Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | GAHLER Michael ( PPE) | ZEMKE Janusz ( S&D), NICOLAI Norica ( ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE), VAN ORDEN Geoffrey ( ECR), TERHO Sampo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó ( PPE) | Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | AUDY Jean-Pierre ( PPE) | Adam GIEREK ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
In this report, the Commission presents a Roadmap for measures to strengthen the Single Market for defence , to promote a more competitive defence industry and to foster synergies between civil and military research including details and timelines for the actions. The Communication is a follow-up to the Commission’s Communication of July 2013 and contributes to the implementation of the European Council Conclusions of December 2013. At the same time, it builds a bridge to the Commission’s contribution to the European Council of June 2015 .
The Commission pursues the following objectives:
· an Internal Market for Defence where European companies can operate freely and without discrimination in all Member States;
· an EU-wide security of supply regime where armed forces can be sure to be sufficiently supplied in all circumstances no matter in which Member State their suppliers are established;
· a Preparatory Action on CSDP-related research to explore the potential of a European research programme which, in the future, may cover both security and defence. This is in addition to exploiting all possible synergies between existing civil and defence research; and
· an industrial policy which fosters competitiveness of European defence industries and helps to deliver at affordable prices all the capabilities Europe needs to guarantee its security.
To pursue these objectives, the report establishes a roadmap for the activities set out in the Communication. In particular, it notes that the relationship between civil and defence world intensifies with the dividing lines becoming increasingly blurred . This is particularly apparent in CSDP missions which are mostly civil and require close civil / military co-operation to be effective. This is increasing the demand for greater civil / military synergies in areas such as communication, strategic transport, surveillance, RPAS etc. At the same time the investment in defence R&D is continuing to fall dramatically. In 2012, EU-wide defence R&D expenditure decreased by 38% compared to 2011. Partly as a consequence, the gap between defence and civil R&D is increasing. Therefore defence industry dependence on technologies with a civilian origin is increasing as is the tendency to diversify into civil businesses.
The Communication aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation that comes from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military.
The Roadmap proposes the following initiatives:
Complete the Single Market for defence and security : the Commission stresses that the Directive on defence and sensitive security procurement and the Directive on transfers of defence-related products , which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market, must be fully applied in order tackle market distortions and contribute to improving security of supply between Member States. It will:
· propose further measures to strengthen the implementation of the Directive on transfers on the basis of the results of a study expected in July 2014;
· issue a Green Paper on possible shortfalls of the current system for the control of assets and explore options for EU-wide action, including mechanisms of notification and consultation between Member States;
· adopt a roadmap in 2015 for a comprehensive EU-wide Security of Supply regime, which will: identify possible actions in the areas of (a) supply between Member States, (b) supply of Member States from third countries and (c) control of industrial and technological assets in the EU, which are all key elements for a comprehensive security of supply regime;
· continue to phase out offsets and clarify exclusions from the scope of Directive 2009/81/EC.
Promoting competitiveness in the defence industry : the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on:
· work to identify a new mechanism for developing defence standards in Europe and a common approach to standards for military aircraft ;
· supporting SMEs – including: (a) development of networks between defence-related regions within the EU, (b) support defence-related SMEs in global competition and (c) provide practical guidance to SMEs and European regional authorities clarifying the eligibility of using European funds in support of dual-use projects.
· screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector through the JRC and with EDA and industry, possibly paving the way for future policy actions in this area;
· a communication campaign on EU funding of skill-related initiatives and launching a study on current and future competencies and skills supply and demand in the defence sector.
Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation : the Commission will seek the maximum synergies possible between civil and military research. The main action it proposes is the Preparatory Action, the purpose of which is to illustrate the value added of an EU contribution in new research areas – complementing the CSDP-related civilian research ongoing under Horizon 2020. The Preparatory Action will last for a maximum of three years. The total amount of funding will depend on the available budgetary resources at the time of adoption. If successful, this Preparatory Action would prepare the ground for a possible CSDP-related research theme which could be funded under the next multi-annual financial framework. While this cannot substitute for national investment in defence R&D, it should promote synergies with national research efforts and encourage industrial co-operation. The scope of the Preparatory Action will be defined in consultation with Member States, the European Parliament, EDA, EEAS and industry.
Development of Capabilities : the Commission will:
· undertake, with the High Representative and EDA, a joint-assessment of dual-use capability needs for EU security and defence policies, to highlight areas where military and non-military capability needs are similar and identify the potential for synergies;
· a Communication, within the context of the European Maritime Security Strategy, to provide an implementation Roadmap for Common Information Sharing Environment (CISE).
Space and Defence: while some space capabilities must remain under exclusive national/military control, the Commission believes that there are significant potential benefits, in terms of reduced costs and greater efficiency, from increased synergies between national and European space capabilities. It will continue its work to protect space infrastructure and support the development of the next generation of Satellite Communication (SATCOM).
Application of EU energy policies and support instruments in the defence sector : armed forces have a strong interest in reducing their energy footprint and could thus make an important contribution to the Union’s energy targets. The Commission started discussions on the establishment of a Consultation Forum for Energy in the Defence and Security Sector. The Forum will develop (i) guidance documents on the implementation of the relevant EU energy legislation and financing investments in energy efficiency and renewables in the defence sector; (ii) concepts and recommendations for joint actions between Member States to improve the protection of critical energy infrastructures.
Strengthening the international dimension : the Commission will discuss with stakeholders how to support the European defence industry on third markets. Issues to be addressed include: (a) the impact of offsets requirements in third countries on the European defence sector; (b) the obstacles that European industry faces when competing for contracts in third countries and the contribution of EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the support that competitors from third countries receive, and the extent to which similar support could be provided to EU companies.
The European Parliament adopted by 415 votes to 103 with 67 abstentions, a resolution on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base.
Parliament recalled that the development of a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB) should be part of the strategic priorities of the EU. It welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area.
Reduction in budgets and investment : Parliament drew attention to the changing strategic global landscape, and to reduced defence budgets, caused especially by the economic and financial crisis. While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.
In this context, the resolution urged Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies.
Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand: in view of the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers, Parliament calls on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and asked the VP/HR to initiate a wide-ranging process to develop a White Paper on European Security and Defence.
Member States are asked to make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality and to explore the possibility of synchronising the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA).
Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of
· optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services;
· promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes.
In acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market, Parliament believed that it was time to promote a voluntary approach as regards supply and demand rules and standards. It also stated that it was time to invest in an integrated sustainable industrial policy based on research, innovation, increasing efficiency of resources, a strategy for raw materials, the strengthening of SMEs and the development of regional networks.
Member States were invited to:
· develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies;
· encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ;
· minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation .
Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes.
Member States were encouraged to:
· explore the possibilities offered by the EDA in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships;
· streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates.
Ensuring security of supply : Parliament called on Member States, the EDA and the Commission:
· to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime;
· to submit a non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics.
Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : Parliament:
· recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS);
· encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes;
· urged the European Council to strengthen the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR).
Furthermore, the resolution stressed the need to:
· support CSDP missions through European research and development using the Horizon 2020 research programme;
· establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere;
· maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union;
· increase cooperation between the European Union and its key partners for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology. Members wanted to see the development of cyber-security standards and the integration of these with international standards.
Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Parliament invited Member States to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. It also invited the Commission to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE) on the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, in response to the Commission communication entitled
‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, in exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report.
Members recalled that an operational Common Security and Defence Policy needs a strong European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). They welcomed the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit and called on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus in this area.
While some third countries such as China, India, Brazil and Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.
Concerned about the reductions in defence investment, the report urged the Member States to reinforce European industrial cooperation with a view to ensuring, as far as possible, strategic autonomy by developing and producing efficient military and security capabilities using the most advanced technologies .
Harmonisation of requirements and consolidation of demand : the report called on the European Council to launch a European defence review process and make the coordination of national defence planning processes at EU level a reality . Member States are invited to further explore the possibility of synchronising and jointly planning the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA).
Industrial policy : according to Members, a European industrial defence policy should have the aim of optimising Member States’ capabilities by coordinating the development, deployment and maintenance of a range of capabilities, installations, equipment and services. It should also promote research and technology cooperation and by developing equipment cooperation programmes.
The report stated that it is time to promote a voluntary approach in acting on the fragmentation of the European industrial defence market , furthering its consolidation (and initiating harmonisation) as regards supply and demand, rules and standards.
Member States are invited to:
develop their defence industrial and technological bases and centres of excellence around key technologies , and provide them with effective corporate governance mechanisms within the European Union; encourage cooperation between major defence companies and universities ; minimise unnecessary regulatory obstacles , to improve dialogue between defence undertakings and to promote the rationalisation ; develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises in a sustainable manner and of facilitating their access to defence procurement.
Common approach to standardisation and certification : Members reiterated the fundamental importance of standardisation of defence equipment for the establishment of a competitive single European defence market, as well as for ensuring interoperability and facilitating cooperation on armaments programmes.
Member States are encouraged to:
explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications , for example for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems; streamline European certification procedures , with the mutual recognition of certificates and the development of common civilian and military European certification procedures.
Ensuring security of supply : Member States, the EDA and the Commission are invited to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime , and to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano-electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics.
Giving a new impetus to armaments cooperation : the report recommended developing key enablers with civil-military applications, which are sorely lacking in the majority of the Member States, such as some remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe.
It encouraged EU participation in joint projects through leasing and/or acquisition of dual-use capabilities and the possible procurement of prototypes.
The European Council is urged, against the background of the existing administrative arrangement between the EDA and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR).
The report also highlighted the need:
to support CSDP missions through European research and development : Members emphasised the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector and of the Horizon 2020 research programme and invited the Member States to establish an appropriate platform for bringing defence research to the civilian sphere , with a focus on cutting-edge technological applications; to maintain the excellence of this technologically innovative and efficient industry in order to ensure the technological independence of the European Union; for greater cooperation and exchange of know-how among Member States, on the one hand, and between the European Union and its key partners, on the other; for the safety and security of infrastructure and technology; to develop European ICT and cyber-security standards and integrating them with international standards.
Strengthening the internal market in defence equipment : Members recalled that Member States urgently need to improve the transparency and increase the openness of their defence markets , while stressing the specific nature of defence procurement. The Commission is urged to step up efforts to build a level playing field in the defence market, limiting the use of market-distorting practices to the strict minimum of duly justified derogations.
PURPOSE: to set out an Action Plan for the Commission’s contribution to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).
BACKGROUND: the security challenges the EU is facing are numerous, complex, interrelated and difficult to foresee. The strategic and geopolitical environment is rapidly and constantly evolving. The world’s balance of power is shifting as new centres of gravity are emerging and the US is rebalancing its strategic focus towards Asia.
The crisis in public spending induces cuts in defence budgets . From 2001 to 2010 EU defence spending declined from €251 billion to €194 billion. These budget cuts are also having a serious impact on the industries that develop equipment for our armed forces . They affect in particular the investment in defence R&D that is crucial for developing capabilities of the future.
The problem of shrinking defence budgets is aggravated by the persisting fragmentation of European markets which leads to unnecessary duplication of capabilities , organisations and expenditures. This situation necessitates a reorientation of priorities.
Defence industry in Europe directly employs about 400 000 people and generates up to another 960 000 indirect jobs. It is, therefore, a sector that is essential to retain if Europe is to remain a world-leading centre for manufacturing and innovation. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) constitutes a key element for Europe's capacity to ensure the security of its citizens and to protect its values and interests.
Europe must be able to assume its responsibilities for its own security and for international peace and stability in general. This necessitates a certain degree of strategic autonomy : to be a credible and reliable partner, Europe must be able to decide and to act without depending on the capabilities of third parties. Security of supply, access to critical technologies and operational sovereignty are therefore crucial.
Defence is still at the heart of national sovereignty and decisions on military capabilities remain with Member States. However, the EU does have a significant contribution to make . With Members States having amongst themselves around 1.6 million soldiers and annual defence budgets of €194 billion the EU has the capacity to be a strategic actor on the international stage, in line with its values.
The European Council, in its Conclusions of 14 December 2012, called upon the High Representative, notably through the European External Action Service and the European Defence Agency, as well as the Commission, to develop further proposals and actions to strengthen CSDP and improve the availability of the required civilian and military capabilities.
CONTENT: this Communication builds on the work of the Commission's Defence Task Force established in 2011 with the objective to strengthen the defence sector by mobilising all relevant EU policies. The European External Action Service (EEAS) and European Defence Agency (EDA) have been fully associated to the work of the Task Force and in the preparation of this Communication.
This Communication presents a package of measures aiming to encourage the cooperation between Member States. It aims to exploit possible synergies and cross-fertilisation which come from the blurring of the dividing line between defence and security and between civil and military.
To reach these objectives, the Commission sets out an Action Plan to strengthen the CSDP in the following areas:
Strengthen the internal market for defence and security : the Commission has put forward the two Directives on defence and sensitive security procurement ( 2009/81/EC ) and transfers ( 2009/43/EC ), which constitute today the cornerstone of the European defence market. The Commission shall also tackle persisting unfair and discriminatory practices and market distortions as well as develop instruments which enable Member States to improve the security of supply between them.
Strengthen the competitiveness of the EDTIB : to this end, the Commission will develop a defence industrial policy based on the following strands:
support for competitiveness – including developing 'hybrid standards ' to benefit security and defence markets and examining the ways to develop a European certification system for military airworthiness, building on the civil experience of EASA gained by certifying the Airbus A-400M (in its civil configuration); screen raw materials that are critical for the defence sector within the context of the EU’s overall raw materials strategy and prepare, if necessary, targeted policy actions; support for SMEs – including development of a European Strategic Cluster Partnership to provide links with other clusters and support defence-related SMEs in global competition; promote skills identified as essential to the future of the industry including through the "Sector Skills Alliances" and "Knowledge Alliances" programmes currently being trialled. In this context, Member States can use the support that can be provided by the European Social Fund (ESF) and in certain cases of mass redundancies also by the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
Exploiting dual-use potential of research and reinforcing innovation and reducing the energy footprint : this concerns exploiting civilian military synergies to the maximum extent possible in order to ensure the most efficient use of European tax payers' resources, in particular by:
concentrating its efforts on possible cross-fertilisation between civil and military research and the dual-use potential of space; assessing the possibility of EU-owned dual-use capabilities, which may in certain security areas complement national capabilities and become effective and cost-efficient force multipliers; considering launching a preparatory action for CSDP-related research focusing on those areas where EU defence capabilities are most needed; helping armed forces reduce their energy consumption and thereby contribute to the Union’s 20/20/20 targets.
The Commission invites the European Council to discuss this Action Plan in December 2013. On the basis of the discussions with Heads of State and Government, the Commission will develop for the areas defined in this Communication a detailed roadmap with concrete actions and timelines.
Documents
- Contribution: COM(2014)0387
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0387
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)88
- Contribution: COM(2013)0542
- Contribution: COM(2013)0542
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0514/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0358/2013
- Committee opinion: PE516.798
- Committee opinion: PE516.616
- Debate in Council: 3258
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.909
- Committee draft report: PE516.829
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2013)0542
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE516.829
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.909
- Committee opinion: PE516.616
- Committee opinion: PE516.798
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)88
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2014)0387
- Contribution: COM(2013)0542
- Contribution: COM(2013)0542
- Contribution: COM(2014)0387
Activities
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - European defence technological and industrial base (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - European defence technological and industrial base (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - European defence technological and industrial base (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - European defence technological and industrial base (debate)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
- Gerard BATTEN
- Andrew DUFF
- Maria Eleni KOPPA
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
- Elmar BROK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tarja CRONBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marietta GIANNAKOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ágnes HANKISS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna IBRISAGIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eduard KUKAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krzysztof LISEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sabine LÖSING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Willy MEYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul MURPHY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika PANAYOTOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cristian Dan PREDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nikolaos SALAVRAKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marietje SCHAAKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sampo TERHO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 4 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 5 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 9/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 11/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 11/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 17 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 25 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 26 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 27 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 29 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 31/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 31/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 33/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 33/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 34/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 34/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 36 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 37/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 37/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 40/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 40/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 44/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 44/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 46/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 46/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 47 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 48/1 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 48/2 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 49 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 51 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - § 52 #
A7-0358/2013 - Michael Gahler - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
99 |
2013/2125(INI)
2013/09/13
IMCO
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the recent economic downturn has led to a number of reductions in the defence budgets of
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that, in order to increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry, Member States urgently need to increase the transparency and openness of their defence markets; considers that Directive 2009/81/EC on defence and sensitive security procurement strengthens
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that greater use of innovative procurement techniques – especially including those related to the aggregation of requirements, use of ICT and incentives- setting for R&D – should be encouraged in defence procurement, as they may be particularly suited to this field and can play a major role in reducing the administrati
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that greater use of innovative procurement techniques – especially including those related to the aggregation of requirements, use of ICT and incentives- setting for R&D – should be encouraged in defence procurement, as they may be particularly suited to this field and can play a major role in reducing the administration and costs related to procurement procedures, while at the same time the protection of intellectual property rights and know-how needs to be ensured;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that greater use of innovative procurement techniques – especially
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that greater use of innovative procurement techniques – especially including those related to the aggregation of requirements, use of ICT and incentives- setting for R&D – should be encouraged in defence procurement, as they may be particularly suited to this field and can play a major role in reducing the administration and costs related to procurement procedures; urges the Member States to make strategic use of defence public procurement and implement innovative awarding principles based on the concept of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender encompassing environmental, social, ethical and quality aspects as well as a life-cycle approach;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that contracting authorities and entities in the fields of defence and security should have access to a specific procurement procedure in respect of contracts where there is a need for the development of an innovative product or service or innovative works and the subsequent purchase of the resulting supplies, services or works which cannot be met by solutions already available on the market; considers furthermore that such a procedure would improve the functioning of the internal market and the development of a European defence equipment market, a European defence technological and industrial base and would drive growth for innovative SMEs; underlines that such a procedure has already been agreed in the revised Classic and Utilities Procurement Directives, allowing contracting authorities to establish a long-term innovation partnership for the development and subsequent purchase of new, innovative products, services or works, providing the necessary 'market-pull' and incentivising the development of an innovative solution without foreclosing the market; calls therefore on the European Commission to take these developments into account in its implementation report to the European Parliament and the Council under Defence Procurement Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC), which is due by 21 August 2016, and to accompany this report with a legislative proposal amending Directive 2009/81/EC, introducing the innovation partnerships procedure for those contracts;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Member States to also take steps to abolish the duplication and excess capacity in the sector through boosting cooperation in the internal market; highlights the potential benefits of joint procurement in terms of economies of scale and interoperability; points out that shared projects will reduce costs and allow for long term investments;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the importance of efficient public expenditure in the defence sector; encourages the Member States, against the background of the current social and economic crisis as well as strained public finances, to scrutinise public defence expenditure and reallocate savings potential in the defence sector in favour of public investments in social economies and civilian industries;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the contracts awarded in the field of defence and security are often technically complex; stresses that in order to facilitate cross-border tendering there is a need to review
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the contracts awarded in the field of defence and security are often technically complex; stresses that in order to facilitate cross-border tendering there is a need to review - where appropriate - unnecessary, incompatible or disproportionate technical requirements so as to minimise and, where possible, eliminate barriers to the internal market;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that the Union should provide security for its citizens and support democracy, human rights and the rule of law in its neighbourhood and beyond; however, considers that this can be done without expanding the common defence policy
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that promoting the European defence technological and industrial base is a further element towards to the completion of the Single Market and can create sustainable jobs for citizens employed in the defence industries;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that liberalisation of non- sensitive national programmes not including nuclear power and weapons, complex weapons system, or complex communications, detection and stealth systems would increase competition and lower prices as defence companies across the Union could compete for contracts; points out that if Member States will not change the national procurement processes, the Commission will have to rely on case law for non-sensitive programmes;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Requests that costly military prestige projects be abandoned and calls on Member States to particularly support the development of products that ensure the protection and safety of the soldiers in the field.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that specific, sometimes even useless, technical demands in invitations to tenders are particularly targeted to exclude foreign companies, in order to increase the financial and technical abilities of the national defence industry;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Emphasizes that so far additional formalities have not proven to diminish this effect in the defence industry sector, but rather to increase it as well as the associated costs and time for the contracting parties, therefore effectively reducing the competitiveness of the European defence industry;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Concludes that, based on developments in Lybia, Mali and Syria and despite the existing common security and defence policy, sovereign nations clearly tend to have sovereign defence interests and hence keep their technological know-how and their defence industry also as sovereign as possible; calls on the Commission to take these important aspects into consideration for the proposal of new or the abolishment of existing formalities in order to effectively increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the fragmentation of the European defence market is an obstacle to small and medium-sized enterprises
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the fragmentation of the European defence market is an obstacle to small and medium-sized enterprises increasing their share in this market; emphasises the importance of possibilities for small and medium-sized enterprises to take part in the process of creating defence equipment sector products, both military equipment and intangibles such as software and technology; urges the Commission, therefore, to adopt further proposals to facilitate their access to the European defence industry;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the fragmentation of the European defence market is an obstacle to small and medium-sized enterprises increasing their share in this market; emphasises the importance of possibilities for small and medium-sized enterprises to take part in the process of creating defence equipment sector products; urges the Commission, therefore, to adopt further proposals to facilitate their access to the European defence industry; emphasizes that the creation of additional Union standards and certifications might be detrimental for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises as they often do not have the ability to invest upfront for years and the costs for qualification and certification already tend to constitute a considerable amount of the overall development costs for new defence products;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Member States to inspire cooperation between major defence companies and universities; emphasises that the knowledge base of universities can be widened through this cooperation;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges the Member States to increase transparency levels with regard to state aid and procurement practices in the defence sector, towards European authorities and agencies as well as towards the general public;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to facilitate efforts of exploiting technologies and innovation emanating from the defence industry for non-military purposes and the production of civilian products and applications in order to strengthen high-technology industries within the internal market;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the need for greater funding for R&D in Member States to successfully compete with third countries' manufacturers in defence sector; notes that innovation and technological developments can lead to improvements in other areas of life;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Deplores the strong emphasis in Commission Communication of 24 July 2013 'Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector1 on labour flexibility schemes as the appropriate response to structural changes within the defence industry; instead draws attention to the assessment of potential economic incentives for the conversion of military-industrial overcapacities into civilian production; ____________________________ 1 COM(2013) 542 final.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and Member States to cooperate with one another to ensure cyber-security, as
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls the tradition of the Union as a civilian power in global affairs; reiterates therefore that the European defence industry should first and foremost focus on the demand from the internal market; deplores in this context the increase in trade in arms and defence equipment emanating from the Union with autocratic regimes in unstable world regions; notes that these trade practices might not be conducive to the security of citizens in regions receiving arms and defence equipment from the Union as well as to European and global security considerations; urges the Member States to act in international fora in favour of more transparency in international defence procurement markets in order to increase the controllability of global trade flows in armament;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that, in order to increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry, Member States urgently need to i
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that, in order to increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry, Member States urgently need to increase the transparency and openness of their defence markets; considers that Directive 2009/81/EC on defence and sensitive security procurement strengthens the single market by reducing the complexity of procurement rules in the defence sector
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that, in order to increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry, Member States urgently need to increase the transparency and openness of their defence markets; considers that Directive 2009/81/EC on defence and sensitive security procurement strengthens the single market by reducing the complexity of procurement rules in the defence sector; calls on the Member States to correctly implement Directive 2009/81/EC (deadline for transposition on 21 August 2011).
source: PE-519.497
2013/09/25
AFET
66 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls th
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that if Europe wishes to maintain a solid security and defence industry its Member States need to coordinate their defence budgets to avoid duplication and to strengthen their joint research programmes;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the EU’s industrial, space and research policies extend to the defence remit; Nevertheless recalls that Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation will focus solely on the development of civilian applications1; points out that Union programmes in other areas such as internal and border security, disaster management and development offer a significant prospect of jointly developing capabilities relevant to those policies and to the conduct of CSDP missions; __________________ 1 Article 16 of the Regulation (EU) No .../2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and innovation (2014-2020)
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the EU's industrial, space and research policies extend to the defence remit; points out that Union programmes in other areas such as internal and border security, disaster management and development offer a significant prospect of jointly developing capabilities relevant to those policies
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to make progress in consolidating the EDTIB,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to make progress in consolidating the EDTIB in a manner which is sustainable and which takes account of the interests of SMEs, given that – in the face of the increasing sophistication and costs of technologies, growing international competition and decreasing defence budgets and production volumes – it is no longer possible in any of the Member States for the defence industry to be sustainable on a strictly national basis; regrets the fact that, while a certain level of concentration has been achieved in the
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Maintains that the construction of a European defence industry should be carried out in a sustainable manner, in all Member States, on the basis of existing industrial infrastructure, and not solely according to the principle of free competition;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes the Commission Communication of 24 July 2013 and the EEAS draft report; considers it regrettable that the Commission Communication did not specify the mechanisms that would ensure the equitable development of the defence industry in all parts of the European Union; considers it similarly regrettable that the Commission and the EEAS did not issue a joint European declaration in preparation for the European Council’s defence summit in December of this year;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the defence sector is a major source of jobs, growth and innovation at European level; stresses the importance of adopting an ambitious EDTIB policy;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers in an own broad assessment that both strategies have been insufficiently implemented because of the lack of a common understanding of EDTIB resulting from differing national and industrial interests, the persistence of established national habits in the armaments sectors; takes note of the fact that there are Member States with no own national defence industry and/or niche industries trying to get globally best value for money, with less competitive defence industries favouring national alimentation suppliers as well as with potent national defence industries accepting strong global competition;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit; calls on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh impetus for supporting a truly European defence technological and industrial base, which will be capability-driven and will promote synergies, provide for the efficient
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the European Council’s decision to put the strengthening of Europe’s defence on the agenda for its December summit; calls on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh and ambitious impetus for supporting a truly European defence technological and industrial base, which will be capability- driven and will promote synergies, provide for the efficient use of resources, avoid duplication and be integrated and competitive on the global market;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the European Council's decision to put the strengthening of Europe's defence on the agenda for its December summit; calls on the European Council to provide the necessary fresh impetus for supporting a truly European defence technological and industrial base, which will be backed by appropriate integrity and trust building measures and which will be capability-driven and will promote synergies, provide for the efficient use of resources, avoid duplication and be integrated and competitive on the global market;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers it regrettable that past efforts to consolidate demand have not improved the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers and an even higher number of customers of products for civilian and military use;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers it regrettable that past efforts to consolidate demand have not improved the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers and an even higher number of customers of products for civilian and military use; regrets the limited results of the EDA’s Capability Development Plan;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers it regrettable that past efforts to consolidate demand have not improved the fragmentation of demand in the EU, with 28 national defence customers and an even higher number of customers of products for civilian and military use; regrets the limited results of the EDA’s Capability Development Plan; calls,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 - subparagraph 1 (new) Notes the work of the NATO defence planning process, through which members of the Alliance, including 26 European Allies, coordinate - where appropriate - to ensure the right defence capabilities are developed and maintained to address future challenges; notes that NATO has long recognised the need for close cooperation with industry, not least to assist the development of military capability requirements, especially regarding standardisation and interoperability, while fostering transatlantic defence technological and industrial cooperation;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that a strong European defence industry has the added advantage of providing jobs, boosting economic growth and fostering innovation, key features for European stability and security;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States to further explore the possibility of synchronis
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States to synchronise and jointly plan the life-cycle management of their defence capabilities in cooperation with the EDA; considers that a common European capabilities and armaments policy would be a prerequisite for turning the harmonisation of military requirements into harmonised equipment acquisition among Member States, thus creating the conditions for a successful demand driven transnational restructuring of the defence industry in the EU;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that the EU should fully integrate its defence policy and industry and create new synergies between the EU’s R+D initiatives outside the sphere of defence, space R+D, and security and defence R+D.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Supports the EDA in its endeavour to promote regional clusters;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasises that a common system of standardisation and certification would be of benefit to European companies, including SMEs, as it would improve their access to European and international markets, create employment and expand their access to EU funding.
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that there is a proliferation of competing industrial standards for civilian and military products; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that there is a proliferation of competing industrial standards for civilian and military products;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States to streamline European certification procedures with the mutual recognition of certificates and the
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that while some third countries such as China, India, Brazil or Russia are increasing their defence spending, EU defence budgets are being cut back.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights, in the context of the industry's restructuring, the importance of ensuring that security of supply is not put at risk; calls on the Member States, EDA and the Commission rapidly to develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime based on a system of mutual guarantees, possibly using the legal basis of permanent structured cooperation;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights, in the context of
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Member States to provide the European Defence Agency with a single purchasing budget serving all the member countries, and for the timetable and scope of military requirements to be harmonised.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the EDA and the Commission to submit a joint non-dependency strategy on critical technologies, in particular as regards unlimited access to and availability of civilian and military (dual-use) emerging and key enabling technologies, such as cutting-edge micro-/nano- electronics, artificial intelligence and photonics, which must be considered as critical to CSDP missions;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Encourages the Member States to address the industrial overcapacities that result from declining demand by launching new joint projects, and in particular to develop key enablers with civil-military applications such as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), fostering the development of high technologies and helping sustain key competencies within Europe; encourages EU participation in joint projects through
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Encourages the Member States to explore the possibilities offered by the European Defence Agency (EDA) in terms of drafting European standards for military products and applications; e.g. for the construction of hospital ships or in the field of remote-controlled aerial systems.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the European Council to enable the EDA fully to assume its institutional role; reiterates the urgent need for Member States to provide the EDA with adequate funding for the full range of its missions and tasks;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the European Council to enable the EDA fully to assume its institutional role; reiterates the urgent need for Member States to provide the EDA with adequate funding for the full range of its missions and tasks;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the European Council to enable the EDA fully to assume its institutional role as outlined in articles 42 (3) and 45 TEU; reiterates the urgent need for Member States to provide the EDA with adequate funding for the full range of its missions and tasks; takes the view that this would best be done by financing the Agency's staffing and running costs from the Union budget, starting with the forthcoming multiannual financial framework;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Draws attention to the changing strategic global landscape, reduced defence budgets, the quickening pace of technological development and the fact that European defence companies are adjusting to this situation by putting an emphasis on exports to third countries, at the cost of transferring sensitive technologies, and intellectual property rights, and moving production outside the EU; is concerned about the reductions in defence investment which will increasingly expose the EDTIB to the
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the European Council to enable the EDA fully to assume its institutional role by giving it the necessary resources; reiterates the urgent need for Member States to provide the EDA with adequate funding for the full range of its missions and tasks; takes the view that this would best be done by financing the Agency’s staffing and running costs from the Union budget, starting with the forthcoming multiannual financial framework;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recalls that opening the EU budget for defence research or for procuring military goods and technology represents a strategic mistake as introducing fresh money would only prolong the current structural deficits such as inefficiency, duplication, corruption and the procurement of useless military goods and technology;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that EDTIB-related defence research and innovation remains on a valid ethical basis; notes that a whole chapter of the Treaty of Lisbon is devoted to the common security and defence policy, which includes defence technology research and the framing of a common Union defence; calls on the Member States and EDA to significantly increase quantity and quality of joint research and development projects;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Encourages the EDA to build on its track record of successful joint investment programmes
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the EDA and the Member States to support more innovative joint programmes, such as the Air to Air Refuelling and the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems ones, with a need to focus on highly cost effective, new generation technologies which are sorely lacking in the majority of EU Member States;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Is concerned by the fact that a number of Member States are preparing to buy used F-16 fighter jets without giving European companies a fair chance to compete; considers that such a practice stands in contrast to the objective of the European Council to strengthen the European Defence Industrial Base; reminds these Member States of the need to implement the principles of non- discrimination and transparency as laid down in the Treaty of Lisbon also to government-to-government sales;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Draws attention to the changing strategic global landscape, and reduced defence budgets and welcomes the fact that European defence companies are adjusting to this situation by putting an emphasis on exports to third countries,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Takes the view that small and medium-sized enterprises, which design and manufacture many innovative products, play a vital part in maintaining and consolidating the EDTIB;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Calls on the Member States, the EDA and the Commission to work together to develop ways and means of consolidating small and medium-sized enterprises and facilitating their access to defence procurement;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Member States, the EDA and the Commission to work together towards the gradual phasing-out of offset requirements, while fostering the integration of smaller Member States' industries into the European defence technological and industrial base by means other than offsets; encourages Member States in particular to make full use of the Directives provisions on subcontracting and General Licences to achieve this objective;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Member States, the EDA and the Commission to devote particular attention to the development of SMEs in the field of defence technology and industrial development;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls for an urgent restructuring of European companies to overcome national barriers and adopt a global outlook.
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Member States to give preference, when exploring large scale defence technology acquisitions, to intra- EU projects or joint schemes, or European based new technologies, which can both foster more European trade, increased cooperation and at the same time competition on the quality and prices of the global defence market;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Draws attention to the changing strategic global landscape, reduced defence budgets, caused especially by the economic and financial crisis, and the fact that European defence companies are adjusting to this situation by
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Draws attention to the changing strategic global landscape, reduced defence budgets and the fact that European defence companies are adjusting to this situation by putting an emphasis on exports to third countries, at the cost of transferring sensitive technologies, and intellectual property rights, and moving production outside the EU
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds the EU Member States, the VP/HR, the European Commission, and the European Defence Agency that more than two decades after the Cold War and after having been able to take advantage of relatively high national defence budgets the EU Member States were not able to fulfil the Helsinki Headline Goals and other joint military capability development objectives; therefore questions the argument that current cuts in national defence budgets might automatically lead to capability gaps for CSDP and weaken the CSDP because these capabilities do not yet exist due to past failures;
source: PE-516.909
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-516829_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-516909_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.616&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-516616_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.798&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-516798_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131120&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-11-20-TOC_EN.html |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0358_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0514New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0514_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/7/12982New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0542:EN
|
activities/1/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013DC0542:EN
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0542/COM_COM(2013)0542_EN.pdf |
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00New
2013-07-04T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3258&dd_DATE_REUNION=26/09/2013&single_date=26/09/2013New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3258*&MEET_DATE=26/09/2013 |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-09-25T00:00:00New
2013-10-24T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00New
2013-11-21T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/8 |
|
committees/0/committee |
Old
ITRENew
AFET |
committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)New
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) |
committees/0/date |
Old
2013-05-30T00:00:00New
2013-03-21T00:00:00 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de182d90fb8127435bdbb3eNew
4f1ac81db819f25efd0000ca |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
AUDY Jean-PierreNew
GAHLER Michael |
committees/0/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
committees/2/committee |
Old
AFETNew
ITRE |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)New
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) |
committees/2/date |
Old
2013-03-21T00:00:00New
2013-05-30T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184df0fb8127435bdbe2dNew
4f1ac60fb819f25efd000019 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GAHLER MichaelNew
AUDY Jean-Pierre |
committees/2/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-11-21T00:00:00New
2013-08-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00New
2013-09-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.829New
PE516.909 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/7/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-358&language=EN
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-11-18T00:00:00New
2013-08-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-08-28T00:00:00New
2013-09-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
PE516.829New
PE516.909 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/5 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-10-24T00:00:00New
2013-11-20T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/8 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-10-17T00:00:00New
2013-10-24T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.909
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.829
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-07-17T00:00:00New
2013-10-17T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1 |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|