Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | HOWITT Richard ( S&D) | BOULLAND Philippe ( PPE), HIRSCH Nadja ( ALDE), LAMBERT Jean ( Verts/ALE), CABRNOCH Milan ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | GRÈZE Catherine ( Verts/ALE) | Enrique GUERRERO SALOM ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | LØKKEGAARD Morten ( ALDE) | Heinz K. BECKER ( PPE), Marie-Christine VERGIAT ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | GRZYB Andrzej ( PPE) | Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | BALDASSARRE Raffaele ( PPE) | Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI ( S&D), Sajjad KARIM ( ECR), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | LANGE Bernd ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Corporate Social Responsibility: promoting society’s interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery.
Parliament states that there has been a sea-change in the investment community, with 1 123 investors (representing USD 32 trillion in total assets under management) endorsing the UN Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI). In addition, the European Sustainable Investment Forum estimates that the global socially responsible investment market reached approximately EUR 7 trillion as of September 2010. This new context, however, has not yet been embraced by all companies because CSR practices are still largely confined to a minority of big companies.
The resolution stresses, in particular, the need to involve SMEs in the CSR debate and calls on the Commission to develop together with Member States’ authorities and multilateral fora , forms of sectoral cooperation between SMEs which would enable them to collectively address social and environmental problems. Parliament also notes the need to engage SMEs in the debate on CSR, many of which adopt it on the basis of a more informal and intuitive approach. The resolution warns that businesses can only be sustainable in the future if they exist within a sustainable economy, and that there can be no alternative to adaptation to a low-carbon future, which also encompasses the preservation of the world's social and natural capital, a process in which CSR must play a decisive role.
The evolving vision of CSR: in rejecting any minimalist vision of CSR that is confined to transparency, responsibility and accountability of financial markets alone, Members appeal to leading companies in the CSR field to serve as examples to their peers by using appropriate guidelines, in encouraging support from public authorities, by improving tools and incentive systems and promoting the increasing recognition within the business world of the extent of the global social and environmental challenges to be faced. Overall, Members support the Commission’s intention to deepen CSR in Europe by producing guidelines and supporting multi-stakeholder initiatives for individual industrial sectors.
Corporate “Social” responsibility: Parliament considers that ‘social responsibility’ should also respect fundamental principles and rights such as those specified by the ILO. It believes that CSR includes social measures encompassing vocational training, work-life balance and appropriate working conditions. On the other hand and contrary to the position of the committee responsible, Plenary rejected the idea that CSR is increasingly important for a company’s social licence to operate, given the incidence of social protest (e.g. the anti-globalisation and Occupy movements). It also opposed the idea that the EU itself must adopt CSR as its own ‘social licence’ to pursue trade and economic benefits with other countries and regions of the world.
Members do however consider that CSR must be a core part of the EU’s trade policies. They emphasise that CSR will only be viable if the legal provisions in force and the local tariff regulations of the social partners are upheld. They note that, in assessing a company’s social responsibility, account must be taken of the conduct of those companies forming part of its supply chain as well as that of any subcontractors .
Sustainable recovery: Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to help businesses, in cooperation with workers’ representatives, to become involved in CSR. It calls on businesses to consider initiatives aimed at preserving and creating jobs , especially for young people and women, in all areas of activity with special regard to those affected by multiple disadvantages, as well as the creation of new employment models. Members call on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on these initiatives, in view of the fact that CSR actions benefit not only society, but also the image of businesses themselves.
Parliament points out that, particularly in times of crisis, companies operating in accordance with CSR principles should help to develop the innovative capacities of their region by introducing innovative and environmentally friendly technological solutions.
Multi-stakeholder approaches: Members strongly commend the emphasis given in the Commission communication to strengthening and implementing international standards and the OECD Guidelines. They encourage the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard and the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. They call for greater policy coherence to be established at EU level. In this regard, they call for impact assessments of legislative proposals for potential incoherence with the UN Guiding Principles. They insist that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of its national action plan on CSR, and the development of national plans implementing the relevant OECD Guidelines and UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised by December 2013 at the latest.
Several other measures are proposed, in particular in the military field in order to arrive at the agreement of an international regulatory framework on the regulation, monitoring and oversight of the activities of private military and security companies. Likewise, Members call on the Commission to put forward proposals for better facilitating access to justice in EU courts for the most extreme, egregious cases of human or labour rights violations by European-based businesses or their subsidiaries , subcontractors or business partners. The Commission is also invited to ensure that the topic of CSR and human rights features among the priorities of individual financial instruments for the 2014-2020 period.
On an international front , Parliament believes that CSR can be an important tool to help the EU support the implementation of International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions internationally. It calls on the Commission to support European organisations and social partners seeking to undertake pilot projects in accordance with the OECD Guidelines and other international CSR standards with a view to building capacity in third countries. It calls for a system of transnational legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third-country signatories to bilateral trade agreements in order to ensure that victims of breaches of social or environmental legislation, or of failures to honour CSR undertakings, by multinationals and their immediate subsidiaries have effective access to justice in the country where the breach took place and in support of the establishment of international judicial procedures to ensure, where necessary, that breaches of the law by companies are punished.
Public policies for CSR: Parliament believes that notwithstanding the handbook on social procurement, that the EU itself has been too constrained in this area. It expresses concern, however, that a wide range of public policy measures has yet to yield significant visible impact in advancing CSR. Members call for there to be greater research into, and evaluation of, public policy measures relating to CSR at the European level. They also call for the Commission itself to lead by example as a responsible employer by publishing its own CSR report.
Furthermore, Parliament considers it essential that the Commission develop as soon as possible the announced common methodology for the measurement of environmental performance based on life-cycle cost. It believes that such a methodology would be useful in terms of both the transparency of company information and the assessment by the authorities of companies' environmental performance.
Socially responsible investment: Parliament considers support the Commission in bringing forward a proposal on non-financial disclosure by business based on a wide-ranging public consultation. This proposal would give the EU the opportunity to recommend that European businesses apply the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the UN Global Compact. It should be flexible and not create excessive administrative burdens and expense.
CSR on a voluntary or regulatory basis? : Parliament reiterates that CSR should be applicable to all enterprises so as to create a fair and level playing field. However, it points out that the way in which extractive industries operate in developing countries requires a move beyond a voluntary approach. It stresses that investment by the petroleum industry in Nigeria is a good example of the limitations of CSR as currently implemented, where companies have failed to take CSR initiatives to create sustainable business practices or contribute to the development of their host states. Members strongly support the legislative proposal for country-by-country reporting founded on the standards of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and reporting on sales and profits, as well as taxes and revenues, in order to discourage corruption and prevent tax avoidance. They call on the European extractive industries operating in developing countries to set an example of social responsibility and the promotion of decent work. Similary measures are called for for businesses working in the mineral extractive sector in conflict zones.
Taking CSR forward: lastly, Members call on the Commission to treat unions and staff representatives as partners in dialogue in connection with CSR-related topics, alongside businesses and other stakeholders. All CSR policies should include specific measures to tackle the unlawful practice of blacklisting workers and denying them access to employment, often due to their trade union membership and activities . Members insist that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding.
Believing that the notion that CSR is a ‘luxury good’ supported by business only in times of prosperity has been decisively refuted, Parliament concludes that the Commission should take further initiatives that aim to unlock and strengthen the potential of CSR in tackling climate change (by linking it to resource and energy efficiency), e.g. in the processes companies use to purchase raw materials.
It should be noted that a parallel resolution on accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth in the framework of CSR was adopted on the same day [see 2012/2098(INI) ].
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the initiative report by Richard HOWITT (S&D, UK) on Corporate Social Responsibility: promoting society’s interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report.
In this context, the two committees decided to work closely together to ensure that a cogent approach is taken in establishing Parliament's position on the renewed EU strategy 2011-2014 for corporate social responsibility (CSR). In view of their respective competences and responsibilities, the two committees decided to draft two distinct initiative reports. The parallel report focuses on corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth [see 2012/2098(INI) ].
Members recall that according to the European Sustainable Investment Forum, the global socially responsible investment market reached approximately EUR 7 trillion as of September 2010. This new context, however, has not yet been embraced by all companies because CSR practices are still largely confined to a minority of big companies. The motion for resolution stresses, in particular, the need to involve SMEs in the CSR debate and calls on the Commission to develop together with Member States’ authorities and multilateral fora , forms of sectoral cooperation between SMEs which would enable them to collectively address social and environmental problems.
The evolving vision of CSR: in rejecting any minimalist vision of CSR that is confined to transparency, responsibility and accountability of financial markets alone, Members appeal to leading companies in the CSR field to serve as examples to their peers by using appropriate guidelines, in encouraging support from public authorities, by improving tools and incentive systems and promoting the increasing recognition within the business world of the extent of the global social and environmental challenges to be faced. Overall, Members support the Commission’s intention to deepen CSR in Europe by producing guidelines and supporting multi-stakeholder initiatives for individual industrial sectors.
“Social” responsibility: Members consider that ‘social responsibility’ should also respect fundamental principles and rights such as those specified by the ILO. They believe that CSR includes social measures encompassing vocational training, work-life balance and appropriate working conditions. They agree with the Commission’s analysis that CSR is increasingly important for a company’s social licence to operate, given the incidence of social protest (e.g. the anti-globalisation and Occupy movements) They believe that the EU itself must adopt CSR as its own ‘social licence’ to pursue trade and economic benefits with other countries and regions of the world . They consider, in particular, that CSR must be a core part of the EU’s trade policies.
Members, furthermore, emphasise that CSR will only be viable if the legal provisions in force and the local tariff regulations of the social partners are upheld. They note that, in assessing a company’s social responsibility, account must be taken of the conduct of those companies forming part of its supply chain as well as that of any subcontractors .
Sustainable recovery: Members call on the Commission and the Member States to help businesses, in cooperation with workers’ representatives, to become involved in CSR. They call on businesses to consider initiatives aimed at preserving and creating jobs , especially for young people and women, in all areas of activity with special regard to those affected by multiple disadvantages, as well as the creation of new employment models. They call on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on these initiatives, in view of the fact that CSR actions benefit not only society, but also the image of businesses themselves.
Multi-stakeholder approaches: Members strongly commend the emphasis given in the Commission communication to strengthening and implementing international standards and the OECD Guidelines. They encourage the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard and the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. They call for greater policy coherence to be established at EU level. In this regard, they call for impact assessments of legislative proposals for potential incoherence with the UN Guiding Principles.
Several other measures are proposed, in particular in the military field in order to arrive at the agreement of an international regulatory framework on the regulation, monitoring and oversight of the activities of private military and security companies. Likewise, Members call on the Commission to put forward proposals for better facilitating access to justice in EU courts for the most extreme, egregious cases of human or labour rights violations by European-based businesses or their subsidiaries , subcontractors or business partners. The Commission is also invited to ensure that the topic of CSR and human rights features among the priorities of individual financial instruments for the 2014-2020 period.
Public policies for CSR: Members believe that notwithstanding the handbook on social procurement, that the EU itself has been too constrained in this area. They express concern, however, that a wide range of public policy measures has yet to yield significant visible impact in advancing CSR. They call for there to be greater research into, and evaluation of, public policy measures relating to CSR at the European level. They also call for the Commission itself to lead by example as a responsible employer by publishing its own CSR report.
Socially responsible investment: Members consider support the Commission in bringing forward a proposal on non-financial disclosure by business based on a wide-ranging public consultation. This proposal would give the EU the opportunity to recommend that European businesses apply the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the UN Global Compact. It should be flexible and not create excessive administrative burdens and expense, particularly for businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
Members note that beneficiaries of long-term investors, such as pension funds, have an interest in sustainable returns and in responsible corporate behaviour.
Taking CSR forward: lastly, Members calls on the Commission to treat unions and staff representatives as partners in dialogue in connection with CSR-related topics, alongside businesses and other stakeholders. All CSR policies should include specific measures to tackle the unlawful practice of blacklisting workers and denying them access to employment, often due to their trade union membership and activities . Members insist that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding.
Believing that the notion that CSR is a ‘luxury good’ supported by business only in times of prosperity has been decisively refuted, Members conclude that the Commission should take further initiatives that aim to unlock and strengthen the potential of CSR in tackling climate change (by linking it to resource and energy efficiency), e.g. in the processes companies use to purchase raw materials.
PURPOSE: to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility
BACKGROUND: the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”.
The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR . Indicators of progress include:
· the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1 900 in 2011;
· the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011;
· the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers’ organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011.
In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy . Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement.
The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007 , and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011.
The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term.
CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR , including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows:
Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as “ the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society ”. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of:
· maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large;
· identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts.
The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive.
The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Agenda for action : the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices : by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR.
The Commission intends to:
· create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress;
· launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders.
Improving and tracking levels of trust in business : there is frequently a gap between citizens’ expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to:
· address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue;
· initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR.
Improving self- and co-regulation processes : the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process.
Enhancing market reward for CSR : this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will:
· facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender;
· consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere.
Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information : one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors.
Further integrating CSR into education, training and research : the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR , and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes , and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR.
Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies : the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication.
Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility.
The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to:
· work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors , as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
· publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports.
Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.
PURPOSE: to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility
BACKGROUND: the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”.
The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR . Indicators of progress include:
· the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1 900 in 2011;
· the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011;
· the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers’ organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011.
In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy . Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement.
The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007 , and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011.
The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term.
CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR , including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows:
Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as “ the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society ”. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of:
· maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large;
· identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts.
The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive.
The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Agenda for action : the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices : by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR.
The Commission intends to:
· create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress;
· launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders.
Improving and tracking levels of trust in business : there is frequently a gap between citizens’ expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to:
· address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue;
· initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR.
Improving self- and co-regulation processes : the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process.
Enhancing market reward for CSR : this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will:
· facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender;
· consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere.
Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information : one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors.
Further integrating CSR into education, training and research : the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR , and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes , and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR.
Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies : the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication.
Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility.
The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to:
· work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors , as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
· publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports.
Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0050/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0023/2013
- Committee opinion: PE497.788
- Committee opinion: PE497.943
- Committee opinion: PE498.150
- Committee opinion: PE500.421
- Committee opinion: PE496.506
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE501.896
- Committee draft report: PE498.081
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0681
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0681
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0681 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE498.081
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE501.896
- Committee opinion: PE496.506
- Committee opinion: PE497.943
- Committee opinion: PE498.150
- Committee opinion: PE500.421
- Committee opinion: PE497.788
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
Votes
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 3 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 4 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 29 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 31 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 40 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 44 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 45 #
A7-0023/2013 - Richard Howitt - § 84 #
Amendments | Dossier |
407 |
2012/2097(INI)
2012/11/07
AFET
46 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) - 1a. Welcomes the fact that the new definition established in the Commission's CSR Communication of 25.10.2011 emphasises that respect for applicable legislation and collective agreements is a prerequisite for responsible action and specifies the framework required for corporate responsibility by demanding that ‘social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns’ are integrated into the operations and core strategy of businesses in close collaboration with their stakeholders; reiterates that corporate social responsibility must also extend to enterprises’ behaviour towards and in third countries;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) (1) While recognizing the importance of UN human rights framework for CSR, reminds that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union guarantees, in its Article 16, the fundamental right to conduct a business which should be duly taken into account and serve as reference supporting CSR policies in the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 (new) (2) Underlines the importance of balancing freedom to conduct business with other rights guaranteed by this Charter as well as internationally recognized principles and guidelines for CSR; in this context, the Committee welcomes the efforts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to collect evidence and expertise concerning existence and interpretation of the freedom to conduct business;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Commits itself to continue to raise consistently its expectation that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative on Human Rights,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Commits itself to continue to raise consistently its expectation that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative on Human Rights
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) (1) Calls the European Commission and Member States to conduct fundamental rights impact assessments prior to conclusion of and when evaluating multilateral and bilateral trade and investment agreements and the attribution of development aid and to guarantee that these rights are respected. In this context, special emphasis should be put on the basic principle of equality between men and women.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises that Paris Principles-aligned NHRIs are uniquely positioned to provide support for the implementation of the U
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises that Paris Principles-aligned NHRIs are
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Undertakes to place the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – point 1 (1) ensure that
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the efforts of the European Union and the Member States to align their policies with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises updated in 2011 and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights1,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – point 2 (2) develop specific support under the EIDHR for training and overall capacity- building in the area of
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society’s interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery and development, that the legislative proposal on the mandatory disclosure of non- financial information (including environmental, social, and governance information) of companies ensures transparency by providing a clear, unambiguous, common and predetermined framework, with specific reference to human rights, that is fully aligned with the UN Guiding Principles and based on objective indicators, such as the gender pay gap,
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes the interests of society
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society’s interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery and development, that the legislative proposal on the mandatory disclosure of non- financial information (including environmental, social, and governance information) of companies ensures transparency by providing a clear, unambiguous, common and predetermined framework. with specific reference to human rights, that is fully aligned with the OECD and UN
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society's interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating ‘business and human rights’ concerns, and to develop further solutions aiming at a ‘level playing field’ for domestic and third countries’ business enterprises in order to combat social dumping;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards, including the obligation to carry out social and environmental impact assessments and effective redress mechanisms, at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals,
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights and supply chain due diligence standards at EU level that meet requirements laid out by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers corporate social responsibility to be a relevant concept for enabling control to be exercised over enterprises’ actions and their impacts; points out that such control is essential for achieving the objectives of the Treaty on European Union and the objectives referred to in the Communication of building a more cohesive society and bringing about a transition towards a sustainable economy; believes, however, that being of a voluntary nature it is insufficient to ensure that enterprises comply fully with social and environmental standards in line with the objectives laid down; calls on the Commission to establish a binding framework for corporate social responsibility for all enterprises in the areas in which they operate;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing; welcomes the programmes already set up by the EU, in particular the FLEGT programme in forestry, and supports private initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, landgrabbing and outsourcing;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the EU and the Member States, with respect to CSR infringements, to adopt specific binding rules on granting fundamental rights to effective remedy and access to an impartial and independent tribunal, referring in particular to the fact that these are secured in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; reaffirms the need to encourage transnational judicial cooperation with the aim of establishing judicial procedures and non- judicial redress mechanisms;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the OECD and UN
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with legal consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged ‘EU Platform for External Cooperation and Development’ establish such modalities;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the importance of the UN ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ framework and considers that its three pillars – the state’s responsibility to protect against human rights violations, the responsibility of businesses to respect human rights and the need for more effective access to remedies – should be supported by appropriate measures to enable their implementation;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that grievances against EU companies operating abroad are often more usefully solved in situ; commends the OECD National Contact Points as state- based non-legal mechanisms that can mediate over a broad range of business and human rights disputes; calls, however, for a greater effort by companies in developing grievance mechanisms aligned with the effectiveness criteria stated in the Guiding Principles and to seek further authoritative guidance provided by internationally recognised principles and guidelines, in particular the recently updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ten principles of the United Nations Global Compact, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility, the ILO Tri-partite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the importance of assessing an enterprise's compliance with social responsibility in terms of the entire supply chain; considers it vital to put in place effective and transparent indicators with which to assess precisely the impact of an enterprise’s activities from a systemic point of view;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for the development of more effective transparency and accountability standards for EU technology companies in relation to export of technologies that can be used to violate human rights or to act against the EU´s security interest;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the Commission’s wish to address the issue of corporate social responsibility in the context of enlargements; is disappointed, nevertheless, that this issue is not specifically addressed in the accession negotiations with candidate countries and that this concept is not mentioned in the Communication from the Commission on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-20131 __________________ 1 COM(2012) 600 final
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls for human rights impact assessments as early as in the research and development phase of new technologies;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to work towards establishing global advocacy, international guidelines and complementary legislation to ensure that EU businesses have a positive impact in foreign societies; notes that businesses’ positive impact in foreign societies can be assessed in terms of, among other things, local people’s access to resources and their food sovereignty and the endogenous development of societies;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Calls for the implementation of ´know your end user´ to ensure the prevention of human rights violations up or down stream in a production or market flow;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 d (new) 14d. Calls on the monitoring of restrictive measures (sanctions, boycotts, embargos) on the EU level;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; Member States should ensure these plans are drafted with participation of all relevant stakeholders including NGOs, civil society; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs);
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard, the OECD Guidelines, the most recent version of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines and guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that the CSR of enterprises both within the EU and in third countries should also be extended to areas such as the organisation of work, the quality of employment, equal opportunities, social inclusion, combating discrimination and continuing training;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for greater policy coherence at EU level by bringing public procurement as well as export credit, good governance, competition, development, trade, investment and other policies and agreements into conformity with the international
source: PE-500.384
2012/11/16
CULT
40 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Encourages the EU to play an active role in raising awareness of the contribution enterprises can give to society through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the field of culture
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Member States to introduce tax exemptions for firms that fund voluntary work and non-profit initiatives;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws attention to the need for corporate social responsibility to be incorporated into the curricula of educational establishments at all levels, including business schools, and into training programmes for managers and employees of small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Encourages Member States to integrate CSR into relevant education curricula both in schools providing upper secondary education and at higher education level;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Encourages Member States to integrate CSR into relevant education curricula, and in particular into language learning and the appreciation of multilingualism;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of the link
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of the link
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. encourages enterprises to provide quality internships with a strong learning component that ease the transition between education and employment, facilitate the development of labour market relevant skills and support the autonomy of young people;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. E
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects within their CSR policies,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Encourages the EU to play an active role in raising awareness of the contribution enterprises can give to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects, and particularly projects linked to problems within Europe, within their CSR policies, in the context of civic commitment, and to stimulate growth and job creation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects within their CSR policies, in the context of civic commitment, and to stimulate sustainable growth and job creation;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points to the importance of involving small and medium-sized enterprises in CSR and recognising their achievements in this area;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages enterprises, in conjunction with management and labour, to train, inform and involve their employees in the major social challenges affecting Europe, particularly as regards the economy, society, the environment and internationally;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the idea of sponsorship to be promoted among employers;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level of interaction with society; stresses in particular the contribution of CSR in creating opportunities for young people and developing their talents;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment, professional ethics and social integration by way of high-level
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, shaping and promoting social attitudes, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level of interaction with society;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level interaction with society, as well as intergenerational activities such as mutual mentoring and know-how transfer between old and young;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of upholding human rights in relations with non-EU countries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and others stakeholders, including educational institutions and sports organisations as an important step in raising the visibility of CSR;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI), as part of the implementation process of CRS in investment decisions, shall combine investors' financial and economic objectives with their social, environmental, ethical, cultural and educational issues;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Encourages the Member States and the Union to take into consideration for their CSR agenda that the cultural and creative SMEs can have a significant impact on social and environmental change, inducing long term solutions to combat poverty in giving new impulses to the labour market and integrating social consideration;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for research to be conducted into the reasons for the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the various CSR strategies implemented;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to support and enhance the status of employee volunteering and employer-
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for more clear-cut action, be it of a voluntary nature or stemming from accountability and/or an obligation, to foster social responsibility as regards Member States’ public sectors;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes cultural content and media companies have a corporate social responsibility in ensuring the fundamental rights of users are protected, and considers that self-regulation and deep packet inspections risks outsourcing police and law enforcement into the hands of private sector (actors);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the fact that a growing number of firms in EU Member States are implementing CSR measures, but points out that decisions on implementing such measures are the exclusive preserve of the individual Member States;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Encourages media companies to include transparent journalism standards in their CSR policies, including guarantees of source protection and the rights of whistle blowers.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EU, pursuant to Article 152 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), to include Corporate Social Responsibility (CRS) in its promotion of the role of, and dialogue between, management and labour; proposes in this regard that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) should be a regular item on the agenda of the Tripartite Social Summit referred to in Article 152(2) TFEU;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States, within the framework of existing programmes, to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to take full advantage of CSR and be able to implement it in their organisational culture;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to take full advantage of CSR and be able to implement it in their organisational culture; points out and regrets however that the language of CSR is still mostly voluntary;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR is insufficient to deal with externalities resulting from the operations of multinationals, including environmental, social and human rights violations; reiterates its call for the establishment of legally binding obligations for investors, especially those operating in developing countries, to respect cultural diversity, human rights, environmental and social standards;
source: PE-500.407
2012/11/20
DEVE
101 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that owing to the heterogeneity of the concept of CSR, with different companies having developed different standards on accounting, auditing and reporting, levels of CSR are hard to compare; emphasises that
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Deplores the lack of information for SMEs on the global compact under which businesses can commit themselves to aligning their operations and strategies with 10 universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Undertakes to place the corporate social responsibility issue on the agendas of all future EU meetings with third countries, especially with privileged relations partners, and calls for corporate social and environmental responsibility to be integrated into contractual relations between the EU and third countries;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that the UN Global Compact and the ISO 26000 standards are not properly suited to the needs of SMEs, which makes the whole idea of CSR less effective within the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for all European companies operating in third countries with more than 1000 employees to be required by 1 January 2014 to apply the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Draws attention to the need for thought to be given at both EU and national levels to how tax incentives might be used to promote CSR more widely among firms;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a binding CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level; suggests that this clause
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR is insufficient to deal with externalities resulting from the operations of multinationals, including environmental degradation and human and labour rights violations; reiterates its call for the establishment of legally binding obligations for foreign investors operating in developing countries to respect human rights
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level in the OECD, the ILO, the UN and the European Union; suggests that this clause contain measures for the implementation of these principles, such as a requirement to carry out reporting and to publish regular assessments of the social and environmental impact of the activities of companies and of their sphere of influence (subsidiaries, supply chains, etc.) and a requirement to apply due diligence, i.e. to take the necessary measures to prevent breaches of social and environmental rights wherever the company operates;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that companies should be encouraged to implement CSR practices, moreover those which have already implemented these practices shall be encouraged to pursuit its goals; asks the Commission to consider incentives, such as priority in EU public procurement contracts, in order to make CSR seen by companies as an opportunity and not as a threat;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that CSR should result in clear commitments
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that CSR should result in clear commitments with performance indicators, and that provision should be made for objective monitoring and effective accountability mechanisms
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level; suggests that this clause contain measures for the implementation of these principles and that National Contact Points be set up as fora for questions concerning the OECD Guidelines;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out it, if uptake of CSR is to increase within the EU, it is essential for appropriate oversight bodies to be set up at both EU and national levels;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the key role played by corporations, their subsidiaries and their supply chains in international trade and calls to make that corporate social and environmental responsibility an integral part of the European Union's trade agreements;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that owing to the heterogeneity of the concept of CSR, with different companies having developed different standards on accounting, auditing and reporting, levels of CSR are hard to compare; emphasises that
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all companies operating in the Single market, including transnational corporations whose subsidiaries or supply chains are located in the EU, comply with all their legal obligations at both the national and EU level in order to ensure fair competition and maximise the benefits for EU consumers; calls also on the Commission to actively promote responsible business conduct amongst EU companies operating abroad with a special focus on ensuring strict compliance with all their legal obligations stemming from either domestic laws or any bilateral or international legal obligations their business operations are subject to therein, none the least compliance with international standards and rules in the areas of human rights, labour and the environment; to this aim, suggests to the Commission to actively engage with its partners in developing and emerging countries to exchange best practices and know-how on ways and means to improve the business environment and awareness about responsible business conduct;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that the way in which
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Suggests to the Member State governments that they ask the European Investment Bank to include a CSR clause in its operations;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that the way in which extractive industries operate in developing countries requires
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers the "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework", or so called Ruggie Framework, endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council on 16 June 2011, as the most comprehensive and innovative framework, to be enshrined in EU trade agreements with third countries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that investment by the petroleum industry in Nigeria is a good example of the limitations of CSR as currently implemented, where companies have failed to take CSR initiatives to create sustainable business practices, or contribute to the development of their host states;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Asks the Commission to introduce a more open and clear procedure for filing and considering complaints of non- compliance to CSR principles, including enforcement mechanisms and initiating investigations where necessary
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to take further initiatives that aim to unlock and strengthen the potential of CSR in tackling climate change (by linking it to resource and energy efficiency), e.g. in companies' raw materials purchasing process;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls for the Commission to urge companies to apply CSR; emphasises the need to support and encourage the spread of such practices among SMEs, limiting the costs and red tape entailed;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that CSR should apply to the entire global supply chain, including all levels of sub-contracting and whether in the supply of goods, workers or services, that it should include provisions to extend protection to migrant, agency and posted workers and that it should be based on fair pay and decent working conditions and guarantee trade union rights and freedoms; takes the view that the concept of Responsible Supply Chain Management needs to be further elaborated as a mechanism for delivering CSR;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to include a CSR clause in agreements with non- governmental organisations (NGOs), particularly where these relate to development activities;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Takes the view that, in order to have a real impact on poverty reduction, the CSR agenda shall also put focus on SMEs as their cumulative social and environmental impacts are significant;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that the principles underpinning CSR have not been sufficiently well incorporated into the revised GSP and GSP+ Regulation; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for violations committed abroad by their subsidiaries and entities they control; points out that the US Alien Tort Claims Act provides the option of suing a corporation or natural person for violating the law of nations or a Treaty of the US irrespective of the nationality of the accused or place in which the crime was committed; calls on the Commission to consider initiatives along this line;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that the principles underpinning CSR have not been sufficiently well incorporated into the revised GSP and GSP+ Regulation; calls on the Commission to ensure that transnational corporations – whether or not they have their registered office in the European Union – whose
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Agrees with the Commission that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) must cover human rights, labour and employment practices, environmental issues (such as biodiversity, climate change, resource efficiency) and combating bribery and corruption, i.e. through good tax governance (namely transparency, exchange of information and fair tax competition);
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Commission has not yet drawn up concrete proposals on the implementation of CSR principles in EU
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for human rights violations committed abroad
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to promote corporate social responsibility in multilateral forums by supporting an enhanced cooperation between the WTO and other multilateral forums dealing with CSR, such as the ILO and the OECD;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for violations of fundamental human, employment and trade union rights committed abroad by their subsidiaries and entities they control; insists that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding and from taking part in calls for tender or other public procurement contracts at EU, national or public authority level;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds that for settling commercial disputes and/or seeking compensation for negative externalities of irresponsible or illegal business activity both court litigations and alternatives to court litigations already exist; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to further enhance awareness of both amongst the businesses community and the public at large; recalls that the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) provides dispute resolution services for individuals, businesses, states, state entities, and international organizations seeking alternatives to court litigation that can contribute to improve effective access to justice for victims in the event of breaches of responsible business practices causing economic, social and environmental damages in the EU and/or abroad;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists that it is the duty of the state to protect against violations of human and labour rights, including by businesses, to hold companies accountable, to uphold freedom of association and collective bargaining rights, and to provide access to justice for victims; calls on the Commission to provide effective measures to operationalise the UN Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework put forward by John Ruggie, the UN Special Representative on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the monitoring of restrictive measures (sanctions, boycotts, embargos), as well as of licensing schemes for dual use items, on the EU level;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that better implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights will contribute to EU objectives regarding specific human rights issues and core labour standards; hence, calls on the EU to strive for a clear international legal framework over the responsibilities and obligations of business with regard to human rights;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for mechanisms to be put in place whereby CSR principles must be respected not only by the main company or contractor benefitting from a trade agreement, but also by any sub- contractors or supply chains which it may use, whether in the supply of goods, workers or services, thereby ensuring a level playing field based on fair pay and decent working conditions, and guaranteeing trade union rights and freedoms;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Welcomes the fact that the number of companies disclosing information on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance has grown significantly in recent years; points out, however, that reporting companies still constitute only a small share of global business; notes that, while the EU Accounts Modernisation Directive 2003/51 ensures a minimum level of disclosure of both financial and non- financial key performance indicators, it does not stipulate any requirements in relation to the type of indicators to be included in annual reports; calls on the Commission to investigate further possible measures to strengthen disclosure of ESG information at the European level, e.g. by complementing the Modernisation Directive through a comply or explain mechanism, instead of permitting companies the option of not reporting;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to improve its sustainability impact assessment model, in order to properly reflect the economic, social, human rights and environmental implications, including climate change mitigation goals, of trade negotiations; calls on the Commission to follow up on the trade agreements with the EU's partner countries, by carrying out, prior to and after the signing of a trade agreement, sustainability impact assessment studies, taking into account in particular vulnerable sectors;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Reiterates its call for the inclusion of CSR clause in EU trade and investment agreements; in particular recommends the implementation of the CSR principle inter alia by export credit and development finance agencies and other institutions involved in foreign direct investment;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Underlines that, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament is to be fully informed on how the findings of Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIA) of agreements are incorporated into negotiations prior to their conclusion, and which chapters of those agreements have been changed to avoid any negative impacts identified in the SIA;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Stresses that EU assistance to governments of third countries in implementing social and environmental regulation together with effective inspection regimes, is a necessary complement to advancing the CSR of European business worldwide;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Stresses that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) is part of the implementation process of CRS in investment decisions; notes that there is currently no universal definition of SRI but it usually combines investors' financial objectives with their concerns about social, environmental, ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third countries signatories to bilateral trade agreements
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Urges the EU and its Member States to take further policy initiatives that aim to raise awareness and strengthen the development of SRI, inter alia by considering legal formulation of an SRI minimum standards setting, especially within the scope of its investment and trade agreements with developing countries;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of transnational legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third countries signatories to bilateral trade agreements
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that CSR is a mechanism with which employers can support their workers and local communities in developing countries and that it can ensure gains are equitably shared to develop sustainable economic and social prosperity and lift more people out of poverty, especially in times of financial crisis; regrets that protocols for social intervention are currently only voluntary and urges the Commission to make these binding;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third countries signatories to bilateral trade agreements, to ensure
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that CSR covers a wide range of social standards on which very little focus is placed owing to a failure to establish indicators with which to measure progress on social issues;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Commission has not yet drawn up concrete proposals on the implementation of CSR principles in EU trade policy; takes the view, in the light of the key role played by corporations, their subsidiaries and their supply chains in international trade, that corporate social and environmental responsibility must become an integral part of the ‘sustainable development’ chapters of the European Union’s trade agreements;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions, in the development, operation and monitoring of companies’ CSR processes and structures, including through the on- going development of workers’ skills and qualifications through training and lifelong learning, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the development of more effective transparency and accountability standards for EU technology companies in relation to export of technologies that can be used to violate human rights or against the EU's security interest;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the EEAS to ensure that EU trade officers, if based in EU embassies, enjoy a regular training on CSR issues, in particular with respect to the implementation of UN "Protect, Respect and Remedy" principles; that EU embassies function as EU Contact Points for complaints concerning EU companies and their subsidiaries, since OECD National Contact Points only exist in OECD adhering countries and therefore are not accessible in practice for concerned workers affected in countries outside the OECD;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for human rights impact assessments as early as in the research and development phase of new technologies, including scenario studies and considerations of identifying Human Rights by Design standards;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that awareness rising for the importance of CSR and the consequences of non compliance at corporate level, as a task for the EU Commission, must be accompanied by adequate awareness and capacity building at the level of host country governments, to effectively ensure the implementation of CSR rights and access to justice;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls for the implementation of the 'know your end user' principle to ensure increased scrutiny and prevention of human rights violations up or down stream in supply chains and production or market flows;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors' protection and the po
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors’ protection and the potential for State intervention, especially as regards social, health and environmental standards;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that its should be easy for investors and consumers to identify firms which have made a commitment to CSR, as this would encourage those firms in their efforts;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Commits itself to step up its efforts continually so that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative for Human Rights, are required to enforce social, environmental and human rights standards in all EU external relations and actions;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and of the Accounting Directive (2003/51/EG) does not address the issue of corporate social responsibility sufficiently; calls on the Commission to ensure that companies falling under these directives are obliged to publicly report regularly on their CSR activities, particularly in non-EU states.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and of the Accounting Directive (2003/51/EG) does not address the issue of corporate societal responsibility sufficiently; calls on the Commission to ensure that companies falling under these directives are obliged to report regularly on their CSR activities, particularly in non-EU states.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that CSR dimension should be incorporated into multilateral trade agreements and therefore calls on the Commission to support it both in the international forums in particular the OECD and the ILO, and in the WTO in the post-Doha context;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for future CSR measures to include the whole value chain, from raw materials extraction via trade to recycling.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks that CSR policies are included in all levels of trade agreements with the EU, and include provisions to extend protection to migrant, agency and posted workers
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the Commission and the Member States should encourage European companies to take initiatives aimed at promoting corporate social responsibility and to exchange good practices with their partners in other countries;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for CSR policies and fundamental employment and trade union rights, such as the right to privacy and freedom of association, to be respected by EU companies in all their operations, whether based in the EU or internationally
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to look at the possibility of partial tax relief for businesses in line with their achievements and efforts in terms of corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions, in the development, operation and monitoring of companies' CSR processes and structures, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Highlights the need for the EU to look at the possibility of introducing appropriate marks or labels to be used alongside the names, or on the products, of firms that have made a commitment to CSR, so as to make them easy to identify;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that promoting CSR is an objective supported by the European Union, therefore the Union must ensure that the external policies it implements make contribution to the sustainable development and to the social development of the countries concerned;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Calls for an increased and more inclusive and transparent monitoring of CSR principles in EU trade policy, with clear benchmarks to measure improvements so as to encourage confidence in the system;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Notes that CSR is a mechanism with which employers can support their workers and local communities in developing countries, that respect for CSR and labour standards can enable such countries to benefit from further international trade and that CSR can ensure gains are equitably shared to develop sustainable economic and social prosperity and lift more people out of poverty, especially in times of financial crisis; regrets that protocols for social intervention are currently only voluntary and urges the Commission to make these binding
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is the best tool for companies to show their commitment, solidarity and responsibility towards society, and its also essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines; regrets, however, that the language of CSR is mostly
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges the Commission, in devising concrete proposals for the application of CSR principles, to base itself on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, including the OECD complaints procedure;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Commands all members of the OECD for their comprehensive work on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as published as of 25 May 2011 that are far reaching recommendations for responsible business conduct that 44 adhering governments – representing all regions of the world and accounting for 85% of foreign direct investment – encourage their enterprises to observe wherever they operate;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines, inter alia the recently updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ten principles of the United Nations Global Compact, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility, the ILO Tri-partite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights; regrets, however, that the language of CSR is mostly voluntary;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Agrees that current environmental and climate change imperatives and the development of global production chains demand a broader CSR concept coverage than envisaged when the concept was first conceived; hence considers necessary to spell out an updated CSR concept, relating to labour and human rights and employment issues, as well as to environmental protection, climate change concerns, and avoidance of corruption and tax evasion;
source: PE-500.608
2012/11/30
EMPL
220 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the mutual benefits to be gained from cooperation between business and civil society, which can facilitate efforts to establish joint strategies, share knowledge and compare expectations; endorses wholeheartedly, therefore, the commitment made by the Commission to set up multi- stakeholder CSR platforms to step up cooperation between business and society on key social and environmental matters; stresses that corporate social responsibility undeniably requires statutory framework provisions and that voluntary measures can complement, but in no way replace, existing provisions regarding the protection of workers, efficient monitoring of compliance and the imposition of any penalties which may be necessary;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas corporate social responsibility (CSR) must not be used to redefine internationally agreed minimum applicable standards but to seek
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Acknowledges that within large companies CSR practices and policies are still very much confined to a minority, therefore calls on the Commission to highlight the importance of CSR being included in education and training especially within business and management schools;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of marginalised groups in society; calls on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on such initiatives, including a gender based approach;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of marginalised groups in society; calls on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on such initiatives; requests companies to keep up with these types of initiatives as they can mitigate the negative consequences of the crisis; calls on the Commission and the Member States to reduce administrative burdens and provide incentives for companies undertaking these activities;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Believes that CSR actions do not just benefit society as a whole, but also help a company to improve its image and raise its standing in the eyes of potential consumers, thus enabling it to be economically viable in the long term;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that the establishment of skills development and lifelong learning programmes for workers, regular individual assessments of workers and a talent management programme as well as the setting of individual business and development goals for workers increases their motivation and commitment and is an essential part of CSR;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Points out that, particularly in times of crisis, companies operating in accordance with CSR should help to develop the innovative capacities of their region by introducing innovative and environmentally friendly technological solutions in production facilities and through new investments and modernisation;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes the financial crisis
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes the financial crisis has shaken employee confidence in company obligations to meet long-term private pension entitlements;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes the financial crisis has shaken employee confidence in company obligations to meet long-term private pension entitlements; believes companies must be fully accountable for pension investments made including for maintaining payments on a regular and continuous basis; calls on companies to take action to redress the imbalance in the eyes of many employees, who believe that their pension entitlements have been disproportionately cut; following the crisis; invites responsible companies to address this problem working with the Commission and the social partners, including by establishing open, inclusive and rules-based arrangements for managing pension investments, and as part of the wider challenge within CSR to address active ageing in an era of demographic change;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes the financial crisis has shaken employee confidence in company obligations to meet long-term private pension entitlements; calls on companies to take action to redress the imbalance in the eyes of many employees, who believe that their pension entitlements have been disproportionately cut; restoration of trust between employees and companies is essential if there is to be a sustainable economic recovery;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to treat unions and staff representatives, who are essential actors, as partners in dialogue in connection with CSR-related topics, alongside businesses and other stakeholders;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the term ‘corporate social responsibility
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Emphasises that integration of environmental concerns such as biodiversity, climate change, resource efficiency, environmental health of the CSR into business operations offers potential to promote a sustainable recovery;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Endorses the emphasis given in the Commission communication to strengthening and implementing international standards, and – in view of the 2011 update of the OECD Guidelines and agreement of the UN Guiding Principles – believes that a major emphasis of EU action must now be on the
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Endorses the emphasis given in the Commission communication to strengthening and implementing international standards, and – in view of the 2011 update of the OECD Guidelines and agreement of the UN Guiding Principles – believes that a major emphasis of EU action must now be on the full implementation of those guidelines and principles; stresses that these OECD guidelines have been defined and acknowledged at the international level in order to set and maintain a level playing field, while fostering open, fair, and responsible business practices worldwide;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the feasibility and desirability of developing a European social label for all companies involved in CSR, so as to make their efforts more visible to consumers and investors; suggests that companies bearing such a label be monitored regularly regarding their compliance with the social CSR provisions set out in the label;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Suggests to the Commission to report annually to both the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of these OECD guidelines;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to make compliance with the OECD Guidelines compulsory for large European companies;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Welcomes in particular the inclusion of the ICT sector for specific European guidelines on business and human rights; recognises the genuine dilemmas created by the need to protect privacy and combat criminal content on the one hand with the objective of defending freedom of expression on the other, as evidenced by the recent controversy created by the anti- Islamic video posted on YouTube; calls for many more European companies to engage with the leading multi-stakeholder initiative in this respect, the Global Network Initiative (GNI), whose membership is currently dominated by US-based companies;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that all ‘finance for trade and development’ offered to private-sector actors by EU investment facilities, the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development should include contractual clauses requiring compliance with the OECD Guidelines
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that all ‘finance for trade and development’ offered to private-sector actors by EU investment facilities, the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development should include contractual clauses requiring compliance with the OECD Guidelines and the UN Guiding Principles and that provision should be made for their monitoring and accountability mechanisms for dealing with non-compliance;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas corporate social responsibility (CSR) must not be used to redefine internationally agreed minimum applicable standards but to seek better to understand and implement, monitor the way in which these are directly applicable to business;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative on national action plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights ; calls on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to play a far greater role in helping to lead implementation at a senior level; calls for a ‘peer review process’ to take place between Member States in order to advance implementation; calls for the European Commission and EEAS to undertake an evaluation of implementation of the action plans together with an assessment of actions taken at EU level to report to the European Council and Parliament by the end of 2014;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative on national action plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles; calls on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to play a far greater role in helping to lead implementation at a senior level and in encouraging an effective monitoring and reporting; calls for a ‘peer review process’ between Member States in order to advance implementation;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recognises that companies increasingly operate in fragile states and that they have a duty of care to protect their staff from conflict, terrorism and organised crime; nevertheless insists that companies have an equal duty to ensure security arrangements do not prejudice peace or security of others where they operate and which can open them up to accusations of complicity in human rights violation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to secure far greater adoption of the international Voluntary Security Principles and to seek agreement of an international regulatory framework on the regulation, monitoring and oversight of the activities of private military and security companies (PMSCs);
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on enterprises and other stakeholders to engage constructively in the Commission’s process on sector- specific human rights guidance, and to use the resulting guidance when it is complete;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission, in particular its DG Justice, to put forward proposals for better facilitating
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission, in particular its DG Justice, to put forward proposals for better facilitating extraterritorial jurisdiction in EU courts for egregious cases of human rights violation by EU- based businesses or their subsidiaries, subcontractors or business partners;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes, too, the need to develop and establish mechanisms for reporting human rights violations within individual businesses;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Believes the "Green Matters" study shows definitively the positive link between companies pursuing CSR and achieving better financial performance as they emerge from the crisis; endorses the concept of "responsible competitiveness" and underlines that the potential market for socially and environmentally useful goods and services remains a crucial market opportunity for companies as well as meeting societal need;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Shares the view of business identified in the Global CEO Survey 2012 that sustainable business growth requires close working with local populations, governments and business partners, and investing in local communities; supports and calls for intensification of business initiatives in job creation, training, helping to manage resource constraints and contributing to health solutions;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the concept of "corporate social responsibility" typically used in the EU institutions should be regarded as largely indistinguishable from related concepts of responsible or ethical business, "environment, society and governance," sustainable development and corporate accountability;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the European Commission
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that CSR
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that CSR is an important tool in helping the EU to support the implementation of ILO conventions;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that CSR is an important tool in helping the EU to support the implementation of ILO conventions; supports the provision of funding to enable European
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Agrees with the Commission communication that "respect for applicable legislation and for collective agreements between social partners is a prerequisite for meeting CSR"; believes CSR should complement, but in no way replace, legislation, collective bargaining or dialogue with workers organised in trade unions that companies should commit themselves to discuss their CSR policy – and elements such as an annual company report on the social and environmental impact of their activities - with the employees and their representatives; believes that an optional frame of rules for EFAs should be adopted on the basis of the possible contents of such a framework, as described in Staff Working Document from the Commission on that subject.
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Notes that the ILO Helpdesk for Business on International Labour Standards as one-stop shop for managers could serve as baseline indicators for effective CSR reporting;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes those from business
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Endorses the view
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Endorses the view, dating from the June 2004 report of the Multi-stakeholder Forum, that public authorities can make a significant contribution by using convening
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas corporate social action calls for standards laid down by law and collective agreement; stresses that promoting voluntary measures can merely complement, and can certainly not replace, provisions for the protection of workers, efficient monitoring of compliance with such provisions and penalties for contravention where necessary;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Endorses the view, dating from the June 2004 report of the Multi-stakeholder Forum, that public authorities can make a significant contribution by using convening
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Endorses the view, dating from the June 2004 report of the Multi-stakeholder Forum, that public authorities can make a significant contribution
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Endorses the view, dating from the June 2004 report of the Multi-stakeholder Forum, that public authorities can make a significant contribution by using convening, incentivising and regulatory roles to advance CSR, not least in public procurement, and calls on the Member States to give major new impetus to these efforts;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers that members states should hold companies accountable for the adoption of principles and proactive policies in order to counter discrimination and social exclusion, to promote gender equality and to respect the fundamental rights of all;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Invites the Commission and Member States given the multi-stakeholder approach to CSR, to consider broadening observer attendance at the bi-annual High Level Group meetings to include observer representatives comprising the two Rapporteurs from Relevant committees of the European Parliament, representatives from the United Nations Environment Programme, the United Nations Human Rights Council and the International Labour Organisation, and from one nominee each from European business, trade unions and civil society agreed from the co-ordinating committee of the Multi- Stakeholder Forum;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Supports a formal examination of the ‘Solidarité proposal’ for an inter- institutional human resources programme in the EU institutions to facilitate the involvement of the institutions’ staff and trainees in volunteering, humanitarian and social activities, both as part of staff training and volunteering in their own time; taking into account that the proposed programme is cost saving and highly value-adding and would help to promote as well as implement EU policies and programmes;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Considers that members states should encourage companies to develop policies and put in place measures regarding the need to respect the private and family life of all their employees; these policies and measures should conform to the principle of equality, and should extend to negotiations on the length and organization of working hours, salary levels, making certain practical facilities available for workers, and flexible working conditions, including the nature of employment contracts and the availability of career breaks;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Recognises that social indicators lag behind environmental indices in terms of economic valuation and general specificity in many CSR initiatives; despite the handbook on social procurement believes that the European Union itself has been too constrained in this area; calls for a study on "valuing social capital" leading to a wide-ranging European-led debate on better integrating social impact in sustainable business management; supports funding for pilot projects to develop social indices, social ratings agencies and the practice of social auditing in some Member States and business sectors;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. The Lisbon Treaty heralds solidarity as one of the founding values of the EU. It aims to ensure belonging, cooperation and active citizenship across the Union. At the same time, however, the need pointed out by the Laeken Declaration in 2001 that the EU Institutions be brought closer to the Union’s citizens is an ongoing call, and, faced with the challenges of the present world, EU officials need to be integrally in touch with society and reality.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Remains unclear how far successive amendments to EU procurement rules have actually been taken-up by public authorities and what overall impact has been achieved in improved environmental or social performance of business as a result as well as to incentivising CSR; calls for further research and evaluation of impact accordingly leading to clear recommendations to provide easily- understandable incentives to business; asks for this to include study of the growing practice of businesses building in CSR clauses in their own private purchasing i.e. in business-to-business contracts, and calls for the identification of good practice in this area;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the multi-stakeholder approach must remain the cornerstone of all EU-backed initiatives on CSR, and the basis of the most credible CSR by business itself, starting from the local level;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new) 18d. Commends the Commission for undertaking CSR pilot projects to support employee volunteering schemes; urges all Member States to include employee volunteering in their national action plans; calls for a "compact" to be signed through the European Volunteer Centre (CEV) to engage civil society organisations from throughout Europe to engage business to this objective; points out that practical schemes such as mentoring or genuine work exchange schemes can break down barriers for unemployed and excluded people and contribute to social and economic objectives; supports a formal examination of the ‘Solidarité proposal’ for an inter- institutional human resources programme in the EU institutions to facilitate the involvement of the institutions’ staff and trainees in volunteering, humanitarian and social activities, both as part of staff training and volunteering in their own time;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new) 18e. Encourages the use of Information Communication Technology and social media to encourage those interested globally to take a more active part in multi-stakeholder consultations;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Commends
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Welcomes the Commission’s desire to formulate the new Public Procurement Directives in a way which is socially and environmentally more sustainable; notes that binding collective labour agreements are especially important in this context; stresses that social criteria for the award of contracts, such as access to training, equality, fair trade and the social integration of disadvantaged workers and people with disabilities, can provide businesses with an incentive to increase their social responsibility;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Urges the Member States to establish favourable scenarios to help companies pursue CSR activities;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls for the European Year of Citizenship 2013 to include a specific strand on business citizenship, inviting entrepreneurs and business people to engage with existing CSR initiatives in Member States and at the EU-level to promote and develop the concept of a "good corporate citizen";
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Welcomes the recognition of the role which must be played by public procurement in promoting CSR in practice; considers it important accordingly that measures be taken under the new directive seeking to include social and environmental factors, progress beyond the award of contracts to ‘the lowest bidder’ and make compulsory compliance with the provisions of international, European and national law and with the collective agreements applicable at the place where the works are carried out or the goods or services provided;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Supports a formal examination of the 'Solidarité proposal' for an inter- institutional human resources programme in the EU institutions to facilitate the involvement of the institutions' staff and trainees in volunteering, humanitarian and social activities, both as part of staff training and volunteering in their own time. Highlights the fact that the proposed programme is cost saving and highly value-adding and would help to implement EU policies and programmes;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Welcomes the European Commission's intention to base its new award scheme by building on existing practices on this area; believes that the awards can incentivise CSR but only if winners represent genuine best practice at their national, European and global level; invites the European Commission to set up an independent panel of experts to assess this and to "audit" the scheme in this and future years on a continuing basis; asks that the publicity around the awards reflects the real complexity of the challenges being faced and emphasises lessons for all companies and not exclusively the winners;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Considers it essential for the Commission to develop as soon as possible the announced common methodology for the measurement of environmental performance based on the life-cycle cost. Such a methodology would be useful in terms of both transparency of company information and assessment by the authorities of companies’ environmental performance;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas the Global Reporting Initiative has provided the most widely accepted methodology internationally by far for business transparency and whereas the formation of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) involving the major global accountancy standard-setting bodies indicates corporate sustainability reporting integrated in financial accounts will become the global norm within less than a decade;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to accelerate its efforts to
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Commends the European Commission’s plans to advance initiatives in the fields of responsible production and consumption; believes the EU can build on the experience of CSR initiatives which have undertaken specific training and capacity-building for purchasers within companies; believes the planned initiative on transparency can be a major driver for the ethical consumer movement; remains sceptical of new initiatives for social and environmental labels at an EU-wide, national or sectoral level, instead preferring continuing support to existing labelling initiatives to continuously promote collaboration from "bottom-up" under the auspices of the International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling (ISEAL) Alliance;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Member States to take action to enhance the effectiveness of policies to promote corporate social responsibility by, for example, introducing rewards for responsible corporate behaviour in the form of investment policy incentives and access to public investment;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Urges the Commission to contribute effectively to the guidance and coordination of EU Member State policies, thereby minimising the risk of additional costs being incurred by businesses operating in more than one Member State as a result of divergent provisions;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Points out that most small, medium and micro enterprises continue to adopt a more informal and intuitive approach to corporate social responsibility and that it would perhaps be appropriate to adopt measures in line with the size of the enterprises and the nature of their activities so as to foster awareness of corporate social responsibility without any increase in costs or bureaucratic burdens;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that a key driver of the socially responsible investment market remains institutional investor demand, but the primary focus should not remain confined to environmental aspects; notes, in this vein, that disclosure to investors and consumers is a key driver of CSR and must be based on readily applicable and measurable social and environmental principles
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that a key driver of the socially and sustainably responsible investment market remains institutional investor demand; notes, in this vein, that disclosure is a key driver of CSR and must be principles-based;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that a key driver of the socially responsible investment market remains institutional investor demand; notes, in this vein, that disclosure is a key driver of CSR and must be based on voluntary principles
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that a key driver of the socially responsible investment market remains institutional investor demand; notes, in this vein, that disclosure is a key driver of CSR and must be principles-based; welcomes the Commission’s moves to engage with the investor community on CSR issues; calls for this engagement to be firmly based on support for the UN Principles for Responsible investment and the principle of integrated reporting (IR);
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Considers that the publicity given to companies’ activities is very important because it enables consumers to make objective assessments regarding the companies most deserving of their custom and/or investment;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas ground-breaking work by the Prince’s Accounting for Sustainability Project, by TEEB for Business and by the United Nations Environmental Programme has now made it possible for business to fully and accurately understand the monetary valuation of its external social and environmental impact and thus build it in to the financial management of the company;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that beneficiaries of long-term investors such as pension funds have an interest in sustainable returns and in responsible corporate behaviour; believes that it is important that the incentives of investment agents are effectively aligned with beneficiaries’ interests, and do not restrict them to a narrow interpretation of those interests which focuses solely on the maximisation of short-term returns; endorses a legal framework supports this aim; welcomes that the Commission is developing proposals on long-term investing and on corporate governance which will help to address these issues
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Fully supports the Commission's intention to put forward a legislative proposal on ‘non-financial disclosure’ by businesses; commends that this proposal is based on a wide-ranging public consultation as well as a series of workshops with relevant stakeholders; warns that use of the term ‘non-financial’ should not disguise the very real financial consequences for business of social, environmental and human-rights-
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Fully supports the Commission's intention to put forward a legislative proposal on ‘non-financial disclosure’ by businesses; warns that use of the term ‘non-financial’ should not disguise the very real financial consequences for business of social, environmental and human-rights- related impact; calls for an ambitious proposal which places the EU right among the many current international initiatives on mandatory corporate sustainability reporting and squarely within the objective of making Integrated Reporting, as being developed by the IIRC, the global norm by the end of the decade; believes that a "comply or explain" system is a useful tool in CSR; is in favour of introducing a CSR policy in businesses and that any deviation from a CSR policy should be explained in a meaningful way;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas there has been a sea-change in the investment community with 1123 investors representing $32trn total assets under management endorsing the UN Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI); the European Sustainable Investment Forum estimates that the global SRI market reached approximately €7 trillion as of September 2010 and 82 investors led by Aviva Global Investors and representing US$50trillion total assets under management leading the call at the UN Summit for Sustainable Development for corporate sustainability reporting to be made mandatory;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Underlines that CSR is led by business and that companies must be able to report in a way which is appropriate and relevant for their particular situation;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission accordingly to propose a clear legislative framework making compulsory non-financial disclosure by major European companies and specifying the minimum amount of information which must be provided (including environmental data, taking account of life-cycle costs, social aspects, in particular respect for human rights, and governance) and the methodology; notes that information should also be given regarding subcontracting and supply chains; calls for the drafting of simplified framework provisions which may be adopted by SMEs ;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Notes that to enhance the credibility of a business's actions, the social report should be verified by an external body;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Endorses a continuing leading role for
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Endorses a continuing leading role for the European Multi-stakeholder Forum in supporting the implementation of the proposals set out in the Commission communication; calls on all participants to engage in the work of the forum with an approach which is flexible, open-minded and consensus-building in the true spirit of CSR;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Insists that trade union rights and freedoms are at the centre of any CSR strategy, commends the extensive EU framework of sectoral and cross-sectoral social dialogue structures and calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations and trade unions in particular in the development, operation and monitoring of companies' CSR processes and structures, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Calls for CSR policies to include specific measures to tackle the unlawful practice of blacklisting workers and denying them access to employment, often due to their trade union membership and activities or health and safety representative role;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 c (new) 23c. Insists that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding and from taking part in calls for tender for other public procurement contracts at EU, national or public authority level;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 d (new) 23d. Asks the Commission to introduce a more open and clear procedure for filing and considering complaints of non- compliance to CSR principles, including enforcement mechanisms and initiating investigations, where necessary;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 e (new) 23e. Notes that CSR policies must be respected not only by the main company or contractor but also by any sub- contractors or supply chains which it may use, whether in the supply of goods, workers or services and whether based in the EU or in a third country, thereby ensuring a level playing field based on fair pay and decent working conditions, and guaranteeing trade union rights and freedoms;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A f (new) Af. whereas the formation of the European Multi-stakeholder Platform on CSR, the undertaking of a series of pilot projects and research projects, the activities of the former Alliance for Business have all established a firm track record for European action in the field of CSR, together with continuing valuable contribution made by a ‘family’ of European CSR organisations including CSR Europe, the European Academy of Business in Society (EABIS), the European Social Investment Forum (Eurosif), and the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ);
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 f (new) 23f. Endorses the Commission's Directive on minimum standards for victims and calls for the CSR policies of companies in the relevant sectors (such as travel, insurance, accommodation and telecommunications) to include positive and practical strategies and structures to support victims of crime and their families during a crisis, and to set up specific policies for any employee who becomes a victim of crime, whether in the workplace or outside;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR but
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR but, recognising that the profusion of
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR but, recognising that the profusion of private and voluntary initiatives can generate additional costs and be a barrier to implementation, calls on the Commission, with the participation of Parliament and the Council and together with other international bodies, to make a commitment to supporting the long-term objective of ‘convergence’ of CSR initiatives;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR but, recognising that the profusion of private and voluntary initiatives can generate additional costs and be a barrier to implementation, calls on the Commission to play a much more active role, together with other international bodies, to make a commitment to supporting the long-term objective of ‘convergence’ of CSR initiatives;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the UN Women’s Empowerment Principles launched in March 2010 which offer guidance on how to empower women in the workplace, marketplace and community and are a result of a collaboration between UN Women and the United Nations Global Compact;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that the economic crisis may have had an adverse impact on the way in which work is organised; calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the social partners, to use the multi- stakeholder platforms as an additional measure to promote efforts to find sustainable solutions in connection
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A g (new) Ag. whereas, although it is essential to establish a core set of common standards for CSR, differences in the materiality of different social and environmental questions necessitates differential approaches to CSR according to different industrial sectors;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Agrees that there cannot be a ‘one size fits all’ approach to CSR but, recognising that the profusion of private and voluntary initiatives can generate additional costs and be a barrier to implementation
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Believes that the notion that CSR is a "luxury good" supported by business only in good economic times has been decisively refuted by the continuing high levels of business engagement with CSR; believes that this was an old-fashioned assumption which ignores the importance of reputation and also of the level of external risk to modern business profitability; calls for all European policy- makers to themselves integrate CSR at all levels of economic policy including reinforcing CSR within the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Member States, in cooperation with the Commission and, as appropriate, with universities, to promote corporate social responsibility through inclusion of the relevant material in the context of education and vocational training, thereby enhancing the role of CSR in the business sector and fostering awareness of sustainable consumption;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b Takes the view that the social partners can play a major role in promoting corporate social responsibility, which, it should be noted, contributes to and facilitates social dialogue;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Commends the work being undertaken in some business schools to promote CSR, but recognises that they are only a minority; calls on the High-Level Group to address ways of mainstreaming CSR
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Commends the work being undertaken in some business schools to promote CSR, but recognises that they are only a minority; calls on the High-Level Group to address ways of mainstreaming CSR into management education for all future business leaders; believes that this must begin with CSR education for school-age children involved in young entrepreneurship schemes;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Commends the work being undertaken in some business schools to promote CSR, but recognises that they are only a minority; calls on the High-Level Group to address ways of mainstreaming CSR into management education for all so that it will become a keystone in strategic corporate governance;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes, for the sake of sustainability, obligations imposed on market operators and calls on the Commission to monitor and evaluate CSR initiatives.
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Recognises that the Laeken Declaration in 2001 points out that the EU institutions need to be brought closer to the Unions citizens;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A h (new) Ah. whereas company codes of conduct have played an important role in initiating and raising awareness of CSR, but are an insufficient response given frequent lack of specificity, inconsistency with existing international standards, examples of avoidance of material issues, lack of comparability and transparency in application;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Supports the development of the 'Solidarité proposal' for an inter- institutional human resources programme in the EU Institutions to facilitate the involvement of the Institutions' staff and trainees in community engagement through benevolent humanitarian and positive social activities, both as part of staff training and volunteering in their own time.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A i (new) Ai. whereas the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights were agreed unanimously in the United Nations with the full support of EU member states, the International Organisation of Employers and the International Chambers of Commerce, including support for the concept of a "smart mix" between regulatory and voluntary actions;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A j (new) Aj. whereas former UN Secretary General Special Representative Ruggie appealed to EU Member States to clarify and support the issue of extraterritorial jurisdiction for violations by companies in fragile third countries as part of the CSR Conference convened by the then Swedish Presidency, which was subsequently endorsed in European Council conclusions, but that currently no action has been taken in response;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A k (new) Ak. whereas the European Commission study in to governance gaps between international CSR instruments and standards and existing European legislation known as "the Edinburgh Study," published in October 2010 and whose results were reported in the 2011 Annual Human Rights Report fully endorsed by the European Council and European Parliament;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A l (new) Al. whereas the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprise are the most credible international CSR standard and that the Update agreed in May 2011 presents a significant opportunity to advance implementation of CSR;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A m (new) Am. whereas numerous international initiatives have taken place to secure mandatory sustainability reporting by business, including the requirement to report for Chinese state-owned businesses, for businesses to report on implementation of CSR Guidelines developed by the Government of India, and for businesses to disclose their sustainability performance required as a stock exchange listing requirement in Brazil, South Africa and Malaysia and by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A n (new) An. whereas the Danish Financial Statements Act (2008) on corporate sustainability reporting with specific additional reporting requirements on climate change and on human rights impact has proven hugely popular with Danish business, with 97 per cent choosing to report despite its "comply or explain" provision within the first three years of its application;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A o (new) Ao. whereas France and Denmark have agreed to be two of four UN member state governments who have agreed to lead implementation of the UN Rio +20 commitment on corporate sustainability reporting;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A p (new) Ap. whereas the update of the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprise led by the Netherlands has offered the opportunity to upgrade their visibility and status through the system of "national contact points," ended the "investment nexus" which prevented their full application to the supply chain and fully integrated the UN Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) - having regard to the "Consistency Project," a collaborative project between the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) designed to support greater consistency of approach to the demand for and supply of corporate climate change-related information;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that the economic crisis may have had an adverse impact on the way in which work is organised; calls on the Commission to use the multi- stakeholder platforms
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A q (new) Aq. whereas the European Parliament resolution on Europe 2020 states that there is an inextricable link between corporate responsibility and corporate governance;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A r (new) Ar. whereas the "Green Winners" 2009 study of 99 companies which showed that in 16 separate industrial sectors, companies with CSR strategies out- performed their industry average by at least 15 per cent, representing extra market capitalisation of €498 ($650m) per company;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A s (new) As. whereas the Global CEO survey 2012 shows that business recognises that growth requires working closely with local populations with, for example, over 60% planning to increase investments in the next three years to help maintain the health of the workforce;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises that the Commission communication is part of a series of policy
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises that the Commission
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that an active awareness of social responsibility brings businesses greater trust and social acceptance;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees, nevertheless, with the analysis
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees, nevertheless, with the analysis set out in the communication to the effect
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees, nevertheless, with the analysis set out in the communication to the effect that CSR practices are still largely confined to a minority of big companies; CSR can, however, be introduced to companies of whatever size and in whatever sector: multinationals and SMEs alike. Small businesses can also play a major role locally in sustainable regional development; this must, however, entail the minimum amount of administration;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 – having regard to the October 2010 study produced for the Commission on governance gaps between international corporate social responsibility instruments and standards and existing European legislation (known as the ‘Edinburgh Study’), the findings of which were reported in the 2011 European Parliament Annual Human Rights Report, fully endorsed by the European Council;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees, nevertheless, with the analysis set out in the communication to the effect that CSR practices are still largely confined to a minority of big companies; stresses that regulation of all entities would create trust and fairness while strengthening monitoring and implementation;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that CSR continues to be focused on environmental standards at the expense of social standards, even though these are essential in order to restore a social climate conducive to economic growth and social convergence;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that the global financial crisis provides a real risk that policy makers including in the EU will suffer their own fatal short-termism, focusing exclusively on measures for narrowly-defined transparency and accountability in financial markets and neglecting the urgent need for the financial as well as all industrial sectors to address pressing and over-riding challenges of environmental degradation and social disintegration in an integrated way;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Warns that businesses can only be sustainable in the future if they exist within a sustainable economy, and that there can be no alternative to transformation to a low-carbon future which also encompasses preservation of social and natural capital in the world, a process in which CSR must play a decisive role;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers, the use of appropriate
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers, the use of
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers, the use of appropriate regulation, a robust impact analysis of existing CSR initiatives, and increasing recognition within both the business community and wider society
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on public procurement (COM(2011)0896);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Agrees with the Commission communication that compliance with the relevant legislation and with collective agreements between the social partners is an essential precondition for corporate social responsibility; notes also that social responsibility necessarily involves properly conducted trade union relations, in particular respect for trade union rights, ongoing information for workers and the associations representing them and their involvement in corporate decision making;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers, the use of appropriate regulation, a robust impact analysis of existing CSR initiatives, support for new initiatives in the social sphere, adaptation of CSR to meet the needs of SMEs, and increasing recognition within both the business community and wider society of the scale of global social and environmental challenges;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Supports the Commission’s intention to deepen CSR in Europe by producing guidelines and supporting multi- stakeholder initiatives for individual industrial sectors, and appeals to leading companies and associations to embrace this initiative;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that workers’ representative bodies and employee participation are essential structural elements of a CSR strategy; democratically-elected workers’ representation bodies must therefore be involved when drawing up a CSR strategy for businesses and must be taken into account in the Commission’s action plan;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Reiterates that CSR must move from process to outcome;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the definition of CSR set out in the Commission communication, which reflects the new approach first adopted by the Commission in the Multi-stakeholder Forum in 2009, provides an indispensable opportunity for inclusi
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the definition of CSR set out in the Commission communication, which reflects the new approach first adopted by the Commission in the Multi-stakeholder Forum in 2009, provides an indispensable opportunity for inclusivity and consensus-building, and properly reflects the new consensus reached between business and other stakeholders on this issue thanks to the unanimous agreement of the UN Guiding Principles; insists that the term ‘voluntary’ should again be a key element of the definition of CSR and that the Commission must differentiate more between (1) the original CSR concept of charitable acts by businesses, in order to exercise their social responsibility; (2) social acts by businesses based on laws, rules and international standards; and (3) anti-social acts by businesses which violate laws, rules and international standards and is criminal and exploitative, for example child or forced labour; regrets these three aspects are constantly becoming intermingled in the CSR debate; strongly condemns antisocial action by businesses and sees a need to compel countries to transpose and enforce international standards in national law; in particular commends businesses – especially SMEs – for their voluntary, charitable involvement in CSR, which it will safeguard and promote; believes that, in a free society, businesses should not be forced to perform charitable acts;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the definition of CSR set out in the Commission communication, which reflects the new approach first adopted by the Commission in the Multi-stakeholder Forum in 2009, provides an indispensable opportunity for inclusivity and consensus-building, and properly reflects the new consensus reached between business and other stakeholders on this issue thanks to the unanimous agreement of the UN Guiding Principles and other instruments such as the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that ‘social responsibility’ should also respect fundamental principles and rights such as those specified by the ILO, including in particular freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, the prohibition on forced labour, the abolition on child labour and the elimination of discrimination at work;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Strongly commends the contribution made by the Commissioners for Employment, Enterprise and Internal Market and their services for the forward- looking and constructive approach contained within the Commission Communication; acknowledges the contribution of other parts of the Commission through the Inter-Service Group on CSR; nevertheless calls on the President of the Commission to give personal leadership in the field of CSR and to ensure there is full "ownership" of the Commission’s commitment to CSR in particular in the Directorates General for Environment and in those covering external relations;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Agrees with the Commission communication that compliance with the relevant legislation and collective agreements between the social partners is an essential precondition for corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 31 a (new) - having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010- 2015’ (COM(2010)0491)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Notes that, in assessing the social responsibility of a company, account must be taken of the conduct of those companies forming part of its supply chain and any subcontractors;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Restates its belief
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Restates its belief in the ‘business case’ for CSR, but reiterates that, where such a
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Restates its belief in the ‘business case’ for CSR, but reiterates that, where such a case does not apply in the short term in any given situation or company, it can never be used as an excuse for choosing irresponsibility and antisocial action;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Restates its belief in the ‘business case’ for CSR, but reiterates that, where such a case does not apply in the short term in any given situation or company, it can never be used as an excuse for choosing irresponsibility; believes sufficient existing research exists to prove the "business case" and the priority should be the dissemination of that research; calls for new research on CSR to be devoted to assessment of the cumulative impact of changed business behaviour due to CSR in dealing with overall European and global challenges such as carbon emissions, water acidification, extreme poverty, child labour or inequality, and for the lessons learnt to be fed in to Europe’s future input in developing global CSR initiatives;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Restates its belief in the ‘business case’ for CSR, but reiterates that, where such a case does not apply in the short term in any given situation or company, it can never be used as an excuse for choosing irresponsibility and that commitments should be monitored while providing for an effective accountability mechanism for dealing with non-compliance;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Maintains that companies must not use CSR as an excuse for marketing their products dishonestly, in particular by relying on false or unproven ecological virtues, since these might mislead consumers;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Agrees with the Commission’s analysis that CSR is increasingly important for a company’s social license to operate, given the incidence of social protest such as the anti-globalisation and "Occupy" movements, of social conflicts and sometimes confrontational industrial relations; believes that the European Union itself must adopt CSR as its own ‘social licence’ to pursue trade and economic benefits with other countries and regions of the world; in particular considers that CSR must be a ‘core’ part of Europe’s trade policies;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises that a deep flaw in CSR initiatives arises
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises that a deep flaw in CSR initiatives arises when companies avoid critical interest groups or sensitive issues relevant to their business and their global supply chain; calls on the Commission, working with financial authorities, to build on the previous work of CSR ‘laboratories’ in order better to identify how companies and their stakeholders can objectively pinpoint social and environmental issues which are ‘material’ to the business in question;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises that a deep flaw in CSR initiatives arises when companies avoid critical interest groups or sensitive issues relevant to their business; calls on the Commission, working with financial authorities, to build on the previous work
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas regulation reduces people’s willingness to implement charitable action;1 __________________ 1 Analysis of the relationship between the World Giving Index and the regulation index of the Cologne Institute for Economic Research (IW); http://www.iwkoeln.de/de/infodienste/wirt schaft-und-ethik/archiv/beitrag/84129
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of introducing a European certificate of corporate social responsibility which should be recognised throughout the European Union as evidence of compliance with a number of conditions relating to various aspects of CSR based on internationally recognised principles and guidelines;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that consumers are increasingly focusing attention on companies’ CSR activities, and therefore urges companies to take a transparent approach, especially to corporate operations related to ethical, social, and environmental concerns;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the fact that CSR will only be viable if the legal provisions in force and local tariff regulations of social partners are upheld;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses that democratically-elected workers’ representatives must be more closely involved in the CSR strategy;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Recognises that CSR actions do not form part of normal business activity, but are an additional source of added value for society and must therefore be voluntary;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for youth job creation as a practical example of their commitment, establishing for example a system that would enable university graduates to work on internships, in order to get the work experience that is needed by employers in the private sector;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A a (new) -Aa. whereas in a free society, businesses may not be forced to perform charitable acts;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Understands that developing CSR will require new skills from businesses and a shift in values and behaviour; is convinced that Member States can play a key role in providing educational institutions with incentives to include CSR, sustainable development and responsible citizenship in the relevant curricula, in both secondary and higher education;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake, in cooperation with workers’ representatives, initiatives for youth job creation as a practical example of their commitment;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for youth job creation in all areas of activity (such as management and training, markets, staff, environment and society) as a practical example of their commitment;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for youth job creation, with special regard to young people having multiple disadvantages, such as Roma and disabled people, as a practical example of their commitment;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for youth job creation and employment not only of rank-and-file workers but also of senior management staff from the local labour market as a practical example of their commitment;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that enterprises should be involved in solving social problems aggravated by the economic crisis, such as lack of housing, poverty, and in the development of the communities in which they work;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Invites the Multi-stakeholder Forum to
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Invites the Multi-stakeholder Forum to consider possible courses of action in response to the growing casualisation of employment with a special focus on women’s employment, enforced part-time working in place of full-time employment, the rise in exploitative work through increased sub-
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas the term ‘voluntary’ will again have to be a key element of CSR and there must be greater differentiation between (1) the original CSR concept of charitable corporate action, in order to exercise social responsibility; (2) corporate social action based on laws, rules and international standards; and (3) antisocial action by businesses which violates laws, rules and international standards and is criminal and exploitative, for example child or forced labour; whereas these three aspects are constantly becoming intermingled in the CSR debate; whereas anti-social corporate action must be strongly condemned; whereas voluntary charitable commitment to CSR must be expressly supported and encouraged;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission, in particular the DG for Justice, to table proposals regarding the extraterritorial jurisdiction of EU courts in cases of human rights violations on the part of European companies or their subsidiaries, subcontractors or trading partners;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Invites the Multi-stakeholder Forum to consider possible courses of action in response to the growing casualisation of employment, enforced part-time working in place of full-time employment, the rise in exploitative work and labour practices through increased sub-
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Invites the Multi-stakeholder Forum to consider possible courses of action, such as further integrating CSR into education and training or investing in the research and development of CSR initiatives, in response to the growing casualisation of employment, enforced part-time working in place of full-time employment, the rise in exploitative work through increased sub- contracting and the resurgence of the informal sector, all of which are a result of the economic crisis;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes that compliance with legislation on physical working conditions, establishing procedures and policy on recruitment and dismissal, the protection of workers’ data and privacy and the timely payment of remuneration and other benefits are also part of CSR, and calls for them to be respected;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of marginalised groups in society and that it is therefore essential to determine benchmarks for social measures; calls on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on such initiatives;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of marginalised groups in society, especially in the countries of the European South, in which the policies of austerity measures have led to further cutbacks on long established employee rights; calls on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social
source: PE-501.896
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-496506_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-497943_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-498150_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-500421_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-497788_EN.html
|
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.081New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-498081_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.896New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-501896_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.506&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.943&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.421&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.788&secondRef=02
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-23&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0023_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-50New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0050_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/7/09580New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0681:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0681:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility BACKGROUND: the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis. The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR. Indicators of progress include: · the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1 900 in 2011; · the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011; · the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011. In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy. Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement. The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007, and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011. The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term. CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR, including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows: Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of: · maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large; · identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts. The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive. The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Agenda for action: the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens. Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices: by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR. The Commission intends to: · create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress; · launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders. Improving and tracking levels of trust in business: there is frequently a gap between citizens expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to: · address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue; · initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR. Improving self- and co-regulation processes: the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process. Enhancing market reward for CSR: this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will: · facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender; · consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information: one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors. Further integrating CSR into education, training and research: the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR, and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes, and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR. Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies: the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication. Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility. The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to: · work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors, as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. · publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports. Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles. New
PURPOSE: to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility BACKGROUND: the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis. The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR. Indicators of progress include: · the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1 900 in 2011; · the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011; · the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011. In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy. Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement. The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007, and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011. The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term. CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR, including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows: Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of: · maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large; · identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts. The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive. The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Agenda for action: the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens. Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices: by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR. The Commission intends to: · create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress; · launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders. Improving and tracking levels of trust in business: there is frequently a gap between citizens expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to: · address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue; · initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR. Improving self- and co-regulation processes: the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process. Enhancing market reward for CSR: this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will: · facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender; · consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information: one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors. Further integrating CSR into education, training and research: the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR, and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes, and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR. Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies: the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication. Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility. The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to: · work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors, as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. · publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports. Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles. |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-01-29T00:00:00New
2012-05-24T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-11-30T00:00:00New
2013-01-24T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-05-24T00:00:00New
2013-01-29T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-01-24T00:00:00New
2013-02-06T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185030fb8127435bdbe65New
4f1ac8c1b819f25efd0000ef |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186650fb8127435bdc056New
4f1ad26cb819f27595000023 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1852a0fb8127435bdbe99New
4f1ac8adb819f25efd0000e8 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1854a0fb8127435bdbec6New
4f1ac923b819f25efd000111 |
committees/3/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de183810fb8127435bdbc2dNew
4f1ac45cb819f2589600000a |
committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de185750fb8127435bdbf03New
4f1ac915b819f25efd00010c |
committees/3/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1863c0fb8127435bdc019New
4f1ad227b819f2759500000b |
committees/3/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de183d80fb8127435bdbcb4New
4f1ac6edb819f25efd000056 |
committees/3/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de187070fb8127435bdc136New
4f1ac48bb819f2589600001d |
committees/5/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001New
4f1ad233b819f2759500000f |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183710fb8127435bdbc17New
4f1ac62ab819f25efd000022 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/9 |
Old
6.40.13 Relations with international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRDNew
5.05 Economic growth |
procedure/subject/11 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable development and growthNew
6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD |
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2013-01-29T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-02-06T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-01-29T00:00:00New
2013-02-06T00:00:00 |
activities/7/docs/0/title |
Old
A7-0023/2013New
T7-0050/2013 |
activities/7/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-23&language=EN
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-23&language=EN
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.896
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-01-24T00:00:00New
2011-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Prev Adopt in CteNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-05-16T00:00:00New
2012-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-11-26T00:00:00New
2012-11-30T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/4 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=681New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.081
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/2/date |
2012-01-25T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2012-01-25T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/7/date |
Old
2011-11-22T00:00:00New
2012-10-10T00:00:00 |
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184310fb8127435bdbd38New
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001 |
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DÉSIR HarlemNew
LANGE Bernd |
committees/7/date |
Old
2011-11-22T00:00:00New
2012-10-10T00:00:00 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184310fb8127435bdbd38New
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DÉSIR HarlemNew
LANGE Bernd |
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/6 |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/date |
2011-11-10T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2011-11-10T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/committees/0/date |
2012-04-26T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-04-26T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/9/date |
2012-05-30T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/9/rapporteur |
|
committees/9/date |
2012-05-30T00:00:00
|
committees/9/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/7/date |
2011-11-22T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
2011-11-22T00:00:00
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/commission/0 |
|
activities/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
EMPL/7/09580
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|