Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AGRI | DE CASTRO Paolo ( S&D) | AMARO Álvaro ( EPP), SANDER Anne ( EPP), TOLLERET Irène ( Renew), GRUFFAT Claude ( Verts/ALE), LIZZI Elena ( ID), AGUILAR Mazaly ( ECR), RODRÍGUEZ PALOP Eugenia ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | LANCINI Danilo Oscar ( ID) | Arnaud DANJEAN ( PPE), Jordi CAÑAS ( RE), Marek BELKA ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA Adrián ( Renew) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 043-p2, TFEU 118-p1
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 043-p2, TFEU 118-p1Subjects
- 2.10.03 Standardisation, EC/EU standards and trade mark, certification, compliance
- 3.10.03 Marketing and trade of agricultural products and livestock
- 3.10.06.08 Wine, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages
- 3.10.10 Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
- 4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 520 votes to 19, with 64 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the Commission's proposal as follows:
Subject matter
This Regulation lays down the rules on the following quality schemes:
(a) protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine, protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for agricultural products, including foodstuffs, as referred to in Article 5(1), point (c), and geographical indications for spirit drinks;
(b) traditional specialities guaranteed and optional quality terms, as set out in Title III, Chapters 2 and 3 respectively, for agricultural products, including foodstuffs.
Unitary and exhaustive system of geographical indications
The system should:
- ensure that producers acting collectively have the necessary powers and responsibilities to manage the geographical indication concerned, including in order to respond to societal demands, such as for animal health and welfare, for products resulting from sustainable production in its three dimensions of economic, environmental and social value, and to operate and be competitive in the market;
- contribute to fair competition and generate added value with the aim of sharing that added value across the marketing chain, in order to ensure a fair return for producers and a capacity to invest in the quality, reputation and sustainability of their products, as well as contributing to the achievement of rural development policy objectives by providing support to agricultural and processing activities, preserving know-how and promoting specific quality products due to the geographical area where they are produced;
- ensure that consumers receive reliable information and necessary guarantee of the origin, authenticity, quality, reputation and other characteristics linked to the geographical origin or the geographical environment of such products and can readily identify them in the marketplace including in electronic commerce;
- ensure the efficient and user-friendly registration of geographical indications taking into account the appropriate protection of intellectual property rights;
- ensure effective controls , enforcement and place on the market throughout the Union, including in electronic commerce, thereby ensuring the integrity of the internal market; and
- contribute to the effective protection of intellectual property rights related to such products in third country markets.
Protection of geographical indications online
Geographical indications should be better protected online. The Regulation pays particular attention to enforcing the protection of geographical indications against domain names that infringe this protection. Competent national authorities should have the tools to react to an infringement of the protection of a geographical indication by a registered domain name.
Consequently, in the exercise of their official control tasks, these authorities will be able to take measures to disable access from the territory of the Member State concerned to domain names registered in violation of the protection of geographical indications. An information and alert system for domain names will be set up by the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
Use of geographical indications designating a product used as an ingredient in the name of a processed product
The amended text stipulates that the geographical indication designating a product used as an ingredient in a processed product may be used in the name of that processed product, or in its labelling, or in its advertising material where: (a) the processed product does not contain any other product comparable to the ingredient designated by the geographical indication; (b) the ingredient designated by the geographical indication is used in sufficient quantities to confer an essential characteristic on the processed product concerned; and (c) the percentage of the ingredient designated by the geographical indication in the processed product is indicated in the label.
A recognised producer group should be notified by the producers of the processed product and may issue recommendations on the correct use of the GI.
More rights for GI producers
GI producers should prevent or counter any measures or commercial practices that are detrimental to the image and value of their products, including devaluing marketing practices.
Where agricultural products are designated by a geographical indication, an indication of the name of the producer or operator must appear on the labelling in the same visual field as the geographical indication . The same will apply in the case of spirit drinks designated by a geographical indication. The name of the operator is understood to be the name of the operator responsible for the production stage at the end of which the product covered by the geographical indication is obtained, or responsible for the substantial transformation of this product.
A producer group may take appropriate action to ensure the protection of the geographical indication and the intellectual property rights directly linked to it, including taking legal action and making applications to the customs authorities, and preventing or countering any measure or commercial practice which damages or is likely to damage the reputation or value of the geographical indication concerned.
Sustainability
A producer group, or a recognised producer group where such a group exists, may agree on sustainable practices to be adhered to in the production of the product designated by a geographical indication or in carrying out other activities subject to one or more obligations provided for in the product specification. Such practices should aim to apply sustainability standards higher than those laid down by Union or national law in terms of environmental, social or economic sustainability or animal welfare.
A producer group, or a recognised producer group where such a group exists, may prepare and regularly update a sustainability report based on verifiable information, comprising a description of existing sustainable practices implemented in the production of the product.
Application for registration
An application for registration of a geographical indication at Union stage should be submitted to the Commission electronically, through a digital system. The Commission should examine applications for registration. The examination should not exceed a period of six months from the day of the reception of the application.
The EUIPO should maintain and keep the Union register up-to-date with respect to registrations, amendments and cancellations of geographical indications.
Specific rules on sourcing of feed and of raw materials, and on slaughtering
In respect of a product of animal origin, the name of which is registered as a designation of origin, feed should be sourced entirely from within the defined geographical area. Insofar as sourcing entirely from within the defined geographical area is not practicable, feed sourced from outside that area may be added, provided that the product quality or characteristics essentially due to the geographical environment are not affected. The amount of feed sourced from outside the defined geographical area should not exceed 50 % of dry matter on an annual basis.
The European Parliament adopted, by 603 votes to 18 with 8 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
The matter has been referred to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.
The regulation would lay down rules governing the following quality schemes: (a) protected designations of origin (PDOs) and protected geographical indications (PGIs) for wines, agricultural products and foodstuffs and geographical indications for spirit drinks; (b) traditional specialities guaranteed (TSGs).
Members stressed that high-quality products represent one of the biggest assets the Union has, both for its economy and cultural identity. Those products are the strongest representation of the “made in the EU” brand, recognisable throughout the whole world, which generate growth and preserve our heritage. Wines, spirit drinks and agricultural products are European assets that need to be further strengthened and protected.
Citizens and consumers have the right to expect any geographical indication and quality system to be backed up by a solid verification and control system, whether the product comes from the EU or a third country.
Geographical indications
The unitary and exclusive system of geographical indications, protecting the names of wines, spirit drinks and agricultural products which have characteristics, attributes or a reputation linked to their place of production, should: (a) help producers to obtain a fair return for the quality of their products; (b) contribute to the achievement of the objectives of rural development policy by supporting farming and processing activities and farming systems associated with high-quality products.
The system should:
- ensure that consumers receive reliable information and a guarantee of authenticity and traceability of the quality, reputation and other characteristics linked to the place of production of these products and can easily identify them on the market, including in the domain name system and in e-commerce;
- guarantee the simple, efficient and user-friendly registration of geographical indications, taking into account the uniform, appropriate and effective protection of intellectual property rights in the internal market, including the Union's digital markets;
- ensuring effective controls, enforcement, use and marketing throughout the EU, as well as in the domain name system and in e-commerce;
- preserving know-how and promoting and supporting local and regional products;
- ensure effective protection of the intellectual property rights of producers of these products on third-country markets.
According to Members, geographical indications should be better protected online .
Top level domain name registries and other domain name registries operating in the EU should revoke or transfer a domain name registered under that domain to the recognised producer group designated by the geographical indication concerned or to the competent authority of the Member State from which the geographical indication in question originates, if that domain name has been registered by its holder without any rights or legitimate interest in the geographical indication.
In particular, a producer group should be able to pursue legal action, including civil and criminal action, to ensure the offline and online protection of the geographical indication and the intellectual property rights directly related to it, including websites, domain names and e-commerce, and to claim damages.
The EUIPO should be empowered, under the delegated acts, to establish and manage an alert system monitoring registration of domain names in the Union which could conflict with the names included in the Union register of geographical indications.
Processed products
Parliament is calling for better protection of GIs in processed products. Processed products containing a GI ingredient should not be allowed to be named after the GI unless authorised to do so by the GI producers.
Commission scrutiny of registration applications
The examination period should not last more than five months from the date of submission of the application for registration. In duly justified cases, the scrutiny procedure could be extended by a maximum of three months. National authorities should handle most requests for changes to existing GI registrations without the Commission having to check them again.
The Commission should remain responsible for registration, amendment and cancellation procedures, due to a strong relationship with the Common Agricultural Policy and the expertise needed to ensure that the specificities of wines, spirit drinks and agricultural products are adequately assessed.
Producer groups
Producer groups should be given the means to better identify and market the specific characteristics of their products, as well as adequate resources to exercise their powers and responsibilities. Member States should be able to ensure that the contribution to the costs of exercising the powers and responsibilities of the recognised producer group is compulsory for all producers of products covered by the geographical indication concerned. A producer group could be set up on the initiative of interested producer groups.
Sustainability undertaking
To enable the adoption of sustainability commitments, producers should receive financial support, through pre-determined, specific and easily accessible funding, and should be properly informed of the opportunities arising from the adoption of sustainability commitments.
These commitments should contribute to one or more social, environmental or economic objectives, including:
- climate change mitigation and adaptation, including energy efficiency and decrease water consumption;
- preservation and sustainable use of soil, landscapes and natural resources;
- preservation of biodiversity and plants varieties, and transition to a circular economy;
- reduction of the use of pesticides, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the use of antimicrobials;
- improving animal health and welfare;
- attracting and sustaining young producers of products benefiting from a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication;
- contributing to the valorisation of rural areas as well as cultural and gastronomic heritage.
Recognition of the European system
All EU geographical indications should be protected under bilateral and multilateral trade and other international agreements through the recognition of the European system as such. In this respect, the EU should make major commercial and diplomatic efforts to ensure the protection of traditional practices that bring together historical, cultural and gastronomic heritage while ensuring sustainable production.
PURPOSE: to revise the system of geographical indications (GIs) for wines, spirit drinks and agricultural products with a view to facilitating the adoption of GIs throughout the Union as intellectual property instruments accessible to all farmers and producers of products, linked by characteristics or reputation, and to their place of production.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Geographical indications (GIs) identify products that have qualities, characteristics or a reputation due to natural and human factors linked to their place of origin. They constitute an intellectual property right (IPR) designed to promote fair competition between producers by preventing bad faith uses of a name and fraudulent and deceptive practices. Today, the EU register of geographical indications contains almost 3 500 names of wines, spirit drinks, agricultural products and foodstuffs.
An evaluation published in December 2021 showed that the existing framework is effective and provides clear EU added value. However, it highlighted certain limitations , such as the low level of consumer awareness and understanding of GIs in some Member States, as well as the low level of enforcement of the legislation. It also pointed out that environmental sustainability and animal welfare could be taken into account more. Furthermore, the length and complexity of the registration and amendment procedures, both at national and EU level, are seen as the main nuisance for producers and source of administrative burden.
Therefore, the proposal meets the following general objectives: (i) to ensure effective IPR protection in the Union, including efficient registration processes, in order to reward producers fairly for their efforts; (ii) to increase the use of GIs throughout the Union for the benefit of the rural economy.
CONTENT: the proposal for the revision of the GI system consists of a set of rules designed to put in place a coherent system for GIs aimed at assisting producers to better communicate the qualities, characteristics and attributes of their GI products, and at ensuring appropriate consumer information. Moreover, the proposal clarifies and improves the traditional speciality guarantee (TSG) scheme while it makes no changes to the scheme for optional quality terms.
The proposal has the following specific objectives:
(1) improve the enforcement of GI rules to better protect IPR and better protect GIs on the internet , including against bad faith registrations and fraudulent and deceptive practices, and uses in the domain name system, and combat counterfeiting;
(2) streamline and clarify the legal framework to simplify and harmonise the procedures for application for registration of new names and amendments to product specifications. The different technical and procedural rules for geographical indications would be merged, resulting in a single simplified GI registration procedure for EU and third country applicants;
(3) contribute to making the Union food system more sustainable by integrating specific sustainability criteria. As a direct follow-up to the Farm to Table strategy, producers could highlight their actions in the field of social, environmental or economic sustainability in their specifications by setting the corresponding requirements;
(4) empower producers and producer groups to better manage their GI assets and encourage the development of structures and partnerships within the food supply chain. Member States should recognise GI producer groups at their request. Recognised groups would be empowered to manage, enforce and develop their GI, including access to anti-counterfeiting authorities and customs services in all Member States;
(5) increase correct market perception and consumer awareness of the GI policy and Union symbols to enable consumers to make informed purchasing choices. It is foreseen to make the use of EU symbols or indications on the packaging of products with a geographical indication obligatory in order to increase consumer awareness of this category of products and the related guarantees, and to facilitate the identification of these products on the market, thus facilitating controls;
(6) safeguard the protection of traditional food names to better valorise and preserve traditional products and production methods.
As regards the reduction of administrative burden, the proposal provides for technical assistance in the registration procedure by an existing EU agency and full exploitation of digital tools. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) will provide technical support in the monitoring process to help speed up procedures.
The new domain name information and alert system to be established by EUIPO will provide GI applicants with an additional digital tool as part of the application process to better protect and enforce their GI rights.
Documents
- Draft final act: 00072/2023/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0101/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2023)012101
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2023)012101
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0210/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0173/2023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0173/2023
- Committee opinion: PE736.693
- Committee opinion: PE731.609
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3736/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE737.394
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.756
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.502
- Committee draft report: PE736.493
- Contribution: COM(2022)0134
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 454 30.11.2022, p. 0112
- Document attached to the procedure: N9-0089/2022
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6620/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0197
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0135
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0136
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0134
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0197
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0135
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0136
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6620/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 454 30.11.2022, p. 0112 N9-0089/2022
- Committee draft report: PE736.493
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE737.394
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.756
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.502
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3736/2022
- Committee opinion: PE731.609
- Committee opinion: PE736.693
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0173/2023
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2023)012101
- Draft final act: 00072/2023/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2022)0134
Activities
- Paolo DE CASTRO
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2023/05/31 Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (debate)
- 2023/05/31 Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (debate)
- 2023/06/01 Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (A9-0173/2023 - Paolo De Castro) (vote)
- 2024/02/27 Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (debate)
- 2024/02/27 Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (debate)
- Clara AGUILERA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Danilo Oscar LANCINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Anne SANDER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Valter FLEGO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Eugenia RODRÍGUEZ PALOP
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Mazaly AGUILAR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Nicola BEER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Isabel CARVALHAIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Elena LIZZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Claude GRUFFAT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ladislav ILČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Franc BOGOVIČ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fabio Massimo CASTALDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles LEBRETON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emmanuel MAUREL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jiří POSPÍŠIL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc TARABELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Juozas OLEKAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sandra PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dino GIARRUSSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Irène TOLLERET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rosanna CONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Álvaro AMARO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Aurélia BEIGNEUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krzysztof JURGIEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maxette PIRBAKAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Lin LACAPELLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Achille VARIATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rafał ROMANOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)