Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | DE BACKER Philippe ( ALDE) | DORFMANN Herbert ( PPE), KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca ( S&D), LAMBERTS Philippe ( Verts/ALE), KAMALL Syed ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | MCINTYRE Anthea ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | MAŇKA Vladimír ( S&D) | Michael THEURER ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo ( ALDE) | Emma McCLARKIN ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | TAYLOR Rebecca ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 538 votes to 20, with 22 abstentions, a resolution on improving access to finance for SMEs, in response to the Commission’s Action Plan on the same subject.
Recalling that SMEs account for more than 98% of Europe's businesses and provide more than 67% of jobs in the Union, Parliament welcomes the Commission‘s Action Plan and its broad set of proposals and recommendations regarding SMEs.
Due to the aggravating effect of the financial and economic crisis, many SMEs have difficulty in accessing finance. Consequently, Members encourage the Commission to continue its efforts in promoting national-level implementation of the ‘Think Small First’ principle , which implies a further simplification of the regulatory and administrative environment for SMEs.
Parliament recalls that banking institutions which have benefited during the crisis from state aid should be subject to targets for their financing amounts and conditions for SMEs. Because of the fragmentation of the banking sector and the subsequent great divergence in lending rates and credit offer among countries, it calls for a differentiated approach to improving SMEs' access to funding is necessary, taking into account the country-specific circumstances.
Vulnerability of SMEs : SMEs are often at the end of a long delivery life cycle and hence are the ones affected most by late payments and short payment periods. Members welcome the Commission’s initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive .
The Commission is asked to submit new regulations relevant to SMEs to an overall and inclusive impact assessment , including a comprehensive test, taking into account the needs and challenges that SMEs have to face.
Professionalising entrepreneurship : Parliament notes that entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge of basic finance limits the quality of business plans and, consequently, the success of credit applications. It calls on the Member States, therefore, to provide professional training support for potential entrepreneurs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay. Members support in this connection the ‘ Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs’ programme, designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness.
Parliament also considers it essential to:
set up a special strategy for start-ups and financial tools to implement innovative projects and develop the creativity of young entrepreneurs; facilitate the implementation of best practice in the field of improving preparation of entrepreneurs; inform entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs and banks in simplified terms and on a regular basis about training initiatives, EU funding and programmes for SMEs at national, regional and local level.
Transparency : recognising that there is a need on the part of SMEs to get specially tailored advice on credit opportunities, the resolution calls on the Commission to foster the sharing of best practices on specific solutions concerning dialogue, cooperation and exchange of information between creditors and entrepreneurs .
With a view to reducing the administrative burden for SMEs, Members stress that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business and call on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a single SME identification number , stored in a single European database for SMEs.
Variations of SMEs and new ways of funding : stressing that there are different categories of SMEs with differing needs and that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Parliament calls on the Commission to support:
the development of a broad range of tailored programmes, instruments and initiatives , ranging across equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and multilateral trading facilities), quasi-equity (such as mezzanine finance) and debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds, guarantee facilities and platforms); partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing (accountancy professionals, business or SME associations or chambers of commerce), in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases, taking into account their size, turnover and financing needs.
Members welcome the Commission’s new funding programmes, which take account of the specific characteristics of SMEs. They strongly believe that the financial envelope for the debt and equity finance instruments under the COSME Programme and under Horizon 2020 should be substantially increased. They call for at least 20% of the Horizon 2020 budget to be allocated to financing innovation in SMEs.
The Commission is invited to:
strengthen and optimise the risk-sharing instruments of the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund programmes for portfolios of equity or mezzanine financing granted by financial institutions (intermediaries) to SMEs; establish a permanent European Guarantee Platform under the European Investment Fund; emphasise the important role that the stock market can play in improving access to liquidity for both SMEs and investors at different stages;
Lastly, noting that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings in bank accounts, Parliament calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal on the activation of these savings , for example by introducing incentives based on the best practices existing in the Member States.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on improving access to finance for SMEs, in response to the Commission’s Action Plan on the same subject.
Members welcome the Commission‘s Action Plan and its broad set of proposals and recommendations regarding SMEs. They agree with the Commission that the European Union‘s economic success, excellence and cohesion largely depend on sustainable growth and job creation based on SMEs committed to providing quality products and services.
Due to the aggravating effect of the financial and economic crisis, many SMEs have difficulty in accessing finance , and that SMEs need to comply with new and sometimes more stringent regulatory criteria than before. Members encourage the Commission to continue its efforts in promoting national-level implementation of the ‘Think Small First’ principle , which implies a further simplification of the regulatory and administrative environment for SMEs. The report stresses that banking institutions which have benefited during the crisis from state aid should be subject to targets for their financing amounts and conditions for SMEs.
Vulnerability : SMEs are often at the end of a long delivery life cycle and hence are the ones affected most by late payments and short payment periods. Members welcome the Commission’s initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive.
The Commission is asked to subject new regulations relevant to SMEs to an overall and inclusive impact assessment , including a comprehensive test, taking into account the needs and challenges that SMEs have to face.
Professionalising entrepreneurship : Members note that entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge of basic finance limits the quality of business plans and, consequently, the success of credit applications. They call on the Member States, therefore, to provide professional training support for potential entrepreneurs.
The Commission and the Member States are called upon to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay. Members support in this connection the ‘ Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs ‘ programme, designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness.
Members also consider it essential to:
set up a special strategy for start-ups and financial tools to implement innovative projects and develop the creativity of young entrepreneurs; facilitate the implementation of best practice in the field of improving preparation of entrepreneurs; inform entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs and banks in simplified terms and on a regular basis about training initiatives, EU funding and programmes for SMEs at national, regional and local level.
Transparency : the report notes that creditors’ knowledge of credit tools is generally better than that of entrepreneurs and that entrepreneurs should communicate better with creditors about their business plan and their long-term strategy. Creditors should set clear and specific criteria on applying for finance in a transparent manner.
Recognising that there is a need on the part of SMEs to get specially tailored advice on credit opportunities, Members call on the Commission to foster the sharing of best practices on specific solutions concerning dialogue, cooperation and exchange of information between creditors and entrepreneurs .
Member States are called upon to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME, given the differences between countries in this field that are hindering the completion of the single market. Members stress that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business and call on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a single SME identification number , stored in a single European database for SMEs.
Variations of SMEs and new ways of funding : the report stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes, instruments and initiatives , ranging across equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and multilateral trading facilities), quasi-equity (such as mezzanine finance) and debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds, guarantee facilities and platforms), in partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing (accountancy professionals, business or SME associations or chambers of commerce), in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases, taking into account their size, turnover and financing needs.
Members welcome the Commission’s new funding programmes, which take account of the specific characteristics of SMEs. They strongly believe that the financial envelope for the debt and equity finance instruments under the COSME Programme and under Horizon 2020 should be substantially increased. They call for at least 20% of the Horizon 2020 budget to be allocated to financing innovation in SMEs.
The Commission is invited to:
strengthen and optimise the risk-sharing instruments of the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund programmes for portfolios of equity or mezzanine financing granted by financial institutions (intermediaries) to SMEs; establish a permanent European Guarantee Platform under the European Investment Fund to ease SMEs‘ access to finance, which would improve the development of guarantees or lending products based on European guarantees and reduce bank capital requirements and risk exposure for financial intermediaries address ways of improving access to finance for SMEs aiming to provide innovative works, supplies or services to the public sector ; emphasise the important role that the stock market can play in improving access to liquidity for both SMEs and investors at different stages;
The report notes that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings in bank accounts, while in other Member States deposits are reducing because of the effects of the crisis. Members call on the Commission to come forward with a proposal on the activation of these savings , for example by introducing incentives based on the best practices existing in the Member States.
PURPOSE: to propose an action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs.
BACKGROUND: Europe's economic success depends largely on the growth of Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) achieving their potential. SMEs contribute more than half of the total value added in the non-financial business economy and provided 80% of all new jobs in Europe in the past five years.
SMEs often face significant difficulties in obtaining the financing they need in order to grow and innovate. One of the key priorities set out in Europe 2020, the EU's growth strategy for the coming decade, as well as in the Commission's Single Market Act and the Small Business Act is to facilitate access to finance for SMEs.
The Annual Growth Survey has underlined the crucial role of a healthy financial system to support growth and set out priorities for action in the short-term perspective. In this context, the reform programme for financial services, implemented as a response to the financial crisis, can bring about regulatory benefits to SMEs. In addition, the Commission is proposing to release new targeted funding at EU level to address the key market failures that limit the growth of SMEs. The Commission is presenting in this Action Plan the various policies that it is pursuing to make access to finance easier for Europe's 23 million SMEs and to provide a significant contribution to growth.
CONTENT: difficulties in accessing finance are one of the main obstacles obstructing the growth of SMEs. There are multiple causes for such obstacles, some cyclical, some structural. Information asymmetries between the suppliers and demanders of funds play a major role.
SMEs are to a very large extent dependent on bank loans for their external financing, therefore suitable alternatives should be put at their disposal.
To respond to these challenges, the Commission has opted for a three-fold approach:
the Commission will use regulation to make SMEs more visible to investors and markets more attractive and accessible for SMEs. Regulatory changes will keep the right balance between prudential regulation and financing of SMEs, and between investor protection and tailored measures for SMEs. the Commission intends to continue using the EU budget to facilitate access to finance for SMEs to address the key market failures (i.e. information asymmetries and fragmentation of venture capital market) that limit the growth of SMEs. EU intervention must have a clear added value complementing financial resources available at national level and mobilise additional finance (presence of a "financial multiplier effect"). the Commission will use its coordinating role, working in particular with Member States, to exchange best practices and develop synergies between actions taken at the national and EU levels.
Current and future budget : the financial instruments of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) with a budget of €1.1 billion should enable financial institutions to provide about €30 billion of new finance for more than 315 000 SMEs . In 2008-2011, the European Investment Bank (EIB) provided around €40 billion of lending for SMEs, which benefitted more than 210 000 SMEs.
In the field of Cohesion Policy the Commission already adopted measures to provide investments for SMEs in 15 Member States through financial engineering instruments designed by structural funds. Assistance to enterprises provided through equity investments, guarantees and loans is estimated to amount to at least €3 billion in the current financial period.
Lastly, in order to provide better access to loan finance a specific Risk Sharing Instrument (RSI) is being created under the EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) Risk-Sharing Finance Facility as of 2012. The RSI will provide partial guarantees to financial intermediaries through a risk-sharing mechanism, thus reducing their financial risks encouraging them to provide lending between €25 000 and €7.5 million to SMEs undertaking research, development or innovation activities.
Regulatory measures : the following measures are proposed:
present a new EU venture capital framework creating a genuine internal market for VC funds. The Commission invites the Parliament and the Council to adopt this legislative proposal by June 2012; in 2012, as part of a wider reflection on long-term investment, on the basis of technical work to be jointly done by the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, the Commission will carry out a study on the relationship between prudential regulation and venture capital investments by banks and insurance companies; complete its examination of the tax obstacles to cross-border venture capital investment with a view to presenting solutions in 2013 aimed at eliminating the obstacles while at the same time preventing tax avoidance and evasion; review, by 2013, the General Block Exemption Regulation and a number of State aid guidelines, including on Risk Capital, to achieve Europe 2020 objectives and respond to SME needs; adopt as swiftly as possible, the proposal on an SME growth market label in EU capital markets legislation ( MIFID ); put in place by the end of 2012, with the assistance of ESMA, a single access point to regulated information at EU level . The Commission will facilitate access to high quality information on listed SMEs;
on an accounting level : (i) adoption of a legislative proposal amending the Accounting Directives in order to simplify and improve accounting rules for SMEs; (ii) revision of the Transparency Directive in order to reduce the regulatory burden for small issuers; (iii) propose, by July 2012, delegated acts in the context of the Prospectus Directive , specifying the content of a proportionate disclosure regime for SMEs and small issuers;
consider appropriate measures addressing the issue of SMEs risk weighting in the context of the CRD IV and CRR (credit risk rating) framework; encourage Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive in advance in respect of the transposition deadline of March 2013; present a new European Social Entrepreneurship Funds regime that will enable EU funds to specialise in this field and to be marketed across the EU under a specific and distinctive label. The Commission invites the EP and Council to adopt this new regulation before the end of 2012 .
Financial measures : the Commission proposes a certain number of new financial instruments to facilitate, including long-term (2014-2020), access to finance for SMEs:
a reinforced and expanded EU Debt Financial Instrument to improve lending to SMEs , including R&I-driven SMEs. The Instrument encompasses a Loan Guarantee Facility under the COSME Programme (2014-2020) and an SME Window under Horizon 2020's Debt facility ; the EU Debt Financial Instrument will also include a Cultural and Creative Sectors Facility financed under the Creative Europe Programme (2014-2020), to enhance access to finance for SMEs in the European cultural and creative sectors; under the EU Programme for Social Change and Innovation (2014-2020), a specific Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship Axis that will support notably microfinance for micro-enterprises, the build up the institutional capacity of microcredit providers and financing for the development of social enterprises; the European Investment Bank will maintain its SME loan activity at a sustained pace close to the 2011 level, subject to market conditions and in line with its funding capacity. The EIB will continue to contribute to improving loan conditions, increasing flexibility and ensuring rapid allocation. EIB and EIF will continue developing synergies through risk-sharing operations; a reinforced and expanded equity financial instrument to improve SMEs' access to venture capital and other risk financing, from their early stage (including seed) to their growth stage. The equity financial instrument will be funded by the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs and by Horizon 2020; the establishment of funds-of-funds , within the EU Equity Financial Instrument, to provide capital to venture capital funds that target notably investments in more than one Member State. National public financial institutions, as well as private investors, will be invited to participate in the fund; the EIB Group will continue supporting the growth of SMEs through its wide range of equity products and particularly the enlarged EIB Risk Capital Mandate.
Coordination measures : to better inform SMEs, the Commission proposes to:
reinforce the financial advisory capacity of the Enterprise Europe Network in order to provide SMEs with better information about the different sources of finance by complementing existing national information structures; ensure that all the information on EU finance will be pooled and made available through a single, multilingual online portal covering the different sources of EU finance available for SMEs; banks and other financial intermediaries have declared that they will promote actions among their members to reinforce information about EU financial instruments and public grants to SMEs ; work together with bank federations and will take advice from other concerned institutions (ECB, EBA) to reinforce the analytical framework for SME lending striving for better comparison and more coherent methodology; promote the exchange of good practice and encourages the banking sector and SME federations to promote the use of qualitative rating as a tool to complement the standard quantitative assessment of SMEs’ creditworthiness; further encourage co-investments with business angels in different forms in co-operation with the EIF and Member States within the possibilities under Structural Funds; further develop cross-border matching between enterprises and investors, in particular business angels ; improve the matching of offers and requests for venture capital within the Enterprise Europe Network; encourage stakeholders and stock exchanges in particular to increase their information to SMEs about the advantages of a market listing and how to go public; promote the establishment of an independent institute to promote analyses and research on listed medium-sized enterprises thereby increasing investors' interest in this segment; encourage Member States and stakeholder associations to establish national SME Finance fora to provide solutions for an improved access to finance; encourage Banks, other financial institutions and SME federations to establish national codes of conducts and guidelines to improve transparency in the lending process and, if appropriate, support credit mediator functions; take regulatory action to encourage responsible and transparent lending to SMEs.
PURPOSE: to propose an action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs.
BACKGROUND: Europe's economic success depends largely on the growth of Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) achieving their potential. SMEs contribute more than half of the total value added in the non-financial business economy and provided 80% of all new jobs in Europe in the past five years.
SMEs often face significant difficulties in obtaining the financing they need in order to grow and innovate. One of the key priorities set out in Europe 2020, the EU's growth strategy for the coming decade, as well as in the Commission's Single Market Act and the Small Business Act is to facilitate access to finance for SMEs.
The Annual Growth Survey has underlined the crucial role of a healthy financial system to support growth and set out priorities for action in the short-term perspective. In this context, the reform programme for financial services, implemented as a response to the financial crisis, can bring about regulatory benefits to SMEs. In addition, the Commission is proposing to release new targeted funding at EU level to address the key market failures that limit the growth of SMEs. The Commission is presenting in this Action Plan the various policies that it is pursuing to make access to finance easier for Europe's 23 million SMEs and to provide a significant contribution to growth.
CONTENT: difficulties in accessing finance are one of the main obstacles obstructing the growth of SMEs. There are multiple causes for such obstacles, some cyclical, some structural. Information asymmetries between the suppliers and demanders of funds play a major role.
SMEs are to a very large extent dependent on bank loans for their external financing, therefore suitable alternatives should be put at their disposal.
To respond to these challenges, the Commission has opted for a three-fold approach:
the Commission will use regulation to make SMEs more visible to investors and markets more attractive and accessible for SMEs. Regulatory changes will keep the right balance between prudential regulation and financing of SMEs, and between investor protection and tailored measures for SMEs. the Commission intends to continue using the EU budget to facilitate access to finance for SMEs to address the key market failures (i.e. information asymmetries and fragmentation of venture capital market) that limit the growth of SMEs. EU intervention must have a clear added value complementing financial resources available at national level and mobilise additional finance (presence of a "financial multiplier effect"). the Commission will use its coordinating role, working in particular with Member States, to exchange best practices and develop synergies between actions taken at the national and EU levels.
Current and future budget : the financial instruments of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) with a budget of €1.1 billion should enable financial institutions to provide about €30 billion of new finance for more than 315 000 SMEs . In 2008-2011, the European Investment Bank (EIB) provided around €40 billion of lending for SMEs, which benefitted more than 210 000 SMEs.
In the field of Cohesion Policy the Commission already adopted measures to provide investments for SMEs in 15 Member States through financial engineering instruments designed by structural funds. Assistance to enterprises provided through equity investments, guarantees and loans is estimated to amount to at least €3 billion in the current financial period.
Lastly, in order to provide better access to loan finance a specific Risk Sharing Instrument (RSI) is being created under the EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) Risk-Sharing Finance Facility as of 2012. The RSI will provide partial guarantees to financial intermediaries through a risk-sharing mechanism, thus reducing their financial risks encouraging them to provide lending between €25 000 and €7.5 million to SMEs undertaking research, development or innovation activities.
Regulatory measures : the following measures are proposed:
present a new EU venture capital framework creating a genuine internal market for VC funds. The Commission invites the Parliament and the Council to adopt this legislative proposal by June 2012; in 2012, as part of a wider reflection on long-term investment, on the basis of technical work to be jointly done by the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, the Commission will carry out a study on the relationship between prudential regulation and venture capital investments by banks and insurance companies; complete its examination of the tax obstacles to cross-border venture capital investment with a view to presenting solutions in 2013 aimed at eliminating the obstacles while at the same time preventing tax avoidance and evasion; review, by 2013, the General Block Exemption Regulation and a number of State aid guidelines, including on Risk Capital, to achieve Europe 2020 objectives and respond to SME needs; adopt as swiftly as possible, the proposal on an SME growth market label in EU capital markets legislation ( MIFID ); put in place by the end of 2012, with the assistance of ESMA, a single access point to regulated information at EU level . The Commission will facilitate access to high quality information on listed SMEs;
on an accounting level : (i) adoption of a legislative proposal amending the Accounting Directives in order to simplify and improve accounting rules for SMEs; (ii) revision of the Transparency Directive in order to reduce the regulatory burden for small issuers; (iii) propose, by July 2012, delegated acts in the context of the Prospectus Directive , specifying the content of a proportionate disclosure regime for SMEs and small issuers;
consider appropriate measures addressing the issue of SMEs risk weighting in the context of the CRD IV and CRR (credit risk rating) framework; encourage Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive in advance in respect of the transposition deadline of March 2013; present a new European Social Entrepreneurship Funds regime that will enable EU funds to specialise in this field and to be marketed across the EU under a specific and distinctive label. The Commission invites the EP and Council to adopt this new regulation before the end of 2012 .
Financial measures : the Commission proposes a certain number of new financial instruments to facilitate, including long-term (2014-2020), access to finance for SMEs:
a reinforced and expanded EU Debt Financial Instrument to improve lending to SMEs , including R&I-driven SMEs. The Instrument encompasses a Loan Guarantee Facility under the COSME Programme (2014-2020) and an SME Window under Horizon 2020's Debt facility ; the EU Debt Financial Instrument will also include a Cultural and Creative Sectors Facility financed under the Creative Europe Programme (2014-2020), to enhance access to finance for SMEs in the European cultural and creative sectors; under the EU Programme for Social Change and Innovation (2014-2020), a specific Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship Axis that will support notably microfinance for micro-enterprises, the build up the institutional capacity of microcredit providers and financing for the development of social enterprises; the European Investment Bank will maintain its SME loan activity at a sustained pace close to the 2011 level, subject to market conditions and in line with its funding capacity. The EIB will continue to contribute to improving loan conditions, increasing flexibility and ensuring rapid allocation. EIB and EIF will continue developing synergies through risk-sharing operations; a reinforced and expanded equity financial instrument to improve SMEs' access to venture capital and other risk financing, from their early stage (including seed) to their growth stage. The equity financial instrument will be funded by the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs and by Horizon 2020; the establishment of funds-of-funds , within the EU Equity Financial Instrument, to provide capital to venture capital funds that target notably investments in more than one Member State. National public financial institutions, as well as private investors, will be invited to participate in the fund; the EIB Group will continue supporting the growth of SMEs through its wide range of equity products and particularly the enlarged EIB Risk Capital Mandate.
Coordination measures : to better inform SMEs, the Commission proposes to:
reinforce the financial advisory capacity of the Enterprise Europe Network in order to provide SMEs with better information about the different sources of finance by complementing existing national information structures; ensure that all the information on EU finance will be pooled and made available through a single, multilingual online portal covering the different sources of EU finance available for SMEs; banks and other financial intermediaries have declared that they will promote actions among their members to reinforce information about EU financial instruments and public grants to SMEs ; work together with bank federations and will take advice from other concerned institutions (ECB, EBA) to reinforce the analytical framework for SME lending striving for better comparison and more coherent methodology; promote the exchange of good practice and encourages the banking sector and SME federations to promote the use of qualitative rating as a tool to complement the standard quantitative assessment of SMEs’ creditworthiness; further encourage co-investments with business angels in different forms in co-operation with the EIF and Member States within the possibilities under Structural Funds; further develop cross-border matching between enterprises and investors, in particular business angels ; improve the matching of offers and requests for venture capital within the Enterprise Europe Network; encourage stakeholders and stock exchanges in particular to increase their information to SMEs about the advantages of a market listing and how to go public; promote the establishment of an independent institute to promote analyses and research on listed medium-sized enterprises thereby increasing investors' interest in this segment; encourage Member States and stakeholder associations to establish national SME Finance fora to provide solutions for an improved access to finance; encourage Banks, other financial institutions and SME federations to establish national codes of conducts and guidelines to improve transparency in the lending process and, if appropriate, support credit mediator functions; take regulatory action to encourage responsible and transparent lending to SMEs.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0036/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0001/2013
- Committee opinion: PE496.331
- Committee opinion: PE496.483
- Committee opinion: PE496.659
- Committee opinion: PE497.893
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.550
- Committee draft report: PE496.312
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0870
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0870
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0870 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE496.312
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.550
- Committee opinion: PE497.893
- Committee opinion: PE496.659
- Committee opinion: PE496.483
- Committee opinion: PE496.331
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
Activities
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bendt BENDTSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jorgo CHATZIMARKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi Ciriaco DE MITA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sari ESSAYAH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sajjad KARIM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mojca KLEVA KEKUŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan KOZŁOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios PAPASTAMKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvana RAPTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Niccolò RINALDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rebecca TAYLOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0001/2013 - Philippe De Backer - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
264 |
2012/2134(INI)
2012/10/16
IMCO
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the Commission's initiative to facilitate access to long-term investment funds for companies in the framework of the Single Market Act;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that SMEs are a diverse group of enterprises and that this fact should be reflected in finance modes;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that special attention must be given to the fact that the economic crisis has led to the bankruptcy of several viable businesses; therefore calls on Member States and the Commission to ensure financial support as a second chance for entrepreneurs to start up a new business;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States to create fast- track procedures and one-stop shops for SMEs to enhance the setting-up of new businesses and also to facilitate their access to international markets; calls on the Commission to establish greater coherence between the various programmes providing guarantees and a good balance between national and EU schemes supporting the financing of innovation or the provision of venture capital to SMEs;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the Business Angels and ensure adequate fiscal support for this funding model;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to increase information on EU initiatives to support SME funding, including COSME;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the mobilisation of household savings is a crucial instrument for stimulating investment in SMEs; urges the Commission to submit as soon as possible a proposal seeking to enhance the mobilisation of available capital for SMEs;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and Member States to provide entrepreneurs with complete and valid information, available in all EU languages with useful references, on access to adequate financing, via a single European website;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to address how to improve access to finance for SMEs aiming to provide innovative works, supplies or services to the public sector; calls in particular for measures to improve finance conditions by ensuring that venture capital and other relevant funding streams fully recognise the growth potential of innovative enterprise working with public sector partners on both pre-commercial procurement projects and in the context of Innovation Partnerships;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to put in place a monitoring system, which ensures that EU funds and guarantees are distributed to the smallest companies;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Highlights the need to raise awareness of entrepreneurship among students and their teachers; stresses the importance of trainee entrepreneurs receiving appropriate education courses on access to funding;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to reduce bureaucratic burdens and simplify procedures which hinder the setting-up of new business and create obstacles for SMEs in keeping their businesses running
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to reduce bureaucratic burdens and simplify procedures which hinder the setting-up of new business and create obstacles for SMEs in keeping their businesses running; in this regard, highlights the importance of the Commission and the Member States applying the SME test consistently in all relevant policy areas;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Asks the Commission to propose simplified and less costly regulations and guidelines, especially for programmes intended to support low-volume SME finance in the form of guarantees and mezzanine or equity instruments;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines the importance of reducing formalities required to start up a new business and asks the Commission to study the best practices in all Member States and promote the dissemination of success stories;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Member States to facilitate SMEs' access to funds by simplifying the rules of data submission and to promote online data repositories for certificates and other supporting documents;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. In order to ensure supply of funds for investment in SMEs, stresses the importance to help SMEs to attract investors, particularly by professionalization of SMEs in developing convincing business plans;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Urges the Commission and the Member States to address tax simplification for SMEs and to remove remaining administrative burdens which better support
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give particular attention to providing incentives for 'Angel' investors in the form of a favourable tax treatment; calls furthermore on the Commission and Member States to promote cooperative finance programmes involving experienced retired executives and finance providers;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that a fair and transparent EU
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that a fair, open and transparent EU regulatory framework for public procurement is indispensable in order for SMEs to gain better access to public contracts.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Adds that measures must be taken in order to ensure that the simplification of cross-border activity for SMEs does not facilitate, at the same time, the cross- border activity of fictitious self- employment, especially in the construction sector;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that, in order for funds to reach SMEs, a monitoring system should be put in place to ensure the banks use the funds and guarantees to increase their SME lending; believes that this may include reporting schemes and a code of conduct for SME lending banks;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls the variability of SMEs according to investment and innovation criteria and recommends differentiate methods of analyse and support for each model;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the financial crisis in the EU resulted in a number of European bank failures and that as a result lenders are less willing to grant a credit to SMEs, hindering SMEs' access to finance; is concerned that an increasingly capital and risk-sensitive banking sector is asking for more collateral and higher risk premiums, both requirements resulting in insufficient financing and missed business and employment opportunities in this very large sector of the economy; regards the availability of credit and loan guarantee schemes, therefore, as crucial to exploiting the growth and job potential offered by SMEs;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the financial crisis in the EU resulted in a number of European bank failures and that as a result on the one side lenders are less willing to grant a credit to SMEs, hindering SMEs' access to finance and on the other side companies' trust in lending institutions was damaged, discouraging them from applying for a credit;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the financial crisis in the EU resulted in a number of European bank failures and that as a result lenders are less willing to grant a credit to SMEs, hindering SMEs' access to finance; calls on the Member States, therefore, to create legal provisions which oblige banks to give reasons for denying credit to SMEs;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that increased taxation imposed by fiscal adjustment plans in Member States under intervention makes life very difficult for SMEs and consumers; calls for measures allowing SMEs to apply more easily for EU and national programmes and funding; urges the Commission to come forward with an impact assessment study on fiscal adjustment, specifically focusing on SMEs;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that SMEs across Europe are very heterogeneous and, in view of their use of divergent business models, they face different types of financing challenges;
source: PE-497.974
2012/10/19
ECON
141 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to the Communication from the Commission 'Europe 2020, a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (COM(2010)2020),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. Whereas it is crucial to create and develop the necessary tools and lay the right conditions that will able the Union to boost growth in the eurozone and in the Union as whole;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that when a creditor rejects or partly rejects the full amount of a credit application, the creditor must inform through a constructive approach the entrepreneur adequately about the reasons for the rejection and must give the entrepreneur the opportunity to request a review of the decision; calls on the Commission to define clear guidelines on transparency;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that when a creditor rejects a credit application, the creditor must inform the entrepreneur adequately about the reasons for the rejection and must give the entrepreneur the opportunity to request a review of the decision; calls on the Commission to define clear guidelines on transparency and if appropriate to propose binding legal instruments with that purpose;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that the increased interest rate might be linked to an increase of non price terms and conditions (collaterals and guarantees);
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that when granting a credit to SMEs, creditors often ask, in addition to a regular bank guarantee, for an extra personal guarantee;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that when granting a credit to
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses the importance of strengthening local banking systems such as cooperative banks and Credit Unions as well as development banks in order to create better financing conditions for SMEs;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Member States to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME; underlines that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business; asks the Commission to study the
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Member States to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME; underlines that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business; asks the Commission to study the best practices to be implemented in all Member States; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a unique SME identification number, stored in a single European database for SMEs, including all financial data, allowing SMEs to apply more easily for EU and national programmes and funding; asks the Commission to monitor and yearly report to the European Parliament on the access of SMEs and micro-enterprises to Community funding with the data broken down by gender;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Member States to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME, given the differences between countries in this field that hinder the completion of the single market; underlines that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business; asks the Commission to study the best practices to be implemented in all Member States; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a unique SME identification number, stored in a single European database for SMEs, including all financial data, allowing SMEs to apply more easily for EU and national programmes and funding;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the Commission's new funding programmes, which take into account the specific characteristics of SMEs; invites the Commission to carry out an impact assessment of increasing the level of the threshold of market capitalisation value below which a company is defined as a listed SME, such an increasing allowing more SMEs to be eligible to the Commission's new funding programmes and measures put in place to attract investments; calls on the Commission to further develop EU funding tailor-made for SMEs; underlines that fragmentation of funding should be avoided and that funding can be effective only when it is able to cover a substantial part of what is needed by the SMEs in question;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Α a (new) Αa. whereas bank loans are the main source of financing for SMEs in the European Union,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the Commission’s new funding programmes, which take into account the specific characteristics of SMEs; calls on the Commission to further develop EU funding tailor-made for SMEs; underlines that fragmentation of funding should be avoided and that funding can be effective only when it is able to cover a substantial part of what is needed by the SMEs in question; considers that the Commission ought to provide more information to the public and SMEs about possibilities of receiving funding to develop business activity;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the Commission's new funding programmes, which take into account the specific characteristics of SMEs; calls on the Commission to further develop EU funding tailor-made for SMEs, their needs and dynamic in various innovative and competitive sectors; underlines that fragmentation of funding should be avoided and that funding can be effective only when it is able to cover a substantial part of what is needed by the SMEs in question;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Urges the swift resolution of discussions on the EU Venture Capital Regulation in order to facilitate SME's access to venture capital finance;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Strongly believes that the financial envelope for the debt and equity finance instruments under the COSME Programme and under Horizon 2020, should be substantially increased, and their access to it by SMEs considerably improved;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Welcomes the focus put on Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship; calls on the Commission and the EIB to further increase the Progress Microfinance Facility;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Takes the view that the Commission should explore ways to improve the European quasi- equity market, in particular mezzanine finance; recommends that the Commission investigates how to strengthen the EIF Mezzanine facility for Growth and how to looks into new mezzanine products such as a guarantee for mezzanine loans; further recommends that data and analysis regarding the financial instruments are provided in order to reduce barriers for financial intermediaries who may wish to explore the lending market for mezzanine capital in the EU;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Calls for at least 20% of Horizon be 2020 budget to be allocated to financing innovation in SME, to be delivered through a range of funding from grants to debt and equity financing; points out that at least one third of the budget of the EU financial instruments of Horizon 2020 must be deployed towards SMEs;.
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Stresses that, if some of the so-called "business angels" can contribute positively to the financing of SMEs, European public policies should rather foster ordinary fundings than "business angels"; believes that the existing SMEs' recourse to "business angels" can be seen to a large extent as a consequence of the lack of ordinary fundings; warns the Commission against creating undue windfall by encouraging the involvement of "business angels"; points out that to the SMEs external funding sources also belong hedge and other alternatives funds, which cannot be considered as funding sources to be fostered; enjoins the Commission accordingly to give a clear and exhaustive definition of "business angels";
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new) 21c. Asks the Commission to come forward with a communication highlighting the best practices regarding the institutional framework and incentives for the financing of social and solidarity entrepreneurship and cooperatives as these forms of SMEs play a key role in terms of job creation (10% of overall employment) and long term investments;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Notes that cohesion policy, as the major investment instrument for convergence and sustainable development, is one of the two main EU support channels for SMEs; calls, therefore, on the Commission to further improve access for SMEs to structural funds, by relaxing the requirements for pre-financed projects, reducing the requirements for co-financing, better targeting different types of SMEs, closing the financing gap between call cycles and supporting capacity building for SME funding; supports the Commission's decision to improve, reinforce and strengthen the use and monitoring of financial instruments in cohesion policy targeted at the SMEs in the future regulatory framework;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Α b (new) Αb. whereas, according to ECB data, lending rates for SMEs vary greatly between Member States and there are imbalances in access to liquidity with high rejection rates as regards lending for business projects in some countries,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Welcomes the Commission's intention of reviewing, by 2013, the General Block Exemption Regulation and several State aid guidelines; underlines that the General Block Exemption Regulation is an important instrument in order to promote SME creation, development and recovery, especially in the current crisis situation; stresses that the most appropriate State aid instruments which should be block exempted are grants, loans, repayable advances, fiscal measures, and guarantee schemes;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Underlines the beneficial role of the financial support provided by cooperative federations and stresses the need for it to be backed by State guarantees in order to increase its efficiency;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and optimise the risk-sharing instruments of the European Investment Bank; believes that the SME loan activity of the European Investment Bank, as a key European-wide instrument able to implement contracyclical measures, should not be subject to market conditions, as stated in the Commission's communication;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and optimise the risk-sharing instruments of the European Investment Bank, reducing red tape and increasing the speed and efficiency with which the use of these instruments is approved;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and optimise the risk-sharing instruments of the European Investment Bank and the SME funding programmes under the Structural Funds;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 – point a (new) (a) Reminds the Commission that raising equity and issuing debt on stock markets represent a complementary source of financing and can also contribute to establishing issuers' credibility in the eyes of the banks ; stresses that the Commission should recognise the role such markets currently play in the EU funding environment, especially with the new constraints under Basel III/CRD IV and Solvency II; invites the Commission to carry out an impact assessment of the financial regulation, including the prudential regulation, in relation with the financing of the economy in Europe.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 – point b (new) (b) Calls on the Commission to ensure an appropriate and tailored regulatory framework for SMEs issuers that does not prove burdensome for them and also wins investors confidence (under the European legislation on accounting standards, the Prospectus Directive, the Transparency Directive, the Market Abuse Directive and the MIFID)
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to support new ways of funding like crowdfunding platforms;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to establish a permanent European Guarantee Platform under the European Investment Fund to ease SMEs' access to finance, which improves the development of guarantees or lending products based on European guarantees and reduces bank capital requirements and risk exposure for financial intermediaries;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas SMEs
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to develop ways of making tailor made SMEs stock markets more attractive both to institutional investors (such as hedge funds, investment funds, pension funds, insurance companies among others) and private investors; Whereas this could be achieved by introducing more friendly tax regimes for investors that would channel part of their investments for SMEs, or by fostering the use of SMEs specialized investments funds, for example in partnership with the EIB, or by supporting mechanisms through which a small group of SMEs, that are already in the stock market and that share the same kind of risk weight, could issue common bonds with medium and long maturity, increasing the attractiveness of this markets to all investors;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commissions to take initiatives in order that the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund get involved in the creation and strengthening of non- banking financial institutions for the development of worker and social cooperatives; believes accordingly that the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund should act as intermediaries between cooperatives networks on the one hand and financial markets, banks and institutional investors on the other hand by issuing dedicated financial instruments;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Encourages the EIB to build further on its Project Microfinance initiative and as such foster its contribution to delivering on EU policy priorities in the area of social inclusion;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Recalls the European Council's commitment to increase the capital base of the EIB by €10 billion as part of the Compact for Growth and Jobs; calls on the EIB to use the majority of the extra €60 billion lending capacity to finance European SMEs especially where the fragmentation of the banking sector and country-specific risks has lead to reduced or expensive lending to the SMEs in order to create a level playing field and finance growth where the banking sector is failing;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Stresses that due to the vital role that SMEs play in the Unions' economy, it makes them the more potent contributors to economic growth and job creation in the upcoming years and for this reason; Calls on the Commission and Member States to act fast in creating the necessary space that the SMEs need to be able to properly finance themselves and drive the Unions' economy;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Calls on the Commission to take account of the Socially and Environmentally Responsible Investing principles as a means of reaching sustainable development goals through SMEs' funding;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Recognizes importance of the growing sector of social enterprises, which make a significant contribution to achieving goals of Europe2020 strategy; stresses that access to finance is highly important for young entrepreneurs setting up their businesses and entrepreneurs coming from or employing people with a socially disadvantageous background; calls on the Commission and the EIB to further improve access to appropriate financing for young entrepreneurs and social enterprises and to consider the option of greater flexibility when defining the size and rules of tailored loans and guarantee schemes for social economy sector;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings on bank accounts, while in other Member States deposits are reducing because of the effects of the crisis as citizens use up their savings or transfer their deposits to banks of Member States least affected by the crisis; stresses that activating these household savings
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings on bank accounts; stresses that
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Asks the ECB to frame a minimum conditionality to its LTRO operations in order to ensure that the transmission of monetary policy is correct and effective for SMEs;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas SMEs are the backbone of the European Union economy and important drivers of
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Whereas the Commission should propose conditionality regarding lending to SMEs in all memorandum's of understanding signed with a Member State receiving a bail out for their financial sector;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new) 24c. Asks the ECB to analyse how to modify their collateral acceptance policy regarding loans to SMEs in order to make these loans more attractive;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the EU needs to strengthen its competitiveness and potential for growth through promotion of social market economy, active support for innovation, investment, vocational education, lifelong learning, transmission of knowledge and skills, quality job creation and formation of favourable environment for SMEs;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas SMEs constitute the dominant category of business organisation in all EU countries with more than 23 million enterprises, representing 99.8% of the market, and their contribution to the EU-GDP is up to 60%;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas 85 % of all new jobs in the EU between 2002 and 2010 were created by SMEs, in particular by new firms; whereas 32.5 million people in the EU are self-employed;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas there's a link between SMEs accessing to their finance needs on realist conditions and the existence of small and median commercial and savings banks with strong knowledge of their structure, management and plans;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas amongst European SMEs a particular attention should be paid to the Social Economy sector, given its economic weight (20 million people i.e. 10% of the overall employment) and the significant resilience its model has shown since the beginning of the economic crisis while Social Economy organisations face comparable problems of access to finance as others SMEs;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) - having regard to the Commission Report 'Minimizing regulatory burden for SMEs, Adapting EU regulation to the needs of micro-enterprises' (COM(2011)0803),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas actions supporting SMEs and entrepreneurship are regulated by the 'Small Business Act' which Member States have committed themselves to implementing together with the European Commission,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the two LTRO operation conducted by the ECB haven't resulted in a generalised increase on credit for SMEs as acknowledged by the ECB;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's Action Plan and its broad set of
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that Europe's economic success largely depends on growth based on SMEs
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that Europe's economic success largely depends on growth
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that Europe's economic success largely depends on
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that the European Union's economic success largely depends on growth based on SMEs;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that Europe’s economic success and social cohesion largely depend
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that, because of the crisis, many SMEs have difficulties in accessing finance and that SMEs need to comply with more stringent regulatory criteria than before; encourages the Commission to continue its efforts in promoting national level implementation of the "Think Small First" principle, which implies a further simplification of the regulatory and administrative environment for SMEs, while at the same time ensure adequate protection for employees in the fields of social security and occupational health and safety;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that, because of the crisis, many SMEs have difficulties in accessing finance and that SMEs need to comply with more stringent regulatory criteria than before; stresses that banking institutions which have benefited from state aid as well as other implicit subsidies provisions over the crisis such as public guarantees and liquidity support from central banks should be subject to targets regarding their financing amounts and conditions to SMEs; points out that the MERLIN project in the UK provides an interesting benchmark with that purpose;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of 23 February 2011 on the Review of the 'Small Business Act for Europe' (COM(2011)0078) and its resolution of 12 May 2011 thereon,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that, because of the financial and economic crisis, many SMEs have difficulties in accessing finance
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines th
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that, because of the crisis, many SMEs have difficulties in accessing finance and that SMEs need to comply with more stringent regulatory criteria than before, although there have been steps to reduce administrative burdens on certain groups of enterprises;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognizes that at the time of fiscal constraint and reduced lending capacity of the private sector, SMEs should be targeted with strengthened European support to continue generating employment, innovation and growth; stresses that entrepreneurs and SMEs should be put at the core of EU innovation and research policy in order to "bring ideas to market";
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that SMEs have to adapt to a new regulatory environment;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that in the recent years there were several activities regarding the reduction of red tape;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the responsibility of banks to invest wisely in the economy and more specifically in SMEs;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the responsibility of banks to invest wisely in the economy and more specifically in SMEs; notes that, in some Member States, SMEs do not have problems in accessing credit
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the responsibility
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on European Social Entrepreneurship Funds (COM(2011)0862),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the responsibility of banks to invest wisely in the economy and more specifically in SMEs; notes that, in some Member States, SMEs do not have problems in accessing credit; expresses its concern about the differences between Member States in the cost of borrowing for SMEs resulting in a serious lack of liquidity in the real economy of some countries and the distortion of the financial market; points out that reducing investments to a minimum can lead to a credit crunch;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Reiterates that revised public procurement and concession contract rules should not hamper SMEs' and micro-enterprises' access to the procurement market;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that in the current economic situation and due to the severe impact it is having in the European banking system, due to its link with sovereign, alternative ways to access finance to SMEs needs to be found; Stresses that the current situation can prove itself ideal to create permanent alternative ways that could help breaking the link between SMEs financing and bank credit;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that banks in the euro area have benefited from abundant and unconditional ECB liquidity; regrets that only a part of this liquidity has been used to finance SMEs;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Reminds that European universal and significantly important financial institutions have continuously shifted their activities away from productive lending using a ever growing part of their balance sheet for risk enhancing activities and lending to financial entities;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that the cost of finance for SMEs can differ between Member States, which affects negatively their competitiveness, especially in border areas;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recalls that in Europe the main source of financing of SMEs is the banking sector; believes that because of the fragmentation of the banking sector and the subsequent great divergence of lending rates and credit offer among countries, a differentiated approach to improving SMEs access to funding is necessary taking into account the country-specific circumstances;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Asks the Commission to require from banks with a balance sheet total above EUR 200 bn that at least 50% of their balance sheet be dedicated to lending to non financial entities and at least 33% to lending to GDP contributing activities and entities such as SMEs;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Asks the Commission to assess the potential effects for lending to SMEs of a limitation of the size of banks by putting a cap on the size of assets that a bank can hold;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reminds the Commission that SMEs across Europe are very heterogeneous, ranging from very traditional, family-run businesses to fast-growing enterprises, high-tech firms and start-ups, and that approaches to assisting them must be equally diverse;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new) - having regard to the Commission and European Central Bank study from 2011 on SME's Access to Finance Survey,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reminds the Commission that SMEs across Europe are very heterogeneous, ranging from
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reminds the Commission that SMEs across Europe are very heterogeneous, ranging from very traditional, family-run
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages the Commission to launch an EU-wide feasibility study into European social label and through an introduction of pilot project try to revitalise social convergence and cohesion;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the Commission’s Action Plan rightly places a lot of emphasis on venture capital as a possible mode of growth finance but that this kind of funding
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out that in the current situation where insufficient access to appropriate sources of risk capital, in particular at the early stages, continues to be one of the most significant constraints to the creation and development of growth- oriented firms, the Commission's Action Plan rightly places a lot of emphasis on venture capital as a possible mode of growth finance
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the Commission's Action Plan
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the Commission’s Action Plan rightly places a lot of emphasis on venture capital as a possible mode of growth finance but that this kind of funding is adequate only for a small number of SMEs, given that, according to Commission data, in the EU only 2% of the financial needs of SMEs are met by venture capital compared to a figure of 14% in the U.S.;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes and instruments,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes and instruments
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 c (new) - having regard to the Special Report 2/2012 of the Court of Auditors on financial instruments for small and medium-sized enterprises co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes and instruments, both in equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and access to capital through regulated markets or multilateral trading facilities) and in debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds and guarantee facilities);
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the Commission should emphasize the important role that the stock market can play as a way for SMEs to obtain their financing requirements at different stages;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Recalls that stock markets designed specifically for SMEs are already in place, such as NYSE Alternext, a market designed to response to specific market and financing requirements in the Eurozone; Whereas this self-regulated market, in operation since 2005, has already allowed SMEs to raise their capital between 2,5 millions € and 15 millions €, which clearly demonstrates the impact and added value that the stock market can have as tool for the financing of SMEs;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Whereas the stock market offers access to liquidity both for companies and investors and should be used by SMEs as a way to step up growth, facilitate the withdrawal of an investor or prepare for an inheritance or buyout;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Stresses that beside being an alternative way for SMEs to access finance, due to the requirements and conditionality's of the stock markets, they have the added value of improving substantially the organization, management and reporting skills of this companies and by that contributing significantly to strengthen this category of business organisation;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Alerts the Commission that a lot of new and more stringent financial services regulation has been put in place without an overall and inclusive impact assessment; urges the Commission to come forward with such an assessment, specifically focusing on SMEs, looking at both indirect and direct impacts; calls on the Commission to halt its plans to apply Solvency 2 capital requirements on pension funds, which would starve the real economy of many billions of euros of investment;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. A
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Alerts the Commission to the fact that a lot of new and more stringent regulation has been put in place without an overall and inclusive impact assessment; urges the Commission to come forward with such an assessment, specifically focusing on SMEs; emphasises that any future measures potentially affecting SMEs must, as a basic requirement, take account of their needs and the challenges they face;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Alerts the Commission that a lot of new and more stringent regulation has been put in place without an overall and inclusive impact assessment; urges the Commission to come forward with such an assessment, specifically focusing on SMEs; urges the Commission to exempt micro-entities from regulation where appropriate;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Highlights that SMEs are often at the end of a long delivery life cycle and thus are the ones to be affected the most by late payments and short payment periods; therefore welcomes the Commission's initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive; however, is aware that in certain Member States, the extension of the Late Payments Directive to all sectors has in certain circumstances resulted in the considerable and undesirable reduction of purchases from SMEs by retailers;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 d (new) - having regard to its resolution from 7 September 2010 on developing the job potential of a new sustainable economy,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that Commission surveys show that not only access to finance but also access to skills, including managerial skills, financial and accountancy knowledge are critical factors for SMEs to access funds, to innovate, compete and grow; believes that the delivery of EU financial instruments should therefore be accompanied by provision of appropriate mentoring, coaching schemes and delivery of knowledge-based business services;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that large-scale tax evasion in a Member State shall not result in rising taxation for those SMEs that already pay what is legally attributed to them, in order to offset the loses;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers it necessary to support SMEs at local level in order to develop policies to promote entrepreneurship, improve the situation of SMEs throughout the course of their lifetime and to help them gain access to new markets; believes that recognition and the exchange of good practices are key elements of this policy;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs' lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide professional training support to potential entrepreneurs and supports initiatives as partnerships between banks, chambers of commerce, business associations and accountancy professionals;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs' lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide professional training support to potential entrepreneurs as well as to redundant workers who aim at taking over their enterprise in the form of a cooperative after restructuring processes;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs' lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the provision of information about European financing instruments to SMEs and to provide professional training support to potential entrepreneurs;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide professional training support to potential entrepreneurs, making it accessible to as many of them as possible;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs' lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the Commission, Member States, the social partners and the
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that entrepreneurs' lack of knowledge about basic finance limits the quality of business plans and thus also the success of a credit application; therefore calls on the
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Believes that female entrepreneurship is an untapped resource for the growth and competitiveness of the EU which should be fostered and strengthened and that all obstacles facing women in the labour market should be removed;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the establishment of more stringent regulations, especially for financial institutions, combined with the severe and pervasive effects of the financial and economic crisis, causes more difficult access to finance for SMEs;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that a course of entrepreneurship and business financing should be included in basic education systems; believes that a well-prepared business plan is the first step towards better access to finance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that a course of entrepreneurship should be included in basic education systems from secondary level onwards; believes that a well- prepared business plan is the first step towards better access to finance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that a course of entrepreneurship encompassing the various entrepreneurial methods should be included in basic education systems; believes that a well-prepared business plan is the first step towards better access to finance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that a course of entrepreneurship should be included in basic education systems; believes that a well-prepared business plan is the first step towards success in business and towards better access to finance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that a course of entrepreneurship and an introduction to how the market and the financial system operate should be included in basic education systems; believes that a well- prepared business plan is the first step towards better access to finance and viability; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay; supports in this connection the 'Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs' programme to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out that synergies among SMEs and micro-enterprises are of vital importance in order to maximise their potentials for achieving economies of scale and increase their competitiveness, especially in times of economic recession;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that informing entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs on a regular basis about training initiatives, EU funding and programmes for SMEs is indispensable; calls on the Commission to ensure that national SME organizations are properly informed of EU initiatives and policy proposals; in this context, stresses the equally important role of the European Information Centres (EICs) to provide service aligned with the needs of European businesses in order to access both single market and public and private procurement markets in emerging third countries;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that lack of awareness of existing SME support programmes and sources of funding is a barrier to the creation and development of SMEs; considers, therefore, that the introduction of arrangements for informing entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs in simplified terms and on a regular basis about training initiatives, EU funding and programmes for SMEs is indispensable;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that informing entrepreneurs
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the establishment of more stringent regulations, especially for financial institutions, combined with the economic and debt crisis, may cause
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that informing entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs on a regular basis about training initiatives, EU funding and programmes for SMEs is indispensable at national, regional and local level, and we need to take advantage of all the available opportunities and actions such as the European SME Week;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on increased communication efforts from the EIB group in order to promote financial schemes to the SME community in cooperation with SME organizations;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Points out that guidance for entrepreneurs who have gone bankrupt is indispensable with a view to offering them a second chance and in order not to discourage risk taking;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Points out that guidance for entrepreneurs who have gone bankrupt is indispensable, as is guidance for the prevention of bankruptcy, given that 15% of businesses that close do so due to bankruptcy; supports the simplification and shortening of bankruptcy procedures and encourages the idea of giving the entrepreneurs in question a second chance;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Believes that what is needed is a special strategy for start-ups and financial tools to implement innovative projects and develop the creativity of young entrepreneurs;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that creditors know better credit tools than entrepreneurs do and that entrepreneurs do not always communicate openly with creditors about their business plan and their long-term strategy; stresses that this information gap creates difficulties when discussing a credit application; calls on the Commission to circulate the existing best practices on specific solutions concerning the dialogue, cooperation and
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that creditors' know
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Creditors should set clear and specified criteria on the application for finance in a transparent manner; Creditors should grant to the entrepreneurs the option to contest a negative decision;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that creditors know better credit tools than entrepreneurs do
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that when a creditor rejects a credit application, the creditor must inform the entrepreneur adequately about the reasons for the rejection
source: PE-496.550
2012/11/07
JURI
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s action plan to improve access to finance
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. In
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the driving force behind the European economy has until now been the hundreds of thousands of SMEs that have made product quality and manufacturing excellence a characteristic of European products in comparison to those of global competitors;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for the Commission to ensure that Member States provide SMEs with greater support, education and training with regard to funding issues and to consider cooperating more closely with SME representative bodies to develop this training; in conjunction, urges the Commission to advance programmes of simplification to improve access to European financing programmes;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive as such late payments are extremely detrimental to SMEs’ financial planning and are often the root cause of their bankruptcy; in this connection, calls on the Commission to carefully assess the payment by public authorities of the credit they have received;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to design specific financing strategies for business networks and consortia formed by small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to consider
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to consider a broader review of EU financial and regulatory legislation which currently burdens SMEs
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that an ever-increasing number of SMEs are winding up or entering bankruptcy, with a knock-on effect in terms of job losses; notes that the growth measures adopted by the EU to date have clearly not been sufficiently effective, and calls on the Commission urgently to adopt measures dedicated more specifically to access to capital for SMEs, their revitalisation and boosting employment;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that, owing to clear political inertia, the recent liquidity issue by the ECB has worked solely to the advantage of those banking institutions able to access it, which have used that issue to purchase government bonds at interest rates up to seven times more advantageous than the rates the ECB is charging them. That liquidity issue has in no way enhanced or facilitated access to credit for SMEs, which have been completely overlooked and excluded from it; calls on the Commission to take urgent and effective steps to frame appropriate legislative instruments that enable SMEs to have similar direct, swift and convenient access to credit;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the lack of legal coherence in the EU with regard to these new means of funding and calls on the Commission to consider the main differences within Member States and to provide guidance
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to make the revitalisation of SMEs and support for them the focal point of its future policies, and stresses that a future outlook for Europe based solely on the provision of services will not generate growth;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Invites the Commission to continue applying the SME Test and the ‘Think Small First’ principle and to carry out impact assessments on all legislative proposals, in particular those of a financial nature, ensuring
source: PE-500.419
2019/07/01
REGI
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the EU Action Plan on improving access to finance for SMEs; takes the view that the plan is necessary so as to ensure that SMEs can surmount the difficulties they are currently facing in this time of economic crisis;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that cohesion policy, being the main tool of convergence and sustainable development of the EU, is one of the main sources of support for its SMEs; understands that future financial support under the cohesion policy and the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs (COSME) should be focused on strengthening the research and innovation capacities of SMEs and improving their competitiveness at global level.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that cohesion policy, being the main tool of convergence and sustainable development of the EU, is one of the main sources of support for its SMEs; underlines, therefore, that, in the context of this convergence objective, preferential access to finance for SMEs should be granted to the least developed regions or to those undergoing economic difficulties, in order to improve sub- optimal investment situations;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that cohesion policy, being the main tool of convergence and sustainable development of the EU, is one of the main sources of support for its SMEs and highlights its importance with a view to the recovery of the EU economy and its competitiveness and to the convergence of its regions;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that cohesion policy, being the main tool of convergence and sustainable development of the EU, is one of the main sources of support for its SMEs, and should be directly or indirectly coordinated with all sectoral measures established in support of SMEs;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that cohesion policy, being the main tool of convergence and sustainable development of the EU, is one of the main sources of support for its SMEs and that its scope is not limited solely to the implementation of the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy under Article 174 TFEU;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Understands that SMEs have a decisive role to play in the economic and social development of the outermost regions and that specific support programmes need to be developed, similar to the POSEI, as well as additional mechanisms to make credit available to enterprises operating in these European regions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that SMEs play a major role in regional development and that future provisions governing the financial services sector should accordingly take account of their funding requirements;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Takes the view that cohesion policy resources for SMEs should be channelled towards risk capital financing so as to ensure greater banking sector involvement and more effective structural fund deployment;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the need to further stimulate simplification of administrative procedures at European, national
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the EU Action Plan on improving access to finance for SMEs, in line with the priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the need to further stimulate simplification of administrative procedures at European, national and subnational levels for the beneficiaries, especially for SMEs, when applying for EU funds or when using existing financial instruments
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the need to further stimulate simplification of administrative procedures at European, national and
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the need to further stimulate simplification of administrative procedures at European, national and subnational levels and to endeavour to limit the regulatory complexity which is often an obstacle for the beneficiaries, especially for SMEs, when applying for EU funds or when using existing financial instruments.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Supports the Commission's proposal to recognise the heterogeneity of SMEs in Europe's regions and the need to implement a broad range of tailored programmes and instruments; encourages the Commission to go further in developing measures that are tailored to the specific regional circumstances in which SMEs develop, taking account, in particular, of the constraints and disadvantages linked to their outermost or island locations (limited size of local markets, distance of market outlets and supply sources, need for larger stocks, etc.);
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls, therefore, on the Member States, in the interest of simplifying administrative procedures, to designate a one-stop agency for applicants with a view to facilitating access to the structural funds for SMEs too;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for measures to promote innovatory financial solutions for SMEs, especially those newly created, with a view to boosting their performance and, by extension the development of all EU regions;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for the provision of both a clear, simple and transparent legal framework for access to finance and an ex ante and ex post evaluation system concerning the role of SMEs in the social, economic and environmental transition under way; calls on the Commission to lay down, in the rules concerned, useful requirements relating to the monitoring of beneficiaries and environmental prerogatives in order to ensure that economic dynamism is fair and sustainable;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recommends that the structural funds be used for funding instruments such as Business Angels with a view to generating additional finance for SMEs;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses the need to inform SMEs about opportunities for funding via the structural funds; considers that existing bodies such as the Enterprise Europe Network should be used and strengthened for this purpose;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Notes the need, in the interests of SMEs, to simplify and shorten the authorisation procedures for obtaining finance from the structural funds, and to pay out subsidies more promptly;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the EU Action Plan on improving access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that ensuring sufficient and timely access to finance for SMEs stimulates and reinforces economic growth, job creation
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that ensuring sufficient and timely access to finance for SMEs stimulates and reinforces economic growth, job creation and labour productivity; supports the Commission's initiative to establish a financial instrument to alleviate the indebtedness of SMEs, given their current problems in obtaining finance from traditional channels;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that ensuring sufficient and timely access to finance for SMEs stimulates and reinforces economic growth, job creation and labour productivity, since, according to Eurostat, in the last five years alone 80% of all new jobs were created by SMEs, which thus form the backbone of the European economy;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that ensuring sufficient and timely access to finance for SMEs stimulates and reinforces economic growth, job creation and labour productivity; stresses the need, however, to ensure that this funding generates strong regional development and protects local jobs;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Supports an increase in the European Investment Bank’s capital as a means of improving the provision of loans to SMEs and carrying out new investments to relaunch economic activity, create employment and generate wealth.
source: PE-498.027
2019/07/10
EMPL
44 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that SMEs provide about 90 million jobs in the EU, with 30% deriving from micro-enterprises, and that 85% of all new jobs between 2002 and 2012 were created by SMEs, in particular by new firms; considers that micro-enterprises should also be a focus of special attention and accordingly recommends that the abbreviation SME be changed to MSME;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that access to affordable finance is crucial for funding business investment, ensuring businesses reach their growth potential, and for facilitating new business start-ups, thereby contributing to future growth and job creation;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that without a personal contribution it is impossible for SMEs to gain access to credit, and that every effort to secure bank guarantees for business creation should be encouraged;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that SMEs are facing difficulties primarily as a result of the decline in domestic demand due to the economic crisis and exacerbated by the implementation of austerity policies; considers the ending of austerity policies and the redevelopment of the economy through public investment programmes as an effective assistance for the majority of SMEs;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that, particularly in periods of economic crisis, funding under European and national programmes should be earmarked first and foremost for SMEs that guarantee constant or increased manning levels over a given period, thereby helping to reduce unemployment;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Refers to the financial support for microfinance of micro-enterprises and to the financing of social enterprises which can create new jobs but expects that the Member States simplify their procedures so that also micro-enterprises can take this risk capital in an un-bureaucratic manner;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes support for SMEs, e.g. through the Cultural and Creative Sector Loan Guarantee Facility, whose aim is to foster the capacity of the private sector in order to deliver growth, job creation and innovation by supporting start-ups, SMEs, micro-finance, knowledge transfer and investment in intellectual property;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes support for SMEs and micro- enterprises through initiatives such as PSCI, COSME and Horizon 2020, which creates opportunities for employees within the SME and micro-enterprise sector to develop their skills and knowledge base; considers that the COSME Loan Guarantee Facility could be of benefit primarily to small and micro-scale enterprises; maintains that the amount to be guaranteed should be raised for medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes support for SMEs and micro-
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes support for SMEs and micro- enterprises through initiatives such as PSCI, the Creative Europe Programme, COSME and Horizon 2020, which creates opportunities for employees within the SME and micro-enterprise sector to develop their skills and knowledge base;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Suggests facilitating and promoting access to businesses’ social and environmental information by means of a label, in order to attract investment funds more easily;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that SMEs contribute to the activation of population in regions of lower job level and the increase in employment and meet the current needs of the population living there and have a positive effect on the development of local communities; therefore, development of SMEs seems to be one way of reducing disparities across the country;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that, despite successful EU initiatives such as the Late Payments Directive, serious barriers exist
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that, despite the widespread nationalisation of the banking sector in many EU countries as well as the provision of capital to banks by the state, the banking sector is still being run as profit-maximising bodies, in the narrow interests of shareholders and not in the interests of SMEs, homeowners or consumers that require credit; calls for the banking sector to be genuinely brought into democratic and public ownership so that it will supply credit to those that require it;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for legal rules to be introduced requiring credit institutions to provide a rapid response to a financing request from an SME;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the Member States to speed up implementation of the Late Payments Directive, given that the economic sustainability of SMEs has been seriously compromised by the observed slowdown in payments for business transactions at a time of great economic hardship;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that the liberalisation and privatisation policies being applied to a whole range of economic sectors, including energy, transport, and communications, have been leading to the formation of monopolies, resulting in higher production factor costs and hence serious consequences for the business of MSMEs;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the offer by the Commission to act in cooperation with the social partners so as to play a coordinating role in the exchange of best practices between Member States regarding SME funding;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls for a simplification of the applicable labour law rules, which, owing to their complexity, can sometimes represent a barrier to employment;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the important role played by the European Investment Bank in taking direct specific measures to facilitate access to funding, especially for small and micro-enterprises;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls for simple rules to be laid down, except where duly specified, to separate the assets of a company from those of the director, even if the head of the company carries out that activity on an individual basis;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to explore the possibility of using the best market screening mechanisms to promote SME internationalisation and to create strategic planning support instruments for them;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that many of these new jobs result from the practice of big companies of replacing directly employed workers with self-employed workers as a way of cutting costs and undermining unionisation of the workforce; condemns this practice and stresses again the need for full trade union rights in SMEs as the best way to safeguard wages and working conditions;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes the benefits of new forms of financing through innovative schemes and non-bank routes, such as peer-to-peer lending schemes, micro-lending, SME bonds and invoice products; stresses that cooperatives and social enterprises need to have their own rules on access to finance;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes the benefits of new forms of financing through innovative schemes and non-bank routes, such as peer-to-peer lending schemes, micro-lending, SME bonds and invoice products, which can provide vital investment to social businesses and "self start-ups";
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes the potential benefit of National or Regional Investment Banks, which can provide affordable finance to SMEs, when commercial banks and other sources of private finance are not accessible;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points to the need to reduce the cost of energy, transport, communications, and other production factors;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that a lack of knowledge and information can affect the supply of both debt and equity finance to SMEs, resulting in potentially viable businesses being refused finance, which inhibits the development or creation of viable SMEs and microenterprises; recognises that "one-stop shops" and e-government can help alleviate this problem by providing all relevant information to SMEs in an easily accessible manner;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to take action to improve and promote comprehensive SME information so as to facilitate their access to funding and limit the information deficit, which is a major reason for restricted SME access to funding;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for improved and easier access to information on funding opportunities for SMEs at regional and local level;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the need for comprehensible, comprehensive and specialised information and for guidance to be provided by appropriately trained staff for SMEs seeking funding from banks or other sources;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b Stresses the need to examine the tax obstacles to cross-border investments at EU level, so as to encourage the cross- border take-up of funding on the one hand and prevent tax evasion and tax avoidance on the other;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that SMEs can only create growth and jobs if favourable finance opportunities are also available at high risk;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses the importance of state support in facilitating SME access to finance by means of transparent procedures, with a view to enhancing economic competitiveness, sustaining employment levels and combating unemployment;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the strengthened SME test, which ensures that a
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the SME test, which ensures that any new measures do not place disproportionate burdens on SMEs; these measures must not apply to the social protection of workers and provisions regarding health and safety at work;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recognises that the administrative burden and financial risk related to accessing finance, can result in stress and other negative health impacts for employees and owners of SMEs and micro enterprises; emphasises the need for employment and social regulation to contribute to the well-being of entrepreneurs and their employees without creating additional barriers to their success;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasizes that loan funds, which are targeted to micro-, small businesses and the unemployed who want to start a business, result in stimulation of local entrepreneurship, in particular investment accountability, which promotes the creation of new jobs;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Therefore welcomes the opportunity to make SMEs investments possible through structural funds; expects, however, that this access will be facilitated for SMEs and that they will be better informed about these possibilities;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that access to finance is crucial for funding business investment, ensuring businesses reach their growth potential, and for facilitating new business start-ups, thereby contributing to future growth and job creation; stresses that, in this respect, access to finance is even more important for young entrepreneurs setting up their businesses and entrepreneurs coming from or employing people with a socially disadvantaged background;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that access to finance is crucial for funding business investment, ensuring businesses reach their growth potential, and for facilitating new business start-ups, especially for very small enterprises and social economy enterprises, thereby contributing to future growth and job creation;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that access to finance is crucial for funding business investment, ensuring businesses reach their growth potential, and for facilitating new business start-ups, thereby contributing to future growth
source: PE-496.589
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-496331_EN.html
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.312New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-496312_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.550New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-496550_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.893&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-497893_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.659&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-496659_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.483&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-496483_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.331&secondRef=03
|
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=870New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0870 |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-1&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0001_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-36New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0036_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/09746New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0870:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0870:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/2 |
Old
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industriesNew
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to propose an action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs. BACKGROUND: Europe's economic success depends largely on the growth of Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) achieving their potential. SMEs contribute more than half of the total value added in the non-financial business economy and provided 80% of all new jobs in Europe in the past five years. SMEs often face significant difficulties in obtaining the financing they need in order to grow and innovate. One of the key priorities set out in Europe 2020, the EU's growth strategy for the coming decade, as well as in the Commission's Single Market Act and the Small Business Act is to facilitate access to finance for SMEs. The Annual Growth Survey has underlined the crucial role of a healthy financial system to support growth and set out priorities for action in the short-term perspective. In this context, the reform programme for financial services, implemented as a response to the financial crisis, can bring about regulatory benefits to SMEs. In addition, the Commission is proposing to release new targeted funding at EU level to address the key market failures that limit the growth of SMEs. The Commission is presenting in this Action Plan the various policies that it is pursuing to make access to finance easier for Europe's 23 million SMEs and to provide a significant contribution to growth. CONTENT: difficulties in accessing finance are one of the main obstacles obstructing the growth of SMEs. There are multiple causes for such obstacles, some cyclical, some structural. Information asymmetries between the suppliers and demanders of funds play a major role. SMEs are to a very large extent dependent on bank loans for their external financing, therefore suitable alternatives should be put at their disposal. To respond to these challenges, the Commission has opted for a three-fold approach:
Current and future budget: the financial instruments of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) with a budget of 1.1 billion should enable financial institutions to provide about 30 billion of new finance for more than 315 000 SMEs. In 2008-2011, the European Investment Bank (EIB) provided around 40 billion of lending for SMEs, which benefitted more than 210 000 SMEs. In the field of Cohesion Policy the Commission already adopted measures to provide investments for SMEs in 15 Member States through financial engineering instruments designed by structural funds. Assistance to enterprises provided through equity investments, guarantees and loans is estimated to amount to at least 3 billion in the current financial period. Lastly, in order to provide better access to loan finance a specific Risk Sharing Instrument (RSI) is being created under the EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) Risk-Sharing Finance Facility as of 2012. The RSI will provide partial guarantees to financial intermediaries through a risk-sharing mechanism, thus reducing their financial risks encouraging them to provide lending between 25 000 and 7.5 million to SMEs undertaking research, development or innovation activities. Regulatory measures: the following measures are proposed:
on an accounting level: (i) adoption of a legislative proposal amending the Accounting Directives in order to simplify and improve accounting rules for SMEs; (ii) revision of the Transparency Directive in order to reduce the regulatory burden for small issuers; (iii) propose, by July 2012, delegated acts in the context of the Prospectus Directive, specifying the content of a proportionate disclosure regime for SMEs and small issuers;
Financial measures: the Commission proposes a certain number of new financial instruments to facilitate, including long-term (2014-2020), access to finance for SMEs:
Coordination measures: to better inform SMEs, the Commission proposes to:
New
PURPOSE: to propose an action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs. BACKGROUND: Europe's economic success depends largely on the growth of Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) achieving their potential. SMEs contribute more than half of the total value added in the non-financial business economy and provided 80% of all new jobs in Europe in the past five years. SMEs often face significant difficulties in obtaining the financing they need in order to grow and innovate. One of the key priorities set out in Europe 2020, the EU's growth strategy for the coming decade, as well as in the Commission's Single Market Act and the Small Business Act is to facilitate access to finance for SMEs. The Annual Growth Survey has underlined the crucial role of a healthy financial system to support growth and set out priorities for action in the short-term perspective. In this context, the reform programme for financial services, implemented as a response to the financial crisis, can bring about regulatory benefits to SMEs. In addition, the Commission is proposing to release new targeted funding at EU level to address the key market failures that limit the growth of SMEs. The Commission is presenting in this Action Plan the various policies that it is pursuing to make access to finance easier for Europe's 23 million SMEs and to provide a significant contribution to growth. CONTENT: difficulties in accessing finance are one of the main obstacles obstructing the growth of SMEs. There are multiple causes for such obstacles, some cyclical, some structural. Information asymmetries between the suppliers and demanders of funds play a major role. SMEs are to a very large extent dependent on bank loans for their external financing, therefore suitable alternatives should be put at their disposal. To respond to these challenges, the Commission has opted for a three-fold approach:
Current and future budget: the financial instruments of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) with a budget of 1.1 billion should enable financial institutions to provide about 30 billion of new finance for more than 315 000 SMEs. In 2008-2011, the European Investment Bank (EIB) provided around 40 billion of lending for SMEs, which benefitted more than 210 000 SMEs. In the field of Cohesion Policy the Commission already adopted measures to provide investments for SMEs in 15 Member States through financial engineering instruments designed by structural funds. Assistance to enterprises provided through equity investments, guarantees and loans is estimated to amount to at least 3 billion in the current financial period. Lastly, in order to provide better access to loan finance a specific Risk Sharing Instrument (RSI) is being created under the EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) Risk-Sharing Finance Facility as of 2012. The RSI will provide partial guarantees to financial intermediaries through a risk-sharing mechanism, thus reducing their financial risks encouraging them to provide lending between 25 000 and 7.5 million to SMEs undertaking research, development or innovation activities. Regulatory measures: the following measures are proposed:
on an accounting level: (i) adoption of a legislative proposal amending the Accounting Directives in order to simplify and improve accounting rules for SMEs; (ii) revision of the Transparency Directive in order to reduce the regulatory burden for small issuers; (iii) propose, by July 2012, delegated acts in the context of the Prospectus Directive, specifying the content of a proportionate disclosure regime for SMEs and small issuers;
Financial measures: the Commission proposes a certain number of new financial instruments to facilitate, including long-term (2014-2020), access to finance for SMEs:
Coordination measures: to better inform SMEs, the Commission proposes to:
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00New
2012-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on improving access to finance for SMEs, in response to the Commissions Action Plan on the same subject. Members welcome the Commissions Action Plan and its broad set of proposals and recommendations regarding SMEs. They agree with the Commission that the European Unions economic success, excellence and cohesion largely depend on sustainable growth and job creation based on SMEs committed to providing quality products and services. Due to the aggravating effect of the financial and economic crisis, many SMEs have difficulty in accessing finance, and that SMEs need to comply with new and sometimes more stringent regulatory criteria than before. Members encourage the Commission to continue its efforts in promoting national-level implementation of the Think Small First principle, which implies a further simplification of the regulatory and administrative environment for SMEs. The report stresses that banking institutions which have benefited during the crisis from state aid should be subject to targets for their financing amounts and conditions for SMEs. Vulnerability: SMEs are often at the end of a long delivery life cycle and hence are the ones affected most by late payments and short payment periods. Members welcome the Commissions initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive. The Commission is asked to subject new regulations relevant to SMEs to an overall and inclusive impact assessment, including a comprehensive test, taking into account the needs and challenges that SMEs have to face. Professionalising entrepreneurship: Members note that entrepreneurs lack of knowledge of basic finance limits the quality of business plans and, consequently, the success of credit applications. They call on the Member States, therefore, to provide professional training support for potential entrepreneurs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay. Members support in this connection the Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs programme, designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness. Members also consider it essential to:
Transparency: the report notes that creditors knowledge of credit tools is generally better than that of entrepreneurs and that entrepreneurs should communicate better with creditors about their business plan and their long-term strategy. Creditors should set clear and specific criteria on applying for finance in a transparent manner. Recognising that there is a need on the part of SMEs to get specially tailored advice on credit opportunities, Members call on the Commission to foster the sharing of best practices on specific solutions concerning dialogue, cooperation and exchange of information between creditors and entrepreneurs. Member States are called upon to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME, given the differences between countries in this field that are hindering the completion of the single market. Members stress that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business and call on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a single SME identification number, stored in a single European database for SMEs. Variations of SMEs and new ways of funding: the report stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes, instruments and initiatives, ranging across equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and multilateral trading facilities), quasi-equity (such as mezzanine finance) and debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds, guarantee facilities and platforms), in partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing (accountancy professionals, business or SME associations or chambers of commerce), in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases, taking into account their size, turnover and financing needs. Members welcome the Commissions new funding programmes, which take account of the specific characteristics of SMEs. They strongly believe that the financial envelope for the debt and equity finance instruments under the COSME Programme and under Horizon 2020 should be substantially increased. They call for at least 20% of the Horizon 2020 budget to be allocated to financing innovation in SMEs. The Commission is invited to:
The report notes that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings in bank accounts, while in other Member States deposits are reducing because of the effects of the crisis. Members call on the Commission to come forward with a proposal on the activation of these savings, for example by introducing incentives based on the best practices existing in the Member States. New
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on improving access to finance for SMEs, in response to the Commissions Action Plan on the same subject. Members welcome the Commissions Action Plan and its broad set of proposals and recommendations regarding SMEs. They agree with the Commission that the European Unions economic success, excellence and cohesion largely depend on sustainable growth and job creation based on SMEs committed to providing quality products and services. Due to the aggravating effect of the financial and economic crisis, many SMEs have difficulty in accessing finance, and that SMEs need to comply with new and sometimes more stringent regulatory criteria than before. Members encourage the Commission to continue its efforts in promoting national-level implementation of the Think Small First principle, which implies a further simplification of the regulatory and administrative environment for SMEs. The report stresses that banking institutions which have benefited during the crisis from state aid should be subject to targets for their financing amounts and conditions for SMEs. Vulnerability: SMEs are often at the end of a long delivery life cycle and hence are the ones affected most by late payments and short payment periods. Members welcome the Commissions initiative of strongly encouraging Member States to accelerate the implementation of the Late Payments Directive. The Commission is asked to subject new regulations relevant to SMEs to an overall and inclusive impact assessment, including a comprehensive test, taking into account the needs and challenges that SMEs have to face. Professionalising entrepreneurship: Members note that entrepreneurs lack of knowledge of basic finance limits the quality of business plans and, consequently, the success of credit applications. They call on the Member States, therefore, to provide professional training support for potential entrepreneurs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to include financial education in their education programmes without any delay. Members support in this connection the Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs programme, designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture and develop the single market and competitiveness. Members also consider it essential to:
Transparency: the report notes that creditors knowledge of credit tools is generally better than that of entrepreneurs and that entrepreneurs should communicate better with creditors about their business plan and their long-term strategy. Creditors should set clear and specific criteria on applying for finance in a transparent manner. Recognising that there is a need on the part of SMEs to get specially tailored advice on credit opportunities, Members call on the Commission to foster the sharing of best practices on specific solutions concerning dialogue, cooperation and exchange of information between creditors and entrepreneurs. Member States are called upon to reduce the administrative burden at the start-up and during the lifetime of the SME, given the differences between countries in this field that are hindering the completion of the single market. Members stress that it is important to reduce the number of days required to start up a new business and call on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing a single SME identification number, stored in a single European database for SMEs. Variations of SMEs and new ways of funding: the report stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all mode of finance and calls on the Commission to support the development of a broad range of tailored programmes, instruments and initiatives, ranging across equity (such as business angels, crowd funding and multilateral trading facilities), quasi-equity (such as mezzanine finance) and debt instruments (such as small-ticket company bonds, guarantee facilities and platforms), in partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing (accountancy professionals, business or SME associations or chambers of commerce), in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases, taking into account their size, turnover and financing needs. Members welcome the Commissions new funding programmes, which take account of the specific characteristics of SMEs. They strongly believe that the financial envelope for the debt and equity finance instruments under the COSME Programme and under Horizon 2020 should be substantially increased. They call for at least 20% of the Horizon 2020 budget to be allocated to financing innovation in SMEs. The Commission is invited to:
The report notes that in some Member States there is a record amount of household savings in bank accounts, while in other Member States deposits are reducing because of the effects of the crisis. Members call on the Commission to come forward with a proposal on the activation of these savings, for example by introducing incentives based on the best practices existing in the Member States. |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2013-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-07-05T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4e73ac94559f84559a58cc89New
4f1ac45bb819f25896000009 |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de184650fb8127435bdbd7cNew
4f1ac7aeb819f25efd0000a0 |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1865d0fb8127435bdc04dNew
4f1ad22ab819f2759500000c |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de185ea0fb8127435bdbfa4New
4f1ac96db819f25efd000136 |
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186050fb8127435bdbfcaNew
4f1ac9a2b819f25efd000147 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183e10fb8127435bdbcc1New
4f1ac71db819f25efd000069 |
committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186d70fb8127435bdc0faNew
4f1ad95eb819f207b3000012 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-02-06T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-1&language=EN
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/7 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
KLEVA MojcaNew
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca |
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-12-17T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033 |
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
KLEVA MojcaNew
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca |
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-01-14T00:00:00New
2011-12-07T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Prev DG PRESNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/body |
Old
ECNew
EP |
activities/2/commission |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2011-12-07T00:00:00New
2012-09-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0870:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/title |
Old
COM(2011)0870New
PE496.312 |
activities/2/docs/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic document publishedNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.312 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3/date |
Old
2011-12-07T00:00:00New
2012-10-19T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
DateNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=870New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0870/COM_COM(2011)0870_EN.pdf |
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
activities/10/date |
Old
2013-01-14T00:00:00New
2013-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.550
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-07-05T00:00:00New
2012-09-19T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-11-29T00:00:00New
2012-12-17T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-06-14T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2012-09-18T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/date |
2012-09-18T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/7/09746
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|