Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CHASTEL Olivier ( Renew) | SARVAMAA Petri ( EPP), ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP), MANDA Claudiu ( S&D), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | TOMC Romana ( EPP) | Lucia ĎURIŠ NICHOLSONOVÁ ( RE), Elżbieta RAFALSKA ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | BRICMONT Saskia ( Verts/ALE) | José GUSMÃO ( GUE/NGL), Ramona STRUGARIU ( RE) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 556 votes to 72 with 4 abstentions, a resolution on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2021: performance, financial management and control. The resolution includes, for the EU agencies, the cross-cutting observations accompanying the discharge decisions.
Members welcomed the agencies' efforts to maintain high standards of work and high-quality outputs despite the limitations imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Main risks identified by the Court of Auditors
According to the Court's report, the overall risk to the reliability of the agencies' accounts is generally low . The Court reports that the overall risk to the legality and regularity of the payments underlying the agencies' accounts is considered to be medium, although the risk varies from low to high from one budget title to another. It also reported a medium risk for sound financial management.
Parliament is pleased to note that, despite the risk associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court nevertheless carried out its work by means of documentary checks and remote interviews with staff at the audited entities. It welcomed the Court's statement that, in most cases, the agencies had taken corrective action in response to audit observations made in previous years.
Budgetary and financial management
The cumulative total of the 2021 budgets for the 33 decentralised Union agencies amounted to around EUR 3 206 million in commitment appropriations , representing an increase of approximately 5% compared to 2020, and amounted to EUR 3 090 million in payment appropriations, an increase of 6.88% compared to 2020. Of the EUR 3 090 million in payment appropriations, approximately EUR 2 477 million were financed from the general budget of the Union, representing 77.27% of the agencies’ total financing in 2021 (compared to 72.83% in 2020). Approximately EUR 728 million were financed by fees and charges and by direct contributions from participating countries (a decrease of 12.15% compared to 2020).
The resolution noted with concern that the final budgets of some agencies have been frozen in nominal terms for 6 years and, due to accumulated inflation, the real purchasing power of the budget decreases.
Parliament noted that the Court delivered an unqualified audit opinion on the reliability of the accounts was issued for all agencies except for the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA).
Members also noted the Court's observation of excessive levels of carry-overs, and numerous payment delays for ten agencies, with weaknesses in particular for the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), eu-LISA and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), as well as the Court's recommendation that the agencies concerned should further improve their budget planning and implementation cycles.
Performance
Members note the achievements and successes of all agencies in 2021 , the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic with particular challenges for the agencies operating in justice and home affairs, transport, and medical related areas. They appreciated the high-quality expertise and work performed by CEDEFOP, Eurofound, EU-OSHA, ETF and ELA, the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion and reiterated the need to equip the agencies (in particular the EU agencies responsible for justice and home affairs) at a level commensurate to the assigned tasks, with a sufficient number of staff, employed in a stable manner and having sufficient material resources.
EU agencies should focus on tasks with clear European added value and the organisation of these tasks should be optimised to avoid duplication, in the interests of EU taxpayers. Agencies should continue developing synergies as well as cooperation and exchange of good practices with other Union agencies with a view to improving efficiency, in particular in the context of inflationary strains.
Staff policy
In 2021, the 33 decentralised agencies reported employing 9 631 members of staff, representing an increase of 7% compared to 2020. Burnout cases (in total 23) were registered in 5 agencies and overtime was taken by some employees in 13 agencies in 2021.
Recurrent shortcomings concern several agencies regarding the use of external staff and interim workers . The report notes an improved gender balance in 2021, compared to 2020, at the level of senior management, with 68% men and 32% women and for staff overall with 50.26% men and 49.73% women. The geographical balance of staff should be improved.
In 2021, the EU agencies network created a working group dedicated to issues in the area of diversity and inclusion for all ages.
Public procurement
The report noted with concern that the Court found 34 weaknesses in public procurement in 2021 (compared with 18 in 2020) and that the number of agencies affected is increasing, with 19 agencies affected in 2021 (compared with 9 in 2020). The increased use of online procurement tools by EU agencies is welcomed.
Prevention and management of conflicts of interest and transparency
Members noted that, with the exception of one agency, all the agencies have put in place a policy for preventing and managing conflicts of interest. They deplored the ineffective and inadequate monitoring of compliance with requirements and restrictions on ‘revolving doors’ by current and former agency staff. They stressed the need to introduce or regularly update systematic rules on transparency, incompatibilities, conflicts of interest and situations of 'revolving doors', illegal lobbying and strategies to combat fraud. All the agencies have implemented a whistleblowing policy.
Parliament stressed the need for effective management and control systems to avoid potential conflicts of interest.
2021 has been a key year for most agencies in terms of the various measures taken to strengthen agencies' cybersecurity and the protection of digital documents in their possession. However, these measures are not harmonised between agencies.
Members reiterated the importance of improving the digitalisation of the agencies' internal operations and management, including speeding up the digitalisation of procedures. They regretted that shortcomings in the use of standardised IT tools (for e-procurement and for the preparation of accounts and financial reports) represent major obstacles preventing the Court from extending the use of digital audit techniques to other areas and to all agencies.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Olivier CHASTEL (Renew Europe, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2021: performance, financial management and control.
This report includes, for the EU agencies, the cross-cutting observations accompanying the discharge decisions.
Members welcomed the agencies' efforts to maintain high standards of work and high-quality outputs despite the limitations imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. They stressed that the pandemic has demonstrated that agencies play a key role in EU policy, controlling the number of infections across Member States, authorising vaccines and treatments, issuing guidelines on workplace adaptation and worker protection, publishing recommendations on teleworking, online shopping and e-health services.
Main risks identified by the Court of Auditors
According to the Court’s report, the overall risk to the legality and regularity of revenue underlying the agencies’ accounts to be low for most agencies, and to be medium for the partly self-financed agencies where specific regulations are applicable to collection of fees and other revenue contributions, as was the case in 2020. The Court reported a low risk to budgetary management, as the Court's audit showed high carry-overs of committed appropriations, which were however justified.
The report notes the Court’s mention of an ‘other risk’ related to the COVID-19 pandemic that has affected the Court’s work as travel restrictions prevented it from carrying out on-the-spot checks, obtaining original documents and interviewing auditees’ staff in person.
Budgetary and financial management
The cumulative total of the 2021 budgets for the 33 decentralised Union agencies amounted to around EUR 3 206 million in commitment appropriations, representing an increase of approximately 5% compared to 2020, and amounted to EUR 3 090 million in payment appropriations, an increase of 6.88% compared to 2020. Of the EUR 3 090 million in payment appropriations, approximately EUR 2 477 million were financed from the general budget of the Union, representing 77.27% of the agencies’ total financing in 2021 (compared to 72.83% in 2020). Approximately EUR 728 million were financed by fees and charges and by direct contributions from participating countries (a decrease of 12.15% compared to 2020).
The report notes with concern that the final budgets of some agencies have been frozen in nominal terms for 6 years and, due to accumulated inflation, the real purchasing power of the budget decreases.
Members note with satisfaction that, according to the Court's annual report, an unqualified audit opinion on the reliability of the accounts was issued for all agencies. They also note that the Court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the payments underlying the accounts for all agencies except for the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA).
Members also noted the Court's observation on excessive levels of carry-over, in particular for ACER, eu-LISA, the Euratom Supply Agency (ESA), the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the Court's recommendation that the agencies concerned should further improve their budgetary planning and implementation cycles.
Performance
Members note the achievements and successes of all agencies in 2021, the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic with particular challenges for the agencies operating in justice and home affairs, transport, and medical related areas. The report appreciates the high-quality expertise and work performed by CEDEFOP, Eurofound, EU-OSHA, ETF and ELA, the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion and reiterates the need to equip the agencies at a level commensurate to the assigned tasks, with a sufficient number of staff, employed in a stable manner and having sufficient material resources.
Agencies should continue developing synergies as well as cooperation and exchange of good practices with other Union agencies with a view to improving efficiency, in particular in the context of inflationary strains.
Staff policy
In 2021, the 33 decentralised agencies reported employing 9 631 members of staff, representing an increase of 7% compared to 2020. Burnout cases (in total 23) were registered in 5 agencies and overtime was taken by some employees in 13 agencies in 2021.
Recurrent shortcomings concern several agencies regarding the use of external staff and interim workers. The report notes an improved gender balance in 2021, compared to 2020, at the level of senior management, with 68% men and 32% women and for staff overall with 50.26% men and 49.73% women. The geographical balance of staff should be improved.
Procurement
The report notes with concern that the Court observed 34 weaknesses in public procurement in 2021 (compared to 18 in 2020) and that the number of agencies concerned is increasing with 19 agencies concerned in 2021 (compared to 9 agencies in 2020). The increased use of e-procurement tools by Union agencies is welcomed.
Prevention and management of conflicts of interests, and transparency
Members note that, with the exception of one agency, all agencies have a policy for prevention and management of conflicts of interest in place. They insist on the need to put in place or regularly update systematic sets of rules on transparency, incompatibilities, conflicts of interest and ‘revolving door’ situations, and illegal lobbying, as well as anti-fraud Strategies. 2021 was a key year for most agencies regarding various measures taken in order to strengthen the agencies’ cybersecurity and protection of the digital records in their possession. However, those measures are not harmonised across agencies.
Lastly, most agencies made further progress with regard to digitalisation and optimisation of their workflows and procedures, in particular in the fields of HR, financial and procurement procedures.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0190/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0144/2023
- Committee opinion: PE739.531
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.597
- Committee opinion: PE736.612
- Committee draft report: PE737.507
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE737.507
- Committee opinion: PE736.612
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.597
- Committee opinion: PE739.531
Votes
Décharge 2021: performance, gestion financière et contrôle des agences de l’Union européenne - A9-0144/2023 - Olivier Chastel - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
Amendments | Dossier |
57 |
2022/2134(DEC)
2022/12/06
EMPL
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the valuable role played by Union agencies in helping Union institutions to implement policies, especially by carrying out specific technical, scientific and managerial tasks; appreciates the high quality work performed by the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion; reiterates in this regard the need to equip the agencies at a level commensurate to the assigned tasks, with a sufficient number of staff, employed in a stable manner and having sufficient material resources; reiterates that the proper functioning of the Executive Agencies also requires a high-quality social dialogue, closely involving the Local Staff Committees;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Highlights that transparency and citizens' awareness of the existence of the agencies are essential for their democratic accountability;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Welcomes that 9 agencies had introduced their own internal rules to deal with the lack of provisions in EU legislation governing the activities of members of agencies’ boards; notes with concern that the remaining 31 agencies only take into account potential ‘revolving door’ cases concerning their current and former staff, leading to only a small fraction of potential ‘revolving door’ cases of agencies’ board members being subject to any assessment; is concerned that during the period 2019-2021 only 20 of the 40 agencies examined by ECA had considered any potential revolving-door cases related to their senior staff members; calls on agencies to urgently introduce internal rules for members of their boards on conflicts of interest in general and ‘revolving door’ situations in particular;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that one observation
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Recalls that gender balance must be ensured within the Agencies in accordance with the basic regulations establishing them; regrets the fact that gender equality is absent in the multiannual strategy 2021-2027 for the EUAN; calls on the agencies and the EUAN to integrate gender equality in their strategies, to align the ambition of agencies with the aim of the Commission to reach a gender balance of 50 % at all levels of its management by the end of 2024 and to pursue gender mainstreaming in all fields;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the valuable role played by Union agencies in helping Union institutions to design and implement policies, especially by carrying out specific technical, scientific and managerial tasks; appreciates the high quality expertise and work performed by CEDEFOP, Eurofound, EU-OSHA, ETF and ELA, the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion; reiterates in this regard the need of ensuring adequate human and financial resources allowing them to continue implementing their work programmes with a very high activity completion rate; stresses the importance and added value of each agency in their field of expertise and their autonomy;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the valuable role played by Union agencies in helping Union institutions to design and implement policies, especially
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Notes with concern that the final budgets of some agencies have been frozen in nominal terms for 6 years and due to accumulated inflation the real purchasing power of the budget decreases; notes that the continuation of this trend puts at risk the agencies' abilities to perform their functions in an effective and timely manner ;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the yearly exchange of views in the EMPL committee regarding the annual work programmes and the multiannual strategies of the agencies is instrumental in ensuring that the programmes and strategies are aligned to the actual political priorities, especially in the context of the implementation of the principles enshrined in the European Pillar of Social Rights and the achievements of the Porto targets;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that the agencies are the most qualified at assessing the use of resources and play a crucial role in supporting the right sustainable projects in line with the European Green Deal; calls on the Commission to ensure funding supporting the EU agencies in securing the social dialogue; notes that EU agencies have a crucial role in securing social dialogue with the EU institutions;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Recalls that gender balance must be ensured within the Union agencies in accordance with the basic regulations establishing them; asks, therefore, that the Union agencies collect and present data on gender balance for all categories of management staff (from the lowest to the highest level) to gather the basic data on the basis of which the Union agencies are encouraged to address gender imbalance in management and to pursue gender mainstreaming in all fields;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the deepened cooperation between the agencies within the framework of the European Union Agencies Network (EUAN) w
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the deepened cooperation between the agencies within the framework of the European Union Agencies Network (EUAN) with a focus on sharing services, knowledge and expertise; calls on the EUAN to develop a general policy to not replace permanent staff by more expensive external consultants, in order to guarantee quality working conditions, and to prevent knowledge and experience from being lost;
source: 739.659
2023/01/19
LIBE
44 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Reiterates the important role of the EU Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies, and the important support they ensure to the Union institutions and bodies and Member States in the sectors of fundamental rights, security and justice, by carrying out operational, analytical, managerial and monitoring tasks; reiterates therefore the need to ensure adequate financial and human resources to JHA agencies;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the EDPS requested to
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the Court found that the payments underlying the accounts were legal and regular for all agencies except for eu-LISA, for which a qualified opinion was issued because of six payments that were considered not compliant to the provisions of framework contracts, amounting in total to EUR 18.11 million in 2021, representing 6,2 % of the total payment appropriations available in 2021; notes from eu-LISA's reply that compliance in this area is affected by several factors linked to budgetary planning, the sourcing model, managing contractual evolutions, delays in the adoption of relevant legislation, as well as understaffing, restricting the possibility of eu-LISA to limit the scope, duration and value of contracts; calls on the Commission to better coordinate the allocation of resources to eu-LISA with the adoption of relevant legislative acts;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the Court found that the payments underlying the accounts were legal and regular for all agencies except for eu-LISA, for which a qualified opinion was issued because of six payments that were considered not compliant to the provisions of framework contracts, amounting in total to EUR 18.11 million in 2021, representing 6,2 % of the total payment appropriations available in 2021; welcomes that eu-LISA complied with its duty to record the payment actually affected by potential error/irregularity in the internal control system of eu-LISA through a non- compliance report and an exception report;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses deep concern that public procurement weaknesses are increasing and remain the largest source of irregular payments and that the Court reported shortcomings in relation to contracts signed by Frontex, eu-LISA, CEPOL and EASO; expresses further concern over the shortage of procurement staff reported by eu-LISA, as well as by the lack of approrpriate grading for posts managing procurement procedures, such as the case of CEPOL where the highest graded procurement officer was recruited at the AST-5 grade; reiterates to the Commission the importance of appropriately graded positions when allocating tasks of great responsibility;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that staff of the European Asylum Support Office have lodged a complaint with OLAF and the Commission, calling for a probe into its director-general, whom they accuse of nepotism, misleading reports and mishandling harassment claims; therefore recommends that the Committee on Budgetary Control postpone granting the discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Asylum Support Office’s budget for the financial year 2021 until such time as the case has been legally resolved;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern the Court’s findings on weaknesses in management and control systems in relation to Frontex, Europol, CEPOL and EPPO; calls on these agencies and on the EPPO to step up their efforts towards effectively addressing these weaknesses and to report to the discharge authority about the progress achieved;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern the Court’s findings on weaknesses in management and control systems in relation to Frontex, Europol, CEPOL and EPPO; notes that in particular for Frontex this is a returning issue that the Agency does not remedy;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern the Court’s findings on weaknesses in management and control systems in relation to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recognises that agencies provide common centres of expertise and networking and are indispensable for the implementation of EU policies; reminds that Union agencies use significant resources and their number has increased over the years; notes that all agencies should effectively perform their mandates;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that weaknesses in budgetary management can result in high carry-overs or late payments; is concerned that the Court found such shortcomings at Frontex, eu-LISA, EPPO and FRA;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that weaknesses in budgetary management can result in high carry-overs or late payments; is concerned that the Court found such shortcomings at Frontex, eu-LISA, EPPO and FRA; acknowledges that such situation could indicate a structural issue, weak budgetary planning, or possibly a contravention of the budgetary principle of annuality; recalls the importance of ensuring appropriate budget planning and its implementation cycles;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that weaknesses in various aspects of budgetary management can result in high carry-overs or late payments, which can, in some cases, be justified by the multi-annual nature of operations or circumstances outside the Agency’s control, such as delays of the Member States in introducing their claims for grants; is concerned that the Court found such shortcomings at Frontex, eu-LISA, EPPO, and FRA;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Applauds that the Court has decided to examine potential ‘revolving door’ situations in its audit and asks that this topic, as well as the associated risk of conflict of interests, is also included in future annual reports; shares the opinion by the Court that Agencies are particularly prone to the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations; expresses deep concern that the EU legal framework applicable to managing ‘revolving door’ risks lacks clear requirements on compliance and monitoring, and that it do not apply to members of the agencies’ boards; urges agencies to ensure that internal rules managing ‘revolving door’ and potential conflict of interests risks are put in place and fully and correctly implemented;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Applauds that the Court has decided to examine potential ‘revolving door’ situations in its audit and asks that this topic, as well as the associated risk of conflict of interests, is also included in future annual reports; shares the opinion by the Court that Agencies are particularly prone to the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations; expresses deep concern that the EU legal framework applicable to managing ‘revolving door’ risks lacks clear requirements on compliance and monitoring, and that it do not apply to members of the agencies’ boards; applauds the FRAs policy and recommendations in this matter;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Applauds
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to propose changes to prevent any risk of ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the EU legal framework for managing ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interests risks should define a common legal basis defining a minimum level of requirements to prevent such situations, as well as the manner in which monitoring compliance of current and former staff with the ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest requirements should take place; calls on the Commission to propose changes to prevent any risk of ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission as a matter of urgency to propose changes to prevent any risk of ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its concern that the Court has identified a recurrent shortcoming applying to several agencies in the use of external staff and interim workers; calls for the dependency on external recruitment by agencies to be addressed and for applicable labour law to be respected; notes the judgement of the Court of Justice of 11 November 2021 in Case C-948/19 which considered as part of the scope of the application of Directive 2008/104/EC temporary agency workers to Union agencies; calls on the agencies to rely as much as possible on permanent staff and on the Commission to ensure appropriate human resources allocations for this purpose;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its concern that the Court has identified a recurrent shortcoming applying to several agencies in the use of external staff and interim workers; calls for the dependency on external recruitment by agencies to be addressed and for applicable labour law to be respected; calls on the Agencies invloved to comply with their mandates and the repeated calls from the European Parlaiment to end the huge dependency on interim contracts and temporary workers;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Re
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that cooperation among JHA agencies is fully transparent and accountability ensured; calls on all JHA agencies to take measures to ensure full compliance with EU transparency rules as well as with fundamental rights and data protection standards; considers that the disclosure of meetings and interactions between JHA Agencies and third parties is required to ensure enhanced transparency by JHA Agencies; urges JHA Agencies to step up efforts in this direction;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Calls on all JHA agencies to take into account sustainability in their overall business processes in order to improve the agencies’ environmental performance, and to report to the discharge authority on implemented measures and progress;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that for the 2021 financial year, the Court issued unqualified (“clean”) audit opinions on the accounts of all 44 agencies; Stresses that the Court issued
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls on all JHA agencies to
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls on all JHA agencies to ensure a gender balanced distribution on all levels of staff; further calls on all JHA agencies to take into consideration geographical balance when conducting their recruitment procedures and report to the discharge authority on implemented measures and progress achieved;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Urges all JHA agencies to implement a clear anti-harassment policy
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Urges all JHA agencies to implement a clear anti-harassment and anti-racism policy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the Court issued three ‘emphasis on the matter’ paragraphs in relation to Frontex; is concerned about weaknesses in recruitment at Frontex related to the evaluation process; reiterates its deep concern about the findings of the OLAF report;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the Court issued three ‘emphasis on the matter’ paragraphs in relation to Frontex; is concerned about weaknesses in recruitment at Frontex related to the evaluation process; reiterates its deep concern about the findings of the OLAF report; reaffirms that the granting of discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the JHA Agencies is conditional on the Agencies’ accountability and transparency, fundamental rights compliance, and commitment to comply with Union law;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the Court issued three ‘emphasis on the matter’ paragraphs in relation to Frontex for reliability of the accounts regarding the carry-over to 2021, for reliability of the accounts concerning the incorrect calculation of contributions from non-EU Schengen area countries, and for reliability of the accounts and for the legality and regularity of payments concerning certification of the accounts; is concerned about weaknesses in recruitment at Frontex related to the evaluation process; reiterates its deep concern about the findings of the OLAF report
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the EDPS requested to the Court of Justice of the European Union to annul two provisions of the revised Europol Regulation, a
source: 740.774
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
events/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4/docs |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0144_EN.html
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0144_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2023-03-23T00:00:00New
2023-03-22T00:00:00 |
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-737507_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
commission |
|
committees/14/rapporteur |
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/9/rapporteur |
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|