Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR) | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | CHINNICI Caterina ( S&D) | Clare DALY ( GUE/NGL), Peter KOFOD ( ID) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 639 votes to 47, with 12 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Administrative Director of the European Union Agency for Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Eurojust) for the financial year 2019 and to approve the closure of the accounts for that year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the Agency's annual accounts for the financial year 2019 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Parliament adopted, by 628 votes to 54 with 9 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations which form an integral part of the discharge decision and which complement the general recommendations contained in the resolution on the performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.
Eurojust's financial statements
Eurojust's final budget for the financial year 2019 was EUR 38 954 265, an increase of 0.90% compared to 2018.
Budgetary and financial management
The budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2019 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.88%, which represents a slight decrease of 0.05% compared to the financial year 2018. The execution rate for payment appropriations was 90.61%, an increase of 3.70% compared to 2018.
In 2019, the Agency's budget amounted to EUR 38 100 000, which is EUR 3 000 000 less than the Agency's request for 2019. The Agency therefore submitted a request to the Commission for an amending budget to cover the shortfall in resources. Pending the outcome of this request, mitigation measures have been put in place, delaying a number of activities. The Commission should intensify its discussions with the Agency before any future annual budget allocations.
Other comments
Members also made a number of observations concerning performance, staff policy, procurement and internal controls.
In particular, they noted that:
- the Agency uses key performance indicators (KPIs), to assess the added value of its activities, as well as various other tools to improve its budgetary management, including increasing the number of references to the Agency in EU texts, the percentage of formal and informal written contributions to draft EU legislation accepted by the institutions, as well as budget execution; the relevance of KPIs will be reassessed in future annual work programmes;
- in 2019, the Agency's assistance was required in 7804 cross-border criminal investigations, an increase of 17% compared to 2018, of which 3892 were new cases opened in 2019, an increase of 9% compared to 2018;
- working together through the Agency in 2019, national judicial and law enforcement authorities brought trade in illicit drugs worth EUR 2.7 billion to a halt, and about EUR 2 billion in criminal assets were seized or frozen; the workload is expected to increase further due to the new strengthened mandate, which entered into force in 2019;
- the Agency continues to cooperate closely at operational level with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), with other partners in the field of justice and home affairs and with third countries. It also cooperates with the European Anti-Fraud Office and the European Union Intellectual Property Office;
- on 31 December 2019, the establishment plan was 98.08 % implemented, with 204 temporary agents appointed out of 208 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget. Member States should take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when appointing members of the Agency's College;
- the Agency should fully comply with the rules governing public procurement and implement the Court's observations which have not yet been implemented;
- the Agency should publish the CVs and declarations of interest of the members of the Executive Board, the Agency's Chair and the Administrative Director and inform the discharge authority of the measures taken in this respect; Members called for the creation of a common ethical framework for all EU institutions and agencies;
- as regards environmental management, the Agency’s building received the sustainability label “very good”.
With regard to cooperation with the UK after the entry into force of the withdrawal agreement, the Agency monitored the negotiations and identified the areas of impact and possible scenarios. The UK was the country with the fifth largest number of cases assisted by the Agency.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0182/2021
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0101/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0101/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.798
- Committee opinion: PE661.918
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee draft report: PE657.215
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE657.215
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee opinion: PE661.918
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.798
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0101/2021
Votes
Décharge 2019 : Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) - 2019 discharge: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) - Entlastung 2019: Agentur der Europäischen Union für justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen (Eurojust) - A9-0101/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Propositions de décision #
Décharge 2019 : Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) - 2019 discharge: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) - Entlastung 2019: Agentur der Europäischen Union für justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen (Eurojust) - A9-0101/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Am 1/1 #
A9-0101/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Am 1/2 #
Décharge 2019 : Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) - 2019 discharge: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) - Entlastung 2019: Agentur der Europäischen Union für justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen (Eurojust) - A9-0101/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2020/2158(DEC)
2021/01/15
LIBE
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; highlights the continuous increase in total number of cases supported by Eurojust in the past five years and stresses the recent trend of cases referred to Eurojust becoming more and more complex and requiring support over longer periods; highlights that working together through Eurojust in 2019, national judicial and law enforcement authorities brought trade in illicit drugs worth EUR 2.7 billion to a halt, and about EUR 2 billion in criminal assets were seized or frozen; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of this operational tool; stresses the essential role that Eurojust plays in the Union security chain and maintains that its budget should match its tasks and priorities in order to enable it to fulfil its mandate, also in the view of an effective cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office; _________________ 1Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the fact that Eurojust correctly implemented the Court's recommendation regarding the publication of vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes Eurojust’s new Rules of Procedure, its new rules on data protection, the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Underlines the important effect of turnover within the staff of the agencies of the European Union; calls for the implementation of human and social policies to remedy it;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses the importance to increase the digitalisation of the Agency in terms of internal operation and management but also in order to speed up the digitalisation of procedures; stresses the need for the Agency to continue to be proactive in this regard in order to avoid a digital gap between the agencies at all costs; draws attention, however, to the need to take all the necessary security measures to avoid any risk to the online security of the information processed;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the Agency to continue to develop its synergies, increase cooperation and exchange of good practices with other European agencies with a view to improving efficiency (human resources, building management, IT services and security).
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite an increase in the number of cases to be processed by the agency in recent years and a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of this operational tool; stresses the essential role that Eurojust plays in the Union security chain
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%),
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and merely a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that an outstanding observation from 2018, namely, the use of a negotiated procurement procedure is still to be justified; further notes that the Court considers the Framework Supply Contract, all related specific contracts and all payments made under these contracts to be irregular; calls on the Agency to step up efforts to implement corrective measures regarding the Court’s ongoing observations;
Amendment 8 #
4. Notes that an outstanding observation from 2018, namely, the use of a negotiated procurement procedure is still to be justified; welcomes the Agency's action following the Court's observation from 2017 so that it now publishes vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in addition to its own website and on social media;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
source: 663.245
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/0/date |
Old
2020-06-29T00:00:00New
2020-06-28T00:00:00 |
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
forecasts |
|
events/4/docs |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
docs/5 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.215New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-657215_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-661918_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.798New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-680798_EN.html |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.798
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-03T00:00:00New
2021-03-04T00:00:00 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03 |
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-03-03T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
commission |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124861
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|