BETA

Procedure completed



2016/2139(INI) Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Opinion CONT
Lead DEVE PREDA Cristian Dan (EPP) TOIA Patrizia (S&D), ZAHRADIL Jan (ECR), VÄYRYNEN Paavo (ALDE), SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola (GUE/NGL), HAUTALA Heidi (Verts/ALE), CORRAO Ignazio (EFD)
Lead committee dossier: DEVE/8/07090
Legal Basis RoP 052

Activites

  • 2016/11/22 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2016/11/21 Debate in Parliament
  • 2016/11/11 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A8-0322/2016 summary
  • 2016/11/08 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2016/09/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
141 2016/2139(INI)
2016/10/18 DEVE 123 amendments...
source: 592.237
2016/11/04 DEVE 18 amendments...
source: 593.894

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2016-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: VÄYRYNEN Paavo group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
  • date: 2016-11-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: VÄYRYNEN Paavo group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
  • date: 2016-11-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0322/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0437/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2016-07-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
docs
  • date: 2016-10-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.254 title: PE589.254 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.237 title: PE592.237 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.894 title: PE593.894 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27807&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)148 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-09-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-11T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN title: A8-0322/2016 summary: The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report by Cristian Dan PREDA (EPP, RO) on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation. Members recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. They insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership . Members also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce their efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda. In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Members recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Members urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF). Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Members noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. They urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016. They called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation. The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability. This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level . Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website. Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable. Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Members called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, they demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee. Responsibility of donors : Member stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. They insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results . They recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. More generally, Members encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support , as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid. They invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements . The report welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard. Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk. Civil society : Members underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. They stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners. Complementarity of aid : Members recalled their request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership. Private sector : lastly, Members firmly believe that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27807&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 title: T8-0437/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 545 votes to 39, with 92 abstentions, a resolution on increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation. Parliament recalled that the aid effectiveness principles have clearly contributed to progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in many countries, but progress remains uneven. It insisted on the fact that Official Development Assistance (ODA) can play a crucial role in delivering on the 2030 Agenda, in particular in low-income countries, if it is better targeted and if it respects the principles of effective development cooperation, namely democratic country ownership . Parliament also called on all development actors to build on the commitments made from Paris to Busan, and to renew and reinforce efforts to make development cooperation as effective as possible with a view to achieving the ambitious goals and targets set out in the 2030 Agenda. In brief, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, adopted at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in 2005, followed by another Forum lunched in turn the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). Sufficient funding of development policy : overall, Parliament recommended the use of all development policy tools for poverty eradication and the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, sufficient funding is a prerequisite for effective development cooperation. Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) providers have not met their commitment to allocate 0.7 % of GNI to development assistance by 2015, resulting in more than USD 2 trillion not being made available to developing countries for attaining the Millennium Development Goals . Parliament urged the EU and its Member States to meet their long-standing commitment to devote 0.7 % of GNI to aid, to step up their development assistance, including through the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF). Parliament called on the Member States to adopt an effective roadmap in order to achieve the commitment target in a transparent, predictable and accountable way. It warned against the dilution of ODA criteria with the aim of covering expenses other than those directly linked to promoting sustainable development in developing countries. Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) : Parliament noted with concern that as of mid-2015, only five EU Member States had published Busan implementation plans. It urged Member States to publish implementation plans and report on their efforts prior to the Second High Level Meeting of the GPEDC, which will take place in Nairobi from 28 November to 1 December 2016. It called for the outcome document of this meeting to clearly address and assign differentiated roles and responsibilities of development actors and institutions for implementing the agenda and applying the principles, in order to enhance progress and facilitate future cooperation. The GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, increased effectiveness of aid, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability, mobilising the private sector and its responsibility for sustainable development, transparency, policy coherence, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and South-South and triangular cooperation. This partnership should support the full implementation of the SDG by all actors at national level . Improve transparency and development aid : whilst welcoming the efforts made to ensure that all actors concerned have access to information on transparency of development cooperation programming, funding mechanisms, projects and aid flows, in particular in the context of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and the setting-up of the ‘EU Aid Explorer’ website, Members stated that major steps still need to be taken in this regard, and called for further significant efforts be urgently made by all donors to make information and data more accessible, timely and comparable. Given that monitoring, review, and knowledge-sharing about progress in development are of paramount importance, Parliament called on the Commission to submit reports, at least every 24 months, on the efforts and action plans of both the EU and the Member States with a view to comprehensively implementing the Busan principles. Moreover, it demanded to be informed regularly and in a timely manner on the positions taken by the Commission in the GPEDC Steering Committee. Responsibility of donors : Parliament stressed that assistance can only be sustained when recipients are strongly committed and in charge. It insisted on the importance of shared responsibility for development results. It recalled that democratic ownership requires strong institutions that can ensure the full participation of local actors in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. More generally, Parliament encouraged recipient countries’ parliaments to adopt national policies on development aid in order to improve the accountability of donors and of recipient governments, including that of local authorities, enhance public financial management and absorption capacity, and improve conditions for receiving budget support, as well as, in the long run, reducing dependence on aid. Members invited the Commission and the Member States to engage with national parliaments of partner countries with a view to constructively supporting the development of such policies, complementing them with mutual accountability arrangements. The resolution welcomed the OECD's initiatives potentially contributing to reducing illicit financial flows, and called on the international community to enhance cooperation in order to increase the transparency of tax regimes and financial flows more generally. It insisted on the crucial role and responsibilities of multinational companies and financial institutions in this regard. Combat against corruption : Members recalled that corruption in recipient countries, whether directly linked to development assistance or not, constitutes a serious violation of democratic legitimacy and harms public support for development assistance in donor countries. They welcomed, therefore, all measures taken to promote sound financial management and eradicate corruption once and for all, while noting that the situation in many partner countries by definition implies a certain degree of risk. Civil society : Parliament underlined the role in development of citizens, local communities, elected representatives, faith-based organisations, civil society organisations (CSOs), academia, trade unions and the private sector, and stresses that all these actors need to be involved in furthering and implementing the effectiveness agenda at various levels. It stated that their effective contribution requires their participatory involvement in planning and implementing, mutual accountability and transparency, and that donors should improve predictability and speediness when working with these actors as implementing partners and basic service supply partners, in order genuinely to reach the most vulnerable sections of the population. Complementarity of aid : Parliament recalled its request for the codification and strengthening of the mechanisms and practices for ensuring better complementarity and effective coordination of development aid among EU Member States and institutions, providing clear and enforceable rules for ensuring democratic domestic ownership. Parliament called for further efforts to accelerate untying of aid at global level. It called on aid providers to use partner countries’ procurement systems as a first option. Private sector : lastly, Parliament firmly believed that the private sector is an important partner in achieving the SDGs and mobilising further resources for development.
  • date: 2016-11-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/8/07090
New
  • DEVE/8/07090
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
6.30
Development cooperation
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0437 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0437/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161121&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/1
date
2016-11-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2
date
2016-11-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0322&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0322/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2016-11-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4f1ac853b819f25efd0000df
New
51ec683cb819f25752000685
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2/name
Old
GOERENS Charles
New
VÄYRYNEN Paavo
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4f1ac853b819f25efd0000df
New
51ec683cb819f25752000685
committees/1/shadows/2/name
Old
GOERENS Charles
New
VÄYRYNEN Paavo
activities/0
date
2016-09-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/8/07090
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: TOIA Patrizia group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: GUE/NGL name: SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY Lola group: Verts/ALE name: HAUTALA Heidi group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2016-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: MIMICA Neven
procedure
reference
2016/2139(INI)
title
Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.30 Development cooperation