BETA

Procedure completed



2015/2097(INI) Report on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead EMPL ARENA Maria (S&D) HETMAN Krzysztof (EPP), GERICKE Arne (ECR), HARKIN Marian (ALDE), PIMENTA LOPES João (GUE/NGL), VANA Monika (Verts/ALE), AGEA Laura (EFD)
Opinion FEMM GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (S&D)
Lead committee dossier: EMPL/8/03516
Legal Basis RoP 052

Activites

  • 2016/05/12 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2016/04/05 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A8-0076/2016 summary
  • 2016/03/16 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2015/05/21 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0076/2016
  • Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0226/2016
AmendmentsDossier
236 2015/2097(INI)
2016/01/12 FEMM 35 amendments...
source: 575.114
2016/01/29 EMPL 201 amendments...
source: 575.187

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
  • date: 2016-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
  • date: 2016-04-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0076/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0226/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ARENA Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
EMPL
date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-11-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2014-11-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
docs
  • date: 2015-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.733 title: PE569.733 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.187 title: PE575.187 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE571.424&secondRef=02 title: PE571.424 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN title: A8-0076/2016 summary: The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maria ARENA (S&D, BE) on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC. Members recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. They felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market. Transposition of the directive : the report stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, Members believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. They also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave. They encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. The committee considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with. The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue. Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector) Members recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented, in a uniform manner . They asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure. Gender imbalance : the report noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. Members believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . They called on the Commission, to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents. With regard to income , Members noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. They also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, are not always included. Members States were called upon to ensure: that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post. Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Members noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States. At the same time, Members called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. They considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Members stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, they called on member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. They believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. Members called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance. The committee went to on to call for: an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance. Lastly, Members called on the Commission, where appropriate, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination, so as to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of EU initiatives on improving work-life balance.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26984&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 title: T8-0226/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 491 votes to 101, with 38 abstentions, a resolution on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC. Parliament recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. It felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market. Transposition of the directive : Parliament stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, it believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. It also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave. Parliament recalled that gold-plating by Member States can add to the complexity of regulation and in effect reduce compliance; calls on the Member States to avoid adding administrative burdens when transposing EU legislation. In general, Parliament encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. It considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with . The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue. Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector), Parliament recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented , in a uniform manner. It welcomed the fact that some Member States have transposed the provisions of the directive beyond the minimum scope of application. It asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure . Gender imbalance : Parliament noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. It believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave . The Commission is called upon to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents so as to encourage them to achieve a better work-life balance and in the best interest of their children. Those rights should be individualised as far as possible to help achieve the 75 % employment rate targets for women and men set in the Europe 2020 strategy. With regard to income , Parliament noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. It also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts , are not always included. Members States were called upon to ensure: that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard; favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post. Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance : Parliament noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States. At the same time, Parliament called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Parliament called on the social partners, on the basis of the Commission report published in February 2015, to address the shortcomings of the Parental Leave Directive in fully achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. It considered that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women. Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave : Parliament stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay . In this regard, it called on Member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. It believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. It called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance. Parliament went on to call for: an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave; the need to extend the period in which both parents can exercise their right to take parental leave ; an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive; tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave; the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market; raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves; adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns; policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance. Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to gauge the positive influence of initiatives on improving work-life balance with a view to redistributing family, care and domestic responsibilities, and to extend the particular responsibilities of those caring for children with disabilities, in a position of dependency and/or belonging to disadvantaged categories and groups.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
EMPL/8/03516
New
  • EMPL/8/03516
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.02 Family policy, family law, parental leave
New
4.10.02
Family policy, family law, parental leave
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0226 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0226/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maria ARENA (S&D, BE) on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC.

    Members recalled that there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020. They felt, therefore, that there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter and stay in the job market.

    Transposition of the directive: the report stressed that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU on the application of the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC takes different forms in the various Member States. Accordingly, Members believed that the transposition should comply fully with legislation in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners. They also felt that classifying the different types of leave at EU level is difficult, since not all Member States have followed the EU’s separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leave.

    They encouraged the Member States that have not yet done so to provide the Commission within a reasonable time with correspondence tables between the provisions of the directive and the transposition measures. The committee considered it is crucial for Member States to ensure that the necessary inspection resources are in place to verify that legislation protecting parents’ rights is being complied with. The Commission is urged to produce a report on this issue.

    Regretting the fact that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application (e.g. more protection is provided for in the public sector across the EU than in the private sector) Members recommended that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be correctly implemented, in a uniform manner.

    They asked Member States to adopt family-oriented social policies that provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure.

    Gender imbalance: the report noted that, more than a decade after the Member States transposed the directive, the gender imbalance in taking parental leaves persists. It stated that the issue of pay during leave is crucial for low-income parents. Members believed that the Commission should propose measures that encourage fathers to take more parental leave. They called on the Commission, to guarantee that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, are equal in terms of individual rights and equally accessible for both parents.

    With regard to income, Members noted that families with children and parents taking a career break to raise them have to bear not only a loss of income but also higher expenditure. They also noted that the flexibility that the Directive grants Member States to define forms of parental leave means that workers on non-standard contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, are not always included.

    Members States were called upon to ensure:

    • that enterprises can plan with certainty, and to pay particular attention to the needs of the smallest and small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard;
    • favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have benefited from parental leave, especially concerning reinstatement to the same post or an equivalent or similar post.

    Towards an effective directive to address the challenges of a work-life balance: Members noted the Commission’s withdrawal of the draft maternity leave directive, and called on the latter to return with an ambitious proposal that will effectively enable a better work-life balance while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. Consideration should be given to a broad non-legislative initiative to promote the reconciliation of work and family life in Member States.

    At the same time, Members called for the social partners, on the basis of the draft implementation report, to acknowledge the failure of the Parental Leave Directive in achieving its objectives in terms of work-life balance, female labour market participation, demographic challenges and men’s share of family tasks, including the care of children and other dependants. They considered, therefore, that more effective measures should be taken to encourage a more equal sharing of family responsibilities between men and women.

    Fair pay and extension of the minimum time period of parental leave: Members stressed that satisfactory parental leave arrangements are closely linked to adequate pay. In this regard, they called on member States, in agreement with the social partners, to reconsider their system of financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for an adequate and decent level of income replacement. They believed that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aimed at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential. Members called on the Commission and the social partners to consider offering an appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at least six months to improve work-life balance.

    The committee went to on to call for:

    • an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave;
    • an increase in the age of the child for which parental leave can be taken, and also the possibility of parental leave for parents of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses should be extended beyond the statutory age of the child provided for in the directive;
    • tackling the many obstacles to the return to work after a period of long parental leave;
    • the exchange of best practices between Member States in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter, stay in and return to the job market;
    • raising parents’ awareness of the benefits of participation in early childhood education and care programmes for their children and themselves;
    • adapting the design and eligibility criteria of high-quality, inclusive early childhood education and care services to increasingly diverse working patterns;
    • policies for overcoming stereotyped gender roles and ensuring the promotion of a gender-balanced work-life balance.

    Lastly, Members called on the Commission, where appropriate, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination, so as to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of EU initiatives on improving work-life balance.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0076&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0076/2016
activities/3/date
Old
2016-05-09T00:00:00
New
2016-05-12T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
activities/2
date
2016-04-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-27T00:00:00
New
2016-05-09T00:00:00
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: HARKIN Marian group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-06-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/2/date
Old
2016-04-11T00:00:00
New
2016-04-27T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
activities/2
date
2016-04-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
HARKIN Marian
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
VANA Monika
activities/1
date
2016-03-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
VANA Monika
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
committees/0/shadows/1
group
GUE/NGL
name
ZUBER Inês Cristina
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
HETMAN Krzysztof
committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
HETMAN Krzysztof
activities/0/committees/0/date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
committees/0/date
2015-06-05T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ARENA Maria
activities/0/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EFD name: AGEA Laura
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EFD name: AGEA Laura
activities
  • date: 2015-05-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2014-11-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
EMPL/8/03516
reference
2015/2097(INI)
title
Report on the application of Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Implementation
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.10.02 Family policy, family law, parental leave