BETA


2013/2125(INI) European defence technogical and industrial base

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET GAHLER Michael (icon: PPE PPE) ZEMKE Janusz (icon: S&D S&D), NICOLAI Norica (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VAN ORDEN Geoffrey (icon: ECR ECR), TERHO Sampo (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion IMCO GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (icon: PPE PPE) Matteo SALVINI (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion ITRE AUDY Jean-Pierre (icon: PPE PPE) Adam GIEREK (icon: S&D S&D), Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/01/20
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2014/06/24
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In this report, the Commission presents a Roadmap for measures to strengthen the Single Market for defence , to promote a more competitive defence industry and to foster synergies between civil and military research including details and timelines for the actions. The Communication is a follow-up to the Commission’s Communication of July 2013 and contributes to the implementation of the European Council Conclusions of December 2013. At the same time, it builds a bridge to the Commission’s contribution to the European Council of June 2015 .

The Commission pursues the following objectives:

· an Internal Market for Defence where European companies can operate freely and without discrimination in all Member States;

· an EU-wide security of supply regime where armed forces can be sure to be sufficiently supplied in all circumstances no matter in which Member State their suppliers are established;

· a Preparatory Action on CSDP-related research to explore the potential of a European research programme which, in the future, may cover both security and defence. This is in addition to exploiting all possible synergies between existing civil and defence research; and

· an industrial policy which fosters competitiveness of European defence industries and helps to deliver at affordable prices all the capabilities Europe needs to guarantee its security.

To pursue these objectives, the report establishes a roadmap for the activities set out in the Communication. In particular, it notes that the relationship between civil and defence world intensifies with the dividing lines becoming increasingly blurred . This is particularly apparent in CSDP missions which are mostly civil and require close civil / military co-operation to be effective. This is increasing the demand for greater civil / military synergies in areas such as communication, strategic transport, surveillance, RPAS etc. At the same time the investment in defence R&D is continuing to fall dramatically. In 2012, EU-wide defence R&D expenditure decreased by 38% compared to 2011. Partly as a consequence, the gap between defence and civil R&D is increasing. Therefore defence industry dependence on technologies with a civilian origin is increasing as is the tendency to diversify into civil businesses.

The Communication aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation that comes from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military.

The Roadmap proposes the following initiatives:

Complete the Single Market for defence and security : the Commission stresses that the Directive on defence and sensitive security procurement and the Directive on transfers of defence-related products , which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market, must be fully applied in order tackle market distortions and contribute to improving security of supply between Member States. It will:

· propose further measures to strengthen the implementation of the Directive on transfers on the basis of the results of a study expected in July 2014;

· issue a Green Paper on possible shortfalls of the current system for the control of assets and explore options for EU-wide action, including mechanisms of notification and consultation between Member States;

· adopt a roadmap in 2015 for a comprehensive EU-wide Security of Supply regime, which will: identify possible actions in the areas of (a) supply between Member States, (b) supply of Member States from third countries and (c) control of industrial and technological assets in the EU, which are all key elements for a comprehensive security of supply regime;

· continue to phase out offsets and clarify exclusions from the scope of Directive 2009/81/EC.

Promoting competitiveness in the defence industry : the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on:

· work to identify a new mechanism for developing defence standards in Europe and a common approach to standards for military aircraft ;

· supporting SMEs – including: (a) development of networks between defence-related regions within the EU, (b) support defence-related SMEs in global competition and (c) provide practical guidance to SMEs and European regional authorities clarifying the eligibility of using European funds in support of dual-use projects.

· screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector through the JRC and with EDA and industry, possibly paving the way for future policy actions in this area;

· a communication campaign on EU funding of skill-related initiatives and launching a study on current and future competencies and skills supply and demand in the defence sector.

Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation : the Commission will seek the maximum synergies possible between civil and military research. The main action it proposes is the Preparatory Action, the purpose of which is to illustrate the value added of an EU contribution in new research areas – complementing the CSDP-related civilian research ongoing under Horizon 2020. The Preparatory Action will last for a maximum of three years. The total amount of funding will depend on the available budgetary resources at the time of adoption. If successful, this Preparatory Action would prepare the ground for a possible CSDP-related research theme which could be funded under the next multi-annual financial framework. While this cannot substitute for national investment in defence R&D, it should promote synergies with national research efforts and encourage industrial co-operation. The scope of the Preparatory Action will be defined in consultation with Member States, the European Parliament, EDA, EEAS and industry.

Development of Capabilities : the Commission will:

· undertake, with the High Representative and EDA, a joint-assessment of dual-use capability needs for EU security and defence policies, to highlight areas where military and non-military capability needs are similar and identify the potential for synergies;

· a Communication, within the context of the European Maritime Security Strategy, to provide an implementation Roadmap for Common Information Sharing Environment (CISE).

Space and Defence: while some space capabilities must remain under exclusive national/military control, the Commission believes that there are significant potential benefits, in terms of reduced costs and greater efficiency, from increased synergies between national and European space capabilities. It will continue its work to protect space infrastructure and support the development of the next generation of Satellite Communication (SATCOM).

Application of EU energy policies and support instruments in the defence sector : armed forces have a strong interest in reducing their energy footprint and could thus make an important contribution to the Union’s energy targets. The Commission started discussions on the establishment of a Consultation Forum for Energy in the Defence and Security Sector. The Forum will develop (i) guidance documents on the implementation of the relevant EU energy legislation and financing investments in energy efficiency and renewables in the defence sector; (ii) concepts and recommendations for joint actions between Member States to improve the protection of critical energy infrastructures.

Strengthening the international dimension : the Commission will discuss with stakeholders how to support the European defence industry on third markets. Issues to be addressed include: (a) the impact of offsets requirements in third countries on the European defence sector; (b) the obstacles that European industry faces when competing for contracts in third countries and the contribution of EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the support that competitors from third countries receive, and the extent to which similar support could be provided to EU companies.

2014/03/10
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2014/03/05
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2013/12/22
   RO_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2013/11/21
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/11/21
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 415 votes to 103 with 67 abstentions, a resolution on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base.

Parliament recalled that the development of a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB) should be part of the strategic priorities of the EU. It welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area.

Reduction in budgets and investment : Parliament drew attention to the changing strategic global landscape, and to reduced defence budgets, caused especially by the economic and financial crisis. While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.

In this context, the resolution urged Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies.

Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand: in view of the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers, Parliament calls on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and asked the VP/HR to initiate a wide-ranging process to develop a White Paper on European Security and Defence.

Member States are asked to make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality and to explore the possibility of synchronising the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA).

Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of

· optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services;

· promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes.

In acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market, Parliament believed that it was time to promote a voluntary approach as regards supply and demand rules and standards. It also stated that it was time to invest in an integrated sustainable industrial policy based on research, innovation, increasing efficiency of resources, a strategy for raw materials, the strengthening of SMEs and the development of regional networks.

Member States were invited to:

· develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies;

· encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ;

· minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation .

Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes.

Member States were encouraged to:

· explore the possibilities offered by the EDA in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships;

· streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates.

Ensuring security of supply : Parliament called on Member States, the EDA and the Commission:

· to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime;

· to submit a non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics.

Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : Parliament:

· recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS);

· encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes;

· urged the European Council to strengthen the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR).

Furthermore, the resolution stressed the need to:

· support CSDP missions through European research and development using the Horizon 2020 research programme;

· establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere;

· maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union;

· increase cooperation between the European Union and its key partners for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology. Members wanted to see the development of cyber-security standards and the integration of these with international standards.

Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Parliament invited Member States to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. It also invited the Commission to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.

Documents
2013/11/21
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/11/20
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/10/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE) on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, in response to the Commission communication entitled

‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’.

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, in exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report.

Members recalled that an operational Common Security and Defence Policy needs a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). They welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area.

While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.

Concerned about the reductions in defence investment, the report urged the Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies .

Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand : the report called on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality . Member States are invited to further explore the possibility of synchronising and jointly planning the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA).

Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services. It should also promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes.

The report stated that it is time to promote a voluntary approach in acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market , furthering its consolidation (and initiating harmonisation) as regards supply and demand, rules and standards.

Member States are invited to:

develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies , and provide them with effective corporate governance mechanisms within the European Union; encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ; minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation ; develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises in a sustainable manner and of facilitating their access to defence procurement.

Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes.

Member States are encouraged to:

explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems; streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates and the development of common civilian and military European certification procedures.

Ensuring security of supply : Member States, the EDA and the Commission are invited to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime , and to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics.

Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : the report recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe.

It encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes.

The European Council is urged, against the background of the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR).

The report also highlighted the need:

to support CSDP missions through European research and development : Members emphasised the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector and of the Horizon 2020 research programme and invited the Member States to establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere , with a focus on cutting-edge technological applications; to maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union; for greater cooperation and exchange of know-how among Member States, on the one hand, and between the European Union and its key partners, on the other; for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology; to develop European ICT and cyber-security standards and integrating them with international standards.

Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Members recalled that Member States urgently need to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. The Commission is urged to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.

Documents
2013/10/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/10/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/10/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/09/26
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2013/09/26
   CSL - Council Meeting
2013/09/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/08/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/07/24
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to set out an Action Plan for the Commission’s contribution to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

BACKGROUND: the security challenges the EU is facing are numerous, complex, interrelated and difficult to foresee. The strategic and geopolitical environment is rapidly and constantly evolving. The world’s balance of power is shifting as new centres of gravity are emerging and the US is rebalancing its strategic focus towards Asia.

The crisis in public spending induces cuts in defence budgets . From 2001 to 2010 EU defence spending declined from €251 billion to €194 billion. These budget cuts are also having a serious impact on the industries that develop equipment for our armed forces . They affect in particular the investment in defence R&D that is crucial for developing capabilities of the future.

The problem of shrinking defence budgets is aggravated by the persisting fragmentation of European markets which leads to unnecessary duplication of capabilities , organisations and expenditures. This situation necessitates a reorientation of priorities.

Defence industry in Europe directly employs about 400 000 people and generates up to another 960 000 indirect jobs. It is, therefore, a sector that is essential to retain if Europe is to remain a world-leading centre for manufacturing and innovation. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) constitutes a key element for Europe's capacity to ensure the security of its citizens and to protect its values and interests.

Europe must be able to assume its responsibilities for its own security and for international peace and stability in general. This necessitates a certain degree of strategic autonomy : to be a credible and reliable partner, Europe must be able to decide and to act without depending on the capabilities of third parties. Security of supply, access to critical technologies and operational sovereignty are therefore crucial.

Defence is still at the heart of national sovereignty and decisions on military capabilities remain with Member States. However, the EU does have a significant contribution to make . With Members States having amongst themselves around 1.6 million soldiers and annual defence budgets of €194 billion the EU has the capacity to be a strategic actor on the international stage, in line with its values.

The European Council, in its Conclusions of 14 December 2012, called upon the High Representative, notably through the European External Action Service and the European Defence Agency, as well as the Commission, to develop further proposals and actions to strengthen CSDP and improve the availability of the required civilian and military capabilities.

CONTENT: this Communication builds on the work of the Commission's Defence Task Force established in 2011 with the objective to strengthen the defence sector by mobilising all relevant EU policies. The European External Action Service (EEAS) and European Defence Agency (EDA) have been fully associated to the work of the Task Force and in the preparation of this Communication.

This Communication presents a package of measures aiming to encourage the cooperation between Member States. It aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation which come from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military.

To reach these objectives, the Commission sets out an Action Plan to strengthen the CSDP in the following areas:

Strengthen the internal market for defence and security : the Commission has put forward the two Directives on defence and sensitive security procurement ( 2009/81/EC ) and transfers ( 2009/43/EC ), which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market. The Commission shall also tackle persisting unfair and discriminatory practices and market distortions as well as develop instruments which enable Member States to improve the security of supply between them.

Strengthen the competitiveness of the EDTIB : to this end, the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on the following strands:

support for competitiveness – including developing 'hybrid standards ' to benefit security and defence markets and examining the ways to develop a European certification system for military airworthiness, building on the civil experience of EASA gained by certifying the Airbus A-400M (in its civil configuration); screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector within the context of the EU’s overall raw materials strategy and prepare, if necessary, targeted policy actions; support for SMEs – including development of a European Strategic Cluster Partnership to provide links with other clusters and support defence-related SMEs in global competition; promote skills identified as essential to the future of the industry including through the "Sector Skills Alliances" and "Knowledge Alliances" programmes currently being trialled. In this context, Member States can use the support that can be provided by the European Social Fund (ESF) and in certain cases of mass redundancies also by the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.

Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation and reducing the energy footprint : this concerns exploiting civilian military synergies to the maximum extent possible in order to ensure the most efficient use of European tax payers' resources, in particular by:

concentrating its efforts on possible cross-fertilisation between civil and military research and the dual-use potential of space; assessing the possibility of EU-owned dual-use capabilities, which may in certain security areas complement national capabilities and become effective and cost-efficient force multipliers; considering launching a preparatory action for CSDP-related research focusing on those areas where EU defence capabilities are most needed; helping armed forces reduce their energy consumption and thereby contribute to the Union’s 20/20/20 targets.

The Commission invites the European Council to discuss this Action Plan in December 2013. On the basis of the discussions with Heads of State and Government, the Commission will develop for the areas defined in this Communication a detailed roadmap with concrete actions and timelines.

2013/07/04
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/07/04
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2013/05/30
   EP - AUDY Jean-Pierre (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2013/05/29
   EP - GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2013/03/21
   EP - GAHLER Michael (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 4 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 472, -: 69, 0: 55
DE FR IT ES PL RO BG BE HU FI SK PT EL SE LT NL LV LU IE EE CZ AT HR SI MT CY DK GB
Total
77
62
51
37
43
28
17
16
19
12
12
18
17
15
10
19
9
6
12
5
13
16
7
4
4
4
10
52
icon: PPE PPE
218

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
22

France NI

2

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
37

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 5 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 455, -: 92, 0: 54
IT DE ES PL FR RO BG GB HU BE SK PT EL IE FI AT CZ NL SI LT LV MT EE LU HR DK SE CY
Total
53
79
37
42
62
28
17
53
19
17
12
18
18
12
12
16
14
20
5
9
9
4
5
5
6
9
15
4
icon: PPE PPE
217

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Hungary S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2
4

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 9/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 458, -: 135, 0: 10
DE FR IT ES RO PL BG BE HU EL PT SK FI LT LU LV EE NL SI MT AT HR IE CZ CY DK SE GB
Total
79
62
53
37
28
43
17
16
19
18
18
12
12
10
6
9
5
20
4
4
16
7
12
14
4
9
15
53
icon: PPE PPE
219

Belgium PPE

3

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1

Sweden S&D

For (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: NI NI
22

France NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Greece EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 11/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 483, -: 104, 0: 12
DE FR ES IT RO PL BE BG HU PT FI EL SK NL AT LT LU LV EE SE DK SI MT HR IE CZ CY GB
Total
78
62
37
52
28
42
17
17
19
18
12
18
12
20
16
10
6
9
5
15
10
4
4
7
12
13
4
51
icon: PPE PPE
217

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

4

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
22

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
37

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 11/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 425, -: 141, 0: 18
IT PL ES DE FR RO BG HU PT BE SK EL LT NL IE LU FI SI MT LV EE HR AT CZ CY DK SE GB
Total
52
42
37
74
59
27
17
19
17
17
12
16
9
20
11
6
12
4
4
9
5
7
16
12
4
10
15
50
icon: PPE PPE
217

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
153

Hungary S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Sweden S&D

For (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
35

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 17 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 535, -: 44, 0: 18
DE IT FR PL GB ES RO NL BE HU BG SK EL PT FI CZ LT SE IE LV LU DK EE AT HR SI MT CY
Total
78
53
59
42
53
37
28
20
17
19
15
12
18
18
12
14
10
15
11
9
6
10
5
16
7
4
4
4
icon: PPE PPE
217

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia PPE

1

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2

Spain NI

1
2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 25 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 469, -: 67, 0: 63
DE IT FR ES PL RO BG BE NL HU SK PT FI EL LT LU LV EE SE CZ IE HR SI MT AT DK CY GB
Total
78
50
61
37
43
28
17
17
20
19
12
18
12
18
10
6
9
5
15
14
12
7
4
4
16
10
4
52
icon: PPE PPE
218

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFD EFD
18

Poland EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: ECR ECR
37

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 26 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 434, -: 140, 0: 18
IT ES DE RO FR PL BG HU SK PT BE EL IE NL FI LT LU SI MT LV DK EE HR AT CZ CY SE GB
Total
52
36
78
28
58
43
17
19
12
18
17
18
11
19
12
10
6
4
4
9
9
5
7
15
14
4
15
51
icon: PPE PPE
218

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Hungary S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
37

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 27 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 469, -: 63, 0: 58
DE FR IT ES PL RO BE BG NL HU FI SK EL PT LT CZ LU DK EE IE LV AT HR SI MT CY SE GB
Total
77
61
50
36
41
28
17
17
19
19
12
12
18
18
9
14
5
10
5
12
9
16
7
4
4
3
15
51
icon: PPE PPE
211

Czechia PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Italy ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: NI NI
22

France NI

2

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: ECR ECR
38

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 29 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 478, -: 89, 0: 25
IT GB ES PL DE FR RO HU BG NL SK PT EL CZ BE FI LT LV SE HR LU EE SI MT DK AT CY IE
Total
52
52
37
43
75
59
28
19
17
20
12
18
18
14
15
12
9
9
14
7
6
5
4
4
10
16
4
12
icon: PPE PPE
215

Czechia PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
4
2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 31/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 534, -: 49, 0: 12
DE IT FR PL GB ES RO BG BE HU FI SK EL PT NL CZ SE LV AT LT DK IE LU EE HR SI MT CY
Total
77
52
60
43
52
37
28
17
17
18
12
12
18
18
19
13
15
9
16
9
10
12
6
5
7
4
4
4
icon: PPE PPE
216

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 31/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 487, -: 83, 0: 21
IT PL GB ES DE FR RO HU BG BE SK PT EL CZ NL LT SE FI LV AT HR LU DK SI MT IE EE CY
Total
51
43
52
36
77
58
28
19
16
17
12
18
18
13
20
9
15
12
9
15
7
6
10
4
4
12
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
215

Czechia PPE

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 33/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 524, -: 51, 0: 17
DE IT FR PL GB ES RO BG BE NL HU FI SK PT EL CZ LV DK LT EE HR LU SE SI MT IE AT CY
Total
77
52
58
42
52
37
28
17
17
20
19
12
12
18
18
13
8
10
9
5
7
5
15
4
4
12
16
4
icon: PPE PPE
215

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 33/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 471, -: 96, 0: 11
DE IT FR ES RO PL BG BE FI SK EL HU PT AT NL LU DK IE LT EE LV SI MT HR CZ SE CY GB
Total
75
52
58
35
28
42
17
15
12
12
18
18
18
14
19
6
10
12
9
5
8
4
4
7
12
13
3
51
icon: PPE PPE
210

Belgium PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Sweden PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
156

Finland S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

4

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2
4
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

2

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 34/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 488, -: 88, 0: 15
DE IT FR ES RO PL BE BG SK EL HU PT FI NL SE AT IE LT LV EE LU DK CZ SI MT HR CY GB
Total
76
51
59
36
28
43
16
17
12
18
19
18
12
20
15
16
11
10
9
5
5
10
13
4
4
7
4
52
icon: PPE PPE
214

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
4

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 34/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 432, -: 124, 0: 28
IT ES FR DE RO PL BG HU SK PT BE EL FI LT SE NL AT LU SI MT LV EE HR DK CZ IE CY GB
Total
52
37
59
72
27
42
17
19
12
18
17
17
12
10
15
19
15
6
4
4
9
5
7
10
12
12
4
50
icon: PPE PPE
209

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 36 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 524, -: 52, 0: 17
DE IT FR PL ES RO GB BG HU NL BE AT FI SK EL PT CZ IE LT DK SE LV LU EE HR SI MT CY
Total
77
52
59
43
36
28
51
17
18
20
17
16
12
12
18
17
13
12
10
10
15
9
6
5
7
4
4
4
icon: PPE PPE
214

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Austria ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
4

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 37/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 535, -: 35, 0: 24
DE IT FR GB PL ES RO BE BG NL HU SK EL PT FI CZ AT IE LT DK SE LV LU EE HR SI MT CY
Total
78
51
59
51
43
37
28
17
17
20
19
12
18
18
11
13
16
12
10
10
14
9
6
5
7
4
4
4
icon: PPE PPE
215

Finland PPE

2

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Netherlands S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
37

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
4

Poland EFD

Against (1)

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 37/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 469, -: 101, 0: 18
DE IT FR ES RO PL BG SK BE EL HU PT NL FI SE AT LT LU DK EE LV SI MT HR IE CZ CY GB
Total
76
51
59
37
28
43
16
12
14
18
19
18
20
12
15
15
10
6
10
5
9
4
4
7
12
13
4
51
icon: PPE PPE
214

Belgium PPE

3

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 40/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 482, -: 90, 0: 17
DE IT FR ES RO PL BG BE HU FI SK PT EL NL IE AT LT LU EE LV SI MT HR SE CZ DK CY GB
Total
75
51
60
37
26
43
17
16
19
12
12
18
17
20
12
16
10
6
5
9
4
4
7
15
12
10
4
51
icon: PPE PPE
216

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 40/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 443, -: 137, 0: 10
IT ES DE RO FR PL BG HU SK PT EL BE FI LT NL IE LU SI MT LV EE HR DK AT CZ SE CY GB
Total
51
35
76
28
60
43
16
19
12
18
18
17
12
10
20
12
6
4
4
9
5
7
10
16
13
15
4
49
icon: PPE PPE
215

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1
2

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 44/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 468, -: 103, 0: 19
DE FR IT ES RO PL BG HU BE SK EL PT NL FI IE LT LU EE LV SI MT AT HR CZ DK CY SE GB
Total
76
60
51
37
28
43
17
19
16
12
18
17
20
12
12
10
6
5
9
4
4
15
7
13
10
4
15
49
icon: PPE PPE
215

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
37

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 44/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 418, -: 148, 0: 23
IT ES DE RO FR PL BG HU PT SK BE EL LT FI LU SI MT IE LV EE HR AT CZ NL CY DK GB SE
Total
51
37
77
28
59
43
16
19
18
12
17
16
10
12
6
4
4
12
9
5
7
16
13
20
4
10
48
15
icon: PPE PPE
213

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1
2

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 46/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 486, -: 89, 0: 14
IT PL ES DE GB FR RO BG HU SK PT BE EL CZ LT NL FI IE AT LV HR DK SI MT EE LU CY SE
Total
51
43
37
74
51
60
28
17
19
12
18
15
18
12
10
20
12
12
16
9
7
10
4
4
5
5
4
15
icon: PPE PPE
216

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

2

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 46/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 415, -: 162, 0: 11
IT ES DE RO FR PL BG HU PT BE SK EL LT FI EE LU SI MT LV AT HR CZ NL IE CY DK SE GB
Total
51
35
75
28
60
43
16
19
18
17
12
18
10
12
5
4
4
4
9
16
6
13
20
12
4
10
15
51
icon: PPE PPE
212

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Bulgaria S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1
2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1
2

France NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 47 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 436, -: 101, 0: 46
IT ES DE PL FR RO BG HU SK PT GB BE FI EL LT NL CZ IE LV HR SI MT LU DK EE AT SE CY
Total
51
36
77
43
58
28
16
18
12
17
50
16
12
16
9
20
13
12
9
7
4
4
5
10
5
16
15
3
icon: PPE PPE
212

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
155

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 48/1 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 297, -: 270, 0: 15
IT PL BG RO HU IE AT FI DE BE SK HR LT SI NL LV EE LU PT SE MT EL CY FR ES DK CZ GB
Total
49
43
17
27
19
12
15
12
78
17
12
7
10
4
19
9
5
5
18
15
4
16
3
58
34
10
13
50
icon: PPE PPE
210

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Austria ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Greece ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Romania NI

For (1)

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
37

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
157

Hungary S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

4

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 48/2 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 465, -: 66, 0: 55
DE FR ES IT PL RO GB BG BE SK PT FI HU NL EL LT IE LV LU CZ DK EE HR SI MT AT CY SE
Total
77
59
36
50
42
27
51
17
17
12
18
12
18
19
16
10
12
9
6
14
10
5
7
4
4
15
3
15
icon: PPE PPE
210

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Finland S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2
4

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 49 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 488, -: 85, 0: 15
IT PL DE ES GB FR RO BG HU BE SK PT CZ LT FI EL SE IE NL AT LV HR DK SI MT LU EE CY
Total
51
43
77
35
51
59
27
17
19
17
12
18
14
10
11
16
15
12
20
16
9
7
10
4
4
5
5
3
icon: PPE PPE
210

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19
2
4

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

2

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 51 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 435, -: 98, 0: 58
IT ES PL DE FR RO BG HU PT BE SK GB FI LT NL EL CZ LV HR SI MT LU DK EE AT SE CY IE
Total
51
37
43
78
60
28
17
19
18
17
12
50
12
10
20
14
14
9
7
4
4
5
10
5
16
15
3
12
icon: PPE PPE
213

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
38

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 52 #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 421, -: 89, 0: 55
IT DE PL ES FR RO BG HU SK PT BE GB FI LT IE CZ NL EL LV HR SI MT LU DK EE SE AT CY
Total
51
77
42
32
58
26
17
18
12
17
16
48
12
9
12
14
18
13
8
7
4
4
5
9
5
14
13
3
icon: PPE PPE
202

Czechia PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
151

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

For (1)

4

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1
4

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - Résolution #

2013/11/21 Outcome: +: 415, -: 103, 0: 67
IT DE FR ES RO PL BG BE SK HU PT FI LT NL SE EL EE SI MT LV LU HR AT CZ IE CY DK GB
Total
50
78
59
35
28
43
17
17
12
19
18
12
9
20
15
13
5
4
4
9
5
7
16
14
12
3
10
50
icon: PPE PPE
211

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Czechia PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
157

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Italy ALDE

Against (1)

4

Spain ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1
2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
19

Poland EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Greece Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
99 2013/2125(INI)
2013/09/13 IMCO 33 amendments...
source: PE-519.497
2013/09/25 AFET 66 amendments...
source: PE-516.909

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/6
date
2014-03-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/6
date
2014-03-06T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/7
date
2013-12-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
docs/7
date
2013-12-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
docs/8
date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0387 title: COM(2014)0387
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/8
date
2015-01-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0387 title: COM(2014)0387
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
committees/0/shadows/4
name
LÖSING Sabine
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-516829_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-516909_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.616&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-516616_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.798&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-516798_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/5
date
2013-10-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0358_EN.html title: A7-0358/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-10-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0358_EN.html title: A7-0358/2013
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131120&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-11-20-TOC_EN.html
events/8
date
2013-11-21T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0514_EN.html title: T7-0514/2013
summary
events/8
date
2013-11-21T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0514_EN.html title: T7-0514/2013
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2013-05-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2013-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0358_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0514
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0514_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: EFD name: TERHO Sampo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
  • date: 2013-07-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0542 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013DC0542:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3258 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3258*&MEET_DATE=26/09/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3258 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2013-09-26T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: EFD name: TERHO Sampo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
  • date: 2013-10-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0358/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131120&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23638&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0514 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0514/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: GAHLER Michael
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2013-05-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2013-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2013-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2013-05-30T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 3258 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3258*&MEET_DATE=26/09/2013 date: 2013-09-26T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2013-08-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829 title: PE516.829 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 title: PE516.909 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.616&secondRef=02 title: PE516.616 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.798&secondRef=02 title: PE516.798 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23638&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)88 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2014-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0387 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0387 summary: In this report, the Commission presents a Roadmap for measures to strengthen the Single Market for defence , to promote a more competitive defence industry and to foster synergies between civil and military research including details and timelines for the actions. The Communication is a follow-up to the Commission’s Communication of July 2013 and contributes to the implementation of the European Council Conclusions of December 2013. At the same time, it builds a bridge to the Commission’s contribution to the European Council of June 2015 . The Commission pursues the following objectives: · an Internal Market for Defence where European companies can operate freely and without discrimination in all Member States; · an EU-wide security of supply regime where armed forces can be sure to be sufficiently supplied in all circumstances no matter in which Member State their suppliers are established; · a Preparatory Action on CSDP-related research to explore the potential of a European research programme which, in the future, may cover both security and defence. This is in addition to exploiting all possible synergies between existing civil and defence research; and · an industrial policy which fosters competitiveness of European defence industries and helps to deliver at affordable prices all the capabilities Europe needs to guarantee its security. To pursue these objectives, the report establishes a roadmap for the activities set out in the Communication. In particular, it notes that the relationship between civil and defence world intensifies with the dividing lines becoming increasingly blurred . This is particularly apparent in CSDP missions which are mostly civil and require close civil / military co-operation to be effective. This is increasing the demand for greater civil / military synergies in areas such as communication, strategic transport, surveillance, RPAS etc. At the same time the investment in defence R&D is continuing to fall dramatically. In 2012, EU-wide defence R&D expenditure decreased by 38% compared to 2011. Partly as a consequence, the gap between defence and civil R&D is increasing. Therefore defence industry dependence on technologies with a civilian origin is increasing as is the tendency to diversify into civil businesses. The Communication aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation that comes from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military. The Roadmap proposes the following initiatives: Complete the Single Market for defence and security : the Commission stresses that the Directive on defence and sensitive security procurement and the Directive on transfers of defence-related products , which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market, must be fully applied in order tackle market distortions and contribute to improving security of supply between Member States. It will: · propose further measures to strengthen the implementation of the Directive on transfers on the basis of the results of a study expected in July 2014; · issue a Green Paper on possible shortfalls of the current system for the control of assets and explore options for EU-wide action, including mechanisms of notification and consultation between Member States; · adopt a roadmap in 2015 for a comprehensive EU-wide Security of Supply regime, which will: identify possible actions in the areas of (a) supply between Member States, (b) supply of Member States from third countries and (c) control of industrial and technological assets in the EU, which are all key elements for a comprehensive security of supply regime; · continue to phase out offsets and clarify exclusions from the scope of Directive 2009/81/EC. Promoting competitiveness in the defence industry : the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on: · work to identify a new mechanism for developing defence standards in Europe and a common approach to standards for military aircraft ; · supporting SMEs – including: (a) development of networks between defence-related regions within the EU, (b) support defence-related SMEs in global competition and (c) provide practical guidance to SMEs and European regional authorities clarifying the eligibility of using European funds in support of dual-use projects. · screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector through the JRC and with EDA and industry, possibly paving the way for future policy actions in this area; · a communication campaign on EU funding of skill-related initiatives and launching a study on current and future competencies and skills supply and demand in the defence sector. Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation : the Commission will seek the maximum synergies possible between civil and military research. The main action it proposes is the Preparatory Action, the purpose of which is to illustrate the value added of an EU contribution in new research areas – complementing the CSDP-related civilian research ongoing under Horizon 2020. The Preparatory Action will last for a maximum of three years. The total amount of funding will depend on the available budgetary resources at the time of adoption. If successful, this Preparatory Action would prepare the ground for a possible CSDP-related research theme which could be funded under the next multi-annual financial framework. While this cannot substitute for national investment in defence R&D, it should promote synergies with national research efforts and encourage industrial co-operation. The scope of the Preparatory Action will be defined in consultation with Member States, the European Parliament, EDA, EEAS and industry. Development of Capabilities : the Commission will: · undertake, with the High Representative and EDA, a joint-assessment of dual-use capability needs for EU security and defence policies, to highlight areas where military and non-military capability needs are similar and identify the potential for synergies; · a Communication, within the context of the European Maritime Security Strategy, to provide an implementation Roadmap for Common Information Sharing Environment (CISE). Space and Defence: while some space capabilities must remain under exclusive national/military control, the Commission believes that there are significant potential benefits, in terms of reduced costs and greater efficiency, from increased synergies between national and European space capabilities. It will continue its work to protect space infrastructure and support the development of the next generation of Satellite Communication (SATCOM). Application of EU energy policies and support instruments in the defence sector : armed forces have a strong interest in reducing their energy footprint and could thus make an important contribution to the Union’s energy targets. The Commission started discussions on the establishment of a Consultation Forum for Energy in the Defence and Security Sector. The Forum will develop (i) guidance documents on the implementation of the relevant EU energy legislation and financing investments in energy efficiency and renewables in the defence sector; (ii) concepts and recommendations for joint actions between Member States to improve the protection of critical energy infrastructures. Strengthening the international dimension : the Commission will discuss with stakeholders how to support the European defence industry on third markets. Issues to be addressed include: (a) the impact of offsets requirements in third countries on the European defence sector; (b) the obstacles that European industry faces when competing for contracts in third countries and the contribution of EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the support that competitors from third countries receive, and the extent to which similar support could be provided to EU companies. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2014-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542 type: Contribution body: IT_CHAMBER
  • date: 2013-12-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2013)0542 title: COM(2013)0542 type: Contribution body: RO_CHAMBER
  • date: 2015-01-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0387 title: COM(2014)0387 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2013-07-24T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0542 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=542 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to set out an Action Plan for the Commission’s contribution to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). BACKGROUND: the security challenges the EU is facing are numerous, complex, interrelated and difficult to foresee. The strategic and geopolitical environment is rapidly and constantly evolving. The world’s balance of power is shifting as new centres of gravity are emerging and the US is rebalancing its strategic focus towards Asia. The crisis in public spending induces cuts in defence budgets . From 2001 to 2010 EU defence spending declined from €251 billion to €194 billion. These budget cuts are also having a serious impact on the industries that develop equipment for our armed forces . They affect in particular the investment in defence R&D that is crucial for developing capabilities of the future. The problem of shrinking defence budgets is aggravated by the persisting fragmentation of European markets which leads to unnecessary duplication of capabilities , organisations and expenditures. This situation necessitates a reorientation of priorities. Defence industry in Europe directly employs about 400 000 people and generates up to another 960 000 indirect jobs. It is, therefore, a sector that is essential to retain if Europe is to remain a world-leading centre for manufacturing and innovation. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) constitutes a key element for Europe's capacity to ensure the security of its citizens and to protect its values and interests. Europe must be able to assume its responsibilities for its own security and for international peace and stability in general. This necessitates a certain degree of strategic autonomy : to be a credible and reliable partner, Europe must be able to decide and to act without depending on the capabilities of third parties. Security of supply, access to critical technologies and operational sovereignty are therefore crucial. Defence is still at the heart of national sovereignty and decisions on military capabilities remain with Member States. However, the EU does have a significant contribution to make . With Members States having amongst themselves around 1.6 million soldiers and annual defence budgets of €194 billion the EU has the capacity to be a strategic actor on the international stage, in line with its values. The European Council, in its Conclusions of 14 December 2012, called upon the High Representative, notably through the European External Action Service and the European Defence Agency, as well as the Commission, to develop further proposals and actions to strengthen CSDP and improve the availability of the required civilian and military capabilities. CONTENT: this Communication builds on the work of the Commission's Defence Task Force established in 2011 with the objective to strengthen the defence sector by mobilising all relevant EU policies. The European External Action Service (EEAS) and European Defence Agency (EDA) have been fully associated to the work of the Task Force and in the preparation of this Communication. This Communication presents a package of measures aiming to encourage the cooperation between Member States. It aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation which come from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military. To reach these objectives, the Commission sets out an Action Plan to strengthen the CSDP in the following areas: Strengthen the internal market for defence and security : the Commission has put forward the two Directives on defence and sensitive security procurement ( 2009/81/EC ) and transfers ( 2009/43/EC ), which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market. The Commission shall also tackle persisting unfair and discriminatory practices and market distortions as well as develop instruments which enable Member States to improve the security of supply between them. Strengthen the competitiveness of the EDTIB : to this end, the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on the following strands: support for competitiveness – including developing 'hybrid standards ' to benefit security and defence markets and examining the ways to develop a European certification system for military airworthiness, building on the civil experience of EASA gained by certifying the Airbus A-400M (in its civil configuration); screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector within the context of the EU’s overall raw materials strategy and prepare, if necessary, targeted policy actions; support for SMEs – including development of a European Strategic Cluster Partnership to provide links with other clusters and support defence-related SMEs in global competition; promote skills identified as essential to the future of the industry including through the "Sector Skills Alliances" and "Knowledge Alliances" programmes currently being trialled. In this context, Member States can use the support that can be provided by the European Social Fund (ESF) and in certain cases of mass redundancies also by the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation and reducing the energy footprint : this concerns exploiting civilian military synergies to the maximum extent possible in order to ensure the most efficient use of European tax payers' resources, in particular by: concentrating its efforts on possible cross-fertilisation between civil and military research and the dual-use potential of space; assessing the possibility of EU-owned dual-use capabilities, which may in certain security areas complement national capabilities and become effective and cost-efficient force multipliers; considering launching a preparatory action for CSDP-related research focusing on those areas where EU defence capabilities are most needed; helping armed forces reduce their energy consumption and thereby contribute to the Union’s 20/20/20 targets. The Commission invites the European Council to discuss this Action Plan in December 2013. On the basis of the discussions with Heads of State and Government, the Commission will develop for the areas defined in this Communication a detailed roadmap with concrete actions and timelines.
  • date: 2013-09-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3258*&MEET_DATE=26/09/2013 title: 3258
  • date: 2013-10-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN title: A7-0358/2013 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE) on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’. The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, in exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report. Members recalled that an operational Common Security and Defence Policy needs a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). They welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area. While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back. Concerned about the reductions in defence investment, the report urged the Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies . Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand : the report called on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality . Member States are invited to further explore the possibility of synchronising and jointly planning the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA). Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services. It should also promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes. The report stated that it is time to promote a voluntary approach in acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market , furthering its consolidation (and initiating harmonisation) as regards supply and demand, rules and standards. Member States are invited to: develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies , and provide them with effective corporate governance mechanisms within the European Union; encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ; minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation ; develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises in a sustainable manner and of facilitating their access to defence procurement. Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes. Member States are encouraged to: explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems; streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates and the development of common civilian and military European certification procedures. Ensuring security of supply : Member States, the EDA and the Commission are invited to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime , and to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics. Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : the report recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe. It encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes. The European Council is urged, against the background of the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR). The report also highlighted the need: to support CSDP missions through European research and development : Members emphasised the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector and of the Horizon 2020 research programme and invited the Member States to establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere , with a focus on cutting-edge technological applications; to maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union; for greater cooperation and exchange of know-how among Member States, on the one hand, and between the European Union and its key partners, on the other; for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology; to develop European ICT and cyber-security standards and integrating them with international standards. Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Members recalled that Member States urgently need to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. The Commission is urged to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.
  • date: 2013-11-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131120&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-11-21T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23638&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-11-21T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0514 title: T7-0514/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 415 votes to 103 with 67 abstentions, a resolution on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base. Parliament recalled that the development of a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB) should be part of the strategic priorities of the EU. It welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area. Reduction in budgets and investment : Parliament drew attention to the changing strategic global landscape, and to reduced defence budgets, caused especially by the economic and financial crisis. While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back. In this context, the resolution urged Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies. Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand: in view of the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers, Parliament calls on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and asked the VP/HR to initiate a wide-ranging process to develop a White Paper on European Security and Defence. Member States are asked to make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality and to explore the possibility of synchronising the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA). Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of · optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services; · promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes. In acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market, Parliament believed that it was time to promote a voluntary approach as regards supply and demand rules and standards. It also stated that it was time to invest in an integrated sustainable industrial policy based on research, innovation, increasing efficiency of resources, a strategy for raw materials, the strengthening of SMEs and the development of regional networks. Member States were invited to: · develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies; · encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ; · minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation . Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes. Member States were encouraged to: · explore the possibilities offered by the EDA in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships; · streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates. Ensuring security of supply : Parliament called on Member States, the EDA and the Commission: · to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime; · to submit a non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics. Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : Parliament: · recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS); · encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes; · urged the European Council to strengthen the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR). Furthermore, the resolution stressed the need to: · support CSDP missions through European research and development using the Horizon 2020 research programme; · establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere; · maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union; · increase cooperation between the European Union and its key partners for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology. Members wanted to see the development of cyber-security standards and the integration of these with international standards. Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Parliament invited Member States to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. It also invited the Commission to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.
  • date: 2013-11-21T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/7/12982
New
  • AFET/7/12982
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.09 Defence and arms industry
  • 6.10.02 Common security and defence policy; WEU, NATO
New
3.40.09
Defence and arms industry
3.50.03
European space policy
6.10.02
Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
activities/1/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0542:EN
activities/1/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0542:EN
activities/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: EFD name: TERHO Sampo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: GAHLER Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
activities/0/date
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00
New
2013-07-04T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829 type: Committee draft report title: PE516.829
activities/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3258&dd_DATE_REUNION=26/09/2013&single_date=26/09/2013
New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3258*&MEET_DATE=26/09/2013
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: EFD name: TERHO Sampo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: GAHLER Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
activities/3/date
Old
2013-09-25T00:00:00
New
2013-10-24T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.909
activities/3/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5
date
2013-10-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/6/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz Władysław group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2013-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
activities/6/date
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00
New
2013-11-21T00:00:00
activities/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23638&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0514 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0514/2013
activities/6/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/8
date
2013-11-21T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0514/2013
body
EP
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
committees/0/committee
Old
ITRE
New
AFET
committees/0/committee_full
Old
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
New
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
committees/0/date
Old
2013-05-30T00:00:00
New
2013-03-21T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de182d90fb8127435bdbb3e
New
4f1ac81db819f25efd0000ca
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name
Old
AUDY Jean-Pierre
New
GAHLER Michael
committees/0/responsible
Old
 
New
True
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz
  • group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
  • group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey
  • group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine
  • group: EFD name: TERHO Sampo
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8f
New
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d
committees/2/committee
Old
AFET
New
ITRE
committees/2/committee_full
Old
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
New
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
committees/2/date
Old
2013-03-21T00:00:00
New
2013-05-30T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184df0fb8127435bdbe2d
New
4f1ac60fb819f25efd000019
committees/2/rapporteur/0/name
Old
GAHLER Michael
New
AUDY Jean-Pierre
committees/2/responsible
Old
True
New
 
committees/2/shadows
  • group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz Władysław
  • group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
activities/7/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131120&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/8
date
2013-11-21T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0514/2013
body
EP
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/date
Old
2013-11-21T00:00:00
New
2013-08-28T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829 type: Committee draft report title: PE516.829
activities/2/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Committee draft report
activities/3
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.909
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/date
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00
New
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/3/docs/0/title
Old
PE516.829
New
PE516.909
activities/3/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
activities/3/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/7/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/6/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE) on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, in response to the Commission communication entitled

    ‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’.

    The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, in exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report.

    Members recalled that an operational Common Security and Defence Policy needs a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). They welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area.

    While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.

    Concerned about the reductions in defence investment, the report urged the Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies.

    Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand: the report called on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality. Member States are invited to further explore the possibility of synchronising and jointly planning the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA).

    Industrial policy: according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services.  It should also promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes.

    The report stated that it is time to promote a voluntary approach in acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market, furthering its consolidation (and initiating harmonisation) as regards supply and demand, rules and standards.

    Member States are invited to:

    • develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies, and provide them with effective corporate governance mechanisms within the European Union;
    • encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities;
    • minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles, to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation;
    • develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises in a sustainable manner and of facilitating their access to defence procurement.

    Common approach to standardisation and certification: Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes.

    Member States are encouraged to:

    • explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications, for example for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems;
    • streamline European certification procedures, with the mutual recognition of certificates and the development of common civilian and military European certification procedures.

    Ensuring security of supply: Member States, the EDA and the Commission are invited to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime, and to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics.

    Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation: the report recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe.

    It encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes.

    The European Council is urged, against the background of the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR).

    The report also highlighted the need: 

    • to support CSDP missions through European research and development: Members emphasised the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector and of the Horizon 2020 research programme and invited the Member States to establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere, with a focus on cutting-edge technological applications;
    • to maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union;
    • for greater cooperation and exchange of know-how among Member States, on the one hand, and between the European Union and its key partners, on the other; for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology;
    • to develop European ICT and cyber-security standards and integrating them with international standards.

    Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment: Members recalled that Member States urgently need to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets, while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. The Commission is urged to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.

activities/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN
activities/6
date
2013-10-30T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0358/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/date
Old
2013-11-18T00:00:00
New
2013-08-28T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829 type: Committee draft report title: PE516.829
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee draft report
activities/3
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.909
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/date
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00
New
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/3/docs/0/title
Old
PE516.829
New
PE516.909
activities/3/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
activities/3/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/5
date
2013-10-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/7/date
Old
2013-10-24T00:00:00
New
2013-11-20T00:00:00
activities/7/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/8
date
2013-11-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/5/date
Old
2013-10-17T00:00:00
New
2013-10-24T00:00:00
activities/4
body
CSL
meeting_id
3258
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3258&dd_DATE_REUNION=26/09/2013&single_date=26/09/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3258
council
Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space)
date
2013-09-26T00:00:00
type
Council Meeting
activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
activities/3
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.909
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to set out an Action Plan for the Commission’s contribution to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

    BACKGROUND: the security challenges the EU is facing are numerous, complex, interrelated and difficult to foresee. The strategic and geopolitical environment is rapidly and constantly evolving. The world’s balance of power is shifting as new centres of gravity are emerging and the US is rebalancing its strategic focus towards Asia.

    The crisis in public spending induces cuts in defence budgets. From 2001 to 2010 EU defence spending declined from €251 billion to €194 billion. These budget cuts are also having a serious impact on the industries that develop equipment for our armed forces. They affect in particular the investment in defence R&D that is crucial for developing capabilities of the future.

    The problem of shrinking defence budgets is aggravated by the persisting fragmentation of European markets which leads to unnecessary duplication of capabilities, organisations and expenditures. This situation necessitates a reorientation of priorities.

    Defence industry in Europe directly employs about 400 000 people and generates up to another 960 000 indirect jobs. It is, therefore, a sector that is essential to retain if Europe is to remain a world-leading centre for manufacturing and innovation. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) constitutes a key element for Europe's capacity to ensure the security of its citizens and to protect its values and interests.

    Europe must be able to assume its responsibilities for its own security and for international peace and stability in general. This necessitates a certain degree of strategic autonomy: to be a credible and reliable partner, Europe must be able to decide and to act without depending on the capabilities of third parties. Security of supply, access to critical technologies and operational sovereignty are therefore crucial.

    Defence is still at the heart of national sovereignty and decisions on military capabilities remain with Member States. However, the EU does have a significant contribution to make. With Members States having amongst themselves around 1.6 million soldiers and annual defence budgets of €194 billion the EU has the capacity to be a strategic actor on the international stage, in line with its values.

    The European Council, in its Conclusions of 14 December 2012, called upon the High Representative, notably through the European External Action Service and the European Defence Agency, as well as the Commission, to develop further proposals and actions to strengthen CSDP and improve the availability of the required civilian and military capabilities.

    CONTENT: this Communication builds on the work of the Commission's Defence Task Force established in 2011 with the objective to strengthen the defence sector by mobilising all relevant EU policies. The European External Action Service (EEAS) and European Defence Agency (EDA) have been fully associated to the work of the Task Force and in the preparation of this Communication.

    This Communication presents a package of measures aiming to encourage the cooperation between Member States. It aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation which come from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military.

    To reach these objectives, the Commission sets out an Action Plan to strengthen the CSDP in the following areas:

    Strengthen the internal market for defence and security: the Commission has put forward the two Directives on defence and sensitive security procurement (2009/81/EC) and transfers (2009/43/EC), which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market. The Commission shall also tackle persisting unfair and discriminatory practices and market distortions as well as develop instruments which enable Member States to improve the security of supply between them.

    Strengthen the competitiveness of the EDTIB: to this end, the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on the following strands:

    • support for competitiveness – including developing 'hybrid standards' to benefit security and defence markets and examining the ways to develop a European certification system for military airworthiness, building on the civil experience of EASA gained by certifying the Airbus A-400M (in its civil configuration);
    • screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector within the context of the EU’s overall raw materials strategy and prepare, if necessary, targeted policy actions;
    • support for SMEs – including development of a European Strategic Cluster Partnership to provide links with other clusters and support defence-related SMEs in global competition;
    • promote skills identified as essential to the future of the industry including through the "Sector Skills Alliances" and "Knowledge Alliances" programmes currently being trialled. In this context, Member States can use the support that can be provided by the European Social Fund (ESF) and in certain cases of mass redundancies also by the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.

    Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation and reducing the energy footprint: this concerns exploiting civilian military synergies to the maximum extent possible in order to ensure the most efficient use of European tax payers' resources, in particular by:

    • concentrating its efforts on possible cross-fertilisation between civil and military research and the dual-use potential of space;
    • assessing the possibility of EU-owned dual-use capabilities, which may in certain security areas complement national capabilities and become effective and cost-efficient force multipliers;
    • considering launching a preparatory action for CSDP-related research focusing on those areas where EU defence capabilities are most needed;
    • helping armed forces reduce their energy consumption and thereby contribute to the Union’s 20/20/20 targets.

    The Commission invites the European Council to discuss this Action Plan in December 2013. On the basis of the discussions with Heads of State and Government, the Commission will develop for the areas defined in this Communication a detailed roadmap with concrete actions and timelines.

activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
activities/1
date
2013-07-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52013DC0542:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2013)0542
body
EC
type
Non-legislative basic document
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
activities/2
date
2013-08-28T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE516.829
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/date
Old
2013-07-17T00:00:00
New
2013-10-17T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2013-11-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2013-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
activities/1
date
2013-07-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2013-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
activities
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz Władysław group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZEMKE Janusz Władysław group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: GAHLER Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/7/12982
reference
2013/2125(INI)
title
European defence technogical and industrial base
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject