BETA


2015/2272(INI) EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET KALNIETE Sandra (icon: PPE PPE) GOMES Ana (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion DEVE HAYES Brian (icon: PPE PPE) Nirj DEVA (icon: ECR ECR), Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ (icon: S&D S&D), Paavo VÄYRYNEN (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/04/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/04/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 232 with 43 abstentions a resolution on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world.

Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security.

Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: Parliament felt that the EU has a key role in upholding the principles enshrined in international human rights law, and that therefore, human rights must be meaningfully integrated into the new Global Strategy. EU foreign policy must adopt a strategic approach to human rights, emphasising concrete actions and outcomes and demonstrating coherence in the EU’s engagement on human rights across different countries and regions, regardless of security, foreign policy, trade, energy, aid or other concerns.

Parliament considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, and be prepared to take greater responsibility for their collective security and territorial defence, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, They must step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to:

· enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects;

· achieve the collective target of 2 % of defence spending on research;

· launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF);

· strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources;

· strengthen EU-Nato cooperation.

On the latter point, Parliament supported the establishment of European capabilities, which strengthen NATO in territorial defence and are able to conduct intervention operations autonomously beyond the EU’s borders. European members of NATO must actually live up to their NATO commitments.

Member States should:

· commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP;

· take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market.

· ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed.

Parliament called on the VP/HR to address the lack of clarity regarding the mutual defence clause contained in Article 42(7) TEU and to define the guidelines and procedures for its implementation. With regard to the European Defence Agency , Parliament reiterated that the EDA should be strengthened by financing its staffing and running costs from the Union budget. A principal objective should be to move towards permanently pooled multinational military units, joint defence forces and the framing of a common defence policy which should ultimately lead to a European Defence Union.

Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood: Parliament felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. It also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX.

Strengthen multilateral global governance: the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. Parliament stressed that the EU should:

· develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action;

· establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges;

· promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance;

· ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy.

Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation.

Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens: Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. Parliament stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.

Documents
2016/04/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/04/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/03/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sandra Kalniete (EPP, LV) on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world.

Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security.

Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: the committee considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, and step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to:

enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects; launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF); strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources; strengthen EU-Nato cooperation.

Member States should:

commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP; take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market. ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed.

Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood : Members felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. They also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX.

Strengthen multilateral global governance : the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. The report stressed that the EU should:

develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action; establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges; promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance; ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy;

Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation.

Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens : Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. The report stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.

Documents
2016/03/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/02/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/12/21
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/10/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/10/29
   EP - HAYES Brian (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2015/06/29
   EP - KALNIETE Sandra (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 5/1 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 538, -: 138, 0: 16
DE PL ES RO FR GB IT BE NL BG CZ PT SK HU FI LT HR SI AT SE LU LV EE DK MT CY IE EL
Total
86
50
48
27
72
62
68
19
25
16
19
21
13
19
13
10
11
8
17
19
5
7
4
12
5
5
10
20
icon: PPE PPE
197

Belgium PPE

2
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

Against (1)

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 5/2 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 503, -: 171, 0: 24
DE PL IT RO ES GB CZ BG BE HU PT SK HR FR NL LT SI LV EE DK EL MT LU CY FI AT IE SE
Total
87
50
68
28
49
64
20
16
20
20
21
13
11
70
24
10
8
7
4
12
20
5
5
6
13
17
10
19
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4
icon: S&D S&D
181

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45
3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 6/1 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 407, -: 266, 0: 28
DE RO IT ES BE PT BG CZ HU FR HR SK SI LT PL LV MT LU EE NL AT EL CY FI SE IE DK GB
Total
88
28
68
47
21
21
16
20
20
73
11
13
8
10
49
7
5
5
5
24
17
20
6
13
19
10
12
64
icon: PPE PPE
199
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 6/2 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 444, -: 222, 0: 30
PL DE RO ES IT BG CZ BE PT SK FR HR HU LT NL SI LV LU EE CY MT AT FI EL DK IE SE GB
Total
48
86
28
47
67
15
20
21
21
13
72
11
19
10
25
8
7
6
5
6
5
17
13
20
11
10
19
65
icon: PPE PPE
196
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
176

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2
3

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 6/3 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 488, -: 191, 0: 14
DE IT ES RO FR BE CZ HU BG PT SE HR SI LT SK LU LV AT PL MT EE NL IE FI CY DK EL GB
Total
85
67
48
27
73
20
20
20
15
21
19
11
8
10
13
6
7
15
49
5
4
25
10
13
6
12
20
63
icon: PPE PPE
197
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 9 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 454, -: 227, 0: 19
IT DE RO ES FR PT BG PL CZ BE AT HU HR SK SI LT MT LV NL LU EE IE FI EL DK SE CY GB
Total
66
87
27
49
73
21
16
50
20
20
16
19
11
13
8
10
5
7
25
6
5
10
13
20
12
19
6
65
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35
2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 10/1 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 463, -: 205, 0: 35
IT DE ES RO FR BE HU PT BG CZ HR LT NL SI SK LU AT EE LV FI PL MT SE EL CY DK IE GB
Total
68
88
49
27
73
21
20
21
16
20
11
10
25
8
13
6
17
5
7
13
50
5
19
20
6
11
10
63
icon: PPE PPE
202
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 10/2 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 382, -: 273, 0: 42
IT DE RO ES PT HU BG CZ BE FR HR SK LT LU SI PL LV EE MT AT CY EL DK FI IE NL SE GB
Total
68
87
26
48
21
20
15
20
20
71
11
13
10
6
8
50
7
5
5
17
6
20
11
13
10
24
19
65
icon: PPE PPE
198
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 10/3 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 423, -: 253, 0: 25
DE ES RO FR IT HU PT BG CZ BE HR SI SK LT LU EE LV PL MT SE AT CY DK EL FI NL IE GB
Total
86
49
28
72
68
20
21
16
19
21
11
8
13
9
6
5
7
50
5
19
17
6
12
20
13
25
10
64
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 11 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 436, -: 251, 0: 13
RO IT DE ES BE PT BG CZ HU FR HR SK SI LT LU AT MT NL EE PL LV DK CY EL FI IE SE GB
Total
28
68
87
49
21
20
16
20
20
73
11
13
8
10
6
16
5
25
5
49
7
12
6
20
13
10
19
62
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 12/1 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 451, -: 221, 0: 26
PL RO ES DE BE CZ BG IT PT SK HU HR LT GB NL LV EE SI FR MT LU FI CY AT SE DK EL IE
Total
50
28
48
88
20
20
16
67
20
13
20
11
10
63
25
7
4
8
73
5
5
13
6
17
18
12
20
10
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

5
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
2

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 12/2 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 508, -: 144, 0: 42
DE PL IT ES RO FR BE GB CZ HU BG PT SK NL LT HR SI SE LU AT EE FI MT LV DK CY EL IE
Total
84
50
68
49
27
72
20
63
20
20
16
21
13
24
10
11
8
18
6
17
5
13
4
7
12
6
19
10
icon: PPE PPE
198
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

5

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
2

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 26 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 461, -: 202, 0: 38
DE IT RO ES BE FR HU PT BG CZ AT SI LT NL HR SK LU EE LV PL MT SE CY DK EL FI IE GB
Total
86
67
28
47
21
73
20
21
16
20
17
8
10
25
11
13
6
5
7
50
5
19
6
12
20
13
10
64
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - § 27 #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 454, -: 204, 0: 39
PL RO DE GB ES BG BE HU CZ PT FR SK HR IT LT NL EE SI LU MT CY LV DK AT FI EL IE SE
Total
50
28
84
64
48
16
20
20
20
21
73
13
11
67
10
24
5
8
6
5
6
7
12
17
13
20
10
18
icon: PPE PPE
202
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
176

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
71

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3

France NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete - Résolution #

2016/04/13 Outcome: +: 427, -: 232, 0: 43
RO PL ES DE IT BE PT BG CZ HU FR HR SK SI LT EE SE NL LU LV MT FI AT DK CY EL IE GB
Total
28
50
49
86
68
21
21
15
20
20
73
11
13
8
10
5
19
25
6
7
5
13
17
12
6
20
10
63
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

4

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47
3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
415 2015/2272(INI)
2016/02/04 DEVE 23 amendments...
source: 576.723
2016/02/25 AFET 392 amendments...
source: 577.080

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-04-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.905
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-572905_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.204&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-573204_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.080
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-577080_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.527
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-578527_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-03-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0069_EN.html title: A8-0069/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-03-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0069_EN.html title: A8-0069/2016
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0120_EN.html title: T8-0120/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0120_EN.html title: T8-0120/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: KALNIETE Sandra date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: GOMES Ana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KALNIETE Sandra group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: GOMES Ana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0069_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0120_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2016-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0069/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0120/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KALNIETE Sandra group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: GOMES Ana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
docs
  • date: 2015-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.905 title: PE572.905 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.204&secondRef=02 title: PE573.204 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.080 title: PE577.080 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.527 title: PE578.527 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN title: A8-0069/2016 summary: The Committee on foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sandra Kalniete (EPP, LV) on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world. Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security. Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: the committee considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, and step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to: enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects; launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF); strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources; strengthen EU-Nato cooperation. Member States should: commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP; take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market. ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed. Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood : Members felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. They also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX. Strengthen multilateral global governance : the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. The report stressed that the EU should: develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action; establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges; promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance; ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy; Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation. Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens : Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. The report stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26972&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 title: T8-0120/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 232 with 43 abstentions a resolution on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world. Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security. Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: Parliament felt that the EU has a key role in upholding the principles enshrined in international human rights law, and that therefore, human rights must be meaningfully integrated into the new Global Strategy. EU foreign policy must adopt a strategic approach to human rights, emphasising concrete actions and outcomes and demonstrating coherence in the EU’s engagement on human rights across different countries and regions, regardless of security, foreign policy, trade, energy, aid or other concerns. Parliament considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, and be prepared to take greater responsibility for their collective security and territorial defence, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, They must step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to: · enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects; · achieve the collective target of 2 % of defence spending on research; · launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF); · strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources; · strengthen EU-Nato cooperation. On the latter point, Parliament supported the establishment of European capabilities, which strengthen NATO in territorial defence and are able to conduct intervention operations autonomously beyond the EU’s borders. European members of NATO must actually live up to their NATO commitments. Member States should: · commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP; · take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market. · ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed. Parliament called on the VP/HR to address the lack of clarity regarding the mutual defence clause contained in Article 42(7) TEU and to define the guidelines and procedures for its implementation. With regard to the European Defence Agency , Parliament reiterated that the EDA should be strengthened by financing its staffing and running costs from the Union budget. A principal objective should be to move towards permanently pooled multinational military units, joint defence forces and the framing of a common defence policy which should ultimately lead to a European Defence Union. Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood: Parliament felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. It also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX. Strengthen multilateral global governance: the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. Parliament stressed that the EU should: · develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action; · establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges; · promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance; · ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation. Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens: Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. Parliament stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/04812
    New
    • AFET/8/04812
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6 External relations of the Union
    New
    6
    External relations of the Union
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0120/2016
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sandra Kalniete (EPP, LV) on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world.

      Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment, and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security.

      Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: the committee considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, and step up their defence capabilities, in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to:

      • enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects;
      • launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF);
      • strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources;
      • strengthen EU-Nato cooperation.

      Member States should:

      • commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP;
      • take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market.
      • ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed.

      Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood: Members felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. They also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX.

      Strengthen multilateral global governance: the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. The report stressed that the EU should:

      • develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action;
      • establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges;
      • promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance;
      • ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy;

      Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation.

      Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens: Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise.  European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. The report stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.

    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0069/2016
    activities/2
    date
    2016-03-29T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/1
    date
    2016-03-22T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-12T00:00:00
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-28T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/date
    2015-06-29T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
    committees/0/date
    2015-06-29T00:00:00
    committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-11T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-28T00:00:00
    activities/1
    date
    2016-04-11T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities
    • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/04812
      reference
      2015/2272(INI)
      title
      EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6 External relations of the Union