Next event: Commission response to text adopted in plenary 2014/05/06 more...
- Results of vote in Parliament 2013/12/12
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2013/12/12
- End of procedure in Parliament 2013/12/12
- Debate in Parliament 2013/12/11
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2013/11/15
- Committee opinion 2013/10/30
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2013/10/24
- Committee opinion 2013/10/10
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/09/13
- Committee draft report 2013/07/10
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | TRZASKOWSKI Rafał ( PPE), GUALTIERI Roberto ( S&D) | DUFF Andrew ( ALDE), HÄFNER Gerald ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo ( GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | GOULARD Sylvie ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | HUGHES Stephen ( S&D) | Patrick LE HYARIC ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052
Legal Basis:
RoP 052Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 359 votes to 115, with 31 abstentions, a resolution on constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union.
Members underlined that differentiated integration should continue to act as a forerunner for deepening European integration , as it is started by a subgroup of Member States, remains open to all Member States and aims at complete integration into the Treaties.
Differentiated integration and European Monetary Union (EMU): Parliament considered that differentiated integration could be a useful tool to promote deeper integration to the extent that it safeguards the integrity of the EU. It could also prove essential to achieving a genuine EMU , enhancing the Union’s competences, in particular in the field of economic policy, and strengthening its budgetary capacity and the role and democratic accountability of the Commission and the prerogatives of Parliament.
Using existing instruments: Parliament underlined that the instruments for differentiated integration in the Treaties - limitation of the territorial scope of application, safeguard clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, enhanced cooperation, and provisions specific to Member States whose currency is the euro – permit a first step to be taken in the establishment of a genuine EMU, falling within the Union’s institutional framework, and excluding the option of a new intergovernmental agreement.
Members therefore called on all institutions to proceed swiftly by maximising the possibilities afforded by the existing Treaties and their elements of flexibility and at the same time to prepare for the necessary Treaty changes in order to guarantee legal certainty and democratic legitimacy.
Procedures: in general terms, differentiation should preferably be done, wherever possible, within a legal act addressed to all Member States by means of derogations and safeguard clauses , instead of a priori excluding some Member States from the territorial scope of application of a legal act. Parliament underlined, nevertheless, that a high number of derogations and safeguard clauses undermine the unity of the EU as well as the consistency and effectiveness of its legal framework. Parliament stressed that, where some Member States want not to take part in the adoption of a legal act in the field of the Union’s non-exclusive competences, an enhanced cooperation in accordance with the relevant Treaty provision should be established instead of concluding international agreements outside the framework of the EU legal order. Member States are asked to extend the principle of enhanced cooperation to employment and social policies .
Democracy and institutions: Members stressed that the participation of the European Parliament - the only EU institution in which citizens are directly represented at Union level - was essential for ensuring the democratic legitimacy and functioning of the EMU and is a precondition for any further step towards a banking union, a fiscal union and an economic union.
In regretting the lack of parliamentary scrutiny of the Troika, the European Fund for Financial Stability (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), Parliament also underlined the pivotal role of the Commission in EMU governance, as also confirmed by the Fiscal Compact and the European Stability Mechanism treaties, in guaranteeing the legal order of the EU treaties and in serving the common interest of the Union as a whole. Members stressed that the Community method should be used for all measures aimed at strengthening the EMU.
Amendment to the Treaties: the resolution states that any future treaty change should affirm differentiated integration as a tool for achieving further integration while safeguarding the unity of the Union . Differentiated integration should remain open and to all Member States and aims at complete integration into the Treaties.
Amongst the proposals for amendment of the Treaties, Parliament suggested the introduction of a new tier of associate membership, including a partial integration into specific Union policy areas, as a means to strengthen the European Neighbourhood Policy.
Among other things, Parliament also suggested making the Eurogroup an informal configuration of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council, and called for the Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs to be a Treasury Minister and a permanent Vice-President of the Commission
Lastly, Parliament called on the future convention to examine the possibility of introducing a special legislative procedure requiring four fifths of the votes in Council and a majority of Parliament’s component members for the adoption of the Own Resources Decision.
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Rafał TRZASKOWSKI (EPP, PL) et de Roberto GUALTIERI (S&D, IT) on constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union.
Members began by clarifying that the debate on multi-tier governance does not overlap with the issue of multi-level governance, which relates to the balance of powers and the involvement of national, regional and local authorities. The report discusses the question of differentiation , which is both a constitutive feature of the process of European integration, and a means to allow its progress and guarantee substantial respect for the principle of equality between Member States.
Differentiated integration : the committee was of the opinion that differentiated integration could be a useful tool to promote deeper integration to the extent that it safeguards the integrity of the EU. It could also prove essential to achieving a genuine European Monetary Union (EMU), enhancing the Union’s competences, in particular in the field of economic policy, and strengthening its budgetary capacity and the role and democratic accountability of the Commission and the prerogatives of Parliament.
Use the existing instruments : the report underlined that the instruments for differentiated integration in the Treaties - limitation of the territorial scope of application, safeguard clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, enhanced cooperation, and provisions specific to Member States whose currency is the euro - allow taking a first step in the establishment of a genuine EMU.
Reiterating that the option of a new intergovernmental agreement should be excluded, Members called on all institutions to proceed swiftly by maximising the possibilities afforded by the existing Treaties and their elements of flexibility and at the same time to prepare for the necessary Treaty changes in order to guarantee legal certainty and democratic legitimacy.
In this context, Parliament must make full use of its prerogative to submit to the Council proposals for the amendment of the Treaties, which subsequently need to be examined by a Convention, in order to complete the framing of a genuine EMU.
Procedures : in general terms, the committee considered that differentiation should preferably be done, wherever possible, within a legal act addressed to all Member States by means of derogations and safeguard clauses, instead of a priori excluding some Member States from the territorial scope of application of a legal act. It underlined nevertheless that a high number of derogations and safeguard clauses undermine the unity of the EU as well as the consistency and effectiveness of its legal framework.
Member States are asked to extend the principle of enhanced cooperation to employment and social policies.
Democracy and institutions : Members recalled that, to be effectively legitimate and democratic, the governance of a genuine EMU must be placed within the institutional framework of the Union. They stressed that the participation of the European Parliament - the only EU institution in which citizens are directly represented at Union level - is essential for ensuring the democratic legitimacy and functioning of the EMU and is a precondition for any further step towards a banking union, a fiscal union and an economic union.
They also underlined the pivotal role of the Commission in EMU governance, as also confirmed by the Fiscal Compact and the European Stability Mechanism treaties, in guaranteeing the legal order of the EU treaties and in serving the common interest of the Union as a whole.
Amendment to the Treaties : the report states that any future treaty change should affirm differentiated integration as a tool for achieving further integration while safeguarding the unity of the Union. Differentiated integration should remain open and to all Member States and aims at complete integration into the Treaties.
Amongst the proposals for amendment of the Treaties, the report suggested the introduction of a new tier of associate membership, including a partial integration into specific Union policy areas, as a means to strengthen the European Neighbourhood Policy. Members also suggested making the Eurogroup an informal configuration of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council, and called for the Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs to be a Treasury Minister and a permanent Vice-President of the Commission
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0598/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0372/2013
- Committee opinion: PE504.128
- Committee opinion: PE500.437
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.937
- Committee draft report: PE502.266
- Committee draft report: PE502.266
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.937
- Committee opinion: PE500.437
- Committee opinion: PE504.128
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
Activities
- John Stuart AGNEW
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elmar BROK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zdravka BUŠIĆ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Carlo CASINI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andrew DUFF
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sylvie GOULARD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Roberto GUALTIERI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zita GURMAI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gerald HÄFNER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Stephen HUGHES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sandra PETROVIĆ JAKOVINA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- György SCHÖPFLIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nikola VULJANIĆ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Auke ZIJLSTRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
52 |
2012/2078(INI)
2013/02/26
ECON
52 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that the euro is the currency of the European Union, and that all member states except those with a derogation, have vocation to join the euro in due course.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as the adoption of the Six-Pack and the creation of the EFSM, the EFSF and the ESM, only concern the euro area Member States; The operations of the EFSF/ESM and any future similar structure should be subject to regular democratic control and oversight by the European Parliament.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as the adoption of the Six-Pack and the creation of the ESM, only concern the euro area Member States; takes the view that the ESM should be enshrined in the acquis communautaire;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that two Member States have opt-outs from the introduction of the euro and two Member States have opt-outs from the implementation of the Schengen acquis;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Notes that enhanced cooperation provides a legal basis for the adoption of measures that only apply to a limited number of Member States; notes that this mechanism is being used already for trans-EU divorce law and for European patent law, and was approved by the European Parliament and the Council in the taxation context for the establishment of a Financial Transaction Tax;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; considers that, to overcome the structural deficiencies inherent in the economic and monetary union and to effectively curb the pervasive moral hazard, the proposed 'banking union' should draw on the earlier reform of the Union financial services sector, including the creation of EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESRB, as well as the strengthened economic governance, especially in the euro area, and the new budgetary framework of the European Semester, to ensure greater resilience and competitiveness of the Union banking sector, increased confidence in it, and enhanced capital reserves to prevent Member States' public budgets having to bear the costs of banks' bail-outs in the future;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; believes that the single supervisory mechanism should be made accountable to the European Parliament, given the latter's mandate as the only European directly elected democratic institution; the Chairperson should be approved by the EP and should regularly report back to the EP;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States and expects the formula of regulation developed on this occasion – as part of which Economic and Monetary Union is strengthened by harmonising financial regulation whilst also leaving the door open for all the Member States concerned, in particular those covered by the derogation laid down in Article 139(1) TFEU – to also be the default formula used in future;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; regards as extremely risky and legally questionable, however, the fact that ultimate responsibility for banking supervision is to lie solely with the ECB;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that the European Parliament is the Parliament of the European Union, the sole seat of the Union's direct democratic legitimacy and the recipient of the Union's direct democratic accountability.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; stresses that establishing a European bank resolution mechanism is an indispensible step in setting up a genuine banking union;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States’
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the Troika sets some Member States’ economic policies
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States' economic policies are constrained by the Troïka, which is not held properly accountable; is of the opinion that the Troika should be made answerable to the European Parliament, by means of regular reporting; commits to presenting systematic suggestions for the activity of the Troika;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States' economic policies are constrained by the Troïka, which is not held properly accountable
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that fiscal consolidation efforts directed to comply with the new economic governance rules should be shared between the different administrations in a fair way, taking into account the services they provide.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen stability, efficiency, transparency, democratic legitimacy and democratic accountability;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission's ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to make legislative proposals under codecision for its implementation without delay, first and foremost with respect to the creation of a fiscal capacity for the eurozone, managed according to the community method;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to make legislative proposals as soon as possible under codecision for its implementation without delay;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that there must be legal certainty with regard to the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012 risks creating legal uncertainty
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012 risks creating legal uncertainty and a democratic deficit given the lack of transparent procedures;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on own resources should be accelerated, through measures including the Financial Transaction Tax, as should that on labour mobility, a
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on own resources should be substantially accelerated, as should that to set up a mechanism to deal with asymmetric shocks, as well as on labour mobility and a euro area budget, to make it an optimal currency area;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Reminds that a lot has to be done to make the single market fully operational;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro’, and Protocol 14 on the Eurogroup foresees ‘the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States’;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro’, and Protocol 14 on the Eurogroup foresees ‘the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States’;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen compliance with the Treaty, stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Therefore calls for the immediate set up of a sub-committee within the European Parliament, tasked with scrutiny related to specifically eurozone matters,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen competitiveness, stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro and those committed to adopting it need to further strengthen stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Believes that the community method should be used for all measures aiming at reinforcing the European Monetary Union; calls for the Fiscal Compact to be integrated into the EU treaties as soon as possible;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
source: PE-506.084
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0372&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0372_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0598New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0598_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFCO/7/08793New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
procedure/subject/3 |
Old
8.40.14 European Council meetingsNew
8.40.14 European Council |
procedure/subject/3 |
Old
8.40.14 European councilsNew
8.40.14 European Council meetings |
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-09-13T00:00:00New
2012-05-24T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-12-12T00:00:00New
2013-10-24T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-10-24T00:00:00New
2013-12-11T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-05-24T00:00:00New
2013-12-12T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188f10fb8127435bdc3f7New
4f1adc16b819f207b30000fe |
committees/0/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de1852c0fb8127435bdbe9dNew
4f1ac8c4b819f25efd0000f0 |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1843a0fb8127435bdbd46New
4f1ac7b2b819f25efd0000a1 |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefaNew
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7 |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12aNew
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185280fb8127435bdbe97New
4f1ac85db819f25efd0000e3 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1853d0fb8127435bdbeb5New
4f1ac92cb819f25efd000114 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-12-11T00:00:00New
2013-07-10T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Committee draft report |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-12-12T00:00:00New
2013-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/6 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-11-18T00:00:00New
2013-12-11T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.937
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.266
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2012-05-07T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-05-07T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2012-07-02T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2012-07-02T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
AFCO/7/08793
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|