BETA


2015/2230(INI) Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE) PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (icon: PPE PPE), WARD Julie (icon: S&D S&D), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga (icon: ECR ECR), VANA Monika (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/07/04
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/03/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/03/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 453 votes to 173, with 79 abstentions, a resolution on Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament.

Parliament recalled that achieving gender equality is central to the protection of human rights, economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability. However, progress in achieving gender equality in the EU is stagnating and at this pace will not be achieved for some time yet.

It stated that one of the competences of the committee responsible is to contribute to the implementation and further development of gender mainstreaming in all policy areas. Whereas the majority of parliamentary committees generally give importance to gender mainstreaming, others exhibit little or no interest in this matter.

General assessment of the existing institutional framework : Parliament noted that female representation in key decision-making positions at political and administrative level, including within Parliament’s political groups, remains low. Different bodies are in charge of developing and implementing gender mainstreaming both at policy and working life level in the Parliament.

It regretted that the activities of these different bodies responsible for gender mainstreaming are not being coordinated or integrated within Parliament or with other institutions. It undertakes to establish effective cooperation between all actors in this institutional framework and recalled its commitment to regularly adopt and implement a policy plan for gender mainstreaming within Parliament.

Parliament called for ongoing development of the gender mainstreaming network , representing committees but also interparliamentary delegations, and its full involvement in regular monitoring of the state of play of gender mainstreaming across policy areas. It noted the need for greater and active participation by Members in the network and called for substitute Members to be added to the network in order to increase participation, as is the case for committees and delegations.

Parliament also called for a yearly analysis of the state of play of gender equality within Parliament, based on gender disaggregated data, at all levels of staff and political bodies, including parliamentary assistants, and for this reporting to be made public. In this respect, plenary deplored the fact that the targets for gender balance at senior and middle management level adopted by the Bureau in 2006 (Kaufmann report) were not reached by the 2009 deadline. It urged for effective, corrective and far-reaching measures to be taken so as to reach these gender equality targets within the shortest possible time frame.

Gender mainstreaming tools : Parliament stressed that the practice of using ‘gender mainstreaming amendments’(GMAs) has proved to be more effective than opinions as they are more concise, can be more rapidly submitted and relate to key, specific and delimited issues. It reiterated its call on the competent committee to include this practice of GMAs in the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the specific role of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in gender mainstreaming as a horizontal principle.

It regretted that despite the interinstitutional declaration on ensuring gender mainstreaming annexed to the Multiannual Financial Framework, no measures concerning gender budgeting have so far been taken. It also deplored that the gender budgeting exercise has revealed that the gender perspective is far from being assumed in all policies, at all levels and at every stage of the policymaking process. In this context, it noted that it is particularly crucial to build up in-house capacity on gender-responsive budgeting in order to enhance Parliament’s scrutiny role on these matters.

Parliament noted that the Commission is considering issuing a report on gender mainstreaming in the Commission in 2017. It also reaffirmed the need for sufficient allocation of resources also at Parliament level in order to develop gender impact assessments and gender-based analysis. It called on the Commission to perform systematic gender impact assessments on new legislative or policy proposals , on the basis of its reinforced assessment of their impact on fundamental rights and in order to guarantee that the EU is upholding women’s rights.

Parliament noted that, in the replies to the questionnaires on the state of gender mainstreaming in the parliamentary committees, specific tools were highlighted as being effective in integrating a gender perspective in the work of committees, including:

distribution of key documents and inclusion of gender equality issues in the terms of reference of studies commissioned; focusing attention on the use of specific terminology and definitions in relation to gender equality issues; promoting ex-ante and ex-post assessment of draft proposals for legislation and for future agreements; training and awareness-raising activities for Members, staff, political advisers and assistants.

Parliament expressed its full support for developing targeted and regular gender mainstreaming training, with adequate resources and tailor-made for Parliament specific needs, addressed to all Parliament staff working in policy fields. These training sessions should include information on the multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination. There is a need to ensure that all its services are aware of their responsibilities in implementing gender mainstreaming. On the other hand, plenary rejected the principle of an accreditation system to be established for those who undergo gender mainstreaming training at Parliament.

Gender mainstreaming in the work of committees : Parliament reiterated its call for the commitment to delivering a biannual report on gender mainstreaming in the work of Parliament to be met. It regretted that a large majority of the committees have neither adopted nor discussed an action plan on gender equality for their work. On the other hand, it rejected the idea of the establishing a standing report on gender mainstreaming in committees. It took the view that an internal monitoring body needs to be created in order to follow up and evaluate ex-post the implementation of tools and actions.

Interinstitutional cooperation to support gender mainstreaming : Parliament stressed that stronger interinstitutional relations will improve the gender balance in EU policy-making. It called on the Commission to propose an appropriate framework for establishing interinstitutional gender mainstreaming cooperation, such as the establishment of an interinstitutional high level working group on gender mainstreaming, and also involving other stakeholders in this field. In this regard, plenary called on the Commission to follow up on the results of the public consultation and the positions of Parliament and of the Council by immediately adopting a communication on a new Strategy for Gender Equality and Women’s Rights post-2015 which addresses gender equality issues in line with the international agenda.

It recommended that data be provided annually by the European Ombudsman to Parliament’s High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity, as regards complaints about maladministration relating to gender equality in Parliament. It also called for the exchanges of best practice to be organised at all levels with other institutions and organisations. Regular interparliamentary meetings on gender mainstreaming should be organised.

It is also noted that an alternative motion for resolution proposed by more than 40 members was rejected in plenary.

Documents
2016/03/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/03/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/02/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Angelika MLINAR (ALDE, AT) on Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament.

The report recalled that achieving gender equality is central to the protection of human rights, economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability. However, progress in achieving gender equality in the EU is stagnating and at this pace will not be achieved for some time yet.

One of the competences of the committee responsible is to contribute to the implementation and further development of gender mainstreaming in all policy areas. Whereas the majority of parliamentary committees generally give importance to gender mainstreaming, others exhibit little or no interest in this matter. Moreover, insufficient funds and human resources are being allocated to ensure real progress in gender mainstreaming of Parliament’s activities.

General assessment of the existing institutional framework : the report noted that female representation in key decision-making positions at political and administrative level, including within Parliament’s political groups, remains low. Different bodies are in charge of developing and implementing gender mainstreaming both at policy and working life level in the Parliament. Members regret that the activities of these different bodies are not being coordinated or integrated within Parliament or with other institutions. Effective cooperation is called for between all actors in this institutional framework. They reiterated their commitment to regularly adopt and implement a policy plan for gender mainstreaming within Parliament.

Members called for ongoing development of the gender mainstreaming network (a network which assesses, through a questionnaire, the state of play of gender mainstreaming in each policy area). However, they noted the need for greater and active participation by MEPs in the network.

Gender mainstreaming tools : the committee stressed that the practice of using ‘gender mainstreaming amendments’(GMAs) has proved to be more effective than opinions as they are more concise, can be more rapidly submitted and relate to key, specific and delimited issues. It reiterated its call on the competent committee to include this practice of GMAs in the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the specific role of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in gender mainstreaming as a horizontal principle.

Members regretted that despite the interinstitutional declaration on ensuring gender mainstreaming annexed to the Multiannual Financial Framework, no measures concerning gender budgeting have so far been taken. They also deplored that the gender budgeting exercise has revealed that the gender perspective is far from being assumed in all policies, at all levels and at every stage of the policymaking process. In this context, they noted that it is particularly crucial to build up in-house capacity on gender-responsive budgeting in order to enhance Parliament’s scrutiny role on these matters.

Members noted that the Commission is considering issuing a report on gender mainstreaming in the Commission in 2017. They also reaffirmed the need for sufficient allocation of resources also at Parliament level in order to develop gender impact assessments and gender-based analysis.

The committee noted that, in the replies to the questionnaires on the state of gender mainstreaming in the parliamentary committees, specific tools were highlighted as being effective in integrating a gender perspective in the work of committees, including:

distribution of key documents and inclusion of gender equality issues in the terms of reference of studies commissioned; focusing attention on the use of specific terminology and definitions in relation to gender equality issues; promoting ex-ante and ex-post assessment of draft proposals for legislation and for future agreements; training and awareness-raising activities for Members, staff, political advisers and assistants.

The report called for an accreditation system to be established so that those who undergo gender mainstreaming training at Parliament can receive formal certification, which they can carry through their career paths.

Gender mainstreaming in the work of committees : the committee reiterated its call for the commitment to delivering a biannual report on gender mainstreaming in the work of Parliament to be met. It regretted that a large majority of the committees have neither adopted nor discussed an action plan on gender equality for their work. It stated that a standing rapporteur on gender mainstreaming will reinforce the current structure.

Interinstitutional cooperation to support gender mainstreaming : Members stressed that stronger interinstitutional relations will improve the gender balance in EU policy-making. They called on the Commission to propose an appropriate framework for establishing interinstitutional gender mainstreaming cooperation, such as the establishment of an interinstitutional high level working group on gender mainstreaming, and also involving other stakeholders in this field.

They recommended that data be provided annually by the European Ombudsman to Parliament’s High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity, as regards complaints about maladministration relating to gender equality in Parliament. They also called for the exchanges of best practice to be organised at all levels with other institutions and organisations. Regular interparliamentary meetings on gender mainstreaming should be organised.

Documents
2016/02/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/01/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/12/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/09/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/12/02
   EP - MLINAR Angelika (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 7/1 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 667, -: 33, 0: 3
DE IT FR ES PL GB RO BE CZ PT EL NL HU BG SE FI DK LT IE HR AT SK LV SI MT EE CY LU
Total
93
69
66
51
48
65
31
21
21
20
21
24
18
15
19
12
11
11
10
10
18
12
8
7
6
5
5
6
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
181

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 11 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 354, -: 347, 0: 10
IT ES SE FI DE BE RO DK EL LT PT IE EE CY BG NL LU HR AT MT LV SI SK HU CZ FR GB PL
Total
70
51
19
13
95
21
31
11
21
11
20
10
5
6
15
24
6
10
18
6
8
7
12
19
21
66
67
48
icon: S&D S&D
181

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
206

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2
3

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 14/2 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 348, -: 337, 0: 20
IT ES PT SE DE BE LT FI DK RO LU IE EE EL CY HR AT MT BG CZ NL LV SI SK HU GB FR PL
Total
68
50
20
19
95
21
11
13
11
30
6
10
5
20
6
10
18
6
15
20
24
8
7
12
19
66
66
49
icon: S&D S&D
176

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Denmark ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
207

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2
3

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 21 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: -: 350, +: 335, 0: 21
ES PT BE SE FI IE RO EE DK EL LT CY CZ LU HR DE AT MT BG NL LV SI HU SK GB IT FR PL
Total
52
20
21
19
13
10
31
5
11
21
11
6
21
5
9
93
18
6
15
24
8
6
18
12
67
69
66
49
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Croatia PPE

3
3
4

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 23 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 479, -: 200, 0: 24
ES IT DE RO BE PT SE HU EL BG CZ IE FI SI CY MT NL LU LV DK SK LT EE PL HR AT FR GB
Total
52
67
91
31
21
20
19
19
21
15
20
10
13
7
6
6
24
6
8
11
12
10
5
49
9
18
66
67
icon: S&D S&D
177
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 26/1 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 517, -: 166, 0: 18
ES IT DE RO GB FR PT HU SE EL BG BE IE CZ FI SI CY MT NL LU LV DK PL LT AT SK EE HR
Total
50
69
91
31
67
65
20
19
19
21
14
21
10
20
12
7
6
6
24
6
8
11
49
11
18
12
4
10
icon: S&D S&D
173

Bulgaria S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

Against (1)

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 29/1 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 533, -: 158, 0: 16
DE IT ES RO FR BE PT HU SE BG EL IE AT FI CZ SI LV HR CY MT LT NL LU EE DK SK PL GB
Total
94
69
51
31
65
21
20
19
19
15
21
10
18
13
21
7
8
10
6
6
11
24
6
5
11
12
49
65
icon: S&D S&D
177
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
207
4

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 29/2 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 352, -: 340, 0: 11
IT ES PT SE BE RO DE FI EE DK EL CZ IE CY LT LU HR AT MT BG LV SI NL SK HU GB FR PL
Total
69
52
20
19
21
31
93
13
5
11
21
21
10
6
11
6
10
18
6
15
7
7
24
12
17
65
65
48
icon: S&D S&D
176

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
205

Belgium PPE

4

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
3

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 32 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: -: 346, +: 339, 0: 15
IT ES DE SE RO BE IE FI DK LT PT EE CY EL LU HR AT MT BG NL LV SI SK HU CZ FR GB PL
Total
69
51
93
19
31
20
9
12
11
11
20
5
6
21
6
10
18
6
14
24
8
7
12
18
21
64
65
49
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
202

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
3

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - § 36 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 568, -: 124, 0: 13
DE ES IT RO FR GB BE PT HU SE CZ BG EL AT IE FI DK HR SI NL CY MT LT LU LV EE PL SK
Total
94
52
69
31
65
67
20
20
19
19
20
14
21
18
9
13
11
9
7
24
6
6
11
6
8
5
49
12
icon: S&D S&D
179
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant A #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 576, -: 78, 0: 55
DE IT ES GB FR RO BE PT SE HU BG EL NL CZ IE AT FI HR SI LT CY PL MT DK LU LV EE SK
Total
94
70
52
67
64
31
21
20
19
19
15
21
24
21
10
18
13
10
7
11
6
48
6
11
6
8
5
12
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
205

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant B #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 555, 0: 88, -: 55
DE IT ES FR PL RO BE HU SE BG PT NL CZ EL IE FI AT HR DK LT LV CY SI MT LU SK EE GB
Total
92
69
50
64
49
30
21
19
19
15
20
23
21
19
10
12
18
10
11
11
8
6
6
6
6
12
5
66
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
175
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35
2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant C #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 627, 0: 49, -: 30
DE IT ES GB PL FR RO BE PT SE HU NL BG CZ FI EL DK IE HR AT LV LT SI CY MT SK LU EE
Total
93
70
52
66
49
64
31
21
19
19
19
24
15
21
13
21
11
10
10
17
8
11
7
6
6
12
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant E/1 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 550, 0: 89, -: 63
DE IT ES FR RO PL BE PT SE BG HU NL EL AT CZ IE FI HR DK LT LV SI CY MT GB LU SK EE
Total
94
70
51
64
31
49
21
18
19
15
18
23
20
17
21
10
12
10
11
11
8
7
6
6
67
6
12
5
icon: S&D S&D
178
3

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
201

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant E/2 #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 361, -: 284, 0: 58
IT ES BE SE FR PT DE GB RO EL IE DK FI EE LT CY CZ LU HR AT MT BG SI LV NL SK HU PL
Total
70
51
20
19
64
20
94
66
31
21
10
10
13
5
11
6
21
6
10
18
6
15
7
8
22
12
18
49
icon: S&D S&D
177

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
5
3

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant F #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 607, -: 48, 0: 45
DE IT ES GB FR PL RO BE PT HU BG NL SE FI EL DK IE AT LT CZ LV CY MT SI SK LU HR EE
Total
92
68
51
66
63
49
31
20
19
19
15
23
19
13
21
11
10
18
11
21
8
6
6
7
12
6
10
5
icon: S&D S&D
177
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2
5

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
34

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Considérant W #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 505, -: 168, 0: 24
ES IT DE RO GB FR PT SE BG EL HU CZ BE IE FI SI CY MT NL LU LV LT DK EE HR SK AT PL
Total
50
67
94
31
65
64
20
18
15
21
17
21
21
10
13
7
6
6
24
6
8
10
11
5
9
11
18
49
icon: S&D S&D
173
3
3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar - Résolution de la commission FEMM #

2016/03/08 Outcome: +: 453, -: 173, 0: 79
ES IT RO FR DE BE SE BG PT EL IE FI HU GB NL SI CZ CY MT AT LU EE DK LT LV SK HR PL
Total
52
69
30
65
94
21
19
15
20
21
9
13
17
67
24
7
21
6
6
18
6
5
11
11
8
12
9
49
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
200
3

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Latvia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Croatia PPE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
126 2015/2230(INI)
2016/01/25 FEMM 126 amendments...
source: 575.339

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-03-07-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
FORENZA Eleonora
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.219
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-PR-573219_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.339
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-575339_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0034_EN.html title: A8-0034/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0034_EN.html title: A8-0034/2016
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160307&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2016-03-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0072_EN.html title: T8-0072/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-03-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0072_EN.html title: T8-0072/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: MLINAR Angelika date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-12-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MLINAR Angelika group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0034&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0034_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0072
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0072_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: ECR name: WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
  • date: 2016-02-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: ECR name: WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0034&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0034/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160307&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0072 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0072/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2014-12-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MLINAR Angelika group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2014-12-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
docs
  • date: 2015-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.219 title: PE573.219 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.339 title: PE575.339 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26848&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)349 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0034&language=EN title: A8-0034/2016 summary: The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Angelika MLINAR (ALDE, AT) on Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament. The report recalled that achieving gender equality is central to the protection of human rights, economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability. However, progress in achieving gender equality in the EU is stagnating and at this pace will not be achieved for some time yet. One of the competences of the committee responsible is to contribute to the implementation and further development of gender mainstreaming in all policy areas. Whereas the majority of parliamentary committees generally give importance to gender mainstreaming, others exhibit little or no interest in this matter. Moreover, insufficient funds and human resources are being allocated to ensure real progress in gender mainstreaming of Parliament’s activities. General assessment of the existing institutional framework : the report noted that female representation in key decision-making positions at political and administrative level, including within Parliament’s political groups, remains low. Different bodies are in charge of developing and implementing gender mainstreaming both at policy and working life level in the Parliament. Members regret that the activities of these different bodies are not being coordinated or integrated within Parliament or with other institutions. Effective cooperation is called for between all actors in this institutional framework. They reiterated their commitment to regularly adopt and implement a policy plan for gender mainstreaming within Parliament. Members called for ongoing development of the gender mainstreaming network (a network which assesses, through a questionnaire, the state of play of gender mainstreaming in each policy area). However, they noted the need for greater and active participation by MEPs in the network. Gender mainstreaming tools : the committee stressed that the practice of using ‘gender mainstreaming amendments’(GMAs) has proved to be more effective than opinions as they are more concise, can be more rapidly submitted and relate to key, specific and delimited issues. It reiterated its call on the competent committee to include this practice of GMAs in the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the specific role of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in gender mainstreaming as a horizontal principle. Members regretted that despite the interinstitutional declaration on ensuring gender mainstreaming annexed to the Multiannual Financial Framework, no measures concerning gender budgeting have so far been taken. They also deplored that the gender budgeting exercise has revealed that the gender perspective is far from being assumed in all policies, at all levels and at every stage of the policymaking process. In this context, they noted that it is particularly crucial to build up in-house capacity on gender-responsive budgeting in order to enhance Parliament’s scrutiny role on these matters. Members noted that the Commission is considering issuing a report on gender mainstreaming in the Commission in 2017. They also reaffirmed the need for sufficient allocation of resources also at Parliament level in order to develop gender impact assessments and gender-based analysis. The committee noted that, in the replies to the questionnaires on the state of gender mainstreaming in the parliamentary committees, specific tools were highlighted as being effective in integrating a gender perspective in the work of committees, including: distribution of key documents and inclusion of gender equality issues in the terms of reference of studies commissioned; focusing attention on the use of specific terminology and definitions in relation to gender equality issues; promoting ex-ante and ex-post assessment of draft proposals for legislation and for future agreements; training and awareness-raising activities for Members, staff, political advisers and assistants. The report called for an accreditation system to be established so that those who undergo gender mainstreaming training at Parliament can receive formal certification, which they can carry through their career paths. Gender mainstreaming in the work of committees : the committee reiterated its call for the commitment to delivering a biannual report on gender mainstreaming in the work of Parliament to be met. It regretted that a large majority of the committees have neither adopted nor discussed an action plan on gender equality for their work. It stated that a standing rapporteur on gender mainstreaming will reinforce the current structure. Interinstitutional cooperation to support gender mainstreaming : Members stressed that stronger interinstitutional relations will improve the gender balance in EU policy-making. They called on the Commission to propose an appropriate framework for establishing interinstitutional gender mainstreaming cooperation, such as the establishment of an interinstitutional high level working group on gender mainstreaming, and also involving other stakeholders in this field. They recommended that data be provided annually by the European Ombudsman to Parliament’s High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity, as regards complaints about maladministration relating to gender equality in Parliament. They also called for the exchanges of best practice to be organised at all levels with other institutions and organisations. Regular interparliamentary meetings on gender mainstreaming should be organised.
  • date: 2016-03-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160307&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26848&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0072 title: T8-0072/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 453 votes to 173, with 79 abstentions, a resolution on Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament. Parliament recalled that achieving gender equality is central to the protection of human rights, economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability. However, progress in achieving gender equality in the EU is stagnating and at this pace will not be achieved for some time yet. It stated that one of the competences of the committee responsible is to contribute to the implementation and further development of gender mainstreaming in all policy areas. Whereas the majority of parliamentary committees generally give importance to gender mainstreaming, others exhibit little or no interest in this matter. General assessment of the existing institutional framework : Parliament noted that female representation in key decision-making positions at political and administrative level, including within Parliament’s political groups, remains low. Different bodies are in charge of developing and implementing gender mainstreaming both at policy and working life level in the Parliament. It regretted that the activities of these different bodies responsible for gender mainstreaming are not being coordinated or integrated within Parliament or with other institutions. It undertakes to establish effective cooperation between all actors in this institutional framework and recalled its commitment to regularly adopt and implement a policy plan for gender mainstreaming within Parliament. Parliament called for ongoing development of the gender mainstreaming network , representing committees but also interparliamentary delegations, and its full involvement in regular monitoring of the state of play of gender mainstreaming across policy areas. It noted the need for greater and active participation by Members in the network and called for substitute Members to be added to the network in order to increase participation, as is the case for committees and delegations. Parliament also called for a yearly analysis of the state of play of gender equality within Parliament, based on gender disaggregated data, at all levels of staff and political bodies, including parliamentary assistants, and for this reporting to be made public. In this respect, plenary deplored the fact that the targets for gender balance at senior and middle management level adopted by the Bureau in 2006 (Kaufmann report) were not reached by the 2009 deadline. It urged for effective, corrective and far-reaching measures to be taken so as to reach these gender equality targets within the shortest possible time frame. Gender mainstreaming tools : Parliament stressed that the practice of using ‘gender mainstreaming amendments’(GMAs) has proved to be more effective than opinions as they are more concise, can be more rapidly submitted and relate to key, specific and delimited issues. It reiterated its call on the competent committee to include this practice of GMAs in the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the specific role of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in gender mainstreaming as a horizontal principle. It regretted that despite the interinstitutional declaration on ensuring gender mainstreaming annexed to the Multiannual Financial Framework, no measures concerning gender budgeting have so far been taken. It also deplored that the gender budgeting exercise has revealed that the gender perspective is far from being assumed in all policies, at all levels and at every stage of the policymaking process. In this context, it noted that it is particularly crucial to build up in-house capacity on gender-responsive budgeting in order to enhance Parliament’s scrutiny role on these matters. Parliament noted that the Commission is considering issuing a report on gender mainstreaming in the Commission in 2017. It also reaffirmed the need for sufficient allocation of resources also at Parliament level in order to develop gender impact assessments and gender-based analysis. It called on the Commission to perform systematic gender impact assessments on new legislative or policy proposals , on the basis of its reinforced assessment of their impact on fundamental rights and in order to guarantee that the EU is upholding women’s rights. Parliament noted that, in the replies to the questionnaires on the state of gender mainstreaming in the parliamentary committees, specific tools were highlighted as being effective in integrating a gender perspective in the work of committees, including: distribution of key documents and inclusion of gender equality issues in the terms of reference of studies commissioned; focusing attention on the use of specific terminology and definitions in relation to gender equality issues; promoting ex-ante and ex-post assessment of draft proposals for legislation and for future agreements; training and awareness-raising activities for Members, staff, political advisers and assistants. Parliament expressed its full support for developing targeted and regular gender mainstreaming training, with adequate resources and tailor-made for Parliament specific needs, addressed to all Parliament staff working in policy fields. These training sessions should include information on the multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination. There is a need to ensure that all its services are aware of their responsibilities in implementing gender mainstreaming. On the other hand, plenary rejected the principle of an accreditation system to be established for those who undergo gender mainstreaming training at Parliament. Gender mainstreaming in the work of committees : Parliament reiterated its call for the commitment to delivering a biannual report on gender mainstreaming in the work of Parliament to be met. It regretted that a large majority of the committees have neither adopted nor discussed an action plan on gender equality for their work. On the other hand, it rejected the idea of the establishing a standing report on gender mainstreaming in committees. It took the view that an internal monitoring body needs to be created in order to follow up and evaluate ex-post the implementation of tools and actions. Interinstitutional cooperation to support gender mainstreaming : Parliament stressed that stronger interinstitutional relations will improve the gender balance in EU policy-making. It called on the Commission to propose an appropriate framework for establishing interinstitutional gender mainstreaming cooperation, such as the establishment of an interinstitutional high level working group on gender mainstreaming, and also involving other stakeholders in this field. In this regard, plenary called on the Commission to follow up on the results of the public consultation and the positions of Parliament and of the Council by immediately adopting a communication on a new Strategy for Gender Equality and Women’s Rights post-2015 which addresses gender equality issues in line with the international agenda. It recommended that data be provided annually by the European Ombudsman to Parliament’s High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity, as regards complaints about maladministration relating to gender equality in Parliament. It also called for the exchanges of best practice to be organised at all levels with other institutions and organisations. Regular interparliamentary meetings on gender mainstreaming should be organised. It is also noted that an alternative motion for resolution proposed by more than 40 members was rejected in plenary.
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
FEMM/8/04389
New
  • FEMM/8/04389
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.04 Gender equality
  • 8.40.01 European Parliament
New
4.10.04
Gender equality
8.40.01
European Parliament
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160307&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0072 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0072/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Angelika MLINAR (ALDE, AT) on Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament.

    The report recalled that achieving gender equality is central to the protection of human rights, economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability. However, progress in achieving gender equality in the EU is stagnating and at this pace will not be achieved for some time yet.

    One of the competences of the committee responsible is to contribute to the implementation and further development of gender mainstreaming in all policy areas. Whereas the majority of parliamentary committees generally give importance to gender mainstreaming, others exhibit little or no interest in this matter. Moreover, insufficient funds and human resources are being allocated to ensure real progress in gender mainstreaming of Parliament’s activities.

    General assessment of the existing institutional framework: the report noted that female representation in key decision-making positions at political and administrative level, including within Parliament’s political groups, remains low. Different bodies are in charge of developing and implementing gender mainstreaming both at policy and working life level in the Parliament. Members regret that the activities of these different bodies are not being coordinated or integrated within Parliament or with other institutions. Effective cooperation is called for between all actors in this institutional framework. They reiterated their commitment to regularly adopt and implement a policy plan for gender mainstreaming within Parliament.

    Members called for ongoing development of the gender mainstreaming network (a network which assesses, through a questionnaire, the state of play of gender mainstreaming in each policy area). However, they noted the need for greater and active participation by MEPs in the network.

    Gender mainstreaming tools: the committee stressed that the practice of using ‘gender mainstreaming amendments’(GMAs) has proved to be more effective than opinions as they are more concise, can be more rapidly submitted and relate to key, specific and delimited issues. It reiterated its call on the competent committee to include this practice of GMAs in the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the specific role of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in gender mainstreaming as a horizontal principle.

    Members regretted that despite the interinstitutional declaration on ensuring gender mainstreaming annexed to the Multiannual Financial Framework, no measures concerning gender budgeting have so far been taken. They also deplored that the gender budgeting exercise has revealed that the gender perspective is far from being assumed in all policies, at all levels and at every stage of the policymaking process. In this context, they noted that it is particularly crucial to build up in-house capacity on gender-responsive budgeting in order to enhance Parliament’s scrutiny role on these matters.

    Members noted that the Commission is considering issuing a report on gender mainstreaming in the Commission in 2017. They also reaffirmed the need for sufficient allocation of resources also at Parliament level in order to develop gender impact assessments and gender-based analysis.

    The committee noted that, in the replies to the questionnaires on the state of gender mainstreaming in the parliamentary committees, specific tools were highlighted as being effective in integrating a gender perspective in the work of committees, including:

    • distribution of key documents and inclusion of gender equality issues in the terms of reference of studies commissioned;
    • focusing attention on the use of specific terminology and definitions in relation to gender equality issues;
    • promoting ex-ante and ex-post assessment of draft proposals for legislation and for future agreements;
    • training and awareness-raising activities for Members, staff, political advisers and assistants.

    The report called for an accreditation system to be established so that those who undergo gender mainstreaming training at Parliament can receive formal certification, which they can carry through their career paths.

    Gender mainstreaming in the work of committees: the committee reiterated its call for the commitment to delivering a biannual report on gender mainstreaming in the work of Parliament to be met. It regretted that a large majority of the committees have neither adopted nor discussed an action plan on gender equality for their work. It stated that a standing rapporteur on gender mainstreaming will reinforce the current structure.

    Interinstitutional cooperation to support gender mainstreaming: Members stressed that stronger interinstitutional relations will improve the gender balance in EU policy-making. They called on the Commission to propose an appropriate framework for establishing interinstitutional gender mainstreaming cooperation, such as the establishment of an interinstitutional high level working group on gender mainstreaming, and also involving other stakeholders in this field.

    They recommended that data be provided annually by the European Ombudsman to Parliament’s High Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity, as regards complaints about maladministration relating to gender equality in Parliament. They also called for the exchanges of best practice to be organised at all levels with other institutions and organisations. Regular interparliamentary meetings on gender mainstreaming should be organised.

activities/3/date
Old
2016-03-08T00:00:00
New
2016-03-07T00:00:00
activities/4
date
2016-03-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/date
Old
2016-03-07T00:00:00
New
2016-03-08T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0034&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0034/2016
activities/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2016-02-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/0
date
2015-09-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: WARD Julie group: ECR name: WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
activities/0/date
Old
2016-02-18T00:00:00
New
2015-09-10T00:00:00
activities/0/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/1/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga
activities/1/date
Old
2016-02-17T00:00:00
New
2016-02-18T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa
  • group: S&D name: WARD Julie
  • group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora
  • group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika
committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa
  • group: S&D name: WARD Julie
  • group: GUE/NGL name: FORENZA Eleonora
  • group: Verts/ALE name: VANA Monika
activities
  • date: 2015-09-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
  • date: 2016-02-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2016-03-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2014-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
FEMM/8/04389
reference
2015/2230(INI)
title
Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject