2021/2255(INI) The New European Bauhaus
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Joint Responsible Committee | ['ITRE', 'CULT'] | EHLER Christian ( EPP), ROS SEMPERE Marcos ( S&D) | ZOVKO Željana ( EPP), TOIA Patrizia ( S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew), MIHAYLOVA Iskra ( Renew), CUFFE Ciarán ( Verts/ALE), RIBA I GINER Diana ( Verts/ALE), DA RE Gianantonio ( ID), LIZZI Elena ( ID), MELBĀRDE Dace ( ECR), BARRENA ARZA Pernando ( GUE/NGL), ERNST Cornelia ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | MANDERS Antonius ( EPP) | Romeo FRANZ ( Verts/ALE), Jordi CAÑAS ( RE), Manuel PIZARRO ( S&D), Beata SZYDŁO ( ECR), Elena LIZZI ( ID) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | OLBRYCHT Jan ( EPP) | Martina DLABAJOVÁ ( RE), Henrike HAHN ( Verts/ALE), Joachim KUHS ( ID), Ilan DE BASSO ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | MICHELS Martina ( GUE/NGL) | Raffaele FITTO ( ECR), Laurence FARRENG ( RE), Ciarán CUFFE ( Verts/ALE), Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA ( PPE), Hannes HEIDE ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58Events
2022/03/17
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/03/02
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2022/01/13
EP - EHLER Christian (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2022/01/13
EP - ROS SEMPERE Marcos (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2021/12/16
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - OLBRYCHT Jan (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2021/10/25
EP - MANDERS Antonius (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2021/09/27
EP - MICHELS Martina (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
Documents
Activities
- Eva KAILI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Antonius MANDERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Martina MICHELS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Iskra MIHAYLOVA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Patrizia TOIA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Juozas OLEKAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Laurence FARRENG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alexis GEORGOULIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ciarán CUFFE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hannes HEIDE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pernille WEISS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elżbieta KRUK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marcos ROS SEMPERE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ilan DE BASSO
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
159 |
2021/2255(INI)
2022/02/07
BUDG
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal, achieving climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest, promoting just green and digital transition of the European economy, as well as fighting the biodiversity crisis through the intersection of art and culture; emphasises the importance of ensuring coherence with legislative and programming instruments and a level of ambition that is in line with EU’s climate commitments, by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role; stresses that the NEB must not erode funding for core programme objectives as agreed by the legislator nor divert focus from agreed political priorities;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the NEB should have a separate line of funding so as not to affect that of other ongoing programmes; calls on the Commission to reflect on the volume of funding needed for the objectives set, identify the financial resources in the budget and submit proposals for NEB funding;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; stresses the importance of making regional and local authorities aware of this initiative so that they can access the corresponding opportunities and funding; calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; calls on the Commission to develop and present to the Parliament a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; notes a lack of communication regarding the proposed NEB objectives and opportunities and calls on the Commission and Member States to endeavour to promote the project among European citizens;
Amendment 16 #
5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; stresses the need to ensure that circularity and sustainable criteria for building materials are at the heart of the selection for pilot projects;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase; underlines that
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase, including an assessment of its contribution to the achievement of the Union’s Green Deal objectives and its effectiveness in promoting synergies between the different Union programmes; underlines that, if continued, the NEB must be designed to ensure democratic oversight and safeguard the role of the budgetary authority; insists that any decision to develop the NEB into a longer-term initiative or programme requires fresh resources as part of the necessary mid-term revision of the MFF.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension; stresses that the NEB must include all Member States of the European Union and be accessible to all citizens, including those in small urban, rural and other remote or isolated areas;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension by bringing together environmental and social sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics in the places where people live and in the way they live;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU’s energy demand, are the single largest energy consumer in Europe and account for 36% of the EU’s CO2 emissions; stresses that, in line with the European Green Deal, the NEB should focus on preparing our current building stock and infrastructure for a more sustainable and climate- friendly future; emphasises that conservation and preservation of monuments and culturally relevant historic buildings should be taken into account;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus initiative, which bridges the worlds of science and technology, art and culture to efficiently address societal issues and build sustainable and inclusive living spaces, but notes with concern that a coherent and strategic approach for the financing of the initiative is still lacking; Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; considers also that the mere re- deployment of existing funds may not be sufficient to achieve the objectives of this initiative and emphasises the need for new funds;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; calls on the European Commission to ensure that all categories of beneficiary in every Member State have access to the resources and results available from the pilot phase; calls on the Commission to introduce a pronounced educational component in the implementation of the pilot phase;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; asks the Commission to clarify its budgetary approach for continuation of the NEB after the pilot phase; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed yet for what is a new initiative;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role;
source: 704.871
2022/03/23
EMPL
140 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the New European Bauhaus (NEB) aims to reimagine the way we live together and to create awareness about our built and designed environment, including in terms of quality and sustainability; whereas the NEB intends to make the benefits of the green transition a tangible reality in citizens' everyday lives and at a local and neighbourhood level; whereas New European Bauhaus projects should be in line with the principles of the EPSR and the UN SDGs;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas a transdisciplinary approach to the opportunities and challenges arising from the green and digital transitions can foster innovative solutions which serve people and communities in a circular and future- proof way; whereas there is a need for such solutions to mainstream a gender- equal and intersectional approach, inclusivity for persons with disabilities as well as inter-generational solidarity;
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Invites the Member States to incentivise the preservation and revaluation of know-how by finding local craftspeople, promoting their work, creating a network and bringing them closer to relevant VET and higher education curricula; encourages the Member States to launch targeted actions to support the upskilling of workers, innovation, research and education within the entire construction ecosystem with the support of professional organisations that offer continuous professional development; notes that innovative education and training models for architects and professionals in the construction sector are necessary to promote greater synergies between spatial planning, design, arts, landscape and interior architecture, craftsmanship and architecture, and achieve a high-quality built environment;
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the New European Bauhaus as a tool to implement the European Parliament resolutions on combating homelessness[1]and ensuring access to adequate and affordable housing[2], by promoting social and publicly funded housing; [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2020-0314_EN.html[2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0020_EN.html
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6 e. Considers that the digital transition can be key in enhancing the use of local resources and competences, as digital fabrication in fablabs or industries allows for a local distribution of production and, in many cases, gives a new life to certain traditions that could otherwise fade away;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6 e. Stresses that the Commission and Member States should use New European Bauhaus housing solutions to provide permanent housing for homeless persons and enforce the “housing first”[1]principle; [1] https://housingfirsteurope.eu/guide/core- principles-housing-first/
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Underlines that Small and Medium Enterprises are important employers at the local level and can adapt quickly to innovate; cautions, however, against the risk that they may be pushed out of markets due to the very rapid transition to large scale solutions in industry such as the construction materials industry; invites the Commission and the Member States to reflect on how to best support SMEs in construction as well as in design and materials production;
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Welcomes the inclusive nature of the New European Bauhaus movement; proposes the cooperation with stakeholders and local authorities to ensure equal access to housing for all and tackle discrimination on grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, disabilities, economic and social status and religion;
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6 g. Underlines the important role of the New European Bauhaus in the promotion of gender equality; proposes the use of New European Bauhaus housing and neighbourhood projects to ensure access to safe and affordable housing for women, in particular single mothers and victims of domestic violence, as well as access to services such as child care, psychological and social support in the neighbourhood;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6 g. Welcomes initiatives such as Interreg’s CRAFTS CODE to improve the competitiveness of SMEs in the crafts sector by creating a framework stimulating capacity building and policy learning and improving the implementation of regional development policies and programmes aimed at supporting these SMEs across their life cycle;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 h (new) 6 h. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all New European Bauhaus housing and neighbourhood projects provide affordable and accessible connectivity for all citizens;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the principles of the New European Bauhaus should not give rise to overly interventionist policies, but rather policies respectful of property rights;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to require Member States to ensure a minimum of 100 m² of green space per home when planning New European Bauhaus housing projects, and a minimum of one hectare of continuous green space per New European Bauhaus neighbourhood as an investment in healthy housing taking into account the lessons of the pandemic;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to require Member States to
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that New European Bauhaus projects will contribute to reduce the land use for buildings, by focussing for example on the renovation of the existing housing stock and the use of already built-up areas;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Member States to recognise advantageous arrangements for house purchases by means of tax reductions and introducing tax exemptions and tax relief;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Notes that empowering local communities to incorporate elements of food security within local areas and regions and to generate energy locally connects to employment and social affairs and can contribute to social equity, resilience and cohesion, ambitions that chime with the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls in regards to Russia's war in Ukraine to re-evaluate the energy- question and - in view of the large number of refugees-, to intensify all efforts concerning human rights, as well as the inclusion dimension; calls on the Commission and the Members States to take into account these new challenges and implications in The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 126 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure better recognition and compensation of asbestos-related and other occupational diseases to all exposed workers in order to protect the health of construction and other workers in the green transition and The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to recognise the digital dimension as an explicit part of how future spaces are conceived; notes that the values that New European Bauhaus promotes for the development of the built environment should be mirrored in the digital sphere;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure good governance, transparency and accountability towards relevant stakeholders for all New European Bauhaus projects;
Amendment 129 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to invest in prefabricated housing to quickly reduce housing shortages;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 130 #
8 b. Calls on the Commission to cooperate with local authorities and stakeholders so that citizens looking for housing have access to information on available New European Bauhaus housing projects; stresses the importance of strengthening the institutional and structured participation of tenants and residents and urges the Commission to facilitate this process by providing them with the necessary knowledge and information about the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to significantly increase their focus on prevention strategies such, for example by strengthening labour inspectorates, national health and safety services and social partner dialogue to ensure that all employees have a right to the highest level of health and safety protection possible in the implementation of The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Welcomes the so-called 15-minute city model implemented by some European cities and invites Member States to consider replicating that model in more cities; encourages the Member States to cluster rural towns to better share resources and capacities with a view to supporting resilience;
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Calls on the Commission to present a clear NEB roadmap for the next decade with clear objectives; Invites the Commission to work alongside stakeholders to make the New European Bauhaus more understandable and inclusive for communities and local authorities; encourages the Commission to launch a dedicated website with an accessible and user-friendly repository of bottom-up best practices, including best practice adaptive re-use and energy upgrade;
Amendment 134 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Stresses that health and safety of workers in construction or renovation, in particular to New European Bauhaus projects, should be ensured, and that protective equipment should be provided;
Amendment 135 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8 d. Calls on the Member States who have not done so already to set up and support a state architect team (and similar) within their administration to provide strategic advice to authorities, promote spatial quality, improve the design and sustainability of public interventions, including their social inclusion considerations, and to foster a culture of place-making; calls on the Member States to set up a quality assurance system, an independent advisory body for public authorities, consisting of experts from other geographical areas and who have no personal interest in the place;6a _________________ 6a European Commission, Directorate- General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, Towards a shared culture of architecture : investing in a high-quality living environment for everyone : executive summary, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/502671
Amendment 136 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8 d. Calls on the Commission to adopt measures for tenants of New European Bauhaus projects to protect them from exposure to asbestos and other harmful materials during energy renovation works; emphasizes that all tenants should be protected from carrying the expenses of the renovation works; stresses that temporary adequate accommodation for tenants should be ensured during renovation works; welcomes the use of safe and sustainable materials for the construction and renovation of all New European Bauhaus projects;
Amendment 137 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8 e. Encourages the Member States to appoint a New European Bauhaus contact to coordinate local efforts and participate in an EU wide informal network to exchange best practices in collaboration with the high-level roundtable; calls on the Commission to duly include all levels of governance in the development and implementation of the New European Bauhaus, be it national, regional or local – as the level closest to citizens -, and to build on the movement of civil society organisations and partners created by the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 138 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8 e. Urges for EU-funded upskilling and training, in particular to digital tools, of workers in New European Bauhaus relevant sectors; calls on the Commission to ensure diversity and equal representation in the New European Bauhaus work environment; urges that workers’ and unions’ rights in the New European Bauhaus work environment should be safeguarded;
Amendment 139 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8 f. Calls on the Commission to designate 2023 the European Year of Craft, 40 years after the first European Year, namely the European Year of SMEs and Craft Industry, with a view to making the craft sector more visible, strengthening the principles championed by the New European Bauhaus and taking stock of the evolution of the sector in the last four decades.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the New European Bauhaus i
Amendment 140 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 g (new) 8 g. Stresses the importance for Member States to integrate New European Bauhaus projects as part of the reforms and investments foreseen in their national recovery and resilience plans in line with the six pillars of the RRF;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the New European Bauhaus movement focuses on creating a healthy, sustainable, beautiful and accessible environment, landscape, housing, workplace, society, economy and way of living;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the New European Bauhaus initiative should be based on innovation at all levels and the active participation and involvement of people and local communities including the integration of female creativity and knowledge in the planning of the daily life in the homes and city spaces as well as the future ways of living;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas The New European Bauhaus movement will include massive renovation works; whereas although asbestos has been banned in the EU since 2005, it is still often present in administrative buildings, schools, housing, infrastructure and public- transport facilities;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the New European Bauhaus aims to capitalise on social assets (social economy organisations, local associations, etc.), natural assets and cultural assets to regain a sense of belonging;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Whereas the New Bauhaus movement should be a continuation of the original Bauhaus, which introduced the social role of art and architecture in addressing societal needs;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Whereas the New European Bauhaus must connect all Member States;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. Whereas EU citizens face growing difficulties in finding affordable housing, mainly due to housing speculation, the expansive growth of short-term holiday rentals and the consequential increase in rental prices;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. whereas the New European Bauhaus should ensure design for ability and empowerment, by designing environments that actively welcome everyone;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) D c. Whereas the cost of living in EU countries is rapidly rising due to the inflation growth and the energy and fuel crisis in the eurozone; whereas energy poverty is rising among low-income households in the EU;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) D c. whereas inclusive environments such as shared infrastructures and services and public spaces enable a sense of shared identity and belonging;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital D d (new) Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital D d (new) D d. whereas the inclusion of local communities and meaningful local ownership play a key role in the process of decarbonisation;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital D e (new) D e. whereas the New European Bauhaus has been a co-creation process and its implementation should also involve the participation of the communities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the New European Bauhaus should facilitate and steer the transformation of our societies in line with three interlinked values: inclusion - from valorising diversity, to securing accessibility and affordability, to aesthetics- quality of experience and style, beyond functionality, and sustainability - from climate goals, to circularity, zero pollution, and biodiversity;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital D e (new) D e. Whereas the need for housing spaces in the EU will increase due to the expected rise of refugees fleeing the war on Ukraine and other non-EU countries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Recital D f (new) D f. Whereas homelessness in the EU has risen 70% in the past decade; whereas estimates show that there are approximately 700.000 homeless people on any given night in the EU; whereas 4.1 million people in the EU are exposed to homelessness each year for a shorter or longer period, while there are more than 11 million empty houses in the European Union;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Recital D g (new) D g. Whereas buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are intertwined values at the core of the New European Bauhaus initiative and calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the universal right to adequate, affordable and healthy housing conditions, including social housing;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the universal right to a
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas housing policy in the Member States should be guided by the common principles of bringing down housing prices so as to make housing accessible to citizens both for sale and rent, including with the option to buy, as well to ensure legal certainty;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure gender equality and the inclusion of minorities and people with disabilities in projects supported in the context of the New European Bauhaus; calls on the Commission to ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities in each application for the New European Bauhaus prizes, as appropriate;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses that the announcement of the Commission for the New European Bauhaus initiative must be followed up by concrete action and receive sufficient financial support in the long-run to make it meaningful and ensure added value;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Member States to cut red tape in access to housing, liberalise access to land and combat illegal occupation;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes that inclusion implies pursuing a Design for All approach to remove accessibility barriers; calls on the Member States to pay particular attention to the groups and individuals who are at risk of exclusion, at greater risk of energy poverty and air pollution, or who are experiencing homelessness; calls on the Commission to ensure that the construction and built environment projected and funded through the New European Bauhaus consider a Design for All approach as a requirement;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Stresses the need to support changes not only in cities but also in rural and remote areas; calls on the Commission to ensure the inclusiveness of the New European Bauhaus Lab and its participation in rural and remote areas; calls on the Commission to support projects providing inclusive job opportunities, in particular in rural and remote areas;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to examine how the New European Bauhaus can contribute to the goal of reducing and eradicating homelessness and supporting homeless people's social inclusion; invites the Commission and Member States to explore links between the Housing First approach and the New European Bauhaus; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from community- designing projects in the field of architecture and sociability such as Home not Shelter, mixed housing and cohousing for young people and refugees, intergenerational cohousing schemes, etc., and promote them in their housing policies;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Highlights the need to promote the New European Bauhaus values in every Member State and in particular in low- income Member States to assist their socio-economic development;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green trans
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the industrial ecosystem through the New European Bauhaus, while making sure no one is left behind; stresses that this initiative should consider the needs of communities and groups most vulnerable to the effects of this change, and in desperate need for a fair and just New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the industrial ecosystem
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. Whereas the New European Bauhaus Lab will serve to reach out to society, industry and politics to connect people and find new ways of creating together;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the housing and industrial ecosystem through the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the Commission to use the New European Bauhaus to realize social sustainability whilst protecting EU citizens, in particular vulnerable groups, from the social impact of the European Green Deal with regard to housing and energy efficiency;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on Member States to introduce genuine aid for access to housing;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to mandate the development of an EU technical standard for New European Bauhaus housing projects in the form of standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), which
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) A b. Whereas New European Bauhaus projects should invest in good thermal isolation to be able to partly offset rising heating costs and achieving the Paris climate agreement;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to mandate the development of an EU technical standard for New European Bauhaus housing projects in the form of standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), which
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes the European Commission’s European Level(s) framework which provides clear priorities and a standardised basis to assess and report on the sustainability of buildings throughout their fully lifecycle; encourages the Member States to use the Davos Baukultur Quality System (DBQS) to determine the Baukultur quality of a spatial intervention, its strengths and weaknesses from a Baukultur perspective;2a _________________ 2a For a definition, please refer to the Council conclusions on culture, high- quality architecture and built environment as key elements of the New European Bauhaus initiative of 30 November 2021.
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that responsibility for housing policies as well as spatial planning lies within Member States’ competences; stresses that the New Bauhaus Initiative cannot lead to the development of a common architectural style across the European Union, with no regard for national and local specificities as well as the cultural and historical context;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on the Commission to have an own fund to finance New European Bauhaus projects, and to cooperate with citizens, neighbourhood organisations and relevant social enterprises, such as NGOs and cooperatives, as well as local authorities in the decision making process;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Expects a successful New European Bauhaus initiative to create new quality employment in the construction, restoration, architecture, design, textile, cultural and creative sectors, and to offer upskilling and reskilling opportunities;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights the importance that local and regional authorities should actively enable the take-up of the New European Bauhaus construction style as it is based on EU standards and values;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a common European identity and a shared sense of belonging based on the conviction that housing is not a luxury that only a few can afford;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recalls that cultural heritage plays an important role in enhancing and creating social capital because it helps to reduce social disparities, facilitates social inclusion, promotes social cohesion and intergenerational dialogue3a;notes that the uptake of digital technologies by cultural heritage sites can offer accessible and innovative experiences for communities; _________________ 3a Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe, Council of the European Union, 20 May 2014
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Urges the Commission to increase efforts in making this initiative more inclusive; notes that most contributions are related to aesthetics or sustainability while accessibility, affordability and inclusion are less present;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to promote and support sustainable housing solutions that lead to more inclusive communities, life-proof housing and solidarity between the generations through the New European Bauhaus, enabling elderly people and persons with disabilities to live at home and to remain active in society for longer and to pass on their experience and knowledge to younger generations;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Considers that the New European Bauhaus should guarantee the quality of housing and social housing; welcomes the acknowledgement of the need to prioritise reuse, regeneration, life extension and transformation of existing buildings over the construction of new ones whenever these activities are technically, economically and functionally feasible as they contribute to reduced energy needs, carbon emissions and pressure for new buildings, and to an improved health, comfort and well-being; is concerned about the disproportionate impact of the poor energy performance of social housing on those who already have lower living standards;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to place in the New European Bauhaus a greater focus on disadvantaged groups, including people experiencing, homelessness, racism, discrimination, poverty and social exclusion; emphasizes in this regards a human-rights based and intersectional, non-discriminatory approach at its core;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to introduce aid for young people and families to access housing, taking into account their needs;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative is guided by the principles of sustainability, inclusiveness, reconnecting with nature, regaining a sense of belonging, prioritising the places and people that need it most, and fostering long-term, life cycle and integrated thinking in the industrial and housing ecosystem;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to proactively reach out to social actors and organisations representing civil society and notably disadvantaged, vulnerable groups as New European Bauhaus partners; recalls, that in order to realize the inclusiveness of the New European Bauhaus, a non-paternalistic approach together with the affected people is essential, who need to be equally represented as promoters, community managers and key interlocutors for the initiative;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Proposes the use of the New Bauhaus to ensure citizens’ “Right to the City”[1], and to help them to reclaim the city as a space created with their participation, as a space of encounter, societal interaction, collective actions and activities and on the basis of collective participation;[1] https://www.right2city.org/
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the authorities to roll out stronger regulatory and fiscal support mechanisms for energy upgrade, repurposing and renovation of existing buildings, which take into consideration the intangible heritage and culture of buildings;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the Commission to take action through the NEB for marginalised Roma communities, living in environmentally polluted areas, with no access to safe drinking water and sanitation, and to support access to decent, safe and adequate housing; urges the Commission to implement NEB projects that aim to truly improve the living conditions of this vulnerable groups and to contribute to territorial developments avoiding spatial segregation of marginalised Roma communities and other vulnerable groups;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Proposes the use of New European Bauhaus to develop neighbourhoods with open, inclusive, accessible and vibrant spaces that promote equality, cultural exchange, democracy and strengthen the sense of community, co-existence and cooperation;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that New European Bauhaus projects promote social and affordable housing as a way to combine social justice, environmental performance and urban aesthetics;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5 d. Welcomes the intention of the New European Bauhaus initiative to promote 15-minute cities[1] in order to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance; [1] https://www.15minutecity.com/
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 e (new) 5 e. Stresses the importance of proximity, functionality and accessibility in planning New European Bauhaus neighbourhoods and 15-minute cities, with particular focus on persons with disabilities; underlines the role of mobility and interconnectivity in safeguarding work-life balance, time efficiency and reduction of energy and fuel costs;
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 f (new) 5 f. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should be used to develop sustainable, aesthetic and inclusive neighbourhoods that allow for access to affordable goods and services for all;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 g (new) 5 g. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should promote social cohesion and interaction by developing projects that provide cultural and creative activities as well as care for people of all ages and groups, such as community centres and multigenerational housing projects;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative is guided by the
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in reviving traditional building techniques and materials which contribute to the objectives of the European Green Deal; urges the Commission and the Member States to also invest in high-quality spatial design and landscape and in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs based on the above-mentioned quality criteria to create a New European Bauhaus way of thinking
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs to create a New European Bauhaus way of thinking and to contribute to an EU-wide healthy lifestyle for all Europeans; calls on the Commission and Member States to invest in new forms of city-planning in order to create sustainable, green and inclusive living;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Commission to define concrete guidelines and guiding principles according to the New European Bauhaus to ensure the quality of the concepts for our built environment in terms of architecture, space and sustainability of the materials used; notes, however, that public space, infrastructure and buildings must be constructed bearing in mind the local planning context, to prevent regional differences and specificities from becoming levelled out;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should focus on the use and energy upgrade of the already existing empty housing spaces in the EU; stresses that New European Bauhaus projects should aim to bring back to life, renovate and reuse existing buildings instead of building new ones, and use as little new space as possible;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that social housing must remain affordable for people with low incomes and that New European Bauhaus could contribute to this goal;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Believes that craftsmanship ensures the longevity of the infrastructure, buildings and public space; considers that craftspeople facilitate social cohesion and the preservation of rural communities, and, given their deep acquaintance with the raw materials they work with, usually local materials, their production has a lower carbon footprint;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Calls on the Commission to take into account that housing costs should be no higher than 25% of the disposable income of a household; calls for the cooperation with local authorities, residents and other relevant stakeholders to ensure affordable rents and security of tenure based on fair and safe tenancy agreements;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Reiterates the call by the Council on the Commission to ensure that architectural quality and a professional architectural service are taken into account in all its measures, policies and programmes, and to encourage the mobility and training of professionals and students of that field;5a _________________ 5a Council Resolution of 12 February 2001 on architectural quality in urban and rural environments
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Underlines the need to develop accessible and affordable New European Bauhaus housing solutions for young people, groups that are vulnerable to social exclusion and citizens who are not considered eligible for housing aid, but are still unable to afford a mortgage or high rental prices;
source: 729.994
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2022-03-29Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/date |
Old
2022-03-02T00:00:00New
2022-03-28T00:00:00 |
2022-03-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-703237_EN.html
|
2022-03-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1 |
|
2022-03-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs |
|
2022-01-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
2022-01-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/9 |
|
2022-01-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2022-01-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2021-12-22Show (3) Changes
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |