BETA


Events

2016/04/05
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/11/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/11/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 574 votes to 84, with 36 abstentions, a resolution on cohesion policy and marginalised communities.

Members recalled that cohesion policy is aimed at enhancing economic, social and territorial cohesion, reducing social disparities, including the reduction and eradication of poverty and exclusion, which calls for the prevention of segregation and for the promotion of equal access and opportunities for all citizens, including the most marginalised communities as well as groups and individuals of all ages facing poverty and social exclusion and lacking access to education, employment, housing and healthcare systems.

General principles : Members recalled the urgent need to tackle the issue of marginalised communities as well as underlined the important role of cohesion policy in supporting their economic, social and territorial inclusion. They highlighted that the implementation of the cohesion policy must tackle the crucial challenge of poverty and exclusion of young people and children, adults and people with disabilities .

The Commission is called upon to:

issue guidance on the definition of marginalised communities , specifying a set of attributes and characteristics of marginalised groups, taking into account the specific situation, challenges and needs of each potential target group with the aim of promoting their socio-economic inclusion, and involving representatives of those communities; provide detailed information about the take-up of funding opportunities for marginalised communities.

Furthermore, stressing the importance of access to public service , the resolution called on the Member States:

to create specialised structures , such as clearing points advising on issues related to access to healthcare, labour market and education; to put in place measures to effect a shift in public administrations from a demand-driven approach to a welcoming service approach .

Members also called for: (i) local authorities to encourage the use of ESF funding to support informal learning and lifelong learning projects; (ii) better coordination and stronger links between national strategies for marginalised communities, including National Roma Inclusion Strategies; (iii) children to be made a priority when implementing the EU Framework for National Roma Strategies.

Preparation of programmes : Parliament asked the Commission to take measures to facilitate the inclusion of marginalised communities in the preparation, implementation and assessment of projects, as a tool for empowering the concerned communities. It suggested that recommendations be presented in the context of the European Semester and called on the Member States to act on, and on the Commission to follow up closely, the country-specific recommendations issued on the social inclusion of marginalised communities.

The resolution stressed the importance of implementing the code of conduct on partnership in ensuring equal participation and representation of partners, whereby specific attention should be paid to including marginalised communities so that their specific situation, and any potential challenges that they face in contributing substantially to the partnership, may be taken into account.

Implementation of programmes : Members are of the opinion that funds should be used in a more integrated way , including by means of multi-fund programmes, in order to achieve synergies with other EU and national funding instruments.

Parliament emphasised the importance of a genuine implementation of urban renewal and regeneration programmes for deprived neighbourhoods . It drew attention to the specific needs that marginalised communities living in rural, mountainous and isolated areas face, as well as those living in cross-border areas .

The Commission is called upon to offer the technical support needed to improve the administrative capacity of bodies involved in the administration of the Structural Funds and to set up an ad hoc expert group for advice, and promote appropriate training for administrative staff, in order to provide specific knowledge of the difficulties facing marginalised communities. Members considered it essential to include equality bodies, women's organisations and women from marginalised communities in the decision-making process on the allocation, use, implementation and monitoring of the funds, at all levels.

Monitoring and recommendations : EU-funded projects must have a long-term perspective in order to be effective. Members called on the Commission to put in place proactive and participatory mechanisms for monitoring and observing Members States' actions in the planning and evaluation processes for funds used for marginalised communities.

Parliament emphasised the importance of integrated housing, educational and employment interventions . More specifically, it called on the need:

to make special efforts as regards existing EU programmes, such as the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and Creative Europe , with a view of reaching out to members of marginalised communities; to create a network platform at EU level facilitating the exchange of best practices and joint problem solving; for the funds to be used to improve living conditions and to facilitate access for women in marginalised communities to high-quality, stable education, housing, health care, employment, childcare, social services; to rigorously enforce and monitor EU legislation on discrimination and to carry out a thorough analysis of the causes of discrimination and marginalisation, and to raise awareness of the fact that xenophobia and racism and all types of marginalisation leading to systemic exclusion, must be eliminated; to implement programmes, projects and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education , to underpin the need for formal education; to propose accessible and affordable training and services for all in the field of new technologies and sectors, with special regard to opportunities in the digital sector and the green economy, especially for the most disadvantaged groups.

The Commission is called upon to provide coherent, consistent and clear guidance on the development, implementation and management of the EU-funded projects related to marginalised communities, including in-depth analyses, best practise examples and policy recommendations, to ensure that marginalised communities are included in EU funds also in view of the forthcoming programming period.

Lastly, Parliament invited the Member States to offer an award for exemplary dedication to the integration and inclusion of marginalised groups in implementing EU funds.

Documents
2015/11/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/11/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/10/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Terry REINTKE (Greens/EFA, DE) on cohesion policy and marginalised communities.

The report underlined the important role of cohesion policy in supporting the economic, social and territorial inclusion of marginalised communities .

Members recalled that marginalised communities were introduced as a focus of cohesion policy measures because of the growing concern about, and commitment to combat, social exclusion, including concern about the situation of Roma and the longstanding demand to improve their living conditions.

The Commission is called upon to:

issue guidance on the definition of marginalised communities , specifying a set of attributes and characteristics of marginalised groups, taking into account the specific situation, challenges and needs of each potential target group with the aim of promoting their socio-economic inclusion, and involving representatives of those communities; provide detailed information about the take-up of funding opportunities for marginalised communities.

The implementation of the cohesion policy must tackle the crucial challenge of poverty and exclusion of young people and children, adults and people with disabilities .

Furthermore, stressing the importance of access to public service, the report called on the Member States:

to improve the provision of tailored health -information material and the development of disease-prevention strategies and community-health initiatives in marginalised communities; to create specialised structures , such as clearing points advising on issues related to access to healthcare, labour market and education; to put in place measures to effect a shift in public administrations from a demand-driven approach to a welcoming service approach .

Preparation of programmes : Members regretted that the Commission has accepted partnership agreements that do not include marginalised communities to a sufficient degree. It asked the Commission to take measures to facilitate the inclusion of marginalised communities in the preparation, implementation and assessment of projects, as a tool for empowering the concerned communities. They suggested that recommendations be presented in the context of the European Semester as a suitable way of promoting action to be taken by Member States.

The report stressed the importance of implementing the code of conduct on partnership in ensuring equal participation and representation of partners, whereby specific attention should be paid to including marginalised communities so that their specific situation, and any potential challenges that they face in contributing substantially to the partnership, may be taken into account.

Implementation of programmes : Members are of the opinion that funds should be used in a more integrated way , including by means of multi-fund programmes, Community-Led Local Development, Integrated Territorial Investment and cross-financing, and that synergies should be achieved with other EU and national funding instruments.

The report emphasised the importance of a genuine implementation of urban renewal and regeneration programmes for deprived neighbourhoods . They drew attention to the specific needs that marginalised communities living in rural, mountainous and isolated areas face, as well as those living in cross-border areas .

The Commission is called upon to offer the technical support needed to improve the administrative capacity of bodies involved in the administration of the Structural Funds and to set up an ad hoc expert group for advice, and promote appropriate training for administrative staff, in order to provide specific knowledge of the difficulties facing marginalised communities. Members considered it essential to include equality bodies, women's organisations and women from marginalised communities in the decision-making process on the allocation, use, implementation and monitoring of the funds, at all levels.

Monitoring and recommendations : EU-funded projects must have a long-term perspective in order to be effective. Members called on the Commission to put in place proactive and participatory mechanisms for monitoring and observing Members States' actions in the planning and evaluation processes for funds used for marginalised communities.

The report stressed the importance of integrated housing, educational and employment interventions, in favour of marginalised communities . More specifically, it called on the need:

to make special efforts as regards existing EU programmes, such as the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and Creative Europe, with a view of reaching out to members of marginalised communities; for the funds to be used to improve living conditions and to facilitate access for women in marginalised communities to high-quality, stable education, housing, health care, employment, childcare, social services; to rigorously enforce and monitor EU legislation on discrimination and to carry out a thorough analysis of the causes of discrimination and marginalisation, and to raise awareness of the fact that xenophobia and racism and all types of marginalisation leading to systemic exclusion, must be eliminated; to implement programmes, projects and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education, to underpin the need for formal education; to propose accessible and affordable training and services for all in the field of new technologies and sectors, with special regard to opportunities in the digital sector and the green economy, especially for the most disadvantaged groups.

The Commission is called upon to provide coherent, consistent and clear guidance on the development, implementation and management of the EU-funded projects related to marginalised communities, including in-depth analyses, best practise examples and policy recommendations, to ensure that marginalised communities are included in EU funds also in view of the forthcoming programming period.

Documents
2015/10/15
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/07/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/07/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/06/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/06/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/02/03
   EP - URTASUN Ernest (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/01/15
   EP - KÓSA Ádám (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2014/11/04
   EP - REINTKE Terry (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke - § 6/1 #

2015/11/24 Outcome: +: 627, -: 60, 0: 6
DE IT ES PL FR RO GB PT BE HU NL AT CZ BG SE SK FI LT HR EL IE DK SI EE CY MT LV LU
Total
87
68
47
48
69
29
71
21
21
19
24
18
19
16
17
13
12
11
11
17
9
8
8
6
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke - § 11 #

2015/11/24 Outcome: +: 536, -: 131, 0: 27
GB DE ES IT FR NL BE HU AT SE FI EL BG CZ HR RO PT IE SK SI CY LT LU LV EE DK MT PL
Total
71
86
47
68
69
24
21
19
18
17
12
18
16
19
11
29
21
9
13
8
6
11
5
7
6
8
6
48
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: NI NI
12

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

Hungary NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
173

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

3

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

4

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke - § 17 #

2015/11/24 Outcome: +: 561, -: 125, 0: 9
DE IT ES RO FR PT HU NL BE PL SE BG CZ EL AT LT IE FI HR SK SI LV EE CY MT LU DK GB
Total
86
68
47
29
69
21
19
24
21
48
17
16
18
18
18
11
9
13
11
13
8
8
6
6
6
5
8
71
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
173

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke - § 26 #

2015/11/24 Outcome: +: 645, -: 48, 0: 1
DE FR IT ES PL RO GB PT BE HU NL CZ BG SE FI EL SK LT HR AT IE LV DK SI EE CY MT LU
Total
87
68
67
47
48
29
71
21
21
19
24
19
16
17
13
18
12
11
11
18
9
8
8
8
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
203
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Greece NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke - Résolution #

2015/11/24 Outcome: +: 574, -: 84, 0: 36
DE IT ES PL RO FR PT BE NL HU CZ SE EL BG HR AT SK IE FI LT LV SI EE CY MT GB DK LU
Total
87
68
47
48
29
69
21
19
24
19
19
17
18
16
11
18
13
9
13
11
8
8
6
6
6
71
8
4
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Greece NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
344 2014/2247(INI)
2015/05/19 EMPL 69 amendments...
source: 557.225
2015/06/09 FEMM 61 amendments...
source: 560.587
2015/07/24 REGI 214 amendments...
source: 564.977

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/4
name
ANDERSON Martina
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.719
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-554719_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.857&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-554857_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.696&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-554696_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.977
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-564977_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-10-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0314_EN.html title: A8-0314/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-10-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0314_EN.html title: A8-0314/2015
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151123&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2015-11-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0402_EN.html title: T8-0402/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-11-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0402_EN.html title: T8-0402/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: REINTKE Terry date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REINTKE Terry group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: KÓSA Ádám date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KÓSA Ádám group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: URTASUN Ernest date: 2015-02-03T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: URTASUN Ernest group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0314&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0314_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0402
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0402_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REINTKE Terry group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REINTKE Terry group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KÓSA Ádám body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-02-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZELLER Joachim group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
  • date: 2015-10-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KÓSA Ádám body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2015-02-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZELLER Joachim group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
  • date: 2015-10-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0314&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0314/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0402 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0402/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REINTKE Terry group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KÓSA Ádám
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-01-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KÓSA Ádám group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: URTASUN Ernest group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
docs
  • date: 2015-06-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.719 title: PE554.719 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.857&secondRef=02 title: PE554.857 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.696&secondRef=02 title: PE554.696 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.977 title: PE564.977 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-05T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26352&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)105 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-15T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0314&language=EN title: A8-0314/2015 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Terry REINTKE (Greens/EFA, DE) on cohesion policy and marginalised communities. The report underlined the important role of cohesion policy in supporting the economic, social and territorial inclusion of marginalised communities . Members recalled that marginalised communities were introduced as a focus of cohesion policy measures because of the growing concern about, and commitment to combat, social exclusion, including concern about the situation of Roma and the longstanding demand to improve their living conditions. The Commission is called upon to: issue guidance on the definition of marginalised communities , specifying a set of attributes and characteristics of marginalised groups, taking into account the specific situation, challenges and needs of each potential target group with the aim of promoting their socio-economic inclusion, and involving representatives of those communities; provide detailed information about the take-up of funding opportunities for marginalised communities. The implementation of the cohesion policy must tackle the crucial challenge of poverty and exclusion of young people and children, adults and people with disabilities . Furthermore, stressing the importance of access to public service, the report called on the Member States: to improve the provision of tailored health -information material and the development of disease-prevention strategies and community-health initiatives in marginalised communities; to create specialised structures , such as clearing points advising on issues related to access to healthcare, labour market and education; to put in place measures to effect a shift in public administrations from a demand-driven approach to a welcoming service approach . Preparation of programmes : Members regretted that the Commission has accepted partnership agreements that do not include marginalised communities to a sufficient degree. It asked the Commission to take measures to facilitate the inclusion of marginalised communities in the preparation, implementation and assessment of projects, as a tool for empowering the concerned communities. They suggested that recommendations be presented in the context of the European Semester as a suitable way of promoting action to be taken by Member States. The report stressed the importance of implementing the code of conduct on partnership in ensuring equal participation and representation of partners, whereby specific attention should be paid to including marginalised communities so that their specific situation, and any potential challenges that they face in contributing substantially to the partnership, may be taken into account. Implementation of programmes : Members are of the opinion that funds should be used in a more integrated way , including by means of multi-fund programmes, Community-Led Local Development, Integrated Territorial Investment and cross-financing, and that synergies should be achieved with other EU and national funding instruments. The report emphasised the importance of a genuine implementation of urban renewal and regeneration programmes for deprived neighbourhoods . They drew attention to the specific needs that marginalised communities living in rural, mountainous and isolated areas face, as well as those living in cross-border areas . The Commission is called upon to offer the technical support needed to improve the administrative capacity of bodies involved in the administration of the Structural Funds and to set up an ad hoc expert group for advice, and promote appropriate training for administrative staff, in order to provide specific knowledge of the difficulties facing marginalised communities. Members considered it essential to include equality bodies, women's organisations and women from marginalised communities in the decision-making process on the allocation, use, implementation and monitoring of the funds, at all levels. Monitoring and recommendations : EU-funded projects must have a long-term perspective in order to be effective. Members called on the Commission to put in place proactive and participatory mechanisms for monitoring and observing Members States' actions in the planning and evaluation processes for funds used for marginalised communities. The report stressed the importance of integrated housing, educational and employment interventions, in favour of marginalised communities . More specifically, it called on the need: to make special efforts as regards existing EU programmes, such as the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and Creative Europe, with a view of reaching out to members of marginalised communities; for the funds to be used to improve living conditions and to facilitate access for women in marginalised communities to high-quality, stable education, housing, health care, employment, childcare, social services; to rigorously enforce and monitor EU legislation on discrimination and to carry out a thorough analysis of the causes of discrimination and marginalisation, and to raise awareness of the fact that xenophobia and racism and all types of marginalisation leading to systemic exclusion, must be eliminated; to implement programmes, projects and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education, to underpin the need for formal education; to propose accessible and affordable training and services for all in the field of new technologies and sectors, with special regard to opportunities in the digital sector and the green economy, especially for the most disadvantaged groups. The Commission is called upon to provide coherent, consistent and clear guidance on the development, implementation and management of the EU-funded projects related to marginalised communities, including in-depth analyses, best practise examples and policy recommendations, to ensure that marginalised communities are included in EU funds also in view of the forthcoming programming period.
  • date: 2015-11-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151123&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26352&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0402 title: T8-0402/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 574 votes to 84, with 36 abstentions, a resolution on cohesion policy and marginalised communities. Members recalled that cohesion policy is aimed at enhancing economic, social and territorial cohesion, reducing social disparities, including the reduction and eradication of poverty and exclusion, which calls for the prevention of segregation and for the promotion of equal access and opportunities for all citizens, including the most marginalised communities as well as groups and individuals of all ages facing poverty and social exclusion and lacking access to education, employment, housing and healthcare systems. General principles : Members recalled the urgent need to tackle the issue of marginalised communities as well as underlined the important role of cohesion policy in supporting their economic, social and territorial inclusion. They highlighted that the implementation of the cohesion policy must tackle the crucial challenge of poverty and exclusion of young people and children, adults and people with disabilities . The Commission is called upon to: issue guidance on the definition of marginalised communities , specifying a set of attributes and characteristics of marginalised groups, taking into account the specific situation, challenges and needs of each potential target group with the aim of promoting their socio-economic inclusion, and involving representatives of those communities; provide detailed information about the take-up of funding opportunities for marginalised communities. Furthermore, stressing the importance of access to public service , the resolution called on the Member States: to create specialised structures , such as clearing points advising on issues related to access to healthcare, labour market and education; to put in place measures to effect a shift in public administrations from a demand-driven approach to a welcoming service approach . Members also called for: (i) local authorities to encourage the use of ESF funding to support informal learning and lifelong learning projects; (ii) better coordination and stronger links between national strategies for marginalised communities, including National Roma Inclusion Strategies; (iii) children to be made a priority when implementing the EU Framework for National Roma Strategies. Preparation of programmes : Parliament asked the Commission to take measures to facilitate the inclusion of marginalised communities in the preparation, implementation and assessment of projects, as a tool for empowering the concerned communities. It suggested that recommendations be presented in the context of the European Semester and called on the Member States to act on, and on the Commission to follow up closely, the country-specific recommendations issued on the social inclusion of marginalised communities. The resolution stressed the importance of implementing the code of conduct on partnership in ensuring equal participation and representation of partners, whereby specific attention should be paid to including marginalised communities so that their specific situation, and any potential challenges that they face in contributing substantially to the partnership, may be taken into account. Implementation of programmes : Members are of the opinion that funds should be used in a more integrated way , including by means of multi-fund programmes, in order to achieve synergies with other EU and national funding instruments. Parliament emphasised the importance of a genuine implementation of urban renewal and regeneration programmes for deprived neighbourhoods . It drew attention to the specific needs that marginalised communities living in rural, mountainous and isolated areas face, as well as those living in cross-border areas . The Commission is called upon to offer the technical support needed to improve the administrative capacity of bodies involved in the administration of the Structural Funds and to set up an ad hoc expert group for advice, and promote appropriate training for administrative staff, in order to provide specific knowledge of the difficulties facing marginalised communities. Members considered it essential to include equality bodies, women's organisations and women from marginalised communities in the decision-making process on the allocation, use, implementation and monitoring of the funds, at all levels. Monitoring and recommendations : EU-funded projects must have a long-term perspective in order to be effective. Members called on the Commission to put in place proactive and participatory mechanisms for monitoring and observing Members States' actions in the planning and evaluation processes for funds used for marginalised communities. Parliament emphasised the importance of integrated housing, educational and employment interventions . More specifically, it called on the need: to make special efforts as regards existing EU programmes, such as the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and Creative Europe , with a view of reaching out to members of marginalised communities; to create a network platform at EU level facilitating the exchange of best practices and joint problem solving; for the funds to be used to improve living conditions and to facilitate access for women in marginalised communities to high-quality, stable education, housing, health care, employment, childcare, social services; to rigorously enforce and monitor EU legislation on discrimination and to carry out a thorough analysis of the causes of discrimination and marginalisation, and to raise awareness of the fact that xenophobia and racism and all types of marginalisation leading to systemic exclusion, must be eliminated; to implement programmes, projects and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education , to underpin the need for formal education; to propose accessible and affordable training and services for all in the field of new technologies and sectors, with special regard to opportunities in the digital sector and the green economy, especially for the most disadvantaged groups. The Commission is called upon to provide coherent, consistent and clear guidance on the development, implementation and management of the EU-funded projects related to marginalised communities, including in-depth analyses, best practise examples and policy recommendations, to ensure that marginalised communities are included in EU funds also in view of the forthcoming programming period. Lastly, Parliament invited the Member States to offer an award for exemplary dedication to the integration and inclusion of marginalised groups in implementing EU funds.
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/8/02313
New
  • REGI/8/02313
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.05 Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
  • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund
New
4.10.05
Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
4.70.02
Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0402 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0402/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Terry REINTKE (Greens/EFA, DE) on cohesion policy and marginalised communities.

    The report underlined the important role of cohesion policy in supporting the economic, social and territorial inclusion of marginalised communities.

    Members recalled that marginalised communities were introduced as a focus of cohesion policy measures because of the growing concern about, and commitment to combat, social exclusion, including concern about the situation of Roma and the longstanding demand to improve their living conditions.

    The Commission is called upon to:

    • issue guidance on the definition of marginalised communities, specifying a set of attributes and characteristics of marginalised groups, taking into account the specific situation, challenges and needs of each potential target group with the aim of promoting their socio-economic inclusion, and involving representatives of those communities;
    • provide detailed information about the take-up of funding opportunities for marginalised communities.

    The implementation of the cohesion policy must tackle the crucial challenge of poverty and exclusion of young people and children, adults and people with disabilities.

    Furthermore, stressing the importance of access to public service, the report called on the Member States:

    • to improve the provision of tailored health-information material and the development of disease-prevention strategies and community-health initiatives in marginalised communities;
    • to create specialised structures, such as clearing points advising on issues related to access to healthcare, labour market and education;
    • to put in place measures to effect a shift in public administrations from a demand-driven approach to a welcoming service approach.

    Preparation of programmes: Members regretted that the Commission has accepted partnership agreements that do not include marginalised communities to a sufficient degree. It asked the Commission to take measures to facilitate the inclusion of marginalised communities in the preparation, implementation and assessment of projects, as a tool for empowering the concerned communities. They suggested that recommendations be presented in the context of the European Semester as a suitable way of promoting action to be taken by Member States.

    The report stressed the importance of implementing the code of conduct on partnership in ensuring equal participation and representation of partners, whereby specific attention should be paid to including marginalised communities so that their specific situation, and any potential challenges that they face in contributing substantially to the partnership, may be taken into account.

    Implementation of programmes: Members are of the opinion that funds should be used in a more integrated way, including by means of multi-fund programmes, Community-Led Local Development, Integrated Territorial Investment and cross-financing, and that synergies should be achieved with other EU and national funding instruments.

    The report emphasised the importance of a genuine implementation of urban renewal and regeneration programmes for deprived neighbourhoods. They drew attention to the specific needs that marginalised communities living in rural, mountainous and isolated areas face, as well as those living in cross-border areas.

    The Commission is called upon to offer the technical support needed to improve the administrative capacity of bodies involved in the administration of the Structural Funds and to set up an ad hoc expert group for advice, and promote appropriate training for administrative staff, in order to provide specific knowledge of the difficulties facing marginalised communities. Members considered it essential to include equality bodies, women's organisations and women from marginalised communities in the decision-making process on the allocation, use, implementation and monitoring of the funds, at all levels.

    Monitoring and recommendations: EU-funded projects must have a long-term perspective in order to be effective. Members called on the Commission to put in place proactive and participatory mechanisms for monitoring and observing Members States' actions in the planning and evaluation processes for funds used for marginalised communities.

    The report stressed the importance of integrated housing, educational and employment interventions, in favour of marginalised communities. More specifically, it called on the need:

    • to make special efforts as regards existing EU programmes, such as the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and Creative Europe, with a view of reaching out to members of marginalised communities;
    • for the funds to be used to improve living conditions and to facilitate access for women in marginalised communities to high-quality, stable education, housing, health care, employment, childcare, social services;
    • to rigorously enforce and monitor EU legislation on discrimination and to carry out a thorough analysis of the causes of discrimination and marginalisation, and to raise awareness of the fact that xenophobia and racism and all types of marginalisation leading to systemic exclusion, must be eliminated;
    • to implement programmes, projects and support activities for marginalised communities in order to provide for preschool education, to underpin the need for formal education;
    • to propose accessible and affordable training and services for all in the field of new technologies and sectors, with special regard to opportunities in the digital sector and the green economy, especially for the most disadvantaged groups.

    The Commission is called upon to provide coherent, consistent and clear guidance on the development, implementation and management of the EU-funded projects related to marginalised communities, including in-depth analyses, best practise examples and policy recommendations, to ensure that marginalised communities are included in EU funds also in view of the forthcoming programming period.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0314&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0314/2015
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2015-11-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2015-10-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2015-10-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1/date
Old
2015-10-26T00:00:00
New
2015-11-23T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2015-09-08T00:00:00
New
2015-10-26T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
D'AMATO Rosa
committees/2/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
D'AMATO Rosa
activities/1
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/3
group
ALDE
name
JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest
committees/2/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr
committees/2/shadows/3
group
ALDE
name
JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KÓSA Ádám body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZELLER Joachim group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KÓSA Ádám
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZELLER Joachim group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/02313
reference
2014/2247(INI)
title
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject