Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
AGRI | |||
CONT | HERCZOG Edit ( ) | AUDY Jean-Pierre ( ), STAES Bart ( ), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo ( ), ANDREASEN Marta ( ) | |
ENVI | |||
IMCO | |||
INTA |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 99
Legal Basis:
RoP 99Subjects
- 3.10.08 Animal health requirements, veterinary legislation and pharmacy
- 3.10.09 Plant health legislation, organic farming, agro-genetics in general
- 3.10.09.04 Organic farming
- 3.10.10 Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
- 3.70.01 Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
- 4.20 Public health
- 4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
- 6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
- 8.70.03.07 Previous discharges
Events
PURPOSE: to draw up a Special Report (No. 9/2012) of the European Court of Auditors on the control system for organic production.
CONTENT: organic production is an overall system of farm management and food production that aims at sustainable agriculture, the production of high-quality products and the use of processes that do not harm the environment, human, plant or animal health and animal welfare. The control system for organic products as set out in the EU regulations aims at guaranteeing the production processes but not the organic character of the products themselves. The organic market has rapidly developed and experienced annual growth rates of more than 10% in the last two decades. The European market for organic food amounts to about 20 billion euro annually, representing an estimated 1.5% share of the entire food market.
The European Court of Auditors’ (ECA) performance audit focuses on the effectiveness of the system for supervising organic production and how the various institutions involved (the EU Commission and the competent Member State authorities, accreditation bodies and control bodies) have fulfilled their responsibilities with regard to both the control system within the EU and the management of the import schemes currently in operation.
According to the Commission, EU consumers can be sure that when they buy an organic apple or a piece of organic beef from their local supermarket, it has been produced according to strict rules. The control system for organic products , as set out in the EU Regulations, aims at guaranteeing that the production processes conform to organic principles.
For organic products originating within the EU, Member States must set up a system of checks. Control bodies, which carry out these checks at the level of individual operators (such as producers, processors and importers) are central to this system. Organic products from outside the EU may be recognised as organic, if the production rules and control system applied to them are considered equivalent to those of the EU.
The Court considers that the shortcomings highlighted by its audit need to be remedied in order to provide sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and ensure that consumer confidence is not undermined.
Conclusions of the Court of Auditors’ audit: in this Special Report (No. 9/2012), the ECA concludes that a number of competent authorities in the Member States do not sufficiently fulfill their supervisory role over control bodies . As a result certain control bodies fail to satisfy a number of EU requirements and fail to take the opportunity to implement certain good practices. The Commission had not audited Member States’ control systems between 2001 and the time of the Court’s audit. Also, the competent authorities in Member States encounter difficulties in ensuring the traceability of organic products within their territories and such traceability is even more difficult to achieve for products that have crossed borders.
In relation to imported organic products, the system governing the various import schemes was also found to have weaknesses .
The Court’s recommendations: the ECA has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving the effectiveness of the current system, in particular in regard to the following points:
the competent Member State authorities should strengthen their supervisory role over control bodies; the exchange of information within Member States, between the Member States and the Commission and among the Member States themselves should be improved; checks should be strengthened to ensure that operators (such as producers, processors, importers) fulfil the regulatory requirements regarding traceability; the Commission should strengthen its monitoring of the Member States’ control systems by undertaking audit visits and gathering the necessary data and information and putting it to good use; regarding imports, the Commission should ensure that the countries in the list of those recognised as being equivalent for organic production are adequately supervised.
The Commission’s replies show broad agreement with the Court's recommendations and indicate its intention to follow them, including specific audits on the control systems for organic production by the Food and Veterinary Office from 2012 onwards.
PURPOSE: to draw up a Special Report (No. 9/2012) of the European Court of Auditors on the control system for organic production.
CONTENT: organic production is an overall system of farm management and food production that aims at sustainable agriculture, the production of high-quality products and the use of processes that do not harm the environment, human, plant or animal health and animal welfare. The control system for organic products as set out in the EU regulations aims at guaranteeing the production processes but not the organic character of the products themselves. The organic market has rapidly developed and experienced annual growth rates of more than 10% in the last two decades. The European market for organic food amounts to about 20 billion euro annually, representing an estimated 1.5% share of the entire food market.
The European Court of Auditors’ (ECA) performance audit focuses on the effectiveness of the system for supervising organic production and how the various institutions involved (the EU Commission and the competent Member State authorities, accreditation bodies and control bodies) have fulfilled their responsibilities with regard to both the control system within the EU and the management of the import schemes currently in operation.
According to the Commission, EU consumers can be sure that when they buy an organic apple or a piece of organic beef from their local supermarket, it has been produced according to strict rules. The control system for organic products , as set out in the EU Regulations, aims at guaranteeing that the production processes conform to organic principles.
For organic products originating within the EU, Member States must set up a system of checks. Control bodies, which carry out these checks at the level of individual operators (such as producers, processors and importers) are central to this system. Organic products from outside the EU may be recognised as organic, if the production rules and control system applied to them are considered equivalent to those of the EU.
The Court considers that the shortcomings highlighted by its audit need to be remedied in order to provide sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and ensure that consumer confidence is not undermined.
Conclusions of the Court of Auditors’ audit: in this Special Report (No. 9/2012), the ECA concludes that a number of competent authorities in the Member States do not sufficiently fulfill their supervisory role over control bodies . As a result certain control bodies fail to satisfy a number of EU requirements and fail to take the opportunity to implement certain good practices. The Commission had not audited Member States’ control systems between 2001 and the time of the Court’s audit. Also, the competent authorities in Member States encounter difficulties in ensuring the traceability of organic products within their territories and such traceability is even more difficult to achieve for products that have crossed borders.
In relation to imported organic products, the system governing the various import schemes was also found to have weaknesses .
The Court’s recommendations: the ECA has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving the effectiveness of the current system, in particular in regard to the following points:
the competent Member State authorities should strengthen their supervisory role over control bodies; the exchange of information within Member States, between the Member States and the Commission and among the Member States themselves should be improved; checks should be strengthened to ensure that operators (such as producers, processors, importers) fulfil the regulatory requirements regarding traceability; the Commission should strengthen its monitoring of the Member States’ control systems by undertaking audit visits and gathering the necessary data and information and putting it to good use; regarding imports, the Commission should ensure that the countries in the list of those recognised as being equivalent for organic production are adequately supervised.
The Commission’s replies show broad agreement with the Court's recommendations and indicate its intention to follow them, including specific audits on the control systems for organic production by the Food and Veterinary Office from 2012 onwards.
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document: N7-0081/2012
- Non-legislative basic document published: N7-0081/2012
- Non-legislative basic document: N7-0081/2012
Amendments | Dossier |
9 |
2012/2140(DEC)
2013/01/10
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 9/2012, and endorses the Court of Auditors’ conclusions; regrets that audit visits were made to only six Member States, even allowing for the fact that these were the countries most directly concerned;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that the importance of organic production goes beyond the
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that many organic products are more costly than non-organic products; as a result, price-sensitive consumers and people living on lower incomes are not able or are less able to afford these
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that many organic products are more costly than non-organic products; as a result, price-sensitive consumers and people living on lower incomes are not able or are less able to afford these products, which are probably healthier
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Regrets that there is no scientific way to determine whether a product is organic or not and that the control system thus serves to guarantee production processes and not the products themselves;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Member States to cease, before the cut-off date, to grant the transitional import authorisations established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2083/92, an arrangement which has been extended several times but is to end under the current Commission Regulation (EU) No 1267/2011 of 6 December 2011, which stipulates that Member States may not issue authorisations of this type after 1 July 2014;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Endorses the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the control procedures for imports need to be implemented properly in order to ensure that imported products comply with at least equivalent production and control conditions, the object being to allow the internal market to run smoothly and guarantee fair competition between EU and non-EU products;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Expresses its surprise and disquiet at the Court of Auditors’ finding that Member States’ competent authorities have been failing to document, or have not sufficiently documented, the approval and supervision procedures applied to control bodies in order to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements; calls on the Commission to inform the national parliaments of that finding;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasizes that the independence of the control bodies, public authorities included, is crucial to maintaining the reputation of the organic label;
source: PE-502.245
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2012-06-26T00:00:00New
2012-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 99
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 93
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/7/10024New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 93
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 093
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Special report 9/2012 (2011 discharge): Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic productsNew
Special report 9/2012 (2011 discharge): Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic products |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4f1ac908b819f25efd000108 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de182d90fb8127435bdbb3eNew
4f1ac60fb819f25efd000019 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de183f10fb8127435bdbcdcNew
4f1ac75eb819f25efd000082 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4bNew
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4f1ac908b819f25efd000108 |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de182d90fb8127435bdbb3eNew
4f1ac60fb819f25efd000019 |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf |
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de183f10fb8127435bdbcdcNew
4f1ac75eb819f25efd000082 |
committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4bNew
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 093 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-18T00:00:00New
2012-11-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
procedure/subject/6 |
Old
4.60.02 Consumer information, publicity, labellingNew
4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to draw up a Special Report (No. 9/2012) of the European Court of Auditors on the control system for organic production. CONTENT: organic production is an overall system of farm management and food production that aims at sustainable agriculture, the production of high-quality products and the use of processes that do not harm the environment, human, plant or animal health and animal welfare. The control system for organic products as set out in the EU regulations aims at guaranteeing the production processes but not the organic character of the products themselves. The organic market has rapidly developed and experienced annual growth rates of more than 10% in the last two decades. The European market for organic food amounts to about 20 billion euro annually, representing an estimated 1.5% share of the entire food market. The European Court of Auditors (ECA) performance audit focuses on the effectiveness of the system for supervising organic production and how the various institutions involved (the EU Commission and the competent Member State authorities, accreditation bodies and control bodies) have fulfilled their responsibilities with regard to both the control system within the EU and the management of the import schemes currently in operation. According to the Commission, EU consumers can be sure that when they buy an organic apple or a piece of organic beef from their local supermarket, it has been produced according to strict rules. The control system for organic products, as set out in the EU Regulations, aims at guaranteeing that the production processes conform to organic principles. For organic products originating within the EU, Member States must set up a system of checks. Control bodies, which carry out these checks at the level of individual operators (such as producers, processors and importers) are central to this system. Organic products from outside the EU may be recognised as organic, if the production rules and control system applied to them are considered equivalent to those of the EU. The Court considers that the shortcomings highlighted by its audit need to be remedied in order to provide sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and ensure that consumer confidence is not undermined. Conclusions of the Court of Auditors audit: in this Special Report (No. 9/2012), the ECA concludes that a number of competent authorities in the Member States do not sufficiently fulfill their supervisory role over control bodies. As a result certain control bodies fail to satisfy a number of EU requirements and fail to take the opportunity to implement certain good practices. The Commission had not audited Member States control systems between 2001 and the time of the Courts audit. Also, the competent authorities in Member States encounter difficulties in ensuring the traceability of organic products within their territories and such traceability is even more difficult to achieve for products that have crossed borders. In relation to imported organic products, the system governing the various import schemes was also found to have weaknesses. The Courts recommendations: the ECA has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving the effectiveness of the current system, in particular in regard to the following points:
The Commissions replies show broad agreement with the Court's recommendations and indicate its intention to follow them, including specific audits on the control systems for organic production by the Food and Veterinary Office from 2012 onwards. New
PURPOSE: to draw up a Special Report (No. 9/2012) of the European Court of Auditors on the control system for organic production. CONTENT: organic production is an overall system of farm management and food production that aims at sustainable agriculture, the production of high-quality products and the use of processes that do not harm the environment, human, plant or animal health and animal welfare. The control system for organic products as set out in the EU regulations aims at guaranteeing the production processes but not the organic character of the products themselves. The organic market has rapidly developed and experienced annual growth rates of more than 10% in the last two decades. The European market for organic food amounts to about 20 billion euro annually, representing an estimated 1.5% share of the entire food market. The European Court of Auditors (ECA) performance audit focuses on the effectiveness of the system for supervising organic production and how the various institutions involved (the EU Commission and the competent Member State authorities, accreditation bodies and control bodies) have fulfilled their responsibilities with regard to both the control system within the EU and the management of the import schemes currently in operation. According to the Commission, EU consumers can be sure that when they buy an organic apple or a piece of organic beef from their local supermarket, it has been produced according to strict rules. The control system for organic products, as set out in the EU Regulations, aims at guaranteeing that the production processes conform to organic principles. For organic products originating within the EU, Member States must set up a system of checks. Control bodies, which carry out these checks at the level of individual operators (such as producers, processors and importers) are central to this system. Organic products from outside the EU may be recognised as organic, if the production rules and control system applied to them are considered equivalent to those of the EU. The Court considers that the shortcomings highlighted by its audit need to be remedied in order to provide sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and ensure that consumer confidence is not undermined. Conclusions of the Court of Auditors audit: in this Special Report (No. 9/2012), the ECA concludes that a number of competent authorities in the Member States do not sufficiently fulfill their supervisory role over control bodies. As a result certain control bodies fail to satisfy a number of EU requirements and fail to take the opportunity to implement certain good practices. The Commission had not audited Member States control systems between 2001 and the time of the Courts audit. Also, the competent authorities in Member States encounter difficulties in ensuring the traceability of organic products within their territories and such traceability is even more difficult to achieve for products that have crossed borders. In relation to imported organic products, the system governing the various import schemes was also found to have weaknesses. The Courts recommendations: the ECA has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving the effectiveness of the current system, in particular in regard to the following points:
The Commissions replies show broad agreement with the Court's recommendations and indicate its intention to follow them, including specific audits on the control systems for organic production by the Food and Veterinary Office from 2012 onwards. |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
NINew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
NINew
ECR |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-18T00:00:00New
2013-03-18T00:00:00 |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
2013-02-18T00:00:00 |
procedure/title |
Old
Special Report No 9/2012 (2011 discharge): Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic productsNew
Special report 9/2012 (2011 discharge): Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic products |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.245
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-01-21T00:00:00New
2013-02-19T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00New
2013-01-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-06-26T00:00:00New
2012-11-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
DateNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.960
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Deadline Amendments |
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-12-03T00:00:00New
2013-01-22T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-12-06T00:00:00New
2012-12-03T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
EP 1R CommitteeNew
Deadline Amendments |
activities/2/committees/1/date |
2012-10-08T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-12-06T00:00:00New
2013-01-10T00:00:00 |
committees/1/date |
2012-10-08T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/4/group |
Old
ECRNew
NI |
committees/1/shadows/4/group |
Old
ECRNew
NI |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|