BETA


2016/2139(INI) Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE PREDA Cristian Dan (icon: PPE PPE) TOIA Patrizia (icon: S&D S&D), ZAHRADIL Jan (icon: ECR ECR), VÄYRYNEN Paavo (icon: ALDE ALDE), HAUTALA Heidi (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CORRAO Ignazio (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion CONT
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/03/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/11/22
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/11/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 545 votes to 39, with 92 abstentions, a resolution on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation.

Parliament recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. It insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership .

Parliament also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda.

In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC).

Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Parliament recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Parliament urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF).

Parliament called on the Member States to adopt an effective roadmap in order to achieve the commitment target in a transparent, predictable and accountable way. It warned against the dilution of ODA criteria with the aim of covering expenses other than those directly linked to promoting sustainable development in developing countries.

Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Parliament noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. It urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016. It called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation.

The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability, mobilising the private sector and its responsibility for sustainable development, transparency, policy coherence, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and South-South and triangular cooperation. This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level .

Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website, Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable.

Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Parliament called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, it demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee.

Responsibility of donors : Parliament stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. It insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results. It recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes.

More generally, Parliament encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support, as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid.

Members invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements.

The resolution welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard.

Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk.

Civil society : Parliament underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. It stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners and basic service supply partners, in order genuinely to reach the most vulnerable sections of the population.

Complementarity of aid : Parliament recalled its request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership. Parliament called for further efforts to accelerate untying of aid at global level. It called on aid providers to use partner countries’ procurement systems as a first option.

Private sector : lastly, Parliament firmly believed that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.

Documents
2016/11/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/11/21
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/11/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report by Cristian Dan PREDA (EPP, RO) on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation.

Members recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. They insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership .

Members also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce their efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda.

In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC).

Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Members recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Members urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF).

Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Members noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. They urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016.

They called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation.

The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability.

This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level .

Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website. Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable.

Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Members called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, they demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee.

Responsibility of donors : Member stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. They insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results . They recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes.

More generally, Members encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support , as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid.

They invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements .

The report welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard.

Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk.

Civil society : Members underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. They stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners.

Complementarity of aid : Members recalled their request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership.

Private sector : lastly, Members firmly believe that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.

Documents
2016/11/08
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/11/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/10/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/10/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/09/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/07/12
   EP - PREDA Cristian Dan (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda - § 5/1 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 607, 0: 47, -: 40
DE IT ES FR RO GB PL BE HU CZ PT AT SE BG NL FI SK HR DK EL LT IE LV SI EE CY MT LU
Total
89
68
47
67
30
62
50
21
19
20
18
18
20
14
25
12
12
11
11
21
10
9
8
8
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
199

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda - § 5/2 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 547, -: 102, 0: 27
DE IT ES RO FR AT PT SE HU CZ BE EL NL BG IE FI LT HR SI LV MT SK LU EE DK CY PL GB
Total
85
66
48
29
66
18
17
19
18
20
21
20
24
13
9
13
10
10
8
8
6
12
5
5
11
6
48
60
icon: PPE PPE
193

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
169

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda - § 28/1 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 637, -: 32, 0: 15
DE FR IT ES PL RO GB NL BE PT SE CZ HU BG AT FI SK EL DK LT HR IE LV SI EE CY MT LU
Total
88
67
65
48
49
30
60
25
20
18
20
19
19
14
17
12
12
21
11
10
10
9
8
8
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
200

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary NI

2

A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda - § 28/2 #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 570, -: 92, 0: 28
DE IT FR ES RO BE SE PT NL AT HU CZ EL BG IE DK SK LT FI HR SI LV EE MT LU PL CY GB
Total
90
68
68
48
30
21
20
17
25
17
19
20
21
14
9
11
11
10
12
10
8
8
6
6
5
49
6
60
icon: PPE PPE
198

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

For (1)

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

3

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda - Résolution #

2016/11/22 Outcome: +: 545, 0: 92, -: 39
DE IT PL FR ES RO GB CZ BE AT HU BG PT SK SE HR FI NL LT DK SI LV IE EL CY MT EE LU
Total
88
67
49
66
46
28
57
20
21
18
19
14
17
12
20
11
12
24
9
10
8
8
9
19
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
195

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
172

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
3
2

Denmark ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary NI

2
AmendmentsDossier
141 2016/2139(INI)
2016/10/18 DEVE 123 amendments...
source: 592.237
2016/11/04 DEVE 18 amendments...
source: 593.894

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.254
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-PR-589254_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.237
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-592237_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.894
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-593894_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-11-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0322_EN.html title: A8-0322/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-11-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0322_EN.html title: A8-0322/2016
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-11-21-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0437_EN.html title: T8-0437/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0437_EN.html title: T8-0437/2016
summary
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0322_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0437_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
activities
  • date: 2016-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: VÄYRYNEN Paavo group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
  • date: 2016-11-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: VÄYRYNEN Paavo group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
  • date: 2016-11-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0322/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0437/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
docs
  • date: 2016-10-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.254 title: PE589.254 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.237 title: PE592.237 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.894 title: PE593.894 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27807&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)148 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-09-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-11T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN title: A8-0322/2016 summary: The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report by Cristian Dan PREDA (EPP, RO) on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation. Members recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. They insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership . Members also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce their efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda. In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Members recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Members urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF). Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Members noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. They urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016. They called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation. The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability. This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level . Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website. Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable. Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Members called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, they demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee. Responsibility of donors : Member stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. They insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results . They recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. More generally, Members encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support , as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid. They invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements . The report welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard. Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk. Civil society : Members underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. They stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners. Complementarity of aid : Members recalled their request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership. Private sector : lastly, Members firmly believe that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27807&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 title: T8-0437/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 545 votes to 39, with 92 abstentions, a resolution on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation. Parliament recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. It insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership . Parliament also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda. In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Parliament recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Parliament urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF). Parliament called on the Member States to adopt an effective roadmap in order to achieve the commitment target in a transparent, predictable and accountable way. It warned against the dilution of ODA criteria with the aim of covering expenses other than those directly linked to promoting sustainable development in developing countries. Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Parliament noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. It urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016. It called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation. The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability, mobilising the private sector and its responsibility for sustainable development, transparency, policy coherence, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and South-South and triangular cooperation. This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level . Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website, Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable. Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Parliament called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, it demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee. Responsibility of donors : Parliament stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. It insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results. It recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. More generally, Parliament encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support, as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid. Members invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements. The resolution welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard. Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk. Civil society : Parliament underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. It stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners and basic service supply partners, in order genuinely to reach the most vulnerable sections of the population. Complementarity of aid : Parliament recalled its request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership. Parliament called for further efforts to accelerate untying of aid at global level. It called on aid providers to use partner countries’ procurement systems as a first option. Private sector : lastly, Parliament firmly believed that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/8/07090
New
  • DEVE/8/07090
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
6.30
Development cooperation
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0437/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/1
date
2016-11-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2
date
2016-11-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0322/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4f1ac853b819f25efd0000df
New
51ec683cb819f25752000685
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2/name
Old
GOERENS Charles
New
VÄYRYNEN Paavo
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4f1ac853b819f25efd0000df
New
51ec683cb819f25752000685
committees/1/shadows/2/name
Old
GOERENS Charles
New
VÄYRYNEN Paavo
activities/0
date
2016-09-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/8/07090
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
procedure
reference
2016/2139(INI)
title
Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.30 Development cooperation