BETA

Procedure completed



2015/2272(INI) EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET KALNIETE Sandra (EPP)
Opinion DEVE HAYES Brian (EPP)
Opinion INTA
Lead committee dossier: AFET/8/04812
Legal Basis RoP 052

Activites

  • 2016/04/13 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2016/04/12 Debate in Parliament
  • 2016/03/29 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A8-0069/2016 summary
  • 2016/03/22 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2015/10/29 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
415 2015/2272(INI)
2016/02/04 DEVE 23 amendments...
source: 576.723
2016/02/25 AFET 392 amendments...
source: 577.080

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2016-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0069/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0120/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KALNIETE Sandra group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: GOMES Ana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2015-10-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
docs
  • date: 2015-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.905 title: PE572.905 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE573.204&secondRef=02 title: PE573.204 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.080 title: PE577.080 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.527 title: PE578.527 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN title: A8-0069/2016 summary: The Committee on foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sandra Kalniete (EPP, LV) on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world. Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security. Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: the committee considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, and step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to: enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects; launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF); strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources; strengthen EU-Nato cooperation. Member States should: commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP; take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market. ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed. Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood : Members felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. They also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX. Strengthen multilateral global governance : the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. The report stressed that the EU should: develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action; establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges; promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance; ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy; Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation. Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens : Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. The report stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.
  • date: 2016-04-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26972&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 title: T8-0120/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 232 with 43 abstentions a resolution on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world. Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment , and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security. Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: Parliament felt that the EU has a key role in upholding the principles enshrined in international human rights law, and that therefore, human rights must be meaningfully integrated into the new Global Strategy. EU foreign policy must adopt a strategic approach to human rights, emphasising concrete actions and outcomes and demonstrating coherence in the EU’s engagement on human rights across different countries and regions, regardless of security, foreign policy, trade, energy, aid or other concerns. Parliament considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, and be prepared to take greater responsibility for their collective security and territorial defence, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, They must step up their defence capabilities , in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to: · enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects; · achieve the collective target of 2 % of defence spending on research; · launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF); · strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources; · strengthen EU-Nato cooperation. On the latter point, Parliament supported the establishment of European capabilities, which strengthen NATO in territorial defence and are able to conduct intervention operations autonomously beyond the EU’s borders. European members of NATO must actually live up to their NATO commitments. Member States should: · commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP; · take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market. · ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed. Parliament called on the VP/HR to address the lack of clarity regarding the mutual defence clause contained in Article 42(7) TEU and to define the guidelines and procedures for its implementation. With regard to the European Defence Agency , Parliament reiterated that the EDA should be strengthened by financing its staffing and running costs from the Union budget. A principal objective should be to move towards permanently pooled multinational military units, joint defence forces and the framing of a common defence policy which should ultimately lead to a European Defence Union. Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood: Parliament felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. It also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX. Strengthen multilateral global governance: the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. Parliament stressed that the EU should: · develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action; · establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges; · promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance; · ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation. Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens: Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise. European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. Parliament stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.
  • date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/04812
    New
    • AFET/8/04812
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6 External relations of the Union
    New
    6
    External relations of the Union
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0120 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0120/2016
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Sandra Kalniete (EPP, LV) on the EU in a changing global environment – a more connected, contested and complex world.

      Members noted that the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must define a political level of ambition for the EU as an international actor. They stressed that the EU must recognise the full extent of the deterioration in its immediate strategic environment, and the long-term consequences thereof. The fact that multiple crises were occurring simultaneously within the Union meant that no Member State could respond alone and that Europeans should exercise their responsibilities collectively to ensure their security.

      Defend the European Union’s people, and its states, societies and values: the committee considered that the EU and its Member States should rely less on the United States, especially in Europe’s neighbourhood, and step up their defence capabilities, in order to be prepared to respond to the broad spectrum of civilian, military and hybrid threats and risks. The Union was urged to:

      • enhance cooperation on defence research, the industrial base and cyber defence through pooling and sharing and other cooperative projects;
      • launch an EU-funded defence research and technology programme in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF);
      • strengthen the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) and increase its resources;
      • strengthen EU-Nato cooperation.

      Member States should:

      • commit to using at least 2 % of their GDP for defence expenditure by 2024 in order to attain the necessary and adequate civilian and military capabilities to implement the objectives of the CFSP/CSDP;
      • take more responsibility for building urgently needed European capabilities, increase their military research expenditure through the EDA and strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and the European Defence Market.
      • ensure European intelligence exchanges are improved and a true European intelligence and forecasting capacity developed.

      Stabilise Europe’s wider neighbourhood: Members felt that the EU should take greater responsibility on filling the security vacuum in its wider neighbourhood, and should be more engaged in de-escalatory diplomacy, especially in the Southern Neighbourhood. They also felt that the current refugee crisis demanded urgent concerted action, and called for a long-term strategy on asylum, migration and readmission policies involving the reinforcement of the Schengen system, the European Border and Coast Guard and FRONTEX.

      Strengthen multilateral global governance: the EU should aspire to be a ‘rule-maker’, contributing to efficient multilateral global governance with the aim of strengthening democracy, good governance, the rule of law and human rights. The report stressed that the EU should:

      • develop synergies between security, development, trade, human rights, democracy promotion activities and EU external action;
      • establish closer relationships with non-state actors, local and regional governments and civil society, ensuring a comprehensive approach to global challenges;
      • promote free and fair trade and investment, secure trade channels and increased market access throughout the world, and safeguard the stability of the global financial system by promoting high standards of regulation and governance;
      • ensure that EU development policy is an essential part of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy;

      Members called for a clear link between the EU Global Strategy and the structure and priorities of the EU budget, including enhanced own resources, in order to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation.

      Engage – the EU, national parliaments and European citizens: Members felt that Parliament should play a key role in the regular, detailed monitoring of the external action of the EU institutions and considered that the national parliaments could be more closely involved in this monitoring exercise.  European policy-makers should also engage with citizens, civil society, industry, and local and regional authorities. The report stressed that the Global Strategy should be revised every five years, with the new European Parliament and the new Commission.

    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0069/2016
    activities/2
    date
    2016-03-29T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/1
    date
    2016-03-22T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-12T00:00:00
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-28T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-13T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/date
    2015-06-29T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
    committees/0/date
    2015-06-29T00:00:00
    committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: KALNIETE Sandra
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-04-11T00:00:00
    New
    2016-04-28T00:00:00
    activities/1
    date
    2016-04-11T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities
    • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/04812
      reference
      2015/2272(INI)
      title
      EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6 External relations of the Union