Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | BORZAN Biljana ( S&D) | KOKALARI Arba ( EPP), GOZI Sandro ( Renew), CORMAND David ( Verts/ALE), JORON Virginie ( ID), MAZUREK Beata ( ECR), PELLETIER Anne-Sophie ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | TÓTH Edina ( NA) | Ulrike MÜLLER ( RE), Stelios KYMPOUROPOULOS ( PPE), Joanna KOPCIŃSKA ( ECR), Malte GALLÉE ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 114Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 593 votes to 21, with 14 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information.
The Commission's proposal aims to empower consumers to make better-informed transactional decisions to promote sustainable consumption, eliminate practices that undermine the sustainable economy and prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, and ensure better and consistent enforcement of the EU consumer protection legal framework.
The amending directive introduces specific rules in Union consumer law to tackle unfair commercial practices that mislead consumers and prevent them from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (‘greenwashing’), misleading information about the social characteristics of products or traders’ businesses, or non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels.
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the Commission's proposal as follows:
Misleading commercial practices
The amended text stressed that in order for consumers to be able to make better-informed decisions, the overall presentation of a product must not mislead them as to its environmental or social characteristics or aspects linked to circularity, such as durability, reparability or recyclability. It is therefore planned to amend Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices by adding environmental and social characteristics and aspects linked to circularity to the list of the main characteristics of a product for which the trader's practices may be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment.
A practice will also be misleading if it involves:
- an environmental claim relating to future environmental performance without clear, objective, publicly available and verifiable commitments set out in a detailed and realistic implementation plan which includes measurable and time-bound targets and other relevant elements required to support its achievement, such as resource allocation, and which is regularly verified by an independent third party expert, whose findings are made available to consumers;
- the advertising of benefits to consumers that are irrelevant and do not result from any feature of the product or business.
Amendments to Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights
Before the consumer is bound by a contract other than a distance or an off-premises contract, or any corresponding offer, the trader should provide the consumer with the following information in a clear and comprehensible manner:
- a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for goods and its main elements, including its minimum duration of two years , in a prominent manner, using the harmonised notice;
- where the producer offers the consumer a commercial guarantee of durability at no additional cost, covering the entire good and with a duration of more than two years and makes that information available to the trader, the information that that good benefits from such a guarantee, its duration and a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity, in a prominent manner, using the harmonised label;
- a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for digital content and digital services;
- where applicable, the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees;
- for goods with digital elements, for digital content and for digital services, where the producer or provider makes the information available to the trader, the minimum period, whether expressed as a period of time or by reference to a date, during which the producer or the provider provides software updates.
For distance contracts, the trader should provide information on the payment and delivery terms , including environmentally friendly delivery options where applicable, performance, the time by which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods or to perform the services and, where applicable, the trader’s complaint handling policy.
Harmonised notice and harmonised label
To ensure that consumers are well informed and can easily understand their rights throughout the Union, a harmonised notice and a harmonised label should be used for the provision of information.
Their layout and content will be specified by implementing acts. The harmonised notice and the harmonised label must be easily recognisable and understandable for consumers and easy to use and reproduce for professionals.
Misleading commercial practices in all circumstances
The amended text added new practices to the existing ‘blacklist’ of unfair commercial practices prohibited in all circumstances, such as:
- making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader’s entire business when it concerns only a certain aspect of the product or a specific activity of the trader’s business;
- claiming, based on the offsetting of greenhouse gas emissions, that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive impact on the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions;
- presenting a software update as necessary when it only enhances functionality features;
- any commercial communication in relation to a good containing a feature introduced to limit its durability despite information on the feature and its effects on the durability of the good being available to the trader;
- falsely claiming that under normal conditions of use a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or intensity;
- withholding information concerning the impairment of the functionality of a good when consumables, spare parts or accessories not supplied by the original producer are used, or falsely claiming that such impairment will happen.
Member States will have 24 months to transpose this amending Directive and should apply those measures from 30 months from the date of its entry into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 544 votes to 18, with 17 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information.
The matter has been referred to the competent committee for inter-institutional negotiations.
The proposal for a directive aims to introduce specific rules in EU consumer protection law to combat unfair commercial practices that mislead consumers and prevent them from making sustainable consumption choices, in particular practices related to early obsolescence of goods, false or misleading environmental claims ("greenwashing"), and non-transparent, non-certified and non-credible labels or sustainability information tools.
These rules would enable national competent bodies to effectively combat such practices. If environmental claims are reliable, clear, understandable and fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products.
This proposal aims to strengthen consumer rights by amending two directives that protect consumer interests at EU level: Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices and Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights.
The main amendments adopted in plenary are the following:
Amendments to Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights
The duration of the legal guarantee of conformity, as well as its voluntary extension in the form of an equivalent producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, covering the entire good, at no extra cost, are good indicators of a good’s durability. Members therefore propose to amend Directive 2011/83/EU to specifically require traders to provide, before the conclusion of the contract, a label indicating, as a minimum, a reminder of the legal guarantee of conformity and, if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability.
When the goods are made available to consumers and other end-users, the label should be displayed prominently and in a clearly legible way.
In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established, traders should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information , such as information about the availability and maximum price expected of the spare parts necessary to repair a good, including the minimum period after the purchase of the good during which spare parts and accessories are available, the procedure for ordering them, the availability of a user and repair manual as well as the availability of diagnosis and repair tools and services. This information should be provided to the respective traders by the producers of the goods.
When traders offer products in more than one Member State, they may opt to refer to the minimum Union period of two years of legal guarantee of conformity on the label referred to in Annex Z. Under this option, traders should ensure that the label is accompanied by a statement that reads that ‘a consumer benefits from a minimum legal guarantee of two years, unless a guarantee of more than two years is provided for under the applicable national law’.
Annex Z and labelling
Members proposed to include a new Annex to the proposed Directive. Annex Z should contain the content and format of the label. The label should indicate the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity and, if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability. It should be displayed prominently and in a way that is clearly legible to the consumer.
Amendments to Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices
Members proposed to add new practices to the existing ‘blacklist’ of unfair commercial practices prohibited in all circumstances, such as:
- making a generic environmental claim for which the trader does not provide evidence of the recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘natural’, ‘animal-friendly’, ‘cruelty-free’, ‘sustainable’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘deforestation-free’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘plastic neutral’, ‘plastic-free’, ‘biobased’, etc.
- claiming, based on carbon offsetting, that a product has a neutral, reduced, compensated or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment;
- making an environmental claim which cannot be substantiated in accordance with legal requirements;
- making the procedure of terminating a service significantly more burdensome than signing up to it;
- any marketing of a good as being identical or seemingly identical to the other good marketed in one or various Member States, while those goods have different composition or characteristics which have not been clearly marked on the packaging, so as to be visible to the consumer;
- omitting to inform the consumer in a clear and understandable manner that the functionality update is not necessary to keep the product in conformity;
- introducing a feature to limit the durability of a good;
- marketing a good without fixing a design issue, within a reasonable time after it became known, thus leading to the early failure of that good;
- marketing a good which does not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements or failing to inform the consumer that a good is not repairable;
- omitting to inform the consumer about the unavailability of spare parts and other repair restrictions;
- omitting to inform the consumer that the trader will refuse to repair a product that has previously been repaired by an independent professional, a non-professional or a user;
- marketing a good that requires replacing the consumables earlier than necessary for technical reasons;
- the fact that the same producer or trader offering the same product with disadvantageous terms or a shorter period of commercial guarantee in one or more Member States resulting in a disadvantageous situation for consumers;
- marketing a good which is not compliant with the requirements under Union product legislation.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Biljana BORZAN (S&D, HR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information.
The European Commission's proposal aims to regulate the market to ensure truthful and easily accessible sustainability information. Members propose measures to further strengthen the proposal. In particular, they suggest better regulation of sustainability labels and sustainability information tools, as well as environmental claims.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Amendments to Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights
Before the consumer is bound by a contract other than a distance or an off-premises contract, or any corresponding offer, the trader should provide the consumer with the following information in a clear and comprehensible manner, if that information is not already apparent from the context:
- for goods with digital elements, the minimum period in units of time, after the date of placement on the market, during which the producer provides software updates, which covers, as a minimum, the period as provided for in Union law and its voluntary extension, where the producer makes such information available for which the updates should be provided;
- information provided by the producer about the availability and maximum price expected of the spare parts necessary to repair goods, including the minimum period, after the purchase of the good, during which spare parts and accessories are available, the procedure of ordering them, and the availability of a user and repair manual, as well as the availability of diagnosis and repair tools and services.
When traders offer products in more than one Member State, they may opt to refer to the minimum Union period of two years of legal guarantee of conformity on the label referred to in Annex Z. Under this option, traders should ensure that the label is accompanied by a statement that reads that ‘a consumer benefits from a minimum legal guarantee of two years, unless a guarantee of more than two years is provided for under the applicable national law’.
Annex Z and labelling
Members proposed to include a new Annex to the proposed Directive. Annex Z should contain the content and format of the label. The label should indicate the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity and, if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability. It should be displayed prominently and in a way that is clearly legible to the consumer.
Amendments to Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices
Members proposed to add new practices to the existing ‘blacklist’ of unfair commercial practices prohibited in all circumstances, such as:
- making a generic environmental claim for which the trader does not provide evidence of the recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim;
- claiming, based on carbon offsetting, that a product has a neutral, reduced, compensated or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment;
- making an environmental claim which cannot be substantiated in accordance with legal requirements;
- any marketing of a good as being identical or seemingly identical to the other good marketed in one or various Member States, while those goods have different composition or characteristics which have not been clearly marked on the packaging, so as to be visible to the consumer;
- omitting to inform the consumer in a clear and understandable manner that the functionality update is not necessary to keep the product in conformity;
- introducing a feature to limit the durability of a good;
- marketing a good without fixing a design issue, within a reasonable time after it became known, thus leading to the early failure of that good;
- marketing a good which does not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements or failing to inform the consumer that a good is not repairable;
- omitting to inform the consumer about the unavailability of spare parts and other repair restrictions;
- omitting to inform the consumer that the trader will refuse to repair a product that has previously been repaired by an independent professional, a non-professional or a user;
- marketing a good that requires replacing the consumables earlier than necessary for technical reasons;
- the fact that the same producer or trader offering the same product with disadvantageous terms or a shorter period of commercial guarantee in one or more Member States resulting in a disadvantageous situation for consumers;
- marketing a good which is not compliant with the requirements under Union product legislation.
PURPOSE: to update EU consumer protection rules to empower consumers to act in favour of the green transition.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the proposal was one of the initiatives set out in the New Consumer Agenda and Circular Economy Action Plan and is a follow-up to the European Green Deal. Empowering consumers and providing them with cost-saving opportunities is a key building block of the sustainable product policy framework. This is to be achieved through the improved participation of consumers in the circular economy , in particular by providing better information on the durability and reparability of certain products to consumers before concluding the contract and stepping up the protection of consumers against unfair commercial practices that prevent sustainable purchases, such as: (i) greenwashing practices (i.e. misleading environmental claims); (ii) early obsolescence practices (i.e. premature failures of goods), and (iii) the use of unreliable and non-transparent sustainability labels and information tools.
CONTENT: this proposal aims to strengthen consumer rights by amending two directives that protect consumer interests at EU level: Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices and Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights.
(1) Amendments to the Consumer Rights Directive
The Commission proposes to oblige traders to provide consumers with pre-contractual information on the durability and reparability of products .
As regards the pre-contractual information to be provided to consumers when concluding contracts other than distance or off-premises contracts, six additional items are added to the list of information to be provided to the consumer in a clear and comprehensible manner, prior to purchase. These six additional items consist of:
- information on the existence and length, of a producer’s commercial guarantee of durability for all types of goods , when this information is made available by the producer;
- information that no information has been provided by the producer about the existence of a producer’s guarantee of durability for energy-using goods;
- the existence and length of the period during which the producer commits to providing software updates for goods with digital elements;
- the existence and length of the period during which the provider commits to providing software updates for digital content and digital services;
- the reparability score of the good as applicable under Union law;
- other repair information, should no reparability score be available at Union level – such as information on the availability of spare parts and a repair manual.
(2) Amendments to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD)
First, it is proposed to extend the list of product characteristics about which a trader cannot mislead consumers to cover the environmental or social impact , as well as the durability and reparability. New commercial practices are also included in the list of actions which are to be considered misleading if they cause or are likely to cause the average consumers to take a transactional decision that they would not have otherwise taken. In this regard, the proposal seeks to:
- making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets, and without an independent monitoring system;
- ensure that a trader cannot advertise benefits for consumers that are considered as a common practice in the relevant market;
- ensure that a trader can only compare products, including through a sustainability information tool, if they provide information about the method of the comparison, the products and suppliers covered, and the measures to keep information up to date.
Lastly, the Commission proposes to amend the UCPD by adding new practices to the existing ‘black list’ of prohibited unfair commercial practice , such as:
- displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities;
- making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim;
- making an environmental claim about the entire product when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product;
- presenting requirements imposed by law on all products in the relevant product category on the Union market as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer;
- omitting to inform the consumer that a software update will negatively impact the use of goods with digital elements or certain feature of those goods even if the software update improves the function of other features;
- omitting to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of a good introduced to limit its durability;
- claiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or intensity when it does not;
- presenting products as allowing repair when they do not or omitting to inform the consumer that goods do not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements;
- inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables of a good earlier than for technical reasons is necessary;
- failing to inform that a good has limited functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories not provided by the original producer.
These amendments aim to ensure legal certainty for traders, but also to facilitate enforcement of cases related to greenwashing and early obsolescence of products.
Documents
- Draft final act: 00064/2023/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0018/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE756.006
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2023)006275
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2023)006275
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE756.006
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T9-0201/2023
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0099/2023
- Committee opinion: PE736.396
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE737.362
- Committee draft report: PE736.537
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1950/2022
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0166
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0085
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0086
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0143
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2022)0166
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0085
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0086
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1950/2022
- Committee draft report: PE736.537
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE737.362
- Committee opinion: PE736.396
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T9-0201/2023
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2023)006275
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE756.006
- Draft final act: 00064/2023/LEX
Activities
- Anne-Sophie PELLETIER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Edina TÓTH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Eugen JURZYCA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marcel de GRAAFF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike MÜLLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan ŠTEFANEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tom VANDENKENDELAERE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sandra PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert HAJŠEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jordi CAÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adriana MALDONADO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Aurélia BEIGNEUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Malte GALLÉE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Donner aux consommateurs les moyens d’agir en faveur de la transition écologique - Empowering consumers for the green transition - Stärkung der Verbraucher für den ökologischen Wandel - A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan - Article 3, § 1 - Am 90 #
A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan - Annexe I, alinéa 1, point 2, Directive 2005/29/CE, Annexe I, après le point 4 ter - Am 89 #
A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan - Annexe I, alinéa 1, point 2, Directive 2005/29/CE, Annexe I, après le point 4 ter - Am 85 #
A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan - Annexe I, alinéa 1, point 4, Directive 2005/29/CE ,Annexe I, après le point 23 decies - Am 88 #
A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan - Proposition de la Commission #
A9-0099/2023 – Biljana Borzan – Provisional agreement – Am 91 #
Amendments | Dossier |
571 |
2022/0092(COD)
2022/10/14
ENVI
283 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader,
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader,
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union law. Until such a reparability score is established under Union law, national law providing for reparability scores applies.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union or national law.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union or national law.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 a (new) (31a) To allow small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to manage the necessary administrative measures, additional guidelines and administrative support should be foreseen by the Commission and the national authorities and provided to the SMEs.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1),
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established in accordance with Union or national law, traders should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information that is made available by the producer, such as information about the availability of spare parts, and a user and repair manual. When this information is not made available by the producer, consumers should be informed of it.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33)
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 a (new) (33a) The new requirements for compliance with the directives will place a certain burden on national authorities and the SME sector; the European Commission should therefore monitor to ensure that the transposition of the amended directives does not create excessive administrative burdens and that these operators benefit as predicted from a clearer legal framework, fair market practices and the expected elimination of barriers to cross-border trade;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 a (new) (33a) To promote the acceleration of more durable, repairable and reusable products in line with the circular economy principles, and to protect the consumers against unfair practices, an extended producer responsibility scheme should be applied.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU should continue to work as a ‘safety net’ ensuring that a high level of consumer protection and empowerment can be maintained in all sectors, by complementing sector and product-specific Union law that prevail in case of conflict.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35)
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely, enabling better informed transactional decisions by consumers to promote sustainable consumption, eliminating practices that cause damage to the sustainable economy and mislead consumers away from sustainable consumption choices, and ensuring a better and consistent application of the Union consumer legal framework, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States individually but can rather, by reason of the Union-wide character of the problem, including persistent non- tariff barriers to cross-border trade caused by unilateral measures put in place by individual EU countries, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35a) To maintain the policy of promoting sustainable consumption, a sanctions regime is required for practices listed in Annex I of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005. Products and services sold by one or more traders who have not ensured that such products and services comply with Annex II of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, including products and services that come from outside the EU or are sold by one or more traders from outside the EU, should be prohibited.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35a) In order to facilitate effective enforcement especially with regard to third countries, it is necessary for increased resources to be made available to the competent authorities to enable them to clarify if manufacturers or distributors were forced to make falsified statements about the lifespan of a product, as such an action would undermine the integrity of the internal market. Therefore, to avoid fraud, non- compliance and lower standards with imports increased vigilance and monitoring by the competent authorities on all sides will be required, particularly in relation to online marketplaces.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 b (new) (35b) To enable the consumers to fully understand the information they receive, the information provided should be clear and precise. Additional or superfluous information could lead to confusion.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or indicates that a product or trader has a positive, minor or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (oa) ‘offsetting’ means a claim that the acquisition of credits or provision of financial support for environmental projects elsewhere, such as the purchase of carbon credits, compensates for the purchaser's own environmental impact, or that of their goods or services. Offsetting is typically achieved through financial support for projects. This financial support is typically provided through the purchase of carbon credits (for greenhouse gases mitigation projects) or plastic credits (for plastic recovery projects;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o b (new) (ob) ‘fossil fuels’ means all fuels formed from hydrocarbon deposits (including, but not limited to, oil, fossil gas, and coal), the burning or combustion of which releases greenhouse gases;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o c (new) (oc) ‘specific environmental claim’ means an explicit environmental claim on a given environmental aspect whereby the specification of the claim is provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o d (new) (od) ‘pre-approval of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment to be performed by a Union or national authority;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p (p) ‘explicit environmental or social claim’ means an environmental or social claim that is in textual form or contained in a sustainability label;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental or social claim’ means any explicit environmental or social claim, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new) (qa) ‘specific environmental claim’ means an explicit environmental claim whereby the specification of the claim is provided in the immediate proximity of the claim in clear and prominent terms on the same medium ;
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental or social aspects or both and for which criteria are publicly available free of cost, developed and periodically updated in independent processes and reflecting significant improvements compared to common practice in the relevant market or Union minimum product requirements, if applicable. This does not cover any mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental or social aspects or both. Sustainability labels not established by national authorities shall, as a minimum, be in line with EN ISO 14024 type 1 standard. This does not cover any mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) ‘pre-approval of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment to be performed by an Union body or competent national authority’
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) ‘pre-approval of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment to be performed by a competent national authority;
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under transparent, fair and non- discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under transparent, fair and non- discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product complies with certain requirements, and for which the monitoring of compliance is objective, based on international, Union or national standards and procedures and
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme related to a sustainability label that is open under transparent, fair and non-
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under transparent, fair and non- discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product complies with certain
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s)
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s a (new) (sa) "offsetting" means a claim that the acquisition of credits or provision of financial support for environmental projects elsewhere, such as the purchase of carbon credits, compensates for the purchasers own environmental impact, or that of their goods or services. Offsetting is typically achieved through financial support for projects. This financial support is typically provided through the purchase of carbon credits (for greenhouse gases mitigation projects) or plastic credits (for plastic recovery projects);
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t (t) ‘sustainability information tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t (t) ‘sustainability information tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects. In the case of comparison, this comparison shall be objective by, in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products being compared;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) ‘recognised excellent environmental performance’ means environmental performance compliant with Regulation (EC) 66/2010 of the European
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) ‘recognised excellent environmental performance’ means environmental performance compliant with Regulation (EC) 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council*, with national or regional EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabelling schemes officially recognised in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) 66/2010, or top environmental performance in accordance with other applicable Union law corresponding indicatively to 10-20% of the products available in the Union market in terms of environmental performance; __________
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u (
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new) (ua) ‘offsetting’ means the claim that a purchase or other acquisition of credits, such as carbon or plastic credits, or financial support for environmental projects elsewhere compensates for the purchaser's environmental impact, including impacts of services it provides;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) ‘software update’ means
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w a (new) (wa) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given device, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device or bring it into conformity;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w a (new) (wa) ‘security update’ means a security update as defined in point 35 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU).../... [ecodesign implementing Regulation for tablets and smartphones];
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w b (new) (wb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the device in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities or implement new functionalities;
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w b (new) (wb) ‘functionality update’ means a security update as defined in point 36 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU).../... [ecodesign implementing Regulation for tablets and smartphones];
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) 'extended producer responsibility scheme' means 'extended producer responsibility scheme' as defined in Article 3, point (21), of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a; ____ 1a Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) ‘offsetting’ means a purchase of credits, such as carbon or plastic credits, or provision of financial support for environmental projects, such as reforestation and renewable energy installations, to compensate for the purchaser's own environmental impact, or that of their goods or services;
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) ‘social impact’ means an effect on people and communities that happens as a result of an action or inaction related with the manufacturing, labour conditions and trading process of any marketed good;
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (ya) "commercially sensitive information" means information that, if disclosed, could prejudice a supplier's commercial interest e.g. trade secrets, profit margins or new ideas as referred to in the Communication from the Commission1a __________________ 1a Communication from the Commission Communication on the protection of confidential information by national courts in proceedings for the private enforcement of EU competition law 2020/C 242/01 (OJ C 242, 22.7.2020, p. 1).
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) ‘pre-approval of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment to be performed by a Union or national authority ;
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) ‘fossil fuels’ means all fuels formed from hydrocarbon deposits (including, but not limited to, oil, fossil gas, and coal), the burning or combustion of which releases greenhouse gases;
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y b (new) (yb) ‘specific environmental claim’ means an explicit environmental claim on a given environmental aspect whereby the specification of the claim is provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium ;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y b (new) (yb) ‘social claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or indicates that a product, company or trader has a positive or non- negative social impact or is less damaging to indigenous or vulnerable sectors of population than other products or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y c (new) (yc) ‘recognised social performance’ means social performance compliant with top social performance in accordance with corporate social responsibility, corporate sustainability reporting, due diligence regulation and other applicable Union law on the subject such as sustainable corporate governance;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact through the whole production chain, accessories, durability, reparability, upgradability, reusability, recyclability, the single-use nature, the right to return to the producer, after-
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance based on offsetting schemes, or without clear, objective and verifiable reduction commitments
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system that is certified by international, Union or national standards and/or endorsed by public authorities;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) ‘(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective, sufficiently specific and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system;
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) advertising benefits for consumers
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) making a social claim without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system;
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. Where a trader provides a service which compares products, including through a sustainability information tool, information about whether that tool has been pre-approved in accordance with minimum requirements, the method of comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, as well as the measures in
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. By... [12 months from adoption], the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16a to supplement this Directive by establishing minimum requirements in relation to sustainability labels and sustainability information tools. When adopting the delegated acts, the Commission shall ensure award criteria are publicly available free of cost, developed in an independent process, periodically revised, and reflecting significant improvements compared to common practice in the relevant market or Union product requirements, if applicable, with an impartial control procedure, including third party verification and transparency of the scheme owner. The Commission shall ensure accessibility to all market players, procedural transparency for consumers, scientific robustness and stakeholder relevance and compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms. If a sustainability label or a sustainability information tool is focused on one particular environmental aspect, this shall be clearly and prominently communicated to consumers. For the sake of transparency, all sustainability labels established by public authorities and all pre-approved sustainability labels and sustainability information tools shall be published in a publicly available online register, which is to be updated regularly by the competent national authorities.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. By ...[12 months from adoption], the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16a to supplement this Directive by establishing minimum requirements in relation to sustainability labels and sustainability information tools. When adopting the delegated acts, the Commission shall ensure award criteria are publicly available free of cost, developed in an independent process, periodically revised, and reflecting significant improvements compared to common practice in the relevant market or Union product requirements, if applicable, with an impartial control procedure, including third party verification and transparency of the scheme owner. The Commission shall ensure accessibility to all market players, procedural transparency for consumers, scientific robustness and stakeholder relevance and compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms. If a sustainability label or a sustainability information tool is focused on one particular environmental aspect, this shall be clearly and prominently communicated to consumers. For the sake of transparency, all pre-approved sustainability labels and sustainability information tools shall be published in a publicly available online register, which is to be updated regularly by the competent national authorities.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. This Directive shall not discourage the development of industry-led initiatives that meaningfully contribute to achieving the Union’s sustainability objectives. Such initiatives play a crucial role in encouraging behavioural change towards more sustainable choices.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. The Commission shall adopt an implementing act specifying the details of the approval procedure for sustainability labels and sustainability information tools referred to in paragraph 8. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 16b.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Sustainability labels shall be accessible to all businesses regardless of their size and financial capability. Certification schemes and sustainability labels that foster the incremental uptake of sustainable practices by microbusinesses, small and medium enterprises shall be encouraged.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 16 a (new) (3a) The following article is inserted: ‘Article 16a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 7(7a) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of six years from...[one month after entry into force of this Directive]. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 7(7a) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State acting in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 7(7a) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.’
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 16 b (new) (3b) The following article is inserted: ‘Article 16b Committee procedure 1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee. That Committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.’
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (3a) ‘energy-using good’ means any good that depends on energy input (electricity, fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended; it covers only durable non-perishable goods;
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (14a) ‘commercial guarantee of durability’ means a
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on a harmonised method established in accordance with Union law;
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea)
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea)
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a free commercial guarantee of durability and its duration in units of time, where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two years;
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods, where the producer makes
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e b (
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (eb) for
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ea), the information on the updates shall be provided
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services,
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (
Amendment 214 #
(eda) in addition to the guaranteed lifespan label for the goods, digital content and digital services, including as a minimum, a reminder of the existence and duration of the legal guarantee of conformity, the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees, where applicable;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) where applicable, the reparability score or carbon footprint for the goods;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of the spare parts
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma)
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma)
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all goods, where the producer makes
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all types of goods, where the producer makes it available, information
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b (
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b (mb) for
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 235 #
(mda) the guaranteed lifespan label for the goods, digital content and digital services, including as a minimum, a reminder of the existence and duration of the legal guarantee of conformity.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d a (new) (mda) for all goods, digital content and digital services referred to in points (ma), (mb), (mc) and (md), the consumer shall have the opportunity to proactively, before the finalisation of the purchase, through an online form confirm being aware of the availability, or absence thereof, of commercial guarantees and software updates;
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) where applicable, the reparability score or carbon footprint for the goods;
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual.; with regard to SMEs, there shall be additional support and guidance in order to enable them to provide this information;
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (4a) in Article 24 paragraph 1, point (a) is inserted as follows: (a) Member States may suspend or prohibit certain products or services imported from outside the EU or sold by one or more traders from outside the EU, until an audit has been carried out by the competent authorities or, failing that, until compliance with the criteria in Annex II to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 has been duly attested.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall analyse in detail the impact of the new rules on the elimination of existing non-tariff barriers to cross- border trade, on the effectiveness of action by national consumer protection authorities and on the level of adjustment burden in the SME sector.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive and on the level of progress achieved to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) That report shall include an assessment of the pre-approval of sustainability labels with a view to harmonise it at Union-level.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from [
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 2a. Displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label or a sustainability information tool which is not based on a certification scheme
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label or a sustainability information tool which is not based on a certification scheme pre- approved by a national authority or Union authority or not established by public authorities.;
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a a (new) 2aa. Displaying the environmental claim "biodegradable", "compostable" or equivalent with regards to plastic or bio- plastic where composting of biodegradable plastic is not possible in a large proportion of waste enterprises.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a a (new) 2aa. Displaying a sustainability label based on different classes of performance, when the available classes are not clearly provided in the same graphic representation to allow for clear comparison.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a a (new) 2aa. Displaying a sustainability label based on different levels of performance, when the existing classes are not clearly provided in the same graphic representation to allow for clear comparison.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 a 4a. Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim in an easily accessible format and stating the respective Union law or ecolabelling scheme.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 a a (new) 4aa. Making a generic social impact claim.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader´s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or aspect of the trader´s business.;
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental or social claim about the entire product that is not covered by a sustainability label when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product.;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or trader’s organisation when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or trader’s organisation.;
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the traders business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or the traders business.;
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader’s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or the trader’s business.;
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader’s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or of the trader’s business.;
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b a (new) 4ba. Claiming that a good, service or organisation has a reduced, neutral or positive impact on climate or the environment based on offsetting.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b a (new) 4ba. Claiming that a good, business or a service has a neutral, reduced, compensated, positive (or similar) environmental impact based on offsetting.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b a (new) 4ba. Making an environmental claim which cannot be substantiated in accordance with legal requirements.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b a (new) 4ba. Claiming that a good, service or business has a neutral or positive environment impact due to offsetting.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b b (new) 4bb. Making a specific environmental claim which the trader is not able to substantiate using a relevant assessment method and communication rules recognised or established in accordance with national or Union law.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b b (new) 4bb. Making an environmental claim with the effect of promoting fossil fuel products, fossil fuel transportation (save services of general economic interest) or highly polluting industries.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b b (new) 4bb. Making an environmental claim that would lead to promotion of fossil fuel products or highly polluting products or activities.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b c (new) 4bc. Making an environmental claim on the content of the product based on an accounting method that allows for the free allocation of inputs to final outputs, without telling consumers that only a residual amount of the input in question was actually fed into the production process of the final product offered for sale.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b c (new) 4bc. Making an environmental claim with the effect of promoting fossil fuel products, fossil fuel transportation or highly polluting industries. This shall not apply to services of general economic interest.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b d (new) 4bd. Making an environmental claim on the content of the product based on an accounting method that allows for the free allocation of inputs to final outputs, while omitting to inform the consumer that only a residual amount of the input in question was fed into the production process of the final product offered for sale.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b d (new) 4bd. Making a specific environmental claim without using a relevant assessment method and communication rules both established in accordance with Union or national law.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b b (new) 4bb. Claiming that a good, business or a service has a neutral, reduced, compensated, positive environmental impact based on offsetting.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b c (new) 4bc. Making an environmental claim with the effect of promoting fossil fuel products, fossil fuel transportation or highly polluting industries, apart from services of general economic interest.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b d (new) 4bd. Making an environmental claim on the content of the product based on an accounting method that allows for the free allocation of inputs to final outputs, without telling consumers that only a residual amount of the input in question was actually fed into the production process of the final product offered for sale.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b e (new) 4be. Making a specific environmental claim without using a relevant assessment method and communication rules both established in accordance with Union or national law.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d a (new) 23da. Claiming that a good has a neutral or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d b (new) 23db. Supplying a software update which will negatively impact the use of goods with digital elements or certain features of those goods even if the software update improves the functioning of other features.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, hindering or preventing their servicing, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d c (new) 23dc. Omitting to inform the consumer in a clear and understandable manner that the update is not necessary to keep the product in conformity.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e a (new) 23ea. Omitting to inform that the seller will refuse to perform a repair on a product that has previously been repaired by an independent professional or non- professionals and users.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e a (new) 23ea. Engaging in practices that lead to shortening a product’s lifespan and stimulate the purchase of a new product.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e b (new) 23eb. Omitting to inform the consumer about a design or feature which will limit repair by end users or independent professionals.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e b (new) 23eb. Marketing a good without fixing, within a reasonable time, a design issue that leads to an early failure of this good.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental or social claims
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g 23g.
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g a (new) 23ga. Omitting to inform the consumer that the seller will refuse to perform a repair on a product that has previously been repaired by an independent professional or end user.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g a (new) 23ga. Omitting to inform the consumer about the unavailability of spare parts and other repair restrictions.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g a (new) 23ga. Omitting to inform the consumer about a design or feature limiting its repairment.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g b (new) 23gb. Omitting to inform the consumer about a design or feature which will limit repair by end users or independent professionals.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h. Inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables of a good earlier than for technical reasons is necessary by omitting information about available and adequate repairs.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”),
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29 Annex I – point 23 i a (new) 23ia. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 of Directive 2019/771, the offering by the same manufacturer of different warranty and repair conditions for the same product model in different EU Member States in whose territory the good is placed on the market and put into service;
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i a (new) 23ia. Marketing a good which is not compliant with the requirements under Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. __________________ 1a Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285 31.10.2009, p. 10).
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i a (new) 23ia. Marketing a good which is not compliant with the requirements under Regulation (EU) .../... [Regulation on ecodesign for sustainable products].
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i a (new) 23ia. Engaging in practices that lead to shortening a product’s lifespan and stimulate the purchase of a new product.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i a (new) 23ia. Engaging in practices that foreseeably lead to shortening a product’s lifespan.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i b (new) 23ib. Marketing a good without fixing a design issue that leads to an early failure of this good, within a reasonable time after it became known.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i b (new) 23ib. Marketing a good without remedying a design issue that leads to a reduced lifetime, within a reasonable time after it became known.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i c (new) 23ic. Bundling security updates with functionality, feature or other software updates.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are fair, clear and understandable, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i c (new) 23ic. Bundling security updates with functionality, feature or other software updates.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact, durability or reparability of their products, including through the overall presentation of the products, Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended by adding the environmental or social impact, durability and reparability of the product to the list of the main characteristics of the product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on the social sustainability of products, such as working conditions, charity contributions or animal welfare, should not mislead consumers either. Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit making generic social claims.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Where manufacturers face challenges in providing accurate information on durability due to the sourcing of different parts from different sellers or supply chains, sufficient time for implementation is to be foreseen to allow accurate information to be gathered.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) In order to provide the correct amount of information to the consumers, the different degrees of information already provided to the consumers in each Member State should be taken into account.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the fairness and
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case- by-case assessment, when they are based on offsetting schemes or are not supported by clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Social claims should take into account compliance with future due diligence requirements set by the Union and be supported by independent monitoring systems. Such claims should cover the entire supply chain and manufacturing process of the products.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Environmental claims related to future environmental performance should only be used at the trader level and not on the product level.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Another potentially misleading commercial practice which should be added to the specific practices targeted by Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC is advertising benefits for consumers that are actually a common practice in the relevant market. For example, if the absence of a chemical substance is a common practice in a specific product market, its promotion as a distinctive feature of the product could constitute an unfair commercial practice. It is therefore in essence advertising the uniqueness of something that is, in fact, common practice.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Comparing products or services based on their environmental or social aspects, including through the use of sustainability information tools or their greenhouse gas emission balance (‘carbon footprint’), is an increasingly common marketing technique. In order to ensure that such comparisons do not mislead consumers, Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to require that the consumer is provided with information about the method of the comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, and the measures to keep information up to date. This should ensure that consumers make better informed transactional decisions when using such services. The comparison should be objective by, in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products being compared.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools which are not based on a certificat
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools which
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools which are not based on a certification scheme
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools which were not pre-approved by a Union body or a national authority and which are not based on an accredited certification scheme or not established by public authorities should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. The certification scheme should fulfil
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) In cases where the displaying of a sustainability label involves a commercial communication that s
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) To support innovation and investment in sustainable practices and products, industry-led and private-label initiatives which meet high sustainability standards based on third-party certifications will continue to play a key role in the green transition.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental or social claims without recognised excellent environmental or social performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental or social claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘eco-friendly packaging’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘bio based’, ‘deforestation-free’, ‘green-dot’, ‘sustainable’, ‘socially just’, ‘socially aware’, ‘poverty-free’, ‘fair trade product’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’, ‘concerned’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental or social performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is no excellent environmental or social performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. For example, the claim ‘biodegradable’, referring to a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that ‘the packaging’ is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific claim, which does not fall under this prohibition. The same would apply with social claims: the claim ‘socially just’ would be generic whilst claiming that ‘the manufacturing and trading process of the marketed good complies with Corporate Social Responsibility or Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Governance regulations’, in the framework of due diligence principles, would be a specific claim.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon offset’, ‘carbon compensated’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘plastic offset’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘bio degradable’, ‘bio based’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever on claims neutrality or offsetting through, for example, purchase of carbon credits, or whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘plastic neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever the
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘carbon offset’, ‘carbon compensated’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘plastic offset’, ‘plastic neutral’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’, ‘offset’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated based on applicable rules established in the Union or national legislation, or whenever the specification of the claim
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘sustainable’, ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘cruelty-free’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit environmental claims being made that state that a good has a neutral or positive carbon emissions’ impact on the environment. Examples of such environmental claims are ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘CO2 neutral’, ‘carbon neutral certified’. Such claims should be prohibited as they imply carbon emissions’ neutrality which is scientifically impossible to substantiate. Sustainability labels containing environmental claims should also be prohibited.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Excellent environmental performance can be demonstrated by compliance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 , or officially recognised type 1 ecolabelling schemes in the Member States, or compliance with top environmental performance for a specific environmental aspect in accordance with other applicable Union laws, such as a class A in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 . The excellent environmental performance in question should be relevant to the claim. For example, a generic claim ‘energy efficient’ could be made based on excellent environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369. By contrast, a generic claim ‘biodegradable’ could not be made based on excellent environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, insofar as there are no requirements for biodegradability in the specific EU Ecolabel criteria related to the product in question. __________________ 22 Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Excellent social performance can be demonstrated by compliance with applicable Union law on the subject, especially with the regulations to be set on due diligence as well as on sustainable corporate governance.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Another misleading commercial practice which should be prohibited in all circumstances and thus added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is making an environmental or social claim about the entire product when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product. This would be the case for example when a product is marketed as ‘made with recycled material’ giving the impression that the entire product is made of recycled material, when in fact it is only the packaging that is made of recycled material
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The Circular Economy Action Plan24 provides for the need to set the rules on environmental claims using Product and Organisation Environmental Footprint methods. Additional requirements on environmental claims will have to be set in specific Union legislation. Those new requirements will contribute to the Green Deal25 objective of enabling buyers to make more sustainable and fair decisions and reduce the risk of greenwashing through reliable, comparable and verifiable information. __________________ 24 COM(2020)98 final, 11 March 2020.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products within the relevant product category on the Union market, including imported products, as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer, should also be prohibited in all circumstances and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. This prohibition could apply, for example, when a trader is advertising that a given product does not include a specific chemical substance while that substance is already forbidden by law for all products within that product category in the Union, and this prohibition is sufficiently well known to the general public. Conversely, the prohibition should not cover commercial practices promoting traders’ or products’ compliance with legal requirements that only apply to some products but not to other competing products of the same category on the Union market, such as products of non-EU origin.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore,
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices are also likely to reduce the amount of waste and the unnecessary consumption of resources, contributing thereby to a more sustainable consumption.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers and contribute to the achievement of the European Green Deal’s objectives, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices are also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) In order to improve the welfare of the consumer , the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address the way in which software updates are presented to consumers. The bundling of security updates with other types of updates, such as feature or functionality updates, should be prohibited in order to ensure that consumers are protected from unwanted content when making their purchasing decision. To further strengthen consumer information, consumers should in all cases be informed in a clear and understandable manner whether the update is necessary to keep the product inconformity.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to omit to inform the consumer
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available. It should include separate information about availability of security updates and about functionality updates that should be provided independently. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029 and (EU) 2019/77130 of the European Parliament and of the Council. __________________ 27 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity, including the voluntary extensions provided by the trader or the producer without additional cost to the consumer, as well as the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771 if provided without additional cost. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders selling goods to inform consumers about the existence of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability for all types of goods, where the producer makes this information available. In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the seller’s liability for lack of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the fact that many product failures occur after two years, the trader’s obligation to inform consumers about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability should apply to guarantees that are of more than two years.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Another observed commercial practice which should be classified as unfair in all circumstances is where the manufacturer applies different warranty and repair conditions for the same product model depending on the Member State in which the product is to be placed on the market; for example, for the same washing machine model a manufacturer offers a five-year warranty in one Member State and only three years in another, which creates discrimination and double standards in the treatment of consumers in the target markets; without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 of Directive 2019/771, such practices should be prohibited;
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) The problem of limited durability contrary to consumer expectations is most relevant for energy-using goods, which are goods that function from an external energy source. Consumers are also most interested in receiving information about the expected durability of this category of goods. For these reasons, con
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) The second-hand market plays a contributory role in the green transition, therefore to facilitate its specificities the legal and commercial guarantees of durability should be attached to the products, not the sellers.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) In order to make it easier for consumers to take an informed transactional decision when comparing goods before concluding a contract, traders
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) In order to make it easier for consumers to take an informed transactional decision when comparing goods before concluding a contract, traders should inform consumers about the existence and duration, of the producer’s voluntary commercial guarantee of durability for the entire good and not for specific components of the good.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 source: 737.299
2022/11/24
IMCO
288 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is marketing goods that induc
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit omitting to inform the consumer that
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) (21a) Audiovisual commercial communication influence consumer behaviour and encourage consumption of displayed products. Commercial communication are responsible for generating transactional decisions that would not have been taken otherwise. In order to engage consumers in the green transition, it is necessary that commercial communication be reserved for goods compatible with our environmental goals. Accordingly, those goods who have the worst environmental impact should be precluded from being promoted through commercial communications.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract, through clear and easy-to-understand labels or, when such labels are not required under Union or national law, through minimum information requirements. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available in accordance with requirements under Union or national law, which is as a minimum, for a period of time that the consumer may reasonably expect. Free software updates should include both security and functionality updates, to be provided independently from each other. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029 and (EU) 2019/77130 of the European Parliament and of the Council. __________________ 27 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, where it can be reasonably assessed, consumers
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available, including both security and other, functionality or features updates, which should be provided independently. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029 and (EU) 2019/77130 of the European Parliament and of the Council. __________________ 27 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Another commercial practice observed, which should be classified as unfair in all circumstances, is when a producer offers a different commercial guarantee and repair conditions for the same model of product depending on the Member State where the product is to be offered. For example, a manufacturer offers a five-year commercial guarantee period for the same model of washing machine in one Member State and only a three-year period in another Member State, which bears the hallmarks of discrimination and double standards in the treatment of consumers in the target markets. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 of Directive 2019/771 and respecting different periods of legal guarantee and its impact on the total length of the commercial guarantee and the legal guarantee, such practices should be prohibited.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the seller’s liability for lack of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer commits to provide software updates for such goods.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader, commits to provide software updates, including security updates, necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader,
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable as a first step, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union or national law.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1),
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, the minimum period for
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 a (new) (33a) Given the key role played by small and medium-sized enterprises in the transition to a more local and circular economy, the Member States and the Commission shall take measures to help them face the administrative and financial burdens.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely, enabling better informed transactional decisions by consumers to promote sustainable consumption, supporting a more local and circular economy, eliminating practices that cause damage to the sustainable economy and mislead consumers away from sustainable consumption choices, and ensuring a better and consistent application of the Union consumer legal framework, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States individually but can rather, by reason of the Union-wide character of the problem, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 a (new) (36a) The Commission should present easy-to-understand guidelines for businesses with the requirements of this Regulation. When developing such guidelines, the Commission should take into consideration needs of SMEs so as to keep administrative and financial burdens to a minimum while facilitating their compliance with this Regulation. The Commission should consult relevant stakeholders, with expertise in the field of marketing.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 b (new) (36b) Consumer-led review systems based on clear and transparent process can be considered a part of independent monitoring system.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 c (new) (36c) Sustainability labels established by public authorities should be accessible to all businesses regardless of their size and financial capability. Certification schemes and sustainability labels that foster the incremental uptake of sustainable practices by small and medium enterprises should be encouraged.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part (1) in Article 2, the following points (o) to (
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation in any form, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law,
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies that a product, group or category of product, brand or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (oa) ‘generic social claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, or specific and based on a certification scheme, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies that a product or trader has been produced in accordance with social justice issues such as gender or racial equality, or that a trader made specific commitments towards fundamental rights, labour norms' respect or working conditions throughout the conception, the manufacturing process of the product and its components, and its distribution, compared to other products or traders;
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any explicit environmental claim, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium or through digital means where space limitations on the same medium would otherwise not allow for specification;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means an
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 –paragraph 1 – point q a (new) (qa) ‘substantiated generic environmental claim’ means a generic environmental claim based on clear, verifiable and scientific methods or standards whose specification is provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, or made available digitally at the point of purchase.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental or social aspects or both , and for which criteria are publicly available free of cost, developed and regularly updated through independent processes, while reflecting significant improvements compared to minimum product requirements under Union or national law. This does not cover any mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) 'pre-approval procedure’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment of the environmental claim, sustainability label or sustainability information tool by an EU body or a national competent authority based on requirements and criteria established in accordance with Union or national law;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) 'Pre-approval of sustainability labels or sustainability information tools' means an ex-ante conformity assessment to be performed by a European or national authority;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under transparent, fair and non- discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product, a process, or a business complies with certain requirements, and for which the monitoring of compliance is objective, based on international, Union or national standards and procedures taking into account the nature of the products, processes, or businesses concerned and
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open to the participating traders under transparent, fair and non-
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s a (new) (sa) ‘An independent monitoring system’ is a certified auditing procedure, or is endorsed by a public authority or is validated by a Non-Governmental Organisation.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t (t) ‘sustainability information and comparison tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) ‘recognised
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) ‘durability’ means
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) (va) ‘premature obsolescence’ means practices that lead to the shortening of a product’s lifespan, either through its design or by not providing essential elements required for the product’s functioning;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) ‘software update’ means a free update,
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) ‘mandatory software update’ means a free update, including a security update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) ‘software update’ means a
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point w a (new) (wa) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given good, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device or bring it into conformity;
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w b (new) (wb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the good in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities or implement new functionalities;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) ‘consumable’ means any component of a good that is used up recurrently and needs to be replaced or replenished for the good to function as intended;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) "Dark pattern" an interaction design that materially distorts or impairs, either on purpose or in effect, the ability of consumers to make autonomous and informed choices or decisions, and persuades them to engage in unwanted behaviours or into undesired decisions which have negative consequences for them.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) ‘offsetting’ means the purchase of credits, such as carbon or plastic credits, or provision of financial support for environmental projects, such as reforestation and renewable energy installation, to allegedly compensate for the purchaser’s own environmental impact, or of their goods or services.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact where applicable or required by product-specific legislation, accessories, durability
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact such as working conditions, origin of the product, charity contributions or animal welfare, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition,
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a (b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c (aa) in paragraph 2, point (c) is replaced by the following: ‘(c) any marketing of a good, in one Member State,
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part (b) in paragraph 2, the following points (d), (e) and (
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system, such an independent monitoring system can be carried out by consumers who review, provided that it is based on a clear and transparent methodology;
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system that is based on publicly accessible data, including by consumers;
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, evidence- based, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system;
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) advertising as a distinctive part of the product benefits for consumers that are considered as a common practice in the relevant market according to Union and national law and public authorities guidelines.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) advertising
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) advertising benefits for consumers that are considered as a common practice in the relevant market, provided it is used as a unique selling point.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) any designs or practices of dark pattern.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2005/29/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. Where a trader provides a service which compares or rates products, including through a sustainability information tool,
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (3a) In Article 9, the following point is added: ‘(ea) the use of dark patterns.’
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Article 12 a (new) Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (aa) point 14 is amended as follows: ‘(14) ‘commercial guarantee’ means any undertaking by the trader or a producer
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (14a) ‘commercial guarantee of durability’ means a
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b (14b) ‘durability’ means
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score to be made known to the consumer when they are purchasing new equipment, expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on a method established in accordance with Union law;
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on a method established
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 e (14e) ‘software update’ means a free update,
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14e a (new) (14ea) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given good, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device or bring it into conformity;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14e b (new) (14eb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the good in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities or implement new functionalities;
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (-a) in paragraph 1, point (e) is replaced by the following: (e) in addition to a reminder of the
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – introductory part (a) the following points (ea) to (e
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – introductory part (a) the
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods,
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods,
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods,
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (ea) for all goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a commercial guarantee
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (eb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (ea), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b (eb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (ea), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements, where
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c (ec) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the provider
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d (ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point ed a (new) (eda) The manufacturer of the product shall provide the relevant information on sustainable consumption choices to all other traders interacting with the customers for the purpose of delivering such an information to customers. The traders who do not act as the manufacturers of the product shall be responsible for presenting all required information. The manufacturer shall be responsible for the accuracy and correctness of the information unless it concerns an obvious or otherwise easy to discover false claim for a diligent economic operator.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point ed a (new) (eda) The producer shall make available the information referred to in paragraph 1(ea), 1(eb) 1(ec) and 1(ed) to the trader. The producer shall make reasonable efforts to inform the trader of any changes or updates thereof. Where the producer does not make available the information or fails to inform the trader of any changes or updates, the trader shall not be held liable for failing to comply with paragraph 1(ea), 1(eb) 1(ec) and 1(ed).
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the following point
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) where applicable and where the provider makes such information available, the reparability score for the goods;
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (i), information that the producer has not provided information on the reparability score. This information shall be displayed in a prominent way;
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/UE Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the period during which they shall be available and the procedure of ordering them,
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when point (i) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual, where this is required by product-specific legislation.;
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) when
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new) (ja) where applicable, the information that the producer makes it possible, and provides access to the third party producers to information that facilitates manufacturing of replacement parts.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (-a) point (g) is replaced by the following: ‘(g) the arrangements for payment, delivery, performance, the time by which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods or to perform the services, the environmental impact of the delivery and the existence of more sustainable delivery options and, where applicable, the trader’s complaint handling policy;’;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point l (
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1– point l (-a) point (l) is amended as follows: ‘(l) a reminder of the existence and duration of a legal guarantee of conformity for goods;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part (a) the following points (ma) to (m
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part (a)
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all types of goods,
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a (ma) for all types of goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a commercial guarantee of durability and its duration
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all types of goods,
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a (ma) for all types of goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a commercial guarantee
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b (mb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available information referred to in point (ma), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements, where
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements,
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c (mc) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides necessary software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ma), the information on the updates shall be provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial guarantee of durability;
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the provider
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d (md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point md a (new) (mda) The manufacturer of the product shall provide the relevant information on sustainable consumption choices to all other traders interacting with the customers for the purpose of delivering such an information to customers. The traders who do not act as the manufacturers of the product shall be responsible for presenting all required information. The manufacturer shall be responsible for the accuracy and correctness of the information unless it concerns an obvious or otherwise easy to discover false claim for a diligent economic operator.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point md a (new) (mda) The producer shall make available the information referred to in paragraph 1(ea), 1(eb) 1(ec) and 1(ed) to the trader. The producer shall make reasonable efforts to inform the trader of any changes or updates thereof. Where the producer does not make available the information or fails to inform the trader of any changes or updates, the trader shall not be held liable for failing to comply with paragraph 1(ea), 1(eb) 1(ec) and 1(ed).
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – introductory part (b) the following point
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point u Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) where applicable, the reparability score for the goods, including information on the availability of spare part and their cost;
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point u (u) where applicable, and where the provider makes such information available the reparability score for the goods;
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new) (ua) where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (u), information that the producer has not provided information on the reparability score. This information shall be displayed in a prominent way.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual, where this is required by product-specific legislation.;
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts and their cost, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual.;
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) when
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) (va) where applicable, the information that the producer makes it possible, and provides access to the third party producers to information that facilitates manufacturing of replacement parts.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 2011/83/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) (va) the place where the goods shall, where applicable, be returned to by the customer.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 2011/83/EU Article 11 a (new) Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report shall contain an assessment if the Directive contributed to the removal of the non-tariff barriers to the trade of sustainable products and services in the internal market and achieved the objective of enhancing the protection of consumers against unfair commercial practices and misleading advertising of products advertised as sustainable as well as a summary of positive and negative effects on businesses, and in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council. The Commission shall assess the necessity for developing and introducing mandatory labelling on the estimated lifetime and reparability of a product, which could take the form of an environmental performance index, taking into account multiple criteria throughout the life cycle of products according to product category.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 By [
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish by [1
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish by [
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish by [1
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from [
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from [
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from [
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities or well-established Non- Governmental Organisation; or standards organisation.;
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label which
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 a 2a. Displaying a sustainability label which
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 2 b (new) 2b. Displaying a sustainability information or comparison tool that was not pre-approved by a national or EU authority;
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) the following points 4a
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) the following points 4a
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 a 4a. Making a generic environmental claim that does refer to recognised excellent environmental performance and for which the trader
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 a 4a. Making a
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4a a (new) 4aa. Making a generic social impact claim.;
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4 b 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product and which overall value for the environment does not exceed other elements of the product.;
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product, service or trader’s activities when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b a (new) 4ba. Making a generic environmental claim that does not refer to recognised excellent environmental performance and for which the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product's packaging or online selling interface.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b a (new) 4ba. Claiming that a good or a service has a neutral or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b a (new) 4ba. Claiming that a good or a service has a neutral or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment;
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b b (new) 4bb. Making an environmental claim in relation to a product or service that promotes fossil fuels or highly polluting industries;
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b c (new) 4bc. Making an environmental claim that was not pre-approved in accordance with the minimum requirements established in accordance with national or Union law;
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b d (new) 4bd. Making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance at the level of a product;
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b e (new) 4be. Making a generic social claim;
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 4b f (new) 4bf. Claiming that a product is biodegradable and omitting to inform the consumer about the conditions under which biodegradability can be achieved based on recognised standards;
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 7 a (new) (2a) the following point 7a is inserted: 7a. Falsely stating that a product will only be available in limited qualities, in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 7 b (new) (2b) The following points 7b (i) to (v) are inserted: 7b. Specifically, the use of any of the following practices of dark pattern: (i) giving more visual prominence to any of the consent options when asking the recipient of an online service for a decision; (ii) installation wherein clicking a button leads to a different result than normally expected; (iii) installation wherein selections have already been taken, especially with check marks set; (iv) making the procedure of terminating a service significantly more cumbersome than signing up to it; or (v) direct display of fake reviews or the supposed behaviour of others.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 13 a (new) (3a) the following point 13a is inserted: 13a. Any marketing of a good as being identical or seemingly identical to the other good marketed in one or various Member State, while those goods have different composition or characteristics which have not been clearly marked on the packaging, so as to be visible to the consumer.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part (4) the following points 23d to 23
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d. Omitting to inform the consumer that a mandatory software update will have reasonably predictable consequences and as a result will negatively impact the use of goods with digital elements or certain features of those goods even if the software update improves the functioning of other features.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d. O
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 d 23d.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23d a (new) 23da. Failing to inform the consumer of the actual price of a product which has a component or element that needs to be replaced regularly (printer ink cartridge, battery, etc.).
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23d b (new) 23db. Manufacturers not providing, free of charge, the updates needed to keep the good in conformity for a period corresponding to the estimated lifespan.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23e 23e.
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e. Omitting to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of a good intentionally introduced to limit its durability.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 e 23e.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23e a (new) 23ea. Any marketing of a good where the trader is aware that this product has a feature introduced to limit its durability.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 f 23f. Claiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or intensity when it evidently does not.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g 23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not or omitting to inform the consumer that goods do not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements or failing to inform that these goods are repairable.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g 23g. Presenting goods
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g 23g.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 g 23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not or repair is significantly hindered, or omitting to inform the
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h. Inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables of a good earlier than for technical reasons is necessary, expect for precautions to ensure the appropriate levels of hygiene, safety and performance of a good.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h.
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 h 23h.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23h a 23ha. The person responsible for placing a product on the market employing stratagems seeking to reduce its lifespan and encourage the consumer to buy a one.
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i. Omitting to inform that a good is intentionally designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer..
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23 i 23i.
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i a (new) 23ia. Offering by the same producer or trader of disadvantageous terms or of a shorter period of commercial guarantee for the same product in one or more Member States resulting in a disadvantageous situation when comparing the situations in different Member States.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i a (new) 23ia. Any marketing of a good, which is not compliant with the requirements under the Union products legislation.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i a (new) 23ia. Engaging in practices that lead to shortening of a product’s lifespan
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i b (new) 23ib. Any marketing of a good without fixing a design issue that leads to an early failure of this good, within a reasonable time after it became known.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i b (new) 23ib. Marketing a good without fixing a known design issue that leads to an early failure of the good in question;
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i c (new) 23ic. Bundling security updates with functionality, feature or other software updates.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i c (new) 23ic. Supplying security updates together with functionality updates or other software updates;
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 23i d (new) 23id. Marketing a good that is not compliant with ecodesign requirements set in Regulation EU [Ecodesign for Sustainable Products]
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I – point 31 a (new) (4a) the following point 31 a is added: 31a. repeated (aggressive) request to perform a certain action ("nagging").
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) (-1) Consumers can often be harmed and lured by false environmental claims, greenwashing and deceptive practices in their purchases, which is a serious problem in terms of consumer protection that must be addressed at a European level.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment. Companies also have a role to play in promoting a green transition and greater sustainability of the products they produce and sell on the internal market, by respecting the environment and being transparent in their business practices all along their value chains.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment. To enable sustainable consumption choices, the products offered must be competitive, particularly in terms of their price compared to similar non- sustainable products.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading or false environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent, non-certified and non- credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are reliable and fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact, durability or reparability of their products, including through the overall presentation of the products, Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended by adding the environmental or social impact, durability and reparability of the product to the list of the main characteristics of the product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on the social sustainability of products, such as working conditions, charity contributions or animal welfare, should not mislead consumers either. This includes statements such as “fairly produced”, “sustainable sound production”, "socially just". Making generic social claim should therefore be added to the Annex I of this Directive.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact, durability or reparability of their products, including through the overall presentation of the products, Article 6(1) of Directive
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. In the same vein, fossil fuel advertising suggests absolute environmental benefit of fossil fuels that are likely to be understood as factual statements by consumers whereas this is misleading. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case- by-case assessment, when based on offsetting schemes or when they are not supported by clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case- by-case assessment, when they are not supported by clear, objective, evidence- based and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader. Such claims should also be supported by an independent monitoring system to monitor the progress of the trader with regard to the commitments and targets.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Comparing products based on their environmental or social aspects, including through the use of tools to provide information about their sustainability, i
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Comparing products based on their environmental or social aspects, including through the use of sustainability information tools, is an increasingly common marketing technique that could be misleading to consumers, who are not always able to assess the reliability of these information. In order to ensure that such comparisons do not mislead consumers, Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to require that the consumer is provided with information about the method of the comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, and the measures to keep information up to date. This should ensure that consumers make better informed transactional decisions when using such services. The comparison should be objective by, in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products being compared.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Comparing or rating products based on their environmental or social aspects, including through the use of sustainability information tools, is an increasingly common marketing technique. In order to ensure that such comparisons or ratings do not mislead consumers, Article 7 of Directive
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. The certification scheme should fulfil minimum transparency and credibility conditions and be supported by methods to monitor compliance that are proportionate and relevant to the nature of the products, processes, or businesses that are subject to the scheme. The displaying of sustainability labels remains possible without a certification scheme where such labels are established by a public authority, or in case of
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Sustainability initiatives, including certification schemes and sustainability labels that foster the uptake of sustainable market practices by SMEs should be encouraged.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. Where space limitations on the same medium exist, it should be possible to provide the specification through digital means. For example, the claim ‘biodegradable’, referring to a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that ‘the packaging is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific claim, which does not fall under this prohibition. It should not be considered a generic environmental claim or a sustainability label when an aggregator program, a filtering functionality, badges or visual representations in online selling interfaces provide consumers the possibility to access or to filter for products or services that are covered by sustainability labels or certification schemes.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making claims that a good or a service has a neutral or positive carbon emissions’ impact on the environment. Examples of such environmental claims are ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘CO2 neutral’, ‘carbon neutral certified’ or similar statements. Such claims implying carbon emissions’ neutrality to consumers should be prohibited as they are impossible to substantiate from a scientifically point of view. They should be also prohibited if displayed to consumers in the form of a sustainability label.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) E
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The use of generic social impact claims should also be prohibited in all circumstances and therefore added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. Examples of such generic social impact claims are ‘fairy produced’, 'ethically produced', ‘sustainable sound production’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘sustainable’ or ‘fair’. Such generic social impact claims should be prohibited whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. Such specification could refer, for example, to ‘no child labour’.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The Circular Economy Action Plan24 provides for the need to set the rules on environmental claims using Product and
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices are also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption. In this respect, the marketing of certain disposable consumer products that generate unnecessary waste, such as disposable electronic cigarettes, should be prohibited.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Where traders are not producers of goods, they may have limited influence on the design of goods and their early obsolescence. Therefore the producers should be liable whenever engaging in such practices, as well as for providing information to traders in this respect. Mere retailers should be responsible for further passing on such information to consumers. In addition, once such practices are established with regards to a specific good, national competent authorities may also require remedial action from the retailers selling the good in question or require them to provide consumers with additional information at the point of sale in this respect.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) It should be prohibited to omit to inform the consumer that a software update, including a security update, will have a negative
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It should also be prohibited to
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Another practice which should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is the practice of claiming that a good has a certain durability when it does not. That would be the case, for instance, when a trader informs consumers that a washing machine is expected to last a certain number of washing cycles
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit presenting products as allowing repair when such repair is not possible provided the product has been used in accordance with expected as normal use, as well as omitting to inform consumers that it is not possible to repair goods in accordance with legal requirements.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit
source: 737.362
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/14 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/10 |
|
events/12 |
|
events/13 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/10 |
|
events/11/summary |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
events/9 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/imco/lcag/2023/10-25/IMCO_LA(2023)006275_EN.pdf
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/7/summary |
|
events/6/docs |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/7 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0099_EN.html
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0099_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration on EU legislative priorities for 2023 and 2024New
Joint Declaration 2023-24 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-736396_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-737362_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-736537_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
links |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0 |
|
procedure/subject/3.70.17 |
European ecolabel and ecolabelling, ecodesign
|
procedure/subject/4.60.02 |
Consumer information, advertising, labelling
|
procedure/subject/4.60.06 |
Consumers' economic and legal interests
|
procedure/subject/7.40.02 |
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
procedure/subject/3.70.17 |
European ecolabel and ecolabelling, ecodesign
|
procedure/subject/4.60.02 |
Consumer information, advertising, labelling
|
procedure/subject/4.60.06 |
Consumers' economic and legal interests
|
procedure/subject/7.40.02 |
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2022/0143/COM_COM(2022)0143_EN.pdf
|
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/title |
Old
Empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better informationNew
Empowering consumers for the green transition |
docs/0/summary |
|