Procedure completed
2013/2024(INI) Mid-term review of the Stockholm Programme
Lead committee dossier: CJ08/7/12106
Legal Basis RoP 052, RoP 055
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | AFCO | CASINI Carlo (PPE), BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D), LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando (S&D) | GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (S&D), THEIN Alexandra (ALDE), HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (EFD) |
| Opinion | AFET | BICEP Jean-Jacob (Verts/ALE) | |
| Opinion | FEMM | PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (PPE) | |
| Lead | JURI | CASINI Carlo (PPE), BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D), LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando (S&D) | GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (S&D), THEIN Alexandra (ALDE), HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (EFD) |
| Lead | LIBE | CASINI Carlo (PPE), BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D), LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando (S&D) | GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (S&D), THEIN Alexandra (ALDE), HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (EFD) |
Legal Basis RoP 052, RoP 055
Subjects
- 1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
- 1.20 Citizen's rights
- 7.10 Free movement and integration of third-country nationals
- 7.10.02 Schengen area
- 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
- 7.10.06 Asylum, refugees, displaced persons
- 7.10.08 Migration policy
- 7.30.05 Police cooperation
- 7.30.09 Public security
- 7.30.30 Action to combat crime
- 7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
- 7.40 Judicial cooperation
Activites
-
2014/04/02
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament
-
T7-0276/2014
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 367 votes to 85 with 29 abstentions, a resolution on the mid-term review of the Stockholm Programme. The Stockholm Programme and the Treaty of Lisbon: recalling that the Treaty of Lisbon and the recognition of the legally binding force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights had strengthened the constitutional basis for the EU institutions Members considered that that opt-outs or special regimes should be removed. They requested that the Commission and the Council Presidency better fulfil their obligation to inform Parliament ‘immediately and fully at all stages of the procedure’ leading to the conclusion of international agreements. Taking the view that the extension of the use of the ordinary legislative procedure had made law-making more legitimate and brought it closer to the people, Parliament believed that in a future Treaty revision the remaining exceptions to the use of the ordinary legislative procedure should be removed. With regard to the European elections, Parliament noted that, even in the absence of an agreement on a uniform electoral procedure for the European Parliament elections, electoral systems were gradually becoming more similar, in particular as a result of the establishment of political parties and political foundations at EU level. It encouraged more transparent procedures for the nomination of candidates, which guaranteed their independence. It also felt that a reform of the electoral procedure would be required in the future in order to enhance Parliament’s legitimacy and effectiveness in accordance with the principles laid down in the Treaties. Evaluation of the Stockholm Programme and its implementation With regard to fundamental rights, Parliament recalled the positions adopted by Parliament on the establishment of a new EU rule of law framework to strengthen the Union’s capacity to address the ‘Copenhagen dilemma’ – a situation in which the Union set high standards for candidate countries but lacked functional tools for the existing Member States whose aim must be to secure compliance by all Member States with the common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU with a view to continuity of the ’Copenhagen criteria’ , as repeatedly requested by Parliament. In an amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament welcomed, in this regard the Commission communication entitled ‘A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law’ and looks forward to cooperating with the Commission on the effective implementation of the framework. It stressed, however, that a regular assessment of Member States’ compliance with the fundamental values of the EU as set out in Article 2 TEU remained necessary and recalled that the FRA, judicial networks and other independent expertise bodies should also contribute to the assessment of threats to the rule of law. Members also discussed the following: (i) the lack of progress on the implementation of the national Roma integration strategies; (ii) the need for the Council to adopt the proposal for an antidiscrimination directive; (iii) the timely transposition of Directive 2011/99/EU on the European protection order and Directive 2011/36/EU on trafficking in human beings; (iv) more checks and balances be put in place on the protection of data, and action taken in relation to surveillance threatening the internal security of the EU; (v) the need for an accountability mechanism aimed at strengthening the capacity of the EU and of its Member States to prevent, investigate and redress human rights violations at EU level, in particular those committed in the context of the alleged transportation and illegal detention of prisoners in European countries by the CIA; (vi) the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. With regard to judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, Parliament noted that only three pieces of legislation in this field had been adopted so far, namely the Brussels I recast, the Successions Regulation, and the Rome III Regulation, of which only the third was applicable today. It considered that mutual recognition required that citizens and legal professionals trust one another’s legal institutions. They stressed the need for the establishment of common standards and an understanding of other legal systems for underpinning mutual recognition and trust but felt that this exchange should not detract from the value of national legal traditions. Parliament called on the Commission, following repeated requests from Parliament, to issue a proposal – adopting an all-encompassing approach – for a regulation on the mutual recognition of the effects of all civil status documents in the EU, in order to eliminate discriminatory legal and administrative barriers for both male and female citizens and their families who wish to exercise their right to free movement. It reiterated its call for the adoption of a European code of private international law. The resolution recommended improvements in the area of procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings as well as better implementation of the European Arrest Warrant. It welcomed the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and on Eurojust. With regard to Internal Security Strategy (ISS), Parliament noted the progress made in the EU in the battle against international organized crime. It stressed, however, that further progress need to be made in the fight against terrorism (violent radicalization) and recalled that Parliament was now a fully fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies and was therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments and monitoring them. Noting that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools for European law enforcement information exchange was complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available, Parliament called for a vision of how to optimise law enforcement data-sharing in the EU. At the same time, it rejected the concept of predictive policing without an initial suspicion, and called on the Commission to repeal the Data Retention Directive. On the issue of borders and visas, Members firmly rejected all attempts to limit the free movement of people, which were not in line with the acquis. They acknowledged that the Schengen area was unique and took the view that long-term reflection on its further development was necessary. The Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded with the support of European border guards whose training includes human rights standards. Parliament welcomed the reform of the mandate of Frontex and the agreement on Eurosur and also welcomed the new rules on the surveillance of sea borders with which saving the lives of migrants as well as respect for the human rights of migrants and asylum-seekers, including the principle of non-refoulement, had also become priorities. It called on the Commission to further improve existing visa facilitation agreements between the Union and its eastern neighbours. With regard to asylum and migration, Parliament called for greater transparency, requiring each Member State to report annually on the progress of each specific minority group in matters of labour market integration and equality policy impacts. It called particularly for an ‘annual trend report’ reflecting the comparable indicators on social cohesion, including EU-wide monitoring of the situation of newcomers, long-term residents, naturalised migrants and the children of migrants, so as to measure progress in social inclusion policies over time. Members regretted the continuing and systematic practice of detaining migrants in detention centres. They believed that, in the context of the Dublin system, the possibility of suspending transfers to Member States under significant pressure should be considered in the future. They expressed deep concern about the fate of third-country nationals and stateless persons readmitted under EU readmission agreements. On the external dimension of the area of freedom, security and justice, Parliament pointed out that the European Union and the Member States should continue to integrate immigration into development cooperation. It stressed the need to encourage voluntary return policies. It wanted an approach to migration policy that was more based on human rights and recalled the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Methods, tools and processes: Parliament proposed a systematic, objective and independent ex-post evaluation of legislation and its implementation, which should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area. Pointing out, in particular, the importance of conducting impact assessments, Parliament welcomed the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard. It stressed the need for European judicial culture and EU judicial training for all legal professionals. Next steps: Parliament was of the opinion that guidance, coherence and benchmarks for the area of freedom, security and justice were necessary and that such objectives requireda proper programming to be prepared in the spirit of the Treaty of Lisbon in a joint exercise between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
-
2014/03/04
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
A7-0153/2014
summary
The Committees on Legal Affairs, on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, and on Constitutional Affairs adopted the joint report by Luigi BERLINGUER (S&D, IT), Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR (S&D, ES) and Carlo CASINI (EPP, IT) on the mid-term review of the Stockholm Programme. The Stockholm Programme and the Treaty of Lisbon: recalling that the Treaty of Lisbon and the recognition of the legally binding force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights had strengthened the constitutional basis for the EU institutions Members considered that that opt-outs or special regimes should be removed. They requested that the Commission and the Council Presidency better fulfil their obligation to inform Parliament ‘immediately and fully at all stages of the procedure’ leading to the conclusion of international agreements. Members believed that in a future Treaty revision the remaining exceptions to the use of the ordinary legislative procedure should be removed. With regard to the European elections, Members encouraged more transparent procedures for the nomination of candidates, and felt that the public should be made more aware of Parliament’s democratic role. They considered that a reform of the electoral procedure would be required in order to enhance Parliament’s legitimacy and effectiveness by dividing up the seats in Parliament more proportionally among the Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Treaties Evaluation of the Stockholm Programme and its implementation With regard to fundamental rights, Members called urgently for measures to address the ‘Copenhagen dilemma’ – a situation in which the Union set high standards for candidate countries but lacked tools for the existing Member States. They called for the creation of a ‘Copenhagen Commission’ whose aims must be to secure compliance by all Member States with the common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU. The report also discussed the following: (i) the lack of progress on the implementation of the national Roma integration strategies; (ii) the need for the Council to adopt the proposal for an antidiscrimination directive; (iii) the timely transposition of Directive 2011/99/EU on the European protection order and Directive 2011/36/EU on trafficking in human beings; (iv) more checks and balances be put in place on the protection of data, and action taken in relation to surveillance threatening the internal security of the EU; (v) the need for an accountability mechanism aimed at strengthening the capacity of the EU and of its Member States to prevent, investigate and redress human rights violations at EU level, in particular those committed in the context of the alleged transportation and illegal detention of prisoners in European countries by the CIA; (vi) the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. With regard to judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, Members noted that only three pieces of legislation in this field had been adopted so far, namely the Brussels I recast, the Successions Regulation, and the Rome III Regulation, of which only the third was applicable today. They considered that mutual recognition required that citizens and legal professionals trust one another’s legal institutions. They stressed the need for the establishment of common standards and an understanding of other legal systems for underpinning mutual recognition and trust but felt that this exchange should not detract from the value of national legal traditions. Members called on the Commission, following repeated requests from Parliament, to issue a proposal – adopting an all-encompassing approach – for a regulation on the mutual recognition of the effects of all civil status documents in the EU, in order to eliminate discriminatory legal and administrative barriers for both male and female citizens and their families who wish to exercise their right to free movement. They reiterated their call for the adoption of a European code of private international law. The report recommended improvements in the area of procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings as well as better implementation of the European Arrest Warrant. It welcomed the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and on Eurojust. With regard to Internal Security Strategy (ISS), Members noted the progress made in the EU in the battle against international organized crime. They stressed, however, that further progress need to be made in the fight against terrorism (violent radicalization) and recalled that Parliament was now a fully fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies and was therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments and monitoring them. Noting that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools for European law enforcement information exchange was complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available Members called for a vision of how to optimise law enforcement data-sharing in the EU. At the same time, it rejected the concept of predictive policing without an initial suspicion, and called on the Commission to repeal the Data Retention Directive. On the issue of borders and visas, Members firmly rejected all attempts to limit the free movement of people, which were not in line with the acquis. They acknowledged that the Schengen area was unique and took the view that long-term reflection on its further development was necessary. The Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded with the support of European border guards whose training includes human rights standards. Members considered that the new rules on the surveillance of sea borders need to be agreed on whilst observing the principle of non-refoulement. They strongly endorsed the European Council’s call for Frontex’s role to be reinforced in accordance with the Stockholm Programme in order to increase its capacity to respond more effectively to changing migration flows. They called on the Commission to further improve existing visa facilitation agreements between the Union and its eastern neighbours. With regard to asylum and migration, Members called for greater transparency, requiring each Member State to report annually on the progress of each specific minority group in matters of labour market integration and equality policy impacts. They called particularly for an ‘annual trend report’ reflecting the comparable indicators on social cohesion, including EU-wide monitoring of the situation of newcomers, long-term residents, naturalised migrants and the children of migrants, so as to measure progress in social inclusion policies over time. Members regretted the continuing and systematic practice of detaining migrants in detention centres. They believed that, in the context of the Dublin system, the possibility of suspending transfers to Member States under significant pressure should be considered in the future. They expressed deep concern about the fate of third-country nationals and stateless persons readmitted under EU readmission agreements. On the external dimension of the area of freedom, security and justice, Members pointed out that the European Union and the Member States should continue to integrate immigration into development cooperation. They stressed the need to encourage voluntary return policies. They wanted an approach to migration policy that was more based on human rights and recalled the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Methods, tools and processes: the report proposed a systematic, objective and independent ex-post evaluation of legislation and its implementation, which should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area. Pointing out, in particular, the importance of conducting impact assessments, Members welcomed the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard. They stress the need for European judicial culture and EU judicial training for all legal professionals. Next steps: Members considered that a proper programming should be prepared in the spirit of the Treaty of Lisbon in a joint exercise between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission and that the multiannual programming should be based on an interinstitutional agreement, as provided for in Article 17(1) TEU. They expected the Commission, therefore, to submit a proposal on this basis.
-
A7-0153/2014
summary
- #3298
- 2014/03/03 Council Meeting
-
2014/02/24
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #3279
- 2013/12/06 Council Meeting
-
2013/03/11
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
- Debate in Council: 3279
- Debate in Council: 3298
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0153/2014
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0276/2014
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 398 |
2013/2024(INI)
2013/07/17
AFET
86 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission and the EEAS to take practical steps to ensure greater coherence and consistency between EU external and internal policies, in line with the commitments set out notably in the Communication on an Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme; calls therefore on the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice President of the Commission (HR/VP), the Council and the Commission to strengthen the existing coordination mechanisms between the services and agencies in the area of Freedom, Security and Justice (FSJ) on the one side, and the European External Action Service (EEAS), including missions and operations under the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) on the other side, taking advantage in particular of the new capabilities of the EU Situation Centre in order to provide common, effective, strategic analyses, threat assessments (internal and external) and timely information to all actors involved; takes the view that fruitful coordination among both the Internal Security Strategy and the European Security Strategy encompasses effective articulation between services, bodies, regional and thematic desks in a transversal way to the relevant Commission and EEAS services for it to be effective and coherent in light of FSJ and CFSP policies;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital 1 a (new) 1a. whereas the Treaty enshrines the fight against social exclusion and discrimination and the promotion of equality between men and women as EU objectives, and whereas the Commission must make sure that the implementation of the Stockholm Programme truly reflects the needs of citizens in terms of equal opportunities and gender equality;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the adoption of the directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, where special attention is paid to the protection of disadvantaged persons such
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Acknowledges in particular the human rights abuses on Greece's border with Turkey, where the building of a fence by Greek authorities and reports of collective expulsions (refoulement) and systematic prolonged detention of refugees, asylum seekers and irregular migrants as well as detention of children, are infringing European and international law;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the adoption of the directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recalls that Members States share the responsibility for the Union's external borders; remains concerned of events on the Greece-Turkey, Cyprus, Malta, Italy borders with regards to the arrival of irregular migrants and calls on Member States, with the support of the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS), to ensure that national authorities analyse the individual situation of each person arriving to its territory, on the basis of international and European human rights obligations and taking into account the needs of vulnerable groups; calls on the Commission to support Member States in ensuring minimum services, such as adequate health care and accomodation, for refugees, asylum seekers and irregular migrants arriving in EU territory;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that the number of people being trafficked to and from the EU is rising, despite the entry into force of the EU Anti-Trafficking Directive in December 2011, calls on the EU Member States to increase their efforts to curb this worrying trend by ensuring that ambitious legislations and measures to fight trafficking in human beings are developed and implemented in accordance with the Directive,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Repeats its call for a compulsory refugee resettlement scheme, in line with Article 21 of the TEU, which obliges the EU to assist populations confronting natural or man- made disasters; notes
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Repeats its call for a compulsory refugee resettlement scheme, in line with Article 21 of the TEU, which obliges the EU to assist
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Commission, despite its many commitments, has not come up with
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Commission, despite its many commitments, has not come up with legislative acts in the fields of violence against women, equality in political decision-making or revision of the directive on the gender pay gap, thus perpetuating existing democratic deficits;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission to launch a comprehensive strategy to fight violence against women as promised in the Stockholm Action Programme and as requested by Parliament in several resolutions, reiterates the need for a legislative criminal-law instrument to be launched by the Commission in order to combat gender-based violence;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expresses alarm at the number of deaths, particularly at sea, and the human rights abuses which
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of deploying all the policy instruments available to provide a robust European response to violence against women and children in all its forms: domestic violence, sexual abuse, harassment and stalking, sexual exploitation, forced marriages, crimes of honour, female genital mutilation, etc., in order to safeguard the rights of women and children and fight all forms of discrimination, racism, xenophobia and homophobia;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Expresses alarm at the number of deaths and the human rights abuses which continue to occur in the course of irregular migrants' attempts to enter the EU; requests that the Commission consult Parliament prior to the conclusion of any agreement between Frontex and a third country; insists that these agreements must provide for adequate safeguards to ensure that human rights standards are fully respected, including with regard to return, joint patrolling, search and rescue or interception operations; in this sense, urges the EU to investigate reports of mistreatment of migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers on the Greek-Turkish border by Frontex, as well as other such allegations in other EU southern borders; emphasises in this regard that, especially given the particular instability and political turmoil in the MENA region, the relevant services of the Commission, the EEAS and specialised agencies of the EU need to coordinate towards a holistic approach to address the issue of irregular migration targeting EU Member States in a manner that is consistent with European principles and values, on the one hand, and consistent with EU efforts in the region and wider southern neighbourhood for the stabilisation and democratisation in the framework of the CFSP/CSDP;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Reiterates its request for the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to combat all forms of violence against women as soon as possible;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the fact that the principle of universality applies to fundamental rights and equal treatment; urges the Council therefore to adopt the Anti-Discrimination Directive proposal1; Given especially that women are often the victims of multiple discrimination, we need to strengthen all fundamental rights through the adoption of joint strategies for the protection of victims and the criminal prosecution of offenders, while promoting equality between men and women;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Expresses deep concern about the fate of third country nationals (TCNs) and stateless persons readmitted under EU readmission agreements (EURAs), including cases of indefinite detention, legal limbo or refoulement to their country of origin, and requests the exclusion of TCN clauses from these agreements; underlines the importance of implementing the recommendations made in the Commission's evaluation of readmission agreements;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses the need to provide proper training for officials (police, health services, court staff, etc.) who are likely to come into contact with cases where a person's physical, psychological and sexual integrity is considered to be at risk, particularly in cases of women victims of gender-based violence; calls on Member States to support the work of civil society, particularly NGOs, women's associations and other voluntary organisations providing specialist support, and to collaborate with such organisations in providing support to women victims of gender-based violence;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Expresses deep concern about the fate of third country nationals (TCNs) and stateless persons
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Expresses deep concern about the fate of third country nationals (TCNs)
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to take action to combat the economic and social causes that foster violence against women, such as unemployment, low wages and pensions, housing shortages, poverty, and non-existent or inadequate public services, particularly public health, education and social security services;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Expresses deep concern about the fate of third country nationals (TCNs) and stateless persons readmitted under EU readmission agreements (EURAs),
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish an EU Coordinator on violence against women,
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to extend the remit of the Fundamental Rights Agency to cover all candidate countries and neighbourhood countries, giving it a specific role in advising EU institutions on how to ensure coherence and consistency between internal and external policies on human rights; calls for the same fundamental rights indicators to be established for all Member States;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the Commission to revise without delay Directive 2006/54/EC and to propose amendments to it in accordance with Article 32 of the Directive and on the basis of Article 157 TFEU following the detailed recommendations set out in the annex to the European Parliament resolution of 24 May 2012; notably - greater transparency of pay data - transparent work evaluation and job classification - strengthened legislation on sanctions
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary legislative and administrative steps to allow the issuance of emergency visas and facilitate the provision of temporary shelter for human rights defenders at risk in third countries; calls for an evaluation of the existing mobility partnerships, particularly the interdependence between development aid, regular migration and irregular migration, as defined in the Global Approach to Migration; expresses concern at the increasingly systematic refusal to grant visas to nationals of certain third countries, in particular the countries of the Maghreb and sub-Saharan Africa; calls for the conditions governing the issuance of visas to be made less stringent, in particular for students and for short-stay visas granted to craft workers and artists;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the urgent need to introduce a common European strategy to combat international organised criminal networks engaged in human trafficking and targeting women and minors in particular;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls the key role of Frontex and CEPOL in training of law enforcement personnel and border guards in order to execute European judicial and law enforcement which respects human rights of migrants;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Invites the Commission and Member states to ensure that a gender-sensitive approach is included in all legal training provided by the European Judicial Training Network, the Academy of European Law and any other relevant institutions to the various stakeholders in the field of judicial and police cooperation; calls for the introduction of specific modules concerning gender-based violence and proper procedures to assist victims;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Str
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Invites the Commission and Member states to ensure that a gender-sensitive and gender mainstreaming approach is included in all legal training provided by the European Judicial Training Network, the Academy of European Law and any other relevant institutions to the various stakeholders in the field of judicial cooperation;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the call of the European Council to reinforce the role of Frontex in accordance with the Stockholm Programme in order to increase its capacity to respond more effectively to changing migration flows;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Proposes that a social awareness- raising campaign be carried out whose common criterion at European level should be to address the serious nature of gender-based violence; considers that the aim of such a campaign should be to foster social awareness, citizen mobilisation and institutional action on the same scale as those associated with the fight against other types of crime or attacks such as terrorism, which have a collective impact as well as their individual dimension; takes the view that this social response has played a significant part in depriving other types of violence of any legitimacy and it should also be deployed against gender-based violence;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for a more joined-up approach between human rights dialogues and justice, liberty and security subcommittees established in the framework of agreements with third countries, notably in the two European Neighbourhood regions and, more generally, all those affected by readmission agreements;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the establishment of a gender focal point in the European Asylum Support Office
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets the continued refusal of the Commission to draft a Human Rights Action Plan to promote EU values in the external dimension of freedom, security and justice policies, as called for by the Council in the Stockholm Programme,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the fact that the principle of universality applies to fundamental rights and equal treatment; urges the Council therefore to adopt the Anti-Discrimination Directive proposal
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the continued efforts of EU institutions and Member States to advance universal support
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Underlines that growing prostitution markets, legalised and institutionalised in some Member States, have proven to fuel trafficking, and therefore calls for measures that decreases prostitution markets, such as placing sanctions on the exploiters, including pimps and sex buyers.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Council and the Commission to take into full consideration the recommendations of the European Parliament and to integrate them in the post-Stockholm follow-up programme or strategy, which should foresee multi-annual planning of the EU's upcoming legislative and policy proposals and actions related to the area of freedom, security and justice;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increasingly fund exit programmes for trafficked persons, in particular for women in prostitution.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Looks forward to the 'EU Anti corruption Report' to be issued by the Commission in 2013; hopes that the identification by the Commission of areas vulnerable to corruption in Member States will help step up anti-corruption efforts, facilitate the exchange of best practices, identify EU trends, and stimulate peer learning and further compliance with EU and international commitments; invites the Commission to consider future EU policy initiatives in the area of anti corruption, in particular binding legislation on Member States and institutions reflecting the highest standards of transparency and integrity, taking due account of the negative impact of corrupt activities on human rights in the EU and in third countries;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's proposal for a regulation on promoting the free movement of citizens and businesses by simplifying the recognition of certain public documents, thus eliminating bureaucracy and the existing gap between EU Institutions and citizens in the EU;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Urges the Member States to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, namely Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland and Sweden; calls on the Council to rapidly adopt the directive on attacks against information systems and repealing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA adopted by the European Parliament on the 4th July 20131 and calls on the Member States to rapidly transpose it into their domestic law; 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0321,
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission, in line with previous commitments and following repeated requests from Parliament, to issue a proposal for a regulation on the mutual recognition of the effects of all civil status documents in the EU, in order to eliminate discriminatory legal and administrative barriers for both men and women citizens and their families who wish to exercise their right to free movement.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. While reaffirming its commitment to and the strategic importance of transatlantic relations in global matters, insists that surveillance programmes, such as PRISM, may result in violations of human rights, namely those of private life and family life, the confidentiality of communications, and may also bear consequences on the fulfilment of other human rights of european and foreign nationals, such as that of freedom of expression; calls on the US authorities to provide the EU, without undue delay, with full information on those surveillance programmes involving data collection, in particular with regard to their legal basis, necessity, proportionality and the safeguards implemented to protect human rights,including mechanisms for redress for violations;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to incorporate the views of all public services and competent authorities at state, regional and local level, since they are responsible for planning and providing services in the field of equality policies;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Insists that the Commission, the Council and the Member Sates should consider all instruments at their disposal and negotiations with the US; calls thus for the potential, timely suspension of the Passenger Name Record (PNR) and Terrorism Finance Tracking Programme (TFTP) agreements, as well as the suspension of the negotiations on the EU- US trade and investment agreement until the US and EU Member States fully account for their illegal surveillance activities targeting the EU citizens and institutions;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission and States to develop specific tools based on new information and communication technologies in order to share best practices in the fight against discrimination at European level;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 e (new) 13e. Expresses deep concern at the increasing trafficking of human beings, using transnational and cyber networks, which represents a serious threat to vulnerable groups, namely women and children, especially in times of economic and social crisis; hence, highlights the importance of a strategic coordination between the objectives and the implementation of the Internal Security Strategy and the European Security Strategy, which might call for the update of both documents; recommends that national anti-slavery plans for Member States be developed and adopted in line with the recommendations of the 2012 EU Strategy Towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings and under the coordination of the EU Anti- trafficking Coordinator;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Reiterates its call for the adoption of a European Code of Private International Law;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the implementation of the European Protection Order Directive(2011/99/EU) and the Directive Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime (2012/29/EU) which largely enhances human rights of victims of crime within the European Union;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to monitor the differentiated impact on women and men on the indirectly affecting gender equality, including in terms of public spending, refers in this context that reduced tax revenues and possible budget cuts lead to reductions in public expenditure, with public services, such as education, training and social care likely to suffer in the medium term, as are women as users of those services,
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Underlines the remaining high threat of terrorism and organised crime; welcomes the strengthening of operational agreements between Europol, Eurojust, and the working arrangements with Frontex to combat terrorism and organised crime;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to recognise regional police forces which have powers to combat crimes against women committed by organised and/or cross-border gangs, and to boost coordination between them and operational security agencies and police forces;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Expresses concern of the increasing global and EU trend of cybercrime, child sex offences and fraud and the enormous financial and psychological damage of citizens worldwide caused by these crimes; welcomes the establishment of the European Cybercrime Centre at Europol to tackle cybercime by means of building operational and analytical capacity for investigations and cooperation with international partners;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Is appalled that the total number of forced labourers in the Member States is estimated at 880 000, of whom 30% are estimated to be victims of sexual exploitation and 70 % victims of forced labour exploitation, with women constituting the majority of forced labour victims;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets the continued refusal of the Commission to draft a Human Rights Action Plan to promote EU values in the external dimension of freedom, security and justice policies, as called for by the Council in the Stockholm Programme
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the fact that the principle of universality applies to fundamental rights and equal treatment; urges the Council therefore to adopt the Anti-Discrimination Directive proposal
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Recalls the importance of the need for special attention, support and social recognition of victims of terrorism, and stresses the urgency for the establishment of a specific legislative instrument for victims of terrorism;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls the Commission to further develop the e-Justice programme to allow citizens a direct access to legal information and justice via online information;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Notes that people trafficking and the illegal importation of human beings are extremely serious crimes which particularly affect women and which represent a violation of human rights and human dignity that the Union cannot tolerate; stresses the need to step up and boost action to prevent and combat people trafficking and the illegal importation of human beings, which entails a coherent and coordinated policy response that goes beyond the area of freedom, security and justice and, bearing in mind the new forms of exploitation, also involves the external relations, development cooperation, social affairs and employment, education and health, gender equality and non-discrimination sectors; stresses that cooperation and coordination with third countries are crucial; points out that the signing of ad hoc cooperation agreements with specific third countries, including the unreserved deployment of all the incentives available to the Union, such as financing programmes, cooperation in gathering and exchanging information, judicial cooperation and migration instruments, could provide a means of improving the fight against people trafficking and the illegal importation of human beings;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Stresses that actions to combat trafficking in human beings, forced labour and irregular immigration need to focus on the root causes, such as global inequalities; calls, therefore, on Member States to live up to their development aid and MDG commitments;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Reiterates its request for the Commission to propose cooperation measures aimed at mobilising consular services in the countries of origin with a view to preventing the fraudulent issue of visas, conducting information campaigns in the countries of origin aimed at potential victims, especially women and children, in cooperation with the authorities there, and measures to make border controls more effective with the aim of preventing people trafficking and irregular immigration;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Calls on the Commission to propose actions to protect and provide assistance to women who are victims of people trafficking and sexual exploitation, through measures including the development of compensation schemes, safe return, reintegration aid in the host country in cases of voluntary return, assistance and aid during their stay in the EU and cooperation with the authorities in the countries of origin in order to protect the families of victims of trafficking and sexual exploitation;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Recalls that around half of the EU’s migrants are women, and that an independent migration status for women and the right to work for spouses are crucial elements in ensuring effective integration;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 g (new) 8g. Highlights the need to protect rights in the field of sexual and reproductive health, and expresses concern at the restrictions that apply in some Member States as regards access to contraceptives and sexual and reproductive health services, particularly abortion;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the fact that the principle of universality applies to fundamental rights and equal treatment; urges the Council therefore to adopt urgently the Anti- Discrimination Directive proposal
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the draft agreement reached by the 47 Council of Europe Member States and the European Union on the EU´s accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, and awaits the positive opinion of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the agreed text; calls on the Parliament and the Council to rapidly ratify the Treaty upon the final ruling of the CJEU.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the various actions supposedly taken to combat terrorism have in fact been used as a pretext for military attacks, occupations, violations of national sovereignty and the destruction of various countries' basic infrastructure, including, in particular, hospitals, schools and homes, resulting in hundreds of thousands of victims and refugees, above all women and children, who are the most vulnerable members of the population;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Strongly believes that the EU and its Member States should not sign agreements with third countries in the field of freedom, security and justice (FSJ), where there is a serious risk of violation of human rights and where the rule of law is not upheld; stresses that any agreement in this field
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Encourages the Commission to work effectively towards the establishment of International Judgements Convention which would pursue similar aims to the Brussels I Regulation;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses concern at the increasing demands being placed on neighbourhood countries in relation to the EU’s migration and border management policies; calls for a human rights-based approach to EU migration and border management which ensures that the rights of regular and irregular migrants and other vulnerable groups are always the first consideration; condemns in the strongest possible terms the practice of sub-contracting EU migration policy to third countries, including countries where migrants are known to be victims of particularly serious human rights violations and cannot seek asylum; recalls the extra- territorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights in the implementation of EU migration policy, as ruled by the European Court of Human Rights;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) a. Calls on Member States to establish complaints procedures that ensure that a victim of multiple discrimination, taking into account that women are particularly affected by such discrimination, can lodge a single complaint addressing more than one ground of discrimination; considers it appropriate to support the activities of human rights defenders and the development of collective actions by marginalised people and communities;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the importance of taking the gender dimension into account in all strategies to integrate people with disabilities, immigrants, the Roma population and other minorities, excluded people, etc.;
source: PE-514.832
2013/09/10
JURI, LIBE, AFCO
312 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Treaty of Lisbon brought important positive elements to the area of freedom, security and justice but deplores certain shortcomings in its implementation; is no longer willing to accept that the Council and the Commission, in many instances, continue to act as if the Treaty of Lisbon had not entered into force; requests the fulfilment of the obligation to inform the Parliament ‘immediately and fully at all stages of the procedure’ leading to the conclusion of international agreements; regrets the unacceptable delays in bringing the acts of the former third pillar in line with the Treaty of Lisbon; calls for a case-by-case assessment of the former third pillar acts with regard to how they impact on fundamental rights, with a view to bringing them in line with the new hierarchy of norms of basic, delegated and implementing acts; and the new institutional order/structure after the coming into force of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, in its communication of 20 April 2010 entitled ‘Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens - Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme’3 , the Commission argued in favour of a more ambitious response to the day-to-day concerns and aspirations of EU citizens, residents and migrants and emphasised that the Union must be able to react to unexpected events and be swift in seizing opportunities and in anticipating and adjusting to future trends;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the Stockholm Programme aims to facilitate the free movement of
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the Stockholm Programme aims to facilitate the free movement of European citizens and further improve security in the Union and thus protect the lives and safety of citizens of the Union and to tackle organised crime, terrorism and other threats by defending and respecting all the rights and obligations deriving from a European area of justice, and that judicial cooperation represents
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Considers it essential for the reform of the EU legal framework on the protection of data to be finalised as swiftly as possible, ensuring full respect for fundamental rights;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Recognises that initiatives in the field of the mutual recognition of legal situations, judgments and documents play a very important role in this respect, as mutual recognition leaves the legal systems of Member States unchanged, but reduces
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Recognises that initiatives in the field of the mutual recognition of legal situations, judgments and documents play a very important role in this respect
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Recalls that the Stockholm Programme contains a number of major initiatives in the field of civil law, including the easier recognition of judgments, the Union-wide validity of wills, easier procedures for the acceptance of public documents, the simpler cross- border enforcement of debts and Union initiatives in the field of legal training;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23 b. Notes that only three pieces of legislation in this field have been adopted so far, namely the Brussels I Recast, the Successions Regulation and the Rome III Regulation, of which only the third is applicable today, and that, whereas the Commission has made a signification number of proposals called for in the Stockholm Programme, several major proposals are still outstanding, including the mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents and the 14th Company Law Directive;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other’s legal institutions; notes that the strengthening of a truly European legal culture that is fully respectful of the principles of subsidiarity
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other's legal institutions;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other's legal institutions; notes that such trust can be built upon the strengthening of a truly European legal culture that is fully respectful of the common principles of
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other’s legal institutions; notes that the strengthening of a truly European legal culture that is fully respectful of the principles of subsidiary and of judicial independence, the
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other's legal institutions; notes that the strengthening of a truly European legal culture that is fully respectful of fundamental rights as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the principles of subsidiary and of judicial independence, the establishment of common standards and an understanding of other legal systems plays a very important role in underpinning mutual recognition and trust; points out that mutual recognition and trust can lead to gradual changes in national civil law traditions through an exchange of best practices between Member States;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Calls on the European Commission to pursue existing plans to make proposals for an all-encompassing approach for the mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents, in order for European citizens and residents and their families to carry throughout the European Union existing rights attached to civil statuses already legally recognised in several European jurisdictions
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Underlines, however, that given national civil law is deeply engrained in historical ethical values and traditions, the drive to exchange best practices and to achieve a certain level of approximation between Member States should not result in an extinction of these long-standing traditions and should continue to honour the myriad of different legal traditions.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Calls on the European Commission to pursue existing plans to make proposals for an all-encompassing approach for the mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents, in order for European citizens and residents and their families to carry throughout the European Union existing rights attached to civil statuses already legally recognised in several European jurisdictions;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Believes that the exchange of best practices should be followed or preceded by an expert diagnostic body that will further provide with a personalized recovery plan instead of referring to only common standards which may or may not be realistic in a given country.
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that legislative initiatives in the field of civil law have so far largely been
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Points out also that the progress made in the field of criminal law has centred on procedural aspects, and calls for a sounder framework to be considered for setting down in EU law what constitutes a serious crime and what a minor crime, as this will be used in criminal proceedings and in combating terrorism;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, but regrets that key proposals on free legal aid and vulnerable suspects are outstanding and that the level of ambition of the Council seems to be decreasing more and more;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges and welcomes the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings,
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings,
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, but regrets that key proposals on legal aid and vulnerable suspects are outstanding and that
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, but regrets that key proposals on legal aid and vulnerable suspects are outstanding and that the level of ambition of the Council seems to be decreasing more and more; Hopes that the institutions embark soon on a revision of the E.A.W. in view of the on-going systematic violation of the proportionality principle by some Member States;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. Regrets that key proposals set out in the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings remain outstanding and recognises the need for proposals on, and the conclusion of, the remaining measures on legal aid and vulnerable suspects; strongly believes that legal aid in particular must be effectively guaranteed to ensure effective implementation of the Directive on the right to access a lawyer;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. Regrets that key proposals set out in the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings are outstanding; recognizes the need for proposals on, as well as the conclusion of, the remaining measures on legal aid and vulnerable suspects; reiterates that without effectively guaranteed legal aid the effective implementation of the Directives, particularly of the Directive on the right of access to a lawyer, cannot be ensured;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the era of large-scale multiannual programmes based on the intergovernmental approach is over, given the importance of ensuring democratic oversight in this field via the ordinary legislative procedure, the array of legal bases provided for by the Treaties in the policy spheres covered by the area of freedom, security and justice, the scope for the Commission to make use of its right to propose legislation and its stated ambition to do so;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. Regrets that key proposals set out in the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings remain outstanding and recognises the need for proposals on, and the conclusion of, the remaining measures on legal aid and vulnerable suspects; strongly believes that legal aid in particular must be effectively guaranteed to ensure effective implementation of the Roadmap Directives, and particularly the Directive on the right to access a lawyer.
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. Recognises that each of the Directives adopted under the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings must be implemented effectively to ensure that they improve standards of criminal justice across the EU, by working with Member States towards full transposition into domestic law and by providing training to government officials, judges, prosecutors and defence practitioners.
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Believes that the Green Paper on Detention Conditions has not given rise to any initiative on the part of the Commission;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26 b. Regrets that further work remains outstanding in relation to pre-trial detention, in relation to which standards in many Member States fall short of human rights and other international standards; recognises the need for an assessment of the effectiveness of non- legislative work on existing Framework Decisions, the widespread recognition of problems with pre-trial detention law and practice across Europe identified as part of the Commission's consultation, and a commitment to revisit the case for establishing minimum and enforceable standards in relation to pre-trial detention through legislative action;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26 b. Underlines that in many Member States standards of pre-trial detention fall short of human rights and other international standards and regrets therefore very much that further work remains outstanding in relation to pre- trial detention; further underlines the need for an assessment of the effectiveness of non- legislative work on existing Framework Decisions and points to the widespread recognition of problems with pre-trial detention law and practice across Europe as identified as part of the Commission's consultation; calls for a commitment to revisit the case for establishing minimum and enforceable standards in relation to pre-trial detention through legislative action.
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26 b. Regrets that further work remains outstanding in relation to pre-trial detention, administrative detention and the detention of minors, in relation to which standards in many Member States fall short of human rights and other international standards; recognises the need for an assessment of the effectiveness of non-legislative work on existing Framework Decisions, the widespread recognition of problems with pre-trial detention law and practice across Europe identified as part of the Commission's consultation, and a commitment to revisit the case for establishing minimum and enforceable standards in relation to pre-trial detention through legislative action; calls on the Commission to revisit the case for establishing minimum and enforceable standards in relation to pre-trial detention, administrative detention and detention of minors through legislative action.
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26 b. Considers that further work remains outstanding in relation to pre-trial detention, in relation to which standards in many Member States fall short of human rights and other international standards; recognises the need for an assessment of the effectiveness of non- legislative work on existing Framework Decisions, the widespread recognition of problems with pre-trial detention law and practice across Europe identified as part of the Commission's consultation, and a commitment to revisit the case for establishing minimum and enforceable standards in relation to pre-trial detention through legislative action.
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Strongly believes that consistency, proportionality, and respect for national sovereignty in principles applied in the development of an EU criminal justice area should be a priority and that the EU institutions should cooperate closely with each other in this respect, as outlined in Parliament's resolution on an EU approach to criminal law9 ;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Strongly believes that consistency in principles applied in the development of an EU criminal justice area should be a priority and that the EU institutions should cooperate closely with each other in this respect, as outlined in Parliament's resolution on an EU approach to criminal law9
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the era of large-scale multiannual programmes based on the intergovernmental approach
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that mutual trust between the Member States must be strengthened and that mutual recognition
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that mutual trust between the Member States must be strengthened and that mutual recognition and harmonisation of EU criminal law cannot progress without serious feed-back on the effective implementation of these rules at Member State level
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that mutual trust between the Member States must be strengthened by harmonizing the respect of fundamental rights in relation to criminal procedures, taking common measures to ensure a good administration of justice and of prisons, which are often at the root of the lack of trust between Member States, and that mutual recognition and harmonisation of EU criminal law cannot progress without serious feed-back on the implementation of these rules at Member State level;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that mutual trust between the Member States must be strengthened and that mutual recognition and harmonisation of EU criminal law cannot progress without serious feed-back on the implementation of these rules at Member State level; welcomes the important steps that have been taken in this extend like the European Arrest Warrant;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Recognises that each of the Directives adopted under the roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings must be implemented effectively to ensure that they improve standards of criminal justice across the EU, by working with Member States towards full transposition into domestic law and by providing training to government officials, judges, prosecutors and defence practitioners;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Believes that the evaluation of the implementation of the Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law provides the opportunity to initiate and adopt further European-legislation on all forms of hate crimes1. __________________ 1 This is a clear reference to the 2009 EP report on Stockholm
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Underlines that implementation of Directives already adopted, progress on any unfinished measures, and the consideration of suspects' rights protections beyond those included in the Stockholm Programme, will all require action beyond the time period allotted for that programme, and therefore have to remain high on the agenda for the next legislative period; reiterates that this is an on-going process that can only be the start of a more effective protection of the rights of suspects and defendants in the EU;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Recognises that implementation of the Roadmap Directives already adopted, progress on any unfinished measures, and the consideration of suspects' rights protections beyond those included in the Stockholm Programme, will all require action beyond the time period allotted for that Programme, and must therefore remain high on the agenda for the next legislative period.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Believes that the evaluation of the implementation of the Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law provides the opportunity to adopt further European legislation to combat all forms of hate crimes;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Believes that greater efforts are needed in order to implement the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions concerning the enforcement of judgments in criminal cases;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Believes that the role of Eurojust should be reinforced in all areas relating to improved judicial coordination and circulation of information among the Member States;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Believes that an effective justice system is important for the confidence and well-being of citizens as well as a powerful driver for a prosperous economy;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Believes that an effective
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Believes that an effective
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point a (new) (a) 29a. Welcomes the proposal presented by the European Commission on 17 July 2013 for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office. Firmly believes that the European Public Prosecutor is a key factor in the development of the EU judicial area. Calls on the Council to make use of Article 86.4 of the TFEU and extend the powers of the European Public Prosecutor to include serious crime having a cross-border dimension;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the Member States and the Commission in the context of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) and the EU policy cycle on organised and serious international crime; points out, however, that further progress needs to be made, for instance in the fields of cybercrime, protection of critical infrastructure
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the Member States and the Commission in the context of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) and the EU policy cycle on organised and serious international crime; points out, however, that further progress needs to be made, for instance in the fields of cybercrime, the timely and efficient sharing of information, the protection of critical infrastructure and the
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the Member States and the Commission in the context of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) and the EU policy cycle on organised and serious international crime; points out, however, that further progress needs to be made, for instance in the fields of combating transnational organised crime, cybercrime, protection of critical infrastructure and the fights against corruption, money laundering, terrorist funding and the trade in illegal firearms;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the Member States and the Commission in the context of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) and the EU policy cycle on organised and serious international crime; points out, however, that further progress needs to be made, for instance in the fields of cybercrime, cyber- facilitated crime such as child pornography, protection of critical infrastructure and the fight
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Regrets that the 2010-2013 EU Action Plan on Strengthening CBRN security was not fully implemented or taken into national policy making by the Member States; calls thus on the EU and Members States to strengthen regional and European-level cooperation and coordination in the CBRN field and, in this regards, also calls the Council to ensure coordination between national authorities and the Counter-terrorism Coordinator;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Urges the Commission to intensify and reinforce its efforts to protect the financial interests of the Union and to complete delayed reform of the European Anti-Fraud Office fully integrating data protection and suspects rights and basing itself on proper criminal definitions;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Regrets the stark security orientation of the ISS at the expense of civil liberties, fundamental rights and adoption of preventive measures; Deplores the gap between words and deeds, between declaratory goals in terms of values and principles on the one hand and the actual implementation of policies on the other, especially as regards the increased wide collection of personal data for undefined security purposes which result in the clear violation of the right to privacy and data protection;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Encourages thought to be given to the possibility of withdrawing 500-euro notes so as to combat money laundering and criminal networks more effectively;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30 b. Strongly believes that the EU's counterterrorism policy needs to address the radicalisation of groups/persons in European societies and the apparent trend towards the individualisation of terrorist activities in our societies, calls for better coordination of all EU services with responsibilities in the implementation of the EU's counterterrorism policies, namely the EU Counter-terrorism Coordinator, Europol, the COSI and the COTER and Eurojust;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30 b. Finds it regrettable that the Commission's second communication on the implementation of the ISS, of 10 April 2013, expresses scant criticism of activities carried out under the ISS, reasserting the same priorities as its initial communication of November 2010 and failing, in particular, to take account of the consequences of the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, most of the provisions of which apply not only to EU citizens but to everyone on EU territory;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30 b. Regrets that the second Commission Communication of 10 April 2013 on the implementation of the ISS of the European Union is not critical enough of the actions carried out under the ISS and simply reasserts the same priorities it had presented in its initial Communication of November 2010 without taking into account the impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights which is applicable to all persons in the EU;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 c (new) 30 c. Expresses deep concern at the increasing trafficking of human beings, using transnational and cyber networks, which represents a serious threat to vulnerable groups, namely women and children, especially in times of economic and social crisis and which is heightened by the trans-national nature of such criminal activities; hence, highlights the importance of a strategic coordination between the objectives and the implementation of the Internal Security Strategy and the European Security Strategy, which might call for the update of both documents; recommends that national anti-slavery plans for Member States be developed and adopted, in line with the recommendations of the 2012 EU Strategy Towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings and under the coordination of the EU Anti- trafficking Coordinator;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the Commission, therefore, to assume its role in framing policies and setting legislative priorities and to make use of its right to propose legislation whenever necessary in order to guarantee a holistic and coherent approach to the Area of Freedom, Justice and Security; states, at the same time, its opposition to any return to the intergovernmental approach which characterised the era prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Recalls that Parliament is now a fully- fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies, and is therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments, including through
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Recalls that Parliament is now a fully- fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies, and is therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments, including
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Recalls that Parliament is now a fully- fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies, and is therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments, including through regular monitoring exercises on the implementation of the ISS, to be conducted jointly by the European Parliament, national parliaments and the Council under Articles 70 and 71 TFEU; Believes that the European Parliament ought to play a crucial role in the evaluation and definition of internal security policies as these have a profound impact on the fundamental rights of all those living in the EU; Emphasises, therefore, the need to ensure these policies fall under the remit of the only directly elected European institution for scrutiny and democratic oversight;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that a proper evaluation of the implementation, effects and concrete results of the policies and legislation in the internal security field, as well as the analysis of the security threats to be addressed
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that a proper analysis and a democratic debate of the security threats at EU level to be addressed is an essential prerequisite for an effective ISS;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that a proper analysis of the security threats to be addressed is an essential prerequisite for an effective ISS; notes the usefulness of Europol's analyses in this connection;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that a
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Points out that the current ISS will come to an end in 2014; calls on the Commission to start preparing a new ISS for the period 2015-2019 which takes account of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into Union law; calls on the Council to take Parliament’s input, and Europol's risk analyses, for the new ISS properly into account before adopting the new strategy;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Urges a comprehensive agreement on the Data protection package which ensures a uniform and high level of protection for data subjects and a level playing field for business; insists that this is a precondition for free trade and police and judicial cooperation;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore underlines the importance of European law enforcement information exchange; believes that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools is complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available and to inadequate democratic oversight at EU level and insufficient accountability to citizens and migrants; calls for a future- oriented vision on how to shape and optimise law enforcement data sharing in the EU while guaranteeing a robust level of data protection, using collection methods respecting the right to privacy, dignity, and non-discrimination, and adhering to and respecting the fundamental rights of those under suspicion; calls on the Commission quickly to bring forward proposals to bring cross-border police cooperation instruments adopted under the former third pillar – such as the Prüm Decision and the Swedish Initiative – under the legal framework of the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34.
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore underlines the importance of European law enforcement information exchange, cooperation and a sufficient funding of its agencies; believes that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools is complicated and scattered
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore underlines the importance of European law enforcement information exchange; believes that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools is complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore underlines the importance of European law enforcement information exchange; believes that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools is complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available and to inadequate democratic oversight at EU level; calls for a future-oriented vision on how to shape and optimise law enforcement data sharing in the EU while
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Welcomes the European Council's initiative to have COSI recurrently informed, however, considers crucial the formation of a communication channel easily accessible and secure to EU citizens that will facilitate unveiling cases of human trafficking and child slavery.
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Rejects the notion of predictive policing without an initial suspicion, in particular the EU PNR proposal and the idea of an EU Terrorist Finance Tracking System; calls on the Commission to repeal the Data Retention Directive;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Congratulates the Commission on its proposal on the confiscation of criminal assets, and trusts that this reform measure will be adopted promptly; points out that confiscating criminal assets is one of the most effective ways of combatting criminal organisations;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34 b. Calls on the Commission to encourage member states to set up aid centres in notorious areas of prostitution in order to provide victims with psychological and physical immediate recovery.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Thinks that being able to propose a few pieces of legislation every year should be a mid-term goal for the European Parliament.
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34b. Regrets the delay in the negotiations on introducing a European passenger name record (PNR) system;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Welcomes the Commission's proposal for the new Europol Regulation and hopes for a quick advancement of this important legislative dossier so that Europol
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Welcomes the
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36.
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 – subparagraph 1 (new) Reaffirms its commitment to seeking accountability at EU and national levels for European complicity in human rights violations committed in the context of the CIA extraordinary rendition and secret detention programmes; calls on the Members States to fully implement the recommendations of the European Parliament's report adopted in September 2012;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36 a. Regrets that no follow-up has taken place to the evaluation of Directive 2006/24/EC; calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal abolishing the data retention framework as soon as possible;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Finds the lack of progress on combatting terrorism most regrettable; notes in particular that much remains to be done on preventing terrorism and on tracking and preventing terrorist financing; calls for policies to be developed to prevent the radicalisation of young people, in particular, and to detect its early signs;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 b (new) 36b. Notes that trafficking in the EU, both of drugs and of people, is continuing to expand and that the relevant European policies need to be strengthened;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Treaty of Lisbon
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the greater role played by national parliaments in the activities of the European Union, as enshrined in Protocols No 1 (on the role of the national parliaments in the European Union) and No 2 (on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality) annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, has had a positive impact on the development and functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice in particular, not only because the subsidiarity principle is now more likely to be complied with, but also because the broader and closer involvement of the peoples of Europe in the democratic process has made a significant contribution to lawmaking and European policy-making; takes the view that the involvement of national parliaments should be further stepped up, including cooperation between national parliaments working to the same timetable; considers that the involvement of national parliaments is essential with regard to security and that the policy cycle pursued by the Council, the Member States and European agencies, without any parliamentary oversight, should be subject to a parliamentary cycle;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 c (new) 36c. Regrets that the EU does not yet have the proper resources to prevent natural or man-made disasters and respond to them;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 d (new) 36d. Calls for the resources allocated for joint investigation teams to be expanded without excessive red tape;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 e (new) 36e. Calls for policies to protect children against all forms of violence, including in the digital environment, to be strengthened;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Welcomes the conclusion of the negotiations on the Schengen Governance Package; calls on the Commission fully to play its roles as coordinator of the
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37.
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Welcomes the conclusion of the negotiations on the Schengen Governance Package; calls on the Commission fully to play its roles as coordinator of the
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Welcomes the conclusion of the negotiations on the Schengen Governance Package; calls on the Commission fully to play its role
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Considers the absence of controls at internal borders as one of the major achievements of European integration;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Considers the absence of controls at internal borders as one of the major achievements of European integration;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Considers the absence of controls at internal borders as one of the major achievements of European integration;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the greater role played by national parliaments in the activities of the European Union, as enshrined in Protocols No 1 (on the role of the national parliaments in the European Union) and No 2 (on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality) annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, has had a positive impact on the development and functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice in particular, not only because the subsidiarity principle is now more likely to be complied with, but also because the broader and closer involvement of the peoples of Europe in the democratic process has made a significant contribution to law-making and European policy-making; believes that subsidiarity should also be applied with those regional governments who have legal powers on this field.
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary; believes, given the great pressure being exerted on them and their strategic importance for the implementation of all other EU policies, that the Schengen external borders should
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary; believes that the Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded by European border guards, trained in human rights standards of protection and supported by legal officers, human rights personnel, interpreters and medical workers;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary; believes that the Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary; believes that the Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded by European border guards, trained in human rights standards of protection;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary, with a view to strengthening external border controls; believes that the Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded by European border guards;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. calls for a strengthened cooperation and dialogue between national parliaments and the European Parliament, as well as between EU institutions and bodies in general and national parliaments, so to ensure that information on EU initiatives is made available directly and promptly by EU institutions and bodies to national parliaments as much as possible, for instance by taking part in national parliaments plenary and committee hearings;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Welcomes the reform of the mandate of FRONTEX and the agreement on Eurosur; considers that the new rules for the surveillance of sea borders need to be agreed on as soon as possible,
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40.
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Welcomes the reform of the mandate of FRONTEX and the agreement on Eurosur; considers that the new rules for the surveillance of sea borders need to be agreed on as soon as possible, that priority should be given to saving the lives of migrants and that the principle of non- refoulement is to be fully respected; considers that the saving of lives starts already in the third country and that cooperation with third countries should be improved;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Welcomes, in this regard, the reform of the mandate of FRONTEX
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40 a. Condemns the weak response of the EU and its Member States with regards to the number of dead persons, particularly at sea, and to the increasing violations of human rights when irregular migrants try to enter the EU; calls on the Commission to consult it before signing any agreement between Frontex and third countries; insists that such agreements should provide a high level of protection to ensure that the standards of human rights are fully respected, especially with regard to returns and the organisation of joint operations, search and rescue or interception operations; recalls the various reports of international organisations (notably the Council of Europe and the UN), of the Fundamental Rights Agency and the European Ombudsman concerning the impact of the management of external borders of the EU to migrants' rights and the respect for human rights by Frontex and calls on the European institutions and Member States to take the necessary measures without delay to put an end to these violations;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40a. Calls on the Commission to provide information on the situation at detention centres and respect for human rights there, and to bring forward initiatives regarding their operation in the future;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Welcomes the successful migration to the Schengen Information System II, the continued roll-out of the Visa Information System and the setting-up of the agency eu-LISA for their operational management; underlines that these new systems now need to stand the test of everyday use;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 Uniform electoral law for the European Parliament elections
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41a. Calls for the security of source documents to be enhanced in order to improve the reliability of identity documents in the European Union;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 b (new) 41b. Stresses the importance of using all means at our disposal, including the available new technologies, to strengthen external border controls;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 c (new) 41c. Highlights the importance of tackling trafficking and smuggling at borders, including combatting the trafficking of migrants;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42.
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Calls for a much better implementation of the visa acquis
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 a (new) 42 a. Calls European institutions and Member States to increase the mobility of workers by allowing for temporary visas and by facilitating the re-application process of those already in the system; this would effectively increase worker mobility by guaranteeing legal certainty and increasing EU internal mobility;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 a (new) 42 a. Calls on the Commission to further improve existing visa facilitation agreements between the European Union and its eastern neighbours along with work towards a visa-free travel area enabling people-to-people contacts;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 10 a (new) Calls Member States and the European commission to address trafficking in human beings in a comprehensive manner which links criminal behaviour and crime to the area of prevention and protection of victims; calls in this regard more agencies to be involved such as EASO, EIGE and the FRA;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 10 b (new) Calls Member States to properly implement the Directive of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims as well as comply with relevant international instruments such as the 1949 UN Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 10 c (new) Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increasingly fund exit programmes for trafficked persons, in particular for women in prostitution;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 10 d (new) Calls the Commission to ensure the position of Anti-Trafficking Coordinator becomes a permanent position to ensure the implementation of the Directive of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims as well as a comprehensive and coherent approach at the EU level;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Recalls that in the Stockholm Programme the European Council had underlined ‘that well-managed migration can be beneficial to all stakeholders’; regrets the limited progress made in the adoption of legislation in the field of legal migration, and calls for greater efforts in the future in view of the demographic challenges and the needs of the economy; believes that assessment of the social impact of immigration and of the substantial influx of non-EU nationals crossing external borders and, at the same time,
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Recalls that in the Stockholm Programme the European Council had
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Recalls that in the Stockholm Programme the European Council had underlined ‘that well-managed migration can be beneficial to all stakeholders’;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Recalls that in the Stockholm Programme the European Council had underlined
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 a (new) 43 a. Urgently calls for greater transparency, requiring each Member State to report annually on the progress of each specific minority group in matters of labour market integration and equality policy impacts; encourages the European Commission to deliver an "annual trend report" reflecting the comparable indicators on social cohesion that have been agreed upon and put forth as targets, including an EU-wide monitoring of the situation of newcomers, long-term residents, naturalised migrants, the children of migrants and broken down by equality grounds (i.e. ethnic/racial, religion/belief, gender, age, sexual orientation and disability), so as to measure progress in social inclusion policies over time. The Open Method of Coordination should be applied to this end;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 a (new) 43 a. Acknowledges that the recent changes and turmoil in Northern Africa and the Middle East have intensified the pressure in the EU's Eastern and Southern borders;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 b (new) 43 b. Calls for the introduction of a coherent, voluntary permanent intra-EU relocation scheme for beneficiaries of international protection;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the adoption of the asylum package even if the completion of the CEAS is still to be seen; calls on the Commission to monitor the correct, comprehensive and full implementation of the package by the Member States as from the date of application, as well as the respect of relevant case-law;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, even in the absence of an agreement on a uniform electoral procedure, electoral systems are gradually becoming more similar, in particular as a
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the adoption of the asylum package; calls on the Commission to monitor the correct implementation of the package by the Member States as from the date of application
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the adoption of the asylum package, in particular the improvements concerning unaccompanied minors; calls on the Commission to monitor the correct implementation of the package by the Member States as from the date of application;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the adoption of the asylum package; calls on the Commission to monitor the correct and comprehensive implementation of the package by
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the adoption of the asylum package stressing however that it falls short of the standards ensuring a high level of protection; calls on the Commission to monitor the correct implementation of the package by the Member States as from the
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 – point a (new) (a) Recalls that international law, the acquis, and in particular the case-law of the ECtHR should be observed by the Union and its Member States in interventions in the high seas or when issuing rules on the surveillance of the external borders;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 – subparagraph 1 (new) Regrets the continuing and systematic practice of detaining migrants in detention centres as recently underlined by the UN Human Rights Council; calls for alternatives to detention to be further developed and implemented, including regularisation of undocumented migrants based on clear criteria;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44 a. Believes that, in the context of the Dublin system, the possibility to suspend transfers to Member States under significant pressure should in the future be considered;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality; believes that accentuated and more concrete measures will be necessary in the future; believes that the Commission should examine the feasibility of setting up truly European asylum centres near the external borders of the European Union in order to deal with the first examination of asylum applications, and a system of fair sharing of responsibility for more complicated asylum applications that cannot be dealt with in the European asylum centres.
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality; believes that accentuated and more concrete measures
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, even in the absence of an agreement on a uniform electoral procedure for the European Parliament elections, electoral systems are gradually becoming more similar, in particular as a result of the establishment of political parties at European Union level4 , the work on drawing up a European statute based on the Commission proposal for a reform of the rules governing European political parties5 and the ban on holding a dual mandate6 , which has made the office of Member of the European Parliament incompatible with that of Member of a national parliament; encourages more transparent procedures for the nomination of candidates that guarantee their independence and the possibility to introduce direct constituencies;
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality, as this harms the Member States more exposed to strong migration pressure; believes that accentuated and more concrete measures will be necessary in the future, following an approach making for the utmost cooperation within the EU;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality; believes that the necessary support must be provided to those Member States receiving higher numbers of migrants and asylum applications and also believes that accentuated and more concrete measures will be necessary in the future;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality; believes that accentuated and more concrete measures will be necessary in the future, including the use of Article 80 as a legal basis in relevant legislative texts and the establishment of a permanent relocation system for beneficiaries of international protection within the EU, which could also serve as a basis for future initiatives aiming at relocating asylum seekers;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Deeply deplores the failure to make the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as laid down in Article 80 TFEU, a reality;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Believes that the external dimension of asylum should be expanded
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Believes that the external dimension of asylum
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Believes that the external dimension of asylum should be expanded, especially in relation to resettlement and to the issue of solidarity with third countries that take in refugees who are fleeing civil conflict, as well as to refugees taken in by third countries located in proximity to countries experiencing civil conflict;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Believes that
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 – subparagraph 1 (new) points out that return policies are an integral part of the policies for tackling illegal immigration; stresses that mutual cooperation and recognition of return decisions must be strengthened;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46 a. Recalls the Commission's commitment to facilitate the orderly arrival in the EU of persons in need of protection and calls on it to explore new approaches to access to asylum procedures inter alia through the adoption of the 'Communication on new approaches concerning access to asylum procedures targeting main transit countries' scheduled for 2013; Calls moreover on the Commission to submit a communication on a framework for the transfer of protection of beneficiaries of international protection and mutual recognition of asylum decisions by 2014, in line with the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46 a. Calls European institutions and Member States to evaluate the transposition of the EU Blue Card Directive and follow this up with European Commission Guidelines; urgently calls for the European Commission to initiate infringement proceedings in a timely manner should a Member State not comply with the requirements of the Directives;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46 a. Calls European institutions and Member State governments to raise attention among the wider public and employers about the EU Immigration Portal, which provides EU and national guidelines, procedural steps and lists the required documentation third country nationals need for working in the EU; governments need to elaborate on this online information by providing relevant information for third country nationals already residing in the EU to work either in the country of EU residence or in another EU country, including relevant information about pension schemes, unemployment benefits, workers' rights and job postings; and made available in multiple languages;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46 a. Points out the importance of the effective implementation of readmission agreements with third countries; reiterates that when a third country does not effectively cooperate, return may become in practice impossible;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46a. External dimension of freedom, security and justice
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 b (new) 46 b. Calls European institutions and Member State governments to raise attention among the wider public and employers about the EU Immigration Portal, which provides EU and national guidelines, procedural steps and lists the required documentation third country nationals need for working in the EU; governments need to elaborate on this online information by providing relevant information for third country nationals already residing in the EU to work either in the country of EU residence or in another EU country, including relevant information about pension schemes, unemployment benefits, workers' rights and job postings; and made available in multiple languages;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 b (new) 46b. Notes the importance of a strengthened external dimension for European policies in the area of freedom, security and justice;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 c (new) 46c. Calls for cooperation with third countries to be strengthened at all levels in the areas of security, migration, fundamental rights and border management;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 d (new) 46d. Notes the need to examine and address the role of transit countries;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 e (new) 46e. Stresses the need to encourage voluntary return policies;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 f (new) 46f. Points out that the European Union and the Member States should continue to integrate immigration into development cooperation and strengthen their partnership agreements with a view to promoting cooperation with third countries of origin and transit on tackling people trafficking and irregular immigration, the restoration of family ties, return and readmission, in the context of the regular dialogue which the European Union conducts with these countries and the action carried out by the European External Action Service (EEAS);
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes the view that the public should be made more aware of Parliament's democratic role and that European election campaigns should focus on
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Profoundly deplores the low quality of the policy-making process; observes that the definition of problems, the discussion of possible solutions and the choice between possible options usually does not follow a sequential order, as would be
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 a (new) 47 a. Believes that through closer coordination and cooperation between the Commission, Member States and the EU Agencies such as Europol, Frontex, EASO, ENISA, EMCDDA and eu-LISA, the implementation of new legislation and the benefits from these Agencies for Member States can be improved;
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 b (new) 47 b. underlines the necessity to strengthen mechanisms and tools to ensure equal implementation and to avoid abuse within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice; stresses the importance of information sharing on both national and EU level and when necessary the possibility to use suspension clauses in EU legislation;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48.
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Proposes a systematic, objective and independent ex-post tracking and evaluation of
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Proposes a systematic and independent ex-post evaluation of new legislation that should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area; Recalls the commitment made by Parliament and Council in the 2005 Interinstitutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment to carry out impact assessments, when they consider this to be appropriate and necessary for the legislative process, prior to the adoption of any substantive amendment, and calls on the committees to make use of the Impact Assessment Unit in implementing this commitment;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Proposes a systematic and independent ex-post evaluation of new legislation that should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area; suggests that investments in information infrastructure related to the Stockholm program shall procure and tender only free and open source software solutions as to avoid creating markets for security vulnerabilities in proprietary programs
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49 a. Stresses the continued need for the Union to provide practical support and best practices to Member States, so they can effectively ensure the correct application of existing EU migration as well as anti-discrimination legislation; draws attention to some existing efforts made by the Commission to help Member States ensure that existing legislation is properly applied to tackle discrimination (notably, the preparation of a Council Recommendation on practical measures to help Member States integrate the Roma in the wider community, which has been adopted by the Commission in June 2013; tools such as the LIME Assessment Framework to assess the economic impact of migration and integration policies, as this has the potential to put migration and integration firmly on national and EU agendas by demonstrating the importance of sound migration policies and the need for comprehensive efforts to increase labour market and educational outcomes for migrants);
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49 a. Stresses the continued need for the Union to provide practical support and best practices to Member States, so they can effectively ensure the correct application of existing EU migration as well as anti-discrimination legislation; draws attention to some existing efforts made by the Commission to help Member States ensure that existing legislation is properly applied to tackle discrimination, notably the preparation of a Council Recommendation on practical measures to help Member States integrate the Roma in the wider community, which has been adopted by the Commission in June 2013 and tools such as the LIME Assessment Framework to assess the economic impact of migration and integration policies, as this has the potential to put migration and integration firmly on national and EU agendas by demonstrating the importance of sound migration policies and the need for comprehensive efforts to increase labour market and educational outcomes for migrants;
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49a. Regrets that impact assessments have not always been adequate and have not always made it possible to assess objectively the costs of new measures; stresses the importance of avoiding any excessive bureaucracy;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the courts; calls for the justice scoreboard exercise to assess all justice areas
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the courts; calls for the justice scoreboard exercise to assess all justice areas, including criminal justice and all horizontal issues
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the courts;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the courts; calls for the justice scoreboard exercise to assess all justice areas, including criminal justice and all horizontal issues; proposes that the Scoreboard be updated to also prioritise the monitoring of discrimination against ethnic minorities, migrants, and other disadvantaged groups; proposes that data regarding the state of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights, and the fulfilment of European values (Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)) in all Member States be included as well;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50 a. Stresses that high-quality justice systems can play a key role in restoring confidence, bringing about a return to growth, and contributing to trust and stability; points out that predictable, timely and enforceable justice decisions are important structural components of an attractive business environment, as outlined in the European Commission communication "The EU Justice scoreboard, a tool to promote effective justice and growth"1. __________________ 1 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2013) 160 final;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Requests the Commission to put more emphasis on overseeing and ensuring the concrete implementation of EU legislation by the Member States; notes that, when the rights of citizens, residents and migrants are concerned, this needs to be done as of the first day an act enters into force; considers that more needs to be done in this area, and that the reasons for any failure to implement EU legislation should be identified;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Treaty of Lisbon brought important positive elements to the area of freedom, security and justice but
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Requests the Commission to put more emphasis on overseeing and ensuring the concrete implementation of EU legislation by the Member States; notes that, when the
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51.
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Requests the Commission to
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Requests the Commission to put more emphasis on overseeing and ensuring the concrete implementation of EU legislation by the Member States;
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Is of the opinion that improving the quality of EU legislation in the area of freedom, security and justice requires a joint effort by the Member States and the European institutions in order to improve the exchange of information on each national system and to provide accurate legal information (on national/regional applicable legislation and standards) while ensuring the protection of fundamental rights as well as information on implementation and practises;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Is of the opinion that improving the quality of EU legislation in the area of freedom, security and justice requires a joint effort by the Member States and the European institutions in order to improve the exchange of information on each national system and to provide accurate legal information (on national/regional applicable legislation and standards) while ensuring the protection of fundamental rights as well as information on implementation and practises;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Is of the opinion that improving the quality of EU legislation in the area of freedom, security and justice requires a joint effort by the Member States and the European institutions in order to improve the exchange of information on each national system and to provide accurate legal information (on national/regional applicable legislation and standards) as well as information on implementation and practises; calls for better interinstitutional coordination;
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53.
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Considers that the development of
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Considers that the development of a European judicial culture is a key prerequisite for making the area of freedom, security and justice a reality for citizens; calls, with this in mind, for much greater emphasis on, and funding for, EU judicial training for all legal professionals; notes the importance of using a ‘bottom-up approach’ for judicial training schemes, of ensuring the greater accessibility of European law information resources via web technology (i.e. an e-justice portal), of
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that a reform of the electoral procedure will be required in the future in order to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of Parliament by strengthening the democratic dimension of Europe
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Considers that the development of a European judicial and police culture is a key prerequisite for making the area of freedom, security and justice a reality for citizens; calls, with this in mind, for much greater emphasis on, and funding for, EU
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Is of the opinion that guidance, coherence and benchmarks for the area of freedom, security and justice are necessary, to truly safeguard the rights of the citizens, and should be ensured in accordance with Article 17(1) TEU; proposes that the multiannual programming be agreed by the three institutions in accordance with this provision of the TEU; looks to the Commission to take appropriate steps to bring this about and to submit a proposal on that basis;
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 56 56. Demands that any future programming be prepared in the spirit of the Treaty of Lisbon in a joint exercise of Parliament, the Council and the Commission; believes it is necessary to focus on the implementation and consolidation of existing instruments and that a future programme should therefore be short and balanced; takes note of the European Council conclusions of 27/28 June this year according to which the European Council ‘will hold a discussion at its June 2014 meeting to define strategic guidelines for legislative and operational planning in the area of freedom, security and justice (pursuant to Article 68 TFEU)’, considers the envisaged timing as inappropriate;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that a reform of the electoral procedure must be European, autonomous, homogeneous and will be required in the future in order to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of Parliament by strengthening the democratic dimension of Europe and dividing up the seats in Parliament more proportionally among the Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Treaties; considers that a reform of this kind will encourage EU citizens to take part in European elections in their Member State
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that a reform of the electoral procedure will be required in the future in order to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of Parliament by strengthening the democratic dimension of Europe
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that a reform of the electoral procedure will be required
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view, therefore, that a reform of the electoral procedure will be required in the future in order to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of Parliament by strengthening the democratic dimension of Europe and dividing up the seats in Parliament more proportionally among the Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Treaties, in order to guarantee a better representation of small parties and small Member States; considers that a reform of this kind will encourage EU citizens to take part in European elections in their Member State of residence if they are not nationals of that State;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Deplores that in some Member States the electoral law for the European elections is based on a single and blocked national list. Reminds that this creates a big gap between elected representatives and citizens that reinforce political disaffection against the EU.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10 b. Calls all Member States with populations bigger than 20 M to ensure that their electoral law for the European elections includes regional circumscriptions in order to minimize distortions.
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes, nevertheless, as a first step, the adoption of Council Directive 2013/1/EU of 20 December 2012 amending Directive 93/109/EC as regards certain detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals7
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Considers that when fundamental and European citizenship rights are at stake the EU mission should be to promote the highest level of protection (as outlined by the art. 53 of the EU Charter and in the ECHR jurisprudence).
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes, nevertheless, as a first step, the adoption of Council Directive 2013/1/EU of 20 December 2012 amending Directive 93/109/EC as regards certain detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals7 , in that it relaxes the requirements which EU citizens resident in a Member State of which they are not nationals must meet if they wish to stand as candidates in European elections; Reiterates that further steps need to be taken in order to guarantee every European citizen the right to vote regardless of their actual residence;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Underlines that the only way to bring citizens closer to the EU is to proceed to a reform of the Treaties so to strengthen its democratic and institutional structure on the federal model and to enhance the participation of citizens to the decision-making process;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that th
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that the citizens' initiative can play a key role in identifying matters which should be dealt with at EU level and enhances the legitimacy of the policies' procedure at EU level;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that the citizens' initiative can play a key role in identifying matters which should be dealt with at EU level; Calls on the European Commission to adopt an open and inclusive approach with regards to European citizens' initiatives to ensure that, when criteria are indeed met, these initiatives lead to subsequent legislative proposals and thereby truly include the people living in the EU in the law-making process;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Deplores, however, the technical problems encountered by the organisers of citizens' initiatives
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to work more closely with the Member States in order to make the European Citizens initiative more effective and accessible to all people; Calls on the Commission to make a first assessment report of the ECIs; Deplores, however, the technical problems encountered by the organisers of citizens' initiatives and calls on the Commission to resolve the problems in question without undue delay;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. (new paragraph) Points out that the effective application of the Citizens' Initiative is hampered not only by technical problems, but also by financial problems due to a lack of budgetary resources.
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the use of the ordinary legislative procedure
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Is of the view that, in general terms, the implementation of the Stockholm Programme does not live up to its ambition to promote citizens' rights as well as the rights of other persons for whom the Union has a responsibility;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Is of the view that, in general terms, the
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Strongly encourages the European Union to seek to make less legislation of a higher quality, aiming to delivering clarity, protection, and trust in European law;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls urgently for measures to address the so-called Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the use of the ordinary legislative procedure has brought lawmaking closer to the people and has given the European Parliament, the only
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls urgently for measures to address the so-called Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States; announces its intention to set up a Copenhagen Commission within the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs; urges the Commission to adopt a country by country approach to monitoring and reporting the situation of fundamental rights within EU member states; calls on the Commission to expand its initiative to create a Justice Scoreboard, to include apart from justice, the rule of law.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls urgently for measures to address the so-called Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States; announces its intention to set up a Copenhagen Commission within the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs; believes that the current situation undermines the political goals behind the accession process.
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls urgently for measures to address the so-called Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Believes that the current situation, in which Member States can infringe, or permit the infringement, of European Values and conditions for accession as, for example, judiciary independence or equality between citizens, without political consequences is unacceptable and should not continue.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Reiterates the calls it made, in its resolution of 12 December 2012 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2010- 2011), for the establishment of a new mechanism to ensure compliance by all Member States with the common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and the continuity of the 'Copenhagen criteria'; this mechanism could assume the form of a 'Copenhagen Commission' or high-level group, a 'group of wise men' or an Article 70 TFEU evaluation, and build up on the reforming and strengthening of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, and on the framework of a strengthened Commission-Council-European Parliament-Member States dialogue on measures to be taken;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16 b. Reiterates that the setting up of such a mechanism could involve a rethinking of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, which should be enhanced to include regular monitoring of Member States' compliance with Article 2 TEU; recommends that such a 'Copenhagen high-level group' or any such mechanism should build on and cooperate with existing mechanisms and structures; recalls the role of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, which could bring together the highly valuable work of the various existing Council of Europe monitoring bodies and the Agency's own data and analysis in order to carry out independent, comparative and regular assessments of the EU Member States' compliance with Article 2 TEU.
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16 c. Reiterates its call for the Commission to create – as soon as risks of violations of Article 2 TEU are identified – an ' Article 2 TEU/ Alarm Agenda' , i.e. a Union values monitoring mechanism, to be dealt with by the Commission with exclusive priority and urgency, coordinated at the highest political level and taken fully into account in the various EU sectoral policies, until full compliance with Article 2 TEU is restored and any risks of violation thereof are defused, as also envisaged in the letter of the Foreign Affairs Ministers of four Member States raising with the President of the Commission the need to develop a new and more effective method of safeguarding fundamental values in order to place greater emphasis on promoting a culture of respect for the rule of law, taken into account by the Council conclusions on fundamental rights and rule of law and on the Commission 2012 Report on the Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 6 and 7 June 2013;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Fears that the economic crisis may develop into a crisis of democracy and believes that strong political leadership
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Fears that the economic crisis may develop into a crisis of democracy and believes that strong political leadership is necessary to defend democratic achievements and combat the rise of populism in Europe;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the use of the ordinary legislative procedure has brought law-making closer to the people and has given the European Parliament, the only democratically elected Union institution, a greater degree of influence, underlines that this procedure should be further expanded in the future Treaty revisions and that stronger transparency in the decision-making process should be brought, notably in relation to first reading agreements and trilogues, so to ensure that the right of access to documents and to information is guaranteed as foreseen by the Treaties;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Fears that the economic crisis may develop into a crisis of democracy and believes that strong political leadership is necessary to defend democratic achievements; is concerned by the attitudes of some Member States which manifested openly intolerance to the mobility of EU workers, targeted to undermine the rights of workers from some new Member States;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Fears that the economic crisis may develop into a crisis of democracy and believes that both a strong political leadership
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Calls attention to the importance of the forthcoming Commission Report on the Transposition of the Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating forms and expression of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (due out by the 28th November 2013); encourages strengthened efforts to combat impunity and redress inconsistencies in Member States' laws and practices, as there is still no legislative provision in some Member States providing for the imposition of restrictions, including prohibition, on political parties involved in racism and hate, including Holocaust denial; Call on the Commission to step up efforts to condemn hate speech and Holocaust denial made by public and political figures and begin the process to launch infringement proceedings as early as 2014;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Takes the view that the adoption and effective implementation of legislation regarding the tackling of hate crime and those who promote, support and commit hate crime, is paramount;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17 b. Considers that greater attention is needed to respond to the particular situation of vulnerable groups, as mentioned in point 2.3.3. of the Stockholm Programme and in strengthening the fight against racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, Afrophobia, anti-Gypsyism, and homophobia in the European Union;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Emphasises that the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as provided for by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, will strengthen even further the protection of fundamental rights in the Union, as guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the case law of the Court of Justice; but regrets also the delay in the completion on the Accession of the EU to the Convention.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls attention to the importance of the forthcoming Commission Report on the Transposition of the Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating forms and expression of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (due out by the 28th November 2013); encourages strengthened efforts to combat impunity and redress inconsistencies in Member States' laws and practices, as there is still no legislative provision in some Member States providing for the imposition of restrictions, including prohibition, on political parties involved in racism and hate, including Holocaust denial; Call on the Commission to step up efforts to condemn hate speech and Holocaust denial made by public and political figures and begin the process to launch infringement proceedings as early as 2014;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, in its communication of 20 April 2010 entitled ‘Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18 b. Considers that a proper accountability process is crucial to protect and promote human rights effectively in the EU's internal and external policies and to ensure legitimate and effective security policies based on the rule of law; calls on the Commission to propose an accountability mechanism aimed at strengthening the EU and Member States' capacity to prevent, investigate and redress human rights violations at EU level, notably those committed in the context of the CIA programme
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that acceding to the Convention will provide citizens as well as other persons for whom the Union has a responsibility with protection in the context of Union action similar to that which they already enjoy in the context of action by individual Member States; points out that this is all the more relevant because the Member States have transferred significant competences to the Union, in particular in the policy spheres covered by the area of freedom, security and justice;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Considers that greater attention is needed to respond to the particular situation of vulnerable groups, as mentioned in point 2.3.3. of the Stockholm Programme and in strengthening the fight against racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, Afrophobia, anti-Gypsyism, and homophobia in the European Union;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the fact that acceding to the Convention will offer citizens as well as other persons for whom the Union has a responsibility vital extra protection, in particular in the context of the area of freedom, security and justice; Underlines the excessively long deadline for concluding accession negotiations and deplores the fact that the EU has still not effectively acceded to the Convention; Recalls that the EU's accession depends on the ratification not only of EU Member States but also of all States which are members to the Convention; Calls on all parties concerned to proceed with ratification as soon as possible.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. strongly condemns the blockage and delays experienced by the EU in the negotiations of accession to the ECHR and calls EU institutions and Member States to accelerate the procedures for the EU accession to the ECHR and to reject any future further attempt to undermine the ECHR role, competences and powers in relation to citizens' and residents' human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Believes that one of the main pillars of freedom, security and justice lies in Article 2 of the UN Charter of Human Rights which places race first in its enumeration string of possible basis of discrimination.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Regrets, however, that in the EU an individual is still not protected outside the workplace against discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, age, disability or sexual orientation; recalls that it has called upon the Council to adopt the proposal for a directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation 11 times over the past 4 years, and that the Council has failed to act; Deplores in this regard the Member States' lack of political will, the lack of transparency in the negotiation process of the Council, and the abuse of the unanimity principle by opposing Member States;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Regrets the inadequacy of policies on integrating people with disabilities and of how their rights are taken into account;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, in its communication of 20 April 2010 entitled ‘Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens - Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme’3 , the Commission argued in favour of a more ambitious response to the day-to-day concerns and aspirations of EU citizens, residents and migrants and emphasised that the Union must be able to react to unexpected events and be swift in seizing opportunities and in anticipating and adjusting to future trends;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20 b. Notes that the Stockholm Programme rightfully aims at combating xenophobia inviting the Commission to report on forms and expressions of such and that the financing programmes should aims at prevention and not only intervention, based on susceptible discrimination tendency areas;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20 b. Regrets the lack of progress of the National Roma Integration Strategies and the continuing racism towards and discrimination against Roma across the EU, including the segregation of Roma children in education; Calls on Member States to step up their efforts to enforce Roma fundamental rights and social inclusion; calls on the European Commission and Member States to support financially and involve Roma organisations in all policies affecting them.
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20 c. Welcomes the Communication from the Commission COM 2013 (454) on the "Steps forward in implementing National Roma Integration Strategies" and its recommendations; Regrets, however, that most of the Member States did not use the National Roma Integration Strategy for adopting and implementing a more proactive Roma policy; Regrets the long timeline of 24 months proposed by the Commission for Member States to implement the recommendations as well as the absence of involvement of the European Parliament given the role the Parliament has played so far in denouncing Roma's violation of fundamental rights.
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20 d. Calls on the European Commission to propose a strategy to combat violence against women as it was announced in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 20 April 2010 – Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens – Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme (COM(2010) 171 final).
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20 e. Recalls that the rapid developments in the digital world (including the increased uses of the Internet, applications and social media) calls for the establishment of the highest level of protection of personal data and privacy; condemns the ratification of agreements for the transfer and exchange of personal data with third countries by the EU, including the TFTP and PNR agreements with the United States, which do not comply with data protection and privacy standards set by the EU or Council of Europe;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 f (new) 20 f. Condemns internet and telecommunications spying practices as revealed by the NSA- Prism Case as well as the inability of the EU to enforce its standards of protection as regards its citizens or the third-country nationals or whistle-blowers on its territory; denounces the weakness of the European response to the scandal of such espionage of Europeans by the NSA
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers the continued blockage of the review of the Access to Documents Regulation unacceptable and calls the Commission and the Council to ensure that the right of access to documents and information, enshrined in the EU Charter of fundamental rights and in the Treaties, is respected, enacted, developed and promoted;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers the continued blockage of the review of the Access to Documents Regulation unacceptable and urges the immediate freeing-up of the negotiations;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that the Directive and the Regulation on the European Protection Order are a step forward in the combating of gender-based violence, but also points out that no comparative statistics exist to illustrate the situations faced by victims of gender-based violence or of trafficking in human beings in the Member States;
source: PE-516.857
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2019-07-06Show (23) Changes | Timetravel
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| council |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CJ08/7/12106New
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
| procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 55
|
| procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 055
|
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
2015-11-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| procedure/subject/0 |
Old
1.10 Fundamental rights in the Union, CharterNew
1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter |
| procedure/subject/10 |
Old
7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence and trafficking in human beingsNew
7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling |
2014-11-09Show (52) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees |
|
| activities/0/date |
Old
2014-04-02T00:00:00New
2013-03-11T00:00:00 |
| activities/0/docs |
|
| activities/0/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3279&dd_DATE_REUNION=06/12/2013&single_date=06/12/2013New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3279*&MEET_DATE=06/12/2013 |
| activities/2/committees |
|
| activities/2/date |
Old
2014-03-04T00:00:00New
2014-02-24T00:00:00 |
| activities/2/docs |
|
| activities/2/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3298&dd_DATE_REUNION=03/03/2014&single_date=03/03/2014New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3298*&MEET_DATE=03/03/2014 |
| activities/4/committees |
|
| activities/4/date |
Old
2014-02-24T00:00:00New
2014-03-04T00:00:00 |
| activities/4/docs |
|
| activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
| activities/5/committees |
|
| activities/5/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2014-04-02T00:00:00 |
| activities/5/docs |
|
| activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
| committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
| committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1838e0fb8127435bdbc3fNew
4f1ac70ab819f25efd000062 |
| committees/0/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de1837a0fb8127435bdbc23New
4f1ac659b819f25efd000034 |
| committees/0/rapporteur/2/mepref |
Old
4de186670fb8127435bdc058New
4f1ad271b819f27595000025 |
| committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1852d0fb8127435bdbe9eNew
4f1ac8c7b819f25efd0000f1 |
| committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188ea0fb8127435bdc3eeNew
4f1adbe1b819f207b30000ec |
| committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefaNew
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7 |
| committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
| committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
| committees/0/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12aNew
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c |
| committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
| committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187970fb8127435bdc207New
4f1ada6cb819f207b300006d |
| committees/3/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
| committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1838e0fb8127435bdbc3fNew
4f1ac70ab819f25efd000062 |
| committees/3/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de1837a0fb8127435bdbc23New
4f1ac659b819f25efd000034 |
| committees/3/rapporteur/2/mepref |
Old
4de186670fb8127435bdc058New
4f1ad271b819f27595000025 |
| committees/3/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1852d0fb8127435bdbe9eNew
4f1ac8c7b819f25efd0000f1 |
| committees/3/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188ea0fb8127435bdc3eeNew
4f1adbe1b819f207b30000ec |
| committees/3/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefaNew
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7 |
| committees/3/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
| committees/3/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
| committees/3/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12aNew
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c |
| committees/4/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
| committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1838e0fb8127435bdbc3fNew
4f1ac70ab819f25efd000062 |
| committees/4/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de1837a0fb8127435bdbc23New
4f1ac659b819f25efd000034 |
| committees/4/rapporteur/2/mepref |
Old
4de186670fb8127435bdc058New
4f1ad271b819f27595000025 |
| committees/4/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1852d0fb8127435bdbe9eNew
4f1ac8c7b819f25efd0000f1 |
| committees/4/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188ea0fb8127435bdc3eeNew
4f1adbe1b819f207b30000ec |
| committees/4/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefaNew
4f1ac8d6b819f25efd0000f7 |
| committees/4/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
| committees/4/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36aNew
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb |
| committees/4/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12aNew
4f1ad9abb819f207b300002c |
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 051New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
| procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 055 |
2014-04-05Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/5/date |
Old
2014-04-03T00:00:00New
2014-04-02T00:00:00 |
| activities/5/docs |
|
| activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
2014-04-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
2014-03-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3279&dd_DATE_REUNION=06/12/2013&single_date=06/12/2013New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3279&dd_DATE_REUNION=06/12/2013&single_date=06/12/2013 |
| activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3298&dd_DATE_REUNION=03/03/2014&single_date=03/03/2014New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3298&dd_DATE_REUNION=03/03/2014&single_date=03/03/2014 |
2014-03-18Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/4 |
|
| activities/5/date |
Old
2014-03-12T00:00:00New
2014-04-02T00:00:00 |
| activities/6/date |
Old
2014-03-13T00:00:00New
2014-04-03T00:00:00 |
| other/0 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
2014-02-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
| activities/4 |
|
2014-02-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/2 |
|
2014-02-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/2/date |
Old
2014-03-11T00:00:00New
2014-03-12T00:00:00 |
2014-01-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/1 |
|
| activities/2 |
|
2013-12-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/docs |
|
2013-12-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3 |
|
2013-12-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/date |
Old
2014-01-14T00:00:00New
2014-03-11T00:00:00 |
2013-10-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/date |
Old
2013-12-09T00:00:00New
2014-01-14T00:00:00 |
2013-10-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/date |
Old
2014-01-15T00:00:00New
2013-12-09T00:00:00 |
2013-10-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/3/date |
Old
2013-12-09T00:00:00New
2014-01-15T00:00:00 |
2013-09-26Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees |
|
| activities/0/date |
Old
2013-09-10T00:00:00New
2013-03-11T00:00:00 |
| activities/0/docs |
|
| activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/2/committees |
|
| activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-09-10T00:00:00 |
| activities/2/docs |
|
| activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
| committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a |
| committees/0/shadows/4/name |
Old
SCHOLZ HelmutNew
SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo |
| committees/3/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a |
| committees/3/shadows/4/name |
Old
SCHOLZ HelmutNew
SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo |
| committees/4/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a |
| committees/4/shadows/4/name |
Old
SCHOLZ HelmutNew
SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo |
2013-09-25Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0 |
|
| activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.857
|
| activities/3/committees |
|
| activities/3/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-12-09T00:00:00 |
| activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
| committees/4/shadows/3 |
|
2013-09-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/2 |
|
2013-08-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.784
|
2013-07-12Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/0/committees/3/shadows |
|
| activities/0/committees/4/shadows |
|
| activities/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/3/shadows |
|
| committees/4/shadows |
|
2013-06-29Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
| committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2013-05-15Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3e9New
4fd4f1e5b819f229e4000002 |
| activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
TAVARES RuiNew
BICEP Jean-Jacob |
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188e60fb8127435bdc3e9New
4fd4f1e5b819f229e4000002 |
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
TAVARES RuiNew
BICEP Jean-Jacob |
2013-05-14Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/2 |
|
| activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur/2 |
|
| activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur/2 |
|
| committees/0/rapporteur/2 |
|
| committees/3/rapporteur/2 |
|
| committees/4/rapporteur/2 |
|
2013-04-27Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/0/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/1 |
|
| activities/0/committees/3/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur/1 |
|
| activities/0/committees/4/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur/1 |
|
| committees/0/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| committees/0/rapporteur/1 |
|
| committees/3/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| committees/3/rapporteur/1 |
|
| committees/4/date |
Old
2013-02-19T00:00:00New
|
| committees/4/rapporteur/1 |
|
2013-04-13Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/2/date |
2013-03-20T00:00:00
|
| activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| committees/2/date |
2013-03-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/2/rapporteur |
|
2013-04-08Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/1/date |
2012-12-18T00:00:00
|
| activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| committees/1/date |
2012-12-18T00:00:00
|
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2013-03-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| activities/0/committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
2013-03-13Show (5) Changes
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|