Next event: Commission response to text adopted in plenary 2017/09/07 more...
- Results of vote in Parliament 2017/04/27
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2017/04/27
- End of procedure in Parliament 2017/04/27
- Debate in Parliament 2017/04/26
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2017/03/31
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2017/03/22
- Committee opinion 2017/03/07
- Committee opinion 2017/02/10
- Amendments tabled in committee 2017/02/06
- Committee draft report 2016/12/22
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | RODUST Ulrike ( S&D) | MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia ( PPE), TOMAŠIĆ Ruža ( ECR), MARINHO E PINTO António ( ALDE), FERREIRA João ( GUE/NGL), ENGSTRÖM Linnéa ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | Andrew LEWER ( ECR), Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR ( S&D), Maurice PONGA ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) | Sophie MONTEL ( ENF), Liadh NÍ RIADA ( GUE/NGL), Isabelle THOMAS ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 428 votes to 64, with 118 abstentions, a resolution on the management of the fishing fleets in the Outermost Regions (ORs).
As a reminder, the outermost regions include nine EU regions, which are part of France (Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Réunion, Martinique, Mayotte and Saint-Martin), Portugal (Madeira and Azores) and Spain (Canary Islands).
Specificities of the ORs : Members considered that the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), designed to tackle the problems and challenges of continental Europe, can only provide a limited response to the specific characteristics of fisheries in the ORs. They called, therefore, for the development of a strategy for each regional sea basin tailored to the specific situation of each of the outermost regions.
Stressing the presence in the ORs of a wide variety of small communities that are highly dependent on traditional, coastal and small-scale fishing , the resolution called for the need to:
involve local fisheries in achieving food security for local communities; protect marine biological resources around the ORs: only fishing vessels registered in OR ports should be allowed to fish in OR waters; strengthen support for relevant scientific research projects given that the OR seabed is a veritable living laboratory of biodiversity; maintain the balance between fishing capacity and opportunities in accordance with the precautionary principle and taking into account socio-economic realities.
Members observed the difficulty, or even impossibility, for certain fishermen in the ORs to access credit and/or insurance for their vessels, causing safety problems and economic constraints for these fishermen.
Making better use of possibilities provided under Article 349 of the Treaty and the CFP : Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union comprises the specific features of ORs. These include remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, and economic dependence on a few products.
Members called for the full application of Article 349 TFEU in the European Union's policies, regulations, funds and programmes relating to fisheries, particularly in the EMFF, in order to respond to the specific difficulties encountered by the ORs.
Parliament recommended, inter alia :
setting up a separate Advisory Council for the ORs; better use of the possibilities provided for in the EMFF to support this kind of local development in the ORs; establishing fisheries local action groups (FLAGs), which are recognised to be an important channel for support and for opportunities to diversify fishing activities; stepping up the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing undertaken in the EEZ of certain ORs; speeding up the implementation of the EMFF and to use the opportunities it provides to invest heavily in fleet modernisation – improvements to safety, on-board hygiene, energy efficiency and quality of fishery products – as well as in fishing ports, landing sites and aquaculture, in order to generate new market outlets; paying particular attention to the interests of ORs when fisheries agreements are concluded with third countries; continue with specific aid schemes such as special taxation models; improving data collection on stocks and the assessment of the impact of small-scale vessels in the ORs; allowing the funding (at EU or national level) of the ORs’ artisanal and traditional fishing vessels with a view to developing economic opportunities for all players in the blue economy; that the aid intensity for engine replacement in the ORs should be increased where scientific evidence indicates that climate conditions and climate change have a decisive negative impact on the ORs’ fleets; creating better incentives under a future EMFF to encourage young people to work in the maritime economy.
The Commission is invited to look into the possibility of establishing an instrument specifically dedicated to supporting fisheries in the ORs, along the lines of the POSEI scheme for agriculture in the ORs.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted an own-initiative report by Ulrike RODUST (S&D, DE) on the management of the fishing fleets in the Outermost Regions (ORs).
As a reminder, the outermost regions include nine EU regions, which are part of France (Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Réunion, Martinique, Mayotte and Saint-Martin), Portugal (Madeira and Azores) and Spain (Canary Islands).
Specificities of the ORs : Members considered that the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), designed to tackle the problems and challenges of continental Europe, can only provide a limited response to the specific characteristics of fisheries in the ORs. They called, therefore, for the development of a strategy for each regional sea basin tailored to the specific situation of each of the outermost regions.
Stressing the presence in the ORs of a wide variety of small communities that are highly dependent on traditional, coastal and small-scale fishing , the report called for the need to:
involve local fisheries in achieving food security for local communities; protect marine biological resources around the ORs; strengthen support for relevant scientific research projects given that the OR seabed is a veritable living laboratory of biodiversity; maintain the balance between fishing capacity and opportunities in accordance with the precautionary principle and taking into account socio-economic realities.
Members observed the difficulty, or even impossibility, for certain fishermen in the ORs to access credit and/or insurance for their vessels, causing safety problems and economic constraints for these fishermen.
Making better use of possibilities provided under Article 349 of the Treaty and the CFP : Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union comprises the specific features of ORs. These include remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, and economic dependence on a few products.
Members called for the full application of Article 349 TFEU in the European Union's policies, regulations, funds and programmes relating to fisheries, particularly in the EMFF, in order to respond to the specific difficulties encountered by the ORs.
The report recommended, inter alia :
setting up a separate Advisory Council for the ORs; better use of the possibilities provided for in the EMFF to support this kind of local development in the ORs; establishing fisheries local action groups (FLAGs), which are recognised to be an important channel for support and for opportunities to diversify fishing activities; stepping up the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing undertaken in the EEZ of certain ORs; speeding up the implementation of the EMFF and to use the opportunities it provides to invest heavily in fleet modernisation – improvements to safety, on-board hygiene, energy efficiency and quality of fishery products – as well as in fishing ports, landing sites and aquaculture, in order to generate new market outlets; paying particular attention to the interests of ORs when fisheries agreements are concluded with third countries; continue with specific aid schemes such as special taxation models; improving data collection on stocks and the assessment of the impact of small-scale vessels in the ORs; providing support to aquaculture development projects; that the aid intensity for engine replacement in the ORs should be increased where scientific evidence indicates that climate conditions and climate change have a decisive negative impact on the ORs’ fleets.
The Commission is invited to look into the possibility of establishing an instrument specifically dedicated to supporting fisheries in the ORs, along the lines of the POSEI scheme for agriculture in the ORs.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)472
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0195/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0138/2017
- Committee opinion: PE595.662
- Committee opinion: PE589.280
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.497
- Committee draft report: PE593.957
- Committee draft report: PE593.957
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.497
- Committee opinion: PE589.280
- Committee opinion: PE595.662
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)472
Activities
- Ulrike RODUST
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
57 |
2016/2016(INI)
2016/12/12
REGI
57 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. having regard to Articles 3, 38, 43 and 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that fisheries are crucial for the optimal development of the potential of the ORs and are an important sector which creates large numbers of jobs; calls for everything possible to be done to strengthen the fisheries sector as a pillar for local development in these regions, in particular by supporting the creation and consolidation of fisheries in the ORs;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the link between food security and establishing sustainable fisheries in the ORs; insists, in this context, on the need to involve local fisheries in achieving food security for local communities, as food security in the ORs is currently too dependent on imports;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the rules governing this sector are complex, and that the obstacles they create are holding back the creation and development of fisheries; calls for the simplification of those rules in order to make it easier for individuals working in ORs to organise themselves into collectives, as well as to maximise the performance of EU funding
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the rules governing
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the rules governing this sector are complex, and that the obstacles they create are holding back the creation and development of fisheries; calls for the simplification of those rules in order to make it easier for individuals working in ORs to organise themselves into collectives and to promote access to funds, as well as to maximise the performance of EU funding and make the best possible use of fisheries assets in these regions;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the common
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the European maritime and fisheries fund (EMFF) were designed to tackle the problems and challenges encountered in the East Atlantic and the northern hemisphere, and
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the European maritime and fisheries fund (EMFF) were designed to tackle the problems and challenges
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the exclusive economic zones of the outermost regions cover 2 507 537 km2, an area equivalent to that covered by of all the EU’s continental EEZs; considers, in this regard, that it is vital for reliable data on the state of resources and practices in these overseas EEZs to be available and accessible;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the European Union,
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the European Union, while st
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the European Union, while still complying with the principles of sustainability and sustainable development
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be applied in full to the EU policies, rules, funds and programmes related to EU fisheries policy, and in particular the EMFF, with the relevant implementing provisions to be established in a homogeneous manner which is consistent with the other operational programmes of the CFP;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it essential to establish specific rules for OR fleets;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should be
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should be used to replace and modernise small fishing boats that land all their catches in ports in the ORs and contribute to the sustainable local development of fisheries in the outermost regions; acknowledges that the EMFF currently offers some flexibility through higher intensities of public aid, a compensation regime for offsetting specific costs and a derogation which allows financing for anchored fish aggregating devices; calls on the Commission to further consider increasing the maximum possible aid intensities for the replacement of fleet engines, provided that taking this course of action is the choice of Member States;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should be used to replace and modernise small fishing boats that land all their catches in ports in the ORs and contribute to the sustainable local development of fisheries in the outermost regions; stresses that in the absence of modernization during the 1970s and 1980s and additional detrimental climate effects, the current fleets are aging more rapidly than in other EU regions, often entailing a state of decay that it endangers safety of fishermen;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reminds that the remoteness of the Outermost Regions has been recognised and taken into account as a general principle within EU law, thus justifying and enabling the set-up of a compensation scheme for additional costs for fishery and aquaculture products in the ORs;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should be used to replace and modernise small fishing boats that land all their catches in ports in the ORs and contribute to the sustainable local development of fisheries in the outermost regions, supporting the labour market derived therefrom;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should be used to replace and modernise small fishing boats that land all their catches in ports in the ORs and contribute to the sustainable local development of fisheries in the outermost regions, and that, in building fishing vessels, materials should be so selected as take account of extreme humidity;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the EMFF should
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes with concern that the socio- economic consequences of this situation strongly affect the ORs already suffering high levels of unemployment (24.6% in Réunion, with a youth unemployment of 52.4%) and that the low level of investments into the fishing fleets prevent efforts towards increasing levels of employment, attractiveness, skills and education of (potential) fishermen;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to look into the possibility of establishing, in the next multiannual financial framework, a financial instrument specifically dedicated to supporting fisheries in the ORs, along the lines of the POSEI scheme for agriculture in the ORs;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for the creation of an instrument dedicated to fisheries in the ORs, as is the case in agriculture with the POSEI scheme, which would make it possible to properly exploit the exceptional fisheries potential of the ORs by providing specific support measures;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that the replacement and modernisation of fishing equipment and the transition to environmentally friendly vessels, boats and fishing gear must be carried out on an incentive basis, not by imposing additional regulatory burdens which would threaten the sustainability of fishery activities;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to single out and promote the use of relevant EU cohesion funds, in particular the ERDF and the ESF, in order to boost investment in the infrastructures required for the development of local fisheries in the outermost regions; encourages, in particular, investment in projects that make fisheries jobs more attractive, projects that attract more young people and innovative projects that make fisheries more sustainable, promote selective fishing methods and help to develop environmentally responsible fisheries
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to single out and promote the use of relevant EU cohesion funds, in particular the ERDF and the ESF, in order to boost investment in the infrastructures required for the development of local fisheries in the outermost regions and for modernisation of fleets; encourages, in particular, investment in projects that make fisheries jobs more attractive, projects that attract more young people and innovative projects that make fisheries more sustainable, promote selective fishing methods and help to develop environmentally responsible fisheries;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to single out and promote the use of relevant EU cohesion funds, in particular the ERDF
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. whereas, despite the constraints which are specific to the ORs, as set out in Article 349 TFEU, the fisheries sector has strengths and considerable potential for development;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to single out and promote the use of relevant EU cohesion funds, in particular the ERDF and the ESF, in order to boost investment in the infrastructures required for the development of local fisheries in the outermost regions; encourages, in particular, investment in projects that make fisheries jobs more attractive, projects that attract more young people and help them enter the industry and innovative projects that make fisheries more sustainable, promote selective fishing methods and help to develop environmentally responsible fisheries;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that modernisation of the fleets is pivotal for the diversification of fishing areas (off coastal areas), for the increase of energy efficiency of engines, for the ability to meet requirements of certain EU requirements, (such as safety standards) and for the improvement of the quality of fish (as far as freezing on board would become feasible);
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to facilitate access for fisheries stakeholders and sectors in the ORs to all European financial instruments;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission to take greater account of the strategic location of the ORs, and the role they can play in ensuring that seas, oceans and coastal areas are used in a sustainable way, as well as in global maritime governance and the development of a knowledge economy based on the sea;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Deplores the lack of consistency between European fisheries policies and points out that EU action in third countries could seriously hinder the development of the sector in the outermost regions; calls on the Commission to ensure that local stakeholders are at the heart of the decision making process when it comes to fishing fleets in the ORs, particularly through the use of community led local development; believes in the importance of ensuring that fishermen in the ORs have access to information which explains how they can make use of the existing support that the EU provides;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Deplores the lack of consistency between European fisheries policies and points out that EU action in third countries could seriously hinder the development of the sector in the outermost regions; calls, therefore, for more consideration to be given to the interests of ORs when fisheries agreements are concluded with third countries, including by laying down obligations to land catches in the ORs or to employ personnel from the ORs on vessels;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Deplores the lack of consistency between European fisheries policies and points out that EU action in third countries could seriously hinder the development of
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Deplores the
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recommends taking into account the impact of the financial crisis and its serious economic repercussions, particularly in Portugal and Spain, which hamper the full exploitation of the specific scheme for the modernisation of their fleets (Regulation (EC) No 639/2004);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. whereas the ORs are characterised in particular by an under-exploitation of fisheries resources and by fleets mainly comprising boats which are old and small;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls the need to tackle challenges related to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing encountered in some ports of the outermost regions which hinders a sound and sustainable development of the fisheries sector;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the European Union to do more to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and to lay down specific measures for tackling IUU in the EEZs of the ORs;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the EU to prioritise the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in its international action, in particular in the context of EPA negotiations;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission to better coordinate its trade policy with the other sectoral policies of the Union, in particular the CFP, to take account in negotiations of the interests and development problems of the outermost regions and to systematically and preventively assess the impact on the ORs and OCTs of trade agreements and fisheries partnership agreements which it negotiates with third countries;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the ORs are dependent on the fish stocks in their EEZs,
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the ORs are dependent on the fish stocks in their EEZs, which are biologically highly vulnerable, and takes the view, therefore, that sensitive OR zones need to be properly and effectively protected, in particular by granting exclusive access to local fleets which use sustainable, environment- friendly fishing equipment;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Regrets that the Commission failed to publish an implementation report on Regulation (EC) 639/2004 by the 30 June 2012 deadline; believes that this represents a lost opportunity, as this publication would have been a crucial source of insight for possible future derogations of the CFP’s entry-exit management scheme which could assist the development of fishing fleets in the ORs; demands that the Commission give further information about why the decision to not publish this report was taken;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recalls that an aging fleet, comprising many vessels that are virtually obsolete, particularly the small vessels of the Canary Islands and Madeira (which on average are more than 40 years old), entails safety risks, is less efficient and affords less attractive working conditions than modern vessels.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that sustainable fisheries are crucial for the development of the ORs and are an important sector which creates large numbers of jobs; calls for everything possible to be done to strengthen the fisheries sector as a pillar for local development in these regions, in particular by supporting the creation and consolidation of fisheries in the ORs and by fostering local markets including in the supply chain of fisheries products;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that fisheries are crucial for the development of the ORs and are an important sector which creates large numbers of jobs and keeps people in their home areas, making communities more prosperous and resilient; calls for everything possible to be done to strengthen the fisheries sector as a pillar for local development in these regions, in particular by supporting the creation and consolidation of fisheries in the ORs;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that fisheries are crucial for the development of the ORs and are an important sector which creates large numbers of jobs and does much to maintain food security; calls for everything possible to be done to strengthen the fisheries sector as a pillar for local development in these regions, in particular by supporting the creation and consolidation of fisheries in the ORs;
source: 594.122
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0138&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0138_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0195New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0195_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/8/05600New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/2/date |
2016-03-17T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-03-17T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
PECH/8/05600
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|