Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | NIEBLER Angelika ( PPE) | GLANTE Norbert ( S&D), JOHANSSON Kent ( ALDE), TURMES Claude ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | CRONBERG Tarja ( Verts/ALE) | Sabine LÖSING ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU space industrial policy: Releasing the Potential for Growth in the Space Sector, following the Commission’s communication on the same subject.
Building upon it resolution of 9 January 2012 , Parliament invites the Commission to take a horizontal approach with a view to mainstreaming space policy and its objectives into the various fields of policy of the Union, such as telecommunications, transport, environment, agriculture safety or culture.
In view of increasing competition from newly emerging space-faring nations, such as China and India, Members point out that the political weight of the EU Member States in national terms may no longer suffice to address the challenges ahead in this sector.
In order to give space policy a European approach , Parliament invited the Commission to prioritise the following areas:
1) Institutional questions: Members recommended that the EU, in very close cooperation with the ESA, should coordinate the space policies and programmes of the Member States more than hitherto in order to adopt a genuine European approach.
The Commission, the Member States and the ESA were called upon to establish a form of coordination group whose members should coordinate strategies and measures in the field of space at regular meetings in order to avoid duplication of structures and develop a common approach to international issues and forums.
2) Galileo and Copernicus: the resolution stressed that the completion of Galileo and the continuation of Copernicus should be assigned the highest priority as the flagships of European space policy, so that the first Galileo services can in practice be opened to the public in 2014. This is why the Commission should present, as soon as possible, a clear roadmap for the GMES/Copernicus programme.
Members regretted that not all of the EU is currently covered by the EGNOS system. They called for that system to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe , hence enabling its use throughout Europe. They also wanted to promote the use of EGNOS in various areas, such as transport.
3) The role of the space industry in driving growth and creating employment: Parliament recalled that the European space industry has a consolidated turnover of EUR 6.5 billion and employed over 34 500 highly skilled people. The resolution:
underlined the importance of an action plan for the European GNSS Agency in order to expand the GNSS market; called on the Commission, and the Member States to create incentives for European industry to develop space components at European level in order to reduce dependence on imports from third countries. The Commission, the ESA, the EDA and the Member States were urged to identify critical technologies in the context; pointed out the importance of the efficient use of European funding from Horizon 2020, particularly for operations close to the market, especially in the context of autonomous and intelligent robotic systems ; called on all parties concerned to step up cooperation between universities and industry and to encourage young talent, in particular female talent, to commit to this sector, and to ensure the availability of a suitable pool of highly skilled employees.
4) Access to space: Parliament stressed the importance of access to space for all Member States and of commercial sales for the European space industry. It called on the Commission and the Member States, jointly with the ESA, to maintain and expand a European launcher system and a rocket-launching service in the long term.
5) The role of research and development: Members urged the EU, the ESA and the Member States to develop a joint ‘research roadmap’ for the period ending in 2020, and to define priorities and objectives for space policy which should be attained jointly, in order to provide consistency of planning for the actors involved.
The resolution welcomed the fact that under the new Framework Programme for Research (Horizon 2020) the sum of EUR 1.5 billion is to be invested in space research and innovation. It stressed the need to ensure that the appropriate funding is provided for research and development in respect of GNSS and urged the Commission to introduce arrangements enabling SMEs to access funding more easily.
6) Satellite communication: Members noted that that satellite communication played an important role within the European space industry. It was an efficient way of providing multimedia services , with a view to achieving total broadband internet coverage in the EU. It was also taking on an increasingly important logistical function in crises such as natural disasters or in maintaining internal security.
In this context, the Commission was called upon to:
ensure that, with reference to technological neutrality, the satellite internet is appropriately taken into account in the technology mix to be used to expand broadband, for example in the EU’s cohesion policy; ensure at the next ITU World Radio Communications Conference that the EU’s interests and those of the satellite communication industry in the field of global and regional spectrum allocation.
7) Space debris: space-based infrastructure constitutes the backbone of many services used by industry and society in everyday life. Accordingly, Parliament asked the Commission and Member States to: (i) work towards global governance for space; (ii) encourage third countries to sign the Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities drawn up by the EU; (iii) support the establishment at European level of the programme to support observation and tracking of objects in space.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Angelika NIEBLER (EPP, DE) on EU Space Industrial Policy, releasing the Potential for Growth in the Space Sector.
The report asked the Commission to take a horizontal approach with a view to mainstreaming space policy and its objectives into the various fields of policy of the Union, such as telecommunications, transport, environment, agriculture safety or culture.
In order to give space policy an European approach , Members invited the Commission to prioritise the following areas:
1) Institutional questions : all the actors involved in the governance of future EU space policies, including the Commission, the European GNSS Agency, the ESA, the national agencies and the specialised agencies such as EUMETSAT, must be interlinked and must operate on a long-term basis.
The Commission, the Member States and the ESA were asked to establish a form of coordination group whose members should coordinate strategies and measures in the field of space at regular meetings in order to avoid duplication of structures and develop a common approach to international issues and forums.
2) Galileo and Copernicus : the report stressed that the completion of Galileo and the continuation of Copernicus should be assigned the highest priority as the flagships of European space policy, so that the first Galileo services can in practice be opened to the public in 2014.
The Commission must present, as soon as possible, a clear roadmap for GMES/Copernicus and for the development and deployment of the various Satellite Sentinels, as well as the legal and operational framework proposed for this complex system.
Members regretted that not all of the EU is currently covered by the EGNOS system. They called for that system to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe, hence enabling its use throughout Europe. They also wanted to promote the use of EGNOS in various areas, such as transport.
3) The role of the space industry in driving growth and creating employment : the report called on the Commission, and the Member States to create incentives for European industry to develop space components at European level in order to reduce dependence on imports from third countries. The Commission, the ESA, the EDA and the Member States were urged to identify critical technologies in the context.
Stressing that a suitable pool of highly skilled employees is key to a competitive European space industry, Members called on all parties concerned to step up cooperation between universities and industry and to encourage young talent, in particular female talent, to commit to this sector.
4) Access to space : the report stressed the importance of access to space for all Member States and of commercial sales for the European space industry. It called on the Commission and the Member States, jointly with the ESA, to maintain and expand a European launcher system and a rocket-launching service in the long term.
5 ) The role of research and development : Members urged the EU, the ESA and the Member States to develop a joint ‘ research roadmap’ for the period ending in 2020, and to define priorities and objectives for space policy which should be attained jointly, in order to provide consistency of planning for the actors involved.
The report welcomed the fact that under the new Framework Programme for Research (Horizon 2020) the sum of EUR 1.5 billion is to be invested in space research and innovation. It stressed the need to ensure that the appropriate funding is provided for research and development in respect of GNSS and urged the Commission to introduce arrangements enabling SMEs to access funding more easily.
6) Satellite communication : Members noted that that satellite communication played an important role within the European space industry. It was an efficient way of providing multimedia services , with a view to achieving total broadband internet coverage in the EU. It was also taking on an increasingly important logistical function in crises such as natural disasters or in maintaining internal security.
In this context, the Commission was called upon to:
ensure that, with reference to technological neutrality, the satellite internet is appropriately taken into account in the technology mix to be used to expand broadband, for example in the EU’s cohesion policy; ensure at the next ITU World Radio Communications Conference that the EU’s interests and those of the satellite communication industry in the field of global and regional spectrum allocation.
7) Space debris : space-based infrastructure constitutes the backbone of many services used by industry and society in everyday life. Accordingly, Members asked the Commission and Member States to: (i) work towards global governance for space; (ii) encourage third countries to sign the Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities drawn up by the EU; (iii) support the establishment at European level of the programme to support observation and tracking of objects in space.
PURPOSE: to improve the competitiveness of the European space industry.
BACKGROUND: space is a driver for growth and innovation , and contributes directly to the objectives of the European 2020 Strategy. The European space industry has to face increasing competition from new emerging space powers such as China and India. An EU space policy could reinforce the European identity at international political level . At the same time, EU intervention could give space a stronger political impetus, for example by putting in place the right framework conditions to maintain and foster space activities in Europe and its industry's competitiveness at global level. This is where article 189 TFEU, which gives the EU a clear mandate to intervene in space matters, could make a difference.
The Commission underlined its intention to pursue a space industrial policy developed in cooperation with ESA and the EU Member States in its Communication on EU industrial policy adopted in October 2010. In April 2011, the Communication entitled “ Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens ” gave further orientations of a potential European space industrial policy. Member States supported this approach in the Council conclusions adopted in May and December 2011.
This Communication builds also on the Commission's Industrial Policy Communication for A Stronger European Industry for Growth and Economic Recovery .
CONTENT: considering the strategic importance of the space industry, its dependence on public funding and the increasing global competition on the commercial market, the EU will draw up a space industrial policy to support the development of the sector, thereby fostering economic growth.
Against this background, the EU space industrial policy could be centred on five specific objectives:
1. Establish a coherent regulatory framework : as space activities expand, the appropriateness of the existing regulatory framework needs to be examined to ensure the security, safety and sustainability of such activities and their economic development. The Commission suggests the following actions and measures:
· examine the possibility of a legislative initiative on certain aspects that have an impact on the emergence of a single market for space products and services ;
· consider proposing a legislative initiative on production and dissemination of private satellite data ;
· monitor and improve the export control and intra-EU transfer frameworks ;
· ensure the availability of a radio spectrum for space operations that is immune from interference, to enable economies of scale and optimise operational costs for pan-European systems;
· explore whether commercial spaceflights activities need to be embedded in a legal framework;
· pursue the standardisation process , notably by decreasing the prices, and in helping SMEs enter certain segments of the space market;
· ensure the availability of necessary skills to satisfy the need of emerging sectors and to attract talent from third countries;
· support access of European industry to the global market by ensuring that specific factors of the European spatial industry are taken into consideration in trade negotiations.
2. Supporting Research and Innovation : the proposed budget for Space under Horizon 2020 (the successor of FP7) is proposed to be EUR 1737 million in current price (EUR 1548 million in constant 2011 prices) for 7 years.
Space in Horizon 2020 will cover R&D and innovation with the objectives to: (i) enable European competitiveness in space, non-dependence and innovation in space activities, focussed on industrial R&I, emphasizing SMEs; (ii) enable advances in space technologies ; (iii) full exploitation of space data, including data from scientific missions and commercial applications of space data.
3. Expanding the array and the use of available financial instruments : in this respect, it is necessary to: (i) e xplore possibilities to facilitate access to finance, especially by SMEs, by promoting the further development of innovative financial instruments and the use of the existing instruments; (ii) encourage Member States and regions to increase the use of structural funds and innovative financial instruments to promote the development of innovative satellite-based services by SMEs; (iii) ensure the rapid extension of the scope of the EU project bond initiative to space infrastructures.
4. Making a better use of procurement policy : the EU should develop and provide to industry a long term and clear planning of the institutional market . In addition, for programmes which involve joint funding by both the Commission and ESA, early coordination should take place to ensure a smooth transition between the development phase and the operational phase.
5. Establish and implement a real European launcher policy : EU autonomy in strategic sectors like launch services is of fundamental importance. In view of this, the EU space industrial policy should pursue the following objectives: (i) ensure a reliable, secure, available and cost efficient launcher system; (ii) create the conditions, and in particular the financial conditions, which are necessary to maintain and strengthen independent European access to space in line with institutional needs while proposing an evolved governance of the exploitation of the European launchers.
6. Ensure the sustainability of space activities in Europe : space infrastructures are increasingly threatened by collision risks due to the growing population of satellites or the increasing amount of space debris in the most commercially exploited orbits.
In order to mitigate the risk of collision , the Commission intends to come forward with a proposal setting out the organisational framework for the setting up and operation of a European space surveillance and tracking (SST) service in partnership with Member States building on their existing assets and expertise.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0534/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0338/2013
- Contribution: COM(2013)0108
- Committee opinion: PE514.674
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.841
- Committee draft report: PE514.925
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0108
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE514.925
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.841
- Committee opinion: PE514.674
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Contribution: COM(2013)0108
Activities
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- António Fernando CORREIA DE CAMPOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erminia MAZZONI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
81 |
2013/2092(INI)
2013/09/04
AFET
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication by the Commission on EU Space Industrial Policy; is convinced that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Urges the Commission to stick to the timetable and the financial framework concerning the Galileo programme; stresses its dual use of radio navigation and positioning function, including relevant applications for both civilian and military activities, in particular the possibility for EU member states to use the Public Regulated Service for military purposes; stresses the need to clarify to which extent PRS and other services will be used for CSDP or national military missions outside the EU framework;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the fact mentioned in the Communication that 60 % of electronics on board European satellites are currently imported from the US; calls for an initiative on how to protect sensitive or personal data in this context
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the fact mentioned in the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Supports the point made by the Commission that many components of space systems are of dual-use or military nature and are hence subject to the Directive on intra-Community transfers, the dual-use export regulation or the Common Position on arms exports; calls on the Commission and the Member States to inform the Parliament how military space cooperation could take place under the permanent structured cooperation; urges to increase the level of cooperation among the Commission, ESA, EDA and EEAS in developing and using jointly EU space assets in support of CSDP missions;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Supports the point made by the Commission that many components of space systems are of dual-use or military nature and are hence subject to the Directive on intra-Community transfers, the dual-use export regulation or the Common Position on arms exports; calls on the Commission, the Member States and COARM to clarify which regulatory framework should apply to which category of goods and technology;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Supports the point made by the Commission that many components of space systems are of dual-use or military nature and are hence subject to the Directive on intra-Community transfers, the dual-use export regulation or the Common Position on arms exports; welcomes the proposal within the Communication to have a formal report to the Parliament on the dual-use export control system before the end of 2013.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines the urgent need to reduce the risk of collision due to the growing population of satellites and space debris; welcomes the initiative of the Commission to propose the organisational framework for the setting up and the operation of a European space surveillance and tracking system (SST); calls on the Commission and the Member States to make sure that these measures are in accordance with draft Code of Conduct in Outer space activities and of the UN space debris mitigation guidelines; calls on the External Action Service and the EU Member States to continue promoting an international Code of Conduct as it seeks to achieve enhanced safety, security, and sustainability in space by emphasizing that space activities should involve a high degree of care, due diligence, and transparency, with the aim of building confidence among space actors worldwide;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Supports the focus on supporting space research and innovation under FP7 and Horizon 2020 which must be a prerequisite to future development of this area, and the provision of €3786 million within the MFF for the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security "Copernicus" programme which will provide reliable, timely and accurate services to manage the global environment, understand and mitigate the effects of climate change and help respond to crises;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication by the Commission on EU Space Industrial Policy; as an important step towards EU's strategic independence in space technology; calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their efforts to build capabilities guaranteeing the autonomous access to space via European launchers and satellites; is convinced that only a more cost-
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication by the Commission on EU Space Industrial Policy; stresses the need to Europeanise the sector and to overcome the high level of fragmentation especially with regard to the institutional demand side; is convinced that only a more cost-
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to clarify first the EU's
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to clarify first the EU's level of ambition especially with regard to its strategic and geopolitical objectives; notes the fact that the Communication does not define the relationship between EU space industrial policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to clarify first the EU's level of ambition especially with regard to its strategic and geopolitical objectives; notes the fact that the Communication does not define the relationship between EU space industrial policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP); calls on the Commission, the Member States and the HR/VP clearly to define the potential contribution of this sector to CSDP, the nature and degree of civil-military synergies and the relevance for CSDP operations and other EU actions and missions in the field of conflict prevention, arms control, the non-proliferation of WMD technologies, counter-terrorism, migration and border control; calls on the Commission and the Member States to inform the Parliament about plans to use the Copernicus programme and the public regulated service of the Galileo programme in support of CSDP missions;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need, before deciding on new initiatives and EU budget contributions, to clarify first the EU's level of ambition especially with regard to its strategic and geopolitical objectives; notes the fact that the Communication does
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the statement by the Commission that space based telecommunication, navigation and earth observation provides the EU with strategically important knowledge underpinning the EU's external relations in the field of development assistance and humanitarian aid;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Underpins the security dimension of the Copernicus programme (former GMES), particularly the applications of prevention and response to crisis, humanitarian aid and cooperation, conflict prevention entailing monitoring of compliance with international treaties, and maritime surveillance;
source: PE-516.825
2013/09/23
ITRE
61 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the European space industry has a consolidated
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that the Commission must, as soon as possible, give us a clear roadmap for GMES/Copernicus and for the development and the deployment of the various satellites Sentinels and the legal and operational framework proposed for this complex system;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission’s intention of taking steps towards the establishment of a coherent EU space regulatory framework; advocates establishing a genuine EU internal market for space products and space-based services; advocates open competition; considers it important that policy should be formulated and developed without its implementation adversely affecting or distorting commercial market conditions; observes that competitive neutrality and transparency are two important cornerstones of the development of European space policy;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the Commission
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the Commission does not yet have a horizontal approach with a view to rooting space policy and its objectives and uses in the various fields of policy of the Union; calls on the Commission in future also to take account of space policy in such fields as, for example, telecommunications, transport, agriculture, safety or culture;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the Commission does not yet have a horizontal approach with a view to rooting space policy and its objectives and uses in the various fields of policy of the Union; calls on the Commission in future also to take account of space policy
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to assign priority to the following aspects: institutional issues, Galileo and Copernicus, the space industry as a generator of growth and employment, impact assessment of space-related activities, civilian access to space, the role of R&D, satellite communication and space
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to assign priority to the following aspects: institutional issues, Galileo and Copernicus, the space industry as a generator of growth and employment, independent access to space, the role of R&D, satellite communication and space
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the successes which the ESA has achieved for Europe in the field of space travel in recent decades; observes, however, that, in the long term, greater operational efficiency and political coordination and responsibility can only be achieved by bringing the ESA
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the successes which the ESA has achieved for Europe in the field of space travel in recent decades; welcomes Poland's accession to the ESA in September 2012, becoming its 20th member, and encourages the remaining non-ESA Member States to consider accession and increased cooperation; observes, however, that, in the long term, greater operational efficiency and political coordination and responsibility can only be achieved by bringing the ESA closer to the EU; calls on the Commission to investigate very carefully whether the ESA could for example in future be linked to the Union's governance structures as an inter-State organisation, while it is not felt to be appropriate to convert the ESA into a European agency;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas at present there is still not sufficient coordination of measures in the field of space travel between the EU, the Member States and the ESA and whereas this has resulted in duplication of structures and prevented synergies from being sufficiently exploited; stresses that the introduction of a clear governance framework in the space sector would make for huge efficiency savings;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the successes which the ESA has achieved for Europe in the field of space travel in recent decades; observes, however, that, in the long term, research needs to be done into ways of achieving greater operational efficiency and political coordination and responsibility
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the successes which the ESA has achieved for Europe in
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that, in the meantime, the European Union, in very close cooperation with the ESA, should coordinate the space policies and programmes of the Member States more than hitherto in order to adopt a genuine European approach, while it is necessary to ensure that the interests of ESA and its Member States are respected; observes that it is only by means of a European approach that the space industry can be given the opportunity to become, and also remain, competitive;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that the geo-return principle should be respected as the key element of contributions by Member States to ESA;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, Member States and the ESA to establish a kind of coordination group whose members should coordinate strategies and measures in the field of space at regular meetings in order to avoid duplication of structures and to develop a common approach to international issues and fora;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that the completion of Galileo and the continuation of Copernicus should be assigned
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underlines that EGNOS is the first operational European GNSS programme; calls on the Commission and Member States to promote and implement the use of EGNOS in various areas, such as transport;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Deplores the fact that, in the past, delays have occurred in establishing the European satellite navigation programme Galileo; welcomes the fact that four satellites have now been launched into earth orbit; stresses that the advantages and utility of Galileo in particular and of a European space industry in general should be communicated to society more effectively and calls on the Commission, in conjunction with future launches of Galileo satellites, to organise high-profile public events in EU capitals to promote Galileo and its potential applications;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the EU needs to teach the people, attract future engineers, spread information about EU satellite navigation and propose a set of incentives for all users in order to use Galileo and Egnos enabled technologies;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Regrets that not all of the European Union is currently covered by the EGNOS System and calls for that system to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority, hence enabling its use throughout Europe;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas at present there is still not sufficient coordination of measures in the field of space
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Observes that
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Reiterates that the EU must not miss the opportunity to develop satellite navigation downstream market and underlines the importance of an action plan for the European GNSS Agency in order to expand the GNSS market, which will be crucial for the future of the EU economy;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Recalls that new applications of satellite navigation can increase the safety, efficiency and reliability of activities from the aviation, maritime, road and agriculture sectors, road safety, fee collection, traffic and parking management, fleet management, emergency call, goods tracking and tracing, online booking, safety of shipping, digital tachographs, animal transport and sustainable land;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Observes that undertakings from outside the space industry can derive benefit from innumerable products derived from space research; calls on all parties concerned, therefore, to develop fruitful exchanges between actors in the space and non-space industries and to work in partnership to develop technologies which can lead to pioneering innovations for the benefit of society; stresses the value of better publicising the tangible benefits that the space industry can bring to the daily lives of Europeans;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Observes that undertakings from outside the space industry can derive benefit from
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the space-based services and robotics industries, in particular, may create
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that it is only by means of the adequate availability of highly skilled employees that it can be ensured that the European space industry can remain competitive; calls therefore on all parties concerned to step up cooperation between universities and industry (in such forms as study visits to ESA, research competitions for European and non-European researchers); observes furthermore that the acquisition of talents from third countries is indispensable;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that it is only by means of the adequate availability of highly skilled employees that it can be ensured that the European space industry can remain competitive; calls therefore on all parties concerned to step up cooperation between universities and industry; observes furthermore that
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that it is only by means of the adequate availability of highly skilled employees that it can be ensured that the European space industry can remain competitive; calls therefore on all parties concerned to step up cooperation between universities and industry and to encourage students, and particularly women students, to pursue careers in that industry; observes furthermore that the acquisition of talents from third countries is indispensable;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ESA, as an intergovernmental organisation, has no formal relationship with the European Parliament, so that there is no direct feedback to citizens such as otherwise exists in all fields of Union policy;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Member States to gear national study and training programmes to this sector of the economy and to promote them, as well as encouraging women, in particular, to take an interest in those technical occupations, and training women for them;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses the importance of commercial sales for the European space industry; observes at the same time that access to institutional markets in third countries remains partially closed to European industry; stresses the importance of equal initial conditions for European industry at international level; calls on the Commission, therefore, to
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses the importance of commercial sales for the European space industry; observes at the same time that access to institutional markets in third countries remains partially closed to European industry; stresses the importance of equal initial conditions for European industry at international level; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure reciprocity, equal opportunities and fair competitive conditions in the context of trade agreements (e.g. TTIP);
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers that the European space industry
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) (after subheading 'The role of research and development') 19a. Welcomes the fact that, in the new Framework Programme of Research, Horizon 2020, too, €1.5 bn is to be invested in space research and innovation; calls on the Commission, furthermore, in the context of Horizon 2020, to make part of the budget available for R&D relating to applications of satellite communication;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that, particularly in the field of research, greater coordination between the EU, the ESA and Member States is needed; calls on all three parties to develop a joint ‘research roadmap’ for the period ending in 2020, to define priorities and objectives for space policy which should be attained jointly, in order to provide consistency of planning for the actors involved, particularly in industry; stresses the importance of research cooperation with third countries;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that the development of GNSS applications and services is essential in order to ensure that the infrastructure investment which Galileo represents is fully exploited and that the Galileo system is developed to its full capacity; stresses the need to ensure that the appropriate funding is provided for research and development in respect of GNSS and for its implementation; regrets that the reduction in the funding allocated to research and innovation for applications based on EGNOS and Galileo is considerably delaying technological progress and the growth of industrial capacity, as well as environmentally-effective implementation, in the European Union, and therefore urges the Commission to introduce arrangements enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to access funding more easily;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Observes that the development of innovative applications in Europe is hampered by various obstacles; reminds the Commission, therefore, that there is an untapped market for the commercial exploitation of space-based data generated by earth observation and satellite programmes; calls on the Commission to conduct a study to identify these obstacles (such as uncertainty regarding the availability of services, reservations with
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Observes that the development of innovative applications in Europe is hampered by various obstacles; reminds the Commission, therefore, that there is an untapped market for the commercial exploitation of space-based data generated by earth observation and satellite programmes; calls on the Commission to conduct a study to identify these obstacles (such as liability for damage caused by space objects, uncertainty regarding the availability of services, reservations with regard to security and data protection, and inadequate awareness of potential) and to put forward possible proposals concerning ways of opening up these markets;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the space industry is investment-intensive and has unusually long development cycles, so that
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Observes that the development of innovative applications in Europe is hampered by various obstacles; reminds the Commission, therefore, that there is an untapped market for the commercial exploitation of space-based data generated by earth observation and satellite programmes; calls on the Commission to conduct a study to identify these obstacles (such as uncertainty regarding the availability of services, reservations with regard to security and data protection, and inadequate awareness of potential, lack of interoperability) and to put forward possible proposals concerning ways of opening up these markets;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses that satellite communication plays an important role within the European space industry, as orders from this sector provide continuous uses for spacecraft and launchers and thus contribute to the objective of independent access to space for the EU; draws attention in this context to the role of independent payload capacity which becomes available when launching commercial satellites (for ‘hosted payloads’) which can be used to try out new products and technologies in space and thus helps to reduce both the costs and the time required to be able to offer new services;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that satellite networks help to meet the EU Digital Agenda targets with a view to achieving total coverage of the EU with broadband internet, particularly in remote areas; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure that, with reference to technological neutrality, the satellite internet is appropriately taken into account in the technology mix to be used to expand broadband, for example in the EU’s cohesion policy;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission therefore to analyse the current availability of, and future need for, radio frequencies for satellite communication and ensure, at the next ITU World Radio Communications Conference, that the EU’s interests and those of the satellite communication industry in the field of global and regional spectrum allocation are defended appropriately;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Stresses that Europe can only maintain its technological advance in satellite communication if research efforts in this field are continued at European level;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Stresses that space-based infrastructure constitutes the backbone of many services used by industry and society in everyday life; observes that loss of access to this infrastructure, for example due to collisions between satellites and
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Stresses that space-based infrastructure constitutes the backbone of many services used by industry and society in everyday life; observes that loss of access to this infrastructure, for example due to collisions between satellites and space
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Observes that space
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas the EU is currently dependent on non-European military GNSS and Galileo was conceived and developed and will remain under civilian control;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Observes that space
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission to support the establishment at European level as quickly as possible of the programme proposed at the beginning of this year to support observation and tracking of objects in space, in order to ensure growing independence from institutions in the USA which issue warnings of collisions;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas satellite-based services play an important part in providing information for the growth sectors of the digital society and help to attain the aims of the EU’s Digital Agenda;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that all the actors involved in the governance of future EU Space Policies, such as the Commission, the European GNSS Agency, ESA, the national agencies and the specialized agencies such as EUMETSAT, must be interlinked and function long term;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that National Agencies could come up with concrete proposals in this direction so that the Commission could harmonize the input coming from the Member States and define an EU vision;
source: PE-516.841
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.925New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-514925_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.841New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-516841_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.674&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-514674_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131209&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-12-09-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-338&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0338_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0534New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0534_EN.html |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4289
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/12756New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
EU Space Industrial Policy, releasing the potential for growth in the space sectorNew
EU space industrial policy, releasing the potential for growth in the space sector |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0108:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0108:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0108/COM_COM(2013)0108_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0108/COM_COM(2013)0108_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|