Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE) | SALINI Massimiliano ( PPE), GRASWANDER-HAINZ Karoline ( S&D), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR), VAN MILTENBURG Matthijs ( ALDE), AIUTO Daniela ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ZOFFOLI Damiano ( S&D) | Mark DEMESMAEKER ( ECR), Mireille D'ORNANO ( ENF), Keith TAYLOR ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 301 votes to 249, with 25 abstentions, a resolution on a European strategy for low-emission mobility in response to the Commission communication on the subject.
While welcoming the Commission’s communication, Parliament stressed the fact that to abide by the Paris Agreement, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transport will need to be near zero by mid-century, and that air pollutant emissions from transport will need to be drastically reduced .
Road transport is responsible for more than 70% of GHG emissions and much of the air pollution. Action should be focused predominantly in this area, while efforts to reduce emissions should be intensified in all transport sectors.
Fair and efficient pricing : Members considered that clearer price signals across all transport modes which better reflect the polluter-pays and user-pays principles are essential. A modal shift in transport requires investment in multimodality and public transport.
Parliament welcomed the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for interoperable electronic tolling systems in the EU, as well as the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive (Directive 1999/62/EC). They believed that the extension of distance-based charging should cover all passenger cars and vans, while allowing for some form of flexibility for remote and sparsely populated areas.
As regards the aviation sector , the Commission is called on to explore the possibilities for harmonised international measures for kerosene taxation for aviation and the removal of the VAT exemption on air passenger tickets.
Logistics and digitalisation : Parliament stressed the role of digitalisation in sustainable mobility. It considered that intelligent transport systems, platooning and autonomous and connected vehicles could constitute an important asset in improving the efficiency of both individual and commercial transport.
It called for a coherent legislative framework and standards that will allow innovative logistical and transport solutions to be deployed throughout Europe.
Members called on the Commission to encourage the use of zero-emissions light-duty commercial vehicles, zero-emissions buses, waste trucks, taxis and freight bicycles in last mile logistics.
Low-emission alternative energy : Parliament called on the Commission to adopt an ambitious action plan for the market uptake of electric vehicles and to issue Member States with guiding recommendations to encourage them to implement fiscal incentives for zero- and low-emission vehicles. The availability of charging and refuelling infrastructure , and the competitiveness of electric vehicles, are essential for increasing consumer acceptance. Members wanted to see a long-term European initiative on next-generation batteries as well as for the development of the necessary infrastructure.
Parliament called for a more ambitious approach for renewables in transport than that proposed in the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. It called for specific incentives be put in place for the deployment of sustainable alternative fuels for those transport modes that currently have no alternatives to liquid fuel.
The Commission should:
propose the phasing-out of direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels by 2020 at the latest; support the potential of LNG to render mobility, the economy and employment sustainable; develop objective criteria for the recognition of advanced biofuels in order to stimulate innovation and market uptake; commit to a feasibility study on the role and possibilities of hydrogen in the European transport system;
Transport infrastructure and investment : Parliament urged the intensification of EU cofinancing of transport projects that contribute to climate action and the minimisation of other external costs, in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the TEN-T.
The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) projects are key for the European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility. Members asked for the CEF budget to be restored , with EFSI II financed from other sources. Members also urged the Commission to make more funds available for cities to bid jointly for infrastructure or technologies that would contribute to reducing air pollution from road vehicles, including public recharging stations for electric vehicles.
Empowering citizens and decision-makers towards behavioural change : taking into account the failure of European standards for light-duty vehicles to reflect real-world emissions, Parliament suggested to examine the benefits of introducing a label or standard for Ultra Low-Emission Vehicles (ULEVs) that would meet emission limit values in real driving conditions.
It also called on the Commission to:
pay greater attention to the increased integration of non-motorised modes of transport and their increased attractiveness; prioritise EU cofinancing of urban mobility projects which contribute to achieving GHG reduction targets; incentivise the purchase of cleaner, less polluting vehicles by both public authorities and private fleets; include the transport needs of citizens in rural and remote areas in its strategies for low-emission mobility; invest more in the integration of the EuroVelo Cycling Network with the TEN-T rail networks.
The resolution analysed specific sectoral trends for different transport modes. It looked at cars, heavy-duty vehicles, railways, aviation, maritime transport and inland waterways.
The Commission has been invited, inter alia , to:
submit a proposal on CO2 emission standards for cars and vans by 2025; come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of HDVs by the end of 2017, as well as with ambitious 2025 CO2 standards by 2018; submit ambitious proposals for the Combined Transport Directive to better promote efficient freight transport and encourage a modal shift to rail and inland waterways; improve the efficiency of aviation by ensuring the rapid application of the single European sky and by participating actively in the work of ICAO to achieve ambitious international CO2 standards.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Bas EICKHOUT (Greens/EFA, NL) on a European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility in response to the Commission communication on the subject.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee under Rule 54 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , also gave its opinion on the report.
The committee welcomed the Commission’s communication and stressed the fact that to abide by the Paris Agreement, GHG emissions from transport will need to be near zero by mid-century, and that air pollutant emissions from transport will need to be drastically reduced if the WHO public health guidelines, at the very least, are to be met without delay.
Fair and efficient pricing : Members considered that clearer price signals across all transport modes which better reflect the polluter-pays and user-pays principles are essential. A modal shift in transport requires investment in multimodality and public transport.
The report welcomed the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for interoperable electronic tolling systems in the EU, as well as the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive (Directive 1999/62/EC). They believed that the extension of distance-based charging should cover all passenger cars and vans, while allowing for some form of flexibility for remote and sparsely populated areas.
Logistics and digitalisation : the report stressed the role of digitalisation in sustainable mobility. It considered that intelligent transport systems, platooning and autonomous and connected vehicles could constitute an important asset in improving the efficiency of both individual and commercial transport. Members called on the Commission to encourage the use of zero-emissions light-duty commercial vehicles, zero-emissions buses, waste trucks, taxis and freight bicycles in last mile logistics.
Low-emission alternative energy : the report called on the Commission to adopt an ambitious action plan for the market uptake of electric vehicles and to issue Member States with guiding recommendations to encourage them to implement fiscal incentives for zero- and low-emission vehicles. The availability of charging and refuelling infrastructure , and the competitiveness of electric vehicles, are essential for increasing consumer acceptance. Members wanted to see a long-term European initiative on next-generation batteries as well as for the development of the necessary infrastructure.
They asked the Commission to propose the phasing-out of direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels by 2020 at the latest. Whilst taking note of the limits proposed in the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive with a view to phasing down first generation biofuels by 2030, the report called on the Commission, to distinguish between first-generation biofuels with high GHG efficiency and a low risk of indirect land use change and those which do not meet those criteria, and to take measures to phase out the use of feedstocks , including palm oil, that drive deforestation or the use of peat land, as a component of biofuels.
Transport infrastructure and investment : Members urged the intensification of EU cofinancing of transport projects that contribute to climate action and the minimisation of other external costs , in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the TEN-T. They felt that Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) projects are key for the European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility, and asked for the CEF budget to be restored, with EFSI II financed from other sources. Members urged the Commission to make more funds available for cities to bid jointly for infrastructure or technologies that would contribute to reducing air pollution from road vehicles, including public recharging stations for electric vehicles.
Empowering citizens and decision-makers towards behavioural change : the committee asked the Commission and the Member States, taking into account the failure of European standards for light-duty vehicles to reflect real-world emissions, to examine the benefits of introducing a label or standard for Ultra Low-Emission Vehicles (ULEVs) that would meet emission limit values in real driving conditions.
It also called on the Commission to:
prioritise EU cofinancing of urban mobility projects which contribute to achieving GHG reduction targets; incentivise the purchase of cleaner, less polluting vehicles by both public authorities and private fleets; include the transport needs of citizens in rural and remote areas in its strategies for low-emission mobility; invest more in the integration of the EuroVelo Cycling Network with the TEN-T rail networks.
The report analysed specific sectoral trends for different transport modes. It looked at cars, heavy-duty vehicles, railways, aviation, maritime transport and inland waterways.
PURPOSE: to present a European strategy for low-emission mobility.
BACKGROUND: transport represents almost a quarter of Europe's greenhouse gas emissions and is the main cause of air pollution in cities. Europe's answer to these challenges is an irreversible shift to low-emission mobility in terms of carbon and air pollutants.
The shift towards low-emission mobility has already started globally and its pace is accelerating. This shift, which has already started building on existing EU policies, should be accelerated through this strategy for low-emission mobility.
CONTENT: the Commission’s strategy aims to reduce emissions from the transport sector while meeting the EU's commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Regions and cities too will be major actors in delivering low-emission mobility solutions. Urban transport is responsible for 23% of EU's greenhouse gas emissions. Behavioural choices made by mobility users will determine how successful we will be.
The strategy’s objective is three-fold:
1) Improving the efficiency of the transport system : the Commission considered that in order to facilitate the transition to low-emission mobility and provide certainty for investors, the EU regulatory framework needs to change:
by making the best use of digital technologies : to this end, the Commission is working on a framework for the swift and coordinated deployment of such systems across the EU; by guaranteeing efficient pricing : across the EU, charging should move towards distance-based road charging systems based on actual kilometres driven, to reflect better the polluter-pays and user-pays principles. To that end, the Commission is developing standards for inter-operable electronic tolling systems in the EU, to facilitate access to markets for new tolling service providers and to reduce overall system costs. Moreover, the Commission will revise the Directive on the charging for lorries to enable charging also on the basis of carbon dioxide differentiation, and extend some of its principles to buses and coaches as well as passenger cars and vans; by promoting multi-modality by incentivising a shift towards lower emission transport modes such as inland waterways, short-sea shipping and rail and providing measures to develop domestic bus and coach services.
2) Scaling up the use of low-emission alternative energy for transport : transport in the EU still depends on oil for about 94% of its energy needs:
as part of the revision of the current legislation related to fuels and renewable energy , the Commission is examining how to provide a strong incentive to innovate in energies needed for the long-term decarbonisation. This could be done for example as an obligation for fuel suppliers to provide a certain share of renewable alternative energy, i.a. advanced biofuels and synthetic fuels; the EU supports the deployment of infrastructure for alternative fuels financially and through its stakeholder platforms. Based on the alternative fuels infrastructure Directive , by November 2016, Member States will design policy frameworks for rolling-out publicly available electric recharging points and natural gas filling stations, and optionally hydrogen filling stations. In order to achieve mass acceptance and deployment of electric vehicles, charging and maintenance infrastructure needs to become widely available throughout Europe; further effort should be made to foster the creation of an EU-wide electro-mobility services market , such as the cross-border interoperability of payments and the provision of real-time information on charging points. A common plug standard already exists for cars and standards for induction charging, batteries, and charging plugs for electric buses and motorbikes are next.
3) Moving forward towards zero-emission vehicles : the transformational change towards low- and zero-emission vehicles will need to be supported by a wide range of measures at all levels of policy-making to engage both manufacturers and users:
the Commission has made fundamental changes to how vehicle emissions are measured and verified . New 'real driving' emissions tests will now be implemented swiftly so that limit values for air pollutant emissions have a stronger impact on the ground and consumers can trust them again. A new global test procedure, the World Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure, will be implemented to deliver more realistic and accurate carbon dioxide and fuel consumption values; it is necessary to further reduce emissions from conventional combustion engines after 2020 . Zero- and low-emission vehicles will need to be deployed and gain significant market share by 2030. The Commission is working on post-2020 carbon dioxide standards for cars and vans; in order to encourage customer uptake, the Commission aims to improve information through car labelling and on support through public procurement rules. Tax instruments are very effective to incentivise consumer behaviour; the EU will also need to introduce measures to actively curb carbon dioxide emissions from lorries, buses and coaches . Other parts of the world, such as the United States, China, Japan and Canada, have already introduced standards, and some European manufacturers participate in these schemes.
Global action : the EU is fully committed to reaching agreement on a Global Market-Based Mechanism to address international aviation emissions and achieve carbon neutral growth from 2020. It is also committed to securing a robust and mandatory global agreement for the collection and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) by the end of 2016.
Documents
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)101
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0503/2017
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0356/2017
- Committee opinion: PE601.214
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE604.501
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE604.871
- Committee draft report: PE602.934
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0501
- Committee draft report: PE602.934
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE604.501
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE604.871
- Committee opinion: PE601.214
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)101
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
- Contribution: COM(2016)0501
Activities
- Daniela AIUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lucy ANDERSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wim van de CAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabella DE MONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matthijs van MILTENBURG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carolina PUNSET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Damiano ZOFFOLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 20/1 14/12/2017 12:18:47.000 #
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 20/2 14/12/2017 12:19:06.000 #
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 85/1 14/12/2017 12:20:05.000 #
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 85/2 14/12/2017 12:20:18.000 #
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 86 14/12/2017 12:20:33.000 #
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - § 93 14/12/2017 12:21:09.000 #
SE | BG | NL | LV | SI | IE | BE | FI | EE | LT | HR | PT | CY | MT | CZ | LU | RO | SK | ES | DK | EL | DE | HU | PL | AT | IT | FR | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
16
|
12
|
23
|
8
|
8
|
9
|
20
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
16
|
3
|
6
|
17
|
6
|
24
|
10
|
43
|
8
|
13
|
83
|
11
|
42
|
18
|
53
|
61
|
60
|
|
PPE |
175
|
4
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
4
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
Portugal PPE |
1
|
3
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (1) |
3
|
Romania PPEFor (7)Against (1) |
4
|
Spain PPEFor (14)Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Gabriel MATO, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
1
|
Germany PPEFor (32)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (6) |
Poland PPEFor (12)Against (8) |
5
|
Italy PPEFor (8)Against (1) |
France PPEFor (17)Against (2) |
||
ALDE |
52
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (3)Against (2) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
Spain ALDEFor (5)Against (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
France ALDEAgainst (5) |
1
|
|||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
United Kingdom ECRFor (14)Against (4) |
||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
44
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
11
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Germany GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
France GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
33
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDD |
4
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
30
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
12
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
1
|
3
|
5
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||
S&D |
150
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (11) |
4
|
8
|
2
|
3
|
Germany S&DAgainst (22)
Arndt KOHN,
Arne LIETZ,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Gabriele PREUSS,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Ismail ERTUG,
Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER,
Jo LEINEN,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Kerstin WESTPHAL,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN
|
2
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
Italy S&DFor (1)Against (22)
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Goffredo Maria BETTINI,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Massimo PAOLUCCI,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Pina PICIERNO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Silvia COSTA,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
10
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (19) |
A8-0356/2017 - Bas Eickhout - Rezolucija 14/12/2017 12:21:51.000 #
IT | BE | NL | ES | CZ | MT | LT | SE | RO | FI | EE | LU | DE | DK | CY | IE | AT | EL | BG | SI | PT | SK | HR | HU | LV | GB | FR | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
50
|
19
|
23
|
37
|
17
|
6
|
7
|
15
|
23
|
8
|
5
|
6
|
82
|
9
|
2
|
9
|
17
|
13
|
12
|
8
|
14
|
10
|
10
|
12
|
8
|
55
|
56
|
40
|
|
S&D |
143
|
Italy S&DFor (21)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Germany S&DFor (21)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN
|
2
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
2
|
||||
ALDE |
50
|
5
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
||||||||
Verts/ALE |
40
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
2
|
3
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (5) |
2
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
France GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
30
|
13
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (12) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
27
|
Italy ENFAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
France ENFAgainst (10) |
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
55
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (17) |
Poland ECRAgainst (11)Abstain (3) |
||||||||||||||
PPE |
174
|
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (8) |
4
|
Netherlands PPEFor (2)Against (2) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (3)Abstain (3) |
3
|
1
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (4) |
Romania PPEAgainst (8) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
Germany PPEFor (2)Against (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (2) |
Slovenia PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Portugal PPEAbstain (1) |
4
|
5
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
4
|
France PPEFor (2)Against (17) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN
Abstain (1) |
Amendments | Dossier |
759 |
2016/2327(INI)
2017/05/05
ENVI
144 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the Commission communication entitled "A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility" (COM (2016)501),
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC 5a; __________________ 5a OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a transparent labelling system, which would provide consumers with accurate, robust and comparable data on the fuel consumption
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a transparent labelling system, which would provide consumers with comparable data on the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of cars placed on the market and recalls that labelling should not be limited to the CO2 levels, but also consider the harmful pollutants like NO2 and particulate matters. (PM);
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls, under the auspices of the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations, for a transparent labelling system, which would provide consumers with comparable data on the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of cars
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the swift adoption of a transparent harmonized labelling system on EU-level, which would provide consumers with comparable data on the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of cars placed on the market;
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a transparent pan-EU labelling system, which would provide consumers with comparable data on the fuel consumption
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a transparent pan-EU labelling system, which would provide consumers with comparable data on the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of cars placed on the market;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a transparent labelling system, which would provide consumers with
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to assess the effectiveness of current Low Emission Zones in cities, taking into account the failure of Euro standards for light-duty vehicles to reflect real world emissions, and to examine the benefit of introducing a label or standard for Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles (ULEVs) that meet the emission limit values in real driving conditions;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to undertake the ongoing transition from the old test cycle NEDC to the new WLTP in accordance with the principle of ‘comparable effort’. A car fleet which in 2021 meets the 95 g target under the NEDC in accordance with the law must also comply with the law after conversion to the WLTP;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC 7a; __________________ 7a OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises that cities and local authorities have an important role to play in the development of low-emission transport; therefore considers that the Covenant of Mayors can offer an interesting platform to tackle the challenges ahead and exchange best practices;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to promote incentives for cars and vans that accept a higher blend of renewable fuels, which can increase the share of renewable energy in transport and contribute to the overall decarbonisation of the European economy;
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to recognise the increasing importance of embedded emissions by incorporating incentives for life cycle emissions accounting;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages national and local authorities to create strong incentives in order to promote low-emission taxi and last mile delivery fleets;
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Welcomes the important initiatives by various cities and local authorities to create Low Emission Zones and recognises the beneficial effects of those zones; calls on the Commission and the competent authorities in the Member States to examine the benefit of introducing a label or standard for Ultra- Low-Emission Vehicles (ULEVs) that meet the emission limit values in real driving conditions;
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to review the emissions limits set out in Annex I with a view to improving air quality in the Union and to achieving the Union ambient air quality limits, as well as the WHO recommended levels, and shall come forward with proposals, as appropriate, for new technology-neutral Euro7 emission limits applicable by 2025 for all M1 and N1 vehicles placed on the Union market;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission, in CO2 regulation after 2020, in so far as possible to take account of all technological approaches to reduce CO2 emissions on the roads. Regulation should particularly take account of the possibilities afforded by the latest alternative fuels (electrofuels; synthetic fuels; power to gas, power to liquid);
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Invites the Commission to revise Directive 96/53/EC with a view to enable longer, higher and/or heavier vehicles to be used in cross-border transport; recalls that longer, higher and/or heavier vehicles can lower emissions from transport by 20-30% and is an efficient mean to decarbonise the transport sector;
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC 8a __________________ 8a OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of heavy-duty
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) by the end of 2017 and ambitious 2025 CO2 targets by the
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) by the end of 2017 and ambitious 2025 CO2
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) by the end of 2017 and ambitious 20
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to come up with a proposal on the certification, monitoring and reporting of heavy-duty
Amendment 126 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the European Commission and Member States for supporting market introduction of HDV propelled by alternative less polluting fuels such as natural gas;
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes VECTO and stresses the need to continue having access to a transparent, realistic and updated monitoring data;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the introduction of low- emissions and zero-emission city buses, garbage vehicles and goods delivery and distribution vehicles through mandatory green public procurement targets;
Amendment 129 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources 9a __________________ 9a OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1
Amendment 130 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the introduction of low- emissions and zero-emission city buses through mandatory
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the introduction of low- emissions and zero-emission city buses through mandatory green public procurement targets; calls on the Commission to amend European legislation on public contracts so as to facilitate the invocation of ecological criteria;
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 134 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the introduction of low- emissions and zero-emission city buses through
Amendment 135 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the introduction of low- emissions and zero-emission city buses through
Amendment 136 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that emission reduction and air quality targets require actions that will concern also older vehicles and reminds in this regard, that retrofitting is the fastest and the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions and pollutants from older fleet as systematic implementation of advanced diesel exhaust after treatment systems allows older heavy-duty vehicles, such as buses and trucks to operate in an environmentally friendly manner, meeting even the strictest emission requirements and achieving maximum reduction in NOx, NO2 and PM reductions; calls therefore on the Commission to come up with common EU guidelines in order to encourage the Member States to fully deploy the possibilities of retrofitting solutions and also ensure the eligibility for funding in context of EU financial instruments aiming to decarbonisation of transport system;
Amendment 137 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the potential of innovative technologies such as automated driving and "platooning" (grouping divers vehicles) as it allows better use of slipstream and thereby reduces fuel consumption and emissions; calls for further support for research and development in that area, notably for necessary digital infrastructure and calls for a coherent legislative framework at EU level;
Amendment 138 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the use of low- and zero-emission light-duty commercial vehicles in last mile logistics reduces CO2- emissions in general as well as local pollutant emissions in particular and therefore makes a positive contribution to urban air quality; therefore stresses the need for relevant infrastructure at logistics hubs;
Amendment 139 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Member States to use part of their revenues from excise duties or road tax on private vehicles to reduce fares for urban public transport with the aim of making it free of charge to residents as well as to give preference to flat-rate systems;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and the Council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources1a; __________________ 1a OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1.
Amendment 140 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to propose measures which could increase the use of heavy duty vehicles using higher blends of biofuels, namely by considering rolling out dedicated refuelling stations.
Amendment 141 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of interoperability for the purpose of reducing emissions from HGVs, in both urban and extra-urban transport;
Amendment 142 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the potential of innovative technologies such as automated driving and "platooning" (grouping divers vehicles) in road freight transport, as it allows better use of slipstream and thereby reduces fuel consumption and emissions; calls for further support for research and development in that area, notably for necessary digital infrastructure and calls for a coherent legislative framework on EU level;
Amendment 143 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to develop separate targets for biofuels for heavy and light duty vehicles (vans, buses and trucks) to ensure that these vehicles do not fall behind in the decarbonisation efforts of the EU;
Amendment 144 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the European Commission to propose a phase out of direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuels by 2020 at latest;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2016 entitled “Renewable energies progress report"1a, __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0292.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 09 September 2015 entitled "Implementation of the 2011 White paper on transport"1a, __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0310.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas under the Paris Agreement, ratified by the EU on 4 November 2016 and entered into force on the same date, following its ratification by 141 Parties, all actors committed at keeping the increase of global temperature to well below 2°C above pre- industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5°C above pre-industrial levels;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the EU ratified the Paris Agreement which entered into force on November 4 2016 and which commits all actors to keep the increase in global temperature to well below 2°C above pre- industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles 2a and Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles 3a __________________ 2a OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1. 3a OJ L 145, 31.5.2011, p. 1
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas transport represents almost a quarter of Europe's greenhouse gas emissions and is the main cause of air pollution in cities;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas transport is responsible for over 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU of which road transport constitutes over 70%; whereas transport- related air pollution is the main cause of air pollution in urban areas and whereas especially particulate matter and nitrogen oxides adversely impact public health;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70% of transport greenhouse gas emissions and much of the air pollution, including NO2 and particulate matter, action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all sectors of transport for reducing emissions;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70% of transport greenhouse gas emissions and much of the air pollution, action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all sectors of transport for reducing emissions;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the transport sector still relies on the use of conventional propellants for more than 96 % of its energy needs, or about one third of total energy consumption;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas this dependence on fossil fuels is the cause of some 23 % of total CO2 emissions and whereas the target is to reduce such emissions by at least 60% by mid century with the aim to reach zero emission;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas transport is responsible for more than half of NOx emissions (with road transport accounting for 39% of total emissions) and contributes significantly to the total emissions of other pollutants;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Commission in its 2011 White paper aims to reduce transport GHG emissions by at least 60% by 2050 compared to the 1990 level and whereas a reliable long-term emissions- reduction trajectory provides vehicle manufacturers with the necessary planning security for investments in new technologies;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the long-term decarbonisation of transport requires a wide use of renewable fuels; whereas, in this context, by now it is still uncertain which drive technology will prove the most resource- and climate-efficient for the different modes of transport; whereas it is expected that liquid and gaseous fuels will continue to play an important role, in particular with regard to shipping, aviation and HDVs, for the decades to come;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the 7th Community Environment Action Programme clearly recognises the role of transport in achieving the Union's 2050 vision of "living well, within the limits of our planet";
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (EURO VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC and 2005/78/EC 4a; __________________ 4a OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 1
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas since the adoption of the Biofuels Directive in 2003 the legislative framework has repeatedly been changed, whereas a certain stability of the legislative approach is necessary to attract investments in advanced biofuels;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new)) Aa. whereas the sustainability of electric vehicles strongly depends on the use of renewable electricity and therefore should always be considered as being linked to the share of renewable electricity;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas electrified transport systems, either private or public, can ensure to tackle all the problems related to mobility in reducing CO2 emissions and eliminating pollutants and noise altogether;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas anti-particulate filters (DPF) aimed at reducing the amount of PMs in the air by burning the ones trapped into them are simply moving the problem toward smaller particle that results from combustion process;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the construction of new road infrastructures has a considerable impact on the landscape and the environment, and is likely to further stimulate the use of private vehicles as a consequence of increased road capacity;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas according to Special Eurobarometer 406, published in 2013, some 50 % of EU citizens use their private cars every day, while only 16 % use public transport and only 12 % use bicycles;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas bunker fuel used for maritime transport is among the most polluting one living the sector with ample margin for improving its emission by promoting and integrating alternative propelling systems;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the transition to a circular economy also entails that consumers increasingly become service-users and whereas the shift to these new business models could have a significant impact on resource efficiency in the transport sector;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas air pollution has severe adverse effects on public health and the environment, causing over 400,000 premature deaths a year in the EU;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the protection of public health and the environment should be a shared societal concern and responsibility, in which all stakeholders have an important role to play;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles 1a, __________________ 1a OJ L 120, 15.5.2009, p. 5.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas between 15 % and 40 % of the European population is exposed to levels of fine particulates (PM 2.5 and PM 10), tropospheric ozone and NO2 which are above EU quality standards, and whereas that percentage increases to 90 % when World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines are taken into account;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas over 100 million Europeans are exposed to noise levels above the EU threshold of 55 decibels (dB), some 32 million of whom are exposed to "very loud" levels in excess of 65 dB;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas according to WHO noise from road traffic alone is the second most harmful environmental stressor in Europe just behind air pollution and that at least 9 000 premature deaths per year can be attributed to heart disease caused by traffic noise;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the estimation of EU's health-related costs due to atmospheric pollution are in the range of between EUR 330 billion and EUR 940 billion, Euros amounting to between 3 % and 9 % of EU GDP;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas applying WHO guidelines on human exposure to PM 2.5 would increase citizens' average life expectancy by roughly 22 months, and would generate annual savings of some EUR 31 billion;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Welcomes the Commission's Communication on "A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility" and calls on the Commission and the competent authorities in the Member States to fully engage with and implement the Strategy; emphasises that this not only benefits public health and the environment, but equally offers opportunities for various stakeholders in the transport sector and is crucial for the transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Welcomes the Communication from the Commission on "A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility" and concurs that a momentous shift to low- emission mobility is essential for the broader shift to a clean circular economy;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Underlines that in order to respect the Paris Agreement greenhouse gas emissions from transport will need to be near zero by mid-century, and emissions of air pollutants from transport need to be drastically reduced to meet at least the WHO public health guidelines without any delay;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) –1b. Calls on the Commission to urgently introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as cost- effective vehicle standards probably represent the most effective measure for improving energy efficiency in the EU in the period up to 2030;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Calls on the Commission to recognise the growing importance of life cycle emissions, including from energy supply, manufacturing and end-of-life, by bringing forward holistic proposals that guide manufacturers towards optimal solutions, in order to ensure that upstream and downstream emissions do not erode the benefits related to the improved operational energy use of vehicles;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC,
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Calls on the Member States to promote public electric transport systems with a view to doubling its use by 2030, inter alia by applying IT solutions such as the remote purchasing of electronic tickets;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) –1a. Recalls that the transport sector is the least decarbonised and that it is still 94% dependent on fossil fuels; observes that greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise; considers that an ambitious target for incorporating renewable energy in transport is essential in order to attain the targets of the Paris climate agreement;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 20
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 20
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission, on the basis of the new Worldwide Light Vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP), to come forward with an ambitious 2025 CO2 target for
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 2025 target for cars
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 20
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 2025 CO2 ambitious targets for cars
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the report on the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (2016/2215 (INI)), as adopted by the European Parliament on April 4 2017,
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 20
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 20
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 2025 target for cars
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 2025 target for cars (in the range of 68-78 gr CO2/km) and vans (in the range of 105-120 gr CO2/km) to be calculated based on the new Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP) together with a linear trajectory to 2030 targets corresponding to at least 6-8% annual improvement;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a 2025 target for cars (in the range of 68-78 gr CO2/km) and vans (in the range of 105-120 gr CO2/km) to be calculated based on the new Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP) and in absolutely strict compliance with the conclusions of the experts of the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, which are the bodies that have the competence and legitimacy to take action in this regard;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that a percentage rate of reduction should be conditional on a gain in market share for alternative propulsion systems. This means that, the greater the number of vehicles approved with zero emissions or very low emissions, the more ambitious the percentage fleet target can be, and vice versa. The principle of technology neutrality should be respected.
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to foster wider electrification in parallel with a transition to alternative technologies in order to ensure progress on both decarbonisation and air quality objectives with their passenger car and light commercial van sectors; considers a stepwise increase of the share of zero- and ultra-low-emission vehicles in the total fleet necessary in this regard, with the aim of phasing out new CO2-emitting cars as soon as feasible before the end of the first half of this century;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the European Parliament's negotiating mandate on the report on the revision of type approval and market surveillance as adopted on April 4 2017;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the introduction of the new WLTP
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the introduction of the
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the introduction of the new WLTP; underlines the need, however, to develop a more transparent and realistic on-road test procedure to reflect real fuel consumption and CO2 emissions complemented by fuel consumption meters on vehicles; stresses, at the same time, the need to be attentive to reciprocity of the application of the new WLTP cycle around the world, particularly in America and Asia;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the introduction of the new WLTP; underlines the need, however, to develop a more transparent and realistic on-road test procedure to reflect real fuel consumption and CO2 emissions complemented by fuel consumption meters on vehicles; reminds that the inverse correlation between CO2 and NOX emissions, and CO2 and PM emissions can be avoided or at least reduced;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the introduction of the new WLTP; underlines the need, however, to
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for the swift adoption of the 3rd and 4th real driving emissions (RDE) packages to complete the regulatory framework for the new type-approval procedure, and for the swift application of this framework; recalls that, in order for RDE tests to be effective in reducing the discrepancies between the emissions measured in the laboratory and on the road, the specifications of the test and evaluation procedures should be set out very carefully and should cover a wide range of driving conditions, including temperature, engine load, vehicle speed, altitude, type of road and other parameters that can be found when driving in the Union;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that the Commission has launched a number of infringement procedures against Member States that breached Directive 2008/50/EC on air quality on the account of continuous exceedance of NO2 and PM10limit values; urges the Commission to exercise its powers of control to prevent the placing on market of polluting diesel-powered cars that contribute significantly to the release of NO2 and PM10 in the atmosphere and that do not comply with EU rules on the type-approval and emissions of passenger and light duty vehicles;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that even the new WLTP test cycle will have a 20% gap with real world and will remain open to test optimisation and manipulation; therefore urges the Commission to introduce a complementary on-road test (similar to RDE for air pollutants) to deter lab optimisation which allows 110% not-to- exceed value of the WLTP measured results; calls on this RDE value to be used for vehicle labelling to provide accurate consumer information;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to consider additional solutions to curb CO2 emissions from the transport sector and in particular take better into account light weighting's contribution to directly reduce CO2 emissions from vehicles;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that as regards CO2 targets and labelling the WLTP should be complemented by an on road test with a 10% not to exceed limit;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the Circular Economy Package as published by the Commission on December 2 2015,
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to review the Clean Power for Transport Directive (2014/94/EU) and to come forward with a draft regulation on CO2 standards for the car fleets coming onto the market from 2025 onwards, with the inclusion of Zero- Emission Vehicles (ZEV) and Ultra-Low Emission Vehicles (ULEV) mandates that impose a stepwise increasing share of zero- and ultra-low-emission vehicles in the total fleet with the aim of phasing out new CO2 -emitting cars by 2035;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of zero- or low-emission vehicles, such as electric vehicles, and calls for
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles; highlights the importance of ensuring that electricity generated for electric vehicles comes from sustainable energy sources and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries in this regard;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles, to come forward with a mandatory target for the minimum share of zero-emissions vehicles, and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries in this regard;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC 6a; __________________ 6a OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles of all types and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries and hydrogen fuel cells in this regard;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles and other low and zero emission vehicles and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries in this regard;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles and zero- emission vehicles and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries in this regard;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehicles and calls for a long-term European initiative on ne
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on Member States soon to make available an interoperable and accessible charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in public areas and to promote the installation of charging points in private places, by at least creating the preconditions for subsequent installation of charging points in new buildings and buildings undergoing major renovation;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to develop widespread charging facilities for electric vehicles looking into innovative systems allowing to optimize the existing electric infrastructures and to promote the installation of recharging facilities in private and public parking areas; urges the integration of renewables into recharging grid to further advance on the decarbonisation of the sector;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises that electrification towards zero-emission mobility demands efforts for ensuring zero-emission in the whole life-cycle based on renewable energy sources;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Invites the Commission and the Member States to prioritise the improvement of local sustainable transport, including logistic services, preferably by electric railways and to develop intermodal systems that answer to the real needs of citizens and enterprises; considers that UE financial support to the development of transport and infrastructures should be only devoted to the realization of non-controversial projects which bring a real added value for the citizens;
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
source: 604.604
2017/05/23
TRAN
479 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the Communication from the Commission from 31 March 1998 ‘on Transport and CO2 - developing a Community Approach’ that was published following the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol but was not translated into sufficient measures;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 b (new) – having regard to the European Parliament Recommendation to Council and Commission following the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector, of 4 April 2017,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged regions of the Union; underscores that this should be combined with investments in green alternatives
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to maintain a clear emissions-reduction trajectory with long term target setting up ambitious mandatory limits on average CO2 emissions for light and heavy vehicles;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that the implementation of the Single European Sky would contribute to a 10% reduction in emissions; therefore urges Member States to expedite the implementation of the Single European Sky;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the potential benefits of light-weighting and of a more efficient use of the current infrastructure, including better distribution of traffic and enhanced inter-modal solutions;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Advises Member States to hasten the implementation of the Single European Sky, as the current fragmentation leads to longer flight times, delays, additional fuel burn and increased CO2 emissions;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Asks the Commission to come Forward with the environmental inspections directive, to ensure implementation and enforcement of all necessary measures;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal to establish a European Parliament framework for distance-based charging including the complete internalisation of external costs also for passenger car in accordance with the polluter-pays principle in order to promote the use of sustainable modes of transport;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 c (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (EURO VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC and 2005/78/EC 4a;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Fair
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays and user- pays principles are essential in ensuring fairness and a level-playing field for different transport modes in Europe; considers at all events that a scheme should be set up that will introduce support measures for countries that have no alternative means of access using more sustainable transport modes, or for distant or remote countries, so as to ensure fair access to the Union market;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays and user- pays principles are essential in ensuring fairness and a level-playing field for different transport modes in Europe, while in the meantime taking into consideration the advantages and disadvantages of different charging systems for citizens and companies;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays and user- pays principles are essential in ensuring fairness and a level-playing field for different transport modes in Europe, but emphasises at the same time the importance of giving incentives to reach the climate objectives in all modes of transport;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays and user- pays principles are essential in ensuring fairness and a level-playing field for different transport modes in Europe, and that in this view, favourable taxation schemes of fossil fuels should no longer be applied;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays and user- pays principles are essential in ensuring fairness and a level-playing field for different transport modes in Europe; pricing should take into account all externalities;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals to reflect better the polluter-pays, across all sectors emitting CO2, and user-
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that clearer price signals
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) – having regard to the report on the inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (2016/2215 (INI)), as adopted by the European Parliament on 4 April 2017;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Each transport mode should cover its marginal costs, both for infrastructure wear and tear (“user pays”) and for external costs, e.g. for air pollution and noise (“polluter pays”). Applying the user-pays and polluter principles EU-wide will help address the current charging discrepancy between the transport modes;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underlines that transport pricing legislation should not create unfair competition in disadvantage of more sustainable modes, such as rail, and urges the Commission to come up with proposals to guarantee fair competition in this regards;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover all passenger cars and vans, and for the principle to be extended to urban areas; calls for flexibility in the upcoming revision for distant and sparsely populated areas as well as border regions;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 22 b (new) – having regard to the Circular Economy Package as published by the Commission on 2 December 2015;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include a distance-based
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU for those Member States using the tolling systems and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover all passenger cars and vans, and for the principle to be extended to urban areas;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover all passenger cars and vans, and for the principle to be extended to urban areas;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of carbon dioxide and other pollutant emissions; calls for the extension of distance-based charging to cover all passenger cars and vans, and for the principle to be extended to urban areas;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts at developing standards for inter- operable electronic tolling systems in the EU and the forthcoming revision of the Eurovignette Directive, which should include distance-based charging and differentiation on the basis of
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes the view that any toll scheme should also be assessed using fairness and social justice criteria in order to prevent a negative impact on consumers with lower income levels and no alternative means of mobility, particularly in those areas on the outskirts of cities but also in rural areas with few public transport alternatives;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls the ‘use of revenues' principle with regard to road charging, and requests that 50% of Eurovignette revenue be dedicated to improving urban mobility and that 75% of urban tolls be used for developing and maintaining urban transport infrastructure;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Emphasises that a modal shift in transport requires the promotion of and investment into multimodality and public transport;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 23 a (new) – having regard to the report of the European Parliament’s Committee on Transport and Tourism on sustainable urban mobility (2014/2242(INI));
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that in case kerosene taxation needs to be introduced for aviation,
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that kerosene taxation does not need
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, at EU level, under the Paris Agreement, which was ratified by the EU on 4 November 2016 and entered into force on the same date following its ratification by 141 Parties, all actors committed to keeping the increase in global temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Is convinced that Member States should be supported to introduce tax incentives that foster low-emission mobility such as walking, cycling and the use of public transport instead of subsidising cars, in particular company diesel cars;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that Member States should be able to use the most cost- efficient advanced biofuels to reduce CO2 in their markets without any artificial market capping mechanism for these fuels under the new Renewable Energy Directive;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Takes the view that digitisation can make transport more efficient and effective, reduce distances and facilitate forms of teleworking which can help reduce congestion in urban centres;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 a (new) Recognises that logistics can play a crucial role in reducing transport´s carbon impact through environmentally- friendly collaborative strategies addressing supply chain integration, multi-modal transport, consolidation of deliveries and reverse logistics; considers that digital technologies are critical to these objectives;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Emphasises the need to develop concepts for avoidance and reduction of transport volumes for freight through green logistics concepts;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that intelligent transport systems, platooning and autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, under the Paris Agreement, which was ratified by the EU on 4 November 2016 and entered into force on the same date following its ratification by 14
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of road, rail, maritime and air transport; insists, however, that autonomous vehicles should be electric/hybrid, shared, and include smart measures to mitigate increasing use;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of road, rail, maritime and air transport; insists, however, that autonomous vehicles should be
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport; insists, however, that autonomous vehicles should be clean, for instance electric, shared, and include smart measures to mitigate increasing use;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous and connected vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport; insists, however, that autonomous vehicles should be electric, shared, and include smart measures to mitigate increasing use;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, under the Paris Agreement, which was ratified by the EU on 4 November 2016 and entered into force on the same date following its ratification by 141 Parties, all actors committed to keeping the increase in global temperature to
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles c
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that autonomous vehicles can be an important asset in improving the efficiency of transport; insists, however, that the use of autonomous vehicles
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Acknowledges that connected car technology will not only improve road safety but also has significant environmental implications and notes the dense network infrastructure required to guarantee high capacity and low latency needs for a 5G network to make best use the possibilities for connected and autonomous vehicles to improve mobility in the urban environment; recognises that in-line with the wider process of digitization across European industry, many companies will have to underpin their transformation strategy with mobility, affording significant opportunities for SME´s and start-ups in the transport sector and this should be supported;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers that the impact of autonomous vehicles should be studied in terms of emissions as well as the impact in relation to the need to adapt the infrastructure network, safety, and also in terms of the impact on employment;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the need to provide incentives for car sharing, car pooling and shared transport in general, as well as alternative means of transport such as the bicycle;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls on the Commission to promote the introduction of efficient transport organisation systems, along with smart driving techniques that will contribute to more efficient and rational transport while also helping to cut emissions and reduce the ecological footprint;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility and transport management for achieving more efficient
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility management for achieving more efficient and environmentally friendly intermodal transport services and smart mobility, which can be key to promoting the
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility management, as for example an integrated multimodal ticketing, for achieving more efficient and environmentally friendly intermodal transport services and smart mobility, which can be key to promoting the shift from car ownership to mobility as a service;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas transport represents almost a quarter of Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions1a and is the main cause of air pollution in cities; __________________ 1a Eurostat, 2014
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility management for achieving more efficient and environmentally friendly intermodal and co-modal transport services and smart mobility, which can be key to promoting the shift from car ownership to mobility as a service and towards public transport;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility management for achieving more efficient and environmentally friendly intermodal transport services
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports initiatives on mobility management for achieving more efficient and environmentally friendly intermodal transport services and smart mobility
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Notes that urban freight vehicles contribute disproportionately to air and noise pollution and have a negative impact on congestion; therefore calls for better optimization of the supply chain in urban areas; calls on the commission to encourage the use of zero-emission light- duty commercial vehicles, zero-emissions buses, waste trucks, taxis and freight bicycles in last mile logistics;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to put forward in the Digital Single Market legislation framework the potential of safer, smarter and greener transportation means on roads, and promote projects for vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to road devices, as part of boosting the economy for innovation and opening up new business opportunities for European ICT companies;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses the importance of investing in optimal hinterland connections in order to decrease the ecological footprint of hinterland transport by encouraging the use of multimodal connections, sustainable rail transport, inland shipping, real time transport data and IT applications along the corridors in the Trans-European Transport Network;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that logistics is a field where the potential for emissions reduction is huge, and that numerous cheap and easy measures could be in place very fast with a measurable effect, such as flow and load optimisation ; calls therefore the Commission to list and identify those measures, in order to promote them in a near future;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Is convinced that promoting mobility management initiatives in regions and cities, institutions and the industry bear a considerable potential for reducing the need for citizens to travel both in terms of distance and speed;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. The contribution of Intelligent Transport Management System (ITS) to a more environmentally friendly transport system should be taken in consideration within future regulation;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70 % of overall greenhouse gas emissions in transport and much of air pollution, including NO2 and particulate matter and whereas action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all sectors of transport to reduce emissions;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Member States to support pilot projects that will encourage greater use of electric vehicles and alternative advanced biofuel vehicles;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses there is a need for a holistic EU approach (legislation, education, social aspects and infrastructure) to enable a swift digitalisation of transport;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Encourages the shift towards Cooperative Connected and Automated mobility, and supports the Commission’s European Strategy in this regard;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls for a uniform legislative framework for innovative logistical and transport solutions, so that the latter can be employed throughout Europe;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that better transport planning and better use of digitalisation are important measures for improving efficiency;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Asks the Commission to develop a comprehensive political strategy to cope with systemic changes that the paradigm of “mobility as a service” will have on consumers, workforce and industry; especially in the context of an ongoing digitalisation and automatisation of the transport sector;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Supports the Commission and the transport operators to elaborate projects that contain consistent information on a comparative CO2 footprint from different transport modes through publications, information, booking and ticketing;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Stresses the imperative need of adapting ICT standardization policy to market and policy developments in order to achieve interoperability for e-Freight and Intelligent Transport Systems;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that public transport has a vast potential to reduce traffic volume and its related emissions and calls on the European Commission to foster digitalisation and connectivity of public transport systems in order to remove barriers between transport modes and systems and to incentivise their use;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the own initiative report 2015/2005(INI) of the European Parliament adopted 09 September 2015, entitled “Implementation of the 2011 White Paper on transport: taking stock and the way forward towards sustainable mobility”;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric vehicle charging, including the provisions from the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive ensuring that the infrastructure cabling for electric vehicles is obligatory for new buildings;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric vehicle charging; calls for additional efforts for the development of adequate infrastructure for other alternative fuels;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric vehicle charging and for vehicles using alternative and sustainable fuels;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric and hydrogen vehicle charging of transport modes;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas road transport is partly responsible for
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes efforts to ensure comprehensive and interoperable infrastructure for electric vehicle charging of transport modes;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to swiftly present its evaluation on the implementation of the directive on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure1a by Member States and to take action on those Member States who have not yet presented a national strategy; __________________ 1aDIRECTIVE 2014/94/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 22 October 2014 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Recalls that Member States had to submit national action plans for the deployment of an appropriate alternative fuels infrastructure by 18 November 2016 in accordance with art. 3(7) of Directive 2014/94(EU);
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Considers that the promotion of electric mobility must consider the entire life cycle of the e-vehicles and be based on renewable energy sources;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Underlines that increased investment in infrastructure and green electricity is essential for the market uptake of electric vehicles. Recalls in this regard the 2020 and 2030 renewable energy goals;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Encourages the Commission to promote further development of infrastructure for other low and zero emissions technologies such as green hydrogen, synthetic fuels or power to gas;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Welcomes requirements for the installation of electric vehicles re- charging points both in private and public buildings;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of road transport and stress that a result based strategy combining all alternative energy sources and technologies is essential in order to facilitate the transition to zero-emissions transport;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, hydrogen, sustainable conventional and advanced biofuels
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70 % of overall greenhouse gas emissions in transport and much of air pollution,
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels, and more generally through positive carbon balance energy sources, would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of road transport;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, hydrogen, natural gas and sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of road transport;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels would be the most effective approach for reducing the climate impact of
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that an obligation for fuel suppliers to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of energy supplied through renewable electricity, sustainable advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels would be
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Reminds the Commission how urgent it is, with a view to taking tangible action geared to the sustainable energy transition of the whole of society, to transfer the financial incentives which fossil fuels continue to enjoy to alternative and sustainable forms of energy;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, at EU level, road transport is responsible for over 70 % of overall greenhouse gas emissions in transport and much of air pollution, and whereas action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all sectors of transport to reduce emissions;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges that the definition of advanced biofuels under the new Renewable Energy Directive should be technology neutral and not based on predetermined technology or feedstock list to allow industry the possibility to innovate;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls for a more ambitious approach for renewables in transport than proposed in the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive in order to achieve long- term decarbonisation of the transport sector;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Underlines the role that natural gas (e.g. CNG, LNG), bio-methane, synthetic methane and LPG could play in the transition towards the decarbonisation of the transport sector;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Urges that specific incentives need to be in place for the deployment of sustainable alternative fuels to those transport modes that currently have no alternatives to liquid fuel; such incentives should be reflected in the new Renewable Energy Directive as well as in Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans, as foreseen in the proposed Regulation on Governance of the Energy Union;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Concurs with the Commission that food-based biofuels have a limited role in decarbonising the transport sector and agrees with the state aid guidelines that food-based biofuels should not receive public support after 2020, however is of the opinion, that economic operators that have invested in conventional biofuel technologies should be assisted in shifting their production towards advanced biofuels;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Concurs with the Commission that food-based biofuels have a limited role in decarbonising the transport sector
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Concurs with the Commission that some food-based biofuels have a limited role in decarbonising the transport sector and
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Concurs with the Commission that food-based biofuels have a
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70 % of overall greenhouse gas emissions in transport and much of air pollution, and whereas action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to phase-out food based biofuels, contrary to what has been called for by most European ‘environmental’ parties for almost 20 years;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Urges the Commission not to give financial support for fossil-fuel related infrastructure investments when there is a risk of carbon lock-in hindering the uptake of low-carbon alternatives. Notes in this regard the high chance of stranded assets if public money is used to subsidise LNG bunkering infrastructure, as LNG, another fossil fuel, will not deliver decarbonisation for the shipping sector needed to achieve 1.5/2C global target;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to take immediate measures to phase vegetable oils including palm oil as a component of biofuels, that drive deforestation and increase competition for land for the production of food and feed, put at risk our ecosystems or do not significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as soon as possible but at latest by 2020
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that the EU approach to sustainable energy should be technology neutral and the goal of EU sustainability policies should focus on reducing climate- and health-damaging emissions
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls for the contribution of transport fuels from palm oil and its derivatives to the share of renewables in transport to be limited until global peatland conversion is halted.
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Encourages the Commission to develop objective criteria for the recognition of advanced biofuels to stimulate innovation and the market uptake;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. asks the Commission to fully use the potential of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) to conduct research in clean energy for transports ;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. welcomes the support in Horizon 2020 for Research, Development and Innovation in the matters of clean transports and sustainable energy, and asks for this support to be pursued in the next MFF ;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas road transport is responsible for over 70 % of overall greenhouse gas emissions in transport and much of air pollution, and whereas action is mainly needed in this area, while efforts should be intensified in all
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to limit European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), Trans- European Transport network (TEN-T), Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) financing to initiatives that contribute to climate action; recalls, therefore, the immediate need to renew the criteria of allocation of different EU funds to foster the decarbonisation and energy-efficiency measures to guarantee that EU funding will not be allocated to projects which are not compliant with CO2 reduction targets and policies; asks the Commission to establish a fostered and transparent methodology for evaluation of the environmental performance of the applications.
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to limit European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), Trans- European Transport network (TEN-T), Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) financing to initiatives that contribute to climate
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the maritime sector is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, predicted to increase between 50% and 250% by 2050; whereas CO2 emissions in the shipping sector relates to the amount and type of fuel consumed; whereas cutting nitrogen oxides emissions from the shipping sector through a taxation system could save €28.3 billion in health costs over the next 23 years1a; __________________ 1aStudy by IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (2017)
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to limit European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), Trans- European Transport network (TEN-T), Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) financing to initiatives that contribute to climate action and minimise external costs;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Urges the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas transports, and in particular road vehicles, are emitting Carbon Dioxide (CO2), which poses no direct threat to human health but is a greenhouse gas; Particulate Matter (PM), such as soot, which are a carcinogenic; and Nitrogen Oxides (NO and NO2 – collectively indicated as NOx), which cause irritation of the respiratory tract and acid rain and are ozone precursors;
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – point 1 (new) (1) Stresses that research and development are vital to attaining the Union’s objectives in terms of decarbonisation of transport and clean mobility; calls on the Commission, in its Horizon 2020 research programme, to pursue its efforts to encourage European innovation and the new technologies in all areas of transport;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Points out that in order to obtain appreciable results in terms of reducing pollutant emissions, a holistic approach needs to be taken to the issue, including measures relating also to urban and non- urban infrastructure, in addition to town planning itself, which needs to take into account new public transport implementation requirements and have the ability to effectively divert private vehicles from urban centres, by redesigning urban areas more carefully so that they are more people-friendly, to enable people to re-learn how to experience towns and cities outside their cars;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers that CEF projects are key for the European Strategy for Low- Emission Mobility and regrets that its budget was used to feed EFSI, therefore asks that CEF budget is restored and reiterates that EFSI II should be financed from other sources; furthermore, considers that it should be avoided that CEF-eligible projects are financed by EFSI;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Emphasises that a cross-border train network including attractive and comfortable night trains is a good alternative to short flights and car travel and therefore insists on revitalising night trains, both for business and tourist destinations;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the needs to deliver the most cost-effective emissions reductions, also through the full exploitation of the existing infrastructure and by boosting technologies that facilitate cross-border impact between Member States;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Points to the importance of maintaining the infrastructure network in good condition and with high levels of quality, which facilitates traffic flow and also makes it possible to reduce congestion and hence the level of CO2 and other pollutant emissions;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Acknowledges that research programmes such as SESAR, CleanSky, ACARE and EGNOS are necessary to allow continued investment in green and innovative technology and operational improvements;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses that low-emission transport should be supported by research programmes to allow continued investment in green and innovative technology and operational improvements;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Highlights the importance of a successful use of EFSI or of combining of EFSI with ESIF; considers that member states should invest more in their railway system and make efforts to increase absorption rates of cohesion funds for rail projects;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls on the Commission to propose within the MFF a maximum of 20% co-funding for roads, a minimum of 40% for rail and a minimum of 5% for cycling infrastructure for each Member State;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the development of passenger and freight transport is largely dependent on the effective use of a variety of modes of transport, and European transport policy should be based on efficient co-modality, where the use of the most energy-efficient and sustainable transport modes should be prioritised where possible;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Urges the Commission to make available more funds for cities to jointly bid for infrastructure or technologies that would contribute to decarbonising urban transport and reduce air pollution from road vehicles. This would include, but not be limited to public recharging stations for electric vehicles, car and bike sharing systems and the development of public transport;
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) and calls for the Commission to link EU co-financing of urban projects to achieving such targets; stresses that the excessive use of private vehicles for road transport is responsible for the congestion of urban centres and the concentration in urban areas of the fine particulates that are the cause of very serious respiratory diseases, and that no strategy seeking to reduce pollutant emissions, in full compliance with the Paris agreements, can fail to aim at persuading people to use public vehicles rather than private ones;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs)
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) and calls for the Commission to link EU co-financing of urban projects to achieving such targets; notes that new mobility concepts for cities must be developed that promote more sustainable behaviour and plan mobility through the development of coordinated urban mobility plans with integrated urban mobility plans;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) and calls for the Commission to link EU co-financing of urban
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) and calls for the Commission to
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas transport-related air pollution is the main cause of air pollution in urban areas and whereas especially particulate matter and nitrogen oxides adversely impact public health;
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Encourages cities to include GHG targets into their
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Promoting public transport Takes the view that one of the most efficient ways of reducing emissions and improving transport efficiency is to promote collective public transport; considers it important to boost the role of public transport services; calls further on the Commission and States to promote and incentivise the purchase of cleaner, less-polluting vehicles by both public authorities and private fleets;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Hopes that urban public transport, in particular that using sustainable fuels and/or electric motors, can be funded ever more extensively to enable it even to become free of charge, which would ensure that it would be used also by the less affluent classes, the numbers of which have been growing due to the economic crisis and which are increasingly concentrated in, and relegated to, the suburbs and outermost urban areas;
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recognises that cities and local authorities have an important role to play in the development of low-emission transport; therefore considers that the Covenant of Mayors can offer an interesting platform to tackle the challenges ahead and exchange best practices; welcomes the important initiatives by various cities and local authorities to create Low Emission Zones and recognises the beneficial effects of those zones;
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls for local and regional authorities to take full consideration the continued assurance of commercial transport and delivery services in their planning of urban transport policy;
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses the opportunities of Green Public Procurement for more sustainable transport, in particular for (sub)urban buses;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls for the Commission to strengthen the networks of front-runners among cities and to share success stories in both GHG emission reductions and clean air strategies; stresses the importance of exchanging best practices and lessons learned in the sector of low-emission mobility among the Member States and requests the Commission to provide platforms for such activities; stresses also that research and development activities play an essential role in the development of low-emission mobility;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls for the Commission to strengthen the networks of front-runners among cities and to share success stories in both GHG emission reductions and clean air strategies and to encourage local, regional and national authorities to fully integrate the needs and procedures of transport, housing and land-use planning in order to better achieve the climate policy goals;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls for the Commission to strengthen the networks of front-runners among cities who prioritize sustainable modes of transport like walking, cycling, public transport, car pooling and sharing in city planning and to share success stories in both GHG emission reductions and clean air strategies;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to its Resolution of 9 July 2015 on “Implementation of the 2011 White Paper on transport”1a; __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0310
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the reduction of the emissions of these pollutants into the atmosphere is on the one hand fundamental for ecosystem conservation and human health (PM and NOx), and on the other hand an important factor for mitigating climate change (CO2), and is required by EU law, and whereas air pollution is the single largest environmental health risk in Europe and results in a substantial public health burden and premature deaths (the transport sector, in particular, is the largest contributor to NOx emissions, accounting for 46 % of total EU NOx emissions in 2014);
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls for the Commission to strengthen the networks of front-runners among cities and to share
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Supports the Commission and the transport operators to elaborate projects that contain consistent information on a comparative CO2 footprint from the respective transport modes through publications, information, booking and by indicating it directly on the tickets;
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Asks the Commission to look into the introduction in several Members States of low emission zones, and to examine the possibility to set common criteria/rules for the introduction/functioning of these zones.
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. More attention must be paid to increasing the integration and attractiveness of non-motorised forms of transport, which would comprehensively reduce the attractiveness of private forms of transport;
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Invites the Member States and local authorities to rethink speed management in cities and to introduce a default speed limit of 30 km/h by 2020;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to include the transport needs of citizens in rural and remote areas into strategies for low emission mobility;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Encourages all public entities to incorporate sustainability criteria in public procurement.
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Considers the availability of easily accessible information on GHG emissions as an intermodal passenger right;
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Encourages the Commission, the Member States and local authorities to evolve concepts of a modal shift for mobility distances of less than 6 km from road to the intermodal mobility chain walking-cycling-public/collective transport- shared use of cars (carpooling and car sharing);
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20d. Supports the Commission, the Member States and the regions to invest more in the combination and integration of the EuroVelo Cycling Network with the TEN-T railway networks;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas modal shift will lead to an optimal rebalancing between different transport modes, and will provide for interoperability within and between the modes, promote more sustainable transport and logistics chains and enhance seamless traffic flows across modes and nodes;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20e. Urges the European Commission and Member States to develop a European Cycling Strategy;
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Encourages national and local authorities to create strong incentives in order to promote low-emission taxi and last-mile delivery fleets;
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 f (new) 20f. Stresses that a proposal for a revision of the General Safety Regulation is overdue and calls upon the Commission to publish it before the end of 2017; considers that technology for 'intelligent speed adaption' is mature and can save many lives, and should therefore be introduced for all vehicles without further delay; underlines that 'direct vision' for trucks is a very effective solution to avoid accidents with vulnerable road users and that mandatory standards in this regard should be part of the proposal;
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for 2025 and 2030 on the basis of a linear trajectory and at a level corresponding to an annual improvement of at least 6-8 %, corresponding to 70 g New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) in 2025 and 50g NEDC in 2030 , and for a new Euro 7 standards particularly for Nitrogen Oxides and Particulate Matters ;
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for 20
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas direct emissions from the aviation sector accounts for about 3% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions and more than 2% of global emissions;
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions of
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for 2025 and 2030 on the basis of a
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for new standards for CO2 emissions from cars and vans to be set for
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Insists that the future Union CO2 standards for vehicles should
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Insists that the future Union CO2 standards for vehicles should
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates its call for a revision of car labelling to improve consumer information and for the public procurement rules to incentivise clean vehicles; stresses that car labelling should be based on a comparative CO2 footprint; takes the view that fuel consumption and CO2 emission specifications for motor vehicles must be accompanied by measures to ensure that this information can be readily understood by laymen;
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates its call for a revision of car labelling to
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas urban transport accounts for about 25% of the CO2 emissions responsible for climate change and harmful levels of air pollution in urban areas are related to direct NO2 emissions from the use of light and heavy vehicles;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates its call for a revision of car labelling to improve consumer information and for the public procurement rules to incentivise clean vehicles; stresses that car labelling should be based on a comparative CO2
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates its call for a revision of
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates its call for a revision of car labelling to improve consumer information and for the public procurement rules to incentivise clean vehicles; stresses that car labelling should be based on a comparative CO2
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Points to the role played by motorised two-wheeled vehicles in reducing congestion in urban centres and reducing emissions and other pollutants; calls on the Commission to take the positive aspects of these vehicles into account across all areas of its legislative programme;
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Considers that labelling with indications of country and region of production is essential in order to guide consumers towards products whose transport to the point of sale will have caused the least greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas ambitious low-emission strategies, in among others China and India, illustrate that it offers major economic opportunities;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 343 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the Commission to introduce a minimum target for the share of electric vehicles for all manufacturers of at least 25 % for 2025; stresses that the growing demand for electric vehicles must be supported by the implementation of sustainable electricity generation and by a widespread distribution of supply networks; calls on the Commission to help Member States equip themselves with such networks;
Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the Commission to
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the Commission to
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the Commission to introduce a
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the Commission to introduce a minimum target for the share of
Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. considers that road pollution control, at the EU level, necessitates a strong and reliable EU oversight and system of controls, which should involve the establishment of a European Vehicles Surveillance Agency, in order to address the failures and legal loopholes identified in the aftermath of Dieselgate;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on ‘A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility’ and concurs that a momentous shift to low-emission mobility is essential for the broader shift to a
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Emphasises the benefits for the European economy of an early transition to those vehicles that the LCA findings have found to have the lowest climate impact. This transition will ensure European carmakers remain competitive on the global stage ensuring existing jobs and while creating new ones;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Hopes that an increasing amount of funding will be allocated to technological research on the production, handling and disposal of the batteries of electric motors, to ensure they are increasingly eco-friendly;
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to assess the appropriateness of setting a target for the share of electric vehicles in the light of technological developments and the economic feasibility of such a measure;
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to consider proposing a flexible Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate which will require car manufacturers to sell a minimum of 20% electric vehicles by 2025;
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Stresses the need to promote wide SME participation in the manufacture of vehicles and components so as to ensure a level playing field in the transport market and encourage research and innovation;
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. calls for specific actions regarding circulating fleet that doesn't meet the current emissions standards ;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) for 2025 without further delay, as well as for CO2 certification to allow for differentiation in road-user charging; calls on the Commission to come up with a proposal how should the energy and emission savings achieved by platooning be taken into account in this differentiation;
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) for 2025
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) for 2025 without further delay, as well as for CO2 certification to allow for differentiation in road-user charging with zero emission vehicles fully relieved of such charges;
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) for 2025 without further delay and based on a solid basis determined by VECTO tool, as well as for CO2 certification to allow for differentiation in road-user charging;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 360 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs)
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects the Commission to come forward with a proposal for CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs)
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Expects
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Reminds the Commission that the European road transport sector is a major contributor to European growth and jobs and that it is important that the sector remains competitive; recalls the fact that the USA, Japan, Canada and China have all introduced truck C02 standards and notes the importance of Europe not falling behind and pursuing technological leadership in order to safeguard the future competitiveness of road passenger and freight transport, for example.
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Stresses that any legislative proposal to reduce CO2 emissions from heavy-duty vehicles has to take account of the key features of trucks, as all these variables result in different CO2 emissions; strongly supports the use of simulation tool VECTO and certified data provided by manufacturers to calculate the CO2 results for a complete vehicle or truck-trailer combination, considering its possible missions;
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Emphasises the important contribution that ‘mega trucks’ can make to increasing efficiency within road haulage, since they make for fewer journeys, fuel savings and hence lower emissions, and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to create incentives to make greater use of ‘mega trucks’;
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Recalls that the Commission committed in its 2016 Low Emission Mobility Strategy to introduce a truck CO2 standard before the end of the mandate; highlights that other regions in the world such as the USA, China, Japan and Canada have already introduced truck CO2 standards;
Amendment 367 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls upon the Commission to start developing a European Low Carbon Trucking Strategy on the basis of a comparative study, given that several Member States such as Germany and Sweden have already taken initiatives to work towards zero emission road freight
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls for the Commission to consider supply as well as demand side measures as part of a wider European Low Carbon Trucking Strategy to support the market uptake of energy-efficient and alternative powered buses and trucks;
Amendment 369 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. considers that the growing use of clean engines for heavy duty vehicles, for instance electric or LNG powered, should be supported and that it requires important and strategic infrastructure investments ;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to establish and also allow the Member States to introduce incentives for the transit of low or zero-emission vehicles and priority for their movement throughout the TEN-T network;
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Points out that there are already member state initiatives looking at zero emission road freight and calls on the Commission to develop a European Low Carbon Trucking Strategy;
Amendment 372 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to include HDVs and their supporting infrastructure in its focus of resources on innovative zero- and low-emissions options and their deployment;
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to introduce a 2030 zero-emission target for city busses;
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Takes the view that, to be able to meet the most immediate emission reduction goals in the transition to a future with zero-emission vehicles, measures need to be taken to promote the renewal of large fleets for the transport by road of goods and people; suggests creating an innovative instrument to finance fleets, for example through EFSI, that will contribute to the renewal of vehicles and their replacement by vehicles that are more efficient in terms of emissions and pollutants, which will help to create economies of scale and bring about a reduction in the prices of low- emission vehicles;
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Stresses the fact that it is important to create the right conditions to stimulate low emission alternative energy for transport and notes that this can be facilitated by ensuring that industry has a clear and long-term framework on which to base investment concerning the decarbonisation of fuels and other new technologies; calls on the Commission to consider undertaking a feasibility study on the potential solutions on offer, on which to base a low carbon strategy for road freight transport;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Highlights that the Commission announced in its 2016 Low Emissions Mobility Strategy that a zero emission target for city buses should be explored; highlights that up to 30 % of European citizens living in cities are exposed to air pollutant levels exceeding the EU air quality standards; in this respect calls on the Commission to introduce a 2025 zero- emission target for city buses in its 2018 truck CO2 standards proposal;
Amendment 377 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Underlines the importance of cleaner buses for air quality in cities and therefore welcomes the announcement of a zero-Emission target for city buses in the Low-Emissions Mobility Strategy; call upon the Commission to translate this announcement into concrete measures by proposing a zero-emission target for city buses by 2025 as part for the future proposal on truck CO2 standards;
Amendment 378 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Calls on the Commission to foster the shift to eHighways, an innovative electric road freight transport system as an alternative and low-emission freight transport mode;
Amendment 379 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Calls on the Commission to introduce a 2025 zero-emission target for city buses in its upcoming truck CO2 standards proposal
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on ‘A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility’ and concurs that a
Amendment 380 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Highlights the fact that a review of the General Safety Regulation can deliver significant gains for both road safety and the environment; calls on the Commission to make a proposal before the end of the year that incorporates the introduction of intelligent speed assistance for all vehicles, better tyre pressure monitoring systems and safer, more aerodynamic truck designs with improved direct vision.
Amendment 381 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Calls on the European Commission to bring the Euro emission standards CO2 emissions into closer alignment, with the ultimate aim of merging them into a new, single and robust vehicle emission standard to avoid perverse incentives to reduce one harmful pollutant to the detriment of another;
Amendment 382 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 d (new) 25d. Takes note of the fact that up to 30% of Europeans who live in cities are exposed to air pollutant levels that exceed EU air quality standards; Recalls that in its Low Emission Mobility Strategy, the Commission expressed an interest in exploring a zero-emission target for city- buses, asks the Commission to consider undertaking a feasibility study or consultation on a zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) mandate for city buses in the EU.
Amendment 383 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 d (new) 25d. Supports the Commission’s plan for a Clean Bus Platform bringing together bus operators, local authorities, bus manufacturers and energy supplies to encourage the rapid take up of cleaner vehicles and calls on the Commission to promote the bus as an environmentally sustainable form of public transport
Amendment 384 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 e (new) 25e. Takes note that there are many new technologies and innovations in existing technologies that can have significant environmental benefits, such as better tires, improved lubricants, more efficient transmission and hybrid engines, and that Europe should look to be technological leaders in this regard; calls on the Commission to investigate the role of such technologies in improving both efficiency and environmental performance;
Amendment 385 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 e (new) 25e. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to update the Clean Vehicle Directive (Directive 2009/33/EC) to encourage the purchase of cleaner vehicles with a clear, simple methodology for cities to use while recognising that where they already have their own well established methodologies and pollutant pricing models for determining the cleanliness of a vehicle, these should be allowed to continue;
Amendment 386 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Underlines that emission reduction and air quality targets require action that will concern also older vehicles and reminds in this regards, that the retrofitting is the fastest and the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions and pollutants from older fleet as systematic implementation of advanced diesel exhaust after treatment allows older heavy-duty vehicles, such as buses and trucks, to operate in an environmentally friendly manner, meeting even the strictest emission requirements and achieving maximum reduction in terms of NOx, NO2 and PM strains; calls therefore the on the Commission to come up with common EU guidelines in order to encourage the Member States to fully deploy the possibilities of retrofitting solutions and also ensure the eligibility for funding in context of EU financial instruments aiming to decarbonisation of transport system.
Amendment 387 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Supports strongly the new Commission calls for proposals on missing cross-border rail links at regional level and welcomes the perspective of minimising or reducing the climate impact; calls in this connection on the Commission to take account, in the framework of the amendment to the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) No 913/2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight, of past experience with implementing the Regulation and to lay down conditions for the operation of freight trains on a defined network in such a way that in prioritising the different types of rail transport, account is taken of their real effectiveness in terms of impact on energy efficiency in the transport sector;
Amendment 388 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Supports strongly the new
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Supports strongly the new Commission calls for proposals on missing cross-border rail links at regional level and welcomes the perspective of minimising or reducing the climate impact, avoiding a repetition of the environmental and financial mistake represented by the Lyon-Turin project;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 390 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 – point 1 (new) (1) Endorses the priority given by the Commission to investments in rail infrastructure, in particular regarding missing links and cross-border connections; recalls in this context that for freight transport in particular, rail is an efficient and sustainable mass transport system;
Amendment 391 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Supports the transition from road transport to rail transport (shift2rail) by increasing the interoperability of the various transport modes;
Amendment 392 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and sustainable waterways of 30 % by 2030 and 50 % by 2050; in this regard, recalls the ten goals for a competitive and resource efficient transport system under 2.5 of the White Paper 2011, in relation to the adherence to 2030 and 2050 modal shift objectives regarding road freight;
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and sustainable waterways
Amendment 394 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport
Amendment 395 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that
Amendment 396 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages
Amendment 397 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and sustainable waterways
Amendment 398 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and sustainable inland waterways of 30 % by 2030 and 50 % by 2050;
Amendment 399 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and sustainable inland waterways of 30 % by 2030 and 50 % by 2050;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 b (new) – having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 23 February 2017 on the “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A European Strategy for Low- Emission Mobility” of 20 July 2016,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that, in order to respect the Paris Agreement, greenhouse gas emissions from transport will need to be
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal for the Combined Transport Directive that better promotes efficient freight transport and encourages the modal shift towards rail and
Amendment 401 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls on the Member States, the Commission and rail stakeholders to take all necessary actions for the implementation of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, in order to accelerate the integration of advanced technologies into innovative rail product solutions, increase the attractiveness of rail transport and bolster the position of the European railway industry;
Amendment 402 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls on the Member States to thoroughly and effectively implement of Directive 2012/34 (Recast), EC Implementing Act 2015/909 and the 4th Railway Package without delay to ensure the competitive setting of Track Access Charges enabling fair cross-modal competition;
Amendment 403 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls on the Commission to examine the disadvantages of passenger rail transport (e.g. through taxation, track charging, direct and indirect subsidies) compared to other modes of transport and to establish a level playing field;
Amendment 404 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Reiterates the importance of interoperability and coordination with the other transport modes, of improved reliability and noise reduction, and of seamless multimodal transport;
Amendment 405 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Stresses the need for a full, effective and uniform implementation of the rail network for competitive freight Regulation benefiting both passengers and industry;
Amendment 406 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 407 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 408 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 409 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that, in order to respect the Paris Agreement, greenhouse gas emissions from transport will need to be
Amendment 410 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 411 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the
Amendment 412 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve
Amendment 413 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve aviation efficiency
Amendment 414 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 415 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve aviation efficiency, including by means of the proposal on landing fees and CO2 standards without going beyond those enshrined in the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) agreement;
Amendment 416 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve aviation efficiency, including by means of the proposal on landing fees and CO2 standards b
Amendment 417 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve
Amendment 418 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Asks the Commission to improve aviation efficiency, including by means of the proposal on landing fees and CO2 standards
Amendment 419 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Recalls that airspace is also part of the EU single market, and that any fragmentation resulting from its inefficient use, as well as diverging national practices (concerning, for instance, operational procedures, taxes, levies, etc.), causes longer flight times, delays, extra fuel burn, and higher levels of CO2 emissions, in addition to negatively impacting the rest of the market and hampering the EU's competitiveness; urges therefore the Council and Member States to make swift progress for the completion of the Single European Sky;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that the Commission should play a leading role in implementing concrete measures and legislative initiatives in the transport sector in order to achieve and respect the EU’s mitigation commitments; in this regard, underlines the importance of submitting ambitious legislative proposals to implement the EU’s Climate and Energy Policy Framework for 2030, including a specific and binding GHG emission reduction target for the transport sector;
Amendment 420 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Notes the decision by the 39th Session of the ICAO Assembly to develop a global market-based measure (GMBM) scheme for international aviation; Calls on the Commission to present an assessment in a timely manner to verify, among other things, the suitability of the provision of the agreement which provides a carbon neutral growth, to limit the emissions' growing in the aviation sector according to the Paris objectives;
Amendment 421 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Urges Member States to speed up implementation of Single European Sky, as the causal effects of the current fragmentation of European airspace are excessive delays, additional fuel burn, longer flight times and greater CO2 emissions;
Amendment 422 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Asks the Commission to continue to work on adjusting the Union Emissions Trading System (ETS) with regard to CORSIA, and to take into account the extension of the exception for serving the European Union’s outermost regions;
Amendment 423 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Urges Member States to speed up implementation of the ‘Single European Sky’, which will make it possible, at a single stroke, to reduce flight times, cut the number of delays, optimise airspace and consequently reduce emissions;
Amendment 424 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Stresses the importance of providing incentives to use the best and shortest flight routes in order to save on fuel and reduce harmful emissions, as compared to longer routes chosen to avoid airspaces, which involve higher costs;
Amendment 425 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Urges Member States to speed up the implementation of the Single European Sky, as current fragmentation are causing longer flight times, delays, extra fuel burn and great CO2 emissions;
Amendment 426 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new) 28b. Takes the view that the aviation sector is a fully global sector that requires global measures in relation to emissions in order to avoid unfair competition and prevent European operators from being placed at a disadvantage; takes the view, therefore, that measures need to be promoted within the ICAO before adopting regional and national measures in this area;
Amendment 427 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 428 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 429 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for car, railway, maritime and aeronautics manufacturers, suppliers and for innovative energy and service providers; stresses that support for new technologies and business models encouraging innovative partnerships between large companies, SMEs and start-ups is needed;
Amendment 430 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 431 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 432 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should fully implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)
Amendment 433 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the
Amendment 434 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) through the Union Emissions Trading System (ETS), while allowing for 50 % of the journeys to be excluded, provided that the destination is implementing CORSIA through national measures; proposes that the EU ETS should be retained for flights within the European Economic Area (EEA)
Amendment 435 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) through the Union Emissions Trading System (ETS)
Amendment 436 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should fully implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)
Amendment 437 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) through the Union Emissions Trading System (ETS), while allowing for 50 % of the journeys to be excluded, provided that the destination is implementing CORSIA through national measures;
Amendment 438 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29.
Amendment 439 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the EU should implement the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 440 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls for continued efforts to reduce the fragmentation of the European airspace; and stresses the importance of reinforcing the Single European Sky through the improvement of the performance of air traffic management, including improved trajectory management in order to reduce CO2 emissions
Amendment 441 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Asks the Commission to continue promoting and financing programmes such as Clean Sky and SESAR and to encourage Member States and the industry to fully benefit from European satellite-based technologies such as EGNOs and Galileo which allow more efficient navigation and approach procedures;
Amendment 442 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Negotiations of air services agreements by the EU with third countries should exclude prohibitions on fuel taxation and should include requirements that countries abide by international standards and recommended practices.
Amendment 443 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Stresses that CORSIA should apply to all international flights, including cross-border flights within the EEA, in order to achieve a successful outcome for the implementation of a GMBM;
Amendment 444 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls for the Commission to look for new ways of supporting the deployment of renewable aviation fuels in order to reduce the GHG emissions in aviation;
Amendment 445 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. calls for the continuation of financing Clean Sky joint undertaking through Horizon 2020 in the next MFF ;
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Stresses the importance of continuing to boost research in this area in order to step up investment in technologies for the development of sustainable aviation – by promoting the design of lighter aircraft, the use of digital and satellite technology to support a more efficient management of flight routes, the production and use of alternative new- generation fuels, especially given that in this sector there are not many alternatives to traditional liquid fuels – including through the development of public-private partnerships; underlines, in this regard, the key role played by research programmes such as Clean Sky and SESAR and the need for their mandates to be extended;
Amendment 447 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Invites the Member States and the aeronautic industry to encourage the development of further measures to promote smart initiatives aiming at reducing emissions in the aviation sector, from, to and within airports;
Amendment 448 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 c (new) 29c. Calls for action to be taken regarding short-haul flights, especially those using obsolete technology which is therefore responsible for high emissions; calls, wherever possible and convenient from an environmental perspective, for more sustainable means of transport to be promoted and for multimodal transport to be encouraged;
Amendment 449 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility does not only benefit public health and the environment but equally offers major opportunities for car manufacturers, suppliers and for innovative energy and service providers;
Amendment 450 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 451 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that,
Amendment 452 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that, in order to
Amendment 453 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that, in order to
Amendment 454 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses that, in the absence of an international agreement on an emissions reduction objective for the shipping sector and IMO measures to mitigate emissions in the international maritime sector, the Union should incorporate international shipping into the Emissions Trading System from 2023; although insists also on the importance of setting a global binding target in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to reach the objective of the 2011 White Paper for an at least 40 % reduction in CO2 emissions from maritime bunker fuels by 2050, to be supported by an EU intermediate target for 2030; calls for an enhancement of the negotiations within the IMO on the development of a global market-based mechanism addressing international maritime emissions, such as an emissions pricing mechanism;
Amendment 455 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses that
Amendment 456 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 457 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses that
Amendment 458 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 459 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses th
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 460 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses that,
Amendment 461 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses that, in the absence of an international agreement on an emissions reduction objective for the shipping sector and IMO measures to mitigate emissions in the international maritime sector, the Union should consider incorporat
Amendment 462 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Underlines the importance to fully transpose and implement the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure directive (COM 2014/94), including the establishment of LNG refuelling points across the TEN-T corridors and at maritime ports. The wider use of LNG in freight transport could contribute to the low-emission mobility, having regard to the international climate and energy long targets;
Amendment 463 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Asks the Commission to support clean technologies that contribute to emissions reduction, such as liquified natural gas (LNG); considers LNG as the most feasible solution in the short and medium term to reduce emissions in maritime sector; calls on the Commission to incentivise the transition and improve the availability of LNG in European ports;
Amendment 464 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Calls for the harmonization and full implementation of European land based infrastructure for maritime transport, such as onshore power supply and LNG-terminals, through concrete financial incentives and regulatory measures, in order to reduce GHG;
Amendment 465 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Considers it necessary to create a European Black Sea macro-region ensuring that the opportunities resulting from cross-border cooperation in this region do not go to waste;
Amendment 466 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 b (new) 31b. Underlines that innovative financing solutions and the use of the EU investment support facilities available from the European Investment Bank should provide useful tools to help ship- owners to shoulder/cover the initial cost in order to reduce GHG.
Amendment 467 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Asks the Commission to come forward with a review of the Directive on River Information Services (RIS)21 , in order to set an EU-wide legal basis for cross-border data exchange, enabling the comprehensive implementation of cross- border RIS and the digital integration with other modes of transport including on how to promote the use of RIS for reducing inland waterways emissions; __________________ 21 Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community, OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 152-159.
Amendment 468 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Asks the Commission to come forward with a review of the Directive on River Information Services (RIS)21 in 2018 to set an EU-wide legal basis for cross- border data exchange, enabling the comprehensive implementation of cross- border RIS and the digital integration with other modes of transport, including on how to promote the use of RIS for reducing inland waterways emissions; __________________ 21 Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river
Amendment 469 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Asks the Commission to come forward with a review of the Directive on River Information Services (RIS)21 in 2018, including on how to promote the use of RIS for reducing inland waterways emissions; __________________ 21 Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community, OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 152-159.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 470 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Stresses that inland waterway transport in Europe should be encouraged and exploited and calls on the Commission to allocate funding for the cleaning of sunken vessels, given the high cost of such operations, along with the prospect of regional development and the expansion of inland waterway shipping and transport operations in the internal market;
Amendment 471 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Stresses that looking at the actual market needs, strong support is needed from the EU, national and regional level in order to ensure that a sufficient number of inland ports of the TEN-T core network are equipped with alternative energy infrastructure and publicly accessible refuelling and storage points for inland waterways transports within adequate distances;
Amendment 472 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Encourages the Commission and Members States to come forward with measures on the use of wind and solar energy as well as on greening the engines and fuel of inland vessels through inter alia showing good practice of front- runners and supporting the financing of clean inland waterways by the existing scrapping-fund and the EFSI/EIB tools;
Amendment 473 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Stresses that, looking at the actual market needs, strong support is needed from the EU, national and regional level in order to ensure that a sufficient number of inland ports of the TEN-T core network are equipped with alternative energy infrastructure and publicly accessible refuelling and storage points for inland waterways transports.
Amendment 474 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Stresses that, a strong support from the EU is recommended in order to ensure the equipment of a sufficient amount of inland ports of the TEN-T core network with alternative fuels infrastructure and refuelling and storage points for inland waterways transports publicly accessible;
Amendment 475 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Underlines the urgent need for a modal shift from road transport to transport over inland waterways;
Amendment 476 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Asks the Commission to establish an Innovation and Greening fund supported by the Connecting Europe Facility and Member States in order to step up their efforts to support greening;
Amendment 477 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Asks the Commission to establish a fund supported by the Connecting Europe Facility and Member States in order to step up their efforts to support greening.
Amendment 478 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Stresses the importance of financial supportive measures to innovate the sector and preserve the environment during infrastructure works;
Amendment 479 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 c (new) 32c. Asks the Commission to support programmes of real-time emission monitoring, to ensure standardisation of monitoring and to establish a European- wide database;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU1a, __________________ 1a OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the shift towards low- emission mobility offers major opportunities for
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that the implementation of new innovative technologies, in a market-driven approach, is a key element to achieve an effective reduction of the GHG emissions within the transport sector;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Encourage the Commission to act as the leading actor for global, harmonised measures, with regards to more sustainable and efficient transport;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need for a clear change in demand management in order to make the necessary shift to an intermodal approach; reiterates that t
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises th
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need for a clear change in transportation demand management in order to make the necessary shift to a
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need for a clear change in demand management in order to make the necessary shift to an intermodal approach;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) – having regard to Communication from the Commission COM(2016)766, A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems, a milestone towards cooperative, connected and automated mobility,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need for a clear change in transportation demand management and spatial planning in order to make the necessary shift to an intermodal approach; reiterates that transport should be seen as a service and not a goal as such;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need for a clear change in demand management in order to make the necessary shift to an intermodal approach; reiterates that transport should be seen as an important service and not a goal as such;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that in the 2011 White Paper on Transport, the European Parliament has stressed that a European sustainable mobility policy needs to build on a broad range of policy tools to shift towards the least polluting and most energy-efficient modes of transport in a cost-efficient manner; points out that shifting the balance between modes of transport is necessary to disconnect mobility from the adverse effects of the present transport system such as congestion, air pollution, noise, accidents and climate change; in this regards acknowledges that the modal shift policy has not so far delivered satisfactory results;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines the importance of Research & Development for tackling technological challenges regarding low- emission mobility; urges the Commission to continue its strong support for research programmes, such as CleanSky and SESAR;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and to come forward with a ‘transport and climate’ legislative package with a view to achieving the climate
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission to ensure
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission to ensure full implementation of existing legislation
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and to come forward with a ‘transport and climate’ legislative package with a view to achieving
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission and Member States to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 20 a (new) – having regard to the results of the 39th session of ICAO Assembly in 2016 in Montreal;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Commission to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and to come forward with a ‘transport and climate’ legislative package with a view to achieving the climate objectives
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Invites the Commission to present an update of the 2011 White Paper on transport based on the report 2015/2005 (INI) of the European Parliament adopted 09 September 2015 entitled “Implementation of the 2011 White Paper on transport: taking stock and the way forward towards sustainable mobility” which accounts for current and developing challenges in the transport sector, especially digitalisation, automatisation, connectivity, sustainability, social matters and clean energy for transport;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is convinced that when sustainability is assessed the entire footprint, from the manufacture via the use to the disposal of vehicles and the requisite infrastructure should be taken into account, and emphasises, for that reason, that only a technology-neutral energy mix can offer realistic and genuinely sustainable solutions;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls the European Parliament’s proposal for funds to address climate change issues to be used also in the transport sector, especially to encourage the development of sustainable urban mobility plans;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes that low-emission mobility not only requires technical solutions but also behavioural change of transport users; Key to enable a majority of citizens to switching to more sustainable modes of transport is an affordable, well-developed and multimodal public transport system that covers urban nodes and connects with rural areas;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Notes that a sustainable transition in transport requires systemic multi- stakeholder action from civil society, consumers, social partners, SMEs, innovative start-ups, global acting major corporations and politicians and official bodies on all levels of government;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 a (new) Calls on the Commission to recognise the growing importance of life-cycle emissions, including from energy supply, manufacturing and end-of-life, by bringing forward holistic proposals that guide manufacturers towards optimal solutions, in order to ensure that upstream emissions do not erode the benefits related to the improved operational energy use of vehicles.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to urgently introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to urgently introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as a matter of urgency and to propose the creation of an independent European car market surveillance authority whose task would be to ensure compliance with these standards; points out that cost-effective vehicle standards probably represent the most effective measure for improving energy efficiency in the EU in the period up to 2030;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to rapidly introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as a matter of urgency; points out that cost-effective vehicle standards
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards and standards for air pollution emissions such as NOx for all road transport as a matter of urgency; points out that cost-effective vehicle standards probably represent the most effective measure for improving energy efficiency in the EU in the period up to 2030;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards respecting the principle of technology neutrality for all road transport as a matter of urgency; points out that cost-effective vehicle standards probably represent the most effective measure for improving energy efficiency in the EU in the period up to 2030;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to introduce and improve CO2 standards for all road transport as a matter of urgency; points out that cost-eff
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission rapidly to propose a regulatory framework for the collaborative economy in order to free this economic sector from legal uncertainty and to exploit its full potential in terms of car-pooling, car-sharing and bikes on demand; recalls that this will result in improved use of infrastructure and optimised filling rates of vehicles and will contribute to creating a solid alternative to the use of the private car;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) – having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “The Paris Protocol – A blueprint for tackling global climate change beyond 2020” (COM(2015)81),
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that the scope for making energy savings should not be forgotten, given that, for example, the use of driver assistance systems, driver training and further training, new mobility concepts, such as platooning and car sharing, and the full implementation of the Single European Sky policy can significantly increase transport sustainability;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the completion of the internal transport market would improve resource efficiency and reduce emissions; its completion can however only be reached while also tackling “social dumping” in the transport sector through clear and enforceable rules and their uniform application;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity and explore the possibility of developing a connectivity index; stresses that air connectivity should
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that one main goal of enhancing connectivity should focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged regions of the Union; underscores that this should be combined with investments in green alternatives such as cross-border (night) trains;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should focus on connecting remote
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should also focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged regions of the Union; underscores that this
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged regions of the Union; underscores that this should be combined with investments in green alternatives
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to review the EU approach to aviation connectivity; stresses that connectivity should focus on connecting remote and disadvantaged regions of the Union; underscores that this should be combined with
source: 604.501
2017/06/08
ENVI
136 amendments...
Amendment 146 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type-approval and market surveillance,
Amendment 147 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type-approval and market surveillance on the basis of clearly defined rules and a clearer distribution of responsibilities, involving EU oversight, in order to address the failures identified in the aftermath of Dieselgate and to ensure the full, homogenous and efficient implementation of the new type-approval and market surveillance framework;
Amendment 148 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type-approval and market surveillance, involving EU oversight, in order to address the failures identified in the aftermath of Dieselgate; recalls the European Parliament's negotiating mandate in this regard as adopted on April 4 2017;
Amendment 149 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type-approval and
Amendment 150 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type-approval and market surveillance, involving EU oversight, in order to address the failures identified in the aftermath of
Amendment 151 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 152 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls
Amendment 153 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of a swift adoption of the Regulation (n. 2016/0014), which is crucial to update the current EU type-approval legal framework; therefore, confirms that the future adoption of the aforementioned Regulation shall ensure a consistent and more transparent playing level field for all the stakeholders of the vehicles sectors and shall establish effective rules to protect consumers;
Amendment 154 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Welcomes the Guidance on the evaluation of Auxiliary Emission Strategies and the presence of Defeat Devices, published by the Commission on 26 January 2017 with the purpose of supporting Member States and the competent authorities in detecting defeat devices;
Amendment 155 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses the importance of a swift adoption of the proposal for a Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (COM(2016)0031) which is crucial to update the current EU type-approval legal framework; therefore, confirms that the future adoption of the aforementioned Regulation shall ensure a consistent and more transparent playing level field for all the stakeholders of the vehicles sectors and shall establish effective rules to protect consumers;
Amendment 156 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Re
Amendment 157 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets
Amendment 158 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOx emissions and urges the Commission to re
Amendment 159 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of
Amendment 160 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOx emissions and urges the Commission to review the conformity factors in 2017 and bring them down to 1 by 2021 at the latest; calls for a swift and ambitious adoption of the last packages of RDE including its extension to cover CO2 emissions and fuel efficiency;
Amendment 161 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 162 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOX emissions and urges the Commission to review the conformity factors in 2017 in so far as the other vehicle-making countries in the world apply equivalent standards;
Amendment 163 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOx emissions and urges the Commission to review the conformity factors in 2017; stresses that at the latest from January 2021 the conformity factor for NOx shall be set to 1.00;
Amendment 164 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOx
Amendment 165 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 166 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 167 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets, in this regard, the adoption of high conformity factors for NOx emissions and urges the Commission to
Amendment 168 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8. Calls on the Commission to check the fitness of anti-particulate filters (DPF) in preserving urban air quality by quantifying the emission of ultrafine particles (i.e. =< 1 um) resulting from regeneration of DPF and to present a legislative proposal to address the problem whether appropriate;
Amendment 169 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Noting the absence of measures to enforce the emissions limits for NOx set in legislation for "normal use" and the continued wide discrepancy of real driving emissions compared to the legal standard despite "Dieselgate" and the results of the EP inquiry, calls for Member States and local authorities to prohibit the sale and use of diesel passenger vehicles in their territory to protect public health and vulnerable citizens, while a prohibition would yield significant health benefits as the WHO recently classified diesel as a carcinogen, and diesel engines are major source of particulate matter;
Amendment 170 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the establishment, in the upcoming regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles, of an EU-wide remote sensing network to monitor the real world emissions of the car fleet and to identify excessively polluting vehicles in order to target in- service conformity checks and to trace cars that might be illegally modified with hardware (e.g. exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) switch-off plates, diesel particulate filter (DPF) or selective catalytic reduction (SCR) removal) or software (illegal chip tuning) modifications;
Amendment 171 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Points out that, as a result of this, the transport sector takes up an unnecessarily large proportion of the permitted NOx emissions which are to be allocated under the national emission ceilings, which unnecessarily both restricts the scope for industrial and agricultural production and damages the competitiveness of the European economy;
Amendment 172 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the swift adoption of the 3rd and 4th real driving emissions (RDE) packages to complete the regulatory framework for the new type-approval procedure, and for the swift application of this framework;
Amendment 173 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the aviation sector should contribute effectively to achieving
Amendment 174 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the aviation sector should contribute effectively to achieving the 2030 climate targets and the objectives of the Paris Agreement within the International Civil Aviation Organisation, which can legitimately act to achieve those goals;
Amendment 175 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the aviation sector should contribute effectively and fairly to achieving the 2030 climate targets and the objectives of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 176 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the aviation sector
Amendment 177 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers that the agreement at ICAO on a global market-based measure is a significant step on the road to reducing the aviation sector's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions; notes that the agreement foresees a review every three years which should allow scope to make it more ambitious and robust;
Amendment 178 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 179 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 180 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 181 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers the 2020 ICAO agreement
Amendment 182 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers the
Amendment 183 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 184 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 185 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 186 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 187 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 188 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Expresses its disappointment
Amendment 189 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Expresses its disappointment that the
Amendment 190 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recalls that beyond the global market-based measure, there are other ways for bringing down emissions, notably investments in greener technologies for manufacturing aircrafts; Notes that the EU's Clean Sky Initiative offers significant funding in this regard;
Amendment 191 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that the EU should implement CORSIA through the Union Emissions Trading System, while allowing for 50% of the journeys to be excluded provided that the destination is implementing CORSIA through national measures;
Amendment 192 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the importance of re
Amendment 193 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the importance of reinforcing the Single European Sky in order to reduce CO2 emissions; calls on the Commission to maintain high innovation ambitions by encouraging research into the use of photovoltaics in the aviation sector (e.g. Solar Impulse 2) and into bio-methane and synthetic methane;
Amendment 194 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 195 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the importance of reinforcing the Single European Sky in order to reduce CO2 emissions and the role which SESAR can play, in terms of defragmenting airspace and modernising air traffic management, thereby reducing fuel use and allowing more direct and shorter journeys;
Amendment 196 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges Member States to speed up the implementation of the Single European Sky, as current fragmentations are causing longer flight times, delays, extra-fuel burn and greater CO2 emissions;
Amendment 197 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the importance of continuing to boost research in this area in order to step up investment in technologies for the development of sustainable aviation – by promoting the design of lighter aircraft, the use of digital and satellite technology to support a more efficient management of flight routes, the production and use of alternative new- generation fuels, especially given that in this sector there are not many alternatives to traditional liquid fuels – including through the development of public-private partnerships; underlines, in this regard, the key role played by research programmes such as Clean Sky and SESAR and the need for their mandates to be extended;
Amendment 198 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that specific incentives for the deployment of sustainable alternative fuels should be given to transport modes where so far no alternative to liquid fuel exists (e.g. aviation, lorries and coaches); these incentives should be reflected in the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive as well as be included in Integrated National Energy and Climate Plans, as foreseen in the proposed Regulation on Governance of the Energy Union;
Amendment 199 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Call on the Commission to propose a specific target of 5% bio-kerosene in aviation, to ensure that the sector contributes to the overall efforts of the decarbonisation of the European economy;
Amendment 200 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls for action to be taken regarding short-haul flights, especially those using obsolete technology which is therefore responsible for high emissions; calls, wherever possible and convenient from an environmental perspective, for more sustainable means of transport to be promoted and for multimodal transport to be encouraged;
Amendment 201 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 202 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 203 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the IMO fell short of delivering progress on the GHG emissions reduction target and measures
Amendment 204 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the
Amendment 205 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the
Amendment 206 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 207 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Notes that, in addition to an adequate distribution infrastructure for alternative maritime fuels, such as LNG, it is essential also to encourage the shipping sector to invest in vessels using low-emission energies; stresses that in this respect it is necessary to consider instruments at national and EU level for speeding up investment in green fleet;
Amendment 208 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Observes that there is a serious danger of carbon leakage and investment leakage in international shipping because of the possibilities of ‘reflagging’ and that any possible EU measure should take maximum account of this risk and of the competitiveness of the EU’s ports;
Amendment 209 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Reminds Member States of the need to expand shore-side electricity for use by ships, in particular at berths located close to residential or business areas and at all cruise and ferry ports, as well as ports in the TEN-T core network;
Amendment 210 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underscores the important role that combined transport can play in reducing emissions; notes the announcement of the Commission to modernise the Combined Transport Directive, which should incentivise a shift to transporting freight by rail and inland waterways;
Amendment 211 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Call on the Commission to propose a specific target of 5% renewable fuels in maritime and inland waters transport, to ensure that the sector contributes to the overall efforts of the decarbonisation of the European economy;
Amendment 212 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the recent adoption by the IMO of a 0.5% global sulphur limit, which is expected to avoid 250000 premature deaths globally;
Amendment 213 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Believes that additional measures are necessary to guarantee a climate friendly and efficient inland waterway transport sector; reiterates the importance of financial supportive measures to innovate the sector in order to increase the energy efficiency of ships and preserve the environment during infrastructure works;
Amendment 214 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls for an ambitious incorporation obligation, of at least 15%, for all renewables in the transport sector, building upon the 10% target foreseen for 2020 and providing the necessary incentives for decarbonisation in this challenging sector;
Amendment 215 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Reminds that reducing black carbon emissions of maritime transport, especially in the arctic region, is essential in reducing global warming;
Amendment 216 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Supports the introduction of more sulphur emission control area and NOx emission control area across Europe;
Amendment 217 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the fact that electric mobility solutions based on sustainable energy sources afford great potential for decarbonising transport; considers, however, that optimisation of the technology involved and large-scale provision of infrastructure facilities are unlikely before 2030; reiterates its call for technological innovations;
Amendment 218 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recalls that the energy efficiency should be considered as the best alternative energy and thus all measures to improve the energy efficiency in a cost- effective way and to reduce the energy demand should be prioritised and promoted, and duly integrated into transport policy and European climate action;
Amendment 219 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for
Amendment 220 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for m
Amendment 221 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for
Amendment 222 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for
Amendment 223 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for a more
Amendment 224 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for a more
Amendment 225 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for more stringent limits than those proposed in the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive in order to phase down
Amendment 226 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for a more
Amendment 227 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls for a more
Amendment 228 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to promote the production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources and in particular to enhance its ability to stabilise the electricity network in production, and to speed up its diverse uses in the area of mobility;
Amendment 229 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 Amendment 230 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with
Amendment 231 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 232 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with high GHG-efficiency, while taking into account indirect land use change and ensuring that existing investments are protected; calls on the Commission to continue its work to address indirect land use change associated with biofuels and to support improvements in statistical modelling of indirect land use change;
Amendment 233 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with high GHG-efficiency, while taking into account indirect land use change and the objectives of EU biodiversity strategy and ensuring that existing investments are protected; calls the phase out of the fossil fuel subsidies to facilitate the transition to the low carbon economy;
Amendment 234 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with high GHG-efficiency, while taking into account
Amendment 235 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with high GHG-efficiency
Amendment 236 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Invites the Commission to favour biofuels with high GHG-efficiency
Amendment 237 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes, in this context, the Commission's proposal to strengthen the GHG savings requirements for biofuels to ensure that they continue to deliver on the EU climate goals;
Amendment 238 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market
Amendment 239 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market penetration of those
Amendment 240 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages
Amendment 241 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market penetration of those sustainable biofuels with high GHG savings and low risk of indirect land use change, as well as advanced biofuels which comply with the
Amendment 242 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market penetration of those
Amendment 243 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market penetration of those advanced biofuels which comply with the principle of cascading use and waste hierarchy as part of the circular economy and which respect strong environmental and social sustainability criteria in order to avoid the same issues that occurred with first- generation biofuels;
Amendment 244 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Encourages greater market penetration of those sustainable crop- based biofuels as well as advanced biofuels which comply with the
Amendment 245 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses in this regard that the life- cycle assessment of biofuels should take into consideration their role to play in the circular economy, which includes inter alia the supply of high-protein animal feed that is chronically short in the EU and otherwise would have to be imported;
Amendment 246 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Recalls that 94% of European transport relies on oil products and believes that sustainable domestic biofuels reduce the fossil fuel import dependency, thus strengthening EU energy security;
Amendment 247 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Urges the Commission to come forward with a report on how to improve the monitoring and enforcement of these provisions with regards to imports from third countries and if appropriate propose accompanying legal measures no later than 2019;
Amendment 248 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 Amendment 249 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 Amendment 250 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 Amendment 251 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that crop-based biofuels
Amendment 252 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses th
Amendment 253 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that
Amendment 254 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that only crop-based biofuels that comply with sustainability criteria should
Amendment 255 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that crop-based biofuels, including palm oil, should not count towards Member States’ climate targets under the Effort Sharing Regulation;
Amendment 256 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that crop-based biofuels should not count as zero emissions towards Member States’ climate targets under the Effort Sharing Regulation;
Amendment 257 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that sustainable crop- based biofuels should
Amendment 258 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to take measures to phase out the use of vegetable oils, that drive deforestation, including palm oil as a component of biofuels as soon as possible but at latest by 2020 and to take account of all the CO2 emissions generated by the production, processing and transport of palm oil;
Amendment 259 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls for the contribution of transport fuels from palm oil and its derivatives to the share of renewables to be limited to those respecting effective sustainability criteria;
Amendment 260 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas, in particular bio-methane and synthetic methane, in short term could play in the transition towards the decarbonisation of the transport sector, especially with regard to shipping, aviation and HDVs; reminds that when discussing liquefied natural gas (LNG) it is also necessary to ensure that there is an infrastructure for liquefied biogas (LBG), to promote its adoption and to ensure that its systems are interoperable.
Amendment 261 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas, in particular bio-methane and synthetic methane, and alternative fuels as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, could play in the transition towards the decarbonisation of the transport sector, especially with regard to shipping, aviation and HDVs.
Amendment 262 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas, in particular bio-methane
Amendment 263 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the essential role that natural gas, in particular liquefied natural gas (LNG)1a, methanol2a, and also bio- methane and synthetic methane,
Amendment 264 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas
Amendment 265 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas
Amendment 266 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas,
Amendment 267 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas
Amendment 268 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas, in particular bio-methane
Amendment 269 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the role that natural gas, in particular bio-methane and synthetic methane, could play in the transition towards the decarbonisation of the transport sector, especially with regard to shipping
Amendment 270 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to review the Clean Power for Transport Directive (2014/94/EU) and to come forward with a draft regulation on CO2 standards for the car fleets coming onto the market from 2025 onwards, with the inclusion of Zero- Emission Vehicles (ZEV) and ULEV mandates that impose a stepwise increasing share of zero- and ultra-low- emission vehicles in the total fleet with the aim of phasing out new CO2-emitting cars by 2035;
Amendment 271 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses that synthetic fuels (liquid and gaseous) derived from surplus renewable energies, in particular solar- and wind-energy at peak production that otherwise would be wasted, could contribute to reducing GHG emissions of the existing fleets from a life-cycle perspective while also increasing the renewable energy yield;
Amendment 272 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to make use of the potential offered by digitalisation (e.g. modern, digitally supported transport technologies) when drawing up new transport and mobility concepts, in order to optimise transport operations;
Amendment 273 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission and Member States, in the context of the circular economy, policy on emissions and climate, and the Union’s renewable energy targets, to increase and fully support the production of green biogas by means of manure processing;
Amendment 274 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to follow closely the development regarding the hydrogen technology and commit to a feasibility study concerning the role and possibilities of hydrogen in European transport system;
Amendment 275 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls for an increasing share of renewable electricity in the electrification of transport;
Amendment 276 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Stresses the importance of exchanging best practices and lessons learned in the sector of low-emission mobility among the Member States and requests the Commission to provide platforms for such activities; stresses also that research and development activities play an essential role in the development of low-emission mobility; calls on the Commission to provide research and vehicle technology development funding for low-emission mobility and urges the Member States to make use of the available funding and ensure that SMEs can also take advantage of research and development funding;
Amendment 277 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Welcomes the fact that EU businesses are currently world technology leaders in synthetic fuels technologies and sees this as a chance to strengthen economic growth and high-quality employment in the EU; therefore stresses the importance of creating a framework that encourages the further development and roll-out of such technologies;
Amendment 278 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the positive opportunities afforded by liquefied natural gas (LNG) for the purpose of rendering mobility, the economy and employment sustainable1a; __________________ 1aEuropean Parliament Resolution of 25 October 2016 on EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage (2016/2059(INI)).
Amendment 279 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Considers that the promotion of guarantees of origin could lead to an important increase in the share of renewable energy in transport.
Amendment 280 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Calls for the deployment of smart charging infrastructure and incentives for company fleets to choose electric cars from renewable energy.
source: 604.646
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.934New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-602934_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE604.501New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-604501_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE604.871New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-604871_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.214&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-601214_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171214&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-12-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0356&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0356_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0503New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0503_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|