BETA


2016/2063(INI) European Central Bank annual report for 2015

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon (icon: ALDE ALDE) MANN Thomas (icon: PPE PPE), FERNÁNDEZ Jonás (icon: S&D S&D), LUCKE Bernd (icon: ECR ECR), URTASUN Ernest (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), ANNEMANS Gerolf (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/03/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/11/22
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/11/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 131, with 140 abstentions, a resolution on the European Central Bank Annual Report for 2015.

Current context : Parliament focused on the following issues:

the euro area continues to suffer from a high level of unemployment, excessive low inflation and large macroeconomic imbalances, including current account imbalances; the euro area is facing a very low level of productivity growth , which is the result of the lack of investment – 10 percentage points below its level before the crisis –, a failure to carry out structural reforms and the weakness of internal demand; the high level of public debt , and particularly the huge number of non-performing loans and a still undercapitalised banking sector in some Member States, are still fragmenting the euro area financial market, thus reducing room for manoeuvre to support the most fragile economies.

Members acknowledged that in light of the current context, the extraordinary measures adopted by the ECB to lift inflation back up to the medium-term objective of 2 % were consistent with the terms of its mandate and therefore not illegal.

Since the launching of the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) in March 2015, and owing to targeted long-term refinancing operation (TLTRO) programmes targeted at the real economy, financial conditions have improved slightly, which has promoted a recovery in lending to firms and households in the euro area. Moreover, Parliament welcomed the European Central Bank’s categorical pledge of July 2012 to ‘ do whatever it takes ’ to defend the euro, which has been instrumental in ensuring the financial stability of the euro area.

Need for a sound budgetary policy and structural reforms : Parliament agreed that the single monetary policy alone cannot stimulate aggregate demand unless it is complemented by sound fiscal policies and ambitious and socially balanced structural reform programmes at Member State level. It stated that monetary policy alone is not the appropriate tool to solve the structural problems of the European economy.

Members insisted on the need to:

implement fully the banking union , as well as the building of a capital market union; solve the issue of non-performing loans for the worst-affected national banking sectors in order to restore a smooth transmission of monetary policy for the whole area; ensure that structural reforms take full account of the demographic deficit in Europe, in order to tackle deflationary pressures.

Unconventional measures : Members noted even though the impact risks and spillovers of unconventional measures has been significant, particularly as regards funding conditions for banks in the periphery, inflation is not expected to converge to the 2 % medium-term objective at the 2017 horizon.

Banks have been able to access funding at virtually no, or very low, cost, which has directly subsidised their balance sheets. Members deplored the fact that the size of this subsidy, despite representing a clear fiscal spillover effect of monetary policy, is not monitored and published, and that it is free from strict conditionality.

The current recovery in bank and market lending is geographically unevenly distributed among the Member States and has not so far wholly produced the expected effect on the existing investment gap in the euro area.

Members deplored the existing, albeit gradually decreasing, gaps between the financing rates granted to SMEs and those granted to bigger companies, between lending rates on small and large loans, and between credit conditions for SMEs located in different euro area countries.

The resolution emphasised that national economic policies should be coordinated, particularly within the euro area . It underlined that the unavoidable process of exiting from unconventional monetary policy will be a very complex one which will have to be carefully planned in order to avoid negative shocks on the capital markets.

Negative interest rate policy : Parliament underlined the fact that a prolonged period of flat yield curve could lessen the profitability of banks , especially if they do not adjust their business models, and could create potential risks, in particular for private savings and pension and insurance funds. A decline in the profitability of banks could dampen their willingness to develop lending activity.

The resolution called therefore for specific and continued monitoring of the negative interest rate tool, its implementation and its effects. It called on the ECB to carefully assess the risks of a future resurgence of asset and housing bubbles owing to its ultra-low (negative) interest rate policy.

Non-marketable assets : Members remain concerned by the still significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset-backed securities put forward as collateral to the eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations. They reiterated their request to the ECB to provide information on which central banks have accepted such securities and to disclose valuation methods regarding such assets. Such disclosure would be beneficial for the purpose of parliamentary scrutiny of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB.

Parliament noted that the ECB’s Asset Purchase Programme (APP) has lowered bond yields in most Member States to unprecedented levels. It warned against the risk of excessively high valuations on the bond markets, which would be difficult to handle if interest rates start to rise again in the absence of a sufficiently robust recovery, particularly for the countries involved in the excessive deficit procedure or with high levels of debt.

The Commission is called upon to examine the need for legislative proposals enabling the current Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation ( CRR / CRD IV ) to be equipped with certain measures which could effectively address specific types of systemic risk .

Lastly, on a possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU , Members recalled that President Draghi correctly stated that ‘the extent to which the economic outlook will be affected depends on the timing, development and final outcome of the upcoming negotiations and that ‘regardless of the type of relationship that emerges between the European Union and the United Kingdom, it is of utmost importance that the integrity of the single market is respected. Any outcome should ensure that all participants are subject to the same rules’.

Documents
2016/11/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/11/21
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/10/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS (ADLE, ES) on the European Central Bank Annual Report for 2015.

Members made the following observations as regards the current context:

the euro area continues to suffer from a high level of unemployment, excessive low inflation and large macroeconomic imbalances, including current account imbalances; the euro area is facing a very low level of productivity growth , which is the result of the lack of investment – 10 percentage points below its level before the crisis –, a failure to carry out structural reforms and the weakness of internal demand; the high level of public debt , and particularly the huge number of non-performing loans and a still undercapitalised banking sector in some Member States, are still fragmenting the euro area financial market, thus reducing room for manoeuvre to support the most fragile economies.

Members acknowledged that, confronted with this very complex environment and the risks of a prolonged period of low inflation, the extraordinary measures adopted by the ECB to lift inflation back up to the medium-term objective of 2 % were consistent with the terms of its mandate and therefore not illegal.

Need for a sound budgetary policy and structural reforms : Members recalled that monetary policy alone is not the appropriate tool to solve the structural problems of the European economy. They emphasised that sound fiscal policies and socially balanced structural reforms oriented towards increasing productivity are the only way of bringing about sustainable economic improvements in these Member States.

The report insisted on the need to:

implement fully the banking union, as well as the building of a capital market union , as this would be a decisive step towards improving the effectiveness of the single monetary policy and mitigating the risks arising from a shock in the financial sector; solve the issue of non-performing loans for the worst-affected national banking sectors in order to restore a smooth transmission of monetary policy for the whole area; ensure that structural and socially balanced reforms take full account of the demographic deficit in Europe, in order to tackle deflationary pressures and create incentives for a more balanced demographic structure that would make it easier to maintain an inflation target of around 2 %.

Unconventional measures : Members noted even though the impact risks and spillovers of unconventional measures has been significant, particularly as regards funding conditions for banks in the periphery, inflation is not expected to converge to the 2 % medium-term objective at the 2017 horizon.

The current recovery in bank and market lending is geographically unevenly distributed among the Member States and has not so far wholly produced the expected effect on the existing investment gap in the euro area.

Members deplored the existing, albeit gradually decreasing, gaps between the financing rates granted to SMEs and those granted to bigger companies, between lending rates on small and large loans, and between credit conditions for SMEs located in different euro area countries, but recognised the limits of what monetary policy can achieve in this respect.

The report emphasised that national economic policies should be coordinated, particularly within the euro area . It underlined that the unavoidable process of exiting from unconventional monetary policy will be a very complex one which will have to be carefully planned in order to avoid negative shocks on the capital markets.

Negative interest rate policy : Members underlined the fact that a prolonged period of flat yield curve could lessen the profitability of banks , especially if they do not adjust their business models, and could create potential risks, in particular for private savings and pension and insurance funds. A decline in the profitability of banks could dampen their willingness to develop lending activity.

The report called therefore for specific and continued monitoring of the negative interest rate tool, its implementation and its effects.

The report called on the ECB to carefully assess the risks of a future resurgence of asset and housing bubbles owing to its ultra-low (negative) interest rate policy.

Non-marketable assets : Members remain concerned by the still significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset-backed securities put forward as collateral to the eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations. They reiterated their request to the ECB to provide information on which central banks have accepted such securities and to disclose valuation methods regarding such assets. Such disclosure would be beneficial for the purpose of parliamentary scrutiny of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB.

The report noted that the ECB’s Asset Purchase Programme (APP) has lowered bond yields in most Member States to unprecedented levels; warns against the risk of excessively high valuations on the bond markets, which would be difficult to handle if interest rates start to rise again in the absence of a sufficiently robust recovery, particularly for the countries involved in the excessive deficit procedure or with high levels of debt.

The Commission is called upon to:

come forward with proposals to improve macroprudential oversight and the policy tools available for mitigating the risks in shadow banking; examine the need for legislative proposals enabling the current Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRR/CRD IV) to be equipped with certain measures which could effectively address specific types of systemic risk .

Lastly, on a possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU , Members recalled that President Draghi correctly stated that ‘the extent to which the economic outlook will be affected depends on the timing, development and final outcome of the upcoming negotiations and that ‘regardless of the type of relationship that emerges between the European Union and the United Kingdom, it is of utmost importance that the integrity of the single market is respected. Any outcome should ensure that all participants are subject to the same rules’.

Documents
2016/10/11
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/08/22
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/06/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/02/04
   EP - TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - § 3 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 491, -: 149, 0: 53
DE ES RO FR SE IT HU PT NL CZ BE AT BG FI HR SI LV SK LT IE EE MT LU DK PL EL CY GB
Total
89
49
30
68
20
68
18
18
25
20
21
18
14
12
10
8
8
12
10
8
6
6
5
11
50
19
6
63
icon: PPE PPE
199

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - Am 6 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: -: 516, +: 89, 0: 88
GB LU CY SI IE EE MT FI LT DK LV HR SK EL BG NL CZ AT SE BE HU PT IT PL FR RO ES DE
Total
63
5
6
8
8
6
6
12
10
11
8
11
12
18
14
25
20
18
20
21
19
18
68
50
68
30
48
89
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

1

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
172

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
3

Bulgaria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
201

Luxembourg PPE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Portugal PPE

4

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - § 6 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 471, -: 213, 0: 8
DE ES RO FR IT HU CZ PT AT BE NL SI SK BG HR LT SE EE MT LU LV DK IE EL PL FI CY GB
Total
89
49
30
68
68
19
20
18
18
21
24
8
12
14
11
10
17
6
6
5
8
11
8
20
50
12
6
63
icon: PPE PPE
201

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
169

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - § 9/3 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 480, -: 178, 0: 38
DE FR ES RO IT BE HU SE PT AT BG NL CZ HR LT SI SK EE MT LU LV IE PL DK FI EL CY GB
Total
89
68
49
30
68
21
19
20
18
18
14
25
20
11
10
8
12
6
6
5
8
8
50
11
12
20
6
63
icon: PPE PPE
201

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - § 12 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 675, -: 12, 0: 9
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO CZ SE NL HU PT AT BE BG SK HR DK LT FI LV IE SI EL EE CY MT LU
Total
90
68
68
63
49
49
30
20
20
25
19
18
18
21
14
12
11
11
10
12
8
8
8
20
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
201

Belgium PPE

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - § 16 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 682, -: 8, 0: 5
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO NL CZ SE HU PT AT BE BG EL SK HR DK LT FI LV IE SI EE CY MT LU
Total
90
68
68
62
50
49
30
25
20
20
19
18
18
20
14
20
12
11
11
10
12
8
8
8
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
201

Belgium PPE

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Greece S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - Am 5 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: -: 589, +: 74, 0: 32
IE LU EE CY MT AT LV SI DK LT FI HR EL SK BG NL HU BE CZ PT SE IT FR RO PL GB ES DE
Total
8
5
6
6
6
18
8
8
11
10
13
11
18
12
13
25
19
21
20
18
20
68
67
30
50
63
49
91
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Germany NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
171

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
202

Luxembourg PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Portugal PPE

4

A8-0302/2016 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells - Résolution #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 437, 0: 140, -: 121
DE FR RO PL ES IT BE HU BG CZ PT SE HR SK LT NL AT SI LV MT EE DK LU IE FI CY GB EL
Total
91
67
30
50
49
68
21
19
14
20
18
20
11
12
10
25
18
8
8
6
6
11
5
8
13
6
63
20
icon: PPE PPE
201

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
269 2016/2063(INI)
2016/07/27 ECON 269 amendments...
source: 587.445

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
DE MASI Fabio
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.196
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-584196_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.445
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-587445_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0302_EN.html title: A8-0302/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0302_EN.html title: A8-0302/2016
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-11-21-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0433_EN.html title: T8-0433/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0433_EN.html title: T8-0433/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0302&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0302_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0433
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0433_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: S&D name: FERNÁNDEZ Jonás group: ECR name: LUCKE Bernd group: GUE/NGL name: DE MASI Fabio group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: ANNEMANS Gerolf responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • date: 2016-10-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: S&D name: FERNÁNDEZ Jonás group: ECR name: LUCKE Bernd group: GUE/NGL name: DE MASI Fabio group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: ANNEMANS Gerolf responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0302&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0302/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0433 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0433/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: KATAINEN Jyrki
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
docs
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.196 title: PE584.196 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-08-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.445 title: PE587.445 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27727&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)148 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0302&language=EN title: A8-0302/2016 summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS (ADLE, ES) on the European Central Bank Annual Report for 2015. Members made the following observations as regards the current context: the euro area continues to suffer from a high level of unemployment, excessive low inflation and large macroeconomic imbalances, including current account imbalances; the euro area is facing a very low level of productivity growth , which is the result of the lack of investment – 10 percentage points below its level before the crisis –, a failure to carry out structural reforms and the weakness of internal demand; the high level of public debt , and particularly the huge number of non-performing loans and a still undercapitalised banking sector in some Member States, are still fragmenting the euro area financial market, thus reducing room for manoeuvre to support the most fragile economies. Members acknowledged that, confronted with this very complex environment and the risks of a prolonged period of low inflation, the extraordinary measures adopted by the ECB to lift inflation back up to the medium-term objective of 2 % were consistent with the terms of its mandate and therefore not illegal. Need for a sound budgetary policy and structural reforms : Members recalled that monetary policy alone is not the appropriate tool to solve the structural problems of the European economy. They emphasised that sound fiscal policies and socially balanced structural reforms oriented towards increasing productivity are the only way of bringing about sustainable economic improvements in these Member States. The report insisted on the need to: implement fully the banking union, as well as the building of a capital market union , as this would be a decisive step towards improving the effectiveness of the single monetary policy and mitigating the risks arising from a shock in the financial sector; solve the issue of non-performing loans for the worst-affected national banking sectors in order to restore a smooth transmission of monetary policy for the whole area; ensure that structural and socially balanced reforms take full account of the demographic deficit in Europe, in order to tackle deflationary pressures and create incentives for a more balanced demographic structure that would make it easier to maintain an inflation target of around 2 %. Unconventional measures : Members noted even though the impact risks and spillovers of unconventional measures has been significant, particularly as regards funding conditions for banks in the periphery, inflation is not expected to converge to the 2 % medium-term objective at the 2017 horizon. The current recovery in bank and market lending is geographically unevenly distributed among the Member States and has not so far wholly produced the expected effect on the existing investment gap in the euro area. Members deplored the existing, albeit gradually decreasing, gaps between the financing rates granted to SMEs and those granted to bigger companies, between lending rates on small and large loans, and between credit conditions for SMEs located in different euro area countries, but recognised the limits of what monetary policy can achieve in this respect. The report emphasised that national economic policies should be coordinated, particularly within the euro area . It underlined that the unavoidable process of exiting from unconventional monetary policy will be a very complex one which will have to be carefully planned in order to avoid negative shocks on the capital markets. Negative interest rate policy : Members underlined the fact that a prolonged period of flat yield curve could lessen the profitability of banks , especially if they do not adjust their business models, and could create potential risks, in particular for private savings and pension and insurance funds. A decline in the profitability of banks could dampen their willingness to develop lending activity. The report called therefore for specific and continued monitoring of the negative interest rate tool, its implementation and its effects. The report called on the ECB to carefully assess the risks of a future resurgence of asset and housing bubbles owing to its ultra-low (negative) interest rate policy. Non-marketable assets : Members remain concerned by the still significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset-backed securities put forward as collateral to the eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations. They reiterated their request to the ECB to provide information on which central banks have accepted such securities and to disclose valuation methods regarding such assets. Such disclosure would be beneficial for the purpose of parliamentary scrutiny of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB. The report noted that the ECB’s Asset Purchase Programme (APP) has lowered bond yields in most Member States to unprecedented levels; warns against the risk of excessively high valuations on the bond markets, which would be difficult to handle if interest rates start to rise again in the absence of a sufficiently robust recovery, particularly for the countries involved in the excessive deficit procedure or with high levels of debt. The Commission is called upon to: come forward with proposals to improve macroprudential oversight and the policy tools available for mitigating the risks in shadow banking; examine the need for legislative proposals enabling the current Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRR/CRD IV) to be equipped with certain measures which could effectively address specific types of systemic risk . Lastly, on a possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU , Members recalled that President Draghi correctly stated that ‘the extent to which the economic outlook will be affected depends on the timing, development and final outcome of the upcoming negotiations and that ‘regardless of the type of relationship that emerges between the European Union and the United Kingdom, it is of utmost importance that the integrity of the single market is respected. Any outcome should ensure that all participants are subject to the same rules’.
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27727&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0433 title: T8-0433/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 131, with 140 abstentions, a resolution on the European Central Bank Annual Report for 2015. Current context : Parliament focused on the following issues: the euro area continues to suffer from a high level of unemployment, excessive low inflation and large macroeconomic imbalances, including current account imbalances; the euro area is facing a very low level of productivity growth , which is the result of the lack of investment – 10 percentage points below its level before the crisis –, a failure to carry out structural reforms and the weakness of internal demand; the high level of public debt , and particularly the huge number of non-performing loans and a still undercapitalised banking sector in some Member States, are still fragmenting the euro area financial market, thus reducing room for manoeuvre to support the most fragile economies. Members acknowledged that in light of the current context, the extraordinary measures adopted by the ECB to lift inflation back up to the medium-term objective of 2 % were consistent with the terms of its mandate and therefore not illegal. Since the launching of the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) in March 2015, and owing to targeted long-term refinancing operation (TLTRO) programmes targeted at the real economy, financial conditions have improved slightly, which has promoted a recovery in lending to firms and households in the euro area. Moreover, Parliament welcomed the European Central Bank’s categorical pledge of July 2012 to ‘ do whatever it takes ’ to defend the euro, which has been instrumental in ensuring the financial stability of the euro area. Need for a sound budgetary policy and structural reforms : Parliament agreed that the single monetary policy alone cannot stimulate aggregate demand unless it is complemented by sound fiscal policies and ambitious and socially balanced structural reform programmes at Member State level. It stated that monetary policy alone is not the appropriate tool to solve the structural problems of the European economy. Members insisted on the need to: implement fully the banking union , as well as the building of a capital market union; solve the issue of non-performing loans for the worst-affected national banking sectors in order to restore a smooth transmission of monetary policy for the whole area; ensure that structural reforms take full account of the demographic deficit in Europe, in order to tackle deflationary pressures. Unconventional measures : Members noted even though the impact risks and spillovers of unconventional measures has been significant, particularly as regards funding conditions for banks in the periphery, inflation is not expected to converge to the 2 % medium-term objective at the 2017 horizon. Banks have been able to access funding at virtually no, or very low, cost, which has directly subsidised their balance sheets. Members deplored the fact that the size of this subsidy, despite representing a clear fiscal spillover effect of monetary policy, is not monitored and published, and that it is free from strict conditionality. The current recovery in bank and market lending is geographically unevenly distributed among the Member States and has not so far wholly produced the expected effect on the existing investment gap in the euro area. Members deplored the existing, albeit gradually decreasing, gaps between the financing rates granted to SMEs and those granted to bigger companies, between lending rates on small and large loans, and between credit conditions for SMEs located in different euro area countries. The resolution emphasised that national economic policies should be coordinated, particularly within the euro area . It underlined that the unavoidable process of exiting from unconventional monetary policy will be a very complex one which will have to be carefully planned in order to avoid negative shocks on the capital markets. Negative interest rate policy : Parliament underlined the fact that a prolonged period of flat yield curve could lessen the profitability of banks , especially if they do not adjust their business models, and could create potential risks, in particular for private savings and pension and insurance funds. A decline in the profitability of banks could dampen their willingness to develop lending activity. The resolution called therefore for specific and continued monitoring of the negative interest rate tool, its implementation and its effects. It called on the ECB to carefully assess the risks of a future resurgence of asset and housing bubbles owing to its ultra-low (negative) interest rate policy. Non-marketable assets : Members remain concerned by the still significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset-backed securities put forward as collateral to the eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations. They reiterated their request to the ECB to provide information on which central banks have accepted such securities and to disclose valuation methods regarding such assets. Such disclosure would be beneficial for the purpose of parliamentary scrutiny of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB. Parliament noted that the ECB’s Asset Purchase Programme (APP) has lowered bond yields in most Member States to unprecedented levels. It warned against the risk of excessively high valuations on the bond markets, which would be difficult to handle if interest rates start to rise again in the absence of a sufficiently robust recovery, particularly for the countries involved in the excessive deficit procedure or with high levels of debt. The Commission is called upon to examine the need for legislative proposals enabling the current Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation ( CRR / CRD IV ) to be equipped with certain measures which could effectively address specific types of systemic risk . Lastly, on a possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU , Members recalled that President Draghi correctly stated that ‘the extent to which the economic outlook will be affected depends on the timing, development and final outcome of the upcoming negotiations and that ‘regardless of the type of relationship that emerges between the European Union and the United Kingdom, it is of utmost importance that the integrity of the single market is respected. Any outcome should ensure that all participants are subject to the same rules’.
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: KATAINEN Jyrki
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/8/05938
New
  • ECON/8/05938
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 5.20.03 European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB
New
5.20.03
European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: S&D name: FERNÁNDEZ Jonás group: ECR name: LUCKE Bernd group: GUE/NGL name: DE MASI Fabio group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: ANNEMANS Gerolf responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
activities/1/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0302&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0302/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0433 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0433/2016
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
activities/1/date
Old
2016-10-10T00:00:00
New
2016-10-11T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2016-11-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
ANNEMANS Gerolf
committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
ANNEMANS Gerolf
activities
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: S&D name: FERNÁNDEZ Jonás group: ECR name: LUCKE Bernd group: GUE/NGL name: DE MASI Fabio group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • date: 2016-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: S&D name: FERNÁNDEZ Jonás group: ECR name: LUCKE Bernd group: GUE/NGL name: DE MASI Fabio group: Verts/ALE name: URTASUN Ernest group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: KATAINEN Jyrki
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/8/05938
reference
2016/2063(INI)
title
European Central Bank annual report for 2015
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
5.20.03 European Central Bank (ECB), ESCB