Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE) | BENJUMEA BENJUMEA Isabel ( EPP), FUGLSANG Niels ( S&D), YON-COURTIN Stéphanie ( Renew), BECK Gunnar ( ID), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR), SCHIRDEWAN Martin ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | KOLAKUŠIĆ Mislav ( NA) | Karen MELCHIOR ( RE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 053-p1, TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 053-p1, TFEU 114-p1Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to introduce targeted amendments to existing EU financial services directives to align them with the requirements set out in the Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Sector (DORA) Regulation.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2022/2556 of the European Parliament and of the Council -amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2013/36/EU, 2014/59/EU, 2014/65/EU, (EU) 2015/2366 and (EU) 2016/2341 as regards digital operational resilience for the financial sector.
CONTENT: the amending Directive is part of the Digital Finance package. It introduces targeted changes to existing EU financial services directives to align them with the requirements on network and information systems and ICT risk management and reporting laid down in the Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Sector ( DORA Regulation ) and clarify certain provisions to ensure information and communication technology (ICT) risks are fully addressed.
The Directive provides for a set of amendments that appear necessary to bring legal clarity and consistency in relation to the application by financial entities that are authorised and supervised in accordance with those Directives of various digital operational resilience requirements that are necessary in the pursuit of their activities, thus guaranteeing the smooth functioning of the internal market.
The Directive emphasises the need to ensure the adequacy of those requirements in relation to market developments, while encouraging proportionality in particular with regard to the size of financial entities and the specific regimes to which they are subject, with the aim of reducing compliance costs.
The Directive amends the various operational risk or risk management requirements foreseen in the following Directives:
- 2009/65/EC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities,
- 2009/138/EU on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance,
- 2011/61/EU on alternative investment fund managers,
- 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential regulation of credit institutions and investment firms,
- 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments,
- 2015/2366/EU on payment services in the internal market,
- 2016/2341/EU on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 16.1.2023.
TRANSPOSITION AND APPLICATION: from 17.1.2025.
The European Parliament adopted by 553 votes to 19, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2013/36/EU, 2014/65/EU, (EU) 2015/2366 and (EU) 2016/2341.
This amending Directive is part of the Digital Finance Package. It introduces targeted changes to the existing EU financial services directives to align them with the risk management and reporting requirements for ICT and networks and information systems set out in the Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Sector ( DORA ) Regulation, and to clarify certain provisions to ensure that ICT risks are fully taken into account.
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Objective of the amendments
The Directive provides for a series of amendments which are necessary to provide legal clarity and consistency with regard to the application by financial entities authorised and supervised under the existing Directives of various digital operational resilience requirements which are necessary for the conduct of their business and the provision of services, thereby ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market.
The amended text emphasises the need to ensure that these requirements are in line with market developments, while promoting proportionality , in particular with regard to the size of financial entities and the specific regimes to which they are subject, in order to reduce compliance costs.
Amendment to Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms (CRD)
The relevant provisions of the CRD have been clarified so that ICT risk is explicitly taken into account.
The amendments stipulate that institutions must have robust governance arrangements , including: (i) a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent division of responsibilities; (ii) effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which they are or may be exposed; (iii) adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures, network and information systems set up and managed in accordance with the DORA Regulation, and remuneration policies and practices that promote sound and effective risk management.
In addition, institutions should have adequate contingency and business continuity plans , including information and communications technology (ICT) business continuity policies and plans and ICT response and recovery plans . These plans should be established, managed and tested in accordance with the DORA Regulation to ensure that institutions can continue to operate in the event of a serious business disruption and limit the losses incurred as a result of such a disruption.
Amendment to Directive 2014/59/EU establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms (BBRD)
According to the amended text, the resolution plan should include:
- a demonstration of how critical functions and core business lines could be legally and economically separated, to the extent necessary, from other functions so as to ensure continuity and digital operational resilience upon the failure of the institution;
- a description of essential operations and systems for maintaining the continuous functioning of the institution’s operational processes, including network and information systems as referred to in the DORA Regulation.
Amendment to Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (payment services)
The Directive sets out specific rules on ICT security controls and mitigation elements for the purposes of authorisation to perform payment services. These authorisation rules to align them with the DORA Regulation.
Furthermore, in order to reduce the administrative burden and to avoid complexity and duplication of reporting obligations, the incident reporting rules contained in that Directive should cease to apply to payment service providers which are covered by that Directive and which are also covered by the DORA Regulation, thus allowing them to benefit from a single and fully harmonised incident reporting mechanism for payment service providers, whether or not such incidents are ICT-related.
Under the amended text, authorisation as a payment institution should be conditional on the submission of an application to the competent authorities of the home Member State, accompanied by the following information:
- a description of the applicant’s governance arrangements and internal control mechanisms, including administrative, risk management and accounting procedures as well as arrangements for the use of ICT services in accordance with the DORA Regulation, which demonstrates that those governance arrangements and internal control mechanisms are proportionate, appropriate, sound and adequate;
- a description of the procedure in place to monitor, handle and follow up a security incident and security related customer complaints, including an incident reporting mechanism which takes account of the notification obligations of the payment institution laid down in the DORA Regulation;
- a description of business continuity arrangements including a clear identification of the critical operations, effective ICT business continuity policy and plans and ICT response and recovery plans and a procedure to regularly test and review the adequacy and efficiency of such plans.
Transposition
Member States should transpose the Directive no later than 24 months after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Mikuláš PEKSA (Greens/EFA, CZ) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EU, 2011/61/EU, 2013/36/EU, 2014/65/EU, (EU) 2015/2366 and (EU) 2016/2341.
This legislative proposal is part of the Digital Finance Package. It introduces:
- targeted changes to existing EU financial services directives to align them with the requirements on network and information systems and ICT risk management and reporting laid down in the DORA Regulation and clarify certain provisions to ensure ICT risks are fully addressed;
- targeted changes to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) to provide legal certainty as regards the definition of crypto assets and to establish a temporary exemption allowing natural persons to participate to the pilot regime for a distributed ledger technology (DLT) Multilateral Trading Facility, under certain conditions.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
ICT risk requirements
As the existing provisions of EU law are not fully harmonised, Members stressed the need to avoid over-regulation and to ensure that these provisions are appropriate to the constantly changing reality in this area. It is also a question of ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market while promoting proportionality , especially as regards SMEs, other small financial entities and other micro-enterprises, with a view to reducing compliance costs.
Amendment to Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms (CRD)
The relevant provisions of the CRD have been clarified so that ICT risk is explicitly taken into account.
The amendments stipulate that institutions must have robust governance arrangements, including: (i) a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent division of responsibilities; (ii) effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which they are or may be exposed; (iii) adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures, network and information systems set up and managed in accordance with the DORA Regulation, and remuneration policies and practices that promote sound and effective risk management.
Institutions should implement policies and processes to identify, monitor and manage their exposures to operational risk , including risk arising from outsourcing of functions and ICT third-party risk service providers as defined in the DORA, and to model risk and to cover low-frequency high-severity events.
In addition, institutions should have adequate contingency and business continuity plans, including ICT business continuity policy and disaster recovery plans in place, managed and tested so that they can continue to operate in the event of severe business disruption and limit losses incurred as a consequence of such a disruption.
Amendment to Directive 2014/59/EU establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms (BBRD)
ICT risks and vulnerabilities to digital operational resilience may impact the network and information systems that support critical functions of the banks and undermine the resolution objectives. It is essential to select the right IT service contracts to ensure business continuity and provide the necessary data in the event of resolution.
In order to be aligned with the objectives of the Union framework for operational resilience, it is proposed to amend Directive 2014/59/EU to ensure that information on operational resilience is taken into account in the context of resolution planning and the assessment of institutions’ resolvability.
Amendment to Directive (EU) 2015/849 (prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering or terrorist financing)
The amended text stresses the need to ensure operational resilience to strengthen the ability of financial institutions to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, especially in light of the increasing and emerging risks opened up in the post-COVID environment, where it is easier for criminals to exploit weaknesses and gaps in institutions’ systems and controls.
Therefore, it is proposed to amend Directive (EU) 2015/849 to explicitly include, in respect of obligated entities that fall within the scope of the DORA Regulation, digital operational resilience requirements as part of the policies, controls and procedures put in place by those obliged entities to mitigate and effectively manage money laundering and terrorist financing risks.
Amendment to Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (payment services)
The Directive sets out specific rules on ICT security controls and mitigation elements for the purposes of authorisation to perform payment services. Members propose to amend these authorisation rules to align them with the DORA Regulation.
Furthermore, in order to reduce the administrative burden and avoid complexity and duplication of reporting obligations, the incident reporting rules in that Directive should cease to apply to payment service providers falling within the scope of Chapter III of the DORA Regulation, thus creating a single and fully harmonised incident reporting mechanism for payment service providers, applicable to all operational or security incidents related to payments or non-payments.
PURPOSE: to amend or clarify certain provisions in existing EU financial services directives.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: this proposal is part of the Digital Finance package, a package of measures to further enable and support the potential of digital finance in terms of innovation and competition while mitigating the risks. The digital finance package includes a new Strategy on digital finance for the EU financial sector with the aim to ensure that the Union’s financial services legislation is fit for the digital age, and contributes to a future-ready economy that works for the people, including by enabling the use of innovative technologies. The Union has a stated and confirmed policy interest in developing and promoting the uptake of transformative technologies in the financial sector, including blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT).
This package also includes a proposal for a proposal on crypto-asset markets, a proposal for digital operational resilience, and a proposal on a common a EU pilot regime.
The particular reasons for this proposal for a directive is that, in order to provide legal certainty as regards crypto assets and achieve the objectives of strengthening digital operational resilience, it is necessary to establish a temporary exemption for multilateral trading facilities and amend or clarify certain provisions in existing EU financial services directives.
CONTENT: the proposed Directive puts forward a set of amendments that appear necessary to bring legal clarity and consistency in relation to the application by financial entities that are authorised and supervised in accordance with those Directives of various digital operational resilience requirements that are necessary in the pursuit of their activities, thus guaranteeing the smooth functioning of the internal market.
All Articles relate to and complement the proposal for a regulation on digital operational resilience.
In particular, they amend the various operational risk or risk management requirements foreseen in the following Directives:
- 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts,
- 2009/65/EC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities,
- 2009/138/EU on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance,
- 2011/61/EU on alternative investment fund managers,
- EU/2013/36 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential regulation of credit institutions and investment firms,
- 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments,
- (EU) 2015/2366 on payment services in the internal market,
- EU/2016/2341 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision, by introducing precise cross-references in those provisions and thus attain legal clarity.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)688
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2022/2556
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 333 27.12.2022, p. 0153
- Draft final act: 00042/2022/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0382/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE734.197
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE734.197
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2022)005010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0340/2021
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Committee opinion: PE693.586
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE693.614
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Committee draft report: PE689.790
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2020)0309
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0203
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0204
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2020)0596
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2020)0309
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0203
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0204
- Committee draft report: PE689.790
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE693.614
- Committee opinion: PE693.586
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2022)005010
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE734.197
- Draft final act: 00042/2022/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)688
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
- Contribution: COM(2020)0596
Activities
- Mikuláš PEKSA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2022/11/09 Digital finance: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) - Digital Finance: Amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirements (debate)
- 2022/11/09 Digital finance: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) - Digital Finance: Amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirements (debate)
- Eva KAILI
- Stanislav POLČÁK
- Alfred SANT
- José GUSMÃO
- Michal ŠIMEČKA
- Ivan Vilibor SINČIĆ
- Frances FITZGERALD
- Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA
Votes
Finance numérique: directive modificative sur les exigences en matière de résilience opérationnelle numérique - Digital Finance: Amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirements - Digitales Finanzwesen: Änderung der Richtlinie hinsichtlich der Anforderungen an die Betriebsstabilität digitaler Systeme - A9-0340/2021 - Mikuláš Peksa - Accord provisoire - Am 2 #
Amendments | Dossier |
36 |
2020/0268(COD)
2021/05/28
ECON
26 amendments...
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) At Union level the requirements related to ICT risk for the financial sector are currently spread over Directives 2006/43/EC,18 2009/66/EC,19 2009/138/EC,20 2011/61/EC,21 EU/2013/36,22 2014/65/EU,23 (EU) 2015/2366,24 (EU) 2016/234125 of the European Parliament and of the Council and are diverse and occasionally incomplete. In some cases, ICT risk has only been implicitly addressed as part of the operational risk, whereas in others it has not been addressed at all. This should be remedied by aligning Regulation (EU) xx/20xx of the European Parliament and of the Council26 [DORA] and those acts. This Directive puts forward a set of amendments that appear necessary to bring legal clarity and consistency in relation to the application by financial entities that are authorised and supervised in accordance with those Directives of various digital operational resilience requirements that are necessary in the pursuit of their activities, thus guaranteeing the smooth functioning of the internal market, while facilitating proportionality in particular with regards to SMEs and other small financial entities, other than microenterprises, with the aim of reducing compliance costs. _________________ 18 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87). 19 Directive 2009/65/EC of the European
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) In the area of banking services, Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential regulation of credit institutions and investment firms currently sets out only general internal governance rules and operational risk provisions containing requirements for contingency and business continuity plans which implicitly serve as a basis for addressing ICT risk management. However, to ensure that ICT risk is explicitly addressed, and in order to provide legal clarity, the requirements for contingency and business continuity plans should be amended in a proportionate way to include business continuity and disaster recovery plans also for ICT risk,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) In order to strengthen the digital resilience of financial entities even after the changes in the less safe digital business and consumer environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the DORA Regulation should also apply to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. In order to provide solutions for the application of the digital resilience dimension, Directive (EU) 2015/849 should be amended to include the DORA framework for that application, where appropriate.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, in order to allow for the development of crypto-assets that would qualify as financial instruments and DLT, while preserving a high level of financial stability, market integrity, transparency and investor protection, it would be beneficial to create a temporary regime for DLT market infrastructures. This temporary legal framework should allow competent authorities to temporarily permit DLT market infrastructures to operate under an alternative set of requirements with regard to access to them compared to those otherwise applicable under the Union financial services
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) A DLT multilateral trading facility should be a multilateral system, operated
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) A DLT multilateral trading facility should be a multilateral system
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 on payment services sets out specific rules on ICT security controls and mitigation elements for the purposes of authorisation to perform payment services. Those authorisation rules should be amended in order to align them with to Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA]. Furthermore, the incident notification rules in that Directive should not apply to
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 on payment services sets out specific rules on ICT security controls and mitigation elements for the purposes of authorisation to perform payment services. Those authorisation rules should be amended in order to align them with to Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA]. Furthermore, the incident notification rules in that Directive should not apply to ICT-related incident notifications that Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA] fully harmonises. Directive (EU) 2015/2366 should also ensure that Member States designate the competent authority responsible for carrying out the duties resulting from Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA] for the supervision of payment systems.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14 a) There is a need for proportionality of the DORA framework, so that smaller financial institutions and smaller IT suppliers are not pushed out of the market by that Regulation.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 4. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall take reasonable steps to ensure continuity and regularity in the performance of their activities, including the development of contingency plans. To that end, the undertaking shall employ appropriate and proportionate systems, resources and procedures and shall
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph -1 (new) Directive 2011/61/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – subpoint iii a (new) -1 In Article 6(4) of Directive 2011/61/EU, the following point is added to point b: 'iii a) any other ancillary service where the ancillary service represents a continuation of the services already undertaken by the AIFM or a use of internal competences, and does not create conflicts of interest that could not be managed by additional rules.'
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph -1 (new) Directive 2013/36/EU Article 65 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint vi -1 In Article 65(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU, subpoint (vi) of point (a) is replaced by the following: "(vi) third parties to whom the entities referred to in points (i) to (iv) have outsourced
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph -1 a (new) Directive 2013/36/EU Article 85 – paragraph 1 -1 a In Article 85 of Directive 2013/36/EU, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Competent authorities shall ensure that institutions implement policies and processes to
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2014/65/EU Article 19 – paragraph 3 Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2014/65/EU Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. However, where
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2014/65/EU Article 47 – paragraph 1 – point (b) (b) to be adequately equipped to manage the risks to which it is exposed, including to manage risks to the ICT systems and tools in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA]*, to implement appropriate arrangements and systems for identifying
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 Article 20 – paragraph 1 (1 a) In Article 20, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Member States shall ensure that, where payment institutions rely on ICT third parties for the performance of
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (1 a) Article 22(1) is amended as follows: "1. Member States shall designate as the competent authorities responsible for the authorisation and prudential supervision of payment institutions which are to carry out the duties provided for under this Title and in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/xx of the European Parliament and of the Council [DORA] either public authorities, or bodies recognised by national law or by public authorities expressly empowered for that purpose by national law, including national central banks.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive (EU) 2015/2366 Article 95 – paragraph 5 5. EBA and its independent director in charge of digital operational resilience shall promote cooperation, including the sharing of information, in the area of operational risks associated with payment services among the competent authorities, and between the competent authorities and the ECB.;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive (E) 2015/2366 Article 95 – paragraph 5 5. EBA shall promote cooperation, including the sharing of information, in the area of operational risks associated with payment services among the competent authorities, and between the competent authorities, ENISA and the ECB.;
Amendment 58 #
(c a) the following paragraph is added: '5a. Member States shall exempt payment service providers referred to in points (a), (b) and (d) of Article 1 (1) that are required to report operational or security payment-related and non-payment related incidents under Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA], from the application of paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article.'
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 Article 96 – paragraph 6 a (new) (b a) the following paragraph is added: '6a. Payment service providers referred to in points (a), (b) and (d) of Article 1(1) who fall under the scope of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx of the European Parliament and of the Council* [DORA], and who manage, classify and report operational or security payment-related incidents and major operational or security payment- related incidents in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx of the European Parliament and of the Council* [DORA], shall be exempted from the application of paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article.'
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 a (new) Directive (EU) 2015/849 Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point f (new) Article 7 a Amendment to Directive (EU) 2015/849 [AML] In Article 7(4), the following point is added: '(f) take appropriate steps to support procedures in accordance with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA] in relation to mitigating ICT-related risks, where applicable.'
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 Directive (EU) 2016/2341 Article 21– paragraph 5 – second sentence To that end, IORPs shall employ appropriate and proportionate systems, resources and procedures and shall
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [
source: 693.614
2021/06/14
JURI
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The Union needs to adequately and comprehensively address digital risks to all financial entities stemming from an increased use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the provision and consumption of financial services, ensuring further support to the potential of digital finance in terms of innovation and competition.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2009/65/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) has sound administrative, operational and accounting procedures and control and safeguard arrangements for electronic data processing, including information and communication technology systems that are set up and managed in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx of the European Parliament and of the Council* [DORA], as well as adequate internal control mechanisms including rules for personal transactions by its employees or for the holding and management of investments in financial instruments in order to invest on its own account and ensuring, at least, that each transaction involving the UCITS may be reconstructed according to its origin, the parties to it, its nature, and the time and place at which it was effected and that the assets of the UCITS managed by the management company are invested according to the fund rules or the instruments of incorporation and the legal provisions in force;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) At Union level the requirements related to ICT risk for the financial sector are currently spread over Directives 2006/43/EC,18 2009/66/EC,19 2009/138/EC,20 2011/61/EC,21 EU/2013/36,22 2014/65/EU,23 (EU) 2015/2366,24 (EU) 2016/234125 of the European Parliament and of the Council and are diverse and occasionally incomplete. The existing norms are not fully harmonised and it is necessary to ensure the avoidance of over-regulation and to guarantee the adequacy of the norms with regard to the reality in the field, which is constantly evolving. In some cases, ICT risk has only been implicitly addressed as part of the operational risk, whereas in others it has not been addressed at all. This should be remedied by aligning Regulation (EU) xx/20xx of the European Parliament and of the Council26 [DORA] and those acts. This Directive puts forward a set of amendments that appear necessary to bring legal clarity and consistency in relation to
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Currently, the definition of ‘financial instrument’ in Directive 2014/65/EU does not explicitly include financial instruments issued using a class of technologies which support the distributed recording of encrypted data (distributed ledger technology, “DLT”), thus not reflecting the reality of the market . In order to ensure that such financial instruments can be traded on the market under the current legal framework, in order to avoid any potential risk due to non-regulation, the definition in Directive 2014/65/EU should
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, in order to allow for the development of crypto-assets that would qualify as financial instruments and DLT, while preserving a high level of financial stability, market integrity, transparency and investor and consumer protection, it would be beneficial to create a temporary regime for DLT market infrastructures. This temporary legal framework should allow competent authorities to temporarily permit DLT market infrastructures to operate under an alternative set of requirements with regard to access to them compared to those otherwise applicable under the Union financial services legislation that could prevent them from developing solutions for the trading and settlement of transactions of crypto-assets that would qualify as financial instruments. This legal framework should be temporary in order to enable the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and the national competent authorities to gain experience on the opportunities and specific risks created by crypto-assets traded on those infrastructures but should not set any limits on innovation. This Directive is consequently accompanying Regulation [on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology] by supporting this new Union regulatory framework on DLT market infrastructures with a targeted exemption from specific provisions of Union financial
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The regulatory process must take into account the proper balance between, on the one hand, efficient management regarding risk limitation and, on the other hand, the insurance of fair competition in terms of encouraging the development of innovation in the market and protecting all actors involved.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In Article 24a(1) of Directive 2006/43/EC, point (b)
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2006/43/EC Article 24a – paragraph 1 – point b (b) a statutory auditor or an audit firm shall have sound administrative and accounting procedures, internal quality control mechanisms, effective procedures for risk assessment, and effective control and safeguard arrangements
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2006/43/EC Article 24a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b)
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2006/43/EC Article 24a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) a statutory auditor or an audit firm shall set up and manage its network and information systems in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2021/xx [DORA] of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
source: 693.848
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/13 |
|
events/14 |
|
events/14/summary |
|
events/13 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/title |
Old
Digital Finance: Amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirementsNew
Digital Finance: amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirements |
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2022-07-12T00:00:00New
2022-07-13T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2022-07-12T00:00:00New
2022-07-13T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2022-07-12T00:00:00New
2022-07-13T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/8 |
|
events/10/summary |
|
events/9/docs |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting dateNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2022-07-12T00:00:00New
2022-07-13T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2022-07-12T00:00:00New
2022-07-13T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2022-10-17T00:00:00New
2022-11-09T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2021-02-22T00:00:00New
2021-02-21T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-05-10T00:00:00New
2021-05-09T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2020-12-15T00:00:00New
2020-12-16T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2021-10-26T00:00:00New
2021-10-27T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2021-02-21T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2021-05-09T00:00:00New
2021-05-10T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2020)0596New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2020)0596 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2020)0596New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2020)0596 |
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2020-12-16T00:00:00New
2020-12-15T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/date |
Old
2021-10-27T00:00:00New
2021-10-26T00:00:00 |
docs/8 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
events/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-693586_EN.html
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2021-07-05T00:00:00New
2021-07-06T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-693614_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE689.790New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-689790_EN.html |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Digital operational resilience: temporary exemption for multilateral trading facilities and amendment of certain EU financial services directivesNew
Digital Finance: Amending Directive regarding Digital Operational Resilience requirements |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|