Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | SIMON Peter ( S&D) | KARAS Othmar ( PPE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), NAGTEGAAL Caroline ( ALDE), GIEGOLD Sven ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), ZANNI Marco ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: establish transitional provisions to progressively incorporate the impact on own funds of the introduction of IFRS 9.
LEGISLATIVE ACT : Regulation (EU) 2017/2395 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 on own funds and for the large exposures treatment of certain public sector exposures denominated in the domestic currency of any Member State.
CONTENT: the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 are intended to introduce transitional provisions, which will apply from 1 January 2018, with a view to mitigating any negative impact on Common Equity Tier 1 capital arising from expected credit loss accounting following the introduction of the IFRS 9 international accounting standard.
Responding to the G20 call, the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 aims to improve financial reporting on financial instruments by addressing the concerns that emerged in this area during the financial crisis. Credit institutions and investment firms that use IFRS to prepare its financial statements will be required to apply IFRS 9 as of the starting opening date of its first financial year beginning on or after 1 January 2018.
The application of IFRS 9 may lead to a sudden significant increase in expected credit loss provisions and consequently to a sudden decrease in institutions’ Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
The amending Regulation will allow institutions to add to their Common Equity Tier 1 capital a portion of the increase in expected credit loss provisions as additional capital for a transitional period of five years to 31December 2022. The portion of expected credit loss provisions that can be included in Common Equity Tier 1 capital should decrease over time down to zero.
Institutions that decide to apply the IFRS 9 transitional arrangements specified in the Regulation should publicly disclose their own funds, capital ratios and leverage ratios both with and without the application of those arrangements in order to enable the public to determine the impact of those arrangements.
The Regulation also provides for the phasing-out over three years of provisions for the exemption from the large exposure limit available for exposures to certain public sector debt of Member States denominated in the domestic currency of any Member State.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 28.12.2017.
APPLICATION: from 1.1.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 495 votes to 41, with 10 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio, requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, counterparty credit risk, market risk, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, large exposures, reporting and disclosure requirements and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure concerns the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 with regard to the transitional arrangements designed to mitigate the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 on own funds and for the large exposure treatment of certain public sector debt of Member States denominated in other than domestic currencies of Member States.
The proposed Regulation recalled that IFRS 9 was published by the International Accounting Standards Board in July 2014. Regulation 2016/2067 requires EU banks to use it in their financial statements for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2018.
IFRS 9 is aimed at improving the loss provisioning of financial instruments by addressing concerns that arose during the financial crisis. It responds to the G20’s call for a more forward-looking model for the recognition of expected credit losses on financial assets.
The application of IFRS 9 may lead to a sudden significant increase in expected credit loss provisions and consequently to a sudden decrease in institutions’ Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 are intended to introduce transitional arrangements, which will apply from 1 January 2018, with a view to mitigating the potential negative regulatory capital impact on banks of the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 .
A recital refers to the resolution of 6 October 2016 in which the European Parliament called for a progressive phase-in regime that would mitigate the impact of the new impairment model of IFRS 9.
The resulting draft regulation will allow banks to add back to their ‘common equity tier 1’ capital a portion of the increased expected credit loss provisions as extra capital during a five-year transitional period . That added amount will progressively decrease to zero during the course of the transitional period.
Institutions should decide whether to apply those transitional arrangements and inform the competent authority accordingly. During the transitional period, an institution should have the possibility to reverse once its initial decision, subject to the prior permission of the competent authority which should ensure that such decision is not motivated by considerations of regulatory arbitrage
The draft Regulation also provides for the phasing-out over three years (from 1 January 2018) of an exemption from the large exposure limit available for exposures to certain public sector debt of Member States denominated in other than domestic currencies of Member States.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Peter SIMON (S&D, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 on own funds and the large exposures treatment of certain public sector exposures denominated in non-domestic currencies of Member States.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows.
The report noted the application of the expected credit loss (ECL) provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments (IFRS9), may lead to a sudden significant decrease in the capital ratios of institutions.
Whereas the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is currently considering the longer-term regulatory capital treatment of expected loss provisions and to prevent an unwarranted detrimental effect on lending by credit institutions, the amended text would allow institutions to offset the potentially significant negative impact on Common Equity Tier 1 capital arising from expected credit losses accounting during a transitional period of five years (until 31 December 2022). This additional amount would gradually be reduced to zero during the transitional period.
A recital refers to the resolution of 6 October 2016 in which the European Parliament called for a progressive phase-in regime that would mitigate the impact of the new impairment model of IFRS 9.
Institutions may put in place transitional arrangements for the introduction of IFRS 9. Where they decide not to do so, it should, as a general rule, not be possible for them to subsequently apply such arrangements.
However, following the first reporting period of the transitional period and subject to the prior approval of the competent authorities, institutions should, on a one-off basis, have the possibility of amending that decision and of applying the transitional arrangements for the remainder of the transitional period.
PURPOSE: reinforce the existing provisions of Union law which lay down uniform prudential requirements for banks and investment firms across the Union (reform of the EU banking sector).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with Council.
BACKGROUND: in the aftermath of the financial crisis that unfolded in 2007-2008, the Union implemented a substantial reform of the financial services regulatory framework to enhance the resilience of its financial institutions. That reform was largely based on internationally agreed standards.
Among its many measures, the reform package included the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, which strengthened the prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms.
While the reform has rendered the financial system more stable and resilient against many types of possible future shocks and crises, it did not address all identified problems .
Now that work on important additional reforms has been completed, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the outstanding problems should be addressed .
In its Communication of 24 November 2015 , the Commission recognised the need for further risk reduction and committed bringing forward a legislative proposal that would build on internationally agreed standards.
The need to take further concrete legislative steps in terms of reducing risks in the financial sector has also been recognised also by the Council in its Conclusions of 17 June 2016 and by the European Parliament in its resolution of 10 March 2016 .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment, rejected on 7 September 2016, was subsequently strengthened by adding: (i) a better explanation on the policy context of the proposal (i.e. it relation to both international and EU policy developments); (ii) more details on stakeholders' views; (iii) further evidence on the impacts of the various policy options that are explored.
As shown by the simulation analysis and macroeconomic modelling developed in the impact assessment, there are limited costs to be expected from the introduction of the new requirements, in particular the new Basel standards such as the leverage ratio and the trading book.
CONTENT: the proposed amendment to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR) is part of a legislative package that includes also amendments to Directive 2013/36/EU (the Capital Requirements Directive or CRD), to Directive 2014/59/EU (the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive or BRRD), and to Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 (the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation or SRMR).
It aims to complete the reform agenda by tackling remaining weaknesses and implementing some outstanding elements of the reform that are essential to ensure the institutions' resilience but have only recently been finalised by global standard setters (i.e. the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB)):
a binding leverage ratio which will prevent institutions from excessively increasing leverage, e.g. to compensate for low profitability; a binding net stable funding ratio (NSFR) which will build on institutions’ improved funding profiles and establish a harmonised standard for how much stable, long-term sources of funding an institution needs to weather periods of market and funding stress; more risk sensitive own funds (i.e. capital) requirements for institutions that trade to an important extent in securities and derivatives which will prevent too much divergence in those requirements that is not based on the institutions' risk profiles; new standards on the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) which will require those institutions to have more loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity; the introduction of more accurate reporting of the risks to which banks are exposed.
In order to improve the lending capacity of banks to support the EU economy, the proposal aims in particular at:
enhancing the capacity of banks to lend to SMEs and to fund infrastructure projects . As far as SMEs are concerned, the proposed recalibration of the own funds requirements for bank exposures to SMEs is expected to have a positive effect on bank financing of SMEs. This would primarily affect SMEs which currently have exposures beyond EUR 1.5 million as these exposures do not benefit from the SME Supporting Factor under the existing rules; applying the current framework in a more proportionate manner, taking into account the situation of non-complex, small banks, reducing the administrative burden linked to some rules in the area of remuneration (namely those on deferral and remuneration using instruments, such as shares), which appear disproportionate for these banks; ensuring a smooth interaction with existing requirements such as for central clearing and collateralisation of derivatives exposures, or a gradual transition to some of the new requirements are necessary.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)8
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2017/2395
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 345 27.12.2017, p. 0027
- Draft final act: 00059/2017/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0468/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE613.530
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2017)010571
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2017)010571
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE613.530
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0255/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE606.265
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE606.266
- Committee draft report: PE605.934
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0850
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE605.934
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE606.265
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE606.266
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2017)010571
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE613.530
- Draft final act: 00059/2017/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)8
Activities
- Peter SIMON
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernard MONOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanisław OŻÓG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marco VALLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0255/2017 - Peter Simon - Am 2 30/11/2017 11:57:07.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
160 |
2016/0360B(COD)
2017/06/23
ECON
160 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. For financial assets that are exposures subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three, institutions shall reduce the amount of expected credit losses for non- defaulted assets calculated in accordance with point (b)(i) of paragraph 2 of this Article by the expected loss amounts calculated in accordance with Article 158(5), (6) and (10). Where the reduction would result in a negative amount it shall be calculated as zero.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2a (new) 2a. For financial assets that are exposures subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three, institutions shall reduce the amount of expected credit losses for non- defaulted assets calculated in accordance with point (b)(i) of paragraph 2 of this Article by the expected loss shortfall amounts currently deducted from CET 1 capital calculated in accordance with Article 158(5), (6) and (10).Where the reduction would result in a negative amount it shall be calculated as zero.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473 a – paragraph 3– point a (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – Paragraph 3 – point a (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) 1 in the period from
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473 a (new)–point a (a)
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a (new) –point b (b) 0,
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 123 #
(b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 0,8 in the period from
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (c) 0,6 in the period from
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,6 in the period from
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation 575/2013/EU Article 473a (new)– point c (c) 0,
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,6 in the period from
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,6 in the period from
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 0,6 in the period from
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/213 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,4 in the period from
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,4 in the period from
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a (new)– point d Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,4 in the period from
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473 a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,4 in the period from
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point d (d) 0,4 in the period from
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a (new)–point e Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e (e) 0,
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e (e) 0,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e (e) 0,25 in the period from
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e (e) 0,2 in the period from
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – point e (e) 0,2 in the period from
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) During the transitional period referred to in this paragraph, institutions that have not applied transitional provisions from the starting period referred to in point (a) of the first paragraph, may on a one-off basis apply the remaining transtitional provisions subject to the prior approval of the competent authority.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493a – paragraph 3a (new) Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) 3a. During the period set out in paragraph 1, in addition to disclosing the information required in Article 99, institutions which choose to apply this Article shall report the amount of own funds, Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, the total capital ratio and leverage ratio they would have in case they would not apply this Article. EBA shall, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, issue guidelines by [31 December 2017] on the reporting requirements laid down in this Article.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 3a (new) 3a. During the period set out in paragraph 1, in addition to disclosing the information required in Part Eight, institutions which choose to apply this Article shall disclose the amount of own funds, Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, the total capital ratio and the leverage ratio they would have if they did not apply this Article. EBA shall, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, issue guidelines by [31 December 2017] on the disclosure requirements laid down in this Article.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. By way of derogation from Article
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. By way of derogation from Article 395, competent authorities may allow institutions to incur one of the exposures provided for in points (a) (c) (d) (e) of Article 400(1) denominated and funded in the currency of any Member States
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – point a (a)
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) 100% of the institution’s Tier 1 capital
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – point b Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b (b)
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – point c Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – point c (c)
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) (ca) The maximum limits specified in points (a), (b), and (c) of the first subparagraph shall apply to exposure values after taking into account the effect of credit risk mitigation in accordance with Articles 399 to 403.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Treatment under paragraph 4 may be applied only if an exposure as referred to in paragraph 5 meets all of the following conditions: (a) the exposure has been assigned a risk weight of 0% in accordance with Article 495(2) as it stood before 1 January 2018; (b) the exposure was incurred on or after [date of adoption to be added when the text is published].
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 120 – point b (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 493 – paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. An exposure as referred to in paragraph 5 incurred before [date of adoption to be added when the text is published] to which a risk weight of 0% was assigned on 31 December 2017 in accordance with Article 495(2) shall be exempted from the application of Article 395(1).”
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the exposure is to an entity or – under specific conditions – to an affiliated holding company which was created specifically to finance or operate physical structures or facilities, systems and networks that provide or
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the primary source of repayment of the obligation is the income generated by or associated with the assets being financed (i.e. including concession based business), rather than the independent capacity of a broader commercial enterprise;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the obligor can meet its financial obligations even under
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point g – point i (i) where the revenues of the obligor are not funded by payments from a large number of users, the revenues are covered by law or the contractual arrangements shall include provisions that effectively protect lenders against losses resulting from the termination of the project by the party which agrees to purchase the goods or services provided by the obligor;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point g – point ii (ii) the obligor has sufficient reserve funds fully funded in cash or other financial arrangements with
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point g – point iii (iii) the lenders have a substantial degree of control over the assets and the income generated by the obligor to be ensured by adequate contractual covenants;
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 127 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 501a – paragraph 1 – point g – point v (v) equity is pledged to lenders
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 128 – introductory part Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 507 (128) Article 507 is
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 128 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 507 Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the provisions in point (119) concerning amendments to Article 473a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, which shall apply from
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (ba) the provisions in point (126) concerning amendments to Article 501 to include an adjustment to SME exposures, which shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b b (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (bb) the provisions on the introduction of an adjustment to capital requirements for credit risk for exposures to entities that operate or finance physical structures or facilities, systems and networks that provide or support essential public services pursuant to Article 501a, which shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 26 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the Standard on regulatory treatment of accounting provisions - interim approach and transitional arrangements of March 2017 by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision,
Amendment 27 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 b (new) - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 6 October 2016 on International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 92, _______________________ 2 P8-TA(2016)0381.
Amendment 28 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 c (new) - having regard to the Report on results from the EBA impact assessment of IFRS 9 of 10 November 2016 by the European Banking Authority,
Amendment 29 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 d (new) - having regard to the Opinion of the European Banking Authority on transitional arrangements and credit risk adjustments due to the introduction of IFRS 9 (EBA/OP/2017/02) of 6 March 2017,
Amendment 30 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 e (new) - having regard to the Opinion of the ECB Supervisory Board on IFRS 9 as expressed by its Chair in the Hearing of the ECON Committee of the European Parliament on 25 April 2017,
Amendment 31 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 f (new) - having regard to the Answer of the Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board to a letter of MEP Danuta Maria Hübner of 1 June 2017,
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) having regard to the Protocol (No 1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the role of national parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 b (new) having regard to the Protocol (No 2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In 2009, a good two years after the start of the financial crisis, a first set of reforms w
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) The consolidation of subsidiaries in third countries should take due account of the stable funding requirements applicable in those countries. Accordingly, consolidation rules in the Union
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) Respondents to the Commission’s Call for Evidence on the EU regulatory framework for financial services regarded current disclosure requirements as disproportionate and burdensome for smaller institutions. Without prejudice to aligning disclosures more closely with international standards, smaller and less complex institutions should normally be required to produce less
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Some clarifications should be made to the remuneration disclosures. Furthermore, institutions benefit
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50a) The global financial crisis brought the role played by international financial reporting standards (IFRS) in financial stability and growth, in particular the rules regarding the recognition of losses incurred in the banking system, onto the G20 and EU agendas. The G20 and the de Larosière report highlighted key issues with respect to accounting standards ahead of the crisis, including pro- cyclicality related to the mark-to-market principle and profit and loss recognition, the underestimation of risk accumulation during cyclical upturns and the lack of a common and transparent methodology for the valuation of illiquid and impaired assets. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments as a key response to some aspects of the financial crisis and to its impact on the banking sector. The IFRS 9 constitutes an improvement on IAS 39 insofar as the move from an ‘incurred loss’ to an ‘expected loss’ impairment model addresses the problem of ‘too little, too late’ in the credit loss recognition procedure. The entry into force of IFRS 9 was in that context expected by all stakeholders and the EU credit institutions have already had time to adapt to the new framework and to identify the changes required for the transition to the new standard.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”, may lead to a sudden significant
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”, may lead to a sudden significant increase in the capital ratios of institutions. While discussions are on-going on the appropriate prudential treatment of the impact of increased expected credit losses and to prevent an unwarranted detrimental effect on lending by credit institutions,
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”, may lead to a sudden significant
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”, may lead to a sudden significant increase (“cliff-effect”) in the capital ratios of institutions. While discussions are on- going on the appropriate prudential treatment of the impact of increased expected credit losses and to prevent an unwarranted detrimental effect on lending by credit institutions, the incremental provisioning for credit risk of
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) The application of the expected credit loss provisioning introduced by the revised international accounting standards on financial instruments “IFRS9”, may lead to a sudden significant increase in the capital ratios of institutions. Whereas the Basel Committee is currently considering the longer-term regulatory capital treatment of expected credit loss provisions and while discussions are on- going on the appropriate prudential treatment of the impact of increased expected credit losses and to prevent an unwarranted detrimental effect on lending by credit institutions, the incremental provisioning for credit risk of IFRS9 should be phased in.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) The change to new accounting principles based on expected losses on loans not yet classed as non-performing could have a considerable adverse effect on the balance sheets of credit institutions more exposed as regards the financing of SMEs and the real economy, placing them at a disadvantage compared with large investment banks carrying out financial activities. In order not to worsen the position further for banks already in crisis, and to keep distortions of competition in the banking sector to a minimum, the application of the new accounting rules should therefore be suspended and the rules revised.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) Institutions should benefit from an optional phased-in transitional period of a maximum duration of three years. In line with the Standard on regulatory treatment of accounting provisions - interim approach and transitional arrangements of March 2017 by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the impact of the expected credit loss provisions on CET1 capital should not be fully neutralised during the transition period.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) For institutions that have not applied transitional provisions for the incremental provisioning for credit risk of IFRS9 and in the case of a significant economic shock, those institutions should be given an option at a later date to apply transitional provisions, in accordance with the procedures set out in this Regulation and subject to the prior approval of the competent authority.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 b (new) (51b) Institutions should disclose publicly their capital ratios as well as their leverage ratio both with and without the application of the IFRS 9 transitional arrangements specified in this Regulation in order for the public to be able to determine the impact of those arrangements on those ratios.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) Mandatory application by all institutions of the IFRS transitional provisions would ensure maximum harmonisation and a consistent transition to IFRS 9 among EU institutions as well as comparability of financial disclosures, and would also address any unintended discrimination against institutions (‘the stigma effect’).
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 b (new) (51b) A proper quantitative impact assessment for IFRS 9 is currently missing due in part to a lack of reliable data. The Commission should proceed to such quantitative impact assessment as soon as sufficient reliable data is available and to the extent possible no latter that by 2019.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 c (new) (51c) The accounting treatment under IFRS 9 of certain financial instruments held directly or indirectly as long-term investments, in particular equity, may have a negative overall aim of promoting long-term investment which is instrumental for sustainable economic growth.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 d (new) (51d) The Commission has cooperated closely with the European Supervisory Agencies (ESAs), the SSM, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) and EFRAG ahead of the entry into force of the IFRS 9 standard and should closely and regularly monitor the implementation of IFRS 9 in the Union and its financial stability implications in cooperation with the abovementioned bodies in order to make sure that IFRS 9 serves the Union’s long-term investment strategy, reduces pro-cyclicality and incentives for excessive risk-taking.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 e (new) (51e) Credit institutions using the Standardised Approach (SA) which are also instrumental for providing long-term financing notably for SMEs might be the most seriously affected by a reduction in their Core Equity Tier 1 capital as loss provisions in the framework of the Standardized Approach are based on provisions for impaired assets and do not include an expected loss rationale for calculating those provisions. Although more heavily affected by increased provisions under IFRS 9, credit institutions using the SA would not be able to recognise any part of their accounting provisions in Tier 2 capital if all provisions were considered specific. In contrast, institutions using the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach to measure credit risk might have regulatory expected losses exceeding accounting provisions under IAS 39, which could reduce the negative impact on CET1 (or even result in no impact) under IFRS 9, and they would be able to recognise in their Tier 2 capital any excess accounting provisions. The IFRS 9 transitional provisions should therefore provide for a differentiated treatment for institutions using the IRB approach and those implementing the SA.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) Any potential unintended negative consequences of exemptions under Article 400(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 should be avoided, when providing for transitional arrangements for the exemption from the large exposure limit available to exposures to certain public sector debt of Member States denominated in non-domestic currencies of Member States.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 11 – paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 18 – paragraph 4 4. The consolidating supervisor shall require the proportional consolidation according to the share of capital held of participations in institutions and financial institutions managed by an undertaking included in the consolidation or by the parent institutions, financial holding companies and mixed financial holdings together with one or more undertakings not included in the consolidation, where the liability of those undertakings is limited to the share of the capital they hold.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 72a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) Minority interests related to Common Equity Tier 1, Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 items not included in consolidated own funds.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 48 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 104 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) financial assets or liabilities
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 57 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 155a (new) Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 83 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 325a – paragraph 1 1. An institution may calculate the own funds requirements for market risks with the approach referred to in point (c) of Article 325(1) provided that the size of the institution’s on- and off-balance sheet business subject to market risks is equal to or less than the higher of the following thresholds on the basis of an assessment carried out on a monthly basis:
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428f – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Assets and liabilities directly linked to the following products or services shall be considered to meet the conditions of paragraph 1 and be considered a
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428f – paragraph 2 – point c (c) covered bonds as referred to in Article 52(4) of Directive 2009/65/EC; or that meet the eligibility requirements for the treatment set out in Article 129(4) or (5), and (7) of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. By way of derogation from Article 428g and from Chapters 3 and 4 of this Title, competent authorities
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428h – paragraph 1 – point a – point va (new) (va) the counterparty is located within the same Member State or in a different Member Statexxx
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428h – paragraph 2 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428q – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The residual maturity of assets with an undefined contractual end date is the date at which the contract allows the credit institution to withdraw or to request payment.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428q – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Securities contractually hedging a derivative have the maturity of the derivative;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428q – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. When calculating the residual maturity of an asset with an early termination where the option to withdraw the money is exercisable at the discretion of both parts, the institution shall consider the asset at the maturity of the date in which the option can be exercised.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428r – paragraph 1 – point aa (new) (aa) assets that have a residual maturity of less than six months resulting from secured lending transactions and capital market-driven transactions as defined in Article 192(2) and (3), where those assets are collateralised by assets that qualify as Level 1 assets under Title II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, excluding extremely high quality covered bonds referred to in point (f) of Article 10(1) of that Delegated Regulation , and where the institution would be legally entitled and operationally able to reuse those assets for the life of the transaction, regardless of whether the collateral has already been reused. Institutions shall take those assets into account on a net basis where Article 428e(1) of this Regulation applies; (ab) assets that have a residual maturity of less than six months resulting from secured lending transactions and capital market-driven transactions as defined in Article 192(2) and (3) with regulated financial customers, where the institution would be legally entitled and operationally able to reuse those assets for the life of the transaction, regardless of whether the collateral has already been reused. Institutions shall take those assets into account on a net basis where Article 428e(1) of this Regulation applies;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428s – point b Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428s – point d (d) all trade finance off-balance sheet related products as referred to in Article 111(1) of this Regulation
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428u – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428w – point b Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428x – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. trade finance on-balance sheet related products with a residual maturity of minimum six months and less than one year;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428ac – point e Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428ac – point g a (new) (ga) those assets referred in Article 428af that have been purchased with the intent of being sold within one year;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428ae – point b a (new) (ba) any assets other than those referred to in Articles 428r to 428af, including loans to financial customers having a residual contractual maturity of one year or more when collateralized by Level 1 high quality liquid assets in accordance with Article 10 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428af – point f (f) unencumbered exchange-traded equities that are not eligible as Level 2B assets in accordance with Article 12 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 unless they have been purchased with the intent of being sold within one year;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428af – point g (g) physical traded commodities, including gold but excluding commodity derivatives, unless they have been purchased with the intent of being sold within one year.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 114 (new) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 428af – point g a (new) (ga) any assets other than those referred to in Articles 428r to 428af, including loans to financial customers having a residual contractual maturity of one year or more when collateralized by Level 2 liquid assets in accordance with Article 10 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/6.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 1 1. Until
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a– paragraph 2 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated as the
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2. 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 119 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 Article 473a – paragraph 2 2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be
source: 606.265
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2017-11-21T00:00:00New
2017-11-20T00:00:00 |
events/8/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE605.934New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-605934_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.265New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-606265_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.266New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-606266_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0255&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0255_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0468New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0468_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/10002New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R2395New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R2395 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/13 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
53b2de3cb819f205b00000e7New
5a0cf705d1d1c556ab000001 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN CoraNew
NAGTEGAAL Caroline |
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
53b2de3cb819f205b00000e7New
5a0cf705d1d1c556ab000001 |
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN CoraNew
NAGTEGAAL Caroline |
activities/5/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
53b2de3cb819f205b00000e7New
5a0cf705d1d1c556ab000001 |
activities/5/committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN CoraNew
NAGTEGAAL Caroline |
activities/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
53b2de3cb819f205b00000e7New
5a0cf705d1d1c556ab000001 |
committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN CoraNew
NAGTEGAAL Caroline |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/7 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/instrument |
Regulation
|
activities/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|