Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | PIEPER Markus ( PPE) | PREUSS Gabriele ( S&D), FOSTER Jacqueline ( ECR), TELIČKA Pavel ( ALDE), DALUNDE Jakop G. ( Verts/ALE), AIUTO Daniela ( EFDD), ARNAUTU Marie-Christine ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon ( ALDE) | Hugues BAYET ( S&D), Alain LAMASSOURE ( PPE), Sander LOONES ( ECR), Michel REIMON ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 100-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 100-p2Events
PURPOSE: to safeguard competition in air transport.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/712 of the European Parliament and of the Council on safeguarding competition in air transport, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004.
CONTENT: in a context of increased competition between air transport actors at a global level, fair competition is an indispensable general principle in the operation of international air transport services.
At the international level, there is currently no World Trade Organization (WTO) or International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) framework regulating competition between air carriers. The purpose of this Regulation is to provide the EU with an effective mechanism to combat unfair commercial practices that have so far been lacking.
Subject matter
This Regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to practices distorting competition between Union air carriers and third-country air carriers and causing, or threatening to cause, injury to Union air carriers.
Procedure
A single procedure for launching investigations and deciding on possible redressive measures shall apply to both global agreements at EU level and bilateral air transport agreements between EU and third countries.
When determining the Union interest, priority shall be given to the need to protect consumer interests and to maintain a high level of connectivity for passengers and for the Union. In the context of the whole aviation chain, the Commission may also take into account relevant social factors. The Commission shall also take into consideration the need to eliminate the practice distorting competition, to restore effective and fair competition, and to avoid any distortion to the internal market.
An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, one or more Union air carriers or an association of Union air carriers, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is prima facie evidence of the existence of all the following circumstances: (i) a practice distorting competition, adopted by a third country or a third-country entity; (ii) injury or threat of injury to one or more Union air carriers; and (iii) a causal link between the alleged practice and the alleged injury or threat of injury.
When deciding not to initiate an investigation, the Commission shall inform the complainant and all Member States. The information shall contain the reasons for the decision and be forwarded to the European Parliament.
The Commission shall decide to open an investigation within a maximum period of 5 months from the lodging of the complaint and inform the Member States and the European Parliament.
The investigation shall be concluded within 12 months while the proceedings shall be concluded within 20 months. That period may be prolonged in duly justified cases. In the case of urgency, that is in situations where, following clear evidence submitted by the complainant or the interested parties, the injury to Union air carriers might be irreversible, the proceedings may be shortened to 9 months.
Distortive practices and redressive measures
A finding of injury shall be based on evidence and shall take account of the relevant factors, in particular:
- the situation of the Union air carriers concerned, notably in terms of aspects such as frequency of services, utilisation of capacity, network effect, sales, market share, profits, return on capital, investment and employment;
- the general situation on the affected air transport services markets, notably in terms of level of fares or rates, capacity and frequency of air transport services or use of the network.
A determination of a threat of injury shall be based on clear evidence and not merely on allegation, conjecture or remote possibility.
Redressive measures - financial or operational – shall be adopted by means of a Commission implementing act, but operational measures shall be subject to a stricter procedure. The Commission shall regularly provide a written report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effectiveness and impact of redressive measures.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 30.5.2019.
The European Parliament adopted, by 478 votes to 100 with 18 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on safeguarding competition in air transport, repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Objective
The Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to practices distorting competition between Union air carriers and third-country air carriers and causing, or threatening to cause, injury to Union air carriers.
Discrimination shall mean differentiation of any kind without objective justification in respect of the supply of goods or services, including public services, employed for the operation of air transport services, or in respect of their treatment by public authorities relevant to such services, including practices relating to air navigation or airport facilities and services, fuel, ground handling, security, computer reservation systems, slot allocation, charges, and the use of other facilities or services employed for the operation of air transport services.
Union interest
A determination of the Union interest shall be made by the Commission based on an appreciation of all the various interests, which are relevant in the particular situation, taken as a whole. When determining the Union interest, priority shall be given to the need to protect consumer interests and to maintain a high level of connectivity for passengers and for the Union. In the context of the whole aviation chain, the Commission may also take into account relevant social factors. The Commission shall also take into consideration the need to eliminate the practice distorting competition, to restore effective and fair competition, and to avoid any distortion to the internal market.
The Union interest shall be determined on the basis of an economic analysis by the Commission based on information collected from the interested parties provided that this information is supported by actual evidence.
Interested parties shall be given the opportunity to make themselves known, present their views in writing or request a hearing by the Commission within a specified time limit.
Proceedings
An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, one or more Union air carriers or an association of Union air carriers, or on the Commission's initiative. When it receives a complaint, the Commission shall inform all Member States.
When deciding not to initiate an investigation, the Commission shall inform the complainant and all Member States. The information shall contain the reasons for the decision and be forwarded to the European Parliament.
The Commission shall decide to open an investigation within a maximum period of 5 months from the lodging of the complaint and inform the Member States and the European Parliament.
Suspension
The Commission may suspend the investigation if it appears more appropriate to address the practice distorting competition exclusively under the dispute settlement procedures established by an applicable air transport or air services agreement to which the Union is a party, or to any other agreement which contains provisions on air transport services to which the Union is a party. The Commission shall notify the Member States of the suspension of the investigation.
The Commission may resume the investigation if the practice distorting competition has not been eliminated within 12 months from the date of suspension of the investigation.
Duration of proceedings and suspension
The investigation shall be concluded within 12 months while the proceedings shall be concluded within 20 months. That period may be prolonged in duly justified cases. In the case of urgency, that is in situations where, following clear evidence submitted by the complainant or the interested parties, the injury to Union air carriers might be irreversible, the proceedings may be shortened to 9 months.
Redressive measures
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down redressive measures if the investigation determines that a practice distorting competition, adopted by a third country or a third-country entity, has caused injury to the Union air carriers concerned.
The redressive measures shall not lead the Union or the Member States concerned to violate air transport or air services agreements, or any provision on air transport services included in a trade agreement or any other agreement concluded with the third country concerned.
The Commission shall regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Regulation. The European Parliament and the Council may invite the Commission to present and explain any issue related to its application.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Markus PIEPER (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on safeguarding competition in air transport, repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004.
The proposed Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices distorting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing or threatening to cause injury to Union air carriers.’
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Union interest : Members considered it necessary to clarify the concept of Union interest when deciding whether or not to apply redressive measures in the event of unfair practices by a carrier from a third country.
When determining the Union interest, priority shall be given to the need to:
restore effective and fair competition, ensure transparency, avoid any distortion to the internal market, avoid undermining Member States’ socio-economic situation, maintain a high level of connectivity for passengers and the Union.
When determining whether or not the Union interest calls for intervention, the Commission shall take into account the views of all interested parties . In order to organise consultations with all interested parties and to give them the opportunity to be heard , time-limits for providing information or for requesting a hearing shall be specified in the notice of initiation of the investigation. Interested parties should be aware of the conditions of disclosure for the information they provide and should be entitled to respond to other parties’ comments.
Procedure : the Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the facts put forward in the complaint neither raise a systemic issue, nor have a significant impact on one or more Union air carriers, and are unwarranted.
The decision not to initiate an investigation shall be duly substantiated by a statement of reasons. The European Parliament may call on the Commission to further justify its decision. Complainants may appeal such a decision within 60 days from its publication. The investigation should be completed within 12 months , which may be extended in duly justified cases.
In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to six months or, as a last resort, the Commission may adopt provisional redressive measures to prevent or offset such injury.
Bilateral agreements : where bilateral air transport or air services agreements with third countries include fair competition clauses or similar provisions, exhausting dispute settlement procedures foreseen in such international agreements shall not be a precondition for opening a procedure under this Regulation.
Concluding the investigation : the Commission shall conclude the investigation after gathering all necessary information from relevant stakeholders and on the basis of best available evidence. Only the Commission may terminate the investigation without adopting redressive measures where the complaint is withdrawn. Union carriers have the right to appeal against a Commission decision to terminate the investigation. The Commission shall further justify its decision before the competent committees of the European Parliament.
Redressive measures : the redressive measures shall have regard to the proper functioning of the Union air transport market and shall not result in an undue advantage being given to any air carrier or group of air carriers. The redressive measures may be provisional and may be adopted, where necessary, when the investigation determines, on the basis of available facts, that a threat of injury exists.
PURPOSE: to safeguard competition in air transport.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: aviation plays a fundamental role in the European Union economy. In 2014, the sector supported the employment of up to 9.3 million people and accounted for over EUR 510 billion of EU Gross Domestic Product.
In 2015, more than 1.45 billion passengers departed from or arrived at EU airports.
The Union's overall connectivity relies on air services performed by Union air carriers (average of 7 million flights per year) and on third country air carriers (1.3 million flights per year).
The liberalisation and deregulation of international air transport has fostered unprecedented competition within the Union market and globally. Global competition is expected to further intensify in coming years with projected international aviation growth of around 5% per year until 2030.
Principles of fair competition have not yet been defined through specific multilateral rules , notably in the context of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) nor of World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, from the scope of which air transport services have largely been excluded.
EU rules ensure that all carriers, European and non-European, are granted the same rights and same opportunity of accessing air transport related services. This may not however be the case in some third countries where discriminatory practices and subsidies may give unfair competitive advantages to air carriers from those third countries.
In its Communication on an Aviation Strategy for Europe , the Commission stated its intention to assess the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 with a view to revising or replacing it with a more effective instrument that would ensure fair competition conditions between all carriers and thereby safeguard connectivity to and from the Union.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the chosen option consists of replacing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 with a new instrument and increasing efforts on the international scene including as regards the negotiation of air transport or services agreements.
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation shall replace Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 and aims to ensure fair competition between Union air carriers and third country air carriers , in the interest of maintaining conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity.
The proposal lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures , relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing or threatening to cause injury to Union air carriers.
Proceedings : the proposal stipulates that an investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers, or on the Commission's own initiative.
The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the adoption of measures would be against the Union interest. It may seek all the information it deems necessary to conduct the investigation and may verify the accuracy of the information it has received or collected.
The proposal also defines (i) the rules under which an investigation is to be conducted, and the conditions under which interested parties may have access to information relating to the investigation; (ii) the rules relating to cooperation with Member States, confidentiality and disclosure.
Redressive and compensatory measures : in order to be able to propose a measure, the Commission will have to demonstrate that an EU airline has been affected by an unfair practice on the part of a third country.
To this end, the proposal:
establishes the conditions under which conditions the existence of injury or threat of injury may be found; sets out the conditions according to which proceedings may be suspended or concluded, with or without the adoption of redressive measures; provides for the possibility to adopt financial or operational measures intended to offset injury or threat of injury and requires that the measures must not exceed what is necessary for such offsetting bearing in mind that the objective of such measures does not consist in punishing the third country air carrier concerned but in restoring fair competition; defines the conditions under which the redressive measures may be reviewed.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: these are related to the initiation and conduct of investigations by the European Commission, and to financial duties. This instrument is expected to require nine officers for its implementation.
The impact on administrative expenditure is estimated at EUR 3.786 million for the period 2018-2020.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2019/712
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 123 10.05.2019, p. 0004
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Draft final act: 00077/2018/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0209/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0125/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.502
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.689
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3714/2017
- Committee draft report: PE613.412
- Contribution: COM(2017)0289
- Contribution: COM(2017)0289
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0182
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0183
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0289
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0182
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0183
- Committee draft report: PE613.412
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3714/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.689
- Committee opinion: PE613.502
- Draft final act: 00077/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Contribution: COM(2017)0289
- Contribution: COM(2017)0289
Activities
- Daniela AIUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wim van de CAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jacqueline FOSTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gabriele PREUSS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dobromir SOŚNIERZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0125/2018 - Markus Pieper - Am 62 14/03/2019 12:26:38.000 #
A8-0125/2018 - Markus Pieper - Am 62 #
Amendments | Dossier |
329 |
2017/0116(COD)
2017/12/12
ECON
42 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Aviation plays a crucial role in Union's economy and the everyday lives of European Union citizens. It is a strong driver for economic growth, jobs, trade
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The European aviation sector represents around 2 million direct jobs and international aviation is expected to grow by around 5 % per year until 2030.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1b) It is essential for the European Union to provide effective protection for the various sectors of its economy and its workers against any unfair competitive practices from third countries.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition between all air carriers taking into account regulatory issues such as labour conditions and environmental protection. This would contribute to maintaining conditions conducive to a high level of Union's connectivity.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Neither an unacceptable trend towards protectionism, nor, on their own, measures to ensure fair competition can guarantee the competitiveness of the EU aviation sector.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) It is important to ensure that the concept of fair competition does not narrowly focus on “equality of benefits”, as sustainable competitiveness underpinning the fair competition clause is an essential element in guaranteeing quality, productivity and innovation leading to a reduction of the environmental footprint of the air transport sector.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The fair competition principle is well established within the Union where market distortive practices are subject to existing Union law, which guarantees equal opportunities and fair competition conditions for all air carriers, European and non-European, operating in the Union. That principle can under no circumstances override a State’s desire to maintain public ownership of its company for strategic reasons and with a view to guaranteeing the cohesion of its territory and the link between its country and its emigrant community.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Efforts should therefore be strengthened in the context of ICAO and of WTO to actively support the development of international rules guaranteeing fair competition conditions between all air carriers, without ever placing the market above the free will of States when managing their public companies in line with their development objectives.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In light of the United Kingdom’s notification to the European Council of 29 March 2017, informing about its intention to withdraw from the European Union in accordance with Article 50 TEU, the European Commission should conduct a thorough assessment of the consequences of this withdrawal on air transport between the Union or its Members and the United Kingdom, with the aim of achieving as little disruption as possible in air transport services for carriers based in the EU and for consumers.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Fair competition between air carriers can also be ensured through appropriate Union legislation such as Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/9320 and Council Directive 96/97/EC21. Insofar as fair competition supposes protection of Union air carriers from certain practices adopted by third countries or third country
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) However, any actions to ensure fair competition with third countries carriers, shall not impede the Union’s efforts to carefully examine its own inter- and intra-model of competition and in particular how its aviation sector has benefited from direct and indirect subsidisation as well as assess to which extent this artificially inflated demand for air transport and led to misallocation of resources.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition with third countries air carriers, thus preserving jobs in Union airlines. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take measures where necessary. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where practices affecting competition cause or threaten to cause injury to Union air carriers.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In order for the Commission to be adequately informed about possible elements justifying the initiation of an investigation, any Member State, Union carrier or association of Union air carriers
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, a national consumer organisation, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is prima facie evidence of either of the following:
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, the European Parliament, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is prima facie evidence of either of the following:
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. A complaint shall include
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the adoption of measures in accordance with Articles 10 or 13 would be against the Union interest
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where it
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. Where the evidence presented is insufficient for the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform the complainant about the insufficiency within
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. Where the evidence presented is insufficient for the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform the complainant about the insufficiency within 60 days of the date on which the complaint was lodged. The complainant shall be given
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide on the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 within
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. The fair competition principle must not override a sovereign country’s desire to maintain public ownership of its airline, with management geared to the cohesion of its territory and the link between the country and its emigrant community.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) whether a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury or threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned or where irregular behaviour restricting competition had a negative impact on the internal market of the European Union.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. If it appears necessary, the Commission may carry out investigations in the territory of the third country concerned or of another third country, provided that the government of the third country concerned and the third country entity concerned have been
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 7 7. Complainants, interested parties, the Member State(s) concerned, the competent committees of the European Parliament and the representatives of the third country or third country entity concerned may consult all information made available to the Commission, except for internal documents that are for the use of the Commission and the administrations, provided that such information is not confidential within the meaning of Article 6 and provided that it has addressed a request in writing to the Commission.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 In cases where access to the necessary information is refused or is otherwise not provided within the appropriate time limits, where a third country concerned has not granted access to its territory in order to conduct investigations or where the investigation is significantly impeded, findings shall be made on the basis of the available facts. Where the Commission finds that false or misleading information has been submitted, such
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission may, with the right of appeal by injured parties, suspend the proceedings where the third country or the third country entity concerned has taken decisive steps to eliminate, as the case may be:
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury or the threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned has not been eliminated following a reasonable period of time, the Commission
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by means of
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the situation of the Union air carrier(s) concerned, notably in terms of aspects such as frequency of services, utilisation of capacity, network effect, sales, market share, profits, return on capital, environmental protection, investment and employment;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the foreseeable evolution of the situation of the Union air carrier(s) concerned notably in terms of frequency of services, utilisation of capacity, network effect, sales, market share, profits, return on capital, environmental protection, investment and employment;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by means of
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament, concludes that adopting redressive measures in accordance with Article 13 would be against Union interest;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 source: 615.422
2018/01/24
TRAN
287 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'interested party' means any natural or legal person or any official body, whether or not having its own legal personality, that is likely to have a significant interest in the result of proceedings, including but not limited to air carriers, airport managing bodies, users of the air services concerned and aircraft and parts manufacturers;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'interested party' means any natural or legal person or any official body, whether or not having its own legal personality, that is likely to have a significant interest in the result of proceedings, including among others the European social partner organisations in civil aviation;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) 'Member State concerned' means a State: (i) that issues the operating licence for European carriers in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008; (ii) under whose aviation agreements, or trade agreements containing provisions governing aviation, European air carriers operate;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) 'dependent industries' means air navigation or airport facilities and services, fuel, ground handling, security, computer reservation systems, slot allocation, charges, and the use of other facilities or services for the operation of air transport services;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'third country entity' means any natural or legal person, whether profit- making or not, or any official body with or without own legal personality, which is under the jurisdiction of a third country, whether controlled by a third country government or not, and is directly or indirectly involved in air transport services or related services or in providing infrastructure or services used to provide
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'third country entity' means any natural or legal person, whether profit- making or not, or any official body with or without own legal personality, which is under the jurisdiction of a third country, whether controlled by a third country government or not, and is directly or indirectly involved in air transport services or related services or in providing infrastructure or services used to provide air transport services or related services, including joint ventures and alliance among carriers;
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'third country entity' means any natural or legal person, whether profit- making or not, or any official body with or without own legal personality, which is under the jurisdiction of a third country, whether controlled by a third country government or not, and is directly or indirectly involved in air transport services or related services or in providing infrastructure or services used to provide air transport services or related services, including joint ventures and alliances;
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'practices affecting competition' means discrimination
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'practices affecting competition' means practice by air carrier within the meaning of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, discrimination and subsidies;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h – point i – point 3 (3) a government or other public organisation, including publicly controlled undertakings, provides goods or services other than general infrastructure, or purchases goods or services;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of this Regulation, a 'Union interest', such as strengthening the internal market, strengthening the connectivity of Member States or increasing competition, shall be determined by the Commission on a case- by-case basis, after consulting the European Parliament and taking into consideration a common view of the majority of Member States and the interests of interested parties;
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) "dependent industries" means services employed for the direct provision of air transport services, including services relating to airport facilities, computer reservation systems, air ticket distribution, search services, charges, and the use of other facilities or services employed for the operation of air transport services.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of this Regulation, a determination as to whether the Union's interest calls for intervention shall be based on an appraisal of all the various interests taken as a whole, including the interests of the Union’s industry, employees and consumers.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) For the purpose of this Regulation, a 'Union interest', such as strengthening the internal market, strengthening the connectivity of Member States, increasing transparency and fair competition, including socioeconomic impact, shall be determined by the Commission on a case by-case basis, after consulting the European Parliament and taking into consideration a common view of the majority of Member States;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) For the purpose of this Regulation, a 'Union interest', such as strengthening the internal market, strengthening the connectivity of Member States, increasing transparency and fair competition, shall be determined by the Commission on a case by-case basis, after consulting the European Parliamentand taking into consideration a common view of the majority of Member States
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is prima facie evidence of actual or potential harm to the consumer and either of the following:
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is prima facie evidence of either of the
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State, a Union air carrier or an association of Union air carriers in accordance with paragraph 2, or on the Commission's own initiative, if there is
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State,
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State,
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An investigation shall be initiated following a written complaint submitted by a Member State,
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a practice affecting fair competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity;
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a practice
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii)
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii)
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii)
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) a causal link between the alleged practice and the alleged
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) a causal link between the alleged practice and the alleged
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) a causal link between the alleged practice and the alleged
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) the negative impact on air connectivity of a particular region, of a Member State or a group of Member States, or of the European Common Aviation Area;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) Without this becoming a precondition for initiating proceedings, the impact on the Union's air connectivity should be examined as part of the taking into account of the Union's interest and when the Commission would consider implementing redressive measures.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Impact on the Union’s air connectivity may be examined only when assessing Union interest with a view to determining whether redressive measures should be adopted. It is therefore not a precondition for initiating proceedings under this Regulation.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. A complaint shall include
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall, as far as possible, examine the accuracy and adequacy of the elements provided in the complaint or at the disposal of the Commission, in order to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1. The Commission shall seek all complementary evidence which it considers necessary and verify that information with relevant stakeholders, provided that the undertakings or organisations concerned give their consent;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 139 #
4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the adoption of measures in accordance with Articles 10 or 13 would be against the Union interest or where the Commission considers that the facts put forward in the complaint neither raise a systemic issue, nor have a significant impact on one or more Union air carriers. When assessing the Union interest the Commission shall consult the European Parliament and give due consideration to the common view of the majority of the Member States and interested parties.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the adoption of measures in accordance with Articles 10 or 13 would be against the Union interest or where the Commission considers that the facts put forward in the complaint neither raise a systemic issue, nor have a significant impact on one or more Union air carriers; when investigating the Union interest, the Commission shall consult Parliament and obtain the opinion of the Member States concerned.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the
Amendment 143 #
4. The Commission
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the adoption of measures in accordance with Articles 10 or 13 would be against the Union interest or where the Commission con
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission may decide not to initiate an investigation where the
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The decision not to initiate an investigation in accordance with paragraph 4 shall be accompanied by a statement of reasons thereof and shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Commission shall further justify its decision before the competent committees of the European Parliament.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. Where the evidence presented is insufficient for the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform the complainant about the insufficiency within
Amendment 149 #
5. Where the evidence presented is insufficient for the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform the complainant about the insufficiency within 60 days of the date on which the complaint was lodged. The complainant shall be given
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. Where the evidence presented is insufficient for the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform the complainant about the insufficiency within
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide on the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 within
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide on the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 within
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide on the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 within
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide on the initiation of an investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 within
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall decide
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – introductory part 7. Subject to paragraph 4,
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – introductory part 7. Subject to paragraph 4,
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; the notice shall announce the initiation of the investigation, indicate the scope of the investigation, the applicable international obligations that are allegedly violated or the third country or third country entity who has allegedly been engaged in practices affecting competition and the alleged injury or threat of injury, the Union air carrier(s) concerned and state the period within which interested parties may make themselves known, present their views in writing, submit information or may apply to be heard by the Commission. This period shall not be shorter than 30 days.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; the notice shall announce the initiation of the investigation, indicate the scope of the investigation, the applicable international obligations that are allegedly violated or the third country or third country entity
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; the notice shall announce the initiation of the investigation, indicate the scope of the investigation, the applicable international obligations that are allegedly violated or the third country or third country entity who has allegedly been engaged in practices affecting competition and the alleged
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; the notice shall announce the initiation of the investigation, indicate the scope of the investigation, the applicable international obligations that are allegedly violated or the third country or third country entity who has allegedly been engaged in practices affecting competition and the alleged
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; the notice shall announce the initiation of the investigation, indicate the scope of the investigation, the applicable international obligations that are allegedly violated or the third country or third country entity who has allegedly been engaged in practices affecting competition and the alleged
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point d a (new) (d a) give a statement in front of the competent committees of the European Parliament.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 8. Where the complaint is withdrawn prior to the initiation of the investigation, the complaint is considered not to have been lodged. This is without prejudice to the right of the Commission to proceed with the initiat
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3 a Determining the Union Interest 1. A determination as to whether the Unions interest calls for an intervention will be based on a thorough appreciation of all of the various interests and affected stakeholders that are relevant and that shall be taken as a whole, explicitly prioritising the interests of consumers and the Member States, particularly those Member states which might see their connectivity impacted as a result of any such intervention. 2. Any test or process to determine the union interest shall constitute a detailed questionnaire for all interests, affected stakeholders, and an economic analysis by the Commission. Elements assessed will include those elements set out in Article 11(1). In such an analysis, the need to eliminate the practices distorting competition or those which violate applicable international obligations shall be given special consideration to ensure consistency with other Union policies in the field of aviation, competition and the environment. 3. A determination pursuant to this Article in application of Articles 10 and 12 shall only be made where interested parties have been given the opportunity and sufficient time to make their views known pursuant to Article 4(6). 4. In determining the Union interest in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission shall examine the information provided by the interested parties which have made themselves known, have presented their views in writing, submitted information, or applied to be heard by the Commission in accordance with point (b), paragraph 7 of Article 3. 5. The interested parties which have made themselves known, presented their views in writing, submitted information, or applied to be heard by the Commission in accordance with point (b), paragraph 7 of Article 3 may request that the fact and considerations on which decisions are likely to be taken be made available to them. Such information shall be made available to the extent possible and in accordance with Article 6, and without prejudice to any subsequent decision taken by the Commission. 6. Information shall be taken into account only where it is supported by actual evidence which substantiates its validity.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Following the initiation of proceedings, and after the dispute settlement procedure foreseen in international agreements has been exhausted and the outcome of the procedure has not been put into effect by the third country or third country entity, the Commission shall begin an investigation.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Following the initiation of proceedings and after the dispute settlement procedure foreseen in international agreements has been exhausted and the outcome of the procedure has not been complied with by the third country or third country entity, the Commission shall begin an investigation.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Aviation plays a crucial role in Union's economy. It is a strong driver for economic growth, jobs, trade and mobility, particularly within and between the areas of the EU. Over the past decades, growth in air transport services significantly contributed to improving connectivity within the Union and with third countries and has been a significant enabler of Union economy at large.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The investigation shall aim to determine whether there is evidence of actual or potential harm to the consumer and either of the following:
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) whether a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury or threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned and to dependent industries.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) whether a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) whether a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) whether a practice
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. If it appears necessary, the Commission may carry out investigations in the territory of the third country concerned
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Aviation plays a crucial role in Union's economy. It is a strong driver for economic growth, jobs, trade and mobility. Over the past decades, growth in air transport services significantly contributed to improving connectivity within the Union and with third countries
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 7 7. Complainants, interested parties, the Member State(s) concerned and the representatives of the third country or third country entity concerned may consult all information made available to the Commission, except for internal documents that are for the use of the Commission and the administrations, provided that such information is not confidential within the meaning of Article 6 and provided that it has addressed a request in writing to the Commission. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament an annual report in which it presents the results of its actions, if any, and justifies the course taken in line with safeguarding the level playing field between all airline companies.
Amendment 181 #
7. Complainants, interested parties
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 a (new) Article 4 a Union Interest A determination as to whether the Union´s interest calls for intervention shall be based on an appreciation of all the various interests that are relevant in the particular situation and taken as a whole, including notably the interests of consumers and of Member States, in particular those Member States whose connectivity may be impacted. In such an examination, the need to eliminate the practices affecting competition or the violation of applicable international obligations shall be given special consideration. 2. A determination pursuant to this Article in application of Articles 10 and 12 shall only be made where interested parties have been given the opportunity to make their views known pursuant to Article 4(6). 3. In determining the Union interest in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall examine the information provided by the interested parties which have made themselves known, presented their views in writing, submitted information, or applied to be heard by the Commission in accordance with point (b), paragraph 7 of Article 3. 4. The interested parties which have made themselves known, presented their views in writing, submitted information, or applied to be heard by the Commission in accordance with point (b), paragraph 7 of Article 3 may request that the fact and considerations on which decisions are likely to be taken be made available to them. Such information shall be made available to the extent possible and in accordance to Article 6, and without prejudice to any subsequent decision taken by the Commission. 5. Information shall be taken into account only where it is supported by actual evidence which substantiates its validity
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 a (new) Article 4 a The Commission's decision referred to in Article 3(4) as to whether the adoption of measures in accordance with Articles 10 or 13 would be against the Union's interest shall be based on an assessment of the actual or potential impact on consumers and the impact on the Member State(s) concerned.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. When the Commission intends to proceed with the initiat
Amendment 185 #
1. When the Commission intends to proceed with the initiat
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Any information which is by nature confidential, including but not limited to information the disclosure of which would be of significant competitive advantage to a competitor or would have a significantly adverse effect upon a person supplying the information or upon a person from whom the person supplying the information has acquired the information, or which is provided on a confidential basis by parties to an investigation, shall
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 In cases where access to the necessary information is refused or is otherwise not provided within the appropriate time limits, where a third country concerned did not grant access to its territory to conduct investigations or where the investigation is by other means significantly impeded, findings shall be made on the basis of the available facts and the Commission might take provisional redressive measures. Where the Commission finds that false or misleading information has been submitted, such information shall be disregarded.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 In cases where access to the necessary information is refused or is otherwise not provided within the appropriate time limits, or where the investigation is significantly impeded, findings shall be made on the basis of the
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 In cases where access to the necessary information is refused or is otherwise not provided within the appropriate time limits, or where the investigation is significantly impeded, findings shall be made on the basis of the
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Aviation plays a crucial role in Union's economy. It is a strong driver for economic growth, jobs, trade, tourism and mobility. Over the past decades, growth in air transport services significantly contributed to improving connectivity within the Union and with third countries and has been a significant enabler of Union economy at large.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 In cases where access to the necessary
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The third country, the third country entity and the third air carrier concerned, as well as the complainant and interested parties shall receive disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to adopt redressive measures, or to terminate proceedings without adopting redressive measures, no later than one month before the Council or the Committee referred to in Article 15 is seized in accordance with Articles 10(2), 10(3), 12(2) or 13(1).
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within two years. That period may be prolonged by an additional three months in duly justified cases.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition between all air carriers. This
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within tw
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The proceedings shall be concluded within
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s),
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s),
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition between all air carriers, ensuring transparency, a level playing field and preventing all anti-competitive behaviour. This would contribute to maintaining conditions conducive to a high level of Union's connectivity
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of urgency, such as in situations where there is a risk of immediate and irreversible injury to Union air carrier(s), the proceedings may be shortened to
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Moreover, precautionary measures may be considered in emergency cases in order to prevent or counteract an injury or a risk of immediate and irreversible injury.
Amendment 216 #
3. The Commission
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) in case of practice affecting competition, either that practice or the injury
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition between all air carriers, ensuring transparency, a level playing field and preventing all anti-competitive behaviour. This would contribute to maintaining conditions conducive to a high level of Union's connectivity.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) in case of practice affecting competition, either that practice or the injury
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury or the threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned has not been eliminated following a reasonable period of time, the Commission
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury or the threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned has not been eliminated following a reasonable period of time, the Commission
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If the violation of applicable international obligations or the practice affecting competition, the injury
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the Commission may terminate the investigation conducted under Article 4 without adopting redressive measures, and present a detailed justification of this course of action in the annual report, in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 7.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the Commission
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the Commission
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Where the complaint is withdrawn, the Commission
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by means of
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The implementing acts referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to the relevant
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and subject to paragraphs 1 and 2, the Co
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and subject to paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt provisional or definitive redressive measures if the investigation determines that the applicable international obligations have been violated.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 3 shall be
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) that the Commission has concluded that one of the following is established, and that it gives rise to actual or potential harm to consumers: (i) the existence of a practice affecting competition adopted by a third country or third country entity; (ii) the existence of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned; (iii) the existence of a causal link between the injury and the practice considered;
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition between all air carriers. This would contribute to preserving the competitiveness of EU air carriers, as well as to maintaining conditions conducive to a high level of Union's connectivity.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) the situation with regard to aviation employees in the Union, above all with regard to labour and social law protection and the effect on the labour market.
Amendment 241 #
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. A finding of a threat of injury requires that it be clearly foreseeable and imminent that a particular situation is likely to develop into actual injury. Any such determination shall be based on evidence and take account of all relevant factors, in particular:
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. A finding of a threat of injury requires that it be clearly foreseeable that a particular situation is likely to develop into actual injury. Any such determination shall be based on verifiable evidence and take account of all relevant factors, in particular:
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) The totality of the factors considered shall be such as to lead to the conclusion that the foreseeable evolution is imminent and that, unless protective action is taken, actual injury will occur. In the event where the situation under scrutiny develops into an actual injury before the end of the proceeding, the Commission shall proceed in accordance with paragraph 1 and take into account the newest evidence at its disposal.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. Injury
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. Injury
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. Injury
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Union air carriers are at the centre of a global network connecting Europe internally and with the rest of the world. They should be enabled to compete against third countries air carriers in an environment of open and fair competition
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by means of
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) the Commission concludes that
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) the existence of injury
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) the existence of injury
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) the existence of a causal link between the injury
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) the existence of a causal link between the injury
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) the existence of a causal link between the injury
Amendment 26 #
(3)
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) the third country or third country entity concerned has eliminated the injury
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) the third country or third country entity concerned has eliminated the injury
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The decision to terminate the investigation in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by a statement of the reasons thereof and shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the annual report which is to be submitted to the European Parliament, in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 7.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The decision to terminate the investigation in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by a statement of the reasons thereof and shall be published
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Commission shall, after consultation with the Council and the Parliament, by means of implementing acts, adopt redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 4 determines that a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury or threat of injury to the
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt provisional or definitive redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 4 determines that a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury or threat of injury to the Union air carrier(s) concerned.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Co
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Fair competition is an i
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b), (c) and (d) of Article 12(2) the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 4 determines that a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Co
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 4 determines that a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 12(1) and except in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 12(2) the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 4 determines that a practice affecting competition, adopted by a third country or a third country entity, has caused injury
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any measure of equivalent or lesser value, not including slots and traffic rights.
Amendment 276 #
(b) any measure of equivalent or lesser value, except slots and traffic rights.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any measure of equivalent or lesser value, except slots and traffic rights.
Amendment 278 #
(b a) suspension of air traffic rights
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed what is necessary to offset the injury
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) This Regulation should apply only after the dispute resolution procedures that are contained within air transport or air services agreements to which the Union is a party, or those that have been concluded between a Member State and a third country, have been exhausted.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed what is necessary to offset the injury
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed what is necessary to offset the injury
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed what is necessary to offset the injury
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The redressive measures referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 shall not consist of suspension or limitation of any rights granted by a Member State to a third country under an air transport, an air service agreement or any provision on air transport services included in a trade agreement concluded with that third country.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 4. The redressive measures
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The redressive measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall have regard to the proper functioning of the Union air transport market and shall not result in an undue advantage being given to any air carrier or group of air carriers.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 – indent 1 (new) - Provisional measures may be imposed if a provisional affirmative determination has been made that the non-Community carriers concerned benefit from subsidies or are engaged in unfair pricing practices causing injury to the fair competition between all air carriers and/or that the Union interest calls for intervention to prevent further such injury.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 – indent 1 (new) – Provisional measures shall be imposed to prevent irreversible injury to Union carriers, notably when the investigation determines that a threat of injury is clear and present, and also in the event of a complex on-going investigation which has not been yet concluded or terminated.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 – indent 2 (new) - The provisional measures referred to in the first indent of this paragraph shall be imposed for a maximum of six months. That period may be prolonged by an additional six months in justified cases.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The redressive measures referred to in Article 13 shall
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) However, in spite of continued efforts by the Union and some third countries
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The redressive measures referred to in Article 13 shall remain in force only as long as, and to the extent that, it is necessary in view of, the persistence of the practice affecting competition and the ensuing
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The redressive measures referred to in Article 13 shall remain in force only as long as, and to the extent that, it is necessary in view of, the persistence of the practice affecting competition and the ensuing
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The redressive measures referred to in Article 13 shall remain in force only as long as, and to the extent that, it is necessary in view of, the persistence of the practice affecting competition and the ensuing
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. Where circumstances so warrant, the need for the continued imposition of redressive measures in their initial form may be reviewed, either on the initiative of the Commission or from a relevant Member State, or of the complainant or upon a reasoned request by the third country or the third country entity concerned.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. Where circumstances so warrant, the need for the continued imposition of redressive measures in their initial form may be reviewed, either on the initiative of the Commission or Member State concerned, or of the complainant or upon a reasoned request by the third country or the third country entity concerned.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. Where circumstances so warrant, the need for the continued imposition of redressive measures in their initial form may be reviewed, either on the initiative of the Commission or of the complainant or upon a reasoned request by the third country or the third country entity concerned or an interested party.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. In the course of its review, the Commission shall assess the continued existence of the practice affecting competition, of the injury
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. In the course of its review, the Commission shall assess the continued existence of the practice affecting competition, of the injury
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. In the course of its review, the Commission shall assess the continued existence of the practice affecting competition, of the injury or threat of injury and of the causal link between the practice and the
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Efforts
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 4. The Co
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 a (new) Article 15 a Report 1. The Commission shall, with due regard to the protection of confidential information within the meaning of Article 6, present an annual report on the application and implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. Where relevant, the report shall include information about the application of redressive measures, the termination of investigations without redressive measures, investigations, reviews and cooperation with Member States, interested parties and third countries. 2. The European Parliament may, within one month of the Commission presenting the report, invite the Commission to an ad hoc meeting of its responsible committee to present and explain any issues related to the implementation of this Regulation. 3. No later than six months after presenting the report to the European Parliament and to the Council, the Commission shall make the report public.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Fair competition between air carriers should preferably be addressed in the context of air transport or air services agreements with third countries. However, most air transport or air services agreements concluded between the Union or its Member States or both, on the one
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Fair competition between air carriers should preferably be addressed in the context of air transport or air services agreements with third countries. However, most air transport or air services agreements concluded between the Union or its Member States or both, on the one hand, and third countries on the other do not so far provide for corresponding rules. Efforts should therefore be strengthened to negotiate the inclusion of fair competition clauses in existing and future air transport or air services agreements with third countries without delay.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Fair competition between air carriers should pr
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Fair competition between air carriers
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The Union will continue to address open and fair competition between all air carriers at multilateral and bilateral level while respecting concluded agreements. Taking this into account, the Union will safeguard and strengthen the Union trade policy by introducing additional, effective and credible autonomous tools and measures in the area of air services. In this respect, this Regulation, on the one hand, and the air transport agreements, air services agreements or any provision on dispute settlement included in a trade agreement with third countries, on the other hand, are complementary tools. These bilateral agreements should neither prevent or hinder the Member States from using this Regulation nor should they prevent the Commission from initiating proceedings and taking measures where and when necessary.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The initiative to negotiate air transport agreements at the Union level and bilateral aviation safety agreements with third countries representing emerging and strategic markets (such as China, Japan, ASEAN, Turkey, Qatar, the UAE, Armenia, Mexico, China, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and Saudi Arabia) is welcomed and constructive negotiations are encouraged. However new agreements should be correctly implemented and enforced by all parties and need to include a fair competition clause on the basis of international standards (ICAO, ILO). The Commission and the Council, on a basis of respect for Article 218 TFEU, are invited to fully involve the Parliament at all stages of negotiations.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Where bilateral air transport or air service agreements include fair competition clauses or similar provisions, dispute settlement procedures foreseen in such international agreements may be taken into consideration, if appropriate, provided that the Member States concerned wish to make use of these procedures. However, this should not be a precondition for opening a procedure under this Regulation in order to ensure complementarity between this Regulation and the bilateral agreements.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The existence of bilateral air transport or air service agreements including fair competition clauses or similar provisions does not prevent the Commission from conducting an investigation and taking measures where necessary. The decision to initiate an investigation does not prevent the Commission to support and advise Member States involved in a dispute settlement procedures foreseen in international agreements.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Where bilateral air transport or air service agreements include fair competition clauses or similar provisions, dispute settlement procedures may be taken into consideration but should not be a precondition for opening a procedure under this Regulation.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 b (new) (7 b) The Commission should make negotiating air transport agreements with third countries conditional on high safety standards, appropriate labour and social standards and participation in the market- based climate change instrument for air transport emissions and should ensure that air transport agreements provide for equal market access, equal ownership conditions and a level playing field based on reciprocity.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Fair competition between air carriers can also be ensured through appropriate Union legislation such as Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/9320 and Council Directive 96/97/EC21 . Insofar as fair competition supposes protection of Union air carriers from certain practices adopted by third countries or third country carriers, this issue is currently addressed in Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 . However, Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 has proven in
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition within the Union and with third countries air carriers. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take measures where necessary, after consulting the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where practices affecting competition cause or threaten to cause injury to Union air carriers and competition.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition within the Union and with third countries air carriers. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take measures where necessary. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where practices affecting competition cause or threaten to cause injury to Union air carriers.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition with third countries air carriers. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take measures where necessary, after consulting the European Parliament, the Member States concerned and the relevant stakeholders. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where practices affecting competition cause
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition with third countries air carriers. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take urgent measures where necessary, if there is a risk of an abusive practice occasioning prejudice to EU airline companies. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a high level of Union connectivity and to ensure fair competition with third countries air carriers. To that end, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to conduct an investigation and to take measures where necessary. Such measures should be available either where relevant obligations under an agreement to which the Union is a party are violated, or where practices
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Effective, proportionate and dissuasive legislation remains necessary in order to maintain conditions conducive to a
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9 a) The issue of ensuring fair competition also includes respect for and adherence to workers' rights including but not limited to the standards of the International Labour Organization, agreed environmental and health and safety standards and rules for the benefit of passengers;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Where the Union is party to an air transport or air services agreement with a third country, the violation of international obligations enshrined therein should be addressed within the context of this agreement, in particular through the application of the fair competition clause
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Air agreements and this Regulation should be complementary and facilitate dialogue with the third country concerned in order to efficiently resolve disputes and restore fair competition. Neither the existence of a fair competition clause in the agreement, nor on-going negotiations on the basis of this clause should preclude the right of the Commission to initiate an investigation. Wherever a satisfactory agreement has been found between the Union and the third country concerned, the Commission should terminate the proceedings without adopting redressive measures.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In order for the Commission to be adequately informed about possible elements justifying the initiation of an investigation, any Member State, Union carrier or association of Union air carriers should be entitled to lodge a complaint, which must be addressed within a reasonable timescale, in order to avoid losses being incurred by European air carriers.
Amendment 56 #
(11a) In order to make the Regulation applicable and effective, it is important for the Commission to be able to consider launching procedures on the basis of prima facie evidence and in cases where there is a threat of injury which the Commission is able to identify, in line with the framework provided by other trade defence instruments.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is important to ensure that the investigation can extend to the widest possible range of pertinent elements. To this effect,
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Where the investigation conducted by the Commission concerns operations covered by an air transport or air services agreement with a third country to which the Union is not a party, it should be ensured that the Commission acts in full knowledge of any proceedings intended or conducted by the Member State concerned under such agreement and pertaining to the situation subject to the Commission’s investigation after dispute settlement procedures foreseen in international agreements have been exhausted and the outcome of the procedures has not been complied with by the third country or third country entity. Member States should therefore be obliged to keep the Commission informed accordingly.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Where the investigation conducted by the Commission concerns operations covered by an air transport or air services agreement with a third country to which the Union is not a party, it should be ensured that the Commission acts in full knowledge of any proceedings intended or
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Where the investigation conducted by the Commission concerns operations covered by an air transport or air services agreement with a third country to which the Union is not a party, it should be ensured that the Commission acts in full knowledge of any proceedings intended or conducted by the Member State concerned under such agreement and pertaining to the situation subject to the Commission’s investigation on the basis of fair competition criteria. Member States should therefore be obliged to keep the Commission informed accordingly.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The practice of subsidies is capable of undermining fair competition between air carriers. The provisions of this regulation on subsidies should not result in imposing more restrictive obligations on third country carriers than those applying to Union carriers.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the Union interest, having regard to their impact on other persons, notably consumers or undertakings in the Union. The existence and safeguarding of high levels of connectivity throughout the Union is a key Union interest and will always have to be taken into account before any investigation is initiated or redressive or other measure is adopted. Proceedings should also be concluded without measures where the requirements for such measures are not, or no longer met.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the Union interest, having regard to their impact on other persons, notably consumers or undertakings in the Union. Since air connectivity within the Union needs to be taken into account, the impact of a procedure on such connectivity should only be analysed if the Commission is considering redressive measures. Proceedings should also be concluded without measures where the requirements for such measures are not, or no longer met.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the Union interest, having regard to their impact on other persons, notably consumers or undertakings in the Union. The impact on Union air connectivity should be examined when the Commission is planning to implement redressive measures. Proceedings should also be concluded without measures where the requirements for such measures are not, or no longer met.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the Union interest, having regard to their impact on other persons, notably consumers or undertakings in the Union. The need to maintain a high level of Union connectivity should be considered with priority. Proceedings should also be concluded without measures where the requirements for such measures are not, or no longer met.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should not be initiated or should be concluded without redressive measures under this Regulation where the adoption of the latter would be against the Union interest, having regard to their impact on other p
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Proceedings should
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15 a) When determining whether or not the Union interest calls for intervention, the Commission should take into account the views of all interested parties. In order to organise such consultations and to give an opportunity to all interested parties to be heard, time-limits for providing information or for requesting a hearing should be specified in the notice of initiation of the investigation. Interested parties should be aware of the conditions of disclosure for the information they provide and should be entitled to respond to other parties’ comments.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16 a) For effective, proportionate and dissuasive reasons the Commission should be entitled to take provisional measures before the termination of proceedings.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Findings in respect of injury
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) For reasons of administrative efficiency and in view of a possible termination without measures, it should be possible to suspend the proceedings where the third country or third country entity concerned has taken decisive steps to eliminate the relevant practice
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) For reasons of administrative efficiency and in view of a possible termination without measures, it should be possible to suspend the proceedings where the third country or third country entity concerned has taken decisive steps to eliminate the relevant practice affecting competition or the ensuing
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Redressive measures in respect of practices
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Redressive measures in respect of practices affecting competition are aimed
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Redressive measures in respect of practices affecting competition are aimed at offsetting the injury that occurs or is threating to occur due to those practices. They should therefore take the form of financial duties or of other measures, with the explicit exception of traffic rights and slots, which, representing a measurable pecuniary value, are capable of achieving the same effect.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Redressive measures in respect of practices affecting competition are aimed at offsetting the injury that occurs
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In line with the same principle, redressive measures in respect of practices
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In line with the same principle, redressive measures in respect of practices affecting competition should remain in force only as long as, and to the extent that, it is necessary in view of such practice and the ensuing
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) Situations investigated under this Regulation and their potential impact on Member States may differ according to the circumstances. Redressive measures may therefore apply, according to the case, to one or more Member States
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21 a) Furthermore, it should be possible for the Union to take provisional measures to prevent irreversible injury to Union carriers, notably when the investigation determines that a threat of injury is clear and present, and also in the event of a complex on-going investigation which has not been yet concluded or terminated.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22 a) The Commission should inform the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation on an annual basis. This report should include information about the application of redressive measures, the termination of investigations without redressive measures, investigations, reviews and cooperation with Member States, interested parties and third countries. This report should be treated with the appropriate level of confidentiality.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the efficient protection, equal for all Union carriers and based on uniform criteria and procedures, against violation of applicable international obligations and against injury or threat of injury to one or more Union air carriers caused by practices affecting competition, adopted by third countries or third country entities cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the efficient protection, equal for all Union carriers and based on uniform criteria and procedures, against violation of applicable international obligations and against injury or threat of injury to one or more Union air carriers caused by practices
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the efficient protection, equal for all Union carriers and based on uniform criteria and procedures, against violation of applicable international obligations and against injury
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23 a) The Commission should propose strengthening rules, criteria and measures on fair competition in the Union, not only within the Union internal air transport sector but also in the intermodal transport sector. Those proposals could inter alia contain effects on fair competition in the fields of exemptions on fuel taxes and VAT on tickets.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures by the Council, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting fair competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing or threatening to cause injury to Union air carriers by distorting competition.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing or threatening to cause injury to Union air carriers or infringe air passengers' rights.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing or threatening to cause injury to Union air carriers and dependent industries.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the conduct of investigations by the Commission and on the adoption of redressive measures, relating to violation of applicable international obligations and to practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and other air carriers and causing
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. For the purpose of this Regulation, fair competition criteria and measures shall be determined by the Commission on a case-by-case basis, after consulting the European Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 a (new) Article 1 a Scope This Regulation shall apply in case of: a) violation of applicable international obligations between the Union and a third country and; b) practices affecting competition between Union air carriers and third country air carriers. 2. This Regulation applies without prejudice to Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93and Article 20 of Directive 96/67/EC. 3. This Regulation applies only after dispute settlement procedures contained in air transport or air services agreement to which the Union is a party, or concluded between a Member State and a third country, has been exhausted and the outcome of the dispute settlement procedure has not been put into effect by the third country or third country entity.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 a (new) Article 1 a Scope 1. This regulation shall apply to air transport services that are currently operated, or will be operated, between a Member State and a third country on a non-stop city-pair route. 2. This Regulation shall apply only after the dispute resolution procedures that are contained within air transport or air services agreements to which the Union is a party, or those that have been concluded between a Member State and a third country, have been exhausted.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 a (new) Article 1 a Scope 1. This regulation shall apply to air transport services operated, or to be operated, between a Member State and a third country on a non-stop city-pair route. 2. This regulation applies only after dispute settlement procedures contained in air transport or air services agreements to which the Union is a party, or concluded between a Member State and a third country, have been exhausted and the outcome of the dispute settlement procedure has not been put into effect by the third country or third country entity.
source: 616.689
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30982&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2017)608689New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2017)608689 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.412New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-613412_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3714)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3714)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.689New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-616689_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.502&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-613502_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/title |
Old
00077/2019/LEXNew
00077/2018/LEX |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190313&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-13-TOC_EN.html |
events/10 |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0125&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0125_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0209New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0209_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30982&j=0&l=en
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/10184New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/2/body |
Old
EPNew
unknown |
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-03-05T00:00:00New
2018-03-20T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
links/Research document |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-10-05T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-10-05T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
links/Research document |
|
links/Research document |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0 |
|
committees/2/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0 |
|
committees/2/shadows/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2017-06-30T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-06-30T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
TRAN/8/10184
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|