Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew) | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP), REPASI René ( S&D), KOVAŘÍK Ondřej ( PfE), MALĄG Marlena ( ECR), SINKEVIČIUS Virginijus ( Greens/EFA), SARAMO Jussi ( The Left), AUST René ( ESN) |
Former Responsible Committee | ECON | ||
Former Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114, TFEU 053-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114, TFEU 053-p1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 484 votes to 8, with 118 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market amending Directive 98/26/EC and repealing Directives 2015/2366/EU and 2009/110/EC.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Subject matter
The proposed Directive lays down rules concerning: (a) access to the activity of providing payment services and electronic money services, within the Union, by payment institutions; (b) supervisory powers and tools for the supervision of payment institutions.
Applications for authorisation
Undertakings intending to provide any of the payment services referred to in Annex I to the Directive, or electronic money services, should obtain authorisation from the competent authorities of their home Member State for the provision of such services. The application for authorisation must be accompanied by the following information:
- a programme of operations setting out in particular the type of payment services envisaged;
- evidence that the applicant holds initial capital as provided for in the Directive;
- for the undertakings applying to provide certain services and electronic money services, a description of the measures taken for safeguarding payment service users’ funds;
- a description of the applicant’s governance arrangements and internal control mechanisms, including administrative, risk management and accounting procedures;
- a description of the procedure in place to monitor, handle and follow up a security incident and security related customer complaints;
- a description of the process in place to file, monitor, track and restrict access to sensitive payment data;
- a description of business continuity arrangements including a clear identification of the critical operations, a description of the ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans;
- a security policy document;
- for applicant institutions that are subject to the obligations in relation to money laundering and terrorist financing under Directive (EU) 2015/849 and Regulation (EU) 2015/847;
- the identity of the persons that hold in the applicant, directly or indirectly, qualifying holdings, the size of their holdings and evidence of their suitability to ensure the sound and prudent management of the applicant;
- the identity of directors and other persons responsible for the management of the applicant payment institution and the applicant’s legal status;
- a winding-up plan in case of failure.
The applicant should provide a description of its audit arrangements and of the organisational arrangements it has set up to protect the interests of its users and to ensure continuity and reliability in the performance of payment or electronic money services.
Initial capital and own funds
Member States should require payment institutions to hold, at the time of authorisation, initial capital which should at no time be less than EUR 25 000; EUR 50 000 or EUR 150 000 according to the payment service provider.
Member States should require that the payment institution’s own funds do not fall below the amount of initial capital or the amount of own funds either calculated in accordance with the Directive for payment institutions that do not offer electronic money services, and for payment institutions that offer electronic money services.
Granting of authorisation
Member States should authorise an applicant payment institution for the payment services and electronic money services it intends to provide, provided that it is a legal person established in a Member State and it has the required initial capital.
Within a maximum of two months of receipt of an application for authorisation, the competent authorities should inform the applicant whether the authorisation is granted or refused. The competent authority should give reasons where it refuses an authorisation.
An authorisation should be valid in all Member States and should allow the payment institution concerned to provide the payment or electronic money services that are covered by the authorisation throughout the Union.
The competent authorities of the home Member State may withdraw the authorisation granted to a payment institution only if that institution has not made use of its authorisation within twelve months of obtaining that authorisation or has not provided any of the services for which it was authorised for more than six consecutive months.
Member States should maintain a public electronic register of payment institutions. The EBA should operate and maintain a central electronic register of payment institutions.
Entities to which activities are outsourced
Member States should ensure that payment institutions that intend to outsource operational functions of payment or electronic money services inform the competent authorities of their home Member State thereof. They should also ensure that payment institutions do not outsource important operational functions, including ICT systems, in such way that the quality of the payment institution’s internal control and the ability of the competent authorities to monitor and retrace the payment institution’s compliance with all of the obligations laid down in this Directive is materially impaired.
Designation of competent authorities
Member States should designate as the competent authorities responsible for the authorisation and prudential supervision of payment institutions which are to carry out the duties provided for under this Directive either public authorities, or bodies recognised by national law or by public authorities expressly empowered for that purpose by national law, including national central banks.
The amended text also contains provisions relating to the application to exercise the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services, as well as the supervision of payment institutions exercising the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services. Transitional provisions are also included.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Ondřej KOVAŘÍK (Renew, CZ) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market amending Directive 98/26/EC and repealing Directives 2015/2366/EU and 2009/110/EC.
The proposed Directive lays down rules concerning: (a) access to the activity of providing payment services and electronic money services, within the Union, by payment institutions; (b) supervisory powers and tools for the supervision of payment institutions.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Applications for authorisation
Undertakings intending to provide any of the payment services referred to in Annex I to the Directive, or electronic money services, should obtain authorisation from the competent authorities of their home Member State for the provision of those services. Member States should require institutions applying for authorisation to provide the payment services referred to in Annex I, point 6 (payment initiation services), as a precondition for such authorisation, to have professional indemnity insurance covering the territories in which they offer services or another comparable guarantee against liability, which may, for the initial authorisation period only, include a minimum initial capital of EUR 50 000.
Within a maximum of two months of receipt of an application for authorisation, the competent authorities should inform the applicant whether the authorisation is granted or refused.
Initial capital
Where the payment institution provides electronic money services, its capital should at no time be less than EUR 350 000 .
Application to exercise the right of establishment and freedom to provide services
Member States should ensure that any payment institution wishing to provide payment or electronic money services for the first time in a Member State other than its home Member State, including via an establishment in a third Member State, in the exercise of the right of establishment or the freedom to provide services, should communicate certain information to the competent authorities in its home Member State.
Within 10 business days of receipt of all of the information, the competent authorities of the home Member State should send that information to the competent authorities of the host Member State. Where the services are provided via a third Member State, the Member State to be notified should be the one where the services are provided to payment service users.
Within 15 business days of receipt of the information from the competent authorities of the home Member State, the competent authorities of the host Member State should assess that information and provide the competent authorities of the home Member State with relevant information about the intended provision of payment or electronic money services by the relevant payment institution in the exercise of the freedom of establishment or the freedom to provide services. Within 30 business days of receipt of the information, the competent authorities of the home Member State should communicate their decision to the competent authorities of the host Member State and to the payment institution.
The Commission should create a dedicated internet website with all of the information in one place on how payment institutions can register in each Member State.
Services where cash is provided in retail stores without a purchase
Member States should exempt from the application of this Directive natural or legal persons providing cash in retail stores independently of any purchase provided the following conditions are met:
- the service is offered at its premises by a natural or legal person selling goods or services as a regular occupation;
- the amount of cash provided does not exceed EUR 100 or the equivalent amount in the currency of the Member State concerned, per withdrawal.
- the client’s withdrawal is non-anonymised and requires the use of customer authentication.
Services enabling cash withdrawals offered by ATM deployers not servicing payment accounts
Natural or legal persons providing cash withdrawal services and who do not service payment accounts and do not provide other payment services referred to in Annex I, should not be subject to authorisation but should register with a competent authority of the home Member State before taking up activity.
The natural or legal persons providing the services should comply with the requirements on transparency of fees and charges laid down in the Payment Services Regulation, and in particular should ensure that such fees and charges are displayed at the initiation of the provision of the services.
Transitional provisions
Member States should allow payment institutions that have been authorised pursuant to Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 by 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive to continue to provide and execute the payment services for which they have been authorised, without having to having to seek a new authorisation.
If those institutions fail to comply with the requirements laid down in Title II of the Directive no later than 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive, they should be suspended from the provision of payment services until they provide the relevant competent authority with the additional information required to ensure compliance with Title II and that competent authority has verified the accuracy of that information and duly authorised the payment service provider.
Competent authorities may exceptionally decide to extend the period before specific payment institutions and electronic money institutions are prohibited from providing services when those institutions provided the information required and the competent authority has not been able to process it within the applicable deadline.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to lay down rules on payment services and electronic money services in the internal market.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) provides a legal framework for all retail payments in the EU, both Euro and other currencies, domestic and cross-border.
PSD2 has tackled the barriers to access to new types of payment services and improved the level of consumer protection and security. PSD2 contains both rules on the provision of payment services by payment service providers (PSPs) and rules on the authorisation and supervision of a specific category of financial service providers, namely payment institutions.
The review of PSD2 has led the Commission to decide to propose legislative changes to PSD2 in order to improve its functioning. These changes are set out in two proposals, this proposal for a Directive on payment services and electronic money services, focusing on the authorisation and supervision of payment institutions (and amending certain other Directives) and a proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the EU.
The impact assessment accompanying this proposal (as well as the proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the internal market) revealed that the EU payments market has four major problems, despite the achievements of the PSD2: (i) consumers are at risk of fraud and lack confidence in payments; (ii) the open banking sector functions imperfectly; (iii) supervisors in EU Member States have inconsistent powers and obligations; (iv) there is an unlevel playing field between banks and non-bank PSPs.
The proposal will amend and modernise the current Payment Services Directive (PSD2) which will become PSD3 and establish, in addition, a Payment Services Regulation (PSR). It will ensure consumers can continue to safely and securely make electronic payments and transactions in the EU, domestically or cross-border, in euro and non-euro.
CONTENT: this proposed Directive therefore lays down rules concerning:
- access to the activity of providing payment services and electronic money services, within the Union, by payment institutions;
- supervisory powers and tools for the supervision of payment institutions.
The revised Directive aims to update and clarify the provisions relating to payment institutions and integrates former electronic money institutions as a sub-category of payment institutions (and consequently repeals the second Electronic Money Directive, 2009/110/EC). Furthermore, it includes provisions concerning cash withdrawal services provided by retailers (without a purchase) or independent ATM deployers and amends the Settlement Finality Directive (Directive 98/26/EC).
More specifically, it consists of a package of measures which:
- combat and mitigate payment fraud , by enabling payment service providers to share fraud-related information between themselves, increasing consumers' awareness, strengthening customer authentication rules, extending refund rights of consumers who fall victim to fraud and making a system for checking alignment of payees' IBAN numbers with their account names mandatory for all credit transfers;
- improve consumer rights , in cases for example where their funds are temporarily blocked, improve transparency on their account statements and provide more transparent information on ATM charges;
- further levelling the playing field between banks and non-banks , in particular by allowing non-bank payment service providers access to all EU payment systems, with appropriate safeguards, and securing those providers' rights to a bank account;
- improve the functioning of open banking , by removing remaining obstacles to providing open banking services and improving customers' control over their payment data, enabling new innovative services to enter the market;
- improve the availability of cash in shops and via ATMs, by allowing retailers to provide cash services to customers without requiring a purchase and clarifying the rules for independent ATM operators;
- strengthen harmonisation and enforcement, by enacting most payment rules in a directly applicable regulation and reinforcing provisions on implementation and penalties.
Transitional provisions
Transitional measures are appropriate regarding existing activities under PSD2 given the creation of a new legal licensing regime. For example, existing licenses for payment institutions and electronic money institutions are prolonged in validity (“grandfathered”) until 30 months after entry into force (one year after the transposition deadline and the beginning of application) on condition that application for a license under this Directive is made at the latest 24 months after entry into force.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to lay down rules on payment services and electronic money services in the internal market.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) provides a legal framework for all retail payments in the EU, both Euro and other currencies, domestic and cross-border.
PSD2 has tackled the barriers to access to new types of payment services and improved the level of consumer protection and security. PSD2 contains both rules on the provision of payment services by payment service providers (PSPs) and rules on the authorisation and supervision of a specific category of financial service providers, namely payment institutions.
The review of PSD2 has led the Commission to decide to propose legislative changes to PSD2 in order to improve its functioning. These changes are set out in two proposals, this proposal for a Directive on payment services and electronic money services, focusing on the authorisation and supervision of payment institutions (and amending certain other Directives) and a proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the EU.
The impact assessment accompanying this proposal (as well as the proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the internal market) revealed that the EU payments market has four major problems, despite the achievements of the PSD2: (i) consumers are at risk of fraud and lack confidence in payments; (ii) the open banking sector functions imperfectly; (iii) supervisors in EU Member States have inconsistent powers and obligations; (iv) there is an unlevel playing field between banks and non-bank PSPs.
The proposal will amend and modernise the current Payment Services Directive (PSD2) which will become PSD3 and establish, in addition, a Payment Services Regulation (PSR). It will ensure consumers can continue to safely and securely make electronic payments and transactions in the EU, domestically or cross-border, in euro and non-euro.
CONTENT: this proposed Directive therefore lays down rules concerning:
- access to the activity of providing payment services and electronic money services, within the Union, by payment institutions;
- supervisory powers and tools for the supervision of payment institutions.
The revised Directive aims to update and clarify the provisions relating to payment institutions and integrates former electronic money institutions as a sub-category of payment institutions (and consequently repeals the second Electronic Money Directive, 2009/110/EC). Furthermore, it includes provisions concerning cash withdrawal services provided by retailers (without a purchase) or independent ATM deployers and amends the Settlement Finality Directive (Directive 98/26/EC).
More specifically, it consists of a package of measures which:
- combat and mitigate payment fraud , by enabling payment service providers to share fraud-related information between themselves, increasing consumers' awareness, strengthening customer authentication rules, extending refund rights of consumers who fall victim to fraud and making a system for checking alignment of payees' IBAN numbers with their account names mandatory for all credit transfers;
- improve consumer rights , in cases for example where their funds are temporarily blocked, improve transparency on their account statements and provide more transparent information on ATM charges;
- further levelling the playing field between banks and non-banks , in particular by allowing non-bank payment service providers access to all EU payment systems, with appropriate safeguards, and securing those providers' rights to a bank account;
- improve the functioning of open banking , by removing remaining obstacles to providing open banking services and improving customers' control over their payment data, enabling new innovative services to enter the market;
- improve the availability of cash in shops and via ATMs, by allowing retailers to provide cash services to customers without requiring a purchase and clarifying the rules for independent ATM operators;
- strengthen harmonisation and enforcement, by enacting most payment rules in a directly applicable regulation and reinforcing provisions on implementation and penalties.
Transitional provisions
Transitional measures are appropriate regarding existing activities under PSD2 given the creation of a new legal licensing regime. For example, existing licenses for payment institutions and electronic money institutions are prolonged in validity (“grandfathered”) until 30 months after entry into force (one year after the transposition deadline and the beginning of application) on condition that application for a license under this Directive is made at the latest 24 months after entry into force.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- ECB: CON/2024/0013
- ECB: OJ OJ C 19.06.2024
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0297/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0046/2024
- ESC: CES3611/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.022
- Contribution: COM(2023)0366
- Committee draft report: PE753.780
- EDPS: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000
- EDPS: N9-0086/2023
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0232
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0231
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0366
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0366
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE753.780
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.022
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0366 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0232
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0231
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Contribution: COM(2023)0366
- EDPS: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000 N9-0086/2023
- ESC: CES3611/2023
- ECB: CON/2024/0013 OJ OJ C 19.06.2024
Votes
A9-0046/2024 – Ondřej Kovařík – Commission proposal and amendment #
Amendments | Dossier |
90 |
2023/0209(COD)
2023/12/04
ECON
90 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities of the home Member State communicate to the payment institution within
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that payment institutions that intend to provide electronic money services through a distributor
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 3 3. Where the payment institution intends to distribute electronic money
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that payment institutions that intend to outsource operational functions of the payment or electronic money services to other entities in the host Member State, inform the competent authorities of their home
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission shall create a dedicated Internet website with all of the information in one place on how payment institutions can register in each Member State.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Within 1
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Within
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Within
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) in the case of payment services using electronic money tokens as defined in the Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, the payment service provider has already been authorised as a crypto-asset service provider in a Member State of the European Union, in accordance with Title V of that Regulation.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 As an alternative to holding a professional indemnity insurance as required in paragraph
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the amount of cash provided does not exceed EUR
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the amount of cash provided does not exceed EUR
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the amount of cash provided does not exceed EUR 150 per withdrawal.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) the amount of cash provided does not exceed a total of EUR 500 per month.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) the use of contactless solutions is excluded and the client must insert the PIN code manually at the point of sale.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The natural or legal persons providing the services referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall comply with the requirements on transparency of fees and charges laid down in Article 7 of Regulation XXX (Payment Services Regulation), and in particular shall ensure that such fees and charges are displayed at the initiation of the provision of the services.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The fees and information, as well as when and how they should be provided to the PSUs, that should be displayed by the ATM shall comply with the rules set out in the Regulation XXX (PSR).
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 2 Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by [ OP please insert the date =
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the appropriateness of the scope of this Directive, in particular regarding the possibility of extending it to certain services, including the operation of payment systems
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) the total number and market share of payment service providers authorized under this Directive, classified per each Member State;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by [ OP please insert the date=
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall allow payment institutions that have been authorised pursuant to Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 by [OP please insert the date = 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive] to continue to provide and execute the payment services for which they have been authorised, without having to having to seek a new authorisation in accordance with Article 3 of this Directive or to comply with the other provisions laid down or referred to in Title II of this Directive until [OP please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) whether those payment institutions comply with new requirements under Title II and, where not, which measures need to be taken to ensure compliance;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Payment institutions as referred to in the first subparagraph which upon verification by the competent authorities comply with Title II shall be authorised as payment institutions pursuant to Article 13 of this Directive and shall be entered in the registers referred to in Articles 17 and 18.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. Member States
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may grant natural and legal persons who benefited from an exemption pursuant to Article 32 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 an exemption pursuant to Article 34 of this Directive and enter those persons in the registers referred to in Articles 17 and 18 of this Directive where the competent authorities have evidence that the requirements laid down in Article 34 of this Directive are complied with. The competent authorities shall inform the payment institutions concerned thereof. If competent authorities fail to take a decision by [OP please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], payment institutions can continue to provide and execute the payment services for which they have been authorized until such decision is taken.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. If competent authorities decide to withdraw an authorisation under this Article, payment institutions can continue to provide and execute the payment services for which they have been authorised pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/2366 within six months after such decision is taken.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allow electronic money institutions which were defined in Article 2, point 1, of Directive 2009/110/EC that have taken up, before [OP please insert the date = 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], activities in accordance with national law transposing Directive 2009/110/EC as electronic money institutions in the Member State in which their head office is located in accordance with national law transposing Directive 2009/110/EC, to continue those activities in that Member State or in another Member State without having to seek a new authorisation in accordance with Article 3 of this Directive or to comply with the other provisions laid down or referred to in Title II of this Directive.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall require the electronic money institutions referred in paragraph 1 to submit to the competent authorities all information that those competent authorities need to assess, by [OP please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], whether those electronic money institutions comply with the new requirements provisioned in this Directive. Where such assessment reveals that those electronic money institutions do not comply with those new requirements, the competent authorities shall decide which measures need to be taken to ensure such compliance, or to
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Electronic money institutions as referred to in the first subparagraph which upon verification by the competent authorities comply with Title II shall be authorised as payment institutions pursuant to Article 13 of this Directive, shall be entered in the registers referred to in Articles 17 and 18.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 3 3. Member States
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall allow legal persons that have taken up, before [OP please insert the date = 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], activities in accordance with national law transposing Article 9 of Directive 2009/110/EC, to continue those activities within the Member State concerned in accordance with that Directive until [OP please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], without being required to seek authorisation under Article 3 of this Directive or to comply with the other provisions laid down or referred to in Title II of this Directive.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. If competent authorities decide to withdraw an authorisation under this Article, electronic money institutions can continue to provide and execute the electronic money services and payment services for which they have been authorized pursuant to Directive 2009/110/EC within six months after such decision is taken.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 a (new) Article 45a Extension period Competent authorities may exceptionally decide to extend the period before specific payment institutions and electronic money institutions are prohibited from providing services when those institutions provided the required information provisioned in Articles 44 and 45 and the competent authority has not been able to process it within the adequate deadline.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 98/26/EC Article 2 – point b ‘institution’ shall mean any of the following entities:
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 98/26/EC Article 2 – point b – an electronic money institution as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, with the exception of legal persons benefitting from an exemption pursuant to Article 9 of that Directive,
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 98/26/EC Article 2 – point b If a system is supervised in accordance with national legislation and only executes transfer orders as defined in point (i), second indent, as well as payments resulting from such orders, a Member State may decide that undertakings which participate in such a system and which
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 48 – paragraph 1 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 is repealed with effect from [ OP please insert the date=
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 48 – paragraph 2 Directive 2009/110/EC is repealed with effect from [ OP please insert the date=
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [ OP please insert the date=
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 They shall apply those measures from [ OP please insert the date=
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Annex II – paragraph 1 Issuance of electronic money
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Annex II – paragraph 1 Issuance of electronic money
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As evidenced in the review conducted by the Commission and given the evolution of the respective markets, businesses and risks attached to the activities, it is necessary to update the prudential regime for payment institutions, including those issuing electronic money and providing electronic money services, by requiring a single licence for providers of payment services and electronic money services not taking deposits. Given that Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 lays down in its Article 48(2) that that issuers of electronic money tokens shall be deemed to be electronic money institutions, the licensing regime for payment institutions, as they will replace the electronic money institutions, should also apply to issuers of electronic money tokens. The prudential regime applicable to payment institutions should be based on an authorisation, subject to a set of strict and comprehensive conditions, for legal persons offering payment services when not taking deposits. The prudential regime applicable to payment institutions should ensure that the same conditions apply Union-wide to the activity of providing payment services. __________________ 32 Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As evidenced in the review conducted by the Commission and given the evolution of the respective markets, businesses and risks attached to the activities, it is necessary to update the prudential regime for payment institutions, including those issuing electronic money and providing electronic money services, by requiring a single licence for providers of payment services and electronic money services not taking deposits. Given that Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 lays down in its Article 48(2) that that issuers of electronic money tokens shall be
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Given the emergence of new types of payment instruments, the technological solutions that can serve as a basis for such instruments, and the uncertainties prevailing in the market as to their legal qualification, the definition of a ‘payment instrument’ should be further specified as to what constitutes or does not constitute a payment instrument, bearing in mind the principle of technology neutrality.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The definition of ‘payment instrument’ under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 made reference to a ‘personalised device’. Since there are pre- paid cards where the name of the holder of the instrument is not printed on the card, this could leave those cards outside the scope of the definition of a payment instrument. The definition of ‘payment instrument’ should, therefore, be amended to refer to ‘individualised’ devices, instead of ‘personalised’ ones, specifying that pre- paid cards where the name of the holder of the instrument is not printed on the card are
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) So-called digital ‘pass-through wallets’, involving the tokenisation of an existing payment instrument, including a payment card, are not to be considered as technical services
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) So-called digital ‘pass-through wallets’, involving the tokenisation of an existing payment instrument, including a payment card, are to be considered as technical services, and should thus be excluded from the definition of payment instrument as a token cannot be regarded as being itself a payment instrument but, rather, a payment application within the meaning of Article 2, point (21) of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 of the European Parliament and of the Council33 . However, some other categories of digital wallets, namely pre-paid electronic wallets such as ‘staged-wallets’ where users can store money for future online transaction, are to be considered a payment instrument and their issuance as a payment service. __________________ 33 Regulation (EU) 2015/751 of the
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of 31 May 2023 lays down that electronic money tokens shall be deemed to be electronic
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) Considering the difficulties experienced by payment institutions in opening and maintaining payment accounts with credit institutions, it is necessary to provide for an additional option for the safeguarding of users’ funds, namely the possibility to hold those funds at a central bank. T
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Payment institutions should be allowed to grant credit, but this activity should be subjected to some strict conditions. It is therefore appropriate to regulate the granting of credit by payment institutions in the form of credit lines and the issuance of credit cards, insofar as those services facilitate payment services and if credit is granted for a period not exceeding 12 months, including on a revolving basis. It is appropriate to allow payment institutions to grant short-term credit with regard to their cross-border activities, on the condition that it is refinanced using mainly the payment institution’s own funds, as well as other funds from the capital markets, and not the funds held on behalf of clients for payment services. That possibility should however be without prejudice to Directive
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Payment institutions should be allowed to grant credit, but this activity should be subjected to some strict conditions. It is therefore appropriate to regulate the granting of credit by payment institutions in the form of credit lines and the issuance of credit cards, insofar as those services facilitate payment services
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new) (37 a) In order for payment institutions to truly engage in cross-border services, the Commission should provide a certain Internet website or a one-stop shop with all of the information in one place on how to register in particular Member States.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 45 a (new) (45 a) When acquirers use an agent to deliver payment services, it should be noted that the agent only acts on behalf of one acquirer as the principal payment service provider and not in respect of all payment services provided to the payment services user.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 45 b (new) (45 b) To take into account evolving market realities, marketplaces and platforms supported by payment service providers, that remove the latter from the control or the possession of funds for third parties, should not be considered by default agents of the payment service providers.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 62 (62) To further improve access to cash, which is a priority of the Commission, retailers should be allowed to offer, in physical shops, cash provision services even in the absence of a purchase by a customer, without having to obtain a payment service provider authorisation, registration or being an agent of a payment institution. Those cash provision services should, however, be subject to the obligation to disclose fees charged to the customer, if any. These services should be provided by retailers on a voluntary basis and should depend on the availability of cash by the retailer. To prevent unfair competition between ATM deployers not servicing payment accounts and retailers offering cash withdrawals without a purchase, and to ensure that shops do not rapidly run out of cash, it is appropriate to impose a cap of EUR 50 per transaction and EUR 500 per month. When offering this service, retailers should be obliged to request the insertion of the PIN Code manually by the client.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 62 (62) To further improve access to cash, which is a priority of the Commission, retailers should be allowed to offer, in physical shops, cash provision services even in the absence of a purchase by a customer, without having to obtain a payment service provider authorisation, registration or being an agent of a payment
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 68 (68) This Directive does not include licensing requirements for payment systems, payment schemes or payment arrangements, taking into account the need to avoid any duplication with the Eurosystem’s oversight framework over retail payment systems, including over Systemically Important Payment Systems and other systems, as well as the Eurosystem’s new ‘PISA’ Framework, and oversight by national central banks.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 71 (71) Payment institutions are not included in the list of entities which fall under the definition of “institutions” in Article 2, point (b) of Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council47 . Consequently, payment institutions are effectively prevented from participating in payment systems designated by Member States pursuant to that Directive. That lack of access to certain key payment systems can impede payment institutions in providing a full range of payment services to their clients effectively and competitively. It is therefore justified to include payment institutions under the definition of ‘institutions’ in that Directive, but only for the purpose of payment systems, and not for securities settlement systems. Therefore it is welcomed that this step was already taken through the Instant Payments Regulation. Payment institutions should meet the requirements and respect the rules of payment systems to be allowed to participate in those systems. Regulation XXX [PSR] lays down requirements on operators of payment systems regarding the admission of new applicants for participation, including as regards an assessment of relevant risks.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 77 (77) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered an opinion on
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24 (24) ‘technical service provider’ means a provider of services which
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24 (24) ‘technical service provider’ means a provider of services which
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24 (24) ‘technical service provider’ means a provider of services which
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 (26) ‘business day’ means a day on which the payment service provider of the payer or of the payee involved in the execution of a payment transaction is open for business
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27 (27) ‘Information and communications technology (ICT) services’ means ICT Services as defined in Article 3, point 21, of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 30 (30) ‘group’ means a group of undertakings that are linked to each other by a relationship as referred to in Article 22(1),
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 (36) ‘distributor’ means a natural or legal person that distributes or redeems electronic money on behalf of and engaged by a payment institution;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 37 (37) ‘electronic money services’ means the issuance of electronic money
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 37 (37) ‘electronic money services’ means the issuance of electronic money
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 38 (38) ‘ATM deployer’ means operators of automated teller machines who do not
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) a business plan
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point l – point i Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point l – point ii Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) where the payment institution provides electronic money services, its capital shall at no time be less than EUR
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) where the payment institution provides electronic money services, its capital shall at no time be less than EUR
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) deposit those funds
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) For the purposes of the second subparagraph, point (a), Member States shall ensure that payment institutions have access to accounts at central banks on an objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate basis. Central banks shall provide duly motivated reasons for any decision to refuse access to an account with the central bank, or to withdraw such access, to the payment institution.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Payment institutions shall avoid concentration risk to safeguarded customer funds by ensuring that the same safeguarding method is not used for the totality of their safeguarded customer funds.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Payment institutions shall endeavour to avoid concentration risk to safeguarded customer funds
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 The EBA shall develop regulatory technical standards on safeguarding requirements, laying down in particular safeguarding risk management frameworks for payment institutions to ensure protection of users’ funds, and including requirements on segregation, designation, reconciliation, insulation and calculation of safeguarding funds requirements and avoiding of liquidity and concentration risk.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) notwithstanding national rules, if any, on providing credit by issuers of credit cards, the credit granted in connection with a payment and executed in accordance with Article 13(6) and Article 30 is to be repaid within a reasonably short period
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Within
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) payment institutions authorised in accordance with Article 13 and their agents
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) payment institutions authorised in accordance with Article 13 and their agents
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Payment institutions that intend to provide payment and other than e-money services, through agents shall communicate to the competent authorities in their home Member State all of the following information:
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities of the home Member State communicate to the payment institution within
source: 757.022
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/summary/25 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/summary/33 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61404&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=61404 |
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ECON/9/12434 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2009/110
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 1998/26 1996/0126(COD) Repealing Directive 2009/110 2008/0190(COD) Repealing Directive 2015/2366 2013/0264(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2008/0190(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/3 |
Repealing Directive 2015/2366
|
procedure/instrument/4 |
2013/0264(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/5 |
Amending Directive 1998/26
|
procedure/instrument/6 |
1996/0126(COD)
|
procedure/subject/2.50.04.02 |
Old
Electronic money and payments, cross-border credit transfersNew
Electronic money and payments, cross-border credit transfers 4.60.08 Safety of products and services, product liability |
procedure/subject/2.50.10 |
Financial supervision
|
procedure/subject/4.60.08 |
Safety of products and services, product liability
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
events/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61404&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0297_en.docx |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0046_EN.html
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0046_EN.html
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2024-04-10T00:00:00New
2024-04-22T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2024-03-11T00:00:00New
2024-04-10T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
commission |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|