Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite ( ALDE) | BONI Michał ( PPE), SILVA PEREIRA Pedro ( S&D), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten ( ECR), TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria ( Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo ( EFDD), ANNEMANS Gerolf ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | PETI | MARIAS Notis ( ECR) | Pál CSÁKY ( PPE), Kostadinka KUNEVA ( GUE/NGL), Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | Cécile Kashetu KYENGE ( S&D), Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE), Csaba SÓGOR ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 459 votes to 170 with 49 abstentions a resolution on the implementation of the Treaty provisions related to EU citizenship.
Parliament stressed that the rights, values and principles on which the Union is based, which are highlighted in Articles 2 and 6 TEU, put the citizen at the very centre of the European project. The debate on the future of Europe therefore also implies a reflection on the strength of common identity.
Members pointed out that the EU has had difficulties in facing numerous crises with important socioeconomic consequences, which have led to the emergence of populist and nationalist ideologies based on exclusive identities and supremacist criteria that contradict European values. The unsatisfactory management of the various crises has increased citizens’ disappointment in some of the results of the EU integration project.
Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that EU citizenship is regarded as a cherished privilege among citizens, including by restoring confidence in the EU project, giving primacy to the promotion of all citizens’ rights, including civil, political and social rights among others, improving the quality of democracy within the Union, the practical enjoyment of fundamental rights and freedoms and the opportunity for every citizen to participate in the democratic life of the Union, while providing for a greater involvement of civil society in decision-making and implementation processes.
Moreover, the prospect of Brexit has highlighted the importance of EU citizenship rights, especially among young Europeans, and their role in the lives of millions of EU citizens, and has also raised awareness in the EU concerning the potential loss of such rights on both sides.
Political rights
Members expressed concern at the trend to decline in voter turnout in both national and European Parliament elections, especially among young people. They were convinced that the strengthening of the EU public sphere and the full implementation of European citizenship have the potential to help reverse that decline by increasing citizens’ sense of belonging to a European community and boosting representative democracy.
Education
Parliament stressed that the development of EU curricula in educational systems should be a priority for continuing to build on the potential of EU citizenship. It emphasised that quality civic education for all ages is crucial for the confident exercise of citizens’ democratic rights and the proper functioning of a democratic society, stating that only continuous educational effort can ensure increased participation in elections at the European level. It recommended the use of Articles 165, 166 and 167 TFUE as a legal basis for exploring the potential of education, vocational training and youth policies.
Freedom of movement
While welcoming the benefits that free movement brings to EU citizens and Member States’ economies, the resolution underlined the problem of incorrect or confusing information on visa requirements for family members or on residence rights. It insisted that Member States should ensure the removal of unnecessary barriers to the right of entry/residence, in particular for third-country nationals who are family members of EU citizens.
Members were also concerned about the difficulties encountered by citizens in getting their professional qualifications recognised across Europe and the discrimination in finding employment, in accessing various services such as renting a car or an apartment or certain banking services, and in the fields of education and taxation.
The loss of electoral rights arising from residence in another Member State could discourage citizens from moving to another Member State.
Recommendations
Parliament strongly encouraged the European political parties and their party members to ensure a gender‑balanced representation of candidates by means of zipped lists or other equivalent methods.
The Commission was called on to:
- extend rights in order to allow EU citizens to choose whether to vote in their Member State of nationality or of residence and that this be extended to include all elections, in line with the constitutional possibilities of each Member State;
- develop and implement e-democracy tools, such as online platforms, to involve citizens more directly in EU democratic life, thus fostering their engagement;
- step up the promotion of democratic participation by intensifying its dialogue with citizens, enhancing citizens’ understanding of the role of EU legislation in their daily lives, and underlining their right to vote in and stand for election at local, national and European level;
- come forward with a proposal enhancing the role of Europe Direct offices;
- come forward with a proposal for the implementation of Parliament’s recommendations on an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights.
European Citizens Initiative and political parties
Members considered that the revision of the legal framework governing the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) presents an opportunity to enhance citizens’ participation in EU policy making by rendering the instrument less bureaucratic and more accessible. They also called for individual citizens of the EU to be given the opportunity to apply directly for membership in political parties at European level.
Parliament proposed to Member States that they establish a European public holiday on 9 May in order to reinforce a European feeling of belonging and create space for civic movements and activities.
Lastly, Parliament recalled the Commission guidance on the application of Union data protection law in the electoral context and its communication of 12 September 2018 on securing free and fair elections in Europe, and underlined the need for a defined EU policy to tackle anti-European propaganda and targeted misinformation. Members called for every effort to be made in order to ensure elections free from any abusive interference.
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Maite PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ (ALDE, ES) on the implementation of the Treaty provisions related to EU citizenship.
In accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) and Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), every person who holds the nationality of a Member State is a citizen of the Union. Union citizenship is additional to the national citizenship without substituting it, and is made up of a combination of rights and duties that are associated to those conferred by the citizenship of a Member State.
The EU has had difficulties in facing numerous crises with important socioeconomic consequences which have led to the emergence of populist and nationalist ideologies based on exclusive identities and supremacist criteria which contradict European values. The unsatisfactory management of the various crises has increased citizens’ disappointment in some of the results of the EU integration project.
Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that EU citizenship is regarded as a cherished privilege among citizens, including by restoring confidence in the EU project, giving primacy to the promotion of all citizens’ rights, including civil, political and social rights among others, improving the quality of democracy within the Union, the practical enjoyment of fundamental rights and freedoms and the opportunity for every citizen to participate in the democratic life of the Union, while providing for a greater involvement of civil society in decision-making and implementation processes.
Moreover, the prospect of Brexit has highlighted the importance of EU citizenship rights, especially among young Europeans, and their role in the lives of millions of EU citizens, and has also raised awareness in the EU concerning the potential loss of such rights on both sides.
Political rights
Members expressed concern at the trend to decline in voter turnout in both national and European Parliament elections, especially among young people. They are convinced that the strengthening of the EU public sphere and the full implementation of European citizenship have the potential to help reverse that decline by increasing citizens’ sense of belonging to a European community and boosting representative democracy.
They stressed that the development of EU curricula in educational systems should be a priority for continuing to build on the potential of EU citizenship.
Freedom of movement
While welcoming the benefits that free movement brings to EU citizens and the Member States’ economies, the report underlined the problem of the absence of information or the provision of incorrect or confusing information on visa requirements for family members or on residence rights. They insisted that Member States should ensure the removal of unnecessary barriers to the right of entry/residence, in particular for third-country nationals who are family members of EU citizens.
Members are also concerned about the difficulties encountered by citizens in getting their professional qualifications recognised across Europe and the discrimination in finding employment, in accessing various services such as renting a car or an apartment or certain banking services, and in the fields of education and taxation.
The loss of electoral rights arising from residence in another Member State could discourage citizens from moving to another Member State.
Recommendations
The Commission is called on to:
- extend rights in order to allow EU citizens to choose whether to vote in their Member State of nationality or of residence and that this be extended to include all elections, in line with the constitutional possibilities of each Member State;
- develop and implement e-democracy tools, such as online platforms, to involve citizens more directly in EU democratic life, thus fostering their engagement;
- step up the promotion of democratic participation by intensifying its dialogue with citizens, enhancing citizens’ understanding of the role of EU legislation in their daily lives, and underlining their right to vote in and stand for election at local, national and European level;
- come forward with a proposal enhancing the role of Europe Direct offices;
- come forward with a proposal for the implementation of Parliament’s recommendations on an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights.
European Citizens Initiative and political parties
Members considered that the revision of the legal framework governing the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) presents an opportunity to enhance citizens’ participation in EU policy making by rendering the instrument less bureaucratic and more accessible.
They also recalled the contribution of political parties at European level to ‘forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of the citizens of the Union’. Therefore, they called for individual citizens of the EU to be given the opportunity to apply directly for membership in political parties at European level.
They underlined that better and more focused information on European policies and on the impact of EU legislation on citizens’ daily lives would improve the turnout in the European elections.
Lastly, the report proposed to the Member States that they establish a European public holiday on 9 May in order to reinforce a European feeling of belonging and create space for civic movements and activities.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0076/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0041/2019
- Committee opinion: PE628.589
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.101
- Committee draft report: PE631.784
- Committee opinion: PE623.689
- Committee opinion: PE623.689
- Committee draft report: PE631.784
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.101
- Committee opinion: PE628.589
Activities
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francis ZAMMIT DIMECH
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz - § 2, Am 4 #
A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz - § 6 #
A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz - Am 5 #
A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz - Am 6 #
GB | PL | HU | FR | SE | LV | SK | DK | ?? | MT | CZ | HR | IE | CY | EE | BG | SI | LT | AT | FI | EL | LU | PT | NL | RO | BE | IT | DE | ES | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
64
|
47
|
16
|
69
|
17
|
8
|
12
|
13
|
3
|
6
|
20
|
10
|
9
|
1
|
3
|
15
|
8
|
9
|
17
|
12
|
15
|
6
|
19
|
24
|
27
|
19
|
63
|
89
|
50
|
|
ECR |
61
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (18)Amjad BASHIR, Anthea McINTYRE, Ashley FOX, Baroness Nosheena MOBARIK, Daniel DALTON, Daniel HANNAN, David CAMPBELL BANNERMAN, Emma McCLARKIN, Geoffrey VAN ORDEN, Jacqueline FOSTER, James NICHOLSON, John FLACK, John PROCTER, Kay SWINBURNE, Rupert MATTHEWS, Sajjad KARIM, Syed KAMALL, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
|
Poland ECRFor (14)Against (1) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
|||||||||||||
PPE |
200
|
2
|
Poland PPEFor (17)Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Marek PLURA, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Against (3)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PPEFor (10) |
France PPEFor (14)Against (5) |
Sweden PPEFor (2)Against (2) |
4
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (1) |
1
|
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (5) |
Croatia PPEFor (4)Against (1) |
Ireland PPEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (4)Against (2) |
Slovenia PPEFor (3)Against (2) |
2
|
Austria PPEFor (4)Against (1) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
Portugal PPEFor (5)Against (1) |
Netherlands PPE |
Romania PPEFor (8)Against (4) |
Belgium PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Italy PPEFor (8)Against (4) |
Germany PPEFor (23)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christian EHLER, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Joachim ZELLER, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN
Against (9)Abstain (1) |
Spain PPEFor (1)Against (16)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
||
ENF |
33
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (1) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
37
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (13) |
1
|
France EFDDFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Greece NIAbstain (1) |
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
45
|
1
|
France GUE/NGLAgainst (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
Portugal GUE/NGLAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
3
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
8
|
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
46
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
France Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (5) |
Sweden Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (13) |
4
|
|||||||||||||
ALDE |
63
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
|||||||||
S&D |
168
|
United Kingdom S&D |
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
4
|
Sweden S&DFor (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (8) |
3
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (11) |
3
|
Italy S&DAgainst (26)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Giuseppe FERRANDINO,
Goffredo Maria BETTINI,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Massimo PAOLUCCI,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Pina PICIERNO,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI,
Silvia COSTA,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
Germany S&DAgainst (25)
Arne LIETZ,
Babette WINTER,
Bernd LANGE,
Birgit SIPPEL,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Gabriele PREUSS,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Ismail ERTUG,
Jens GEIER,
Jo LEINEN,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
|
Spain S&DAgainst (13) |