BETA


2015/2097(INI) Report on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead EMPL ARENA Maria (icon: S&D S&D) HETMAN Krzysztof (icon: PPE PPE), GERICKE Arne (icon: ECR ECR), HARKIN Marian (icon: ALDE ALDE), VANA Monika (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), AGEA Laura (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion FEMM GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (icon: S&D S&D) Daniela AIUTO (icon: EFDD EFDD), Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA (icon: ALDE ALDE), Beatrix von STORCH (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/05/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/05/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 491 votes to 101, with 38 abstentions, a resolution on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC.

Parliament recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. It felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market.

Transposition of the directive : Parliament stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, it believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. It also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave.

Parliament recalled that gold-plating by Member States can add to the complexity of regulation and in effect reduce compliance; calls on the Member States to avoid adding administrative burdens when transposing EU legislation.

In general, Parliament encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. It considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with . The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue.

Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector), Parliament recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented , in a uniform manner. It welcomed the fact that some Member States have transposed the provisions of the directive beyond the minimum scope of application.

It asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure .

Gender imbalance : Parliament noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. It believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . The Commission is called upon to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents so as to encourage them to achieve a better work-life balance and in the best interest of their children. Those rights should be individualised as far as possible to help achieve the 75 % employment rate targets for women and men set in the Europe 2020 strategy.

With regard to income , Parliament noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. It also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts , are not always included.

Members States were called upon to ensure:

that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post.

Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Parliament noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States.

At the same time, Parliament called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women.

Parliament called on the social partners, on the basis of the Commission report published in February 2015, to address the shortcomings of the Parental Leave Directive in fully achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women.

Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Parliament stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, it called on Member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. It believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. It called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance.

Parliament went on to call for:

an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; the need to extend the period in which both parents can exercise their right to take parental leave ; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance.

Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to gauge the positive influence of initiatives on improving work-life balance with a view to redistributing family, care and domestic responsibilities, and to extend the particular responsibilities of those caring for children with disabilities, in a position of dependency and/or belonging to disadvantaged categories and groups.

Documents
2016/05/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maria ARENA (S&D, BE) on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC.

Members recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. They felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market.

Transposition of the directive : the report stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, Members believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. They also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave.

They encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. The committee considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with. The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue.

Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector) Members recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented, in a uniform manner .

They asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure.

Gender imbalance : the report noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. Members believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . They called on the Commission, to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents.

With regard to income , Members noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. They also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, are not always included.

Members States were called upon to ensure:

that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post.

Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Members noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States.

At the same time, Members called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. They considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women.

Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Members stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, they called on member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. They believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. Members called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance.

The committee went to on to call for:

an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance.

Lastly, Members called on the Commission, where appropriate, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination, so as to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of EU initiatives on improving work-life balance.

Documents
2016/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/02/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/01/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/12/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/06/05
   EP - ARENA Maria (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2015/05/21
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/11/06
   EP - GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 3 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 344, -: 247, 0: 42
PL CZ BG GB HU LT BE FI NL LV IE SI HR SK MT ES LU EE PT DE SE CY DK AT RO IT EL FR
Total
46
16
14
47
19
9
18
12
23
8
9
8
9
13
3
48
6
4
21
80
14
5
10
15
26
60
20
68
icon: PPE PPE
186

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Denmark ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2
icon: S&D S&D
166

Czechia S&D

For (1)

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 7 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 411, -: 212, 0: 21
PL FR GB NL CZ EL BG DE DK IE ES BE LT SK LV FI HR SI PT SE MT EE RO AT CY LU HU IT
Total
46
69
47
23
17
20
15
82
10
9
49
18
9
13
8
12
10
8
21
14
3
4
29
15
5
6
19
61
icon: PPE PPE
191

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
59

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
3
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

France Verts/ALE

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 11/1 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 491, -: 119, 0: 32
DE IT ES RO PL FR HU PT BE BG EL CZ AT HR SE SI IE SK LU LV FI LT EE DK NL MT CY GB
Total
82
60
49
29
45
70
19
21
17
14
20
17
15
10
14
8
9
13
6
8
12
9
4
10
23
3
5
48
icon: PPE PPE
191

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Germany GUE/NGL

6

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
32

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 11/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 334, -: 289, 0: 16
IT FR ES BE LU FI SE EL RO LT PT EE DE AT BG DK IE HR CY CZ SI HU LV MT SK GB NL PL
Total
60
69
48
18
6
12
14
20
29
8
21
4
82
15
14
10
9
9
5
17
8
18
8
3
13
48
23
46
icon: S&D S&D
165

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

6

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
191

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 14/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 557, -: 46, 0: 42
DE FR IT PL ES GB RO HU BE BG AT PT CZ SK FI HR LT LV DK SI LU IE NL EE MT EL CY SE
Total
82
70
61
46
49
48
29
19
18
15
15
21
16
13
12
10
9
8
10
8
6
9
23
4
3
20
5
14
icon: PPE PPE
191

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
165

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Am 6 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: -: 536, +: 68, 0: 34
CY MT EE EL FI SI LU LT LV SE IE ES HR DK SK BG BE HU AT CZ PT IT NL RO GB PL FR DE
Total
5
3
4
20
12
8
6
9
8
14
9
49
10
10
13
14
17
17
15
17
21
60
22
28
48
45
70
82
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
10

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ECR ECR
59

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Finland ALDE

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
191

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2
5

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Am 8 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: -: 573, +: 55, 0: 12
IE MT EL EE CY LU LT LV SI DK SE FI HR HU AT SK BG CZ BE PT IT NL RO ES PL GB FR DE
Total
9
3
20
4
5
6
9
8
8
10
14
12
10
19
15
13
14
17
18
21
61
23
29
49
44
47
70
80
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
4

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 27/1 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 596, 0: 27, -: 17
DE FR IT ES PL GB RO PT HU BE BG CZ SK AT EL FI SE LT IE HR LV SI NL LU DK CY EE MT
Total
81
69
60
49
44
48
29
21
19
18
15
17
13
15
20
12
14
9
9
9
8
8
23
6
10
5
4
3
icon: PPE PPE
188

Finland PPE

2

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
164

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 27/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 334, -: 262, 0: 38
IT ES BE EL PT GB AT FI SE LT DE CY RO EE LU IE HR DK CZ LV SI HU BG MT SK NL FR PL
Total
59
49
18
19
20
48
15
12
14
9
80
4
29
4
6
9
10
10
16
8
8
18
15
3
13
23
70
44
icon: S&D S&D
161

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
187

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - § 33/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: -: 341, +: 277, 0: 22
ES FI LT RO BE PT SE EE DK AT EL LU CY HR SI BG CZ IT LV MT IE SK DE HU GB NL FR PL
Total
49
12
9
29
18
21
14
4
10
15
20
6
5
10
8
15
17
61
7
3
9
13
81
19
48
23
70
42
icon: S&D S&D
163

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1
3

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
32

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
190

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Am 1 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: -: 505, +: 112, 0: 24
ES IE MT EL LU EE LT CY SE SI LV DK FI HR HU AT BE SK BG NL CZ PT IT GB RO PL DE FR
Total
49
9
3
20
6
4
9
5
14
8
8
10
12
10
19
15
18
13
14
23
17
21
61
48
29
43
81
70
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
189

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Considérant E #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 581, -: 32, 0: 26
DE FR PL ES GB IT RO PT BE EL HU NL BG AT CZ FI HR DK LT SK LV SI IE LU CY EE MT SE
Total
81
70
42
48
48
61
29
21
18
20
18
23
15
15
17
12
10
10
9
13
8
8
9
6
5
4
3
14
icon: PPE PPE
188

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
163

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

5
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

Against (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Considérant R/2 #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 540, -: 74, 0: 26
FR DE IT ES RO PT HU AT EL BG CZ BE SE IE FI HR SI LT GB NL SK LU CY LV EE DK MT PL
Total
70
81
61
49
29
21
19
15
20
15
16
18
14
9
12
10
8
9
48
23
13
6
5
7
4
10
3
43
icon: PPE PPE
189

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Romania ENF

1

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Considérant S #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 358, -: 193, 0: 85
ES FR IT GB BE DE IE FI SE PT RO DK EL CY MT LT CZ LU EE AT HR BG SI NL HU LV SK PL
Total
49
70
60
47
18
81
9
12
14
21
29
9
20
5
3
8
17
6
4
15
10
15
8
23
18
8
13
42
icon: S&D S&D
161

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
190

Finland PPE

2

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

5

Latvia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena - Résolution #

2016/05/12 Outcome: +: 491, -: 101, 0: 38
DE IT ES FR RO PT HU EL BG BE IE AT SI SK LT FI HR GB LU DK SE CY CZ EE LV NL MT PL
Total
78
61
49
69
28
21
18
20
14
17
9
15
8
13
8
12
10
47
6
10
13
5
17
4
8
23
3
43
icon: PPE PPE
186

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

2
4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Bulgaria S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Germany ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
AmendmentsDossier
236 2015/2097(INI)
2016/01/12 FEMM 35 amendments...
source: 575.114
2016/01/29 EMPL 201 amendments...
source: 575.187

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.733
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-569733_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.187
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-575187_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.424&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-571424_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-04-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0076_EN.html title: A8-0076/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-04-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0076_EN.html title: A8-0076/2016
summary
events/4
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0226_EN.html title: T8-0226/2016
summary
events/4
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0226_EN.html title: T8-0226/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-11-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0076_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0226_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
  • date: 2016-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
  • date: 2016-04-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0076/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0226/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
EMPL
date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-11-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2014-11-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
docs
  • date: 2015-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.733 title: PE569.733 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.187 title: PE575.187 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.424&secondRef=02 title: PE571.424 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN title: A8-0076/2016 summary: The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maria ARENA (S&D, BE) on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC. Members recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. They felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market. Transposition of the directive : the report stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, Members believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. They also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave. They encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. The committee considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with. The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue. Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector) Members recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented, in a uniform manner . They asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure. Gender imbalance : the report noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. Members believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . They called on the Commission, to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents. With regard to income , Members noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. They also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, are not always included. Members States were called upon to ensure: that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post. Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Members noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States. At the same time, Members called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. They considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Members stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, they called on member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. They believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. Members called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance. The committee went to on to call for: an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance. Lastly, Members called on the Commission, where appropriate, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination, so as to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of EU initiatives on improving work-life balance.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26984&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 title: T8-0226/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 491 votes to 101, with 38 abstentions, a resolution on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC. Parliament recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. It felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market. Transposition of the directive : Parliament stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, it believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. It also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave. Parliament recalled that gold-plating by Member States can add to the complexity of regulation and in effect reduce compliance; calls on the Member States to avoid adding administrative burdens when transposing EU legislation. In general, Parliament encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. It considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with . The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue. Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector), Parliament recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented , in a uniform manner. It welcomed the fact that some Member States have transposed the provisions of the directive beyond the minimum scope of application. It asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure . Gender imbalance : Parliament noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. It believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . The Commission is called upon to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents so as to encourage them to achieve a better work-life balance and in the best interest of their children. Those rights should be individualised as far as possible to help achieve the 75 % employment rate targets for women and men set in the Europe 2020 strategy. With regard to income , Parliament noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. It also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts , are not always included. Members States were called upon to ensure: that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post. Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Parliament noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States. At the same time, Parliament called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Parliament called on the social partners, on the basis of the Commission report published in February 2015, to address the shortcomings of the Parental Leave Directive in fully achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Parliament stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, it called on Member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. It believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. It called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance. Parliament went on to call for: an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; the need to extend the period in which both parents can exercise their right to take parental leave ; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance. Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to gauge the positive influence of initiatives on improving work-life balance with a view to redistributing family, care and domestic responsibilities, and to extend the particular responsibilities of those caring for children with disabilities, in a position of dependency and/or belonging to disadvantaged categories and groups.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
EMPL/8/03516
New
  • EMPL/8/03516
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.02 Family policy, family law, parental leave
New
4.10.02
Family policy, family law, parental leave
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0226/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maria ARENA (S&D, BE) on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC.

    Members recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. They felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market.

    Transposition of the directive: the report stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, Members believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. They also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave.

    They encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. The committee considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with. The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue.

    Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector) Members recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented, in a uniform manner.

    They asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure.

    Gender imbalance: the report noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. Members believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave. They called on the Commission, to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents.

    With regard to income, Members noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. They also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, are not always included.

    Members States were called upon to ensure:

    • that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard;
    • favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post.

    Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance: Members noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States.

    At the same time, Members called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. They considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women.

    Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave: Members stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay. In this regard, they called on member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. They believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. Members called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance.

    The committee went to on to call for:

    • an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave;
    • an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive;
    • tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave;
    • the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market;
    • raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves;
    • adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns;
    • policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance.

    Lastly, Members called on the Commission, where appropriate, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination, so as to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of EU initiatives on improving work-life balance.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0076/2016
activities/3/date
Old
2016-05-09T00:00:00
New
2016-05-12T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
activities/2
date
2016-04-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-27T00:00:00
New
2016-05-09T00:00:00
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-11T00:00:00
New
2016-04-27T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
activities/2
date
2016-04-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
VANA Monika
activities/1
date
2016-03-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
VANA Monika
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
HETMAN Krzysztof
committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
HETMAN Krzysztof
activities/0/committees/0/date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
committees/0/date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
activities/0/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EFD name: AGEA Laura
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EFD name: AGEA Laura
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
EMPL/8/03516
reference
2015/2097(INI)
title
Report on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Implementation
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.10.02 Family policy, family law, parental leave