Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | POCHE Miroslav ( S&D) | HAYES Brian ( PPE), MARIAS Notis ( ECR), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE), TARAND Indrek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | SCHMIDT Claudia ( PPE) | Pavel TELIČKA ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant the Executive Director of the SESAR Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2015.
Based on the statement of assurance provided by the Court of Auditors concerning the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, it decided to approve the closure of the accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the same financial year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 105 with 9 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations which form an integral part of the decision on discharge.
General : 2015 was the first year of real transition from SESAR 1 (funded from FP 7 and TEN-T) to SESAR 2 (funded from Horizon 2020). Members noted research and innovation in the field of Air Traffic Management (ATM) continued beyond the initial 2007-2013 financial framework into the 2014-2020 financial framework under Horizon 2020. They noted the transition to the SESAR 2 Programme and the launch and execution of exploratory research, industrial research and innovation projects within the framework of SESAR 2020.
Budget and financial management : the final budget for SESAR1 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 30 229 774 and payment appropriations of EUR 126 733 842. The final budget for SESAR 2020 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 51 470 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 10 300 000. Members noted that: the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 100 % and 82.3 %, respectively. The payment appropriations rate of 82.3 % was due to delay of two months for the first Horizon 2020. Related unused 2015 payment appropriations were fully reintroduced into the 2016 budget; of the total operational commitments made in 2015, 29 % were individual commitments based on completed award procedures for grants and contracts and that the remaining 71 % were global commitments for which the award procedure was not completed.
Other observations : the resolution also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the adoption of an anti-fraud strategy and prevention and management of conflicts of interests, calls for proposal, internal audits and control systems.
In July 2015, the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertakings related to rules on conflicts of interest . Members urged the Joint Undertaking to report to the discharge authority on the issue.
Parliament noted that the Administrative Board adopted in December 2015 the ATM Master Plan (2015 Edition) covering both SESAR development and deployment. It welcomed the development of a SESAR vision 2035+.
Members welcomed the successful delivery of the work mandated by the Commission concerning the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) definition phase. Lastly, they highlighted the vital role of the Joint Undertaking in coordinating and implementing research into the SESAR project.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Miroslav POCHE (S&D, CZ) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the joint undertaking’s Executive Director discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2015.
Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2015, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the joint undertaking’s accounts .
They made, however, a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted. They may be summarised as follows:
Budget and financial management : 2015 was the first year of real transition from SESAR 1 (funded from FP 7 and TEN-T) to SESAR 2 (funded from Horizon 2020). The final budget for SESAR1 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 30 229 774 and payment appropriations of EUR 126 733 842. The final budget for SESAR 2020 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 51 470 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 10 300 000. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 100 % and 82.3 %, respectively. The payment appropriations rate of 82.3 % was due to delay of two months for the first Horizon 2020. Related unused 2015 payment appropriations were fully reintroduced into the 2016 budget.
Other observations : the report also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, calls for proposal, internal audits and control systems.
In July 2015, the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertakings related to rules on conflicts of interest , including a common template for the declaration of absence of a conflict of interest. Members urged the Joint Undertaking to reflect those guidelines in its procedures and to report to the discharge authority on the completion of the aforementioned declarations.
The report noted that the Administrative Board adopted in December 2015 the ATM Master Plan (2015 Edition) covering both SESAR development and deployment. It welcomed the development of a SESAR vision 2035+.
Members welcomed the successful delivery of the work mandated by the Commission concerning the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) definition phase.
Lastly, they highlighted the vital role of the Joint Undertaking in coordinating and implementing research into the SESAR project.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2015 of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Joint Undertaking's Financial Rules, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, some observations were by the Council:
financial programming : the Council called on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the proper programming and implementation of commitment and payment appropriations in the course of the budgetary year and to decommit unused appropriations if necessary; governance : the Council encouraged the Joint Undertaking to implement its action plan on operational governance and the Master Plan update without delay; conflict of interest : lastly, the Council invited the Joint Undertaking to incorporate in its procedures a declaration of absence of a conflict of interest as stated in the Commission's guidelines.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking (research programme on air traffic management – ATM - in the Single European Sky). The SESAR project is divided into three phases:
a ‘definition phase’ (2004-2007) led by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), with co-financing from the European Union budget through the Trans-European Networks — Transport (TEN-T) programme. The outcome was the European ATM Master Plan, which defines the content and describes the development and deployment of the next generation of ATM systems; a two-term ‘development phase’ (2008–2013, extended to 2015) managed by the SJU and leading to the production of new technological systems, components and operational procedures as defined in the European ATM Master Plan; a ‘deployment phase’ (2014-2024) to be led by industry and stakeholders for the large-scale production and implementation of the new ATM infrastructure.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 are, in all material respects, legal and regular.
The audit also revealed the following points:
budget and financial management : of the total operational commitments made in 2015 (EUR 74.5 million), 29 % were individual commitments based on completed award procedures for grants and contracts. The remaining 71 % were global commitments for which the award procedure was not completed. The high level of global commitments in 2015 is due to the fact that the first Horizon 2020 calls for proposals for EUR 51.5 million in grants were launched in the second half of 2015, and the related agreements would be signed in 2016.
Reply from the Joint Undertaking : the Joint Undertaking sought to highlight that the delay of two months for the first Horizon 2020 calls was beyond its control. The main reason was significant changes to the IT tool for grant preparation and evaluation. Therefore, when strictly following the Horizon 2020 grant procedures, the first grant agreements could only be signed in January 2016. The related unused 2015 payment appropriations were fully reintroduced into the 2016 budget.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the SESAR JU, with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the SESAR JU.
The SESAR Joint Undertaking : the SESAR JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up in 2007 by Regulation (EC) 219/2007 for a period extending to 31 December 2017. The aim of this Joint Undertaking is to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system and the rapid implementation of the European air traffic management Master Plan by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the EU.
As regards SESAR’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the final accounts of the SESAR JU ).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the SESAR JU, with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the SESAR JU.
The SESAR Joint Undertaking : the SESAR JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up in 2007 by Regulation (EC) 219/2007 for a period extending to 31 December 2017. The aim of this Joint Undertaking is to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system and the rapid implementation of the European air traffic management Master Plan by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the EU.
As regards SESAR’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the final accounts of the SESAR JU ).
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0194/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0096/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.876
- Committee opinion: PE595.623
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05875/2017
- Committee draft report: PE593.968
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 473 16.12.2016, p. 0066
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0149/2016
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex COM(2016)0475
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 473 16.12.2016, p. 0066 N8-0149/2016
- Committee draft report: PE593.968
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05875/2017
- Committee opinion: PE595.623
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.876
Votes
A8-0096/2017 - Miroslav Poche - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
18 |
2016/2195(DEC)
2017/02/06
TRAN
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Points out that to ensure the proper deployment of SESAR, and in the interest of achieving global interoperability, a specific and ambitious budget, other than the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) budget, should be allocated for its implementation;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Highlights the
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Deeply regrets that, as the renewed Eurocontrol/SESAR Joint Undertaking agreement was not signed in 2015, it has not been possible to show a budget for in- kind contribution, a detailed multi-annual budget or report on its implementation other than the EUR 585 million contributions of the Union as fixed in the 2014 amendment of the Undertaking Regulation; insists that a reason why the renewed Eurocontrol/SESAR Joint Undertaking agreement was not signed to be presented to Parliament immediately;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Administrative Board has adopted in December 2015 the ATM Master Plan (2015 Edition) covering both SESAR development and deployment; welcomes the development of a
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the successful delivery of the work mandated by the European Commission concerning the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) Definition phase; underlines the importance of a preliminary agreement with the wider Aviation industry on prerequisites for the safe integration of drones into civilian air space; notes also that a
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the fact that the Undertaking has adopted in 2015 a multi- faceted approach to effectively review, manage and mitigate risks and that it has verification mechanisms in place to enable proper prevention and management of conflict of interest and expects that the European Parliament, the Council and the public will be annually informed on the results and follow-up of these measures;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Notes the results of the 2015 Human Resources bench marking exercise: 54% operational posts, 4
source: 599.583
2017/03/06
CONT
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to the Court of Auditor's Special Report No 15/2012 "Management of conflict of interest in selected EU Agencies";
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes that the lower-than-expected implementation rate for payment appropriations was due to the fact that the launch of the first Horizon 2020 calls was delayed and the related grant agreements could only be signed in early 2016;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Regrets that despite the Joint Undertaking 's policy on conflicts of interests, there are no declarations of absence of a conflict of interest on the Joint Undertaking's website; reminds that transparency is a core issue for the credibility of the Joint Undertaking's operations and for the public trust in the integrity of its staff and the use of financial and human resources for its operations; calls upon the Joint Undertaking to make immediately available for the public the declarations of absence of a conflict of interest of its executive and administrative staff until June 2017; asks the Joint Undertaking to present by June 2017 the list of the conflicts of interests identified (if any) and how they were handled and finalized;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes from the Court’s report that in July 2015, that the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertakings related to rules on conflicts of interest, including a common template for the declaration of absence of a conflict of interest; invites the Joint Undertaking to reflect those guidelines in its procedures; urges, however, the Joint Undertaking to enact the submission of declaration of absence of a conflict of interest; urges the Joint Undertaking to entrust an independent third party with the task of evaluating declarations of the absence of conflicts of interest because the self-evaluation of such an absence in itself is a conflict of interest; asks the Joint Undertaking to report by June 2017 those changes and to indicate who is checking the situations of conflicts of interest; reiterates that transparency is key to the public trust;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes from the Court’s report that in July 2015,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. deplores the fact that the Joint Undertaking has not established rules regarding the protection of whistle- blowers and "revolving doors" and urges the Joint Undertaking to put in place such rules as a matter of urgency; asks the Joint Undertaking to provide by June 2017 details on the whistle-blower cases in 2015 (if any) and how they were handled and finalized; reiterates only integrity and transparency uphold the public trust; urges the Joint Undertaking to put in place measures to prevent "revolving doors" establishing dissuasive sanctions such us the reduction of pensions or prohibition to work at least three years in similar bodies;
source: 599.876
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2016-07-11T00:00:00New
2016-07-10T00:00:00 |
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.968New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593968_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.623&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-595623_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.876New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-599876_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0096&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0096_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0194New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0194_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/07521New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):ENNew
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:ENNew
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN |
activities/3/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Miroslav POCHE (S&D, CZ) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the joint undertakings Executive Director discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertakings budget for the financial year 2015. Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2015, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the joint undertakings accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies: Budget and financial management: 2015 was the first year of real transition from SESAR 1 (funded from FP 7 and TEN-T) to SESAR 2 (funded from Horizon 2020). The final budget for SESAR1 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 30 229 774 and payment appropriations of EUR 126 733 842. The final budget for SESAR 2020 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 51 470 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 10 300 000. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 100 % and 82.3 %, respectively. The payment appropriations rate of 82.3 % was due to delay of two months for the first Horizon 2020. Related unused 2015 payment appropriations were fully reintroduced into the 2016 budget. Other observations: the report also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, calls for proposal, internal audits and control systems. In July 2015, the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertakings related to rules on conflicts of interest, including a common template for the declaration of absence of a conflict of interest. Members urged the Joint Undertaking to reflect those guidelines in its procedures and to report to the discharge authority on the completion of the aforementioned declarations. The report noted that the Administrative Board adopted in December 2015 the ATM Master Plan (2015 Edition) covering both SESAR development and deployment. It welcomed the development of a SESAR vision 2035+. Members welcomed the successful delivery of the work mandated by the Commission concerning the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) definition phase. Lastly, they highlighted the vital role of the Joint Undertaking in coordinating and implementing research into the SESAR project. New
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Miroslav POCHE (S&D, CZ) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015. The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the joint undertakings Executive Director discharge in respect of the implementation of the joint undertakings budget for the financial year 2015. Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2015, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the joint undertakings accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted. They may be summarised as follows: Budget and financial management: 2015 was the first year of real transition from SESAR 1 (funded from FP 7 and TEN-T) to SESAR 2 (funded from Horizon 2020). The final budget for SESAR1 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 30 229 774 and payment appropriations of EUR 126 733 842. The final budget for SESAR 2020 for the financial year 2015 included commitment appropriations of EUR 51 470 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 10 300 000. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 100 % and 82.3 %, respectively. The payment appropriations rate of 82.3 % was due to delay of two months for the first Horizon 2020. Related unused 2015 payment appropriations were fully reintroduced into the 2016 budget. Other observations: the report also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, calls for proposal, internal audits and control systems. In July 2015, the Commission issued guidelines to the Joint Undertakings related to rules on conflicts of interest, including a common template for the declaration of absence of a conflict of interest. Members urged the Joint Undertaking to reflect those guidelines in its procedures and to report to the discharge authority on the completion of the aforementioned declarations. The report noted that the Administrative Board adopted in December 2015 the ATM Master Plan (2015 Edition) covering both SESAR development and deployment. It welcomed the development of a SESAR vision 2035+. Members welcomed the successful delivery of the work mandated by the Commission concerning the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) definition phase. Lastly, they highlighted the vital role of the Joint Undertaking in coordinating and implementing research into the SESAR project. |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2017-04-27T00:00:00New
2016-07-11T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
51ec5b8cb819f257520001ebNew
53b2dd58b819f205b00000c0 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
FITTO RaffaeleNew
MARIAS Notis |
activities/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
51ec5b8cb819f257520001ebNew
53b2dd58b819f205b00000c0 |
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
FITTO RaffaeleNew
MARIAS Notis |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2016-10-06T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-10-06T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/07521
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|