2020/2132(INI) | [ParlTrack]

download json

Changes: 2023/08/03events.docs, events, docs.docs.url, events.docs.url, docs, 2022/06/10docs, forecasts, procedure.stage_reached, events, 2022/06/03docs, forecasts, procedure.stage_reached, events, 2022/03/22forecasts, 2022/02/12forecasts, 2022/02/04forecasts.date, 2021/12/03forecasts.date, 2021/10/21forecasts.date, 2021/09/29docs.docs.url, 2021/09/15docs.date, 2021/09/10docs, 2021/09/05forecasts.date, 2021/08/14docs.date, 2021/08/04docs.date, 2021/07/30docs.docs.url, 2021/07/16docs.date, 2021/07/14docs.date, 2021/07/13docs.date, 2021/07/09docs, 2021/07/06forecasts, 2021/06/01docs.docs.url, 2021/05/21docs, 2021/05/12forecasts, 2021/05/10commission, 2021/05/03events.body, 2021/04/30forecasts.title, events, 2021/04/13docs.docs.url

View current state | View Changes for this date

2020/2132(INI) Parliament’s right of initiative
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2021/07/05 more...

Progress: Awaiting committee decision

Role	Committee	Rapporteur	Shadows
Lead	AFCO	RANGEL Paulo ( EPP)	BENIFEI Brando ( S&D), GOZI Sandro ( Renew), DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline ( Verts/ALE), MADISON Jaak ( ID), CHAIBI Leila ( GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion	LIBE	DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline ( Verts/ALE)	Caterina CHINNICI ( S&D), Sophia IN 'T VELD ( RE), Nicolaus FEST ( ID), Anne-Sophie PELLETIER ( GUE/NGL), Isabel WISELER-LIMA ( PPE), Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI ( ECR)
Committee Opinion	JURI	DURAND Pascal ( Renew)	Angel DZHAMBAZKI ( ECR), Gilles LEBRETON ( ID), Tiemo WÖLKEN ( S&D), Manon AUBRY ( GUE/NGL), Marie TOUSSAINT ( Verts/ALE), Marion WALSMANN ( PPE)

Lead committee dossier:

AFCO/9/03616

Legal Basis:

RoP 54, RoP 57

Subjects

8.40.01 European Parliament

Events

2021/07/05

Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading

2021/03/22

EP - Committee opinion

Documents

PE657.481

2020/09/17

EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

2020/09/17

EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament

2020/07/13

EP - DURAND Pascal (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in JURI

2020/06/11

EP - DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE

2020/05/26

EP - RANGEL Paulo (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

Committee opinion: PE657.481
Committee opinion: PE657.481

Activities

Antonio TAJANI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Brando BENIFEI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Caterina CHINNICI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Pascal DURAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Charles GOERENS
Plenary Speeches (0)
Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Gilles LEBRETON
Plenary Speeches (0)
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR
Plenary Speeches (0)
Maite PAGAZAURTUNDÚA
Plenary Speeches (0)
Paulo RANGEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
Helmut SCHOLZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (0)
Leila CHAIBI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD
Plenary Speeches (0)
Márton GYÖNGYÖSI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Marcel KOLAJA
Plenary Speeches (0)
Grace O'SULLIVAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
Eugenia RODRÍGUEZ PALOP
Plenary Speeches (0)
Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (0)
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA
Plenary Speeches (0)
Damian BOESELAGER
Plenary Speeches (0)
Bert-Jan RUISSEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
Eugen TOMAC
Plenary Speeches (0)
Andrey SLABAKOV
Plenary Speeches (0)
László TRÓCSÁNYI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Sven SIMON
Plenary Speeches (0)
Salvatore DE MEO
Plenary Speeches (0)
Sandro GOZI
Plenary Speeches (0)
Cyrus ENGERER
Plenary Speeches (0)
Vlad GHEORGHE
Plenary Speeches (0)

Amendments	Dossier
33	2020/2132(INI) 2021/01/08 JURI 33 amendments... Amendment 1 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 a (new) A. whereas the Commission shall promote the general interest of the Union and take appropriate initiatives to that end; whereas Union legislative acts may only be adopted on the basis of a Commission proposal, except where the Treaties provide otherwise, as laid down in Article 17 of the Treaty of European Union (TEU); Amendment 10 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the European Council has a de-facto right of initiative within the area of freedom, security and justice in accordance with Article 68 TFEU, which does not reflect ~~a level playing field~~the legislative equality between Parliament and Council as foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making; underlines moreover the early influence by the Member States via their participation in numerous Commission advisory bodies and asks the Commission to ensure to the Parliament the same level of participation; Amendment 11 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the European Council has a de-facto right of initiative within the area of freedom, security and justice in accordance with Article 68 TFEU~~, which does not reflect a level playing field between Parliament and Council~~; underlines moreover the early influence by the Member States via their participation in numerous Commission advisory bodies; Amendment 12 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the Council and Parliament should have a~~n enhanced~~ direct right of legislative initiative, ~~as it directly represents the European people and not just national interests, which need to be counter-balanced; deplores therefore that this possibility has been~~the former because it represents the States and the latter because it is the regsul~~arly deferred to a future Treaty revision~~t of universal suffrage; Amendment 13 # Manon AUBRY Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that Parliament should have an enhanced direct right of legislative initiative, as it directly represents the European people ~~and not just national interests, which need to be counter- balanced~~s; deplores therefore that this possibility has been regularly deferred to a future Treaty revision; Amendment 14 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that Parliament should have an enhanced direct right of legislative initiative, as it directly represents the European ~~people~~citizens and not just national interests, which need to be counter- balanced; deplores therefore that this possibility has been regularly deferred to a future Treaty revision; Amendment 15 # Pascal DURAND, Marie TOUSSAINT, Tiemo WÖLKEN Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that, in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2019/788, in case the Commission has failed to publish its intentions or has set out in a communication that it intends not to take action on a European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) that has met the procedural requirements, Parliament could decide to follow up with an INL report that is based on the ECI; Urges the Commission to commit itself to submit a legislative proposal following the adoption of a Parliament’s initiative that is based on an ECI that has met the procedural requirements and that is in line with the Treaties and the core values of the Union enshrined in Article 2 TEU; Proposes in that regard to modify the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission; Amendment 16 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that providing Parliament with the right of legislative initiative would require a Treaty revision and therefore exploring the potential of current treaty provisions to enhance the influence the Parliament can have on initiating legislation are worth looking at in order to pave the way to its direct right to initiative; Amendment 17 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses the importance of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the Parliament, Council and the Commission and the Framework Agreement on relation between the Parliament and the Commission and the fact that changes there can enhance the legislative agenda setting powers of Parliament and recalibrate the institutional balance without formally changing the Treaties; Amendment 18 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Proposes to consider developing a procedure for Parliament to support ideas in form of a sponsorship to for instance European Economic and Social Committee´s and European Committee of the Regions’ positions within the framework of Article 225 TFEU; Amendment 19 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Deeply regrets that only one-third of Parliament’s legislative and non- legislative initiative procedures can be considered successful and that most legislative initiative (INL) reports adopted since 2011 did not result in a positive reply from the Commission1; regrets also that, to date, the three-month deadline for the Commission to react to a parliamentary resolution, as laid down in paragraph 16 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (‘2010 FA’)2, and the one-year deadline for the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal in response to a legislative initiative report have consistently not been respected; concludes from this that the current system is in need of fundamental change; _________________ 1Study ‘The European Parliament’s right of initiative’, Andreas Maurer, University of Innsbruck, Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration Studies and Michael C. Wolf, University of Innsbruck, July 2020, pages 55 and 57. 2 OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47. Amendment 2 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 b (new) B. whereas the Treaties grant Parliament the direct right of initiative only in very limited cases, namely its own composition, the election of its members and their Statute, the Statute of the European Ombudsman, to initiate a rule of law procedure, to set up temporary inquiry committees and to initiate Treaty revisions; whereas Parliament has the right to request from the Commission to submit any appropriate proposal on matters it considers relevant for a Union act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties, according to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU); whereas Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (RoP) further details this indirect right of initiative; Amendment 20 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Deeply regrets that on~~ly one-third of Parliament’s legislative and non- legislative initiative procedures can be considered successful and that~~ most legislative initiative (INL) reports adopted since 2011 ~~did not result~~ the Commission did not follow- up by submitting a ~~positive reply from the Commission~~ny appropriate proposal1 ; regrets also that, to date, the three-month deadline for the Commission to react to a parliamentary resolution, as laid down in paragraph 16 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (‘2010 FA’)2 , and the one-year deadline for the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal in response to a legislative initiative report have consistently not been respected; _________________ 1Study ‘The European Parliament’s right of initiative’, Andreas Maurer, University of Innsbruck, Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration Studies and Michael C. Wolf, University of Innsbruck, July 2020, pages 55 and 57. 2 OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47. Amendment 21 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that INL reports in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, with only one addressee and workable proposals within realistic timeframes, will be more successful; recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs invites the Commission to the negotiating table in order to slightly extend the relevant deadlines and to accommodate alleged organisational difficulties with regard to the 2010 FA and thereby enhance the Commission’s responsiveness to Parliament’s resolutions; expects in return, however, that the Commission’s response to and implementation of an INL report should be automatic;deleted Amendment 22 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that INL reports in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, with only one addressee and ~~workable proposals within realistic timeframes, will be more successful; recommends therefore~~clearly defined proposals that focus on the scope of the report and are within realistic timeframes, have a greater chance of being translated into legislative proposals by the Commission; recommends that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs invites the Commission to the negotiating table in order to slightly extend the relevant deadlines and to accommodate alleged organisational difficulties with regard to the 2010 FA and thereby enhance the Commission’s responsiveness to Parliament’s resolutions; expects in return, however, that the Commission~~’s response to and implementation of an INL report should be automatic~~ translates an INL report automatically into a concrete legislative proposal; Amendment 23 # Tiemo WÖLKEN Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making plays an essential role in securing sincere and transparent cooperation throughout the entire legislative cycle and allows to achieve a better and mutual understanding of the respective positions of the different institutions; calls for an assessment of the extent to which the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making should be revised with the purpose of eliminating possible barriers to the Parliament right of Initiative; Amendment 24 # Marie TOUSSAINT Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that new EU law- making mechanisms associating EU citizens and their elected representatives in the European Parliament should be designed in order to improve citizens participation and the European democracy as a whole; believes for instance that the procedural thresholds for ECIs should be lowered where the proposal for an ECI is co-signed by a minimal number of MEPs; Amendment 25 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Reminds that Parliament has a structure for impact assessment activities and is convinced that the use of it should be mandatory before drafting a legislative own-initiative report in order to enhance the European added value assessment foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making; Amendment 26 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that Parliament fully adheres to the interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, which stresses the necessity of a prior "European added value" analysis as well as a "cost of non- Europe" assessment; Amendment 27 # Marie TOUSSAINT Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Asks the Commission to study the possibility of introducing mechanisms of direct democracy, such as citizen's assemblies or referendum vote on specific issues, which would grant EU citizens decisional or consultative power in the EU law-making process, without depending on the reform of the Treaty; Amendment 28 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI Draft opinion Paragraph 6 ~~6. Urges the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, to adhere to its responsibilities and to honour its own commitments;~~deleted Amendment 29 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Urges the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, to adhere to its responsibilities and to ~~honour its own commitments~~systematically involve Parliament in its decisions on the Commission Work Programme, so that Parliament has to approve the programme before its publication in order to enhance Parliaments´ agenda-setting power in the meantime before its direct right to initiative is established; Amendment 3 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 c (new) C. whereas Article 225 TFEU obliges the Commission to give reasons, in case it would not submit a legislative proposal as requested by Parliament; recalls thereby the compulsory character of this Treaty provision; Amendment 30 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is of the opinion that, if the Commission fails to implement Parliament’s call for a legislative act in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, its resolution adopted by a majority of members shall form the basis for a legislative procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself;deleted Amendment 31 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is of the opinion that, if the Commission fails to implement Parliament’s ~~call~~request for a legislative act in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, ~~its resolution adopted by a majority of members shall~~ Parliament should systematically consider to bring an action regarding the Commission´s failure to act beforme the ~~basis for a legisla~~Court of Justivce ~~procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself~~of the European Union to have an infringement by the Commission established on the basis of Article 265 TFEU; Amendment 32 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that, were the Commission does not to submit a legislative proposal and fails to provide proper reasons as required by Article 225 TFEU, following Parliament’s request, this would c~~onstitute a failure to act and Parliament would reserve its right to take action under~~ause for a motion of censure on the Commission´s activities according to Article 26534 TFEU.; Amendment 33 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Is convinced that Article 294 TFEU should be revised in a way that Parliament’s resolution requesting a legislative act pursuant to Article 225 TFEU, adopted by a majority of members shall form the basis for a legislative procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself, if the Commission does not forward a legislative proposal within 12 months after Parliament’s request; Amendment 4 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 d (new) D. whereas the European Parliament is the only directly elected EU institution, which at the same time has less legislative initiative powers than most national parliaments; Amendment 5 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 e (new) E. whereas Ms Ursula von der Leyen, before she was elected President of the Commission, committed to respond to legislative initiatives, when adopted by a majority of Parliament’s members and in full respect of the proportionality, subsidiarity, and better law-making principles; Amendment 6 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 f (new) F. whereas the Conference on the Future of Europe will be an avenue for further reflection with civil society on how to best strengthen the Parliament’s right of initiative with regards to better law- making; Amendment 7 # Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ Draft opinion Recital 1 g (new) G. deplores the existing imbalance of EU agenda-setting powers between Commission, Council and Parliament, notably in policy areas where the Commission does not enjoy an exclusive right of initiative and where no consultation obligation for Council exists, namely in the area of Economic and Monetary Union and Common Foreign and Security Policy, whereby competences were transferred to the EU High Representative and the European External Action Service; Amendment 8 # Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Commission’s right of legislative initiative, as set out in the Treaties, has been neither constructive nor productive in recent years, with a decrease in the Commission’s output over the past decade and Commission Presidents not assuming their political responsibilities; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs further exploit Parliament’s powers assigned by the Treaties and consider a Treaty revision to give Parliament a direct right of legislative initiativeand that the Commission has no democratic legitimacy to exercise such a political role; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs consider a Treaty revision to remove from the Commission its right of legislative initiative and transfer it to the Council and Parliament; Amendment 9 # Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. ~~Believ~~Stresses that ~~the Commission’s~~Parliament is a democratically elected body which unlike national parliaments, does not have a formal right of legislative initiative, as set out in the Treaties, has been neither constructive nor productive in recent years, with a decrease in the Commission’s output over the past decade and Commission Presidents not assuming their political responsibilitiesnd therefore the fact that the Commission has the exclusive direct right of legislative initiative creates a problem of democratic legitimacy that has to be addressed; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs further exploit Parliament’s powers assigned by the Treaties and ~~consider a Treaty revision~~analyse the different ways to give Parliament a direct right of legislative initiative; source: 662.145

Amendments

Dossier

2020/2132(INI)

2021/01/08 JURI 33 amendments...

Amendment 1 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 a (new)

A. whereas the Commission shall promote the general interest of the Union and take appropriate initiatives to that end; whereas Union legislative acts may only be adopted on the basis of a Commission proposal, except where the Treaties provide otherwise, as laid down in Article 17 of the Treaty of European Union (TEU);

Amendment 10 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Stresses that the European Council has a de-facto right of initiative within the area of freedom, security and justice in accordance with Article 68 TFEU, which does not reflect ~~a level playing field~~the legislative equality between Parliament and Council as foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making; underlines moreover the early influence by the Member States via their participation in numerous Commission advisory bodies and asks the Commission to ensure to the Parliament the same level of participation;

Amendment 11 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Stresses that the European Council has a de-facto right of initiative within the area of freedom, security and justice in accordance with Article 68 TFEU~~, which does not reflect a level playing field between Parliament and Council~~; underlines moreover the early influence by the Member States via their participation in numerous Commission advisory bodies;

Amendment 12 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Believes that the Council and Parliament should have a~~n enhanced~~ direct right of legislative initiative, ~~as it directly represents the European people and not just national interests, which need to be counter-balanced; deplores therefore that this possibility has been~~the former because it represents the States and the latter because it is the regsul~~arly deferred to a future Treaty revision~~t of universal suffrage;

Amendment 13 #

Manon AUBRY

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Believes that Parliament should have an enhanced direct right of legislative initiative, as it directly represents the European people ~~and not just national interests, which need to be counter- balanced~~s; deplores therefore that this possibility has been regularly deferred to a future Treaty revision;

Amendment 14 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Believes that Parliament should have an enhanced direct right of legislative initiative, as it directly represents the European ~~people~~citizens and not just national interests, which need to be counter- balanced; deplores therefore that this possibility has been regularly deferred to a future Treaty revision;

Amendment 15 #

Pascal DURAND, Marie TOUSSAINT, Tiemo WÖLKEN

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. Believes that, in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2019/788, in case the Commission has failed to publish its intentions or has set out in a communication that it intends not to take action on a European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) that has met the procedural requirements, Parliament could decide to follow up with an INL report that is based on the ECI; Urges the Commission to commit itself to submit a legislative proposal following the adoption of a Parliament’s initiative that is based on an ECI that has met the procedural requirements and that is in line with the Treaties and the core values of the Union enshrined in Article 2 TEU; Proposes in that regard to modify the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission;

Amendment 16 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. Notes that providing Parliament with the right of legislative initiative would require a Treaty revision and therefore exploring the potential of current treaty provisions to enhance the influence the Parliament can have on initiating legislation are worth looking at in order to pave the way to its direct right to initiative;

Amendment 17 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)

3b. Stresses the importance of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the Parliament, Council and the Commission and the Framework Agreement on relation between the Parliament and the Commission and the fact that changes there can enhance the legislative agenda setting powers of Parliament and recalibrate the institutional balance without formally changing the Treaties;

Amendment 18 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)

3c. Proposes to consider developing a procedure for Parliament to support ideas in form of a sponsorship to for instance European Economic and Social Committee´s and European Committee of the Regions’ positions within the framework of Article 225 TFEU;

Amendment 19 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4

4. Deeply regrets that only one-third of Parliament’s legislative and non- legislative initiative procedures can be considered successful and that most legislative initiative (INL) reports adopted since 2011 did not result in a positive reply from the Commission1; regrets also that, to date, the three-month deadline for the Commission to react to a parliamentary resolution, as laid down in paragraph 16 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (‘2010 FA’)2, and the one-year deadline for the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal in response to a legislative initiative report have consistently not been respected; concludes from this that the current system is in need of fundamental change; _________________ 1Study ‘The European Parliament’s right of initiative’, Andreas Maurer, University of Innsbruck, Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration Studies and Michael C. Wolf, University of Innsbruck, July 2020, pages 55 and 57. 2 OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.

Amendment 2 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 b (new)

B. whereas the Treaties grant Parliament the direct right of initiative only in very limited cases, namely its own composition, the election of its members and their Statute, the Statute of the European Ombudsman, to initiate a rule of law procedure, to set up temporary inquiry committees and to initiate Treaty revisions; whereas Parliament has the right to request from the Commission to submit any appropriate proposal on matters it considers relevant for a Union act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties, according to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU); whereas Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (RoP) further details this indirect right of initiative;

Amendment 20 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4

4. Deeply regrets that on~~ly one-third of Parliament’s legislative and non- legislative initiative procedures can be considered successful and that~~ most legislative initiative (INL) reports adopted since 2011 ~~did not result~~ the Commission did not follow- up by submitting a ~~positive reply from the Commission~~ny appropriate proposal1 ; regrets also that, to date, the three-month deadline for the Commission to react to a parliamentary resolution, as laid down in paragraph 16 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (‘2010 FA’)2 , and the one-year deadline for the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal in response to a legislative initiative report have consistently not been respected; _________________ 1Study ‘The European Parliament’s right of initiative’, Andreas Maurer, University of Innsbruck, Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration Studies and Michael C. Wolf, University of Innsbruck, July 2020, pages 55 and 57. 2 OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.

Amendment 21 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Is of the opinion that INL reports in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, with only one addressee and workable proposals within realistic timeframes, will be more successful; recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs invites the Commission to the negotiating table in order to slightly extend the relevant deadlines and to accommodate alleged organisational difficulties with regard to the 2010 FA and thereby enhance the Commission’s responsiveness to Parliament’s resolutions; expects in return, however, that the Commission’s response to and implementation of an INL report should be automatic;deleted

Amendment 22 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Is of the opinion that INL reports in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, with only one addressee and ~~workable proposals within realistic timeframes, will be more successful; recommends therefore~~clearly defined proposals that focus on the scope of the report and are within realistic timeframes, have a greater chance of being translated into legislative proposals by the Commission; recommends that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs invites the Commission to the negotiating table in order to slightly extend the relevant deadlines and to accommodate alleged organisational difficulties with regard to the 2010 FA and thereby enhance the Commission’s responsiveness to Parliament’s resolutions; expects in return, however, that the Commission~~’s response to and implementation of an INL report should be automatic~~ translates an INL report automatically into a concrete legislative proposal;

Amendment 23 #

Tiemo WÖLKEN

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Considers that the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making plays an essential role in securing sincere and transparent cooperation throughout the entire legislative cycle and allows to achieve a better and mutual understanding of the respective positions of the different institutions; calls for an assessment of the extent to which the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making should be revised with the purpose of eliminating possible barriers to the Parliament right of Initiative;

Amendment 24 #

Marie TOUSSAINT

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Considers that new EU law- making mechanisms associating EU citizens and their elected representatives in the European Parliament should be designed in order to improve citizens participation and the European democracy as a whole; believes for instance that the procedural thresholds for ECIs should be lowered where the proposal for an ECI is co-signed by a minimal number of MEPs;

Amendment 25 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Reminds that Parliament has a structure for impact assessment activities and is convinced that the use of it should be mandatory before drafting a legislative own-initiative report in order to enhance the European added value assessment foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making;

Amendment 26 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Emphasises that Parliament fully adheres to the interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, which stresses the necessity of a prior "European added value" analysis as well as a "cost of non- Europe" assessment;

Amendment 27 #

Marie TOUSSAINT

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)

5b. Asks the Commission to study the possibility of introducing mechanisms of direct democracy, such as citizen's assemblies or referendum vote on specific issues, which would grant EU citizens decisional or consultative power in the EU law-making process, without depending on the reform of the Treaty;

Amendment 28 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

~~6. Urges the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, to adhere to its responsibilities and to honour its own commitments;~~deleted

Amendment 29 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

6. Urges the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, to adhere to its responsibilities and to ~~honour its own commitments~~systematically involve Parliament in its decisions on the Commission Work Programme, so that Parliament has to approve the programme before its publication in order to enhance Parliaments´ agenda-setting power in the meantime before its direct right to initiative is established;

Amendment 3 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 c (new)

C. whereas Article 225 TFEU obliges the Commission to give reasons, in case it would not submit a legislative proposal as requested by Parliament; recalls thereby the compulsory character of this Treaty provision;

Amendment 30 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7

7. Is of the opinion that, if the Commission fails to implement Parliament’s call for a legislative act in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, its resolution adopted by a majority of members shall form the basis for a legislative procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself;deleted

Amendment 31 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7

7. Is of the opinion that, if the Commission fails to implement Parliament’s ~~call~~request for a legislative act in the area of the ordinary legislative procedure, ~~its resolution adopted by a majority of members shall~~ Parliament should systematically consider to bring an action regarding the Commission´s failure to act beforme the ~~basis for a legisla~~Court of Justivce ~~procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself~~of the European Union to have an infringement by the Commission established on the basis of Article 265 TFEU;

Amendment 32 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8

8. Considers that, were the Commission does not to submit a legislative proposal and fails to provide proper reasons as required by Article 225 TFEU, following Parliament’s request, this would c~~onstitute a failure to act and Parliament would reserve its right to take action under~~ause for a motion of censure on the Commission´s activities according to Article 26534 TFEU.;

Amendment 33 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)

8a. Is convinced that Article 294 TFEU should be revised in a way that Parliament’s resolution requesting a legislative act pursuant to Article 225 TFEU, adopted by a majority of members shall form the basis for a legislative procedure to be initiated by Parliament itself, if the Commission does not forward a legislative proposal within 12 months after Parliament’s request;

Amendment 4 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 d (new)

D. whereas the European Parliament is the only directly elected EU institution, which at the same time has less legislative initiative powers than most national parliaments;

Amendment 5 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 e (new)

E. whereas Ms Ursula von der Leyen, before she was elected President of the Commission, committed to respond to legislative initiatives, when adopted by a majority of Parliament’s members and in full respect of the proportionality, subsidiarity, and better law-making principles;

Amendment 6 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 f (new)

F. whereas the Conference on the Future of Europe will be an avenue for further reflection with civil society on how to best strengthen the Parliament’s right of initiative with regards to better law- making;

Amendment 7 #

Pascal DURAND, Javier NART, Karen MELCHIOR, Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ

Draft opinion
Recital 1 g (new)

G. deplores the existing imbalance of EU agenda-setting powers between Commission, Council and Parliament, notably in policy areas where the Commission does not enjoy an exclusive right of initiative and where no consultation obligation for Council exists, namely in the area of Economic and Monetary Union and Common Foreign and Security Policy, whereby competences were transferred to the EU High Representative and the European External Action Service;

Amendment 8 #

Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Gunnar BECK, Laura HUHTASAARI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. Believes that the Commission’s right of legislative initiative, as set out in the Treaties, has been neither constructive nor productive in recent years, with a decrease in the Commission’s output over the past decade and Commission Presidents not assuming their political responsibilities; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs further exploit Parliament’s powers assigned by the Treaties and consider a Treaty revision to give Parliament a direct right of legislative initiativeand that the Commission has no democratic legitimacy to exercise such a political role; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs consider a Treaty revision to remove from the Commission its right of legislative initiative and transfer it to the Council and Parliament;

Amendment 9 #

Marion WALSMANN, Andrzej HALICKI, Sven SIMON, Daniel BUDA, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Believ~~Stresses that ~~the Commission’s~~Parliament is a democratically elected body which unlike national parliaments, does not have a formal right of legislative initiative, as set out in the Treaties, has been neither constructive nor productive in recent years, with a decrease in the Commission’s output over the past decade and Commission Presidents not assuming their political responsibilitiesnd therefore the fact that the Commission has the exclusive direct right of legislative initiative creates a problem of democratic legitimacy that has to be addressed; strongly recommends therefore that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs further exploit Parliament’s powers assigned by the Treaties and ~~consider a Treaty revision~~analyse the different ways to give Parliament a direct right of legislative initiative;

source: 662.145

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-03-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
docs	date: 2021-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.481&secondRef=02 title: PE657.481 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
forecasts	date: 2021-07-05T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading

2021-03-03Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group

2021-02-24Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: EPP - Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ID - Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Greens/EFA - Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL - European United Left - Nordic Green Left
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: Greens/EFA - Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE

2021-02-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: EPP - Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ID - Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Greens/EFA - Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL - European United Left - Nordic Green Left
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: Greens/EFA - Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group

2021-02-16Show (5) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group name: CHAIBI Leila group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref	124693
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/2	type Committee Opinion body EP committee_full Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee LIBE associated False rapporteur name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE

2020-12-09Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP committee_full Constitutional Affairs committee AFCO associated False rapporteur name: RANGEL Paulo date: 2020-05-26T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP shadows name: BENIFEI Brando group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: GOZI Sandro group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew name: MADISON Jaak group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: CHAIBI Leila group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref	124693
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref	197531

2020-09-28Show (1) Changes

committees/2/rapporteur

name: DELBOS-CORFIELD Gwendoline date: 2020-06-11T00:00:00 group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE

Progress: Awaiting committee decision

Lead committee dossier:

AFCO/9/03616

Legal Basis:

Subjects

Links

Events

Documents

Activities

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024