BETA


Events

2017/03/29
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/11/06
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2016/10/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/10/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 415 votes to 223, with 55 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’.

Whilst welcoming the Commission communication, Members stressed that an EU strategy for LNG must be consistent with the framework strategy for a resilient Energy Union , so as to contribute to increased security of energy supply, decarbonisation, the long-term sustainability of the economy and the delivery of affordable and competitive energy prices.

Members highlighted, in this context, current developments in global LNG markets, where oversupply has led to lower prices , presenting an opportunity to deliver lower energy costs to EU consumers through relatively cheaper gas supplies.

(1) Reduce Union dependency : Members agreed with the assessment of the Commission that Member States in the Baltic Sea region and in central and south-eastern Europe, and Ireland – despite the huge infrastructure development efforts realised by certain Member States – are still heavily reliant on a single supplier and are exposed to supply shocks and disruptions. The availability of LNG, including supporting pipeline infrastructure, in these Member States could significantly improve the current supply security situation, contributing to more competitive energy prices.

The resolution stressed the need to:

make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible and develop a strategy that aims at lessening EU gas dependency in the long term ; promote, before supporting new regasification terminals, the most efficient use of existing LNG terminals from a cross-border perspective, so to avoid technology lock-in or stranded assets in fossil fuel infrastructure and ensure that consumers do not have to bear the costs of any new projects.

(2) Completing missing infrastructure :

As regards the LNG infrastructure , Members highlighted the importance of:

giving priority to market-based solutions and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level; carrying out a careful analysis of LNG supply alternatives and options from a regional as well as an environmentally sustainable perspective, before deciding on new infrastructure; cooperating a regional level when building new LNG terminals and interconnections: Member States with access to the sea should cooperate closely with landlocked countries in order to avoid over-investment in unnecessary and uneconomic projects.

The Commission and the Member States are called upon to:

put in place strategies to support facilities that can be used in the future to manage the transfer and storage of renewable natural gas; fully implement key projects of common interest (PCIs), and to assign high priority primarily to the most economically and environmentally efficient.

Regarding storage infrastructure , Members recalled that the cross-border accessibility of gas storages is one of the key tools to implement the principle of energy solidarity during gas shortages and emergency crisis. They emphasised that a more extensive use of Ukraine’s storage capacity will only be possible if an appropriate and stable commercial and legal framework and the integrity of supply infrastructure is guaranteed in Ukraine. The EU should support Ukraine in transitioning from dependency on Russian natural gas to LNG.

(3) Connecting LNG and storage to markets : Parliament emphasised the importance of the work of regional high-level groups, such as the Central East South Europe Gas Connectivity High Level Group (CESEC), the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP) and the South-West Europe group.

Members are called upon to:

find cost-efficient and environmentally sustainable energy supply options to increase long-term security of supply for the Iberian peninsula, Central and South-East Europe, the Baltic states and Ireland; support the most vulnerable countries that continue to remain energy islands, such as Cyprus and Malta.

Parliament expressed concern at the proposed doubling of capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline , and the counterproductive effects this would have on energy security and diversification of supply sources and the principle of solidarity among Member States. It considered that if, contrary to European interests, Nord Stream 2 were to be built it would necessarily require a sound assessment of LNG terminals’ accessibility and a detailed state of play on the North-South Gas Corridor.

(4) Making the EU an attractive market for LNG : Members urged the Member States to fully implement the third energy package , while insisting that the completion of the internal gas market and the elimination of regulatory obstacles would greatly improve the liquidity of gas markets. They urged stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possible.

(5) Gas storage in the internal market : the resolution highlighted the need to develop harmonised tariff structures across the EU and to increase transparency in tariff definition in order to achieve a higher utilisation rate of existing gas storages. Members supported the Commission’s proposal to enable the deployment of bio-methane and other renewable gases which comply with relevant EU quality standards in gas transmission, distribution and storage.

(6) Role of the EU as a player on international LNG markets : Parliament supported the Commission, the European External Action Service and the Member States in their active engagement in energy diplomacy in order to promote a rule-based, transparent and well-functioning global gas market.

Members considered it of key importance that the EU’s trade policy should enhance the Union’s and Member States’ energy diversification and reduce their dependency on imported energy from too few suppliers.

Stressing that trade plays a key role in energy security, Members noted that strong energy partnerships, reinforced by the inclusion of energy chapters in the EU’s trade agreements , are essential tools.

(7) Sustainability and the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport, heat and power : Members acknowledged the potential of LNG as an alternative fuel, both in road and maritime transport. They underlined that wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the decrease of global CO2, SOx, and NOx emissions, especially through using more LNG engines in maritime transport .

The report recommended, inter alia:

the creation of a common project of ‘ LNG Blue Corridors for Islands ’ for the maritime sector, including ports of the TEN-T Comprehensive Network;

the adoption of measures to promote: (i) the development of vessels and motor vehicles running on LNG; (ii) transport of LNG by rail; (iii) the development of an efficient network of refuelling infrastructure in order to close the existing gaps in provision and create a complete supply network.

Lastly, Parliament noted that the use of small-scale LNG technology in certain areas, such as long-range transportation or industrial high-performance applications , could not only contribute to climate policy objectives but also result in significant business advantage. It also noted that LNG, and in particular CNG, is also a viable solution for public transport.

Documents
2016/10/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/09/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by András GYÜRK (EPP, HU) in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’.

Whilst welcoming the Commission communication, Members stressed that an EU strategy for LNG must be consistent with the framework strategy for a resilient Energy Union , so as to contribute to increased security of energy supply, decarbonisation, the long-term sustainability of the economy and the delivery of affordable and competitive energy prices.

Members agreed with the assessment of the Commission that Member States in the Baltic Sea region and in central and south-eastern Europe, and Ireland – despite the huge infrastructure development efforts realised by certain Member States – are still heavily reliant on a single supplier and are exposed to supply shocks and disruptions. The availability of LNG, including supporting pipeline infrastructure, in these Member States could significantly improve the current supply security situation, contributing to more competitive energy prices.

The resolution stressed the need to:

make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible and develop a strategy that aims at lessening EU gas dependency in the long term ; promote, before supporting new regasification terminals, the most efficient use of existing LNG terminals from a cross-border perspective, so to avoid technology lock-in or stranded assets in fossil fuel infrastructure and ensure that consumers do not have to bear the costs of any new projects.

Completing missing infrastructure

As regards the LNG infrastructure , Members highlighted the importance of:

giving priority to market-based solutions and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level; carrying out a careful analysis of LNG supply alternatives and options from a regional as well as an environmentally sustainable perspective, before deciding on new infrastructure; cooperating a regional level when building new LNG terminals and interconnections: Member States with access to the sea should cooperate closely with landlocked countries in order to avoid over-investment in unnecessary and uneconomic projects.

The Commission and the Member States are called upon to:

put in place strategies to support facilities that can be used in the future to manage the transfer and storage of renewable natural gas; fully implement key projects of common interest (PCIs), and to assign high priority primarily to the most economically and environmentally efficient.

Regarding storage infrastructure , Members recalled that the cross-border accessibility of gas storages is one of the key tools to implement the principle of energy solidarity during gas shortages and emergency crisis. They emphasised that a more extensive use of Ukraine’s storage capacity will only be possible if an appropriate and stable commercial and legal framework and the integrity of supply infrastructure is guaranteed in Ukraine. The EU should support Ukraine in transitioning from dependency on Russian natural gas to LNG.

Connecting LNG and storage to markets : the report emphasised the importance of the work of regional high-level groups , such as the Central East South Europe Gas Connectivity High Level Group (CESEC), the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP) and the South-West Europe group.

Members are called upon to:

find cost-efficient and environmentally sustainable energy supply options to increase long-term security of supply for the Iberian peninsula, Central and South-East Europe, the Baltic states and Ireland; support the most vulnerable countries that continue to remain energy islands, such as Cyprus and Malta; prioritise gas production in the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Caspian regions, as well as for interconnecting landlocked countries in Central and South-East Europe to these new capacities in order to diversify supply sources in those regions.

Making the EU an attractive market for LNG : Members urged the Member States to fully implement the Third Energy Package . They highlighted the important role that well-interconnected liquid gas hubs play on the gas markets that would ensure a single integrated market where gas can freely flow across borders in line with market price signals. They urged stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possible.

Gas storage in the internal market : the report highlighted the need to develop harmonised tariff structures across the EU and to increase transparency in tariff definition in order to achieve a higher utilisation rate of existing gas storages. It urged the Member States to fully implement the third energy package, particularly in relation to the provisions on granting access to bio-methane to the grid and to storage facilities. It also underlined the importance of eliminating regulatory barriers to developing regional storage concepts.

Role of the EU as a player on international LNG markets : Members considered that, through its emergence as an important market, the EU can contribute to the evolution of gas trading rules with a view to improved flexibility and the convergence of global gas markets.

In order to do so:

the EU’s trade policy should enhance the Union’s and Member States’ energy diversification and reduce their dependency on imported energy from too few suppliers; the EU should play a more proactive role in the international energy diplomacy arena : it should explore new partnerships, review its existing ones and hold specific energy talks with other partners in areas such as – but not limited to – Central Asia, North Africa and the Americas; coherence between the EU’s trade and energy policies should be enhanced.

Sustainability and the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport, heat and power : Members acknowledged the potential of LNG as an alternative fuel, both in road and maritime transport. They underlined that wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the decrease of global CO2, SOx, and NOx emissions, especially through using more LNG engines in maritime transport.

The report recommended, inter alia :

the creation of a joint project with the Member States and their regions, a common project of ‘ LNG Blue Corridors for Islands ’ for the maritime sector, including ports of the TEN-T Comprehensive Network; the implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU as regards the establishment of CNG refuelling points , so as to ensure that motor vehicles running on that fuel can circulate in urban/suburban agglomerations and other densely populated areas, and at least along the existing TEN-T Core Network; the adoption of measures to promote: (i) the development of vessels and motor vehicles running on LNG; (ii) transport of LNG by rail; (iii) the development of an efficient network of refuelling infrastructure in order to close the existing gaps in provision and create a complete supply network.

Documents
2016/09/26
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/09/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/09/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/08/31
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/08/04
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2016/07/19
   DE_BUNDESTAG - Contribution
Documents
2016/07/14
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/06/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/06/16
   RO_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2016/06/05
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2016/05/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/04/27
   EP - ZORRINHO Carlos (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/04/26
   RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2016/04/07
   EP - MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2016/02/23
   EP - GYÜRK András (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2016/02/16
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present an EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage.

BACKGROUND: the Commission's " Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy " gives concrete expression to the EU's ambition to bring about a transition to a sustainable, secure and competitive energy system.

As stressed in the Communication on the State of the Energy Union , the geopolitical challenges linked to ensuring secure and resilient supplies of fossil fuels also remain significant, particularly as regards commodities for which the EU is highly dependent on imports.

In this context, the Commission considers that the further diversification of the EU's natural gas supply remains a key objective, particularly as domestic production in the EU will continue to decline in coming decades. Vulnerability due to increasing import dependency can also be mitigated if the gas system remains flexible and able to respond to fluctuations in supply.

As regards LNG , the prospect of a dramatic (50%) expansion in global supply over the next few years and consequently of lower prices presents a major opportunity for the EU, particularly when it comes to gas security and resilience. Four Member States in the Baltic, central-eastern and south-eastern European regions are heavily dependent on a single supplier, and hence vulnerable to supply interruptions. These Member States need rapidly to develop access to a diverse range of energy sources, and the availability of LNG could make a major contribution in this regard.

LNG can also bring benefits in terms of competitiveness , as markets become exposed to greater competitive challenges from international suppliers.

In addition to improving security and competitiveness, LNG has the potential in some cases to reduce environmental impacts , and hence support the EU's sustainability objective.

Lastly, robust and sufficient gas storage facilities are crucial to energy security and resilience in times of major supply disruption. However, as with LNG, the full potential of storage to contribute to gas security and resilience is not currently being exploited.

This strategy, which has been prepared in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, goes into the above issues in further detail and draws conclusions as to what specific measures may be necessary.

CONTENT: the present strategy aims to exploit the potential of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas storage to make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible, thus contributing to the key Energy Union objective of a secure, resilient and competitive gas supply. To exploit the full potential of access to a growing international LNG market and to make the EU an attractive market for suppliers the EU needs to:

1) Ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place to complete the internal market and allow all Member States to benefit from access to international LNG markets, either directly or via other Member States. This is particularly urgent for Member States that are overly dependent on a single supplier. The EU's current LNG terminals provide sufficient overall regasification capacity, with further additions planned. However, they are not optimally distributed across the EU. To meet the challenge of non-optimal distribution of LNG terminals, the Commission feels that increased interconnection to liquid hubs where gas from existing LNG terminals or from pipeline sources is traded would improve security of supply for those Member States who currently have access to only a limited number of supply sources, while also helping to integrate markets across borders.

According to the Commission’s analysis, the implementation of key projects of common interest supported in the high-level groups set up under the TEN-E policy will remove, or at least mitigate, the main vulnerabilities identified by the gas stress tests. It is therefore vital that the missing infrastructure links rapidly be constructed, and the requisite measures taken to promote liquid and competitive markets, including those to enable access to LNG and to promote new liquid hubs in the central and south eastern, Baltic and south western regions and the Mediterranean . The Commission supports the work being carried out in the high-level groups and encourages Member States and project promoters to accelerate final decisions on these key projects as a priority.

2) Complete the internal gas market : the EU needs to complete the internal gas market so that it sends the right price signals – both to attract LNG to where it is needed and to allow the necessary investments in infrastructure to take place. It is therefore crucial that Member States, in cooperation with national regulatory authorities (NRAs), take all necessary action to complete the internal gas market, eliminate the remaining regulatory, commercial and legal barriers and provide access for these markets to effective regional gas hubs.

3) Improve the role of storage to ensure security of gas supply : where the geological conditions allow for it, storage plays a major role in balancing the usual daily and seasonal fluctuation of supply and demand. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across Member States' borders and at regional level, both under normal market conditions and in crisis situations, could be improved.

Building on the proposed revision of the Gas Security of Supply Regulation , the Commission calls on Member States to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across borders through regional preventive action and emergency plans.

The Commission also invites Member States to take action in the context of these plans to facilitate the availability of and access to storage on a wider regional level.

4) Cooperate more closely with international partners in promoting free, liquid and transparent LNG markets around the world. This means continuing to work closely with other current and potential suppliers such as Qatar, Nigeria, Egypt, Angola, Mozambique, Tanzania, Israel, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Libya) and with other major LNG importers such as Japan, South Korea, China and India, to eliminate obstacles LNG trade in world markets.

5) Support the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport : the Commission calls on Member States ensure full implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU on alternative fuels, including the establishment of LNG refuelling points across the TEN-T corridors and at maritime and inland ports. The EU should also continue to support the growth of LNG as an alternative fuel where it replaces more polluting conventional fuels and does not take the place of renewable energy sources, consistent with sustainability goals.

The Commission will report on progress as regards the strategic LNG and storage objectives presented here in its annual State of the Energy Union, identifying, any additional measures required.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - Am 2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 353, -: 340, 0: 6
IT ES BE SE PT DK EL EE CY NL IE RO BG FI LT LU HR MT AT SI DE LV HU SK GB FR CZ PL
Total
69
50
20
20
21
10
20
5
6
25
10
27
16
13
9
5
7
5
17
8
91
6
20
13
67
70
19
49
icon: S&D S&D
178

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 3/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 557, -: 107, 0: 28
DE PL IT ES GB RO FR BE HU BG SE NL PT SK CZ FI DK LT AT SI HR LV EE MT LU IE CY EL
Total
90
48
69
50
66
26
70
20
20
16
20
25
21
13
19
12
10
9
17
8
7
6
5
5
4
10
6
19
icon: PPE PPE
200

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

6

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
37

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 10/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 527, -: 137, 0: 35
DE IT FR ES RO AT NL HU SE PT BG BE FI CZ DK SI LT SK IE LV LU HR EE PL MT CY EL GB
Total
91
69
70
50
27
17
25
20
20
21
16
20
13
19
10
8
9
13
10
6
5
7
5
49
5
6
20
67
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 11 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 364, -: 321, 0: 12
IT ES NL EL SE DE DK PT FI BE CY LT EE IE RO HR LU MT AT BG SI LV HU SK CZ GB FR PL
Total
69
50
25
20
20
91
10
21
12
19
6
9
5
10
27
7
5
5
17
16
8
6
20
13
19
67
70
49
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
63
2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 24/3 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 507, -: 155, 0: 33
DE PL GB ES RO IT BG PT CZ SK BE HU SE FI FR NL DK LT HR SI LU LV EE MT IE AT CY EL
Total
90
49
67
50
27
69
16
21
19
13
19
20
20
13
70
25
10
9
7
8
4
6
5
5
10
16
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 24/4 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 542, -: 101, 0: 47
DE GB PL ES RO SE FR IT BG HU BE NL CZ PT SK FI DK LT AT HR SI LV LU EE IE MT CY EL
Total
88
67
49
49
27
20
70
67
15
19
19
25
18
21
13
13
10
9
17
7
8
7
5
5
10
5
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1
2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

4

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 24/5 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 495, -: 160, 0: 33
DE PL GB RO ES IT BG CZ SK HU SE NL PT FR LT FI HR SI BE LU LV DK IE EE AT MT CY EL
Total
89
48
67
26
49
68
16
19
13
20
20
25
20
67
9
13
7
8
19
5
7
9
10
5
17
5
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
196

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

2
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

6

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 29/1 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 629, 0: 43, -: 26
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO SE HU NL PT BG CZ BE AT SK FI EL IE DK LT SI HR LV LU EE MT CY
Total
91
69
70
49
50
67
27
20
20
25
21
16
19
19
17
13
12
20
10
10
9
8
7
7
5
5
5
6
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 29/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 516, -: 142, 0: 38
DE PL FR RO IT GB ES BG BE HU CZ SK PT LT NL FI HR AT SI SE LU EE DK LV MT IE CY EL
Total
90
47
70
27
69
66
50
16
20
20
19
13
21
9
25
13
7
17
8
20
5
5
10
7
5
10
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
202

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

2
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 31 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 528, -: 98, 0: 70
PL GB ES IT DE RO SE HU BG NL FR PT SK BE IE DK CZ LT AT HR FI SI LU EE MT LV CY EL
Total
49
66
50
69
90
27
20
20
16
25
69
21
13
19
10
10
19
9
17
7
13
8
5
5
5
7
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
177
4

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
37
2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 32/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 460, -: 198, 0: 39
PL RO ES GB IT CZ PT SK HU BG BE SE DK LT NL LU HR DE FI SI MT LV EE IE AT CY EL FR
Total
49
27
50
67
69
19
21
13
20
14
20
20
10
9
25
5
7
90
13
8
5
7
5
10
17
6
20
70
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Czechia S&D

3
4

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 33 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 560, -: 109, 0: 23
DE PL IT GB ES RO FR BE AT HU BG CZ SE PT SK NL FI DK LT SI HR LV LU EE MT IE CY EL
Total
90
49
68
67
49
26
69
20
17
19
15
19
20
21
13
24
13
10
9
8
7
7
5
5
5
10
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 40/1 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 578, -: 108, 0: 11
DE IT PL GB ES RO FR BE HU BG SE NL PT SK AT FI CZ DK LT SI HR LV LU MT EE IE CY EL
Total
90
69
49
67
50
27
70
20
20
16
20
25
21
13
17
13
18
10
9
8
7
7
5
5
4
10
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
202

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Czechia ECR

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 40/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 337, -: 321, 0: 28
PL BG CZ BE FI SK HU RO HR SI LT NL LU LV EE DK MT FR IE AT PT DE ES CY SE EL GB IT
Total
48
16
19
18
13
13
19
24
7
8
9
25
5
7
4
10
5
67
10
16
21
91
50
6
20
20
67
67
icon: PPE PPE
198

Croatia PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: S&D S&D
176

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 46/2 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 560, -: 131, 0: 4
DE PL GB ES RO FR IT BE BG HU SE NL CZ PT SK FI DK LT AT SI HR LV LU MT EE IE CY EL
Total
90
49
65
50
27
69
69
20
16
20
20
25
19
21
13
13
10
9
17
8
7
7
5
5
4
10
6
20
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 54 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 439, -: 199, 0: 55
PL DE RO IT GB BG SK CZ HU PT DK FI LT SI LU HR LV MT BE EE NL ES SE IE AT CY EL FR
Total
49
90
26
69
67
16
13
19
20
21
10
12
8
8
5
7
7
5
20
4
25
49
20
10
17
6
20
69
icon: PPE PPE
203

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Belgium S&D

4

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

2
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - § 55 #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 439, -: 184, 0: 67
PL DE GB RO IT BG SK CZ HU PT FI LT BE LU HR DK SI MT EE LV NL ES SE CY IE AT EL FR
Total
49
90
65
27
68
16
13
19
19
21
13
9
20
5
7
10
7
5
4
7
25
49
20
6
10
17
20
68
icon: PPE PPE
200

Lithuania PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

3

Belgium S&D

4

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

2
2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
38
2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

A8-0278/2016 - András Gyürk - Résolution #

2016/10/25 Outcome: +: 415, -: 223, 0: 55
RO DE ES IT HU BG BE PT PL FI SK LT HR SI NL SE LU DK MT CZ EE CY AT LV EL IE FR GB
Total
27
89
50
69
20
16
20
21
49
12
13
9
7
8
25
19
5
9
5
19
4
6
17
7
20
10
69
67
icon: PPE PPE
202

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

2
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
532 2016/2059(INI)
2016/06/02 AFET 52 amendments...
source: 583.931
2016/06/16 ITRE 265 amendments...
source: 584.007
2016/06/22 TRAN 93 amendments...
source: 584.117
2016/07/18 INTA 122 amendments...
source: 587.457

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/7
date
2016-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESTAG
docs/7
date
2016-07-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESTAG
docs/8
date
2016-06-16T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
docs/8
date
2016-06-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
docs/9
date
2016-08-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/9
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/10
date
2016-11-06T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/10
date
2016-11-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/11
date
2016-06-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/11
date
2016-06-06T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/12
date
2016-04-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
RO_SENATE
docs/12
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049
type
Contribution
body
RO_SENATE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: GYÜRK András date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: GYÜRK András date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis date: 2016-05-04T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/2/rapporteur
  • name: KOULOGLOU Stelios date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.327
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-582327_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.007
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-584007_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.256&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-582256_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.452&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-585452_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE583.876&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-583876_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.261&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-584261_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-09-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0278_EN.html title: A8-0278/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-09-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0278_EN.html title: A8-0278/2016
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-10-24-TOC_EN.html
events/6
date
2016-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0406_EN.html title: T8-0406/2016
summary
events/6
date
2016-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0406_EN.html title: T8-0406/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: GYÜRK András date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GYÜRK András group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis date: 2016-05-04T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-05-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: KOULOGLOU Stelios date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOULOGLOU Stelios group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: ZORRINHO Carlos date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZORRINHO Carlos group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2016-04-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/6/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0278&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0278_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0406
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0406_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0049/COM_COM(2016)0049_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0049 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0049:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy Commissioner: ARIAS CAÑETE Miguel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2016-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: ZORRINHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KOULOGLOU Stelios body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZANONATO Flavio group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: PUNSET Carolina group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: DALUNDE Jakop group: EFD name: PAKSAS Rolandas group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: GYÜRK András body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: EPP name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia
  • date: 2016-09-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2016-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: ZORRINHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KOULOGLOU Stelios body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZANONATO Flavio group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: PUNSET Carolina group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: DALUNDE Jakop group: EFD name: PAKSAS Rolandas group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: GYÜRK András body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: EPP name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia
  • date: 2016-09-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0278&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0278/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0406 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0406/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy commissioner: ARIAS CAÑETE Miguel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GYÜRK András group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2016-05-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-05-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ZORRINHO Carlos
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOULOGLOU Stelios group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZORRINHO Carlos group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: KOULOGLOU Stelios
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: EPP name: GYÜRK András
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2016-04-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2016-04-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: EPP name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia
docs
  • date: 2016-05-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.327 title: PE582.327 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.007 title: PE584.007 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.256&secondRef=03 title: PE582.256 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-08-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.452&secondRef=02 title: PE585.452 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE583.876&secondRef=02 title: PE583.876 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.261&secondRef=02 title: PE584.261 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27625&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)54 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2016-07-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESTAG
  • date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: RO_CHAMBER
  • date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: IT_CHAMBER
  • date: 2016-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2016-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0049 title: COM(2016)0049 type: Contribution body: RO_SENATE
events
  • date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0049/COM_COM(2016)0049_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0049 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0049 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present an EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage. BACKGROUND: the Commission's " Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy " gives concrete expression to the EU's ambition to bring about a transition to a sustainable, secure and competitive energy system. As stressed in the Communication on the State of the Energy Union , the geopolitical challenges linked to ensuring secure and resilient supplies of fossil fuels also remain significant, particularly as regards commodities for which the EU is highly dependent on imports. In this context, the Commission considers that the further diversification of the EU's natural gas supply remains a key objective, particularly as domestic production in the EU will continue to decline in coming decades. Vulnerability due to increasing import dependency can also be mitigated if the gas system remains flexible and able to respond to fluctuations in supply. As regards LNG , the prospect of a dramatic (50%) expansion in global supply over the next few years and consequently of lower prices presents a major opportunity for the EU, particularly when it comes to gas security and resilience. Four Member States in the Baltic, central-eastern and south-eastern European regions are heavily dependent on a single supplier, and hence vulnerable to supply interruptions. These Member States need rapidly to develop access to a diverse range of energy sources, and the availability of LNG could make a major contribution in this regard. LNG can also bring benefits in terms of competitiveness , as markets become exposed to greater competitive challenges from international suppliers. In addition to improving security and competitiveness, LNG has the potential in some cases to reduce environmental impacts , and hence support the EU's sustainability objective. Lastly, robust and sufficient gas storage facilities are crucial to energy security and resilience in times of major supply disruption. However, as with LNG, the full potential of storage to contribute to gas security and resilience is not currently being exploited. This strategy, which has been prepared in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, goes into the above issues in further detail and draws conclusions as to what specific measures may be necessary. CONTENT: the present strategy aims to exploit the potential of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas storage to make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible, thus contributing to the key Energy Union objective of a secure, resilient and competitive gas supply. To exploit the full potential of access to a growing international LNG market and to make the EU an attractive market for suppliers the EU needs to: 1) Ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place to complete the internal market and allow all Member States to benefit from access to international LNG markets, either directly or via other Member States. This is particularly urgent for Member States that are overly dependent on a single supplier. The EU's current LNG terminals provide sufficient overall regasification capacity, with further additions planned. However, they are not optimally distributed across the EU. To meet the challenge of non-optimal distribution of LNG terminals, the Commission feels that increased interconnection to liquid hubs where gas from existing LNG terminals or from pipeline sources is traded would improve security of supply for those Member States who currently have access to only a limited number of supply sources, while also helping to integrate markets across borders. According to the Commission’s analysis, the implementation of key projects of common interest supported in the high-level groups set up under the TEN-E policy will remove, or at least mitigate, the main vulnerabilities identified by the gas stress tests. It is therefore vital that the missing infrastructure links rapidly be constructed, and the requisite measures taken to promote liquid and competitive markets, including those to enable access to LNG and to promote new liquid hubs in the central and south eastern, Baltic and south western regions and the Mediterranean . The Commission supports the work being carried out in the high-level groups and encourages Member States and project promoters to accelerate final decisions on these key projects as a priority. 2) Complete the internal gas market : the EU needs to complete the internal gas market so that it sends the right price signals – both to attract LNG to where it is needed and to allow the necessary investments in infrastructure to take place. It is therefore crucial that Member States, in cooperation with national regulatory authorities (NRAs), take all necessary action to complete the internal gas market, eliminate the remaining regulatory, commercial and legal barriers and provide access for these markets to effective regional gas hubs. 3) Improve the role of storage to ensure security of gas supply : where the geological conditions allow for it, storage plays a major role in balancing the usual daily and seasonal fluctuation of supply and demand. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across Member States' borders and at regional level, both under normal market conditions and in crisis situations, could be improved. Building on the proposed revision of the Gas Security of Supply Regulation , the Commission calls on Member States to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across borders through regional preventive action and emergency plans. The Commission also invites Member States to take action in the context of these plans to facilitate the availability of and access to storage on a wider regional level. 4) Cooperate more closely with international partners in promoting free, liquid and transparent LNG markets around the world. This means continuing to work closely with other current and potential suppliers such as Qatar, Nigeria, Egypt, Angola, Mozambique, Tanzania, Israel, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Libya) and with other major LNG importers such as Japan, South Korea, China and India, to eliminate obstacles LNG trade in world markets. 5) Support the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport : the Commission calls on Member States ensure full implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU on alternative fuels, including the establishment of LNG refuelling points across the TEN-T corridors and at maritime and inland ports. The EU should also continue to support the growth of LNG as an alternative fuel where it replaces more polluting conventional fuels and does not take the place of renewable energy sources, consistent with sustainability goals. The Commission will report on progress as regards the strategic LNG and storage objectives presented here in its annual State of the Energy Union, identifying, any additional measures required.
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0278&language=EN title: A8-0278/2016 summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by András GYÜRK (EPP, HU) in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’. Whilst welcoming the Commission communication, Members stressed that an EU strategy for LNG must be consistent with the framework strategy for a resilient Energy Union , so as to contribute to increased security of energy supply, decarbonisation, the long-term sustainability of the economy and the delivery of affordable and competitive energy prices. Members agreed with the assessment of the Commission that Member States in the Baltic Sea region and in central and south-eastern Europe, and Ireland – despite the huge infrastructure development efforts realised by certain Member States – are still heavily reliant on a single supplier and are exposed to supply shocks and disruptions. The availability of LNG, including supporting pipeline infrastructure, in these Member States could significantly improve the current supply security situation, contributing to more competitive energy prices. The resolution stressed the need to: make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible and develop a strategy that aims at lessening EU gas dependency in the long term ; promote, before supporting new regasification terminals, the most efficient use of existing LNG terminals from a cross-border perspective, so to avoid technology lock-in or stranded assets in fossil fuel infrastructure and ensure that consumers do not have to bear the costs of any new projects. Completing missing infrastructure As regards the LNG infrastructure , Members highlighted the importance of: giving priority to market-based solutions and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level; carrying out a careful analysis of LNG supply alternatives and options from a regional as well as an environmentally sustainable perspective, before deciding on new infrastructure; cooperating a regional level when building new LNG terminals and interconnections: Member States with access to the sea should cooperate closely with landlocked countries in order to avoid over-investment in unnecessary and uneconomic projects. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to: put in place strategies to support facilities that can be used in the future to manage the transfer and storage of renewable natural gas; fully implement key projects of common interest (PCIs), and to assign high priority primarily to the most economically and environmentally efficient. Regarding storage infrastructure , Members recalled that the cross-border accessibility of gas storages is one of the key tools to implement the principle of energy solidarity during gas shortages and emergency crisis. They emphasised that a more extensive use of Ukraine’s storage capacity will only be possible if an appropriate and stable commercial and legal framework and the integrity of supply infrastructure is guaranteed in Ukraine. The EU should support Ukraine in transitioning from dependency on Russian natural gas to LNG. Connecting LNG and storage to markets : the report emphasised the importance of the work of regional high-level groups , such as the Central East South Europe Gas Connectivity High Level Group (CESEC), the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP) and the South-West Europe group. Members are called upon to: find cost-efficient and environmentally sustainable energy supply options to increase long-term security of supply for the Iberian peninsula, Central and South-East Europe, the Baltic states and Ireland; support the most vulnerable countries that continue to remain energy islands, such as Cyprus and Malta; prioritise gas production in the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Caspian regions, as well as for interconnecting landlocked countries in Central and South-East Europe to these new capacities in order to diversify supply sources in those regions. Making the EU an attractive market for LNG : Members urged the Member States to fully implement the Third Energy Package . They highlighted the important role that well-interconnected liquid gas hubs play on the gas markets that would ensure a single integrated market where gas can freely flow across borders in line with market price signals. They urged stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possible. Gas storage in the internal market : the report highlighted the need to develop harmonised tariff structures across the EU and to increase transparency in tariff definition in order to achieve a higher utilisation rate of existing gas storages. It urged the Member States to fully implement the third energy package, particularly in relation to the provisions on granting access to bio-methane to the grid and to storage facilities. It also underlined the importance of eliminating regulatory barriers to developing regional storage concepts. Role of the EU as a player on international LNG markets : Members considered that, through its emergence as an important market, the EU can contribute to the evolution of gas trading rules with a view to improved flexibility and the convergence of global gas markets. In order to do so: the EU’s trade policy should enhance the Union’s and Member States’ energy diversification and reduce their dependency on imported energy from too few suppliers; the EU should play a more proactive role in the international energy diplomacy arena : it should explore new partnerships, review its existing ones and hold specific energy talks with other partners in areas such as – but not limited to – Central Asia, North Africa and the Americas; coherence between the EU’s trade and energy policies should be enhanced. Sustainability and the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport, heat and power : Members acknowledged the potential of LNG as an alternative fuel, both in road and maritime transport. They underlined that wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the decrease of global CO2, SOx, and NOx emissions, especially through using more LNG engines in maritime transport. The report recommended, inter alia : the creation of a joint project with the Member States and their regions, a common project of ‘ LNG Blue Corridors for Islands ’ for the maritime sector, including ports of the TEN-T Comprehensive Network; the implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU as regards the establishment of CNG refuelling points , so as to ensure that motor vehicles running on that fuel can circulate in urban/suburban agglomerations and other densely populated areas, and at least along the existing TEN-T Core Network; the adoption of measures to promote: (i) the development of vessels and motor vehicles running on LNG; (ii) transport of LNG by rail; (iii) the development of an efficient network of refuelling infrastructure in order to close the existing gaps in provision and create a complete supply network.
  • date: 2016-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27625&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0406 title: T8-0406/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 415 votes to 223, with 55 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’. Whilst welcoming the Commission communication, Members stressed that an EU strategy for LNG must be consistent with the framework strategy for a resilient Energy Union , so as to contribute to increased security of energy supply, decarbonisation, the long-term sustainability of the economy and the delivery of affordable and competitive energy prices. Members highlighted, in this context, current developments in global LNG markets, where oversupply has led to lower prices , presenting an opportunity to deliver lower energy costs to EU consumers through relatively cheaper gas supplies. (1) Reduce Union dependency : Members agreed with the assessment of the Commission that Member States in the Baltic Sea region and in central and south-eastern Europe, and Ireland – despite the huge infrastructure development efforts realised by certain Member States – are still heavily reliant on a single supplier and are exposed to supply shocks and disruptions. The availability of LNG, including supporting pipeline infrastructure, in these Member States could significantly improve the current supply security situation, contributing to more competitive energy prices. The resolution stressed the need to: make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible and develop a strategy that aims at lessening EU gas dependency in the long term ; promote, before supporting new regasification terminals, the most efficient use of existing LNG terminals from a cross-border perspective, so to avoid technology lock-in or stranded assets in fossil fuel infrastructure and ensure that consumers do not have to bear the costs of any new projects. (2) Completing missing infrastructure : As regards the LNG infrastructure , Members highlighted the importance of: giving priority to market-based solutions and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level; carrying out a careful analysis of LNG supply alternatives and options from a regional as well as an environmentally sustainable perspective, before deciding on new infrastructure; cooperating a regional level when building new LNG terminals and interconnections: Member States with access to the sea should cooperate closely with landlocked countries in order to avoid over-investment in unnecessary and uneconomic projects. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to: put in place strategies to support facilities that can be used in the future to manage the transfer and storage of renewable natural gas; fully implement key projects of common interest (PCIs), and to assign high priority primarily to the most economically and environmentally efficient. Regarding storage infrastructure , Members recalled that the cross-border accessibility of gas storages is one of the key tools to implement the principle of energy solidarity during gas shortages and emergency crisis. They emphasised that a more extensive use of Ukraine’s storage capacity will only be possible if an appropriate and stable commercial and legal framework and the integrity of supply infrastructure is guaranteed in Ukraine. The EU should support Ukraine in transitioning from dependency on Russian natural gas to LNG. (3) Connecting LNG and storage to markets : Parliament emphasised the importance of the work of regional high-level groups, such as the Central East South Europe Gas Connectivity High Level Group (CESEC), the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP) and the South-West Europe group. Members are called upon to: find cost-efficient and environmentally sustainable energy supply options to increase long-term security of supply for the Iberian peninsula, Central and South-East Europe, the Baltic states and Ireland; support the most vulnerable countries that continue to remain energy islands, such as Cyprus and Malta. Parliament expressed concern at the proposed doubling of capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline , and the counterproductive effects this would have on energy security and diversification of supply sources and the principle of solidarity among Member States. It considered that if, contrary to European interests, Nord Stream 2 were to be built it would necessarily require a sound assessment of LNG terminals’ accessibility and a detailed state of play on the North-South Gas Corridor. (4) Making the EU an attractive market for LNG : Members urged the Member States to fully implement the third energy package , while insisting that the completion of the internal gas market and the elimination of regulatory obstacles would greatly improve the liquidity of gas markets. They urged stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possible. (5) Gas storage in the internal market : the resolution highlighted the need to develop harmonised tariff structures across the EU and to increase transparency in tariff definition in order to achieve a higher utilisation rate of existing gas storages. Members supported the Commission’s proposal to enable the deployment of bio-methane and other renewable gases which comply with relevant EU quality standards in gas transmission, distribution and storage. (6) Role of the EU as a player on international LNG markets : Parliament supported the Commission, the European External Action Service and the Member States in their active engagement in energy diplomacy in order to promote a rule-based, transparent and well-functioning global gas market. Members considered it of key importance that the EU’s trade policy should enhance the Union’s and Member States’ energy diversification and reduce their dependency on imported energy from too few suppliers. Stressing that trade plays a key role in energy security, Members noted that strong energy partnerships, reinforced by the inclusion of energy chapters in the EU’s trade agreements , are essential tools. (7) Sustainability and the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport, heat and power : Members acknowledged the potential of LNG as an alternative fuel, both in road and maritime transport. They underlined that wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the decrease of global CO2, SOx, and NOx emissions, especially through using more LNG engines in maritime transport . The report recommended, inter alia: the creation of a common project of ‘ LNG Blue Corridors for Islands ’ for the maritime sector, including ports of the TEN-T Comprehensive Network; the adoption of measures to promote: (i) the development of vessels and motor vehicles running on LNG; (ii) transport of LNG by rail; (iii) the development of an efficient network of refuelling infrastructure in order to close the existing gaps in provision and create a complete supply network. Lastly, Parliament noted that the use of small-scale LNG technology in certain areas, such as long-range transportation or industrial high-performance applications , could not only contribute to climate policy objectives but also result in significant business advantage. It also noted that LNG, and in particular CNG, is also a viable solution for public transport.
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy commissioner: ARIAS CAÑETE Miguel
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/8/06297
New
  • ITRE/8/06297
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60.03 Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
  • 3.60.08 Energy efficiency
  • 3.60.10 Security of energy supply
  • 3.60.15 Cooperation and agreements for energy
New
3.60.03
Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
3.60.08
Energy efficiency
3.60.10
Security of energy supply
3.60.15
Cooperation and agreements for energy
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0278&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0278/2016
activities/4
date
2016-10-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/date
Old
2016-10-27T00:00:00
New
2016-10-25T00:00:00
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0406 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0406/2016
activities/5/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/date
Old
2016-10-24T00:00:00
New
2016-10-27T00:00:00
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2016-09-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2016-09-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4/mepref
Old
53b2d955b819f205b000005b
New
57561460d1d1c56f91000000
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4/name
Old
ERIKSSON Peter
New
DALUNDE Jakop
committees/4/shadows/4/mepref
Old
53b2d955b819f205b000005b
New
57561460d1d1c56f91000000
committees/4/shadows/4/name
Old
ERIKSSON Peter
New
DALUNDE Jakop
activities/1/committees/3/date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KOULOGLOU Stelios
committees/3/date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: KOULOGLOU Stelios
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to present an EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage.

    BACKGROUND: the Commission's "Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy" gives concrete expression to the EU's ambition to bring about a transition to a sustainable, secure and competitive energy system.

    As stressed in the Communication on the State of the Energy Union, the geopolitical challenges linked to ensuring secure and resilient supplies of fossil fuels also remain significant, particularly as regards commodities for which the EU is highly dependent on imports.

    In this context, the Commission considers that the further diversification of the EU's natural gas supply remains a key objective, particularly as domestic production in the EU will continue to decline in coming decades. Vulnerability due to increasing import dependency can also be mitigated if the gas system remains flexible and able to respond to fluctuations in supply.

    As regards LNG, the prospect of a dramatic (50%) expansion in global supply over the next few years and consequently of lower prices presents a major opportunity for the EU, particularly when it comes to gas security and resilience. Four Member States in the Baltic, central-eastern and south-eastern European regions are heavily dependent on a single supplier, and hence vulnerable to supply interruptions. These Member States need rapidly to develop access to a diverse range of energy sources, and the availability of LNG could make a major contribution in this regard.

    LNG can also bring benefits in terms of competitiveness, as markets become exposed to greater competitive challenges from international suppliers.

    In addition to improving security and competitiveness, LNG has the potential in some cases to reduce environmental impacts, and hence support the EU's sustainability objective.

    Lastly, robust and sufficient gas storage facilities are crucial to energy security and resilience in times of major supply disruption. However, as with LNG, the full potential of storage to contribute to gas security and resilience is not currently being exploited.

    This strategy, which has been prepared in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, goes into the above issues in further detail and draws conclusions as to what specific measures may be necessary.

    CONTENT: the present strategy aims to exploit the potential of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas storage to make the EU gas system more diverse and flexible, thus contributing to the key Energy Union objective of a secure, resilient and competitive gas supply. To exploit the full potential of access to a growing international LNG market and to make the EU an attractive market for suppliers the EU needs to:

    1) Ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place to complete the internal market and allow all Member States to benefit from access to international LNG markets, either directly or via other Member States. This is particularly urgent for Member States that are overly dependent on a single supplier. The EU's current LNG terminals provide sufficient overall regasification capacity, with further additions planned. However, they are not optimally distributed across the EU. To meet the challenge of non-optimal distribution of LNG terminals, the Commission feels that increased interconnection to liquid hubs where gas from existing LNG terminals or from pipeline sources is traded would improve security of supply for those Member States who currently have access to only a limited number of supply sources, while also helping to integrate markets across borders.

    According to the Commission’s analysis, the implementation of key projects of common interest supported in the high-level groups set up under the TEN-E policy will remove, or at least mitigate, the main vulnerabilities identified by the gas stress tests. It is therefore vital that the missing infrastructure links rapidly be constructed, and the requisite measures taken to promote liquid and competitive markets, including those to enable access to LNG and to promote new liquid hubs in the central and south eastern, Baltic and south western regions and the Mediterranean. The Commission supports the work being carried out in the high-level groups and encourages Member States and project promoters to accelerate final decisions on these key projects as a priority.

    2) Complete the internal gas market: the EU needs to complete the internal gas market so that it sends the right price signals – both to attract LNG to where it is needed and to allow the necessary investments in infrastructure to take place. It is therefore crucial that Member States, in cooperation with national regulatory authorities (NRAs), take all necessary action to complete the internal gas market, eliminate the remaining regulatory, commercial and legal barriers and provide access for these markets to effective regional gas hubs.

    3) Improve the role of storage to ensure security of gas supply: where the geological conditions allow for it, storage plays a major role in balancing the usual daily and seasonal fluctuation of supply and demand. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across Member States' borders and at regional level, both under normal market conditions and in crisis situations, could be improved.

    Building on the proposed revision of the Gas Security of Supply Regulation, the Commission calls on Member States to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of storage across borders through regional preventive action and emergency plans.

    The Commission also invites Member States to take action in the context of these plans to facilitate the availability of and access to storage on a wider regional level.

    4) Cooperate more closely with international partners in promoting free, liquid and transparent LNG markets around the world. This means continuing to work closely with other current and potential suppliers such as Qatar, Nigeria, Egypt, Angola, Mozambique, Tanzania, Israel, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Libya) and with other major LNG importers such as Japan, South Korea, China and India, to eliminate obstacles LNG trade in world markets.

    5) Support the use of LNG as an alternative fuel in transport: the Commission calls on Member States ensure full implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU on alternative fuels, including the establishment of LNG refuelling points across the TEN-T corridors and at maritime and inland ports. The EU should also continue to support the growth of LNG as an alternative fuel where it replaces more polluting conventional fuels and does not take the place of renewable energy sources, consistent with sustainability goals.

    The Commission will report on progress as regards the strategic LNG and storage objectives presented here in its annual State of the Energy Union, identifying, any additional measures required.

activities/2
date
2016-10-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/0/date
2016-05-04T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis
committees/0/date
2016-05-04T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: HADJIGEORGIOU Takis
activities
  • date: 2016-02-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0049/COM_COM(2016)0049_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52016DC0049:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2016)0049 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy Commissioner: ARIAS CAÑETE Miguel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: ZORRINHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZANONATO Flavio group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: PUNSET Carolina group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: ERIKSSON Peter group: EFD name: PAKSAS Rolandas group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: GYÜRK András body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: EPP name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: ZORRINHO Carlos
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ZANONATO Flavio group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: PUNSET Carolina group: GUE/NGL name: SYLIKIOTIS Neoklis group: Verts/ALE name: ERIKSSON Peter group: EFD name: PAKSAS Rolandas group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: GYÜRK András
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: EPP name: MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm title: Energy commissioner: ARIAS CAÑETE Miguel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/8/06297
reference
2016/2059(INI)
title
EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject