BETA


Events

2017/02/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/02/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 329 votes to 223 with 83 abstentions, a resolution on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty.

Members recalled that the European Union and its Member States are facing unprecedented challenges , such as the refugee crisis, the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisation, climate change, demographic developments, unemployment, the causes and consequences of the financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness. These challenges cannot be adequately tackled individually by the Member States but need a collective response from the Union.

A draft replacement resolution, tabled by the ENF group, was rejected in plenary by 53 votes to 567 with 14 abstentions.

The resolution stressed that the Community method is best suited for the functioning of the Union and that intergovernmental solutions should only be an instrument of ultima ratio, subject to strict conditions.

Moreover, the directly elected European Parliament is the Parliament of the whole Union, and proper democratic accountability must be ensured also in the areas in which not all Member States participate, including euro area-specific actions and decisions.

1) Institutional set-up, democracy and accountability :

Parliaments : Members insisted that Parliament’s legislative powers and rights of control must be guaranteed, consolidated and strengthened. Parliament should reform its working methods by limiting first-reading agreements to exceptional cases of urgency in order to improve the transparency of the procedure leading to the adoption of such agreements. It should make more use of legislative initiative reports under Article 225 TFEU. The resolution encouraged political dialogue with national parliaments on the contents of legislative proposals and stressed the need to intensify political dialogue between national parliaments and the European Parliament in joint bodies; European Council : Members considered that the European Council's practice of “tasking the Council” goes against the letter and the spirit of the Treaties , which stipulates that the European Council shall define the general political directions and priorities of the Union but shall not exercise legislative functions; it is therefore necessary to improve the working relations between the European Council and Parliament; Council : Parliament proposed that the Council be transformed into a true legislative chamber by reducing the number of configurations, thus creating a genuinely bicameral legislative system involving the Council and Parliament, with the Commission acting as the executive. It insisted on the importance of guaranteeing the transparency of Council legislative decision-making in general and demanded that the Council switch completely to qualified majority voting wherever this is possible under the Treaties. The President and the members of the Eurogroup should be subject to appropriate mechanisms of democratic accountability towards the European Parliament; Commission : the role of the Parliament should be strengthened in the election of the Commission President in order to ensure that the European Council takes full account of the election results when presenting a candidate for Parliament to elect. Moreover, all Commission proposals should be fully justified and accompanied by a detailed impact assessment, including a human rights assessment. Every Member State should designate at least three candidates of both genders to be Commissioner.

The resolution also called for:

strengthening the Court of Auditors , improving cooperation modalities with the Committee of the Regions and European Economic and Social Committee , including at the pre-legislative stage and considering the adoption of a framework regulation for Union agencies ; cooperation between national parliaments to be enhanced to enable them to play their role as regards the application of the principles of subsidiarity; institutional reforms to be introduced in order to provide the Economic and Monetary Union with an effective and democratic economic government with improved capacities that is integrated within the institutional framework of the Union; a convergence code to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure with a view to creating a more effective framework for economic policy coordination; a simplified, more focused and more democratic European Semester process to be established and for the relevant provisions of the fiscal compact to be integrated into the EU legal framework.

2) The role of the EU budget in the EMU : the report pointed to the possibility of switching from unanimity to qualified majority voting for the adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) Regulation and stressed the importance of establishing a link between the duration of Parliament’s legislative term, the Commission’s mandate and the duration of the MFF. It is proposed to change the current system based on GNI contributions to one based on real own resources for the EU and, eventually, a euro area budget.

Members called for:

the use of the existing Structural Funds to be optimised in the direction of fostering the EU’s competitiveness and cohesion, and for an increase in EU investment capacity through the exploitation of innovative approaches such as, e.g. the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); the establishment of a fiscal capacity within the euro area through part of the EU budget; a rapid but step-by-step completion of a banking union , based on a single supervision mechanism (SSM), a single resolution mechanism (SRM) and a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS); the establishment of a true capital markets union ; the improvement of the automatic information exchange between national tax authorities in order to avoid tax fraud and tax evasion; a more democratic institutional set-up for the EMU with an enhanced scrutiny role for the European Parliament at EU level; the completion of the internal market by removing all remaining internal barriers, especially as concerns the Energy Union, the common digital market and the market in service; a social Europe , so that the European integration project continues to have the support of workers; the importance of promoting the idea of a minimum wage determined by each Member State is stressed.

3) External action : Parliament advocated:

increasing the effectiveness, coherence and accountability of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) : Members took the view that the European Union’s comprehensive approach to external conflicts and crises should be reinforced, insisted on using the provisions of Article 22 TEU to set up an overall strategic framework, and called for parliamentary oversight of EU external action to be strengthened; the adoption of progressive steps to be taken towards a common defence policy and, eventually, a common defence , which can be set up by unanimous decision of the European Council: Members recommended setting up a permanent Council of Defence Ministers, to be chaired by the VP/HR with a view to coordinating the Member States' defence policies, particularly with regard to cybersecurity and anti-terrorism, and jointly developing the EU's defence strategy and priorities.

4) Justice and home affairs (JHA) : in the light of the recent attacks and the increasing terrorist threat, a systematic, mandatory and structured exchange of information and data between national law enforcement authorities and intelligence services, and with Europol, Frontex and Eurojust, is absolutely essential and must be put in place as soon as possible.

The resolution also highlighted the need to establish a fair and effective EU common asylum and immigration policy , based on the principles of solidarity, non-discrimination, non-refoulement and sincere cooperation among all Member States.

Lastly, Members called for an urgent review of the Dublin Regulation by establishing a permanent EU‑wide and legally binding system of distribution of asylum seekers between the Member States, based on fair and compulsory allocation.

Documents
2017/02/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/01/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Mercedes BRESSO (S&D, IT) and Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty.

Members recalled that the European Union and its Member States are facing unprecedented challenges , such as the refugee crisis, the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisation, climate change, demographic developments, unemployment, the causes and consequences of the financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness. These challenges cannot be adequately tackled individually by the Member States but need a collective response from the Union.

The report stressed that the Community method is best suited for the functioning of the Union and that intergovernmental solutions should only be an instrument of ultima ratio, subject to strict conditions.

Moreover, the directly elected European Parliament is the Parliament of the whole Union, and proper democratic accountability must be ensured also in the areas in which not all Member States participate, including euro area-specific actions and decisions.

Institutional set-up, democracy and accountability :

Parliaments : Members insisted that Parliament’s legislative powers and rights of control must be guaranteed, consolidated and strengthened. Parliament should reform its working methods by limiting first-reading agreements to exceptional cases of urgency in order to improve the transparency of the procedure leading to the adoption of such agreements. It should make more use of legislative initiative reports under Article 225 TFEU. The report encouraged political dialogue with national parliaments on the contents of legislative proposals. Decisions must be taken at the level of constitutional competences and there should be a clear delineation of the respective decision-making competences of the national parliaments and the European Parliament. European Council : Members considered that the European Council's practice of ‘tasking the Council’ goes against the letter and the spirit of the Treaties , which stipulates that the European Council shall define the general political directions and priorities of the Union but shall not exercise legislative functions; it is therefore necessary to improve the working relations between the European Council and Parliament. Council : the report proposed that the Council be transformed into a true legislative chamber by reducing the number of configurations, thus creating a genuinely bicameral legislative system involving the Council and Parliament, with the Commission acting as the executive. It insisted on the importance of guaranteeing the transparency of Council legislative decision-making in general and demanded that the Council switch completely to qualified majority voting wherever this is possible under the Treaties. Commission : the role of the Parliament should be strengthened in the election of the Commission President in order to ensure that the European Council takes full account of the election results when presenting a candidate for Parliament to elect. Moreover, all Commission proposals should be fully justified and accompanied by a detailed impact assessment, including a human rights assessment.

The report also called for:

the role of the European Court of Auditors in ensuring better and smarter spending of European funds to be strengthened; cooperation modalities with the Committee of the Regions (CoR) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), including at the pre-legislative stage during the conduct of impact assessments, to be improved; a framework regulation for Union agencies to be adopted; cooperation between national parliaments to be enhanced to enable them to play their role as regards the application of the principles of subsidiarity; institutional reforms to be introduced in order to provide the Economic and Monetary Union with an effective and democratic economic government with improved capacities that is integrated within the institutional framework of the Union; a convergence code to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure with a view to creating a more effective framework for economic policy coordination; a simplified, more focused and more democratic European Semester process to be established and for the relevant provisions of the fiscal compact to be integrated into the EU legal framework.

The role of the EU budget in the EMU : the report pointed to the possibility of switching from unanimity to qualified majority voting for the adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) Regulation and stressed the importance of establishing a link between the duration of Parliament’s legislative term, the Commission’s mandate and the duration of the MFF. It is proposed to introduce a euro area budget with revenue originating from the Member States whose currency is the euro.

Members called for:

use of the existing Structural Funds to be optimised in the direction of fostering the EU’s competitiveness and cohesion, and for an increase in EU investment capacity through the exploitation of innovative approaches such as, e.g. the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); the establishment of a fiscal capacity within the euro area through part of the EU budget; a rapid but step-by-step completion of a banking union , based on a single supervision mechanism (SSM), a single resolution mechanism (SRM) and a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS); the establishment of a true capital markets union ; the improvement of the automatic information exchange between national tax authorities in order to avoid tax fraud and tax evasion; a more democratic institutional set-up for the EMU; the completion of the internal market by removing all remaining internal barriers, especially as concerns the Energy Union, the common digital market and the market in service; the importance of establishing a social Europe , so that the European integration project continues to have the support of workers; the importance of promoting the idea of a minimum wage determined by each Member State is stressed.

External action : the report advocated:

increasing the effectiveness, coherence and accountability of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) : Members insisted on using the provisions of the TEU to set up an overall strategic framework for, and to take decisions on, strategic interests and objectives, that can extend beyond the CFSP to other areas of external action. This would require consistency with other policies such as trade, agriculture and development assistance. They are in favour of parliamentary oversight of EU external action being strengthened; the adoption of progressive steps to be taken towards a common defence policy and, eventually, a common defence , which can be set up by unanimous decision of the European Council: Members recommended setting up a permanent Council of Defence Ministers, to be chaired by the VP/HR with a view to coordinating the Member States' defence policies, particularly with regard to cybersecurity and anti-terrorism, and jointly developing the EU's defence strategy and priorities.

Justice and home affairs (JHA) : in the light of the recent attacks and the increasing terrorist threat, a systematic, mandatory and structured exchange of information and data between national law enforcement authorities and intelligence services, and with Europol, Frontex and Eurojust, is absolutely essential and must be put in place as soon as possible.

The report also highlighted the need to establish a fair and effective EU common asylum and immigration policy , based on the principles of solidarity, non-discrimination, non-refoulement and sincere cooperation among all Member States, which should also provide for the fair redistribution of asylum seekers within the EU.

Documents
2016/12/08
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/02/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/02/23
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/01/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/09/15
   EP - SARVAMAA Petri (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2015/05/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/01/20
   EP - ARTHUIS Jean (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2015/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/11/06
   EP - BROK Elmar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2014/11/06
   EP - BRESSO Mercedes (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 1 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: -: 567, +: 53, 0: 14
CY LU EE LV MT DK SI AT FI LT IE SK EL HR HU NL SE BG BE CZ PT GB FR RO PL ES IT DE
Total
5
6
6
6
6
11
7
16
12
10
9
9
16
10
15
20
18
16
19
18
21
45
66
30
50
47
58
81
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
186

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

4

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3
3

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 25 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 370, -: 228, 0: 42
DE RO ES PT BG CZ HU PL HR SI AT LT LU EE IE BE LV SK FR FI MT CY SE DK EL NL IT GB
Total
82
30
46
21
16
18
15
50
10
8
17
10
6
6
9
19
7
9
66
12
6
6
17
11
18
21
58
45
icon: PPE PPE
188

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 27S #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 530, -: 73, 0: 29
DE IT PL ES GB RO FR PT BG CZ BE AT NL FI HR IE SE LT SK HU DK SI CY LV EE EL MT LU
Total
82
57
50
47
43
29
65
21
16
18
18
17
21
12
10
9
18
10
8
15
11
8
6
7
6
18
3
6
icon: PPE PPE
187

Finland PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

For (1)

6

Slovakia S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Malta S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 30S #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 599, -: 25, 0: 16
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO NL BE PT BG SE CZ FI HU DK LT HR IE AT SK SI EL LU EE CY LV MT
Total
81
58
66
49
47
45
30
21
19
21
16
18
18
12
15
11
10
10
9
17
9
8
18
6
6
6
7
6
icon: PPE PPE
189

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
171

Netherlands S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 31 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 465, -: 111, 0: 60
PL DE FR RO ES IT GB PT CZ BG BE SE HR SK LT HU FI SI CY MT AT LV EE LU DK NL IE EL
Total
47
81
66
30
47
58
45
21
18
16
19
18
10
9
10
15
12
8
6
6
17
7
6
5
10
21
9
18
icon: PPE PPE
187

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
171

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 32S #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 617, -: 18, 0: 8
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO NL PT CZ SE AT BG BE DK HU LT EL IE SK FI HR SI LV EE CY MT LU
Total
82
58
66
50
48
45
30
21
21
18
18
17
16
19
11
15
10
18
9
9
12
10
8
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
189

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary NI

2

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 33 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 443, -: 167, 0: 31
PL DE RO IT ES PT CZ BG HR SK NL GB HU FR LT SI BE AT LV LU EE CY IE DK FI SE MT EL
Total
49
81
30
58
48
21
18
16
10
9
21
45
15
66
10
8
19
17
7
6
6
6
9
11
12
18
6
18
icon: PPE PPE
188

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
171

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - Am 34S #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 567, -: 55, 0: 17
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO PT CZ SE NL BE BG AT EL HR SK HU LT FI IE DK SI CY LV MT EE LU
Total
80
58
66
50
47
45
30
21
18
18
21
19
16
17
17
10
9
15
10
12
9
11
8
6
7
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
187

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
171

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 85/2 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: -: 435, +: 181, 0: 22
BE AT EE LT LU PT MT SE CY LV HR FI SI IE SK DK IT NL EL ES BG HU CZ DE RO FR GB PL
Total
19
17
6
10
6
21
6
17
6
7
10
11
8
9
9
11
58
21
17
48
16
15
18
82
29
65
45
50
icon: S&D S&D
171

Belgium S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

2
3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

4

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
60

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
188

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 116 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 396, -: 209, 0: 33
DE RO IT ES BG BE PT HU CZ AT HR FR SI SK PL EE LU MT LT LV CY FI NL GB EL DK SE IE
Total
80
30
58
48
16
19
21
15
18
17
10
64
8
9
50
6
6
6
10
7
6
12
21
45
18
10
18
9
icon: PPE PPE
189

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: S&D S&D
169

Belgium S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 121 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 375, -: 242, 0: 23
DE RO ES BG PT IT CZ BE HU FR HR AT SI PL EE LT LU SK LV CY MT NL FI DK EL IE SE GB
Total
80
30
48
16
21
58
17
19
15
66
10
17
8
50
6
10
6
9
7
6
6
21
12
11
18
9
18
45
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

4
icon: S&D S&D
170

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 131 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 421, -: 187, 0: 28
RO DE FR ES BG AT CZ BE PT HU IT HR SK LT EE PL SI MT LU NL IE LV CY FI DK EL GB SE
Total
30
80
65
48
16
17
18
18
20
15
58
10
9
10
6
50
8
5
6
21
9
7
6
12
11
17
45
18
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 134 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 403, -: 191, 0: 40
PL FR NL CZ BG HR SK BE GB DE AT HU LT RO PT MT EE DK EL LV FI SI LU CY IE ES IT SE
Total
50
65
21
17
16
10
9
19
45
82
17
15
10
29
20
6
6
11
17
7
12
8
6
6
9
46
57
18
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Cyprus ECR

1

Italy ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

Against (1)

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: S&D S&D
167

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3
4

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - § 137 #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 423, -: 200, 0: 15
DE RO ES CZ BG BE PT AT HU IT PL FR HR EE SI LV MT LT LU SE SK IE CY DK FI GB NL EL
Total
80
29
48
18
16
19
21
17
15
58
50
66
10
6
8
7
6
10
6
17
9
9
6
11
12
45
21
17
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
169

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso et Elmar Brok - AFCO résolution #

2017/02/16 Outcome: +: 329, -: 223, 0: 83
DE ES FR PT BG BE AT SI HR LT EE LU PL HU CZ SK NL FI CY IT LV IE DK EL MT SE GB RO
Total
80
48
65
21
16
19
17
8
10
10
6
6
50
14
17
9
21
12
6
56
8
9
11
18
5
18
44
30
icon: PPE PPE
186

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
168

Belgium S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

3

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

For (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45
4

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
19

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
931 2014/2249(INI)
2015/04/22 BUDG 26 amendments...
source: 554.949
2016/02/11 CONT 17 amendments...
source: 576.888
2016/02/17 AFCO 881 amendments...
source: 576.982
2016/02/23 AFCO 7 amendments...
source: 578.462

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/2
name
SPINELLI Barbara
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.633&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-554633_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.146
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-PR-573146_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.982
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-576982_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.009
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-577009_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.022
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-577022_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.462
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-578462_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.649&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-571649_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2017-01-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0386_EN.html title: A8-0386/2016
summary
events/2
date
2017-01-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0386_EN.html title: A8-0386/2016
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2017-02-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2017
summary
events/5
date
2017-02-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2017
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ARTHUIS Jean date: 2015-01-20T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARTHUIS Jean group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: SARVAMAA Petri date: 2015-09-15T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SARVAMAA Petri group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0386&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0386_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0049
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0049_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ECR name: UJAZDOWSKI Kazimierz Michał group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: GUE/NGL name: SPINELLI Barbara group: Verts/ALE name: GIEGOLD Sven group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: ANNEMANS Gerolf responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: S&D name: BRESSO Mercedes body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: ARTHUIS Jean body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2015-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: SARVAMAA Petri
  • date: 2016-12-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ECR name: UJAZDOWSKI Kazimierz Michał group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: GUE/NGL name: SPINELLI Barbara group: Verts/ALE name: GIEGOLD Sven group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: ANNEMANS Gerolf responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: S&D name: BRESSO Mercedes body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: ARTHUIS Jean body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2015-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: SARVAMAA Petri
  • date: 2017-01-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0386&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0386/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170214&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFCO
date
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
rapporteur
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARTHUIS Jean group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: ARTHUIS Jean
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SARVAMAA Petri group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CONT
date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: EPP name: SARVAMAA Petri
docs
  • date: 2015-05-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.633&secondRef=03 title: PE554.633 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.146 title: PE573.146 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.982 title: PE576.982 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.009 title: PE577.009 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.022 title: PE577.022 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.462 title: PE578.462 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.649&secondRef=02 title: PE571.649 committee: CONT type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-12-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0386&language=EN title: A8-0386/2016 summary: The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Mercedes BRESSO (S&D, IT) and Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty. Members recalled that the European Union and its Member States are facing unprecedented challenges , such as the refugee crisis, the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisation, climate change, demographic developments, unemployment, the causes and consequences of the financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness. These challenges cannot be adequately tackled individually by the Member States but need a collective response from the Union. The report stressed that the Community method is best suited for the functioning of the Union and that intergovernmental solutions should only be an instrument of ultima ratio, subject to strict conditions. Moreover, the directly elected European Parliament is the Parliament of the whole Union, and proper democratic accountability must be ensured also in the areas in which not all Member States participate, including euro area-specific actions and decisions. Institutional set-up, democracy and accountability : Parliaments : Members insisted that Parliament’s legislative powers and rights of control must be guaranteed, consolidated and strengthened. Parliament should reform its working methods by limiting first-reading agreements to exceptional cases of urgency in order to improve the transparency of the procedure leading to the adoption of such agreements. It should make more use of legislative initiative reports under Article 225 TFEU. The report encouraged political dialogue with national parliaments on the contents of legislative proposals. Decisions must be taken at the level of constitutional competences and there should be a clear delineation of the respective decision-making competences of the national parliaments and the European Parliament. European Council : Members considered that the European Council's practice of ‘tasking the Council’ goes against the letter and the spirit of the Treaties , which stipulates that the European Council shall define the general political directions and priorities of the Union but shall not exercise legislative functions; it is therefore necessary to improve the working relations between the European Council and Parliament. Council : the report proposed that the Council be transformed into a true legislative chamber by reducing the number of configurations, thus creating a genuinely bicameral legislative system involving the Council and Parliament, with the Commission acting as the executive. It insisted on the importance of guaranteeing the transparency of Council legislative decision-making in general and demanded that the Council switch completely to qualified majority voting wherever this is possible under the Treaties. Commission : the role of the Parliament should be strengthened in the election of the Commission President in order to ensure that the European Council takes full account of the election results when presenting a candidate for Parliament to elect. Moreover, all Commission proposals should be fully justified and accompanied by a detailed impact assessment, including a human rights assessment. The report also called for: the role of the European Court of Auditors in ensuring better and smarter spending of European funds to be strengthened; cooperation modalities with the Committee of the Regions (CoR) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), including at the pre-legislative stage during the conduct of impact assessments, to be improved; a framework regulation for Union agencies to be adopted; cooperation between national parliaments to be enhanced to enable them to play their role as regards the application of the principles of subsidiarity; institutional reforms to be introduced in order to provide the Economic and Monetary Union with an effective and democratic economic government with improved capacities that is integrated within the institutional framework of the Union; a convergence code to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure with a view to creating a more effective framework for economic policy coordination; a simplified, more focused and more democratic European Semester process to be established and for the relevant provisions of the fiscal compact to be integrated into the EU legal framework. The role of the EU budget in the EMU : the report pointed to the possibility of switching from unanimity to qualified majority voting for the adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) Regulation and stressed the importance of establishing a link between the duration of Parliament’s legislative term, the Commission’s mandate and the duration of the MFF. It is proposed to introduce a euro area budget with revenue originating from the Member States whose currency is the euro. Members called for: use of the existing Structural Funds to be optimised in the direction of fostering the EU’s competitiveness and cohesion, and for an increase in EU investment capacity through the exploitation of innovative approaches such as, e.g. the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); the establishment of a fiscal capacity within the euro area through part of the EU budget; a rapid but step-by-step completion of a banking union , based on a single supervision mechanism (SSM), a single resolution mechanism (SRM) and a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS); the establishment of a true capital markets union ; the improvement of the automatic information exchange between national tax authorities in order to avoid tax fraud and tax evasion; a more democratic institutional set-up for the EMU; the completion of the internal market by removing all remaining internal barriers, especially as concerns the Energy Union, the common digital market and the market in service; the importance of establishing a social Europe , so that the European integration project continues to have the support of workers; the importance of promoting the idea of a minimum wage determined by each Member State is stressed. External action : the report advocated: increasing the effectiveness, coherence and accountability of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) : Members insisted on using the provisions of the TEU to set up an overall strategic framework for, and to take decisions on, strategic interests and objectives, that can extend beyond the CFSP to other areas of external action. This would require consistency with other policies such as trade, agriculture and development assistance. They are in favour of parliamentary oversight of EU external action being strengthened; the adoption of progressive steps to be taken towards a common defence policy and, eventually, a common defence , which can be set up by unanimous decision of the European Council: Members recommended setting up a permanent Council of Defence Ministers, to be chaired by the VP/HR with a view to coordinating the Member States' defence policies, particularly with regard to cybersecurity and anti-terrorism, and jointly developing the EU's defence strategy and priorities. Justice and home affairs (JHA) : in the light of the recent attacks and the increasing terrorist threat, a systematic, mandatory and structured exchange of information and data between national law enforcement authorities and intelligence services, and with Europol, Frontex and Eurojust, is absolutely essential and must be put in place as soon as possible. The report also highlighted the need to establish a fair and effective EU common asylum and immigration policy , based on the principles of solidarity, non-discrimination, non-refoulement and sincere cooperation among all Member States, which should also provide for the fair redistribution of asylum seekers within the EU.
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=28018&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0049 title: T8-0049/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 329 votes to 223 with 83 abstentions, a resolution on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty. Members recalled that the European Union and its Member States are facing unprecedented challenges , such as the refugee crisis, the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisation, climate change, demographic developments, unemployment, the causes and consequences of the financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness. These challenges cannot be adequately tackled individually by the Member States but need a collective response from the Union. A draft replacement resolution, tabled by the ENF group, was rejected in plenary by 53 votes to 567 with 14 abstentions. The resolution stressed that the Community method is best suited for the functioning of the Union and that intergovernmental solutions should only be an instrument of ultima ratio, subject to strict conditions. Moreover, the directly elected European Parliament is the Parliament of the whole Union, and proper democratic accountability must be ensured also in the areas in which not all Member States participate, including euro area-specific actions and decisions. 1) Institutional set-up, democracy and accountability : Parliaments : Members insisted that Parliament’s legislative powers and rights of control must be guaranteed, consolidated and strengthened. Parliament should reform its working methods by limiting first-reading agreements to exceptional cases of urgency in order to improve the transparency of the procedure leading to the adoption of such agreements. It should make more use of legislative initiative reports under Article 225 TFEU. The resolution encouraged political dialogue with national parliaments on the contents of legislative proposals and stressed the need to intensify political dialogue between national parliaments and the European Parliament in joint bodies; European Council : Members considered that the European Council's practice of “tasking the Council” goes against the letter and the spirit of the Treaties , which stipulates that the European Council shall define the general political directions and priorities of the Union but shall not exercise legislative functions; it is therefore necessary to improve the working relations between the European Council and Parliament; Council : Parliament proposed that the Council be transformed into a true legislative chamber by reducing the number of configurations, thus creating a genuinely bicameral legislative system involving the Council and Parliament, with the Commission acting as the executive. It insisted on the importance of guaranteeing the transparency of Council legislative decision-making in general and demanded that the Council switch completely to qualified majority voting wherever this is possible under the Treaties. The President and the members of the Eurogroup should be subject to appropriate mechanisms of democratic accountability towards the European Parliament; Commission : the role of the Parliament should be strengthened in the election of the Commission President in order to ensure that the European Council takes full account of the election results when presenting a candidate for Parliament to elect. Moreover, all Commission proposals should be fully justified and accompanied by a detailed impact assessment, including a human rights assessment. Every Member State should designate at least three candidates of both genders to be Commissioner. The resolution also called for: strengthening the Court of Auditors , improving cooperation modalities with the Committee of the Regions and European Economic and Social Committee , including at the pre-legislative stage and considering the adoption of a framework regulation for Union agencies ; cooperation between national parliaments to be enhanced to enable them to play their role as regards the application of the principles of subsidiarity; institutional reforms to be introduced in order to provide the Economic and Monetary Union with an effective and democratic economic government with improved capacities that is integrated within the institutional framework of the Union; a convergence code to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure with a view to creating a more effective framework for economic policy coordination; a simplified, more focused and more democratic European Semester process to be established and for the relevant provisions of the fiscal compact to be integrated into the EU legal framework. 2) The role of the EU budget in the EMU : the report pointed to the possibility of switching from unanimity to qualified majority voting for the adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) Regulation and stressed the importance of establishing a link between the duration of Parliament’s legislative term, the Commission’s mandate and the duration of the MFF. It is proposed to change the current system based on GNI contributions to one based on real own resources for the EU and, eventually, a euro area budget. Members called for: the use of the existing Structural Funds to be optimised in the direction of fostering the EU’s competitiveness and cohesion, and for an increase in EU investment capacity through the exploitation of innovative approaches such as, e.g. the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI); the establishment of a fiscal capacity within the euro area through part of the EU budget; a rapid but step-by-step completion of a banking union , based on a single supervision mechanism (SSM), a single resolution mechanism (SRM) and a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS); the establishment of a true capital markets union ; the improvement of the automatic information exchange between national tax authorities in order to avoid tax fraud and tax evasion; a more democratic institutional set-up for the EMU with an enhanced scrutiny role for the European Parliament at EU level; the completion of the internal market by removing all remaining internal barriers, especially as concerns the Energy Union, the common digital market and the market in service; a social Europe , so that the European integration project continues to have the support of workers; the importance of promoting the idea of a minimum wage determined by each Member State is stressed. 3) External action : Parliament advocated: increasing the effectiveness, coherence and accountability of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) : Members took the view that the European Union’s comprehensive approach to external conflicts and crises should be reinforced, insisted on using the provisions of Article 22 TEU to set up an overall strategic framework, and called for parliamentary oversight of EU external action to be strengthened; the adoption of progressive steps to be taken towards a common defence policy and, eventually, a common defence , which can be set up by unanimous decision of the European Council: Members recommended setting up a permanent Council of Defence Ministers, to be chaired by the VP/HR with a view to coordinating the Member States' defence policies, particularly with regard to cybersecurity and anti-terrorism, and jointly developing the EU's defence strategy and priorities. 4) Justice and home affairs (JHA) : in the light of the recent attacks and the increasing terrorist threat, a systematic, mandatory and structured exchange of information and data between national law enforcement authorities and intelligence services, and with Europol, Frontex and Eurojust, is absolutely essential and must be put in place as soon as possible. The resolution also highlighted the need to establish a fair and effective EU common asylum and immigration policy , based on the principles of solidarity, non-discrimination, non-refoulement and sincere cooperation among all Member States. Lastly, Members called for an urgent review of the Dublin Regulation by establishing a permanent EU‑wide and legally binding system of distribution of asylum seekers between the Member States, based on fair and compulsory allocation.
  • date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFCO/8/02318
New
  • AFCO/8/02318
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8 State and evolution of the Union
  • 8.10 Revision of the Treaties, intergovernmental conferences
  • 8.30 Treaties in general
  • 8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources
  • 8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
New
8
State and evolution of the Union
8.10
Revision of the Treaties, intergovernmental conferences
8.30
Treaties in general
8.70.01
Financing of the budget, own resources
8.70.03
Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
procedure/subtype
Old
Initiative
New
  • Initiative
  • See also 2014/2248(INI)
procedure/summary
  • See also
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2017
activities/4/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0386&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0386/2016
activities/3
date
2017-02-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170214&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/date
Old
2017-02-14T00:00:00
New
2017-02-16T00:00:00
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/date
Old
2017-02-01T00:00:00
New
2017-02-14T00:00:00
activities/2/date
Old
2016-12-16T00:00:00
New
2017-01-09T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2016-12-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2016-12-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1/date
Old
2016-12-14T00:00:00
New
2017-02-01T00:00:00
procedure/summary
  • See also
activities/1/date
Old
2016-11-24T00:00:00
New
2016-12-14T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-10-24T00:00:00
New
2016-11-24T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-11-21T00:00:00
New
2016-10-24T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-07-04T00:00:00
New
2016-11-21T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-05-09T00:00:00
New
2016-07-04T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2016-05-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1
date
2016-05-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/date
Old
2016-04-28T00:00:00
New
2016-05-26T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SARVAMAA Petri
activities/1
date
2016-04-28T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/2/date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SARVAMAA Petri
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5
group
ENF
name
ANNEMANS Gerolf
committees/0/shadows/5
group
ENF
name
ANNEMANS Gerolf
procedure/subject/0
8 State and evolution of the Union
procedure/subject/1
8.10 Revision of the Treaties, intergovernmental conferences
procedure/subject/3
8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources
procedure/subject/4
8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
activities/0/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0
group
ECR
name
UJAZDOWSKI Kazimierz Michał
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
GUE/NGL
name
SPINELLI Barbara
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4
group
EFD
name
CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
activities/0/committees/1/date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: ARTHUIS Jean
committees/0/shadows/0
group
ECR
name
UJAZDOWSKI Kazimierz Michał
committees/0/shadows/2
group
GUE/NGL
name
SPINELLI Barbara
committees/0/shadows/4
group
EFD
name
CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
committees/1/date
2015-01-20T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: ARTHUIS Jean
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
TIMMERMANS Frans
activities
  • date: 2015-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: GIEGOLD Sven responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: S&D name: BRESSO Mercedes body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: GIEGOLD Sven responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: S&D name: BRESSO Mercedes
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    AFCO/8/02318
    reference
    2014/2249(INI)
    title
    Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    8.30 Treaties in general