BETA


2014/2209(INI) Green growth opportunities for SMEs

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE DE BACKER Philippe (icon: ALDE ALDE) RÜBIG Paul (icon: PPE PPE), KOFOD Jeppe (icon: S&D S&D), HENKEL Hans-Olaf (icon: ECR ECR), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ZULLO Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion BUDG Clare MOODY (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion REGI NICA Dan (icon: S&D S&D) Enrique CALVET CHAMBON (icon: ALDE ALDE), James NICHOLSON (icon: ECR ECR), Davor ŠKRLEC (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/09/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/05/19
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/05/19
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 93, with 60 abstentions, a resolution on green growth opportunities for SMEs.

SMEs account for more than 98% of Europe’s businesses and provide more than 67% of total employment in the Union and 58% of gross value added. Employment in the environmental goods and services sector in the years 2007-2011 grew by 20% in spite of the crisis.

Against this background, Parliament supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. It called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy.

The EU needs to drastically change its entrepreneurial culture in order to contribute to economic growth by having more people starting up their own businesses and seeking more business opportunities, especially in green growth, and by accepting failure and risk-taking. Parliament emphasised the importance of putting this issue at the centre of policymaking . Moreover, the Commission should include green services in the ongoing negotiations on the Environmental Goods Agreement, as well as in bilateral trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

Financing of green initiatives : Parliament stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments.

The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘ Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal.

Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Parliament called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes, instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases. T he Commission should assess the impact of a tax shift from labour to natural resource use.

Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business.

Knowledge management : the resolution stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration

Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created.

Research, development and innovation, and skills : Parliament stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances. It also noted the benefits which the unitary European patent confers on SMEs, particularly in the field of green technologies.

Stressing the need for an improved policy framework for the circular economy, Members called for:

a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy; including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly.

(De)regulation as an engine for growth : Parliament called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation.

Whilst welcoming the Commission decision for withdrawing obsolete or overly burdensome legislative proposals, Members called on the Commission to come forward with a more ambitious waste legislation proposal .

Miscellaneous support measures : the resolution included several other important challenges:

developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning; helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth; addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour; speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets; fostering female entrepreneurship; identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs.

Lastly, the Commission, under the umbrella of regional policy , is called upon to draw up specific programmes which embody all relevant green growth elements for SMEs.

Documents
2015/05/19
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/05/18
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/04/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on green growth opportunities for SMEs the Commission Communication entitled ‘Green Action Plan For SMEs’.

Members supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. They called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy.

Financing of green initiatives : Members stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments.

Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Members called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes , instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases.

The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘ Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal.

Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business

Knowledge management : the report stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration

Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created.

Research, development and innovation, and skills : the report stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances for an improved policy framework for the circular economy. Members called for:

a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy; promoting the use by SMEs of data derived from European space infrastructures in business nurseries and incubators; including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly.

(De)regulation as an engine for growth : the report called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation.

The Commission was asked to:

refrain from legislative proposals that would lead to an unnecessary administrative burden for businesses and SMEs and to continuously review existing legislation with the objective of decreasing the current administrative burden; draw up common guidelines for national public support schemes for green investment projects in order to create a more uniform set of measures.

Miscellaneous support measures : the report several other important challenges, including:

developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning; helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth; addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour; speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets; fostering female entrepreneurship; identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs.

Documents
2015/04/14
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/04/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/03/30
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/03/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/02/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/12/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/12/03
   EP - NICA Dan (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2014/10/23
   EP - DE BACKER Philippe (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2014/07/02
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a Green Action Plan for SMEs.

BACKGROUND: in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, the EU has the priority to become a sustainable economy and set ambitious objectives for climate action and energy efficiency. The Small Business Act (SBA) highlighted that the EU and Member States should enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities .

Improving resource efficiency in SMEs offers enormous potential for the reduction of production costs and for productivity gains. A better use of resources is calculated to represent an overall savings potential of €630 billion per year for European industry. Too few SMEs in Europe are aware of this potential.

The Green Action Plan aims to contribute to the re-industrialisation of Europe as advocated by the communication " For a European industrial renaissance "and supported by the European Council.

It focuses on European level actions which are designed to fit in with, and reinforce existing "green" initiatives to support SMEs at national and regional levels.

CONTENT: the Green Action Plan (GAP) gives a clear direction and framework for how the EU, in partnership with Member States and regions , intends to help SMEs exploit the business opportunities that the transition to a green economy offers . This initiative concretely presents a series of new or revised SME-oriented actions proposed at European level.

The Plan pursues four objectives to:

1) Improve resource efficiency of European SMEs :

· by providing European SMEs with practical information, advice and support on how to improve their resource efficiency in a cost-effective manner;

· by supporting efficient technology transfer mechanisms for green technologies;

· by facilitating the access to finance for resource-related improvements and energy efficiency in SMEs.

2) Support green entrepreneurship :

· by facilitating business partnering, skills and knowledge for green entrepreneurship;

· by supporting all forms of innovation that foster green entrepreneurship;

· by aiding SMEs to explore the scientific or technical feasibility and the commercial potential of ecoinnovative;

· by better exploiting the role of clusters in support of eco-innovative SMEs, notably via the Programme COSME .

3) Exploit the opportunities of greener value chains :

· by addressing systemic barriers to cross-sectoral and cross-national value chain collaboration and business creation and cooperation, by facilitating the creation of service business models and the re-use of materials, products and waste;

· by facilitating cross-sectoral collaboration in view of promoting the circular economy which enhances resource and cost savings by maximising the time that resources, products and components are used.

4) Facilitate market access for green SMEs :

· by developing a joint strategy for internationalisation and encouraging the establishment of European Strategic Cluster Partnerships to access foreign markets;

· by facilitating the uptake of resource efficiency technology in partner countries through cooperation with European SMEs.

The Commission underlined the importance of implementing the Action Plan thoroughly. This requires the full political commitment of both the Commission and the Member States.

The actions linked to this Green Action Plan for SMEs will be regularly monitored.

The Small Business Act governance mechanism , and in particular the Network of SME Envoys, will be used to provide a platform to discuss implementation of best practices, results and obstacles.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer - Sous-titre après le § 32 #

2015/05/19 Outcome: +: 365, -: 314, 0: 8
PL FR HU BE BG FI HR SI LT CZ AT SK NL LV LU EE DE DK RO IE MT ES CY PT SE EL GB IT
Total
45
71
18
21
14
12
11
7
11
20
16
13
24
7
6
6
88
12
30
9
5
46
6
19
19
21
66
63
icon: PPE PPE
200

Belgium PPE

4

Finland PPE

2
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
46

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: S&D S&D
175

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Austria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer - § 34/2 #

2015/05/19 Outcome: +: 412, -: 258, 0: 11
GB PL FR NL CZ BG BE HU LT RO FI HR SI SK AT LV LU EE DK DE SE IE MT PT CY ES EL IT
Total
64
45
71
24
19
14
21
18
11
31
12
11
7
13
16
7
5
6
12
88
19
9
5
19
6
45
21
62
icon: PPE PPE
198

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4
2

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
46

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

4

Hungary S&D

For (1)

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Austria S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer - Résolution #

2015/05/19 Outcome: +: 519, -: 93, 0: 60
DE IT PL FR RO ES BE GB CZ BG HU PT AT SK LT FI HR DK SE NL SI LV MT EE EL LU CY IE
Total
86
62
45
66
29
45
21
66
19
14
18
18
16
12
11
12
11
12
18
24
7
7
5
6
21
5
6
9
icon: PPE PPE
193
2

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
172

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
44

Germany NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Germany GUE/NGL

Against (1)

5

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
260 2014/2209(INI)
2015/03/02 ITRE 183 amendments...
source: 549.392
2015/03/09 REGI 57 amendments...
source: 551.769
2015/03/19 BUDG 20 amendments...
source: 552.011

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
RANSDORF Miloslav
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: NÍ RIADA Liadh date: 2015-01-14T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.606
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-546606_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.392
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-549392_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.130&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-549130_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.893&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-546893_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0135_EN.html title: A8-0135/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0135_EN.html title: A8-0135/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150518&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-05-19T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0198_EN.html title: T8-0198/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-05-19T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0198_EN.html title: T8-0198/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: DE BACKER Philippe date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE BACKER Philippe group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: NÍ RIADA Liadh date: 2015-01-14T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NÍ RIADA Liadh group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: NICA Dan date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NICA Dan group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0135&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0135_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0198
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0198_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0440 title: COM(2014)0440 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0440:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul group: S&D name: KOFOD Jeppe group: ECR name: HENKEL Hans-Olaf group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: NICA Dan
  • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul group: S&D name: KOFOD Jeppe group: ECR name: HENKEL Hans-Olaf group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: NICA Dan
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0135&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0135/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-05-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150518&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25592&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0198 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0198/2015 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE BACKER Philippe group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NÍ RIADA Liadh group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NICA Dan group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2014-12-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: NICA Dan
docs
  • date: 2015-02-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.606 title: PE546.606 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.392 title: PE549.392 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.130&secondRef=02 title: PE549.130 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.893&secondRef=02 title: PE546.893 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=25592&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)470 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2014-07-02T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0440/COM_COM(2014)0440_EN.pdf title: COM(2014)0440 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0440 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to propose a Green Action Plan for SMEs. BACKGROUND: in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, the EU has the priority to become a sustainable economy and set ambitious objectives for climate action and energy efficiency. The Small Business Act (SBA) highlighted that the EU and Member States should enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities . Improving resource efficiency in SMEs offers enormous potential for the reduction of production costs and for productivity gains. A better use of resources is calculated to represent an overall savings potential of €630 billion per year for European industry. Too few SMEs in Europe are aware of this potential. The Green Action Plan aims to contribute to the re-industrialisation of Europe as advocated by the communication " For a European industrial renaissance "and supported by the European Council. It focuses on European level actions which are designed to fit in with, and reinforce existing "green" initiatives to support SMEs at national and regional levels. CONTENT: the Green Action Plan (GAP) gives a clear direction and framework for how the EU, in partnership with Member States and regions , intends to help SMEs exploit the business opportunities that the transition to a green economy offers . This initiative concretely presents a series of new or revised SME-oriented actions proposed at European level. The Plan pursues four objectives to: 1) Improve resource efficiency of European SMEs : · by providing European SMEs with practical information, advice and support on how to improve their resource efficiency in a cost-effective manner; · by supporting efficient technology transfer mechanisms for green technologies; · by facilitating the access to finance for resource-related improvements and energy efficiency in SMEs. 2) Support green entrepreneurship : · by facilitating business partnering, skills and knowledge for green entrepreneurship; · by supporting all forms of innovation that foster green entrepreneurship; · by aiding SMEs to explore the scientific or technical feasibility and the commercial potential of ecoinnovative; · by better exploiting the role of clusters in support of eco-innovative SMEs, notably via the Programme COSME . 3) Exploit the opportunities of greener value chains : · by addressing systemic barriers to cross-sectoral and cross-national value chain collaboration and business creation and cooperation, by facilitating the creation of service business models and the re-use of materials, products and waste; · by facilitating cross-sectoral collaboration in view of promoting the circular economy which enhances resource and cost savings by maximising the time that resources, products and components are used. 4) Facilitate market access for green SMEs : · by developing a joint strategy for internationalisation and encouraging the establishment of European Strategic Cluster Partnerships to access foreign markets; · by facilitating the uptake of resource efficiency technology in partner countries through cooperation with European SMEs. The Commission underlined the importance of implementing the Action Plan thoroughly. This requires the full political commitment of both the Commission and the Member States. The actions linked to this Green Action Plan for SMEs will be regularly monitored. The Small Business Act governance mechanism , and in particular the Network of SME Envoys, will be used to provide a platform to discuss implementation of best practices, results and obstacles.
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0135&language=EN title: A8-0135/2015 summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on green growth opportunities for SMEs the Commission Communication entitled ‘Green Action Plan For SMEs’. Members supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. They called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy. Financing of green initiatives : Members stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments. Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Members called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes , instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases. The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘ Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal. Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business Knowledge management : the report stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created. Research, development and innovation, and skills : the report stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances for an improved policy framework for the circular economy. Members called for: a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy; promoting the use by SMEs of data derived from European space infrastructures in business nurseries and incubators; including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly. (De)regulation as an engine for growth : the report called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation. The Commission was asked to: refrain from legislative proposals that would lead to an unnecessary administrative burden for businesses and SMEs and to continuously review existing legislation with the objective of decreasing the current administrative burden; draw up common guidelines for national public support schemes for green investment projects in order to create a more uniform set of measures. Miscellaneous support measures : the report several other important challenges, including: developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning; helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth; addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour; speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets; fostering female entrepreneurship; identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs.
  • date: 2015-05-18T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150518&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25592&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0198 title: T8-0198/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 93, with 60 abstentions, a resolution on green growth opportunities for SMEs. SMEs account for more than 98% of Europe’s businesses and provide more than 67% of total employment in the Union and 58% of gross value added. Employment in the environmental goods and services sector in the years 2007-2011 grew by 20% in spite of the crisis. Against this background, Parliament supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. It called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy. The EU needs to drastically change its entrepreneurial culture in order to contribute to economic growth by having more people starting up their own businesses and seeking more business opportunities, especially in green growth, and by accepting failure and risk-taking. Parliament emphasised the importance of putting this issue at the centre of policymaking . Moreover, the Commission should include green services in the ongoing negotiations on the Environmental Goods Agreement, as well as in bilateral trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Financing of green initiatives : Parliament stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments. The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘ Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal. Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Parliament called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes, instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases. T he Commission should assess the impact of a tax shift from labour to natural resource use. Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business. Knowledge management : the resolution stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created. Research, development and innovation, and skills : Parliament stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances. It also noted the benefits which the unitary European patent confers on SMEs, particularly in the field of green technologies. Stressing the need for an improved policy framework for the circular economy, Members called for: a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy; including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly. (De)regulation as an engine for growth : Parliament called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation. Whilst welcoming the Commission decision for withdrawing obsolete or overly burdensome legislative proposals, Members called on the Commission to come forward with a more ambitious waste legislation proposal . Miscellaneous support measures : the resolution included several other important challenges: developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning; helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth; addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour; speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets; fostering female entrepreneurship; identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs. Lastly, the Commission, under the umbrella of regional policy , is called upon to draw up specific programmes which embody all relevant green growth elements for SMEs.
  • date: 2015-05-19T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/8/02100
New
  • ITRE/8/02100
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.14 Industrial competitiveness
  • 3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
  • 3.70.20 Sustainable development
New
3.40.14
Industrial competitiveness
3.45.02
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
3.70.20
Sustainable development
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0440:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0440:EN
activities/5/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25592&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/docs/1/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 93, with 60 abstentions, a resolution on green growth opportunities for SMEs.

    SMEs account for more than 98% of Europe’s businesses and provide more than 67% of total employment in the Union and 58% of gross value added. Employment in the environmental goods and services sector in the years 2007-2011 grew by 20% in spite of the crisis.

    Against this background, Parliament supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. It called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy.

    The EU needs to drastically change its entrepreneurial culture in order to contribute to economic growth by having more people starting up their own businesses and seeking more business opportunities, especially in green growth, and by accepting failure and risk-taking. Parliament emphasised the importance of putting this issue at the centre of policymaking. Moreover, the Commission should include green services in the ongoing negotiations on the Environmental Goods Agreement, as well as in bilateral trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

    Financing of green initiatives: Parliament stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments.

    The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal.

    Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Parliament called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes, instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases. The Commission should assess the impact of a tax shift from labour to natural resource use.

    Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business.

    Knowledge management: the resolution stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration

    Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created.

    Research, development and innovation, and skills: Parliament stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances. It also noted the benefits which the unitary European patent confers on SMEs, particularly in the field of green technologies.

    Stressing the need for an improved policy framework for the circular economy, Members called for:

    • a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy;
    • including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly.

    (De)regulation as an engine for growth: Parliament called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation.

    Whilst welcoming the Commission decision for withdrawing obsolete or overly burdensome legislative proposals, Members called on the Commission to come forward with a more ambitious waste legislation proposal.

    Miscellaneous support measures: the resolution included several other important challenges:

    • developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning;
    • helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth;
    • addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour;
    • speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets;
    • fostering female entrepreneurship;
    • identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs.

    Lastly, the Commission, under the umbrella of regional policy, is called upon to draw up specific programmes which embody all relevant green growth elements for SMEs.

activities/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150518&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0198 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0198/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Philippe DE BACKER (ADLE, BE) on green growth opportunities for SMEs the Commission Communication entitled ‘Green Action Plan For SMEs’.

    Members supported the concept of green growth and circular economy should be part of a wider strategy of promoting job creation and economic growth among SMEs. They called on the Commission to establish a comprehensive policy framework, including concrete policy objectives and better integrating and streamlining existing policy tools to ensure opportunities and participation of SMEs in the green and circular economy.

    Financing of green initiatives: Members stressed that apart from venture capital, private investment and credit unions should be assessed more clearly as alternative financing to classic bank loans. Potential financing opportunities should be explored through the European Fund for Strategic Investments.

    Stressing that there was no one-size-fits-all mode of finance, Members called on the Commission to take into account the interests of SMEs in all existing and possible future programmes, instruments and initiatives, especially for new business models in the green economy, ranging across equity, quasi-equity and debt instruments, and partnerships between banks and other operators involved in SME financing in order to support businesses in their start-up, growth and transfer phases.

    The Commission and the EIB were asked to make sure that in the implementation phase of the ‘Investment Plan for Europe’ SMEs, including green and innovative ones, would be key beneficiaries of the support provided for under this proposal.

    Furthermore, entrepreneurs, SMEs, business associations and support organisations should be more literate on financing possibilities for more performing technologies, or for contracting services such as consultancy, coaching and training on eco-design, and availability of green technologies, products and services that could be beneficial for their business

    Knowledge management: the report stressed the importance of knowledge transfers and multi-stakeholder knowledge sharing, including cross-border, through informal networks, especially for SMEs and microenterprises to raise awareness of existing and new innovative techniques, best practices, ways to acquire proper financing, possible government support schemes and the relevant legislative frameworks entailing the least burdensome administration

    Members supported the organisation of a European Resource Efficiency Campaign to inform SMEs about the benefits and opportunities offered by resource efficiency and how industrial synergies on recycling could be created.

    Research, development and innovation, and skills: the report stressed the need to be more effective in developing basic R&D, to fully involve SMEs in this process and to actively support further transformation of basic R&D outcomes into further technological advances for an improved policy framework for the circular economy. Members called for:

    • a more stable regulatory framework and adequate financial schemes in order to enable economic initiative and entrepreneurship and to limit the time to market of new products, services and business practices, notably in the green economy;
    • promoting the use by SMEs of data derived from European space infrastructures in business nurseries and incubators; 
    • including as part of the Circular Economy Package the extension of the eco-design instrument to include the resource efficiency dimension. Eco-design should address durability, reparability and recyclability of products, including standards for guaranteed minimum lifetime and disassembly.

    (De)regulation as an engine for growth: the report called on Member States to avoid creating barriers to the internal market by gold-plating, to review their current regulatory regimes, to remove any superfluous or ineffective regulations which constitute market barriers, and to ensure consistent transposition into national legislation.

    The Commission was asked to:

    • refrain from legislative proposals that would lead to an unnecessary administrative burden for businesses and SMEs and to continuously review existing legislation with the objective of decreasing the current administrative burden;
    • draw up common guidelines for national public support schemes for green investment projects in order to create a more uniform set of measures.

    Miscellaneous support measures: the report several other important challenges, including:

    • developing entrepreneurship skills, which should be included in basic and higher education systems, and also be promoted through extra-curricular activities and lifelong learning;
    • helping microenterprises and start-ups in moving towards sustainable green growth;
    • addressing unsustainable consumption patterns and promoting a change in consumer behaviour;
    • speeding up pending trade agreements with our partners so as to facilitate European SMEs’ access to new markets;
    • fostering female entrepreneurship;
    • identifying the sectors of European industry and geographical areas where the conditions are met for the creation of new clusters and hubs.
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0135&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0135/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2015-05-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/date
Old
2015-04-21T00:00:00
New
2015-04-28T00:00:00
activities/3
date
2015-04-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul group: S&D name: KOFOD Jeppe group: ECR name: HENKEL Hans-Olaf group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: NICA Dan
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to propose a Green Action Plan for SMEs.

    BACKGROUND: in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, the EU has the priority to become a sustainable economy and set ambitious objectives for climate action and energy efficiency. The Small Business Act (SBA) highlighted that the EU and Member States should enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities.

    Improving resource efficiency in SMEs offers enormous potential for the reduction of production costs and for productivity gains. A better use of resources is calculated to represent an overall savings potential of €630 billion per year for European industry. Too few SMEs in Europe are aware of this potential.

    The Green Action Plan aims to contribute to the re-industrialisation of Europe as advocated by the communication "For a European industrial renaissance"and supported by the European Council.

    It focuses on European level actions which are designed to fit in with, and reinforce existing "green" initiatives to support SMEs at national and regional levels.

    CONTENT: the Green Action Plan (GAP) gives a clear direction and framework for how the EU, in partnership with Member States and regions, intends to help SMEs exploit the business opportunities that the transition to a green economy offers. This initiative concretely presents a series of new or revised SME-oriented actions proposed at European level.

    The Plan pursues four objectives to:

    1) Improve resource efficiency of European SMEs:

    ·        by providing European SMEs with practical information, advice and support on how to improve their resource efficiency in a cost-effective manner;

    ·        by supporting efficient technology transfer mechanisms for green technologies;

    ·        by facilitating the access to finance for resource-related improvements and energy efficiency in SMEs.

    2) Support green entrepreneurship:

    ·        by facilitating business partnering, skills and knowledge for green entrepreneurship;

    ·        by supporting all forms of innovation that foster green entrepreneurship;

    ·        by aiding SMEs to explore the scientific or technical feasibility and the commercial potential of ecoinnovative;

    ·        by better exploiting the role of clusters in support of eco-innovative SMEs, notably via the Programme COSME.

    3) Exploit the opportunities of greener value chains:

    ·        by addressing systemic barriers to cross-sectoral and cross-national value chain collaboration and business creation and cooperation, by facilitating the creation of service business models and the re-use of materials, products and waste;

    ·        by facilitating cross-sectoral collaboration in view of promoting the circular economy which enhances resource and cost savings by maximising the time that resources, products and components are used.

    4) Facilitate market access for green SMEs:

    ·        by developing a joint strategy for internationalisation and encouraging the establishment of European Strategic Cluster Partnerships to access foreign markets;

    ·        by facilitating the uptake of resource efficiency technology in partner countries through cooperation with European SMEs.

    The Commission underlined the importance of implementing the Action Plan thoroughly. This requires the full political commitment of both the Commission and the Member States.

    The actions linked to this Green Action Plan for SMEs will be regularly monitored.

    The Small Business Act governance mechanism, and in particular the Network of SME Envoys, will be used to provide a platform to discuss implementation of best practices, results and obstacles.

activities/1
date
2014-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul group: S&D name: KOFOD Jeppe group: ECR name: HENKEL Hans-Olaf group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: NICA Dan
activities/3/date
Old
2014-12-17T00:00:00
New
2015-05-18T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/date
2015-01-14T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
committees/3/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
ZULLO Marco
activities/1
date
2014-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/8/02100
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2014-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0440 title: COM(2014)0440 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0440:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: RÜBIG Paul group: S&D name: KOFOD Jeppe group: ECR name: HENKEL Hans-Olaf group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DE BACKER Philippe
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: NICA Dan
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
procedure
reference
2014/2209(INI)
title
Green growth opportunities for SMEs
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject