Next event: Debate in plenary scheduled 2021/03/24 more...
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations 2021/01/14
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement 2020/12/16
- Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71) 2020/11/13
- Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71) 2020/11/11
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2020/11/10
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading 2020/11/10
- Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee 2020/11/10
- Contribution 2020/10/28
- Contribution 2020/10/23
- Amendments tabled in committee 2020/10/14
- Committee draft report 2020/10/05
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report 2020/09/23
- Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2020/09/14
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | KARAS Othmar ( EPP) | FERNÁNDEZ Jonás ( S&D), GARICANO Luis ( Renew), LAMBERTS Philippe ( Verts/ALE), ZANNI Marco ( ID), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan ( ECR), MACMANUS Chris ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
The proposed regulation aims to maximise the capacity of institutions to lend and to absorb losses related to the COVID-19 pandemic, while ensuring their continued resilience.
The Commission proposed three targeted amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) increasing the overall risk-sensitivity of the EU securitisation framework that would make the recourse to the
securitisation tool more economically viable for institutions within a prudential framework adequate to safeguard the EU financial stability.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's first-reading position should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Securitisation of non-performing exposures (NPEs)
A specific treatment for the securitisation of NPEs should be introduced building on the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) opinion and taking due account of the Union specificities of the NPE securitisation market and the market for NPEs as well as of the developments in the international standards for exposures to NPE securitisations.
To allow for the due assessment of the relevant Basel standard once it is published, the Commission should be mandated to review the prudential treatment of NPE securitisations.
The EBA should be mandated to monitor the market for securitisations of non-performing exposures and to report to the European Parliament and the Commission on the convenience of reviewing the regulatory capital treatment of NPE securitisations, having regard to the state of the NPE securitisation market, in particular, and the market for NPEs, in general, following the COVID-19 crisis.
Specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised (STS) on-balance sheet securitisations
The regulation would introduce a risk-sensitive calibration more appropriate for on-balance sheet STS securitisations, building on the current preferential regulatory treatment of senior tranches in SME portfolios.
The amended text also provides for the application of a ‘grandfathering’ rule to the outstanding senior positions in synthetic on-balance sheet securitisations to which originator institutions applied the current Article 270 of the CRR before the entry into force of this Regulation.
Review of the Standard Approach to Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR)
Given that the SA-CCR approach could have adverse effects on the availability and cost of financial hedges to end-users, the Commission should review before 30 June 2021 the application of the SA-CCR approach taking into account the specificities of the European banking sector and economy, the international level-playing-field and any developments in international standards and fora.
Collective Investment Undertakings (CIUs) with an underlying portfolio of eurozone sovereign bonds
In close cooperation with the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the Commission should, as part of the upcoming implementation of the Basel III framework, produce a report by 31 December 2021 to duly assess the preferential regulatory treatment of exposures in the form of units or shares in Collective Investment Undertakings (CIUs) with an underlying portfolio consisting of sovereign bonds of euro area Member States, whose relative weight for each Member State’s bonds equals the relative weight of each Member State’s capital contribution to the European Central Bank (ECB).
In doing so, it should consider the European Parliament's position on the Sovereign Bond-backed Securities Regulation adopted on 23 March 2019.
PURPOSE: to amend the capital requirements regulations to maximise the capacity of institutions to lend and to absorb losses related to the COVID-19 pandemic, while still ensuring their continued resilience.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, known as the Capital Requirements Regulation (the CRR), establishes together with Directive 2013/36/EU, known as the Capital Requirements Directive (the CRD), the prudential regulatory framework for credit institutions operating in the Union. One set of amendments, contained in Regulation (EU) 2017/2401, has implemented the revised securitisation framework adopted by the BCBS in December 2014 (the revised Basel framework).
In order to further promote the development of a high quality EU securitisation market based on sound practices, Regulation (EU) 2017/2401 also included amendments aiming at providing for a more risk-sensitive regulatory treatment for simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisations.
Securitisation can play an important role in enhancing the capacity of institutions to support the economic recovery, providing for an effective tool for funding and risk diversification for institutions. It is therefore essential in the context of the economic recovery post COVID-19 pandemic to reinforce that role and help institutions to be able to channel sufficient capital to the real economy.
As highlighted by the European Banking Authority (EBA) in its report of 6 May 2020 on the STS framework for synthetic securitisations, there is a need to introduce a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised on-balance-sheet (STS) securitisations, which will free up regulatory capital and ultimately further strengthen the lending capacity of institutions in a prudentially sound manner. Specific treatment should also be introduced for non-performing exposures (NPE) securitisations.
This proposal is part of a ‘Capital Markets Stimulus Package’ to facilitate economic recovery post-COVID-19, which also includes legislative proposals to amend the Prospectus Regulation , the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID II) and the Securitisation Regulation .
CONTENT: the proposed amendments to the CRR and to the securitisation regulations will enable institutions to maintain a high volume of lending to the economy in the coming months and therefore will provide an important contribution to the absorption of the impact of the shock of the COVID-19 crisis.
The Commission proposes three targeted amendments aiming at increasing the overall risk sensitivity of the EU securitisation framework that would make the recourse to the securitisation tool more economically viable for institutions within a prudential framework adequate to safeguard the EU financial stability.
More risk-sensitive treatment for STS on-balance-sheet securitisation
STS on-balance-sheet securitisation allows institutions to transfer credit risk through funded or unfunded credit protection bought or granted by other investors, freeing capacity for new lending to the real economy and ensuring a more efficient risk sharing among financial actors.
Following the recommendations of the EBA report, it is also proposed to introduce a targeted and limited in scope preferential treatment for STS on-balance sheet securitisation exposures, which focuses on the senior tranche. This would be done by extending the treatment currently provided in Article 270 of the CRR to a wider range of underlying assets.
Removal of regulatory constraints to the securitisation of non-performing exposures (NPEs)
When applied to NPE securitisations, this framework yields capital requirements that proved to be disproportionate, in particular for the so-called ‘formulaic approaches’ (i.e. the SEC-IRBA and SEC-SA). It is therefore proposed to amend the treatment of NPE securitisations by providing for a simple and sufficiently conservative approach based on:
- a flat 100% risk weight applicable to the senior tranche of traditional NPE securitisations and;
- on the application of a floor of 100% to the risk weights of any other tranches of both traditional and on-balance-sheet synthetic NPE securitisations that remain subject to the general framework for the calculation of risk-weighted exposures.
Recognition of credit risk mitigation for securitisation positions
It is proposed to amend Article 249(3) of the CRR which introduces an additional eligibility criterion for the recognition of unfunded credit protection for institutions applying the standardised approach to calculate capital requirements for securitisation exposures.
The proposal imposes a minimum credit rating requirement for almost all types of providers of unfunded credit protection, including central governments. This amendment will enhance the effectiveness of national public guarantee schemes assisting institutions’ strategies to securitise NPEs in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Documents
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2020)007618
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0213/2020
- Contribution: COM(2020)0283
- Contribution: COM(2020)0283
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.993
- Committee draft report: PE658.799
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2020/0022
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: OJ C 377 09.11.2020, p. 0001
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0120
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2020)0283
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0120
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2020/0022 OJ C 377 09.11.2020, p. 0001
- Committee draft report: PE658.799
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.993
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2020)007618
- Contribution: COM(2020)0283
- Contribution: COM(2020)0283
Activities
- Jonás FERNÁNDEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Markus FERBER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Enikő GYŐRI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- France JAMET
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Philippe LAMBERTS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Roberta METSOLA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pedro SILVA PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Paul TANG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Johan VAN OVERTVELDT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Luis GARICANO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tineke STRIK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lídia PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sunčana GLAVAK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Chris MACMANUS
Plenary Speeches (0)
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-03-10T00:00:00New
2021-03-24T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0213_EN.html
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0213_EN.html
|
events/5 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-10-27T00:00:00New
2020-11-09T00:00:00 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.993
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2020-10-13T00:00:00New
2020-10-14T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|