Awaiting committee decision
Next event: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2017/11/21
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | ENVI | ||
Lead | PECH | TOMAŠIĆ Ruža (ECR) | GARDINI Elisabetta (EPP), CAPUTO Nicola (S&D), NICOLAI Norica (ALDE), FERREIRA João (GUE/NGL), AFFRONTE Marco (Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa (EFD) |
Legal Basis TFEU 043-p2
Activites
-
2017/11/21
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #3524
- 2017/03/06 Council Meeting
-
2017/03/01
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2017/02/24
Legislative proposal published
-
COM(2017)0097
summary
PURPOSE: to establish a multi-annual plan for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: the common fisheries policy (CFP) seeks to ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long term, to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and to implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management. Scientific advice from the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) and from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean’s Scientific Advisory Committee (GFCM — SAC) has indicated that the exploitation of anchovy and sardine stocks in the Adriatic Sea exceeds the levels required to achieve the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The vast majority are being caught by Italy and Croatia, in the northern part of the Adriatic. Currently, small pelagic fisheries in the Adriatic Sea are governed by several legal frameworks, at national, EU and international level. This proposal addresses the problem of overexploitation of small pelagic stocks due to an unsustainable fishery and ineffective governance. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option was the one which called for an EU Regulation to manage small pelagic fisheries. This option should lead to an improved conservation status of anchovy and sardine, which would ultimately result in a healthier and more sustainable fishing sector dependent on this resource, with better salaries for individual fishers and greater profitability overall compared to the status quo. CONTENT: the proposed plan seeks to replenish stocks such as sardines, anchovies, mackerel and horse mackerel and contribute to their sustainable use, as well as to establish a simpler and more comprehensive management framework. The plan should: facilitate the introduction of the landing obligation by providing a basis for derogations in certain circumscribed situations; enable regionalisation to be used, whereby Member States around sea basins are involved in the conception and design of management rules for the interested parties. The multiannual-plan will apply to all EU fishing vessels irrespective of their overall participation in fishing in the Adriatic Sea (in EU and international waters). It shall include: target fishing mortalities expressed in ranges for each of the stocks, where available, which would be the basis for setting annual catch limits for those stocks; safeguard measures to give a framework to restore stocks when they fall below safe biological limits; control provisions are provided on the vessel monitoring system, prior notification, electronic logbooks and designated ports. Regarding electronic logbooks and the vessel monitoring system, the provisions included in Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 are extended to cover all vessels over eight metres in length, to improve control of the fisheries covered by the multiannual plan. The plan should be evaluated every five years on the basis of scientific advice.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en', 'title': 'Maritime Affairs and Fisheries'}, VELLA Karmenu
-
COM(2017)0097
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0097
- Debate in Council: 3524
Amendments | Dossier |
90 |
2017/0043(COD)
2017/06/27
ENVI
90 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The common fisheries policy (CFP) should contribute to the protection of the marine environment, to the sustainable management of all commercially exploited species, and in particular to the achievement of good environmental status in the marine environment by 2020 in accordance with Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council40. The CFP, which is an exclusive competence of the Union, must be conducted in harmony with the Member States, as otherwise it could induce a country to leave the European Union, as happened in 1985 with Greenland, which is now an overseas territory associated with the Union. __________________ 40 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19).
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, multiannual plans are to be based on scientific
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The objective of the multiannual plan should be to contribute to achieving the objectives of the CFP, and especially
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) For the purposes of fixing fishing opportunities, there should be a
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) For stocks for which they are available and for the purpose of the application of safeguard measures, it is necessary to establish conservation reference points expressed as MSY Btrigger and Blim for anchovy and sardine stocks. Should the stocks fall below MSY Btrigger, fishing mortality should be reduced below FMSY until the stocks are restored.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) In order to adapt to the technical and scientific progress in a timely and proportionate fashion and to ensure flexibility and allow evolution of certain measures, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing this Regulation as regards remedial measures for the conservation of mackerel and horse mackerel, implementation of the landing obligation and technical measures. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making*. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In accordance with Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, provisions should be established for the periodical assessment by the Commission of the adequacy and effectiveness of the application of this Regulation. Such assessment should follow and be based on a periodic evaluation of the plan that is based on scientific advice. The plan should be evaluated three years after entry into force and then every five years. This period allows for the full implementation of the landing obligation, and for regionalised measures to be adopted, implemented and to show effects on the stocks and fishery. It is also a minimum required period by scientific bodies.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The common fisheries policy (CFP)
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Regulation shall apply to the stocks of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in the Adriatic Sea (“
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Regulation shall apply to the stocks of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in the Adriatic Sea (“
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) ‘Small pelagic
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) ‘Small pelagic
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) ‘SSBlim’ means the spawning stock biomass reference point below which remedial management action is to be taken to ensure rebuild of stocks above biological safe referent point;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new) (cb) ‘SSBpa’ means the precautionary spawning stock biomass reference point below which management action is to be taken to ensure that stocks are above biological safe referent point;
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new) (cc) ‘Targeting’ means account of at least 50% of sardine or anchovy of the catch in live weight;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The Adriatic Sea represents approximately one third of the total value of landings of marine products, and small pelagic species are a major component of Adriatic fisheries. Among them, anchovies and sardines are the most lucrative and the most prized in the Adriatic and thus represent virtually all the catches of small pelagic fishermen.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The multiannual plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The multiannual plan shall provide
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The multiannual plan takes into account socio-economic aspects in line with Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Targets for
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The target
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The target
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Despite being managed under both an international management plan under the GFCM and national management plans adopted under Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/200642, Adriatic anchovy and sardine stocks continue to be overexploited and the current management measures are considered to be insufficient to achieve MSY by 2020. Member States and stakeholders have expressed
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2,
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 a (new) Article 4a Management measures In order to achieve the targets referred to in Article 4, the following management measures shall be introduced as from 1 January 2018 for all fleet segments having anchovy and sardine as their target species: a) the number of fishing days shall not exceed 180 in any one year and 20 in any one month; b) for all fishing vessels whose overall length exceeds 12 metres, spatio-temporal closures of at least: i) 30% of the territorial waters of Croatia and Slovenia for at least six months; ii) 50% of the territorial waters of Italy for at least four months. By way of derogation from letter (b), in the area of the Gulf of Trieste off the western coast of Istria to the Lim Channel, those spatio-temporal closures shall apply to fishing vessels whose overall length exceeds 15 metres. c) temporal closure of at least 15 consecutive fishing days to be implemented in the following spawning periods of the target species: i) for anchovy: between 1 May and 30 September, ii) for sardine: between 1 November and 31 March; d) reduction to a maximum of 144 fishing days for species for which scientific data shows the level of spawning stock biomass to be below the biomass limit reference point for the spawning stock.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The conservation reference points expressed as
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Three years after the application of the management measures referred to in Article 4a, scientific research shall verify the effectiveness of the measures taken, particularly on the stocks to which this Regulation applies and on the fisheries exploiting those stocks.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of either of the s
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Despite being managed under both an international management plan under the GFCM and national management plans adopted under Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006,42 Adriatic anchovy and sardine stocks continue to be overexploited and the current management measures are
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of either of the s
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of either of the stocks concerned is below the limit spawning stock biomass reference point (Blim) as set out in Annex II, column B to this Regulation, further remedial measures shall be taken to ensure the rapid return of
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Those remedial measures may also include, as appropriate, the submission of legislative proposals by the Commission and emergency measures adopted by the Commission under Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Technical measures 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, Article 13(2) and (3) and Annex II, point 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 shall not apply. 2. For the purposes of this Regulation, maximum length of surrounding nets (purse seines and seines without purse line) shall be restricted to 600 m with net drop of maximum 1/3 of length.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. In order to achieve the targets established in Article 4, the following measures will apply for a period of five years: (a) in 2018 catch limit for small pelagics shall be set at 2014 level. Starting from 2019, catch limit for small pelagics shall be gradually reduced each year for 5% in comparison to previous year till 2022; (b) fishing vessels targeting small pelagics shall not exceed 180 fishing days per year and 20 fishing days per month, with maximum of 144 fishing days per year targeting sardine and with maximum of 144 fishing days per year targeting anchovy; (c) spatio-temporal closures will be implemented each year in order to protect nursery and spawning areas. Such closures shall cover the entire distribution of small pelagics in the Adriatic Sea, for periods of no less than 15 continuous days and up to 30 continuous days. These closures shall take place during the following period: (i) for sardine, from 1 October to 31 March, and (ii) for anchovy, from 1 April to 30 September; (d) additional closures for vessels over 12 m length overall shall be implemented for no less than six months. Such closures shall cover at least 30 percent of the area which has been identified as nursery area or area important for the protection of early age classes of fish (in territorial and inner sea); (e) overall fleet capacity of trawlers and purse seiners actively fishing for small pelagic stocks shall not exceed values of active fleet registered in 2014 in terms of gross tonnage (GT) and/or gross registered tonnage (GRT), engine power (kW) and number of vessels.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. In order to achieve the targets established in Article 4, the following measures will apply for a period of five years: (a) in 2018 catch limit for small pelagics shall be set at 2014 level. Starting from 2019, catch limit for small pelagics shall be gradually reduced each year for 5% in comparison to previous year till 2022; (b) fishing vessels targeting small pelagics shall not exceed 180 fishing days per year and 20 fishing days per month, with maximum of 144 fishing days per year targeting sardine and with maximum of 144 fishing days per year targeting anchovy; (c) spatio-temporal closures will be implemented each year in order to protect nursery and spawning areas. Such closures shall cover the entire distribution of small pelagics in the Adriatic Sea, for periods of no less than 15 continuous days and up to 30 continuous days. These closures shall take place during the following period: (i) for sardine, from 1 October to 31 March, and (ii) for anchovy, from 1 April to 30 September; (d) additional closures for vessels over 12 m length overall shall be implemented for no less than six months. Such closures shall cover at least 30 percent of the area which has been identified as nursery area or area important for the protection of early age classes of fish (in territorial and inner sea); (e) overall fleet capacity of trawlers and purse seiners actively fishing for small pelagic stocks shall not exceed values of active fleet registered in 2014 in terms of gross tonnage (GT) and/or gross registered tonnage (GRT), engine power (kW) and number of vessels.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of the small pelagic
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) To achieve the objectives of the CFP, a number of conservation measures are to be adopted as appropriate in any combination thereof, such as multi-annual plans, technical measures, fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities and the establishment of marine protected areas.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) prohibition or limitation to fish in specific areas to protect spawning and juvenile fish or fish below the minimum conservation reference size
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Article, in order to ensure stability and limit variations in management measures, they shall not vary more than 10% between consecutive years.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Article 18 (1) to (6) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 shall apply to measures referred to in Articles
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1 of this Article, Member States having direct management interest may submit joint recommendations in accordance with Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the first time not later than twelve months after the entry into force of this Regulation and thereafter twelve months after each submission of the evaluation of the multiannual plan in accordance with Article 14 to this Regulation. They may also submit such recommendations when deemed necessary by them, in particular in the event of an abrupt change in the situation for either of the stocks to which this Regulation applies. Joint recommendations in respect of measures concerning a given calendar year shall be submitted no later than 1 June of the previous year. The Commission shall require the STECF to assess the joint recommendations. Any deviation by the Commission from the joint recommendations shall be presented to the European Parliament and to the Council for scrutiny.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1 of this Article, Member States having direct management interest may submit joint recommendations in accordance with Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the first time not later than twelve months after the entry into force of this Regulation and thereafter twelve months after each submission of the evaluation of the multiannual plan in accordance with Article 14 to this Regulation. They may also submit such recommendations when deemed necessary by them, in particular in the event of an abrupt change in the situation for either of the stocks to which this Regulation applies. Joint recommendations in respect of measures concerning a given calendar year shall be submitted no later than 1 June of the previous year. To the extent possible, the Commission shall take these joint recommendations into account.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The empowerments granted under Articles
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Regionalisation should be used to create tailor-made measures that take into account the specificities of each fisheries area and safeguard their environmental conditions.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. By way of derogation from Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the prior notification referred to in that Article shall be made at least one
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. By way of derogation from Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the prior notification referred to in that Article shall be made at least one
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. The prior notification obligation shall apply to masters of Union fishing vessels retaining on board at least one tonne of anchovy
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the application of the provisions laid down in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 shall be extended to fishing vessels of eight metres length overall or more, engaged in target
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. The exemption laid down in Article 9(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 shall not apply to vessels engaged in target
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the obligation to keep an electronic fishing logbook and to send it by electronic means at least once a day to the competent authority of the flag Member State laid down in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 shall be extended to masters of Union fishing vessels of eight metres length overall or more engaged in target
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The exemption laid down in Article 15(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 shall not apply to masters of vessels engaged in target
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The threshold applicable to the live weight of s
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) (6b) Fishing opportunities should be allocated in accordance with the principles laid down in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, using transparent and objective criteria, including those of an environmental, social and economic nature. Fishing opportunities should also be fairly distributed across the various fisheries segments, including traditional and small- scale fisheries. Moreover, Member States should provide incentives to fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear or using fishing techniques with reduced environmental impact.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 Five years after the entry into force of this Regulation,
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law Making. To the extent possible, the Commission shall take into account the views of the experts of the Member States in its delegated acts.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 6 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 a (new) Article 15a Technical measures 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, Article 13(2) and (2) and Annex II, point 2, of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 shall not apply. 2. For the purposes of this Regulation, maximum length of surrounding nets (purse seines and seines without purse line) shall be restricted to 600 m with net drop of maximum 1/3 of length.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Stock
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, multi- annual plans are to be based on scientific, technical and economic advice
source: 607.775
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/3/date |
Old
2017-11-21T00:00:00New
2018-01-24T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2017-11-20T00:00:00New
2017-11-21T00:00:00 |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-06-27T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-06-27T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-06-27T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-06-27T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/5 |
|
committees/1/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
links/Research document |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-03-22T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-03-22T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
links/Research document |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social CommitteeNew
European Economic and Social Committee |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52017PC0097:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52017PC0097:EN
|
activities/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|