the Interinstitutional Agreement:

    • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
    • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
    • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
    • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
    • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

    Parliament welcomes the statement attached to the agreement concerning the classification of documents amending the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement to reflect both the reforms carried out since it was concluded and the current situation. It regrets however that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification.

activities/4
date
2012-06-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.308 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE491.308
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/7
body
EC
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General Commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
activities/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-339
activities/6/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0339/2012
activities/6/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/6
body
EP
date
2012-09-12T00:00:00
type
EP 1R Plenary
activities/7/date
Old
2012-09-12T00:00:00
New
2012-09-13T00:00:00
activities/6/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
EP 1R Plenary
activities/8
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate scheduled
activities/5/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

·        a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;

·        a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;

·        the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;

·        the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;

·        provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
New

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

It should be recalled that the Treaty of Lisbon extended the European Parliament’s powers in the field of international agreements. The requirement for the Council to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure is explicitly laid down in Article 218(10) of the TFEU.

In order to effectively exercise its prerogatives and competences, Parliament must therefore be able to access classified information held by the Council.

Until now, Parliament’s access to all classified information which relates exclusively to the common foreign and security policy will continue to be governed by arrangements under an ad hoc Council decision or under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy ("the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement") until other arrangements are agreed.

In view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these rules should be reviewed in order to lay down arrangements for cooperation between Council and Parliament. Article 295 TFEU allows for the conclusion of an Interinstitutional agreement for that purpose. The Conference of Presidents decided to nominate a European Parliament negotiating team to conduct talks with the Council of Ministers on this matter. After several months of discussions, the team approved the result of the interinstitutional negotiations and referred the draft IIA to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 127 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. It is the result of these negotiations which is now before Parliament for its approval and signature.

Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

  • a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;
  • a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;
  • the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;
  • provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

They regret the following, however:

  • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
  • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report by Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy.

    Members welcome the following aspects contained in the agreement:

    ·        a differentiation in the handling and storage of documents depending on the level of classification;

    ·        a differentiation in procedures as regards security clearance for Members and staff depending on the level of classification, whereby no security clearance will be necessary for Members in respect of documents beneath the level of "CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL" or equivalent, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;

    ·        the inclusion of documents classified at the level of "TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET" or equivalent within the scope of the agreement, as is the case in the abovementioned Framework Agreement between Parliament and the Commission;

    ·        the fact that access to documents, as appropriate, may be granted also to rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, or all or certain members of the committee(s) concerned;

    ·        provisions on close cooperation between Parliament and the Council to ensure equivalent levels of protection for classified documents.

    Members draw attention to the statement by the European Parliament and the Council attached to the agreement, which states that a review of the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement should begin in the course of 2012 and should take account of the experience gained in implementing both the agreement and the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement.

    They regret the following however:

    • that, unlike the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament, the agreement does not lay down a detailed procedure to be followed in cases of doubt regarding the confidential nature of an item of information or its appropriate level of classification;
    • the fact that the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement did not set out more clear-cut arrangements on access to classified information concerning the common foreign and security policy than the adoption of ad hoc decisions.
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-245&language=EN
activities/5
date
2012-07-18T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0245/2012
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
activities/4/type
Old
Prev Adopt in Cte
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote scheduled
activities/6
body
EC
date
2012-09-12T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General Commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
activities/2
date
2012-05-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377 type: Committee draft report title: PE489.377
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/2/body
Old
EC
New
EP
activities/2/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General Commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
activities/2/date
Old
2012-09-11T00:00:00
New
2012-05-07T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377 type: Committee draft report title: PE489.377
activities/2/type
Old
Prev DG PRES
New
Committee draft report
activities/5
body
EP
date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
type
EP 1R Plenary
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
EP 1R Plenary
activities/6
body
EC
date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General Commissioner: ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
activities/7
date
2012-09-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4/date
Old
2012-07-11T00:00:00
New
2012-07-12T00:00:00
activities/3
body
EP
date
2012-06-13T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/4
body
EP
date
2012-07-11T00:00:00
type
Prev Adopt in Cte
activities/5
date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.377
activities/2
date
2012-05-07T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE489.377
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
activities/1/committees/0/date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
committees/0/date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: HÄFNER Gerald
activities/1
date
2012-04-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten responsible: True committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
AFCO/7/09318
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: TRZASKOWSKI Rafał
  • group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique
  • group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-03-15T00:00:00 type: EP officialisation
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2012/2069(ACI)
    title
    Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 127
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Interinstitutional agreement
    type
    ACI - Interinstitutional agreement procedure
    subject