2020/2158(DEC) 2019 discharge: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust)
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR) | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), OMARJEE Younous ( Confederal Group of the European United Left) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | CHINNICI Caterina ( S&D) | Roberta METSOLA ( PPE), Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ( ECR), Saskia BRICMONT ( Verts/ALE), Olivier CHASTEL ( RE), Peter KOFOD ( ID) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2021/03/01
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/02/25
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2021/02/05
CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Documents
2021/01/11
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/10/01
EP - CHINNICI Caterina (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2020/09/15
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2020/09/08
EP - CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2020/06/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2020/06/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.798
- Committee opinion: PE661.918
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee draft report: PE657.215
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE657.215
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee opinion: PE661.918
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.798
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2020/2158(DEC)
2021/01/15
LIBE
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; highlights the continuous increase in total number of cases supported by Eurojust in the past five years and stresses the recent trend of cases referred to Eurojust becoming more and more complex and requiring support over longer periods; highlights that working together through Eurojust in 2019, national judicial and law enforcement authorities brought trade in illicit drugs worth EUR 2.7 billion to a halt, and about EUR 2 billion in criminal assets were seized or frozen; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of this operational tool; stresses the essential role that Eurojust plays in the Union security chain and maintains that its budget should match its tasks and priorities in order to enable it to fulfil its mandate, also in the view of an effective cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office; _________________ 1Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the fact that Eurojust correctly implemented the Court's recommendation regarding the publication of vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes Eurojust’s new Rules of Procedure, its new rules on data protection, the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Underlines the important effect of turnover within the staff of the agencies of the European Union; calls for the implementation of human and social policies to remedy it;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses the importance to increase the digitalisation of the Agency in terms of internal operation and management but also in order to speed up the digitalisation of procedures; stresses the need for the Agency to continue to be proactive in this regard in order to avoid a digital gap between the agencies at all costs; draws attention, however, to the need to take all the necessary security measures to avoid any risk to the online security of the information processed;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the Agency to continue to develop its synergies, increase cooperation and exchange of good practices with other European agencies with a view to improving efficiency (human resources, building management, IT services and security).
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite an increase in the number of cases to be processed by the agency in recent years and a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of this operational tool; stresses the essential role that Eurojust plays in the Union security chain
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%),
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and merely a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that an outstanding observation from 2018, namely, the use of a negotiated procurement procedure is still to be justified; further notes that the Court considers the Framework Supply Contract, all related specific contracts and all payments made under these contracts to be irregular; calls on the Agency to step up efforts to implement corrective measures regarding the Court’s ongoing observations;
Amendment 8 #
4. Notes that an outstanding observation from 2018, namely, the use of a negotiated procurement procedure is still to be justified; welcomes the Agency's action following the Court's observation from 2017 so that it now publishes vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in addition to its own website and on social media;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
source: 663.245
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-03-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03 |
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-03-03T00:00:00 |
2021-03-03Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
2021-03-02Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.918 |
docs/4 |
|
2021-02-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/3 |
|
2021-02-24Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
2021-02-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2 |
|
2021-02-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
2021-02-16Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
2020-12-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124861
|
2020-11-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2020-10-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2020-09-27Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2020-09-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2020-09-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2020-09-02Show (1) Changes
committees/0/shadows |
|